Abstract
This review paper examines the crucial role of nanowires in the field of quantum computing, highlighting their importance as versatile platforms for qubits and vital building blocks for creating fault-tolerant and scalable quantum information processing systems. Researchers are studying many categories of nanowires, including semiconductor, superconducting, and topological nanowires, to explore their distinct quantum features that play a role in creating various qubit designs. The paper explores the interdisciplinary character of quantum computing, combining the fields of quantum physics and materials science. This text highlights the significance of quantum gate operations in manipulating qubits for computation, thus creating the toolbox of quantum algorithms. The paper emphasizes the key research areas in quantum technology, such as entanglement engineering, quantum error correction, and a wide range of applications spanning from encryption to climate change modeling. The research highlights the importance of tackling difficulties related to decoding mitigation, error correction, and hardware scalability to fully utilize the transformative potential of quantum computing in scientific, technical, and computational fields.
Keywords: Nanowires, NWs, Quantum computing, Computation, Prospects, Challenges, Applications
Abbreviation
- NWs –
Nanowires
- SNSPDs –
Superconducting-Nanowire Single-Photon Detectors
- TIs –
Topological Insulators
- TI –
Topological Insulator
- TCI –
Topological Crystalline Insulator
- SEM –
Scanning Electron Microscope
- TEM –
Transmission Electron Microscopy
- QD –
Quantum Dot
- EDSR –
Electric-Dipole Spin Resonance
- QED –
Quantum Electrodynamics
- SC –
Superconducting
- QEA –
Quantum-inspired Evolutionary Algorithm
- QRG –
Quantum Rotation Gate
- NISQ –
Noisy Intermediate-Scale Quantum
- SNSPDs –
Superconducting Nanowire Single-Photon Detector
- MF –
Majorana fermion
- MZMs –
Majorana fermion zero modes
- SPDC –
Spontaneous Parametric Down-Conversion
- MZMs –
Majorana zero modes
- QEC –
Quantum Error Correction
- HHL –
Harrow, Hassidim, Lloyd
- FTQC –
Fault-Tolerant Quantum Computation
- QC –
Quantum Computing
- QKD –
Quantum Key Distribution
- NISQ
Noisy Intermediate Scale Quantum
- QML –
Quantum Machine Learning
- DL –
Discrete Logarithm
- DLP –
Discrete Logarithm Problem
- WSQSE –
Working Seminar on Quantum Software Engineering
- SWEBOK –
Software Engineering Body of Knowledge
1. Introduction
Nanowires are a key component of quantum computing and are an example of the marriage of nanotechnology with quantum mechanics. These extremely thin structures, which are frequently only a few atoms broad, have special quantum characteristics that can be used to process information [1,2]. Qubits, the building blocks of quantum information, are transported through nanowires in quantum computing [3,4]. Their nanoscale size makes it possible to precisely regulate quantum states, which makes it easier to construct quantum gates and improves coherence [5,6]. To optimize quantum computer systems, researchers are investigating a variety of materials for nanowire production, including semiconductors and superconductors. The development of quantum systems' scalability and functionality is greatly aided by nanowires, which hold the potential to bring about revolutionary advances in computational power [7].
In quantum computing, nanowires are flexible platforms for qubits, and different methods are used for various materials. Utilizing electron charge states, semiconductor nanowires provide tunable characteristics for quantum information processing [8]. Using zero-resistance states, superconducting nanowires improve coherence and enable quantum entanglement [9]. Exotic particle statistics are used by topological nanowires to build reliable qubits with built-in fault tolerance [10]. Electron spin serves as the foundation for quantum information processing and storing in spin qubits within nanowires [11]. These many nanowire-based qubit architectures highlight how interdisciplinary quantum computing is, bringing together quantum physics and materials science to create fault-tolerant and scalable quantum information processing systems.
To manipulate qubits for computation, quantum gate operations are essential parts of quantum circuits. The Pauli gate modifies quantum states by applying particular rotations along the X, Y, or Z axes [12]. Phase gates contribute to quantum algorithms by introducing phase shifts [13]. Arbitrary rotations in the quantum state space are possible with rotation gates [14]. SWAP gates are necessary for the exchange of qubit states in quantum information transfer [15]. Together, these gates make up the quantum algorithm toolbox, which makes it easier to perform the complex manipulations needed for quantum computing.
A key area of research in quantum technology is entanglement engineering, which involves exact control over quantum states for use in quantum sensing and computing [[16], [17], [18]]. By adjusting electron spin states, quantum dots—nanoscale semiconductor structures—act as causes of entanglement [19]. Superconducting nanowires enhance quantum coherence by generating entanglement through the use of zero-resistance states [20]. Using exotic particle properties, topological nanowires provide robust entangled states that are essential for fault-tolerant quantum processing [21,22]. Long-distance entanglement transfer is made possible in quantum communication networks by photonic nanowires [23]. Entanglement helps quantum sensing by improving measurement accuracy [24]. This multidisciplinary discipline, which combines quantum physics and materials science, has the potential to develop quantum technologies with hitherto unheard-of capabilities.
The feasibility of quantum processing depends critically on quantum error correction, especially when topological qubits depend on unusual particles such as Majorana fermions [25,26]. These particles provide intrinsic fault tolerance by topological shielding against local faults via braiding operations [25]. To achieve quantum scalability, qubits must be coordinated in a hybrid system that combines different technologies, including topological qubits and superconducting circuits [27]. The issues caused by decoherence are addressed by braiding Majorana fermions, laying the groundwork for error-protected logical qubits [13,26,28]. The development of quantum scalability in conjunction with error correction solutions is imperative to fully realize the potential of quantum computing.
Applications and techniques for quantum computing span a wide range of industries. Quantum key distribution reduces the dangers associated with quantum assaults by ensuring safe communication channels in cryptography [29]. Quantum algorithms are useful for data analysis and machine learning, with the potential for increased computational efficiency with quantum machine learning methods [4,30]. Shor's technique presents a danger to traditional cryptography since it factorizes huge numbers quickly and affects discrete logarithm problems, which are important for maintaining cryptographic security [31]. On the other hand, Grover's approach influences optimization in data analysis by providing a quadratic speedup for unstructured search tasks [32]. These quantum algorithms and applications demonstrate how quantum computing has the potential to revolutionize a wide range of industries, including cybersecurity and computational optimization.
The emergence of quantum computing has significant ramifications for many industries. As quantum algorithms defeat traditional security methods, cryptography is going through fundamental transformations. Quantum simulations make it possible to precisely model intricate environmental processes to combat climate change [33]. Quantum computing also speeds up research on materials and optimization for renewable energy, which has the potential to completely change the energy industry [33]. The far-reaching effects include encouraging creative methods in environmental research and sustainable technology, as well as rethinking digital security [34].
Decoding mitigation, error correction, and hardware scalability are problems for quantum computing [25]. The development of fault-tolerant quantum systems, the investigation of new qubit technologies, and the optimization of quantum algorithms are the future directions [35,36]. To fully utilize quantum computing in a variety of scientific, technological, and computational domains, overcoming these obstacles is crucial.
2. Nanowire as qubits
Future electrical and optoelectronic devices are anticipated to heavily rely on nanowires (NWs), which present a novel approach for investigating phenomena at the nanoscale [37]. Nanowires are a one-dimensional example of a low-dimensional semiconductor material structure, which has become one of the most extensively researched areas of science and technology [38]. Nanowire technology advancements have transformed electronics by making it possible to build ultra-compact, high-performance transistors, opening the door for quicker, more energy-efficient electronic gadgets.
There are two main strategies for generating 1-D nanoscale structures or NWs. First, there is the top-down method, which depends on using high-quality bulk beginning material from which it is feasible to remove certain materials and shape the final structure. There must be an additional advantage of converting the bulk material into a 1-D structure, resulting in increased functioning of the created material, for this procedure to be effective [39]. Additionally, it's crucial to manage the effects of etch damage on exposed surfaces since otherwise, this could reduce the inherent quality of the material. There are numerous instances in the literature where the top-down technique has been used to develop NW structures that improve device performance 8,9 and even demonstrate novel capabilities [40,41]. The only materials and material combinations that can be employed using this technology are those that are already available in bulk form [42]. Nanowires can be utilized in a variety of ways as qubits which are shown in Fig. 1.
Fig. 1.
Nanowire as qubits.
2.1. Semiconductor nanowires
Semiconductor nanowires have demonstrated fascinating characteristics in the fields of nanophotonics, sensors, energy technologies, and advanced electronic devices that go beyond the current roadmap. There are multiple ways for fabricating nanowires, which can be categorized into three main groups [43].
-
1.
Nanowires are formed by a process called bottom-up crystal formation, which is catalyzed locally.
-
2.
Bulk crystals and epitaxial films are patterned and etched using a technique called top-down lithography.
-
3.
Hybrid approaches combine elements from both categories 1 and 2.
The application of a gold metal catalyst enabled the vapor-liquid-solid growth mechanism, leading to the creation of silicon semiconductor nanowires with a one-dimensional, crystalline structure [44]. Hybrid systems that combine the macroscopic quantum features of superconductors with the capability to influence individual electrons have become a promising platform for investigating superconductivity [45]. Semiconductor nanowires have become a prominent area of research due to their significant contributions to the study of Majorana modes and topological superconductivity [46]. Majorana modes are quasiparticles characterized by their zero energy, which emerge in the vicinity of the border of a topological superconductor [47,48]. A number of investigations have provided evidence of electron transport in a semiconductor nanowire connected to a superconductor [[49], [50], [51], [52], [53], [54], [55]].
2.2. Superconducting nanowires
In recent times, there has been a rapid global expansion of interest in quantum technologies. The importance of systems for quantum communication, quantum encryption, and quantum key distribution has been specifically emphasized [[56], [57]]. Single-photons, being quantum entities, offer fascinating options for utilization as the medium in this technology [,58]. The primary options for adopting quantum technologies are single-photon detectors and nanoscale superconducting devices. The combination of solid-state and optical components forms superconducting-nanowire single-photon detectors (SNSPDs), which allow for high-speed (1.3 GBit s-1) quantum key distribution over extensive distances (>400 km), long-range (>1200 km), and space communication (239,000 miles) [59].
2.3. Topological nanowires
Over the past decade, there has been a rise in the study of topological materials, which are In recent years, there has been an increase in the investigation of topological materials, which are characterized by distinctive electronic band structures that deviate from those observed in conventional insulators and metals. This subject has emerged as a significant field of study in the field of condensed matter physics. At the interface of the materials, a complex band structure forms stable, spin-polarized electronic states that exhibit a linear correlation between energy and momentum. Accurate manipulation and dependable identification of topological states in nanostructures are crucial for maximizing their utility in electrical devices, given that the large surface-to-volume ratios of these structures can magnify the topological states. The number 64 is enclosed in square brackets. The earliest experimental discovery of topological materials, which can achieve a topological state without requiring intricate experimental conditions, occurred ten years ago [60]. Understanding the electrical band structure of topological materials, which have a unique band topology, is currently crucial for comprehending the physical properties of various materials [61]. Surface states in topological insulators (TIs) result from the inversion of the bulk bandgap, which is induced by the strong spin-orbit coupling of the heavy atoms present in the material. Time-reversal symmetry ensures the protection of these surface states. These materials have surface states that are safeguarded by topology and have distinctive electrical properties [62]. The work centered on analyzing the electron transport properties of nanodevices to understand the characteristics of the topological surface states in nanostructures [63]. Empirical data from multiple investigations on nanostructures of topological insulators (TI) and topological crystalline insulators (TCI) has conclusively demonstrated the existence of the expected topological surface states. These states demonstrate a helical Dirac characteristic. The number 69 is enclosed in square brackets. ARPES measurements on TI nanoplates can directly detect the presence of the topological surface state. By performing electron transport experiments on nanodevices made of both topological insulators (TI) and topological crystalline insulators (TCI), one can see the surface states' two-dimensional and helical properties. Moreover, the characteristics of the superconductivity generated in TI nanostructures can be understood by performing experiments using Josephson junction devices [64]. Quantum interference experiments were done on nanostructures constructed of Cd3As2, 1T-MoTe2, and 1T-WTe2 to assess the surface transport parameters of Dirac and Weyl semimetals [[65], [66], [67], [68], [69]]. Fig. 2(a) shows a scanning electron microscope (SEM) image of the as-produced nanowires, which are 10 μm long and 50 nm–150 nm wide; Fig. 2(b) identifies the growth direction and single-crystal rhombohedral phase of the Bi₂Se₃ nanowires; Fig. 3(c) presents a schematic of the Bi₂Se₃ nanowire field-effect transistor (FET); and Fig. 4(d) displays a transmission electron microscope (TEM) image of the nanowire cross-section [70].
