Skip to main content
The BMJ logoLink to The BMJ
. 1999 Apr 17;318(7190):1070. doi: 10.1136/bmj.318.7190.1070

Should women who elect to have caesarean sections pay for them?

I Z MacKenzie 1
PMCID: PMC1115459  PMID: 10205112

Editor—The issue of whether doctors should perform elective caesarean sections on request confronts obstetricians almost daily.1 Neither the original articles in the BMJ on elective caesarean section nor the correspondence that followed quantified the problem in the United Kingdom.1,2

The table illustrates the primary indications for 978 caesarean sections performed before labour in 1976, 1986, and 1996 at the John Radcliffe Hospital in Oxford. The information was collected prospectively as part of a larger study.3 The most dramatic change has been the increase in the proportion of elective caesarean sections performed during labour at the woman’s request. Of 911 caesarean sections performed during labour in 1976 and 1986 none were done at the woman’s request but in 1996, 6% were done at the mother’s request.

The added morbidity and mortality associated with caesarean sections compared with vaginal delivery are clearly relevant2 but personal experience suggests that the patient’s awareness of this does not reduce the demand.

The cost to the NHS for a caesarean section is not established2 but it has been calculated for the John Radcliffe Hospital at £668 ($1069), which includes the preoperative check (£6), the operation (£188), and a mean 4.2 days in the postnatal ward (£475).4 The cost of inducing labour has been calculated at £644 for a nulliparous woman and £494 for a multiparous woman which includes the induction, intrapartum care with delivery, and a mean 2.1 days in the postnatal ward.4 Using these figures, it would be reasonable to make a small charge for those women who request a caesarean section that is not medically indicated. Since it is widely accepted that women should be allowed to choose delivery by caesarean section,2 labour induction as term approaches should also be accepted despite current opposition from obstetricians and midwives. The risk of caesarean section to a woman’s health and life should, however, be made clear.

Table.

Primary indications for 978 caesarean sections performed at the John Radcliffe Hospital. Values are numbers (percentages)

1976 1986 1996
Total deliveries 4714 5967 6337
Total antepartum caesarean sections:  171  321  486
 Previous caesarean section 93 (54) 162 (50) 105 (22)
 Breech presentation 14 (8)  64 (20)  68 (14)
 Multiple pregnancy 2 (1) 13 (4) 19 (4)
 Deteriorating fetal wellbeing 10 (6)  13 (40) 29 (6)
 Other indications 50 (29)  67 (21) 119 (24)
 Maternal request 2 (1)  2 (1) 146 (30)

References

  • 1.Paterson-Brown S, Amu O, Rajendran S, Bolaji II. Should doctors perform an elective caesarean section on request? BMJ. 1998;317:462–465. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.De Zulueta P, Norman B, Crowhurst JA, Plaat F, Stirrat GM, Dunn PM, Idama TO, Lindow SW, Van Roosmalen J, Rosenthal A, Howard RJ. Elective caesarean section on request [letters] BMJ. 1999;318:120–122. . (9 January.) [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Cooke IE, Annan B, MacKenzie IZ. Has “Changing Childbirth” increased caesarean section rates? Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1998;105(suppl 17):65. [Google Scholar]
  • 4.MacKenzie IZ, Magill P, Burns E. Randomised trial of one versus two doses of prostaglandin E2 for induction of labour. II: Analysis of cost. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1997;104:1068–1072. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.1997.tb12069.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from BMJ : British Medical Journal are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES