Abstract
Risk for transmission of SARS-CoV-2 through allogeneic human tissue transplantation is unknown. To further evaluate the risk of virus transmission, tissues were obtained from deceased donors who had tested positive for SARS-CoV-2 RNA via nasopharyngeal swab. This study evaluated an array of human tissues recovered for transplantation, including bone, tendon, skin, fascia lata, vascular tissues, and heart valves. Tissue samples and plasma or serum samples, if available, were tested for viral RNA (vRNA) using a real time PCR system for the presence of virus RNA. All samples were tested in quadruplicate for both subgenomic (sgRNA) and genomic (gRNA) RNA encoding the SARS-CoV-2 nucleocapsid gene. Amplification of a cellular housekeeping gene served as the positive control for every sample. A total of 47 tissue samples from 17 donors were tested for SARS-CoV-2 RNA. Four donors had plasma or serum available for paired testing. SARS-CoV-2 RNA was not detected from any tissue or plasma/serum sample tested. Based on these findings, risk of transmission through the transplantation of tissue types studied from SARS-CoV-2 infected donors is likely to be low.
Keywords: Tissues, Tissue donor, SARS-CoV-2, Transplantation, Infection, RNA, Viral, Tendons, Fascia lata, Bone, Heart valves, Vascular tissue, Dermis, Musculoskeletal tissue
Introduction
The risk for transmission of SARS-CoV-2 through transplantation of allogeneic human tissues (tissues) is unknown. The identification of the angiotensin 2 converting enzyme (ACE-2) receptor as the primary receptor for virus to enter cells provides an imperfect guide to potential target tissues. There have been many reports describing the detection of SARS-CoV-2 RNA in tissues beyond the respiratory tract (Bradley 2020; Best 2021; Gaussen 2021; Penfield 2020; Trypsteen 2020). This includes reports that viral RNA (vRNA) is detectable in the blood of some patients, suggesting systemic viral dissemination (Yang 2020; Beyerstedt 2021) and broad organ involvement. While, historically, respiratory viruses were not thought to pose a significant risk for transmission via allograft tissue implantation, SARS-CoV-2 may behave differently due to this systemic dissemination. Considering the severity of illness, rapid community spread, and uncertainty surrounding tropism in human tissue, the American Association of Tissue Banks (AATB) issued guidance for screening and exclusion of donors who may be infected with SARS-CoV-2 (American Association of Tissue Banks 2020).
In the United States, human tissues for transplantation are regulated by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) as human cells, tissues, and cellular and tissue-based products (HCT/Ps) under 21 CFR Part 1271. This study evaluated multiple different human tissues intended for transplantation, including bone, tendon, skin, fascia lata, vascular tissues, and heart valves. FDA requires all HCT/P donors to be screened and tested for relevant communicable disease agents or diseases for use in making a donor eligibility determination to exclude donors with the potential to transmit communicable diseases. Typically, when potential tissue donors are identified, recovery establishments perform a preliminary review for donor suitability, i.e., obtain donor information to identify any data that would obviously render the donor ineligible for donation according to standards established by FDA, AATB, and each tissue establishment. If a potential donor appears to be suitable for donation, tissues are then recovered, sent to the tissue processing facility where they are held or processed while completing the collection and review of donor medical and social history data.
Determining whether viral RNA (vRNA), and infectious virus, is regularly present in tissues typically used for transplantation collected from donors with a history of prior SARS-CoV-2 infection would better inform decisions regarding whether to exclude potential donors. AATB sponsored two studies to help evaluate the potential role of SARS-CoV-2 transmission in tissue transplantation. The first (Greenwald 2022) was to examine the risk of SARS-CoV-2 viremia in blood of deceased tissue donors, showing an incidence of RNAemia of approximately 1 in 1000. However, in that study, the results of SARS-CoV-2 RNA testing of donor nasopharyngeal (NP) swabs, if performed, was unknown, and tissues from these donors were not tested. To further characterize the risk of viral transmission and inform tissue safety policy, this retrospective study was performed to examine various tissues obtained from deceased donors whose NP swabs collected within 24 h of death tested positive for SARS-CoV-2 RNA for evidence of the SARS-CoV-2 via reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction testing (RT-PCR).
Materials/methods
Between April 2020 and April 2021, tissue establishments identified stored, frozen human tissues collected from research-authorized deceased donors who had NP samples positive for SARS-CoV-2 RNA using nucleic acid amplification testing (NAT) for the presence of viral RNA (Table 1) and meeting all other study criteria (Table 2) for study inclusion. Research authorization was provided by the individual authorizing donation after death, or at the time of donation registration (first-person authorization), and all donor samples were anonymized by the establishment providing the research tissue and its associated recovery data. At the time of tissue collection, the donors were not suspected of being at risk of SARS-CoV-2 infection and there was no information available at the time tissues were recovered to indicate the donor would be ineligible for donation (Table 3). Tissue donor NP swabs were collected at the time of tissue recovery. Tissues were handled, stored, and processed according to the information provided in Table 4. None of the tissues underwent processing that included viral inactivation steps, and none of the antibiotics or antifungals used are known to have virucidal properties.
Table 1.
Donor testing for SARS-CoV-2
| Donor identification number | Sampling methodology | SARS-CoV-2 testing methodology | SARS-CoV-2 assay |
|---|---|---|---|
| D1 | Nasopharyngeal Swab | RT-PCRa | BioGX SARS-CoV-2b |
| D2 | Nasopharyngeal Swab | RT-PCR | BioGX SARS-CoV-2 |
| D3 | Nasopharyngeal Swab | RT-PCR | BioGX SARS-CoV-2 |
| D4 | Nasopharyngeal Swab | RT-PCR | Viracor SARS-CoV-2 Eurofinsc |
| D5 | Nasopharyngeal Swab | RT-PCR | Viracor SARS-CoV-2 |
| D6 | Nasopharyngeal Swab | RT-PCR | BioGX SARS-CoV-2 |
| D7 | Nasopharyngeal Swab | TMAd | Procleix SARS-CoV-2e |
| D8 | Nasopharyngeal Swab | RT-PCR | BioGX SARS-CoV-2 |
| D9 | Nasopharyngeal Swab | RT-PCR | Viracor SARS-CoV-2 |
| D10 | Nasopharyngeal Swab | RT-PCR | BioGX SARS-CoV-2 |
| D11 | Nasopharyngeal Swab | RT-PCR | BioGX SARS-CoV-2 |
| D12 | Nasopharyngeal Swab | RT-PCR | BioGX SARS-CoV-2 |
| D13 | Nasopharyngeal Swab | TMA | Procleix SARS-CoV-2 |
| D14 | Nasopharyngeal Swab | TMA | Procleix SARS-CoV-2 |
| D15 | Nasopharyngeal Swab | TMA | Procleix SARS-CoV-2 |
| D16 | Nasopharyngeal Swab | TMA | Procleix SARS-CoV-2 |
| D17 | Nasopharyngeal Swab | TMA | Procleix SARS-CoV-2 |
aReverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction
bManufactured by Becton, Dickinson & Company
cManufactured by Viracor Eurofins Clinical Diagnostics
dTranscription-mediated amplification
eManufactured by Grifols
This table provides information about how the asymptomatic donors were determined to be SARS-CoV-2 positive. See Table 10 for more detail regarding assay performance characteristics.
Table 2.
Study criteria
| Inclusion criteria | Exclusion criteria |
|---|---|
| Donations collected within study timeframe, April 1, 2020–April 30, 2021 | Donation occurred outside the study timeframe |
| At time of tissue collection, donor not known to have signs or symptoms of COVID-19 (nasopharyngeal swab test results would have been pending at the time of tissue collection), and no obvious reasons to consider the donor to be ineligible for donation according to FDA regulatory requirements | Donor known to have factors that would render them ineligible according to FDA regulatory requirements, or donor known or suspected to have SARS-CoV-2, otherwise the donor tissues would not have been collected |
| Donor nasopharyngeal swab sample found to be NAT-positive for SARS-CoV-2 | |
| Donor authorized for research | Research authorization not obtained |
| Donations collected within the United Statesa | Donor demographic data not provided |
| Stored tissues available for testing | Stored tissues not available for testing |
| Unknown | |
| Whether the donor also was an organ donor | |
| Vaccination status of donors (the first COVID-19 vaccine was made available in the United States was on December 11, 2020) | |
aConvenience sample based on willingness of tissue establishment to participate in the study
Table 3.
