Skip to main content
Journal of Family Medicine and Primary Care logoLink to Journal of Family Medicine and Primary Care
. 2024 Apr 22;13(4):1340–1346. doi: 10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_652_23

Cyproheptadine in serotonin syndrome: A retrospective study

Sanjay Prakash 1,, Harsh Patel 1, Sunil Kumar 2, Chetsi S Shah 1
PMCID: PMC11142004  PMID: 38827706

ABSTRACT

Objective:

Serotonin syndrome (SS) is an iatrogenic life-threatening condition caused by serotonergic agents. The treatment for SS involves the administration of a serotonin antagonist (cyproheptadine). However, the dosing schedule for cyproheptadine is not uniform in the literature.

Methods:

We retrospectively evaluated 23 adult patients (>18 years) admitted to the Neurology Department and met the Hunter criteria for SS.

Results:

The mean age was 35.2 years, and 52% were female. Ten patients were managed in the intensive care unit (ICU), whereas thirteen patients were admitted to the ward. Hyperreflexia was the most common clinical feature (100%), followed by clonus (91%), tachycardia (83%), and tremor (83%). Other common clinical features were rigidity (65%), increased bowel sound (61%), diaphoresis (48%), fever (43%), hypertension (39%), and myoclonus (30%). All but one patient received two or more serotonergic drugs. Tramadol was the most common serotonergic agent (39%), followed by sodium valproate (21%), and amitriptyline (21%). Cyproheptadine was administered to all patients. All patients admitted in the ICU received a loading dose of 12 mg followed by 2 mg every 2 h for at least 24 h. All patients admitted to the ward were given 4 mg of cyproheptadine three times each day. Every patient showed at least some response to cyproheptadine within 24 h. The total doses of cyproheptadine and the length of treatment differed between patients.

Conclusion:

Any response to cyproheptadine at a therapeutic dose within 24 h, even a partial one, could be a diagnostic indicator of the existence of SS.

Keywords: Cyproheptadine, serotonin, serotonin syndrome, serotonin toxicity

Introduction

Serotonin syndrome (SS) is an iatrogenic, drug-induced, potentially life-threatening clinical condition characterized by an altered mental state, neuromuscular hyperactivity, and autonomic hyperactivity.[1,2] The incidence of SS is rising globally as a result of the pervasive and expanding usage of serotonergic drugs in clinical practice. Historically, the majority of SS reports were published from toxicology centers, primarily in patients with mental disorders. However, a number of new clinical settings have been identified, and cases are now being reported from nontoxicological centers such as perioperative settings, neurology clinics, cardiac settings, gynecological settings, and pediatric clinics.[3] Antidepressants are the most common drugs implicated in the generation of SS. However, several new drugs, including over-the-counter medications, have been discovered to have serotonergic properties. SS cases have been documented in both intensive care units and outpatient clinics across all departments. Therefore, physicians should be familiar with SS.

SS is a highly underdiagnosed clinical condition, and awareness about this syndrome is extremely low among medical professionals.[4] SS is typically diagnosed according to either Hunter criteria or Sternbach’s criteria.[5,6] The criteria is based on the demonstration of specific clinical features. However, the differential diagnosis of SS includes a wide range of clinical syndromes such as neuroleptic malignant syndrome (NMS), catatonia, anticholinergic toxicity, malignant hyperthermia, sympathomimetic agent intoxication, thyroid storm, acute extrapyramidal syndromes, encephalitis, and meningitis.[1] Therefore, a thorough history and physical examination are crucial. Treatment for SS consists of 1) withholding serotonergic medications, 2) supportive care, 3) sedating the patient with benzodiazepines, and 4) administration of serotonin antagonists (cyproheptadine). However, there is no agreement on the use of cyproheptadine in the treatment of SS. The dosing schedule of cyproheptadine is not uniform, and it varies considerably across published studies.[7,8,9]

