Skip to main content
American Academy of Pediatrics Selective Deposit logoLink to American Academy of Pediatrics Selective Deposit
. 2021 Oct;148(4):e2021052456. doi: 10.1542/peds.2021-052456

Early-Onset Sepsis Among Very Preterm Infants

Dustin D Flannery a,b,c,, Erika M Edwards d,e,f, Karen M Puopolo a,b,c, Jeffrey D Horbar d,f
PMCID: PMC11151778  PMID: 34493539

Abstract

Download video file (20.4MB, mp4)
DOI: 10.1542/6265760582001

Video Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To determine the epidemiology and microbiology of early-onset sepsis (EOS) among very preterm infants using a nationally representative cohort from academic and community hospitals to inform empirical antibiotic guidance, highlight risk factors for infection, and aid in prognostication for infected infants.

METHODS

Prospective observational study of very preterm infants born weighing 401 to 1500 g or at 22 to 29 weeks’ gestational age from January 2018 to December 2019 in 753 Vermont Oxford Network centers. EOS was defined as a culture-confirmed bacterial infection of the blood or cerebrospinal fluid in the 3 days after birth. Demographics, clinical characteristics, and outcomes were compared between infants with and without EOS.

RESULTS

Of 84 333 included infants, 1139 had EOS for an incidence rate of 13.5 per 1000 very preterm births (99% confidence interval [CI] 12.5–14.6). Escherichia coli (538 of 1158; 46.5%) and group B Streptococcus (218 of 1158; 18.8%) were the most common pathogens. Infected infants had longer lengths of stay (median 92 vs 66 days) and lower rates of survival (67.5% vs 90.4%; adjusted risk ratio 0.82 [95% CI 0.79–0.85]) and of survival without morbidity (26.1% vs 59.4%; adjusted risk ratio 0.66 [95% CI 0.60–0.72]).

CONCLUSIONS

In a nationally representative sample of very preterm infants with EOS from 2018 to 2019, approximately one-third of isolates were neither group B Streptococcus nor E coli. Three-quarters of all infected infants either died or survived with a major medical morbidity. The profoundly negative impact of EOS on very preterm infants highlights the need for novel preventive strategies.


What’s Known on This Subject:

Studies conducted in high-risk perinatal centers have identified Escherichia coli and group B Streptococcus as the most common organisms causing early-onset sepsis. Few data inform the full spectrum of pathogens or the impact of infection on outcomes among surviving infants.

What This Study Adds:

Although E coli and group B Streptococcus were most common, one-third of infections were due to other pathogens. Very preterm infants with early-onset sepsis had higher adjusted risks of death and major medical morbidity compared with those uninfected.

Early-onset sepsis (EOS) is a significant cause of morbidity and mortality among newborn infants. The overall incidence of the disease in the US birth population is ∼1 case per 1000 live births but is ∼10-fold higher among infants born preterm.1 For preterm infants at the lowest gestational ages (GAs), EOS-related mortality approaches 50%.2 Because of this risk, ∼80% of very preterm infants are started on empirical antibiotics at birth, with little change over the last decade despite ongoing refinements in EOS risk assessment.3,4

Infection epidemiology is important to guide empirical antibiotic decisions in neonatal care. The recommended empirical antibiotic regimen for preterm infants at risk for EOS, according to the American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) Committee on the Fetus and Newborn, is the dual combination of ampicillin and gentamicin.2 This recommendation is based on previous reports and knowledge about the typical EOS pathogens infecting preterm infants. Previously, the most common organism causing EOS in preterm infants was Streptococcus agalactiae (group B Streptococcus [GBS]).5 However, more recently, Escherichia coli has become the most common cause, followed by GBS.1,6 Continued surveillance of EOS epidemiology is especially important in light of recent debate on the continued utility of ampicillin and gentamicin for empirical coverage.7 In 2 separate reports, up to 1 in 10 E coli isolates causing neonatal EOS were resistant to both ampicillin and gentamicin.1,8 Although the regimen provides adequate coverage for GBS, because this organism remains almost universally sensitive to ampicillin, there is concern about increasing prevalence of EOS infections due to organisms besides E coli and GBS, including other multidrug-resistant Gram-negative bacteria.1,9,10 Furthermore, as the landscape of EOS microbiology continues to evolve, the impact of the disease on both short- and long-term outcomes must be continually assessed. The objective of this study was to determine the epidemiology, microbiology, and related outcomes of EOS among very preterm infants by using a large, contemporary, and nationally representative prospective cohort from both academic and community hospitals across the United States.

