Skip to main content
PMC home page
Mitochondrial DNA. Part B, Resources logoLink to Mitochondrial DNA. Part B, Resources
. 2024 Jun 7;9(6):720–724. doi: 10.1080/23802359.2024.2357681

The complete chloroplast genomes of Polygonatum hunanense, P. verticillatum, and P. caulialatum and their phylogenetic positions

Qing-Dong Ma a,b,c, Hong-Jing Zhang a,b, Yan-Ran Qi a,b, Zheng-You Yin a, Dong-Yang Yi a,b,c,✉, Si-Rong Yi a,b,c,✉
PMCID: PMC11164183  PMID: 38859915

Abstract

Polygonatum hunanense H.H. Liu & B.Z. Wang (2021) and P. verticillatum (L.) All. (1875) have been widely used as foods and as folk medicines in China and India, and P. caulialatum S. R. Yi (2021) has recently been described as a new medical plant in China. There is at present a lack of genome information regarding the species. Hence, this study reports the complete chloroplast genomes of the three species. The genomes of P. hunanense, P. verticillatum, and P. caulialatum were 155,583 bp, 155,650 bp, and 155,352 bp in length, respectively. They contained large single-copy (LSC) regions of 84,412 bp, 84,404 bp, and 84,285 bp, small single-copy (SSC) regions of 18,427 bp, 18,416 bp, and 18,463 bp, and a pair of inverted repeats of 26,372 bp, 26,415 bp, and 26,302 bp, respectively. The chloroplast genomes of P. hunanense, P. verticillatum, and P. caulialatum had 133 (103 unique) genes, consisting of 87 protein-coding genes, 38 ribosomal ribonucleic acid (RNA) genes, and eight transfer RNA genes, respectively. A maximum-likelihood phylogenetic tree showed that P. kingianum Coll. et Hemsl. var. grandifolium D.M. Liu & W.Z. Zeng (1991) was closer to P. cyrtonema Hua (1892) rather than to P. kingianum Coll. et Hemsl. (1890), further supporting its status as a unique species of the genus. Moreover, P. verticillatum was separated from the easily confused herb P. cirrhifolium (Wall.) Royle (1839), while P. caulialatum was closest to P. humile Fisch. ex Maxim. (1859). This research provides a foundation for further study of these herbs.

Keywords: Chloroplast genome, Polygonatum hunanense, Polygonatum kingianum var. grandifolium, Polygonatum verticillatum, Polygonatum caulialatum

Introduction

Polygonati rhizoma has been employed as a tonic and a traditional Chinese medicine for over 2000 years, being registered in the Chinese Pharmacopoeia as ‘Huang Jing’ and comprising Polygonatum kingianum Coll.et Hemsl. (1890), P. sibiricum Red. (1812), and P. cyrtonema Hua (1892) (Jiang et al. 2022). In addition, there are more than 10 species of Polygonatum that are cultivated, produced, and sold as medical plants in Chinese markets (Yang et al. 2020).

Among the above species, P. kingianum Collett et Hemsl. var. grandifolium D.M. Liu & W.Z. Zeng (1991) is the major medicinal variety cultivated in Sichuan and Chongqing as polygonati rhizoma due to its large size, sweet taste, and strong adaptability (Lu et al. 2019). However, the classification of P. kingianum var. grandifolium remains controversial; it was initially recorded as a variety of P. kingianum named ‘Daye Huangjing’ in the Flora of Sichuan in 1991 and as a synonym for P. kingianum in the Flora of China in 2000 (Shi et al. 2022). Based on morphological and molecular evidence, P. kingianum var. grandifolium had been proposed as a newly recognized synonym of P. hunanense H.H. Liu & B.Z. Wang (2021) (Figure 1(a)) as ‘Xiang Huangjing’ in Chinese (Liu et al. 2021; Xia et al. 2021), and it was more recently regarded as a species of P. cyrtonema (Ma et al. 2022). In the meantime, P. verticillatum (L.) All. (1875) (Figure 1(b)) has been widely used as a food and a folk medicine in China and India, including as a substitute for P. kingianum in Yunnan province of China, but it is among the least investigated species in the genus Polygonatum Mill. (Zhou et al. 2017; Sharma et al. 2021). Recently, another new medicinal plant in this genus, P. caulialatum S. R. Yi (2021) (Figure 1(c)), was discovered in Sichuan province by Si-Rong Yi from our team (Chen et al. 2021). Coincidentally, all three herbs are distributed in the mountains of northeastern Chongqing municipality in China, but little is known concerning their genomic information. Furthermore, DNA barcoding based on ITS/ITS2 sequences has had low identification efficiency toward interspecies relationships within the genus Polygonatum Mill. (Long et al. 2022; Zhang MY et al. 2023). To provide additional data for research and development of the herbs, in this study, we obtained the complete chloroplast genomes and analyzed the relationships between the three species.