Methods

This retrospective study comprises all consecutive adult patients (>18) who were hospitalized with a diagnosis of SS. Included individuals were seen in the neurology department of a tertiary hospital between September 2020 and February 2023. Inclusion criteria include 1) age: >18 years; 2) patients fulfilling the criteria for SS; and 3) patients who were admitted to the hospital for the management of SS. Exclusion criteria were 1) age: <18 years; 2) patients who were managed without getting admitted to the hospital; 3) patients with a history of chronic illnesses like diabetes and hypertension to prevent potential confounders; and 4) patients who refused to give consent. The primary objective was to observe the effects of cyproheptadine on clinical characteristics over time. Therefore, the patients who were managed without getting admitted to the hospital were excluded from the study. The institutional ethics committee approved the study. The study was carried out in accordance with the Helsinki Declaration guidelines. All patients gave consent for the publication of this observation. Our group has been working on SS for a number of years. So, as a departmental policy, all patients who satisfy the Hunter criteria for SS are routinely subjected to a thorough clinical history and physical examination during their hospital stay. So, all of the data presented here were gathered prospectively. Cyproheptadine is considered an antidote for SS. There is, however, no consensus on the use of cyproheptadine in the management of SS. However, the dosing regimen for cyproheptadine is not standardized and varies substantially between published case reports. According to reports, SS patients may need 12 to 32 mg of cyproheptadine per day.[1] For severe SS, admitted to the ICU, we followed the treatment regimen as described by Boyer et al.[1] They recommend a loading dose of 12 mg, followed by 2 mg every 2 h if symptoms continue. It was followed by a maintenance dose of 8 mg of cyproheptadine every 6 h. This regimen of cyproheptadine was administered to all patients admitted to the ICU, in addition to other supportive treatments. The patients who were stable and were admitted to the ward received 4 mg of cyproheptadine three times daily (tid) as an initial dose. This dose was titrated based on the patient’s response to cyproheptadine.

Results

We identified 38 patients who met the Hunter criteria for SS. Fifteen patients were excluded from the study for the following reasons: age less than 18 years (n = 2 patients), patients treated without hospitalization (n = 6 patients), a history of associated chronic illness = 5 (hypertension = 2, diabetes = 2, and multiple sclerosis = 1 patient), and patients who did not give consent (n = 2 patients). Finally, 23 cases were included in the analysis. Table 1 provides an overview of the clinical characteristics and other aspects of all 23 patients. The mean age was 35.2 years (range: 23–59 years), and 52% were female. Ten patients were managed in the ICU, whereas 13 patients were admitted to the ward.

Table 1.

Details of patients with serotonin syndrome

Age/Sex Clinical settings Details of the clinical characteristics Serotonergic agent and its details Investigations

