Skip to main content
Advances in Pharmacological and Pharmaceutical Sciences logoLink to Advances in Pharmacological and Pharmaceutical Sciences
. 2024 May 27;2024:3869387. doi: 10.1155/2024/3869387

Exploring the Formulation and Approaches of Injectable Hydrogels Utilizing Hyaluronic Acid in Biomedical Uses

Hadeia Mashaqbeh 1,, Batool Al-Ghzawi 2, Fatima BaniAmer 2
PMCID: PMC11147673  PMID: 38831895

Abstract

The characteristics of injectable hydrogels make them a prime contender for various biomedical applications. Hyaluronic acid is an essential component of the matrix surrounding the cells; moreover, hyaluronic acid's structural and biochemical characteristics entice researchers to develop injectable hydrogels for various applications. However, due to its poor mechanical properties, several strategies are used to produce injectable hyaluronic acid hydrogel. This review summarizes published studies on the production of injectable hydrogels based on hyaluronic acid polysaccharide polymers and the biomedical field's applications for these hydrogel systems. Hyaluronic acid-based hydrogels are divided into two categories based on their injectability mechanisms: in situ-forming injectable hydrogels and shear-thinning injectable hydrogels. Many crosslinking methods are used to create injectable hydrogels; chemical crosslinking techniques are the most frequently investigated technique. Hybrid injectable hydrogel systems are widely investigated by blending hyaluronic acid with other polymers or nanoparticulate systems. Injectable hyaluronic acid hydrogels were thoroughly investigated and proven to demonstrate potential in various medical fields, including delivering drugs and cells, tissue repair, and wound dressings.

1. Introduction

Hyaluronic acid is found naturally and comprises repeated negatively charged acetyl glucosamine and glucuronic units linked by 1,4 and 1,3-glycosidic linkages. Hyaluronic acid has modifiable carboxyl, hydroxyl, and amino groups to develop hyaluronic acid-based formulations [14]. As a vital constituent of the extracellular matrix, hyaluronic acid's structure, besides its biological features, mediates its engagement in cellular signaling and wound healing [5]. Furthermore, it is vital in cell motility and differentiation processes [6].

Hydrogels are 3-dimensional structures composed of covalently or physically linked polymeric structures, which are usually capable of holding enormous quantities of water in their network [7]. Hydrogels typically have excellent biocompatibility and can load hydrophilic substances due to their significant water content, ranging from 70–99%, thus mimicking body tissues [8]. Stimuli-responsive hydrogels are constructed to react with chemical and physical stimuli, including pH, temperature, ionic strength, light exposure, and glucose level [9, 10]. Owing to their unique characteristics, these hydrogels have been widely investigated for medical applications [1114]. Polymers employed in the manufacture of stimulus-sensitive hydrogel systems have different interacting functional groups located throughout the primary polymeric structure; these functional groups, as well as other environmental factors, can detect the polymer configuration by affecting both polymer interactions with the solvent and interpolymeric interactions; when a polymer is in contact with a favorable solvent, interactions between segments of the polymer predominate, resulting in relaxed polymer chains. Meanwhile, the hydrogel will aggregate when it encounters a poor solvent because the chain mobility is constrained due to increased polymer-polymer interaction. Alterations in the solution's conditions, such as acidity, temperature, and ion concentration, as well as in the electrical current and ultrasonic velocity, among other external stimuli, can alter the solvent-polymer interaction [15].

1.1. Main Challenges Associated with Hydrogel Use in Biomedical Fields

Hydrogel delivery of hydrophobic ingredients is challenging because of its variability, inadequate solubility, poor biological stability, and difficulty controlling the release rate. However, by improving solubility and strength, it is possible to optimize the hydrogel's ability to release incorporated active ingredients in a controlled way [16, 17].

Scaling up hydrogel production for commercialization is a primary challenge in transforming hydrogel use in biomedical fields from laboratory experiments to the market [18, 19]. Scaling up hydrogel production presents a significant challenge due to the fact that hydrogel is typically made from natural polysaccharide polymers, such as hyaluronic acid. These materials are naturally driven, which makes batch-to-batch variability the primary obstacle to large-scale hydrogel production. A major obstacle in the commercialization of hydrogels is the requirement for sterilization. Traditional heat sterilization methods can lead to the destruction of hydrogel products. Alternative sterilization methods, such as gamma radiation or filtration, should be explored to overcome this challenge. In addition, hydrogel should be produced in an aseptic condition [20].

The safety of using hydrogel in biomedical applications should be carefully considered. The effects of hydrogel degradation products on normal physiological functions of body tissues remain to be studied. Hydrogel use safety might be maintained by adequately conducting the toxicological characteristics of the materials used in hydrogel manufacturing and selecting biodegradable and biocompatible materials [21].

In addition to previous limitations, the suitable mechanical property of hydrogels for human tissues is a crucial factor to consider, as this will provide an acceptable tissue reaction while avoiding injury to healthy tissues [21, 22]. The mechanical properties of hydrogels can be modulated to mimic biological tissues by controlling hydrogel crosslinking densities [23] and using metal bonds of coordination as a hydrogel crosslinker [24, 25]. Furthermore, composite hydrogels are produced by incorporating nanoparticles, which have been reported to enhance the mechanical characteristics of the hydrogel [26].

1.2. Injectable Hydrogels for Biomedical Applications

Injectable hydrogels used in biomedical applications are growing in popularity. The ability to be administered to the target site using an injection device is called injectable. Consequently, it is not limited to in situ gel formation but can be produced in vivo. After injection, injectable hydrogels must exhibit the appropriate mechanical properties [27].

Hydrogels have gained significant consideration among various matrices explored for tissue repair due to their versatility, structural resemblance to the extracellular matrix, substantial water content, biodegradability, porosity, and low cytotoxicity [28]. Over the last few years, there has been an upsurge in the investigation of injectable hydrogels in tissue regeneration because of their less invasive administration and structural flexibility [29, 30]. It is simple to perform structural modifications, modulate mechanical properties, and promote the physicochemical characteristics of hydrogels to fit different anticipated medical applications [31].

The use of hyaluronic acid hydrogel for wound healing and cancer therapy was intensively reviewed by Yang et al., indicating the significance of using injectable hyaluronic acid hydrogel in wound dressing due to its good adherence to wounds and its ability to fill wound sites [32]. The investigation of injectable gels, in general, as a localized drug delivery vehicle has attracted researchers in different disciplines [3336], where injectable hydrogels containing chemotherapeutic drugs can be injected directly into the tumor to treat specific cancer [3740]. Due to the injectable hydrogels' limited toxicity and the drug's localization at the treatment site, developing these pharmaceutical formulations to treat different tumors has become a research hotspot [41].

This article goes over various approaches in producing hyaluronic acid-based injectable hydrogels to aid researchers in improving their understanding of the design and development of hyaluronic acid-based injectable hydrogels for different biomedical uses.

2. Injectability Mechanisms

In terms of the injection mechanisms, the hyaluronic acid-based hydrogels can be classified into two main categories: in situ-forming injectable hydrogels and shear-thinning injectable hydrogels, as described in Figure 1.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Illustration of injectability mechanisms of injectable hyaluronic acid hydrogels: (a) in situ-forming liquid and (b) shear-thinning injectable gel. This original figure was created by the authors using BioRender.com.

2.1. Hyaluronic Acid-Based In Situ Gel-Forming Liquid

This type of hydrogel is prepared as a flowable liquid that can be converted into a hydrogel at physiological conditions triggered by various stimuli, including temperature, pH, and ionic strength, or by being subjected to other stimuli, such as light exposure [42].

2.1.1. Thermoresponsive Hyaluronic Acid-Based Injectable Hydrogel

The thermoresponsive hyaluronic hydrogel was produced using a disulfide-modified poloxamer diacrylate crosslinking agent, and the in situ formed gel showed good mechanical properties with minimum swelling [43]. It has been found that hyaluronic acid modified by acetylation and glycol chitosan can interact hydrophobically to generate thermally induced gels [44]. Poly (N-isopropylacrylamide)-grafted hyaluronic acid demonstrated hydrogel formation when the heat was increased over 35°C; the formed hydrogel showed sustained release properties of riboflavin with a stable hydrogel shape after 24 hours of in vivo administration [45]. Another study reported the in situ formation of a hydrogel of hyaluronic poly (N-isopropylacrylamide) prepared using click chemistry [46]. Thermosensitive hyaluronic acid-based injectable hydrogels were recently reported through the conjugation of hyaluronic acid with poly (N-isopropyl acrylamide), the produced hydrogel exhibited in situ gelation at body temperature, and study results indicate good compatibility with prolonged residence at the injection site which is regarded crucial for e for ensuring the treatment's maximum efficacy [47].

A recorded patent claimed the formation of a thermosensitive hyaluronic acid hydrogel when combined with polypropylene and polyethylene oxide copolymers with a measured sol-to-gel transition temperature ranging from 30 to 37°C [48].

2.1.2. Other Stimuli-Responsive Hyaluronic Acid-Based Injectable Hydrogel

The methacrylate-thiol Michael addition reaction resulted in light-induced gel formation of methacrylate, hyaluronic, and thiolated hyaluronic acid [49]. Figueiredo et al. used the benzoxaborin-saccharide complexation to prepare an injectable dynamic covalent hydrogel at physiological pH conditions, mainly in an epidermal application [50]. Another pH-induced hydrogel was produced using aldehyde-modified maleic sodium hyaluronate [51].

Hyaluronic acid-based injectable nanogel was prepared through salt-triggered in situ gelling; cholesteryl-conjugated hyaluronic acid was mixed with recombinant human growth hormone to obtain prolonged release properties [6].

2.2. Shear-Thinning Hyaluronic Acid-Based Injectable Hydrogels

Although in situ gel formation is considered a standard technique for producing injectable hydrogels, it is difficult to monitor the in vivo process of in situ gel formation, which limits their use in clinical applications. Shear-thinning hydrogels, which differ from in situ gelling hydrogels in that they can be created ex vivo, can change from the gel form to solution form throughout injection and reconvert directly after injection, making them appropriate for minimally invasive applications [52].

Self-healing is the process of restoring the hydrogel to its intact form. The ability of an already-formed hydrogel to flow and be injected by applying shear stress upon the use of needles and to return to the hydrogel form when relaxed after injection is referred to as shear thinning. This type of hydrogel can involve a gel formed by both chemical and physical crosslinking, and the exact mechanism of injectability differs for each hydrogel system [42, 53].

The shear-thinning hydrogel was produced using hyaluronic acid and methylcellulose to repair spinal cord damage. In addition to the shear-thinning property, the produced hydrogel indicated increased hydrogel strength with temperature increase [54].

The shear-thinning hydrogel was produced by ionic crosslinking of blended hyaluronic acid and alginate. Iron (III) metal ion coupled with ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid was evaluated as a crosslinking complex. The resultant hydrogel exhibited antimicrobial activity and could return to its gel 3D structure immediately after injection [55]. Nanofiber containing hyaluronic acid hydrogel was developed to be used as a filler for tissue regeneration applications, and the produced gel maintained the hydrogel 3D structure immediately after injection [56]. Injectable dermal fillers are one of the popular applications of this type of hydrogel. Hyaluronic dermal fillers with a soft consistency are already available on the market and are used to minimize the visible signs of facial lines [57].

3. Methods of Preparation

3.1. Crosslinking Mechanism of Hyaluronic Acid Injectable Hydrogel

Injectable hyaluronic acids are set using various physical and chemical methods to overcome the limitation of using hyaluronic acid itself [58], to prolong hydrogel residence, and to offer the hydrogel with specific mechanical, viscoelastic, solubility, degradation, and biological properties matching the clinical indications [59].

3.1.1. Physical Crosslinking Mechanism of Hyaluronic Acid Injectable Hydrogel

Physical crosslinking is a simple method with low toxicity that depends on changes in different conditions, including temperature, acidity, ion type, and concentration, and it includes hydrophobic interactions, hydrogen bonding, charge interaction, and stereo complexation [60]. Few attempts to develop an injectable hydrogel based on hyaluronic acid without the addition of chemical crosslinkers or chemical modification have been reported; a physical crosslinked hyaluronic-based hydrogel usually involves blending with one or more polymers, as described in Section 3.2.

3.1.2. Chemical Crosslinking Mechanism of Hyaluronic Acid Injectable Hydrogel

Most of the formulated hyaluronic-based hydrogel is crosslinked by directly including crosslinking substances or by modifying the polymeric chain to generate new functional groups that can form a hydrogel network [5]. The modifications on hyaluronic acid mainly occur at different sites: carboxylic groups, hydroxyl groups, and N-acetyl groups that can react with various functionals [61]. These modifications are performed to maintain biocompatibility and biodegradation characteristics and to form a resistant hydrogel to hyaluronidase digestion [62].