Fig. 2.
(a) A scanning electron microscope (SEM) image of the 10 m long, 50 nm–150 nm wide, as-produced nanowires. (b) The growth direction and single-crystal rhombohedral phase of the Bi2Se3 nanowires are identified. (c) depicts a schematic of the Bi2Se3 nanowire FET, and (d) depicts a TEM picture of the cross-section [70].
Fig. 3.
Quantum gates and their operations.
Fig. 4.
Quantum entanglement engineering techniques.
2.4. Spin qubits in nanowire
A quantum computer can be built by utilizing the spin of an electron or hole that is confined within a semiconductor quantum dot (QD) [71]. Methods for manipulating the spin qubit using magnetic and electric fields are suggested [[72], [73], [74], [75]]. The utilization of electric-dipole spin resonance (EDSR) for the electrical control of the spin qubit is favorable in physical implementations, despite the fact that managing the spin qubit is easier using magnetic fields [[76], [77], [78]].
3. Quantum gate operations
Prime factorization and the simulation of complex quantum systems are two significant computational challenges that beyond the capability of traditional computers. Quantum computers offer the potential to efficiently carry out these operations [79]. A digital quantum computer possesses a native gate set, which comprises the operations that may be physically executed in the hardware. Remarkably, finite collections of native gates have the capability to combine any operation with any required level of accuracy, thus establishing these gate sets as universal [80]. Maintaining coherence in quantum computing is a significant obstacle due to the inherent susceptibility to errors in all components of a quantum computer, such as physical qubits, gate operations, and measurements. The methods of quantum fault tolerance can remove this obstacle to large-scale quantum computation [81]. Some groups of fundamental operations are functionally complete in the older computers. It is possible to carry out each operation by combining and recombining such a set of procedures. For instance, the NAND gate is entirely functional on its own! The space of potential quantum operations is continuous, in contrast to the discrete set of operations used to express it in classical computers, hence the cardinals are not entirely equivalent. Nevertheless, a variety of gates can be used to approximate random quantum actions. In essence, quantum operators are what the quantum gates are [82]. Fig. 3 displays the Quantum gates and their associated operations.
3.1. Pauli gate
Nanoscale refers to a scale of measurement that is extremely small, typically on the order of nanometers. All-optical logic gate technologies are the preferable option for applications that involve all-optical computing and signal processing. All-optical quantum computing provides unparalleled processing power and the capacity to execute operations without any loss. The Pauli X, Y, and Z gates are essential quantum logic gates in the field of all-optical systems [83]. The limited bandwidth of the electronics systems is regarded as a barrier in the information processing process [84]. All-optical signal processing is a distinctive platform with diverse applications in logic units, telecommunications, and quantum computing. The reason for this is that it has inherent characteristics such as high velocity, low photon coupling, and an advantage in long-range transmission [85]. All-optical systems contain numerous passive components that can be employed to manipulate light, minimize heat generation, and improve fan-in and fan-out capabilities [86]. Historically, there have been multiple suggestions for optical logic gates, memory units, and other devices that utilize semiconductor optical amplifiers, electro-optic modulators, and non-linear materials. These sizable devices were restricted to functioning at speeds ranging from 93 to 94 gigabits per second (Gbps). Previously, numerous suggestions have been made for optical logic gates, memory units, and other devices that utilize semiconductor optical amplifiers, electro-optic modulators, and non-linear materials. These sizable devices were restricted to functioning at rates within the gigabits per second (Gbps) range [87].
3.2. Phase gate
Since the 1940s, a phased method has been employed in investment decisions for development, especially in large-scale projects related to mechanical and chemical engineering. According to a single account, there were a total of eight phases. In the last ten years, there has been significant advancement in circuit quantum electrodynamics (QED), a scientific discipline that employs microwave resonators or cavities and superconducting (SC) qubits. References [[88], [89], [90]] demonstrate that the circuit is very suitable for quantum information processing. Superconducting qubits are crucial in quantum information processing (QIP) because they can modify the gap between energy levels, have the potential for circuit scalability, and improve coherence times. Experimental data has shown a strong and consistent association between a superconducting qubit and a microwave resonator [[91], [92], [93]]. Furthermore, researchers have achieved the creation of a microwave resonator that exists in three dimensions, exhibiting a loaded quality factor of 3.5 x 10^7. Additionally, a coplanar waveguide microwave resonator has been developed, demonstrating a burdened quality factor of 10^6 [10^2]. Microwave photons in a high-quality factor microwave resonator or cavity can serve as a quantum data bus and a quantum memory due to their much longer lifespans compared to SC qubits [[94], [95], [96]].
3.3. Rotation gate
The Quantum-inspired Evolutionary Algorithm (QEA) created by Han and Kim has been widely and successfully employed in several industries. QEA encodes a solution individual using a quantum bit, which is represented by a pair of normalized probability amplitudes. Quantum bit coding offers a wide array of possibilities and represents the linear superposition of 0 and 1. QEA possesses the potential to accurately identify the global optimum with a high probability, even when employing a small population size [97,]. The quantum rotation gate (QRG) is the predominant quantum gate utilized in quantum error correction algorithms (QEA). There is a genetic quantum approach available for addressing knapsack issues. The QRG encompasses the definition and operational methodology, wherein the sole operational parameters are the directions and magnitudes of the rotation angles. The parameters are obtained using a lookup table [98]. QRG algorithms are frequently used in literature to implement dynamic rotation angles. Bin et al. introduced a quantum-inspired binary gravitational search method to tackle the challenge of incorporating wind power into thermal unit commitment. The QRG system is characterized by rotation angles that fluctuate based on the generation [99].
3.4. SWAP gate
It is important to consider the limited connectivity of many near-term quantum computers. One way to overcome limited connection is by incorporating swaps into the circuit, which allows for logical operations to be performed on qubits that are physically adjacent to each other. The problem of "routing via matchings" is commonly referred to as solving [100]. Experimental quantum computing is currently progressing towards achieving quantum supremacy, which refers to the stage where quantum computers can perform certain specialized tasks that are beyond the capabilities of even the most powerful classical supercomputers. Nevertheless, there is an additional technological milestone to be achieved: practical quantum supremacy. This would enable quantum computers to solve problems of significant value, irrespective of the method used to arrive at the solutions. Long-term progress in this area is probable, unless there are significant obstacles, due to the combination of efficient quantum algorithms with error correction that can be scaled up [101,102]. Presently, we possess Noisy Intermediate-Scale Quantum (NISQ) devices, which have minimal resources but have the potential to surpass classical devices in some scenarios. The interconnection of various technologies, including superconducting quantum processors, will be limited [103]. The majority of current quantum algorithms assume the existence of an abstract device that has unlimited connectivity, meaning it can perform a two-qubit gate operation between any pair of qubits. Considering that circuits can be assembled to any specific group of devices with a polynomial increase in the number of qubits and gates, this should be theoretically adequate. The presence of polynomial overheads is of practical importance and can determine whether a solution is possible or not on NISQ devices [104].
4. Entanglement engineering
Entanglement-based quantum science leverages the subtleties of quantum mechanics for applications such as metrology, sensing, and quantum computing [105]. In two well-known quantum theory paradoxes, the concept of quantum entanglement is present. For a long while, experiments meant to demonstrate the validity of quantum mechanics were particularly interested in entanglement [106]. Numerous nanowires are applicable in this field, such as free-standing silver nanowires that are even used to transmit plasmon quantum entanglement in the quantum region [107]. Several techniques for quantum entanglement engineering involve the use of nanowires Fig. 4.
4.1. Quantum dots
Semiconductor quantum dots that are incorporated into nanowires show great potential as suitable options for fulfilling the strict criteria of a "ideal" entangled photon source, which is necessary for the successful implementation of ambitious schemes in quantum information processing [108]. GaAs quantum dots in nanowires are a highly promising choice for achieving scalable quantum photonics. These devices can be adjusted to match the frequency of atomic transitions and possess outstanding optical characteristics [109]. An advantage of quantum dots (QDs) compared to other single quantum emitters is their compatibility with existing semiconductor technology. These variables have resulted in the current contention that they could evolve into the "optimal" origins of entangled photons [110]. Despite the interdot distance being smaller than the operating wavelength, it has been proposed that two quantum dots (QDs) can become entangled by interacting within the same cavity [111]. Entanglement between the quantum dots (QDs) arises spontaneously due to their shared interaction with the plasmonic nanostructures. There is no need for selected observations or deliberate manipulation of the dissipative environment to achieve this entanglement. Quantum information and computing rely on entanglement, a distinct quantum characteristic, which theoretically suggests the potential for actual "quantum plasmonics” [112]. Quantum dots have the ability to generate polarization-entangled photons through a process called the biexciton-exciton cascade [113].
4.2. Superconducting nanowires
Superconducting nanowire single-photon detectors, also known as SNSPDs, are extensively employed for the detection of photons throughout the visible and near-infrared spectrums. SNSPDs have demonstrated exceptional performance in the second scenario. Their system has achieved system detection efficiencies (SDE) above 90 % [114,115], dark count rates (DCR) below 1 count per second (cps) [116], count rates (CR) exceeding 1.5 billion counts per second (Gcps) [117], and precise timing with a temporal precision of less than 15 ps (ps) [118,119]. Detectors [120] have been effectively utilized in diverse applications, such as high-speed optical communication [121], time-of-flight ranging systems [122,123], and quantum information processing [124]. Superconducting nanowire single-photon detectors are becoming more popular in the disciplines of quantum optics and quantum communication due to their minimal temporal variation and excellent quantum efficiency in detecting low-energy photons [125].
4.3. Topological nanowire
Entangled multiphoton states are the essential building blocks for quantum computers, communications, and information. While researchers have successfully confirmed the topological protection of correlated and single photons through experiments, the observation of topologically protected entangled states has remained difficult [126]. The experimental achievement of the Majorana fermion (MF), a fermion that is self-conjugate and exhibits non-Abelian exchange statistics, has greatly increased the interest in topological quantum computation [127]. Although initially conceptualized in two dimensions, topological superconducting phases can also exist in one-dimensional systems, such as wire networks and nanowires, where braiding operations can be carried out. Compelling empirical data indicates that semiconductor nanowires have been employed to achieve a topological superconductor [128]. Presently, spin-orbit linked superconducting nanowires containing Majorana fermion zero modes (MZMs) are considered to be highly promising for the development of a topological qubit [129]. Precise management of electrostatics at wire junctions is essential for the manipulation and intertwining of non-Abelian Majorana zero modes, which are concentrated in semiconductor nanowires that have been proximitized. This is crucial for achieving topological quantum computation. This enables the implementation of anyonic fault-tolerant gate operations [130].
4.4. Photonic nanowire
Integrated photonics is a highly promising technology for generating entangled quantum states. This is because it requires little pump power, offers great stability, scalability [131,132], and has the advantage of being portable for distributed quantum networks [[133], [134], [135], [136]]. In order to conduct multiphoton studies using spontaneous parametric down-conversion (SPDC), it is important to maintain a low probability (p) of creating a single photon pair per pump pulse, often less than 0.1 [137]. This will effectively eliminate the undesired noise generated by the double-pair emission rate (∼p2). Optimizing the spatial and spectral characteristics of the pulsed SPDC is crucial in order to improve the efficiency of collecting photons into a single spatial mode. This will result in a higher count rate of entangled photons, while still maintaining the purity and indistinguishability of single photons. Nevertheless, the ability to gather all the necessary particles in previous studies involving multiphoton entanglement [138] was not enough to demonstrate entanglement with 10 photons [139].