Methods

Data Source and Study Population

Vermont Oxford Network (VON) is a nonprofit voluntary worldwide community of practice dedicated to improving the quality, safety, and value of care for newborns through a coordinated program of data-driven quality improvement, education, and research. VON maintains a voluntary database for collecting and benchmarking data from NICU care of very low birth weight (VLBW) (birth weight [BW] <1500 g) infants. This was a prospective observational study of infants born weighing 401 to 1500 g or at 22 to 29 weeks’ GA at the reporting hospital or transferred to the reporting hospital within 28 days after birth from January 1, 2018, to December 31, 2019. Infants born at 22 to 29 weeks’ GA were included regardless of BW, and infants with a BW of 401 to 1500 g were included regardless of GA. Data from 753 participating centers in 49 states across the United States were included. Infants who died in the delivery room were excluded. Data were collected from birth until hospital discharge, death, or first birthday (whichever came first). Infants who were transferred were tracked to determine their ultimate disposition and length of stay. The Institutional Review Board at The University of Vermont determined that use of the VON database for this analysis was not human subjects research.

Study Definitions

Exposure

EOS was defined as a culture-confirmed infection of the blood or cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) by a prespecified bacterial pathogen (Supplemental Information) in the first 3 days after birth. For Staphylococcus aureus, there was no distinction between methicillin-sensitive and methicillin-resistant isolates. Polymicrobial infections were counted once for Tables 1 and 2 and were reported individually in Table 3.

TABLE 1.

Demographics, Clinical Characteristics, and Outcomes of Infants With and Without EOS

Overall (N = 84 333) Infected (EOS) (n = 1139) Not Infected (No EOS) (n = 83 191)
Maternal characteristics
 Race and/or ethnicity
  Black, non-Hispanic 26 109/83 539 (31.2) 375/1124 (33.4) 25 734/82 415 (31.2)
  Hispanic 16 320/83 539 (19.5) 247/1124 (22.0) 16 073/82 415 (19.5)
  White, non-Hispanic 34 293/83 539 (41.1) 402/1124 (35.8) 33 893/82 415 (41.2)
  Asian American, non-Hispanic 4332/83 539 (5.2) 57/1124 (5.1) 4275/82 415 (5.2)
  American Indian, non-Hispanic 690/83 539 (0.8) 8/1124 (0.7) 682/82 415 (0.8)
  Other, non-Hispanic 1793/83 539 (2.2) 35/1124 (3.1) 1758/82 415 (2.1)
 Any prenatal care 80 822/84 018 (96.2) 1067/1133 (94.2) 79 755/82 885 (96.2)
 Hypertensive disorder 31 830/83 887 (37.9) 170/1126 (15.1) 31 660/82 761 (38.3)
 Chorioamnionitis 10 849/83 600 (13.0) 515/1121 (45.8) 10 034/82 479 (12.5)
 Diabetes 9179/83 734 (11.0) 103/1128 (9.2) 9076/82 606 (11.0)
 Antenatal steroids 73 691/83 977 (87.8) 977/1134 (86.3) 72 714/82 843 (87.8)
 Multiple gestation 20 555/84 329 (24.4) 177/1139 (15.6) 20 378/83 190 (24.5)
 Cesarean delivery 62 594/84 322 (74.2) 659/1139 (57.9) 61 935/83 183 (74.5)
Infant characteristics
 BW, n 84 325 1139 83 186
  Median (Q1, Q3), g 1100 (810, 1330) 870 (650, 1170) 1100 (819, 1334)
 GA, n 84 329 1139 83 190
  ≤23 wk 4908/84 329 (5.8) 223/1139 (19.6) 4685/83 190 (5.6)
  24–25 wk 12 482/84 329 (14.8) 324/1139 (28.5) 12 158/83 190 (14.6)
  26–27 wk 16 574/84 329 (19.7) 259/1139 (22.7) 16 315/83 190 (19.6)
  28–29 wk 22 762/84 329 (27.0) 229/1139 (20.1) 22 533/83 190 (27.1)
  >29 wk 27 603/84 329 (32.7) 104/1139 (9.1) 27 499/83 190 (33.1)
  Median (Q1, Q3), wk 28 (26, 30) 26 (24, 28) 28 (26, 30)
 Apgar score at 1 min, n 83 416 1113 82 303
  Median (Q1, Q3) 5 (3, 7) 3 (1, 5) 5 (3, 7)
 SGA 16 048/84 009 (19.1) 48/1123 (4.3) 16 000/82 886 (19.3)
 Female sex 41 802/84 310 (49.6) 528/1139 (46.3) 41 275/83 171 (49.6)
 Outborn 11 396/84 333 (13.5) 180/1139 (15.8) 11 216/83 194 (13.5)
 Congenital anomaly 4953/84 311 (5.9) 49/1139 (4.3) 4904/83 172 (5.9)
Infant individual outcomes
 NEC 3967/84 307 (4.7) 69/1139 (6.1) 3898/83 168 (4.7)
 CLD 20 474/69 219 (29.6) 315/746 (42.2) 20 159/68 473 (29.4)
 Late-onset sepsis 7184/81 149 (8.9) 156/946 (16.5) 7028/80 203 (8.8)
 Pneumothorax 3895/84 290 (4.6) 105/1138 (9.2) 3790/83 152 (4.6)
 Severe IVH 6206/76 270 (8.1) 342/990 (34.6) 5864/75 280 (7.8)
 Cystic PVL 2039/76 288 (2.7) 76/990 (7.7) 1963/75 298 (2.6)
 Total length of stay among survivors, n 75 596 763 74 833
  Median (Q1, Q3), d 66 (45, 96) 92 (66, 123) 66 (45, 95)
  By GA
   ≤23 wk, n 2538 106 2422
    Median (Q1, Q3), d 143 (122, 175) 148 (124, 194) 143 (122, 174)
   24–25 wk, n 9539 191 9348
    Median (Q1, Q3), d 115 (98, 142) 115 (97, 146) 115 (98, 141)
   26–27 wk, n 14 941 191 14 750
    Median (Q1, Q3), d 87 (73, 107) 90 (75, 105) 87 (73, 107)
   28–29 wk, n 21 777 187 21 590
    Median (Q1, Q3), d 63 (52, 78) 64 (53, 81) 63 (52, 78)
   >29 wk, n 26 807 88 26 719
    Median (Q1, Q3), d 40 (31, 52) 46 (37, 65) 40 (31, 52)

