Abstract
A growing body of evidence indicates that the gap junction (GJ) plays a pivotal role in tumor suppression by exerting cell‐cell communication. It has, however, been reported that expression of connexin26 (Cx26) protein is induced in human ductal carcinomas of the breast and that its amount increases in proportion to the grade of malignancy. We thus examined the effects of over‐expressed Cx26 on growth characteristics in GJ‐deficient human MCF‐7 breast cancer cells that maintain the phenotype of early‐stage cancers. MCF‐7 cells were transfected with Cx26 cDNA, and several clones of stable transformants exhibiting a high level of cell‐cell communication were established. When they were examined in terms of various growth characteristics in vitro, the proliferation rate and the saturation density were drastically reduced in Cx26‐transfected clones compared with the mock‐transfectant. The anchorage‐independent growth capacity was also decreased by 50–75% after transfection of Cx26. Furthermore, the cell migration toward growth factors and cell invasion into Matrigel in a Boyden chamber were suppressed to 5–10% and 20–60%, respectively, of the control in Cx26‐transfected clones. When implanted into the mammary fat pads of nude mice in the presence of an excess of 17β‐estradiol, Cx26‐transfected clones tended to show slower tumor growth than the mock‐transfectant, although the difference was not statistically significant. Our results strongly suggest that the induction of Cx26 protein observed in human breast cancers, reported previously, may not be very relevant to the development of breast cancers, and that Cx26 can function as a tumor suppressor in breast cancer cells.
References
- 1. Bruzzone R, White TW, Paul DL. Connections with connexins: the molecular basis of direct intercellular signaling. Eur J Biochem 1996; 238: 1–27. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2. Willecke K, Eiberger J, Degen J, Eckardt D, Romualdi A, Guldenagel M, Deutsch U, Sohl G. Structural and functional diversity of connexin genes in the mouse and human genome. Biol Chem 2002; 383: 725–37. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3. Yamasaki H, Naus CCG. Role of connexin genes in growth control. Carcinogenesis 1996; 17: 1199–213. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4. Omori Y, Dagli Zaidan ML, Yamakage K, Yamasaki H. Involvement of gap junctions in tumor suppression: analysis of genetically‐manipulated mice. Mutat Res 2001; 477: 191–6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5. Mesnil M, Krutovskikh V, Piccoli C, Elfgang C, Traub O, Willecke K, Yamasaki H. Negative growth control of HeLa cells by connexin genes: connexin species specificity. Cancer Res 1995; 55: 629–39. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6. Krutovskikh VA, Yamasaki H, Tsuda H, Asamoto M. Inhibition of intrinsic gap‐junction intercellular communication and enhancement of tumorigenicity of the rat bladder carcinoma cell line BC31 by a dominant‐negative connexin 43 mutant. Mol Carcinog 1998; 23: 254–61. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7. Yano T, Hernandez‐Blazquez FJ, Omori Y, Yamasaki H. Reduction of malignant phenotype of HEPG2 cell is associated with the expression of connexin 26 but not connexin 32. Carcinogenesis 2001; 22: 1593–600. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8. Lee SW, Tomasetto C, Sager R. Positive selection of candidate tumor‐suppressor genes by subtractive hybridization. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1991; 88: 2825–9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9. Pozzi A, Risek B, Kiang DT, Gilula NB, Kumar NM. Analysis of multiple gap junction gene products in the rodent and human mammary gland. Exp Cell Res 1995; 220: 212–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10. Monaghan P, Clarke C, Perusinghe NP, Moss DW, Chen XY, Evans WH. Gap junction distribution and connexin expression in human breast. Exp Cell Res 1996; 223: 29–38. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11. Jamieson S, Going JJ, D' Arcy R, George WD. Expression of gap junction proteins connexin 26 and connexin 43 in normal human breast and in breast tumours. J Pathol 1998; 184: 37–43. