Skip to main content
Veterinární Medicína logoLink to Veterinární Medicína
. 2022 Sep 21;67(10):527–537. doi: 10.17221/26/2022-VETMED

The effect of brown seaweed and polyphenol supplementation in male rabbits on the blood profile and antioxidant markers

Nikola Knizatova 1, Martin Massanyi 2,*, Raffaella Rossi 3, Lubomir Ondruska 4, Anton Kovacik 1, Katarina Tokarova 1, Agnieszka Gren 5, Grzegorz Formicki 5, Lukasz Binkowski 5, Marko Halo 2, Norbert Lukac 1, Peter Massanyi 1,5, Francesco Vizzarri 6
PMCID: PMC11154876  PMID: 38846428

Abstract

Currently, in animal nutrition, the replacement of synthetic substances with natural ones was expected to improve animal health. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the effects of a dietary brown seaweed and plant polyphenol mixture in adult male rabbits on the haematological profile and antioxidant markers. Twenty-four adult male rabbits were divided into three experimental groups receiving a control diet (C) or diets supplemented with 0.3% (T1) and 0.6% (T2) of a feed additive containing brown seaweed (Laminaria spp.) and plant extracts of seaweed origin. The trial lasted for 90 days. A lower potassium concentration was observed at 30 days in the T2 group, compared with the T1 and C groups. An increase in the antioxidant status was observed (P < 0.05) from day 60 of the trial in the rabbits fed diets with an algae-polyphenolic supplement (T1 and T2 groups). Concluding, the diet supplementation of brown seaweed and polyphenol stimulates the antioxidant status of the blood, however, it does not affect the haematological profile.

Keywords: algae, antioxidants, biochemical analysis, haematology, rabbit


Nowadays, animal welfare is key issue for a sustainable livestock production system. In fact, the authorities have asked for the lowered use of antimicrobials for problems related to antibiotic resistance, and trace elements for problems related to the residue in the environment (Singer et al. 2016).

Therefore, the use of natural additives has great potential in replacing synthetic substances in feeding animals. In literature, a search for dietary sustainable additives was started to find the ones with antimicrobial, antioxidant, anti-inflammatory, immunostimulant and prebiotic functions. It is important also to identify the optimal dosage of the dietary supplementation of the natural extract to avoid problems related to the feed palatability or the overconsumption that leads to “antioxidative stress”, with negative effects on the organism (Corino and Rossi 2021), several studies on natural extracts from plants in animal feed have been performed in order to find an alternative to the synthetic substances able to sustain the growth performance, animal health and product quality (Dalle Zotte et al. 2016; Mahfuz et al. 2021; Tsiplakou et al. 2021).

A natural extract mixture was used to support the reproductive performances, enhancing the antioxidant status in does and to sustain the growth performance and meat quality parameters in growing rabbits (Rossi et al. 2020; Vizzarri et al. 2020). The type of natural substances and dosage should be carefully considered in order to avoid problems with some parameters (Zbynovska et al. 2016; Kovacikova et al. 2019). Moreover, it is important to test the natural extract dosage in male rabbits that are fundamental for the reproductive traits, influencing the fertility and prolificacy (Vizzarri et al. 2019). Algae contain a high amount of polyphenols that act as an antioxidant, antimicrobial, anti-inflammatory and immunostimulant (Valenzuela-Grijalva et al. 2017).

Particularly, brown seaweed is characterised by a high content of sulfated polysaccharides, phlorotannins, diterpenes, minerals and vitamins (Corino et al. 2019). The extract of these plants, containing prebiotic polysaccharides from brown seaweed (Laminaria spp.) plus phenolic acid, hydroxycinnamic acids, tannins, and flavonoids from plant extracts, was successfully used in the nutrition of rabbit does and broilers (Rossi et al. 2020; Vizzarri et al. 2020), which also improved the antioxidant status of the semen in male rabbits (Vizzarri et al. 2021).

Considering these data, it could be hypothesised that dietary supplementation with a brown seaweed and polyphenol mixture should synergistically influence the blood profile and antioxidant markers.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Animals and design of the experiment

All the experimental procedures were conducted in accordance with European Community guidelines No. 86/609/EEC regarding the protection of animals for experimental purpose.

All the experimental procedures involving animals were approved by the National Agricultural and Food Centre ethical committee (No. NPPC 18-10-2016).

Adult New Zealand male rabbits (n = 24) were provided by the National Agricultural and Food Centre, Nitra (Slovak Republic). The animals were placed in separate cages that were equipped by a feeder and automatic watering system. The entire experiment lasted for 90 days. The environmental conditions in the rabbitry were 16 h of light and 8 h of dark per day (maximal intensity being 80 lux), an air temperature of 20–24 °C and 65% humidity.

The rabbits were randomly selected and divided into three groups homogeneous for age (18.5 ± 1.5 months) and body weight (4.90 ± 0.87 kg), and then they received a control diet (C) or diets supplemented with 0.3% (T1) and 0.6% (T2) of the feed additive containing prebiotic polysaccharides from brown seaweed (Laminaria spp.) and plant extracts containing phenolic acid, hydroxycinnamic acids, tannins, and flavonoids originating from brown seaweed. The dosage of feed additive was chosen based on a previous experiment (Vizzarri et al. 2019; Knizatova et al. 2021; Vizzarri et al. 2021).

The feed additive was included in the mashed diets, then the diets were pelleted. The rabbits were fed ad libitum. There was no adaptation period set for the rabbits in the experiment, the sample collections were performed throughout the entire experiment since the start of the supplementation.

The ingredients and the chemical composition of the experimental diets are reported in Table 1. All the analyses on the experimental diets were performed in accordance with the methods of the Association of Analytical Chemists (AOAC 2000).

Table 1. Ingredients and chemical composition of the ex-perimental diets (g/kg).

