Skip to main content
PLOS One logoLink to PLOS One
. 2024 Jun 7;19(6):e0296321. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0296321

Antioxidant, insecticidal activity and chemical profiling of flower’s extract of Parthenium weed (Parthenium hysterophorus L.)

Maqsood Ahmed 1,2, Ansar Javeed 3, Aatika Sikandar 1, Mingshan Ji 1, Xuejing Bai 4, Zumin Gu 1,*
Editor: Samuel Adelani Babarinde5
PMCID: PMC11161021  PMID: 38848347

Abstract

Parthenium hysterophorus L., an invasive alien species and notorious weed, offers various benefits to the medical and agrochemical industries. This study aimed to evaluate the antioxidant and insecticidal activities of P. hysterophorus flower extract and conduct chemical profiling to identify the phytoconstituents responsible for these biological effects. The antioxidant activity was assessed using the 1,1-diphenyl-2-picrylhydrazyl (DPPH) assay, while gas chromatography mass spectrometry (GCMS) analysis was employed for chemical configuration evaluation. Our findings demonstrate that the dichloromethane (DCM) extract of P. hysterophorus exhibits potent radical scavenging activity (95.03%). Additionally, phytochemical analysis revealed significant amounts of phenols and flavonoids in the distilled water and ethyl acetate extracts (103.30 GAEg-1 and 138.67 QEg-1, respectively). In terms of insecticidal activity, the flower extract displayed maximum mortality rates of 63.33% and 46.67% after 96 hours of exposure at concentrations of 1000 μgmL-1 and 800 μgmL-1, respectively, with similar trends observed at 72 hours. Furthermore, the P. hysterophorus extracts exhibited LC50 values of 1446 μgmL-1 at 72 hours and 750 μgmL-1 at 96 hours. Imidacloprid, the positive control, demonstrated higher mortality rates at 96 hours (97.67%) and 72 hours (91.82%). Moreover, the antioxidant activity of P. hysterophorus extracts exhibited a strong correlation with phenols, flavonoids, and extract yield. GCMS analysis identified 13 chemical compounds, accounting for 99.99% of the whole extract. Ethanol extraction yielded the highest percentage of extract (4.34%), followed by distilled water (3.22%), ethyl acetate (3.17%), and dichloromethane (2.39%). The flower extract of P. hysterophorus demonstrated significant antioxidant and insecticidal activities, accompanied by the presence of valuable chemical compounds responsible for these biological effects, making it a promising alternative to synthetic agents. These findings provide a novel and fundamental basis for further exploration in purifying the chemical compounds for their biological activities.

Introduction

The introduction of invasive alien species, such as Parthenium hysterophorus, has devastating consequences for native biota and ecosystems, contributing to climate change, pollution, and habitat destruction. Understanding the positive and negative impacts of this species can aid in controlling biological invasions, which pose a global risk to biodiversity and agricultural production. Invasive weeds not only compete with crops for resources but also produce bioactive compounds that hold potential for medicinal purposes, highlighting the importance of natural plants in pharmaceutical and herbal systems [1].

Parthenium hysterophorus L. is an extremely invasive plant species belonging to family Asteraceae that has invaded almost fifty countries in sub-continent Africa, Asia, and Oceania, infesting forests, feeding lands, and urban landscapes [2, 3]. It is a devastating and hazardous weed of various economically important crops [4]. Moreover, it is amongst the top ten worst weeds in the world and is included in the world catalogue of destructive species [5, 6]. In Europe P. hysterophorus is considered as an ephemeral species. It is generally recognized by different names such as parthenium weed, congress grass, Gajjar botti, white head and white top [7]. It is native to Gulf of Mexico and United States. However, it accidently introduced in Indian subcontinent [8]. This weed has been considered as a major weed of high rank spreading at a much faster pace to takeover abandoned land, canal, watercourse banks, roads, and fields to challenge crop productivity [9, 10].

Medicinal plants are the fundamentals of traditional therapeutic systems based on the trusts and observations comprised of hundreds of years [11]. The phytochemical constituents such as phenolic and flavonoid are secondary metabolites involved in therapeutic system, because of the existence of these functional phytochemicals mainly parthenin [12]. Moreover, P. hysterophorus renowned to contain vital biochemical compounds such as alkaloids, tannins, and saponins, which are important from the medicinal viewpoint [13]. It also exhibited allelopathic effects and important phytochemicals such as parthenon and coronopilin which are auto-toxic to its own seed germination and seedling growth [14]. Furthermore, serious health consequences on human beings and livestock have been reported [15]. The agriculturists who are come in contact with P. hysterophorus; the pollen and dust produced by this weed provoke allergic contact dermatitis in human beings. Major chemical compounds, parthenin’s contained by P. hysterophorus exhibited phytotoxic properties against a variety of plants, including weeds and various crops such as Slender amaranth (Amaranthus viridis), Billygoat weed (Ageratum conyzoides), common wild oat. (Avena fatua), nettleleaf goosefoot (Chenopodium murale), Foetid cassia (Cassia tora), mung bean (Phaseolus aureus) [16, 17]. Moreover, parthenin’s the main biochemical compounds showed insecticidal activity against termites, cockroaches and migratory grasshoppers, Melanoplus sanguinipes [7]. Similarly, Patel and Chitra [18] reported pesticidal activity of the ethanol extract of P. hysterophorus which showed substantial lethal effect against stored grain pest like Tribolium sp. and Oryzaephilus sp. Essential oils from the natural plants also have antioxidant effects. In recent years several reports have been breakout, the essential oil from Rosemary `(Salvia rosmarinus) [19], wild mint (Mentha longifolia var. Calliantha) [20], black turmeric (Curcuma caesia) [21] Ammodaucus leucotrichus [22] and black pepper (Piper nigrum) [23].

Pharmacologically, it is involved in treating numerous diseases like allergies, anemia, sores, skin diseases, facial neuralgia, fever, vermifuge, blood purifier, and insecticide [7, 24]. This plant species is enriched with vital phytoconstituents however; sesquiterpene lactones are the most copious phytochemicals exhibited by this plant which are accountable for injurious effects such as strong allelopathic [25], toxic to livestock [26], It also possess many advantageous effects like antibacterial [27, 28], acaricidal [29], antioxidant [30, 31], cytotoxic [32, 33], larvicidal potential against Aedes aegypti L. [34, 35], skeletal muscle relaxant [36], pesticidal agent [37], producing bioethanol [38], as reducing agent in the formation of silver nanoparticles [39] and in production of zinc nanoparticles [40]. However, various factors affect the biological profile of the plants and from some recent studies it has been reported that nanoparticle influenced the physiological and biological properties of the plants. It has been reported that metal-based nanoparticle showed a decrease in protein and amino acid and micronutrient contents in wheat crop grown under such conditions [41]. Moreover, nitrogen doped titanium dioxide nanoparticle enhanced antioxidant activity via reducing power assay and percent inhibition of DPPH against Streptomyces [42]. Likewise, synthetically and biologically prepared nanoparticle significantly exerted effects on plant growth and secondary metabolites which ultimately triggered the biological activity of the plants [43].

As some earlier researches have been conducted on this plant species but, detailed studies on chemical and quantitative phytochemical analysis and assessment of antioxidant activities from different solvents extract as well as aphicidal activity against cabbage aphid Brevicoryne brassicae from flower’s extracts has not been explored before. Hence, keeping in view the diverse biological properties of P. hysterophorus, current study was designed to determine the antioxidant and insecticidal activity of flower’s extract against B. brassicae with appraisal of quantitative phytochemical analysis as well as assessment of chemical profiling of extract.

Materials and methods

Collection and samples preparation

The whole plant samples were collected from District Sialkot Punjab Pakistan during the month of June-July 2019 and were identified as Parthenium hysterophorus L., from Ayub Agricultural Research Institute (AARI) Faisalabad Pakistan by Dr. Dilbar Hussain. Flowers were manually separated from the plants and left over for 20 days to dry under shade. These dried flowers were powdered by electric grinder and then extracted with different solvents (ethanol, ethyl acetate, dichloromethane and distilled water) by cold extraction method for seventy two hours at fixed temperature 28°C and at 100 rpm in an incubator shaker (ZWY-1102C). Extracted contents were filtered and concentrated to lessen the volume on rotary evaporator model R-210 BUCHI Labortechnik AG, CH-9230 Flawil 1/Switzerland). Obtained extract’s yield was measured using following Equation (Eq 1).

yield%=WeightoftheextractWeightofthedriedsample×100 (1)

Quantitative analysis for total phenolic and flavonoids content

To assess the phytochemicals quantitatively, 1mg of extract from each solvent was dissolved in 1mL Methanol separately. Consequent mixture was vortexed and separated for analysis. For the assessment of total content for phenols Folin—Ciocalteu reagent test was used. In brief, 1mL solution (1mgmL-1) was added to 2.5mL of (10%) Folin—Ciocalteu with supplementary addition of 2mL solution of (2%) sodium carbonate (Na2CO3). The consequential blend was incubated for fifteen min in the dark to measure absorbance at 765nm in 96-well ELISA plate using (SpectraMax 190, Meigu molecular International Co. Ltd., Shanghai China). To build a standard curve, Gallic acid was used (1mgmL-1) at different concentrations such as 1, 0.50, 0.25, 0.10, 0.05, 0.02, 0.01, 0 mgmL-1 to describe the obtained results as Gallic acid equivalent (GAE) mgg-1 of total extract. Each treatment was replicated ten times to analyze the data.

To examine the total flavonoids content, aluminium chloride colourimetric method was adopted. Briefly, 1mL solution (1mgmL-1) was poured into 3mL methanol, with addition of 0.2mL of 1M Potassium acetate (CH3COOK), 0.2mL of (10%) aluminium chloride (AlCl3) and at the end, distilled water 5.6mL was added to the consequent mixture. The incubation of solution was performed for half an hour in the darkness and absorbance at 420nm was measured. A standard curve was built using quercetin at different concentrations such as 1, 0.50, 0.25, 0.10, 0.05, 0.02, 0.01, 0 mgmL-1 to represent the results as quercetin equivalent (QE) mgg-1 of total extract. The procedure was replicated 10 times for each treatment.

Assessment of free radical scavenging activity

Antioxidant activity of extracts obtained by different solvents from Parthenium hysterophorus flowers was accomplished in 1% solution of tween 20 by using 1,1-diphenyl-2-picrylhydrazyl (DPPH) (C18H13N5O6) a free radical. In brief, to assess the free radical scavenging activity, all dried solvent extracts were mixed together in equal proportion (5mg each) and were dissolved in HPLC grade methanol and filtered. The filtrate was formerly used to assess the antioxidant activity. Similarly, DPPH solution was prepared in same grade Methanol @ 0.001g 25mL-1. Then, into 3.5mL freshly prepared DPPH solution and 0.25mL extract prepared in Methanol was added. The consequent mixture was shacked for complete mixing and then the resulting mixture was incubated in darkness at 28°C for 30 min [44]. After incubation of resulting mixture for stipulated period of time, the absorbance was assessed at 517nm by using (SpectraMax 190, Meigu molecular International Co. Ltd., Shanghai China). The inhibition percentage of primed DPPH solution was predicted on reduction of absorbance through following Equation (Eq 2). Each treatment was replicated 10 to analyze the data.

Inhibition%=AblankAsampleAblank×100 (2)

Where: Ablank = (control absorbance); ASample = (samples absorbance).

Correlation of antioxidant activity versus phenols, flavonoids and extract yield

Correlation of antioxidant activity P. hysterophorus versus Phenols, Flavonoids and extract yield was carried out using SPSS statistics 25.0 version with significant values at (P≤0.05) level.

