Abstract
Overview:
Mycobacterial infections are important in humans and animals. Cats can be infected by several Mycobacterium species, which may cause different syndromes, mainly tuberculosis, atypical or non-tuberculous mycobacteriosis and leprosy. In recent years, awareness has increased about how to recognise and confirm these infections. More cases are diagnosed today, which probably means that the disease has escaped detection in the past.
Infection:
Most cases in cats are cutaneous, presenting as nodules in the skin and draining tracts, ulceration and local lymphadenopathy; however, systemic dissemination may also occur.
Diagnosis:
Definitive diagnosis is difficult when the bacterium cannot be detected by histology or culture. However, species confirmation is essential for treatment and prognosis, so material for culture and polymerase chain reaction should be submitted in every suspected case.
Treatment:
Treatment is challenging. A combination of two or three antibiotics is needed, and treatment must be continued for some months, which makes owner compliance especially difficult in cats.
Zoonotic risk:
There is a zoonotic risk associated with some mycobacterial species. Concerns should be communicated in every case of an immunocompromised owner in contact with an infected cat.
Bacterial properties
Mycobacteria are intracellular, acid-fast, slow-growing bacilliform bacteria, highly resistant to environmental conditions.1,2 Mycobacterial taxonomy is complex and many species can infect the cat and induce a variety of clinical presentations. Different classifications have been made in the past based on features and ability to grow in culture, as well as biochemical properties. 2 The use of molecular techniques has led to taxonomic changes, and some species have been or will be classified into different groups. 2
For practical purposes, we here classify mycobacteria on the basis of their biological behaviour, including aspects of clinical presentation, diagnosis and culture, their response to treatment and on zoonotic aspects.
Tuberculosis (TB) complex group
Mycobacterium tuberculosis (mainly infecting humans and dogs, rarely cats and other species), M bovis (infecting cattle, dogs and cats) and M microti (infecting small rodents like voles, shrews and cats) are bacteria that can be grown only in specific culture media. Tuberculosis in cats is a systemic disease with disseminated internal lesions,3,4 but cats with M microti infection may also present with localised or disseminated cutaneous disease. 5
Non-tuberculous mycobacteria (NTM) group
This group includes a large number of slow-growing species like M mageritense, M genavese and M malmoense and rapidly growing species like M fortuitum, M chelonae-abscessus, M avium, M smegmatis, M flavescens and the M avium–intracellulare complex (MAC) among others. NTM infections in cats are typically subcutaneous (local or disseminated), rarely progressing to systemic disease. 6 However, MAC infections, which in some classifications are included within the TB complex group, are frequently sytemic.3,7
Feline leprosy
The M lepraemurium and several other species cannot be grown in culture. Infection in cats is restricted to the skin where it produces mainly localised and rarely disseminated cutaneous nodules. 8
Epidemiology
The prevalence of mycobacterial infections in cats is unknown. They are considered rare, but case series or case reports from the United States, Australia, New Zealand and several European countries have been published. In recent years, more cases have been recognised, probably meaning that the infection was under-diagnosed previously.7,9,10 A 2009 survey from diagnostic laboratories in the UK evaluating tissue samples with a histological diagnosis of mycobacterial infection showed a significant incidence of around 1%. 10
Data on the prevalence of the different mycobacterial species are also lacking. However, a recent retrospective study from the UK evaluating 339 cases of mycobacterial disease in cats found that 53% could not be identified through culture, 19% were M microti, 15% M bovis, 7% MAC and 6% of the NTM group. 5 Most cats with mycobacterial infections have an outdoor lifestyle;5,8 living in a non-urban area seems to increase the risk. 10 Adult tom cats seem to be predisposed to developing disease,3,5 as are Siamese and Abyssinian breeds.5,7,11
TB complex group
M microti infection is mainly related to direct contact with small rodents like voles and mice. 12
M tuberculosis infection is rare in cats, probably due to their natural resistance. 13 M tuberculosis and M bovis are directly transmitted to cats by ingestion of milk from infected cattle and by direct or environmental contact with badgers (M bovis). 14
NTM group
The main risk to cats is wound contamination by mycobacteria present in the environment (soil, water and decaying vegetation).6,9,15,16
Feline leprosy
The main risk comes from direct contact or rodent bites, or from wound contamination by mycobacteria present in the soil or on plants.7,17
Pathogenesis
Mycobacteria infect the macrophage and induce granulomatous and pyogranulomatous inflammatory responses in the organs involved. 18 The mycobacterial species, route of infection and immune responses determine the extent, location and severity of the lesions.
