Skip to main content
American Academy of Pediatrics Selective Deposit logoLink to American Academy of Pediatrics Selective Deposit
. 2022 Nov 11;150(6):e2022058813. doi: 10.1542/peds.2022-058813

Late-Onset Sepsis Among Very Preterm Infants

Dustin D Flannery a,b,c,, Erika M Edwards d,e,f, Sarah A Coggins a,c, Jeffrey D Horbar d,f, Karen M Puopolo a,b,c
PMCID: PMC11151779  PMID: 36366916

Abstract

Download video file (30MB, mp4)
DOI: 10.1542/6312701839112

Video Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To determine the epidemiology, microbiology, and associated outcomes of late-onset sepsis among very preterm infants using a large and nationally representative cohort of NICUs across the United States.

METHODS

Prospective observational study of very preterm infants born 401 to 1500 g and/or 22 to 29 weeks’ gestational age (GA) from January 1, 2018, to December 31, 2020, who survived >3 days in 774 participating Vermont Oxford Network centers. Late-onset sepsis was defined as isolation of a pathogenic bacteria from blood and/or cerebrospinal fluid, or fungi from blood, obtained >3 days after birth. Demographics, clinical characteristics, and outcomes were compared between infants with and without late-onset sepsis.

RESULTS

Of 118 650 infants, 10 501 (8.9%) had late-onset sepsis for an incidence rate of 88.5 per 1000 (99% confidence interval [CI] [86.4–90.7]). Incidence was highest for infants born ≤23 weeks GA (322.0 per 1000, 99% CI [306.3–338.1]). The most common pathogens were coagulase negative staphylococci (29.3%) and Staphylococcus aureus (23.0%), but 34 different pathogens were identified. Infected infants had lower survival (adjusted risk ratio [aRR] 0.89, 95% CI [0.87–0.90]) and increased risks of home oxygen (aRR 1.32, 95% CI [1.26–1.38]), tracheostomy (aRR 2.88, 95% CI [2.47–3.37]), and gastrostomy (aRR 2.09, 95% CI [1.93–2.57]) among survivors.

CONCLUSIONS

A substantial proportion of very preterm infants continue to suffer late-onset sepsis, particularly those born at the lowest GAs. Infected infants had higher mortality, and survivors had increased risks of technology-dependent chronic morbidities. The persistent burden and diverse microbiology of late-onset sepsis among very preterm infants underscore the need for innovative and potentially organism-specific prevention strategies.


What’s Known on the Subject:

Late-onset sepsis is a significant cause of morbidity and mortality among very preterm infants, leading to high rates of empirical antibiotic administration for suspected infection. Substantial infection prevention efforts have been implemented over the last 3 decades.

What This Study Adds:

Late-onset sepsis incidence rates in 2018 to 2020 have plateaued, and remained alarmingly high among infants born at the lowest gestational ages. Infected very preterm infants had lower survival, and survivors had increased adjusted risks of technology-dependent chronic morbidities.

Late-onset sepsis is a significant cause of morbidity and mortality among very preterm infants. Infants who develop late-onset sepsis are at higher risk of in-hospital morbidities, death, and poor neurodevelopmental outcomes among survivors.14 Accordingly, substantial late-onset sepsis prevention efforts have been implemented over the last 3 decades.5 Despite these efforts, antibiotic administration for suspected or confirmed late-onset sepsis drives as much as one-third of antibiotic use in NICUs.6

Contemporary data informing late-onset sepsis epidemiology among preterm infants in the United States are crucial to understand the impact of prevention efforts and to continually refine risk assessment and prognostication for infected infants. Pathogen surveillance among preterm infants with late-onset sepsis also informs empirical antibiotic decisions when late-onset sepsis is suspected, and allows for detection of changing microbiological trends. Reports that focus solely on extremely low birth weight (BW) and low gestational age (GA) infants do not address the incidence and outcomes of pathogen-specific infections across the GA spectrum. In this study, we sought to determine the epidemiology, microbiology, and associated outcomes of late-onset sepsis among very preterm infants born 2018 to 2020 using a large and nationally representative cohort from NICUs across the United States.

Methods

Data Source and Study Population

Vermont Oxford Network (VON) is a worldwide community of practice dedicated to improving the quality, safety, and value of newborn care through a coordinated program of quality improvement, education, and research. This prospective observational study included infants born 401 to 1500 g and/or 22 to 29 weeks’ GA at the reporting hospital, or transferred to the reporting hospital within 28 days after birth, from January 1, 2018, to December 31, 2020, at 774 participating centers from 49 US states. Infants who died in the delivery room or who had length of stay of <4 days were excluded. Data were collected from birth until hospital discharge, death, or first birthday (whichever came first). Transferred infants were tracked to determine their ultimate disposition and LOS. The institutional review board at the University of Vermont determined that use of the VON database for this analysis was not human subjects research.