Figure 1.

Figure 1.

Open in a new tab

Photographs of Polygonatum hunanense (a), P. verticillatum (b), and P. caulialatum (c) taken by Si-Rong Yi at Wushan (N31°00′, E109°75′) and Chengkou (N31°85′, E109°12′; N32°05′, E108°83′, respectively), Chongqing, China. Core features: (a) rhizome ginger-like, 2–4 cm in diameter. Stem over 100 cm tall; leaves whorled, opposite, or alternate, elliptic to oblong-lanceolate, 8–25 cm long, 1.5–3.5 cm wide, apex cirrose to curved. Inflorescences with 2–10 flowers, pedicels 4–10 mm long. Perianth white, light yellow-green, or light purple, 6–9 mm long, cylindrical, slightly constricted in the middle. Berries spherical, yellow when ripe, 6–7 mm in diameter, with 10–20 seeds. (b) Rhizome, internode 2–3 cm long, thick at one end and thin at the other end. Stem 40–80 cm tall, with three leaves in whorls, elliptical to rectangular, 6–10 cm long, 2–3 cm wide, apex acute to acuminate. Inflorescence with 1 or 2–4 flowers, pedicels 1–2 cm long. Flowers pendulous, bracts small or absent. Perianth pale yellow or light purple, 8–12 mm long, lobes 2–3 mm long. Berries, red, 6–9 mm in diameter, 6–12-seeded. (c) Rhizome moniliform, 1.5–2.5 cm in diameter. Stem 40–80 cm tall, leaves 7–15, alternate, oblong, 8–15 cm long, 3.5–5 cm wide. Inflorescences axillary, 1–2-flowered, sparsely 3-flowered; pedicels 2.5–3.5 cm long. Corolla campanulate terete, 2.8–3.2 cm long, 8–10 mm in diameter, green-white. Berries subglobose, red, 8–15 mm in diameter, 3-loculed, 2–4 seeds per locule; seeds subglobose, 3.2–4 mm in diameter.

Materials and methods

The fresh leaves of P. hunanense were collected from Wushan, Chongqing, China (N31°00′, E109°75′), and the fresh leaves of P. verticillatum and P. caulialatum were collected from Chengkou, Chongqing, China (N31°85′, E109°12′; N32°05′, E108°83′, respectively). The specimens were deposited in the herbarium of Chongqing Three Gorges Medical College (P. hunanense: YSR0891, P. verticillatum: the specimen was planted in the herb garden of the same college, P. caulialatum: YSR1458; Chongqing, China; Si-Rong Yi; yisirong123@aliyun.com). After the total genomic DNA was extracted, high-throughput sequencing was performed with an Illumina HiSeq X Ten platform, and bioinformatic data for P. hunanense, P. verticillatum, and P. caulialatum were then assembled from the reference sequences of P. hunanense (MZ286311, Ji 2022a), P. zanlanscianense Pamp. (1915) (ON534059, Zhang DJ et al. 2023), and P. caulialatum (NC_068899, Hu et al. 2022), respectively (Hahn et al. 2013; Zhou et al. 2022). Genome maps, coverage-depth maps, and cis-/trans-splicing gene maps were constructed using the CPGview online tools (Liu et al. 2023).

