Editor—Collinge et al recommend that tonsil biopsy be considered in all those in whom new variant Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease is suspected.1 Though the detection of protease resistant prion protein in tonsillar tissue from a young person with a rapidly progressive dementia may have a high specificity for this diagnosis, there are no published data on sensitivity, specificity, or safety; the procedure carries the risk of haemorrhage and infection as well as the risks associated with anaesthesia. Some patients clinically suspected of having new variant Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease, and therefore potential candidates for tonsil biopsy, have subsequently recovered.2 Further information is obviously required, and we concur with the recommendation of a recent WHO consultation that this should come from postmortem studies.3
Brain biopsy has been carried out in 9 of the 27 cases of new variant Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease in the United Kingdom. This procedure has risks but, in contrast to tonsillar biopsy, enables potentially treatable neurological disorders to be identified. New variant Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease is confirmed in about 1 in 7 cases,2 and routine tonsillar biopsy in the population of suspected cases would lead to a high proportion of negative results. A negative result on tonsillar biopsy does not preclude the necessity to proceed to brain biopsy in selected cases. There is clearly a need for a non-invasive diagnostic test for new variant Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease, and preliminary investigation indicates that the presence of posterior thalamic high signal on brain magnetic resonance imaging may be diagnostically useful.4
The accepted clinical diagnostic criteria for sporadic Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease have depended on electroencephalography, and an alternative paraclinical criterion would be useful. Cerebrospinal fluid 14-3-3 protein has proved to be a remarkably sensitive and specific marker for sporadic Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease when used appropriately. Protease resistant prion protein has not been detected in palatine tonsillar tissue obtained at necropsy from the small number of patients with sporadic Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease studied to date (unpublished data).5 Unless necropsy studies yield positive results, the clinical use of tonsil biopsy in sporadic Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease is not justified.
References
- 1.Collinge J, Rossor MN, Thomas D, Frosh A, Tolley N. Tonsil biopsy helps diagnose new variant Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease. BMJ. 1998;317:472. . (15 August.) [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Will RG, Knight RSG, Zeidler M, Stewart G, Ironside JW, Cousens SN, Smith PG. Reporting of suspect new variant Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease. Lancet. 1997;349:847. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(97)24012-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.World Health Organisation. Report of a WHO Consultation on the global surveillance, diagnosis and therapy of human transmissible spongiform encephalopathies. Geneva: WHO; 1998. [Google Scholar]
- 4.Sellar RJ, Will RG, Zeidler M. MR Imaging of new variant Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease: the pulvinar sign. Neuroradiology. 1997;39(suppl 1):S53. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Kawashima T, Furukawa H, Doh-ura K, Iwaki T. Diagnosis of new variant Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease by tonsil biopsy. Lancet. 1997;350:68–69. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(05)66274-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