Assessment of insecticidal activity

Residual toxicity method was adopted for the assessment of insecticidal activity of extract of P. hysterophorus flowers. Samples for bioassay study were prepared to obtain mother mixture by mixing 0.1g of each solvent’s extract and dissolved in Acetone, because it is aprotic solvent having intermediate polarity comparable to polar parotic solvents and it also evaporates immediately from the extract when exposed to air. The resulting mixture was placed in the fume hood for six hours for complete drying of Acetone. Serial concentrations viz. 100, 200, 400, 800 and 1000 μgmL-1 was prepared in Tween-20 (1%) solution from mother mixture. Briefly, fresh cabbage leaf discs 5cm in diameter were cut off and dipped for 10 s in the respective concentration and then dried for 5 min at room temperature. Formerly, 10 adult wingless aphids were carefully released onto the leaf disc using a fine-haired brush contained in the Petri dish and incubated for 96 h at 65% R.H., 25°C and with a 16:8 (light: dark) photoperiod. Imidacloprid 25% WP was used as the positive control at a rate of 0.0025 mLmL−1 of water, and control (CK) with a 1% Tween 20 solution. Positive controls and CKs were placed in a greenhouse for 96 h. Mortality data was collected at 12, 24, 48, 72 and 96h using binocular microscope and the response of aphids was observed by needle probing, and the aphids who offered no response on stimulation were considered dead. Each treatment was replicated five times.

Chemical analysis

Samples for analysis were prepared by mixing 0.1g of each solvent extract into 2mL of HPLC grade methanol to obtain mother solution. Consequent mixture was vortexed for 1 min following the addition of graphitized carbon black “GCB” (0.005g). Mixture was centrifuged for 10 min at 10000 rpm at 25°C and colorless material was separated and collected in (1.5mL) centrifuges tubes. Work for GCMS analysis was accomplished using an Agilent Model 6890-5973N accompanied with gas chromatograph established on HP1 capillary column TG-5MS polydimethylsiloxane (length 30m × diameter 250μm × film thickness 0.25μm) interfaced with mass selective detector Hewlett Packard (5973N). The established parameters were; preliminary temperature was adjusted at 70°C for 0 min however, final temperature was extended to 200°C for 10min-1 whereas, inlet temperature was adjusted at 250°C with split ratio 10:1. MS quadruple temperatures were fixed at 150°C while thermal aux temperatures were 285°C. The Scan range for MS was 35–520 units however; as a carrier, helium gas was used bearing stream frequency of 1.0 mLmin-1. The existing compounds in the extract were identified by comparison of their retention time and the mass spectra of the NIST 08 and Wiley 7 of the data base and confirmed by comparing with GCMS literature data at NIST and TMS database Wiley/NIST.1998.1 [45].

Statistical analysis

All calculated data was analysed by one way analysis of variance (ANOVA), mean difference between treatments was calculated for significance test by Duncan Multiple Range Test “DMRT” at P≤ 0.05) with IBM-SPSS statistics 25.0 version software. Probit analysis was performed using EPA Probit analysis program version 1.5.

Results

The current study carried out on the flower’s extract of Parthenium hysterophorus revealed the existence of medicinally and agro-chemically active compounds. The phytochemical constituents of P. hysterophorus were qualitatively analyzed for antioxidant and insecticidal activities.

Extract yield (%)

Yield of extract by the solvent extraction technique from P. hysterophorus flowers was calculated and presented in (Fig 1).

Fig 1. Yield of extract obtained by different solvents: Data presented in bars is described as mean values ± standard error with superscripts is significantly different according to “DMRT” P ≥0.05).

Fig 1

EtOH; (Ethanol), EA; (Ethyl Acetate), DCM; (Dichloromethane), DW; (Distilled Water).

The maximum extract was obtained by ethanol (4.34%) whereas; minimum extract quantity (2.39%) was afforded by dichloromethane. The extract obtained via ethanol and ethyl acetate was bluish green and greenish in color and exhibited consistency, respectively. The same oil was brownish in color and non-consistent via dichloromethane and distilled water, respectively, (Table 1).

Table 1. Physical appearance of the flower’s extract of Parthenium hysterophorus.

Extract Visibility Physical Nature Consistency
EtOH Bluish green Oily Consistent
EA Greenish Oily Consistent
DCM Brownish Oily/Gummy Non-consistent
DW Brownish Oily/Gummy Non-consistent

EtOH; (Ethanol), EA; (Ethyl Acetate), DCM; (Dichloromethane), DW; (Distilled water).

Analysis for phenol and flavonoid and antioxidant activity

The total contents for phenol and flavonoid as well as DPPH scavenging activity afforded by P. hysterophorus flower’s extract via different solvents are presented in (Table 2). Results confirmed that the highest total phenol were reported from distilled water 103.30 GAE/g followed by Ethyl acetate and Ethanol’ extract, 47.79 and 27.55 GAEg-1, respectively. On the other hand highest flavonoid was reported from Ethyl acetate extract 138.67 QEg-1 followed by Ethanol 14.23 QEg-1 respectively.

Table 2. Total phenol, flavonoid content and DPPH radical scavenging activity of the flower’s extract of Parthenium hysterophorus.

Extracts Phenol (GAEg-1) Flavonoid (QEg-1) DPPH Inhibition (%)
EtOH 27.55±1.46c 14.23±0.10b 88.53±0.11b
EA 47.79±0.85b 138.67±2.20a 67.21±0.19c
DCM 30.50±0.00d 15.38±0.04c 95.03±1.58a
DW 103.30±1.16a 4.81±0.01c 18.73±0.89d
Statics S.S = 24268 S.S = 248063 S.S = 13880
M.S = 8069 M.S = 82687 M.S = 4626
Df = 3 Df = 3 M.S = 3
f = 2564*** f = 22488*** f = 1031***

Data in the columns is described as mean values ± standard deviations with various superscripts are significantly different according to DMRT” P≤ 0.05). S.S (Sum of square); M.S (Mean square); Df (Degree of freedom); f (Significance);

*** (significance level).

Inhibition (%) was determined by 1,1-Diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl (DPPH) displayed color absorption at 517nm on using spectrophotometer. When DPPH trap free radicals, the color of the solution changed to light yellow and, subsequently, resulted in decrease of the absorbance. Maximum DPPH radical scavenging activity was afforded by Dichloromethane extract 95.03% followed by Ethanol and Ethyl acetate 88.53% and 67.21%, respectively.

Correlation of antioxidant activity versus phenols, flavonoids and extract yield

In our study, the Pearson’s correlation regarding antioxidant activity of P. hysterophorus showed positive relationship (Table 3). Results showed highly significant (P≤0.01) negative effect of phenol with DPPH as well as DPPH showed strongly highly significant negatively correlation and similar results were found reciprocally in the studied parameters. However, yield extracted by different solvents did not affect the Antioxidant Activity versus phenols, flavonoids quantitatively.

Table 3. Correlation of the antioxidant activity of P. hysterophorus extract versus phenols, flavonoids and extract yield.

Treatments Phenols Flavonoids DPPH Yield
Phenols 1 -0.16 -0.99** -0.11
Flavonoids -0.16 1 -0.71 -0.90
DPPH -0.99** -0.71 1 -0.10
Yield -0.11 -0.09 -0.10 1

Note:

* Correlation is significant at 0.05 levels;

** Correlation is highly significant at 0.05 levels

Assessment of insecticidal activity

The mortality data of cabbage aphid B. brassicae at specific period of time using P. hysterophorus flower’s extract is presented in (Fig 2).

Fig 2. Insecticidal activity of extract of Parthenium hysterophorus flowers: Data in bars is described as mean values ± standard error with various superscripts is significantly different according to “DMRT” P ≥0.05).

Fig 2

A (100μgmL-1); B (200μgmL-1); C (400μgmL-1); D (800μgmL-1); E (1000μgmL-1); F (-iv Control); G (+ iv Control).

It was perceived that the percent mortality was directly correlated to the concentration and the time. The results demonstrated that the maximum mortality was recorded at 1000μgmL-1 at 96 h and 72 h with 63.33% and 46.67%, respectively. Same trend of mortality was also observed at 800 μgmL-1 with 56.67% and 36.67%, respectively. Imidacloprid 25% WP being a positive control produced the highest rates of mortality after 96 h of exposure 97.67%. Likewise, Imidacloprid also produced significant mortality after 72 h and 48 h exposure 91.82% and 87.38% mortality, respectively.

Analysis for probability of the data showed the LC50 values, slope, chi-square, and fiducial limits at confidence interval of 95% for P. hysterophorus extracts. Mortality response using plant extracts showed sensitivity of B. brassicae to various concentrations which is represented in (Table 4).

Table 4. Toxicity of P. hysterophorus extracts against B. brassicae at 12, 24, 48, 72 and 96 hours exposure.

Time LC50 μgmL-1 95% F.L Slope± S.E χ2
Lower Upper
12 3598 1421 35512 1.09±0.38 0.25
24 2569 1321 27758 1.51±0.46 0.99
48 2345 1153 25517 1.31±0.53 0.85
72 1446 852 21721 1.56±0.63 0.22
96 750 468 1276 1.89±0.58 0.04

Note: LC50 (Lethal concentration); S.E. (standard error); χ2 (chi-square); F.L. (Fiducial limit)

Chemical analysis

The existence of chemical compounds in P. hysterophorus flower’s extract was analyzed by GCMS techniques and data is presented in (Table 5). Thirteen biochemical compounds equivalent to 99.99% of entire extract by GC fraction were identified. Moreover,2-naphthalenemethanol,decahydro-.alpha.,.alpha.,4a-trimethyl-8- methylene-, [2R—(2.alpha., 4a.alpha.,8a.beta.)]-(25.93%), histidine, 1,N-dimethyl-4-nitro- (19.25%) and 3-methoxy-3, 4-dimethyl-1-heptyne (11.27%), were the major chemical compounds while, 10 others chemical compounds were identified in minor amounts having areas with peak range 2.04–3.7%. GCMS chromatogram of P. hysterophorus flower extract is presented in (Fig 3).

Table 5. Chemical composition of the flower’s extract of Parthenium hysterophorus.

Peak # R. T Area % Chemical Compounds M.F M.W gmol-1
1 3.22 7.05 Benzene, 1,3-dimethyl- C8H10 106.17
2 3.92 3.47 2,4-Dimethylamphetamine C11H17N 163.26
3 4.43 2.04 3-Piperidinol C5H11NO 101.15
4 5.05 2.74 2-Pentene, 4,4-dimethyl-, (E)- C7H14 98.186
5 5.52 3.55 2-Butanamine ‎C 6H 5N 101.19
6 12.96 25.93 2-Naphthalenemethanol,decahydro.alpha.,.α.,4a-trimethyl-8-methylene-,[2R (2 α.,4a.α.,8a.beta.)]- C15H26O 222.36
7 14.29 11.27 3-Methoxy-3,4-dimethyl-1-heptyne C10H18O 154.25
8 15.21 4.76 Undecane C11H24 156.31
9 15.85 3.82 2-Pyrrolidinone, 1-methyl- C5H9NO 99.13
10 16.62 7.26 Glycinamide hydrochloride C2H7ClN2O 110.54
11 17.58 2.18 1,2-Benzenedicarboxylic acid, butyl 2-ethylhexyl ester C20H30O4 334.45
12 18.1 6.67 Hexadecanoic acid, ethyl ester C18H36O2 284.48
13 21.85 19.25 Histidine, 1,N-dimethyl-4-nitro- C8H10N2O2 166.18

R.T (Retention time); M.F (Molecular formula); M.W (Molecular Weight).

Fig 3. GC-MS chromatogram of Parthenium hysterophorus flower’s extract.

Fig 3

Discussion

Parthenium hysterophorus, known as Parthenium weed, is recognized as a noxious weed with detrimental effects on ecosystems. However, our study revealed that this invasive plant species possesses valuable properties in terms of antioxidant and insecticidal activities.

The chemical compounds found in P. hysterophorus, such as phenolics, steroids, alkaloids, flavonoids, and terpenoids, vary in concentration based on ecological factors and pathogen presence. These compounds exhibit bio-pesticidal properties, specifically targeting insect pests and pathogens. Importantly, they are biodegradable and do not pose significant harm to the environment [27, 4648].

