SUMMARY
Gonorrhea rates continue to rise in the US and different populations disproportionally carry the burden of disease. Complicating the management is N. gonorrhoeae’s propensity to develop resistance to all therapies that have been used for gonococcal treatment. As antimicrobial resistance increases in the US, there are few new antimicrobials being developed. Ceftriaxone is the last remaining highly effective single-dose recommended regimen for gonococcal treatment. The 2021 CDC STI Treatment Guidelines increased the dose of ceftriaxone to 500 mg (1 g if ≥ 150 kg) for uncomplicated infections. An increasing number of ceftriaxone-based treatment failures have been reported internationally, most commonly at the pharynx. Therefore, all pharyngeal gonococcal infections are recommended to undergo TOC 7 to 14 days after treatment. It is recommended that all providers, laboratorians, and public health staff become aware of antimicrobial resistant gonorrhea and be able to identify, appropriately manage, and report any suspected gonorrhea treatment failure case.
Keywords: Neisseria gonorrhoeae, Gonorrhea, Sexually transmitted infections, Antimicrobial resistance
BACKGROUND
Gonorrhea is caused by Neisseria gonorrhoeae, a gram-negative diplococcus. The bacterium, a strictly human pathogen transmitted primarily by sexual contact, causes both symptomatic and asymptomatic infections. Asymptomatic infections can contribute to delays in medical care, onward transmission in a community, and complications such as pelvic inflammatory disease (PID). Gonorrhea is a public heath challenge, particularly due to the organism’s ability to develop antimicrobial resistance. Current control methods rely on prevention, timely diagnosis, and appropriate treatment.
Epidemiology
Gonorrhea is the second most commonly reported bacterial infection in the United States (US) with 710,151 cases reported to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) in 2021.1 After decades of declining gonorrhea rates, the early 2000s initiated a reverse in trends with continuously increasing rates. However, the true incidence of disease is uncertain due to underdiagnosis and under reporting. It is estimated that 1.6 million incident gonococcal infections occur in the US annually and 82.3 million occur globally.2,3
Gonorrhea epidemiology highlights major health disparities in the US, mostly attributed to environmental factors, limited resources, and unequal access to health care.4 Differences appear by age, gender, geographic region, race, and sexual orientation. Overall, gonorrhea is more common in men than in women and is highest in both men and women aged 20 to 24 years.1 The US South region and non-Hispanic Black or African American persons have the highest reported case rates. Additionally, test positivity for gonorrhea was highest among gay, bisexual, and other men who have sex with men (MSM) at 22.7%, followed by men who have sex with women only (MSW) at 12.2%, and women at 5.9%.1
Antimicrobial Resistance in Gonorrhea
Neisseria gonorrhoeae’s ability to develop resistance to antimicrobials has been a persistent challenge since the early 20th century.5 Sulfonamides were introduced in the late 1930s and by the 1940s resistance to high doses of sulfonamides was widespread. In the 1940s and 1950s, penicillins, aminoglycosides, and macrolides were introduced, with penicillins becoming the preferred treatment. Despite early resistance development, penicillin was able to be used for gonorrhea treatment for over 40 years due to its safety and tolerability allowing gradual increases of curative dosing until the 1980s. Tetracyclines, introduced in the 1960s, were used as an alternative to penicillin until resistance became widespread in the 1980s.
Newer antimicrobials like cephalosporins and fluoroquinolones were introduced in the 1980s. By the 1990s, resistance to fluoroquinolones began to appear and quickly spread across the US in the early 2000s. Third-generation cephalosporins were left as the drugs of choice for gonococcal treatment.5 Because of signs of developing resistance to cefixime and reported treatment failures in 2010, cefixime was removed as a recommended regimen,6 and rising rates of azithromycin with elevated minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) led to the drugs removal as an alternative treatment in 2015, and as a co-therapy in 2020.7 Now, ceftriaxone, the injectable third-generation cephalosporin, is the last remaining highly effective single-dose drug available for empiric single-dose gonorrhea treatment. Neisseria gonorrhoeae’s constant adaptation to different antimicrobials has required regular updates to national gonorrhea treatment recommendations to maintain effective treatment options.
Clinical Manifestations and Transmission
Neisseria gonorrhoeae initially infects non-cornified epithelium, the mucous membranes, of the urogenital tract, the rectum, the oropharynx, and conjunctivae. In some cases, the organism can cross into the blood stream from these mucosal sites and cause a disseminated infection (Table 1).
Table 1.