Ingredients Experimental diet
C T1 T2
Maize 282 279 276
Alfalfa hay 305 305 305
Sunflower meal 135 135 135
Palm seed oil 8 8 8
Soybean oil 7 7 7
Wheat 80 80 80
Cane molasses 20 20 20
Carob bean meal 90 90 90
Oat 53 53 53
Calcium carbonate 7 7 7
Sodium chloride 3 3 3
Dicalcium phosphate 2 2 2
dl-Methionine (99%) 2.5 2.5 2.5
l-Lysine HCl (78.5%) 1.6 1.6 1.6
Choline (75%) 1.4 1.4 1.4
Vitamin and mineral premix* 2.5 2.5 2.5
Dietary supplement 0 3 6
Chemical composition1
Crude protein 184 183.6 183.5
Ether extract 35.7 35.5 35.5
Crude fibre 187 186.8 187
Ash 86 85.7 85.8
Nitrogen free extract 507 507.1 506.9
NDF 302.1 301.5 301.7
ADF 195.8 195.4 195.3
ADL 39.9 39.5 39.5

*Supplied per kg diet: 13 500 IU vitamin A (trans-retinyl acetate); 800 IU vitamin D3 (cholecalciferol); 35 mg vitamin E (α-tocopherol min 91%), 35 mg copper (cupric sulfate pentahydrate); 1Analyses determined in triplicate

ADF = acid detergent fiber; ADL = acid detergent lignin; C = control group; NDF = neutral detergent fiber; T1 = group supplemented with 0.3% of brown seaweed and plant polyphenols; T2 = group supplemented with 0.6% of brown seaweed and plant polyphenols

The extract used in this experiment is based on the addition of natural substances into a standard feed and fulfils the nutrition requirements of an organism with the purpose of improving the physiological functions and natural immunity response of an organism (Vizzarri et al. 2019).

High-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) with a diode-array detector (DAD) – HPLC-DAD was used to identify and quantify the natural compounds of the dietary supplement (Russo et al. 2019; Table 2).

Table 2. Composition of the feed additive.

Compounds Dry weight (mg/kg)
Phenolic acids
Dihydroxybenzoic acid ≤ LOD
Syringic acid 1 059.79 ± 62.82
Hydroxycinnamic acids
Neochlorogenic acid 7 979.23 ± 468.11
Rosmarinic acid 126.54 ± 8.67
trans-sinapic acid 105.54 ± 8.09
Chlorogenic acid 21.45 ± 3.65
Tannins
Ellagic acid 2 440.88 ± 148.29
Rutin 272.37 ± 20.82
Flavonoids
Myricetin 53.88 ± 5.68
Kaempferol ≤ LOD

LOD = limit of detection

Four main phyto-derivate families were identified, such as phenolic acid, with syringic acid as the most represented; a hydroxycinnamic acid group, with neochlorogenic acid as the most abundant; a tannin class, with ellagic acid as the most present; and a flavonoid group, with rutin as the most represented.

Blood sampling

Blood samples were collected into two separate tubes (one with heparin to prevent the blood from coagulating and a second one for the serum) from all the rabbits at day 0 (D0), day 30 (D30), day 60 (D60) and day 90 (D90) of the experimental trial from the ear marginal vein using a common (animal fixation) blood sampling technique (Parasuraman et al. 2010).

The samples were mixed and placed into a thermobox, and afterwards transported to the laboratory where the blood was centrifuged at 1 006 × g for 15 min, and the blood serum was stored at –80 °C.

Analysis of the haematological profile

A fully automatic Abacus Vet5 (Diatron Mi Ltd., Budapest, Hungary) haematological analyser was used to measure the haematological profile. The following haematological variables were analysed: total leukocyte count (WBC, 109/l), total lymphocyte count (LYM, 109/l), total granulocyte count (GRA, 109/l), lymphocyte percent (LYM, %), total monocyte count (MON, 109/l), granulocyte percent (GRA, %), total erythrocyte count (RBC, 1012/l), haemoglobin (HGB, g/l), haematocrit (HCT, %), average erythrocyte volume (MCV, fl), mean corpuscular haemoglobin (MCH, pg), mean corpuscular haemoglobin concentration (MCHC, g/l), red cell distribution width (RDWc, %) (Massanyi et al. 2020).

Analysis of the blood serum and antioxidant markers

Determined serum variables: magnesium (Mg), calcium (Ca), phosphorus (P), sodium (Na), potassium (K), chlorides (Cl), total proteins, urea, cholesterol, triacylglycerols (TAG), glucose, alanine aminotransferase (ALT), aspartate aminotransferase (AST), alkaline phosphatase (ALP).

The urea, uric acid, albumins, Ca, P, Mg, AST, ALT, cholesterol, and TAG were measured using DiaSys commercial kits (Diagnostic Systems GmbH, Holzheim, Germany) on a Randox RX Monza analyser (Crumlin, United Kingdom) and an EasyLyte Plus analyser (Medica Corporation, Bedford, MA, USA). Selected antioxidant markers and additional variables, such as superoxide dismutase (SOD), glutathione peroxidase (GPx), malondialdehyde (MDA), ferric ion reducing antioxidant power (FRAP), total oxidative status (TOS), and albumins, were analysed.