Study Definitions

Late-onset sepsis was defined as isolation of a bacterial or fungal pathogen from blood and/or bacterial pathogen from cerebrospinal fluid cultures obtained >3 days after birth. Pathogenic species were specified in the VON manual of operations (Supplemental Information).7 Coagulase-negative staphylococci (CONS) from blood or cerebrospinal fluid culture was considered a true case of late-onset sepsis if there were signs of generalized infection and ≥5 days of antibiotics. For Staphylococcus aureus, data collection did not distinguish between methicillin- sensitive S. aureus (MSSA) and methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA) isolates. For fungi, pathogen was not recorded. For infants with >1 pathogen identified, we could not distinguish between polymicrobial infection in a single episode and multiple episodes.

The primary outcome was survival to hospital discharge. Secondary outcomes among survivors included home oxygen, tracheostomy, and gastrostomy (or jejunostomy). Infants who had tracheostomy or gastrostomy at transfer were assumed to have these at discharge; infants on supplemental oxygen at the time of transfer were not assumed to have this at discharge. Maternal race/ethnicity, maternal hypertensive disorders, maternal diabetes, chorioamnionitis, antenatal steroids, congenital anomalies, pneumothorax, periventricular leukomalacia, early-onset sepsis, and necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC) were defined per the VON manual of operations.7 Small for GA was defined as BW <10th percentile.8 Length of stay was calculated as days from birth to discharge or death. Chronic lung disease was defined for infants born <33 weeks’ GA as supplemental oxygen at 36 weeks’ corrected GA or as oxygen dependence at transfer if transferred at 34 or 35 weeks’ GA. Severe intraventricular hemorrhage was defined as grade 3 or 4 on the basis of radiographic imaging before day 28 after birth. Severe retinopathy of prematurity was defined as stage 3 to 5 disease.9 All morbidities occurred before discharge or death; late-onset sepsis, retinopathy, NEC, pneumothorax, and leukomalacia were not associated with a specific timing relative to birth. NICU level of care was defined using the VON membership survey.

Statistical Analysis

Demographics, clinical characteristics, and unadjusted outcomes were compared between infants with and without late-onset sepsis using standard descriptive statistics. The incidence rate of late-onset sepsis was determined per 1000 eligible infants overall, by study year, by GA category, and by pathogen type (CONS, Group B Streptococcus [GBS], other gram-positive, gram-negative, and fungal). Incidence analyses among the same cohort were repeated using the composite outcome of late-onset sepsis or death, as these are competing outcomes. The proportion of deaths for infants with and without late-onset sepsis was determined overall, by GA category, and by pathogen type. Outcomes were evaluated using generalized estimating equation regressions, adjusting for GA, small for GA, multiple birth, mode of delivery (vaginal or cesarean), inborn/outborn status, and accounting for clustering of infants within centers. Statistical analyses were performed using SAS 9.4 (Cary, N.C.).

Results

Characteristics of the Study Participants and Centers

During the study period, 124 497 infants born 401 to 1500 g and/or 22–29 weeks’ GA were admitted to participating NICUs, of which 118 650 infants survived >3 days and were included in the analysis (Table 1). Median BW was 1110 g (interquartile range [IQR] 834–1340) and median GA was 28 weeks (IQR 26–30). Half of cohort infants were male and the median length of stay among survivors was 66 days (IQR 45–96). Of the infants admitted to centers with NICU-level designation available (N = 118 192), 29 325 (24.8%) were at NICU Type A, 52 706 (44.6%) were at NICU Type B, and 36 161 (30.6%) were at NICU Type C centers. Regarding US geographic region designation, 17 722 (14.9%) infants were admitted to centers in the Northeast, 26 196 (22.1%) in the Midwest, 23 359 (19.7%) in the Pacific, and 51 373 (43.3%) in the South.

TABLE 1.

Demographics and Clinical Characteristics of Infants With and Without Late-Onset Sepsis (N = 118 650)

