Skip to main content
Cancer Science logoLink to Cancer Science
. 2010 Oct 18;101(11):2503. doi: 10.1111/j.1349-7006.2010.01755.x

Correction

PMCID: PMC11158327

The authors would like to draw the reader’s attention to the errors in the following article:

Konishi et al.“Expression of C4.4A at the invasive front is a novel prognostic marker for disease recurrence of colorectal cancer”. Cancer Sci 2010; 101: 2269–77.

Incorrect n value were printed on page 5, Table 3. On the top of the table, number of A should be 25 and the number of B1, B2, C should be 57. The correct version of Table 3 is shown as below.

Table 3.

 Expression pattern of C4.4A and clinicopathological parameters in colorectal cancer patients with stage II and III tumors (n = 82)

A (n = 25) B1, B2, C (n = 57) P‐value
Age in years, mean (range) 64 (39–85) 62 (47–79) NS
Sex
 Male 14 36 NS
 Female 11 21
Tumor size (cm), mean (range) 5 (1.8–9) 5 (1.4–17) NS
Differentiation
 Well, mod 25 52 NS
 Por, muc 0 5
Depth of invasion
 ∼mp 2 6 NS
 ss∼ 23 51
Lymph node metastasis
 Negative 11 33 NS
 Positive 14 24
Venous invasion
 Negative 12 46 0.003
 Positive 13 11

Colorectal cancer cases were categorized as: (A) translocation from cytoplasm to membrane and with enhanced intensity; (B1) translocation but without enhanced intensity; (B2) no translocation but with enhanced intensity; or (C) no translocation and without enhanced intensity. mp, muscularis propria; NS, not significant; Por, muc, poorly differentiated adenocarcinoma or mucinous carcinoma; ss, subserosa; Well, mod, well or moderately differentiated adenocarcinoma.

The authors apologize for these errors and any confusion they may have caused.


Articles from Cancer Science are provided here courtesy of Wiley

RESOURCES