4.5. Quantum sensing
Nanowires have been investigated for their potential use in quantum plasmonic sensing, among other quantum applications [[140], [141], [142], [143], [144], [145], [146]]. Utilizing plasmonic entanglement for sensing is particularly advantageous for sensitive systems such as photosensitive biological samples. In these cases, simply increasing the optical power to enhance sensitivity might cause optical damage to the specimens under study [147]. Quantum sensing is a rapidly advancing field with a broad spectrum of potential applications. This statement encompasses all quantum protocols that are capable of surpassing any classical method in terms of discrimination and estimation [148]. Table 1 provides a general overview of the characteristics, benefits, and difficulties of the many kinds of quantum sensors [149].
Table 1.
Different types of quantum sensors [149].
| Technology | Quantum features | Experimental conditions | Advantages vs classical systems | Challenges | Refs. |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nonphotonic quantum sensors | Spin qubits, neutral atoms, trapped ions | Multiple parameter measurements | High sensitivity, low noise | Decoherence, quantum projection noise | 164 |
| Remote target detection | Quantum illumination, quantum entanglement | Quantum interferometry | Enhanced signal-to-noise rat | Very fragile concerning optical loss | 165 |
| Quantum radar | Microwave quantum illumination | Quantum interferometry | Expose stealth targets | Lack of photon-microwave converters | 166 |
| Quantum spectroscopy | Quantum entanglement, single photons | Intensity correlation measurements | Beyond the shot-noise limit, approaching the ultimate quantum limit | Quantum decoherence | 167 |
| Quantum reading of optical classical memory | Quantum channel discrimination | Interferometer and single-photon source | Error-free, faster optical readers and denser memories | Using photon sources and detectors with very high efficiency | 168 |
5. Quantum error correction and scalability
Because of their special qualities, ultra-thin wires with widths on the order of nanometers are intriguing for applications in quantum computing. Nanowire can be used in quantum error correction and scalability. Quantum error correction and scalability can be divided into separate types. Fig. 5 shows some important methods of using nanowires in quantum error correction and scalability.
Fig. 5.
Quantum error correction and scalability methods.
5.1. Topological qubits
A type of stabilizer error-correcting code with practical features is called a topological code. Their current status as the top contenders in the hunt for quantum error-correcting codes that can be included in a plan to create an experimentally implantable quantum computer is a direct consequence [150]. The primary obstacle to accomplishing quantum computation is handling quantum error. Because of the spatial separations between the boundary modes and anyons, topological qubits have inherent fault tolerance, which makes them valuable in this context. One of the most promising approaches in topological quantum computing is the study of Majorana zero modes, which arise as end modes of p-wave superconducting nanowires [151]. Topological qubits may become incoherent as a result of quasiparticle poisoning (QP), a solely fermionic mistake that modifies the fermion parity connected to Majorana degrees of freedom [152]. Superconducting qubits are known as "noisy intermediate-scale quantum computers" because of their sensitivity to noise, which increases inaccuracy with an increase in the number of qubits. As a result, one of their primary issues is scalability. This problem might be resolved by topological qubits because they are fault-tolerant topological quantum computers [153].
5.2. Majorana fermions
The possibility of utilizing Majorana fermions in fault-tolerant quantum computation is extremely fascinating [154]. A one-dimensional nanowire was subjected to a novel technique that involves the combination of spin-orbit interaction and Zeeman field to induce s-wave pairing and ultimately produce Majorana fermions. A system of this nature can be developed using the existing experimental techniques [155]. Qubits based on Majorana particles provide longer coherence lengths and improved fidelity for single-qubit Clifford gates through the process of braiding. In addition, they enable ancilla-free stabilizer measurements for quantum error correction [156], which is not possible with ordinary qubits. The Majorana fermion surface code is derived by employing the commuting Hamiltonians of two-dimensional interacting Majorana fermions with Z2 topological order [157]. Majorana zero modes, known for their nonlocal quantum information storage, are very resilient to noise and have been suggested as a key element in quantum computers [158].
5.3. Braiding operations
Decoherence poses a substantial impediment to the realization of large-scale quantum computing. Utilizing topologically protected non-Abelian anyons to implement fault-tolerant quantum computation is an appealing choice due to the inherent fault tolerance provided by topological protection. Zero-energy quasiparticles known as non-Abelian anyons can be created at the boundaries of a topological superconductor system. These quasiparticles are now referred to as Majorana zero modes (MZMs). By combining two Majorana zero modes (MZMs), it is feasible to attain quantum gates and a qubit that are protected by topology [159]. The use of two-dimensional quantum systems with anyonic excitations in the field of quantum information science is particularly intriguing because of its topological properties. The anyons offer inherent safeguards for maintaining quantum coherence. These systems that are arranged in a topological manner have the ability to achieve quantum gates by manipulating anyons through braiding. Anyons, being intrinsically topological, are resistant to errors, making them highly reliable. Additionally, there is a degeneracy in the ground-space that is contingent upon the topology of the system. Ultimately, these systems are not affected by small changes in their immediate surroundings [160].
5.4. Quantum scalability
Scalability is an essential element that must be present in any forthcoming computing system. The Riel group has recently demonstrated the ability to create patternable ballistic InAs NW crosses on silicon using template-assisted growth [161]. An important challenge that needs to be addressed is the capacity of solid-state spin qubits to couple and entangle across long distances. This feature is essential for implementing fault-tolerant quantum error correction techniques and for building scalable quantum computer architectures [162]. The Majorana qubit is expected to surpass other potential platforms for quantum computing in terms of scalability due to its great fidelity [163]. Quantum computers are essential for achieving qualitative relevance in scalable quantum algorithms [164]. The HHL (Harrow, Hassidim, Lloyd) algorithm [165], Shor's factorization algorithm, quantum simulation [166], and other quantum algorithms that have demonstrated increased speed are instances of algorithms for solving linear systems of equations. However, these algorithms can only be implemented when utilizing thousands of qubits that are nearly perfect. Given the unlikelihood of physical error rates becoming extremely low in the near future, it is necessary to have fault tolerance and quantum error correction (QEC). The threshold value functions as the essential metric for practical QEC implementations. Logical qubit errors will be suppressed to zero and the error rate will stay below a predetermined threshold when the error rate of physical qubits falls below this number. At this point, QEC kicks in and corrects more errors than we do. Conversely, if the error rate of physical qubits exceeds this threshold, the logical qubit errors will grow until they reach infinity. Therefore, the maximum permissible amount of physical error per gate for each qubit must be as large as possible at the threshold value to ensure the efficacy of QEC [167] (Fig. 6).
Fig. 6.
The scalability hierarchy. The foundation of effective quantum error correction (QEC) is the threshold. One essential and essential element in the field of QEC is the threshold. It serves as a crucial reference point for assessing how well QEC methods rectify faults that arise in quantum systems. QEC is not feasible, if not impossible, to deploy in practice without reaching a high enough threshold. Crossing the threshold, however, is the moment at which QEC starts to effectively repair more mistakes than we cause. Shir's algorithm and quantum simulation are two examples of actual quantum applications that need great precision and reliability. The implementation of QEC may allow Fault-Tolerant Quantum Computation (FTQC). Thus, achieving a high threshold not only guarantees QEC's viability but also opens the door to fault-tolerant quantum computation (FTQC).
5.5. Hybrid system
For a while now, there has been a search for a clear explanation of how quantum-classical hybrid systems behave. This search aims to achieve several objectives, such as understanding how mesoscopic systems work, finding a way to combine quantum theory and gravity, and explaining how quantum measurements occur [[168], [169], [170], [171], [172], [173]]. The utilization of atomic resonance has been employed to precisely control and adjust the emission frequency of quantum dots, resulting in the creation of a highly stable source of single photons. Hybrid systems enable the operation of several emitters at the exact same wavelength, which helps overcome a major challenge in quantum information processing and communication [174]. Nanowires have the potential to form hybrid quantum systems by integrating various qubits or quantum technologies. The hybrid nanowire-based technique is advantageous as it eliminates the need for exact positioning of individual nanowires by utilizing Josephson junctions that are integrated inside a two-dimensional structure as the nonlinear component. Superconducting qubits [175] are a branch of research that focuses on scalability as one of its key objectives.
6. Applications and algorithms
Processing massive amounts of data is now possible because of advancements in computing technology. The ability of quantum computing (QC) to do difficult jobs significantly more quickly than traditional computers has been demonstrated [176]. Now that a large number of people have started to investigate and engage with quantum computers, research towards useable quantum algorithms has been stimulated, attracting interest from the academic, governmental, and corporate worlds [177]. The quantum applications cover fields like data encoding, compilers, or the detection of entanglement, identification of defective gates, and quantum machine learning that are connected to quantum circuits [178].
6.1. Applications
Quantum computing revolutionizes cryptography, optimizes complex systems, and accelerates material and drug discovery. It enhances AI by improving machine learning, driving advancements across scientific and industrial fields. Fig. 7 shows the applications of quantum computing.
Fig. 7.
Applications of quantum computing.
6.1.1. Cryptography and cybersecurity
6.1.1.1. Quantum key distribution
Quantum key distribution (QKD) allows for the secure distribution of keys that are guaranteed to be safe from an information-theoretical standpoint [179,180]. The BB84 protocol, first introduced by Bennett and Brassard in 1979 and then published in a computer conference proceeding in 1984, is widely acknowledged as the groundbreaking Quantum Key Distribution (QKD) technology [181]. The B92 protocol is a cryptographic modification of the BB84 protocol, despite their distinct physical characteristics [182]. Quantum Key Distribution (QKD) is a cutting-edge technique that employs the laws of quantum physics to securely transmit random secret keys between two users, even in the presence of an unauthorized listener. The creation of Quantum Key Distribution (QKD) relies primarily on the no-cloning theorem and Heisenberg's uncertainty principle [183].
Even in the scenario of Fig-8, a possible eavesdropper with limitless computer capacity, quantum key distribution (QKD) enables Alice and Bob to successfully extract a string of symmetric keys and finish the perfectly secure communication of one secret at a time [184].
Fig. 8.
Quantum Key Distribution [185].
6.1.2. Machine language and data analysis
6.1.2.1. Quantum machine learning
Quantum machine learning (QML) is a novel paradigm of parallel computation that combines quantum or conventional computational systems and algorithms with network theory. Its purpose is to enhance computation speed and existing capabilities of NISQ-era quantum technology. Quantum computers have the ability to run at far faster speeds than conventional computers, according to the phenomenon of quantum parallelism. However, as traditional algorithms may not be sufficient, it is necessary to develop novel quantum algorithms. Shor's approach is capable of efficiently factoring large integers by utilizing quantum parallelism [186]. QML finds applications in diverse domains such as image processing, computational biology, bioinformatics, particle physics, communication networks, and privacy protection. QML methods, such as amplitude amplification, provide a fair balance between temporal complexity and traditional approaches for problems related to pattern classification and identification [187]. Table 2 presents a comprehensive overview of the several uses of quantum computing.
Table 2.