Donor information
| Manuscript donor identification number | Donor tissue recovery date | Age (years) | Gender | Race | Cause of death/mechanism of death | Circumstances/clinical course | Autopsy data | Histology data |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| D1 | 5/17/20 | 26 | M | Caucasian | Drowning / Asphyxiation | Patient presented to ED via EMS in cardiac arrest after being dragged out of the water by a lifeguard at the beach. CPR was started on scene with unknown downtime | Near drowning leading to anoxic brain injury | Myocardium unremarkable |
| D2 | 5/27/20 | 50 | M | Caucasian | Asystole cardiac arrest | Had been consuming alcohol all day on 5/26/20. Last seen alive 5/26 at 12:00. Wife returned home after 15:00 and found him unresponsive on floor. CPR initiated by wife. Asystole when EMS arrived. ACLS initiated by EMS and continued in the ER. Pronounced in the ER on 5/26/20 16:03 | N/Aa | N/A |
| D3 | 5/19/20 | 45 | M | Caucasian | Hanging /asphyxiation | Patient found hanging from a tree by a bungee cord | Circumferential furrow around neck; ligature recovered; ETOH recovered from peripheral blood and vitreous fluid; isopropanol recovered from vitreous fluid | Heart pathology: hypereosinophilic myocytes and a foci of contraction band necrosis/coagulative myocytolysis; LAD 60% narrowed by atherosclerotic plaque |
| D4 | 4/21/20 | 69 | F | Caucasian | Cardiac Arrest, acute respiratory failure with hypoxia, severe pulmonary hypertension | Admitted to hospital on 4/15/20 for shortness of breath. Diagnosed with pulmonary hypertension. She did not improve and died on 4/20/20 at 18:01. History of severe obesity | N/A | N/A |
| D5 | 4/23/20 | 46 | M | Caucasian | Arrhythmia/asystole cardiac arrest | Found unresponsive in bed. EMS arrived. He has a shockable rhythm but then went into asystole. CPR and ACLS were initiated and continued in the ER. Pronounced in ER on 4/22/20 at 19:53 | N/A | N/A |
| D6 | 6/4/20 | 47 | M | Hispanic | Unknown | Last seen alive by wife 6/3/20 09:30. Pronounced dead at scene on 6/3/20 at 11:44 | N/A | N/A |
| D7 | 8/19/20 | 53 | M | Black | Heart Attack / Asystole cardiac arrest | Patient presented to ED via EMS for cardiac arrest. Per family patient complained of chest pain and was found unresponsive by bystanders with estimated downtime of 45 min. EMS arrived, started CPR, and patient remained in asystole | N/A | N/A |
| D8 | 5/17/20 | 40 | F | Caucasian | Overdose | Patient had witnessed cardiac arrest (bardycardia– > PEA) and suspected oxycodone overdose (missing pill bottles) transferred to another hospital’s ICU for resp failure on ventilation, pontine hemorrhage and concern for cerebral edema | N/A | N/A |
| D9 | 4/17/20 | 57 | M | Caucasian | Sudden Death | No fever or respiratory symptoms | N/A | Heart pathology normal |
| D10 | 5/11/20 | 25 | M | Unknown | Sudden Death | Complained of headache/stomach pain, collapsed, pronounced in ER | N/A | Heart pathology normal |
| D11 | 5/21/20 | 33 | M | Unknown | Sudden Death | Witnessed Arrest After Smoking Marijuana and Drank A Few Beers, EMS Called And Transported To ER And Pronounced | N/A | Heart pathology normal |
| D12 | 5/27/20 | 50 | M | Caucasian | Sudden Death | Out of hospital cardiac arrest, history of asthma and unknown GI issues but otherwise healthy, no known complaints prior | N/A | Heart pathology normal |
| D13 | 9/21/20 | 5 | F | Unknown | Trauma | Hit by vehicle | N/A | Heart pathology normal |
| D14 | 7/2/20 | 22 | F | Unknown | Hanging / Asphyxiation | Attempted OD, then hung herself, no previous symptoms | N/A | Heart pathology normal |
| D15 | 11/4/20 | 47 | F | Hispanic | Asystole cardiac arrest | N/A | N/A | |
| D16 | 1/6/21 | 58 | M | Caucasian | Asystole cardiac arrest | N/A | N/A | |
| D17 | 4/29/21 | 51 | M | Caucasian | Heart attack/asystole cardiac arrest | Circumstances surrounding death: Came in with STEMI, intubated, transferred from hospital for high-risk CABG. Coded multiple times. Family chose not to start ECMO and made comfort care; started the withdrawal process and died without further interventions | N/A | N/A |
aData not available because autopsy or histology were not performed
This table provides donor information including demographics, details surrounding the death, and any known autopsy or pathological data. Abbreviations: advanced cardiac life support (ACLS), cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR), coronary artery bypass graft (CABG), emergency department (ED), emergency room (ER), emergency medical services (EMS), pulseless electrical activity (PEA), ethyl alcohol (ETOH), extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO), female (F), gastrointestinal (GI), intensive care unit (ICU), left anterior descending (LAD), male (M), not applicable (N/A), overdose (OD), ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI)
Table 4.
Tissue handling and processing
| Tissue type | Recovery technique | Transport to tissue bank | Processing at tissue bank | Transport to miller lab |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bone and tendon | Standard surgical techniques, en bloc for the tendons and disarticulated for the bone | Tissue placed in transport solution and transported on wet ice (1–10 °C) or dry ice (~ − 50 °C), arriving to the tissue establishment within 48–72 h after recovery | Stored frozen at − 20 °C or − 80 °C; no processing | Tissues shipped on dry ice (~ − 50 °C) |
| Tissue is transported on wet ice (1–10 °C) for up to 36 h | ||||
| Cardiovascular (CV) tissues (i.e., artery, vein, heart valve) | Standard surgical techniques, en bloc for the vascular tissues, with no chemical agents applied to the tissue | Transported to the tissue bank packaged in normal saline, placed in a cooler on wet ice (1–10 °C) within 24 h of recovery | Dissected, disinfected with an antibiotic/antifungal cocktail, and cryopreserved in tissue culture media supplemented with 10% dimethylsulfoxide (cryoprotectant), 10% fetal calf serum and cryopreserved at − 1 °C per minute to at least − 50 °C and stored in the vapor phase of liquid nitrogen ~ − 150 °C | Tissues shipped on dry ice (~ − 50 °C) |
| Dissected, disinfected with an antibiotic/ antifungal cocktail, stored − 80 °C freezer until shipped on dry ice | ||||
| Dermis | Standard surgical technique, surgical prep solution is used and then rinsed off during packaging stage | The tissue is then packaged in saline or RMPI, transported on wet ice (1–10 °C) for up to 36 h | Stored at 2–8 °C; no processing | Tissues shipped on dry ice (~ − 50 °C) |
| Blood Specimens | Collected after cessation of the heartbeat | After collection and separation, immediately stored at − 80 °C | Not applicable | Blood specimens shipped on dry ice (~ − 50 °C) |
This table information provided about how tissues were handled and processed, including storage and transport temperatures. For some tissue types, there were differences among study participants in how tissues were handled, indicated by including different information within that category
Because there were finite lab resources available, amongst the available stored donor tissue identified, a convenience sample representing a variety of the tissue types available for transplantation was selected for testing. Human tissue and blood specimens were shipped frozen on dry ice to the Miller Laboratory at University of California Davis (ML/UCD) where tissues were kept in dry ice storage from receipt until they were prepared and tested between January 2021 and February 2022. All tissues and blood had been frozen once, and not thawed, at the time that they were shipped.
Tissue preparation for sampling
The ML/UCD received 47 tissues from 17 donors, and 6 donor blood tubes (serum or plasma) from 4 of the 17 donors. Tissues were kept in dry ice storage until time of preparation for testing. Fascia lata, dermis, tendon, femur, and tibia were thawed overnight at 4 degrees Celsius. Cryopreserved cardiovascular tissues were thawed and rinsed per clinical instructions for use (cryopreservative solutions were properly removed), while the remaining cardiovascular tissues that were not control-rate frozen and without cryopreservation solution were thawed in the same manner as other tissues.
Sample collection
Tissues were thawed to collect samples for testing. Three distinct sites/subsets (designated A, B, and C) were selected as samples for testing from all tissue sets (when possible). For bone, the subset sites included endosteum (A), periosteum (B) and cancellous bone (C), and for the other tissue types, the three subset sites were taken different areas of the selected tissue. For each distinct site, samples were collected in duplicate to allow ribonucleic acid (RNA) extraction using two different methodologies (i.e., Trizol or RNAeasy), and all RNA extracted from the samples was then suspended in RNAlater (Thermo Fisher Scientific/ Invitrogen) and snap-frozen on dry ice.
