Abstract
Vascularized composite allotransplantations are complex procedures with substantial functional impact on patients. Extended preservation of VCAs is of major importance in advancing this field. It would result in improved donor-recipient matching as well as the potential for ex vivo manipulation with gene and cell therapies. Moreover, it would make logistically feasible immune tolerance induction protocols through mixed chimerism. Supercooling techniques have shown promising results in multi-day liver preservation. It consists of reaching sub-zero temperatures while preventing ice formation within the graft by using various cryoprotective agents. By drastically decreasing the cell metabolism and need for oxygen and nutrients, supercooling allows extended preservation and recovery with lower ischemia–reperfusion injuries. This study is the first to demonstrate the supercooling of a large animal model of VCA. Porcine hindlimbs underwent 48 h of preservation at − 5 °C followed by recovery and normothermic machine perfusion assessment, with no issues in ice formation and favorable levels of injury markers. Our findings provide valuable preliminary results, suggesting a promising future for extended VCA preservation.
Subject terms: Translational research, Preclinical research
Introduction
The preservation of transplanted organs has evolved rapidly in the last decade. Static cold storage has given way to the perfusion machine for several solid organs, so much so that it has become the clinical standard in some centers1–5. The objective is to improve the quality of transplanted organs by reducing the ischemic damage and ischemia–reperfusion injuries6–8 that lead to increased inflammation and a heightened host immune response. An even more ambitious goal is to optimize perfusion extended to several days, with multiple potential clinical applications: Extended preservation would allow for improved cross-matching between donor and recipient by enabling long-distance transport9–11, potentially to the other side of the globe. In addition, some procedures require prolonged preparation of the recipient, as is the case with immune tolerance protocols that have shown encouraging results, mainly through bone marrow mixed-chimerism12–14. From a vascularized composite allotransplantation (VCA) perspective, these technologies present a tremendous opportunity since the contribution of VCAs to the patient is mainly functional, bringing a debate on the benefit-risk ratio of long-term immunosuppression15. Moreover, since VCAs are highly immunogenic due to the presence of a cutaneous component16, and particularly sensitive to ischemia due to the muscle component17,18, the improvement of VCAs preservation is an essential research topic in the field of reconstructive transplant.
As a potential solution, supercooling techniques have recently demonstrated promising outcomes in solid organ preservation. Supercooling leverages sub-zero storage temperature aimed at minimizing cell metabolism and saving energy and ATP consumption but avoids injuries due to phase change and ice formation19. As conventional static cold storage at 4 °C leads to significant injuries after 6 h preservation20, these perspectives lead to the potential of extending current storage durations from a few hours to several days. Supercooling prevents ice nucleation using cryoprotection solutions while reaching moderately negative temperatures (− 2 to − 10 °C). Successful preservation of the liver for up to 4 days was demonstrated in a supercooled state21,22, and horizontal translation to rodent limbs was shown by our group23, but scale-up to large animals remains to be done.
In this work, to evaluate the feasibility and challenges of VCA preservation by supercooling, an initial study with porcine partial hindlimbs was performed. The results were compared with cold static storage, which remains the gold standard in VCA preservation8.
Material and methods
Animal experiments
Bilateral partial hindlimb harvesting was performed in six 30 kg Female Yorkshire pigs (CBSET Inc, Lexington, MA) for these experiments. All animals were housed in the local Center for Comparative Medicine facility and received humane care in accordance with the National Institutes of Health Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals24. The local Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC—protocols 2019N000176 and 2022N000167) and the Animal Care and Use Review Office (ACURO) approved all animal protocols. The authors followed the Animal Research: Reporting of In Vivo Experiments (ARRIVE) guidelines.
VCA procurement
The surgery was performed under general anesthesia (Isoflurane 2–3% inhalation) and orotracheal intubation. All animals were euthanized at the end of the procedure (Pentobarbital/Phenytoin 100 mg/kg IV injection) following the recommendations of the local IACUC and ACURO guidelines. All surgeries were performed by the same surgical team. The VCA model used was a partial hindlimb model previously described25. It comprises a composite graft including the distal femoral and proximal tibial and fibular bones, knee joint, surrounding muscles, and a skin paddle corresponding to a saphenous axial fasciocutaneous flap (Fig. 1a,b). This partial hindlimb is vascularized by the femoral vessels, allowing for adequate vascularization of the entirety of the surrounding muscles, as confirmed by angiography (Fig. 1c,d). Before pedicle division, a full dose of 100 UI/Kg of heparin was injected intravenously. After the division of the vessels, the graft was flushed with 50 to 150 ml of cold heparin-saline solution (5%) until clear venous outflow. The VCA then received either static cold storage or supercooling loading.