Presenting complaint Other symptoms and signs Duration of illness
35 M ICU Altered behavior leading to coma Fever, diaphoresis, tachycardia, hypertension, rigidity, clonus, myoclonus hyperreflexia, increased bowel sound 5 days Lithium and sertraline for chronic depression. Dose of sertraline was increased 2 wk back Leukocytosis, raised CPK
32 F ICU Agitation, fever, vomiting Tachycardia, tremor, myoclonus, diaphoresis, rigidity, hyperreflexia, clonus, bowel sound 7 days Valproate for seizure (2 years), tramadol for pain (3 wk), and linezolid after admission. Leukocytosis
24 M ICU Fever, altered behavior, myoclonus, tremulousness, Tachycardia, diaphoresis, hypertension, rigidity, hyperreflexia, clonus, increased bowel sound. 5–6 days Dextromethorphan and chlorpheniramine for cough. Linezolid and ondansetron for fever Leukocytosis, raised CPK
44 M ICU Agitation, fever, diaphoresis shivering, ataxia, Tachycardia, tremor, nystagmus, mydriasis, hyperreflexia, clonus, increased bowel sound 7–10 days Escitalopram, pregabaline, tramadol for fibromyalgia (8 wk) Leukocytosis, raised CPK
23 M ICU Fever, tremulousness, agitation Tachycardia, diaphoresis hypertension, rigidity hyperreflexia, clonus, increased bowel sound 4–6 days Amitriptyline, sertraline, tramadol for posttraumatic pain (2 wk) Leukocytosis, raised CPK
39 M ICU Fever, agitation, myoclonus, tremulousness Tachycardia, diaphoresis, hypertension, clonus hyperreflexia, bowel sound 5–6 days Valproate and lithium for cluster headache (3 wk) Leukocytosis,
49 F ICU Fever, stupor, myoclonus, diaphoresis Tachycardia, hypertension, rigidity, hyperreflexia, clonus, bowel sound 8–10 days Linezolid, ondansetron, dextromethorphan for fever and cough (2 wk) Leukocytosis, raised CPK
26 M ICU Irritability, fever, diaphoresis, tremulousness, Tachycardia, rigidity, hyperreflexia, clonus, increased bowel sound 9–10 days Escitalopram and Venlafaxine for depression (6 wk) Leukocytosis
37 F ICU Fever, nausea, vomiting, drowsiness, diaphoresis Tachycardia, hypertension, hyperreflexia, clonus, rigidity, myoclonus, increased bowel sound 4–5 days Cough syrup (chlorpheniramine and dextromethorphan), tramadol for pain (6–7 days) Leukocytosis
46 M ICU Fever, drowsiness, tremulousness, diaphoresis Tachycardia, hyperreflexia, clonus, myoclonus, rigidity, increased bowel sound 6–7 days Pregabaline, tramadol nortriptyline for cervical spondylosis, ondansetron Leukocytosis, raised CPK
34 F Ward Dizziness, fatigue, restlessness, insomnia, Tremor, hyperreflexia, rigidity, clonus, increased bowel sound 10–12 days Amitriptyline and paroxetine for depression for 6 wk
59 M Ward Gait problems, tremor, insomnia Tachycardia, rigidity, hyperreflexia, clonus, increased bowel sound 1–2 wk Pregabalin and amitriptyline for back pain (4 wk) raised CPK
36 F Ward Generalized body pain, tremor tachycardia, hypertension, rigidity, hyperreflexia, clonus, 3–4 wk Topiramate and amitriptyline for migraine (2 months) Leukocytosis
26 F Ward Headache, insomnia, dizziness, Tachycardia, tremor, rigidity, hyperreflexia, clonus (ill-sustained). 2 wk Tramadol, gabapentin for carpal tunnel syndrome (for 4 wk)
33 F Ward Dizziness, fatigue, insomnia, tremor, irritability Tachycardia, hypertension, hyperreflexia, clonus, rigidity, diaphoresis 1–2 wk Amitriptyline, sertraline for depression. tension-type headache (6 wk) Leukocytosis
27 M Ward Tremor, ataxia, incoordination Tachycardia, rigidity, hyperreflexia, clonus 2 wk Gabapentin, nortriptyline, tramadol for back pain (3 wk) raised CPK
29 F Ward Dizziness, body pain, irritability Tremor, tachycardia, hypertension, hyperreflexia 7–8 days Valproate and ondansetron for mood disorder (6–7 wk)
42 M Ward Tremors, ataxia, incoordination Tachycardia, hyperreflexia, clonus 10–12 days Venlafaxine and fluoxetine for mood disposer (8 wk)
45 M Ward Tremor, insomnia headache, nausea, vomiting Tachycardia, hyperreflexia, clonus, increased bowel sound 2–3 wk Gabapentin, nortriptyline, tramadol for back pain and radiculopathy (8 wk)
32 F Ward Diffuse body pain, vertigo, ataxia Tremors, hyperreflexia, clonus, incoordination 2–3 wk Valproate and escitalopram for migraine (4 wk) raised CPK
32 F Ward Anxiety, headache insomnia Tremors, spasticity, hyperreflexia, clonus 2 wk Pregabaline, nortriptyline, tramadol for back pain (5 wk)
24 F Ward Headache, nausea, vomiting, dizziness Tachycardia, hyperreflexia, clonus, increased bowel sound. 10–12 days Valproate for epilepsy. Sertraline added for depression 2 wk back Leukocytosis
37 F Ward Headache, diffuse body pain Tremor, hyperreflexia, 3 wk Fluoxetine for chronic depression for 8 wk

CPK, creatine phosphokinase; F, female; ICU, intensive care unit; M, male; wk, weeks

Hyperreflexia was the most common clinical feature (n = 23, 100%), followed by clonus (n = 21, 91%), tachycardia (n = 19, 83%), and tremor (n = 19, 83%). Other common clinical features were rigidity or spasticity (n = 15, 65%), increased bowel sound (n = 14, 61%), diaphoresis (n = 11, 48%), fever (n = 10, 43%), hypertension (n = 9, 39%), and myoclonus (n = 7, 30%). Other clinical features were insomnia (n = 6, 26%), dizziness (n = 5, 22%), ataxia (n = 4, 17%), nausea-vomiting (n = 4, 17%), generalized body pain (n = 4, 17%), headache (n = 4, 17%), and incoordination (n = 3, 13%). All patients admitted to the ICU had a fever, abnormal mental status (agitation or irritability, drowsiness, stupor, and coma), and diaphoresis. Acute febrile encephalopathy was a syndromic diagnosis for all patients admitted to the ICU. Patients admitted to the ward had a variety of syndromic diagnoses, including dizziness, insomnia, ataxia, incoordination, generalized body pain, and headaches. All of the ICU patients had symptoms for 4 to 10 days before they were admitted. The duration of illness for the ward patients was somewhat prolonged, ranging from 1 to 4 weeks.

