Abstract
Despite the large number of surgical operations for stomach cancer in Japan, no study based on data from population‐based cancer registries has been conducted regarding the relationship between hospital surgical volume for stomach cancer and patients’ survival. Using data from the Osaka Cancer Registry (OCR), we performed survival analyses on 28,608 patients aged 35–79 years old who underwent surgery for stomach cancer, according to the extent of disease at diagnosis (localized: cancer is confined to the original organ; regional: cancer spreads to regional lymph nodes; adjacent: cancer infiltrates to adjacent tissue; distant: cancer metastasizes to distant organs). The study was divided into four periods; 1975–79, 1980–84, 1985–89 and 1990–94, according to year of diagnosis. Hospitals were stratified into four groups by total number of stomach cancer operations during each of the study periods, so that the numbers of operations in each group would be approximately equal. Cox's proportional hazards model was used to examine the relationships between hospital volume and 5‐year survival according to the extent of disease, after adjustment for age at diagnosis and sex. Positive relationships between hospital volume and 5‐year survival were seen in the localized and regional groups during the period 1975–79. These associations, however, decreased in later periods and disappeared in 1990–94 except for the very‐low‐volume hospitals. Stomach cancer patients treated in these hospitals remained at significantly higher risk of death than in the high‐volume hospitals. In the case of the distant group, there was no clear relationship between hospital volume and 5‐year survival during the study periods.
References
- 1. Schrag D, Cramer LD, Bach PB, Cohen AM, Warren JL, Begg CB. Influence of hospital procedure volume on outcomes following surgery for colon cancer. JAMA 2000; 284: 3028–35. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2. Bach PB, Cramer LD, Schrag D, Downey RJ, Gelfand SE, Begg CB. The influence of hospital volume on survival after resection for lung cancer. N Engl J Med 2001; 345: 81–8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3. Birkmeyer JD, Warshaw Al, Finlayson SRG, Grove MR, Tosteson ANA. Relationship between hospital volume and late survival after pancreaticoduodectomy. Surgery 1999; 126: 78–83. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4. Tanaka H, Hiyama T, Hanai A, Fujimoto I. Interhospital differences in cancer survival: magnitude and trend in 1975–1987 in Osaka, Japan, Jpn J Cancer Res 1994; 85: 680–5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5. Oshima A, Kitagawa T, Ajiki W, Tsukuma H, Takenaka S, Iura A. Survival of testicular cancer patients in Osaka, Japan. Jpn J Clin Oncol 2001; 31: 438–43. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6. Parkin DM, Whelan SL, Ferlay J, Teppo L, Thomas DB (eds). Cancer incidence in five continents. vol. VIII. IARC Scientific Publications No. 155 Lyon : IARC; 2002. [Google Scholar]
- 7. Osaka Cancer Registry (ed). Survival of cancer patients in Osaka, 197589. Tokyo : The Shinohara Publishers Inc; 1998. [Google Scholar]
- 8. Osaka Prefectural Department of Public Health and Welfare, Osaka Medical Association, Osaka Medical Center for Cancer and Cardiovascular Diseases . Annual report of Osaka cancer registry No. 65—Cancer incidence and medical care in Osaka in 1999 and the survival in 1995—. OPDPHW, 2002. (in Japanese). [Google Scholar]
- 9. Ajiki W, Tsukuma H, Oshima A. Trends in cancer incidence and survival in Osaka. In: Tominaga S, Oshima A, editors. Cancer mortality and morbidity statistics Japan and the World—1998. Gann Monogr. on Cancer Res. No. 47. Tokyo ; Japanese Cancer Association; 1999. p. 145–151. [Google Scholar]