Fluoroquinolones are highly active, broad spectrum antibiotics with many uses in both human and veterinary medicine. As with other classes of antibiotic, however, decreased susceptibility or resistance to these agents has developed. Resistance is usually chromosomally mediated so the spread of resistant bacteria contributes to the high numbers of resistant strains reported by some institutions. Although for many infections the changes in susceptibility of the bacteria have not had an immediate clinical impact, highly resistant strains have recently emerged. For some infections and bacterial species the clinical usefulness of fluoroquinolones may be limited if their use is not curtailed.
Genetic and biochemical experiments have shown two enzymes that are the targets of fluoroquinolones.1 In Gram negative bacteria such as Escherichia coli, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and Neisseria gonorrhoea, the primary target is DNA gyrase and the secondary target DNA topoisomerase IV; in Gram positive bacteria, such as Staphylococcus aureus and S pneumoniae, the primary and secondary targets are reversed.2 DNA gyrase and topoisomerase IV are each enzymes composed of four subunits (two A and two B) encoded by gyrA and gyrB, and parC and parE respectively. Fluoroquinolone resistant isolates usually contain one or more mutations in a small section of gyrA or parC; mutation in gyrB and parE is rare.1 In bacteria where mutations have given rise to a resistant DNA gyrase mutations then occur in the topoisomerase IV genes (and vice versa for Gram positive bacteria) to give a highly resistant bacterium. In addition there are genes that influence the uptake of the drug into the bacterial cell and efflux pumps that can be overexpressed to enhance excretion of quinolones from the cell. This enhanced efflux in turn causes increased minimum inhibitory concentrations of several drugs, including fluoroquinolones, tetracycline, chloramphenicol, and ampicillin.3–6 It has been suggested that mutations enhancing efflux occur as a first step, allowing the bacteria to survive such that mutations can accumulate in genes encoding the target proteins. Plasmid mediated, transferable, fluoroquinolone resistance has recently been described7; its mechanism of resistance and epidemiology is unknown.
Gram negative bacteria such as Enterobacteriaceae spp and N gonorrhoea are usually exquisitely susceptible to fluoroquinolones, and repeated exposure to fluoroquinolones has probably allowed the bacteria to acquire and accumulate the mutations that give rise to resistance. Highly resistant E coli and N gonorrhoea have already been described.8,9 For gut commensals such as E coli, frequent exposure to fluoroquinolones during treatment of other infections, such as those of the respiratory tract, may allow the accretion of mutations and emergence of highly resistant bacteria. In susceptible hosts these then give rise to infections. Although decreased susceptibility of gonococci to fluoroquinolones has become widespread, clinical resistance remains rare, occurring only in geographical hot spots such as the Far East. Clearly clonal spread of resistant bacteria is important in the spread of fluoroquinolone resistant gonococci, so efforts to reduce transfer of the bacteria are necessary.
Some bacteria such as Salmonella typhimurium and Campylobacter species are well known zoonoses. S typhimurium with decreased susceptibility to fluoroquinolones and Campylobacter resistant to fluoroquinolones have been isolated from animals and retail poultry.10,11 For these reasons the use of fluoroquinolones in veterinary medicine has caused concern, as such strains can infect man. A fluoroquinolone is often the drug of choice for patients who have chronic enteritis, are immunocompromised, or have extraintestinal infection. There is evidence that complicated infections caused by resistant strains of S typhimurium are difficult to treat; S typhi (not a zoonose) with reduced susceptibility to fluoroquinolones (resistant to nalidixic acid) responded more slowly to fluoroquinolone treatment—and clinical outcome was poorer.12 Therefore, it has been suggested that nalidixic acid should be used to detect decreases in susceptibility which may herald fluoroquinolone resistance. Many patients (>60%) infected with a non-typhoidal salmonella with decreased susceptibility to fluoroquinolones or a fluoroquinolone resistant Campylobacter have had no prior exposure to fluoroquinolone, suggesting that the bacteria must have been ingested. However, it is unclear how many patients have received a fluoroquinolone to treat their infection and whether their clinical outcome is poor. Until the full clinical relevance and risk to human health has been determined the role of fluoroquinolones in veterinary medicine remains controversial.