Data are presented as numerator/denominator (%) unless otherwise stated. Q1, quartile 1; Q3, quartile 3.

TABLE 2.

Incidence of Early-Onset Neonatal Infection by Study Year, BW Category, and GA Category

Category n Infected (EOS) Incidence Rate per 1000 Births (99% CI)
Overall 84 333 1139 13.5 (12.5–14.6)
 2018 41 094 534 13.0 (11.6–14.5)
 2019 43 249 605 14.0 (12.6–15.5)
BW, g
 ≤500 2697 55 20.4 (14.5–28.7)
 501–750 14 326 355 24.7 (21.6–28.3)
 751–1000 17 736 305 17.2 (14.9–19.9)
 1001–1250 20 871 210 10.0 (8.4–11.9)
 1251–1500 26 415 188 7.1 (5.9–8.6)
 ≥1501 2280 26 11.4 (6.9–18.7)
GA, completed wk
 ≤23 4908 223 45.4 (38.3–53.7)
 24–25 12 482 324 26.0 (22.6–29.9)
 26–27 16 574 259 15.5 (13.2–18.2)
 28–29 22 762 229 10.1 (8.5–11.9)
 >29 27 603 104 3.8 (2.9–4.9)
TABLE 3.

Microbiology of EOS

Pathogen Overall, n (%)
Gram-positive 385 (33.2)
 GBS 218 (18.8)
S aureus 73 (6.3)
Enterococcus species 32 (2.8)
Streptococcus anginosus 20 (1.7)
Listeria monocytogenes 18 (1.6)
Streptococcus pneumoniae 15 (1.3)
Streptococcus pyogenes 9 (0.8)
Gram-negative 773 (66.8)
E coli 538 (46.5)
Haemophilus species 90 (7.8)
Klebsiella species 46 (4.0)
Enterobacter species 16 (1.4)
Citrobacter species 15 (1.3)
Morganella morganii 14 (1.2)
Pseudomonas species 12 (1.0)
Serratia species 12 (1.0)
Bacteroides species 11 (0.9)
Acinetobacter species 5 (0.4)
Proteus species 4 (0.3)
Flavobacterium species 3 (0.3)
Moraxella species 2 (0.2)
Neisseria species 2 (0.2)
Burkholderia species 1 (0.1)
Campylobacter species 1 (0.1)
Pantoea species 1 (0.1)
Total pathogens 1158 (100)

There were 1,158 pathogens identified among 1,139 infants; percentages shown are out of total number of pathogens. There were 15 infants with 2 pathogens reported and 2 infants with 3 pathogens reported. No infections were reported for Clostridium species, Achromobacter species, Aeromonas species, Alcaligenes species, Chryseobacterium species, Pasteurella species, Providencia species, Prevotella species, Ralstonia species, Salmonella species, or Stenotro-phomonas maltophilia.