Applications of quantum computing.
| Applications of Quantum Machine Learning | Description |
|---|---|
| Quantum Data Analysis and Classification | faster than conventional techniques in searching an unsorted database. |
| Quantum Data Regression | quicker than standard methods for searching an unsorted database. |
| Quantum Support Vector Machines Enhancing | discovering the best decision boundaries and translating data to quantum states to improve SVMs. |
| Quantum Generative Models | encoding and producing complicated quantum states for the simulation and discovery of materials. |
| Quantum Neural Networks | neural networks with quantum circuit integration for faster inference and training. |
| Quantum Boltzmann Machines | using quantum versions for unsupervised learning, data production, and optimization. |
| Quantum Data Clustering | Quantum parallelism speeds up k-means clustering for data processing. |
| Quantum Dimensionality Reduction | reducing the number of dimensions in quantum data for analysis and display. |
| Quantum Anomaly Detection | finding anomalies or outliers in large datasets using quantum machine learning. |
| Quantum Optimization | optimizing activities, including portfolio management, using quantum algorithms. |
| Quantum Chemistry and Drug Discovery | speeding up molecular behavior simulations for drug development and materials research. |
| Quantum-enhanced Reinforcement Learning | improving decision-making through the use of quantum algorithms in reinforcement learning. |
| Quantum Data Compression | investigating practical techniques for quantum data storage and compression. |
6.2. Algorithms
Quantum computing algorithms exploit quantum phenomena like superposition and entanglement to perform calculations exponentially faster than classical algorithms, revolutionizing cryptography, optimization, and simulation tasks across industries. Fig. 9 illustrates the algorithms of quantum computing.
Fig-9.
Algorithms of quantum computing.
6.2.1. Shor's algorithm
Shor's algorithm is the most illustrative and engaging quantum algorithm [188]. In 1994, Shor developed Shor's method, proving that quantum computers are capable of polynomial fast prime factorization. The fastest traditional method's time complexity is exponentially increased by the first quantum algorithm, which significantly raises interest in and funding for quantum computing in the academic world [189]. This computation can be done significantly more quickly by quantum computers thanks to Shor's algorithm, a quantum algorithm [190].
6.2.1.1. Shor's algorithm in discrete logarithm problems
Quantum computers have demonstrated that solving the discrete logarithm problem is not challenging, according to Shor's Algorithm [191]. Shor's method successfully solves the discrete logarithm problem (DLP) by using the inherent commutativity structure of the group [192]. The discrete logarithm (DL) problem and its related challenges have been fundamental cryptographic primitives for a significant period of time in the era before quantum computing [DH76, Gam 85]. The emergence of quantum computing has had a profound effect on the field of cryptography in the post-quantum era. Due to Shor's approach [Sho94], the problem of DL (and integer factoring) may now be efficiently solved in quantum polynomial time. As a result, numerous cryptographic schemes that depend on the DL problem are no longer secure against fully operational quantum computers [193].
6.2.2. Grover's algorithm
Grover's algorithm is a quantum method that may be used to search an unsorted database or find a specific item in a list of unstructured data. It was created by Lov Grover in 1996, and today is recognized as one of the most important quantum algorithms [194]. Well-known quantum algorithm Grover's search can quicken the thorough key search against symmetric key cryptography [195]. The likelihood of receiving accurate results when using Grover's technique to search an unordered database typically declines as the number of marked items rises [196]. Grover's Search was a ground-breaking algorithm when it was first developed, and its underlying technique of amplitude amplification has served as a foundation for several other algorithms and patterns for decoding information contained in quantum states [197].
7. Implications and potential impact
Quantum technologies have experienced tremendous progress, with important ramifications [198]. Although its effects are still being studied, quantum computing has the potential to transform a wide range of fields in science and industry.
7.1. Cryptography in quantum computing
There is no denying that modern society is based on technical breakthroughs, notably in the area of electronic communications. The science of cryptography is one of the most crucial areas of study in information technology since data transmission and storage require secrecy, integrity, authenticity, and non-repudiation. The act of protecting data from third-party adversaries while it is in transit or being stored, known as cryptography, is etymologically derived from the Greek terms for concealed and writing [199]. The field of quantum information science has perhaps seen the quickest growth in quantum cryptography. Regularly new theoretical protocols are developed, security proofs are improved, and trials gradually go from proof-of-concept lab tests to real-world deployments and technology prototypes [200]. The security of internet communication, automobiles, and implanted medical devices depends on cryptography [201]. Traditional cryptography either assumes that no one can answer a particular challenging mathematical issue in a reasonable period or uses information theory justifications. Instead, quantum cryptography is based on the basic principles of quantum physics [202].
Cryptography, often known as cryptology, refers to the practice of using hidden or secret writing to enable secure communication. In order to establish secure communication, both parties involved must reach a consensus on a specific encryption mechanism for encoding and decoding the data. After selecting a method for encrypting and decrypting Fig. 10 data, the communicators exchange a secret key, which is also referred to as the encryption key [203].
Fig. 10.
Encryption decryption process in cryptography [204].
7.2. Climate change
To determine how or where emerging quantum technologies may be applied to slow down the pace and impact of climate change, the Climate Initiative brings together the research communities at the intersection of quantum and climate science, involving academia, government, and industry [205].
7.2.1. Impact of quantum computing on climate change
7.2.1.1. Renewable energy
Quantum computers has an extraordinary computational capacity that could potentially lead to a disruptive revolution in the field of renewable energy. The combination of quantum computing's computational power and optimization capabilities, along with efficient algorithms that can greatly speed up renewable energy process modeling, is expected to greatly change the way we explore renewable energy sources [206]. As renewable resources are accepted and ramped up, the electrical system will encounter significant challenges during the coming decades. These issues include the requirement to coordinate more dispersed resources and take weather-dependent power patterns into account. The present issues with renewable energy might be made worse by quantum computing. The challenges that present technology may face in the future may be solved by quantum computing [207]. Quantum computers are highly successful in handling the intricate problems associated with optimizing renewable energy sources. Due to its superior performance in terms of objective function value and processing time, the quantum method provides a viable approach to developing cost-effective and durable renewable energy solutions. The scalability of quantum computing and its dependence on quantum phenomena provide more evidence of its revolutionary impact on strategies for optimizing renewable energy. This opens up possibilities for a safer and more ecologically friendly future of energy [208]. Fig. 11 illustrates the utilization of quantum computing in the renewable energy sector.
Fig. 11.
Quantum computing in renewable energy [209].
8. Challenges and future directions
8.1. Challenges
Finding a means to use gadgets without having accurate knowledge of their physical properties is the difficulty of quantum computing [210]. If a large-scale implementation of quantum computing can be created, it has the potential to provide exponentially more powerful processing. The construction, verification, and architectural hurdles of creating a large-scale quantum computer are numerous [211].
The First Working Seminar on Quantum Software Engineering (WSQSE 2022) was held in Innsbruck, Austria, on December 15 and 16, 2022. 33 researchers and practitioners in software engineering and quantum computing attended the two-day conference [212]. The software business has faced unforeseen hurdles as a result of the present technological revolution. Software engineering is about to undergo a revolution thanks to the development of quantum computing (QC) technologies during the past several years. The evaluation and prioritization of QC concerns in the software sector, however, are still understudied, poorly understood, and dispersed [213]. Affecting all facets of software engineering is quantum computing. In reality, updating SWEBOK (Software Engineering Body of Knowledge) to include quantum concerns should be done in the majority of the 14 categories. Since the early 1900s, quantum mechanics has been studied. Today, we have multiple quantum computers that incorporate various technological levels multiple algorithms have also been presented, and several programming languages are also accessible. Therefore, it is now time to suggest and validate software engineering methodologies to usher in a new era of peak achievement for quantum software engineering [214,215].
8.2. Future directions
A whole new and rich paradigm for investigation has been given to information theorists and computer scientists. In the broadest sense, any physical theory—not just quantum mechanics—can serve as the foundation for a theory of information processing and transmission. These research efforts might one day provide information processing devices that are significantly more advanced than current computer and communications systems, with both advantages and disadvantages for society as a whole. The obstacles that come with quantum processing and quantum information are many, but the long-term benefits that these concepts bring to physics are probably a bit more subtle [216]. Modern computers are built on the principles of classical physics, both in theory (Turing machines) and in practice (PCs, HPCs, laptops, tablets, cellphones, etc.). They are constrained by localization (operations only have local effects) and the conventional restriction that systems may only exist in a single state at a time. Modern quantum physics, on the other hand, teaches us that the universe operates rather differently. During its evolution, a quantum system may show interference effects and be in a superposition of several distinct states at once [217]. Finding effective solutions for a variety of problems that are not known to be N P-complete and do not have a known effective classical solution is one of the key topics of research in quantum algorithms. This is the Graph Isomorphism issue, which involves determining if two graphs are isomorphic. Finding algorithms that more accurately imitate quantum physical systems is a key area of research for quantum algorithms. Quantum complexity research is still in its infancy [218].
9. Conclusion
The review study highlights the difficulties and barriers that currently hinder the complete achievement of the potential of quantum computing. Major obstacles arise from the need for efficient quantum error correction, specifically in relation to topological qubits that depend on non-traditional particles such as Majorana fermions. To achieve quantum scalability, it is necessary to coordinate qubits in hybrid systems that combine different technologies, including topological qubits and superconducting circuits. Innovative methods such as braiding Majorana fermions are being employed to tackle the ongoing problem of decoherence, which is crucial for the advancement of error-protected logical qubits. To fully harness the revolutionary potential of quantum computing in scientific, technological, and computational fields, it is essential to overcome challenges related to decoding mitigation, error correction, and hardware scalability.
Quantum computing's arrival holds great potential and represents a fundamental change with significant implications for multiple industries. The assessment emphasizes the profound impact on cryptography, which requires major changes to mitigate the risks posed by quantum algorithms. Quantum simulations provide accurate modeling for addressing climate change, while expediting research on materials and optimization for renewable energy holds the potential for transformative advancements in the energy industry. The interdisciplinary character of quantum computing, which integrates principles from quantum physics and materials science, fosters innovative approaches in environmental research and the development of sustainable technology. The review highlights the undeniable potential of quantum computing to revolutionize industries and reshape technological landscapes. It emphasizes the need for further research into fault-tolerant systems, novel qubit technologies, and optimized quantum algorithms, despite the existing challenges.
Date availability
The authors confirm that the data supporting the findings of this study are available within the article.
CRediT authorship contribution statement
Mariam Akter Mimona: Writing – original draft, Visualization, Supervision, Resources, Formal analysis. Md Hosne Mobarak: Writing – review & editing, Supervision, Resources, Formal analysis, Data curation, Conceptualization. Emtiuz Ahmed: Writing – original draft, Visualization, Resources. Farzana Kamal: Writing – original draft, Visualization. Mehedi Hasan: Writing – review & editing, Data curation.
Declaration of competing interest
The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.
Acknowledgement
We would like to express our deep gratitude to Dreamers Lab for their invaluable support and guidance, which have played a pivotal role in shaping us into the skilled researchers we aspired to become. Additionally, we are indebted to Dreamers Lab for their ongoing technical assistance, which has been instrumental in the success of our work.
Contributor Information
Mariam Akter Mimona, Email: 21303059@iubat.edu.
Md Hosne Mobarak, Email: 18207023@iubat.edu.
Emtiuz Ahmed, Email: 21303061@iubat.edu.
Farzana Kamal, Email: moupriya843@gmail.com.
Mehedi Hasan, Email: 23107021@iubat.edu.
