Abstract
Introduction
Acinetobacter baumannii, designated as a priority pathogen by the World Health Organization (WHO), is responsible for recalcitrant infections in immunocompromised patients. The type VI secretion system (T6SS) is a class of macromolecular secretion machines, contributing to its virulence. The aim of this study is thus to predict the immune-dominant epitope peptides from the Acinetobacter T6SS-associated protein of A. baumannii (AsaA).
Methods
AsaA protein retrieval from the bacteria was carried out using computational platforms and the evaluation of antigenicity and allergenicity was performed. The T-cell epitopes of major histocompatibility complex class II binders were identified followed by molecular docking of the immune-dominant epitopes with human leukocyte antigen alleles using the ClusterPro server (https://cluspro.org/help.php). Additionally, the B-cell epitopes were predicted.
Results
Immune-informatic analysis showed immune-dominant peptides in the most favored regions with promising interactions with HLA alleles DP, DQ, DR, and toll-like receptor showing high binding capacity.
Conclusion
In the present investigation, epitope 1 (LILFLIGNY) was found to be a promising candidate for the synthesis of vaccines. However, it requires further experimentation for its immunological memory and response.
Keywords: acinetobacter baumannii, health, epitopes, vaccine peptides, asaa, t6ss
Introduction
Acinetobacter baumannii is a non-fermenting gram-negative pleomorphic bacteria and an important nosocomial pathogen causing recalcitrant infections [1]. This coccobacillus had been previously regarded as a pathogen of low priority; however, it has been found that it is an opportunistic pathogen causing systemic infections including septicemia due to its propensity of multi-drug resistance (MDR) [2]. A. baumannii is ubiquitous in nature. They can be recovered after enrichment culture is obtained virtually from soil or surface water. Increasing reports on its virulence and rapid acquisition of the property of MDR are often reported among the A. baumannii traits [3]. The World Health Organization has declared A. baumannii as a priority pathogen due to its resistance to the last resort of antibacterial drugs. It is been categorized under the ESKAPE (Enterococcus faecium, Staphylococcus aureus, Klebsiella pneumonia, Acinetobacter baumannii, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and Enterobacter species) group of pathogens [4].
In A. baumannii, several virulence factors have been characterized both genotypically and phenotypically and they encompass the porins in the outer membrane, potent proteases, phospholipases, cell wall lipopolysaccharides (LPS), polysaccharides in the capsule, iron chelating systems, and secretion systems of virulent proteins [5]. The type VI secretion system (T6SS) is a recently described secretory machine used widely by gram-negative bacteria in order to target their eukaryotic and prokaryotic competitors [6]. These macromolecular secretion mechanisms facilitate the entry of various effector proteins into the target cells. This process, in turn, is linked to the anti-phagocytosis and anti-apoptotic functions of the cell and is highly associated with bacterial virulence [7]. The secretion system contains several proteins that form needle-like structures that further help the gram-negative bacteria for the translocation of its substrates. The T6SS is competent in mediating inter-bacterial competitions which aids the bacteria to survive in their natural habitat [8].
The Acinetobacter T6SS-associated protein in A. baumannii (AsaA) is known to be comprised of 20 genes, and the first gene in order is the AsaA which is highly specific to the genus. Not many experiment-based evidenced documents are reported for their specific contribution to the bacterium. In a study done on the AsaA homolog analysis in Acinetobacter baylyi, AsaA was attributed to the T6SS and a high genetic difference occurred in comparison with the traits of A. baumannii [9]. In another study, the AsaA gene is documented to be highly specific to A. baumannii and is also highly conserved contributing to the virulence of the bacterium [10].
Targeting the secretion systems would be thus a novel approach to alleviating the A. baumannii complications among hospitalized patients. In-silico-based computational platforms are widely employed tools to predict the immuno-dominant peptides that may be used to design the vaccine constructs [10-11]. The approach has been applied in many studies to predict the epitope peptides in A. baumannii for various virulent proteins. The objectives of the present study were thus framed to predict the peptide epitopes from the AsaA protein and to analyze its properties of antigenicity, stability, human leukocyte antigen (HLA) interactions, major histocompatibility complex (MHC) class restrictions, and B-cell antigenicity. The study aims to predict the immune-dominant epitope peptides from the AsaA protein in A. baumannii using an immune-informatics approach that may be chosen as a suitable vaccine candidate.