The SOD activity was assessed using a Randox RANSOD commercial kit (Randox Laboratories, Crumlin, Great Britain) employing xanthine and xanthine oxidase (XO) to generate the superoxide radicals, which will react with 2-(4-iodophenyl)-3-(4-nitrophenol)-5-phenyltetrazolium chloride (INT) to form a red formazan dye. The SOD activity was subsequently measured by the inhibition degree of the reaction at 505 nm using a Genesys 10 spectrophotometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc., Waltham, MA, USA). The results are expressed as IU/mg protein. The glutathione peroxidase (GPx) activity was evaluated using a Randox Ransel commercial kit (Randox Laboratories, Crumlin, Great Britain), applying the method of Paglia and Valentine (1967). GPx catalyses the oxidation of glutathione by cumene hydroperoxide. In the presence of glutathione reductase (Gr) and nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide phosphate (NADPH), the oxidised glutathione is subsequently converted to a reduced form with a concomitant oxidation of NADPH to NADP+. The decrease in the absorbance was measured using a Genesys 10 spectrophotometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc., Waltham, MA, USA) at 340 nm. The GPx activity is expressed as IU/mg protein.

The protein concentration was assessed using a DiaSys Total Protein (DiaSys, Holzheim, Germany) commercial kit and a semi-automated Microlab 300 Clinical Chemistry Photometric Analyser (Merck, Darmstadt, Germany). The measurement is based on the biuret method, according to which copper sulfate reacts with proteins to form a violet blue colour complex in an alkaline solution, and the intensity of the colour is directly proportional to the protein concentration when measured at 540 nm (Tvrda et al. 2016).

Analysis for FRAP was performed according to the method proposed by (Benzie and Strain 1996). The test determines the total antioxidant power, based on the reduction of a ferric-tripyridyl triazine complex to its ferrous coloured form in the presence of antioxidants. The FRAP reagent contains 10 mmol/l of a TPTZ (2,4,6-tripyridyl-s-triazine) solution in 40 mmol/l of HCl (Centralchem, Bratislava, Slovak Republic) plus 5 ml of 20 mmol/l of FeCl3 (Centralchem, Bratislava, Slovak Republic) and 50 ml of a 0.3 mol/l acetate buffer (pH = 3.6; Centralchem, Bratislava, Slovak Republic). Aliquots of a 100 μl sample were mixed with 3 ml of the FRAP reagent and the absorbance of the reaction mixture was measured at 593 nm for 4 min using a Genesys 10 Spectrophotometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc., Waltham, MA, USA). The MDA analysis was based on the reaction between the MDA and thiobarbituric acid (TBA) and executed using an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) kit for MDA detection (Bevan et al. 2003).

Statistical analysis

A statistical analysis was carried out using the program GraphPad Prism v6.1 (for Windows; GraphPad Software, La Jolla, CA, USA; www.graphpad.com). After assessing whether the frequency distribution assumed normality with the Shapiro-Wilk test, the data on the biochemical markers and antioxidant status were submitted to a repeated-measures analysis of variance (ANOVA) to assess the main effects of the treatment and time and their interaction. The rabbit was considered the experimental unit for all the measured variables. The data were reported as means ± pooled SEM. The differences were considered statistically significant at a level of P < 0.05.

RESULTS

Analysis of the haematological profile

The red blood cells indices are reported in Table 3. All the considered variables, such as the RBC, HGB, HCT, MCV, MCH, MCHC and RDWc did not present significant differences (P > 0.05) in relation to the dietary treatment and sampling time. All the obtained results are in line with the normal range of values for the rabbit species.

Table 3. Red blood cell variables in relation to the dietary treatments and sampling time.

Item Group SEM P-value
C T1 T2 G T G × T
Total erythrocyte count; RBC (1012/l)
D0 6.82 7.22 7.05 0.199 ns ns ns
D30 6.57 7.38 7.18 0.190
D60 6.79 7.21 7.16 0.201
D90 7.09 7.22 7.34 0.193
Haemoglobin; HGB (g/l)
D0 127.10 133.30 128.80 2.713 ns ns ns
D30 122.20 134.70 131.00 2.866
D60 126.10 129.50 129.20 2.194
D90 129.90 130.80 132.30 2.174
Haematocrit; HCT (%)
D0 41.24 42.65 40.62 0.492
D30 39.95 43.70 43.78 0.993
D60 41.06 42.14 42.62 0.835
D90 42.84 42.78 44.13 0.561 ns ns ns
Average erythrocyte volume; MCV (fl)
D0 60.62 59.13 57.65 1.264 ns ns ns
D30 60.77 59.30 61.05 1.313
D60 60.41 58.61 59.69 0.983
D90 60.51 59.32 60.21 1.184
Mean corpuscular haemoglobin; MCH (pg)
D0 18.69 18.47 18.27 0.193 ns ns ns
D30 18.60 18.25 18.27 0.340
D60 18.56 18.00 18.08 0.407
D90 18.34 18.13 18.07 0.348
Mean corpuscular haemoglobin concentration; MCHC (g/l)
D0 308.40 312.50 317.00 2.443 ns ns ns
D30 306.40 308.00 299.40 3.651
D60 307.10 307.20 303.00 1.106
D90 303.00 305.80 300.00 4.828
Red cell distribution width; RDWc (%)
D0 13.93 13.83 13.89 0.185
D30 14.05 14.53 13.70 0.209
D60 14.10 14.08 13.47 0.166
D90 14.83 14.75 13.91 0.249

C = rabbits fed by commercial feed; G = fixed effect of the dietary supplementation; G × T = interaction of the dietary supplementation × time; ns = not significant; T = fixed effect of time; T1 = rabbits fed by feed supplemented with 0.3% of an algae-polyphenolic extract mixture; T2 = rabbits fed by feed supplemented with 0.6% of an algae-polyphenolic extract mixture

All the white blood cells indices, such as the WBC, GRA, LYM, GRA (%), LYM (%), and MON did not show any statistical changes (P > 0.05) among the groups after the dietary treatment during the whole experiment. All the obtained results are in line with the normal range of values for the rabbit species (Melillo 2007; Pavlik et al. 2008; Leineweber et al. 2018) (Table 4).

Table 4. White blood cell variables in relation to the dietary treatments and sampling time.