References
- 1.Tarkowski T., Szwacki N.G. The structure of thin boron nanowires predicted using evolutionary computations. Solid State Sci. 2023;142 doi: 10.1016/j.solidstatesciences.2023.107241. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Alfieri A., Anantharaman S.B., Zhang H., Jariwala D. Nanomaterials for quantum information science and engineering. Adv. Mater. 2022;35(27) doi: 10.1002/adma.202109621. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Sun X., Li B., Zhuo E., Lyu Z., Ji Z., Fan J., Song X., Qu F., Liu G., Shen J., Lü L. Realization of superconducting transmon qubits based on topological insulator nanowires. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2023;122(15) doi: 10.1063/5.0140079. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Jin C., Gao J., Zadeh I.E., Elshaari A.W., Zwiller V. Nanowire-based integrated photonics for quantum information and quantum sensing. Nanophotonics. 2023;12(3):339–358. doi: 10.1515/nanoph-2022-0652. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Mohamed R.I., Eldin M.G., Farouk A., Ramadan A., Abdel‐Aty M. Quantum computational speed of a nanowires system with Rashba interaction in the presence of a magnetic field. Sci. Rep. 2021;11(1) doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-02051-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Fan B., Samanta A., García-García A.M. Tuning superinductors by quantum coherence effects for enhancing quantum computing. arXiv (Cornell University) 2021 doi: 10.1103/physrevlett.130.047001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Azam Z., Singh A. Advances in Computer and Electrical Engineering Book Series. 2021. Various applications of nanowires; pp. 17–53. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Liu C., Wang G., Dvir T., Wimmer M. Tunable superconducting coupling of quantum dots via Andreev bound states in Semiconductor-Superconductor nanowires. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2022;129(26) doi: 10.1103/physrevlett.129.267701. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Bai M., Wei X.K., Feng J., Luysberg M., Bliesener A., Lippertz G.…Ando Y. Novel realization of superconducting topological-insulator nanowires. 2021;41 arXiv preprint arXiv:2108.08559. [Google Scholar]
- 10.Bezryadin A. Quantum suppression of superconductivity in nanowires. Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter. 2008;20(4) [Google Scholar]
- 11.Froning F., Rančić M.J., Hetényi B., Bosco S., Rehmann M.K., Li A., Bakkers E.P.a.M., Zwanenburg F.A., Loss D., Zumbühl D.M., Braakman F. Strong spin-orbit interaction and g -factor renormalization of hole spins in Ge/Si nanowire quantum dots. Phys. Rev. Res. 2021;3(1) doi: 10.1103/physrevresearch.3.013081. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Alfieri A., Anantharaman S.B., Zhang H., Jariwala D. Nanomaterials for quantum information science and engineering. Adv. Mater. 2022;35(27) doi: 10.1002/adma.202109621. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Marra P. Majorana nanowires for topological quantum computation. J. Appl. Phys. 2022;132(23) doi: 10.1063/5.0102999. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Narożniak M., Dartiailh M., Dowling J.P., Shabani J., Byrnes T. Quantum gates for Majoranas zero modes in topological superconductors in one-dimensional geometry. Phys. Rev. 2021;103(20) doi: 10.1103/physrevb.103.205429. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Narożniak M., Dartiailh M., Dowling J.P., Shabani J., Byrnes T. Quantum gates for Majoranas zero modes in topological superconductors in one-dimensional geometry. Phys. Rev. 2021;103(20) doi: 10.1103/physrevb.103.205429. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Alfieri A., Anantharaman S.B., Zhang H., Jariwala D. Nanomaterials for quantum information science and engineering. Adv. Mater. 2022;35(27) doi: 10.1002/adma.202109621. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Nayfeh M.H., Nayfeh A. Elsevier; 2023. Integrated Silicon-Metal Systems at the Nanoscale: Applications in Photonics, Quantum Computing, Networking, and Internet. [Google Scholar]
- 18.Alfieri A., Anantharaman S.B., Zhang H., Jariwala D. Nanomaterials for quantum information science and engineering. Adv. Mater. 2022;35(27) doi: 10.1002/adma.202109621. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Arab H., Mohammadnejad S., KhodadadKashi A., Ahadzadeh S. Recent advances in nanowire quantum dot (NWQD) single-photon emitters. Quant. Inf. Process. 2019;19(2) doi: 10.1007/s11128-019-2542-9. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Prada E., San-José P., De Moor M.W.A., Geresdi A., Lee E.J.H., Klinovaja J., Loss D., Nygård J., Aguado R., Kouwenhoven L.P. From Andreev to Majorana bound states in hybrid superconductor–semiconductor nanowires. Nature Reviews Physics. 2020;2(10):575–594. doi: 10.1038/s42254-020-0228-y. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Ayukaryana N.R., Fauzi M.H., Hasdeo E.H. The quest and hope of Majorana zero modes in topological superconductor for fault-tolerant quantum computing: an introductory overview. AIP Conf. Proc. 2021 doi: 10.1063/5.0059974. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Tutschku C., Reinthaler R.W., Lei C., MacDonald A.H., Hankiewicz E.M. Majorana-based quantum computing in nanowire devices. Phys. Rev. 2020;102(12) doi: 10.1103/physrevb.102.125407. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Tsimvrakidis K., Tsintzos S.I., Gates J.C., Smith P.G.R., Elshaari A.W., Zwiller V., Riziotis C. Nanowire integration in silica based integrated optical circuits: limitations and challenges towards quantum computing. Opt. Laser Technol. 2024;170 doi: 10.1016/j.optlastec.2023.110276. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Laucht A., Hohls F., Ubbelohde N., González-Zalba M.F., Reilly D., Stobbe S., Schröder T., Scarlino P., Koski J., Dzurak A.S., Yang C.H., Yoneda J., Kuemmeth F., Bluhm H., Pla J., Hill C.D., Salfi J., Oiwa A., Muhonen J.T.…Baugh J. Roadmap on quantum nanotechnologies. Nanotechnology. 2021;32(16) doi: 10.1088/1361-6528/abb333. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.De Leon N.P., Itoh K.M., Kim D., Mehta K.K., Northup T.E., Paik H., Palmer B.S., Samarth N., Sangtawesin S., Steuerman D.W. Materials challenges and opportunities for quantum computing hardware. Science. 2021;372(6539) doi: 10.1126/science.abb2823. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Aguado R., Kouwenhoven L.P. Majorana qubits for topological quantum computing. Phys. Today. 2020;73(6):44–50. doi: 10.1063/pt.3.4499. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Sun X., Li B., Zhuo E., Lyu Z., Ji Z., Fan J., Song X., Qu F., Liu G., Shen J., Lü L. Realization of superconducting transmon qubits based on topological insulator nanowires. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2023;122(15) doi: 10.1063/5.0140079. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Siddiqi I. Engineering high-coherence superconducting qubits. Nat. Rev. Mater. 2021;6(10):875–891. doi: 10.1038/s41578-021-00370-4. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Vajner D.A., Rickert L., Gao T., Kaymazlar K., Heindel T. Quantum communication using semiconductor Quantum dots. Advanced Quantum Technologies. 2022;5(7) doi: 10.1002/qute.202100116. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Kudyshev Z.A., Shalaev V.M., Boltasseva A. Machine learning for integrated quantum photonics. ACS Photonics. 2020;8(1):34–46. doi: 10.1021/acsphotonics.0c00960. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Kumar M., Mondal B. Study on Implementation of Shor’s Factorization Algorithm on Quantum Computer. SN Computer Science. 2024;5(4):413. [Google Scholar]
- 32.Saggio V., Asenbeck B.E., Hamann A., Strömberg T., Schiansky P., Dunjko V., Friis N., Harris N.C., Hochberg M., Englund D., Wölk S., Briegel H.J., Walther P. Experimental quantum speed-up in reinforcement learning agents. Nature. 2021;591(7849):229–233. doi: 10.1038/s41586-021-03242-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Paudel H.P., Syamlal M., Crawford S.E., Lee Y., Shugayev R., Lü P., Ohodnicki P.R., Mollot D., Duan Y. Quantum computing and simulations for energy applications: review and perspective. ACS Engineering Au. 2022;2(3):151–196. doi: 10.1021/acsengineeringau.1c00033. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Ramakrishnan R.K., Ravichandran A.B., Kaushik I., Hegde G., Srinivas T., Rohde P.P. The quantum internet: a hardware review. Journal of the Indian Institute of Sciences. 2022;103(2):547–567. doi: 10.1007/s41745-022-00336-7. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Jardine M.J.A., Stenger J.P.T., Jiang Y., De Jong E.J., Wang W., Jayich A., Frolov S. Integrating micromagnets and hybrid nanowires for topological quantum computing. SciPost Physics. 2021;11(5) doi: 10.21468/scipostphys.11.5.090. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Kuncic Z., Nakayama T. Neuromorphic nanowire networks: principles, progress and future prospects for neuro-inspired information processing. Adv. Phys. X. 2021;6(1) doi: 10.1080/23746149.2021.1894234. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Lu W., Lieber C.M. Semiconductor nanowires. J. Phys. Appl. Phys. 2006;39(21) [Google Scholar]
- 38.Wang S., Shan Z., Huang H. The mechanical properties of nanowires. Adv. Sci. 2017;4(4) doi: 10.1002/advs.201600332. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Cui Y., Van Dam D., Mann S.A., Van Hoof, Van Veldhoven, Garnett E.C.…Haverkort J.E.M. Boosting solar cell photovoltage via nanophotonic engineering. Nano letters. 2016;16(10):6467–6471. doi: 10.1021/acs.nanolett.6b02971. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Waldron N., Merckling C., Teugels L., Ong P., Ibrahim S.A.U., Sebaai F.…Thean A.V.Y. InGaAs gate-all-around nanowire devices on 300mm Si substrates. IEEE Electron Device Letters. 2014;35(11):1097–1099. [Google Scholar]
- 41.Zhang J., Dhindsa N., Chia A.C.E., Boulanger J., Khodadad I., Saini S.S., LaPierre R. Multi-spectral optical absorption in substrate-free nanowire arrays. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2014;105(12) doi: 10.1063/1.4896772. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Barrigón E., Heurlin M., Bi Z., Monemar B., Samuelson L. Synthesis and applications of III–V nanowires. Chem. Rev. 2019;119(15):9170–9220. doi: 10.1021/acs.chemrev.9b00075. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.McIntyre P.C., i Morral A.F. Semiconductor nanowires: to grow or not to grow? Materials Today Nano. 2020;9 [Google Scholar]
- 44.Eaton S.W., Fu A., Wong A.B., Ning C.Z., Yang P. Semiconductor nanowire lasers. Nat. Rev. Mater. 2016;1(6):1–11. [Google Scholar]
- 45.Zhang H., Gül Ö., Conesa-Boj S., Nowak M.P., Wimmer M., Zuo K.…Kouwenhoven L.P. Ballistic superconductivity in semiconductor nanowires. Nat. Commun. 2017;8(1) doi: 10.1038/ncomms16025. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Read N., Green D. Paired states of fermions in two dimensions with breaking of parity and time-reversal symmetries and the fractional quantum Hall effect. Phys. Rev. B. 2000;61 [Google Scholar]
- 47.Kitaev A.Y. Unpaired Majorana fermions in quantum wires. Phys. Usp. 2001;44:131–136. [Google Scholar]