In addition to its antioxidant activity, the flower extract of P. hysterophorus exhibited promising insecticidal activity against Brevicoryne brassicae, a notorious sucking pest. This finding suggests that the extract has the potential to be used as a natural insecticide. The observed LC50 values indicate the concentration at which the extract is lethal to 50% of the exposed insects. The lower LC50 value at 96 hours compared to 72 hours indicates the increased effectiveness of the extract over time. These results are consistent with previous studies that have reported the insecticidal properties of plant extracts against various pests [49]. The assessment of antioxidant and polyphenolic activity in medicinal products is crucial for understanding the therapeutic potential of natural plants. Kumar and Mishra [44] identified alkaloids, flavonoids, terpenoids, and cardiac glycosides in the extract of P. hysterophorus, while the flower extracts exhibited phenolic contents ranging from 86.69–320.17mg propyl gallate equivalent PGEg-1. These findings align with our study, highlighting the significant antioxidant activity of the bioactive compounds present in P. hysterophorus extracts. Previous research on P. hysterophorus leaves extract reported a 50% radical scavenging potential at 250μgmL-1 in the DPPH assay and 30% inhibition at 100μgmL-1 in hydrogen peroxide assays [50], indicating the antioxidant potential of the plant extract. This antioxidant activity in the hydro-ethanolic extracts of P. hysterophorus leaves is likely attributed to the presence of polyphenolic compounds [11, 51]. The flower extract of P. hysterophorus exhibited significant antioxidant activity, as evidenced by its potent radical scavenging ability. This finding is in line with previous studies that have reported the antioxidant potential of various plant extracts [52]. The presence of phenolic and flavonoid compounds in the extract may contribute to its antioxidant activity. Phenols and flavonoids are well-known antioxidant compounds that can effectively neutralize free radicals and protect against oxidative stress [53]. The strong correlation observed between antioxidant activity, phenolic/flavonoid content, and extract yield further supports the potential of P. hysterophorus as a source of natural antioxidants.

Our findings on the antioxidant activity of P. hysterophorus are consistent with previous studies. Sinha and Paul [54] reported similar scavenging properties (54.5%) and IC50 values (60.2) via the DPPH assay, as well as high scavenging activity (93.2%) and IC50 values (33.6) via the ABTS assay. Likewise, Bashir [55] demonstrated the presence of significant phenolic and flavonoid contents (105.44mg GAEg-1 and 41.50mg REg-1, respectively) in a 60% ethanolic leaf extract of P. hysterophorus, along with comparable IC50 values for DPPH radical scavenging activity (87.55 μgmL-1) and ABTS (98.22 μgmL-1). Furthermore, the phytochemical profiling of P. hysterophorus revealed the presence of terpenes, fatty acids, hydrocarbons, and phytosterols, with the root extract exhibiting the highest antioxidant potential [56]. These findings align with Sinha and Paul [54], who reported substantial antioxidant activity in crude leaf extracts of P. hysterophorus, with IC50 values of 60.24% and 33.60% using the DPPH and ABTS methods, respectively.

Previous research has demonstrated that exposure of natural fauna to harmful chemicals can have significant impacts on biological activities. For instance, estrogen compounds have been found to cause acute toxicity in edible crops and vegetables, particularly when long-term irrigation with estrogen-containing water is involved. Adeel and Zain [57] reported similar results, showing the uptake and accumulation of l7β-estradiol (17β-E2) and ethinylestradiol (EE2) in lettuce (Lactuca sativa) grown under laboratory conditions. These findings emphasize the potential risks associated with the contamination of agricultural systems by estrogen compounds.

The utilization of secondary metabolites, including terpenoids, alkaloids, and flavonoids, as pest control agents has gained attention due to historical practices involving nicotine and pyrethrum [58]. Our findings align with previous studies by Tesfu and Emana [59], who observed significant mortality rates of Callosobruchus chinensis after 96 hours of exposure to different parts of P. hysterophorus extract. Inflorescence and stem powder demonstrated mortality rates of 76.67% and 56.67%, respectively, while the leaves extract exhibited repellent effects of 70–100% on Aedes aegypti adults. Additionally, the diethyl ether extracts showed exceptional repellency at 99.7%.The insecticidal effects of plant extracts can be attributed to their repellency and stomach poisoning properties, which hinder insect movement and cause death by constricting their spiracles [60]. Chemical analysis of P. hysterophorus revealed the presence of sesquiterpene lactones, particularly parthenin derivatives, which exhibited insecticidal and nematicidal activities against Callosobruchus maculatus adults and Meloidogyne incognita root knot nematodes. Notably, the pyrazoline compound demonstrated high efficacy as an insecticide, with an LC50 value of 32mgL-1 after 72 hours of exposure, and also exhibited strong nematicidal activity, with an LC50 value of 512mgL-1 for parthenin after 72 hours [37]. The chemical profiling of the P. hysterophorus flower extract using GCMS analysis revealed the presence of several chemical compounds, indicating its complex chemical composition. These compounds could be responsible for the observed biological activities, including antioxidant and insecticidal effects. Further investigation is warranted to isolate and purify these bioactive compounds and evaluate their specific biological properties. The identification and characterization of these compounds can contribute to the development of natural products for antioxidant and insecticidal purposes.

P. hysterophorus extract exhibited remarkable effectiveness against Lipaphis erysimi, reducing infestation by 29%, possibly due to the presence of phenolic acids [61]. Ahmad and Bagheri [56] reported mortality rates of 26.70% and 27% in mustard aphids treated with P. hysterophorus extract concentrations of 10% and 20% respectively, after 21 days. Additionally, Wasu and Yogesh [62] demonstrated high mortality (100% with freshly prepared solution, 80% with stored stock) of Aedes aegypti larvae when exposed to P. hysterophorus leaf and stem extract (200g500-1ml). Another study highlighted significant mortality rates of 73.33%, 86.67%, and 83.33% against B. brassicae and moderate mortality rates of 26.67%, 46.67%, and 63.33% against Myzus persicae at 10% concentration and exposure times of 24, 48, and 72 hours respectively [58]. Furthermore, Wasu and Yogesh [62] reported promising effects of crude extracts from fresh P. hysterophorus leaves against Spodoptera littura and Spodoptera littorallis, with LC50 values of 7.96% and 8.14% respectively.

Gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GCMS) analysis revealed the presence of various phytochemicals in different parts of P. hysterophorus. Wang and Gan [63] identified fourteen chemical compounds, including phytosterols, stigmasterol, daucosterol, dtigmasterol-3-O-glucopyranoside, and Stigmasteryl-3β-arachidate. Similarly, Białon et al [64] found diverse terpenoids in Lavender oil, exhibiting antibacterial and antifungal properties. The chemical composition of Satureja montana and its tincture demonstrated high polyphenol, phenolic, and flavonoid contents, suggesting potential antimicrobial and antioxidant activities for further clinical investigation [65]. GCMS coupled with the NIST library enabled the identification of known compounds in extracts, facilitating the separation and exploration of unidentified compounds. In another study, phenolic compounds from Cladofora glomerata algae were isolated and characterized using colorimetric, chromatographic, and HPLC methods, revealing the presence of nine phenolic compounds, phenolic acids, and flavonoids [66]. In the leaf extracts of P. hysterophorus, a significant abundance of parthenin, a key component, was observed, showing a positive correlation with cytotoxicity but not with phytotoxicity. Bajwa and Weston [67] identified chlorogenic acid and ambrosin as compounds positively correlated with germination inhibition, while vatirenene was found in high concentrations (19.8%) in the roots. Vatirenene was also detected in breath tests, reported by Koo andThomas [68], potentially linked to aspergillosis. Additionally, caryophyllene oxide demonstrates effective fungicidal properties [69] and can induce resistance in reproductive parts [70, 71], while globulol exhibits strong antibacterial activity [72]. Our current investigation highlights the flower extract of P. hysterophorus as a rich source of chemical compounds responsible for antioxidant and insecticidal activities.

While various studies have explored the phytochemistery, pharmacology, and other biological activities of P. hysterophorus, there is limited research on its antioxidant activity, insecticidal properties against B. brassicae, and chemical analysis of the flower extract. Given the growing interest in botanical-based natural antioxidants for the food, medical, and agrochemical industries, this study fills a critical research gap by investigating the antioxidant and insecticidal potential of P. hysterophorus flower extract against B. brassicae, providing valuable insights into its novel applications.

Conclusions

Parthenium hysterophorus, despite being a noxious weed, exhibits significant beneficial properties for the medical and agrochemical industries. The flower extract displays remarkable antioxidant and insecticidal activities, particularly against Brevicoryne brassicae, a widespread sucking pest. The extract’s potency is further supported by its LC50 values of 1446μgmL-1 and 750μgmL-1 at 72 and 96 hours, respectively. The strong correlation between antioxidant activity, phenolic/flavonoid content, and extract yield highlights its potential. Chemical analysis reveals the presence of various bioactive compounds responsible for these activities. Therefore, P. hysterophorus extract shows promise as an alternative to synthetic chemicals for antioxidant and insecticidal purposes. However, further research is necessary to optimize extraction, purification, and evaluate the biological potential of these compounds.

Acknowledgments

The support and supervision provided by Professor Zumin Gu, Ji Mingshan and experimental guidelines of lab mates of Biopesticides Laboratory, Plant Protection College Shenyang is greatly acknowledged.

Data Availability

All relevant data are within the paper.

Funding Statement

This research was supported by National Key Research & Development Program of China (Grant No. 0201300). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