RNA/cDNA processing
Tissue samples were thawed and immediately transferred from RNAlater preservation solution to a sterile bead beater tube containing 1 ml Trizol (Thermo Fisher Scientific/ Invitrogen) and a 7 mm stainless steel bead. Tissues were homogenized for 3–5 min. Homogenate was transferred to a new tube. RNA was extracted using either Trizol or the RNAeasy Mini Kit (Qiagen). Frozen plasma and serum samples were thawed, and RNA was extracted using the Qiagen Ultrasens Virus Kit. One mg of complementary deoxyribonucleic acid (cDNA) was synthesized from the RNA extracted from each sample using Superscript IV (Thermo Fisher Scientific/ Invitrogen).
Real-time PCR
Plasma and serum cDNA samples were tested immediately after cDNA synthesis using the Qiagen Ultrasens Virus Kit using primers and probes from Integrated DNA Technologies as described in Carroll (2022), Shaan Lakshmanappa (2021), and Deere (2021).
Tissue cDNA samples, which underwent two freeze–thaw cycles (one of which was part of the RNA assessment protocol), were run on the Quant Studio 6 Flex real-time PCR system (Qiagen) as described in Carroll (2022), Shaan Lakshmanappa (2021), and Deere (2021). All samples were tested in quadruplicate for both subgenomic RNA (sgRNA) and genomic nucleocapsid RNA (gRNA) of SARS-CoV-2, and in duplicate for the housekeeping gene Glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH), which served as the positive control. Positive controls were included for all three targets on every plate. Human control RNA was used for GAPDH positive control. The human control RNA was also screened for sgRNA and gRNA (negative for both).
Results
Results are reported across the 17 NP swab SARS-CoV-2-positive donors with donor identification designations as D1 through D17. Individual tissue sample identifiers are represented as the secondary number to the donor identification (i.e., D1.01, D1.02., etc.). Sample testing replicates for each tissue sample are identified with an alpha character (i.e., D1.01.A, D1.01.B, etc.).
Table 3 outlines the donor demographic and clinical data that were provided for the study. Twelve (12) male and five (5) female donors were evaluated; donors ranged in age from 5 to 69 years old with a median age of 47. Donor tissues were recovered between 4/17/2020 and 4/29/2021 with a median recovery date of 5/27/2020. Donations were recovered within the continental United States.
A range of circumstances and causes surrounding donor death were observed, including, but not limited to, sudden death, cardiac events, asphyxiation, and drug overdose. Cardiac histology data were limited; however, for the donors where histology data were provided, there were no indications of abnormal tissue pathology with the one exception being a donor showing contraction band necrosis/myocytolysis consistent with ischemic injury.
The results of all testing are provided in detail in Tables 5, 6, 7, 8, 9. No viral RNA was detected in any tissue or blood specimens provided.
Table 5.
Blood testing results
| Donor | Tissue classification | Tissue | Sample ID | Subset | Processing information | sgRNA | gRNA | Mean Ct-GAPDH |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| D11 | Blood component | Plasma | D11.05.A | Single sample | No Processing | Negative | Negative | 29.294 |
| D15 | Blood component | Plasma | D15.02.A | Single sample | No Processing | Negative | Negative | 28.541 |
| D15 | Blood component | Serum | D15.03.A | Single sample | No Processing | Negative | Negative | 27.248 |
| D16 | Blood component | Plasma | D16.02.A | Single sample | No Processing | Negative | Negative | 32.780 |
| D16 | Blood component | Serum | D16.03.A | Single sample | No Processing | Negative | Negative | 32.474 |
| D17 | Blood component | Plasma | D17.02.A | Single sample | No Processing | Negative | Negative | 32.904 |
This table provides blood specimen (serum or plasma) results. All samples were tested in quadruplicate for both subgenomic RNA (sgRNA) and genomic nucleocapsid RNA (gRNA) of SARS-CoV-2, and in duplicate for the housekeeping gene Glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH), which served as the positive control
Table 6.
Cardiac tissue results
| Donor | Tissue classification | Tissue | Sample ID | Subset | Processing information | sgRNA | gRNA | Mean Ct-GAPDH |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| D1 | Cardiac | Ascending aorta | D1.07.A | Replicate sample | Dissection, Antibiotics, Cryopreserved | Negative | Negative | 25.419 |
| D1 | Cardiac | Ascending aorta | D1.07.B | Replicate sample | Dissection, Antibiotics, Cryopreserved | Negative | Negative | 24.132 |
| D1 | Cardiac | Ascending aorta | D1.07.C | Replicate sample | Dissection, Antibiotics, Cryopreserved | Negative | Negative | 26.067 |
| D1 | Cardiac | Pulmonic valve | D1.08.A | Replicate sample | Dissection, Antibiotics, Cryopreserved | Negative | Negative | 23.783 |
| D1 | Cardiac | Pulmonic valve | D1.08.B | Replicate Sample | Dissection, Antibiotics, Cryopreserved | Negative | Negative | 23.797 |
| D1 | Cardiac | Pulmonic valve | D1.08.C | Replicate sample | Dissection, Antibiotics, Cryopreserved | Negative | Negative | 24.65 |
| D3 | Cardiac | Pulmonic valve | D3.01.A | Replicate sample | Dissection, Antibiotics, Cryopreserved | Negative | Negative | 19.782 |
| D3 | Cardiac | Pulmonic valve | D3.01.B | Replicate sample | Dissection, Antibiotics, Cryopreserved | Negative | Negative | 19.532 |
| D3 | Cardiac | Pulmonic valve | D3.01.C | Replicate sample | Dissection, Antibiotics, Cryopreserved | Negative | Negative | 18.766 |
| D3 | Cardiac | Pulmonary Artery (Segment) | D3.02.A | Replicate sample | Dissection, Antibiotics, Cryopreserved | Negative | Negative | 24.639 |
| D3 | Cardiac | Pulmonary Artery (Segment) | D3.02.B | Replicate sample | Dissection, Antibiotics, Cryopreserved | Negative | Negative | 24.663 |
| D3 | Cardiac | Pulmonary Artery (Segment) | D3.02.C | Replicate sample | Dissection, Antibiotics, Cryopreserved | Negative | Negative | 22.758 |
| D7 | Cardiac | Pulmonary Artery (Segment) | D7.01.A | Replicate sample | Dissection, Antibiotics, Cryopreserved | Negative | Negative | 23.99 |
| D7 | Cardiac | Pulmonary Artery (Segment) | D7.01.B | Replicate sample | Dissection, Antibiotics, Cryopreserved | Negative | Negative | 27.149 |
| D7 | Cardiac | Pulmonary Artery (Segment) | D7.01.C | Replicate sample | Dissection, Antibiotics, Cryopreserved | Negative | Negative | 26.764 |
| D8 | Cardiac | Hemi Pulmonary Artery (Right) | D8.01.A | Replicate sample | Dissection, Antibiotics, Cryopreserved | Negative | Negative | 17.41 |
| D8 | Cardiac | Hemi Pulmonary Artery (Right) | D8.01.B | Replicate sample | Dissection, Antibiotics, Cryopreserved | Negative | Negative | 21.218 |
| D8 | Cardiac | Hemi Pulmonary Artery (Right) | D8.01.C | Replicate sample | Dissection, Antibiotics, Cryopreserved | Negative | Negative | 20.404 |
| D9 | Cardiac | Aortic valve | D9.01.A | Replicate sample | Dissection, Antibiotics, Flash Frozen | Negative | Negative | 31.421 |
| D9 | Cardiac | Aortic valve | D9.01.B | Replicate sample | Dissection, Antibiotics, Flash Frozen | Negative | Negative | 31.328 |
| D9 | Cardiac | Aortic valve | D9.01.C | Replicate sample | Dissection, Antibiotics, Flash Frozen | Negative | Negative | 32.06 |
| D9 | Cardiac | Pulmonic valve | D9.02.A | Replicate sample | Dissection, Antibiotics, Flash Frozen | Negative | Negative | 34.954 |
| D9 | Cardiac | Pulmonic valve | D9.02.B | Replicate sample | Dissection, Antibiotics, Flash Frozen | Negative | Negative | 33.815 |
| D9 | Cardiac | Pulmonic valve | D9.02.C | Replicate sample | Dissection, Antibiotics, Flash Frozen | Negative | Negative | 33.59 |