Materials and methods
Protein retrieval
The CELLO v.2.5: Sub-cellular localization predictor tool (http://cello.life.nctu.edu.tw/) was used to estimate the subcellular location of the sequence AsaA.
Antigenic and allergenic predictions
The score for the antigenicity of AsaA was predicted by applying the VaXiJen v2.0 server (https://www.ddg-pharmfac.net/vaxijen/). Antigens are categorized based on the physical and chemical properties of the proteins and are based on the prediction model of the protein alignment [12]. Allergenicity of the AsaA is predicted using the AlgPred server (http://crdd.osdd.net/raghava/algpred/) which is employed to predict the proteins that are allergenic based on the mapping of immunoglobulin E (IgE) epitopes.
Secondary structure prediction
The secondary structure of the AsaA was predicted using the Self-Optimized Prediction Method with Alignment (SOPMA) server (https://npsa-prabi.ibcp.fr/cgi-bin/npsa_automat.pl?page=/NPSA/npsa_sopma.html). Predictions were made for the amount of beta-sheet, turns, and coils.
Predictions of T-cell immunodominant epitopes
T-cell immunodominant epitopes restricted to MHC class II molecules are crucial for the start of the immune response that is directed against an antigen. The EpiDOCK tool (https://www.ddg-pharmfac.net/epidock/EpiDockPage.html) was applied to predict the T-cell epitopes of AsaA, to check for the binding of epitopes to 12, 6, and 5 HLA alleles respective to -DR, -DQ, and -DP alleles. The query sequence was given as input in the FASTA format and the tool was applied to detect the maximum number of binders for the predicted epitopes for the best assessments.
Predictions on stable and antigenic T-cell epitopes
The VaXiJen 2.0 server was used to predict antigenicity, and the ProtParam server (https://web.expasy.org/protparam/) was used to determine the instability index of predicted epitopes.
Predicted epitopes structure prediction and validation
The PEP-FOLD server (https://mobyle.rpbs.univ-paris-diderot.fr/cgi-bin/portal.py#forms::PEP-FOLD) is a de novo approach used to identify the structures of the peptide from amino acid sequences and further employed to detect the MHC class II binders. Using the RAMPAGE program (https://bio.tools/RAMPAGE), which forecasts the stereochemical characteristics of a given structure, the projected structure was verified. By forecasting which amino acids will lie in the preferred, permitted, and disallowed sections of the Ramachandran plot, the server evaluates the quality of simulated epitopes.
Interactions of the selected epitopes with HLA alleles
From the protein data bank (PDB) database, the three-dimensional structures of the HLA alleles specific to -DP, -DQ, -DR, and TLR-2 were retrieved as 3LQZ, 5KSV, 4AH2, and -6NIG, respectively. Using the ClusterPro tool (https://cluspro.org/help.php), the molecular interactions of the binders of MHC with HLA-alleles were performed.
B-cell epitope prediction
Using the Kolaskar and Tongaonkar Antigenicity Prediction technique (http://tools.iedb.org/bcell/), the Immune Epitope Database (IEDB) (https://www.iedb.org/) was used to predict the AsaA B-cell epitope.
Results
Protein retrieval
The AsaA sequence from A. baumannii was observed with the sequence ID R9RHI2 in the database of the UniProt (Universal Protein Resource) (https://www.uniprot.org/). The subcellular location of the predicted protein was assessed to be at the periplasmic membrane (2.865*) using CELLO v.2.5: subCELlularLOcalization predictor tool (http://cello.life.nctu.edu.tw/).
Antigenicity and allergenicity results
The antigenicity of AsaA was predicted based on the antigenicity score obtained from the VaXiJen v2.0 server and it was observed to be 0.5478. The epitope was observed to be non-allergen in the AlgPred tool that is obtained by the support vector machine (SVM) based method relying on the mapping of epitope-specific to IgE (Table 1).