References

  • 1.Sukanya S, Sudisha J, Hariprasad P, Niranjana S, Prakash H, Fathima S. Antimicrobial activity of leaf extracts of Indian medicinal plants against clinical and phytopathogenic bacteria. Afr J. Biotechnol. 2009;8(23). [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Adkins SW, Shabbir A, Dhileepan K. Parthenium weed: biology, ecology and management: CABI; 2018. [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 3.Adkins S, Shabbir A. Biology, ecology and management of the invasive parthenium weed (Parthenium hysterophorus L.). Pest Manage Sci. 2014;70(7):1023–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Ray P, Gour HN. Ray Puja and Gour H.N. (2012). Integrated Management of Parthenium hysterophorus L. (Asteraceae): A weed of worldwide significance. Ind J Mycol Pl Path. 2012;5:605–32. [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Kapoor RT. Awareness related survey of an invasive alien weed, Parthenium hysterophorus L. in Gautam Budh Nagar district, Uttar Pradesh, India. J Agric Technol. 2012;8(3):1129–40. [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Khan N, Bibi K, Ullah R. Distribution pattern and ecological determinants of an invasive plant Parthenium hysterophorus L., in Malakand division of Pakistan. J Mt Sci. 2020;17:1670–83. [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Kushwaha VB, Maurya S. Biological utilities of Parthenium hysterophorus. J Appl Nat Sci. 2012;4(1):137–43. [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Kaur M, Aggarwal NK, Kumar V, Dhiman R. Effects and management of Parthenium hysterophorus: A weed of global significance. Int Sch Res Notices. 2014;2014. doi: 10.1155/2014/368647 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Javaid A, Jabeen T, Khan IH, Jabeen K, Akbar M. Herbicidal potential of Alternaria citri Ellis and Pierce metabolites against Parthenium hysterophorus. L. Allelopathy J. 2022;55(1):25–34. [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Khan IH, Javaid A, Ahmad S. Metabolites of Penicillium citrinum as potent herbicides against parthenium weed. Pak J Weed Sci Res. 2021;28(1):77–85. [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Raza S, Chaudhary A, Mumtaz M, Bashir S. Antioxidant, iron chelating, lipase inhibition activities and metabolite’s prediction of hyrdoethanolic leaf extract of Conocarpus erectus. Food Res. 2019;4:482–7. [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Seufi AM, Mohammed HA, Moussa FI, El-Din AAS, El-Saadani M, Taha TH, et al. Protective Effects of the Aqueous Extract of Black Mulberry Leaves, Morus nigra, on Chlorpyrifos Toxicity in Male Albino Rats. Jordan J Biol Sci. 2019;12(4). [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Kapoor RT. Farmers’perception about Parthenium hysterophorus l.-a case study of handia and phulpur tehsils of allahabad district, uttar pradesh. 2016.
  • 14.Picman AK, Elliott R, Towers G. Cardiac-inhibiting properties of the sesquiterpene lactone, parthenin, in the migratory grasshopper, Melanoplus sanguinipes. Can J Zool. 1981;59(2):285–92. [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Lakshmi C, Srinivas C. Parthenium a wide angle view. Indian J Dermatol Venereol Leprol. 2007;73(5):296. doi: 10.4103/0378-6323.35732 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Batish DR, Singh H, Kohli R, Saxena D, Kaur S. Allelopathic effects of parthenin against two weedy species, Avena fatua and Bidens pilosa. Environ Exp Bot. 2002;47(2):149–55. [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Batish D, Singh H, Saxena D, Kohli R. Weed suppressing ability of parthenin-a sesquiterpene lactone from Parthenium hysterophorus. N Z Plant Prot. 2002;55:218–21. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Patel VS, Chitra V, Prasanna PL, Krishnaraju V. Hypoglycemic effect of aqueous extract of Parthenium hysterophorus L. in normal and alloxan induced diabetic rats. Indian J Pharmacol. 2008;40(4):183. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Selmi S, Rtibi K, Grami D, Sebai H, Marzouki L. Rosemary (Rosmarinus officinalis) essential oil components exhibit anti-hyperglycemic, anti-hyperlipidemic and antioxidant effects in experimental diabetes. Pathophysiology. 2017;24(4):297–303. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Asghari B, Zengin G, Bahadori MB, Abbas-Mohammadi M, Dinparast L. Amylase, glucosidase, tyrosinase, and cholinesterases inhibitory, antioxidant effects, and GC-MS analysis of wild mint (Mentha longifolia var. calliantha) essential oil: A natural remedy. Eur J Integr Med. 2018;22:44–9. [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Borah A, Paw M, Gogoi R, Loying R, Sarma N, Munda S, et al. Chemical composition, antioxidant, anti-inflammatory, anti-microbial and in-vitro cytotoxic efficacy of essential oil of Curcuma caesia Roxb. leaves: An endangered medicinal plant of North East India. Ind Crops Prod. 2019;129:448–54. [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Manssouri M, Znini M, Majidi L. Studies on the antioxidant activity of essential oil and various extracts of Ammodaucus leucotrichus Coss. & Dur. Fruits from Morocco. J Taibah Uni Sci. 2020;14(1):124–30. [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Zhang C, Zhao J, Famous E, Pan S, Peng X, Tian J. Antioxidant, hepatoprotective and antifungal activities of black pepper (Piper nigrum L.) essential oil. Food Chem. 2021;346:128845. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Dwivedi S, Dwivedi A, Dwivedi S. Folk lore uses of some plants by the tribes of Madhya Pradesh with special reference to their conservation. Ethnobot leafl. 2008;2008(1):105. [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Shabbir A, Javaid A. Effect of aqueous extracts of alien weed Parthenium hysterophorus and two native asteraceous species on germination and growth of mungbean, Vigna radiata L. wilczek. J Agric Res. 2010;48(4):483–8. [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Towers G, Subba Rao P, editors. Impact of the pan-tropical weed, Parthenium hysterophorus L. on human affairs. Proceedings of the first international weed control congress; 1992: Weed Science Society of Victoria Melbourne.
  • 27.Espinosa-Rivero J, Rendón-Huerta E, Romero I. Inhibition of Helicobacter pylori growth and its colonization factors by Parthenium hysterophorus extracts. J Ethnopharmacol. 2015;174:253–60. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Tanvir R, Sajid I, Hasnain S. Screening of endophytic Streptomycetes isolated from Parthenium hysterophorus L. against nosocomial pathogens. Pak J Pharm Sci. 2013;26(2):277–83. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Deka B, Jiten M, Bhattacharyya P. Acaricidal activities of Parthenium hysterophorus L. against red spider mite, Oligonychus coffeae Nietner (Acarina: Tetranychidae) of tea. Int J Sci Res. 2013;4(5):2319–7064. [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Krishnaveni M. Air pollution tolerance index and antioxidant activity of Parthenium hysterophorus. J Pharm Res. 2013;7(4):296–8. [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Nabi SA, Kasetti RB, Sirasanagandla S, Tilak TK, Kumar MVJ, Rao CA. Antidiabetic and antihyperlipidemic activity of Piper longum root aqueous extract in STZ induced diabetic rats. BMC Complement Altern Med. 2013;13(1):37. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Panwar R, Sharma AK, Dutt D, Pruthi V. Phenolic acids from Parthenium hysterophorus: evaluation of bioconversion potential as free radical scavengers and anticancer agents. Adv Biosci Biotech. 2015;6(01):11. [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Anup R, Sainath P, Padma S, Sukumaran M. In vitro cytotoxic activity of methanolic extract of Parthenium hysterophorus flowers on MCF-7 and HeLa cell lines. Int J Curr Microbiol Appl Sci. 2015;4(8):710–5. [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Kumar S, Nair G, Singh AP, Batra S, Wahab N, Warikoo R. Evaluation of the larvicidal efficiency of stem, roots and leaves of the weed, Parthenium hysterophorus (Family: Asteraceae) against Aedes aegypti L. Asian Pac J Trop Dis. 2012;2(5):395–400. [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Kumar VP, Chauhan NS, Padh H, Rajani M. Search for antibacterial and antifungal agents from selected Indian medicinal plants. J Ethnopharmacol. 2006;107(2):182–8. doi: 10.1016/j.jep.2006.03.013 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Jha U, Chhajed PJ, Oswal RJ, Shelke TT. Skeletal muscle relaxant activity of methanolic extract of Parthenium hysterophorus L. leaves in swiss albino mice. Int J Pharm Life Sci. 2011;2(11). [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Datta S, Saxena DB. Pesticidal properties of parthenin (from Parthenium hysterophorus) and related compounds. Pest Manage Sci. 2001;57(1):95–101. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Bharadwaja S, Singh S, Moholkar VS. Design and optimization of a sono-hybrid process for bioethanol production from Parthenium hysterophorus. J Taiwan Inst Chem Eng. 2015;51:71–8. [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Parashar V, Parashar R, Sharma B, Pandey AC. Parthenium leaf extract mediated synthesis of silver nanoparticles: a novel approach towards weed utilization. Dig J Nanomater Biostructures. 2009;4(1). [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Rajiv P, Rajeshwari S, Venckatesh R. Bio-Fabrication of zinc oxide nanoparticles using leaf extract of Parthenium hysterophorus L. and its size-dependent antifungal activity against plant fungal pathogens. Spectrochimica Acta Part A: Mol Biomol Spectrosc. 2013;112:384–7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Yang J, Jiang F, Ma C, Rui Y, Rui M, Adeel M, et al. Alteration of crop yield and quality of wheat upon exposure to silver nanoparticles in a life cycle study. J Agric Food Chem. 2018;66(11):2589–97. doi: 10.1021/acs.jafc.7b04904 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Ahmad MA, Yuesuo Y, Ao Q, Adeel M, Hui ZY, Javed R. Appraisal of comparative therapeutic potential of undoped and nitrogen-doped titanium dioxide nanoparticles. Molecules. 2019;24(21):3916. doi: 10.3390/molecules24213916 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Javed R, Ahmad MA, Gul A, Ahsan T, Cheema M. Comparison of chemically and biologically synthesized nanoparticles for the production of secondary metabolites, and growth and development of plants. Compr Anal Chem. 2021;94:303–29. [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Ahmed M, Ji M, Qin P, Gu Z, Liu Y, Sikandar A, et al. Determination of phytochemicals, antioxidant activity and biochemical composition of chinese mugwort (Artemisia argyi l.) leaf extract from northeast China. Appl Ecol Environ Res. 2019;17(6):15349–62. [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Sparkman OD. Identification of essential oil components by gas chromatography/quadrupole mass spectroscopy Robert P. Adams. J Am Soc Mass Spectrom. 2005;16(11):1902–3. [Google Scholar]
  • 46.McConnachie A, Strathie L, Mersie W, Gebrehiwot L, Zewdie K, Abdurehim A, et al. Current and potential geographical distribution of the invasive plant Parthenium hysterophorus (Asteraceae) in eastern and southern Africa. Weed Res. 2011;51(1):71–84. [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Narasimhan T, Murthy BK, Harindranath N, Rao PS. Characterization of a toxin from Parthenium hysterophorus and its mode of excretion in animals. Weed Res. 1984;6(5):729–38. [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Hasan N, Jain R. Biotoxicity of Parthenium hysterophorus extracts against Meloidogyne javanica and Helicotylenchus dihystera. Nematol Mediterr. 1984. [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Attaullah ZM, Zahoor M, Mubarik M, Rizvi H, Majeed H, Zulhussnain M, et al. Insecticidal, biological and biochemical response of Musca domestica (Diptera: Muscidae) to some indigenous weed plant extracts. Saudi J Biol Sci. 2020;27(1):106–16. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Kalaiselvi M, Subbaiya R, Selvam M. Synthesis and characterization of silver nanoparticles from leaf extract of Parthenium hysterophorus and its anti-bacterial and antioxidant activity. Int J Curr Microbiol Appl Sci. 2013;2(6):220–7. [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Arshad M, Mumtaz MW, Chaudhary AR, Rashid U, Ali M, Mukhtar H, et al. Metabolite profiling of Cycas revoluta leaf extract and docking studies on alpha-glucosidase inhibitory molecular targets by phytochemicals. PakJ Pharm Sci. 2019;32(2 (Supplementary)):871–4. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Yamaguchi KKdL Souza AdO. Antioxidant, hypoglycemic and neuroprotective activities of extracts from fruits native to the Amazon region: A review. Biotech J Int. 2020;24(6):9–31. [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Akbari B, Baghaei-Yazdi N, Bahmaie M, Mahdavi Abhari F. The role of plant-derived natural antioxidants in reduction of oxidative stress. BioFactors. 2022;48(3):611–33. doi: 10.1002/biof.1831 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Sinha SN, Paul D. Antioxidant potentials of Parthenium hysterophorus L. leaf extracts. Sci Res J India. 2014;3(2):80–6. [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Bashir S, Raza S.A., Ahmad M., Farhan M., Ali S. and William J. Hydroethanolic leaf extract of Parthenium hysterophorus attenuates blood glucose in alloxan induced diabetic mice. Food Res. 2021;5(1):72–7. [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Ahmad J, Bagheri R, Bashir H, Baig MA, Al-Huqail A, Ibrahim MM, et al. Organ-specific phytochemical profiling and antioxidant analysis of Parthenium hysterophorus L. BioMed Res Int. 2018;2018. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Adeel M, Zain M, Fahad S, Rizwan M, Ameen A, Yi H, et al. Natural and synthetic estrogens in leafy vegetable and their risk associated to human health. Environ Sci Pollut Res. 2018;25(36):36712–23. doi: 10.1007/s11356-018-3588-4 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Rajiv P, Rajeshwari S, Yadav RH, Rajendran V. Vermiremediation: Detoxification of Parthenin toxin from Parthenium weeds. J Hazard Mater. 2013;262:489–95. doi: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2013.08.075 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Tesfu F, Emana G. Evaluation of Parthenium hysterophorus L. powder against Callosobruchus chinensis L.(Coleoptera: Bruchidae) on chickpea under laboratory conditions. Afri J Agri Res. 2013;8(44):5405–10. [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Shaheen FA, Khaliq A. Management of Pulse Beetle, Callosobruchus chinensis L.(Coleoptera: Bruchidae) in stored Chickpea using ashes, red soil powder and turpentine oil. Pak Entomol. 2005;27(2):19–24. [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Yadav SK, Patel S. Insecticidal and repellent activity of some plant extracts against Myzus persicae (Sulzer) and Brevicoryne brassicae (Linnaeus). J Entomol Zool Stud. 2017;5(2):1434–143. [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Wasu Yogesh H GD, Patel Sagar B. Larvicidal effects of Parthenium hysterophorus againstpolyphagus pests Spodoptera Litura and Spodopteralittoralis. Indian J Appl Res. 2019;9(2):1–19. [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Wang M-H, Gan J-J, Chen W-H, Guan Y-L. Chemical Constituents of Parthenium hysterophorus. Chem Nat Comp. 2020;56:556–8. [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Białoń M, Krzyśko-Łupicka T, Nowakowska-Bogdan E, Wieczorek PP. Chemical composition of two different lavender essential oils and their effect on facial skin microbiota. Molecules. 2019;24(18):3270. doi: 10.3390/molecules24183270 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Hudz N, Makowicz E, Shanaida M, Białoń M, Jasicka-Misiak I, Yezerska O, et al. Phytochemical Evaluation of Tinctures and Essential Oil Obtained from Satureja montana Herb. Molecules. 2020;25(20):4763. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Korzeniowska K, Łęska B, Wieczorek PP. Isolation and determination of phenolic compounds from freshwater Cladophora glomerata. Algal Res. 2020;48:101912. [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Bajwa AA, Weston PA, Gurusinghe S, Latif S, Adkins SW, Weston LA. Toxic Potential and Metabolic Profiling of Two Australian Biotypes of the Invasive Plant Parthenium Weed (Parthenium hysterophorus L.). Toxins. 2020;12(7):447. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Koo S, Thomas HR, Daniels SD, Lynch RC, Fortier SM, Shea MM, et al. A breath fungal secondary metabolite signature to diagnose invasive aspergillosis. Clin Infect Dis. 2014;59(12):1733–40. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciu725 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Yang D, Michel L, Chaumont J-P, Millet-Clerc J. Use of caryophyllene oxide as an antifungal agent in an in vitro experimental model of onychomycosis. Mycopathologia. 2000;148(2):79–82. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Saifullah K. Callus induction and cell suspension culture production of Catharanthus roseus for biotransformation studies of (-)-caryophyllene oxide. Pak J Bot. 2011;43(1):467–73. [Google Scholar]
  • 71.Halim SA, Uddin R, Madura JD. Benchmarking docking and scoring protocol for the identification of potential acetylcholinesterase inhibitors. J Mol Graph Model. 2010;28(8):870–82. doi: 10.1016/j.jmgm.2010.03.007 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72.Mulyaningsih S, Sporer F, Reichling J, Wink M. Antibacterial activity of essential oils from Eucalyptus and of selected components against multidrug-resistant bacterial pathogens. Pharm Biol. 2011;49(9):893–9. doi: 10.3109/13880209.2011.553625 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Decision Letter 0