Outcomes

The primary outcome was survival to hospital discharge. There were 2 secondary outcomes: survival without morbidity by using the VON Manual of Operations definition11 (survival without any of the following: necrotizing enterocolitis [NEC], chronic lung disease [CLD], severe intraventricular hemorrhage [IVH], pneumothorax, late-onset sepsis, or cystic periventricular leukomalacia [PVL]) and survival with major neonatal morbidity (including CLD, IVH, PVL, and/or severe retinopathy of prematurity [ROP]). The latter outcome is focused on the morbidities that may predict death after NICU discharge or survival with neurodevelopmental impairment.12 CLD was defined for infants born at <33 weeks’ GA as supplemental oxygen requirement at 36 weeks’ corrected GA or as oxygen dependence at transfer if transferred at 34 or 35 weeks’ GA. Severe IVH was defined as grade 3 or 4 on the basis of a cranial ultrasound, computed tomography scan, or MRI before day 28 from birth.13 Severe ROP was defined as stage 3 to 5 ROP among infants who received an ophthalmologic examination.14 NEC was defined as at least 1 clinical (bilious gastric aspirate or emesis, abdominal distension, occult or gross blood in stool) and at least 1 radiographic finding (pneumatosis intestinalis, hepato-biliary gas, pneumoperitoneum). Pneumothorax was diagnosed as extrapleural air by chest radiograph or thoracentesis. Late-onset sepsis was defined as culture-confirmed infection of the blood (bacterial or fungal) or CSF (bacterial), or culture-confirmed coagulase-negative Staphylococcus infection (blood or CSF) with signs of infection and at least 5 days of antibiotic treatment, occurring after day 3 from birth. Cystic PVL was defined as evidence based on a cranial ultrasound, computed tomography scan, or MRI scan at any time. All morbidities occurred before NICU discharge or death; in the VON database, severe ROP, NEC, pneumothorax, late-onset sepsis, and cystic PVL are not associated with a specific timing relative to birth.

Covariates

Covariates of interest were defined per the VON Manual of Operations definitions.11 Race and/or ethnicity, acknowledged as a social construct, was obtained by personal interview with the mother, by review of the birth certificate, or per medical record, in that order, and was included because of previously reported racial and/or ethnic disparities in care practice and outcomes (including EOS) among preterm infants in the United States.9,15,16 The following maternal variables were defined by notation in the infant or maternal medical record: maternal hypertensive disorders, including chronic or pregnancy-induced maternal hypertension, with or without associated preeclampsia; maternal diabetes of any type or severity; and obstetric clinical diagnosis of chorioamnionitis. Prenatal care was defined as any prenatal obstetrical care before the birth admission. Antenatal steroid treatment was defined as betamethasone, dexamethasone, or hydrocortisone administered intramuscularly or intravenously to the mother at any time before delivery. Small for gestational age (SGA) was defined as BW in the <10th percentile by using the Fenton prenatal growth charts.17 Length of stay was calculated as total days from birth to hospital discharge or death. Congenital anomalies included those on a prespecified list or, if not on the list, those that were lethal (primary cause of death) or life-threatening (treated with surgical or medical therapy to correct an anatomic anomaly or physiologic dysfunction before discharge).11

NICU level of care is defined in the VON database as follows: type A, restrictions on mechanical ventilation and/or major surgery not performed; type B, no restrictions on ventilation and major surgery performed; and type C, no restrictions on ventilation and major surgery performed, including cardiac surgery. Geographical region was assigned by using the US Census Bureau classifications.

Statistical Analysis

The incidence rate of EOS was determined per 1000 very preterm births overall and by GA category. The microbiology of EOS was determined by using proportions of infecting isolates overall and by Gram-positive or Gram-negative isolate status. Demographics and clinical characteristics were compared between infants with and without EOS by using standard descriptive statistics. The proportion of deaths was determined overall and by GA category. The primary outcomes were evaluated by using generalized estimating equation regressions controlling for factors present at birth known to affect outcomes, including GA, inborn or outborn status, infant sex, SGA, multiple gestation, Apgar score at 1 minute, mode of delivery, and presence of a congenital anomaly, as well as clustering of infants within hospitals. Statistical analyses were performed by using SAS 9.4 (SAS Institute, Inc, Cary, NC).

Results

Characteristics of the Study Participants and Centers

A total 84 333 infants born weighing 401 to 1500 g or at 22 to 29 weeks’ GA were included in the analysis. For the overall cohort (Table 1), the median BW was 1100 g (interquartile range [IQR] 810–1330) and the median GA was 28 weeks (IQR 26–30). Fifty percent of infants were female, and the median length of stay was 66 days (IQR 45–95). Of the infants admitted to centers with NICU level designation available (n = 83 321), 20 440 (24.5%) were at NICU type A, 37 178 (44.6%) were at NICU type B, and 25 703 (30.8%) were at NICU type C centers. Of the infants admitted to centers with US geographic region designation available (n = 84 333), 12 539 (14.9%) were in the Northeast, 18 657 (22.1%) were in the Midwest, 16 638 (19.7%) were in the West, and 36 499 (43.3%) were in the South.