Table 1. Identification of major histocompatibility class II (MHC class II) binders (T-cell epitopes) and prediction of antigenicity and stability prediction of selected T-cell epitopes using VaxiJen and ProtParam.
HLA: human leukocyte antigen
| Position of peptide | Sequence | Number of binders to HLA alleles (DP, DQ, DR) | VaxiJen v 2.0 | ProtParam |
| 1 | MLKQSVLIL | 14 | -0.4152 | 95.99 |
| 2 | LKQSVLILF | 12 | 0.1329 | 95.99 |
| 3 | KQSVLILFL | 14 | 0.6194 | 105.42 |
| 7 | LILFLIGNY | 15 | 0.6852 | 20.86 |
| 12 | IGNYVGLSC | 11 | 0.5946 | 26.24 |
| 15 | YVGLSCAQA | 13 | 1.1138 | 35.68 |
| 18 | LSCAQAAEL | 15 | 0.9975 | 45.11 |
| 29 | IKLKKSCIK | 18 | 1.2485 | 7.38 |
| 30 | KLKKSCIKK | 17 | 0.9433 | 16.81 |
| 33 | KSCIKKNPI | 13 | 0.5314 | 32.48 |
| 36 | IKKNPIIEG | 10 | 0.2056 | 45.08 |
| 41 | IIEGQTDPE | 10 | 0.2272 | 77.02 |
| 50 | LLNLFKQVC | 10 | -0.3243 | 10.12 |
| 51 | LNLFKQVCD | 12 | 0.3469 | 31.52 |
Protein secondary structure
A. baumannii depicted a secondary structure representing an alpha helix of 43.81%, an extended strand of 7.52%, a beta-turn of 2.65%, and a random coil of 46.02% (Figure 1).
Figure 1. Structure predictions of the predicted epitopes using PEP-FOLD server and its validation by Ramachandran plot: A. LILFLIGNY (LEU1, ILE2, PHE4, LEU6, TYR 9, ASN8); B. (TYR1, GLY3, VAL2, LEU4, SER3, ALA7, GLN8); C. YVGLSCAQA (LYS1, LYS2, LYS3, LYS4, SER5, LYS6, ILE7, LYS8, LYS9); D. KLKKSCIKK (LYS1, SER2, LYS3, LYS5, LYS6, ILE9, ASN9, PRO8).
Antigenicity and stability results
The peptide binders that were ≥10 were selected for the evaluations of antigenic and further to evaluate its stability. The peptides showing an antigenicity score of >0.4 were assessed as antigenic epitopes. Similarly, the epitopes were categorized as stable based on the ProtParam scores <40. From the final 20 peptides predicted, 14 peptides were observed as antigenic, while the remaining six were observed as stable peptides (Table 2).
Table 2. Structure prediction using PEP-FOLD and Ramachandran plot evaluation showing the epitopes at the most favorable region.
HLA: human leukocyte antigen
| Position of peptide | Sequence | Number of binders to HLA alleles (DP, DQ, DR) | VaXiJen v 2.0 | ProtParam |
| 1 | MLKQSVLIL | 14 | -0.4152 | 95.99 |
| 2 | LKQSVLILF | 12 | 0.1329 | 95.99 |
| 3 | KQSVLILFL | 14 | 0.6194 | 105.42 |
| 7 | LILFLIGNY | 15 | 0.6852 | 20.86 |
| 12 | IGNYVGLSC | 11 | 0.5946 | 26.24 |
| 15 | YVGLSCAQA | 13 | 1.1138 | 35.68 |
| 18 | LSCAQAAEL | 15 | 0.9975 | 45.11 |
| 29 | IKLKKSCIK | 18 | 1.2485 | 7.38 |
| 30 | KLKKSCIKK | 17 | 0.9433 | 16.81 |
| 33 | KSCIKKNPI | 13 | 0.5314 | 32.48 |
| 36 | IKKNPIIEG | 10 | 0.2056 | 45.08 |
| 41 | IIEGQTDPE | 10 | 0.2272 | 77.02 |
| 50 | LLNLFKQVC | 10 | -0.3243 | 10.12 |
| 51 | LNLFKQVCD | 12 | 0.3469 | 31.52 |
Results of epitope structure predictions
The selected proteins were subjected to the structure predictions in the PEP-FOLD server, and the structures were validated using the Ramachandran plot analysis. Based on the obtained results, six epitope peptides out of the 18 were short-listed for the final docking interactions, along with HLA restriction analysis (Table 3).