To analyze the phylogenetic relationships among P. hunanense, P. verticillatum, and P. caulialatum within the genus Polygonatum, the chloroplast genome data of 29 species of Polygonatum were downloaded. These genome sequences, based on protein-coding genes, were aligned and processed by Geneious R11, and then imported to TOPALI v2.5 software and RAxML version 8.2.12 to construct a maximum-likelihood (ML) phylogenetic tree (Milne et al. 2009; Alexandros Stamatakis 2014).

Results and discussion

Analysis of the depth of coverage of the complete chloroplast genomes and the annotation accuracy of several difficult genes suggested that the results for the complete chloroplast genomes of the three medical plants were trustworthy (Figures S1 and S2). Each group of raw reads of P. hunanense, P. verticillatum, and P. caulialatum indicated respective genome lengths of 155,583 bp, 155,650 bp, and 155,352 bp, comprising a typical tetrad circular molecule with a large single-copy (LSC) region, a small single-copy (SSC) region, and a pair of inverted repeats (IRs) that separated the LSC and SSC (Figure 2). The LSC regions of P. hunanense (GenBank accession no. OR386975), P. verticillatum (OR255921), and P. caulialatum (OR386974) were 84,412 bp, 84,404 bp, and 84,285 bp, respectively, in length; while their SSC regions were 18,427 bp, 18,416 bp, and 18,463 bp, respectively, in length, and the sizes of their IR regions ranged from 26,302 bp to 26,415 bp (Table S1). A total of 133 genes (103 different genes), including 87 protein-coding genes, 38 transfer ribonucleic acid (RNA) genes, and eight ribosomal RNA genes, were detected in the complete chloroplast genomes of the three herbs. The total guanine–cytosine (GC) content of the complete chloroplast genomes was 37.7%. The IR regions contained the highest GC content at 42.9%–43.0%, followed by the LSC regions at 35.7%; in contrast, the SSC regions had the lowest GC content at 31.5%–31.6%. This indicated an unbalanced distribution of the GC content among the regions.

Figure 2.

Figure 2.

Open in a new tab

Chloroplast genome maps of Polygonatum hunanense (a), P. verticillatum (b), and P. caulialatum (c). The chloroplast genome structure consists of a typical tetrad circular molecule with a large single-copy (LSC) region, a small single-copy (SSC) region, and a pair of inverted repeats (IRa and IRb) that separate the LSC and SSC. The transcription direction of genes inside is clockwise, while the transcription direction of genes outside is counterclockwise. Genes are color-coded by their functional classification as shown in the lower-left corner.

The annotation results also showed that all functional genes comprised three categories: photosynthesis, self-replication, and other genes (Table S2). Among the genes, nine different genes (atpF, ndhA, ndhB, petB, petD, rpl2, rpl16, rpoC1, and rpsl6) contained one intron, and the clpP gene contained two introns. Meanwhile, seven genes (ndhB, rpl2, rpl23, rps7, rps19, ycf1, and ycf2) were duplicated, and the rps12 gene was triplicated. Furthermore, 44, 45, and 49 simple sequence repeats in P. hunanense, P. verticillatum, and P. caulialatum were identified, respectively, consisting of mononucleotides, dinucleotides, and trinucleotides (Table S3). The polymers of A/T dominated in simple sequence repeats, ranging from 85.71% to 88.89%, indicating a remarkable base preference. Moreover, the number of codons in P. hunanense, P. verticillatum, and P. caulialatum was 20,297, 20,301, and 21,031, respectively (Table S4). Leucine was the most abundant amino acid, accounting for 10.2%–10.3% of the total codons; in contrast, cysteine comprised the least number of codons. This indicated a preference in the codons.

Chloroplast genomes play an important role in phylogenetic analysis and species identification (Wu et al. 2020). The ML phylogenetic tree (Figure 3) showed that P. hunanense was close to P. cyrtonema rather than to P. kingianum, further supporting it as a unique species in the genus. This was consistent with the conclusions of a previous study (Guo et al. 2022). Moreover, P. verticillatum was separated from the easily confused herb P. cirrhifolium, while P. caulialatum was closest to P. humile.