All but one patient received two or more serotonergic drugs. Eleven patients (48%) received two serotonergic drugs, whereas nine patients (39%) got three. Tramadol was the most common drug that caused SS (n = 9, 39%), followed by sodium valproate (n = 5, 21%), amitriptyline (n = 5, 21%), sertraline (n = 4, 17%), nortriptyline (n = 4, 17%), pregabalin (n = 4, 17%), and ondansetron (n = 4, 17%). Other drugs were escitalopram (n = 3, 13%), gabapentin (n = 3, 13%), linezolid (n = 3, 13%), dextromethorphan (n = 3, 13%), lithium (n = 2, 9%), fluoxetine (n = 2, 9%), chlorpheniramine (n = 2, 9%), venlafaxine (n = 2, 9%), paroxetine (n = 1, 4%), and topiramate (n = 1, 4%). Every patient received only therapeutic doses of serotonergic medications. There were no overdoses among the patients. All patients were subjected to a number of investigations. Leukocytosis was noted in 13 (57%) patients. All 10 patients admitted to the ICU had leukocytosis. Nine patients had raised creatine phosphokinase (CPK).

The dosage schedule and effects of cyproheptadine on each patient are described in Table 2. All 10 patients who were brought to the ICU received the identical initial dosage regimen, which consisted of a loading dose of 12 mg followed by 2 mg every 2 h for at least 24 h. Those admitted to the ward had a lower initial dose. All patients admitted to the ward were given 4 mg of cyproheptadine three times each day. Every patient showed at least some response to cyproheptadine within 24 h. In fact, the response was noted in almost all clinical features. However, the most notable response was noted in the clonus. Clonus was noted in 21 patients (out of 23) at the time of admission. There was no clonus in 11 patients after 24 h of cyproheptadine administration. In another 10 patients, the clonus was markedly reduced. After 24 h of cyproheptadine administration, clonus disappeared in 11 patients and diminished in 10 more. Rigidity or spasticity (noted in 15 patients) disappeared or subsided in 11 patients. The degree of fever and diaphoresis decreased in all ICU patients within 24 h. Out of the 10 patients with mental abnormalities, six showed improvement in their mental state within 24 h after cyproheptadine administration. After 24–36 h, the dose of cyproheptadine was changed from 2 mg every 2 h to 8 mg every 6 h in all ICU patients. This dose was administered for 1 to 5 days, depending on the improvement of the patient’s clinical conditions. Thereafter, the dose was reduced to 4 mg every 6 h. Nonetheless, there has been a worsening of the symptoms in 7 patients out of 10. The previous dose was reinstituted, and the same dose was given for another 5 to 14 days. After complete improvement, cyprohepatadine was gradually withdrawn over 2 weeks. Two ICU patients, although they showed marked responses in the early stages, did not show complete responses. Both patients had an associated respiratory tract infection. We believe that these patients had two syndromes during their hospital stay (serotonin syndrome and respiratory tract infection).

Table 2.