| D10 | Cardiac | Aortic valve | D10.03.A | Single sample | Dissection, Antibiotics, Flash Frozen | Negative | Negative | 26.197 |
| D10 | Cardiac | Pulmonic valve | D10.04.A | Replicate sample | Dissection, Antibiotics, Flash Frozen | Negative | Negative | 33.74 |
| D10 | Cardiac | Pulmonic valve | D10.04.B | Replicate sample | Dissection, Antibiotics, Flash Frozen | Negative | Negative | 33.276 |
| D10 | Cardiac | Pulmonic valve | D10.04.C | Replicate sample | Dissection, Antibiotics, Flash Frozen | Negative | Negative | 34.716 |
| D11 | Cardiac | Aortic valve | D11.04.A | Replicate sample | Dissection, Antibiotics, Flash Frozen | Negative | Negative | 26.331 |
| D11 | Cardiac | Aortic valve | D11.04.B | Replicate sample | Dissection, Antibiotics, Flash Frozen | Negative | Negative | 26.69 |
| D11 | Cardiac | Aortic valve | D11.04.C | Replicate sample | Dissection, Antibiotics, Flash Frozen | Negative | Negative | 26.97 |
| D12 | Cardiac | Pulmonic valve | D12.01.A | Single sample | Dissection, Antibiotics, Flash Frozen | Negative | Negative | UND |
| D12 | Cardiac | Aortic valve | D12.03.A | Replicate sample | Dissection, Antibiotics, Flash Frozen | Negative | Negative | 23.434 |
| D12 | Cardiac | Aortic valve | D12.03.B | Replicate sample | Dissection, Antibiotics, Flash Frozen | Negative | Negative | 23.519 |
| D12 | Cardiac | Aortic valve | D12.03.C | Replicate sample | Dissection, Antibiotics, Flash Frozen | Negative | Negative | 32.084 |
| D13 | Cardiac | Aortic valve | D13.01.A | Replicate sample | Dissection, Antibiotics, Flash Frozen | Negative | Negative | 25.848 |
| D13 | Cardiac | Aortic valve | D13.01.B | Replicate sample | Dissection, Antibiotics, Flash Frozen | Negative | Negative | 26.596 |
| D13 | Cardiac | Aortic valve | D13.01.C | Replicate sample | Dissection, Antibiotics, Flash Frozen | Negative | Negative | 26.523 |
| D13 | Cardiac | Pulmonic valve | D13.02.A | Replicate sample | Dissection, Antibiotics, Flash Frozen | Negative | Negative | 25.703 |
| D13 | Cardiac | Pulmonic valve | D13.02.B | Replicate sample | Dissection, Antibiotics, Flash Frozen | Negative | Negative | 26.293 |
| D13 | Cardiac | Pulmonic valve | D13.02.C | Replicate Sample | Dissection, Antibiotics, Flash Frozen | Negative | Negative | 27.497 |
| D14 | Cardiac | Pulmonic valve | D14.01.A | Replicate Sample | Dissection, Antibiotics, Flash Frozen | Negative | Negative | 32.882 |
| D14 | Cardiac | Pulmonic valve | D14.01.B | Replicate Sample | Dissection, Antibiotics, Flash Frozen | Negative | Negative | 32.753 |
| D14 | Cardiac | Pulmonic valve | D14.01.C | Replicate sample | Dissection, Antibiotics, Flash Frozen | Negative | Negative | 32.25 |
| D14 | Cardiac | Aortic valve | D14.02.A | Replicate sample | Dissection, Antibiotics, Flash Frozen | Negative | Negative | 28.36 |
| D14 | Cardiac | Aortic valve | D14.02.B | Replicate sample | Dissection, Antibiotics, Flash Frozen | Negative | Negative | 28.772 |
| D14 | Cardiac | Aortic valve | D14.02.C | Replicate sample | Dissection, Antibiotics, Flash Frozen | Negative | Negative | 28.257 |
This table provides cardiac tissue results. All samples were tested in quadruplicate for both subgenomic RNA (sgRNA) and genomic nucleocapsid RNA (gRNA) of SARS-CoV-2, and in duplicate for the housekeeping gene Glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH), which served as the positive control. UND indicates an undetected GAPDH result
Table 7.
Vascular tissue results
| Donor | Tissue classification | Tissue | Sample ID | Subset | Processing information | sgRNA | gRNA | Mean Ct-GAPDH |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| D1 | Vascular | Femoral vein | D1.01.A | Replicate sample | Dissection, Antibiotics, Cryopreserved | Negative | Negative | 22.949 |
| D1 | Vascular | Femoral vein | D1.01.B | Replicate sample | Dissection, Antibiotics, Cryopreserved | Negative | Negative | 22.77 |
| D1 | Vascular | Femoral vein | D1.01.C | Replicate sample | Dissection, Antibiotics, Cryopreserved | Negative | Negative | 24.587 |
| D1 | Vascular | Femoral artery | D1.02.A | Replicate sample | Dissection, Antibiotics, Cryopreserved | Negative | Negative | 24.451 |
| D1 | Vascular | Femoral artery | D1.02.B | Replicate sample | Dissection, Antibiotics, Cryopreserved | Negative | Negative | 23.93 |
| D1 | Vascular | Femoral artery | D1.02.C | Replicate sample | Dissection, Antibiotics, Cryopreserved | Negative | Negative | 23.788 |
| D1 | Vascular | Femoral vein | D1.03.A | Replicate sample | Dissection, Antibiotics, Cryopreserved | Negative | Negative | 17.776 |
| D1 | Vascular | Femoral vein | D1.03.B | Replicate sample | Dissection, Antibiotics, Cryopreserved | Negative | Negative | 17.863 |
| D1 | Vascular | Femoral vein | D1.03.C | Replicate sample | Dissection, Antibiotics, Cryopreserved | Negative | Negative | 17.4 |
| D1 | Vascular | Femoral artery | D1.04.A | Replicate sample | Dissection, Antibiotics, Cryopreserved | Negative | Negative | 18.99 |
| D1 | Vascular | Femoral artery | D1.04.B | Replicate sample | Dissection, Antibiotics, Cryopreserved | Negative | Negative | 19.868 |
| D1 | Vascular | Femoral artery | D1.04.C | Replicate sample | Dissection, Antibiotics, Cryopreserved | Negative | Negative | 18.969 |
| D1 | Vascular | Saphenous vein | D1.05.A | Replicate sample | Dissection, Antibiotics, Cryopreserved | Negative | Negative | 17.306 |
| D1 | Vascular | Saphenous vein | D1.05.B | Replicate sample | Dissection, Antibiotics, Cryopreserved | Negative | Negative | 17.677 |
| D1 | Vascular | Saphenous vein | D1.05.C | Replicate sample | Dissection, Antibiotics, Cryopreserved | Negative | Negative | 18.172 |
| D1 | Vascular | Aortoiliac artery | D1.06.A | Replicate sample | Dissection, Antibiotics, Cryopreserved | Negative | Negative | 21.214 |
| D1 | Vascular | Aortoiliac artery | D1.06.B | Replicate sample | Dissection, Antibiotics, Cryopreserved | Negative | Negative | 18.576 |
| D1 | Vascular | Aortoiliac artery | D1.06.C | Replicate sample | Dissection, Antibiotics, Cryopreserved | Negative | Negative | 20.055 |
| D3 | Vascular | Saphenous vein | D3.03.A | Replicate sample | Dissection, Antibiotics, Cryopreserved | Negative | Negative | 23.529 |
| D3 | Vascular | Saphenous vein | D3.03.B | Replicate sample | Dissection, Antibiotics, Cryopreserved | Negative | Negative | 23.215 |
| D3 | Vascular | Saphenous vein | D3.03.C | Replicate sample | Dissection, Antibiotics, Cryopreserved | Negative | Negative | 21.323 |
| D8 | Vascular | Femoral vein | D8.01.A | Replicate sample | Dissection, Antibiotics, Cryopreserved | Negative | Negative | 18.379 |
| D8 | Vascular | Femoral vein | D8.01.B | Replicate sample | Dissection, Antibiotics, Cryopreserved | Negative | Negative | 20.828 |
| D8 | Vascular | Femoral vein | D8.01.C | Replicate sample | Dissection, Antibiotics, Cryopreserved | Negative | Negative | 25.254 |
| D8 | Vascular | Femoral vein | D8.03.A | Replicate sample | Dissection, Antibiotics, Cryopreserved | Negative | Negative | 18.597 |
| D8 | Vascular | Femoral vein | D8.03.B | Replicate sample | Dissection, Antibiotics, Cryopreserved | Negative | Negative | 19.127 |
| D8 | Vascular | Femoral vein | D8.03.C | Replicate sample | Dissection, Antibiotics, Cryopreserved | Negative | Negative | 18.467 |
| D10 | Vascular | Saphenous vein | D10.01.A | Replicate sample | Dissection, Antibiotics, Flash Frozen | Negative | Negative | 22.387 |
| D10 | Vascular | Saphenous vein | D10.01.B | Replicate sample | Dissection, Antibiotics, Flash Frozen | Negative | Negative | 22.695 |
| D10 | Vascular | Saphenous vein | D10.01.C | Replicate sample | Dissection, Antibiotics, Flash Frozen | Negative | Negative | 21.536 |
