Skip to main content
Journal of Family Medicine and Primary Care logoLink to Journal of Family Medicine and Primary Care
. 2024 Apr 22;13(4):1401–1407. doi: 10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_1715_23

Prevalence and risk factors of gastro-esophageal reflux disease among college students at a public university in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia

Khalid A Bin Abdulrahman 1,, Abdullah F Alsaif 2, Ibrahim A Almehaidib 2, Mohammed A Almtehe 2, Nawaf M Alqahtani 2, Abdulaziz K Alabdali 2
PMCID: PMC11142017  PMID: 38827728

ABSTRACT

Background:

Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is one of the most prevalent gastrointestinal disorders worldwide. It manifests when the lower esophageal sphincter malfunctions, causing the stomach’s contents to reflux into the esophagus, lead to discomforting symptoms. Heartburn and regurgitation are the typical symptoms of GERD. This study aims to determine the prevalence of GERD and assess its risk factors.

Materials and Methods:

This cross-sectional study was conducted at IMSIU, Saudi Arabia. An online survey was distributed to the students’ email addresses to determine the prevalence of GERD, its related risk factors, and understanding of its symptoms.

Results:

One thousand five hundred and thirty-three (1533) students participated in the survey. The prevalence of GERD was 34.6%. The majority (79.7%) of the respondent students had heard of GERD. Stress is believed to be a factor in developing GERD by 35.7% of students. Heartburn was the predominant symptom of GERD (76.2%). No association existed between the socio-demographic traits of those with GERD except for age and academic year.

Conclusions:

It is imperative to raise public awareness of the disorder’s characteristics and its modifiable risk factors to prevent the emergence of GERD and its complications.

Keywords: Gastro-esophageal reflux disease, prevalence, Saudi Arabia, students

Introduction

Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is a widespread digestive disorder with varying prevalence across different regions, affecting approximately 10%–20% of individuals in North America and Europe and less than 5% in Asia.[1,2] This condition is characterized by an effortless passage of stomach contents into the esophagus or mouth, leading to bothersome symptoms or complications. Retrosternal burning/heartburn and regurgitation are GERD hallmark symptoms.[3] These symptoms may exist without apparent esophageal mucosal injury or be linked to erosive esophagitis, esophageal stricture, Barrett’s esophagus (BE), or esophageal cancer.[4]

Patients commonly describe a burning sensation that ascends into the chest, extending to the neck, throat, and occasionally the back.[3] It happens post-prandially, especially after consuming large, fatty meals, spicy foods, citrus, chocolates, or alcohol. Heartburn may be made worse by lying down and bending over. Heartburn at night may cause sleeping rugged and compromise performance the following day.[5]

Regurgitation, defined as the “perception of the flow of refluxed gastric contents into the mouth or hypopharynx,” according to the Montreal consensus statement, is another prevalent symptom associated with GERD.[3] Several factors, including temporary relaxations of the lower esophageal sphincter and abnormalities in the lower esophageal sphincter pressure, contribute to the development of GERD.[6] Older age, high body mass index (BMI), smoking, depression, anxiety, and decreased physical exercise at work are risk factors for GERD.[7,8,9]

This chronic ailment has a significant economic burden and affects the quality of life. Numerous studies have demonstrated that individuals with gastro-gastroesophageal have a lower quality of life than healthy controls, and as the disease gets worse, so does the patient’s health-related quality of life score.[10]

Recent studies in Saudi Arabia, such as the work by Al Ghadeer et al. (2021) and Alrashed et al. (2019), have highlighted a noteworthy prevalence of GERD among university students. These findings underscore the need for further exploration, especially given the limited research on the prevalence of GERD among university students in Saudi Arabia. Additionally, the susceptibility of college students to GERD risk factors, such as stress and sleep deprivation, due to academic pressures warrants special attention.[11,12]

Although this topic has been addressed worldwide, published studies on the prevalence of GERD among university students in Saudi Arabia have been limited and need further exploration. Moreover, college students are particularly vulnerable and predisposed to GERD risk factors such as stress and sleep deprivation since they are preoccupied with their academic studies. This study aims to contribute to the existing body of knowledge by determining the prevalence of GERD, exploring its associated risk factors, and enhancing understanding of its symptoms among students at IMSIU in Saudi Arabia. By addressing this gap in research, the findings of our study hold particular relevance to primary care physicians and family physicians, as they play a pivotal role in managing and providing care for individuals with GERD. The insights gained from this study inform preventive strategies and interventions in primary care settings, ultimately improving patient outcomes and overall healthcare practices.