EOS Incidence Rate and Microbiology

There were 1139 infants who had EOS for an incidence rate of 13.5 per 1000 very preterm births (99% confidence interval [CI] 12.5–14.6). The incidence rate was similar between 2018 and 2019 and was highest for infants born at ≤23 completed weeks’ GA (45.4 per 1000 [99% CI 38.3–53.7]; Table 2). E coli (538 of 1158; 46.5%) and GBS (218 of 1158; 18.8%) were the most common pathogens identified, although 402 of 1158 (34.7%) were other bacteria (Table 3). Haemophilus species (n = 90; 7.8%) and S aureus (n = 73; 6.3%) isolates were the third and fourth most common causes of EOS infections, respectively.

Comparison of Infants With and Without EOS

Infants with EOS were more often born vaginally and to mothers with chorioamnionitis and without hypertension or multiple gestation (Table 1). Infected infants were also less often SGA and had lower BWs and GAs compared with uninfected infants. There were no major differences in sex, race, or ethnicity between the 2 groups (Table 1). Including infants who died before NICU discharge, lengths of stay were longer for infants with EOS compared with uninfected infants (median 92 vs 66 days).

Outcomes

Infants with EOS had lower rates of survival to hospital discharge (67.5% vs 90.4%; adjusted risk ratio 0.82 [95% CI 0.79–0.85]; Table 4). Infants without EOS were more than twice as likely to survive to hospital discharge without morbidity (VON metric) compared with infants without EOS (Table 4). Infants with EOS who survived to discharge were at significantly increased risk for ≥1 major neonatal morbidity (CLD, IVH or PVL, ROP) when compared with infants without EOS, after adjustment for confounders (Table 5).

TABLE 4.

Survival and Survival Without Morbidity for Infants With and Without EOS, by GA

Outcome Overall Infected (EOS) Not Infected (No EOS) Adjusted Risk Ratio (95% CI)
`Survival 75 703/84 029 (90.1) 765/1133 (67.5) 74 938/82 896 (90.4) 0.82a (0.79–0.85)
 By GA,b wk
  ≤23 2358/4882 (51.6) 107/221 (48.4) 2431/4661 (52.2) 0.90 (0.77–1.05)
  24–25 9569/12 387 (77.3) 191/322 (59.3) 9378/12 065 (77.7) 0.74 (0.68–0.81)
  26–27 14 968/16 494 (90.8) 191/258 (74.0) 14 777/16 236 (91.0) 0.80 (0.74–0.86)
  28–29 21 799/22 711 (96.0) 188/228 (82.5) 21 611/22 483 (96.1) 0.86 (0.81–0.91)
  >29 26 825/27 551 (97.4) 88/104 (84.6) 26 737/27 447 (97.4) 0.86 (0.79–0.94)
Survival without morbidityc (VON metric) 49 390/83 941 (58.9) 294/1130 (26.1) 49 0926/82 811 (59.4) 0.66a (0.60–0.72)
 By GA,b wk
  ≤23 340/4877 (7.0) 5/221 (2.3) 335/4656 (7.2) 0.25 (0.09–0.64)
  24–25 2560/12 372 (20.7) 43/321 (13.4) 2517/12 051 (20.9) 0.60 (0.45–0.80)
  26–27 7479/16 475 (45.4) 79/258 (30.6) 7400/16 217 (45.6) 0.63 (0.52–0.76)
  28–29 15 591/22 687 (68.7) 109/226 (48.2) 15 482/22 461 (68.9) 0.69 (0.61–0.79)
  >29 23 416/27 526 (85.1) 58/104 (55.8) 23 358/27 422 (85.2) 0.65 (0.55–0.78)

Data are presented as numerator/denominator (%) unless otherwise stated.

a

Adjusted for GA, inborn or outborn status, infant sex, SGA, multiple gestation, Apgar score at 1 min, mode of delivery, and presence of a congenital anomaly.

b

Adjusted for inborn or outborn status, infant sex, SGA, multiple gestation, Apgar score at 1 min, mode of delivery, and presence of a congenital anomaly.

c

The VON metric is defined as survival without any of the following: NEC, CLD, severe IVH, pneumothorax, late-onset sepsis, and cystic PVL.

TABLE 5.

Survival With Major Neonatal Morbidity for Infants With and Without EOS

Survival With Major Neonatal Morbidity (CLD, sIVH or PVL, sROP) Overall Infected (EOS) Not Infected (No EOS) Adjusted Risk Ratioa (95% CI)
0 morbidities 37 805/59 841 (63.2) 286/682 (41.9) 37 519/59 159 (63.4) Reference
1 morbidity 16 909/59 841 (28.3) 239/682 (35.0) 16 670/59 159 (28.2) 1.39 (1.22–1.57)
2 morbidities 4412/59 841 (7.4) 120/682 (17.6) 4292/59 159 (7.3) 1.92 (1.50–2.48)
3 morbidities 715/59 841 (1.2) 37/582 (5.4) 678/59 159 (1.1) 2.67 (1.83–3.90)

Data are presented as numerator/denominator (%) unless otherwise stated. sIVH, severe intraventricular hemorrhage; sROP, severe retinopathy of prematurity.

a

Adjusted for GA, inborn or outborn status, infant sex, SGA, multiple gestation, Apgar score at 1 min, mode of delivery, and presence of a congenital anomaly.