| D10 | Vascular | Femoral artery | D10.02.A | Replicate sample | Dissection, Antibiotics, Flash Frozen | Negative | Negative | UND |
| D10 | Vascular | Femoral artery | D10.02.B | Replicate sample | Dissection, Antibiotics, Flash Frozen | Negative | Negative | 31.228 |
| D10 | Vascular | Femoral artery | D10.02.C | Replicate sample | Dissection, Antibiotics, Flash Frozen | Negative | Negative | 27.105 |
| D11 | Vascular | Aortoiliac artery | D11.01.A | Replicate sample | Dissection, Antibiotics, Flash Frozen | Negative | Negative | 24.188 |
| D11 | Vascular | Aortoiliac Artery | D11.01.B | Replicate sample | Dissection, Antibiotics, Flash Frozen | Negative | Negative | 24.988 |
| D11 | Vascular | Aortoiliac Artery | D11.01.C | Replicate sample | Dissection, Antibiotics, Flash Frozen | Negative | Negative | 25.912 |
| D11 | Vascular | Saphenous vein | D11.02.A | Replicate sample | Dissection, Antibiotics, Flash Frozen | Negative | Negative | 24.626 |
| D11 | Vascular | Saphenous vein | D11.02.B | Replicate sample | Dissection, Antibiotics, Flash Frozen | Negative | Negative | 23.023 |
| D11 | Vascular | Saphenous vein | D11.02.C | Replicate sample | Dissection, Antibiotics, Flash Frozen | Negative | Negative | 22.853 |
| D11 | Vascular | Femoral artery | D11.03.A | Replicate sample | Dissection, Antibiotics, Flash Frozen | Negative | Negative | 26.37 |
| D11 | Vascular | Femoral artery | D11.03.B | Replicate sample | Dissection, Antibiotics, Flash Frozen | Negative | Negative | 27.438 |
| D11 | Vascular | Femoral artery | D11.03.C | Replicate sample | Dissection, Antibiotics, Flash Frozen | Negative | Negative | 26.736 |
| D12 | Vascular | Saphenous vein | D12.02.A | Replicate sample | Dissection, Antibiotics, Flash Frozen | Negative | Negative | 27.649 |
| D12 | Vascular | Saphenous vein | D12.02.B | Replicate sample | Dissection, Antibiotics, Flash Frozen | Negative | Negative | UND |
| D12 | Vascular | Saphenous vein | D12.02.C | Replicate sample | Dissection, Antibiotics, Flash Frozen | Negative | Negative | 26.856 |
This table provides vascular tissue results. All samples were tested in quadruplicate for both subgenomic RNA (sgRNA) and genomic nucleocapsid RNA (gRNA) of SARS-CoV-2, and in duplicate for the housekeeping gene Glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH), which served as the positive control. UND indicates an undetected GAPDH result
Table 8.
Musculoskeletal tissue results
| Donor | Tissue classification | Tissue | Sample ID | Subset | Processing information | sgN | wtN | Mean Ct-GAPDH |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| D2 | Musculoskeletal | Femur (Left) | D2.01.A | Endosteum | No processing | Negative | Negative | 28.061 |
| D2 | Musculoskeletal | Femur (Left) | D2.01.B | Periosteum | No processing | Negative | Negative | 28.223 |
| D2 | Musculoskeletal | Femur (Left) | D2.01.C | Cancellous Bone | No processing | Negative | Negative | 24.171 |
| D2 | Musculoskeletal | Gracilis Tendon (Left) | D2.02.A | Replicate sample | No processing | Negative | Negative | 29.544 |
| D2 | Musculoskeletal | Gracilis Tendon (Left) | D2.02.B | Replicate sample | No processing | Negative | Negative | 29.19 |
| D2 | Musculoskeletal | Gracilis Tendon (Left) | D2.02.C | Replicate sample | No processing | Negative | Negative | 29.51 |
| D2 | Musculoskeletal | Tibia (Left) | D2.05.A | Endosteum | No Processing | Negative | Negative | 28.998 |
| D2 | Musculoskeletal | Tibia (Left) | D2.05.B | Periosteum | No processing | Negative | Negative | 24.958 |
| D2 | Musculoskeletal | Tibia (Left) | D2.05.C | Cancellous bone | No processing | Negative | Negative | 29.583 |
| D4 | Musculoskeletal | Semitendinosus Tendon (Right) | D4.01.A | Replicate sample | No processing | Negative | Negative | 29.263 |
| D4 | Musculoskeletal | Semitendinosus Tendon (Right) | D4.01.B | Replicate sample | No processing | Negative | Negative | 28.705 |
| D4 | Musculoskeletal | Semitendinosus Tendon (Right) | D4.01.C | Replicate sample | No processing | Negative | Negative | 30.03 |
| D4 | Musculoskeletal | Tibia (Left) | D4.02.A | Endosteum | No processing | Negative | Negative | 30.557 |
| D4 | Musculoskeletal | Tibia (Left) | D4.02.B | Periosteum | No processing | Negative | Negative | 29.521 |
| D4 | Musculoskeletal | Tibia (Left) | D4.02.C | Cancellous bone | No processing | Negative | Negative | 23.819 |
| D4 | Musculoskeletal | Femur (Left) | D4.03.A | Endosteum | No processing | Negative | Negative | 26.66 |
| D4 | Musculoskeletal | Femur (Left) | D4.03.B | Periosteum | No processing | Negative | Negative | 30.227 |
| D4 | Musculoskeletal | Femur (Left) | D4.03.C | Cancellous bone | No processing | Negative | Negative | 23.393 |
| D5 | Musculoskeletal | Semitendinosus Tendon (Right) | D5.01.A | Replicate sample | No processing | Negative | Negative | 30.722 |
| D5 | Musculoskeletal | Semitendinosus Tendon (Right) | D5.01.B | Replicate sample | No processing | Negative | Negative | 28.714 |
| D5 | Musculoskeletal | Semitendinosus Tendon (Right) | D5.01.C | Replicate sample | No processing | Negative | Negative | 29.516 |
| D5 | Musculoskeletal | Tibia (Right) | D5.02.A | Endosteum | No processing | Negative | Negative | 22.375 |
| D5 | Musculoskeletal | Tibia (Right) | D5.02.B | Periosteum | No processing | Negative | Negative | 21.736 |
| D5 | Musculoskeletal | Tibia (Right) | D5.02.C | Cancellous bone | No processing | Negative | Negative | 22.038 |
| D6 | Musculoskeletal | Achilles Tendon (Right) | D6.01.A | Replicate sample | No processing | Negative | Negative | 29.536 |
| D6 | Musculoskeletal | Achilles Tendon (Right) | D6.01.B | Replicate sample | No processing | Negative | Negative | 29.911 |
| D6 | Musculoskeletal | Achilles Tendon (Right) | D6.01.C | Replicate sample | No processing | Negative | Negative | 24.643 |
| D6 | Musculoskeletal | Humerus (Right) | D6.02.A | Endosteum | No processing | Negative | Negative | 24.452 |
| D6 | Musculoskeletal | Humerus (Right) | D6.02.B | Periosteum | No processing | Negative | Negative | 27.349 |
| D6 | Musculoskeletal | Humerus (Right) | D6.02.C | Cancellous bone | No processing | Negative | Negative | 21.908 |
| D15 | Musculoskeletal | Fascia Lata | D15.01.A | Replicate sample | Dissection, saline rinse | Negative | Negative | 27.013 |
| D15 | Musculoskeletal | Fascia Lata | D15.01.B | Replicate sample | Dissection, Saline Rinse | Negative | Negative | 26.887 |
| D15 | Musculoskeletal | Fascia Lata | D15.01.C | Replicate sample | Dissection, saline rinse | Negative | Negative | 29.475 |
| D16 | Musculoskeletal | Fascia Lata | D16.01.A | Replicate sample | Dissection, saline rinse | Negative | Negative | 27.635 |
| D16 | Musculoskeletal | Fascia Lata | D16.01.B | Replicate sample | Dissection, Saline Rinse | Negative | Negative | 29.245 |
| D16 | Musculoskeletal | Fascia Lata | D16.01.C | Replicate sample | dissection, saline rinse | Negative | Negative | 28.883 |
| D17 | Musculoskeletal | Fascia Lata | D17.01.A | Replicate sample | Dissection, saline rinse | Negative | Negative | 29.467 |
| D17 | Musculoskeletal | Fascia Lata | D17.01.B | Replicate sample | Dissection, saline rinse | Negative | Negative | 27.725 |
| D17 | Musculoskeletal | Fascia Lata | D17.01.C | Replicate sample | Dissection, saline rinse | Negative | Negative | 28.083 |
This table provides musculoskeletal tissue results. All samples were tested in quadruplicate for both subgenomic RNA (sgRNA) and genomic nucleocapsid RNA (gRNA) of SARS-CoV-2, and in duplicate for the housekeeping gene Glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH), which served as the positive control
Table 9.