Study design
The objective was to assess the supercooling storage of VCA for extended preservation. The total preservation duration was 48 h. One experimental group (Supercooling, “SC group”) and two control groups [(Control group 1: Cold Storage (CS) followed by SubNormothermic Machine Perfusion (SNMP) recovery, or “CS + SNMP group”) and (Control group 2: Cold Storage, or CS group)] were composed. The objective of both control groups was to separately assess the effects of Supercooling and SNMP, which is used to recover Supercooled limbs in this protocol. Each group was comprised of n = 4 replicates (Fig. 2).
Machine perfusion system
A custom-made perfusion system was used for subnormothermic machine perfusion for cryoprotective agent loading and recovery and normothermic reperfusion using whole blood. The system was composed of a roller pump (Drive Masterflex L/S, Cole-Parmer, Vernon Hills, IL), a hollow-fiber oxygenator (Affinity Pixie Fusion, Medtronic, Dublin, Ireland), platinum-cured silicon tubings, a pressure sensor, and a pressure monitor (Fig. 3a).
A hot plate stirrer (StableTemp, Cole-Parmer, Vernon Hills, IL) was used for blood warming (37 °C, monitored by a thermometer) and stirring to avoid sedimentation.
48-h ex vivo preservation
Static cold storage (SCS)
VCAs undergoing SCS were flushed with 50 ml of 4 °C Histidine-tryptophan-ketoglutarate (HTK) solution and placed in a sterile bag with 600 ml of the same solution and transported on ice to a cold room (+ 4 °C), protected from the light. The Cold Storage + SNMP group (CS + SNMP group, SCS with SNMP recovery) was preserved in SCS for 48 h before receiving normothermic machine perfusion with whole blood. The Cold Storage group (CS group, SCS with no SNMP recovery) was preserved for 48 before receiving subnormothermic machine perfusion (SNMP) for 2 h.
Supercooling
The supercooling protocol was inspired by our previously detailed work in livers21, with the key differences being the cryoprotective agent (CPA) compositions and the perfusate solution used for organ recovery. Partial hindlimbs in the Supercooling Group (SG) were transported on ice to the perfusion system for CPA loading (Fig. 3b). The first phase of the CPA loading consisted of 3-O-methyl-glucose (3-OMG) loading for intracellular cryoprotection. This was performed by 1-h SNMP of 350 ml Steen + solution with 100 mM of 3-OMG. At 60 min, the temperature was lowered to + 4 °C (− 0.5 °C per minute and the loading solution was incrementally switched to a cocktail storage solution optimized in rodent VCA supercooling23, based on HTK, Trehalose (50 mM), Polyethylene Glycol (PEG) (5 g) and glycerol (5%). Upon reaching hypothermic temperatures, the flow was lowered to maintain appropriate pressures (30 to 40 mmHg). At 90 min, the VCA was detached from the perfusion system and submerged in 150 mL of storage solution composed of the same Cryoprotective Agents (CPAs). To minimize the risks for ice nucleation, the air–liquid interface was suppressed26 by sealing the storage bag before submersion in refrigerant at − 5 °C for 48 h storage.
SNMP recovery
To avoid ice formation, the VCA was rewarmed to + 4 °C in a water bath at + 37 °C for 13 min based on preliminary studies (Supplementary Fig. 1). The perfusion was initiated at + 4 °C with modified Steen (Steen +)27. Upon connection of the organ, the temperature was gradually increased to + 21 °C (mean of + 1.3 °C per minute) and continued for 2 h. In the Supercooling Group, the CPA cocktail solution was flushed out using incremental switch to Steen + , during the gradual rewarming.
Normothermic reperfusion
To better assess the optimization of the VCA preservation, Normothermic Machine Perfusion (NMP) (37 °C) was performed using autologous whole blood. At the end of the limb harvesting procedure, 500 mL blood was obtained per limb and was stored at + 4 °C in citrate phosphate dextrose adenine (CPDA) bags. After 2-h SNMP (in SC and CS + SNMP GROUP) or directly after rewarming (in CS GROUP), the temperature of the system was increased to 37 °C, and the perfusate was replaced by autologous porcine whole blood which was circulated for 2 h.
Histology
Biopsies were sampled initially (t = 0) before preservation, at the end of the preservation (t = EOP), of the SNMP recovery (t = EOSR), and of the normothermic blood perfusion (t = EOB). The muscle was biopsied (surgical biopsies) at each time point, including three muscle samples per VCA at the end of the NMP. Skin biopsies were procured initially and at the end of the NMP phase. Samples were fixed in 10% buffered formalin and sent to the pathology department for paraffin inclusion, slicing, and H&E staining. A double-blinded reading was performed, and a muscle injury score was used (Kruit et al.28) to compare the groups and the changes over time. For the final muscle samples, a mean score was calculated from the three values.