Treatment with cyproheptadine in patients with serotonin syndrome

Initial Dose (first 24 h) Clinical Response within 24 h Dose of Cyproheptadine and Clinical Response after 24 h
12 mg loading dose, 2 mg 2 hourly Diaphoresis, clonus, hypertension subsided. Fever, rigidity reduced 8 mg qid for next 2 days. Reduction of dose (4 mg tid) led aggravation of symptoms. Restarted (8 mg qid). Complete improvement in 10 days. Gradually tapered over 2 wk
12 mg loading dose, 2 mg 2 hourly Clonus disappeared. Agitation, fever, rigidity improved 8 mg qid for next 24 h. Reduction of dose (4 mg qid) led aggravation of symptoms. Restarted (8 mg qid). Complete response in 8 days. Gradually tapered over 2 wk
12 mg loading dose, 2 mg 2 hourly Clonus, myoclonus, rigidity, tremulousness improved 8 mg qid for next 4 days. Further Improvement in next 2 days, bowel sound decreased, diaphoresis-subsided. Fever and behavioral abnormally persisted (little bit improved). Change in antibiotic led improvement in 2 wk
12 mg loading dose, 2 mg 2 hourly Fever, diaphoresis, hypertension, rigidity, clonus improved 8 mg qid for next 48 h. Improvement continued. Reduction of dose (4 mg qid) led aggravation of symptoms. Restarted (8 mg qid). Complete response in 10 days. Gradually tapered over 2–3 wk. Aggravation by while tapering was noted
12 mg loading dose, 2 mg 2 hourly Fever, diaphoresis, rigidity clonus improved 8 mg qid for next 5 days. Gradual improvement continued. Reduction of dose (4 mg qid) after 5 days. Complete response in 12 days. Drug was gradually tapered over 2–3 wk
12 mg loading dose, 2 mg 2 hourly Fever, agitation, clonus, myoclonus, diaphoresis improved 8 mg qid for next 2 days. Improvement continued. Reduction of dose (4 mg qid) led aggravation of symptoms. Restarted (8 mg qid). Complete response in 7 days. Gradually tapered over 2 wk
12 mg loading dose, 2 mg 2 hourly Fever, mental status, clonus myoclonus, diaphoresis improved 8 mg qid for next 4 days. Gradual improvement continued. Reduction of dose (4 mg qid) after 4 days. Complete response in 10 days. Drug was gradually tapered over 2 wk
12 mg loading dose, 2 mg 2 hourly Irritability, fever, rigidity, clonus improved 8 mg qid for next 3 days. Gradual improvement continued. Reduction of dose (4 mg qid) after 3 days. Complete response in 7–8 days. Drug was gradually tapered over 10 days
12 mg loading dose, 2 mg 2 hourly Clonus disappeared Fever, mental status, diaphoresis improved 8 mg qid for next 5 days. Further Improvement in next 2–3 days. No complete improvement. Fever and irritability persisted (little bit improved). Change in antibiotic led to improvement in 2 wk
12 mg loading dose, 2 mg 2 hourly Clonus disappeared Fever, drowsiness improved 8 mg qid for next 1 day. Reduction of dose (4 mg qid) led aggravation of symptoms. Restarted (8 mg qid). Complete improvement in 5 days. Gradually tapered over 15 days
4 mg tid Clonus disappeared Restlessness, rigidity improved Dose was reduced to 2 mg tid due to sedation. Aggravation of symptoms. Again escalated to 4 mg tid. Complete improvement in 7 days. Drug was continued for another 10 days
4 mg tid Clonus reduced, Gait improved Dose was escalated to 8 mg tid. Marked improvement in 3 days. Complete improvement in 10 days
4 mg tid Rigidity, clonus subsided Skipped the drug for 1 day due to sedation. Aggravation of symptoms. Restarted at 2 mg tid. Complete response in 7 days. Withdrawal of drug again led to reappearance of symptoms. Reinstitution of drug again provided complete improvement. Drug was continued for 2 wk
4 mg tid Clonus, rigidity disappeared 4 mg tid for next 7 days. All symptoms disappeared in 5 days. Drug was continued for 7 more days (2 mg tid)
4 mg tid Rigidity, clonus subsided Dizziness, fatigue improved 4 mg tid for next 7 days. Marked improvement in 7 days. Reduction of dose (2 mg tid) led to reappearance of symptoms. Dose was escalated (4 mg tid). Symptoms again subsided. Continued for 4 wk
4 mg tid Rigidity, clonus, incoordination improved 4 mg tid for next 3 wk. Gradual improvement continued. Complete improvement in 3 wk. Skipping the drug led to reappearance of the symptoms
4 mg tid Dizziness, irritability, hypertension improved 4 mg tid for next 7 days. Improvement continued. Complete response in 2 wk. Drug was gradually tapered over 2 wk
4 mg tid Clonus disappeared Incoordination improved Dose was reduced to 2 mg qid due to sedation. Aggravation of symptoms. Escalated to 4 mg tid after 3 days. Complete improvement in 4 days. Drugs was continued for 14 days
4 mg tid Clonus disappeared headache, nausea, vomiting improved Dose was reduced to 2 mg qid due to sedation. Gradual improvement continued. Complete improvement in 8 days
4 mg tid Clonus disappeared Vertigo, incoordination, ataxia improved 4 mg tid continued. Complete improvement in 2 wk. Drug was gradually tapered over 2 wk
4 mg tid Clonus disappeared Headache improved 4 mg tid continued. Complete improvement in 5 days. Drug was gradually tapered over 2 wk
4 mg tid Clonus disappeared Headache, dizziness, nausea improved 4 mg tid continued. Complete improvement in 7 days. Drug was gradually tapered over 2 wk
4 mg tid Headache, body pain improved Dose was reduced to 2 mg qid due to sedation. Gradual improvement continued. Complete improvement in 6 days

qid- four times daily; tid- three times daily; wk- weeks

Although the ward patients received a lower daily dose of cyproheptadine (4 mg tid), every patient had some improvement within 24 h. Improvement in clonus was noted in all patients within 24 h. Depending on the resolution of symptoms and the development of cyproheptadine-induced sedation, each patient’s treatment duration varied. The dosage of cyproheptadine was reduced from 4 mg tid to 2 mg tid in five ward patients due to the development of sedation. Reduction of the dose led to aggravation of symptoms in all five patients. Three patients resumed their previous dose, whereas two continued to take a reduced dose. One patient need an escalation of the dose as improvement stopped after 2–3 days. The duration of treatment for the ward patients varied from 2 weeks to 4 weeks.