Overall Late-Onset Sepsis No Late-Onset Sepsis
N No. % or Median (IQR) N No. % or Median (IQR) N No. % or Median (IQR)
Maternal characteristics
 Race/ethnicity
  Black/Non-Hispanic 117 346 36 873 31.4 10 379 3580 34.5 106 967 33 293 31.1
  Hispanic 117 346 22 881 19.5 10 379 2141 20.6 106 967 20 740 19.4
  White/Non-Hispanic 117 346 48 067 41.0 10 379 3885 37.4 106 967 44 182 41.3
  Asian/Pacific Islander 117 346 5978 5.1 10 379 446 4.3 106 967 5532 5.2
  Other Non-Hispanic 117 346 2611 2.2 10 379 235 2.3 106 967 2376 2.2
 Hypertension 118 012 46 455 39.4 10 409 3142 30.2 107 603 43 313 40.3
 Diabetes 117 620 13 495 11.5 10 364 941 9.1 107 256 12 554 11.7
 Antenatal steroids 117 771 104 186 88.2 10 368 9125 87.4 107 403 95 061 88.2
 Chorioamnionitis 118 175 14 903 12.7 10 438 1845 17.8 107 737 13 058 12.2
 Multiple gestation 118 646 28 643 24.1 10 501 2225 21.2 108 145 26 418 24.4
 Vaginal delivery 118 632 30 011 25.3 10 499 3466 33.0 108 133 26 545 24.5
Infant characteristics
 BW, g 118 644 1110 (834–1340) 10 499 760 (612–985) 108 145 1140 (875–1350)
 GA, wk 118 646 28 (26–30) 10 501 25 (24–27) 108 145 29 (27–30)
 Small for GA 118 323 22 662 19.2 10 406 1631 15.7 107 917 21 031 19.5
 Male sex 118 626 59 415 50.1 10 498 5764 54.9 108 128 53 651 49.6
 Inborn 118 650 102 492 86.4 10 501 8418 80.2 108 149 94 074 87.0
 Congenital anomaly 118 639 6386 5.4 10 499 854 8.1 108 140 5532 5.1
 Early onset sepsis 118 614 1353 1.1 10 491 217 2.1 108 123 1136 1.1
 NEC 118 636 5799 4.9 10 498 1693 16.1 108 138 4106 3.8
 Pneumothorax 118 615 4725 4.0 10 492 784 7.5 108 123 3.941 3.6
 Severe intraventricular hemorrhage 109 722 8315 7.6 10 230 1802 17.6 108 123 6513 6.5
 Periventricular leukomalacia 110 816 2919 2.6 10 251 653 6.4 99 492 2266 2.3
 Chronic lung disease 101 125 30 034 29.7 8155 5059 62.0 92 970 24 975 26.9
 Retinopathy of prematurity 95 179 30 313 31.8 8304 5121 61.7 86 875 25 192 29.0
 Length of stay, d 118 650 64 (42–94) 10 501 102 (63–141) 108 149 62 (41–89)
 Length of stay among survivors, d 110 807 66 (45–96) 8199 114 (86–150) 102 608 64 (44–91)

Infants with >1 pathogen identified were counted once. —, not applicable.

Incidence

Overall, 10 501 (8.9%) infants had late-onset sepsis for an overall incidence rate of 88.5 per 1000 eligible very preterm infants (99% confidence interval [CI] [86.4–90.7]). Incidence was highest for infants born ≤23 completed weeks’ GA (322.0 per 1000; 99% CI [306.3–338.1]) (Table 2). Pathogen-specific incidence rates were similar across the 3 study years, and proportions of infants with all pathogen-specific types of late-onset sepsis increased with decreasing GA (Table 2). Incidence of composite late-onset sepsis or death was 135.1 per 1000 infants (99% CI [132.5–137.6]), and was highest for infants born ≤23 weeks’ GA (549.7 per 1000; 99% CI [532.7–566.6]) (Supplemental Table 6).

TABLE 2.

Incidence of Late-Onset Sepsis Pathogen Types by Study Year and Gestational Age Category

Category N All Late-Onset Sepsisa (No., %) Incidence Rate Per 1000 Eligible Infantsa (99% CI) CONSb (No., %) GBSb (No., %) Other GPb (No., %) GNb (No., %) Fungalb (No., %)
Overall 118 650 10 501 (8.9) 88.5 (86.4–90.7) 3549 (3.0) 569 (0.5) 3436 (2.9) 3692 (3.1) 620 (0.5)
Study year
 2018 40 295 3514 (8.7) 87.2 (83.7–90.9) 1224 (3.0) 196 (0.5) 1153 (2.9) 1228 (3.1) 213 (0.5)
 2019 40 727 3609 (8.9) 88.6 (85.1–92.3) 1193 (2.9) 203 (0.5) 1182 (2.9) 1261 (3.1) 201 (0.5)
 2020 37 628 3378 (9.0) 89.8 (86.0–93.6) 1132 (3.0) 170 (0.5) 1101 (2.9) 1203 (3.2) 206 (0.6)
GA category, completed wkc
 ≤23 5708 1838 (32.2) 322.0 (306.3–338.1) 611 (10.7) 68 (1.2) 516 (9.0) 766 (13.4) 224 (3.9)
 24–25 16 781 3669 (21.9) 218.6 (210.5–227.0) 1270 (7.6) 149 (0.9) 1235 (7.4) 1330 (7.9) 229 (1.4)
 26–27 23 368 2583 (11.1) 110.5 (105.4–115.9) 889 (3.8) 159 (0.7) 865 (3.7) 838 (3.6) 104 (0.5)
 28–29 32 590 1579 (4.9) 48.5 (45.5–51.6) 509 (1.6) 124 (0.4) 507 (1.6) 530 (1.6) 44 (0.1)
 >29 40 199 832 (2.1) 20.7 (18.8–22.6) 270 (0.7) 69 (0.2) 313 (0.8) 228 (0.6) 19 (0.1)

GN, gram-negative; GP, gram-positive.

a

Infants with >1 pathogen identified were counted once. There were 9067 infants with 1 pathogen identified (7.6% of total and 86.3% of infants with infection), 1270 infants with 2 pathogens identified (1.1% of total and 12.1% of infants with infection), and 164 infants with 3 or more pathogens identified (0.14% of total and 1.6% of infants with infection). Infants with >1 pathogen identified had polymicrobial infection and/or multiple distinct, late-onset sepsis episodes.

b

Infants with >1 pathogen identified were counted separately in each relevant group.

c

Four infants with missing GA were not included in the GA-specific counts.