Table 3. Molecular docking scores upon the interaction of the predicted epitopes with HLA-alleles and TLR-2 using the PEP-FOLD server and its validation by Ramachandran plot.
HLA: human leukocyte antigens; TLR-2: toll-like receptor 2
| Predicted peptides | Peptides | Most favored region |
| Epitope 1 | LILFLIGNY | 100% |
| Epitope 2 | YVGLSCAQA | 100% |
| Epitope 3 | KLKKSCIKK | 100% |
| Epitope 4 | KSCIKKNPI | 100% |
| Epitope 5 | IGNYVGLSC | 42.8% |
| Epitope 6 | IKLKKSCIK | 42.8% |
Results of docking interactions of the epitopes with HLA alleles
Molecular docking interactions of the selected peptides with the HLA-alleles were successful and the final epitope LILFLIGNY was selected as the best immune-dominant epitope with good docking interaction scores (Table 4) possessing high affinity yielding the maximum number of hydrogen bonds (Figure 2).
Table 4. Molecular docking scores upon the interaction of the predicted epitopes with HLA-alleles and TLR-2.
HLA: human leukocyte antigen; TLR-2: toll-like receptor 2
| Molecular docking of epitopes with HLA-alleles | Epitopes | HLA-DP | HLA-DQ | HLA-DR | TLR-2 |
| Epitope 1 | LILFLIGNY | -922.9 | -830.5 | -807.8 | -1075.4 |
| Epitope 2 | YVGLSCAQA | -643.3 | -648.7 | -685.7 | -934.3 |
| Epitope 3 | KLKKSCIKK | -622.8 | -563.3 | -623.2 | -554.1 |
| Epitope 4 | KSCIKKNPI | -625.5 | -569.3 | -637.3 | -738.2 |
Figure 2. Docking interactions of the epitope LILFLIGNY with A. HLA-DP, B. HLA-DQ, C. HLA-DR, and D. TLR-2 using VaxiJen and ProtParam.
HLA: human leukocyte antigen; TLR-2: toll-like receptor 2
B-cell antigenicity predictions
Predictions of the B-cell antigenicity for the epitope LILFLIGNY assessed using the Kolaskar & Tongaonkar tool were promising. The X-axis and Y-axis were checked for the position of the amino acid sequence and the propensity of the antigen, respectively. Antigenic positions were observed based on the threshold value that appeared in yellow and considered antigenic (Figure 3).
Figure 3. Kolaskar and Tongaonkar antigenicity predictions of the B-cell dominant LILFLIGNY epitope.
The X-axis and Y-axis denote the sequence position and antigenic propensity, respectively
The regions above the threshold value are antigenic and are depicted in yellow
Discussion
The present study is based on the synthesis of peptide vaccine from the immune-dominant epitopes from A. baumannii infections that are common and linked to high morbidity, death, and multi-resistance rates. Acquired MDR, which makes it difficult to find effective antimicrobials, is the biggest issue in complicating the treatment of recalcitrant infections [12]. MDR can result from the presence of a single resistance determinant, such as an MDR pump, which confers resistance to multiple classes of antimicrobial agents, particularly in patients with co-morbidities. Recently, it has also emerged as an oral and dental pathogen [13-14]. Many resistance genetic determinants are associated with the propensity of MDR [15-16]. The T6SS plays a vital role in the anti-phagocytic process and thus attributes virulence to A. baumannii. In the present investigation, the AsaA T6SS was selected for the identification of B-cell and T-cell dominant epitope peptides, which will be utilized in further vaccine construct development. In-silico-based predictions aid in the preliminary assessment of the cell-mediated and humoral immune responses.