Statistical analysis
Quantitative data were entered into Microsoft Excel (Redmond, WA, U.S.A.) for recording, and GraphPad Software's Prism 9 (La Jolla, CA, U.S.A.) was used for all statistical analyses. The significance level, or alpha risk, was set at 5%. A double-sided ANOVA test (if no missing values) or a mixed-effects model (in case of missing values) with the Geisser-Greenhouse correction was performed to compare groups during each recovery phase. Mann–Whitney U tests were performed to compare pathology scores at each time point.
All figures are original and were created by the authors, using photographs taken by the authors during the experiments. Diagrams were created using Biorender.com.
Results
The 12 hindlimbs were equally distributed to the three groups (n = 4 per group): Supercooling (SC group), Cold Storage + SNMP recovery (CS + SNMP group), and Cold Storage without SNMP recovery (CS group). The overall mean initial weight of the VCAs was 475.18 g. The procurement-to-storage time was immediate in the control groups (CS + SNMP and CS groups) and 10.2 + /– 7.8 min in the SC group (time-to-SNMP loading).
SNMP parameters
Prior to comparing the outcomes for each group, we will briefly summarize the initial step of loading CPAs during machine perfusion protocol, which is performed for only a single group.
Loading (supercooling group)
The mean initial loading flow (Supplementary Fig. 2) in this group was 17.5 + /– 2.9 ml/min (at 37 °C) and was increased to reach 31.3 + /– 13.8 ml/min after 30 min. After 60 min (temperature decrease and incremental switch to the extracellular CPA with higher viscosity), the increasing resistances led to a decrease in the flow to 9.2 + /– 7.2 ml/min.
Recovery (supercooling and CS + SNMP groups)
Following 48 h of storage and after 5 min of adaptation to the pressure, the mean initial flow during (Steen +)-based SNMP was 7.0 + /– 2.45 and 5.0 + /– 0.0 ml/min in the Supercooling group and the CS + SNMP group, respectively (p = 0.008, Fig. 4a). The corresponding vascular resistance (Fig. 4b) was calculated to be 5.66 + /– 2.27 and 9.05 + /– 1.41 mmHg.min/ml, respectively (p = 0.011). The supercooled limbs (Fig. 4c) tended to lose weight following loading and storage with a mean weight at 48 h of 88 + /– 8.26% of the initial weight versus 100.79 + /– 2.05% in CS + SNMP group (p = 0.11) and 101.57 + /– 1.99 in Cold storage group (p = 0.11). At the end of the SNMP recovery, weight gain was observed in Supercooled limbs (107.03 + /– 8.26%) and CS + SNMP group (123.87 + /– 7.81%) with no statistically significant difference (p = 0.11, Fig. 4d).
During the 2 h SNMP period, the oxygen consumption was higher in the Supercooled group with 0.34 + /– 0.24 versus 0.136 + /– 0.01 mmHg*ml*g–1*min–1 in the CS + SNMP group (p = 0.02) at t = 2 h (p = 0.043 for the SNMP phase, Fig. 5a). Mean glucose consumption in the CS + SNMP group was 2.69 + /– 0.63 and 0.38 + /– 0.19 mg*ml*g–1*dl–1 at t = 0 and t = 2 h SNMP, respectively (Fig. 5b). Glucose consumption in the Supercooled group could not be interpreted because of interference between Glucose and 3-OMG in the biochemical analyzer during this phase.
The pH was lower in the Supercooling group with a mean of 6.38 + /– 0.16 and 6.79 + /– 0.08 initially and at the end of SNMP, versus 6.67 + /– 0.09 and 6.87 + /– 0.11 in CS + SNMP group (p = 0.025, Fig. 5f). Similarly, the lactate release (Fig. 5c) was initially higher in the Supercooling group (21.9 + /– 2.83 mmol/L) when compared with Cold Storage + SNMP group (15.99 + /– 2.39 mmol/L, p = 0.06) but reached similar values at the end of the SNMP recovery (7.63 + /– 5.16 and 7.76 + /– 2.93 mmol/L, respectively). The potassium concentration (Fig. 5e) in the outflow was higher in the Supercooled group during the whole SNMP phase (p < 0.001).
NMP parameters (whole blood, all groups)
Blood viscosity imposed higher vascular resistance during NMP than SNMP. Mean initial vascular resistance was 7.71 + /– 1.74, 10.66 + /– 1.34, and 8.10 + /– 1.23 mmHg.min/ml in the Supercooled, CS + SNMP and CS groups, respectively (p = 0.03 and 0.54). At the end of the NMP phase, the resistance in the experimental group was still lower without reaching statistical significance (p = 0.372 and 0.198) with a higher flow (7.5 + /– 2.3 versus 5.0 + /– 0.81 and 4.75 + /– 0.65 ml/min). Weight gain following 2 h-NMP was comparable in all 3 groups (121.52 + /– 4.45, 124.11 + /– 4.12 and 116.79 + /– 4.57%, respectively).