TB complex group
The primary site of infection by M tuberculosis and M bovis may be the alimentary tract, lungs or skin.2,15 From these sites dissemination and systemic infection may occur. Occasionally, the infection is primarily systemic.
In M microti infection, the portal of entry is the skin, in locations commonly affected by wild rodent bites (the face and legs). 5
NTM group
The primary site of infection is the skin, with mainly traumatic or surgical wounds becoming contaminated with mycobacteria.6,8 Some fast-growing mycobacteria show a predilection to replicate in lipid-rich tissues, like the ventral abdominal and inguinal areas, particularly after a surgical wound contamination (Figure 1). A lipoid pneumonia case caused by mycobacterial infection has also been reported. 19 Dissemination from the skin and systemic infections are not common for bacteria of this group, with the exception of MAC infections, which are easily disseminated.6,11,20–22
Figure 1.

Mycobacterial infection in the ventral abdomen. Courtesy of Richard Malik, University of Sydney Veterinary School
Feline leprosy
The primary site of infection is the skin, with localised subcutaneous granulomas and, less commonly, disseminated skin granulomas. 7
Clinical presentation
Most mycobacterial infections occur in immunocompetent animals.3,5 Cases in cats with primary or acquired immunodeficiency have been documented. Two feline immunodeficiency virus-positive cats with atypical mycobacterial infection have been reported.23,24 One case has been documented of an atypical mycobacterial infection in a cat with an idiopathic CD4+ lymphopenia. 25 Two cases (MAC disseminated infection and mycobacterial osteomyelitis) have been reported after renal transplantation and long-term immunosuppressive therapy with ciclosporin.26,27

Cutaneous forms
M microti, the NTM group and feline leprosy species are the most common mycobacteria producing skin lesions. These typically consist of dermal nodules, non-healing wounds with draining tracts and ulceration (Figures 2–4).4,5,8–10 Common locations are the facial area, extremities, tail base, perineum, ventral thorax and abdomen. Lesions may be solitary or multiple.5,9 Multiple skin lesions may result from local spread or haematogenous dissemination. Local or generalised lymphadenopathy is present in about half of the cases and may be the only clinical sign (especially submandibular and prescapular). 5
Figure 2.

Ulcerated skin nodule in M microti infection. Courtesy of Richard Malik, University of Sydney Veterinary School
Figure 3.

Subcutaneous skin nodule in NTM infection. Courtesy of Albert Lloret, Veterinary Teaching Hospital, Universitat Autonoma, Barcelona, Spain
Figure 4.

(a,b) Subcutaneous nodules in a cat with leprosy. Courtesy of Richard Malik, University of Sydney Veterinary School
Visceral (digestive or respiratory) or systemic forms
The TB complex and MAC species are the most common mycobacteria producing visceral or systemic lesions.3,20–22 NTM infections rarely produce disseminated disease. 19 Common clinical signs and abnormalities are digestive (weight loss, mesenteric lymphadenopathy) or respiratory (pneumonia, hilar lymphadenopathy, pneumothorax, pleural or perdicardial effusions), and may be accompanied by signs of systemic dissemination like fever, ocular signs, splenomegaly, hepatomegaly, generalised lymphadenopathy, bone lesions and central nervous system signs.3,6,11,20–22,27
Diagnosis
Diagnosis may be difficult, especially when skin lesions are absent. It is based on a clinical suspicion when the presentation is indicative and other diseases are ruled out. In these cases, appropriate samples should be obtained for cytology and/or histology (including acid-fast staining), culture and polymerase chain reaction (PCR).
