Skip to main content
PLOS ONE logoLink to PLOS ONE
. 2024 Jun 6;19(6):e0305010. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0305010

Association between weight-adjusted waist index and periodontitis: A population-based study

Lihan Xu 1, Yuntao Liu 1, Chenchen Zhao 1, Jiaying Wang 1, Haojing Zhou 2,*
Editor: Tanay Chaubal3
PMCID: PMC11156281  PMID: 38843124

Abstract

Objective

This study aims to examine the association between the Weight-adjusted Waist Circumference Index (WWI) and the prevalence of periodontitis, providing novel evidence on the link between central obesity and periodontal health.

Methods

A cross-sectional study was conducted with 10,289 participants enrolled from NHANES 2009 to 2014. WWI was calculated by dividing waist circumference by the square root of weight. We employed a multivariate logistic regression model and smoothed curve fitting method to evaluate the relationship between WWI and periodontitis. We also compared different subgroups and analyzed the interaction effects.

Results

A significant positive association between WWI and periodontitis was observed in 10,289 participants aged ≥30 (OR: 1.20, 95% CI: 1.12–1.28). Upon categorizing WWI into quartiles, the top quartile group exhibited a 27% increased prevalence of periodontitis compared to the bottom quartile (OR: 1.27, 95% CI: 1.10–1.46; P for trend = 0.001). Among individuals aged 30 to 60, the strength of this positive correlation is more pronounced than in those aged 60 and above.

Conclusions

WWI demonstrates a positive correlation with periodontitis with a particularly pronounced impact on moderate periodontitis, suggesting its potential to improve periodontitis prevention in a broad population.

Introduction

Periodontitis, a chronic inflammatory disease, arises from the interaction of pathogenic bacteria and the host immune response, which gradually erodes the periodontal supporting structure and ultimately results in tooth loss [1]. Worldwide, periodontitis affects approximately 45–50% of the population, with the severe case impacting 11.2%, ranking it as the sixth most common disease globally [2]. In the U.S., individuals over 30 experience a prevalence rate of 42.2% for periodontal disease. Additionally, periodontitis has been found to have associations with numerous systemic disorders, such as diabetes [3], cardiovascular diseases [4], and Alzheimer’s disease [5], thereby imposing substantial health and economic burdens on society.

Obesity is defined as improper or excessive adipose tissue buildup [6]. As awareness of the role of adipocytes in inflammation and immune regulation gains, obesity is increasingly seen as a chronic systemic condition that can impact the onset and progression of periodontal disease [7, 8]. Traditional obesity assessment tools like Body Mass Index (BMI) and Waist Circumference (WC) are utilized yet have drawbacks [9, 10]. While the link between BMI, WC, and periodontitis has been reported in various studies, it is still controversial [1114]. According to research, BMI fails to distinguish between central and peripheral adiposity and varies with age, gender, and ethnicity [15, 16]. Park et al. introduced the Weight-adjusted Waist Index (WWI) in 2018, a brand-new indicator that refines waist circumference measurement by reducing its correlation with BMI, thus offering a more precise assessment of central obesity [17]. Using this new indicator to explore the relationship between periodontitis and obesity might further reveal a more precise relationship between them, which might aid in periodontitis prediction.

Nevertheless, the correlation between WWI and periodontitis has not been thoroughly investigated. Therefore, we seek to assess the possible link between WWI and periodontitis prevalence, utilizing statistics from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) spanning 2009–2014.

Materials and methods

This cross-sectional study followed the Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement (S1 Table) [18].

Data collection

This cross-sectional study utilized data from NHANES spanning 2009–2014. This extensive survey concentrates on evaluating the health and nutritional status of the U.S. populace [19]. Extensive information on the NHANES survey design is accessible at https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/nhanes/index.htm.

From the NHANES 2009–2014 cohort, 30,468 individuals were initially considered. Exclusions were made for those lacking data on periodontitis (19,804 individuals) and WWI (375 individuals in total; including 321 without waist circumference data and 54 without weight data). Ultimately, the study’s sample consisted of 10,289 participants, as detailed in Fig 1.

Fig 1. Flowchart of population included in our final analysis.

Fig 1

Evaluation of WWI

The WWI is formulated for obesity assessment, which was obtained by dividing the WC (in cm) by the square root of body weight (in kg) [20]. In our analysis, WWI was utilized as an exposure variable. We considered WWI as a continuous metric and divided the study subjects into quartiles according to their WWI scores for a more detailed examination.

Evaluation of periodontitis

Periodontal examination includes measuring both Clinical Attachment Loss (CAL) and Probing Pocket Depth (PPD) at six locations per tooth excluding third molars, using the FMPE protocol [21]. According to the consensus of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and American Academy of Periodontology, periodontitis was categorized into four stages: no, mild, moderate, or severe periodontitis [22]. The criteria for each stage are as follows: (1)Mild periodontitis: more than 2 interdental locations with CAL ≥3 mm but <4 mm, more than 2 interdental locations with PPD ≥4 mm but <5 mm (on different tooth), or a single location with PPD ≥5 mm; (2)Moderate periodontitis: more than 2 interdental locations with CAL ≥4 mm but <6 mm or more than 2 interdental locations with PPD ≥5 mm (on different tooth); (3)Severe periodontitis: more than 2 interdental locations with CAL ≥6 mm (on different tooth) and at least one interdental location with PPD ≥5 mm; (4) Participants not meeting any of these criteria were considered to have no periodontitis [23]. Many similar studies have used this criterion to define periodontitis [2426].

Selection of covariates

To ensure highly accurate results, we investigated several sociodemographic and behavioral factors, as well as systemic diseases linked to periodontitis, as potential confounders. The included covariates were: age (years), gender (male/female), racial/ethnic identity (Non-Hispanic White, Non-Hispanic Black, Mexican American, or Other race/Multiracial), educational background (below high school, high school graduate, or over high school), Poverty Income Ratio (PIR), smoking condition (indicating if the participant has smoked at least 100 cigarettes in their life: Yes/No), alcohol consumption frequency over the past year, diabetes (yes/no), levels of Triglycerides, and High-density lipoprotein cholesterol.

Statistical analysis

Our descriptive analysis assessed the demographic characteristics of participants across various WWI quartiles using chi-square and t-tests. We investigated the relationships between WWI and periodontitis, including its varying degrees of severity, employing multivariate linear and logistic regression models. To assess robustness, we examined linear trends between WWI and periodontitis by conducting a trend test after categorizing WWI as a quartile variable instead of a continuous one. The analysis was structured into three distinct models. Model 1 was conducted without any covariate adjustments. Model 2 incorporated adjustments for age, gender, and race. Model 3, the most comprehensive, included adjustments for all the covariates under consideration. Additionally, we utilized smoothed curve fitting to explore the possible non-linear connection between WWI and periodontitis. The threshold effect within this relationship was evaluated using two distinct linear regression models. Subgroup analysis was carried out, focusing on the WWI-periodontitis relationship across individuals of different genders, ages, races, educational levels, drinking behaviors, and diabetes. Interaction tests were further applied to assess the uniformity of these associations across the different subgroups. All statistical analysis were executed using R software (version 4.2) and EmpowerStats (version 5.0), considering a two-sided p-value of less than 0.05 as statistically significant.