Cytoplasmic membrane proteins play a vital role in developing small molecule drugs while the membrane peptides are utilized for the formation of vaccines. The location predictions of the AsaA secretion systems have shown the periplasmic spaces and are promising for the design of the peptides. The antigenic epitopes of a few potent virulence proteins were done for designing the vaccine against A. baumannii using computational-based tools and databases in many earlier studies. Antigenicity and allergenicity predictions were also promising for the selection of the epitopes for further evaluation. The selected peptide binders (>10) subjected to the evaluation of their antigenic, and stability properties were assessed based on the default set score >0.4 in the VaXiJen prediction tool. An initial selection of 18 peptides was made from a total of 20 peptides for further analysis. Allergenicity was assessed by the SVM method using the prediction analysis based on the mapping of the IgE epitope.
The PEP-FOLD server was used for the prediction of the peptide structures for the epitopes and was validated using the RAMPAGE tool for assessing the stereo-chemical properties of the structures. Based on the PEP-FOLD server evaluation, around 10 epitopes were shortlisted for further structural validation. From the predicted epitopes, four epitopes were in the favored regions by the Ramachandran validation. The designed vaccine binding affinity was further evaluated by molecular docking to six variable HLA molecules, and the epitope LILFLIGNY showed the highest interactions with good docking scores as -830.5, -807.8, and -1075.4 for HLA-DQ, DR, and TLR-2, respectively. Conventional hydrogen bonds, hydrophobic interactions, alkyl-pi, and pi-pi stacks were also in a higher state suggesting the increase in the stability and strength of a vaccine-receptor interaction sustainability. Similar studies also have proved that such in-silico analysis and vaccine predictions are cheaper, and one of the most efficient methodologies in the field of drug and vaccine discovery [17-18]. Developing vaccines for MDR strains is a novel approach to effectively address the antimicrobial resistance (AMR) traits. The limitations of this in-silico analysis conducted on the LILFLIGNY epitope stride lacked experimental validation. Additionally, protein detection in in-vitro studies and further analysis, as well as preclinical trials (animal studies), are necessary steps for synthesizing vaccines from immune-dominant epitope peptides. Looking ahead, clinical studies on this vaccine targeting MDR traits and enhancing immune response through B-cell and T-cell activation hold promise for addressing the AMR challenge.
Conclusions
In the present investigation, it was found that epitope LILFLIGNY is a promising immune-dominant peptide to evoke host immune responses. Computational platforms are promising in the design of immune-dominant peptides and for further vaccine synthesis. The findings of the present study also warrant the need for further experimental evidence-based studies on its toxicity and immunological memory. The present investigation concludes with LILFLIGNY as a suitable epitope vaccine peptide that may be a candidate to combat the complications of the infections caused by A. baumannii.
The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Author Contributions
Concept and design: A. S. Smiline Girija, Medha Ranjan
Acquisition, analysis, or interpretation of data: A. S. Smiline Girija, Vijayashree J. Priyadharsini, Medha Ranjan
Drafting of the manuscript: A. S. Smiline Girija, Vijayashree J. Priyadharsini, Medha Ranjan
Critical review of the manuscript for important intellectual content: A. S. Smiline Girija, Vijayashree J. Priyadharsini
Supervision: A. S. Smiline Girija
Human Ethics
Consent was obtained or waived by all participants in this study
Animal Ethics
Animal subjects: All authors have confirmed that this study did not involve animal subjects or tissue.