Clinical syndromes and infections caused by Neisseria gonorrhoeae
Anatomic Site of Infection | Associated Syndrome | Signs and Symptoms | Complications | Comments |
---|---|---|---|---|
Male urogenital infections | ||||
Urethra | Urethritis | Copious urethral discharge, purulent or mucopurulent in color; dysuria | Periurethral abscesses, penile edema, penile lymphangitis, prostatitis | Discharge may not be distinguishable on examination from the discharge seen in nongonococcal urethritis |
Epididymis | Epididymitis | Unilateral testicular pain, testicular swelling, dysuria | Abscess, testicular infarction, decreased fertility | N/A |
Female urogenital infections | ||||
Cervix | Cervicitis Or Asymptomatic | Mucopurulent discharge, vaginal pruritus, menorrhagia, bleeding in between menstrual cycles; friable cervical mucosa and frank discharge on physical examination | Pelvic inflammatory disease, chronic pelvic pain, ectopic pregnancy | A normal-appearing cervix does not rule out presence of gonococcal cervicitis |
Upper reproductive tract (uterus, ovaries, fallopian tubes) | Pelvic inflammatory disease | Pelvic/abdominal pain, dyspareunia, and abnormal vaginal bleeding; physical examination findings may include abdominal tenderness, uterine tenderness, and adnexal or cervical motion tenderness | Infertility, chronic pelvic pain, ectopic pregnancy | Signs and symptoms are not specific to gonococcal-related PID |
All genders | ||||
Rectum | Proctitis Or Asymptomatic | Anorectal bleeding, anorectal pain, tenesmus, constipation, rectal fullness or incomplete defecation, and mucopurulent discharge | Stricture or stenosis, fistulas | N/A |
Pharynx | Pharyngitis Or Asymptomatic | Pharyngeal erythema and pain; pharyngeal exudates, cervical lymphadenitis | N/A | N/A |
Conjunctiva | Conjunctivitis | Range of severity from conjunctival injection to severe mucopurulent discharge, periorbital edema | Uveitis, severe keratitis; corneal ulceration, perforation, and blindness if left untreated | N/A |
Other | Disseminated gonococcal infection | Fevers, chills, malaise, skin lesions (typically described as pustular or vesicopustular, though can be hemorrhagic macules, papules, bullae, and nodules), polyarthralgias, tenosynovitis, arthritis, synovial effusion | Septic arthritis, osteomyelitis; meningitis; endocarditis, can result in significant valvular dysfunction and heart failure | Persons with DGI are often asymptomatic at the mucosal site of infection (urogenital, pharyngeal, and/or rectal site) at the time of clinical presentation |
Urogenital Infection
Gonorrhea is associated with urogenital clinical syndromes including urethritis, epididymitis, cervicitis, and PID. However, a high proportion of persons with urogenital gonorrhea may be asymptomatic; up to 70% of women with cervical infections may not present with symptoms.8 The relative proportion of urethral infection that remains asymptomatic is somewhat unclear. Clinic-based studies suggest that urethral gonorrhea is primarily a symptomatic infection,9,10 but some population-based studies estimate that up to 60% of men with urethral gonorrhea may be asymptomatic or present only with mild symptoms.11,12 Epididymitis is the most common local complication of gonococcal urethritis, though the frequency of urethral infection progression to epididymitis in the modern era of antimicrobial therapy remains unknown.13 PID has been estimated to occur in 10% to 20% of those with untreated cervical gonorrhea.14,15
Rectal Infection
Although rectal gonococcal infections have been associated with receptive anal intercourse, they can be detected in the absence of reported rectal sexual exposure. In a systemic review of extragenital gonorrhea, the prevalence of rectal infection among MSM was estimated to be 6% (median; range 0.2%–24%) compared with 3% (median; range 0%–5.7%) among MSW and 2% (median; range 0.6%–36%) among women.16 In women, anorectal gonorrhea may be acquired through autoinoculation in the absence of receptive anal intercourse. Among men who report no receptive anal intercourse the route of transmission is unclear, but may be due to analingus.17 Gonococcal infections at the rectum are typically asymptomatic, though proctitis may occur.18
Pharyngeal Infection
The pharynx is a common site of gonococcal infection and is typically asymptomatic. The prevalence of pharyngeal gonorrhea, among MSM, has been found to be greater than 10%, and among women and heterosexual men, 2% to 10%.16,19 Additionally, among heterosexual contacts to gonorrhea, approximately 20% to 50% test positive at the throat.20,21 Pharyngeal gonorrhea is thought to be acquired primarily via oralgenital contact, though some literature suggests kissing could be a primary transmission mode.22
Conjunctival Infection
Historically, gonococcal conjunctivitis was a disease of infants due to acquisition from untreated mothers during birth; however, it can also occur in adults and adolescents as a result of autoinoculation from an anogenital infection. Person-to-person nonsexual contact, fomites, and vectors have been reported in outbreaks of gonococcal conjunctivitis.23,24 Gonococcal conjunctivitis in infants (ie, ophthalmia neonatorum) has been a rare event in the modern era due to routine prophylaxis with antibiotic eye ointment application to infants at birth.25
Disseminated Gonococcal Infection
Historically, disseminated gonococcal infection (DGI) has been rare, occurring in 0.5% to 3% of untreated gonococcal infections26; however, as rates of gonorrhea continue to increase, clinicians may see rare gonococcal clinical presentations more frequently. Clinical manifestations of DGI include skin lesions, tenosynovitis, asymmetric polyarthralgia, septic arthritis, and, on rare occasions, endocarditis, meningitis, or osteomyelitis. Since 2019, DGI clusters and increases in DGI cases have been reported in some US states, Manitoba, Canada, and England.27-30 Among 274 DGI cases voluntarily reported in the US to CDC between 2020 and 2022, 85.8% required hospitalization, 41.2% underwent related surgeries, and 2.2% died.31 DGI cases are often asymptomatic at the mucosal site of infection (urogenital, pharyngeal, and/or rectal site) at the time of presentation32; thus, clinicians should maintain a high degree of suspicion for patients presenting with signs and symptoms of DGI.
PREVENTION AND CONTROL STRATEGIES
Since the 1970s, gonorrhea prevention and control has relied on screening asymptomatic persons and treating sex partners. Now, 2 novel biomedical prevention strategies are on the horizon—post-exposure prophylaxis (PEP) with doxycycline and a vaccine (See “Novel Approaches and Advances in STI Treatment and Prevention”).
Gonorrhea Screening
Given the high proportion of asymptomatic gonorrhea, screening is an important tool for identifying individuals with gonorrhea and providing treatment and other management strategies to reduce the risk of complications and decrease transmission in the community. Recommendations and considerations for gonorrhea screening vary by population, age, and sexual behavior and are published by US Preventive Services Task Force, the CDC, and the HIV Medicine Association of the Infectious Diseases Society of America (See “A Practical Approach to STI Screening for the Primary Care Clinician”).