Results

Participants’ baseline characteristics

Our study included 10,289 individuals, with an average age of 51.84 ± 14.17 years; 49.51% were male, and 43.02% identified as non-Hispanic white (Table 1). All individuals had a mean WWI of 11.08 ± 0.77. The average WWI values for each quartile (Q1-Q4) were 8.62–10.55, 10.55–11.07, 11.07–11.60, and 11.60–14.79, respectively. The overall prevalence of periodontitis was 50.6%, showing an upward trend in line with increasing WWI quartiles (Quartile 1: 41.17%, Quartile 2: 48.13%, Quartile 3: 53.58%, Quartile 4: 59.50%; P < 0.0001). Individuals in the upper WWI quartiles exhibited characteristics such as advanced age, a higher likelihood of being female, and lower incomes and education levels. Additionally, they exhibited a greater prevalence of diabetes and moderate-to-severe periodontitis, higher alcohol intake, elevated triglyceride levels, and reduced HDL cholesterol levels.

Table 1. Basic characteristics of participants by weight-adjusted waist index quartile.

Characteristics Weight-adjusted-waist index quartile (cm/√kg) Overall P-value
Q1 (8.62–10.55) Q2 (10.55–11.07) Q3 (11.07–11.60) Q4 (11.60–14.79)
N = 2572 N = 2572 N = 2572 N = 2573
Age (years) 44.80 ± 11.66 49.92 ± 13.05 54.08 ± 13.74 58.55 ± 14.30 51.84 ± 14.17 <0.001
Gender, (%) <0.001
Male 1558 (60.58%) 1424 (55.37%) 1227 (47.71%) 885 (34.40%) 5094 (49.51%)
Female 1014 (39.42%) 1148 (44.63%) 1345 (52.29%) 1688 (65.60%) 5195 (50.49%)
Race/ethnicity,(%) <0.001
Non-Hispanic White 1147 (44.60%) 1096 (42.61%) 1051 (40.86%) 1132 (44.00%) 4426 (43.02%)
Non-Hispanic Black 704 (27.37%) 499 (19.40%) 481 (18.70%) 423 (16.44%) 2107 (20.48%)
Mexican American 181 (7.03%) 356 (13.85%) 445 (17.31%) 501 (19.47%) 1483 (14.41%)
Other race/multiracial 540 (21.00%) 621 (24.14%) 595 (23.13%) 517 (20.09%) 2273 (22.09%)
Education level, (%) <0.001
Less than high school 354 (13.77%) 563 (21.92%) 665 (25.87%) 811 (31.57%) 2393 (23.28%)
High school 538 (20.93%) 500 (19.47%) 584 (22.71%) 575 (22.38%) 2197 (21.38%)
More than high school 1678 (65.29%) 1505 (58.61%) 1322 (51.42%) 1183 (46.05%) 5688 (55.34%)
PIR 2.94 ± 1.64 2.74 ± 1.59 2.58 ± 1.59 2.28 ± 1.46 2.63 ± 1.59 <0.001
Smoked at least 100 cigarettes in life 0.536
Yes 1097 (42.68%) 1139 (44.28%) 1142 (44.42%) 1141 (44.35%) 4519 (43.93%)
No 1473 (57.32%) 1433 (55.72%) 1429 (55.58%) 1432 (55.65%) 5767 (56.07%)
How often drink alcohol over the past 12 months 2.51 ± 2.06 3.29 ± 27.87 3.09 ± 24.96 3.32 ± 31.74 3.05 ± 24.55 0.002
Diabetes, (%) <0.001
Yes 117 (4.55%) 268 (10.43%) 460 (17.88%) 688 (26.76%) 1533 (14.91%)
No 2454 (95.45%) 2301 (89.57%) 2112 (82.12%) 1883 (73.24%) 8750 (85.09%)
Triglycerides (mg/dL) 194.32 ± 37.00 199.32 ± 40.49 198.89 ± 41.52 198.00 ± 44.09 197.63 ± 40.90 <0.001
High-density lipoprotein cholesterol (mg/dL) 57.03 ± 17.22 53.20 ± 16.12 50.75 ± 14.66 50.09 ± 13.94 52.77 ± 15.77 <0.001
Periodontitis, (%) <0.001
No 1513 (58.83%) 1334 (51.87%) 1194 (46.42%) 1042 (40.50%) 5083 (49.40%)
Mild 143 (5.56%) 127 (4.94%) 115 (4.47%) 112 (4.35%) 497 (4.83%)
Moderate 693 (26.94%) 832 (32.35%) 996 (38.72%) 1148 (44.62%) 3669 (35.66%)
Severe 223 (8.67%) 279 (10.85%) 267 (10.38%) 271 (10.53%) 1040 (10.11%)

Mean ± SD for continuous variables: the P value was calculated by the linear regression model. (%) for categorical variables: the P value was calculated by the chi-square test. Abbreviation: Q, quartile; PIR, Ratio of family income to poverty.

Association between WWI and periodontitis

Our analysis employed three models to examine the relationship between the WWI and the prevalence of total periodontitis (Table 2). We identified a substantial positive relationship between WWI and periodontitis when considering WWI as a continuous variable, which remained statistically significant across all three models. Even after eliminating key demographic and other disease-related variables in Model 3, this association remained consistently significant. In the model with full adjustments, we observed that with every unit rise in WWI, there was a corresponding 20% increase in the periodontitis prevalence (Model 3, OR: 1.20, 95% CI: 1.12–1.28). We subsequently divided WWI into quartiles and observed that this significant correlation persisted among all three models. In the unadjusted model (Model 1), higher WWI groups tend to exhibit an increasing prevalence of periodontitis compared to the lowest quartile (P for trend < 0.001). Using the lowest group as a reference, the OR of total periodontitis prevalence for subjects belonging to the second, third, and fourth WWI quartiles were 1.33, 1.65, and 2.10, respectively. In the fully adjusted, participants within the highest quartile of WWI showed a 27% increased likelihood of experiencing periodontitis compared to those in the lowest quartile (OR: 1.27, 95% CI: 1.10–1.46).

Table 2. The associations between weight-adjusted waist index and periodontitis.