Discussion

The primary objective of the study was to observe the effect of cyproheptadine in addition to detailing its clinical characteristics. The true incidence of SS is largely unknown for a variety of reasons. Nonetheless, it appears that it is not uncommon in clinical practice. Dunkley et al.[5] reviewed 473 cases with a single-agent selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) overdose. Overall, 73 patients (15.4%) had SS. Similarly, 10.3% (14/136) of the patients developed SS following a noncyclic antidepressant overdose.[10] In the Whyte et al. study,[11] SS developed in 29% of venlafaxine overdose patients and 19% of SSRI overdose cases. In one postmarketing survey, the incidence of SS was 0.5–0.9 cases per 1000 patient months in patients receiving SSRI monotherapy at a therapeutic dose.[12] In a cross-sectional study of older adults receiving antidepressants, 25.2% (60/238) were found to have SS. In one cross-sectional study, 7.8% (24/309) of the patients met the criteria for SS in an ICU setting.[13]

The majority of earlier case studies on SS were restricted to patients with psychiatric disorders. Lately, a number of nonpsychiatric medicines have been found to have serotonergic properties, and they include antiepileptic drugs, analgesics, antitussive agents, antiemetic agents, antimigraine drugs, and herbal products. Therefore, nowadays several cases of SS are being reported from nontoxicology centers.[3] We are reporting 23 cases of SS observed in the neurology department. We identified a wide variety of drugs associated with the onset of SS, including SSRIs, serotonin and norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors (SNRIs), tricyclic antidepressants, antiepileptic, antitussive agents, antiemetic, analgesic, antibiotic, and gabapentinoids. Most of the initial cases reported in the literature were linked to serotonergic drug overdose or poisoning. Nowadays, cases of SS are being reported from the therapeutic doses of serotonergic medications.[14] There was no overdose or poisoning of any serotonergic medicines in any of our patients, and all of our cases were on therapeutic doses of serotonergic medicines.

Cognitive impairments in SS vary from mild irritability to coma. Neuromuscular dysfunctions range from hyperreflexia to severe rigidity or spontaneous clonus. Autonomic hyperactivity vary from mild nausea to hyperthermia.[15] Untreated or severe SS may cause a number of complications, including multiorgan failure. The Hunter criteria for SS, however, only lists seven characteristics, including fever, agitation, diaphoresis, rigidity-spasticity, tremor, hyperreflexia, and clonus (induced, spontaneous, and ocular).[5] The most common symptoms of SS are probably hyperreflexia, clonus, tachycardia, and tremor.[3,14] The central features of SS, according to the Hunter criteria, are hyperreflexia and clonus (including ocular clonus). The enterochromaffin cells of the gastrointestinal tract store almost 95% of the body’s serotonin, which controls a number of gastrointestinal processes.[16] Therefore, gastrointestinal features (nausea, vomiting, diarrhea, and increased bowel sounds) are common in SS. Although gastrointestinal symptoms are not included in the Hunter criteria, diarrhea is one of the symptoms listed in Sternbach’s criteria for SS.[6] Gastrointestinal features, particularly increased bowel sounds, may be an important diagnostic point favoring a diagnosis of SS over other similar conditions, such as NM.[17]

Dunkley et al.[5] made the first reference to the ocular clonus when they proposed the Hunter criteria. They did not, however, provide any information about ocular clonus, including a definition. There are just a few case reports of SS that mention the presence of ocular clonus in patients with SS. Even these case reports did not define the ocular clonus. The literature is silent on whether ocular clonus of SS differs from opsoclonus. A video of ocular movement in a patient with SS was uploaded in NEJM, and the author reported it as “ocular flutter.”[18] There is a need to define the place of ocular clonus in the diagnostic criteria for SS.

SS develops over some preexisting disorder (for which serotonergic agents have been started). SS and preexisting syndrome disorders may progress and produce a myriad of complications. So, a patient may not have isolated SS, but rather it may be superimposed on a preexisting illness. Therefore, SS is called “Syndrome on Syndrome.”[19] Our two patients had SS over preexisting illnesses during their hospital stay. A correct diagnosis of both diseases at the same time is crucial since the two diseases may require different treatments. Such patients may show only partial response to cyproheptadine. A proper history is required to find out the possibility of a preexisting disorder with SS.