(1) Crosslinking and Modification of the Carboxylic Acid (–COOH) Group. The chemically crosslinked hyaluronic injectable hydrogel was formed using a chemical modification procedure for the amide linkages between the carboxyl and amino functional groups [63]. The reaction depends initially on the process of activating the carboxylic group [64], in addition to the creation of an amide or ester bond in two stages; initially, the reaction between the reactant and the carboxylic functional group of the hyaluronic acid produces a reactive moiety, the amino group of the reagent acts as the nucleophile and the nucleophile reacts with the carboxyl group and forms the ammonium hydrogel. The hydrogel prepared following these reactions was characterized by improved stability and mechanical properties [6567].

Different chemical moieties can be used to crosslink hyaluronic acid to form in situ hydrogels, as proposed in Figure 2, which involves the use of ethyl-dimethyl-aminopropyl-carbodiimide hydrochloride and N-hydroxysuccinimide as they were reported to create ester bindings among the carboxylic and hydroxylic groups of hyaluronic acid itself or with other molecules [68, 69]. The crosslinking of hyaluronic acid with adipic dihydrazide has also been reported to sustain protein release for up to 28 days; the produced in situ-forming hydrogels were promising for bone regeneration treatments [70].

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Examples of chemical modifications of the carboxylic acid (–COOH) and hydroxyl (–OH) groups of hyaluronic acid. This original figure was created by the authors.

The crosslinking of hyaluronic acid was achieved using boronate esters from boronic derivatives and hyaluronic polymer binding. Crosslinking was obtained by reversible covalent bonds between hyaluronic acid, boric acid, and boronic acid derivatives [50]. This method is rapid and easy, while the hydrogel structure is more stable and flexible [71].

Hyaluronic acid modification with 3-aminophenylboronic acid has been reported for the formation of glucose-sensitive in situ-formed injectable hydrogels; this conjugation allows the transition of hyaluronic acid solution to a hydrogel that is responsive to the existence of glucose at a level that mimics the physiological concentration [72].

Another chemical modification involving the hyaluronic carboxylic group is the cycloaddition (click) Diels–Alder crosslinking, which is one of the attractive options for medical applications due to its great adaptability and good productivity [73]. Shuangli et al. produced hyaluronic acid crosslinked polyethylene glycol hydrogels by reacting with cyclooctyne-grafted hyaluronic and azide-grafted polyethylene glycol. They prepared the hydrogel injectable to be used as surgical fillers [74].

(2) Modifications and Crosslinking of Hydroxyl Groups. In general, modifications on hydroxyl groups include oxidation or the creation of hemiacetal, ether, or ester bonds [61].

Kenne et al. investigated butanedioldiglycidyl ether for the crosslinking of hyaluronic acid to form a hydrogel, which was performed in an alkaline pH medium to create an ether bond between the hydroxide and epoxide ring [75]. The stability of butanedioldiglycidyl ether crosslinked hyaluronic acid has been studied, indicating the formation of hydrogels with enhanced resistance toward enzymatic degradation [76]. Butanedioldiglycidyl ether crosslinked hyaluronic acid has also been investigated by Zerbinati et al. for the production of dermal fillers. The formed hydrogel was reported to have a spider-web-like structure and good elasticity [77].

Sodium periodate produces aldehydes by oxidizing hyaluronic acid hydroxyl groups, forming a linear chain by opening the sugar ring and increasing the polymeric backbone's flexibility [78]. The oxidation degree is relatively proportional to the added periodate quantity [79], and this oxidized product is considered a precursor for hydrogel fabrication using Schiff's base reactions [8082].

The Schiff base chemical reaction occurs under physiological conditions that allow the production of in situ-forming hydrogels that are crosslinked by the reaction between amine and carbonyl groups to form a reversible imine bond; this reaction is regarded as imine formation and can be catalyzed by both acid and base catalysis [83].

This reaction produces injectable hydrogels that can be used for 3D printing with self-healing ability while maintaining its main structure [84].

These advantages of Schiff's base reactions were broadly investigated for various applications. However, the practical use of the Schiff base reaction was limited due to its pH sensitivity [32].

Ester bond formed between the anhydride of octenyl succinic anhydride and the hydroxyl of hyaluronic in alkaline conditions (pH = 9) was reported by Eenschooten et al. Hyaluronic acid degree of substitution has reached 43% in the optimal conditions [85]. Tous E. et al. investigated the formation of an ester bond between hyaluronic acid and methacrylic anhydride in alkaline media (pH: 8–10). The resulting injectable gel was reported to have good stability against enzymatic degradation; it was used in myocardial infarction cases to remodel the left ventricle and control symptomatic heart failure. This treatment reduced the myocardial wall stress from 2 to 8 weeks [86].

3.2. Hyaluronic Acid-Based Injectable Composite Hydrogel

Single-network hydrogels, sometimes called conventional hydrogels, have been limited when high mechanical properties are required [87]. Composites are systems of hybrid materials featuring different characteristics from the created components. The construction of a composite tries to enhance particular polymers' properties so that they are superior to those of individual polymers [88].

Hyaluronic acid-based composite hydrogels are dual network hydrogels composed of blended hyaluronic acid and other polymer/s or colloidal mixes of microparticles and nanoparticles coupled with hyaluronic acid [89].

Historically, the components of the polymeric composite have been characterized as matrices and reinforcing portions. It is crucial to consider whether the composite contains a synthetic polymer or has both a major and minor component [90]. These two phases have been given the names “matrix” continuous phase, which provides the composite material's structure and support, and “dispersed phase,” which is incorporated to enhance the matrix's properties [91]. However, it is not particularly significant for composites constructed entirely of polysaccharide polymers and may even be challenging to determine because polysaccharides exhibit comparable surface characteristics [92].

3.2.1. Hybrid Hyaluronic Acid-Based Injectable Hydrogels

In general, polymeric blending is used in hydrogel formulations to enhance hydrophilicity [93, 94], promote antimicrobial activity [95], improve compatibility, and modulate mechanical properties [9698]. The diversity of hyaluronic acid-based injectable hydrogels is being expanded by hybrid hydrogels, in which several polymers with different physicochemical properties are combined in a single unit and show significant modifications in their mechanical properties, which reflect on their release properties, drug delivery targeting, and overall strength and durability of the system [89].

The preparation of polymeric blends is considered a simple method to get the desired polymeric properties from each polymeric component [99]. Polymeric blending in the preparation of hydrogels is considered a typical method to produce different materials that exhibit many features that cannot be achieved by utilizing each polymer alone. In general, the materials used in the hydrogel preparation are principally considered by the presence of multiple functional moieties, leading to the implementation of different modifications. For instance, combining synthetic and naturally driven materials allows tuning the physicochemical properties of materials to merge the biocompatibility and safety of natural polymers with the different favorable physicochemical properties of synthetic ones [87, 100].

In most cases, blending of hyaluronic acid with other polymers for the preparation of injectable hydrogels aimed to promote mechanical properties of the hydrogel, as reported for a hyaluronic blend with polyethylene glycol [74], oxidized pectin [101], glycol chitosan [102], poly (γ-glutamic acid) [103, 104], and gelatin [105]. Other studies use polymeric blends with hyaluronic acid to improve the gel's stability and slow its degradation, as reported using gelatin [106] and glycol chitosan [102]. Blending with hyaluronic acid was also used to promote cell adhesion, as reported for fibrinogen with hydroxyphenyl-modified hyaluronic acid to obtain stem cell adhesion [107]. Adhesive properties were also obtained using gelatin blended with tyramine-modified hyaluronic acid [105]. Hyaluronic acid is also blended with pluronic acid and cyclodextrin polymers to modify the hydrogel's rheological characteristics [108]. Furthermore, methylcellulose was blended with hyaluronic acid to gain fast gelling properties, as the gel formed within two minutes when incubated at 37°C without the need of using a crosslinker or chemical modification [54].

Two primary methods for polymer blending are solution blending [109] and fusion blending [110]. Solution blending is the most applicable method, which is simple and suitable for preparing several applicable forms [111]. Solution blending can be done by dissolving each polymer in a suitable solvent and mixing the two polymeric solutions; in addition, the crosslinker can be added to improve the mechanical strength [112, 113]. The properties of polymeric blends are determined by potential interactions between two polymers [114].

(1) Chemically Crosslinked Hyaluronic Acid-Based Hybrid Injectable Hydrogel. Preparing a hybrid in situ-forming hyaluronic acid injectable hydrogels usually requires chemical modification of hyaluronic acid, as represented in Table 1, to allow chemical crosslinking between two polymers. The hyaluronic acid can be conjugated with thiol and hydrazide to permit double crosslinking with oxidized sodium alginate through the formation of hydrazone bonds and disulfide bonds [115]. Hydrazone bond-based crosslinking was also reported for thiolate-modified hyaluronic acid with acidic type I collagen [117]. Hyaluronic acid can also be oxidized to form an aldehyde-modified hyaluronic acid upon cleavage; this aldehyde group can react with amine-containing proteins and polymers, which can allow the chemical crosslinking through the formation of imine bonding; this reaction called Schiff's base reaction and used to covalently combine hyaluronic acid with different derivatives of chitosan polymer including N-succinyl-chitosan [119], N, O-carboxymethyl chitosan [118], carboxymethyl chitosan [116], and gycol chitosan [102]; Schiff's base reaction also reported for oxidized hyaluronic with carbohydrazide groups of the carbohydrazide-modified gelatin [106]. A chemical crosslinking agent such as genipin can prepare hyaluronic combined with collagen and chitosan polymers [120].

Table 1.

The polymeric composition, type of chemical modification or crosslinking method, and gelation time of an injectable hybrid hydrogel-containing hyaluronic acid.

Blended polymer Modification of hyaluronic acid Crosslinking mechanism Gelling time in physiological conditions at 37 C Ref
Oxidized sodium alginate Thiol and hydrazide Hydrazone bonds and disulfide bonds 157–955 seconds [115]
Polyethylene glycol Cyclooctyne Cycloaddition click reaction 5–50 minutes [74]
Carbohydrazide-modified gelatin Oxidized Schiff base reaction 1–6 seconds [106]
Oxidized pectin Adipic dihydrazide Hydrazone 112–399 seconds [101]
Glycol chitosan Oxidized Schiff base reaction 18–47 seconds [102]
Carboxymethyl chitosan Oxidized Schiff base reaction 60–360 seconds [116]
Acidic type I collagen Thiol Disulfide bond [117]
N, O-carboxymethyl chitosan Oxidized Schiff base reaction 70 s–2400 seconds [118]
N-succinyl-chitosan Oxidized Schiff base reaction [119]
Collagen and chitosan Genipin crosslinking agent [120]
Pluronic F-127 Photo crosslinking [121]
Heparin Methacrylate Photopolymerization processes [122]
Polyglutamic acid Methacrylate Photopolymerization [103]
Polyglutamic acid Glycidyl methacrylate-conjugated oxidized hyaluronic acid Labile hemithioacetal bonds + photocrosslinking 17–210 seconds [104]
Fibrinogen Hydroxyphenyl Enzymatical crosslinking 61 ± 4 seconds [107]
Gelatin Tyramine Enzymatical crosslinking 4–9 minutes [105]
κ-carrageenan and pluronic F-127 Physical crosslinking 6–15 seconds [123]
Poloxamer, κ-carrageenan Physical crosslinking 51–72 seconds [124]
Chitosan Physical crosslinking/complex coacervation 1-2 h [125]
Chitosan Physical crosslinking 3 h [126]
N-hexanoylation of glycol chitosan Acetylation [44]
Poloxamer and cyclodextrin Physical crosslinking [108]

Photopolymerization of methacrylate hyaluronic acid when combined with polyglutamic acid [103] and heparin [122], self-healing maleic hyaluronic acid-based-hydrogel is produced through acyl hydrazone bonding combined with photocrosslinking due to the aldehyde modification of the maleic hyaluronic salt, the produced hydrogel was with good cytocompatibility, mechanical strength, and pH responsiveness [127].

Enzymatical crosslinking can also obtain injectable hyaluronic-based hydrogels by forming hydroxyphenyl-modified hyaluronic acid's enzymatically induced soft hydrogel when combined with fibrinogen [107]. Another study reported the enzymatic crosslinking of tyramine-modified hyaluronic acid and gelatin as the resulting phenolic group reacted with the peroxidase enzyme to form the hydrogel [105].