Microbiology

From the 10501 infants with late-onset sepsis, 12117 isolates and 34 pathogens were identified. Gram-positive bacteria accounted for 62.9% of isolates and gram-negatives accounted for 32.0% (Table 3). CONS (3549 of 12 117; 29.3%) and Staphylococcus aureus (2784 of 12117; 23.0%) were the most-common pathogens. Escherichia coli (1479 of 12 117; 12.2%) and Klebsiella spp. (1005/12 117; 8.3%) were the third and fourth most common pathogens, respectively. Enterococcus spp. accounted for 5.3% (642 of 12 117) and fungi accounted for 5.1% (620/12 117); all other pathogens accounted for <5% (Table 3). Distribution of pathogen types by GA demonstrated higher proportions of gram-negative and fungal infections, and lower proportions of GBS and other gram-positive infections, among infants at lower GAs compared with those at higher GAs (Supplemental Table 7). Proportions of CONS infections were similar across GA categories (Supplemental Table 7).

TABLE 3.

Microbiology of Late-Onset Sepsis

Pathogen No., %
Gram-positive bacteria 7621 (62.9)
 Coagulase-negative staphylococci 3549 (29.3)
Staphylococcus aureus 2784 (23.0)
Enterococcus spp. 642 (5.3)
 GBS 569 (4.7)
Streptococcus pneumoniae 24 (0.2)
Streptococcus pyogenes 23 (0.2)
Streptococcus anginosus 20 (0.2)
Clostridium spp. 9 (0.1)
Listeria spp. 1 (0.0)
Gram-negative bacteria 3876 (32.0)
Escherichia coli 1479 (12.2)
Klebsiella spp. 1005 (8.3)
Enterobacter spp. 441 (3.6)
Pseudomonas spp. 379 (3.1)
Serratia spp. 275 (2.3)
Citrobacter spp. 62 (0.5)
Acinetobacter spp. 52 (0.4)
Proteus spp. 46 (0.4)
Stenotrophomonas maltophilia 37 (0.3)
Haemophilus spp. 17 (0.1)
Morganella morganii 16 (0.1)
Salmonella spp. 13 (0.1)
Bacteroides spp. 11 (0.1)
Moraxella spp. 8 (0.1)
Achromobacter spp. 7 (0.1)
Pantoea spp. 7 (0.1)
Neisseria spp. 5 (0.0)
Burkholderia spp. 5 (0.0)
Flavobacterium spp. 4 (0.0)
Ralstonia spp. 2 (0.0)
Alcaligenes spp. 1 (0.0)
Campylobacter spp. 1 (0.0)
Chryseobacterium spp. 1 (0.0)
Prevotella spp. 1 (0.0)
Providencia spp. 1 (0.0)
Fungi 620 (5.1)
Total 12 117

There were 12 117 pathogens identified among 10 501 infants. Percentages are out of total number of identified pathogens. Infants with >1 pathogen identified were counted more than once. No infections were reported for Aeromonas species or Pasteurella species.

Comparison of Infants With and Without Late-Onset Sepsis

Multiple maternal and infant characteristics differed between infected and uninfected infants (Table 1). Infants with late-onset sepsis were more often born vaginally (33.0% vs 24.5%), to mothers with chorioamnionitis (17.8% vs 12.2%) and without hypertension (30.2% vs 40.3%). Infected infants had lower BWs (median 760 g vs 1140 g) and GAs (median 25 weeks versus 29 weeks) compared with uninfected infants. Infected infants had longer length of stay compared with uninfected infants (median 102 vs 62 days); length of stay was also longer among surviving infants with late-onset sepsis compared with uninfected surviving infants (median 114 vs 64 days). Median length of stay for infants with late-onset sepsis who died was 21 days (IQR 11–46).

Outcomes

Infected infants had lower overall survival (78.2% vs 94.9%; adjusted risk ratio [aRR] 0.89, 95% CI [0.87–0.90]) and lower survival in each GA category (Table 4). Survival among infected infants by pathogen type, overall and by GA category, is shown in Supplemental Table 8. Length of stay among infants who did not survive to hospital discharge, by pathogen type, is shown in Supplemental Table 9. Notably, uninfected infants born ≤23 weeks’ GA had 66.4% survival, compared with 75.1% for CONS and 69.1% for GBS (Supplemental Table 8), though median length of stay for uninfected infants born ≤23 weeks’ GA was only 10 days (Supplemental Table 9). Infants with late-onset sepsis who survived to discharge had significantly increased adjusted risks for home oxygen (aRR 1.32, 95% CI [1.26–1.38]), tracheostomy (aRR 2.88, 95% CI [2.47–3.37]), and gastrostomy (aRR 2.09, 95% CI [1.93–2.57]) when compared with survivors without late-onset sepsis (Table 5).

TABLE 4.