Materials and Methods

Study design

A descriptive cross-sectional study was conducted in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia, in 2021 to measure the prevalence of GERD, students’ understanding of its symptoms, and associations with other factors and socio-demographic information among college students at IMSIU. Four major streams comprise the colleges of Humanitarian, Science, Economic and Administrative Sciences, and Medicine.

Inclusion and exclusion criteria

Eligible participants must be undergraduates, bachelors, and on-campus registered students in one of these disciplines mentioned above. However, participants were excluded if they were in diploma, master, and doctorate programs.

Sample size calculation

Based on IMSIU’s website, the number of undergraduate regular bachelor students in these majors was 73938 for both genders (38756 were males and 35182 were females). The minimal sample size of responses was calculated to be at least 385 participants to reach a confidence level of 95% and a margin of error of 5%.

Data collection tools and procedures

An online self-completed electronic questionnaire has been sent by email to a large random sample of participants provided by the I.T. Deanship. Follow-up reminder emails have been sent to increase the response rate.

Demographic and social/clinical characteristics questionnaire

The questionnaire was classified into two parts: the first part covered the demographic information of the students, which covers gender, age, nationality, specialty, educational level, height, and weight. The second part includes the gastroesophageal reflux disease questionnaire (GERDQ) used to diagnose GERD.[13] The questionnaire from previously published Saudi studies included demographic characteristics and multiple lifestyle factors that might cause GERD. The GERDQ was used to diagnose students with GERD and validated as a patient-centered self-assessment. Those with a score of 8 or more were considered to have GERD, while those with a score of less than eight were not supposed to have this disease.[13]

Statistical analysis

The data analyses were performed using Statistical Packages for Software Sciences (SPSS) version 26, Armonk, New York, IBM Corporation. Descriptive statistics were used to define the proportion of responses for each question and the total distribution of the total score of each questionnaire. Values were computed and reported as mean ± SD (standard deviation).

The multivariable linear regression (MLR) analysis was applied to assess the statistically significant predictors of mean mental distress K6 score among university students; the associations between predictor variables with analyzed outcome in the linear regression were expressed as a beta coefficient with its associated 95% confidence interval. Also, the students’ help-seeking dependent outcome variables were analyzed with multivariable logistic binary regression analysis (MLBR) to assess the predictors of students’ help-seeking behavior upon mental distress. The association between predictor variables with the analyzed binary logistic regression analysis outcome was expressed as a multivariable-adjusted odds ratio (OR) with 95% confidence intervals. The alpha significance level was considered to be at 0.050.

Ethical considerations

The study adhered to ethical standards and guidelines for reporting. Participants provided informed consent, and the ethical review board of [Institution’s Name] reviewed and approved the research protocol before initiation. Confidentiality of participant information was strictly maintained throughout the study.

Results

Demographic factors of the participants

The study included a total of 1,533 participants, with 68.6% being females and 99.2% being Saudi citizens. Most participants were distributed across different age groups, academic years, and colleges, reflecting the diverse student population at IMSIU [Table 1].

Table 1.