Blood perfusion allowed for better correction of the pH with values of 6.87 + /– 0.11, 6.95 + /– 0.08, and 6.92 + /– 0.08 at the end of the perfusion. Similarly, the lactate release decreased progressively in all groups to reach its lowest at the end of the NMP phase, with insignificantly lower values for the Supercooled group. The outflow potassium concentration was higher in the Supercooled group than in both controls with statistical significance. The oxygen consumption was significantly higher in the Supercooling group (p < 0.001) compared to both the control groups. The glucose consumption was also higher in the experimental limbs without reaching statistical significance (p = 0.073 and 0.689).
The hemoglobin arteriovenous difference at the end of the 2 h-NMP was 19.68 + /– 15.9, 21.27 + /– 10.77, and 10.93 + /– 3.90% in the Supercooling, CS + SNMP and CS groups, respectively, with no statistical significance (Fig. 5d).
Histology
Figure 6 presents the macroscopic and microscopic aspects of the VCAs following 48 h of preservation, SNMP recovery (for Supercooling and CS + SNMP groups), and whole blood normothermic machine perfusion. Overall, no macroscopic difference was found between groups, despite milder ecchymoses in the supercooled grafts. When focusing on the myocyte preservation, blinded microscopic assessment of the muscle only showed statistically significant differences with lower injuries at the end of the SNMP phase (Kruit et al. VCA score)28. Skin and nerve microscopic analyses showed no significant differences in all three groups following normothermic blood perfusion (Supplementary Fig. 3 and Table 1).
Discussion
Despite the high immunogenicity of vascularized composite allografts- primarily attributed to the skin component15,29- over 140 limb transplants and nearly 50 partial or full-face transplants and successful penile and uterine transplantations30,31 have been performed globally15,32. In order to combat the high immunogenicity of VCAs, the development of protocols for extended VCA preservation and ex vivo manipulation of the VCA represent critical goals for this burgeoning field. Superior preservation mitigates ischemia–reperfusion injury, which reduces inflammation and the subsequent host immune response and may buy time for better matching of national (and perhaps even international) donor-recipient pairs. Extended preservation also holds the potential for increasing the total number of available organs, by allowing national, transcontinental and international graft transportation as recently demonstrated in solid organs33. These perspectives would greatly reduce waiting list delays, improve donor-recipient immune and phototype matching, and avoid complex logistic arrangements such as patient transfers. Implementing immune tolerance through mixed chimerism procedures would necessitate a preparation time frame of 2 to 6 days12–14, a requirement that is not possible in brain dead donors (but only living donors, irrelevant for VCA) with current preservation protocols. Additionally, ex vivo manipulation with gene and cell therapies in the VCA during loading and/or recovery has the potential to abrogate rejection mechanisms as well, providing a synergic approach. Consequently, it is imperative to develop novel protocols for extended VCA preservation.
This study demonstrated the first successful supercooling of porcine VCAs for 48 h. Despite the complexity of this model, which is composed of multiple tissue types, no uncontrolled spontaneous ice nucleation was observed during 2 days of subzero preservation. This can be challenging due to the significant volume of the model. Indeed, ice nucleation is a stochastic process and, therefore, increases with preserved tissue volume26. Moreover, the composite aspect of the porcine partial hindlimb makes it difficult to suppress the air/liquid interface, which is a critical step to further avoid ice formation22,26. The combination of CPAs and the protocol used in our study made it possible to avoid this phenomenon at − 5 °C. Pushing the limits further by reaching lower temperatures could lead to a more significant reduction in cell metabolism, potentially resulting in improved organ recovery and decreased ischemia–reperfusion injuries. Further work should focus on optimizing the balance between deeper negative temperatures and a stable supercooling state.
In the present results, recovery of supercooled VCAs revealed successful restoration of post-preservation vascular flow. Supercooled limbs showed significantly lower vascular resistance during SNMP recovery following 48 h preservation when compared with static cold stored controls. Interestingly, this difference was not significant during the NMP phase. Moreover, the vascular resistance in the CS group was lower than in the CS + SNMP group. This highlights the ambivalence of SNMP, which, on one hand, allows for recovering the limb to a sub-physiological state while clearing toxic metabolites22 and, on the other hand, exposes the graft to potential endothelial injuries34. More work is needed to balance the role of SNMP in supercooling techniques to reach optimized protocols, ensuring adequate recovery following extended preservation. Weight gain was minor and stayed below 20% at the end of the NMP phase, with no significant difference between groups. However, a significant difference was found between the supercooled and CS limbs at the end of the SNMP, which is consistent with the vascular resistance outcomes. Among the outcome metrics, weight gain and vascular resistance are the earliest and most critical parameters in organ machine perfusion. Meyers et al. demonstrated that weight gain was correlated with microscopic muscle injury and was the earliest evidence of VCA dysfunction during ex-vivo normothermic limb perfusion in swine34. In addition, vascular resistance is closely linked to endothelial cell injury: shear-stress-induced injuries cause cellular edema, which eventually increases perfusion resistance by external compression of the microvessels35. Moreover, no autonomic nerve control is possible during ex-vivo perfusion, and circulating vasoactive substances show poor action, leaving the paracrine relaxing factors as the main effector for vasodilatation. These endothelial injuries should, therefore, be estimated using flow parameters such as vascular resistance and weight gain34–36. Specifically, assessing endothelial injuries following extended preservation and ex vivo recovery using electron microscopy techniques would be of great interest and should be included in subsequent studies.