Item Group SEM P-value
C T1 T2 G T G × T
Total leukocyte count; WBC (109/l)
D0 11.00 10.21 10.62 1.007 ns ns ns
D30 10.72 9.90 9.17 1.142
D60 8.74 9.28 8.69 0.416
D90 10.19 10.58 9.08 1.173
Total granulocyte count; GRA (109/l)
D0 7.80 5.95 5.21 1.052 ns ns ns
D30 6.90 4.88 4.02 0.954
D60 5.59 4.47 3.26 1.288
D90 7.20 7.80 4.99 0.992
Total lymphocyte count; LYM (109/l)
D0 2.32 5.66 3.40 0.606 ns ns ns
D30 3.47 4.37 4.52 0.566
D60 2.84 4.21 5.03 0.611
D90 2.24 2.07 4.38 0.527
Granulocyte percentage; GRA (%)
D0 68.71 54.40 50.61 5.147 ns ns ns
D30 59.77 48.61 41.73 5.430
D60 61.56 46.53 57.44 7.774
D90 78.49 66.21 60.12 5.946
Lymphocyte percentage; LYM (%)
D0 43.81 57.37 45.73 6.415 ns ns ns
D30 36.72 44.61 51.49 5.093
D60 46.61 46.60 57.87 6.559
D90 44.35 47.07 52.38 5.134
Total monocyte count; MON (109/l)
D0 0.88 0.66 0.57 0.093 ns ns ns
D30 0.35 0.65 0.63 0.091
D60 0.31 0.60 0.41 0.104
D90 0.75 0.71 0.71 0.088

C = rabbits fed by commercial feed; G = fixed effect of the dietary supplementation; G × T = interaction of the dietary supplementation × time; ns = not significant; T = fixed effect of time; T1 = rabbits fed by feed supplemented with 0.3% of an algae-polyphenolic extract mixture; T2 = rabbits fed by feed supplemented with 0.6% of an algae-polyphenolic extract mixture

The other haematological variables on the platelets [total platelet count (PLT), platelet percentage (PCT), mean platelet volume (MPV) and platelet distribution width (PDWc)] did not show any influence (P > 0.05) due to the dietary treatment with the natural extract mixtures and sampling time (Table 5).

Table 5. Platelet variables in relation to the dietary treatments and sampling time.

Item Group SEM P-value
C T1 T2 G T G × T
Total platelet count; PLT (109/l)
D0 418.20 224.20 286.50 66.58 ns ns ns
D30 307.00 289.00 239.90 51.40
D60 296.60 373.30 344.80 63.01
D90 365.20 276.20 263.90 61.88
Platelet percentage; PCT (%)
D0 0.25 0.14 0.17 0.031 ns ns ns
D30 0.18 0.18 0.14 0.031
D60 0.19 0.23 0.20 0.024
D90 0.22 0.17 0.15 0.036
Mean platelet volume; MPV (fl)
D0 5.99 6.14 6.11 0.164 ns ns ns
D30 5.89 6.15 5.99 0.094
D60 6.50 6.09 5.84 0.081
D90 6.07 6.16 5.86 0.073
Platelet distribution width; PDWc (%)
D0 31.71 31.36 31.21 0.214 ns ns ns
D30 31.91 32.48 32.08 0.489
D60 32.30 33.05 31.15 0.374
D90 32.03 31.71 31.15 0.516

C = rabbits fed by commercial feed; G = fixed effect of the dietary supplementation; G × T = interaction of the dietary supplementation × time; ns = not significant; T = fixed effect of time; T1 = rabbits fed by feed supplemented with 0.3% of an algae-polyphenolic extract mixture; T2 = rabbits fed by feed supplemented with 0.6% of an algae-polyphenolic extract mixture

Analysis of the serum profile

A significant decrease (P < 0.05) in the potassium level was detected in the T2 group than the T1 group at 30 days of the experiment. However, this difference was not observed for the other sampling time. The other analysed variables, such as the calcium, magnesium, phosphorus, sodium and chlorides did not show any differences (P > 0.05) among the experimental groups (Table 6).

Table 6. Blood mineral profile in relation to the dietary treatments and sampling time.

Item Group SEM P-value
C T1 T2 G T G × T
Calcium (mmol/l)
D0 3.08 3.25 3.25 0.115 ns ns ns
D30 3.01 3.15 2.38 0.181
D60 2.95 3.03 3.03 0.036
D90 3.02 3.07 2.98 0.057
Magnesium (mmol/l)
D0 1.39 1.20 1.16 0.039 ns ns ns
D30 1.24 1.09 1.11 0.040
D60 1.25 1.08 1.20 0.063
D90 1.28 1.02 1.21 0.096
Phosphorus (mmol/l)
D0 1.74 1.64 1.91 0.311 ns ns ns
D30 1.63 1.74 1.87 0.364
D60 1.48 1.31 2.52 0.694
D90 1.44 1.23 1.31 0.112
Sodium (mmol/l)
D0 137.80 141.60 137.60 0.753 ns ns ns
D30 137.10 137.50 141.60 0.958
D60 145.80 143.90 150.10 0.746
D90 140.40 137.10 139.50 0.751
Potassium (mmol/l)
D0 4.40 4.36 3.96 0.202 < 0.05 ns ns
D30 4.321 4.381 3.782 0.105
D60 4.55 4.26 4.33 0.047
D90 4.04 3.95 3.94 0.132
Chlorides (mmol/l)
D0 111.30 109.20 109.50 0.602 ns ns ns
D30 109.70 109.20 109.60 0.707
D60 116.90 114.80 112.50 0.613
D90 111.00 109.30 109.80 0.593

1,2Within the same row, means with different numbers differ significantly (P < 0.05)

C = rabbits fed by commercial feed; G = fixed effect of the dietary supplementation; G × T = interaction of the dietary supplementation × time; ns = not significant; T = fixed effect of time; T1 = rabbits fed by feed supplemented with 0.3% of an algae-polyphenolic extract mixture; T2 = rabbits fed by feed supplemented with 0.6% of an algae-polyphenolic extract mixture

Table 7. Blood glucose and hepatic profile in relation to the dietary treatments and sampling time.