Descriptive characteristics of university students (n=1533)

Frequency Percentage
Gender
 Female 1051 68.6
 Male 482 31.4
Age group—years
 18–19 years 366 23.9
 20–21 years 536 35.0
 22-23 years 401 26.2
 24-25 years 230 15.0
Nationality
 Saudi 1520 99.2
 Non-Saudi 13 0.8
College
 Economic and Administrative sciences 610 39.8
 Humanities science 509 33.2
 Science streams colleges 320 20.9
 Medicine 94 6.1
Academic year
 First-year 457 29.8
 Second year 235 15.3
 Third year 284 18.5
 Fourth-year 258 16.8
 Fifth year 299 19.5
Height—cm
 <160 566 36.9
 160-170 641 41.8
 171-180 266 17.4
 181-190 59 3.8
 >190 1 0.1
Weight—kg
 <60 715 46.6
 60-70 316 20.6
 71-80 224 14.6
 81-90 103 6.7
 91-100 92 6.0
 >100 83 5.4

Background knowledge of GERD

Table 2 provides background information on GERD. A noteworthy 34.6% reported experiencing GERD, while 20.3% were unfamiliar with the disease. Furthermore, 36.9% of respondents had an unfavorable opinion of caffeine’s role in developing GERD. At the same time, 30.9% of those surveyed agreed that smoking is one of the causes, too. Additionally, 76.2% of individuals believe that heartburn is one of the symptoms of GERD [Table 2].

Table 2.

Background knowledge of gastroesophageal reflux disease (n=1533)

Frequency Percentage
Have you ever heard of gastroesophageal reflux disease?
 Yes 1222 79.7
 No 311 20.3
Do you think that consuming coffee is one of the causes of GERD?
 Strongly Agree 284 18.5
 Agree 469 30.6
 Neutral 566 36.9
 Disagree 167 10.9
 Strongly Disagree 47 3.1
Do you think that smoking is one of the causes of GERD?
 Strongly Agree 457 29.8
 Agree 473 30.9
 Neutral 402 32.7
 Disagree 83 5.4
 Strongly Disagree 18 1.2
Could being exposed to stress be a triggering factor for GERD?
 Strongly Agree 547 35.7
 Agree 537 35.0
 Neutral 335 21.9
 Disagree 105 6.8
 Strongly Disagree 9 0.6
Nausea is a symptom of GERD.
 Yes 838 54.7
 No 103 6.7
 I do not know 592 38.6
Vertigo is a symptom of GERD.
 Yes 361 23.5
 No 282 18.4
 I do not know 890 58.1
Vomiting is a symptom of GERD.
 Yes 920 60.0
 No 129 8.4
 I do not know 484 31.6
Headache is a symptom of GERD.
 Yes 343 22.4
 No 338 22.0
 I do not know 852 55.6
Heartburn is a symptom of GERD
 Yes 1168 76.2
 No 34 2.2
 I do not know 331 21.6
Do you suffer from gastroesophageal reflux disease?
 Yes 530 34.6
 No 1003 65.4

Association with socio-demographic factors

Moreover, 34.4% of males and 34.6% of females were affected. The incidence increased as people aged, reaching a peak of 44.8% in the 24–25 age group. Participants in their fifth year had the highest incidence (48.2%). With a frequency of 37.5%, science stream colleges had the highest prevalence. The persons with heights between 160 and 170 cm and weights between 60 and 70 kg had the greatest prevalence rates, 39.3%, and 37.0%, respectively. The correlation between the participants’ socio-demographic data and GERD is shown in Table 3. No significant link exists between any socio-demographic characteristics of individuals with GERD, except age, academic year, and height, with P values of 0.001, 0.001, and 0.020, respectively [Table 3].

Table 3.

Association between the socio-demographic characteristics of the participants and GERD