Exposure Model 1 [OR (95% CI)] Model 2 [OR (95% CI)] Model 3 [OR (95% CI)]
WWI (continuous) 1.48 (1.40, 1.56) 1.38 (1.30, 1.47) 1.20 (1.12, 1.28)
WWI (quartile)
Quartile 1 reference reference reference
Quartile 2 1.33 (1.19, 1.48) 1.18 (1.05, 1.33) 1.06 (0.94, 1.21)
Quartile 3 1.65 (1.48, 1.84) 1.36 (1.20, 1.54) 1.13 (0.99, 1.29)
Quartile 4 2.10 (1.88, 2.35) 1.73 (1.51, 1.97) 1.27 (1.10, 1.46)
P for trend < 0.001 < 0.001 0.001

Model 1: no covariates were adjusted. Model 2: age, gender, and race were adjusted. Model 3: age, gender, race, education level, PIR, smoking, alcohol drinking, diabetes, triglycerides, and high-density lipoprotein cholesterol were adjusted.

Correlation between WWI and periodontitis severity

As mentioned, we similarly used the same three models to explore the correlation between WWI and different levels of periodontitis severity, including mild, moderate, and severe cases (S2 Table). Across all three models, an elevated WWI was significantly linked to a risen likelihood of moderate periodontitis. Particularly within Model 3, which excluded the influence of all covariates, every unit increment in WWI correlated with a 23% rise in the incidence of moderate periodontitis (OR: 1.23, 95% CI: 1.15–1.32). For mild and severe periodontitis, the increase was comparatively lower at 12% (Mild periodontitis, OR: 1.12, 95% CI: 1.04–1.20; Severe periodontitis, OR: 1.12, 95% CI: 1.01–1.25).

Non-linear correlation between WWI and periodontitis

The study uncovered a non-linear positive correlation between WWI and periodontitis (Fig 2). Utilizing a two-stage linear regression model, we identified a substantial threshold effect between WWI and periodontitis, with an inflection point (K) calculated at 11.99 (S3 Table). WWI maintained a significant positive correlation with periodontitis on both sides of this inflection point. For WWI values below the inflection point of 11.99, each unit increase was associated with an 11% rise in periodontitis prevalence (OR: 1.11, 95% CI: 1.03–1.20; P for trend = 0.0096). For WWI values above 11.99, each additional unit was linked to a 97% upsurge in prevalence (OR: 1.97, 95% CI: 1.48–2.62; P for trend < 0.0001). The log-likelihood ratio tests yielded P-values all below 0.001.

Fig 2. Non-linear correlation between WWI and periodontitis.

Fig 2

Subgroup analyses

We conducted subgroup analysis and interaction tests to investigate the stability of the relationship between WWI and periodontitis across diverse population backgrounds (Table 3). Our findings revealed significant variations in the WWI-periodontitis association across different age groups (P for interaction = 0.005). Notably, a more robust and pronounced connection was shown in the younger and middle-aged population under 60. For individuals aged 60 and above, each unit’s increase in WWI was associated with a 19% rise in periodontitis prevalence. By contrast, in the under-60 age group, this increase was markedly higher, at 44%. None of the other stratified factors such as gender, race, education level, smoking behavior, and diabetes significantly influenced the positive association between WWI and periodontitis (P for interaction > 0.05).

Table 3. Subgroup analysis of the association between weight-adjusted waist index and periodontitis.

Subgroup Periodontitis [OR (95%CI)] P for interaction
Gender 0.4301
Male 1.17 (1.06, 1.29) 0.0016
Female 1.23 (1.12, 1.34) <0.0001
Age 0.0054
< 60 years 1.44 (1.33, 1.56) <0.0001
≥ 60 years 1.19 (1.06, 1.33) 0.0032
Race/ethnicity 0.1111
Non-Hispanic White 1.20 (1.09, 1.33) 0.0003
Non-Hispanic Black 1.13 (0.98, 1.30) 0.0904
Mexican American 1.47 (1.22, 1.77) <0.0001
Other race/multiracial 1.13 (0.97, 1.31) 0.1066
Education level, (%) 0.1660
Less than high school 1.34 (1.16, 1.55) <0.0001
High school 1.11 (0.97, 1.28) 0.1326
More than high school 1.19 (1.08, 1.30) 0.0003
Smoked at least 100 cigarettes in life 0.7340
Yes 1.19 (1.08, 1.31) 0.0004
No 1.21 (1.11, 1.32) <0.0001
Diabetes, (%) 0.5284
Yes 1.26 (1.06, 1.50)) 0.0090
No 1.19 (1.10, 1.28) <0.0001

Age, gender, race, education level, PIR, smoking, alcohol drinking, diabetes, triglycerides, and high-density lipoprotein cholesterol were adjusted.

Discussion

Through this comprehensive cross-sectional study with 10,289 diverse participants, we identified a positive correlation between WWI and periodontitis. Remarkably, age was found to have a substantial impact on this correlation, suggesting that higher WWI levels are associated with an increased probability of moderate to severe periodontitis, particularly in individuals under 60 years old. We further discovered that the positive correlation between WWI and periodontitis is nonlinear, with an inflection point at 11.99 cm/√kg. This indicates that obesity management assessed by WWI could reduce both the incidence and severity of periodontitis.

Obesity, increasingly recognized as a non-communicable chronic inflammatory disease, is marked by persistently activated multisystemic low-level chronic inflammation and resultant tissue damage. Research indicates that obesity is a primary risk factor for the inflammatory degeneration of periodontal tissues, ranking just behind smoking in its impact [27]. This underlines the potential importance of appropriately evaluating obesity for predicting periodontitis risk and gauging disease severity. Liu et al.’s investigation using NHANES data (2011–2014) found significant correlations between periodontitis and both BMI and WC, though this association was not evident in men [11]. However, Alsalihi et al. and Kim et al. did not find any link between periodontitis and BMI, but an association with WC, whereas Torrungruang et al. reported no association between periodontitis and either BMI or WC [14, 28, 29]. These discrepancies question the effectiveness of these traditional indicators. A comprehensive cohort study appreciated WWI’s superiority in predicting cardiometabolic diseases and mortality over BMI, WC, and Waist-to-Height ratio [17]. The WWI was proven to be associated with diabetes, cardiovascular disease, and hypertension, all of which are connected to periodontitis [3033]. Therefore, we utilized WWI as a new indicator of central obesity reflecting body fat distributions to explore the relationship between obesity and periodontitis. We identified a significant positive link between WWI and a higher prevalence of periodontitis, with a noteworthy nonlinear association and a critical inflection point at 11.99 cm/√kg. Above this point, every unit rise in WWI was linked to a 97% increase in periodontitis prevalence. These findings advocate for rigorous WWI management in obesity control as a complementary strategy for improving periodontal health.

Our research further explored the connection between obesity and periodontitis severity, uncovering a novel and significant association: higher WWI levels were notably linked to a greater occurrence of moderate-to-severe periodontitis. This finding contrasts with a Northern Ireland study involving Western European men aged 60 to 70, where BMI was linked to mild periodontitis but not to its severe form [34]. Similarly, another study found no substantial link between BMI and the occurrence of periodontal pockets with PPD exceeding 6 mm [35]. It would be interesting to evaluate the association between WWI and the severity of periodontitis in these populations to see if WWI could reveal a significant correlation. If further research across diverse populations confirms the link between WWI and periodontitis severity, WWI could emerge as a crucial marker for monitoring periodontitis progression and supply evidence for the link between inflammatory disease progression and visceral obesity. Moreover, examining various populations might reveal how racial and regional differences impact this relationship.