Discussion

In this nationally representative sample of very preterm infants from 2018 to 2019, incidence rates of EOS remain substantial, particularly among infants at the lowest GAs. E coli was the most common EOS pathogen, but approximately one-third of EOS isolates were neither GBS nor E coli. Very preterm infants with EOS died at higher rates, and those who survived the infection had a significantly lower rate of surviving without VON-defined morbidities. Notably, VLBW survivors of EOS were more likely to suffer brain injury, retinopathy, and CLD, complications of prematurity that have been associated with subsequent risk of neurodevelopmental impairment or later death.12 The results of this study have important implications for clinicians who must assess sepsis risk and choose empirical antibiotics for very preterm infants and who counsel families both before and after very preterm birth.

EOS risk assessment for preterm infants is challenged by the relatively high incidence of infection (compared with term infants), by the prevalence of traditional risk factors for perinatal infection, and by the physiologic instability inherent to very preterm infants that can be difficult, if not impossible, to distinguish from instability due to infection. Current AAP guidance for EOS risk assessment among preterm infants endorses an approach based on the etiology of preterm birth and circumstances of delivery that may be used to categorize infants as at lower or higher risk of EOS.2 Although the clinical detail available in this study does not allow strict classification in the manner recommended by the AAP, our findings do support that approach. Consistent with the known association of intraamniotic infection as an etiology of spontaneous preterm birth,18,19 the obstetric diagnosis of chorioamnionitis was made in the mothers of ∼13% of all infants in our cohort as well as all uninfected infants, yet it was present in 46% of infected infants. AAP guidance strongly recommends evaluation and empirical treatment of preterm infants born to women with suspected or proven chorioamnionitis.2 In contrast, diagnoses associated with medically indicated preterm birth (maternal hypertensive disorders and fetal growth restriction) were present in far lower proportions of infected infants compared with the overall and uninfected infants (Table 1). Another important finding that can aid clinicians in risk assessment is that the size of this study and available clinical detail allow further discrimination by gestational week. The incidence of EOS in our study is similar to contemporary Neonatal Research Network data.1 In contrast to other recent EOS studies, however, we were able to the quantify the differential impact of GA. In this study, incidence of EOS was inversely related to GA. Roughly 1 of every 20 infants born at ≤23 weeks’ gestation suffered EOS; in contrast, ∼1 of every 100 infants born at 28 to 29 weeks’ gestation were infected. Among VLBW infants born at >29 weeks’ GA, incidence declined further to 1 of every 200 to 250 infants. Incidence of EOS was also inversely related to BW, except for very premature infants born weighing >1500 g. We interpret this as the impact of GA and infants born SGA, that is, heavier infants born at lower GAs are more at risk for EOS than lighter infants born at higher GAs.

The microbiology of EOS informs the content of empirical antibiotic therapies. This large and contemporary cohort largely confirms and extends the findings of Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) active surveillance conducted in 2005–2014 and the findings of a Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (NICHD) study of high-risk centers conducted in 2015–2017.1,20 Although the accounting of GA and BW differed slightly among these and the current study, approximately half of infections among VLBW infants were due to E coli, and 10% to 20% were due to GBS in these reports.1,20 Antibiotic susceptibility data for each EOS isolate were not available in our data. The CDC and NICHD studies found ∼8% to 10% of EOS E coli isolates to be resistant to both ampicillin and gentamicin.1,20 Using known antibiotic susceptibilities of organisms other than GBS and E coli, we speculate that S aureus (6.3% of all infections) and most of the other Gram-negative organisms in our cohort would be resistant to ampicillin. Therefore, many may not be optimally treated given that gentamicin monotherapy would not be considered sufficient therapy for such infections. These data strongly support current AAP guidance that suggests additional empirical therapy with a broader-spectrum agent may be indicated in high-risk cases until culture results are known.2 Although we excluded coagulase-negative staphylococci (CONS) isolates in our analysis, reports from Europe, Canada, and China have found relatively high proportions of EOS caused by CONS.2123 It is possible that different parturient colonization patterns contribute to variation in EOS microbiology. However, the Canadian report, in particular, was unable to distinguish contaminating species from true infections,23 a persistent challenge with interpretation of CONS isolation among neonates.