GERD P

Yes No


Number % Number %
Gender
 Male 166 34.4 316 65.6 0.942
 Female 364 34.6 687 65.4
Age
 18-19 72 19.7 294 80.3 <0.001*
 20-21 178 33.2 358 66.8
 22-23 177 44.1 224 55.9
 24-25 103 44.8 127 55.2
Nationality
 Saudi 526 34.6 994 65.4 0.514
 Non-Saudi 4 30.8 9.0 69.2
Academic Year
 First-year 108 23.6 349 76.4 <0.001*
 Second year 74 31.5 161 68.5
 Third year 97 34.1 187 65.9
 Fourth-year 107 41.5 151 58.5
 Fifth year 144 48.2 155 51.8
College
 Economic and Administrative sciences 211 34.6 399 65.4
 Humanities science 169 33.2 340 66.8 0.587
 Medicine 30 37.5 64 62.5
 Science streams colleges 120 31.9 200 68.1
Height—cm
 <160 180 31.8 386 68.2 0.020*
 160-170 252 39.3 389 60.7
 171-180 80 30.1 186 69.9
 181-190 18 30.5 41 69.5
Weight—Kg
 <60 245 34.3 470 65.7 0.726
 60-70 117 37.0 199 63
 71-80 112 34.2 215 65.8
 91-100 27 29.3 65 70.7
 >100 29 34.9 54 65.1

Age, academic year, and height showed meaningful odds ratios, suggesting a potential association with GERD. Other factors, including gender, nationality, college, and weight, did not exhibit significant associations [Table 4].

Table 4.

Univariate logistic regression for the associated factors with GERD

Odds ratio 95% CI P

Lower Upper
Gender
 Male 0.991 0.790 1.244 0.941
 Female** 1.000
Age
 18-19** 1.000
 20-21 2.030 1.483 2.780 <0.001*
 22-23 3.227 2.333 4.463 <0.001*
 24-25 3.312 2.297 4.775 <0.001*
Nationality
 Saudi 1.191 0.365 3.885 0.772
 Non-Saudi** 1.000
Academic Year
 First-year** 1.000
 Second year 1.485 1.047 2.107 0.027
 Third year 1.676 1.209 2.324 0.002
 Fourth-year 2.290 1.649 3.180 <0.001*
 Fifth year 3.002 2.195 4.106 <0.001*
Collage
 Economic and Administrative sciences 0.881 0.665 1.168 0.379
 Humanities science 0.828 0.619 1.109 0.206
 Medicine 0.781 0.479 1.274 0.323
 Science streams colleges ** 1.000
Height—cm
 <160** 1.000
 160-170 1.389 1.096 1.762 0.007
 171-180 0.922 0.672 1.265 0.616
 181-190 0.941 0.526 1.684 0.839
Weight—Kg
 <60 0.971 0.602 1.564 0.903
 60-70 1.095 0.660 1.815 0.726
 71-80 0.970 0.585 1.608 0.906
 91-100 0.773 0.409 1.462 0.429
 >100** 1.000

*Significant P. **Used as a reference

Discussion

Prevalence of GERD

Our research aims to evaluate the prevalence of GERD and its risk factors among IMSIU students in Saudi Arabia. The population of this study consisted of university students only, with a small age group ranging from 18 to 25. GERD is one of the major gastrointestinal disorders affecting adults worldwide.[14,15] Our study results revealed that GERD is a common problem among IMSIU students, with a prevalence of (34.6%). This prevalence is higher than reported in a previous study conducted among college students at Sharqa University, which reported a prevalence of 23.8%.[12] Additionally, prior research has demonstrated that, in comparison to the general population, college students, in particular, comprise a population with a higher frequency of GERD.[16,17,18] Our result is consistent with a comprehensive review that found GERD affects between 8.7 and 33.1% of the Middle Eastern population.[2] Our percentage is similar to the 33.2% reported among Saudi Arabia’s southwest university students.[19]

Socio-demographic factors associated with GERD prevalence

The prevalence of GERD appeared similar between males (34.4%) and females (34.6%). This result contradicts some previous studies that suggested a significant difference between the two genders, considering the prevalence of GERD.[12,20,21] However, our findings emphasize that GERD affects both genders, highlighting the importance of considering individual factors beyond gender, similar to what is presented in some previous studies.[22,23] The incidence of GERD increased with age, reaching a peak of 44.8% in the 24–25 age group. This age-related trend aligns with the general understanding that GERD risk tends to rise.[24,25] Additionally, participants in their fifth academic year had the highest incidence (48.2%), indicating a potential cumulative effect or increased susceptibility as students progress through their educational journey. Individuals with heights between 160 and 170 cm and weights between 60 and 70 kg exhibited the greatest prevalence rates of 39.3% and 37.0%, respectively. While these findings might be suggestive, additional research is needed to understand the underlying mechanisms linking height, weight, and GERD. It could be related to body composition, dietary habits, or other lifestyle factors.