The link between WWI and periodontitis was significant across both over and under 60 years groups but was more evident and had a more substantial effect size in the younger cohort. These results diverge somewhat from the previous studies by Liu et al. and Al-Zahrani et al., which reported substantial links between obesity and periodontitis among young and middle-aged adults but not in the older population, using BMI and WC as indicators [11, 12]. On the whole, the correlation between obesity and the incidence of periodontitis appears to be stronger in young and middle-aged individuals compared to older adults. The differences may stem from several factors. Firstly, older individuals may have already lost several teeth, leaving behind healthier remaining teeth. Secondly, oxidative stress and reduced physical activity associated with aging may contribute to increased body fat [3638]. This implies that weight gain in some older obese individuals could be attributed to the aging process, whereas obesity in younger age groups might commence earlier in life. Lastly, younger and older populations may adopt different lifestyles, with unhealthy dietary habits prevalent among young people, such as high sugar and high-fat intake, potentially accentuating the relationship between obesity and periodontal disease [39]. Overall, our results endorse WWI’s reliability in relation to periodontitis, suggesting a strong correlation between periodontitis and central obesity. However, in our study, neither smoking nor diabetes made any difference. Given the inherent limitation of NHANES dataset to decipher this kind of relationship, there is a need to validate this index on other cohorts longitudinally in the future.

The underlying biological mechanism connecting central obesity WWI to periodontitis remains incompletely understood. Research indicated that adipose tissue secretes various bioactive molecules, such as tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α), interleukins (IL-6 and IL-8), leptin, and plasminogen activator inhibitor-1 (PAI-1) [40]. Obesity triggers low-grade systemic inflammation through an increase in pro-inflammatory mediators and a decrease in anti-inflammatory factors [41]. This systemic inflammation is also manifested in periodontal tissues, as indicated by elevated concentrations of pro-inflammatory markers (such as TNF-α, IL-1, IL-6,) in the gingival crevicular fluid of obese individuals [42]. These inflammatory changes potentially modify the body’s immune response, increasing susceptibility to bacterial infections and aggravating the inflammatory and destructive processes of periodontitis induced by oral microorganisms [43]. TNF-α, a key cytokine produced in response to periodontal pathogens, plays a crucial role in periodontitis by promoting osteoclast formation and thus contributing to alveolar bone and connective tissue degradation [44]. Moreover, the mechanism of obesity-induced periodontitis might also involve increased insulin resistance [45], heightened oxidative stress [46], changes in gingival blood supply and microcirculation [47], and alterations in oral microbiota composition [4850]. For example, elevated PAI-1 expression in visceral fat triggers blood coagulation, reducing gingival blood flow, and thus advancing periodontitis progression [47]. Changes in oral microbiota due to obesity are also noteworthy. While Rahman et al. [49] observed a higher presence of periodontitis-associated bacteria like Aggregatibacter actinomycetemcomitans, Tannerella forsythia and Treponema denticola in obese individuals with moderate-severe periodontitis, Lê et al. reported a decreased relative abundance of certain periodontal pathogens in obese subjects. This necessitates further investigation to clarify the disease’s pathophysiological mechanisms [50].

Our study stands as a pioneering cross-sectional analysis investigating the relationship between WWI and periodontitis, marked by several strengths. Firstly, the substantial sample size and thorough covariates’ adjustment bolster the study’s credibility and applicability. Secondly, an essential contribution of this research is identifying the nonlinear and threshold effects in the WWI-periodontitis relationship. However, certain limitations must be acknowledged. The cross-sectional design of our study restricts our capacity to draw causal inferences. Despite integrating numerous relevant covariates into our model, fully mitigating the impact of other potential confounding variables remains challenging. Besides that, the use of the NHANES dataset, specific to the U.S. population, may constrain the global generalization of our findings. Finally, this study considered wide range of demographic data and clinical parameters, but the presence of biochemical parameters may affect the value of this study. While WWI is less commonly used than BMI and WC in obesity assessment, its effectiveness in predicting periodontitis risk and severity suggests the need for further clinical exploration to fully understand its advantages and drawbacks. Despite these constraints, our study demonstrated the relationship between WWI and periodontitis, emphasizing the potential of WWI in evaluating the risks of periodontitis associated with obesity.

Conclusion

Elevated WWI levels are significantly associated with an increased prevalence of periodontitis. The current findings emphasize the importance of WWI levels in evaluating periodontitis, particularly among the non-elderly population where it may offer enhanced benefits. As WWI is an indicator of adiposity central obesity, our study suggests a tight correlation of central obesity and periodontitis. Nevertheless, validation by further prospective studies is still needed.

Supporting information

S1 Table. Checklist of STROBE statement.

(DOCX)

pone.0305010.s001.docx (21.2KB, docx)
S2 Table. The associations between weight-adjusted waist index and severity of periodontitis.

(DOCX)

pone.0305010.s002.docx (15.7KB, docx)
S3 Table. Threshold effect analysis of WWI on periodontitis using two-piecewise linear regression model.

(DOCX)

pone.0305010.s003.docx (15.4KB, docx)
S1 Data

(XLS)

pone.0305010.s004.xls (936.6KB, xls)

Acknowledgments

The authors thank all of the people who participated in this study.

Data Availability

All relevant data are within the manuscript and its Supporting Information files.

Funding Statement

The author(s) received no specific funding for this work.