Neonatal clinicians play a key role in counseling both patients with threatened preterm birth, and families whose newborn has suffered EOS. Our study provides important and, we believe, sobering data to inform these conversations. Similar to CDC and NICHD reports,1,20 approximately one-third of VLBW infants with EOS died, in contrast to the 90% rate of survival in the uninfected infants. The differential impact of infection on GA-specific survival is notable. Although EOS does not significantly impact the already high rate of mortality among infants born at ≤23 weeks’ gestation, the relative impact is substantial for those born at ≥24 weeks’ gestation, in which infected infants die at 2 to 6 times the rate of the uninfected. We speculate that the differential impact of EOS may be explained by the relative proportion of births that are due to spontaneous preterm birth prompted by intraamniotic infection at each GA week. Importantly, infants who survived EOS had a markedly lower rate of survival without specified morbidities, even when adjusted for GA and multiple other predictors of preterm morbidity. In particular, survivors of EOS had a higher adjusted risk of suffering specific morbidities that have been associated with both neurodevelopmental impairment in early childhood and risk of death after NICU discharge.12 This information may be critically important to inform conversation and joint decision-making around obstetric management and neonatal care, particularly at the lowest GAs, when there is high obstetric concern for intraamniotic infection (chorioamnionitis) as the etiology of preterm birth.

The strengths of our study include prospective data collection by using standardized definitions and access to the overall VON data set, which informs robust statistical adjustment. Given that >700 neonatal centers from 49 states across the United States contribute data to VON, our findings are generalizable to most preterm infants cared for in the United States. The limitations of our study were primarily related to unavailable data, including maternal antibiotic data, pathogen susceptibility profile data, fungal pathogen data, and postdischarge outcomes. In addition, we were unable to distinguish bloodstream infection from meningitis.

Conclusions

In a nationally representative cohort study of very preterm infants from 2018 to 2019, the overall incidence rate of EOS was 13.5 per 1000 very preterm live births and increased significantly with decreasing GA. E coli was the most common infecting pathogen, but approximately one-third of isolates were neither GBS nor E coli. Very preterm infants with EOS died at higher rates, and survivors had significantly increased risk of morbidities compared with uninfected infants. The profoundly negative impact of EOS on very preterm infants highlights the need for novel preventive strategies among such infants.

Acknowledgments

We are indebted to our colleagues who submit data to VON on behalf of infants and their families. The list of centers contributing data to this study are in Supplemental Table 6.

Glossary

AAP

American Academy of Pediatrics

BW

birth weight

CDC

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

CI

confidence interval

CLD

chronic lung disease

CONS

coagulase-negative staphylococci

CSF

cerebrospinal fluid

EOS

early-onset sepsis

GA

gestational age

GBS

group B Streptococcus

IVH

intraventricular hemorrhage

NEC

necrotizing enterocolitis

NICHD

Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development

PVL

periventricular leukomalacia

ROP

retinopathy of prematurity

SGA

small for gestational age

VLBW

very low birth weight

VON

Vermont Oxford Network

Footnotes

FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE: The authors have indicated they have no financial relationships relevant to this article to disclose.

FUNDING: Dr Flannery reports receiving research funding from the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (K08HS027468), 2 contracts with the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, and the Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia. Dr Puopolo reports receiving research funding from the National Institutes of Health (5UG1HD068244; 5R01AI121383), 2 contracts with the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, and the Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia. The funders/sponsors had no role in the design or conduct of the study; collection, management, analysis, or interpretation of the data; preparation, review, or approval of the manuscripts; or decision to submit the manuscript for publication.

POTENTIAL CONFLICT OF INTEREST: Dr Horbar is the President, Chief Executive Officer, and Chief Scientific Officer of Vermont Oxford Network (VON) and an unpaid member of the VON Board of Trustees. Dr Edwards receives salary support from VON; and Drs Flannery and Puopolo have indicated they have no potential conflicts of interest to disclose.

Dr Flannery conceptualized and designed the study, drafted the initial manuscript, and reviewed and revised the manuscript; Dr Edwards contributed to the study design, conducted the initial analyses, and reviewed and revised the manuscript; Dr Puopolo conceptualized and designed the study and reviewed and revised the manuscript; Dr Horbar contributed to the study design, coordinated and supervised data collection, and reviewed and revised the manuscript; and all authors approved the final manuscript as submitted and agree to be accountable for all aspects of the work.