Survival Among Infants With or Without Late-Onset Sepsis, Overall and by Gestational Age Category

Any Late-Onset Sepsis No Late-Onset Sepsis
N No. % N No. % aRR (95% CI)
Overall 10 491 8199 78.2 108 131 102 608 94.9 0.89 (0.87–0.90)a
GA category, completed wk
 ≤23 1837 1155 62.9 3869 2570 66.4 0.95 (0.91–0.99)b
 24–25 3665 2790 76.1 13 106 11 216 85.6 0.90 (0.89–0.92)b
 26–27 2579 2156 83.6 20 778 19 690 94.8 0.90 (0.88–0.91)b
 28–29 1579 1388 87.9 31 008 30 363 97.9 0.91 (0.89–0.92)b
 >29 831 710 85.4 39 366 38 765 98.5 0.87 (0.85–0.90)b

Infants with >1 pathogen identified were counted once. Twenty-eight infants were missing data on survival and were not included in the analysis.

a

Adjusted for GA, small for GA, multiple birth, vaginal delivery, sex, inborn, and clustering of infants within hospitals.

b

Adjusted for small for GA, multiple birth, vaginal delivery, sex, inborn, and clustering of infants within hospitals.

TABLE 5.

Secondary Outcomes Among Infants With or Without Late-Onset Sepsis Who Survived to Hospital Discharge or Transfer

Any Late-Onset Sepsis No Late-Onset Sepsis
Outcome N No. % N No. % aRR (95% CI)a
Home oxygen 6891 2602 37.8 94 408 12 453 13.2 1.32 (1.26–1.38)
Tracheostomy 8197 295 3.6 102 593 582 0.6 2.89 (2.47–3.37)
Gastrostomy 8197 1198 14.6 102 593 3873 3.8 2.09 (1.93–2.56)

Infants with >1 pathogen identified were counted once. Infants who had tracheostomy or gastrostomy at the time of transfer were assumed to have these at hospital discharge; infants who were on supplemental oxygen at the time of transfer were not assumed to have this at hospital discharge.

a

Adjusted for GA, small for GA, multiple birth, vaginal delivery, sex, inborn, and clustering of infants within hospitals.

Discussion

In this large, nationally representative sample of very preterm infants from 2018 to 2020, we observed lower overall incidence rates of late-onset sepsis compared with previous US reports.1013 However, incidence among infants born at the lowest GAs who survived >3 days was substantial, approaching 1 in every 3 infants born ≤23 weeks’ GA. CONS was the most-common pathogen, but the highly pathogenic S. aureus accounted for nearly a quarter of all cases. Remarkably, 34 different pathogens were identified. Very preterm infants with late-onset sepsis died at higher rates, and those who survived had increased adjusted risks of technology-dependent, chronic morbidities upon discharge. The results of this study have important implications for clinicians who care for very preterm infants at risk for late-onset sepsis, choose empirical antibiotic regimens, and discuss prognostication with families. Furthermore, the study results highlight a current challenge in neonatal care. Despite ongoing national quality improvement efforts aimed at late-onset sepsis prevention, and attention paid by local and national public health agencies, as well as insurers, late-onset sepsis persists among very preterm infants. This suggests that prevention efforts and related reductions have likely plateaued.

Our contemporary findings do suggest declines in late-onset sepsis incidence compared with data published over the past 3 decades, although the use of different populations of preterm infants complicates comparisons. The Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Neonatal Research Network (NRN) collects data from select high-risk academic centers. Among 7861 infants born with BW <1500 g from 1991 to 1993 who survived >3 days after birth, 25% developed late-onset sepsis.1 Among 6956 preterm infants born 1998 to 2000 in NRN centers, similar findings were reported in incidence and pathogen distribution.11 Data from 313 pediatric NICUs from 1997 to 2010 found that 12.2% of very low BW infants suffered from late-onset sepsis.14 Previous reporting from VON centers found the proportion of very preterm infants with late-onset sepsis declined from 21.1% in 2000 to 15.0% in 2009 and 10.1% in 2014.12,13 Analysis by GA at birth rather than BW results in higher-reported incidence of infection, but a trend to improvement is still apparent. NRN data encompassing 10 131 infants born <27 weeks’ GA born 2000 to 2011 found decreasing rates over time, with 41% suffering late-onset sepsis if born 2000 to 2005, compared with 34% of those born 2006 to 2011.10 In our study, 24.5% of infants born ≤25 weeks’ GA and 17.6% born ≤27 weeks’ GA had late-onset sepsis (Table 2), suggesting that further reductions in infection have been accomplished over the past decade among the lowest-GA infants who survive.

Pathogen surveillance informs optimal empirical antibiotic choices, sheds light on the effects of infection prevention efforts, and can detect shifting infection patterns. Historically, CONS was the most-common late-onset sepsis pathogen among very preterm infants and was isolated in more than half of cases in previous reports from US and international cohorts.1,4,10,11,1517 In the current study, which included >12000 isolates, only 29.3% of late-onset sepsis was caused by CONS, whereas 23.0% was caused by S. aureus. Variable definitions of CONS infection may partially explain the proportional difference, though the overall decline in late-onset sepsis incidence combined with the increasing proportion of S. aureus infections may indicate infection prevention practices have disproportionately reduced CONS infections. The pathogenesis of CONS infections is such that certain infection prevention practices may be particularly effective (for example, bundles aimed at reducing central line-associated bloodstream infection).18 The biologic origins of S. aureus infections include direct invasion of colonized mucosal surfaces and may be less amenable to practice improvements focused on optimal central-line care.19,20 Gram-negative organisms were isolated in one-third of late-onset sepsis cases, in contrast to ∼20% of cases in previous reports.1,4,10,14 Fungal species, which accounted for up to 10% of late-onset sepsis cases in previous reports, were isolated in only 5.1% of cases.1,10