References

  • 1.Kinane DF, Stathopoulou PG, Papapanou PN. Periodontal diseases. Nature reviews Disease primers. 2017;3:17038. doi: 10.1038/nrdp.2017.38 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Kassebaum NJ, Bernabé E, Dahiya M, Bhandari B, Murray CJ, Marcenes W. Global burden of severe periodontitis in 1990–2010: a systematic review and meta-regression. Journal of dental research. 2014;93(11):1045–53. doi: 10.1177/0022034514552491 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Holmstrup P, Damgaard C, Olsen I, Klinge B, Flyvbjerg A, Nielsen CH, et al. Comorbidity of periodontal disease: two sides of the same coin? An introduction for the clinician. Journal of oral microbiology. 2017;9(1):1332710. doi: 10.1080/20002297.2017.1332710 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Etta I, Kambham S, Girigosavi KB, Panjiyar BK. Mouth-Heart Connection: A Systematic Review on the Impact of Periodontal Disease on Cardiovascular Health. Cureus. 2023;15(10):e46585. doi: 10.7759/cureus.46585 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Bouziane A, Lattaf S, Abdallaoui Maan L. Effect of Periodontal Disease on Alzheimer’s Disease: A Systematic Review. Cureus. 2023;15(10):e46311. doi: 10.7759/cureus.46311 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Schetz M, De Jong A, Deane AM, Druml W, Hemelaar P, Pelosi P, et al. Obesity in the critically ill: a narrative review. Intensive Care Medicine. 2019;45(6):757–69. doi: 10.1007/s00134-019-05594-1 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Keller A, Rohde JF, Raymond K, Heitmann BL. Association between periodontal disease and overweight and obesity: a systematic review. Journal of periodontology. 2015;86(6):766–76. doi: 10.1902/jop.2015.140589 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Jepsen S, Suvan J, Deschner J. The association of periodontal diseases with metabolic syndrome and obesity. Periodontology 2000. 2020;83(1):125–53. doi: 10.1111/prd.12326 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Musaiger AO. Overweight and obesity in eastern mediterranean region: prevalence and possible causes. Journal of obesity. 2011;2011:407237. doi: 10.1155/2011/407237 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Kangas S, Timonen P, Knuuttila M, Jula A, Ylöstalo P, Syrjälä AH. Waist circumference and waist-to-height ratio are associated with periodontal pocketing-results of the Health 2000 Survey. BMC oral health. 2017;17(1):48. doi: 10.1186/s12903-017-0336-y [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Liu L, Xia LY, Gao YJ, Dong XH, Gong RG, Xu J. Association between Obesity and periodontitis in US Adults: NHANES 2011–2014. Obesity facts. 2023. doi: 10.1159/000534751 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Al-Zahrani MS, Bissada NF, Borawskit EA. Obesity and periodontal disease in young, middle-aged, and older adults. Journal of periodontology. 2003;74(5):610–5. doi: 10.1902/jop.2003.74.5.610 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Kim YS, Kim JH. Body mass index and oral health status in Korean adults: the Fifth Korea National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey. International journal of dental hygiene. 2017;15(3):172–8. doi: 10.1111/idh.12207 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Alsalihi L, Bain C, Milosevic A, Hassan A, Janahi A, Sivaramakrishnan G. Prevalence of periodontitis in obese patients in Bahrain: a cross-sectional study. BMC oral health. 2021;21(1):376. doi: 10.1186/s12903-021-01720-y [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Prillaman M. Why BMI is flawed—and how to redefine obesity. Nature. 2023;622(7982):232–3. doi: 10.1038/d41586-023-03143-x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Kim KJ, Son S, Kim KJ, Kim SG, Kim NH. Weight-adjusted waist as an integrated index for fat, muscle and bone health in adults. J Cachexia Sarcopenia Muscle. 2023;14(5):2196–203. doi: 10.1002/jcsm.13302 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Park Y, Kim NH, Kwon TY, Kim SG. A novel adiposity index as an integrated predictor of cardiometabolic disease morbidity and mortality. Scientific reports. 2018;8(1):16753. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-35073-4 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.von Elm E, Altman DG, Egger M, Pocock SJ, Gøtzsche PC, Vandenbroucke JP. The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies. Lancet. 2007;370(9596):1453–7. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(07)61602-X [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Xie R, Liu Y, Wang J, Zhang C, Xiao M, Liu M, et al. Race and Gender Differences in the Associations Between Cadmium Exposure and Bone Mineral Density in US Adults. Biological trace element research. 2023;201(9):4254–61. doi: 10.1007/s12011-022-03521-y [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Yu L, Chen Y, Xu M, Li R, Zhang J, Zhu S, et al. Association of weight-adjusted-waist index with asthma prevalence and the age of first asthma onset in United States adults. Frontiers in endocrinology. 2023;14:1116621. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2023.1116621 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Dye BA, Afful J, Thornton-Evans G, Iafolla T. Overview and quality assurance for the oral health component of the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES), 2011–2014. BMC oral health. 2019;19(1):95. doi: 10.1186/s12903-019-0777-6 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Eke PI, Thornton-Evans GO, Wei L, Borgnakke WS, Dye BA, Genco RJ. Periodontitis in US Adults: National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey 2009–2014. Journal of the American Dental Association (1939). 2018;149(7):576–88.e6. doi: 10.1016/j.adaj.2018.04.023 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Eke PI, Page RC, Wei L, Thornton-Evans G, Genco RJ. Update of the case definitions for population-based surveillance of periodontitis. Journal of periodontology. 2012;83(12):1449–54. doi: 10.1902/jop.2012.110664 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Li W, Zheng Q, Xu M, Zeng C, Deng X. Association between circulating 25-hydroxyvitamin D metabolites and periodontitis: Results from the NHANES 2009–2012 and Mendelian randomization study. Journal of clinical periodontology. 2023;50(2):252–64. doi: 10.1111/jcpe.13736 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Liang F, Lu M, Zhou Y. Associations between single and multiple dietary vitamins and the risk of periodontitis: results from NHANES 2009–2014. Frontiers in nutrition. 2024;11:1347712. doi: 10.3389/fnut.2024.1347712 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Li X, Wang L, Yang L, Liu X, Liu H, Mu Y. The association between plain water intake and periodontitis in the population aged over 45: a cross-sectional study based on NHANES 2009–2014. BMC oral health. 2024;24(1):27. doi: 10.1186/s12903-023-03809-y [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Nishida N, Tanaka M, Hayashi N, Nagata H, Takeshita T, Nakayama K, et al. Determination of smoking and obesity as periodontitis risks using the classification and regression tree method. Journal of periodontology. 2005;76(6):923–8. doi: 10.1902/jop.2005.76.6.923 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Kim EJ, Jin BH, Bae KH. Periodontitis and obesity: a study of the Fourth Korean National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey. Journal of periodontology. 2011;82(4):533–42. doi: 10.1902/jop.2010.100274 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Torrungruang K, Tamsailom S, Rojanasomsith K, Sutdhibhisal S, Nisapakultorn K, Vanichjakvong O, et al. Risk indicators of periodontal disease in older Thai adults. Journal of periodontology. 2005;76(4):558–65. doi: 10.1902/jop.2005.76.4.558 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Cao S, Hu X, Shao Y, Wang Y, Tang Y, Ren S, et al. Relationship between weight-adjusted-waist index and erectile dysfunction in the United State: results from NHANES 2001–2004. Frontiers in endocrinology. 2023;14:1128076. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2023.1128076 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Qin Z, Chang K, Yang Q, Yu Q, Liao R, Su B. The association between weight-adjusted-waist index and increased urinary albumin excretion in adults: A population-based study. Frontiers in nutrition. 2022;9:941926. doi: 10.3389/fnut.2022.941926 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Fang H, Xie F, Li K, Li M, Wu Y. Association between weight-adjusted-waist index and risk of cardiovascular diseases in United States adults: a cross-sectional study. BMC cardiovascular disorders. 2023;23(1):435. doi: 10.1186/s12872-023-03452-z [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Li Q, Qie R, Qin P, Zhang D, Guo C, Zhou Q, et al. Association of weight-adjusted-waist index with incident hypertension: The Rural Chinese Cohort Study. Nutrition, metabolism, and cardiovascular diseases: NMCD. 2020;30(10):1732–41. doi: 10.1016/j.numecd.2020.05.033 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Linden G, Patterson C, Evans A, Kee F. Obesity and periodontitis in 60-70-year-old men. Journal of clinical periodontology. 2007;34(6):461–6. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-051X.2007.01075.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Ylöstalo P, Suominen-Taipale L, Reunanen A, Knuuttila M. Association between body weight and periodontal infection. Journal of clinical periodontology. 2008;35(4):297–304. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-051X.2008.01203.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Fukagawa NK, Bandini LG, Young JB. Effect of age on body composition and resting metabolic rate. The American journal of physiology. 1990;259(2 Pt 1):E233–8. doi: 10.1152/ajpendo.1990.259.2.E233 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Harper EJ. Changing perspectives on aging and energy requirements: aging, body weight and body composition in humans, dogs and cats. The Journal of nutrition. 1998;128(12 Suppl):2627s–31s. doi: 10.1093/jn/128.12.2627S [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Tessari P. Changes in protein, carbohydrate, and fat metabolism with aging: possible role of insulin. Nutrition reviews. 2000;58(1):11–9. doi: 10.1111/j.1753-4887.2000.tb01819.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Cavadini C, Siega-Riz AM, Popkin BM. US adolescent food intake trends from 1965 to 1996. The Western journal of medicine. 2000;173(6):378–83. doi: 10.1136/ewjm.173.6.378 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Kershaw EE, Flier JS. Adipose tissue as an endocrine organ. The Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism. 2004;89(6):2548–56. doi: 10.1210/jc.2004-0395 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Krysiak R, Handzlik-Orlik G, Okopien B. The role of adipokines in connective tissue diseases. European journal of nutrition. 2012;51(5):513–28. doi: 10.1007/s00394-012-0370-0 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Kumar DP, Koka S, Li C, Rajagopal S. Inflammatory Mediators in Obesity. Mediators of inflammation. 2019;2019:9481819. doi: 10.1155/2019/9481819 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Nascimento GG, Leite FR, Correa MB, Horta BL, Peres MA, Demarco FF. Relationship between periodontal disease and obesity: the role of life-course events. Brazilian dental journal. 2014;25(2):87–9. doi: 10.1590/0103-6440201300019 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Khosravi R, Ka K, Huang T, Khalili S, Nguyen BH, Nicolau B, et al. Tumor necrosis factor- α and interleukin-6: potential interorgan inflammatory mediators contributing to destructive periodontal disease in obesity or metabolic syndrome. Mediators of inflammation. 2013;2013:728987. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Genco RJ, Grossi SG, Ho A, Nishimura F, Murayama Y. A proposed model linking inflammation to obesity, diabetes, and periodontal infections. Journal of periodontology. 2005;76(11 Suppl):2075–84. doi: 10.1902/jop.2005.76.11-S.2075 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Boesing F, Patiño JS, da Silva VR, Moreira EA. The interface between obesity and periodontitis with emphasis on oxidative stress and inflammatory response. Obesity reviews: an official journal of the International Association for the Study of Obesity. 2009;10(3):290–7. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-789X.2008.00555.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Khader YS, Bawadi HA, Haroun TF, Alomari M, Tayyem RF. The association between periodontal disease and obesity among adults in Jordan. Journal of clinical periodontology. 2009;36(1):18–24. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-051X.2008.01345.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.de Andrade DR, Silva PA, Colombo APV, Silva-Boghossian CM. Subgingival microbiota in overweight and obese young adults with no destructive periodontal disease. Journal of periodontology. 2021;92(10):1410–9. doi: 10.1002/JPER.20-0187 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Rahman B, Al-Marzooq F, Saad H, Benzina D, Al Kawas S. Dysbiosis of the Subgingival Microbiome and Relation to Periodontal Disease in Association with Obesity and Overweight. Nutrients. 2023;15(4). doi: 10.3390/nu15040826 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Lê S, Laurencin-Dalicieux S, Minty M, Assoulant-Anduze J, Vinel A, Yanat N, et al. Obesity Is Associated with the Severity of Periodontal Inflammation Due to a Specific Signature of Subgingival Microbiota. International journal of molecular sciences. 2023;24(20). doi: 10.3390/ijms242015123 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Decision Letter 0