Background knowledge and awareness

In understanding the background knowledge of GERD among IMSIU students, it is crucial to note that approximately 79.7% of participants reported awareness of the disease. However, a significant portion (20.3%) remained unfamiliar with GERD, emphasizing this population’s need for increased education and awareness campaigns. This lack of awareness may contribute to delayed diagnosis and treatment, potentially leading to complications associated with untreated GERD, which is similar to what was reported previously.[26]

Symptoms perception

The survey explored students’ perception of GERD symptoms. Notably, a substantial number of participants recognized heartburn as a symptom (76.2%), aligning with the classic manifestation of GERD.[14] However, there was a notable lack of awareness regarding other symptoms, such as nausea, vertigo, and vomiting. This highlights a critical gap in knowledge that may hinder early recognition and management of GERD, emphasizing the importance of comprehensive education programs.

Trigger factors awareness

Understanding the triggers of GERD is essential for preventive measures. While 30.6% of students recognized coffee consumption as a trigger, a considerable number (36.9%) remained neutral, indicating potential misconceptions or lack of clarity. Smoking, a well-established risk factor for GERD, was acknowledged by 30.9% of students, with variations in agreement levels. The majority recognized stress as a common lifestyle factor (35.7%), reinforcing its association with GERD. These findings underscore the need for targeted educational interventions to address misconceptions and promote a better understanding of GERD triggers among students.

BMI and GERD association

Our study identified a significant association between high BMI and GERD, consistent with existing literature. High BMI contributes to increased thoracoabdominal pressure and reduced lower esophageal sphincter pressure, predisposing individuals to GERD.[27,28] This highlights the importance of lifestyle modifications, including weight management, among university students in GERD prevention and management.

Comparing our findings with previous studies, the prevalence of GERD among IMSIU students aligns with the global trend of GERD being a common digestive disorder. However, this population’s specific risk factor awareness and symptom perception provide valuable insights for targeted interventions. Our results emphasize the need for tailored educational programs, considering university students’ unique characteristics and perceptions.

Limitations of the study

This study has several limitations that warrant consideration when interpreting the findings. The cross-sectional design restricts our ability to establish causation, emphasizing the need for future longitudinal investigations. The study’s exclusive focus on IMSIU students aged 18–25 introduces potential sampling bias, limiting generalizability to other age groups and academic levels. Reliance on self-reported data, particularly regarding GERD symptoms and lifestyle factors, raises concerns about recall bias. The absence of formal diagnostic confirmation through medical examinations or endoscopy may contribute to misclassification of GERD status. Being a single-center study conducted in Saudi Arabia, the results may only partially represent diverse populations or university settings. Cultural and regional factors influencing lifestyle behaviors were not extensively explored, affecting the generalizability of findings. The study did not delve deeply into participants’ underlying health conditions or medications, which could impact GERD symptoms. Addressing these limitations in future research endeavors will contribute to a more comprehensive understanding of GERD among university students.

Conclusions

Gastroesophageal reflux disease is highly prevalent among the students of the IMSIU population. Moreover, most of the students have heard about GERD. Heartburn was the most widely recognized symptom of the disease. However, many students were unaware of vertigo as a symptom. The study identified coffee, smoking, stress, and high BMI as common triggers for GERD. It is essential to raise awareness about the nature of the disease and these modifiable risk factors to prevent the development of GERD and its complications.

Financial support and sponsorship

Nil.

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.

Acknowledgment

The authors would like to thank the college students who all participated in the survey.