Figure 3.

Figure 3.

Open in a new tab

Maximum-likelihood (ML) phylogenetic tree of Polygonatum hunanense, P. verticillatum, P. caulialatum, and 29 Polygonatum species. The branches of the ML tree were supported using 1000 bootstrap replicates. The following sequences were used: P. stewartianum Diels (1912) NC_065352 (Wang J et al. 2022), P. kingianum MW566466 (Guo et al. 2022), P. punctatum Royle ex Kunth (1850) OQ532974 (Ji 2023a), P. cirrhifolium (Wall.) Royle (1839) MN912821 (Wu and Xiao 2022), P. prattii Baker (1892) OL405017 (Wang J et al. 2022), P. hookeri Baker (1875) OL405012 (Wang J et al. 2022), P. curvistylum Hua (1892) OQ532970 (Ji 2023b), P. stenophyllum Maxim. (1859) OL405025 (Wang J et al 2022), P. tessellatum Wang et Tang (1936) NC_058567 (Xia et al. 2022), P. cathcartii Baker (1875) NC_062699 (Zhao 2023), P. sibiricum MZ029093 (Wang J and Duan 2021), P. zanlanscianense OL895311 (Liu et al. 2022), P. cyrtonema NC_028429 (Wang S et al. 2023), P. hunanense MZ286304 (Ji 2022b), OL405014 (Wang J et al. 2022), P. franchetii Hua (1892) OP615253 (Wang L 2022), P. involucratum (Franch.et Sav.) Maxim. (1883) OL405015 (Wang J et al. 2022), P. acuminatifolium Kom. (1916) NC_058569 (Xia et al. 2022), P. nodosum Hua (1892) NC_058564 (Xia et al. 2022), P. inflatum Kom. (1901) NC_058559 (Xia et al. 2022), P. macropodum Turcz. (1832) NC_058562 (Xia et al. 2022), P. odoratum (Mill.) Druce (1906) NC_050926 (Du et al. 2020), P. filipes Merr. (1959) MZ571521 (Yan and Cheng 2022), P. caulialatum ON943064 (Hu et al. 2022), P. humile MN218691 (Lee et al. 2019), Asparagus cochinchinensis (Lour.) Merr. (1919) MW447164 (Sheng W 2021), and Anemarrhena asphodeloides Bunge (1831) MH669277 (Li et al. 2019).

Conclusions

In this study, the complete chloroplast genomes of P. hunanense, P. verticillatum, and P. caulialatum were sequenced and annotated into a typical tetrameric structure that was similar to those of other Polygonatum species. The ML phylogenetic tree based on protein-coding genes in the chloroplast genomes suggested distinguishing between P. kingianum var. grandifolium and P. kingianum. The chloroplast genomes of the three herbs will provide information for identification and classification of the species that can be used to explore the evolution of the genus Polygonatum.

Funding Statement

This work was supported by the Scientific Research Projects of Wanzhou District of Chongqing [wzstc-2021041], Chongqing Key Laboratory of Development and Utilization of DaoDi Medicinal Materials in Three Gorges Reservoir Area [Sys20210001] and Chongqing Municipal Education Commission [KJZD-K202202703], and the Multi-Crossed Disciplines Innovation Team for Protecting and Utilizing DaoDi Medicinal Materials in Three Gorges Reservoir Area [YuZhongYi [2022]33#].

Author contributions

Qing-Dong Ma was involved in analyzing the data and writing the manuscript, along with Hong-Jing Zhang and Zheng-You Yin, who also contributed to the collection of the plant samples. Yan-Ran Qi and Dong-Yang Yi supervised the project and proposed revisions to the manuscript. Si-Rong Yi was responsible for authenticating the plants and managing the herb collection, together with Dong-Yang Yi, who also reviewed and approved the final version of the manuscript.