Another major finding was the higher oxygen consumption of the supercooled limbs during recovery. This parameter directly indicates higher metabolism, potentially linked to better cell viability permitted by supercooling. This was also suggested by a higher glucose consumption during the NMP phase without reaching statistical significance. The evaluation was done under physiological conditions through whole-blood NMP, which significantly improved the relevance of those metrics. However, if the microscopic assessment of the muscle following NMP suggested better preservation of the myocyte structure and lower edema in the Supercooling group, no significant differences with CS controls were found after this physiological recovery. More replicates in each group could help increase the statistical significance. Alternatively, a longer normothermic phase with fresh blood could have unveiled more IRI and potentially more differences in pathology scoring between groups. NMP as a simulation for physiological replantation has been used by other authors, but to date, there is no consensual protocol22,37,38.
However, this last point highlights the first limit of these results: the absence of transplantation with in vivo assessment of the VCA. The 2 h blood NMP phase limits the extrapolation to the in vivo behavior of the graft. However, the relevance of NMP has been demonstrated. It appears to be more ethical regarding animal welfare since it allows for an ex-vivo assessment of graft quality following each preservation technique. Our experience with other preservation protocols showed that transplanting VCAs in a poor metabolic condition can lead to a critical decrease in the recipient animal’s general condition, which needs to be avoided36. The purpose of this preliminary study was, therefore, to act as a first phase of ex-vivo optimization. The most critical challenge remains upscaling preclinical results to the clinical reality. The model used in our study is composed of a substantial volume of muscle, which is the limiting tissue when focusing on ischemia–reperfusion injuries. In contrast, human upper limb VCA often mainly comprises the distal tendons of the forearm muscle groups, with a limited amount of muscle belly. Similarly, face transplantation involves thin but important muscles. Being able to preserve multiple bulky muscle groups for several days with supercooling, therefore, holds great promise for clinical applications. Nerve function following recovery becomes of crucial interest, and implementing nerve conduction and muscle contraction assessments seems to be one of the most critical next steps.
Moreover, the Supercooling protocol inspired by previous work in the liver showed limitations in this VCA study: the potassium release was significantly higher in the Supercooled limbs for both recovery phases. This could be due to either rhabdomyolysis due to ischemia–reperfusion injuries or due to potassium storage and release from the CPA cocktail. This second hypothesis is more likely: the lactate release was similar in all groups, the histology showed better preservation of the muscle fiber architecture, and the CPA cocktail solution based on HTK (potassium concentration 8–9 mmol/L) was loaded for 30 min using machine perfusion versus a hand flush in the control groups. To elucidate on this, it could be of interest to compare the potassium release levels of CPA-stored limbs with VCAs stored in a perfusate solution based on physiologic potassium concentrations, such as Steen +. Media composition has been shown to be critical in VCA machine-perfusion protocols39; therefore, current work focuses on optimizing the CPA cocktail and recovery solution compositions.
This study is part of a broader research trend. The recent exponential advancement of perfusion machines in kidney2,40, liver1,4, heart3,41, and lung42,43 transplantation hints at potential applications in VCAs. The variety of tissues composing VCAs brings a substantial challenge when translating solid organ preservation protocols. Kruit et al. and later our team described the first machine perfusion protocols applied to large animal VCA27,28,36,39,44–46. Nonetheless, current dynamic hypothermic and SNMP techniques are limited to preservation periods of 24 to 36 h due to factors such as edema and vascular resistance34,47–49. Supercooling has proven itself a promising technique to overcome these limits and go beyond several days in liver22,50. The sub-zero temperature reduction, combined with the absence of ice nucleation, has been shown to extend liver preservation to 96 hours50. Hence, developing a relevant VCA supercooling protocol appears worthwhile51. We aimed for 48 h of preservation since this duration would make it possible to combine with immune tolerance protocols based on mixed chimerism. Being able to preserve a VCA procured on a brain-dead donor for 2 days would allow preparing the recipient (body irradiation, immunosuppressive regimen) for combined VCA and bone marrow transplantation, as previously described14,52. However, while we focused on supercooling cryopreservation, other techniques are of great interest for organ and VCA preservation. Vitrification aims to drastically and quickly decrease the organ temperature to the extreme, reaching a glass-like state53,54, while partial freezing seeks to control the ice nucleation and its potentially harmful effects on the tissues55,56. These alternative techniques showed promising results in solid organs, and further studies should explore them in VCAs.