References

  • 1. Stoll BJ, Puopolo KM, Hansen NI, et al. ; Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Neonatal Research Network . Early-onset neonatal sepsis 2015 to 2017, the rise of Escherichia coli, and the need for novel prevention strategies. JAMA Pediatr. 2020;174(7):e200593. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2. Puopolo KM, Benitz WE, Zaoutis TE; Committee on Fetus and Newborn; Committee on Infectious Diseases . Management of neonates born at ≤34 6/7 weeks’ gestation with suspected or proven early-onset bacterial sepsis. Pediatrics. 2018;142(6):e20182896. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3. Flannery DD, Ross RK, Mukhopadhyay S, Tribble AC, Puopolo KM, Gerber JS. Temporal trends and center variation in early antibiotic use among premature infants. JAMA Netw Open. 2018;1(1):e180164. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4. Puopolo KM, Mukhopadhyay S, Hansen NI, et al. ; NICHD Neonatal Research Network . Identification of extremely premature infants at low risk for early-onset sepsis. Pediatrics. 2017;140(5):e20170925. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5. Mukhopadhyay S, Puopolo KM. Risk assessment in neonatal early onset sepsis. Semin Perinatol. 2012;36(6):408–415 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6. Stoll BJ, Hansen NI, Sánchez PJ, et al. ; Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Neonatal Research Network . Early onset neonatal sepsis: the burden of group B streptococcal and E. coli disease continues. Pediatrics. 2011;127(5):817–826 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7. Weissman SJ, Stoll B. Ampicillin and gentamicin in infants with suspected sepsis: long live Amp and Gent-but for how long? JAMA Pediatr. 2021;175(2):131–132 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8. Flannery DD, Akinboyo IC, Mukhopadhyay S, et al. Antibiotic susceptibility of Escherichia coli among infants admitted to neonatal intensive care units across the US from 2009 to 2017. JAMA Pediatr. 2021;175(2):168–175 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9. Simonsen KA, Anderson-Berry AL, Delair SF, Davies HD. Early-onset neonatal sepsis. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2014;27(1):21–47 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10. Folgori L, Ellis SJ, Bielicki JA, Heath PT, Sharland M, Balasegaram M. Tackling antimicrobial resistance in neonatal sepsis. Lancet Glob Health. 2017;5(11):e1066–e1068 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11. Vermont Oxford Network Manual of Operations . Very low birth weight database. 2017. Available at: https://public.vtoxford.org/data-and-reports/vlbw-database/. Accessed March 4, 2021
  • 12. Schmidt B, Asztalos EV, Roberts RS, Robertson CMT, Sauve RS, Whitfield MF; Trial of Indomethacin Prophylaxis in Preterms (TIPP) Investigators . Impact of bronchopulmonary dysplasia, brain injury, and severe retinopathy on the outcome of extremely low-birth-weight infants at 18 months: results from the trial of indomethacin prophylaxis in preterms. JAMA. 2003;289(9):1124–1129 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13. Papile LA, Burstein J, Burstein R, Koffler H. Incidence and evolution of subependymal and intraventricular hemorrhage: a study of infants with birth weights less than 1,500 gm. J Pediatr. 1978;92(4):529–534 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14. International Committee for the Classification of Retinopathy of Prematurity . The international classification of retinopathy of prematurity revisited. Arch Ophthalmol. 2005;123(7):991–999 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15. Travers CP, Carlo WA, McDonald SA, et al. ; Generic Database and Follow-up Subcommittees of the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Neonatal Research Network . Racial/ethnic disparities among extremely preterm infants in the United States from 2002 to 2016. JAMA Netw Open. 2020;3(6):e206757. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16. Hornik CP, Fort P, Clark RH, et al. Early and late onset sepsis in very-low-birth-weight infants from a large group of neonatal intensive care units. Early Hum Dev. 2012;88(suppl 2):S69–S74 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17. Fenton TR, Kim JH. A systematic review and meta-analysis to revise the Fenton growth chart for preterm infants. BMC Pediatr. 2013;13:59. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18. Agrawal V, Hirsch E. Intrauterine infection and preterm labor. Semin Fetal Neonatal Med. 2012;17(1):12–19 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19. Romero R, Dey SK, Fisher SJ. Preterm labor: one syndrome, many causes. Science. 2014;345(6198):760–765 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20. Schrag SJ, Farley MM, Petit S, et al. Epidemiology of invasive early-onset neonatal sepsis, 2005 to 2014. Pediatrics. 2016;138(6):e20162013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21. Mularoni A, Madrid M, Azpeitia A, Valls i Soler A. The role of coagulase-negative staphylococci in early onset sepsis in a large European cohort of very low birth weight infants. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2014;33(5):e121–e125 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22. Jiang S, Hong L, Gai J, et al. ; REIN-EPIQ Study Group . Early-onset sepsis among preterm neonates in China, 2015 to 2018. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2019;38(12):1236–1241 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23. Sgro M, Shah PS, Campbell D, Tenuta A, Shivananda S, Lee SK; Canadian Neonatal Network . Early-onset neonatal sepsis: rate and organism pattern between 2003 and 2008. J Perinatol. 2011;31(12):794–798 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Pediatrics are provided here courtesy of American Academy of Pediatrics

RESOURCES