Post-Exposure Prophylaxis with Doxycycline
Randomized controlled trials have evaluated the use of doxycycline taken within 72 hours after sexual activity for the prevention of bacterial sexually transmitted infections (STIs) (ie, chlamydia, gonorrhea, and syphilis), an intervention known as STI PEP.33 There is concern, however, that early reductions in incident gonorrhea will be followed by major increases in antimicrobial resistance rendering the intervention ineffective for gonorrhea within 10 to 20 years.34 Additionally, 2 groups have demonstrated that selection for tetracycline resistance also selects for resistance in other antimicrobials which may have more widespread effects on gonorrhea antimicrobial resistance.35,36
Vaccination
Gonococcal vaccine research efforts were renewed by the possible protective effects of group B outer membrane vesicle (OMV) meningococcal (MenB) vaccines. In 2017, New Zealand reported a decline in gonorrhea after the large-scale distribution of their meningococcal (MeNZB) vaccine, with an estimated vaccine efficacy of 31%.37 Other studies using different MenB vaccines have also demonstrated reductions in gonorrhea.38 Although the MenB vaccine used in New Zealand no longer exists, the 4CMenB, Bexsero (GlaxoSmithKline, UK), vaccine has the same OMV components as the MeNZB vaccine. The impact of meningococcal vaccines on gonococcal infections is promising, but results from additional studies are needed to determine vaccine efficacy and duration of protection.
CLINICAL MANAGEMENT
Gonorrhea Diagnosis
Persons at risk for or suspected of having gonorrhea based on symptoms should undergo evaluation and testing to confirm the microbiologic diagnosis, ensure appropriate treatment, and further management.39 Diagnostic tests to identify gonorrhea include microscopy, nucleic acid amplification tests (NAAT), and culture; each type has benefits and limitations under different scenarios due to differences in test performance, characteristics, and result turnaround time.
Microscopy
Although not routinely used in current practice, microscopy with Gram stain is a point-of-care (POC) test that can be used with male urethral swabs to differentiate gonococcal urethritis from urethritis due to other pathogens (ie, non-gonococcal urethritis). Gram stain of a male urethral specimen with polymorphonuclear leukocytes with intracellular gram-negative diplococci is highly specific (>95%) and can be considered diagnostic for gonorrhea.40 Gram stain microscopy is not a reliable tool for diagnosis at any other anatomic sites because of low specificity due to possible presence of other nonpathogenic gram-negative diplococci.41
Nucleic Acid Amplification Tests
NAAT are the preferred test for the detection of gonorrhea in patients with or without symptoms given their high sensitivity and specificity and relatively fast turnaround time. NAAT manufacturer product inserts should be reviewed carefully since approved specimen types (eg, urine, urethral, vaginal, cervical) and collection methods, as well as performance, vary by test manufacturer.39 Two NAAT have been cleared by US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for detection of gonorrhea and chlamydia from rectal and oropharyngeal samples—Xpert CT/GC Assay (Cepheid, Sunnyvale, CA, USA) and Aptima Combo 2 Assay (Hologic, San Diego, CA, USA), though NAAT from other manufacturers can be used for extragenital specimen collection following laboratory validation. One of the benefits of NAAT is their shelf-stability and ease of use which allow patients to self-collect samples. Patient-collected specimens can be considered for testing outside of clinical spaces.42
Point-of-Care Nucleic Acid Amplification Tests
The FDA recently cleared a few near-patient and rapid POC NAAT for the detection of gonorrhea.43 POC tests allow patients to receive test results and treatment during the same clinic visit. When implemented in places without microscopy or for persons with known sexual exposure to gonorrhea, POC NAAT has the potential to reduce the widespread use of empiric antimicrobials. At present, all gonorrhea POC NAAT are cleared only for urogenital specimens. The GeneXpert assay (Cepheid, Sunnyvale, CA, USA) demonstrated high sensitivity and specificity (95.6%–100% and 99.9%–100%, respectively) for the detection of N. gonorrhoeae and Chlamydia trachomatis and results in 90 minutes,44 whereas the Binx io Platform (Binx Health, Limited, Trowbridge, UK and Boston, MA, USA) results in 30 minutes.45 Both the Gene Xpert and the Binx io require an on-site Clinical Laboratory Improvement Ammendments (CLIA)-certified laboratory and investment in the processing instrument. However, the Visby Medical Sexual Health Test device (Visby Medical, San Jose, CA, USA) is a single-use rapid device approved for detection of N. gonorrhoeae, C. trachomatis, and Trichomonas vaginalis in self-collected vaginal swabs in under 30 minutes.46 Other POC tests are in development.
Culture
Culture is critical in the management of suspected gonorrhea treatment failures as it is the only testing modality that performs comprehensive antimicrobial susceptibility testing. It is no longer the testing standard in routine clinical care due to lower sensitivity (which varies by anatomic site of infection), long turnaround time, and both clinical and laboratory technical requirements.47 Although not used routinely, clinics that diagnose gonorrhea should consider a plan for obtaining gonorrhea culture in cases of suspected treatment failure.39
Gonorrhea Treatment
Recommended treatment for uncomplicated gonococcal infections
The 2021 CDC STI Treatment Guidelines recommend a single 500 mg intramuscular (IM) dose (for persons weighing ≥ 150 kg, a single 1 g IM dose) of ceftriaxone for treatment of uncomplicated urogenital, anorectal, and pharyngeal gonorrhea (Box 1).39 During 2015 to 2020, CDC recommended dual therapy with a single 250 mg IM dose of ceftriaxone and a single 1 g oral dose of azithromycin as first-line treatment of uncomplicated gonococcal infections. The recommendations were re-evaluated and updated in 2020 due to increasing concerns for antimicrobial stewardship and the potential impact of dual therapy on commensal organisms and concurrent STI pathogens, in addition to continued low incidence of ceftriaxone resistance and increased incidence of azithromycin resistance.7 The rationale for increasing the dose of ceftriaxone to 500 mg was based on recent pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics studies of ceftriaxone for gonorrhea treatment.7 If co-infection with chlamydia has not been excluded, doxycycline 100 mg orally twice daily for 7 days is recommended (or azithromycin 1 g if doxycycline is contraindicated or there are adherence concerns).39 Persons treated for gonorrhea should abstain from sexual activity for 7 days after treatment and until all sex partners are treated (7 days after receiving treatment and resolution of symptoms if present) to minimize risk of re-infection.39 All persons diagnosed with gonorrhea should be retested in 3 months due to high rates of reinfection.39
Box 1. Recommended and alternative treatment regimens for uncomplicated gonococcal infections.