Haematology and biochemistry changes are non-specific, suggesting a chronic inflammatory condition. Hypercalcaemia due to granulomatous disease has been reported in systemic MAC 6 and M microti infections. 4 Cats infected with mycobacteria may show reduced levels of vitamin D when compared with healthy cats, as occurs in humans. 28
Thoracic radiographic changes are variable and non-specific, ranging from no abnormalities to bronchial, alveolar or interstitial nodular mixed patterns, pleural effusion and/or mediastinal and perihilar lymphadenopathy (Figure 5). 29 Appendicular radiographs may show bone osteolytic lesions, and less frequently osteoproliferative changes, associated with systemic infections.27,29 Abdominal ultrasound may be useful for identifying mesenteric lymphadenopathy or granulomatous lesions and as a guide to obtain fine needle aspirates. 26
Figure 5.
Mixed bronchial–interstitial pattern in the lungs of a cat with TB complex group infection. Courtesy of Richard Malik, University of Sydney Veterinary School
Cytology
Fine needle aspirates or smears from skin lesions (nodules, ulcers, draining tracts) or from granulomatous lymph nodes should always be stained for acid-fast bacteria using, for example, the Ziehl-Neelsen (ZN) procedure. Sensitivity is variable, as the number of bacteria within macrophages varies depending on the mycobacterial species and on the host’s immune response. 2 A negative cytology result does not rule out mycobacterial infection [EBM grade III]. 10 If cytology suggests a granulomatous inflammation, a biopsy for histology must be obtained. Samples for culture and PCR should be obtained in all cases when a mycobacterial infection is suspected (granulomatous inflammation and ZN-positive staining).

Histology
Histology is useful in the diagnosis of mycobacterial infections. It allows the inflammatory pattern (pyogranulomatous or granulomatous) to be assessed and special acid-fast staining, like ZN, to be performed (Figure 6).18,30 However, only a few bacteria may be present and pass undetected by staining (M microti and some NTM species), although culture or PCR may give a positive result [EBM grade III].10,30 Bacterial morphology and staining do not allow identification of the mycobacterial species. If a mycobacterial infection is suspected it is mandatory to keep fresh biopsy samples frozen for further culture and PCR. 2
Figure 6.

Large numbers of acid-fast bacteria revealed using the Ziehl–Neelsen stain. Courtesy of Richard Malik, University of Sydney Veterinary School
Culture
Culture from a fresh tissue sample is useful to confirm mycobacterial infection and to identify the species involved, which has implications for treatment, prognosis and assessment of zoonotic risk. This needs to be done in a specialised laboratory and, even still, many mycobacterial species are slow growing (2 to 3 months) or fail to grow [EBM grade III].5,10 In feline leprosy and some forms of NTM infection, cultures are always negative, even when ZN staining has been positive [EBM grade III].7,17,30 Due to these limitations it is advisable to simultaneously submit samples for PCR.
PCR
PCR (eventually followed by sequencing) is the recommended test for diagnosing mycobacterial infections [EBM grade III].4,13,18 It allows confirmation of the diagnosis and species identification more rapidly than any other procedure. Availability may be limited depending on the private diagnostic laboratories in the area. Samples should alternatively be submitted to an official national laboratory for mycobacterial diagnosis.
Interferon gamma test and other immunoassays
These tests are currently commercially unavailable, but they are promising for the diagnosis of TB complex group infections.31,32 A recent study evaluating a cell-based interferon gamma test and serum antibody tests showed excellent specificity and a variable, moderate sensitivity [EBM grade II]. 33
Treatment
Treatment of mycobacterial infections is generally difficult and challenging. There are no prospective controlled clinical trials, and recommendations are based on case reports or retrospective studies. Good outcomes have been published after identification of the mycobacterial species and treatment with a long (several months) course of an appropriate antibiotic combination [EBM grade III].2,30 Surgery is indicated when local skin lesions can be removed; more diffuse lesions can be treated with surgical debridement and the cat subsequently treated with appropriate antibiotics [EBM grade III].8,34
Some important considerations before embarking on treatment are outlined in the box above.
