Skip to main content
. 2024 Jun 2;332(6):471–481. doi: 10.1001/jama.2024.10398

Table 2. Regression Model Estimates of Study Group Effects on 24-Week Outcome Measures.

Outcome measures Estimated mean or proportion (SE)a Difference (lower 1-sided 95% confidence limit) or difference (95% CI)b P valuec
Stepped palliative care (n = 250) Early integrated palliative care (n = 257)
Primary outcome test of noninferiority
Quality of life, FACT-L, mean scored 100.6 (1.3) [n = 146] 97.8 (1.3) [n = 145] 2.9 (−0.1) <.001e
Secondary outcome tests of noninferiority
Discussed end-of-life care with clinician, %f 30.4 (3.3) [n = 190] 33.0 (3.4) [n = 187] −2.6 (−10.4) .09e
Length of hospice stay, mean, dg 19.5 (4.3) [n = 159] 34.6 (4.2) [n = 161] −15.2 (−25.1) .91e
Secondary outcome test of superiority
Palliative care visits, mean No. per patient 2.4 (0.2) [n = 250] 4.7 (0.1) [n = 257] −2.3 (−2.7 to −1.8) <.001
Exploratory outcome tests of superiority
Depression symptoms, PHQ-9, mean score 5.0 (0.3) [n = 139] 5.3 (0.3) [n = 142] −0.4 (−1.3 to 0.5)
Coping skills, Brief COPE
Approach-oriented coping, mean score 17.7 (0.3) [n = 116] 17.5 (0.3) [n = 115] 0.2 (−0.7 to 1.0)
Avoidant coping, mean score 5.7 (0.2) [n = 126] 5.7 (0.2) [n = 124] 0.0 (−0.5 to 0.5)
Perceptions of prognosis
Perceives goal of therapy is to cure cancer, % 27.9 (3.3) [n = 181] 25.6 (3.2) [n = 184] 2.3 (−6.7 to 11.3)
Perceives cancer is curable, % 22.2 (3.0) [n = 182] 23.8 (3.1) [n = 176] −1.6 (−10.0 to 6.8)

Abbreviations: Brief COPE, Brief Coping Orientation to Problems Experienced Inventory; FACT-L, Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy–Lung; PHQ-9, Patient Health Questionnaire 9.

a

All estimates are adjusted for study site and cancer type (non–small cell lung cancer vs small cell lung cancer or mesothelioma). Estimates for FACT-L, PHQ-9, and coping skills are additionally adjusted for baseline scores of outcome variable. Numbers in brackets reflect the number of patients in each group whose data were included in the model.

b

Comparing the lower 1-sided 95% confidence limit with the noninferiority margin corresponds to the primary 1-sided 5% significance level test for noninferiority. Confidence intervals for secondary and exploratory outcomes are not adjusted for multiple testing.

c

P values for secondary outcomes are adjusted for multiple testing using the false discovery rate approach. P values are not reported for exploratory outcomes.

d

Prespecified noninferiority margin, −4.5 points.

e

P value for noninferiority.

f

Prespecified noninferiority margin, −10 percentage points.

g

Prespecified noninferiority margin, −7 days.