Our results do not clearly identify the optimal choice of empirical therapy but do inform this important clinical decision. First, the relative proportions of CONS and S. aureus infections and the higher survival among infants infected with CONS support efforts to reduce empirical vancomycin use.21,22 Although we could not distinguish between MSSA and MRSA, previous studies have found that MRSA late-onset sepsis is less common than MSSA.15,23,24 Centers that use routine MRSA surveillance may consider selective use of antistaphylococcal penicillins in place of empirical vancomycin for suspected late-onset sepsis.25 Second, gram-negative bacteria accounted for one-third of identified pathogens, and infants with gram-negative infection had increased mortality, especially among infants at the lowest GAs. Therefore, empirical gram-negative coverage for very preterm infants with suspected late-onset sepsis remains warranted. Although susceptibility data were not available, the paucity of Pseudomonas isolates in our cohort and recent reports of neonatal E. coli and other gram-negative pathogen susceptibilities suggest that an aminoglycoside or third-generation cephalosporin may be most appropriate for infants without risk factors for multidrug-resistant infection.26,27 Third, although we could not account for antifungal prophylaxis, routine empirical antifungal coverage for suspected late-onset sepsis is likely not warranted in most instances: only 0.5% of infants in this cohort had fungal late-onset sepsis. Our results also support consideration of GA at birth when making empirical antimicrobial decisions. Not only were infants of the lowest GAs at highest risk of infection, 46.1% of pathogens identified among infants ≤23 weeks’ GA were gram-negative or fungal organisms, with a combined incidence rate of 173 per 1000. Differential fungal infection by GA is particularly notable: 10% of pathogens identified among infants born ≤23 weeks’ GA were fungal organisms (incidence rate 39 per 1000), whereas 2.5% of pathogens identified among infants born ≥28 weeks’ GA were fungal organisms (incidence rate 0.9 per 1000).

We were unable to assess the temporal association of late infection and specific morbidities of prematurity. Nonetheless, the pathogen-specific association of late-onset sepsis with death and higher rates of neonatal, in-hospital morbidities suggest that either the sickest infants are also at risk for late-onset sepsis, or that late-onset sepsis contributes to preterm morbidity and mortality. Previous studies have supported causation, but the predominance of late-onset sepsis among infants born <26 weeks, ∼1 of every 4 infants, suggests that the association likely goes in both directions.1,11 Survivors of late infection also had higher adjusted risks of technology-dependent, chronic morbidities, including home oxygen, tracheostomy, and gastrostomy, which are associated with significant health burden and resource utilization, including hospital readmissions in the first year after birth.2830 Importantly, infants with late-onset sepsis born ≤23 weeks’ GA had higher rates of survival than uninfected infants, but uninfected infants born ≤23 weeks’ GA had median survival of only 10 days, suggesting survival bias.

Our findings suggest that novel approaches will be needed to make further reductions in late-onset sepsis. The predominance of highly pathogenic organisms infecting the lowest-GA infants argues that new tools need to be added to established prevention efforts, such as central-line care bundles, hand hygiene, early enteral feeding, and fluconazole prophylaxis.3135 A better understanding of late-onset sepsis pathogenesis is needed: to the extent that some infections are because of invasive events after colonization of mucosal surfaces, strategies to prevent specific strain colonization, interrupt translocation, or promote bloodstream clearance are necessary. In addition, neonatal clinicians should recognize those infections that simply may not be preventable with current strategies. GBS disease accounted for 6.3% of late-onset sepsis among infants born ≥26 weeks’ GA, with an incidence rate of 3.7 per 1000, which is 10-fold higher than the overall national incidence of late-onset GBS infection.36 There are no effective strategies for the prevention of late-onset GBS infection. Currently, strategies exist to decrease but not eliminate the risk of NEC, and associated infections, among preterm infants.37 Similarly, late-onset sepsis secondary to urinary tract infection is a common cause of serious bacterial infection, and there are no strategies for primary prevention unless urinary tract anomalies are recognized.38 As resuscitation near the limit of viability increases, the imperative to improve late-onset sepsis prevention through a better understanding of pathogenesis is clear: 1 of every 2 infants born ≤23 weeks’ GA in our study who survived past day 3 either died later or suffered late-onset sepsis.

The strengths of this study include prospective data collection with validation audits and access to the overall VON data set that inform robust statistical adjustment. The findings should be generalizable to most centers across the country that care for very preterm infants. The study does have limitations. Some important data were not available, including maternal and neonatal antimicrobial agents, invasive interventions which may increase the risk of infection, antimicrobial susceptibilities (including inability to distinguish between MRSA and MSSA), fungal pathogen speciation (though we speculate that most were Candida species), urine and other specimen culture results, and postdischarge outcomes (including later death and duration of home oxygen, tracheostomy, and gastrostomy). Importantly, we were unable to delineate timing of late infection or distinguish between polymicrobial versus multiple episodes of infection and bacteremia versus meningitis.