Dermis tissue results
| Donor | Tissue classification | Tissue | Sample ID | Subset | Processing information | sgRNA | gRNA | Mean Ct-GAPDH |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| D2 | Dermis | Dermis (Posterior) | D2.03.A | Replicate sample | No processing | Negative | Negative | 24.045 |
| D2 | Dermis | Dermis (Posterior) | D2.03.B | Replicate sample | No processing | Negative | Negative | 24.972 |
| D2 | Dermis | Dermis (Posterior) | D2.03.C | Replicate sample | No processing | Negative | Negative | 24.736 |
| D2 | Dermis | Dermis (Anterior) | D2.04.A | Replicate sample | No Processing | Negative | Negative | 24.859 |
| D2 | Dermis | Dermis (Anterior) | D2.04.A | Replicate sample | No processing | Negative | Negative | 24.133 |
| D2 | Dermis | Dermis (Anterior) | D2.04.C | Replicate sample | No processing | Negative | Negative | 24.514 |
This table provides dermis results. All samples were tested in quadruplicate for both subgenomic RNA (sgRNA) and genomic nucleocapsid RNA (gRNA) of SARS-CoV-2, and in duplicate for the housekeeping gene Glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH), which served as the positive control
Testing results for cadaveric (post cessation of heartbeat) blood available for D11 (plasma only) and D15–D17 (plasma and serum) are outlined in Table 5 and indicate negative real-time PCR cycle threshold (Ct) results for nucleocapsid sgRNA and gRNA. The remaining donors did not have cadaveric blood samples available for testing in this study.
Cardiac and vascular tissue type RNA target results are included in Tables 6 and 7. Cardiac tissues, including pulmonic and aortic valves, ascending aorta, and pulmonary arteries were tested from ten (10) donors. Vascular tissues, femoral veins and arteries, saphenous veins, and aortoiliac arteries, were tested from six (6) donors. Cardiac tissue was negative for sgRNA and gRNA using real-time PCR, while the mean GAPDH Ct values ranged from 17.41 to 34.954. Vascular tissue sgRNA and gRNA targets were negative using real-time PCR with mean Ct-GAPDH values ranging from 17.4 to 27.736.
Table 8 outlines musculoskeletal (MS) tissue RNA target results. Seven (7) donors tested both bone and soft tissues, femur, tibia, humerus, gracilis tendon, semitendinosus tendon, and fascia lata. Viral RNA targets (sgRNA and gRNA) were negative for all MS tissue types. Mean Ct-GAPDH values ranged from 21.908 to 30.722.
Table 9 outlines dermis tissue RNA target results from one (1) donor where this tissue type was procured. Dermis tissue sgRNA and gRNA targets were negative using real-time PCR. Mean Ct-GADPH values ranged between 24.045 and 24.972.
Discussion
This study tested human tissues, intended for transplantation, for evidence of SARS-CoV-2. There was a focus on oversampling for tissue types that tend to be minimally processed and tropic for the virus, as those have been the tissue types most likely to transmit infection in past outbreaks involving a variety of pathogens (Tugwell 2005; CDC 2011; Schwartz 2022; Lu 2018; Greenwald 2012). We did not detect SARS-CoV-2 sgRNA or gRNA in any of the samples tested. However, we did detect GAPDH mRNA in all samples, except for one replicate of each of two samples of cardiovascular cissue, indicating that the RNA extraction and PCR methods used were valid. Further, the level of GAPDH in a sample was consistent with the cellularity of that sample. Thus, the samples that contained very few cells, tendon, heart valves, had lower levels of GAPDH (higher CT values) than more cellular samples from the dermis and vasculature. We quantified sgRNA because SARS-CoV-2 sgRNA is a good surrogate marker of infectivity (Santos Bravo 2022).
Many early exploratory studies detected SARS-CoV-2 by various testing methods in multiple organs and biospecimens, only few of which were designed to determine whether live virus was present (Bradley 2020; Best 2021; Gaussen 2021; Penfield 2020; Trypsteen 2020). While the ACE-2 receptor is required for cellular infection, the extent to which cells with ACE-2 receptors become infected with SARS-CoV-2 remains unclear. Furthermore, it is not clear whether end-organ damage observed is a result of direct viral activity or if it was immune-mediated, while emerging evidence indicates much of the observed damage outside of the respiratory system is likely immune-mediated (Merad 2022).
In October 2020, Trypsteen and colleagues reviewed available data regarding SARS-CoV-2 tropism. At that time, only respiratory and GI tract samples (mostly stool) demonstrated evidence that viral particles from a biopsy were capable of reinfecting target cells in-vitro. For cardiac tissue, there was discussion of the high level of acute cardiac injury that occurred in individuals hospitalized in the ICU with COVID-19, and the need to further investigate whether this was due to direct viral effects versus immune-mediated damage. Furthermore, some studies detected viral particles in or around cardiac tissue, but not within the myocytes. They concluded that the evidence at that time suggested immune mediated injury is more likely the culprit for the observed cardiac damage, but additional studies would be required.
In July 2021, Gaussen and colleagues reviewed literature for evidence of SARS-CoV-2 transmissibility via cell, tissue, and organ transplantation. Most studies included in this review article looked for evidence of the virus (e.g., NAT testing, direct visualization) while only few performed viral infectivity assays. As presented in the Gaussen review article, the evidence was strong for SARS-CoV-2 presence in lungs and the respiratory tract, both by NAT testing and some viral infectivity assays. Kidneys had some intermittent positive NAT results amongst tissues obtained from individuals who died of COVID-19, while only one study had found evidence of a small subset of kidneys having evidence of viral infectivity (Braun 2020). Ocular tissue testing largely did not have positive NAT in SARS-CoV-2-infected individuals, but one cited study showed NAT positivity and positive viral infectivity in an individual with COVID and bilateral conjunctivitis at the time of death (Colavita 2020). Studies including heart tissue demonstrated mostly histopathological evidence of damage with only rare instances of myocarditis. There was one cited study where testing of heart tissue from 39 individuals deceased from COVID demonstrated PCR positive results in 24/39 individuals and among those, 5 individuals with the highest viral load also demonstrated viral replication determined by cDNA synthesis (Lindner 2020).
Our study did not include donations of birth tissue (e.g., placenta, amniotic membrane) or reproductive tissue (i.e., semen or oocytes). Best and colleagues evaluated the semen of men who were diagnosed with acute SARS-CoV- 2 by RT-PCR testing of NP swab specimens. Among the 30 semen samples provided by subjects during the 11–64 days after testing positive for SARS-CoV-2 infection, 16 semen samples were tested for SARS-CoV-2 by RT-PCR (in addition to the semen analysis performed on all samples) and found to be negative. Penfeld et al. (2020) reported a study of 32 pregnant patients who delivered at the time of being diagnosed with COVID-19 infection. They obtained placental swabs of 11 of those patients, and found 3 of those 11 placental swabs to be positive for SARS-CoV-2 by RT-PCR—the positive placental specimens were found in women with severe COVID disease at the time of delivery. Follow-up studies to verify whether positive results on placenta represent viable virus should be performed.