TB complex group and NTM group
Currently, double or triple therapy is recommended: rifampicin (10–15 mg/kg q24h) plus a quinolone (marbofloxacin 2 mg/kg q24h) plus a macrolide (clarithromycin 125 mg/cat q24h or azithromycin 5–15 mg/kg q24h) for 6–9 months. Ideally, the three drugs should be giving during an initial phase of 2 months, followed by two of the drugs for 4–7 months [EBM grade III].2,3 In many cats, an oesophageal tube is needed to allow for such long and intensive pill administration. 2 Adverse effects (cutaneous, hepatic) are not uncommon, and in some cats treatment must be discontinued. 2
Short courses of antibiotic and/or monotherapy (eg, quinolones or beta-lactams) have been associated with clinical responses and remissions, but also with a high risk of relapse, which may be followed by systemic spread. 30 It is recommended always to start complete treatment while waiting for diagnostic confirmation and species identification.
MAC infections
Disseminated MAC infections usually respond poorly to treatment, and quinolones are not very effective [EBM grade IV].20–22 Recommended first-line therapy is clarithromycin with clofazimine (4–8 mg/kg q24h) or rifampicin or doxycycline (5–10 mg/kg q12h) based on the few cases reported with good outcomes [EBM grade IV].8,37,38
Feline leprosy
Most cats with leprosy can be cured by surgery (small lesions) and applying combinations of rifampicin, clofazimine and clarithromycin for several months [EBM grade III].1,7 Spontaneous remission has been documented in one cat [EBM grade IV]. 39
Prevention
Keeping cats indoors and avoiding contact with wild rodents are the only measures for preventing mycobacterial infection.
Prognosis
The prognosis generally must be considered guarded, but depends on the mycobacterial species and the extent and severity of the disease. Disseminated infections (TB complex and MAC) are associated with a poor prognosis.3,9,20–22 Localised skin disease (NTM infection), M microti infection and leprosy may have a good prognosis if treated appropriately.7,8,30
Footnotes
Funding: The authors received no specific grant from any funding agency in the public, commercial or not-for-profit sectors for the preparation of this article. The ABCD is supported by Merial, but is a scientifically independent body.
The authors do not have any potential conflicts of interest to declare.
Key Points
Mycobacterial infections should be included in the list of differential diagnoses for cats with solitary or multiple nodules, ulcers and draining tracts, especially in ‘fight and bite’ locations.
Acid-fast (eg, Ziehl-Neelsen) staining should always be performed if cytology or histology samples show a granulomatous inflammatory pattern.
Samples for culture and/or PCR should be submitted to specialised laboratories to confirm mycobacterial infection and for species identification.
Treatment of mycobacterial infections requires long-term therapy with a combination of two or three antibiotics in most cases. In some cases surgery may be needed as well.
Incomplete treatment and lack of compliance may be an important cause of treatment failure and may induce resistance to antibiotics.
Potential zoonotic risk exists with some mycobacterial species, and should be discussed with the owner before starting treatment; especially in the case of immunosuppressed persons in the household.