Ali Ahsan Bajwa

14 Aug 2022

PONE-D-22-14804Antioxidant, Insecticidal Activity and Chemical Profiling of Flower’s Extract of Carrot Grass (Parthenium hysterophorus L.)PLOS ONE

Dear Dr. Gu,

Thank you for submitting your manuscript to PLOS ONE. After careful consideration, we feel that it has merit but does not fully meet PLOS ONE’s publication criteria as it currently stands. Therefore, we invite you to submit a revised version of the manuscript that addresses the points raised during the review process.

Please submit your revised manuscript by Sep 28 2022 11:59PM. If you will need more time than this to complete your revisions, please reply to this message or contact the journal office at plosone@plos.org. When you're ready to submit your revision, log on to https://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/ and select the 'Submissions Needing Revision' folder to locate your manuscript file.

Please include the following items when submitting your revised manuscript:

  • A rebuttal letter that responds to each point raised by the academic editor and reviewer(s). You should upload this letter as a separate file labeled 'Response to Reviewers'.

  • A marked-up copy of your manuscript that highlights changes made to the original version. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Revised Manuscript with Track Changes'.

  • An unmarked version of your revised paper without tracked changes. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Manuscript'.

If you would like to make changes to your financial disclosure, please include your updated statement in your cover letter. Guidelines for resubmitting your figure files are available below the reviewer comments at the end of this letter.

If applicable, we recommend that you deposit your laboratory protocols in protocols.io to enhance the reproducibility of your results. Protocols.io assigns your protocol its own identifier (DOI) so that it can be cited independently in the future. For instructions see: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/submission-guidelines#loc-laboratory-protocols. Additionally, PLOS ONE offers an option for publishing peer-reviewed Lab Protocol articles, which describe protocols hosted on protocols.io. Read more information on sharing protocols at https://plos.org/protocols?utm_medium=editorial-email&utm_source=authorletters&utm_campaign=protocols.

We look forward to receiving your revised manuscript.

Kind regards,

Ali Bajwa, Ph.D

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Journal Requirements:

When submitting your revision, we need you to address these additional requirements.

1. Please ensure that your manuscript meets PLOS ONE's style requirements, including those for file naming. The PLOS ONE style templates can be found at

https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=wjVg/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_main_body.pdf and

https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=ba62/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_title_authors_affiliations.pdf

2. In the 'header' sections of your manuscript the following text is present 'Nextgenediting Template PLOS_One_Word_Template.docx. www.nextgenediting.com [double click header to delete]'. Did you receive any third party support in conducting this research, analyzing the data, or preparing the manuscript for submission? If yes, provide details as to the organization(s) involved and their specific contributions by updating the acknowledgements section of the manuscript.

3. Thank you for stating the following financial disclosure:

“G.Z.;

Grant No. (0201300)

National Key Research & Development Program of China

No;”

Please state what role the funders took in the study.  If the funders had no role, please state: "The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript."

If this statement is not correct you must amend it as needed.

Please include this amended Role of Funder statement in your cover letter; we will change the online submission form on your behalf.

4. In your Data Availability statement, you have not specified where the minimal data set underlying the results described in your manuscript can be found. PLOS defines a study's minimal data set as the underlying data used to reach the conclusions drawn in the manuscript and any additional data required to replicate the reported study findings in their entirety. All PLOS journals require that the minimal data set be made fully available. For more information about our data policy, please see http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/data-availability.

Upon re-submitting your revised manuscript, please upload your study’s minimal underlying data set as either Supporting Information files or to a stable, public repository and include the relevant URLs, DOIs, or accession numbers within your revised cover letter. For a list of acceptable repositories, please see http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/data-availability#loc-recommended-repositories. Any potentially identifying patient information must be fully anonymized.

Important: If there are ethical or legal restrictions to sharing your data publicly, please explain these restrictions in detail. Please see our guidelines for more information on what we consider unacceptable restrictions to publicly sharing data: http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/data-availability#loc-unacceptable-data-access-restrictions. Note that it is not acceptable for the authors to be the sole named individuals responsible for ensuring data access.

We will update your Data Availability statement to reflect the information you provide in your cover letter.

5. We note that you have stated that you will provide repository information for your data at acceptance. Should your manuscript be accepted for publication, we will hold it until you provide the relevant accession numbers or DOIs necessary to access your data. If you wish to make changes to your Data Availability statement, please describe these changes in your cover letter and we will update your Data Availability statement to reflect the information you provide.

6. PLOS requires an ORCID iD for the corresponding author in Editorial Manager on papers submitted after December 6th, 2016. Please ensure that you have an ORCID iD and that it is validated in Editorial Manager. To do this, go to ‘Update my Information’ (in the upper left-hand corner of the main menu), and click on the Fetch/Validate link next to the ORCID field. This will take you to the ORCID site and allow you to create a new iD or authenticate a pre-existing iD in Editorial Manager. Please see the following video for instructions on linking an ORCID iD to your Editorial Manager account: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_xcclfuvtxQ

Additional Editor Comments:

The manuscript reports on bioactivity of parthenium weed flower extracts with some significant results. However, authors must address comments raised by reviewers, especially Reviewer 2. I don't think Carrot grass is a good common name to use when in fact the weed is a broadleaf species.

[Note: HTML markup is below. Please do not edit.]

Reviewers' comments:

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Comments to the Author

1. Is the manuscript technically sound, and do the data support the conclusions?

The manuscript must describe a technically sound piece of scientific research with data that supports the conclusions. Experiments must have been conducted rigorously, with appropriate controls, replication, and sample sizes. The conclusions must be drawn appropriately based on the data presented.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Partly

**********

2. Has the statistical analysis been performed appropriately and rigorously?

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: I Don't Know

**********

3. Have the authors made all data underlying the findings in their manuscript fully available?

The PLOS Data policy requires authors to make all data underlying the findings described in their manuscript fully available without restriction, with rare exception (please refer to the Data Availability Statement in the manuscript PDF file). The data should be provided as part of the manuscript or its supporting information, or deposited to a public repository. For example, in addition to summary statistics, the data points behind means, medians and variance measures should be available. If there are restrictions on publicly sharing data—e.g. participant privacy or use of data from a third party—those must be specified.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

4. Is the manuscript presented in an intelligible fashion and written in standard English?

PLOS ONE does not copyedit accepted manuscripts, so the language in submitted articles must be clear, correct, and unambiguous. Any typographical or grammatical errors should be corrected at revision, so please note any specific errors here.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: No

**********

5. Review Comments to the Author

Please use the space provided to explain your answers to the questions above. You may also include additional comments for the author, including concerns about dual publication, research ethics, or publication ethics. (Please upload your review as an attachment if it exceeds 20,000 characters)

Reviewer #1: It is a good piece of work. However, needs some corrections before publication.

1- Do not use useless abbreviations. Please see comments in abstract.

2- Whole paper needs thorough corrections for formatting. Give proper spacing between a digit and a its units.

3- Introduction is too lengthy. Delete the first paragraph.

4- Delete Table 1.

5- Check stats in Table 2 for flavonoids.

6- In Table 5, give units of RT

7- Format references uniformly and correctly.

8- Two or more references should be cited at the end of Paragraph 2 of Introduction. I have suggested two references. Please check their suitabllity.

Reviewer #2: This is a good study but the English language/expression is very poor and it needs to be improved. For specific comments please see the attached file. The Figure 1 does not include the positive control treatment, please check.

**********

6. PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean?). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy.

Reviewer #1: Yes: Dr. Arshad Javaid

Reviewer #2: Yes: Asad Shabbir

**********

[NOTE: If reviewer comments were submitted as an attachment file, they will be attached to this email and accessible via the submission site. Please log into your account, locate the manuscript record, and check for the action link "View Attachments". If this link does not appear, there are no attachment files.]

While revising your submission, please upload your figure files to the Preflight Analysis and Conversion Engine (PACE) digital diagnostic tool, https://pacev2.apexcovantage.com/. PACE helps ensure that figures meet PLOS requirements. To use PACE, you must first register as a user. Registration is free. Then, login and navigate to the UPLOAD tab, where you will find detailed instructions on how to use the tool. If you encounter any issues or have any questions when using PACE, please email PLOS at figures@plos.org. Please note that Supporting Information files do not need this step.

Attachment

Submitted filename: PONE-D-22-14804.pdf

pone.0296321.s001.pdf (1.3MB, pdf)
Attachment

Submitted filename: Summary of Comments on PONE-D-22-14804_reviewer.pdf

pone.0296321.s002.pdf (1,015.2KB, pdf)
PLoS One. 2024 Jun 7;19(6):e0296321. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0296321.r002

Author response to Decision Letter 0


15 Jan 2023

Reviewer Comments:

Reviewer 1

Review comments:

Page 9

Point 1: innate of what? do you mean native?

Response:

The word innate changed to inherent

Point 2.3; need to explain how?

Response:

Sentence was explained in detail to clarify the meaning

Point 4,5 No clear, check the grammar

Response: compliance has been done and sentence was revised

Point 6, 7 Again, this need to be explained how?

Response compliance has been done and explained to clear the meaning

Point 8, 9 Is this correct referencing style?

Response: reference style has been adjusted according the journal

Point, 10 not clear

Response sentence was revised to clarify the meaning

Page 10

Point 1,2,3 Do you mean parthenin?

Response: yes, compliance was done

Point 4,5,6 move 'health' before 'consequences'

Response: compliance has been done and sentence was revised as suggested

Point 7,8 Do you mean "come in contact'

Response: yes the same meaning

Point 8, add author citations with the sci. names of all plants when mentioned first time

Response: compliance has been made and instruction were followed

Page 16

Point 1 highest?

Response: compliance was done

Page 21

Point 1 leaves.?

Response: sentence was revised.