To date, there has been no known transmission via tissue or ocular transplantation (FDA 2021) or blood transfusion (FDA 2022), and the only verified organ transmission was via lung transplantation (Kaul et al. 2021). In a study testing blood specimens from deceased tissue donors without COVID-19 symptoms, the rate of SARS-CoV-2 NAT-positive results (about 1 in 1000) was found, while infectivity data are unavailable (Greenwald 2022). Considering that, through Spring 2022, most tissue establishments have excluded donors with positive NP swab results for SARS-CoV-2, the true risk of transmission is difficult to measure. Although no transmission events have been reported through human tissue, since there are recognized challenges of identifying donor-derived transmission amongst allograft recipients (Greenwald 2012), the actual risk of transmission via tissues cannot be reliably confirmed by absence of transmission alone.
In our study, amongst the 17 donors who died of causes not known to be related to COVID but were found to have positive NP swabs, 45 tissue samples and 6 blood samples were tested by two different methodologies and no SARS-CoV-2 RNA was detected. Follow-up viral culture to determine infectivity was therefore not possible. It is notable that in the few studies where replication-competent SARS-CoV-2 was detected in non-respiratory organs and tissues, the virus was found only intermittently and in tissues or organs from individuals who were known to have died of COVID-19 infection (Gaussen 2021). Available evidence therefore indicates that asymptomatic tissue donors, regardless of their SARS-CoV-2 NP swab test results, are unlikely to have SARS-CoV-2 present in their tissues, much less a replication-competent virus. While it is notable that among the 17 donors in our study, 10 died suddenly of unknown causes (often attributed to “cardiac death” or “sudden cardiac death”), and another donor died of ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI), there is not enough information available to draw any conclusions about the potential role of undiagnosed COVID-19, including hypercoagulability, in the donor deaths.
Our study has limitations
First, our study was not a random sample of donors who tested positive by NP swabs for SARS-CoV-2, but rather a convenience sample of donors provided by participating US tissue processors in which tissues were recovered, available, and met acceptability criteria for recovery. As such, included donors were most likely not severely ill with COVID-19, and perhaps therefore less likely to have disseminated infection with the virus to involve recovered tissues. No viral RNA was detected in blood from donors tested in this study, but this subsample and the overall study sample size were small. Second, the donor nasopharyngeal swab testing was performed using assays under Emergency Use Authorization since there were no available FDA-cleared or approved test kits, see Table 10 for information on assay performance characteristics. Third, tissue storage (Auer et al. 2014; Bao 2013), freeze thaw cycles (Dzung 2021; Botling 2009), and any minimal processing performed (e.g., rinsing) could have impacted results (Schilling-Loeffler 2022; Nogueira 2022). The bone and tendon were not rinsed prior to testing and thus represent a worst case for viral load. The dermis, heart, and vascular tissue were rinsed either in transport solution (all) or during processing (heart and veins). As the virus is an intracellular pathogen, it will not be passively rinsed off the tissue; however, cells such as endothelium that may contain virus could be dislodged. These rinses are representative of processing for human tissues and thus representative of the potential viral load after rinsing. Finally, the effect of different SARS-CoV-2 variants circulating during the study, with possible differences in virulence and tropism, are unknown since genotyping was not available.
Table 10.
Performance characteristics of EUA assays used in testing donor NP specimens
| Assay (manufacturer) | Sample type | Sensitivity | Specificity | Limit of detection (LOD)1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BioGX2 SARS-CoV-2 (Becton, Dickinson & Company) | NP Swab | 19/19a positive at ~ 1–2 × LOD; 10/10 at ~ 3–5 × LOD | 30/30 negative | 40 genome equivalents (GE)/mL |
| Viracor3 SARS-CoV-2 (Viracor Eurofins Clinical Diagnostics) | NP Swab | 20/20 positive at ~ 2 × LOD | 30/30 negative | 73 copies/mL |
| Procleix4 SARS-CoV-2 (Grifols) | NP Swab | Positive Percent Agreement: 30/30; 100% (95% CI: 88.65–100.00%)* | Negative Percent Agreement: 30/30; 100% (95% CI: 88.65–100.00%)* | 60 copies/mL |
aDuring screening one retrospective nasopharyngeal swab clinical sample resulted in an UND for N1 and as a result was removed from data analysis
*Two-sided 95% score confidence intervals
1Lowest concentration of genomic RNA from SARS-CoV-2 that can be reproducibly distinguished from negative samples ≥ 95% of the time
2EUA data available via FDA at https://www.fda.gov/medical-devices/emergency-use-authorizations-medical-devices/historical-information-about-device-emergency-use-authorizations and https://www.fda.gov/media/136653/download
3EUA data available via FDA at https://www.fda.gov/media/143069/download?attachment
4EUA data available via FDA at https://www.fda.gov/media/145938/download and additional information provided in Sauleda et al. (2022) and Bakkour (2021)
Table 10 provides performance information available at the time of testing for EUA assays used to test donor nasopharyngeal swabs for SARS-CoV-2.
In conclusion, this study did not detect SARS-CoV-2 in MS, vascular, and skin types of human tissue collected from donors with positive NP swabs. There were no data collected on birth or reproductive tissue. The preponderance of evidence, from this research data and others, is reassuring that the likelihood of transmission of SARS-CoV-2 through the human tissue studied is likely low.
Data availability statement
All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in this published article.
Acknowledgements
This study was funded by the American Association of Tissue Banks, with a special thanks to Beverly Bliss for providing expertise, perspective, and management. This study could not have happened without the participating tissue establishments: Artivion (formerly Cryolife), LifeNet Health, MTF Biologics, Vivex, and Allosource.
Declarations
Conflict of interest
Authors are required to disclose financial or non-financial interests that are directly or indirectly related to the work submitted for publication. Please refer to “Competing Interests and Funding” below for more information on how to complete this section.
Footnotes
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
References
- American Association of Tissue Banks. Bulletin No.20–3 of January 31, 2020, Bulletin No.20–7 of February 25, 2020, Bulletin No.20–8 of March 4, 2020, Bulletin No.20–9 of March 14, 2020, and Bulletin No.20–10 of April 2, 2020
- Auer H, Mobley JA, Ayers LW, Bowen J, Chuaqui RF, Johnson LA, Livolsi VA, Lubensky IA, McGarvey D, Monovich LC, Moskaluk CA, Rumpel CA, Sexton KC, Washington MK, Wiles KR, Grizzle WE, Ramirez NC. The effects of frozen tissue storage conditions on the integrity of RNA and protein. Biotech Histochem. 2014;89(7):518–528. doi: 10.3109/10520295.2014.904927. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Bakkour S, Saá P, Groves JA, et al. Minipool testing for SARS-CoV-2 RNA in United States blood donors. Transfusion. 2021;61(8):2384–2391. doi: 10.1111/trf.16511. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Bao WG, Zhang X, Zhang JG, Zhou WJ, Bi TN, Wang JC, Yan WH, Lin A. Biobanking of fresh-frozen human colon tissues: impact of tissue ex-vivo ischemia times and storage periods on RNA quality. Ann Surg Oncol. 2013;20(5):1737–1744. doi: 10.1245/s10434-012-2440-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Best JC, Kuchakulla M, Khodamoradi K, Lima TFN, Frech FS, Achua J, Rosete O, Mora B, Arora H, Ibrahim E, Ramasamy R. Evaluation of SARS-CoV-2 in human semen and effect on total sperm number: a prospective observational study. World J Mens Health. 2021;39(3):489–495. doi: 10.5534/wjmh.200192. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Beyerstedt S, Casaro EB, Rangel EB. COVID-19: angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE2) expression and tissue susceptibility to SARS-CoV-2 infection. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2021;40(5):905–919. doi: 10.1007/s10096-020-04138-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lacy JM, Williams T, Yarid N. Histopathology and ultrastructural findings of fatal COVID-19 infections. Lancet. 2020;396(10247):320–332. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)31305-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Botling J, Edlund K, Segersten U, Tahmasebpoor S, Engström M, Sundström M, Malmström PU, Micke P. Impact of thawing on RNA integrity and gene expression analysis in fresh frozen tissue. Diagn Mol Pathol. 