References

  • 1.Sharma A, Sharma PK, Puri P. Prevalence and the risk factors of gastroesophageal reflux disease in medical students. Med J Armed Forces India. 2018;74:250–4. doi: 10.1016/j.mjafi.2017.08.005. doi: 10.1016/j.mjafi.2017.08.005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.El-Serag HB, Sweet S, Winchester CC, Dent J. Update on the epidemiology of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease: A systematic review. Gut. 2014;63:871–80. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2012-304269. doi:10.1136/gutjnl-2012-304269. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Vakil N, van Zanten SV, Kahrilas P, Dent J, Jones R. The montreal definition and classification of gastroesophageal reflux disease: A global evidence-based consensus. Am J Gastroenterol. 2006;101:1900–20. doi: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2006.00630.x. doi:10.1111/j. 1572-0241.2006.00630.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Kellerman R, Kintanar T. Gastroesophageal reflux disease. Prim Care Clin Off Pract. 2017;44:561–73. doi: 10.1016/j.pop.2017.07.001. doi: 10.1016/j.pop. 2017.07.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Johnson DA, Orr QC, Crawley JA, Traxler B, McCullough J, Brown KA, et al. Effect of esomeprazole on nighttime heartburn and sleep quality in patients with GERD: A randomized, placebo-controlled trial. Am J Gastroenterol. 2005;100:1914–22. doi: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2005.00285.x. doi:10.1111/j. 1572-0241.2005.00285.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Mikami DJ, Murayama KM. Physiology and pathogenesis of gastroesophageal reflux disease. Surg Clin North Am. 2015;95:515–25. doi: 10.1016/j.suc.2015.02.006. doi: 10.1016/j.suc. 2015.02.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Zheng Z, Nordenstedt H, Pedersen NL, Lagergren J, Ye W. Lifestyle factors and risk for symptomatic gastroesophageal reflux in monozygotic twins. Gastroenterology. 2007;132:87–95. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2006.11.019. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro. 2006.11.019. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Jarosz M, Taraszewska A. Risk factors for gastroesophageal reflux disease –the role of diet. Prz Gastroenterol. 2014;9:297–301. doi: 10.5114/pg.2014.46166. doi: 10.5114/pg. 2014.46166. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Ferriolli E, Oliveira RB, Matsuda NM, Braga FJ, Dantas RO. Aging, esophageal motility, and gastroesophageal reflux. J Am Geriatr Soc. 1998;46:1534–37. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.1998.tb01538.x. doi:10.1111/j. 1532-5415.1998.tb01538.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Revicki DA, Wood M, Maton PN, Sorensen S. The impact of gastroesophageal reflux disease on health-related quality of Life 11 supported by research funding from Astra/Merck, Wayne, Pennsylvania. Am J Med. 1998;104:252–8. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9343(97)00354-9. doi:10.1016/S0002-9343(97)00354-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Al Ghadeer HA, Alabbad ZE, AlShaikh SB, Ahmed SU, Bu-Khamseen AA, Alhashem AT, et al. Prevalence of gastroesophageal reflux disease and associated risk factors in the eastern region, Saudi Arabia. Cureus. 2021;13:e19599. doi: 10.7759/cureus.19599. doi:10.7759/cureus. 19599. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Alrashed AA, Aljammaz K, Pathan A, Mandili AA, Almatrafi SA, Almotire MH, et al. Prevalence and risk factors of gastroesophageal reflux disease among Shaqra University students, Saudi Arabia. J Fam Med Prim Care. 2019;8:462–67. doi: 10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_443_18. doi:10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_443_18. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Jones R, Junghard O, Dent J, Vakil N, Halling K, Wernersson B, et al. Development of the GerdQ, a tool for the diagnosis and management of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease in primary care. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2009;30:1030–8. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2036.2009.04142.x. doi:10.1111/j. 1365-2036.2009.04142.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Clarrett DM, Hachem C. Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) Mo Med. 2018;115:214–8. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30228725. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Boulton KH, Dettmar PW. A narrative review of the prevalence of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) Ann Esophagus. 