Recommended regimens for uncomplicated gonococcal infections (cervix, urethra, pharynx, or rectum)
Ceftriaxone 500 mg IM as a single dose (persons weighing <150 kg)
Ceftriaxone 1 g IM as a single dose (persons weighing ≥150 kg)
Test-of-cure is recommended for anyone diagnosed with pharyngeal gonorrhea after initial gonorrhea treatment by using either gonorrhea culture or NAAT
Alternative regimens for uncomplicated gonococcal infection (cervix, urethra, or rectum only)
Gentamicin 240 mg IM as a single dose plus azithromycin 2 g orally as a single dose
OR
Cefixime 800 mg orally as a single dose
No reliable alternative treatments are available for pharyngeal gonorrhea
For persons with an anaphylactic or other severe reaction (eg, Stevens-Johnson syndrome) to ceftriaxone, consult an infectious disease specialist
If chlamydial infection has not been excluded
Doxycycline 100 mg orally twice daily for 7 days
OR
Azithromycin 1 g as a single dose (if doxycycline is contraindicated)
Alternative regimens for uncomplicated gonococcal infections
There are currently few reliable alternative antimicrobial treatment regimens for gonorrhea. In cases in which patients report a beta-lactam allergy, it is critical that clinicians first attempt to determine whether it is a true allergy by performing a thorough patient history (eg, type of reaction, timing of reaction, and previous prescription records) and allergy skin testing.39 Though the prevalence of reported penicillin allergy has been estimated to be 10% among US population, less than 1% likely have a true penicillin allergy. Clinicians often avoid cephalosporin use (eg, ceftriaxone) in patients with reported penicillin allergies, though the cross-reactivity between penicillin and third-generation cephalosporins is rare.48,49 Additionally, a majority (80%) of patients with a true IgE-mediated penicillin allergy will lose their hypersensitivity after 10 years49; thus, patients with remote allergic reactions may no longer have a hypersensitivity reaction. The use of third-generation cephalosporins (ceftriaxone, cefixime) for the treatment of gonorrhea is safe for patients without a history of any IgE-mediated symptoms (eg, anaphylaxis, urticaria) from penicillin during the preceding 10 years.39
For patients with a true beta-lactam allergy and anogenital gonorrhea, the recommended alternative treatment is dual therapy with a single IM gentamicin 240 mg dose and oral azithromycin 2 g once. Though not yet FDA-cleared, laboratory-developed NAAT with gyrase A (gyrA) testing have been shown to be highly sensitive and specific for predicting N. gonorrhoeae ciprofloxacin susceptibility.50 If gyrA testing is available and indicates ciprofloxacin susceptibility, patients with a true beta-lactam allergy can be treated with ciprofloxacin 500 mg orally once.39 If there are not concerns for a beta-lactam allergy, but ceftriaxone cannot be administered, an 800 mg oral dose of cefixime can be considered as an alternative cephalosporin regimen. Oral cefixime use for the treatment of gonorrhea should be limited as it does not provide the high, sustained bactericidal blood levels as a 500 mg IM dose of ceftriaxone.39
There is no recommended alternative regimen for the treatment of pharyngeal gonorrhea. Presently, ceftriaxone is the only available antimicrobial that reliably eradicates gonorrhea at the pharynx.
Future treatments
Historically, public health has relied on new antimicrobial development to overcome gonorrhea’s expanding antimicrobial resistance. Zoliflodacin and gepotidacin (new type II topoisomerase inhibitors) have demonstrated in vitro activity against N. gonorrhoeae with known ciprofloxacin resistance.51,52 Both drugs are in clinical trials and are expected to be oral therapeutic options for gonorrhea treatment in the relatively near future.
Repurposing currently available drugs is a faster method to new treatments. Ertapenem, a beta-lactam and carbapenem, with demonstrated in vitro activity against N. gonorrhoeae, was found to be non-inferior to ceftriaxone at anogenital sites in a large randomized controlled trial; however, efficacy against ceftriaxone-resistant strains is uncertain.53
Additional Patient Management
Pharyngeal gonorrhea test- of cure
Pharyngeal gonococcal infections consistently have lower cure rates than anogenital gonococcal infections, regardless of antibiotic class. Although this is likely due to variable drug concentrations at the pharynx, including for ceftriaxone, there are many unanswered questions about gonorrhea at this anatomic site. Clinically, most ceftriaxone treatment failures have occurred at the pharynx. Although treatment failure at the pharynx has occurred with susceptible organisms, there have also been treatment failures with strains demonstrating high ceftriaxone MICs (>0.25 μg/mL).54,55 Due to concerns of potential persistent asymptomatic infection, the unclear penetration of recommended drugs, and the risk of antimicrobial resistance development at the pharynx, the 2021 CDC STI Treatment Guidelines recommended test of cure (TOC) for anyone diagnosed with pharyngeal gonorrhea 7 to 14 days after initial gonorrhea treatment by using either gonorrhea culture or NAAT.7,39 However, a subsequent study assessing time to clearance of N. gonorrhoeae at the pharynx found that positive pharyngeal gonorrhea TOC prior to 12 days after treatment are likely false-positive results, and in the absence of re-exposure, may warrant repeat testing.56 Prior to retreatment, a confirmatory culture should be attempted for any positive TOC NAAT.7 All positive TOC cultures should undergo antimicrobial susceptibility testing to assess for resistance.39 If pharyngeal TOC is persistently NAAT positive and culture negative, clinicians may consider testing on a different NAAT platform since false positives can occur due to cross-reactivity with commensal Neisseria species.47,57
Management of Sex Partners
Partner notification
Clinicians serve an important role in reducing patients’ risk for reinfection by ensuring patients’ sex partners are notified of exposure and clinically evaluated.58 All sex partners from the prior 60 days should be referred for clinical evaluation, testing, and empiric gonorrhea treatment.39 If the patient’s most recent sexual exposure was greater than 60 days before onset of symptoms or diagnosis, the most recent sex partner should be tested and treated for gonorrhea.39 When feasible, providers should encourage patients to bring their primary sex partner to clinic when returning for treatment so both can be treated concurrently. Providing written information to patients to share with their sex partners can increase rates of partner treatment.39,59
Expedited partner therapy