This preliminary work showed promising outcomes regarding microvascular preservation estimated by the perfusion parameters and histologic preservation of the myocytes and muscle fibers. However, this protocol, highly inspired by liver supercooling, still needs substantial optimization. In order to address the limits shown in metabolic parameters, adjustment in CPA and media seems necessary before in vivo experimentation of VCA transplantation following prolonged storage, eventually opening the door to a wide range of new applications.
Supplementary Information
Acknowledgements
This work was supported by the U.S Army Medical Research Acquisition Activity (RTRP program) under grant award No. W81XWH-17-1-0437 and W81XWH-17-1-0440 (C.L.C, A.G.L, K.U). Support from Shriners Hospital for Children (85105-BOS-23) and the National Science Foundation [Grant No. EEC 1941543, Engineering Research Center for Advanced Technologies for the Preservation of Biological Systems (ATP-Bio)] and partial support from the US National Institutes of Health (R01EB028782 and R56AI171958) are gratefully acknowledged. Y.B. and I.F.R are supported by Shriners Hospital for Children. Y.B. received funding from CHU de Rennes (France), Université de Rennes (France), the French Society of Plastic Surgery (SOFCPRE), and Fondation des Gueules Cassées (Award 09-2022).
Author contributions
Y.B., I.F.R., P.T., C.L.C. and K.U. conceptualized the experiments; Y.B., I.F.R., L.C., A.T.D., and M.A.R. performed the experiments; Y.B., P.T., M.G., N.B., M.T., C.L.C. and K.U. performed the data analysis; Y.B., I.F.R., P.T., N.B., A.G.L., and K.U. drafted the manuscript. L.C., M.G., A.M.M., J.H.C., N.B., A.G.L., and M.A.R. substantially revised the manuscript to reach the final version. N.B., M.T., C.L.C, and K.U supervised the study. All authors reviewed and revised the manuscript.
Data availability
All data generated and analyzed during this study have been included in this manuscript and its Supplementary Information file. All raw data can be provided on demand by the corresponding author.
Competing interests
K.U., C.L.C, A.G.L., M.T and Y.B. have patent applications relevant to this field. K.U. and M.T. have financial interests in and serve on the Scientific Advisory Board for Sylvatica Biotech Inc., a private company developing high subzero organ preservation technologies. Competing interests for Massachusetts General Hospital investigators are managed by the MGH and MGB in accordance with their conflict-of-interest policies.
Footnotes
Publisher's note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
These authors contributed equally: Yanis Berkane and Irina Filz von Reiterdank.
Supplementary Information
The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1038/s41598-024-63041-8.
References
- 1.Markmann JF, et al. Impact of portable normothermic blood-based machine perfusion on outcomes of liver transplant: The OCS liver PROTECT randomized clinical trial. JAMA Surg. 2022;157:189–198. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2021.6781. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Ghoneima AS, et al. Outcomes of kidney perfusion techniques in transplantation from deceased donors: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J. Clin. Med. 2023 doi: 10.3390/jcm12123871. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Pizanis N, et al. Introduction of machine perfusion of donor hearts in a single center in Germany. Int. J. Cardiol. Heart Vasc. 2023;47:101233. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcha.2023.101233. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Patrono D, et al. Outcome of liver transplantation with grafts from brain-dead donors treated with dual hypothermic oxygenated machine perfusion, with particular reference to elderly donors. Am. J. Transplant. 2022;22:1382–1395. doi: 10.1111/ajt.16996. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Tingle SJ, et al. Machine perfusion preservation versus static cold storage for deceased donor kidney transplantation. Cochrane Database Syst. Rev. 2019;3:Cd011671. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011671.pub2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Yue P, et al. Hypothermic oxygenated perfusion attenuates DCD liver ischemia-reperfusion injury by activating the JAK2/STAT3/HAX1 pathway to regulate endoplasmic reticulum stress. Cell Mol. Biol. Lett. 2023;28:55. doi: 10.1186/s11658-023-00466-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Xu J, Buchwald JE, Martins PN. Review of current machine perfusion therapeutics for organ preservation. Transplantation. 2020;104:1792–1803. doi: 10.1097/TP.0000000000003295. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.He J, Khan UZ, Qing L, Wu P, Tang J. Improving the ischemia-reperfusion injury in vascularized composite allotransplantation: Clinical experience and experimental implications. Front. Immunol. 2022;13:998952. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2022.998952. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Cypel M, et al. Technique for prolonged normothermic ex vivo lung perfusion. J. Heart Lung Transplant. 2008;27:1319–1325. doi: 10.1016/j.healun.2008.09.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Raigani S, De Vries RJ, Uygun K, Yeh H. Pumping new life into old ideas: Preservation and rehabilitation of the liver using ex situ machine perfusion. Artif. Organs. 2020;44:123–128. doi: 10.1111/aor.13579. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Bruinsma B, Uygun K. Subzero organ preservation: The dawn of a new ice age? Curr. Opin. Organ Transplant. 2017;22:1. doi: 10.1097/MOT.0000000000000403. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Sasaki H, et al. Preclinical and clinical studies for transplant tolerance via the mixed chimerism approach. Hum. Immunol. 2018;79:258–265. doi: 10.1016/j.humimm.2017.11.008. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Oura T, Hotta K, Cosimi AB, Kawai T. Transient mixed chimerism for allograft tolerance. Chimerism. 2015;6:21–26. doi: 10.1080/19381956.2015.1111975. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Sachs DH, Kawai T, Sykes M. Induction of tolerance through mixed chimerism. Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Med. 2014;4:a015529. doi: 10.1101/cshperspect.a015529. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Milek D, et al. A systematic review of the reported complications related to facial and upper extremity vascularized composite allotransplantation. J. Surg. Res. 2023;281:164–175. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2022.08.023. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Kadono K, Gruszynski M, Azari K, Kupiec-Weglinski JW. Vascularized composite allotransplantation versus solid organ transplantation: Innate-adaptive immune interphase. Curr. Opin. Organ Transplant. 2019;24:714–720. doi: 10.1097/mot.0000000000000705. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Kruit AS, et al. Successful long-term extracorporeal perfusion of free musculocutaneous flaps in a porcine model. J. Surg. Res. 2019;235:113–123. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2018.09.076. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Kruit AS, Winters H, van Luijk J, Schreinemachers MJM, Ulrich DJO. Current insights into extracorporeal perfusion of free tissue flaps and extremities: A systematic review and data synthesis. J. Surg. Res. 2018;227:7–16. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2018.01.023. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Staples JF, Mathers KE, Duffy BM. Mitochondrial metabolism in hibernation: Regulation and implications. Physiology (Bethesda) 2022;37:260–271. doi: 10.1152/physiol.00006.2022. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Gok E, Kubiak CA, Guy E, Kemp SWP, Ozer K. Effect of static cold storage on skeletal muscle after vascularized composite tissue allotransplantation. J. Reconstr. Microsurg. 2020;36:9–15. doi: 10.1055/s-0039-1693455. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.de Vries RJ, et al. Subzero non-frozen preservation of human livers in the supercooled state. Nat. Protoc. 2020;15:2024–2040. doi: 10.1038/s41596-020-0319-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.de Vries RJ, et al. Supercooling extends preservation time of human livers. Nat. Biotechnol. 2019;37:1131–1136. doi: 10.1038/s41587-019-0223-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Von Reiterdank IF, et al. 24-hour supercooling preservation of vascularized composite allografts in rats: A proof-of-concept study. Cryobiology. 2022;109:19–20. doi: 10.1016/j.cryobiol.2022.11.062. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 24.National Research Council Committee for the Update of the Guide for the, C. & Use of Laboratory, A. In Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals (National Academies Press (US) Copyright © 2011, National Academy of Sciences, 2011).
- 25.Ibrahim Z, et al. A modified heterotopic swine hind limb transplant model for translational vascularized composite allotransplantation (VCA) research. J. Vis. Exp. 2013 doi: 10.3791/50475. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Huang H, Yarmush ML, Usta OB. Long-term deep-supercooling of large-volume water and red cell suspensions via surface sealing with immiscible liquids. Nat. Commun. 2018;9:3201. doi: 10.1038/s41467-018-05636-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Goutard M, et al. Exceeding the limits of static cold storage in limb transplantation using subnormothermic machine perfusion. J. Reconstr. Microsurg. 2022 doi: 10.1055/a-1886-5697. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Kruit AS, et al. Rectus abdominis flap replantation after 18 h hypothermic extracorporeal perfusion-A porcine model. J. Clin. Med. 2021 doi: 10.3390/jcm10173858. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Etra JW, Raimondi G, Brandacher G. Mechanisms of rejection in vascular composite allotransplantation. Curr. Opin. Organ Transplant. 2018;23:28–33. doi: 10.1097/mot.0000000000000490. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Cetrulo CL, Jr, et al. Penis transplantation: First US experience. Ann. Surg. 2018;267:983–988. doi: 10.1097/sla.0000000000002241. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Dion L, et al. Uterus transplantation, current prospect and future indications. State of art with review of literature. Gynecol. Obstet. Fertil. Senol. 2021;49:193–203. doi: 10.1016/j.gofs.2020.09.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Shores JT, Malek V, Lee WPA, Brandacher G. Outcomes after hand and upper extremity transplantation. J. Mater. Sci. Mater. Med. 2017;28:72. doi: 10.1007/s10856-017-5880-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Lebreton G, Leprince P. Successful heart transplant after 12 h preservation aboard a commercial flight. Lancet. 2024;403:1019. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(24)00258-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Meyers A, et al. Weight gain is an early indicator of injury in ex vivo normothermic limb perfusion (EVNLP) Artif. Organs. 2023;47:290–301. doi: 10.1111/aor.14442. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Fujiyoshi M, de Meijer VE, Porte RJ. Organ Repair and Regeneration. Academic Press; 2021. pp. 43–73. [Google Scholar]