(2) Physically Crosslinked Hyaluronic Acid-Based Hybrid Injectable Hydrogel. Several attempts have been made to obtain physically crosslinked hyaluronic acid-based injectable hydrogels without chemical agents; hyaluronic acid combined with poloxamer and k-carrageenan was reported to form a physical hydrogel [123, 124]. However, in both studies, poloxamer was the foremost hydrogel component, and hyaluronic acid was added in minor concentrations.

Blending two anionic polymers will affect the swelling ability of the prepared gel by varying the exterior pH conditions. In the presence of the anionic, carboxylic, or sulfate moieties, increasing pH is expected to increase the polymeric chain charge, which then leads to an increase in repulsive forces along the polymer chains, which then results in the formation of an expanded network; this extreme pH-dependent behavior explains the potential of using this type of polymeric combination for the construction of pH-responsive hydrogels [51]. This explains the promoted swelling and drug release of hybrid hyaluronic carrageenan and poloxamer hydrogels [123]. Physical crosslinking was also reported with fish gelatin [128] and gellan gum [129].

Hydrogels can be produced when two polyelectrolytes with opposing charges are mixed; the electrostatic interaction of two opposed charges is primarily responsible for the production of polyelectrolyte complexes, causing interpolymeric ion condensation and the release of counterions as a result [130132]. H-bonding, ionic, or hydrophobic forces maintain this hydrogel structure [133]. Since all of these interactions are reversible, they might be destroyed by altering the surrounding conditions [134]. The formation of a hydrogel of hyaluronic acid with chitosan and chitosan derivatives has been studied [44, 126]; Vignesh et al. reported the development of the coacervation complex by nonspecific electrostatic binding with the chitosan polymer [125]. Thermally induced gelling through the formation of hydrophobic interactions between N-hexanoylation of glycol, chitosan, and hyaluronic acid modified by acetylation followed by additional physical crosslinking has been reported [44].

3.2.2. Hyaluronic Acid-Based Injectable Hydrogels Incorporating Nanoparticles

Significant efforts have been carried out in recent years to create innovative drug delivery technologies that incorporate drug-loaded nanoparticles into injectable hydrogels, as this allows site-specific delivery of drugs targeting tumor cells [135137]. Hydrogel nanoparticles are one of the attractive medication delivery approaches as these systems merge the functionalities of hydrogel and nanoparticles; they allow for localized and targeted delivery of the drug combined with properties of small particles and controlled release properties [138, 139].

As illustrated in Figure 3, hyaluronic acid injectable hydrogels incorporating nanoparticle technology can be designed using different strategies. First, nanoparticles containing hyaluronic acid in the surface shell that aggregated in situ to produce hydrogels as constructed by Chen et al. in their study on the preparation of a tumor-targeting nanocapsule formulation composed of a hyaluronic acid shell and mesoporous silica-based core, besides targeting the CDD4 receptor on the tumor cells surface, showed a pH sensitivity as the low pH of the tumor environment triggers the in situ gelation of hyaluronic acid [140].

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Simple illustration of various design approaches of hyaluronic acid injectable nanocomposite hydrogel: (a) nanoparticles containing hyaluronic acid in the surface shell that aggregated in situ to produce hydrogels, (b) hyaluronic derivative-based hydrogels designed with the capability of in situ-forming nanoparticles, (c) nanoparticles mixed with chemically modified hyaluronic acid that enable to in situ form hydrogel, and (d) nanoparticles act as a node to crosslink the hydrogel triggering the formation of shear-thinning composite hydrogel. This original figure was created by the authors using BioRender.com.

More recently, hyaluronic derivative-based hydrogels were designed with the capability of in situ-forming nanoparticles; the transformation to nanoparticles was achieved at a temperature above 30 C; the production involved the use of poly-N-isopropyl acrylamide and sulfo-dibenzocyclooctyne-PEG4-amine; the produced hydrogel system has a prolonged residence time and superior stability toward both enzymatic and oxidative degradation [141].

Nanoparticles mixed with chemically modified hyaluronic acid can form hydrogels in situ. Hu et al. demonstrated the production of a composite hydrogel composed of chemically crosslinked hyaluronic acid through in situ polymerization, and this hydrogel is embedded with a pH-sensitive nanoparticle for cell therapy applications. The composite hydrogel showed a pH sensitivity with good mechanical characteristics and was superior to the corresponding noncomposite hydrogel [142]. Hyaluronic acid hydrogel incorporating drug nanocrystals provides a potential intraarticular treatment approach for inflammatory arthritis, taking advantage of the depot formation of the hydrogel combined with the release, solubilization, and stabilization advantages of drug encapsulation as a nanocrystal [143].

Besides the typical advantages of encapsulating drugs in nanoparticles, such as improving drug solubility, stability, and release characteristics, nanoparticles can also act as a node to crosslink hydrogels, presenting an innovative approach in developing nanocomposite hydrogels. Hybrid thiol-modified hyaluronic hydrogel incorporating silver-lignin nanoparticles, where the nanoparticles act as a node to crosslink the hydrogel, resulted in a composite hydrogel that has a shear-thinning ability and was found to be promising for chronic wound healing treatments [144].

While preclinical investigations demonstrate the advantages of incorporating nanoparticles into hydrogel products, the clinical translation of nanomedicines has proved complicated [145].

4. Biomedical Applications of Injectable Hyaluronic Acid-Based Hydrogel

4.1. Injectable Hyaluronic Acid-Based Hydrogel for Tissue Engineering Applications

Tissue engineering principally involves the use of synthetic as well as natural tissue analogs to restore or replace destroyed or deteriorating tissues. Generating innovative tissue engineering scaffold materials with superior characteristics is especially important.

Injectable hydrogels are among the most intriguing biomedical products that can be employed in tissue engineering applications, and their use is advantageous as they can be injected directly into the area of the injury without the need for surgery. Besides, hydrogels can be easily loaded with cells and active molecules and might control their delivery in vivo. Furthermore, the injectable hydrogel can be shaped within the body to attain the shape of the injection area. It can supply the cells with a proper three-dimensional surrounding environment analogous to their naturally situated within the tissues' extracellular matrices [42, 146]. Injectable hydrogels have been utilized to regenerate cartilage [147], bones [147, 148], skin [149], heart tissues [150], and nervous system tissues [151]. Reported injectable hydrogel systems based on hyaluronic acid for tissue regeneration are summarized in Table 2.

Table 2.

Injectable hydrogel systems based on hyaluronic acid: polymeric composition, encapsulated ingredients, crosslinking method, defected tissue type, and injectability mechanism.

Blended Polymer/s Active ingredient/s Crosslinking type Tissue type Injectability Ref
Hyaluronic acid silk fibroin Methylprednisolone Chemical Cartilage In situ [152]
Hyaluronic acid acidic type I collagen Chemical Cartilage In situ [117]
Hyaluronic acid chitosan and silanized-hydroxypropyl methylcellulose Chondrocytes Physical Cartilage In situ [126]
Hyaluronic acid-adipic dihydrazide oxidized pectin Chemical Cartilage In situ [101]
Acetyle hyaluronic acid and glycol chitosan Chondrocytes Physical Cartilage In situ [44]
Hyaluronic acid and methylcellulose Physical Spinal cord Self-healing [54]
Hydroxyphenyl-modified hyaluronic acid and fibrinogen Mesenchymal stem cells Enzymatic Spinal cord In situ [107]
Oxidized HA carboxymethyl chitosan Chemical Vitreous In situ [116]
Methacrylate hyaluronic acid and heparin Growth factors Photopolymerization Osteoarthritis [122]
Oxidized hyaluronic and glycol-modified chitosan Graphene oxide Chemical Bone In situ [102]
Aldehyde-modified hyaluronic and carboxymethyl chitosan Chemical Abdominal wall In situ [118]

Hyaluronic acid-based hydrogels are attractive for tissue engineering applications as they are nonimmunogenic, biocompatible, and biodegradable and are a primary extracellular matrix element of connective tissues [153, 154].

Injectable hydrogels consisting of oxidized hyaluronic acid covalently linked with carboxylated chitosan was investigated as a vitreous replacement by Wang et al. In vivo experiment results indicated the ability of the produced vitreous substitute to retain the retina at its position and keep the ocular pressure without any considerable side effects [116].

The hybrid injectable hydrogels of aldehyde hyaluronic acid and carboxymethyl chitosan with good biocompatibility and cytocompatibility, exhibiting anti-inflammatory and tissue regeneration capabilities when employed for abdominal cavity defects, the addition of chitosan derivatives and the formed imide linkage strengthen and slow down hyaluronic acid degradation to mimic the rate of abdominal tissue regeneration [118].

4.1.1. Injectable Hyaluronic Acid-Based Hydrogel for Articular Cartilage Repair

Phan et al. developed a porous injectable hydrogel for articular cartilage repair; the constructed hydrogel was composed of silk fibrin combined with hyaluronic acid crosslinked by Schiff's base reaction. Furthermore, glutaraldehyde and ultrasonication were used to trigger in situ gel formation, and methylprednisolone was loaded in the produced gel as an active ingredient to lower inflammatory response. The developed hydrogels were found to be able to control methylprednisolone release as a result of their slow biodegradation characteristics. Besides, in vivo experimental evaluation indicates the potential of using the constructed hydrogel for cartilage regeneration [152]. Another study reported the investigation of injectable hydrogels for articular cartilage tissue repair; the developed hydrogel consisted of thiolated hyaluronic acid and collagen, and in vivo evaluation indicated an enhancement in cartilage formation when using this hydrogel system [117]. A hybrid hydrogel system of hyaluronic acid, chitosan, and methylcellulose derivatives was also evaluated for cartilage tissue repair and found to increase the rate of tissue repair and enhance the matrix deposition and proliferation; the developed hydrogel can be easily produced by physical blending with no chemical crosslinker addition [126].

4.1.2. Injectable Hyaluronic Acid-Based Hydrogel for Neural Tissue Engineering Applications

Hyaluronic acid-based injectable hydrogel systems were investigated for neural tissue engineering applications. For instance, hydroxyphenyl-modified hyaluronic acid has been used for the construction of injectable hydrogels for the regeneration of spinal cord defects; the chemically modified hyaluronic acid was blended with fibrinogen and embedded with mesenchymal stem cells, and fibrinogen protein was added to improve cell migration and adhesion, and proliferation. In vivo evaluation of a partial defect in the spinal cord indicated the prospect of using this hydrogel system for tissue regeneration. Besides the capability to encapsulate stem cells, the hydrogel covers the injured cavity and promotes axonal sprouting and vascularization [107]. The self-healing hydrogel of hyaluronic acid and methylcellulose polymers was developed and evaluated for spinal cord tissue repair; the produced hydrogel exhibited thixotropic rheological behavior, explaining its good injectability combined with the thermal gelation effect of methylcellulose that suggested the potential of its investigation for sustained delivery applications, besides that, the produced hydrogel system exhibited no cell adhesion, biodegradability, and biocompatibility inside the intrathecal space [54].

4.1.3. Injectable Hyaluronic Acid-Based Hydrogel for Bone Tissue Regeneration Applications

For osteoarthritis defect repair, an injectable hyaluronic and heparin hydrogel was assessed for the local delivery of two types of transforming and platelet-derived growth factors; a microfluidic technique with the assistance of photopolymerization was used to formulate the microgel, compared to the conventional treatments, the developed injectable microgel suggested to be promising for osteoarthritis restoring as the study indicated an improvement in cell adhesion, migration, and differentiation [122].

Injectable hydrogel loaded with osteogenic compound graphene oxide was reported to be promising for bone tissue regeneration applications; the produced hydrogel was able to encapsulate and deliver the active ingredient directly to the defect site in a controlled dose [102].

A thermoresponsive and ultrasound-sensitive injectable hydrogel, composed of hyaluronic acid and a pluronic and gelatin composite system, has been recently developed. Both in vivo and in vitro examinations of the hydrogel have shown its potential for delivering hydrocortisone to treat osteoarthritis. Nevertheless, hydrocortisone release is triggered by ultrasound and also has pH-dependent release [155].

4.2. Wound Healing Applications

Skin wound repair and healing is a complex process containing a combination of several cellular and matrix elements at multiple stages [156]. During the initial phase, inflammatory cells such as macrophages gathered and released high amounts of chemokines, attracting functioning fibroblasts and repairing the damaged area by depositing collagen fibers [157]. Late in the process, the fibroblast-driven matrix promotes vasculature formation in a three-dimensional environment and nourishes the buildup of granulation tissues [158]. Since fibroblasts perform an essential role, the speed at which they migrate to the injury site significantly affects how quickly a wound heals. In addition, growing evidence suggests that the mechanical properties of scaffolding materials may influence cell proliferation and migration since it may alter the mechanical transduction in the interfaces [104, 159].