2009;18(1):44–52. doi: 10.1097/PDM.0b013e3181857e92. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Braun F, Lütgehetmann M, Pfefferle S, Wong MN, Carsten A, Lindenmeyer MT, Nörz D, Heinrich F, Meißner K, Wichmann D, Kluge S, Gross O, Pueschel K, Schröder AS, Edler C, Aepfelbacher M, Puelles VG, Huber TB. SARS-CoV-2 renal tropism associates with acute kidney injury. Lancet. 2020;396(10251):597–598. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)31759-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Carroll T, Fox D, van Doremalen N, Ball E, Morris MK, et al. The B1.427/1.429 (epsilon) SARS-CoV-2 variants are more virulent than ancestral B.1 (614G) in Syrian hamsters. PLoS Pathog. 2022;18(2):1009914. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1009914. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Transmission of hepatitis C virus through transplanted organs and tissue—Kentucky and Massachusetts, 2011. Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2011;60(5):1697–1700. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Colavita F, Lapa D, Carletti F, Lalle E, Bordi L, Marsella P, Nicastri E, Bevilacqua N, Giancola ML, Corpolongo A, Ippolito G, Capobianchi MR, Castilletti C. SARS-CoV-2 isolation from ocular secretions of a patient with COVID-19 in Italy with prolonged Viral RNA detection. Ann Intern Med. 2020;173(3):242–243. doi: 10.7326/M20-1176. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Deere JD, Carroll TD, Dutra J, Fritts L, Sammak RL, Yee JL, Olstad KJ, Reader JR, Kistler A, Kamm J, Di Germanio C, Shaan Lakshmanappa Y, Elizaldi SR, Roh JW, Simmons G, Watanabe J, Pollard RE, Usachenko J, Immareddy R, Schmidt BA, O'Connor SL, DeRisi J, Busch MP, Iyer SS, Van Rompay KKA, Hartigan-O'Connor DJ, Miller CJ. SARS-CoV-2 infection of rhesus macaques treated early with human COVID-19 convalescent plasma. Microbiol Spectr. 2021;9(3):e0139721. doi: 10.1128/Spectrum.01397-21. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Dzung A, Cheng PF, Stoffel C, Tastanova A, Turko P, Levesque MP, Bosshard PP. Prolonged unfrozen storage and repeated freeze-thawing of SARS-CoV-2 patient samples have minor effects on SARS-CoV-2 detectability by RT-PCR. J Mol Diagn. 2021;23(6):691–697. doi: 10.1016/j.jmoldx.2021.03.003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- FDA (2021) Information for human cell, tissue, or cellular or tissue-based product (HCT/P) establishments regarding the COVID-19 pandemic
- FDA (2022) Updated information for blood establishments regarding the COVID-19 pandemic and blood donation
- Gaussen A, Hornby L, Rockl G, et al. Evidence of SARS-CoV-2 infection in cells, tissues, and organs and the risk of transmission through transplantation. Transplantation. 2021;105(7):1405–1422. doi: 10.1097/TP.0000000000003744. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Goer A, Blanchard LS, Van Belkum A, Loftus KJ, Armstrong TP, Gatermann SG, Shortridge D, Olson BJ, Meece JK, Fritsche TR, Pompilio M, Halimi D, Franceschi C. Multicenter evaluation of the novel ETEST fosfomycin for antimicrobial susceptibility testing of Enterobacterales, Enterococcus faecalis, and Staphylococcus species. J Clin Microbiol. 2022;60(7):e0002122. doi: 10.1128/jcm.00021-22. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Greenwald MA, Kuehnert MJ, Fishman JA. Infectious disease transmission during organ and tissue transplantation. Emerg Infect Dis. 2012;18(8):e1. doi: 10.3201/eid1808.120277. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Greenwald MA, Grebe E, Green V, Jones AL, Linnen JM, Williamson P, Busch MP, Kuehnert MJ. Low rate of detection of SARS-CoV-2 RNA in deceased tissue donors. Cell Tissue Bank. 2022;9:1–12. doi: 10.1007/s10561-022-10054-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kaul DR, Valesano AL, Petrie JG, et al. Donor to recipient transmission of SARS-CoV-2 by lung transplantation despite negative donor upper respiratory tract testing. Am J Transplant. 2021;21(8):2885–2889. doi: 10.1111/ajt.16532. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Koval CE, Poggio ED, Lin YC, Kerr H, Eltemamy M, Wee A. Early success transplanting kidneys from donors with new SARS-CoV-2 RNA positivity: a report of 10 cases. Am J Transplant. 2021 doi: 10.1111/ajt.16765. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lindner D, Fitzek A, Bräuninger H, Aleshcheva G, Edler C, Meissner K, Scherschel K, Kirchhof P, Escher F, Schultheiss HP, Blankenberg S, Püschel K, Westermann D. Association of cardiac infection with SARS-CoV-2 in confirmed COVID-19 autopsy cases. JAMA Cardiol. 2020;5(11):1281–1285. doi: 10.1001/jamacardio.2020.3551.PMID:32730555;PMCID:PMC7385672. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lu XX, Zhu WY, Wu GZ. Rabies virus transmission via solid organs or tissue allotransplantation. Infect Dis Poverty. 2018;7:82. doi: 10.1186/s40249-018-0467-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Merad M, Blish CA, Sallusto F, Iwasaki A. The immunology and immunopathology of COVID-19. Science. 2022;375(6585):1122–1127. doi: 10.1126/science.abm8108. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Nogueira CL, Boegel SJ, Shukla M, Ngo W, Jones L, Aucoin MG. The impact of a rub and rinse regimen on removal of human coronaviruses from contemporary contact lens materials. Cont Lens Anterior Eye. 2022;45(6):101719. doi: 10.1016/j.clae.2022.101719. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Penfield CA, Brubaker SG, Limaye MA, Lighter J, Ratner AJ, Thomas KM, Meyer JA, Roman AS. Detection of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 in placental and fetal membrane samples. Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM. 2020;2(3):100133. doi: 10.1016/j.ajogmf.2020.100133s. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Sauleda S, Palacios L, Brès V, Piñana M, Alonso-Hernandez L, Bes M, Piron M, Entrena E, Minguez-Micolau AM, Marimón JM, Gurrola A, Soria G, Puig L, Antón A, Pumarola T, Linnen JM. Clinical evaluation of the Procleix SARS-CoV-2 assay, a sensitive, high-throughput test that runs on an automated system. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 2022;102(1):115560. doi: 10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2021.115560. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Santos Bravo M, Berengua C, Marín P, Esteban M, Rodriguez C, Del Cuerpo M, Miró E, Cuesta G, Mosquera M, Sánchez-Palomino S, Vila J, Rabella N, Marcos MÁ. Viral culture confirmed SARS-CoV-2 subgenomic RNA value as a good surrogate marker of infectivity. J Clin Microbiol. 2022;60(1):e0160921. doi: 10.1128/JCM.01609-21. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Schilling-Loeffler K, Falkenhagen A, Johne R. Coronaviruses are stable on glass, but are eliminated by manual dishwashing procedures. Food Microbiol. 2022;106:104036. doi: 10.1016/j.fm.2022.104036. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Schwartz NG, Hernandez-Romieu AC, Annambhotla P, Filardo TD, Althomsons SP, Free RJ, Li R, Wyatt Wilson W, Deutsch-Feldman M, Drees M, Hanlin E, White K, Lehman KA, Thacker TC, Brubaker SA, Clark B, Basavaraju SV, Benowitz I, Burton Glowicz J, Cowan LS, Starks AM, Bamrah Morris S, LoBue P, Stewart RJ, Wortham JM, Haddad MB, Bone Allograft Tuberculosis Investigators Nationwide tuberculosis outbreak in the USA linked to a bone graft product: an outbreak report. Lancet Infect Dis. 2022 doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(22)00425-X. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Shaan Lakshmanappa Y, Elizaldi SR, Roh JW, et al. SARS-CoV-2 induces robust germinal center CD4 T follicular helper cell responses in rhesus macaques. Nat Commun. 2021;12:541. doi: 10.1038/s41467-020-20642-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Trypsteen W, Van Cleemput J, Wv S, Gerlo S, Vandekerckhove L. On the whereabouts of SARS-CoV-2 in the human body: a systematic review. PLoS Pathog. 2020;16(10):e1009037. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1009037. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Tugwell BD, Patel PR, Williams IT, Hedberg K, Chai F, Nainan OV, Thomas AR, Woll JE, Bell BP, Cieslak PR. Transmission of hepatitis C virus to several organ and tissue recipients from an antibody-negative donor. Ann Intern Med. 2005;143(9):648–654. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-143-9-200511010-00008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Yang J, Petitjean SJL, Koehler M, et al. Molecular interaction and inhibition of SARS-CoV-2 binding to the ACE2 receptor. Nat Commun. 2020;11:4541. doi: 10.1038/s41467-020-18319-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Data Availability Statement
All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in this published article.