As SS is a potentially life-threatening condition, a proper treatment is crucial. Depending on the severity of the symptoms, treatment may differ. Moderate and severe SS may necessitate immediate and aggressive therapy. Patients may require serotonin antagonists in addition to discontinuing serotonergic medications and symptomatic therapy. Cyproheptadine is one of the best serotonin antagonists, and it is considered an antidote in SS. However, its efficacy in SS has not been rigorously proven. The majority of the data is derived from case reports, and these reports show varying responses to cyproheptadine. The variability in response could be attributed to varied dosages and a delay in the initiation of the drug.[20]

Nguyen et al.[7] reviewed the effects of cyproheptadine in 288 patients with probable SS. A total of 68 patients received cyproheptadine. They compared it with a control group that did not get cyproheptadine. They did not find any differences between the groups. Unfortunately, there were several limitations in the study. The details of the cyproheptadine dose was available for only 44% of patients (30 of 68). The average initial dose was 7.1 mg (range: 1 to 12.5 mg). They provided no information regarding the maintenance dose. It will not be rational to draw any conclusions from this study. They suggested that the lack of effects could be attributed to a lower-than-required dose. Graudins et al.[8] reported five patients with moderate SS who received cyproheptadine. Four patients received an initial dose of 8 mg, whereas one patient received 4 mg. Three experienced complete resolution of symptoms within 2 h of treatment. Two additional patients had a residual tremor or hyperreflexia following the initial dose, which resolved after receiving a second dose. In a retrospective study, Frye et al.[9] evaluated the effects of cyproheptadine on 28 SS patients. Cyproheptadine regimens varied greatly in these patients. In 25 cases, the initial dose was at least 12 mg or higher. The cumulative dose varied from 12 mg to 116 mg. With the exception of one patient, the clinical symptoms resolved within 48 h. The duration of treatment varied from 1 day to 7 days.

One study found that 30 mg of cyproheptadine is needed to block 85%–95% of brain 5-HT2A receptors. Therefore, a few authors recommend a higher initial dose (12 to 32 mg) in the first 24 h for the treatment of moderate to severe SS. It could be the reason for the excellent result in the Frye et al. study and the poor outcome in the Nguyen et al. study. We also used a higher dose, and all patients responded favorably. In light of this, at least some response to cyprohepatadine at a therapeutic dose within 24 h may serve as a diagnostic sign for the presence of SS. It can be included in the diagnostic criteria of SS. One thing that was unusual in our study was that these patients needed a longer duration of treatment with cyproheptadine.

The patients with poisoning or intentional overdose may have a relatively acute onset and severe symptoms. The diagnosis of such cases may be overt because of the circumstances. The onset of symptoms in patients who develop SS as a result of therapeutic doses may be gradual. Because of the insidious onset and nonspecific symptoms, patients may continue to take serotonergic drugs despite having SS. A few studies have found that chronic use of SSRIs can cause cortical hyperexcitability.[21] Another study demonstrated increased dendritic arborization of cortical cells by chronic fluoxetine administration.[22] Therefore, chronic treatment with SSRIs may cause persistent hyperexcitable states. These may be the reasons for the longer treatment in a subset of patients in our series.

The medications that cause SS differ depending on the clinics. In psychiatry clinic, it is mainly SSRI. In various clinical settings, tramadol is emerging as a significant medication producing SS.[3,23]

There are various limitations to our study. This is a retrospective case series from a single center, observed by neurologists. So, it cannot be generalized. There can be several biases in this study. We did not find any SS due to overdose. Even though all cases in our cohort met the Hunter criteria, we could not exclude the possibility of all causes of SS-like illness for several reasons. Despite these limitations, our cases indicate that different patients with SS may require a varied cyproheptadine dosage regimen. Multicenter prospective studies from different clinical settings are required to determine the optimal dosing regimen.

Ethical policy and Institutional Review board statement

The institutional ethics committee approved the study (SVIEC/ON/MEDI/RP/23/April/5Y). The study was carried out in accordance with the Helsinki Declaration guidelines.

Patient declaration of consent statement

All patients gave consent for the publication of this observation. There is no image of any patients.

Financial support and sponsorship

Nil.

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.