The hydrogel-based wound dressing is gaining popularity due to its benefits in establishing a three-dimensional environment for cell attachment, immigration, and proliferation [160]. In particular, the injectable hydrogel used in wound healing is an area of interest because it can adhere to a lesion's erratic shape while providing a vehicle for drug and cell delivery [36, 161, 162].

Several scientists have constructed various hyaluronic acid-based hydrogels and investigated the capabilities of the developed hydrogel for wound healing. The previous article reviews the reported use of hyaluronic hydrogels as a wound dressing [32]. Table 3 summarizes the recent publications on injectable hyaluronic hydrogels for the healing and repairing of acute, diabetic, and chronic wounds.

Table 3.

Injectable hydrogel systems based on hyaluronic acid for wound healing applications: polymeric composition, encapsulated ingredients, crosslinking method, investigated wound classification, injectability mechanism, and indicated functional characteristics explained the potential of the constructed hydrogels for wound healing applications.

Components Active ingredients Crosslinking type Application Injectability Function Ref
Oxidized hyaluronic acid and ε-polylysine Chemical and enzymatic Acute Self-healing Antibacterial and accelerated wound healing [163]
Aldehyde-modified hyaluronic acid and adipic acid dihydrazide-modified hyaluronic acid Sisomicin sulfate Chemical Acute In situ Antibacterial, antioxidant, and hemostatic
effect
[164]
Poly-γ-glutamic acid and oxidized hyaluronic acid Chemical and photocrosslinking Acute In situ Promote collagen deposition and increase vascularization [104]
Hyaluronic acid blended with κ-carrageenan and pluronic F-127 Meropenem Physical Chronic In situ Antibacterial drug release, migration, adhesion, and cell proliferation [123]
Furfurylamine-modified hyaluronic acid blended with maleimide polyethylene glycol Physical Acute Self-healing Antibacterial anti-inflammatory [165]
Dopamine-modified hyaluronic acid Chemical and physical Acute In situ Antibacterial
Good hemostasis and absorb tissue exudates
[166]
Dopamine-modified hyaluronic acid combined with reduced graphene oxide Chemical Acute Self-healing Antioxidant antibacterial [167]
Methacrylate hyaluronic acid Hydrogen sulfide Chemical Acute In situ Increase re-epithelialization, cell proliferation, collagen deposition, and angiogenesis [168]
Tyramine-modified hyaluronic acid and hydroxybenzoic-modified collagen Chemical Acute In situ Increase re-epithelialization, vasculature, and collagen deposition [169]
Thiolate-modified hyaluronic acid and acrylate-modified polyethylene glycol Chemical Diabetic In situ Anti-inflammatory increase re-epithelialization and vasculature [170]
Oxidized hyaluronic acid, quaternary ammonium-modified chitosan, and kalium γ-cyclodextrin α-lipoic acid Chemical Chronic Self-healing Antibacterial and antioxidant-enhanced tissue granulation and collagen deposition [171]
Aldehyde-modified hyaluronic acid and carboxyethyl chitosan Chemical Diabetic Self-healing Anti-inflammatory increase re-epithelialization, vasculature, collagen deposition, and cell proliferation [172]
Oxidized hyaluronic acid and antimicrobial peptide Chemical Chronic Self-healing Antibacterial [173]
Diphenylalanine-modified hyaluronic acid and curcumin Chemical Diabetic/chronic Self-healing Prolonged release of curcumin [174]
Phenylboronate conjugated hyaluronic acid and quaternary modified chitosan Magnesium Physical Diabetic/chronic Self-healing Anti-inflammatory increase vasculature, collagen deposition, and granulation tissue [175]
Thiolate-modified hyaluronic loaded Silver-lignin nanoparticles Physical Diabetic/chronic In situ Antioxidant, antibacterial, and anti-inflammatory [144]
Thiol- and catechol-modified hyaluronic acid polyhexamethylene guanidine and black phosphorus nanosheets Chemical Diabetic/chronic Self-healing Antibacterial and anti-inflammatory increase collagen deposition and granulation tissues [176]
Oxidized hyaluronic acid, tannic acid, and quaternary chitosan Physical Chronic Self-healing Antioxidant and antibacterial [177]

A more recent study reported the investigation of thiol and catechol-modified hyaluronic polymer for diabetic wound healing applications. Conjugated hyaluronic acid polymer is combined with polyhexamethylene guanidine and black phosphorus, and the resulting hydrogel of this combinatiob has good self-healing properties due to the dynamic nature of chemical coupling between the polymeric structures. When compared to commercially available wound dressings, in vivo experiments revealed that the developed hydrogel exhibited improved and accelerated healing properties. These properties were explained by the hydrogel's antibacterial, antioxidant, and anti-inflammatory properties as well as by the observed increase in granulation tissues and collagen deposition [176]. Han et al. recently reported the production of a physically crosslinked hydrogel composed of oxidized hyaluronic acid combined with tannic acid and quaternary chitosan; the produced hydrogel displayed good healing properties as indicated by in vivo experiments, and this effect was attributed to the intrinsic antioxidant and antibacterial characteristics of the forming polymers [177].

Bioadhesive hydrogel having inherent antimicrobial activity was produced by combining ε-polylysine functionalized hyaluronic acid that double crosslinked via Schiff's base reaction and by peroxidase enzymatic crosslinking, the developed hydrogel displayed antimicrobial action against different bacterial species; the antibacterial action mainly related to the amine group of ε-polylysine. In vivo evaluation of the treatment of wounds on rats displayed accelerated wound healing, and the study indicated two-fold enhancement in the growth of new skin, micro vascularization, collagen, and tissue granulation compared to the commercially available fibrin sealant [163]. Another study reported the construction of hyaluronic acid-based injectable hydrogels with antibacterial and wound-repairing capabilities created using aldehyde hyaluronic acid covalently bound to hyaluronic acid grafted with adipic acid and combined with sisomicin sulfate. The produced in situ formed hydrogels displaying pH and enzymatic sensitivity; this study suggested the significance of using the studied hydrogels for their wound healing and antibacterial activities as the release of sisomicin sulfate from the hydrogel is expected to increase at acidic pH due to the indicated higher degradation rates in acidic media which allows the on-demand release in wound site with bacterial infection. Besides that, the study results indicated that the increased sisomicin sulfate level in the hydrogel reduces the inflammatory response in the wound process [164].

4.3. Drug and Cell Delivery Applications

The typical systemic administration of active ingredients is accompanied by undesirable adverse effects [178181]. Therefore, an alternative to the systemic parenteral route of administration is local site-specific delivery systems, as they enable the medication to be localized at the site of action with a lower dose. Therefore, these delivery systems are expected to exhibit minimal systemic absorption and limited undesired side effects and drug-drug interactions [182].

4.3.1. Injectable Hyaluronic Acid-Based Hydrogel for Drug Delivery Applications

Drug-loaded injectable hydrogels can effectively minimize systemic side effects by releasing drugs locally at the site of the tumor. Due to the injectable hydrogels' limiting toxicity and the drug's localization at the action site, developing these pharmaceutical formulations to treat different malignancies has become a research hotspot [37, 41]. Besides that, drug release from a hydrogel matrix could be controlled by a variety of mechanisms [183, 184].

The rate at which active ingredients are released from the hydrogel may be changed advantageously in response to external factors, if the crosslinking process is reversible, or if the hydrogels incorporate stimuli-responsive moieties in their structural components [27].

Zhang et al.'s study stated the in situ double crosslinking to produce an injectable hydrogel, which was constructed using hyaluronic acid featured by thiol and hydrazide moieties added to oxidized alginate. This hydrogel displayed a considerable ability to be used as a drug carrier, as the release studies indicated extended-release characteristics of the model drug—bovine serum albumin—from the developed hydrogel system [115].

Self-healing hyaluronic acid combined with carboxymethyl chitosan hydrogel has been recently reported to sustain the release rate of acetylsalicylic acid as a model drug. The injectable hydrogel was produced with proper mechanical strength through Schiff's base reaction, and study results indicated the potential of using this hydrogel for drug delivery applications as it can encapsulate high amounts of active ingredients and prolong drug release with pH-dependent properties combined with inherent hydrogel antibacterial properties [185].

Sustained release properties of 5-fluorouracil were obtained for the loaded hydrogels composed of hyaluronic acid, k-carrageenan, and poloxamer polymers; study results indicated that the drug release was determined by diffusion, and accumulative drug amounts of 60% were released in the first four hours meanwhile another 20% of the drug took three days to be released. In addition, the optimized hydrogel was highly elastic and thermosensitive with antiadhesive properties [124].

Berberine-loaded supramolecular bioadhesive injectable hydrogels were constructed using a polymeric mixture of hyaluronic acid and carboxymethyl-hexanoyl chitosan, then effectively encapsulated with berberine, the study indicates prolonged and pH-responsive drug release from the developed hydrogels, suggesting the potential of using these injectable hydrogel systems for biomedical applications [186].

Vignesh et al. reported the production of hyaluronic hydrogels formed through nonspecific electrostatic binding with cationic chitosan polymer reported with the ability to encapsulate deferoxamine-containing PLGA nanoparticles for therapeutic angiogenesis applications, drug-loaded nanoparticles addition did not disturb the smooth injectability of constructed hydrogels, besides that, the dissolution studies indicated a controlled release property of deferoxamine from this delivery system [125].

4.3.2. Injectable Hyaluronic Acid-Based Hydrogel for Cell Delivery Applications

Injectable hydrogel prepared by photocrosslinking of copolymeric hyaluronic acid with poloxamer was reported for the delivery of bovine chondrocytes; the produced in situ-forming hydrogel exhibiting slow release rate of the loaded cells suggested as a promising candidate for cell delivery applications [121]. Another study reported the effectual cell delivery of hyaluronic acid-based injectable hydrogels produced from chemically crosslinked hyaluronic acid through hydrazone crosslinking blended with oxidized pectin. The developed hydrogel is suggested to be gradually destroyed by glutathione formed by the cells, allowing sufficient space for cell proliferation [101, 187].

Mesenchymal stem cells embedded in hyaluronic acid, chitosan, and glycerophosphate systems for treating myocardial infarction. In vivo experiments indicated the improved therapeutic effectiveness of mesenchymal stem cells when loaded in the developed hydrogel, as the study displayed enhancement in cardiac function and vascularization associated with lowered cell apoptosis [188].

5. Conclusions and Outlooks

This article provides a summary of injectable hydrogels prepared using hyaluronic acid. When used as a principal constituent of injectable hydrogels, the distinctive properties of hyaluronic acid attracted researchers from different disciplines to fabricate and evaluate hyaluronic-based injectable hydrogels using different strategies. It can be noted that researchers primarily intended to increase the mechanical strength of hyaluronic acid to be more suitable for medical use. Most of the discussed hydrogels exhibit in situ gel formation under physiological conditions, and there have been several attempts to produce hydrogels with shear-thinning ability. More studies are required to understand the techniques used to produce this class of hyaluronic hydrogels.

Most of the produced hydrogels involve chemical modifications to the hyaluronic acid polymer. Limited attempts were reported to produce the physically crosslinked hyaluronic acid injectable hydrogel. More focus has recently been noted on the production of composite hydrogels, either by combining hyaluronic acid and other materials to modulate the hydrogel's mechanical characteristics or by including nanoparticles to improve both gel strength and encapsulated active molecules release and targeting properties.

Incorporating nanoparticles in hydrogels will lead to the design and manufacturing of superior products with active component stabilization, solubilization, and optimization of release properties previously unattainable by intact hydrogels; this introduces various issues for researchers interested in the investigation of hydrogel biomedical applications.

Hyaluronic injectable hydrogels were widely investigated and found to be promising in different biomedical fields, including tissue regeneration, drug and cell delivery, and wound healing. Despite numerous preclinical studies on injectable hydrogels in biomedical applications, further research is needed to determine how the hydrogel's breakdown products affect the regular physiological activities of body tissues. Biomedical research primarily focuses on clinical translation, and scaling up hydrogel production is required to remove barriers hindering their real-world application in various medical fields.

Overall, it is worthwhile investing more effort in the design strategies for manufacturing hyaluronic acid-based injectable hydrogels to enable rapid translation into clinical use, especially given the significant potential of this hydrogel. Furthermore, collaborative research bringing together specialists from different fields will be crucial for more effective hydrogel implementation in biomedical fields.

Acknowledgments

The authors thank Yarmouk University for administrative support. The authors acknowledge that some of the figures have been created using Biorender.com. The authors thank the Deanship of Research at Yarmouk University (Irbid, Jordan) for funding this project (local fund number: 72/2022).