Point 2 Either use Parthenium or Parthenium hysterophorus, throughout

Response: compliance has been done and instruction was followed.

Page 36

Point C.L stands for?

Response: actually the word is F.L stands for Fiducial Limit

Page 39

Point 1G = +ve control missing in Figure

Response: Positive control was added in the figure

Reviewer 1

Point 1 Also add authority

Response: compliance was made and Authority was added

Point 2 Do not use such useless abbreviations. Write full words for these names or parameters.

Response: Instructions were followed and useless abbreviation were deleted

Point 3 Give space

Response: compliance was made

Point 4 showed.?

Response: compliance was made and the word changed to “showed”

Point: 5 No need of First paragraph.

Response: First paragraph deleted.

Point 6 CIte reference correctly. Delete the name of authors

Response: reference was cited in correct style

Point 7 This paragraph should be extended

Response: The suggested paragraph was extended.

Point 8 It is ......

Response Compliance has been made

Point 9 Add a references here.; Following latest references is suggested:

Response The suggested reference were added and cited in the manuscript

Point 10 Should not be a new paragraph

Response Compliance was made and Instructions were followed

Point: 11 No need to mention the Institute.

Response: Information about institute were deleted

Point: 12 Do not use capital letters

Response: suggestion were followed, and word were corrected

Point: 13 Delete %

Response: The symbol % was removed

Point: 14 Add space

Response: The space was added where needed

Point 15 Do not use upper case letters for the names of compounds

Response:: Compliance has been done

Point 16 No need of this introductory paragraph

Response: A part of the paragraph has been deleted

Point 17 Format references uniformly and correctly

Response: References were formatted according to the journal style

Attachment

Submitted filename: Point by Point Reviewer Comments.docx

pone.0296321.s003.docx (22.5KB, docx)

Decision Letter 1

Ali Ahsan Bajwa

14 Feb 2023

PONE-D-22-14804R1Antioxidant, Insecticidal Activity and Chemical Profiling of Flower’s Extract of Carrot Grass (Parthenium hysterophorus L.)PLOS ONE

Dear Dr. Gu,

Thank you for submitting your manuscript to PLOS ONE. After careful consideration, we feel that it has merit but does not fully meet PLOS ONE’s publication criteria as it currently stands. Therefore, we invite you to submit a revised version of the manuscript that addresses the points raised during the review process.

Please submit your revised manuscript by Mar 25 2023 11:59PM. If you will need more time than this to complete your revisions, please reply to this message or contact the journal office at plosone@plos.org. When you're ready to submit your revision, log on to https://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/ and select the 'Submissions Needing Revision' folder to locate your manuscript file.

Please include the following items when submitting your revised manuscript:

  • A rebuttal letter that responds to each point raised by the academic editor and reviewer(s). You should upload this letter as a separate file labeled 'Response to Reviewers'.

  • A marked-up copy of your manuscript that highlights changes made to the original version. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Revised Manuscript with Track Changes'.

  • An unmarked version of your revised paper without tracked changes. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Manuscript'.

If you would like to make changes to your financial disclosure, please include your updated statement in your cover letter. Guidelines for resubmitting your figure files are available below the reviewer comments at the end of this letter.

If applicable, we recommend that you deposit your laboratory protocols in protocols.io to enhance the reproducibility of your results. Protocols.io assigns your protocol its own identifier (DOI) so that it can be cited independently in the future. For instructions see: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/submission-guidelines#loc-laboratory-protocols. Additionally, PLOS ONE offers an option for publishing peer-reviewed Lab Protocol articles, which describe protocols hosted on protocols.io. Read more information on sharing protocols at https://plos.org/protocols?utm_medium=editorial-email&utm_source=authorletters&utm_campaign=protocols.

We look forward to receiving your revised manuscript.

Kind regards,

Aishat Akere, Ph.D

Staff

PLOS ONE

Journal Requirements:

Please review your reference list to ensure that it is complete and correct. If you have cited papers that have been retracted, please include the rationale for doing so in the manuscript text, or remove these references and replace them with relevant current references. Any changes to the reference list should be mentioned in the rebuttal letter that accompanies your revised manuscript. If you need to cite a retracted article, indicate the article’s retracted status in the References list and also include a citation and full reference for the retraction notice.

Additional Editor Comments (if provided):

Manuscript is acceptable as the authors have addressed the reviewers' comments. I suggest authors replace the common name 'carrot grass' with 'parthenium weed' in title and throughout the manuscript at proofs stage.

[Note: HTML markup is below. Please do not edit.]

Reviewers' comments:

[NOTE: If reviewer comments were submitted as an attachment file, they will be attached to this email and accessible via the submission site. Please log into your account, locate the manuscript record, and check for the action link "View Attachments". If this link does not appear, there are no attachment files.]

While revising your submission, please upload your figure files to the Preflight Analysis and Conversion Engine (PACE) digital diagnostic tool, https://pacev2.apexcovantage.com/. PACE helps ensure that figures meet PLOS requirements. To use PACE, you must first register as a user. Registration is free. Then, login and navigate to the UPLOAD tab, where you will find detailed instructions on how to use the tool. If you encounter any issues or have any questions when using PACE, please email PLOS at figures@plos.org. Please note that Supporting Information files do not need this step.

PLoS One. 2024 Jun 7;19(6):e0296321. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0296321.r004

Author response to Decision Letter 1


28 Feb 2023

Rebuttal Letter

Title:

[Antioxidant, Insecticidal Activity and Chemical Profiling of Flower’s Extract of Parthenium weed (Parthenium hysterophorus L.]

[PlosOne]

[Submission Date: May 26, 2022]

Dear Editor

Thank you for inviting us to submit a revised draft of our manuscript entitled, "Antioxidant, Insecticidal Activity and Chemical Profiling of Flower’s Extract of Parthenium weed (Parthenium hysterophorus L. PlosOne journal. We also appreciate the time and effort you and each of the reviewers have dedicated to providing insightful feedback on ways to strengthen our paper. Thus, it is with great pleasure that we resubmit our article for further consideration.

We have incorporated changes that reflect the detailed suggestions you have graciously provided. We also hope that our edits and the responses we provide below satisfactorily address all the issues and concern you and the reviewers have noted.

To facilitate your review of our revisions, the following is a point-by-point response to the questions and comments.

EDITOR COMMENTS [1st round]

The present manuscript is informative and interpretation of obtained results is satisfactory. But the presentation of the manuscript is poor and must be improved significantly as suggested by the reviewers. Moreover, detail method used for the Extraction and Purification of Biochemical Compound should be described in little detail or relavant reference should be provided.

Negative and positive control must be considered rationally in each assay as one of the major concerns of the reviewer.

Authors must be careful in presenting the units [unit of LC50 of residual assay in table 3 is µg/mL while in text (result section 2.3 Insecticidal Activity) mentioned mg/mL].

Response: Compliance has been done;

� Manuscript has edited by native English speaker/TOPEDIT SCIENTIFIC EDITING [Http://www.topeditsci.com]

� Negative and Positive control has been added where needed as suggested by the reviewers.

� In Table 3 is µg/mL has been corrected as point out by the reviewer.

Reviewer Comments:

Reviewer 1

1. Introduction:

1- Introduction part should be started by specific paragraph regarding the microbial resistance, infectious diseases, reactive species, oxidative stress, and the role of naturally occurring compounds in the treatment of such issues.

Instructions have been followed and a paragraph has been added at the start of the introduction as suggested by the reviewer along with references;

“Oxidative stress plays a double role in infections; the pathologies that arise during such infections can be attributed to oxidative trauma and the creation of reactive species, often with lethal consequences. Microbial resistance to conventional antibiotics poses a significant threat to the treatment of infectious diseases. However, phytochemicals exhibit latent biological activity towards both resistant and sensitive pathogens. Phytochemicals are a valuable source of bioactive compounds with antimicrobial activities. Among these phytochemicals, phenolics are diverse secondary metabolites such as tannins, flavonoids, and lignin that exhibit antioxidant properties and are abundant in plant tissues. Likewise, reactive oxygen species (ROS) are produced as typical products in plant cellular breakdown. Naturally occurring compounds play a vital role against microbial resistance in the management of infectious diseases.”

2- The sentence ''Natural plants are venerated source of….'' should be typed as ''Medicinal plants are venerated source of….''.

Response: 2. Compliance has been done and stated as Medicinal plants are venerated source of phytochemical compounds….….….

3. Discussions:

1- The sentence ''Natural plants are God gifted treasures…..'' should be typed as ''Medicinal plants are God gifted treasures…..''.

Response: 1. Instructions have been followed and statement has been revised as Medicinal plants are God gifted treasures for humans which possess …..

2- Please, re-write this section ''Moreover, all of the populations of C. colocynthis extract showed antibacterial activity against Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Escherichia coli, Enterococcus faecalis and Staphylococcus aureus and antifungal activity against four Candidia species i.e. Candida krusei, Candida glabrata, Candida parapsilosis and Candida albicans 32'', try to delete the repeated word (and).

Response: 2. Instructions have been followed and statement has been revised as suggested

Moreover, all of the populations of C. colocynthis extract showed antibacterial activity against Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Escherichia coli, Enterococcus faecalis and Staphylococcus aureus whereas, antifungal activity against four Candidia species i.e. Candida krusei, Candida glabrata, Candida parapsilosis and Candida albicans 32

3- In the section ''Similarly, a flavonoid4’-methoxy-5,7-dihydroxyflavone6-C-glucoside isolated.'', the term (-C-) should be typed in italic font.

Response: 3. Instructions have been followed and the term has been revised as

Similarly, a flavonoid 4’-methoxy-5,7-dihydroxyflavone 6-C-glucoside isolated

Materials and Methods:

1- If allowed, a molecular docking study should be performed.

Response: 1. As labs are closed, shortage of time and mainly, COVID-19 Pandemic and Omicron etc. the docking study at this stage may not be possible; however in future this should be followed in another experiment

Abbreviations:

1- A list of abbreviations should be inserted by the end of the manuscript before references.

Response: 1. Compliance has been done as suggested by the reviewer

1. DPPH (1, 1-diphenyl-2-picrylhydrazyl)

2. EC50 (Half maximal effective concentration)

3. LC50; (Lethal concentration)

4. ABTS (2, 2'-Azino-Bis-3-Ethylbenzothiazoline-6-Sulfonic Acid)

5. TEV (Tobacco Etch Virus )

6. CMV (Cucumber Mosaic Virus)

7. Conc. (Concentration)

8. PDA (Potatoes Dextrose Agar)

9. WP (Wettable Powder)

References:

1. All Scientific names of plants should be typed in italic fonts.

Response: 1. All the scientific names of the pants has been changed into italic fonts in the ref list

2. All Scientific names of microorganisms should be typed in italic fonts.

Response: 2. All the scientific names of microorganisms has been changed into italic fonts

3. In some references; page number, volume number, and issue number were missed.

Response: 3. Compliance has been done; page number, volume number, and issue number has been added as suggested.

4. Ref. No. 10: The word (linn.) should be typed as (Linn.), also the plant name should be typed as (Luffa acutangula).

Response: 4. Instructions have been followed and the word (linn.) typed as (Linn.), as well as re-typed as Luffa acutangula.

Ref No 10; Soam, P. S., Singh, T. & Vijayvergia, R. Short Communication Citrullus colocynthis (Linn.) and Luffa acutangula (l.) Roxb, schrad. Source of bioinsecticides and their contribution in managing climate change. in (2013).

5. Ref. No. 10: The word (And) should be typed as (and).

Response: 5. Instructions have been followed, And written as “and”

Ref No 10; Soam, P. S., Singh, T. & Vijayvergia, R. Short Communication Citrullus colocynthis (Linn.) and Luffa acutangula (l.) Roxb, schrad. Source of bioinsecticides and their contribution in managing climate change. in (2013).

6. In some references; the complete list of authors were missed except first author (e.g., Ref. No. 12; Ahmed, M. et al.).

Response: 6. Instructions have been followed and a complete list of authors has been added in the references list.