Tanay Chaubal

30 Apr 2024

PONE-D-24-08383Association between weight-adjusted waist index and periodontitis: a population-based studyPLOS ONE

Dear Dr. Zhou,

Thank you for submitting your manuscript to PLOS ONE. After careful consideration, we feel that it has merit but does not fully meet PLOS ONE’s publication criteria as it currently stands. Therefore, we invite you to submit a revised version of the manuscript that addresses the points raised during the review process.

==============================

ACADEMIC EDITOR: I thank you for submitting an interesting topic for publication. However, there are a few queries raised by the reviewers' which if addressed could make your manuscript more robust.

==============================

Please submit your revised manuscript by Jun 14 2024 11:59PM. If you will need more time than this to complete your revisions, please reply to this message or contact the journal office at plosone@plos.org. When you're ready to submit your revision, log on to https://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/ and select the 'Submissions Needing Revision' folder to locate your manuscript file.

Please include the following items when submitting your revised manuscript:

  • A rebuttal letter that responds to each point raised by the academic editor and reviewer(s). You should upload this letter as a separate file labeled 'Response to Reviewers'.

  • A marked-up copy of your manuscript that highlights changes made to the original version. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Revised Manuscript with Track Changes'.

  • An unmarked version of your revised paper without tracked changes. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Manuscript'.

If you would like to make changes to your financial disclosure, please include your updated statement in your cover letter. Guidelines for resubmitting your figure files are available below the reviewer comments at the end of this letter.

If applicable, we recommend that you deposit your laboratory protocols in protocols.io to enhance the reproducibility of your results. Protocols.io assigns your protocol its own identifier (DOI) so that it can be cited independently in the future. For instructions see: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/submission-guidelines#loc-laboratory-protocols. Additionally, PLOS ONE offers an option for publishing peer-reviewed Lab Protocol articles, which describe protocols hosted on protocols.io. Read more information on sharing protocols at https://plos.org/protocols?utm_medium=editorial-email&utm_source=authorletters&utm_campaign=protocols.

We look forward to receiving your revised manuscript.

Kind regards,

Tanay Chaubal

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Journal Requirements:

When submitting your revision, we need you to address these additional requirements.

1. Please ensure that your manuscript meets PLOS ONE's style requirements, including those for file naming. The PLOS ONE style templates can be found at 

https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=wjVg/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_main_body.pdf and 

https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=ba62/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_title_authors_affiliations.pdf

2. Please note that PLOS ONE has specific guidelines on code sharing for submissions in which author-generated code underpins the findings in the manuscript. In these cases, all author-generated code must be made available without restrictions upon publication of the work. Please review our guidelines at https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/materials-and-software-sharing#loc-sharing-code and ensure that your code is shared in a way that follows best practice and facilitates reproducibility and reuse.