References
- 1.Uncovering the mechanisms of Acinetobacter baumannii virulence. Harding CM, Hennon SW, Feldman MF. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2018;16:91–102. doi: 10.1038/nrmicro.2017.148. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Multidrug-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii as an emerging concern in hospitals. Ibrahim S, Al-Saryi N, Al-Kadmy IM, Aziz SN. Mol Biol Rep. 2021;48:6987–6998. doi: 10.1007/s11033-021-06690-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Multidrug resistant Acinetobacter. Manchanda V, Sanchaita S, Singh N. J Glob Infect Dis. 2010;2:291–304. doi: 10.4103/0974-777X.68538. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Acinetobacter baumannii: evolution of a global pathogen. Antunes LC, Visca P, Towner KJ. Pathog Dis. 2014;71:292–301. doi: 10.1111/2049-632X.12125. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.An increasing threat in hospitals: multidrug-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii. Dijkshoorn L, Nemec A, Seifert H. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2007;5:939–951. doi: 10.1038/nrmicro1789. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Structure and activity of the type VI secretion system. Cherrak Y, Flaugnatti N, Durand E, Journet L, Cascales E. Microbiol Spectr. 2019;7 doi: 10.1128/microbiolspec.psib-0031-2019. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.The type VI secretion system: a versatile bacterial weapon. Coulthurst S. Microbiology (Reading) 2019;165:503–515. doi: 10.1099/mic.0.000789. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Bacterial defense against the type VI secretion system. Robitaille S, Trus E, Ross BD. Trends Microbiol. 2021;29:187–190. doi: 10.1016/j.tim.2020.09.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Genetic dissection of the type VI secretion system in Acinetobacter and identification of a novel peptidoglycan hydrolase, TagX, required for its biogenesis. Weber BS, Hennon SW, Wright MS, et al. mBio. 2016;7:0–16. doi: 10.1128/mBio.01253-16. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.The type VI secretion system protein AsaA in Acinetobacter baumannii is a periplasmic protein physically interacting with TssM and required for T6SS assembly. Li L, Wang YN, Jia HB, et al. Sci Rep. 2019;9:9438. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-45875-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Design of a multi-epitope vaccine against Acinetobacter baumannii using immunoinformatics approach. Touhidinia M, Sefid F, Bidakhavidi M. Int J Pept Res Ther. 2021;27:2417–2437. doi: 10.1007/s10989-021-10262-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Homology modeling and docking analysis of prodigiosin from Serratia marcescens. Suba KP, Stalin A, Smiline Girija AS, Raguraman R. https://www.elixirpublishers.com/articles/1680525132_201302018.pdf Elix Biotech. 2013;55:12897–12902. [Google Scholar]
- 13.Study of uropathogens among type II diabetic patients and their antimicrobial resistance pattern among rural south Indian population. Pragash DS, Smiline Girija AS, Usha S, Rayapu V, Malathi M. https://saspublishers.com/media/articles/SJAMS_22B589-591.pdf Sch J Med Sci. 2014;2:589–591. [Google Scholar]
- 14.Clinical and pathophysiological overview of Acinetobacter infections: a century of challenges. Wong D, Nielsen TB, Bonomo RA, Pantapalangkoor P, Luna B, Spellberg B. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2017;30:409–447. doi: 10.1128/CMR.00058-16. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.An insight into the emergence of Acinetobacter baumannii as an oro-dental pathogen and its drug resistance gene profile - an in silico approach. Vijayashree PJ, Smiline Girija AS, Paramasivam A. Heliyon. 2018;4:0. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2018.e01051. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Antibiotic resistance assessment of Acinetobacter baumannii isolates from Tehran hospitals due to the presence of efflux pumps encoding genes (adeA and adeS genes) by molecular method. Basatian-Tashkan B, Niakan M, Khaledi M, Afkhami H, Sameni F, Bakhti S, Mirnejad R. BMC Res Notes. 2020;13:543. doi: 10.1186/s13104-020-05387-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.An in silico approach towards identification of virulence factors in red complex pathogens targeted by reserpine. Ushanthika T, Smiline Girija AS, Paramasivam A, Priyadharsini JV. Nat Prod Res. 2021;35:1893–1898. doi: 10.1080/14786419.2019.1641811. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Delineating the immuno-dominant antigenic vaccine peptides against gacS-sensor kinase in Acinetobacter baumannii: an in silico investigational approach. Smiline Girija AS. Front Microbiol. 2020;11:2078. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2020.02078. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]