Supplementary Files S1:

1. Add the word ''and'' before the last 1H-NMR and 13C-NMR value and the chemical shift unit (ppm).

Response: 6. Compliance has been done as suggested like………………

1D (1H-NMR and 13C-NMR),

REVIEWER 2

1. There are numerous typos and grammatical mistakes that I’m not able to point them one by one (for example, using Upper-Lower case for the name of compounds, disease and pathogens; repeated full name of pathogen; not using comma before "respectively", and so on)

Response: 1. Compliance has been done and the Manuscript also has been revised and edited by a English speaker/ TOPEDIT SCIENTIFIC EDITING [Http://www.topeditsci.com]

2. Spinasterol and 22,23-dihydrospinasterol presented as mixture. But the author does not give any evidence for a 5:4 ratio of this mixture. The MS and NMR spectra were not clear to determine the ratio of this mixture compounds.

Response: 2. The mass spectrometer examination showed molecular ion peak (M) at m/z 414 and 412 which suggested the molecular formula as a mixture of C29H50O, C29H48O with the ratio of 5:4 calculated by the available results of mass spectrum; elemental analysis and nuclear magnetic resonance analysis (1H-NMR and 13C-NMR) suggested the ratio of 5:4.

3. These authors did not show the positive and negative control to indicate the activities of these compounds (Table 1, 3, 4, 5). So the data is not enough to conclude the biological activities of this mixture.

Response: 3. Compliance has been done and positive as well as negative control has been added in the table where needed as;

Table 1. For DPPH assay methanol was used as a negative control and the DPPH solution only (without the sample). Whereas, DPPH+ methanol was used as experimental control. Therefore, negative control was usually methanol and DPPH. Negative control was prepared to obtain the absorbance of the DPPH before reacting with the sample.

However, the positive control was prepared in order to compare the results of the samples with those obtained from a standard compound.

Table 4. Positive control was added in the Table 3 which was missed by mistake,

Table 3. As LC50 was calculated from the raw data obtained during calculation of mortality, So, it was not compulsory to calculate or mention the mortality of positive control. However, positive control was mentioned now in the Table 4.

Table 5. In the Table 5 Correlation of antioxidant activity versus antifungal and insecticidal activity was presented, as data was used from the already prepared tables, so, only correlation was calculated.

2nd round

ADDITIONAL EDITOR SUGGESTIONS: [2nd round]

1. [Manuscript is acceptable as the authors addressed the reviewer’s comments. I suggest the author replace the common name ‘carrot grass’ with ‘parthenium weed’ in title and throughout the manuscript at proof stage.]

RESPONSE: [The common name ‘carrot grass’ has been replaced with ‘parthenium weed’ in title and throughout the manuscript]

REVIEWER 1 COMMENTS:

1[Innate of what? do you mean native?]

RESPONSE: [The word innate changed to inherent]

2[Point 2.3; need to explain how?]

RESPONSE: [Sentence was explained in detail to clarify the meaning]

3[Point 4,5 No clear, check the grammar]

RESPONSE: [compliance has been done and sentence was revised]

4[Point 6, 7 Again, this need to be explained how?]

RESPONSE: [compliance has been done and explained to clear the meaning]

5[Point 8, 9 Is this correct referencing style?]

RESPONSE: [reference style has been adjusted according the journal]

6 [Point, 10 not clear]

RESPONSE: [sentence was revised to clarify the meaning]

7[Point 1,2,3 Do you mean parthenin?]

RESPONSE [yes, compliance was done]

8[Point 4,5,6 move 'health' before 'consequences'?]

RESPONSE: [compliance has been done and sentence was revised as suggested]

9[Point 7,8 Do you mean "come in contact']

RESPONSE: [: yes the same meaning]

10 [Point 8, add author citations with the sci. names of all plants when mentioned first time

RESPONSE: [compliance has been made and instruction were followed]

11 [Point 1 highest?

RESPONSE: [compliance was done]

12 [Point 1 leaves.?]

RESPONSE: [: sentence was revised.]

13 [Point 2 Either use Parthenium or Parthenium hysterophorus, throughout

RESPONSE: compliance has been done and instruction was followed.

14 [Point C.L stands for?]

RESPONSE: actually the word is F.L stands for Fiducial Limit

15 [Point 1G = +ve control missing in Figure]

RESPONSE: Positive control was added in the figure

Reviewer 2

1 [Point 1 Also add authority]

RESPONSE: compliance was made and Authority was added

2 [Point 2 Do not use such useless abbreviations. Write full words for these names or parameters.]

RESPONSE: Instructions were followed and useless abbreviation were deleted

3 [Point 3 Give space]

RESPONSE: compliance was made

4 [Point 4 showed.?]

RESPONSE: compliance was made and the word changed to “showed”

5 [Point: 5 No need of First paragraph.]

RESPONSE: First paragraph deleted.

6 [Point 6 CIte reference correctly. Delete the name of authors]

RESPONSE: reference was cited in correct style

7 [Point 7 This paragraph should be extended]

RESPONSE: The suggested paragraph was extended.

8 [Point 8 It is ......]

RESPONSE Compliance has been made

9 [Point 9 Add a references here.; Following latest references is suggested:]

RESPONSE The suggested reference were added and cited in the manuscript

10 [Point 10 Should not be a new paragraph]

RESPONSE Compliance was made and Instructions were followed

11 [Point: 11 No need to mention the Institute.]

RESPONSE: Information about institute were deleted

12 [Point: 12 Do not use capital letters]

RESPONSE: suggestion were followed, and word were corrected

13 [Point: 13 Delete %]

RESPONSE: The symbol % was removed

14 [Point: 14 Add space]

RESPONSE: The space was added where needed

15 [Point 15 Do not use upper case letters for the names of compounds]

RESPONSE: Compliance has been done

16 [Point 16 No need of this introductory paragraph]

RESPONSE: A part of the paragraph has been deleted

17 [Point 17 Format references uniformly and correctly]

RESPONSE: References were formatted according to the journal style

CONCLUDING REMARKS: Again, thank you for giving us the opportunity to strengthen our manuscript with your valuable comments and queries. We have worked hard to incorporate your feedback and hope that these revisions persuade you to accept our submission.

Sincerely,

Zumin Gu.

Corresponding Author

Associate Professor, College of Plant Protection

Shenyang Agricultural University, Shenyang

No.120 Dongling Road Shenhe District Liaoning, CHINA

guzumin1212@163.com

Tel: +86-24- 8848‐7148; Fax: +86-24-8834-2

Attachment

Submitted filename: Rebuttal Letter.docx

pone.0296321.s004.docx (39.1KB, docx)

Decision Letter 2

Samuel Adelani Babarinde

11 Apr 2023

PONE-D-22-14804R2Antioxidant, Insecticidal Activity and Chemical Profiling of Flower’s Extract of Carrot Grass (Parthenium hysterophorus L.)PLOS ONE

Dear Dr. Gu,

Thank you for submitting your manuscript to PLOS ONE. After careful consideration, we feel that it has merit but does not fully meet PLOS ONE’s publication criteria as it currently stands. Therefore, we invite you to submit a revised version of the manuscript that addresses the points raised during the review process.

Please submit your revised manuscript by May 26 2023 11:59PM. If you will need more time than this to complete your revisions, please reply to this message or contact the journal office at plosone@plos.org. When you're ready to submit your revision, log on to https://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/ and select the 'Submissions Needing Revision' folder to locate your manuscript file.

Please include the following items when submitting your revised manuscript:

  • A rebuttal letter that responds to each point raised by the academic editor and reviewer(s). You should upload this letter as a separate file labeled 'Response to Reviewers'.

  • A marked-up copy of your manuscript that highlights changes made to the original version. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Revised Manuscript with Track Changes'.

  • An unmarked version of your revised paper without tracked changes. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Manuscript'.

If you would like to make changes to your financial disclosure, please include your updated statement in your cover letter. Guidelines for resubmitting your figure files are available below the reviewer comments at the end of this letter.

If applicable, we recommend that you deposit your laboratory protocols in protocols.io to enhance the reproducibility of your results. Protocols.io assigns your protocol its own identifier (DOI) so that it can be cited independently in the future. For instructions see: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/submission-guidelines#loc-laboratory-protocols. Additionally, PLOS ONE offers an option for publishing peer-reviewed Lab Protocol articles, which describe protocols hosted on protocols.io. Read more information on sharing protocols at https://plos.org/protocols?utm_medium=editorial-email&utm_source=authorletters&utm_campaign=protocols.

We look forward to receiving your revised manuscript.

Kind regards,

Samuel Adelani Babarinde, PhD

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

[Note: HTML markup is below. Please do not edit.]

Reviewers' comments:

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Comments to the Author

1. If the authors have adequately addressed your comments raised in a previous round of review and you feel that this manuscript is now acceptable for publication, you may indicate that here to bypass the “Comments to the Author” section, enter your conflict of interest statement in the “Confidential to Editor” section, and submit your "Accept" recommendation.

Reviewer #1: (No Response)

Reviewer #3: All comments have been addressed

**********

2. Is the manuscript technically sound, and do the data support the conclusions?

The manuscript must describe a technically sound piece of scientific research with data that supports the conclusions. Experiments must have been conducted rigorously, with appropriate controls, replication, and sample sizes. The conclusions must be drawn appropriately based on the data presented.

Reviewer #1: Partly

Reviewer #3: Yes

**********

3. Has the statistical analysis been performed appropriately and rigorously?

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #3: Yes

**********

4. Have the authors made all data underlying the findings in their manuscript fully available?

The PLOS Data policy requires authors to make all data underlying the findings described in their manuscript fully available without restriction, with rare exception (please refer to the Data Availability Statement in the manuscript PDF file). The data should be provided as part of the manuscript or its supporting information, or deposited to a public repository. For example, in addition to summary statistics, the data points behind means, medians and variance measures should be available. If there are restrictions on publicly sharing data—e.g. participant privacy or use of data from a third party—those must be specified.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #3: Yes

**********

5. Is the manuscript presented in an intelligible fashion and written in standard English?

PLOS ONE does not copyedit accepted manuscripts, so the language in submitted articles must be clear, correct, and unambiguous. Any typographical or grammatical errors should be corrected at revision, so please note any specific errors here.

Reviewer #1: No

Reviewer #3: Yes

**********

6. Review Comments to the Author

Please use the space provided to explain your answers to the questions above. You may also include additional comments for the author, including concerns about dual publication, research ethics, or publication ethics. (Please upload your review as an attachment if it exceeds 20,000 characters)

Reviewer #1: The revision seems incomplete.

1- Significant improvement in language and formatting is needed throughout the paper. Better to get it edit by a professional language editor.

2- Rewrite Abstract in a better scientific language.

3- Delete 1st paragraph of Introduction.

4- Improve Discussion.

5- Format references uniformly and correctly.

6- Also add latest references.

Reviewer #3: The authors have addressed all the comments raised by reviewers satisfactorily, hence can be accepted in its present form.

**********

7. PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean?). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy.

Reviewer #1: Yes: Prof. Dr. Arshad Javaid

Reviewer #3: Yes: Shailendra S Gurav

**********

[NOTE: If reviewer comments were submitted as an attachment file, they will be attached to this email and accessible via the submission site. Please log into your account, locate the manuscript record, and check for the action link "View Attachments". If this link does not appear, there are no attachment files.]

While revising your submission, please upload your figure files to the Preflight Analysis and Conversion Engine (PACE) digital diagnostic tool, https://pacev2.apexcovantage.com/. PACE helps ensure that figures meet PLOS requirements. To use PACE, you must first register as a user. Registration is free. Then, login and navigate to the UPLOAD tab, where you will find detailed instructions on how to use the tool. If you encounter any issues or have any questions when using PACE, please email PLOS at figures@plos.org. Please note that Supporting Information files do not need this step.