Expedited partner therapy (EPT) is the clinical practice of treating sex partners of persons diagnosed with chlamydia or gonorrhea who are unable or unlikely to seek timely treatment by providing medications to the partner in the absence of a clinical evaluation. EPT is permissible or potentially allowable in all 50 states,60 and should be offered if the sex partner’s access to clinical evaluation and treatment is limited; clinicians should be aware of local EPT regulations.39 The recommended regimen for gonorrhea EPT is cefixime 800 mg as a single oral dose which can be provided to the partner by the patient or a collaborating pharmacy as permitted by law.39 The partner should also receive doxycycline 100 mg twice daily for 7 days (or azithromycin 1 g if doxycycline is contraindicated) if the patient has chlamydia or chlamydia has not been ruled out.39 If the partner is of child-bearing potential and pregnancy status is unknown, azithromycin 1 g for chlamydia EPT can be provided.61 EPT is supported by evidence from 3 US clinical trials that included heterosexual men and women with gonorrhea or chlamydia and found that more partners were treated when patients were offered EPT and gonorrhea reinfection rates declined.62,63 There are limited data regarding use of EPT for gonorrhea among MSM. Providers and patients who are MSM should use shared clinical decision-making regarding EPT.39
Managing Persistent Gonococcal Infections and Suspected Treatment Failures
Ceftriaxone remains the sole recommended regimen for empiric single-dose gonorrhea treatment but increasing international reports of patients failing ceftriaxone-based therapies have highlighted the need to quickly identify and appropriately treat all suspected treatment failures.7 The first published report of a gonorrhea ceftriaxone treatment failure occurred in Sweden in 2010.64 By 2018, the UK reported the first case of a gonococcal treatment failure in the setting of ceftriaxone resistance combined with high-level azithromycin resistance, followed by a similar case in Australia.7 Although there have been no “resistance-related” ceftriaxone treatment failures identified in the US, gonococcal isolates with high ceftriaxone MIC levels have been reported and public health authorities are concerned about the inevitability of a treatment failure in the US.65,66
Suspected gonorrhea treatment failures present either with persistent clinical symptoms or a positive TOC after recommended treatment and in the absence of reinfection (Table 2). Alternatively, identification of a concerning laboratory result (ie, antimicrobial MIC value or molecular test result) can lead to suspicions of resistance. Symptomatic persistent infections may lack expected symptom resolution 3 to 5 days after treatment. Asymptomatic persistent infections can only be identified through repeat testing (ie, TOC). Concerning TOC results are either positive cultures greater than 72 hours or positive NAAT greater than 12 (pharyngeal)56 or NAAT greater than 7 (anogenital) days after recommended treatment.67
Table 2.
Important considerations when managing a suspected gonococcal treatment failure
Step 1: Evaluate for Persistent Infection | ||
---|---|---|
Symptomatic | Asymptomatic | |
Patient with persistent symptoms
|
Patient with positive test-of-cure (TOC) result(s)
|
|
Step 2: Evaluate for Treatment Failure | ||
| ||
Alternative Diagnosis | Gonococcal Re-infection | Suspected Gonococcal Treatment Failure |
Patient with positive test result(s) for another diagnosis
|
Patient with positive gonorrhea test result(s), including TOC, when re-exposure is likely
|
Patient with positive gonorrhea test result(s), including TOC, when re-exposure is unlikely
|
Step 3: Evaluate for Antimicrobial Resistance | ||
| ||
Step 4: Management of Suspected Treatment Failure | ||
Culture positive or NAAT positive result(s) identified | ||
|
In the US, reinfections are more likely to occur than true treatment failures. Providers should take a thorough sexual history including asking about timing of symptom resolution, new onset of symptoms, treatment completion and tolerance, abstinence after treatment, treatment of sex partners, and new sex partners since treatment.68 Additionally, providers should ask regarding recent travel and sexual contacts outside of the US, as most of the internationally reported treatment failures have been associated with travel to Asia.7,39,64,69 In addition to repeating a gonorrhea NAAT and attempting to perform culture, other sexually transmitted pathogens that produce similar symptoms should be ruled out.39 Specifically, persistent urogenital symptoms may be due to concurrent infection with Mycoplasma genitalium or T. vaginalis. Management and treatment next steps should be tailored to the suspected diagnosis.
Once treatment failure is suspected, reinfection is ruled out, and testing has been completed (ie, repeat NAAT and culture specimens obtained), single doses of IM gentamicin 240 mg plus oral azithromycin 2 g can be administered if there is concern that the N. gonorrhoeae isolate has an elevated ceftriaxone MIC,39 though gentamicin is unlikely to be curative for pharyngeal infections.70 All providers managing a suspected cephalosporin treatment failure are strongly encouraged to consult an infectious disease specialist or an STI clinical expert (https://www.stdccn.org/render/Public) for assistance with clinical management.
Local and state health departments can often help providers with managing suspected gonorrhea treatment failures. Providers are encouraged to communicate with their health departments and public health laboratories. Although culture for N. gonorrhoeae should be collected for antimicrobial susceptibility testing,39 not all laboratories have the capacity to culture N. gonorrhoeae or perform susceptibility testing. If local laboratories do not have the capacity to perform this testing, CDC can assist in connecting providers to a laboratory that does. All positive samples should be saved for shipment to CDC through local and state public health mechanisms.39
To ensure that potentially resistant strains of gonorrhea are contained, it is important to encourage sex partners to present for testing and treatment, and counsel patients to abstain from sexual activity until their infection has been confirmed to be eradicated. Health departments can help with partner notification and culture evaluation of patients and sex partners with suspected gonorrhea treatment failure.
KEY POINTS.
Neisseria gonorrhoeae’s ability to develop resistance to antimicrobials remains a challenge.
Nucleic acid amplification tests are considered the preferred test for the detection of N. gonorrhoeae; however, culture is the only modality that allows for comprehensive antimicrobial susceptibility testing.