- 48.Fu L., Kane C.L. Superconducting proximity effect and Majorana fermions at the surface of a topological insulator. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2008;100 doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.100.096407. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Mourik V., et al. Signatures of Majorana fermions in hybrid superconductor-semiconductor nanowire devices. Science. 2012;336:1003–1007. doi: 10.1126/science.1222360. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Das A., et al. Zero-bias peaks and splitting in an Al-InAs nanowire topological superconductor as a signature of Majorana fermions. Nat. Phys. 2012;8:887–895. [Google Scholar]
- 51.Rokhinson L.P., Liu X., Furdyna J.K. The fractional a.c. Josephson effect in a semiconductor–superconductor nanowire as a signature of Majorana particles. Nat. Phys. 2012;8:795–799. [Google Scholar]
- 52.Churchill H.O.H., et al. Superconductor-nanowire devices from tunneling to the multichannel regime: zero-bias oscillations and magnetoconductance crossover. Phys. Rev. B. 2013;87 [Google Scholar]
- 53.Albrecht S.M., et al. Exponential protection of zero modes in Majorana islands. Nature. 2016;531:206–209. doi: 10.1038/nature17162. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Deng M.T., et al. Majorana bound state in a coupled quantum-dot hybrid-nanowire system. Science. 2016;354:1557–1562. doi: 10.1126/science.aaf3961. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Chen J., et al. 2016. Experimental Phase Diagram of a One-Dimensional Topological Superconductor. Preprint at arxiv.org/abs/1610.04555. [Google Scholar]
- 56.Riedel M.F., Binosi D., Thew R., Calarco T. Quantum Sci. Technol. 2017;2 [Google Scholar]
- 57.Singh K., Chuan K.L., Ekert A., Theng C.C., Hogan J., Tan E. 50 Years of Science in Singapore. WORLD SCIENTIFIC; 2017. [Google Scholar]
- 58.Kraack J.P. Single-photon gatekeepers. Nature Physics. 2018;14(8) 776-776. [Google Scholar]
- 59.Holzman I., Ivry Y. Superconducting nanowires for single‐photon detection: progress, challenges, and opportunities. Advanced Quantum Technologies. 2019;2(3–4) [Google Scholar]
- 60.König M., et al. Quantum spin Hall insulator state in HgTe quantum wells. Science. 2007;318:766–770. doi: 10.1126/science.1148047. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Fu L., Kane C.L. Time reversal polarization and a Z2 adiabatic spin pump. Phys. Rev. B. 2006;74 [Google Scholar]
- 62.Qi X.-L., Zhang S.-C. Topological insulators and superconductors. Rev. Mod. Phys. 2011;83:1057–1110. [Google Scholar]
- 63.Alpichshev Z., et al. STM Imaging of electronic waves on the surface of Bi2Te3: topologically protected surface states and hexagonal warping effects. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2010;104 doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.104.016401. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Wang L.-X., Li C.-Z., Yu D.-P., Liao Z.-M. Aharonov– Bohm oscillations in Dirac semimetal Cd3As2 nanowires. Nat. Commun. 2016;7 doi: 10.1038/ncomms10769. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65.Li P., et al. Evidence for topological type-II Weyl semimetal WTe2. Nat. Commun. 2017;8:2150. doi: 10.1038/s41467-017-02237-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66.Keum D.H., et al. Bandgap opening in few-layered monoclinic MoTe2. Nat. Phys. 2015;11:482–486. [Google Scholar]
- 67.Cho S., et al. Symmetry protected Josephson supercurrents in three-dimensional topological insulators. Nat. Commun. 2013;4:1689. doi: 10.1038/ncomms2701. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68.Cho S., et al. Aharonov–Bohm oscillations in a quasi-ballistic three-dimensional topological insulator nanowire. Nat. Commun. 2015;6:7634. doi: 10.1038/ncomms8634. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69.Mourik V., et al. Signatures of Majorana fermions in hybrid superconductor–semiconductor nanowire devices. Science. 2012;336:1003–1007. doi: 10.1126/science.1222360. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70.Zhu H., Richter C.A., Zhao E., Bonevich J.E., Kimes W.A., Jang H., Yuan H., Li H., Arab A., Kirillov O.A., Maslar J.E., Ioannou D., Li Q. Topological insulator BI2SE3 nanowire high performance field-effect transistors. Sci. Rep. 2013;3(1) doi: 10.1038/srep01757. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 71.Nielsen M.A., Chuang I.L. Cambridge University Press; Cambridge, UK: 2010. Quantum Computation and Quantum Information. [Google Scholar]
- 72.Bosco S., Benito M., Adelsberger C., Loss D. Phys. Rev. B. 2021;104 [Google Scholar]
- 73.Miladić S., Stipsić P., Dobardžić E., Milivojević M. Phys. Rev. B. 2020;101 [Google Scholar]
- 74.Stipsić P., Milivojević M. Phys. Rev. B. 2020;101 [Google Scholar]
- 75.Khomitsky D.V., Lavrukhina E.A., Sherman E. Ya. Phys. Rev. Applied. 2020;14 [Google Scholar]
- 76.Khomitsky D.V., Lavrukhina E.A., Sherman E. Ya. Phys. Rev. B. 2019;99 [Google Scholar]
- 77.Takeda K., Yoneda J., Otsuka T., Nakajima T., Delbecq M.R., Allison G., Hoshi Y., Usami N., Itoh K.M., Oda S., Kodera T., Tarucha S. npj. Quantum Inf. 2018;4:54. [Google Scholar]
- 78.Maurand R., Jehl X., Kotekar-Patil D., Corna A., Bohuslavskyi H., Lavieville R., Hutin L., Barraud S., Vinet M., Sanquer M., De Franceschi S. A CMOS silicon spin qubit. Nat. Commun. 2016;7(1) doi: 10.1038/ncomms13575. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 79.Postler L., Heuben S., Pogorelov I., Rispler M., Feldker T., Meth M., Monz T. Demonstration of fault-tolerant universal quantum gate operations. Nature. 2022;605(7911):675–680. doi: 10.1038/s41586-022-04721-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 80.Nielsen M.A., Chuang I.L. 10th Anniversary Edition. Cambridge University Press; 2010. Quantum Computation and Quantum Information. [Google Scholar]
- 81.Terhal B.M. Quantum error correction for quantum memories. Rev. Mod. Phys. 2015;87:307. [Google Scholar]
- 82.Raychev N. Universal quantum operators. Int. J. Sci. Eng. Res. 2015;6(6):1369–1371. [Google Scholar]
- 83.Chattopadhyay T., Sarkar T. All-optical switching by Kerr nonlinear prism and its application to of binary-to-gray-to-binary code conversion. Optics & Laser Technology. 2012;44(6):1722–1728. [Google Scholar]
- 84.Mohebbi Z., Nozhat N., Emami F. High contrast all-optical logic gates based on 2D nonlinear photonic crystal. Optics Communications. 2015;355:130–136. [Google Scholar]
- 85.Djavid M., et al. 2017. 4-Port Reciprocal Optical Circulators Employing Photonic Crystals for Integrated Photonics Circuits Optik. [Google Scholar]
- 86.Chen N.K., Kaushik B.K., Kumar S. Implementation of reversible Peres gate using electro-optic effect inside lithium-niobate based Mach-Zehnder interferometers. Optics & Laser Technology. 2019;117:28–37. [Google Scholar]
- 87.Riesebos L., Fu X., Varsamopoulos S., Almudever C.G., Bertels K. Proceedings of the 54th Annual Design Automation Conference 2017. 2017, June. Pauli frames for quantum computer architectures; pp. 1–6. [Google Scholar]
- 88.Buluta S. Ashhab, Nori F. Natural and artificial atoms for quantum computation. Rep. Prog. Phys. 2011;74 [Google Scholar]
- 89.You J.Q., Nori F. Atomic physics and quantum optics using superconducting circuits. Nature. 2011;474:589. doi: 10.1038/nature10122. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 90.Xiang Z.L., Ashhab S., You J.Q., Nori F. Hybrid quantum circuits: superconducting circuits interacting with other quantum systems. Rev. Mod. Phys. 2013;85:623. [Google Scholar]
- 91.Reagor M., Pfaff W., Axline C., Heeres R.W., Ofek N., Sliwa K., Holland E., Wang C., Blumoff J., Chou K., et al. A quantum memory with near-millisecond coherence in circuit QED. Phys. Rev. B. 2016;94 [Google Scholar]
- 92.Yan F., Gustavsson S., Kamal A., Birenbaum J., Sears A.P., Hover D., Gudmundsen T.J., Yoder J.L., Orlando T.P., Clarke J., et al. The flux qubit revisited to enhance coherence and reproducibility. Nat. Commun. 2016;7 doi: 10.1038/ncomms12964. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 93.Peterer M.J., Bader S.J., Jin X., Yan F., Kamal A., Gudmundsen T.J., Leek P.J., Orlando T.P., Oliver W.D., Gustavsson S. Coherence and decay of higher energy levels of a superconducting transmon qubit. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2015;114 doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.114.010501. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 94.Stern M., Catelani G., Kubo Y., Grezes C., Bienfait A., Vion D., Esteve D., Bertet P. Flux qubits with long coherence times for hybrid quantum circuits. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2014;113 doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.113.123601. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 95.Rigetti C., Poletto S., Gambetta J.M., Plourde B.L.T., Chow J.M., Corcoles A.D., Smolin J.A., Merkel S.T., Rozen J.R., Keefe G.A., et al. Superconducting qubit in waveguide cavity with coherence time approaching 0.1 ms. Phys. Rev. B. 2012;86:100506(R). [Google Scholar]
- 96.Devoret M.H., Schoelkopf R.J. Superconducting circuits for quantum information: an outlook. Science. 2013;339:1169. doi: 10.1126/science.1231930. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 97.Arpaia P., Maisto D., Manna C. A Quantum-inspired Evolutionary Algorithm with a competitive variation operator for Multiple-Fault Diagnosis. Applied soft computing. 2011;11(8):4655–4666. [Google Scholar]
- 98.Ji B., et al. Application of quantum-inspired binary gravitational search algorithm for thermal unit commitment with wind power integration. Energy Convers. Manag. 2014 [Google Scholar]
- 99.Arpaia P., Maisto D., Manna C. A Quantum-inspired Evolutionary Algorithm with a competitive variation operator for Multiple-Fault Diagnosis. Applied soft computing. 2011;11(8):4655–4666. [Google Scholar]
- 100.O'Gorman B., Huggins W.J., Rieffel E.G., Whaley K.B. 2019. Generalized Swap Networks for Near-Term Quantum Computing. arXiv preprint arXiv:1905.05118. [Google Scholar]
- 101.Boixo S., Isakov S.V., Smelyanskiy V.N., Babbush R., Ding N., Jiang Z., Bremner M.J., Martinis J.M., Neven H. Nat. Phys. 2018;1 [Google Scholar]
- 102.Fowler G., Stephens A.M., Groszkowski P. Phys. Rev. A. 2009;80 [Google Scholar]
- 103.Preskill J. Quantum computing in the NISQ era and beyond. Quantum. 2018;2:79. [Google Scholar]
- 104.Brierley S. Quant. Inf. Comput. 2017;17:1096. [Google Scholar]
- 105.Jha P.K., Shitrit N., Kim J., Ren X., Wang Y., Zhang X. Metasurface-mediated quantum entanglement. ACS Photonics. 2017;5(3):971–976. [Google Scholar]
- 106.Slepyan G., Boag A., Mordachev V., Sinkevich E., Miano G., Portnoi M.E., Maffucci A. 2016 IEEE International Conference on the Science of Electrical Engineering (ICSEE) IEEE; 2016, November. Quantum entanglement in electric circuits: from anomalous crosstalk to electromagnetic compatibility in nano-electronics; pp. 1–4. [Google Scholar]
- 107.Wu Y., Lu L., Chen Y., Feng L., Qi X., Ren H.L.…Ren X. Excitation and analyzation of different surface plasmon modes on a suspended Ag nanowire. Nanoscale. 2019;11(46):22475–22481. doi: 10.1039/c9nr08031g. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 108.Versteegh M.A., Reimer M.E., Jöns K.D., Dalacu D., Poole P.J., Gulinatti A.…Zwiller V. Observation of strongly entangled photon pairs from a nanowire quantum dot. Nat. Commun. 2014;5(1):5298. doi: 10.1038/ncomms6298. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 109.Lorenzo L., Jacob H., Rodion R., George C., Nika A. Resonant excitation of nanowire quantum dots. NPJ Quantum Information. 2020;6(1) [Google Scholar]
