Editor—We share Malik and Cutting’s enthusiasm for Unicef’s baby friendly initiative in the United Kingdom but were disappointed that they did not acknowledge the great progress made over the past year.1 It is pessimistic to state that hospitals have been slow to work with the initiative. In fact, almost all units are working towards baby friendly accreditation; 11 British maternity units have achieved the required standard and another 40 have a certificate of commitment. Although Malik and Cutting suggest that hospitals might be demoralised by unachievable targets (such as the 75% breastfeeding rate required for the global baby friendly award), we removed this requirement for the United Kingdom’s standard award in order to focus on the support and encouragement of best clinical practice.
It is also unfair to suggest that the baby friendly initiative is confined to hospitals. On 15 May we launched best practice standards for community healthcare settings, with the support of the minister for public health. This is the first step in introducing the initiative into the community and provides a framework around which clinical accreditation will be developed. The United Kingdom will probably be unique in having a primary care baby friendly award. As with the existing awards, particular emphasis is placed on support for mothers to make informed decisions about feeding their babies.
Malik and Cutting call for better coordination with existing groups that support mothers; in fact, all four national groups are fully involved with the baby friendly initiative. We were also puzzled by the statement that “government and NHS managers should recognise and encourage [the baby friendly initiative’s] development.” The Department of Health has worked in partnership with the initiative since its inception in the United Kingdom,2,3 while an increasing proportion of NHS managers see the initiative as a cost effective quality framework to achieve a high standard of care, which can be independently accredited.
We agree that much more could be done to support mothers in their choice to breast feed. Nevertheless, the healthcare system has a crucial role; it was particularly pleasing to note that the 1995 infant feeding statistics4 documented progress on relevant hospital practices.5 We are optimistic that the progress of Unicef’s baby friendly initiative in the United Kingdom can strengthen this trend.
References
- 1.Malik ANJ, Cutting WAM. Breast feeding: the baby friendly initiative. BMJ. 1998;316:1548–1549. doi: 10.1136/bmj.316.7144.1548. . (23 May.) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Department of Health/Unicef UK Baby Friendly Initiative. Memorandum of understanding between the National Breastfeeding Working Group and the Unicef UK Baby Friendly Initiative. London: Department of Health/Unicef UK Baby Friendly Initiative; 1993. [Google Scholar]
- 3.National Breastfeeding Working Group. Breastfeeding: good practice guidance to the NHS. London: Department of Health; 1995. [Google Scholar]
- 4.Foster K, Lader D, Cheesbrough S. Infant feeding 1995. London: Stationery Office; 1997. [Google Scholar]
- 5.Williams A. Infant nutrition in Britain: where are we and where should we be going? BNF Nutr Bull. 1998;23(suppl 1):5–11. [Google Scholar]