Attachment

Submitted filename: PONE-D-22-14804_R2_reviewer.pdf

pone.0296321.s005.pdf (4.1MB, pdf)
PLoS One. 2024 Jun 7;19(6):e0296321. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0296321.r006

Author response to Decision Letter 2


26 May 2023

A file is uploaded ad rebuttal letter as well as Response to reviewers

Attachment

Submitted filename: Rebuttal Letter.docx

pone.0296321.s006.docx (39.1KB, docx)

Decision Letter 3

Samuel Adelani Babarinde

29 Aug 2023

PONE-D-22-14804R3Antioxidant, Insecticidal Activity and Chemical Profiling of Flower’s Extract of Carrot Grass (Parthenium hysterophorus L.)PLOS ONE

Dear Dr. Gu,

Thank you for submitting your manuscript to PLOS ONE. After careful consideration, we feel that it has merit but does not fully meet PLOS ONE’s publication criteria as it currently stands. Therefore, we invite you to submit a revised version of the manuscript that addresses the points raised during the review process.

Please submit your revised manuscript by Oct 13 2023 11:59PM. If you will need more time than this to complete your revisions, please reply to this message or contact the journal office at plosone@plos.org. When you're ready to submit your revision, log on to https://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/ and select the 'Submissions Needing Revision' folder to locate your manuscript file.

Please include the following items when submitting your revised manuscript:

  • A rebuttal letter that responds to each point raised by the academic editor and reviewer(s). You should upload this letter as a separate file labeled 'Response to Reviewers'.

  • A marked-up copy of your manuscript that highlights changes made to the original version. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Revised Manuscript with Track Changes'.

  • An unmarked version of your revised paper without tracked changes. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Manuscript'.

If you would like to make changes to your financial disclosure, please include your updated statement in your cover letter. Guidelines for resubmitting your figure files are available below the reviewer comments at the end of this letter.

If applicable, we recommend that you deposit your laboratory protocols in protocols.io to enhance the reproducibility of your results. Protocols.io assigns your protocol its own identifier (DOI) so that it can be cited independently in the future. For instructions see: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/submission-guidelines#loc-laboratory-protocols. Additionally, PLOS ONE offers an option for publishing peer-reviewed Lab Protocol articles, which describe protocols hosted on protocols.io. Read more information on sharing protocols at https://plos.org/protocols?utm_medium=editorial-email&utm_source=authorletters&utm_campaign=protocols.

We look forward to receiving your revised manuscript.

Kind regards,

Samuel Adelani Babarinde, PhD

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Journal Requirements:

Please review your reference list to ensure that it is complete and correct. If you have cited papers that have been retracted, please include the rationale for doing so in the manuscript text, or remove these references and replace them with relevant current references. Any changes to the reference list should be mentioned in the rebuttal letter that accompanies your revised manuscript. If you need to cite a retracted article, indicate the article’s retracted status in the References list and also include a citation and full reference for the retraction notice.

[Note: HTML markup is below. Please do not edit.]

Reviewers' comments:

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Comments to the Author

1. If the authors have adequately addressed your comments raised in a previous round of review and you feel that this manuscript is now acceptable for publication, you may indicate that here to bypass the “Comments to the Author” section, enter your conflict of interest statement in the “Confidential to Editor” section, and submit your "Accept" recommendation.

Reviewer #1: (No Response)

Reviewer #3: All comments have been addressed

**********

2. Is the manuscript technically sound, and do the data support the conclusions?

The manuscript must describe a technically sound piece of scientific research with data that supports the conclusions. Experiments must have been conducted rigorously, with appropriate controls, replication, and sample sizes. The conclusions must be drawn appropriately based on the data presented.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #3: Yes

**********

3. Has the statistical analysis been performed appropriately and rigorously?

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #3: Yes

**********

4. Have the authors made all data underlying the findings in their manuscript fully available?

The PLOS Data policy requires authors to make all data underlying the findings described in their manuscript fully available without restriction, with rare exception (please refer to the Data Availability Statement in the manuscript PDF file). The data should be provided as part of the manuscript or its supporting information, or deposited to a public repository. For example, in addition to summary statistics, the data points behind means, medians and variance measures should be available. If there are restrictions on publicly sharing data—e.g. participant privacy or use of data from a third party—those must be specified.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #3: Yes

**********

5. Is the manuscript presented in an intelligible fashion and written in standard English?

PLOS ONE does not copyedit accepted manuscripts, so the language in submitted articles must be clear, correct, and unambiguous. Any typographical or grammatical errors should be corrected at revision, so please note any specific errors here.

Reviewer #1: No

Reviewer #3: Yes

**********

6. Review Comments to the Author

Please use the space provided to explain your answers to the questions above. You may also include additional comments for the author, including concerns about dual publication, research ethics, or publication ethics. (Please upload your review as an attachment if it exceeds 20,000 characters)

Reviewer #1: Paper needs a thorough revision. It is full of formatting errors. Please especially concentrate on the following points:

1- There should be proper spacing between a digit and its unit.

2- write units in a similar format throughout the manuscript.

3- Write scientific names in Italics. It is a big issue in the references.

4- Write equations correctly, in same font size and style.

5- Write P≤0.05 instead of P>0.05.

6- Format references uniformly and correctly. Titles of papers should be in sentence format.

Reviewer #3: All queries raised by respective reviewers have been resolved and revised manuscript can be accepted in the present form.

**********

7. PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean?). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy.

Reviewer #1: Yes:

Reviewer #3: No

**********

[NOTE: If reviewer comments were submitted as an attachment file, they will be attached to this email and accessible via the submission site. Please log into your account, locate the manuscript record, and check for the action link "View Attachments". If this link does not appear, there are no attachment files.]

While revising your submission, please upload your figure files to the Preflight Analysis and Conversion Engine (PACE) digital diagnostic tool, https://pacev2.apexcovantage.com/. PACE helps ensure that figures meet PLOS requirements. To use PACE, you must first register as a user. Registration is free. Then, login and navigate to the UPLOAD tab, where you will find detailed instructions on how to use the tool. If you encounter any issues or have any questions when using PACE, please email PLOS at figures@plos.org. Please note that Supporting Information files do not need this step.

Attachment

Submitted filename: PONE-D-22-14804_R3_reviewer.pdf

pone.0296321.s007.pdf (4.7MB, pdf)
PLoS One. 2024 Jun 7;19(6):e0296321. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0296321.r008

Author response to Decision Letter 3


12 Oct 2023

Dear Editor

Now this version is final with compliance to all the comments suggested by the editors and reviewers. Now plz accept it for publication.

Regards

Attachment

Submitted filename: Rebuttal Letter.docx

pone.0296321.s008.docx (39.1KB, docx)

Decision Letter 4

Samuel Adelani Babarinde

11 Dec 2023

Antioxidant, Insecticidal Activity and Chemical Profiling of Flower’s Extract of Carrot Grass (Parthenium hysterophorus L.)

PONE-D-22-14804R4

Dear Dr. Gu,

We’re pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been judged scientifically suitable for publication and will be formally accepted for publication once it meets all outstanding technical requirements.

Within one week, you’ll receive an e-mail detailing the required amendments. When these have been addressed, you’ll receive a formal acceptance letter and your manuscript will be scheduled for publication.

An invoice for payment will follow shortly after the formal acceptance. To ensure an efficient process, please log into Editorial Manager at http://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/, click the 'Update My Information' link at the top of the page, and double check that your user information is up-to-date. If you have any billing related questions, please contact our Author Billing department directly at authorbilling@plos.org.

If your institution or institutions have a press office, please notify them about your upcoming paper to help maximize its impact. If they’ll be preparing press materials, please inform our press team as soon as possible -- no later than 48 hours after receiving the formal acceptance. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information, please contact onepress@plos.org.

Kind regards,

Samuel Adelani Babarinde, PhD

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Reviewers' comments:

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Comments to the Author

1. If the authors have adequately addressed your comments raised in a previous round of review and you feel that this manuscript is now acceptable for publication, you may indicate that here to bypass the “Comments to the Author” section, enter your conflict of interest statement in the “Confidential to Editor” section, and submit your "Accept" recommendation.

Reviewer #1: All comments have been addressed

**********

2. Is the manuscript technically sound, and do the data support the conclusions?

The manuscript must describe a technically sound piece of scientific research with data that supports the conclusions. Experiments must have been conducted rigorously, with appropriate controls, replication, and sample sizes. The conclusions must be drawn appropriately based on the data presented.

Reviewer #1: Yes

**********

3. Has the statistical analysis been performed appropriately and rigorously?

Reviewer #1: Yes

**********

4. Have the authors made all data underlying the findings in their manuscript fully available?

The PLOS Data policy requires authors to make all data underlying the findings described in their manuscript fully available without restriction, with rare exception (please refer to the Data Availability Statement in the manuscript PDF file). The data should be provided as part of the manuscript or its supporting information, or deposited to a public repository. For example, in addition to summary statistics, the data points behind means, medians and variance measures should be available. If there are restrictions on publicly sharing data—e.g. participant privacy or use of data from a third party—those must be specified.

Reviewer #1: Yes

**********

5. Is the manuscript presented in an intelligible fashion and written in standard English?

PLOS ONE does not copyedit accepted manuscripts, so the language in submitted articles must be clear, correct, and unambiguous. Any typographical or grammatical errors should be corrected at revision, so please note any specific errors here.

Reviewer #1: Yes

**********

6. Review Comments to the Author

Please use the space provided to explain your answers to the questions above. You may also include additional comments for the author, including concerns about dual publication, research ethics, or publication ethics. (Please upload your review as an attachment if it exceeds 20,000 characters)

Reviewer #1: This is the fourth round of evaluation. Authors have incorporated all the suggested corrections. Paper is now acceptable.

**********

7. PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean?). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy.

Reviewer #1: Yes: Prof. Dr. Arshad Javaid

**********

Acceptance letter

Samuel Adelani Babarinde

15 May 2024

PONE-D-22-14804R4

PLOS ONE

Dear Dr. Gu,

I'm pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been deemed suitable for publication in PLOS ONE. Congratulations! Your manuscript is now being handed over to our production team.

At this stage, our production department will prepare your paper for publication. This includes ensuring the following:

* All references, tables, and figures are properly cited

* All relevant supporting information is included in the manuscript submission,

* There are no issues that prevent the paper from being properly typeset

If revisions are needed, the production department will contact you directly to resolve them. If no revisions are needed, you will receive an email when the publication date has been set. At this time, we do not offer pre-publication proofs to authors during production of the accepted work. Please keep in mind that we are working through a large volume of accepted articles, so please give us a few weeks to review your paper and let you know the next and final steps.

Lastly, if your institution or institutions have a press office, please let them know about your upcoming paper now to help maximize its impact. If they'll be preparing press materials, please inform our press team within the next 48 hours. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information, please contact onepress@plos.org.

If we can help with anything else, please email us at customercare@plos.org.

Thank you for submitting your work to PLOS ONE and supporting open access.

Kind regards,

PLOS ONE Editorial Office Staff

on behalf of

Dr. Samuel Adelani Babarinde

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Associated Data

    This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

    Supplementary Materials

    Attachment

    Submitted filename: PONE-D-22-14804.pdf

    pone.0296321.s001.pdf (1.3MB, pdf)
    Attachment

    Submitted filename: Summary of Comments on PONE-D-22-14804_reviewer.pdf

    pone.0296321.s002.pdf (1,015.2KB, pdf)
    Attachment

    Submitted filename: Point by Point Reviewer Comments.docx

    pone.0296321.s003.docx (22.5KB, docx)
    Attachment

    Submitted filename: Rebuttal Letter.docx

    pone.0296321.s004.docx (39.1KB, docx)
    Attachment

    Submitted filename: PONE-D-22-14804_R2_reviewer.pdf

    pone.0296321.s005.pdf (4.1MB, pdf)
    Attachment

    Submitted filename: Rebuttal Letter.docx

    pone.0296321.s006.docx (39.1KB, docx)
    Attachment

    Submitted filename: PONE-D-22-14804_R3_reviewer.pdf

    pone.0296321.s007.pdf (4.7MB, pdf)
    Attachment

    Submitted filename: Rebuttal Letter.docx

    pone.0296321.s008.docx (39.1KB, docx)

    Data Availability Statement

    All relevant data are within the paper.


    Articles from PLOS ONE are provided here courtesy of PLOS

    RESOURCES