- 36.Berkane Y, et al. Abstract #436—24h acellular subnormothermic machine perfusion for VCA preservation. Am. J. Transplant. 2023;23:614–1200. [Google Scholar]
- 37.Markgraf W, et al. Inulin clearance during ex vivo normothermic machine perfusion as a marker of renal function. ASAIO J. 2022;68:1211–1218. doi: 10.1097/mat.0000000000001624. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Mahboub P, et al. The efficacy of HBOC-201 in ex situ gradual rewarming kidney perfusion in a rat model. Artif. Organs. 2020;44:81–90. doi: 10.1111/aor.13534. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Burlage LC, et al. Optimization of ex vivo machine perfusion and transplantation of vascularized composite allografts. J. Surg. Res. 2022;270:151–161. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2021.09.005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Mazilescu LI, et al. Normothermic ex vivo kidney perfusion for human kidney transplantation: First North American results. Transplantation. 2022;106:1852–1859. doi: 10.1097/tp.0000000000004098. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Michel SG, et al. Twelve-hour hypothermic machine perfusion for donor heart preservation leads to improved ultrastructural characteristics compared to conventional cold storage. Ann. Transplant. 2015;20:461–468. doi: 10.12659/aot.893784. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Roesel MJ, Wiegmann B, Ius F, Knosalla C, Iske J. The role of ex-situ perfusion for thoracic organs. Curr. Opin. Organ Transplant. 2022;27:466–473. doi: 10.1097/mot.0000000000001008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Sage AT, et al. A machine-learning approach to human ex vivo lung perfusion predicts transplantation outcomes and promotes organ utilization. Nat. Commun. 2023;14:4810. doi: 10.1038/s41467-023-40468-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Kruit AS, et al. Ex-vivo perfusion as a successful strategy for reduction of ischemia-reperfusion injury in prolonged muscle flap preservation—A gene expression study. Gene. 2019;701:89–97. doi: 10.1016/j.gene.2019.03.021. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Pendexter CA, et al. Development of a rat forelimb vascularized composite allograft (VCA) perfusion protocol. PLoS One. 2023;18:e0266207. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0266207. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Berkane Y, et al. Towards optimizing sub-normothermic machine perfusion in fasciocutaneous flaps: A large animal study. Bioengineering (Basel) 2023 doi: 10.3390/bioengineering10121415. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Brouwers K, et al. 24-hour perfusion of porcine myocutaneous flaps mitigates reperfusion injury: A 7-day follow-up study. Plast. Reconstr. Surg. Glob. Open. 2022;10:e4123. doi: 10.1097/gox.0000000000004123. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Slater NJ, et al. Ex-vivo oxygenated perfusion of free flaps during ischemia time: a feasibility study in a porcine model and preliminary results. J. Surg. Res. 2016;205:292–295. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2016.06.096. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Berkane Y, et al. 121. Acellular subnomothermic machine perfusion of fasciocutaneous flaps in swine. Plast. Reconstr. Surg. Glob. Open. 2023;11:76. doi: 10.1097/01.GOX.0000938072.54318.61. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Bruinsma BG, et al. Supercooling preservation and transplantation of the rat liver. Nat. Protoc. 2015;10:484–494. doi: 10.1038/nprot.2015.011. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Berkane Y, et al. Supercooling: A promising technique for prolonged preservation in solid organ transplantation, and early perspectives in vascularized composite allografts. Front. Transplant. 2023 doi: 10.3389/frtra.2023.1269706. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Lellouch AG, et al. Tolerance of a vascularized composite allograft achieved in MHC Class-I-mismatch swine via mixed chimerism. Front. Immunol. 2022;13:829406. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2022.829406. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Cornwall W. Frozen in time. Science. 2023;380:1313–1317. doi: 10.1126/science.adj4220. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Han Z, et al. Vitrification and nanowarming enable long-term organ cryopreservation and life-sustaining kidney transplantation in a rat model. Nat. Commun. 2023;14:3407. doi: 10.1038/s41467-023-38824-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Tessier SN, et al. Partial freezing of rat livers extends preservation time by 5-fold. Nat. Commun. 2022;13:4008. doi: 10.1038/s41467-022-31490-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Tessier SN, et al. The role of antifreeze glycoprotein (AFGP) and polyvinyl alcohol/polyglycerol (X/Z-1000) as ice modulators during partial freezing of rat livers. Front. Phys. 2022 doi: 10.3389/fphy.2022.1033613. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
All data generated and analyzed during this study have been included in this manuscript and its Supplementary Information file. All raw data can be provided on demand by the corresponding author.