Item Group SEM P-value
C T1 T2 G T G × T
Glucose (mmol/l)
D0 4.86 5.18 5.96 0.428 ns ns ns
D30 5.24 5.55 5.86 0.345
D60 5.25 5.18 5.92 0.200
D90 5.27 5.22 5.60 0.238
Triglycerides (mmol/l)
D0 0.83 0.71 0.88 0.063 ns ns ns
D30 0.76 0.54 0.65 0.057
D60 0.84 0.64 0.89 0.050
D90 0.81 0.91 1.01 0.029
Cholesterol (mmol/l)
D0 1.10 1.03 0.69 0.118 ns ns ns
D30 1.01 1.06 0.61 0.127
D60 1.08 0.93 0.86 0.121
D90 1.24 0.85 0.84 0.207
Aspartate aminotransferase; AST (μkat/l)
D0 0.19 0.19 0.23 0.029 ns ns ns
D30 0.19 0.23 0.26 0.034
D60 0.26 0.21 0.21 0.025
D90 0.28 0.24 0.29 0.045
Alkaline phosphatase; ALP (μkat/l)
D0 0.67 0.72 0.80 0.109 ns ns ns
D30 0.54 0.73 0.68 0.179
D60 0.49 0.96 0.86 0.117
D90 0.54 0.88 0.61 0.121
Alanine aminotransferase; ALT (μkat/l)
D0 0.24 0.18 0.23 0.014 ns ns ns
D30 0.31 0.30 0.35 0.081
D60 0.36 0.33 0.27 0.013
D90 0.41 0.34 0.38 0.072

C = rabbits fed by commercial feed; G = fixed effect of the dietary supplementation; G × T = interaction of the dietary supplementation × time; ns = not significant; T = fixed effect of time; T1 = rabbits fed by feed supplemented with 0.3% of an algae-polyphenolic extract mixture; T2 = rabbits fed by feed supplemented with 0.6% of an algae-polyphenolic extract mixture

The dietary treatments with the different dosages of the natural extract mixture did not affect (< 0.05) variables mentioned in Table 4. No difference was observed in relation to the sampling time (P > 0.05). The total protein, urea, uric acid and albumins did not show any significant change (P > 0.05) between the experimental groups. No time effect was observed either with regards to the previous variables (P > 0.05) (Table 8). All the obtained results are consistent with the normal range of values for the rabbit species.

Table 8. Nitrogen profile in relation to the dietary treatments and sampling time.

Item Group SEM P-value
C T1 T2 G T G × T
Total proteins (g/l)
D0 51.82 58.33 55.14 1.026 ns ns ns
D30 53.33 59.00 56.29 1.030
D60 53.30 58.06 55.20 1.216
D90 53.09 58.54 54.88 1.078
Urea (mmol/l)
D0 7.33 6.55 5.67 0.953 ns ns ns
D30 5.40 4.71 3.73 0.513
D60 5.14 5.81 4.72 0.303
D90 5.56 4.53 4.55 0.878
Uric acid (μmol/l)
D0 60.07 68.4 49.37 0.109 ns ns ns
D30 51.75 70.19 43.42 0.093
D60 52.94 46.39 55.91 0.181
D90 48.18 41.04 36.28 0.047
Albumins (g/l)
D0 37.7 38.5 35.0 0.086 ns ns ns
D30 37.6 39.2 39.6 0.109
D60 35.2 38.7 37.3 0.094
D90 35.2 37.7 39.0 0.103

C = rabbits fed by commercial feed; G = fixed effect of the dietary supplementation; G × T = interaction of the dietary supplementation × time; ns = not significant; T = fixed effect of time; T1 = rabbits fed by feed supplemented with 0.3% of an algae-polyphenolic extract mixture; T2 = rabbits fed by feed supplemented with 0.6% of an algae-polyphenolic extract mixture

Analysis of the antioxidant markers

The values revealed an increase in the FRAP values in both experimental groups (T1 and T2) in comparison with the control group after 90 days of the dietary supplementation. In addition, a time effect between the first and the last samplings was observed in the C and T2 groups (Table 9).

Table 9. Antioxidant markers in relation to the dietary treatments and sampling time.

Item Group SEM P-value
C T1 T2 G T G × T
Ferric ion reducing antioxidant power; FRAP (mmol Fe2+)
D0 233.40a 224.20 238.70a 13.46 < 0.05 < 0.05 ns
D30 230.10 218.70 230.30 23.60
D60 203.40 234.50 215.50b 15.75
D90 185.801b 238.102b 218.402b 11.88
Total oxidative status; TOS (mmol H2O2)
D0 3.94 4.09a 3.61a 0.264 < 0.05 < 0.05 ns
D30 3.23 3.85 3.19 0.126
D60 2.921 2.631b 2.402b 0.210
D90 2.691 1.682b 2.032b 0.109
Malondialdehyde; MDA (mmol MDA)
D0 57.11 63.07a 67.42a 6.496 < 0.05 < 0.05 ns
D30 56.21 56.26 61.55 4.647
D60 73.141 49.322 63.521 6.085
D90 66.351 44.362b 48.212b 5.127
Superoxide dismutase; SOD (IU/ml)
D0 1.84 1.80 1.64 0.120 ns ns ns
D30 1.94 1.83 1.66 0.110
D60 1.92 2.03 2.14 0.200
D90 1.80 1.95 1.84 0.174
Glutathione peroxidase; GPx (U/l)
D0 0.21 0.21 0.21 0.013 ns ns ns
D30 0.21 0.23 0.22 0.009
D60 0.22 0.23 0.22 0.004
D90 0.19 0.23 0.19 0.001