References

  • 1.Boyer EW, Shannon M. The serotonin syndrome. N Engl J Med. 2005;352:1112–20. doi: 10.1056/NEJMra041867. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Prakash S, Rathore C, Rana K, Prakash A. Fatal serotonin syndrome: A systematic review of 56 cases in the literature. Clin Toxicol (Phila) 2021;59:89–100. doi: 10.1080/15563650.2020.1839662. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Prakash S, Rathore C, Rana KK, Dave A, Joshi H, Patel J. Refining the clinical features of serotonin syndrome: A prospective observational study of 45 patients. Ann Indian Acad Neurol. 2019;22:52–60. doi: 10.4103/aian.AIAN_344_18. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Prakash S, Rathore C, Rana K. Knowledge, attitude, and practice (KAP) study on serotonin syndrome among neuro physicians. Ann Indian Acad Neurol. 2020;23:638–43. doi: 10.4103/aian.AIAN_603_19. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Dunkley EJ, Isbister GK, Sibbritt D, Dawson AH, Whyte IM. The hunter serotonin toxicity criteria: Simple and accurate diagnostic decision rules for serotonin toxicity. QJM. 2003;96:635–42. doi: 10.1093/qjmed/hcg109. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Sternbach H. The serotonin syndrome. Am J Psychiatry. 1991;148:705–13. doi: 10.1176/ajp.148.6.705. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Nguyen H, Pan A, Smollin C, Cantrell LF, Kearney T. An 11-year retrospective review of cyproheptadine use in serotonin syndrome cases reported to the California Poison Control System. J Clin Pharm Ther. 2019;44:327–34. doi: 10.1111/jcpt.12796. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Graudins A, Stearman A, Chan B. Treatment of the serotonin syndrome with cyproheptadine. J Emerg Med. 1998;16:615–9. doi: 10.1016/s0736-4679(98)00057-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Frye JR, Poggemiller AM, McGonagill PW, Pape KO, Galet C, Liu YM. Use of cyproheptadine for the treatment of serotonin syndrome: A case series. J Clin Psychopharmacol. 2020;40:95–9. doi: 10.1097/JCP.0000000000001159. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Graudins A, Dowsett RP, Liddle C. The toxicity of antidepressant poisoning: Is it changing?A comparative study of cyclic and newer serotonin-specific antidepressants. Emerg Med (Fremantle) 2002;14:440–6. doi: 10.1046/j.1442-2026.2002.00384.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Whyte IM, Dawson AH, Buckley NA. Relative toxicity of venlafaxine and selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors in overdose compared to tricyclic antidepressants. QJM. 2003;96:369–74. doi: 10.1093/qjmed/hcg062. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Mackay FJ, Dunn NR, Mann RD. Antidepressants and the serotonin syndrome in general practice. Br J Gen Pract. 1999;49:871–4. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Erken N, Kaya D, Dost FS, Ates Bulut E, Isik AT. Antidepressant-induced serotonin syndrome in older patients: A cross-sectional study. Psychogeriatrics. 2022;22:502–8. doi: 10.1111/psyg.12849. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Prakash S, Patel V, Kakked S, Patel I, Yadav R. Mild serotonin syndrome: A report of 12 cases. Ann Indian Acad Neurol. 2015;18:226–30. doi: 10.4103/0972-2327.150612. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Buckley NA, Dawson AH, Isbister GK. Serotonin syndrome. BMJ. 2014;348:g1626. doi: 10.1136/bmj.g1626. doi: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.g1626. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Terry N, Margolis KG. Serotonergic mechanisms regulating the GI tract: Experimental evidence and therapeutic relevance. Handb Exp Pharmacol. 2017;239:319–42. doi: 10.1007/164_2016_103. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Prakash S, Lodha D, Rawat KS. Coexistence of serotonin syndrome and neuroleptic malignant syndrome: Does it exist? BMJ Case Rep. 2021;14:e241578. doi: 10.1136/bcr-2021-241578. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Sim SS, Sun JT. Ocular flutter in the serotonin syndrome. N Engl J Med. 2016;375:e38. doi: 10.1056/NEJMicm1506066. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Prakash S, Rathore C, Rana K. Serotonin syndrome: A syndrome on syndrome. Ann Indian Acad Neurol. 2021;24:430–2. doi: 10.4103/aian.AIAN_421_20. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Gillman PK. The serotonin syndrome and its treatment. J Psychopharmacol. 1999;13:100–9. doi: 10.1177/026988119901300111. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Chollet F, Tardy J, Albucher JF, Thalamas C, Berard E, Lamy C, et al. Fluoxetine for motor recovery after acute ischaemic stroke (FLAME): A randomised placebo controlled trial. Lancet Neurol. 2011;10:123–30. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(10)70314-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.McAllister BB, Spanswick SC, Patel PP, Barneto AA, Dyck RH. The effects of chronic fluoxetine treatment following injury of medial frontal cortex in mice. Behav Brain Res. 2015;290:102–16. doi: 10.1016/j.bbr.2015.04.049. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Ali AA, Abdeshafy MM, Abdelkawy K, Elsabaa RM, Elbarbry F. Clinical and laboratory factors related to seizure and serotonin toxicity in tramadol intoxication: An Egyptian study. Clin Drug Investig. 2023;43:963–71. doi: 10.1007/s40261-023-01326-y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Family Medicine and Primary Care are provided here courtesy of Wolters Kluwer -- Medknow Publications

RESOURCES