Ethics statement

The plant samples used in this research were unprotected species. We confirm that the study is conducted in accordance with the ethical guidelines and the legal requirements of the county.

Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).

Data availability statement

The genome sequence data that support the findings of this research are openly available in GenBank of NCBI at https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/ under the accession nos. OR386975 (P. hunanense), OR255921 (P. verticillatum), and OR386974 (P. caulialatum). The associated BioProject, BioSample, and SRA numbers are PRJNA1020603; SAMN37526446 (P. hunanense), SAMN37526444 (P. verticillatum), and SAMN37526445 (P. caulialatum); SRR26159564 (P. hunanense), SRR26159566 (P. verticillatum), and SRR26159565 (P. caulialatum).

References

  1. Chen HY, Huang Y, Zhou XX, Yi SR.. 2021. Polygonatum caulialatum, a new species of medicinal plant of Polygonatum (Asparagaceae) from Sichuan, China. Phytotaxa. 513(1):55–61. doi: 10.11646/phytotaxa.513.1.3. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  2. Du ZF, Qian J, Jiang Y, Duan BZ.. 2020. The complete chloroplast genome of Polygonatum odoratum (Mill.) Druce and its phylogenetic analysis. Mitochondrial DNA B. 5(2):1601–1602. doi: 10.1080/23802359.2020.1745101. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  3. Guo XR, Shi NX, Xie PX, Zhang GF, Liu HY, Ji YH.. 2022. Plastome sequencing for accurate and effective authentication of Polygonatum kingianum (Asparagaceae). Ind Crops Prod. 184:115056. doi: 10.1016/J.INDCROP.2022.115056. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  4. Hahn C, Bachmann L, Chevreux B.. 2013. Reconstructing mitochondrial genomes directly from genomic next-generation sequencing reads—a baiting and iterative mapping approach. Nucleic Acids Res. 41(13):e129. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkt371. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Hu YF, Liu YF, Ali M, Wu W, Li XL, Chen LS, Shao JW.. 2022. Polygonatum praecox (Asparagaceae), a new species from mid-eastern China revealed by morphological and molecular evidence. PhytoKeys. 211:125–138. doi: 10.3897/phytokeys.211.90456. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Ji Y. 2022a. Polygonatum hunanense chloroplast, complete genome. [updated 2022 Jul 4; accessed 2023 Oct 12]. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nuccore/MZ286311.1/.
  7. Ji Y. 2022b. Polygonatum hunanense chloroplast, complete genome. [updated 2022 Jul 4; accessed 2024 Jan 10]. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nuccore/MZ286304.
  8. Ji Y. 2023a. Polygonatum punctatum voucher 16CS11940 chloroplast, complete genome. [updated 2023 Apr 2; accessed 2023 Oct 12]. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nuccore/OQ532974.1/.
  9. Ji Y. 2023b. Polygonatum curvistylum voucher Ji YH 2020333 chloroplast, complete genome. [updated 2023 Apr 2; accessed 2023 Oct 12]. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nuccore/OQ532970.
  10. Jiang W, Li YP, Chen JD, Tao ZM.. 2022. Genetic diversity analysis of Polygonati Rhizoma based on ISSR and SRAP molecular markers. Chin Tradit Herb Drugs. 53(21):6865–6873. doi: 10.7501/j.issn.0253-2670.2022.21.025. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  11. Lee SY, Zou YL, Liao WB, Fan Q.. 2019. The complete chloroplast genome of a traditional medicinal and food plant, Polygonatum humile (Asparagaceae, Asparagales). Mitochondrial DNA B Resour. 4(2):3184–3185. doi: 10.1080/23802359.2019.1666044. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Li F, Li C, Tian EW, Chen AM, Ye HT, Shu YQ, Chao Z.. 2019. The complete chloroplast genome sequence of Anemarrhena asphodeloides Bunge. Mitochondrial DNA B. 4(1):441–442. doi: 10.1080/23802359.2018.1545542. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  13. Liu HH, Ma YS, Wang BZ, Jie HD, Xiang SJ, Yang JN, Jie YC.. 2021. Morphological and molecular character on a new species of Polygonatum hunanens from Hunan, China. Crop Res. 35(1):88–94. doi: 10.16848/j.cnki.issn.1001-5280.2021.01.15. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  14. Liu SY, Ni Y, Li JL, Zhang XY, Yang H, Chen HM, Liu C.. 2023. CPGView: a package for visualizing detailed chloroplast genome structures. Mol Ecol Resour. 23(3):694–704. doi: 10.1111/1755-0998.13729. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Liu Y, Jin C, Zhang X, Zhou Y, Hu Y.. 2022. Polygonatum zanlanscianense chloroplast, complete genome. [updated 2022 Oct 17; accessed 2023 Oct 12]. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nuccore/OL895311.1/.
  16. Long BH, Jiang XH, Song R, Li SH, Xiao LQ, Yi ZL, She CW.. 2022. Application of DNA barcodes in identification and genetic diversity analysis of medicinal plants of the genus Polygonatum. Plant Sci J. 40(4):533–543. doi: 10.11913/PSJ.2095-0837.2022.40533. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  17. Lu J, Zhang CH, Wu Y.. 2019. Investigating tissue culture technique of a Polygonatum kingianum variety distributed in Sichuan. Chin J Appl Environ Biol. 25(5):1222–1227. doi: 10.19675/j.cnki.1006-687x.2018.11043. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  18. Ma CD, Chang H, Yang YC, Wang EH, Zhan ZL.. 2022. Herbal textual research on Polygonati Rhizoma in famous classical formulas. Chin J Exp Tradit Med Formul. 28(10):193–206. doi: 10.13422/j.cnki.syfjx.20211865. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  19. Milne I, Lindner D, Bayer M, Husmeier D, McGuire G, Marshall DF, Wright F.. 2009. TOPALi v2: a rich graphical interface for evolutionary analyses of multiple alignments on HPC clusters and multi-core desktops. Bioinformatics. 25(1):126–127. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btn575. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Sharma S, Joshi R, Kumar D.. 2021. Metabolomics insights and bioprospection of Polygonatum verticillatum: an important dietary medicinal herb of alpine Himalaya. Food Res Int. 148:110619. doi: 10.1016/j.foodres.2021.110619. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Sheng W. 2021. Asparagus cochinchinensis chloroplast, complete genome. [updated 2021 Jun 30; accessed 2024 Jan 10]. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nuccore/MW447164.
  22. Shi Y, Yang TG, Yang MS, Yu M, Zhang XF.. 2022. Polygonati Rhizoma: a crop with potential of being consumed as food and medicine. Zhongguo Zhong Yao Za Zhi. 47(4):1132–1135. doi: 10.19540/j.cnki.cjcmm.20211105.101. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Stamatakis A. 2014. RAxML version 8: a tool for phylogenetic analysis and post-analysis of large phylogenies. Bioinformatics. 30(9):1312–1313. doi: 10.1093/bioinfor-matics/btu033. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Wang J, Duan B.. 2021. Polygonatum sibiricum chloroplast, complete genome. [updated 2021 Aug 7; accessed 2023 Oct 12]. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nuccore/MZ029093.
  25. Wang J, Qian J, Jiang Y, Chen XC, Zheng BJ, Chen SL, Yang FJ, Xu ZC, Duan BZ.. 2022. Comparative analysis of chloroplast genome and new insights into phylogenetic relationships of Polygonatum and tribe polygonateae. Front Plant Sci. 13:882189. doi: 10.3389/FPLS.2022.882189. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Wang L. 2022. Polygonatum franchetii chloroplast, complete genome. [updated 2022 Nov 13; accessed 2023 Oct 12]. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nuccore/OP615253.1/.
  27. Wang S, Dang K, Niu J, Wang S, Wang L.. 2023. Polygonatum cyrtonema chloroplast, complete genome. [updated 2023 Apr 3; accessed 2023 Oct 12]. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nuccore/NC_028429.1/.