2022;5:7. doi:10.21037/aoe-20-80. [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Elnemr G, Almuntashiri AH, Alghamdi SA, Alharthi FR, Masoodi I. The predictors of Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease among University students: A cross-sectional study in the western region of Saudi Arabia. Egypt J Hosp Med. 2018;73:5828–38. doi: 10.21608/ejhm. 2018.12046. [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Martinucci I, Natilli M, Lorenzoni V, Pappalardo L, Monreale A, Turchetti G, et al. Gastroesophageal reflux symptoms among Italian university students: Epidemiology and dietary correlates using automatically recorded transactions. BMC Gastroenterol. 2018;18:116. doi: 10.1186/s12876-018-0832-9. doi:10.1186/s12876-018-0832-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Baklola M, Terra M, Badr A, Fahmy FM, Elshabrawy E, Hawas Y, et al. Prevalence of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease, and its associated risk factors among medical students: A nation-based cross-sectional study. BMC Gastroenterol. 2023;23:269. doi: 10.1186/s12876-023-02899-w. doi:10.1186/s12876-023-02899-w. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Awadalla NJ. Personal, academic and stress correlates of gastroesophageal reflux disease among college students in southwestern Saudi Arabia: A cross-section study. Ann Med Surg (Lond) 2019;47:61–5. doi: 10.1016/j.amsu.2019.10.009. doi: 10.1016/j.amsu. 2019.10.009. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Rasool MF, Sarwar R, Arshad MS, Imran I, Saeed H, Majeed A, et al. Assessing the frequency and risk factors associated with gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) in Southern Punjab, Pakistan. Risk Manag Health Policy. 2021;14:4619–25. doi: 10.2147/RMHP.S335142. doi:10.2147/RMHP. S335142. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Warsi I, Ahmed J, Younus A, Rasheed A, Akhtar TS, Ain QUI, et al. Risk factors associated with oral manifestations and oral health impact of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease: A multicentre, cross-sectional study in Pakistan. BMJ Open. 2019;9:e021458. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-021458. doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2017-021458. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Nusrat S, Nusrat S, Bielefeldt K. Reflux and sex: What drives testing, what drives treatment? Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2012;24:233–47. doi: 10.1097/MEG.0b013e32834f6baa. doi:10.1097/MEG.0b013e32834f6baa. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Matar Alsulobi A, Mohamed Abo El-Fetoh N, Ghazi Eid Alenezi S, Alanazi RA, Hamdan Salem Alenazy R, Aied Lafi Alenzy F, et al. Gastroesophageal reflux disease among population of Arar City, Northern Saudi Arabia. Electron Physician. 2017;9:5499–505. doi: 10.19082/5499. doi:10.19082/5499. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Cho Y-S, Choi M-G, Jeong J-J, Chung W-C, Lee I-S, Kim S-W, et al. Prevalence and clinical spectrum of gastroesophageal reflux: A population-based study in Asan-si, Korea. Am J Gastroenterol. 2005;100:747–53. doi: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2005.41245.x. doi:10.1111/j. 1572-0241.2005.41245.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Li Y, Du J, Zhang H, Yu C. Epidemiological investigation in outpatients with symptomatic gastroesophageal reflux from the department of medicine in Zhejiang Province, East China. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2008;23:283–9. doi: 10.1111/j.1440-1746.2007.05045.x. doi:10.1111/j. 1440-1746.2007.05045.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Alshahrani SM, Alahmari AO, Alobaidi AJ. Assessment knowledge and attitude and practice toward GERD among smokers in Riyadh City, 2018. Egypt J Hosp Med. 2018;73:6763–6. [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Jung HS, Choi MG, Baeg MK, Lim CH, Kim JS, Cho YK, et al. Obesity is associated with increasing esophageal acid exposure in korean patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease symptoms. J Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2013;19:338–43. doi: 10.5056/jnm.2013.19.3.338. doi: 10.5056/jnm. 2013.19.3.338. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Seeras K, Campbell J, Pryor AD. Considerations in the management of gastroesophageal reflux disease in the morbidly obese. Ann Esophagus. 2022;5:41. doi:10.21037/aoe-21-20. [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Family Medicine and Primary Care are provided here courtesy of Wolters Kluwer -- Medknow Publications

RESOURCES