1,2Within the same row, means with different numbers differ significantly (P < 0.05); a,bWithin the same column, means with different letters differ significantly (P < 0.05)

C = rabbits fed by commercial feed; G = fixed effect of the dietary supplementation; G × T = interaction of the dietary supplementation × time; ns = not significant; T = fixed effect of time; T1 = rabbits fed by feed supplemented with 0.3% of an algae-polyphenolic extract mixture; T2 = rabbits fed by feed supplemented with 0.6% of an algae-polyphenolic extract mixture

At day 60, a lower TOS (P < 0.05) was observed in the T2 group than the T1 and control groups. At the end of the trial, this variable was lower (P < 0.05) in both experimental groups (T1 and T2) than the control group. A time effect (P < 0.05) was reported in both experimental groups, between the first and the last samplings. The MDA values were lower (P < 0.05) in both experimental groups after 90 days of the dietary supplementation. At 60 days, a lower value (P < 0.05) was observed in the T1 group than the T2 and C groups. A time effect (P < 0.05) in both experimental groups, between the first and the last samplings, was reported.

During the experimental trial, the SOD and GPx activity showed the same level in all the experimental groups, without any appreciable changes.

The brown seaweed extract did not affect the haematological profile, blood glucose, hepatic, and nitrogen profile (P > 0.05).

DISCUSSION

Many studies are reported in the literature on natural substances, medicinal herbs and plant extracts and their effect on animals’ health by analysing changes in their blood profile, as they are considered as good marker of animal welfare (Pozzo et al. 2015; El-Nomeary et al. 2016; Kovacs et al. 2016).

In the present study, we evaluate the effect of an algae-polyphenolic supplement in a male rabbit diet on the blood haematological profile, as well as the nitrogenous, hepatic, mineral profile, and antioxidant markers. The resulting values of all the analysed blood profile variables are in line with the ranges for healthy rabbit species (Ozkan et al. 2012). Even though previous studies on rabbits have reported that dietary supplementation with phytogenic additives reduced the blood lipid parameters, our presented data show that dietary supplementation with natural mixture had no adverse effects of blood variables. Variables remained in the normal range without any proof of toxicity or side effects. (Abdelnour et al. 2018; Ismail et al. 2019).

A similar study in rabbit does, using the same dosage of the algae-polyphenolic supplement, reported an improvement in the blood lipid parameters (Vizzarri et al. 2020). Moreover, a recent study reported that the dietary seaweed decreased the blood lipid and cholesterol levels (Abu Hafsa et al. 2021). The lack of effects of the dietary supplement on the variables observed in the present study could be probably related to the high weight of the male rabbits, as an increased weight correlates with the concentrations of the total lipids and cholesterol, which can cause deviations in the results, especially in variables, such as the glucose and nitrogen profile.

Okab et al. (2013) did not notice any pathological changes in the hepatic enzymes concentration after a dietary supplementation with brown seaweed, using a similar dosage.

Other experimental studies reported that a rabbit dietary phytogenic supplementation did not affect the nitrogen profile (Dalle Zotte et al. 2016; Kovitvadhi et al. 2016). In the present study, similar results were observed with the hepatic and nitrogen profile. Therefore, we can state that algae-polyphenolic based supplement can be safely supplemented in a male rabbit diet.

The dietary treatment with seaweed and polyphenol mixture improved the antioxidant status of the blood serum after 60 days of supplementation. In fact, an increase in the FRAP and a decrease in the TOS and MDA was observed in the T2 group. In compliance with the present data, an increase in the antioxidant status was previously reported in rabbit does fed the same supplement (Vizzarri et al. 2020) and in rabbits fed bay laurel leaves (Casamassima et al. 2017) or selenium-enriched olive leaves (Mattioli et al. 2020). In these studies, an increase in the FRAP and a decrease in the MDA production was observed.

These results are probably due to the action of the antioxidant bioactive compounds contained in the feed additive. In fact, the antioxidant compounds from the plant extract have a chemical structure that makes them able to directly scavenge the reactive oxygen and nitrogen species and also has the ability to interact with several redox signalling pathways modulating the redox enzyme activity (Hunyadi et al. 2019).

In fact, bioactive compounds with antioxidant, antiviral and antimicrobial activities have been detected in brown, red and green seaweed (Cox et al. 2010). The antioxidant molecules in seaweed are different, such as carotenoids and vitamin E (α-tocopherol), as a fat-soluble fraction, whereas water-soluble vitamins (B1, B2, B3 and C), sulfates, polysaccharides and polyphenols are powerful water-soluble antioxidants (Kovacikova et al. 2019). Brown seaweeds, such as Laminaria spp., Ascophyllum nodosum and Fucus spp., showed a high content of vitamins E and C (Dominguez 2013). Data on natural extracts, essential oils, and by-products from plants highlighted that they contain bioactive compounds that are strong natural antioxidants. Considering that oxidative stress is relevant in livestock, polyphenols might be the most promising antioxidant due to their recognised antioxidative and gene regulatory properties (Gessner et al. 2017).

In summary, the antioxidant profile of a male rabbit can be improved by a mixture of brown seaweed and polyphenols after 90 days of dietary supplementation, however, without affecting the blood profile. Therefore, brown seaweed and a mixture of plant polyphenols are safe for animals and seem like a good way to increase their antioxidant status. Considering the present data, the supplement in the tested levels can be considered safe in male rabbits. From the data, we can conclude that a brown seaweed and plant polyphenol mixture is a valid approach to boost male rabbits’ antioxidant status.

Acknowledgement

The authors thank the technicians at the National Agricultural and Food Centre, Nitra (Slovak Republic) for the efficient support in the experiment performing.