Conclusions

Late-onset sepsis incidence among very preterm infants remains substantial, particularly among infants born at the lowest GAs. CONS and S. aureus were the predominant pathogens. Infants with late-onset sepsis suffered from higher mortality, and survivors had increased risks of technology-dependent, chronic morbidities. The persistent burden and diverse microbiology of late-onset sepsis among very preterm infants underscore the need for innovative and potentially organism-specific prevention strategies.

Supplementary Material

Supplemental Information

Acknowledgments

We thank colleagues who submitted data to VON on behalf of infants and their families. The list of centers contributing data to this study is in Supplemental Table 10.

Glossary

aRR

adjusted risk ratio

BW

birth weight

CI

confidence interval

CONS

coagulase negative staphylococci

GA

gestational age

GBS

Group B Streptococcus

IQR

interquartile range

MRSA

methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus

MSSA

methicillin-sensitive Staphylococcus aureus

NEC

necrotizing enterocolitis

NRN

Neonatal Research Network

VON

Vermont Oxford Network

Footnotes

Dr Flannery conceptualized and designed the study, and drafted the initial manuscript; Dr Edwards contributed to the study design, and conducted the initial analyses; Drs Puopolo and Coggins conceptualized and designed the study; Dr Horbar contributed to the study design, and coordinated and supervised data collection; and all authors reviewed and revised the manuscript, approved the final manuscript as submitted, and agree to be accountable for all aspects of the work.

FUNDING: Dr Flannery reports receiving research funding from the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (grant K08HS027468), from 2 contracts with the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, and from the Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia. Dr Coggins reports receiving research funding from the National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute of the National Institutes of Health (grant T32HL007891). Dr Puopolo reports receiving research funding from the National Institutes of Health, from 2 contracts with the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, and from the Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia. The funders/sponsors had no role in the design or conduct of this study.

CONFLICT OF INTEREST DISCLAIMER: Dr Horbar is the president, chief executive and chief scientific officer of Vermont Oxford Network, and an unpaid member of the Vermont Oxford Network Board of Trustees. Dr Edwards receives salary support from Vermont Oxford Network. The other authors have indicated they have no conflicts of interest relevant to this article to disclose.