- 110.Trotta R., Martín-Sánchez J., Wildmann J.S., Piredda G., Reindl M., Schimpf C., Rastelli A. Wavelength-tunable sources of entangled photons interfaced with atomic vapours. Nat. Commun. 2016;7(1) doi: 10.1038/ncomms10375. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 111.Vasco J.P., Gerace D.A.R.I.O., Guimarães P.S.S., Santos M.F. Steady-state entanglement between distant quantum dots in photonic crystal dimers. Phys. Rev. B. 2016;94(16) [Google Scholar]
- 112.Otten M., Shah R.A., Scherer N.F., Min M., Pelton M., Gray S.K. Entanglement of two, three, or four plasmonically coupled quantum dots. Phys. Rev. B. 2015;92(12) [Google Scholar]
- 113.Fognini A., Ahmadi A., Zeeshan M., Fokkens J.T., Gibson S.J., Sherlekar N.…Reimer M.E. Dephasing free photon entanglement with a quantum dot. ACS Photonics. 2019;6(7):1656–1663. [Google Scholar]
- 114.Marsili F., Verma V.B., Stern J.A., Harrington S., Lita A.E., Gerrits T., Vayshenker I., Baek B., Shaw M.D., Mirin R.P., Nam S.W. Detecting single infrared photons with 93% system efficiency. Nat. Photon. 2013;7:210. [Google Scholar]
- 115.Zhang W.J., You L.X., Li H., Huang J., Lv C.L., Zhang L., Liu X.Y., Wu J.J., Wang Z., Xie X.M. NbN superconducting nanowire single photon detector with efficiency over 90% at 1550 nm wavelength operational at compact cryocooler temperature. Sci. China Phys. Mech. Astron. 2017;60 [Google Scholar]
- 116.Zhang W.J., Yang X.Y., Li H., You L.X., Lv C.L., Zhang L., Zhang C.J., Liu X.Y., Wang Z., Xie X.M. Fiber-coupled superconducting nanowire singlephoton detectors integrated with a bandpass filter on the fiber end-face. Supercond. Sci. Technol. 2018;31 [Google Scholar]
- 117.Zhang W.J., Huang J., Zhang C.J., You L.X., Lv C.L., Zhang L., Li H., Wang Z., Xie X.M. A 16-pixel interleaved superconducting nanowire single-photon detector array with a maximum count rate exceeding 1.5 GHz. IEEE Trans. Appl. Supercond. 2019;29:1. [Google Scholar]
- 118.Wu J.J., You L.X., Chen S.J., Li H., He Y.H., Lv C.L., Wang Z., Xie X.M. Improving the timing jitter of a superconducting nanowire single-photon detection system. Appl. Opt. 2017;56:2195. doi: 10.1364/AO.56.002195. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 119.Zadeh I.E., Los J.W.N., Gourgues R.B.M., Steinmetz V., Bulgarini G., Dobrovolskiy S.M., Zwiller V., Dorenbos S.N. Single-photon detectors combining high efficiency, high detection rates, and ultra-high timing resolution. APL Photon. 2017;2 [Google Scholar]
- 120.Zhang W., Jia Q., You L., Ou X., Huang H., Zhang L.…Xie X. Saturating intrinsic detection efficiency of superconducting nanowire single-photon detectors via defect engineering. Phys. Rev. Appl. 2019;12(4) [Google Scholar]
- 121.Grein M.E., Kerman A.J., Dauler E.A., Willis M.M., Romkey B., Molnar R.J., Robinson B.S., Murphy D.V., Boroson D.M. An optical receiver for the Lunar Laser Communication Demonstration based on photon-counting superconducting nanowires. SPIE Sens. Technol. + Appl. 2015;9492 [Google Scholar]
- 122.McCarthy A., Krichel N.J., Gemmell N.R., Ren X., Tanner M.G., Dorenbos S.N., Zwiller V., Hadfield R.H., Buller G.S. Kilometer-range, high resolution depth imaging via 1560 nm wavelength single-photon detection. Opt Express. 2013;21:8904. doi: 10.1364/OE.21.008904. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 123.Zhou H., He Y., You L., Chen S., Zhang W., Wu J., Wang Z., Xie X. Few-photon imaging at 1550 nm using a low-timing-jitter superconducting nanowire single-photon detector. Opt Express. 2015;23 doi: 10.1364/OE.23.014603. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 124.Sun Q.C., Mao Y.L., Chen S.J., Zhang W., Jiang Y.F., Zhang Y.B.…Pan J.W. Quantum teleportation with independent sources and prior entanglement distribution over a network. Nat. Photonics. 2016;10(10):671–675. [Google Scholar]
- 125.Polakovic T., Armstrong W., Karapetrov G., Meziani Z.E., Novosad V. Unconventional applications of superconducting nanowire single photon detectors. Nanomaterials. 2020;10(6):1198. doi: 10.3390/nano10061198. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 126.Wang M., Doyle C., Bell B., Collins M.J., Magi E., Eggleton B.J.…Blanco-Redondo A. Topologically protected entangled photonic states. Nanophotonics. 2019;8(8):1327–1335. [Google Scholar]
- 127.Xue Z.Y., Gong M., Liu J., Hu Y., Zhu S.L., Wang Z.D. Robust interface between flying and topological qubits. Sci. Rep. 2015;5(1) doi: 10.1038/srep12233. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 128.Karzig T., Knapp C., Lutchyn R.M., Bonderson P., Hastings M.B., Nayak C.…Freedman M.H. Scalable designs for quasiparticle-poisoning-protected topological quantum computation with Majorana zero modes. Phys. Rev. B. 2017;95(23) [Google Scholar]
- 129.Barkeshli M., Sau J.D. 2015. Physical Architecture for a Universal Topological Quantum Computer Based on a Network of Majorana Nanowires. arXiv preprint arXiv:1509.07135. [Google Scholar]
- 130.Stanescu T.D., Sarma S.D. Building topological quantum circuits: Majorana nanowire junctions. Phys. Rev. B. 2018;97(4) [Google Scholar]
- 131.Tanzilli S., Martin A., Kaiser F., De Micheli M.P., Alibart O., Ostrowsky D.B. On the genesis and evolution of integrated quantum optics. Laser Photon. Rev. 2012;6(1):115–143. [Google Scholar]
- 132.Caspani L., Xiong C., Eggleton B.J., Bajoni D., Liscidini M., Galli M., Moss D.J. Integrated sources of photon quantum states based on nonlinear optics. Light Sci. Appl. 2017;6(11) doi: 10.1038/lsa.2017.100. 17100-e17100. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 133.Perseguers S., Lapeyre G.J., Cavalcanti D., Lewenstein M., Acín A. Distribution of entanglement in large-scale quantum networks. Rep. Prog. Phys. 2013;76(9) doi: 10.1088/0034-4885/76/9/096001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 134.McCutcheon W., Pappa A., Bell B.A., Mcmillan A., Chailloux A., Lawson T., Tame M.S. Experimental verification of multipartite entanglement in quantum networks. Nat. Commun. 2016;7(1) doi: 10.1038/ncomms13251. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 135.Bunandar D., Lentine A., Lee C., Cai H., Long C.M., Boynton N., Englund D. Metropolitan quantum key distribution with silicon photonics. Phys. Rev. X. 2018;8(2) [Google Scholar]
- 136.Feng L.T., Zhang M., Zhou Z.Y., Chen Y., Li M., Dai D.X., Ren X.F. Generation of a frequency-degenerate four-photon entangled state using a silicon nanowire. npj Quantum Information. 2019;5(1):90. [Google Scholar]
- 137.Pan J.W., Chen Z.B., Lu C.Y., Weinfurter H., Zeilinger A., Żukowski M. Multiphoton entanglement and interferometry. Rev. Mod. Phys. 2012;84(2):777. [Google Scholar]
- 138.Yao X.C., Wang T.X., Xu P., Lu H., Pan G.S., Bao X.H.…Pan J.W. Observation of eight-photon entanglement. Nat. Photonics. 2012;6(4):225–228. [Google Scholar]
- 139.Wang X.L., Chen L.K., Li W., Huang H.L., Liu C., Chen C.…Pan J.W. Experimental ten-photon entanglement. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2016;117(21) doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.117.210502. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 140.Kalashnikov D.A., Pan Z., Kuznetsov A.I., Krivitsky L.A. Quantum spectroscopy of plasmonic nanostructures. Phys. Rev. X. 2014;4(1) [Google Scholar]
- 141.Fan W., Lawrie B.J., Pooser R.C. Quantum plasmonic sensing. Phys. Rev. 2015;92(5) [Google Scholar]
- 142.Pooser R.C., Lawrie B. Plasmonic trace sensing below the photon shot noise limit. ACS Photonics. 2016;3(1):8–13. [Google Scholar]
- 143.Lee C., Dieleman F., Lee J., Rockstuhl C., Maier S.A., Tame M. Quantum plasmonic sensing: beyond the shot-noise and diffraction limit. Acs Photonics. 2016;3(6):992–999. [Google Scholar]
- 144.Lee J.S., Huynh T., Lee S.Y., Lee K.G., Lee J., Tame M.…Lee C. Quantum noise reduction in intensity-sensitive surface-plasmon-resonance sensors. Phys. Rev. 2017;96(3) [Google Scholar]
- 145.Dowran M., Kumar A., Lawrie B.J., Pooser R.C., Marino A.M. Quantum-enhanced plasmonic sensing. Optica. 2018;5(5):628–633. [Google Scholar]
- 146.Lee J.S., Yoon S.J., Rah H., Tame M., Rockstuhl C., Song S.H., Lee K.G. Quantum plasmonic sensing using single photons. Opt Express. 2018;26(22):29272–29282. doi: 10.1364/OE.26.029272. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 147.Chen Y., Lee C., Lu L., Liu D., Wu Y.K., Feng L.T., Ren X.F. Quantum plasmonic N00N state in a silver nanowire and its use for quantum sensing. Optica. 2018;5(10):1229–1235. [Google Scholar]
- 148.Pirandola S., Bardhan B.R., Gehring T., Weedbrook C., Lloyd S. Advances in photonic quantum sensing. Nat. Photonics. 2018;12(12):724–733. [Google Scholar]
- 149.Crawford S.E., Shugayev R.A., Paudel H.P., Lu P., Syamlal M., Ohodnicki P.R., Duan Y. Quantum sensing for energy applications: review and perspective. Advanced Quantum Technologies. 2021;4(8) [Google Scholar]
- 150.Watson F. 2015. Performance of Topological Codes for Quantum Error Correction. [Google Scholar]
- 151.Stenger J.P., Mong R.S. One-dimensional error-correcting code for Majorana qubits. Phys. Rev. 2020;101(4) [Google Scholar]
- 152.Viyuela O., Vijay S., Fu L. Scalable fermionic error correction in Majorana surface codes. Phys. Rev. B. 2019;99(20) [Google Scholar]
- 153.Klausen K.O., Sitek A., Erlingsson S.I., Manolescu A. Majorana zero modes in nanowires with combined triangular and hexagonal geometry. Nanotechnology. 2020;31(35) doi: 10.1088/1361-6528/ab932e. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 154.Hyart T., Van Heck B., Fulga I.C., Burrello M., Akhmerov A.R., Beenakker C.W.J. Flux-controlled quantum computation with Majorana fermions. Phys. Rev. B. 2013;88(3) [Google Scholar]
- 155.Amorim C.S., Ebihara K., Yamakage A., Tanaka Y., Sato M. Majorana braiding dynamics in nanowires. Phys. Rev. B. 2015;91(17) [Google Scholar]
- 156.Litinski D., Von Oppen F. Braiding by Majorana tracking and long-range CNOT gates with color codes. Phys. Rev. B. 2017;96(20) [Google Scholar]
- 157.Vijay S., Fu L. Physical implementation of a Majorana fermion surface code for fault-tolerant quantum computation. Phys. Scripta. 2016;2016(T168) [Google Scholar]
- 158.O'Brien T.E., Rożek P., Akhmerov A.R. Majorana-based fermionic quantum computation. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2018;120(22) doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.120.220504. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 159.Zhang Z.T., Mei F., Meng X.G., Liang B.L., Yang Z.S. Effects of decoherence on diabatic errors in Majorana braiding. Phys. Rev. 2019;100(1) [Google Scholar]
- 160.Brell C.G., Burton S., Dauphinais G., Flammia S.T., Poulin D. Thermalization, error correction, and memory lifetime for ising anyon systems. Phys. Rev. X. 2014;4(3) [Google Scholar]
- 161.Friedl M., Cerveny K., Weigele P., Tütüncüoglu G., Martí-Sánchez S., Huang C.…Fontcuberta i Morral A. Template-assisted scalable nanowire networks. Nano Lett. 2018;18(4):2666–2671. doi: 10.1021/acs.nanolett.8b00554. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 162.Szumniak P., Pawłowski J., Bednarek S., Loss D. Long-distance entanglement of soliton spin qubits in gated nanowires. Phys. Rev. B. 2015;92(3) [Google Scholar]
- 163.Schüffelgen P., Schmitt T., Schleenvoigt M., Rosenbach D., Perla P., Jalil A.R., Grützmacher D. Exploiting topological matter for Majorana physics and devices. Solid State Electron. 2019;155:99–104. [Google Scholar]