3. Please include captions for your Supporting Information files at the end of your manuscript, and update any in-text citations to match accordingly. Please see our Supporting Information guidelines for more information: http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/supporting-information. 

4. Please review your reference list to ensure that it is complete and correct. If you have cited papers that have been retracted, please include the rationale for doing so in the manuscript text, or remove these references and replace them with relevant current references. Any changes to the reference list should be mentioned in the rebuttal letter that accompanies your revised manuscript. If you need to cite a retracted article, indicate the article’s retracted status in the References list and also include a citation and full reference for the retraction notice.

[Note: HTML markup is below. Please do not edit.]

Reviewers' comments:

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Comments to the Author

1. Is the manuscript technically sound, and do the data support the conclusions?

The manuscript must describe a technically sound piece of scientific research with data that supports the conclusions. Experiments must have been conducted rigorously, with appropriate controls, replication, and sample sizes. The conclusions must be drawn appropriately based on the data presented.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: No

**********

2. Has the statistical analysis been performed appropriately and rigorously?

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

3. Have the authors made all data underlying the findings in their manuscript fully available?

The PLOS Data policy requires authors to make all data underlying the findings described in their manuscript fully available without restriction, with rare exception (please refer to the Data Availability Statement in the manuscript PDF file). The data should be provided as part of the manuscript or its supporting information, or deposited to a public repository. For example, in addition to summary statistics, the data points behind means, medians and variance measures should be available. If there are restrictions on publicly sharing data—e.g. participant privacy or use of data from a third party—those must be specified.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

4. Is the manuscript presented in an intelligible fashion and written in standard English?

PLOS ONE does not copyedit accepted manuscripts, so the language in submitted articles must be clear, correct, and unambiguous. Any typographical or grammatical errors should be corrected at revision, so please note any specific errors here.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

5. Review Comments to the Author

Please use the space provided to explain your answers to the questions above. You may also include additional comments for the author, including concerns about dual publication, research ethics, or publication ethics. (Please upload your review as an attachment if it exceeds 20,000 characters)

Reviewer #1: The extracted NHANES data along with statistical analysis and the manuscript concluded the study well. Even all 3 models whether covariates not adjusted or some or all covariates adjusted, the relationship of WWI & Periodontitis showed the same pattern. I have certain suggestions to improve this manuscript as follows.

1) The authors should include justification for more pronounced positive correlation in below 60 years group.

2) This study considered wide range of demographic data and clinical parameters, but presence of biochemical parameters could have raised the value of this study (link between obesity and periodontitis). Kindly include it in drawbacks of this study.

3) The WWI is not validated yet and so there is a risk of overfitting and optimism in evaluation of the predictive performance (To fulfill all the 22 checklists of TRIPOD)!

4) Page 9 line 65-66: "Nevertheless, the particular relationship between WWI and periodontitis has rarely been studied comprehensively." If this the first study correlating WWI & Periodontitis, kindly reframe the sentence.

Reviewer #2: the periodontitis classification of the mild moderate and severe were based on what criteria ?any particular article or which year classification was referred?

just the population age was considered or the gender was also taken in account as male and female ? was that also taken or just the age ? will that lead to any limitation to your study when it comes to gender segregation?

**********

6. PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean?). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy.

Reviewer #1: Yes: DR. ANUJ SHARMA

Reviewer #2: No

**********

[NOTE: If reviewer comments were submitted as an attachment file, they will be attached to this email and accessible via the submission site. Please log into your account, locate the manuscript record, and check for the action link "View Attachments". If this link does not appear, there are no attachment files.]

While revising your submission, please upload your figure files to the Preflight Analysis and Conversion Engine (PACE) digital diagnostic tool, https://pacev2.apexcovantage.com/. PACE helps ensure that figures meet PLOS requirements. To use PACE, you must first register as a user. Registration is free. Then, login and navigate to the UPLOAD tab, where you will find detailed instructions on how to use the tool. If you encounter any issues or have any questions when using PACE, please email PLOS at figures@plos.org. Please note that Supporting Information files do not need this step.

PLoS One. 2024 Jun 6;19(6):e0305010. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0305010.r002

Author response to Decision Letter 0


7 May 2024

Reply to Academic Editor

1.Please ensure that your manuscript meets PLOS ONE's style requirements, including those for file naming.

Response: Thank you for your suggestion. We have made the requested changes, including adjusting the font size of the third-level headings, modifying the naming convention of the figures, and adding the figures at the end of the document. If there are any areas where we have not complied with the requirements, please let us know, and we will make the necessary adjustments immediately.

2.Please note that PLOS ONE has specific guidelines on code sharing for submissions in which author-generated code underpins the findings in the manuscript. In these cases, all author-generated code must be made available without restrictions upon publication of the work.

Response: Is your inquiry directed towards the code of the statistical software utilized in this study? The statistical analysis software employed in this study is derived from publicly available sources, as outlined in the methods section. Consequently, there is no specific code necessitating sharing within this article.

3.Please include captions for your Supporting Information files at the end of your manuscript, and update any in-text citations to match accordingly.

Response: A heading for the supplementary information file has been appended to the end of the manuscript.

4.Please review your reference list to ensure that it is complete and correct. If you have cited papers that have been retracted, please include the rationale for doing so in the manuscript text, or remove these references and replace them with relevant current references. Any changes to the reference list should be mentioned in the rebuttal letter that accompanies your revised manuscript. If you need to cite a retracted article, indicate the article’s retracted status in the References list and also include a citation and full reference for the retraction notice.

Response: We have thoroughly reviewed each reference to ensure that none of them have been retracted. In order to improve the manuscript's quality, we have retained the original references and supplemented them with references 18, 24-26, and 36-39.

Reviewer #1:

1.The authors should include justification for more pronounced positive correlation in below 60 years group.

Response: Thank you for your suggestion. We have thoroughly deliberated on the points you raised. Please see Line 236-246.

2.This study considered wide range of demographic data and clinical parameters, but presence of biochemical parameters could have raised the value of this study (link between obesity and periodontitis). Kindly include it in drawbacks of this study.

Response: Thanks for your advice. We have incorporated the limitation you mentioned. Please see Line 286-288.

3.The WWI is not validated yet and so there is a risk of overfitting and optimism in evaluation of the predictive performance (To fulfill all the 22 checklists of TRIPOD)!

Response: You are correct; adhering to the guidelines for manuscript writing is crucial. Nevertheless, our study is a cross-sectional analysis showcasing the correlation between WWI and periodontitis. We did not utilize WWI for predictive purposes concerning periodontitis. Our methodology aligns with the STROBE statement, elucidated in the Methods section, and we have included the STROBE checklist as Supplementary File S1 Table. Kindly consult section Line 72-73 and Supplementary File S1 Table for further information.