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12. Monaghan P, Perusinghe N, Carlile G, Evans WH. Rapid modulation of gap junction expression in mouse mammary gland during pregnancy, lactation, and involution. J Histochem Cytochem 1994; 42: 931–8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13. Locke D, Perusinghe N, Newman T, Jayatilake H, Evans WH, Monaghan P. Developmental expression and assembly of connexins into homomeric and heteromeric gap junction hemichannels in the mouse mammary gland. J Cell Physiol 2000; 183: 228–37. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14. Laird DW, Fistouris P, Batist G, Alpert L, Huynh HT, Carystinos GD, Alaoui‐Jamali MA. Deficiency of connexin43 gap junctions is an independent marker for breast tumors. Cancer Res 1999; 59: 4104–10. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15. Lee SW, Tomasetto C, Paul D, Keyomarsi K, Sager R. Transcriptional downregulation of gap‐junction proteins blocks junctional communication in human mammary tumor cell lines. J Cell Biol 1992; 118: 1213–21. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16. Li GY, Lin HH, Tu ZJ, Kiang DT. Gap junction Cx26 gene modulation by phorbol esters in benign and malignant human mammary cells. Gene 1998; 209: 139–47. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17. Singal R, Tu ZJ, Vanwert JM, Ginder GD, Kiang DT. Modulation of the connexin26 tumor suppressor gene expression through methylation in human mammary epithelial cell lines. Anticancer Res 2000; 20: 59–64. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18. El‐Fouly MH, Trosko JE, Chang CC. Scrape‐loading and dye transfer. A rapid and simple technique to study gap junctional intercellular communication. Exp Cell Res 1987; 168: 422–30. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19. Warri AM, Huovinen RL, Laine AM, Martikainen PM, Harkonen PL. Apoptosis in toremifene‐induced growth inhibition of human breast cancer cells in vivo and in vitro . J Natl Cancer Inst 1993; 85: 1412–8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20. Krutovskikh V, Mazzoleni G, Mironov N, Omori Y, Aguelon A‐M, Mesnil M, Berger F, Partensky C, Yamasaki H. Altered homologous and heterologous gap‐junctional intercellular communication in primary human liver tumors associated with aberrant protein localization but not gene mutation of connexin 32. Int J Cancer 1994; 56: 87–94. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21. Omori Y, Krutovskikh V, Mironov N, Tsuda H, Yamasaki H. Cx32 gene mutation in a chemically induced rat liver tumour. Carcinogenesis 1996; 17: 2077–80. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22. Zhu D, Caveney S, Kidder GM, Naus CCG. Transfection of C6 glioma cells with connexin 43 cDNA: analysis of expression, intercellular coupling, and cell proliferation. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1991; 88: 1883–7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23. Qin H, Shao Q, Belliveau DJ, Laird DW. Aggregated DsRed‐tagged Cx43 and over‐expressed Cx43 are targeted to lysosomes in human breast cancer cells. Cell Common Adhes 2001; 8: 433–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24. Qin H, Shao Q, Curtis H, Galipeau J, Belliveau DJ, Wang T, Alaoui‐Jamali MA, Laird DW. Retroviral delivery of connexin genes to human breast tumor cells inhibits in vivo tumor growth by a mechanism that is independent of significant gap junctional intercellular communication. J Biol Chem 2002; 277: 29132–8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25. Kumar NM, Gilula NB. The gap junction communication channel. Cell 1996; 84: 381–8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26. Ito A, Katoh F, Kataoka TR, Okada M, Tsubota N, Asada H, Yoshikawa K, Maeda S, Kitamura Y, Yamasaki H, Nojima H. A role for heterologous gap junctions between melanoma and endothelial cells in metastasis. J Clin Invest 2000; 105:1189–97. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27. Mesnil M, Yamasaki H. Bystander effect in herpes simplex virus‐thymidine kinase/ganciclovir cancer gene therapy: role of gap‐junctional intercellular communication. Cancer Res 2000; 60: 3989–99. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]