Funding Statement

Supported by VEGA 1/0539/18: VEGA 1/0392/20, APVV-16-0289; Operational program – Integrated Infrastructure within the project: Demand-driven research for the sustainable and innovative food, Drive4SIFood 313011V336; co-financed by the European Regional Development Fund.

Supplementary Files

Corrigendum

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

REFERENCES

  1. Abdelnour S, Alagawany M, Abd El-Hack M, Sheiha A, Swelum A, Saadeldin I. Growth, carcass traits, blood haematology, serum metabolites, immunity, and oxidative indices of growing rabbits fed diets supplemented with red or black pepper oils. Animals. 2018 Oct;8(10):168. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Abu Hafsa SH, Khalel MS, El-Gindy YM, Ayman AH. Nutritional potential of marine and freshwater algae as dietary supplements for growing rabbits. Int J Anim Sci. 2021 May 27;20(1):784-93. [Google Scholar]
  3. AOAC – Association of Official Analytical Chemists. Official methods of analysis of AOAC International. 17th ed. Gaithersburg, MD, USA: Association of Official Analytical Chemists; 2000. [Google Scholar]
  4. Benzie IF, Strain JJ. The ferric reducing ability of plasma (FRAP) as a measure of “antioxidant power”: The FRAP assay. Anal Biochem. 1996 Jul 15;239(1):70-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Bevan RJ, Durand MF, Hickenbotham PT, Kitas GD, Patel PR, Podmore ID, Griffiths HR, Waller HL, Lunec J. Validation of a novel ELISA for measurement of MDA-LDL in human plasma. Free Radic Biol Med. 2003 Sep 1;35(5):517-27. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Casamassima D, Chiosi F, Vizzarri F, Palazzo M, Costagliola C. The effect of Laurus nobilis on the blood and lenses antioxidant activity in rabbit under fat-enriched diet. Physiol Res. 2017 May 4;66(2):325-33. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Corino C, Modina SC, Di Giancamillo A, Chiapparini S, Rossi R. Seaweeds in pig nutrition. Animals (Basel). 2019 Dec 12;9(12):1126. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Corino C, Rossi R. Antioxidants in animal nutrition. Antioxidants. 2021;10(12):1877. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Cox S, Abu-Ghannam N, Gupta S. An assessment of the antioxidant and antimicrobial activity of six species of edible Irish seaweeds. Int Food Res J. 2010;17(1):205-20. [Google Scholar]
  10. Dalle Zotte A, Celia C, Szendro Z. Herbs and spices inclusion as feedstuff or additive in growing rabbit diets and as additive in rabbit meat: A review. Livestock Sci. 2016;189:82-90. [Google Scholar]
  11. Dominguez H. Functional ingredients from algae for foods and nutraceuticals. Cambridge, UK: Woodhead Publishing Limited; 2013. p. 228-9. [Google Scholar]
  12. El-Nomeary SAA, El-Kady RI, El-Shahat AA, El-Nattat WS. Prolonged effect of some plant seeds meals supplementation on the performance and plasma parameters in male rabbits. Int J Chem Tech Res. 2016;9(12):68-80. [Google Scholar]
  13. Gessner DK, Ringseis R, Eder K. Potential of plant polyphenols to combat oxidative stress and inflammatory processes in farm animals. J Anim Physiol Anim Nutr (Berl). 2017 Aug;101(4):605-28. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Hunyadi A. The mechanism(s) of action of antioxidants: From scavenging reactive oxygen/nitrogen species to redox signaling and the generation of bioactive secondary metabolites. Med Res Rev. 2019 Nov;39(6):2505-33. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Ismail E, Abdelnour SA, Sabry SA, El-Hack Mohamed AE, El-Edel Mohamed A, Ayman TE, Schiavitto M, Tufarelli V. Effect of dietary Boswellia serrata resin on growth performance, blood biochemistry, and cecal microbiota of growing rabbits. Front Vet Sci. 2019 Dec 20;6:471. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Knizatova N, Massanyi M, Tokarova K, Vizzarri F, Massanyi P, Ondruska L, Lukac N. Effect of dietary supplementation with seaweed and polyphenols mixture on antioxidant status, concentration and motility of rabbit spermatozoa. J Microbiol Biotechnol Food Sci. 2021;10(5):1-4. [Google Scholar]
  17. Kovacikova E, Kovacik A, Halenar M, Tokarova K, Chrastinova L, Ondruska L, Jurcik R, Kolesar E, Valuch J, Kolesarova A. Potential toxicity of cyanogenic glycoside amygdalin and bitter apricot seed in rabbits-health status evaluation. J Anim Physiol Anim Nutr (Berl). 2019 Mar;103(2):695-703. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Kovacs M, Tuboly T, Mezes M, Balogh K, Gerencser Z, Matics Z, Dal Bosco A, Szendro Z, Tornyos G, Hafner D, Milisits G, Balogh-Zandoki E, Dalle Zotte A. Effect of dietary supplementation of spirulina (Arthrospira platensis) and thyme (Thymus vulgaris) on serum biochemistry, immune response and antioxidant status of rabbits. Ann Anim Sci. 2016;16(1):181-95. [Google Scholar]