The recommended treatment for uncomplicated gonorrhea in adults and adolescents at all anatomic sites is ceftriaxone 500 mg intramuscular once as it is the only remaining highly effective single-dose regimen; thus, a reported beta-lactam allergy should prompt a review to determine whether a true allergy is present.
Test of cure is recommended for everyone diagnosed with pharyngeal gonorrhea.
Clinicians should work with local and state partners to manage suspected gonorrhea treatment failure cases.
CLINICS CARE POINTS.
Gonorrhea cases and reported rates continue to increase. National surveillance efforts for gonorrhea and antimicrobial resistant gonorrhea continue to monitor trends across different populations.
As rates of gonorrhea continue to increase, clinicians will likely see rare clinical presentations of gonorrhea more frequently. Clinicians should maintain a high degree of suspicion for gonorrhea—including rare gonococcal clinical syndromes such as DGI.
NAAT are considered the preferred test for the detection of gonorrhea in patients with or without symptoms given their high sensitivity and specificity.
The recommended treatment for uncomplicated gonorrhea in adults and adolescents at urogenital, rectal, and pharyngeal anatomic sites is ceftriaxone 500 mg IM once in a single dose.
Test of cure is recommended for anyone diagnosed with pharyngeal gonorrhea.
A reported beta-lactam allergy should prompt a review to determine whether a true allergy is present since there are limited reliable alternative gonorrhea treatment regimens; a very small proportion of the population likely have true penicillin allergies, and the cross-reactivity between penicillin and third-generation cephalosporins is rare.
If a gonococcal treatment failure is suspected, all efforts should be made to (1) rule out reinfection; (2) obtain simultaneous culture and NAAT samples to evaluate for resistance; (3) provide appropriate treatment after all samples have been collected; and (4) notify state and local health departments. Clinicians should work with local partners to understand policies and procedures for managing suspected treatment failure cases.
Footnotes
DISCLAIMER
The findings and conclusions in this report are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official position of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC).
DISCLOSURE
S.B. St. Cyr has no conflicts of interest to report. L.A.S. Quilter has no conflicts of interest to report. L.A. Barbee has received research support from Hologic, United States, Nabriva, Ireland and SpeeDx.
REFERENCES
- 1.Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Sexually Transmitted Disease Surveillance Report, 2021. 2022. Available at: https://www.cdc.gov/std/statistics/2021/default.htm. Accessed June 7, 2023. [Google Scholar]
- 2.Kreisel KM, Weston EJ, St Cyr SB, et al. Estimates of the Prevalence and Incidence of Chlamydia and Gonorrhea Among US Men and Women, 2018. Sex Transm Dis 2021;48(4):222–31. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.World Health Organization (WHO). Global health sector strategies on, respectively, HIV, viral hepatitis and sexually transmitted infections for the period 2022-2030. World Health Organization. Available at: https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789240053779. Accessed June 7, 2023. [Google Scholar]
- 4.Hogben M, Leichliter JS. Social determinants and sexually transmitted disease disparities. Sex Transm Dis 2008;35(12 Suppl):S13–8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Unemo M, Shafer WM. Antibiotic resistance in Neisseria gonorrhoeae: origin, evolution, and lessons learned for the future. Ann N Y Acad Sci 2011;1230:E19–28. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Update to CDC’s Sexually transmitted diseases treatment guidelines, 2010: oral cephalosporins no longer a recommended treatment for gonococcal infections. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 2012;61(31):590–4. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Barbee LA, St Cyr SB. Management of Neisseria gonorrhoeae in the United States: Summary of Evidence From the Development of the 2020 Gonorrhea Treatment Recommendations and the 2021 Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Sexually Transmitted Infection Treatment Guidelines. Clin Infect Dis 2022; 74(Suppl_2):S95–111. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.McCormack WM, Stumacher RJ, Johnson K, et al. Clinical spectrum of gonococcal infection in women. Lancet 1977; 1(8023): 1182–5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Martín-Sánchez M, Ong JJ, Fairley CK, et al. Clinical presentation of asymptomatic and symptomatic heterosexual men who tested positive for urethral gonorrhoea at a sexual health clinic in Melbourne, Australia. BMC Infect Dis 2020; 20(1):486. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Ong JJ, Fethers K, Howden BP, et al. Asymptomatic and symptomatic urethral gonorrhoea in men who have sex with men attending a sexual health service. Clin Microbiol Infect 2017;23(8):555–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Handsfield HH, Lipman TO, Harnisch JP, et al. Asymptomatic gonorrhea in men. Diagnosis, natural course, prevalence and significance. N Engl J Med 1974; 290(3):117–23. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Klouman E, Masenga EJ, Sam NE, et al. Asymptomatic gonorrhoea and chlamydial infection in a population-based and work-site based sample of men in Kilimanjaro, Tanzania. Int J STD AIDS 2000;11(10):666–74. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Pelouze PS. Gonorrhea in the Male. Bull N Y Acad Med 1941;17(1):39–44. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Eschenbach DA, Buchanan TM, Pollock HM, et al. Polymicrobial etiology of acute pelvic inflammatory disease. N Engl J Med 1975;293(4):166–71. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Holmes KK, Eschenbach DA, Knapp JS. Salpingitis: overview of etiology and epidemiology. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1980;138(7 Pt 2):893–900. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Chan PA, Robinette A, Montgomery M, et al. Extragenital Infections Caused by Chlamydia trachomatis and Neisseria gonorrhoeae: A Review of the Literature. Infect Dis Obstet Gynecol 2016;2016:5758387. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Khosropour CM, Coomes DM, LeClair A, et al. High Prevalence of Rectal Chlamydia and Gonorrhea Among Men Who Have Sex With Men Who Do Not Engage in Receptive Anal Sex. Sex Transm Dis 2023;50(7):404–9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.de Vries HJC, Nori AV, Kiellberg Larsen H, et al. European Guideline on the management of proctitis, proctocolitis and enteritis caused by sexually transmissible pathogens. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol 2021;35(7):1434–43. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Wiesner PJ, Tronca E, Bonin P, et al. Clinical spectrum of pharyngeal gonococcal infection. N Engl J Med 1973;288(4):181–5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Chow EPF, Chen MY, Williamson DA, et al. Oropharyngeal and Genital Gonorrhea Infections Among Women and Heterosexual Men Reporting Sexual Contact With Partners With Gonorrhea: Implication for Oropharyngeal Testing of Heterosexual Gonorrhea Contacts. Sex Transm Dis 2019;46(11):743–7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.McLaughlin SE, Golden MR, Soge OO, et al. Pharyngeal Gonorrhea in Heterosexual Male and Female Sex Partners of Persons With Gonorrhea. Sex Transm Dis 2023;50(4):203–8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Charleson F, Tran J, Kolobaric A, et al. A Systematic Review of Kissing as a Risk Factor for Oropharyngeal Gonorrhea or Chlamydia. Sex Transm Dis 2023;50(7): 395–401. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Alfonso E, Friedland B, Hupp S, et al. Neisseria gonorrhoeae conjunctivitis. An outbreak during an epidemic of acute hemorrhagic conjunctivitis. JAMA 1983; 250(6):794–5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Mak DB, Smith DW, Harnett GB, et al. A large outbreak of conjunctivitis caused by a single genotype of Neisseria gonorrhoeae distinct from those causing genital tract infections. Epidemiol Infect 2001; 126(3):373–8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Laga M, Meheus A, Piot P. Epidemiology and control of gonococcal ophthalmia neonatorum. Bull World Health Organ 1989;67(5):471–7. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Hook EW III, Handsfield HH. Gonococcal infections in the adult [Chapter 35]. In: Holmes KK, Sparling PF, Stamm WE, et al. , editors. Sexually transmitted diseases. 4th. New York, NY: McGraw-6 Hill Medical; 2008. p. 627–45. [Google Scholar]
- 27.Tang EC, Johnson KA, Alvarado L, et al. Characterizing the Rise of Disseminated Gonococcal Infections in California, July 2020-July 2021. Clin Infect Dis 2023; 76(2): 194–200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Nettleton WD, Kent JB, Macomber K, et al. Notes from the Field: Ongoing Cluster of Highly Related Disseminated Gonococcal Infections - Southwest Michigan, 2019. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 2020;69(12):353–4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Sawatzky P, Martin I, Thorington R, et al. Disseminated Gonococcal Infections in Manitoba, Canada: 2013 to 2020. Sex Transm Dis 2022;49(12):831–7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Merrick R, Pitt R, Enayat Q, et al. National surveillance of disseminated gonococcal infection: preliminary findings from cross-sectional survey data in England, 2016–21. The Lancet. 2021;398:S65. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(21)02608-8. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Quilter LAS, Tang EC, Johnson KA, et al. Reported disseminated gonococcal infections in the United States, 2020-2022. Presented at: IDWeek 2022; October 21, 2022; Washington, DC. [Google Scholar]
- 32.O’Brien JP, Goldenberg DL, Rice PA. Disseminated gonococcal infection: a prospective analysis of 49 patients and a review of pathophysiology and immune mechanisms. Medicine (Baltimore) 1983;62(6):395–406. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Luetkemeyer AF, Donnell D, Dombrowski JC, et al. Postexposure Doxycycline to Prevent Bacterial Sexually Transmitted Infections. N Engl J Med 2023;388(14): 1296–306. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Reichert E, Grad YH. Resistance and prevalence implications of doxycycline post-exposure prophylaxis for gonorrhea prevention in men who have sex with men: a modeling study. medRxiv [Preprint] 2023. 10.1101/2023.04.24.23289033. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Mortimer TD, Grad YH. A genomic perspective on the near-term impact of doxycycline post-exposure prophylaxis on Neisseria gonorrhoeae antimicrobial resistance. Clin Infect Dis 2023. 10.1093/cid/ciad279. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Vanbaelen T, Manoharan-Basil SS, Kenyon C. Doxycycline Post Exposure Prophylaxis could induce cross-resistance to other classes of antimicrobials in Neisseria gonorrhoeae: an in-silico analysis. Sex Transm Dis 2023. 10.1097/olq.0000000000001810. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Petousis-Harris H, Paynter J, Morgan J, et al. Effectiveness of a group B outer membrane vesicle meningococcal vaccine against gonorrhoea in New Zealand: a retrospective case-control study. Lancet 2017;390(10102):1603–10. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Abara WE, Jerse AE, Hariri S, et al. Planning for a Gonococcal Vaccine: A Narrative Review of Vaccine Development and Public Health Implications. Sex Transm Dis 2021;48(7):453–7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Workowski KA, Bachmann LH, Chan PA, et al. Sexually Transmitted Infections Treatment Guidelines, 2021. MMWR Recomm Rep (Morb Mortal Wkly Rep) 2021;70(4):1–187. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Sherrard J, Barlow D. Gonorrhoea in men: clinical and diagnostic aspects. Genitourin Med 1996;72(6):422–6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Goh BT, Varia KB, Ayliffe PF, et al. Diagnosis of gonorrhea by gram-stained smears and cultures in men and women: role of the urethral smear. Sex Transm Dis Jul-Sep 1985; 12(3): 135–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Lunny C, Taylor D, Hoang L, et al. Self-Collected versus Clinician-Collected Sampling for Chlamydia and Gonorrhea Screening: A Systemic Review and Meta-Analysis. PLoS One 2015;10(7):e0132776. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Gaydos CA, Melendez JH. Point-by-point progress: gonorrhea point of care tests. Expert Rev Mol Diagn 2020;20(8):803–13. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Jacobsson S, Boiko I, Golparian D, et al. WHO laboratory validation of Xpert(®) CT/NG and Xpert(®) TV on the GeneXpert system verifies high performances. Apmis 2018; 126(12):907–12. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Van Der Pol B, Taylor SN, Mena L, et al. Evaluation of the Performance of a Point-of-Care Test for Chlamydia and Gonorrhea. JAMA Netw Open 2020;3(5):e204819. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Morris SR, Bristow CC, Wierzbicki MR, et al. Performance of a single-use, rapid, point-of-care PCR device for the detection of Neisseria gonorrhoeae, Chlamydia trachomatis, and Trichomonas vaginalis: a cross-sectional study. Lancet Infect Dis 2021;21(5):668–76. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Recommendations for the laboratory-based detection of Chlamydia trachomatis and Neisseria gonorrhoeae–2014. MMWR Recomm Rep 2014;63(Rr-02):1–19. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Blumenthal KG, Peter JG, Trubiano JA, et al. Antibiotic allergy. Lancet 2019; 393(10167): 183–98. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Shenoy ES, Macy E, Rowe T, et al. Evaluation and Management of Penicillin Allergy: A Review. JAMA 2019;321(2):188–99. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Allan-Blitz LT, Wang X, Klausner JD. Wild-Type Gyrase A Genotype of Neisseria gonorrhoeae Predicts In Vitro Susceptibility to Ciprofloxacin: A Systematic Review of the Literature and Meta-Analysis. Sex Transm Dis 2017;44(5):261–5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Taylor SN, Marrazzo J, Batteiger BE, et al. Single-Dose Zoliflodacin (ETX0914) for Treatment of Urogenital Gonorrhea. N Engl J Med 2018;379(19):1835–45. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Taylor SN, Morris DH, Avery AK, et al. Gepotidacin for the Treatment of Uncomplicated Urogenital Gonorrhea: A Phase 2, Randomized, Dose-Ranging, Single-Oral Dose Evaluation. Clin Infect Dis 2018;67(4):504–12. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.de Vries HJC, de Laat M, Jongen VW, et al. Efficacy of ertapenem, gentamicin, fosfomycin, and ceftriaxone for the treatment of anogenital gonorrhoea (NA-BOGO): a randomised, non-inferiority trial. Lancet Infect Dis 2022;22(5):706–17. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Fifer H, Natarajan U, Jones L, et al. Failure of Dual Antimicrobial Therapy in Treatment of Gonorrhea. N Engl J Med 2016;374(25):2504–6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Eyre DW, Sanderson ND, Lord E, et al. Gonorrhoea treatment failure caused by a Neisseria gonorrhoeae strain with combined ceftriaxone and high-level azithromycin resistance, England. Euro Surveill 2018;23(27). 10.2807/1560-7917.Es.2018.23.27.1800323. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Barbee LA, Soge OO, Khosropour CM, et al. Time to Clearance of Neisseria gonorrhoeae RNA at the Pharynx following Treatment. J Clin Microbiol 2022;60(6): e0039922. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Hopkins M, Arcenas R, Couto-Parada X, et al. PivNG primers and probes set used in the cobas omni Utility Channel is a reliable supplemental test for detection of Neisseria gonorrhoeae in oropharyngeal, urogenital and rectal specimens collected in cobas PCR Media. Sex Transm Infect 2023. 10.1136/sextrans-2022-055576. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Wilson TE, Hogben M, Malka ES, et al. A randomized controlled trial for reducing risks for sexually transmitted infections through enhanced patient-based partner notification. Am J Public Health 2009;99(Suppl 1):S104–10. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Trelle S, Shang A, Nartey L, et al. Improved effectiveness of partner notification for patients with sexually transmitted infections: systematic review. BMJ 2007; 334(7589):354. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Legal Status of Expedited Partner Therapy (EPT). 2023. Available at: https://www.cdc.gov/std/ept/legal/default.htm. Accessed June 7, 2023.
- 61.Public Health - Seattle & King County. Expedited Partner Therapy (EPT) Guidelines. 2022. Available at: https://kingcounty.gov/depts/health/communicable-diseases/hiv-std/providers/partner-notification/ept-guidelines.aspx. Accessed June 7, 2023. [Google Scholar]
- 62.Golden MR, Whittington WL, Handsfield HH, et al. Effect of expedited treatment of sex partners on recurrent or persistent gonorrhea or chlamydial infection. N Engl J Med 2005;352(7):676–85. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Kissinger PJ, Reilly K, Taylor SN, et al. Early repeat Chlamydia trachomatis and Neisseria gonorrhoeae infections among heterosexual men. Sex Transm Dis 2009;36(8):498–500. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Unemo M, Golparian D, Hestner A. Ceftriaxone treatment failure of pharyngeal gonorrhoea verified by international recommendations, Sweden, 2010. Euro Surveill 2011;16(6). [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65.Picker MA, Knoblock RJ, Hansen H, et al. Notes from the Field: First Case in the United States of Neisseria gonorrhoeae Harboring Emerging Mosaic penA60 Allele, Conferring Reduced Susceptibility to Cefixime and Ceftriaxone. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 2020;69(49):1876–7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66.Commonwealth of Massachusetts. Press Release: Department of Public Health announces first cases of concerning gonorrhea strain. 2023. Available at: https://www.mass.gov/news/department-of-public-health-announces-first-cases-of-concerning-gonorrhea-strain. Accessed June 7, 2023.
- 67.Wind CM, Schim van der Loeff MF, Unemo M, et al. Test of Cure for Anogenital Gonorrhoea Using Modern RNA-Based and DNA-Based Nucleic Acid Amplification Tests: A Prospective Cohort Study. Clin Infect Dis 2016;62(11):1348–55. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68.Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). A Guide to Taking a Sexual History. 2022. Available at: https://www.cdc.gov/std/treatment/sexualhistory.htm. Accessed June 7, 2023.
- 69.Whiley DM, Jennison A, Pearson J, et al. Genetic characterisation of Neisseria gonorrhoeae resistant to both ceftriaxone and azithromycin. Lancet Infect Dis 2018;18(7):717–8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70.Barbee LA, Soge OO, Morgan J, et al. Gentamicin Alone Is Inadequate to Eradicate Neisseria Gonorrhoeae From the Pharynx. Clin Infect Dis 2020;71(8): 1877–82. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]