- 164.Van Meter Rodney, Devitt Simon J. The path to scalable distributed quantum computing. Computer. 2016;49.9:31–42. doi: 10.1109/MC.2016.291. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 165.Harrow Aram W., Hassidim Avinatan, Lloyd Seth. Quantum algorithm for linear systems of equations. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2009;103:15. doi: 10.1103/physrevlett.103.150502. 10.1103%2Fphysrevlett.103.150502. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 166.Lanyon B.P., et al. Towards quantum chemistry on a quantum computer. Nat. Chem. 2010;2(2):106–111. doi: 10.1038/nchem.483. 10.1038%2Fnchem.483. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 167.Üstün G., Morello A., Devitt S. 2023. Single-Step Parity Check Gate Set for Quantum Error Correction. ArXiv./abs/2306.08849. [Google Scholar]
- 168.Diósi L. Hybrid quantum-classical master equations. Phys. Scripta. 2014;2014(T163) [Google Scholar]
- 169.Sergi A., Lamberto D., Migliore A., Messina A. Quantum–classical hybrid systems and ehrenfest's theorem. Entropy. 2023;25(4):602. doi: 10.3390/e25040602. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 170.Diósi L. Hybrid completely positive Markovian quantum-classical dynamics. Phys. Rev. 2023;107(6) [Google Scholar]
- 171.Manfredi G., Rittaud A., Tronci C. Hybrid quantum-classical dynamics of pure-dephasing systems. J. Phys. Math. Theor. 2023;56(15) [Google Scholar]
- 172.Barchielli A., Werner R. 2023. Hybrid Quantum-Classical Systems: Quasi-free Markovian Dynamics. arXiv preprint arXiv:2307.02611. [Google Scholar]
- 173.Barchielli A. Markovian master equations for quantum-classical hybrid systems. Phys. Lett. 2023 [Google Scholar]
- 174.Leandro L., Gunnarsson C.P., Reznik R., Jöns K.D., Shtrom I., Khrebtov A.…Akopian N. Nanowire quantum dots tuned to atomic resonances. Nano Lett. 2018;18(11):7217–7221. doi: 10.1021/acs.nanolett.8b03363. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 175.Kjærgaard M., Suominen H.J., Nowak M.P., Akhmerov A.R., Shabani J., Palmstrøm C.J.…Marcus C.M. Transparent semiconductor-superconductor interface and induced gap in an epitaxial heterostructure Josephson junction. Phys. Rev. Appl. 2017;7(3) [Google Scholar]
- 176.Ur Rasool R., Ahmad H.F., Rafique W., Qayyum A., Qadir J., Anwar Z. Quantum computing for healthcare: a review. Future Internet. 2023;15(3):94. [Google Scholar]
- 177.Lukyanenko R., Wiggins A., Rosser H.K. Citizen science: An information quality research frontier. Information Systems Frontiers. 2020;22:961–983. [Google Scholar]
- 178.Peral-García D., Cruz-Benito J., García-Peñalvo F.J. Systematic literature review: Quantum machine learning and its applications. Computer Science Review. 2024;51:100619. [Google Scholar]
- 179.Bennett C.H., Brassard G. Quantum cryptography: public key distribution and coin tossing. Theor. Comput. Sci. 2014;560:7. [Google Scholar]
- 180.Ekert A.K. Quantum cryptography based on bell's theorem. Phys. Rev. Lett. 1991;67:661. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.67.661. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 181.Bennett C.H., Brassard G. Proceedings of the Workshop on the Theory and Application of Cryptographic Techniques, Paris, France, 9–11 April 1984. Springer; Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany: 1984. An update on quantum cryptography; pp. 475–480. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 182.Bennett C.H. Quantum cryptography using any two nonorthogonal states. Phys. Rev. Lett. 1992;68(21):3121–3124. doi: 10.1103/physrevlett.68.3121. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 183.Liu R., Rozenman G.G., Kundu N.K., Chandra D., De D. Towards the industrialisation of quantum key distribution in communication networks: a short survey. IET Quantum Communication. 2022;3(3):151–163. doi: 10.1049/qtc2.12044. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 184.Sun X., Liang H. Implementation of encoder and decoder for low-density parity-check codes in continuous-variable quantum key distribution on a field programmable gate array. Opt. Eng. 2023;62(1) 014105-014105. [Google Scholar]
- 185.Liu R., Rozenman G.G., Kundu N.K., Chandra D., De D. Towards the industrialisation of quantum key distribution in communication networks: a short survey. IET Quantum Communication. 2022;3(3):151–163. doi: 10.1049/qtc2.12044. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 186.Tychola K.A., Kalampokas T., Papakostas G.A. Quantum machine learning—an overview. Electronics. 2023;12(11):2379. doi: 10.3390/electronics12112379. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 187.Jadhav A., Rasool A., Gyanchandani M. Quantum machine learning: scope for real-world problems. Proc. Comput. Sci. 2023;218:2612–2625. doi: 10.1016/j.procs.2023.01.235. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 188.Liu X., Yang H., Yang L. 2023. Minimizing CNOT-Count in Quantum Circuit of the Extended Shor's Algorithm for ECDLP. arXiv preprint arXiv:2305.11410. [Google Scholar]
- 189.Jia S. Comparison of performances for quantum and conventional algorithms: shor's algorithm and boson sampling. Highlights in science. Eng. Technol. 2023;38:493–501. doi: 10.54097/hset.v38i.5873. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 190.Salim A., Manoj A., Shaji A. The future of encryption in the face of advancing quantum computing technology. Zenodo. 2023 doi: 10.5281/zenodo.8013611. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 191.Unsal C.M., Topaloglu R.O. 2022. On the Complexity of Generalized Discrete Logarithm Problem. arXiv preprint arXiv:2212.12577. [Google Scholar]
- 192.Montgomery, H., & Zhandry, M. (2022, December). Full quantum equivalence of group action DLog and CDH, and more. In International Conference on the Theory and Application of Cryptology and Information Security (pp. 3-32). Cham: Springer Nature Switzerland.
- 193.Hhan M., Yamakawa T., Yun A. 2023. Quantum Complexity for Discrete Logarithms and Related Problems. arXiv preprint arXiv:2307.03065. [Google Scholar]
- 194.Naik A., Yeniaras E., Hellstern G., Prasad G., Vishwakarma S. From portfolio optimization to quantum blockchain and security: a systematic review of quantum computing in finance. arXiv (Cornell University) 2023 doi: 10.48550/arxiv.2307.01155. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 195.Song G., Jang K., Kim H., Eum S., Sim M., Kim H., Lee W., Seo H. SPEEDY quantum circuit for Grover's algorithm. Appl. Sci. 2022;12(14):6870. doi: 10.3390/app12146870. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 196.Li P., Li S. Phase matching in Grover's algorithm. Phys. Lett. 2007;366(1–2):42–46. doi: 10.1016/j.physleta.2007.02.029. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 197.Gilliam A., Pistoia M., Gonciulea C. 2020. Optimizing Quantum Search Using a Generalized Version of Grover's Algorithm. arXiv preprint arXiv:2005.06468. [Google Scholar]
- 198.Gulyamov S. Quantum law: navigating the legal challenges and opportunities in the age of quantum technologies. Uzbek Journal of Law and Digital Policy. 2023;1(1) [Google Scholar]
- 199.Mavroeidis V., Vishi K., Zych M.D., Jøsang A. 2018. The Impact of Quantum Computing on Present Cryptography. arXiv preprint arXiv:1804.00200. [Google Scholar]
- 200.Pirandola S., Andersen U.L., Banchi L., Berta M., Bunandar D., Colbeck R.…Wallden P. Advances in quantum cryptography. Advances in optics and photonics. 2020;12(4):1012–1236. [Google Scholar]
- 201.Bernstein D.J., Buchmann J., Dahmen E. Post-quantum cryptography. Nature. 2017;549(7671):188–194. doi: 10.1038/nature23461. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 202.Cavaliere F., Mattsson J., Smeets B. The security implications of quantum cryptography and quantum computing. Netw. Secur. 2020;2020(9):9–15. doi: 10.1016/s1353-4858(20)30105-7. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 203.Nanda A., Puthal D., Mohanty S.P., Choppali U. A computing perspective of quantum cryptography [energy and security] IEEE Consumer Electronics Magazine. 2018;7(6):57–59. doi: 10.1109/mce.2018.2851741. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 204.Nanda A., Puthal D., Mohanty S.P., Choppali U. A computing perspective of quantum cryptography [energy and security] IEEE Consumer Electronics Magazine. 2018;7(6):57–59. doi: 10.1109/mce.2018.2851741. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 205.Berger C., Di Paolo A., Forrest T., Hadfield S., Sawaya N.P.D., Stęchły M., Thibault K. Quantum technologies for climate change: preliminary assessment. arXiv (Cornell University) 2021 doi: 10.48550/arxiv.2107.05362. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 206.Olatunji O.O., Adedeji P.A., Madushele N. Quantum Computing in Renewable Energy Exploration: Status, Opportunities, and Challenges. Elsevier eBooks; 2021. pp. 549–572. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 207.Rajawat A.S., Pant P., Goyal S.B. Utilization of renewable energy for industrial applications using quantum computing. GLOBAL JOURNAL OF NOVEL RESEARCH IN APPLIED SCIENCES (NRAS) 2022;1(1):5–10. doi: 10.58260/j.nras.2202.0102. [ISSN: 2583-4487] [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 208.Rambabu, M., Kumar, P. P., Loor-Cevallos, M. E., Nuvvula, R. S., Mounich, K., & Gupta, M. K. Integrating Renewable Energy and Computer Science: Innovations and Challenges in a Sustainable Future.
- 209.Giani A., Eldredge Z. Quantum computing opportunities in renewable energy. SN Computer Science. 2021;2(5) doi: 10.1007/s42979-021-00786-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 210.Keyes R.W. Challenges for quantum computing with solid-state devices. IEEE Computer. 2005;38(1):65–69. doi: 10.1109/mc.2005.13. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 211.Franklin D., Chong F.T. Kluwer Academic Publishers eBooks; 2006. Challenges in Reliable Quantum Computing; pp. 247–266. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 212.Felderer M., Taibi D., Palomba F., Epping M., Lochau M., Weder B. Software engineering challenges for quantum Computing. Software Eng. Notes. 2023;48(2):29–32. doi: 10.1145/3587062.3587071. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 213.Awan U., Hannola L., Tandon A., Goyal R.K., Dhir A. Quantum computing challenges in the software industry. A fuzzy AHP-based approach. Inf. Software Technol. 2022;147 doi: 10.1016/j.infsof.2022.106896. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 214.Piattini M., Serrano M.A., Pérez-Castillo R., Petersen G., Hevia J.L. Toward a quantum software engineering. IT Professional. 2021;23(1):62–66. doi: 10.1109/mitp.2020.3019522. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 215.Akbar M.A., Khan A., Mahmood S., Rafi S. Quantum Software Engineering: a new genre of computing. arXiv (Cornell University) 2022 doi: 10.48550/arxiv.2211.13990. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 216.Pachos J., Zanardi P. Quantum holonomies for quantum computing. Int. J. Mod. Phys. B. 2001;15(9):1257–1285. [Google Scholar]
- 217.De Wolf R. Quantum Computing: lecture notes. arXiv (Cornell University) 2019 doi: 10.48550/arxiv.1907.09415. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 218.Aharonov D. WORLD SCIENTIFIC eBooks. 1999. Quantum computation; pp. 259–346. [DOI] [Google Scholar]