  28. Wu LW, Nie LP, Xu ZC, Li P, Wang Y, He CN, Song JY, Yao H.. 2020. Comparative and phylogenetic analysis of the complete chloroplast genomes of three Paeonia section Moutan species (Paeoniaceae). Front Genet. 11:980. doi: 10.3389/fgene.2020.00980. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Wu T, Xiao L.. 2022. Polygonatum cirrhifolium chloroplast, complete genome. [updated 2022 Apr 18; accessed 2023 Oct 12]. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nuccore/MN912821.
  30. Xia MQ, Liu Y, Liu JJ, Chen DH, Shi Y, Bai ZC, Xiao Y, Peng C, Si JP, Li P, et al. . 2021. A new synonym of Polygonatum in China, based on morphological and molecular evidence. PhytoKeys. 175:137–149. doi: 10.3897/phytokeys.175.63383. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Xia MQ, Liu Y, Liu JJ, Chen DH, Shi Y, Chen ZX, Chen DR, Jin RF, Chen HL, Zhu SS, et al. . 2022. Out of the Himalaya-Hengduan Mountains: phylogenomics, biogeography and diversification of Polygonatum Mill. (Asparagaceae) in the Northern Hemisphere. Mol Phylogenet Evol. 169:107431. doi: 10.1016/j.ympev.2022.107431. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Yan M, Cheng R.. 2022. Polygonatum filipes chloroplast, complete genome. [updated 2022 Aug 6; accessed 2023 Oct 12]. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nuccore/MZ571521.1/.
  33. Yang ZY, Yang K, Zhu XX, Liu XM, Hu Q, Chen Y.. 2020. Development status and industry development analysis of Polygonati Rhizoma health-care food. J Tradit Chin Med Univ Hunan. 40(7):853–859. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-070X.2020.07.014. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  34. Zhang DJ, Ren J, Jiang H, Wanga VO, Dong X, Hu GW.. 2023. Comparative and phylogenetic analysis of the complete chloroplast genomes of six Polygonatum species (Asparagaceae). Sci Rep. 13(1):7237. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-34083-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Zhang MY, Li YM, Cheng WP, Gao J, Yan YG, Yang L, Hu JH, Zhang G.. 2023. Molecular authentication of medicinal Polygonatum species utilizing the universal DNA barcode sequences. Chin Tradit Herb Drugs. 54(1):235–244. doi: 10.7501/j.issn.0253-2670.2023.01.025. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  36. Zhao L. 2023. Polygonatum cathcartii plastid, complete genome. [updated 2023 Apr 3; accessed 2023 Oct 12]. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nuccore/NC_062699.1/.
  37. Zhou JC, Zhang JZ, Qiu YJ, Fan CZ.. 2022. The complete chloroplast genome sequence of Viola kunawarensis Royle, a precious Uygur medicinal material. Mitochondrial DNA B Resour. 7(9):1704–1706. doi: 10.1080/23802359.2022.2122882. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Zhou PJ, Li XF, Fu DH, Pu XY, Zhu GQ.. 2017. Comparative identification of Polygonatum kingianum Coll. et Hemsley and its adulterants Polygonatum verticillatum (L.) All. J Guangzhou Univ Tradit Chin Med. 34(4):587–591. doi: 10.13359/j.cnki.gzxbtcm.2017.04.026. [DOI] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Data Availability Statement

The genome sequence data that support the findings of this research are openly available in GenBank of NCBI at https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/ under the accession nos. OR386975 (P. hunanense), OR255921 (P. verticillatum), and OR386974 (P. caulialatum). The associated BioProject, BioSample, and SRA numbers are PRJNA1020603; SAMN37526446 (P. hunanense), SAMN37526444 (P. verticillatum), and SAMN37526445 (P. caulialatum); SRR26159564 (P. hunanense), SRR26159566 (P. verticillatum), and SRR26159565 (P. caulialatum).

Articles from Mitochondrial DNA. Part B, Resources are provided here courtesy of Taylor & Francis

RESOURCES