References
- 1. Greene CE, Gunn-Moore DA. Mycobacterial infections. In: Greene CE. (ed). Infectious diseases of the dog and the cat. 3rd ed. St Louis: Saunders Elsevier, 2006, pp 462–488. [Google Scholar]
- 2. Gunn-Moore DA. Mycobacterial infections in cats and dogs. In: Ettinger S, Feldman E. (eds). Textbook of veterinary internal medicine. 7th ed. Philadelphia: WB Saunders, 2010, pp 875–881. [Google Scholar]
- 3. Gunn-Moore DA, Jenkins PA, Lucke VM. Feline tuberculosis: a literature review and discussion of 19 cases caused by an unusual mycobacterial variant. Vet Rec 1996; 138: 53–58. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4. Rüfenacht S, Bögli-Stuber K, Bodmer T, Jaunin VF, Jmaa DC, Gunn-Moore DA. Mycobacterium microti infection in the cat: a case report, literature review and recent clinical experience. J Feline Med Surg 2011; 13: 195–204. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5. Gunn-Moore DA, McFarland SE, Brewer JI, Crawshaw TR, Clifton-Hadley RS, Kovalik M, et al. Mycobacterial disease in cats in Great Britain: I. Culture results, geographical distribution and clinical presentation of 339 cases. J Feline Med Surg 2011; 13: 934–944. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6. Baral RM, Metcalfe SS, Krockenberger MB, Catt MJ, Barrs VR, McWhirter C, et al. Disseminated Mycobacterium avium infection in young cats: over-representation of Abyssinian cats. J Feline Med Surg 2006; 8: 23–44. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7. Malik R, Hughes MS, James G, Martin P, Wigney DI, Canfield PJ, et al. Feline leprosy: two different clinical syndromes. J Feline Med Surg 2002; 4: 43–59. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8. Horne KS, Kunkle GA. Clinical outcome of cutaneous rapidly growing mycobacterial infections in cats in the south-eastern United States: a review of 10 cases (1996–2006). J Feline Med Surg 2009; 11: 627–632. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9. Smith NH, Crawshaw T, Parry J, Birtles RJ. Mycobacterium microti: more diverse than previously thought. J Clin Microbiol 2009; 47: 2551–2559. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10. Gunn-Moore DA, Gaunt C, Shaw DJ. Incidence of mycobacterial infections in cats in Great Britain: estimate from feline tissue samples submitted to diagnostic laboratories. Transbound Emerg Dis. Epub ahead of print 21 June 2012. DOI: 10.1111/j.1865-1682.2012.01352.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11. Jordan HL, Cohn LA, Armstrong PJ. Disseminated Mycobacterium avium complex infection in three Siamese cats. J Am Vet Med Assoc 1994, 204: 90–93. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12. Burthe S, Bennet M, Kipar A, Lambin X, Smith A, Telfer S, et al. Tuberculosis (Mycobacterium microti) in wild field vole populations. Parasitology 2008; 35: 309–317. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13. Aranaz A, Liébana E, Pickering X, Novoa C, Mateos A, Domínguez L. Use of polymerase chain reaction in the diagnosis of tuberculosis in cats and dogs. Vet Rec 1996; 138: 276–280. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14. Biet F, Boschiroli ML, Thorel MF, Guilloteau LA. Zoonotic aspects of Mycobacterium bovis and Mycobacterium avium-intracellulare complex (MAC). Vet Res 2005; 36: 411–436. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15. Malik R, Wigney DI, Dawson D, Martin P, Hunt GB, Love DN. Infection of the subcutis and skin of cats with rapidly growing mycobacteria: a review of microbiological and clinical findings. J Feline Med Surg 2000; 2: 35–48. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16. Jang SS, Hirsch DC. Rapidly growing members of the genus Mycobacterium affecting dogs and cats. J Am Anim Hosp Assoc 2002; 38: 217–220. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17. McIntosh DW. Feline leprosy: a review of forty-four cases from Western Canada. Can Vet J 1982; 23: 291–295. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18. Kipar A, Schiller I, Baumgärtner W. Immunopathological studies on feline cutaneous and (muco)cutaneous mycobacteriosis. Vet Immunol Immunopathol 2003; 91: 169–182. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19. Couto SS, Artacho CA. Mycobacterium fortuitum pneumonia in a cat and the role of lipids in the pathogenesis of atypical mycobacterial infections. Vet Pathol 2007; 44: 543–546. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20. Rivière D, Pringet JL, Etievant M, Jechoux A, Lanore D, Raymond-Letron I, et al. Disseminated Mycobacterium avium subspecies infection in a cat. J Feline Med Surg 2011; 13: 125–128. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21. Barry M, Taylor J, Woods JP. Disseminated Mycobacterium avium in a cat. Can Vet J 2002; 43: 369–371. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22. de Groot PH, van Ingen J, de Zwaan R, Mulder A, Boeree MJ, van Soolingen D. Disseminated Mycobacterium avium subsp avium infection in a cat, the Netherlands. Vet Microbiol 2010; 144: 527–529. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23. De Lorenzi D, Solano-Gallego L. Tracheal granuloma because of infection with a novel mycobacterial species in an old FIV-positive cat. J Small Anim Pract 2009; 50: 143–146. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24. Hughes MS, Ball NW, Love DN, Canfield PJ, Wigney DI, Dawson D, et al. Disseminated Mycobacterium genavense infection in a FIV-positive cat. J Feline Med Surg 1999; 1: 23–29. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25. Meeks C, Levy JK, Crawford PC, Farina LL, Origgi F, Alleman R, Seddon OM, et al. Chronic disseminated Mycobacterium xenopi infection in a cat with idiopathic CD4+ lymphocytopenia. J Vet Intern Med 2008; 22: 1043–1047. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26. Griffin A, Newton AL, Aronson LR, Brown DC, Hess RS. Disseminated Mycobacterium avium complex infection following transplantation in a cat. J Am Vet Med Assoc 2003; 222: 1097–1101. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27. Lo AJ, Goldschmidt MH, Aronson LR. Osteomyelitis of the coxofemoral joint due to Mycobacterium species in a feline transplant recipient. J Feline Med Surg 2012; 14: 919–923. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28. Lalor SM, Mellanby RJ, Friend EJ, Bowlt KL, Berry J, Gunn-Moore DA. Domesticated cats with active mycobacteria infections have low serum vitamin D (25(OH)D) concentrations. Transbound Emerg Dis 2012; 59: 279–281. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29. Bennet AD, Lalor S, Schwarz T, Gunn-Moore DA. Radiographic findings in cats with mycobacterial infections. J Feline Med Surg 2011; 13: 776–780. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30. Gunn-Moore DA, McFarland SE, Schock A, Brewer JI, Crawshaw TR, Clifton-Hadley RS, et al. Mycobacterial disease in a population of 339 cats in Great Britain: II. Histopathology of 225 cases, and treatment and outcome of 184 cases. J Feline Med Surg 2011; 13: 945–952. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31. Rhodes SG, Gruffydd-Jones T, Gunn-Moore DA, Jahans K. Interferon-gamma test for feline tuberculosis. Vet Rec 2008; 162: 453–455. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32. Fenton KA, Fitzgerald SD, Kaneene JB, Kruger JM, Greenwald R, Lyashchenko KP. Comparison of three immunodiagnostic assays for antemortem detection of Mycobacterium bovis in domestic cats. J Vet Diagn Invest 2010; 22: 724–749. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33. Rhodes SG, Gunn-Moore DA, Boschiroli ML, Schiller I, Esfandiari J, Greenwald R, et al. Comparative study of IFNgamma and antibody tests for feline tuberculosis. Vet Immunol Immunopathol 2011; 144: 129–134. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34. Elsner L, Wayne J, O’Brien CR, McCowan C, Malik R, Hayman JA, et al. Localised Mycobacterium ulcerans infection in a cat in Australia. J Feline Med Surg 2008; 10: 407–412. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35. Xavier Emmanuel F, Seagar AL, Doig C, Rayner A, Claxton P, Laurenson I. Human and animal infections with Mycobacterium microti, Scotland. Emerg Infect Dis 2007; 13: 1924–1927. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36. Masur H. Recommendations on prophylaxis and therapy for disseminated Mycobacterium avium complex disease in patients infected with the human immunodeficiency virus. Public health service task force on prophylaxis and therapy for Mycobacterium avium complex. N Engl J Med 1993; 329: 898–904. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37. Kaufman AC, Greene CE, Rakich PM, Weigner DD. Treatment of localized Mycobacterium avium complex infection with clofazimine and doxycycline in a cat. J Am Vet Med Assoc 1995; 207: 457–459. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38. Sieber-Ruckstuhl NS, Sessions JK, Sanchez S, Latimer KS, Greene CE. Long-term cure of disseminated Mycobacterium avium infection in a cat. Vet Rec 2007; 160: 131–132. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39. Roccabianca P, Caniatti M, Scanziani E, Penati V. Feline leprosy: spontaneous remission in a cat. J Am Anim Hosp Assoc 1996; 32: 189–193. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40. Phan TA, Relic J. Sporotrichoid Mycobacterium marinum infection of the face following a cat scratch. Australas J Dermatol 2010; 51: 45–48. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]