Another major use of fluoroquinolones is in treating respiratory tract infections, especially with the development of agents to treat pneumococcal infections. Gram positive bacteria are inherently less susceptible to fluoroquinolones than many Gram negative bacteria, so bacteria such as Streptococcus pneumoniae typically require only one, sometimes two, mutations in the genes encoding the target proteins to become clinically resistant. Therefore fluoroquinolone resistance is more likely to occur. For Staphylococcus aureus clonal spread of these bacteria in institutions has always been a problem and now fluoroquinolone resistance has been added to methicillin resistance. Good infection control will reduce the transfer and prevalence of these strains.
Fluoroquinolones have also been used as second line agents to treat multidrug resistant tuberculosis. However, mycobacteria have also been able to acquire mutations in the genes encoding the target protein.13 Such strains are prevalent only in areas where fluoroquinolones have been widely used, and preventing the spread of Mycobacterium tuberculosis will reduce the numbers of resistant bacteria isolated.
As with other antibacterial agents, initial optimism about fluoroquinolones has been tempered by the development of resistant strains. The species that have become problematic are typically those that are inherently less susceptible to this class of agents. There has been misuse and abuse, so to retain the excellent activity of this class of antibiotics and reduce the development of resistant strains and their spread fluoroquinolones should be used prudently and only where there is a clinical need. For several infections a fluoroquinolone is not necessary as a first line agent.
References
- 1.Everett MJ, Piddock LJV. Resistance to quinolones and fluoroquinolones. In: Kahlman B, Dalhoff A, editors. Handbook of experimental pharmacology: microbial resistance to drugs. Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag; 1997. [Google Scholar]
- 2.Pan XS, Fisher LM. Cloning and characterization of the parC and parE genes of Streptococcus pneumoniae encoding DNA Topoisomerase IV—role in fluoroquinolone resistance. J Bacteriol. 1996;178:4060–4069. doi: 10.1128/jb.178.14.4060-4069.1996. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Alekshun MN, Levy SB. Regulation of chromosomally mediated multiple antibiotic resistance: the mar regulon. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1997;41:2067–2075. doi: 10.1128/aac.41.10.2067. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Miller PF, Sulavik MC. Overlaps and parallels in the regulation of intrinsic multiple-antibiotic resistance in Escherichia coli. Mol Microbiol. 1996;21:441–448. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2958.1996.tb02553.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Poole K, Krebes K, McNally K, Neshat S. Multiple antibiotic resistance in Pseudomonas aeruginosa: evidence for involvement of an efflux operon. J Bacteriol. 1993;175:7363–7372. doi: 10.1128/jb.175.22.7363-7372.1993. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Kaatz GW, Seo SM, Ruble CA. Efflux-mediated fluoroquinolone resistance in Staphylococcus aureus. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1993;37:1086–1094. doi: 10.1128/aac.37.5.1086. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Martinez L, Pascual A, Jacoby GA. Quinolone resistance from a transferable plasmid. Lancet. 1998;351:797–799. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(97)07322-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Everett MJ, Jin Y-F, Ricci V, Piddock LJV. Contribution of individual mechanisms to fluoroquinolone resistance in 36 Escherichia coli isolated from humans and animals. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1996;40:2380–2386. doi: 10.1128/aac.40.10.2380. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Ross JDC. Fluoroquinolone resistance in gonorrheae: how, where and so what. Int J Sex Transmitted Dis and AIDS. 1998;9:318–322. doi: 10.1258/0956462981922322. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Griggs DJ, Hall MC, Jin YF, Piddock LJV. Quinolone-resistance in veterinary isolates of salmonella. J Antimicrob Chemother. 1994;33:1173–1189. doi: 10.1093/jac/33.6.1173. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Gaunt PN, Piddock LJV. Ciprofloxacin resistant campylobacter in humans: an epidemiological and laboratory study. J Antimicrob Chemother. 1996;37:747–757. doi: 10.1093/jac/37.4.747. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Wain J, Hoa NTT, Chinh NT, Vinh H, Everett MJ, Diep TS, et al. Quinolone resistant Salmonella typhi in Viet Nam: molecular basis of resistance and clinical response to treatment. Clin Infect Dis. 1997;25:1404–1410. doi: 10.1086/516128. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Takiff HE, Salazar L, Guerrero C, Philipp W, Huang WM, Kreiswirth B, et al. Cloning and nucleotide-sequence of Mycobacterium tuberculosis gyrA and gyrB genes and detection of quinolone resistance mutations. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1994;38:773–780. doi: 10.1128/aac.38.4.773. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]