Data Availability

The data supporting this review are from previously reported studies and datasets, which have been cited. The processed data are available from the corresponding author upon request.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

References

  • 1.Wickens J. M., Alsaab H. O., Kesharwani P., et al. Recent advances in hyaluronic acid-decorated nanocarriers for targeted cancer therapy. Drug Discovery Today . 2017;22(4):665–680. doi: 10.1016/j.drudis.2016.12.009. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Zhang Q., Deng C., Fu Y., Sun X., Gong T., Zhang Z. Repeated administration of hyaluronic acid coated liposomes with improved pharmacokinetics and reduced immune response. Molecular Pharmaceutics . 2016;13(6):1800–1808. doi: 10.1021/acs.molpharmaceut.5b00952. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Bhattacharya S., Singh D., Aich J., Shete M. B., Shete M. B. Development and characterization of Hyaluronic acid surface scaffolds Encorafenib loaded polymeric Nanoparticles for colorectal cancer targeting. Materials Today Communications . 2022;31 doi: 10.1016/j.mtcomm.2022.103757. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Information N. C. f. B. PubChem Compound Summary for CID 155925852, Hyaluronic Acid Sodium . 2023. [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Burdick J. A., Prestwich G. D. Hyaluronic acid hydrogels for biomedical applications. Advanced Materials . 2011;23(12):H41–H56. doi: 10.1002/adma.201003963. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Nakai T., Hirakura T., Sakurai Y., Shimoboji T., Ishigai M., Akiyoshi K. Injectable hydrogel for sustained protein release by salt‐induced association of hyaluronic acid nanogel. Macromolecular Bioscience . 2012;12(4):475–483. doi: 10.1002/mabi.201100352. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Vildanova R., Lobov A., Spirikhin L., Kolesov S. Hydrogels on the base of modified chitosan and hyaluronic acid mix as polymer matrices for cytostatics delivery. Gels . 2022;8(2):p. 104. doi: 10.3390/gels8020104. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Bardajee G. R., Hosseini S. S., Ghavami S. Embedded of nanogel into multi-responsive hydrogel nanocomposite for anticancer drug delivery. Journal of Inorganic and Organometallic Polymers and Materials . 2018;28(6):2196–2205. doi: 10.1007/s10904-018-0914-8. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Samchenko Y., Ulberg Z., Korotych O. Multipurpose smart hydrogel systems. Advances in Colloid and Interface Science . 2011;168(1-2):247–262. doi: 10.1016/j.cis.2011.06.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Chu L.-Y., Xie R., Ju X.-J., Wang W. Smart Hydrogel Functional Materials . Springer; 2013. [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Rizzo F., Kehr N. S. Recent advances in injectable hydrogels for controlled and local drug delivery. Advanced Healthcare Materials . 2021;10(1):p. e2001341. doi: 10.1002/adhm.202001341. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Zhong Y., Zhang L., Sun S., et al. Sequential drug delivery by injectable macroporous hydrogels for combined photodynamic-chemotherapy. Journal of Nanobiotechnology . 2021;19(1):333–414. doi: 10.1186/s12951-021-01066-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.He J., Zhang Z., Yang Y., et al. Injectable self-healing adhesive pH-responsive hydrogels accelerate gastric hemostasis and wound healing. Nano-Micro Letters . 2021;13(1):80–17. doi: 10.1007/s40820-020-00585-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Deka R., Boruah P., Ali A. A., Dutta R., Gogoi P., Sarmah J. K. Smart hydrogel with rapid self-healing and controlled release attributes for biomedical applications. Smart Materials and Structures . 2022;31(9):p. 095039. doi: 10.1088/1361-665x/ac845d. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Soppimath K. S., Aminabhavi T. M., Dave A. M., Kumbar S. G., Rudzinski W. Stimulus-responsive “smart” hydrogels as novel drug delivery systems. Drug Development and Industrial Pharmacy . 2002;28(8):957–974. doi: 10.1081/ddc-120006428. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.McKenzie M., Betts D., Suh A., Bui K., Kim L. D., Cho H. Hydrogel-based drug delivery systems for poorly water-soluble drugs. Molecules . 2015;20(11):20397–20408. doi: 10.3390/molecules201119705. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Raina N., Pahwa R., Bhattacharya J., et al. Drug delivery strategies and biomedical significance of hydrogels: translational considerations. Pharmaceutics . 2022;14(3):p. 574. doi: 10.3390/pharmaceutics14030574. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Yu A. C., Chen H., Chan D., et al. Scalable manufacturing of biomimetic moldable hydrogels for industrial applications. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences . 2016;113(50):14255–14260. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1618156113. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Correa S., Grosskopf A. K., Lopez Hernandez H., et al. Translational applications of hydrogels. Chemical Reviews . 2021;121(18):11385–11457. doi: 10.1021/acs.chemrev.0c01177. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Galante R., Pinto T. J., Colaço R., Serro A. P. Sterilization of hydrogels for biomedical applications: a review. Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part B: Applied Biomaterials . 2018;106(6):2472–2492. doi: 10.1002/jbm.b.34048. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Yu W., Gong E., Liu B., et al. Hydrogel-mediated drug delivery for treating stroke. Chinese Chemical Letters . 2023;34(9) doi: 10.1016/j.cclet.2023.108205. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Luo T., Tan B., Zhu L., Wang Y., Liao J. A review on the design of hydrogels with different stiffness and their effects on tissue repair. Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology . 2022;10 doi: 10.3389/fbioe.2022.817391. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Ge S., Ji N., Cui S., et al. Coordination of covalent cross-linked gelatin hydrogels via oxidized tannic acid and ferric ions with strong mechanical properties. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry . 2019;67(41):11489–11497. doi: 10.1021/acs.jafc.9b03947. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Yi X., He J., Wang X., et al. Tunable mechanical, antibacterial, and cytocompatible hydrogels based on a functionalized dual network of metal coordination bonds and covalent crosslinking. ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces . 2018;10(7):6190–6198. doi: 10.1021/acsami.7b18821. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Wang J., Fan X., Liu H., Tang K. Self-assembly and metal ions-assisted one step fabrication of recoverable gelatin hydrogel with high mechanical strength. Polymer-Plastics Technology and Materials . 2020;59(17):1899–1909. doi: 10.1080/25740881.2020.1773499. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Chen T., Hou K., Ren Q., Chen G., Wei P., Zhu M. Nanoparticle–polymer synergies in nanocomposite hydrogels: from design to application. Macromolecular Rapid Communications . 2018;39(21):p. e1800337. doi: 10.1002/marc.201800337. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Sun Y., Nan D., Jin H., Qu X. Recent advances of injectable hydrogels for drug delivery and tissue engineering applications. Polymer Testing . 2020;81 doi: 10.1016/j.polymertesting.2019.106283. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Peppas N. A., Hilt J. Z., Khademhosseini A., Langer R. Hydrogels in biology and medicine: from molecular principles to bionanotechnology. Advanced Materials . 2006;18(11):1345–1360. doi: 10.1002/adma.200501612. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Radhakrishnan J., Subramanian A., Krishnan U. M., Sethuraman S. Injectable and 3D bioprinted polysaccharide hydrogels: from cartilage to osteochondral tissue engineering. Biomacromolecules . 2017;18(1):1–26. doi: 10.1021/acs.biomac.6b01619. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Singh Y. P., Moses J. C., Bhardwaj N., Mandal B. B. Injectable hydrogels: a new paradigm for osteochondral tissue engineering. Journal of Materials Chemistry B . 2018;6(35):5499–5529. doi: 10.1039/c8tb01430b. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Yang J., Zhang Y. S., Yue K., Khademhosseini A. Cell-laden hydrogels for osteochondral and cartilage tissue engineering. Acta Biomaterialia . 2017;57:1–25. doi: 10.1016/j.actbio.2017.01.036. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Yang X., Wang B., Peng D., et al. Hyaluronic acid‐based injectable hydrogels for wound dressing and localized tumor therapy: a review. Advanced NanoBiomed Research . 2022;2(12) doi: 10.1002/anbr.202200124. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Xin H., Naficy S. Drug delivery based on stimuli-responsive injectable hydrogels for breast cancer therapy: a review. Gels . 2022;8(1):p. 45. doi: 10.3390/gels8010045. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Mo C., Luo R., Chen Y. Advances in the stimuli‐responsive injectable hydrogel for controlled release of drugs. Macromolecular Rapid Communications . 2022;43(10):p. e2200007. doi: 10.1002/marc.202200007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Li Y., Yang H. Y., Lee D. S. Biodegradable and injectable hydrogels in biomedical applications. Biomacromolecules . 2022;23(3):609–618. doi: 10.1021/acs.biomac.1c01552. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Zheng B.-D., Ye J., Yang Y.-C., Huang Y.-Y., Xiao M.-T. Self-healing polysaccharide-based injectable hydrogels with antibacterial activity for wound healing. Carbohydrate Polymers . 2022;275 doi: 10.1016/j.carbpol.2021.118770. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Liow S. S., Dou Q., Kai D., et al. Thermogels: in situ gelling biomaterial. ACS Biomaterials Science & Engineering . 2016;2(3):295–316. doi: 10.1021/acsbiomaterials.5b00515. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Chen Y., Hao Y., Huang Y., et al. An injectable, near-infrared light-responsive click cross-linked azobenzene hydrogel for breast cancer chemotherapy. Journal of Biomedical Nanotechnology . 2019;15(9):1923–1936. doi: 10.1166/jbn.2019.2821. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Fathi M., Alami-Milani M., Geranmayeh M. H., Barar J., Erfan-Niya H., Omidi Y. Dual thermo-and pH-sensitive injectable hydrogels of chitosan/(poly (N-isopropylacrylamide-co-itaconic acid)) for doxorubicin delivery in breast cancer. International Journal of Biological Macromolecules . 2019;128:957–964. doi: 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2019.01.122. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Guo D.-D., Hong S.-H., Jiang H.-L., et al. Synergistic effects of Akt1 shRNA and paclitaxel-incorporated conjugated linoleic acid-coupled poloxamer thermosensitive hydrogel on breast cancer. Biomaterials . 2012;33(7):2272–2281. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2011.12.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Huang P., Song H., Zhang Y., et al. Bridging the gap between macroscale drug delivery systems and nanomedicines: a nanoparticle-assembled thermosensitive hydrogel for peritumoral chemotherapy. ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces . 2016;8(43):29323–29333. doi: 10.1021/acsami.6b10416. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Mellati A., Akhtari J. Injectable hydrogels: a review of injectability mechanisms and biomedical applications. Research in Molecular Medicine (RMM) . 2019:1–14-11–14. doi: 10.18502/rmm.v6i4.4799. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Chen M., Li C., Nie F., Liu X., Pipinos I. I., Li X. Synthesis and characterization of a hyaluronic acid-based hydrogel with antioxidative and thermosensitive properties. RSC Advances . 2020;10(56):33851–33860. doi: 10.1039/d0ra07208g. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Lee E. J., Kang E., Kang S.-W., Huh K. M. Thermo-irreversible glycol chitosan/hyaluronic acid blend hydrogel for injectable tissue engineering. Carbohydrate Polymers . 2020;244 doi: 10.1016/j.carbpol.2020.116432. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Ha D. I., Lee S. B., Chong M. S., Lee Y. M., Kim S. Y., Park Y. H. Preparation of thermo-responsive and injectable hydrogels based on hyaluronic acid and poly (N-isopropylacrylamide) and their drug release behaviors. Macromolecular Research . 2006;14(1):87–93. doi: 10.1007/bf03219073. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Mortisen D., Peroglio-Martynovitch M., Alini M., Eglin D. Injectable Thermoresponsive Hyaluronic Acid Gels for Intervertebral Disc Regeneration .
