Abstract
Introduction
Novel augmented-reality (AR)-based surgical simulator offers promise in training, yet its comprehensive evaluation across Kirkpatrick's pyramid levels is pivotal. Kirkpatrick's pyramid, a four-level framework, assesses training effectiveness.
Methods
A holistic assessment of AR-based surgical simulators across Kirkpatrick's levels was executed through multiple studies encompassing four main modalities. A pilot study (n=11) and a multi-centre study (n=6) scrutinised junior trainees' performance in appendectomies and vaginal cuff closures, emphasising completion time and distance travelled metrics (Level 2).
A concurrent study evaluated self-confidence scores pre- and post-AR training, showcasing a mean improvement of 3.82 (Likert, p=0.018), indicating enhanced morale and skill translatability (Level 1 and 3). Health economics review exhibited potential cost savings (Level 4).
An independent systematic review (n=26) of pertinent literature across the four modalities was conducted.
Results
Statistically significant reductions in completion time and distance travelled (p<0.001, n=6 and p<0.05, n=6, respectively) underscore the skill enhancement via AR training (Level 2). Self-confidence improvements suggest elevated morale and skill translatability (Level 1,3). A health economics review highlighted potential per-patient savings of up to £455 through AR-based surgical training, demonstrating organisational benefits (Level 4).
Conclusions
The novel AR-based surgical simulator showcased positive outcomes spanning Levels 1 to 4, elevating trainees' morale, satisfaction, confidence, and skill translatability (Levels 1, 3) while yielding substantial organisational savings (Level 4). Findings can extrapolate to wider specialisations.
AR-based surgical training significantly reduced completion time and distance travelled, emblematic of enhanced skill acquisition (Level 2). These findings endorse AR's transformative role in surgical training, aligning with Kirkpatrick's goals.