  19. Kovitvadhi A, Gai F, Dabbou S, Ferrocino I, Rotolo L, Falzone M, Vignolini C, Gennero MS, Bergagna S, Dezzutto D, Barbero R, Nebbia P, Rosati S, Cocolin L, Zoccarato I, Gasco L. Rabbit dietary supplementation with pale purple coneflower. 2. Effects on the performances, bacterial community, blood parameters and immunity of growing rabbits. Animal. 2016 Jul;10(7):1110-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Leineweber C, Muller E, Marschang RE. Blood reference intervals for rabbits (Oryctolagus cuniculus) from routine diagnostic samples. Tierarztl Prax Ausg K Kleintiere Heimtiere. 2018 Dec;46(6):393-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Mahfuz S, Shang Q, Piao X. Phenolic compounds as natural feed additives in poultry and swine diets: A review. J Anim Sci Biotechnol. 2021 Apr 7;12(1):48. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Massanyi M, Kohut L, Argente MJ, Halo M, Kovacik A, Kovacikova E, Ondruska L, Formicki G, Massanyi P. The effect of different sample collection methods on rabbit blood parameters. Saudi J Biol Sci. 2020 Nov;27(11):3157-60. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Mattioli S, Rosignoli P, D’Amato R, Fontanella MC, Regni L, Castellini C, Proietti P, Elia AC, Fabiani R, Beone GM, Businelli D, Dal Bosco A. Effect of feed supplemented with selenium-enriched olive leaves on plasma oxidative status, mineral profile, and leukocyte DNA damage in growing rabbits. Animals (Basel). 2020 Feb 11;10(2):274. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Melillo A. Rabbit clinical pathology. J Exot Pet Med. 2007 Jul;16(3):135-45. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Okab AB, Samara EM, Abdoun KA, Rafay J, Ondruska L, Parkanyi V, Pivko J, Ayoub MA, Alhaidary AA, Aljumaah RS, Massanyi P, Lukac N. Effects of dietary seaweed (Ulva lactuca) supplementation on the reproductive performance of buck and doe rabbits. J App Anim Res. 2013;41(3):347-55. [Google Scholar]
  26. Ozkan C, Kaya A, Akgul Y. Normal values of haematological and some biochemical parameters in serum and urine of New Zealand white rabbits. World Rabbit Sci. 2012;20(4):253-9. [Google Scholar]
  27. Paglia DE, Valentine WN. Studies on the quantitative and qualitative characterization of erythrocyte glutathione peroxidase. J Lab Clin Med. 1967 Jul;70(1):158-69. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Parasuraman S, Raveendran R, Kesavan R. Blood sample collection in small laboratory animals. J Pharmacol Pharmacother. 2010 Jul;1(2):87-93. Erratum in: J Pharmacol Pharmacother. 2017 Jul-Sep;8(3):153. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Pavlik A, Jezova D, Zapletal D, Bakos J, Jelinek P. Impact of housing technology on blood plasma corticosterone levels in laying hens. Acta Vet Hung. 2008 Dec;56(4):515-27. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Pozzo L, Vizzarri F, Ciardi M, Nardoia M, Palazzo M, Casamassima D, Longo V. The effects of fermented wheat powder (Lisosan G) on the blood lipids and oxidative status of healthy rabbits. Food Chem Toxicol. 2015 Oct;84:1-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Rossi R, Vizzarri F, Chiapparini S, Ratti S, Casamassima D, Palazzo M, Corino C. Effects of dietary levels of brown seaweeds and plant polyphenols on growth and meat quality parameters in growing rabbit. Meat Sci. 2020 Mar;161:107987. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Russo R, Pucci L, Giorgetti L, Arvay J, Vizzarri F, Longo V, Pozzo L. Polyphenolic characterisation of plant mixture (Lisosan® reduction) and its hypocholesterolaemic effect in high fat diet-fed mice. Nat Prod Res. 2019 Mar;33(5):651-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Singer AC, Shaw H, Rhodes V, Hart A. Review of antimicrobial resistance in the environment and its relevance to environmental regulators. Front Microbiol. 2016 Nov 1;7:1728. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Tsiplakou E, Pitino R, Manuelian CL, Simoni M, Mitsiopoulou C, De Marchi M, Righi F. Plant feed additives as natural alternatives to the use of synthetic antioxidant vitamins in livestock animal products yield, quality, and oxidative status: A review. Antioxidants (Basel). 2021 May 14;10(5):780. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Tvrda E, Tusimova E, Kovacik A, Paal D, Greifova H, Abdramanov A, Lukac N. Curcumin has protective and antioxidant properties on bull spermatozoa subjected to induced oxidative stress. Anim Reprod Sci. 2016 Sep;172:10-20. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Valenzuela-Grijalva NV, Pinelli-Saavedra A, Muhlia-Almazan A, Dominguez-Diaz D, Gonzalez-Rios H. Dietary inclusion effects of phytochemicals as growth promoters in animal production. J Anim Sci Technol. 2017 Apr 17;59:8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Vizzarri F, Palazzo M, Casamassima D, Ondruska L, Massanyi M, Tirpak F, Formicki G, Gren A, Massanyi P. Lippia citriodora (verbascoside) extract supplementation: Effect on rabbit semen quality in vivo and in vitro. Czech J Anim Sci. 2019 Jan;64(1):1-10. [Google Scholar]
  38. Vizzarri F, Chiapparini S, Corino C, Casamassima D, Palazzo M, Parkanyi V, Ondruska L, Rossi R. Dietary supplementation with natural extracts mixture: Effects on reproductive performances, blood biochemical and antioxidant parameters in rabbit does. Ann Anim Sci. 2020;20(2):565-78. [Google Scholar]
  39. Vizzarri F, Massanyi M, Knizatova N, Corino C, Rossi R, Ondruska L, Tirpak F, Halo M, Massanyi P. Effects of dietary plant polyphenols and seaweed extract mixture on male-rabbit semen: Quality traits and antioxidant markers. Saudi J Biol Sci. 2021 Jan;28(1):1017-25. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Zbynovska K, Halenar M, Chrastinova L, Ondruska L, Jur-cik R, Cupka P, Kovacikova E, Kovacik A, Kolesar E, Valuch J, Kolesarov A. Oral and instamuscular application of cyanogenic glycoside amygdalin did not induce changes in haematological profile of male rabbits. Slovak J Food Sci. 2016;11(1):315-21. [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Corrigendum

Articles from Veterinární Medicína are provided here courtesy of Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences

RESOURCES