  • 47.Gou S., Porcello A., Allémann E., et al. Injectable hyaluronan-based thermoresponsive hydrogels for dermatological applications. Pharmaceutics . 2023;15(6):p. 1708. doi: 10.3390/pharmaceutics15061708. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Jhan H.-J., Ho H.-O., Sheu M.-T., Shen S. C., Ho Y. S., Jun-Jen L. Thermosensitive Injectable Hydrogel for Drug Delivery . Google Patents; 2016. [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Lee H. J., Fernandes-Cunha G. M., Myung D. In situ-forming hyaluronic acid hydrogel through visible light-induced thiol-ene reaction. Reactive and Functional Polymers . 2018;131:29–35. doi: 10.1016/j.reactfunctpolym.2018.06.010. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Figueiredo T., Jing J., Jeacomine I., et al. Injectable self-healing hydrogels based on boronate ester formation between hyaluronic acid partners modified with benzoxaborin derivatives and saccharides. Biomacromolecules . 2019;21(1):230–239. doi: 10.1021/acs.biomac.9b01128. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Mohamadnia Z., Zohuriaan-Mehr M., Kabiri K., Jamshidi A., Mobedi H. pH-sensitive IPN hydrogel beads of carrageenan-alginate for controlled drug delivery. Journal of Bioactive and Compatible Polymers . 2007;22(3):342–356. doi: 10.1177/0883911507078519. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Zhou H., Liang C., Wei Z., et al. Injectable biomaterials for translational medicine. Materials Today . 2019;28:81–97. doi: 10.1016/j.mattod.2019.04.020. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Guvendiren M., Lu H. D., Burdick J. A. Shear-thinning hydrogels for biomedical applications. Soft Matter . 2012;8(2):260–272. doi: 10.1039/c1sm06513k. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Gupta D., Tator C. H., Shoichet M. S. Fast-gelling injectable blend of hyaluronan and methylcellulose for intrathecal, localized delivery to the injured spinal cord. Biomaterials . 2006;27(11):2370–2379. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2005.11.015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Shuai F., Zhang Y., Yin Y., Zhao H., Han X. Fabrication of an injectable iron (III) crosslinked alginate-hyaluronic acid hydrogel with shear-thinning and antimicrobial activities. Carbohydrate Polymers . 2021;260 doi: 10.1016/j.carbpol.2021.117777. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Yalanis G. C., Reddy S., Martin R., et al. An injectable nanofiber-hydrogel composite with interfacial bonding for soft tissue filling and regeneration. Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery . 2015;136(4S):153–154. doi: 10.1097/01.prs.0000472477.01873.45. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Wu Y., Xu J., Jia Y., Murphy D. K. Safety and effectiveness of hyaluronic acid injectable gel in correcting moderate nasolabial folds in Chinese subjects. Journal of Drugs in Dermatology . 2016;15(1):70–76. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Pérez L. A., Hernández R., Alonso J. M., Pérez-González R., Sáez-Martínez V. Hyaluronic acid hydrogels crosslinked in physiological conditions: synthesis and biomedical applications. Biomedicines . 2021;9(9):p. 1113. doi: 10.3390/biomedicines9091113. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Faivre J., Pigweh A. I., Iehl J., Maffert P., Goekjian P., Bourdon F. Crosslinking hyaluronic acid soft-tissue fillers: current status and perspectives from an industrial point of view. Expert Review of Medical Devices . 2021;18(12):1175–1187. doi: 10.1080/17434440.2021.2014320. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Hemshekhar M., Thushara R. M., Chandranayaka S., Sherman L. S., Kemparaju K., Girish K. S. Emerging roles of hyaluronic acid bioscaffolds in tissue engineering and regenerative medicine. International Journal of Biological Macromolecules . 2016;86:917–928. doi: 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2016.02.032. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Khunmanee S., Jeong Y., Park H. Crosslinking method of hyaluronic-based hydrogel for biomedical applications. Journal of Tissue Engineering . 2017;8:p. 204173141772646. doi: 10.1177/2041731417726464. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Picotti F., Fabbian M., Gianni R., Sechi A., Stucchi L., Bosco M. Hyaluronic acid lipoate: synthesis and physicochemical properties. Carbohydrate Polymers . 2013;93(1):273–278. doi: 10.1016/j.carbpol.2012.04.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Sakurai K., Ueno Y., Okuyama T. Crosslinked Hyaluronic Acid and its Use . Google Patents; 1987. [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Reddy N., Reddy R., Jiang Q. Crosslinking biopolymers for biomedical applications. Trends in Biotechnology . 2015;33(6):362–369. doi: 10.1016/j.tibtech.2015.03.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Fields G. B. Introduction to peptide synthesis. Current Protocols in Protein Science . 2001;26:1–18. doi: 10.1002/0471140864.ps1801s26. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Benoiton N. L. Peptide synthesis: coupling methods. Wiley Encyclopedia of Chemical Biology . 2007;33:1–9. [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Möller S., Schmidtke M., Weiss D., et al. Synthesis and antiherpetic activity of carboxymethylated and sulfated hyaluronan derivatives. Carbohydrate Polymers . 2012;90:608–615. doi: 10.1016/j.carbpol.2012.05.085. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Séon-Lutz M., Couffin A.-C., Vignoud S., Schlatter G., Hébraud A. Electrospinning in water and in situ crosslinking of hyaluronic acid/cyclodextrin nanofibers: towards wound dressing with controlled drug release. Carbohydrate Polymers . 2019;207:276–287. doi: 10.1016/j.carbpol.2018.11.085. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Tomihata K., Ikada Y. Crosslinking of hyaluronic acid with water‐soluble carbodiimide. Journal of Biomedical Materials Research . 1997;37(2):243–251. doi: 10.1002/(sici)1097-4636(199711)37:2:243::aid-jbm14>3.0.co;2-f. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Mozipo E. A., Galindo A. N., Khachatourian J. D., et al. Statistical optimization of hydrazone-crosslinked hyaluronic acid hydrogels for protein delivery. bioRxiv . 2023 doi: 10.1101/2023.07.14.549125. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71.Brooks W. L., Sumerlin B. S. Synthesis and applications of boronic acid-containing polymers: from materials to medicine. Chemical Reviews . 2016;116(3):1375–1397. doi: 10.1021/acs.chemrev.5b00300. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72.Holz E., Rajagopal K. In situ‐forming glucose‐responsive hydrogel from hyaluronic acid modified with a boronic acid derivative. Macromolecular Chemistry and Physics . 2020;221(15) doi: 10.1002/macp.202000055. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 73.Roy B., Mondal D., Hatai J., Bandyopadhyay S. A highly efficient tandem [3+ 2]“click” cycloaddition/6-exo-cyclization strategy for the construction of triazole fused pyrazines. RSC Advances . 2014;4(100):56952–56956. doi: 10.1039/c4ra12489h. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 74.Fu S., Dong H., Deng X., Zhuo R., Zhong Z. Injectable hyaluronic acid/poly (ethylene glycol) hydrogels crosslinked via strain-promoted azide-alkyne cycloaddition click reaction. Carbohydrate Polymers . 2017;169:332–340. doi: 10.1016/j.carbpol.2017.04.028. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 75.Kenne L., Gohil S., Nilsson E. M., et al. Modification and cross-linking parameters in hyaluronic acid hydrogels—definitions and analytical methods. Carbohydrate Polymers . 2013;91(1):410–418. doi: 10.1016/j.carbpol.2012.08.066. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 76.Xue Y., Chen H., Xu C., Yu D., Xu H., Hu Y. Synthesis of hyaluronic acid hydrogels by crosslinking the mixture of high-molecular-weight hyaluronic acid and low-molecular-weight hyaluronic acid with 1, 4-butanediol diglycidyl ether. RSC Advances . 2020;10(12):7206–7213. doi: 10.1039/c9ra09271d. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 77.Zerbinati N., Sommatis S., Maccario C., et al. Comparative physicochemical analysis among 1, 4-butanediol diglycidyl ether cross-linked hyaluronic acid dermal fillers. Gels . 2021;7(3):p. 139. doi: 10.3390/gels7030139. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 78.Jia X., Burdick J. A., Kobler J., et al. Synthesis and characterization of in situ cross-linkable hyaluronic acid-based hydrogels with potential application for vocal fold regeneration. Macromolecules . 2004;37(9):3239–3248. doi: 10.1021/ma035970w. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 79.Cerroni B., Chiessi E., Margheritelli S., Oddo L., Paradossi G. Polymer shelled microparticles for a targeted doxorubicin delivery in cancer therapy. Biomacromolecules . 2011;12(3):593–601. doi: 10.1021/bm101207k. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 80.Muhammad M., Willems C., Rodríguez-Fernández J., Gallego-Ferrer G., Groth T. Synthesis and characterization of oxidized polysaccharides for in situ forming hydrogels. Biomolecules . 2020;10(8):p. 1185. doi: 10.3390/biom10081185. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 81.Pandit A. H., Mazumdar N., Ahmad S. Periodate oxidized hyaluronic acid-based hydrogel scaffolds for tissue engineering applications. International Journal of Biological Macromolecules . 2019;137:853–869. doi: 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2019.07.014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 82.Han C., Zhang H., Wu Y., He X., Chen X. Dual-crosslinked hyaluronan hydrogels with rapid gelation and high injectability for stem cell protection. Scientific Reports . 2020;10(1):14997–7. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-71462-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 83.Xu J., Liu Y., Hsu S.-h. Hydrogels based on Schiff base linkages for biomedical applications. Molecules . 2019;24(16):p. 3005. doi: 10.3390/molecules24163005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 84.Yu Z., Li Q., He X., et al. A multifunctional hydrogel based on nature polysaccharide fabricated by Schiff base reaction. European Polymer Journal . 2023;197 doi: 10.1016/j.eurpolymj.2023.112330. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 85.Eenschooten C., Guillaumie F., Kontogeorgis G. M., Stenby E. H., Schwach-Abdellaoui K. Preparation and structural characterisation of novel and versatile amphiphilic octenyl succinic anhydride–modified hyaluronic acid derivatives. Carbohydrate Polymers . 2010;79(3):597–605. doi: 10.1016/j.carbpol.2009.09.011. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 86.Tous E., Ifkovits J. L., Koomalsingh K. J., et al. Influence of injectable hyaluronic acid hydrogel degradation behavior on infarction-induced ventricular remodeling. Biomacromolecules . 2011;12(11):4127–4135. doi: 10.1021/bm201198x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 87.Sionkowska A. Current research on the blends of natural and synthetic polymers as new biomaterials: review. Progress in Polymer Science . 2011;36(9):1254–1276. doi: 10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2011.05.003. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 88.BeMiller J. N. Pasting, paste, and gel properties of starch–hydrocolloid combinations. Carbohydrate Polymers . 2011;86(2):386–423. doi: 10.1016/j.carbpol.2011.05.064. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 89.Highley C. B., Prestwich G. D., Burdick J. A. Recent advances in hyaluronic acid hydrogels for biomedical applications. Current Opinion in Biotechnology . 2016;40:35–40. doi: 10.1016/j.copbio.2016.02.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 90.Dufresne A. Nanocellulose: potential reinforcement in composites. Natural polymers: Nanocomposites . 2012;2:1–32. [Google Scholar]
  • 91.Baptista A., Ferreira I., Borges J. P. Biomass Based Biocomposites . UK: Smithers Rapra Technology; 2013. Cellulose-based composite systems for biomedical applications. [Google Scholar]
  • 92.Šimkovic I. What could be greener than composites made from polysaccharides? Carbohydrate Polymers . 2008;74(4):759–762. doi: 10.1016/j.carbpol.2008.07.009. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 93.Kweon D. K., Kang D. W. Drug‐release behavior of chitosan‐g‐poly (vinyl alcohol) copolymer matrix. Journal of Applied Polymer Science . 1999;74(2):458–464. doi: 10.1002/(sici)1097-4628(19991010)74:2:458::aid-app29>3.0.co;2-6. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 94.Zhang M., Li X., Gong Y., Zhao N., Zhang X. Properties and biocompatibility of chitosan films modified by blending with PEG. Biomaterials . 2002;23(13):2641–2648. doi: 10.1016/s0142-9612(01)00403-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 95.Wu Y.-B., Yu S.-H., Mi F.-L., et al. Preparation and characterization on mechanical and antibacterial properties of chitsoan/cellulose blends. Carbohydrate Polymers . 2004;57(4):435–440. doi: 10.1016/j.carbpol.2004.05.013. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 96.Arvanitoyannis I. S., Nakayama A., Aiba S.-i. Chitosan and gelatin based edible films: state diagrams, mechanical and permeation properties. Carbohydrate Polymers . 1998;37(4):371–382. doi: 10.1016/s0144-8617(98)00083-6. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 97.Lee J. W., Kim S. Y., Kim S. S., Lee Y. M., Lee K. H., Kim S. J. Synthesis and characteristics of interpenetrating polymer network hydrogel composed of chitosan and poly (acrylic acid) Journal of Applied Polymer Science . 1999;73(1):113–120. doi: 10.1002/(sici)1097-4628(19990705)73:1<113::aid-app13>3.3.co;2-4. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 98.Park S. J., Lee K. Y., Ha W. S., Park S. Y. Structural changes and their effect on mechanical properties of silk fibroin/chitosan blends. Journal of Applied Polymer Science . 1999;74(11):2571–2575. doi: 10.1002/(sici)1097-4628(19991209)74:11<2571::aid-app2>3.0.co;2-a. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 99.Taravel M., Domard A. Collagen and its interactions with chitosan: III. Some biological and mechanical properties. Biomaterials . 1996;17(4):451–455. doi: 10.1016/0142-9612(96)89663-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 100.Ronca A., D’Amora U., Raucci M. G., et al. A combined approach of double network hydrogel and nanocomposites based on hyaluronic acid and poly (ethylene glycol) diacrylate blend. Materials . 