In the published article, there was an error in Table 2 as published. We have carelessly swapped the rows and columns of Table 2. The corrected Table 2 and its caption appear below.
Table 2.
Estimated parameters by fitting the mathematical model to experimental data.
| Symbol | Unit | Value | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| p = 0 | p = 0.1 | p = 1,000 | ||
| g | Day−1 | 7.33 × 10−1 | ||
| K | Cell | 6.51 × 106 | ||
| c | Day−1 | 2.44 × 10−1 | ||
| β | (Day × cell)−1 | 2.46 × 10−6 | 6.36 × 10−7 | 8.08 × 10−11 |
| T 0 | Cell | 8.53 × 104 | 6.76 × 104 | 6.17 × 104 |
| I ar, 0 | Cell | 1.80 × 104 | 3.88 × 104 | 4.62 × 104 |
The authors apologize for this error and state that this does not change the scientific conclusions of the article in any way. The original article has been updated.
Publisher's note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.