4.Page 9 line 65-66: "Nevertheless, the particular relationship between WWI and periodontitis has rarely been studied comprehensively." If this the first study correlating WWI & Periodontitis, kindly reframe the sentence.

Response: Thank you for your suggestion, and we appreciate you pointing out our error. We have now revised it to state: 'Nevertheless, the correlation between WWI and periodontitis has not been thoroughly investigated.' Please see Line 65-66.

Reviewer #2:

1.the periodontitis classification of the mild moderate and severe were based on what criteria ?any particular article or which year classification was referred?

Response: Thanks for your careful work. The classification criteria for mild, moderate, and severe periodontitis are established by the consensus of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) and the American Academy of Periodontology, a standard widely adopted by similar studies. We have elaborated on this in the article. Please see Line 92-93 and 101-102.

2.just the population age was considered or the gender was also taken in account as male and female ? was that also taken or just the age ? will that lead to any limitation to your study when it comes to gender segregation?

Response: We accounted for both age and gender in our analysis. Age and gender were incorporated as covariates, and their influence on the outcomes was regulated using statistical methodologies (Table 2). Furthermore, we performed subgroup analyses by stratifying participants based on gender and age to reinforce the relationship between WWI and periodontitis (Table 3). The findings demonstrated the consistent robustness of the association between WWI and periodontitis.

Attachment

Submitted filename: Response to Reviewers.docx

pone.0305010.s005.docx (21.4KB, docx)

Decision Letter 1

Tanay Chaubal

22 May 2024

Association between weight-adjusted waist index and periodontitis: a population-based study

PONE-D-24-08383R1

Dear Dr. Haojing Zhou,

We’re pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been judged scientifically suitable for publication and will be formally accepted for publication once it meets all outstanding technical requirements.

Within one week, you’ll receive an e-mail detailing the required amendments. When these have been addressed, you’ll receive a formal acceptance letter and your manuscript will be scheduled for publication.

An invoice will be generated when your article is formally accepted. Please note, if your institution has a publishing partnership with PLOS and your article meets the relevant criteria, all or part of your publication costs will be covered. Please make sure your user information is up-to-date by logging into Editorial Manager at Editorial Manager® and clicking the ‘Update My Information' link at the top of the page. If you have any questions relating to publication charges, please contact our Author Billing department directly at authorbilling@plos.org.

If your institution or institutions have a press office, please notify them about your upcoming paper to help maximize its impact. If they’ll be preparing press materials, please inform our press team as soon as possible -- no later than 48 hours after receiving the formal acceptance. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information, please contact onepress@plos.org.

Kind regards,

Tanay Chaubal

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Additional Editor Comments (optional):

Reviewers' comments:

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Comments to the Author

1. If the authors have adequately addressed your comments raised in a previous round of review and you feel that this manuscript is now acceptable for publication, you may indicate that here to bypass the “Comments to the Author” section, enter your conflict of interest statement in the “Confidential to Editor” section, and submit your "Accept" recommendation.

Reviewer #1: All comments have been addressed

Reviewer #2: All comments have been addressed

**********

2. Is the manuscript technically sound, and do the data support the conclusions?

The manuscript must describe a technically sound piece of scientific research with data that supports the conclusions. Experiments must have been conducted rigorously, with appropriate controls, replication, and sample sizes. The conclusions must be drawn appropriately based on the data presented.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

3. Has the statistical analysis been performed appropriately and rigorously?

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

4. Have the authors made all data underlying the findings in their manuscript fully available?

The PLOS Data policy requires authors to make all data underlying the findings described in their manuscript fully available without restriction, with rare exception (please refer to the Data Availability Statement in the manuscript PDF file). The data should be provided as part of the manuscript or its supporting information, or deposited to a public repository. For example, in addition to summary statistics, the data points behind means, medians and variance measures should be available. If there are restrictions on publicly sharing data—e.g. participant privacy or use of data from a third party—those must be specified.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

5. Is the manuscript presented in an intelligible fashion and written in standard English?

PLOS ONE does not copyedit accepted manuscripts, so the language in submitted articles must be clear, correct, and unambiguous. Any typographical or grammatical errors should be corrected at revision, so please note any specific errors here.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

6. Review Comments to the Author

Please use the space provided to explain your answers to the questions above. You may also include additional comments for the author, including concerns about dual publication, research ethics, or publication ethics. (Please upload your review as an attachment if it exceeds 20,000 characters)

Reviewer #1: (No Response)

Reviewer #2: thank you for addressing all the queries. keep up the good work. all the best. but then this study in today s world where junk food is eaten so frequently can be considered as a way to pre determine and predict the periodontal condition

**********

7. PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean?). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy.

Reviewer #1: Yes: Dr. Anuj Sharma

Reviewer #2: No

**********

Acceptance letter

Tanay Chaubal

27 May 2024

PONE-D-24-08383R1

PLOS ONE

Dear Dr. Zhou,

I'm pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been deemed suitable for publication in PLOS ONE. Congratulations! Your manuscript is now being handed over to our production team.

At this stage, our production department will prepare your paper for publication. This includes ensuring the following:

* All references, tables, and figures are properly cited

* All relevant supporting information is included in the manuscript submission,

* There are no issues that prevent the paper from being properly typeset

If revisions are needed, the production department will contact you directly to resolve them. If no revisions are needed, you will receive an email when the publication date has been set. At this time, we do not offer pre-publication proofs to authors during production of the accepted work. Please keep in mind that we are working through a large volume of accepted articles, so please give us a few weeks to review your paper and let you know the next and final steps.

Lastly, if your institution or institutions have a press office, please let them know about your upcoming paper now to help maximize its impact. If they'll be preparing press materials, please inform our press team within the next 48 hours. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information, please contact onepress@plos.org.

If we can help with anything else, please email us at customercare@plos.org.

Thank you for submitting your work to PLOS ONE and supporting open access.

Kind regards,

PLOS ONE Editorial Office Staff

on behalf of

Dr. Tanay Chaubal

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Associated Data

    This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

    Supplementary Materials

    S1 Table. Checklist of STROBE statement.

    (DOCX)

    pone.0305010.s001.docx (21.2KB, docx)
    S2 Table. The associations between weight-adjusted waist index and severity of periodontitis.

    (DOCX)

    pone.0305010.s002.docx (15.7KB, docx)
    S3 Table. Threshold effect analysis of WWI on periodontitis using two-piecewise linear regression model.

    (DOCX)

    pone.0305010.s003.docx (15.4KB, docx)
    S1 Data

    (XLS)

    pone.0305010.s004.xls (936.6KB, xls)
    Attachment

    Submitted filename: Response to Reviewers.docx

    pone.0305010.s005.docx (21.4KB, docx)

    Data Availability Statement

    All relevant data are within the manuscript and its Supporting Information files.


    Articles from PLOS ONE are provided here courtesy of PLOS

    RESOURCES