2018;11(12):p. 2454. doi: 10.3390/ma11122454. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 101.Chen F., Ni Y., Liu B., et al. Self-crosslinking and injectable hyaluronic acid/RGD-functionalized pectin hydrogel for cartilage tissue engineering. Carbohydrate Polymers . 2017;166:31–44. doi: 10.1016/j.carbpol.2017.02.059. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 102.Lee S. J., Nah H., Heo D. N., et al. Induction of osteogenic differentiation in a rat calvarial bone defect model using an in situ forming graphene oxide incorporated glycol chitosan/oxidized hyaluronic acid injectable hydrogel. Carbon . 2020;168:264–277. doi: 10.1016/j.carbon.2020.05.022. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 103.Ma X., Liu S., Tang H., Yang R., Chi B., Ye Z. Polymer Edition. In situ photocrosslinked hyaluronic acid and poly (γ-glutamic acid) hydrogels as injectable drug carriers for load-bearing tissue application. Journal of Biomaterials Science, Polymer Edition . 2018;29(18):2252–2266. doi: 10.1080/09205063.2018.1535820. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 104.Yang R., Huang J., Zhang W., et al. Mechanoadaptive injectable hydrogel based on poly (γ-glutamic acid) and hyaluronic acid regulates fibroblast migration for wound healing. Carbohydrate Polymers . 2021;273 doi: 10.1016/j.carbpol.2021.118607. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 105.Sanmartín-Masiá E., Poveda-Reyes S., Gallego Ferrer G. Extracellular matrix–inspired gelatin/hyaluronic acid injectable hydrogels. International Journal of Polymeric Materials and Polymeric Biomaterials . 2017;66(6):280–288. doi: 10.1080/00914037.2016.1201828. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 106.Hozumi T., Kageyama T., Ohta S., Fukuda J., Ito T. Injectable hydrogel with slow degradability composed of gelatin and hyaluronic acid cross-linked by Schiff’s base formation. Biomacromolecules . 2018;19(2):288–297. doi: 10.1021/acs.biomac.7b01133. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 107.Zaviskova K., Tukmachev D., Dubisova J., et al. Injectable hydroxyphenyl derivative of hyaluronic acid hydrogel modified with RGD as scaffold for spinal cord injury repair. Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part A . 2018;106(4):1129–1140. doi: 10.1002/jbm.a.36311. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 108.Seçer S., Ceylan Tuncaboylu D. Supramolecular poloxamer-based in situ gels with hyaluronic acid and cyclodextrins. International Journal of Polymeric Materials and Polymeric Biomaterials . 2022;71(9):647–655. doi: 10.1080/00914037.2021.1876055. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 109.Singh D. K., Ray A. R. Radiation‐induced grafting of N, N′‐dimethylaminoethylmethacrylate onto chitosan films. Journal of Applied Polymer Science . 1997;66(5):869–877. doi: 10.1002/(sici)1097-4628(19971031)66:5<869::aid-app7>3.0.co;2-t. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 110.Correlo V., Boesel L., Bhattacharya M., Mano J., Neves N., Reis R. Properties of melt processed chitosan and aliphatic polyester blends. Materials Science and Engineering A . 2005;403(1-2):57–68. doi: 10.1016/j.msea.2005.04.055. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 111.El-Hefian E. A., Nasef M. M., Yahaya A. H. Chitosan-based polymer blends: current status and applications. Journal of the Chemical Society of Pakistan . 2014;36(1):p. 11. [Google Scholar]
  • 112.Fazli N., Norita M. Z., Raha M. G., Nahrizul Adib K. Characterization of Chitosan-Poly (Ethylene Oxide) Blends as Haemodialysis Membrane . 2005. [Google Scholar]
  • 113.Qi Q.-l., Li Q., Lu J.-w., Guo Z.-x., Yu J. Preparation and characterization of soluble eggshell membrane protein/chitosan blend films. Chinese Journal of Polymer Science . 2009;27(03):387–392. doi: 10.1142/s0256767909004047. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 114.Gebrekrstos A., Ray S. S. Superior electrical conductivity and mechanical properties of phase‐separated polymer blend composites by tuning the localization of nanoparticles for electromagnetic interference shielding applications. Journal of Polymer Science . 2023;61(21):2567–2584. doi: 10.1002/pol.20230059. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 115.Zhang Y., Li X., Zhong N., Huang Y., He K., Ye X. Injectable in situ dual-crosslinking hyaluronic acid and sodium alginate based hydrogels for drug release. Journal of Biomaterials Science, Polymer Edition . 2019;30(12):995–1007. doi: 10.1080/09205063.2019.1618546. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 116.Wang S., Chi J., Jiang Z., et al. A self-healing and injectable hydrogel based on water-soluble chitosan and hyaluronic acid for vitreous substitute. Carbohydrate Polymers . 2021;256 doi: 10.1016/j.carbpol.2020.117519. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 117.Liu Y., Yang J., Luo Z., et al. Development of an injectable thiolated icariin functionalized collagen/hyaluronic hydrogel to promote cartilage formation in vitro and in vivo. Journal of Materials Chemistry B . 2019;7(17):2845–2854. doi: 10.1039/c9tb00211a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 118.Deng Y., Ren J., Chen G., et al. Injectable in situ cross-linking chitosan-hyaluronic acid based hydrogels for abdominal tissue regeneration. Scientific Reports . 2017;7(1):2699–2713. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-02962-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 119.Maiz-Fernández S., Pérez-Álvarez L., Silván U., Vilas-Vilela J. L., Lanceros-Méndez S. Dynamic and self-healable chitosan/hyaluronic acid-based in situ-forming hydrogels. Gels . 2022;8(8):p. 477. doi: 10.3390/gels8080477. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 120.Gilarska A., Lewandowska-Łańcucka J., Horak W., Nowakowska M. Collagen/chitosan/hyaluronic acid–based injectable hydrogels for tissue engineering applications–design, physicochemical and biological characterization. Colloids and Surfaces B: Biointerfaces . 2018;170:152–162. doi: 10.1016/j.colsurfb.2018.06.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 121.Lee H., Park T. G. Photo‐crosslinkable, biomimetic, and thermo‐sensitive pluronic grafted hyaluronic acid copolymers for injectable delivery of chondrocytes. Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part A . 2009;88(3):797–806. doi: 10.1002/jbm.a.31983. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 122.Lei Y., Wang Y., Shen J., et al. Stem cell‐recruiting injectable microgels for repairing osteoarthritis. Advanced Functional Materials . 2021;31(48) doi: 10.1002/adfm.202105084. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 123.Ijaz U., Sohail M., Usman Minhas M., et al. Biofunctional hyaluronic acid/κ-carrageenan injectable hydrogels for improved drug delivery and wound healing. Polymers . 2022;14(3):p. 376. doi: 10.3390/polym14030376. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 124.Dinh L., Hong J., Min Kim D., et al. A novel thermosensitive poloxamer-hyaluronic acid-kappa-carrageenan-based hydrogel anti-adhesive agent loaded with 5-fluorouracil: a preclinical study in Sprague-Dawley rats. International Journal of Pharmaceutics . 2022;621 doi: 10.1016/j.ijpharm.2022.121771. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 125.Vignesh S., Sivashanmugam A., Annapoorna M., et al. Injectable deferoxamine nanoparticles loaded chitosan-hyaluronic acid coacervate hydrogel for therapeutic angiogenesis. Colloids and Surfaces B: Biointerfaces . 2018;161:129–138. doi: 10.1016/j.colsurfb.2017.10.033. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 126.Hu M., Yang J., Xu J. Structural and biological investigation of chitosan/hyaluronic acid with silanized-hydroxypropyl methylcellulose as an injectable reinforced interpenetrating network hydrogel for cartilage tissue engineering. Drug Delivery . 2021;28(1):607–619. doi: 10.1080/10717544.2021.1895906. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 127.Zhang M., Chen X., Yang K., et al. Dual-crosslinked hyaluronic acid hydrogel with self-healing capacity and enhanced mechanical properties. Carbohydrate Polymers . 2023;301 doi: 10.1016/j.carbpol.2022.120372. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 128.Okawa M., Tanabe A., Ohta S., Nagatoishi S., Tsumoto K., Ito T. Extracellular matrix-inspired hydrogel of hyaluronan and gelatin crosslinked via a Link module with a transglutaminase reactive sequence. Communications Materials . 2022;3(1):81–11. doi: 10.1038/s43246-022-00309-4. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 129.Kim W. K., Choi J. H., Shin M. E., et al. Evaluation of cartilage regeneration of chondrocyte encapsulated gellan gum-based hyaluronic acid blended hydrogel. International Journal of Biological Macromolecules . 2019;141:51–59. doi: 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2019.08.176. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 130.Dautzenberg H., Kriz J. Response of polyelectrolyte complexes to subsequent addition of salts with different cations. Langmuir . 2003;19(13):5204–5211. doi: 10.1021/la0209482. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 131.Schatz C., Lucas J.-M., Viton C., Domard A., Pichot C., Delair T. Formation and properties of positively charged colloids based on polyelectrolyte complexes of biopolymers. Langmuir . 2004;20(18):7766–7778. doi: 10.1021/la049460m. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 132.Wu D., Delair T. Stabilization of chitosan/hyaluronan colloidal polyelectrolyte complexes in physiological conditions. Carbohydrate Polymers . 2015;119:149–158. doi: 10.1016/j.carbpol.2014.11.042. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 133.Prestwich G. D., Marecak D. M., Marecek J. F., Vercruysse K. P., Ziebell M. R. Controlled chemical modification of hyaluronic acid: synthesis, applications, and biodegradation of hydrazide derivatives. Journal of Controlled Release . 1998;53(1-3):93–103. doi: 10.1016/s0168-3659(97)00242-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 134.Sankalia M. G., Mashru R. C., Sankalia J. M., Sutariya V. B. Stability improvement of alpha-amylase entrapped in kappa-carrageenan beads: physicochemical characterization and optimization using composite index. International Journal of Pharmaceutics . 2006;312(1-2):1–14. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpharm.2005.11.048. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 135.Hou M., Liu W., Zhang L., et al. Responsive agarose hydrogel incorporated with natural humic acid and MnO 2 nanoparticles for effective relief of tumor hypoxia and enhanced photo-induced tumor therapy. Biomaterials Science . 2020;8(1):353–369. doi: 10.1039/c9bm01472a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 136.Cimen Z., Babadag S., Odabas S., Altuntas S., Demirel G., Demirel G. B. Injectable and self-healable pH-responsive gelatin–PEG/laponite hybrid hydrogels as long-acting implants for local cancer treatment. ACS Applied Polymer Materials . 2021;3(7):3504–3518. doi: 10.1021/acsapm.1c00419. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 137.Zhou L., Chen F., Hou Z., Chen Y., Luo X. Injectable self-healing CuS nanoparticle complex hydrogels with antibacterial, anti-cancer, and wound healing properties. Chemical Engineering Journal . 2021;409 doi: 10.1016/j.cej.2020.128224. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 138.Hamidi M., Azadi A., Rafiei P. Hydrogel nanoparticles in drug delivery. Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews . 2008;60(15):1638–1649. doi: 10.1016/j.addr.2008.08.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 139.Nunes D., Andrade S., Ramalho M. J., Loureiro J. A., Pereira M. C. Polymeric nanoparticles-loaded hydrogels for biomedical applications: a systematic review on in vivo findings. Polymers . 2022;14(5):p. 1010. doi: 10.3390/polym14051010. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 140.Chen X., Liu Z. A pH‐responsive hydrogel based on a tumor‐targeting mesoporous silica nanocomposite for sustained cancer labeling and therapy. Macromolecular Rapid Communications . 2016;37(18):1533–1539. doi: 10.1002/marc.201600261. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 141.Porcello A., Gonzalez-Fernandez P., Jordan O., Allémann E. Nanoforming hyaluronan-based thermoresponsive hydrogels: optimized and tunable functionality in osteoarthritis management. Pharmaceutics . 2022;14(3):p. 659. doi: 10.3390/pharmaceutics14030659. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 142.Hu X., Gao Z., Tan H., Wang H., Mao X., Pang J. An injectable hyaluronic acid-based composite hydrogel by DA click chemistry with pH sensitive nanoparticle for biomedical application. Frontiers in Chemistry . 2019;7:p. 477. doi: 10.3389/fchem.2019.00477. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 143.Gao Y., Vogus D., Zhao Z., et al. Injectable hyaluronic acid hydrogels encapsulating drug nanocrystals for long‐term treatment of inflammatory arthritis. Bioengineering & Translational Medicine . 2022;7(1) doi: 10.1002/btm2.10245. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 144.Pérez-Rafael S., Ivanova K., Stefanov I., et al. Nanoparticle-driven self-assembling injectable hydrogels provide a multi-factorial approach for chronic wound treatment. Acta Biomaterialia . 2021;134:131–143. doi: 10.1016/j.actbio.2021.07.020. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 145.Savina I. N., Ingavle G. C., Cundy A. B., Mikhalovsky S. V. A simple method for the production of large volume 3D macroporous hydrogels for advanced biotechnological, medical and environmental applications. Scientific Reports . 2016;6(1) doi: 10.1038/srep21154. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 146.Yang J.-A., Yeom J., Hwang B. W., Hoffman A. S., Hahn S. K. In situ-forming injectable hydrogels for regenerative medicine. Progress in Polymer Science . 2014;39(12):1973–1986. doi: 10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2014.07.006. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 147.Ghandforoushan P., Alehosseini M., Golafshan N., et al. Injectable hydrogels for cartilage and bone tissue regeneration: a review. International Journal of Biological Macromolecules . 2023;246 doi: 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2023.125674. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 148.Liu M., Zeng X., Ma C., et al. Injectable hydrogels for cartilage and bone tissue engineering. Bone research . 2017;5(1):17014–17020. doi: 10.1038/boneres.2017.14. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 149.Alinezhad V., Esmaeilzadeh K., Bagheri H., et al. Engineering a platelet-rich plasma-based multifunctional injectable hydrogel with photothermal, antibacterial, and antioxidant properties for skin regeneration. Biomaterials Science . 2023;11(17):5872–5892. doi: 10.1039/d3bm00881a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 150.He S., Zhang Z., Luo R., Jiang Q., Yang L., Wang Y. Advances in injectable hydrogel strategies for heart failure treatment. Advanced Healthcare Materials . 2023;12(19):p. e2300029. doi: 10.1002/adhm.202300029. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 151.Hasanzadeh E., Seifalian A., Mellati A., et al. Injectable hydrogels in central nervous system: unique and novel platforms for promoting extracellular matrix remodeling and tissue engineering. Materials Today Bio . 2023;20 doi: 10.1016/j.mtbio.2023.100614. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 152.Phan V. G., Murugesan M., Nguyen P. T., et al. Biomimetic injectable hydrogel based on silk fibroin/hyaluronic acid embedded with methylprednisolone for cartilage regeneration. Colloids and Surfaces B: Biointerfaces . 2022;219 doi: 10.1016/j.colsurfb.2022.112859. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 153.Bao Z., Xian C., Yuan Q., Liu G., Wu J. Natural polymer‐based hydrogels with enhanced mechanical performances: preparation, structure, and property. Advanced Healthcare Materials . 2019;8(17):p. e1900670. doi: 10.1002/adhm.201900670. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 154.Dovedytis M., Liu Z. J., Bartlett S. Hyaluronic acid and its biomedical applications: a review. Engineered Regeneration . 2020;1:102–113. doi: 10.1016/j.engreg.2020.10.001. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 155.Jahanbekam S., Mozafari N., Bagheri-Alamooti A., et al. Ultrasound-responsive hyaluronic acid hydrogel of hydrocortisone to treat osteoarthritis. International Journal of Biological Macromolecules . 2023;240 doi: 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2023.124449. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 156.Chouhan D., Dey N., Bhardwaj N., Mandal B. B. Emerging and innovative approaches for wound healing and skin regeneration: current status and advances. Biomaterials . 2019;216 doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2019.119267. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 157.Palmieri B., Vadalà M., Laurino C. Nutrition in wound healing: investigation of the molecular mechanisms, a narrative review. Journal of Wound Care . 2019;28(10):683–693. doi: 10.12968/jowc.2019.28.10.683. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 158.Du P., Suhaeri M., Ha S. S., Oh S. J., Kim S.-H., Park K. Human lung fibroblast-derived matrix facilitates vascular morphogenesis in 3D environment and enhances skin wound healing. Acta Biomaterialia . 2017;54:333–344. doi: 10.1016/j.actbio.2017.03.035. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 159.Xian L. J., Roy Chowdhury S., Bin Saim A., Bt Hj Idrus R. Concentration-dependent effect of platelet-rich plasma on keratinocyte and fibroblast wound healing. Cytotherapy . 2015;17(3):293–300. doi: 10.1016/j.jcyt.2014.10.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 160.Liang Y., He J., Guo B. Functional hydrogels as wound dressing to enhance wound healing. ACS Nano . 2021;15(8):12687–12722. doi: 10.1021/acsnano.1c04206. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 161.Gao Y., Li Z., Huang J., Zhao M., Wu J. In situ formation of injectable hydrogels for chronic wound healing. Journal of Materials Chemistry B . 2020;8(38):8768–8780. doi: 10.1039/d0tb01074j. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 162.Zawani M., Fauzi M. B. Injectable hydrogels for chronic skin wound management: a concise review. Biomedicines . 2021;9(5):p. 527. doi: 10.3390/biomedicines9050527. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 163.Liu S., Liu X., Ren Y., et al. Mussel-inspired dual-cross-linking hyaluronic acid/ε-polylysine hydrogel with self-healing and antibacterial properties for wound healing. ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces . 2020;12(25):27876–27888. doi: 10.1021/acsami.0c00782. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 164.Guan S., Li Y., Cheng C., et al. Manufacture of pH-and HAase-responsive hydrogels with on-demand and continuous antibacterial activity for full-thickness wound healing. International Journal of Biological Macromolecules . 2020;164:2418–2431. doi: 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2020.08.108. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 165.Zhou C., Sheng C., Gao L., Guo J., Li P., Liu B. Engineering poly (ionic liquid) semi-IPN hydrogels with fast antibacterial and anti-inflammatory properties for wound healing. Chemical Engineering Journal . 2021;413 doi: 10.1016/j.cej.2020.127429. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 166.Zhang Y., Wu H., Li P., Liu W., Zhang Y., Dong A. Dual‐light‐triggered in situ structure and function regulation of injectable hydrogels for high‐efficient anti‐infective wound therapy. Advanced Healthcare Materials . 2022;11(1):p. e2101722. doi: 10.1002/adhm.202101722. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 167.Liang Y., Zhao X., Hu T., et al. Adhesive hemostatic conducting injectable composite hydrogels with sustained drug release and photothermal antibacterial activity to promote full‐thickness skin regeneration during wound healing. Small . 2019;15(12):p. e1900046. doi: 10.1002/smll.201900046. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 168.Wu J., Chen A., Zhou Y., et al. Novel H2S-Releasing hydrogel for wound repair via in situ polarization of M2 macrophages. Biomaterials . 2019;222 doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2019.119398. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 169.Ying H., Zhou J., Wang M., et al. In situ formed collagen-hyaluronic acid hydrogel as biomimetic dressing for promoting spontaneous wound healing. Materials Science and Engineering: C . 2019;101:487–498. doi: 10.1016/j.msec.2019.03.093. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 170.Xu Q., Sigen A., Gao Y., et al. A hybrid injectable hydrogel from hyperbranched PEG macromer as a stem cell delivery and retention platform for diabetic wound healing. Acta Biomaterialia . 2018;75:63–74. doi: 10.1016/j.actbio.2018.05.039. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 171.Li Q., Liu K., Jiang T., et al. Injectable and self-healing chitosan-based hydrogel with MOF-loaded α-lipoic acid promotes diabetic wound healing. Materials Science and Engineering: C . 2021;131 doi: 10.1016/j.msec.2021.112519. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 172.Bai H., Kyu-Cheol N., Wang Z., et al. Regulation of inflammatory microenvironment using a self-healing hydrogel loaded with BM-MSCs for advanced wound healing in rat diabetic foot ulcers. Journal of Tissue Engineering . 2020;11:p. 204173142094724. doi: 10.1177/2041731420947242. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 173.Suo H., Hussain M., Wang H., et al. Injectable and pH-sensitive hyaluronic acid-based hydrogels with on-demand release of antimicrobial peptides for infected wound healing. Biomacromolecules . 2021;22(7):3049–3059. doi: 10.1021/acs.biomac.1c00502. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 174.Wang L., Li J., Xiong Y., et al. Ultrashort peptides and hyaluronic acid-based injectable composite hydrogels for sustained drug release and chronic diabetic wound healing. ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces . 2021;13(49):58329–58339. doi: 10.1021/acsami.1c16738. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 175.Zhu S., Dai Q., Yao L., et al. Engineered multifunctional nanocomposite hydrogel dressing to promote vascularization and anti-inflammation by sustained releasing of Mg2+ for diabetic wounds. Composites Part B: Engineering . 2022;231 doi: 10.1016/j.compositesb.2021.109569. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 176.Yang X., He S., Wang J., et al. Hyaluronic acid-based injectable nanocomposite hydrogels with photo-thermal antibacterial properties for infected chronic diabetic wound healing. International Journal of Biological Macromolecules . 2023;242 doi: 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2023.124872. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 177.Han W., Chen C., Yang K., et al. Hyaluronic acid and chitosan-based injectable and self-healing hydrogel with inherent antibacterial and antioxidant bioactivities. International Journal of Biological Macromolecules . 2023;227:373–383. doi: 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2022.12.037. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 178.Gulbake A., Jain A., Jain A., Jain A., Jain S. K. Insight to drug delivery aspects for colorectal cancer. World Journal of Gastroenterology . 2016;22(2):582–599. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v22.i2.582. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 179.Carr C., Ng J., Wigmore T. The side effects of chemotherapeutic agents. Current Anaesthesia and Critical Care . 2008;19(2):70–79. doi: 10.1016/j.cacc.2008.01.004. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 180.Partridge A. H., Burstein H. J., Winer E. P. Side effects of chemotherapy and combined chemohormonal therapy in women with early-stage breast cancer. JNCI Monographs . 2001;2001(30):135–142. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.jncimonographs.a003451. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 181.Lebaron S., Zeltzer L. K., Lebaron C., Scott S. E., Zeltzer P. M. Chemotherapy side effects in pediatric oncology patients: drugs, age, and sex as risk factors. Medical and Pediatric Oncology . 1988;16(4):263–268. doi: 10.1002/mpo.2950160408. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 182.Lorscheider M., Gaudin A., Nakhlé J., Veiman K.-L., Richard J., Chassaing C. Challenges and opportunities in the delivery of cancer therapeutics: update on recent progress. Therapeutic Delivery . 2021;12(1):55–76. doi: 10.4155/tde-2020-0079. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 183.Pertici V., Pin-Barre C., Rivera C., et al. Degradable and injectable hydrogel for drug delivery in soft tissues. Biomacromolecules . 2018;20(1):149–163. doi: 10.1021/acs.biomac.8b01242. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 184.Manavitehrani I., Fathi A., Schindeler A., Dehghani F. Sustained protein release from a core‐shell drug carrier system comprised of mesoporous nanoparticles and an injectable hydrogel. Macromolecular Bioscience . 2018;18(12):p. e1800201. doi: 10.1002/mabi.201800201. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 185.Zhang F., Zhang S., Lin R., Cui S., Jing X., Coseri S. Injectable multifunctional carboxymethyl chitosan/hyaluronic acid hydrogel for drug delivery systems. International Journal of Biological Macromolecules . 2023;249 doi: 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2023.125801. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 186.Lu K.-Y., Lin Y.-C., Lu H.-T., et al. A novel injectable in situ forming gel based on carboxymethyl hexanoyl chitosan/hyaluronic acid polymer blending for sustained release of berberine. Carbohydrate Polymers . 2019;206:664–673. doi: 10.1016/j.carbpol.2018.11.050. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 187.Chen Y., Sui J., Wang Q., et al. Injectable self-crosslinking HA-SH/Col I blend hydrogels for in vitro construction of engineered cartilage. Carbohydrate Polymers . 2018;190:57–66. doi: 10.1016/j.carbpol.2018.02.057. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 188.Peng L., Li M., Zhao K., Ma C., Tang H., Li Y. Evaluation of an injectable hydrogel based on hyaluronic acid–chitosan/β‐glycerophosphate‐loaded mesenchymal stem cells in enhancing the therapeutic efficacy of myocardial infarction. Macromolecular Bioscience . 2022;22(4):p. e2100286. doi: 10.1002/mabi.202100286. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Data Availability Statement

The data supporting this review are from previously reported studies and datasets, which have been cited. The processed data are available from the corresponding author upon request.


Articles from Advances in Pharmacological and Pharmaceutical Sciences are provided here courtesy of Wiley

RESOURCES