References

  • 1. Stoll BJ, Gordon T, Korones SB, et al. Late-onset sepsis in very low birth weight neonates: a report from the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Neonatal Research Network. J Pediatr. 1996;129(1):63–71 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2. Fanaroff AA, Korones SB, Wright LL, et al. The National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Neonatal Research Network . Incidence, presenting features, risk factors and significance of late onset septicemia in very low birth weight infants. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 1998;17(7):593–598 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3. Stoll BJ, Hansen NI, Adams-Chapman I, et al. National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Neonatal Research Network . Neurodevelopmental and growth impairment among extremely low-birth-weight infants with neonatal infection. JAMA. 2004;292(19):2357–2365 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4. Mukhopadhyay S, Puopolo KM, Hansen NI, et al. NICHD Neonatal Research Network . Neurodevelopmental outcomes following neonatal late-onset sepsis and blood culture-negative conditions. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2021;106(5):467–473 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5. Downey LC, Smith PB, Benjamin DK Jr. Risk factors and prevention of late-onset sepsis in premature infants. Early Hum Dev. 2010;86(1 Suppl 1):7–12 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6. Cantey JB, Wozniak PS, Pruszynski JE, Sánchez PJ. Reducing unnecessary antibiotic use in the neonatal intensive care unit (SCOUT): a prospective interrupted time-series study. Lancet Infect Dis. 2016;16(10):1178–1184 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7. Vermont Oxford Network Manual of Operations . Very Low Birth Weight Database. Available at: https://public.vtoxford.org/data-and-reports/vlbw-database/. Accessed March 4, 2021
  • 8. Fenton TR, Kim JH. A systematic review and meta-analysis to revise the Fenton growth chart for preterm infants. BMC Pediatr. 2013;13:59. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9. Quinn GE. International Committee for the Classification of Retinopathy of Prematurity . The international classification of retinopathy of prematurity revisited. Arch Ophthalmol. 2005;123(7):991–999 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10. Greenberg RG, Kandefer S, Do BT, et al. Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Neonatal Research Network . Late-onset sepsis in extremely premature infants: 2000–2011. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2017;36(8):774–779 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11. Stoll BJ, Hansen N, Fanaroff AA, et al. Late-onset sepsis in very low birth weight neonates: the experience of the NICHD Neonatal Research Network. Pediatrics. 2002;110(2 Pt 1):285–291 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12. Horbar JD, Carpenter JH, Badger GJ, et al. Mortality and neonatal morbidity among infants 501 to 1500 grams from 2000 to 2009. Pediatrics. 2012;129(6): 1019–1026 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13. Horbar JD, Edwards EM, Greenberg LT, et al. Variation in performance of neonatal intensive care units in the United States. JAMA Pediatr. 2017;171(3):e164396. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14. Hornik CP, Fort P, Clark RH, et al. Early and late onset sepsis in very-low-birth-weight infants from a large group of neonatal intensive care units. Early Hum Dev. 2012;88(Suppl 2):S69–S74 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15. Vergnano S, Menson E, Kennea N, et al. Neonatal infections in England: the NeonIN surveillance network. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2011;96(1):F9–F14 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16. Letouzey M, Foix-L’Hélias L, Torchin H, et al. Cause of preterm birth and late-onset sepsis in very preterm infants: the EPIPAGE-2 cohort study. Pediatr Res. 2021;90(3):584–592 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17. Bizzarro MJ, Raskind C, Baltimore RS, Gallagher PG. Seventy-five years of neonatal sepsis at Yale: 1928–2003. Pediatrics. 2005;116(3):595–602 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18. Crnich CJ, Maki DG. The promise of novel technology for the prevention of intravascular device-related bloodstream infection. I. Pathogenesis and short-term devices. Clin Infect Dis. 2002;34(9):1232–1242 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19. Kwiecinski JM, Horswill AR. Staphylococcus aureus bloodstream infections: pathogenesis and regulatory mechanisms. Curr Opin Microbiol. 2020;53:51–60 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20. Khamash DF, Voskertchian A, Milstone AM. Manipulating the microbiome: evolution of a strategy to prevent S. aureus disease in children. J Perinatol. 2017;38(2):105–109 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21. Chiu CH, Michelow IC, Cronin J, Ringer SA, Ferris TG, Puopolo KM. Effectiveness of a guideline to reduce vancomycin use in the neonatal intensive care unit. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2011;30(4):273–278 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22. Magers J, Prusakov P, Speaks S, Conroy S, Sánchez PJ. Safety and efficacy of nafcillin for empiric therapy of late-onset sepsis in the NICU. Pediatrics. 2022;149(5):e2021052360. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23. Shane AL, Hansen NI, Stoll BJ, et al. Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Neonatal Research Network . Methicillin-resistant and susceptible Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia and meningitis in preterm infants. Pediatrics. 2012;129(4):e914–e922 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24. Lessa FC, Edwards JR, Fridkin SK, Tenover FC, Horan TC, Gorwitz RJ. Trends in incidence of late-onset methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus infection in neonatal intensive care units: data from the National Nosocomial Infections Surveillance System, 1995–2004. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2009;28(7):577–581 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25. Hamdy RF, Bhattarai S, Basu SK, et al. Reducing vancomycin use in a level IV NICU. Pediatrics. 2020;146(2):e20192963. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26. Flannery DD, Akinboyo IC, Mukhopadhyay S, et al. Antibiotic susceptibility of escherichia coli among infants admitted to neonatal intensive care units across the US from 2009 to 2017. JAMA Pediatr. 2021;175(2):168–175 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27. Flannery DD, Chiotos K, Gerber JS, %Puopolo KM. Neonatal multidrug-resistant gram-negative infection: epidemiology, mechanisms of resistance, and management. Pediatr Res. 2022;91(2):380–391 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28. Powell J, Keltie K, Sims A, Richardson H, Brodlie M, Powell S. National cohort study of health care resource use after pediatric tracheostomy. JAMA Pediatr. 2022;176(8):817–819 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29. Duncan TL, Ulugia J, Bucher BT. Association of gastrostomy placement on hospital readmission in premature infants. J Perinatol. 2019;39(11):1485–1491 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30. DeMauro SB, Jensen EA, Bann CM, et al. Home oxygen and 2-year outcomes of preterm infants with bronchopulmonary dysplasia. Pediatrics. 2019;143(5):e20182956. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31. Ng PC, Wong HL, Lyon DJ, et al. Combined use of alcohol hand rub and gloves reduces the incidence of late onset infection in very low birthweight infants. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2004;89(4):F336–F340 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32. Payne V, Hall M, Prieto J, Johnson M. Care bundles to reduce central line-associated bloodstream infections in the neonatal unit: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2018;103(5):F422–F429 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33. Mobley RE, Bizzarro MJ. Central line-associated bloodstream infections in the NICU: successes and controversies in the quest for zero. Semin Perinatol. 2017;41(3):166–174 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34. Zaoutis T, Walsh TJ. Antifungal therapy for neonatal candidiasis. Curr Opin Infect Dis. 2007;20(6):592–597 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35. El Manouni El Hassani S, Berkhout DJC, Niemarkt HJ, et al. Risk factors for late-onset sepsis in preterm infants: A multicenter case-control study. Neonatology. 2019;116(1): 42–51 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention . ABCs Bact Facts Interactive Data Dashboard. Available at: https://www.cdc.gov/abcs/bact-facts-interactive-dashboard.html. Accessed June 21, 2022
  • 37. Neu J. Prevention of necrotizing enterocolitis. Clin Perinatol. 2022;49(1):195–206 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38. Dorney K, Bachur RG. Febrile infant update. Curr Opin Pediatr. 2017;29(3):280–285 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplemental Information

Articles from Pediatrics are provided here courtesy of American Academy of Pediatrics

RESOURCES