Diagnostics and treatment delay in primary central nervous system lymphoma: What the neurosurgeon should know

Abstract

Purpose

The gold standard for diagnostics in primary central nervous system lymphoma (PCNSL) is histopathological diagnosis after stereotactic biopsy. Yet, PCNSL has a multidisciplinary diagnostic work up, which associated with diagnostic delay and could result in treatment delay. This article offers recommendations to neurosurgeons involved in clinical decision-making regarding (novel) diagnostics and care for patients with PCNSL with the aim to improve uniformity and timeliness of the diagnostic process for patients with PCNSL.

Methods

We present a mini review to discuss the role of stereotactic biopsy in the context of novel developments in diagnostics for PCNSL, as well as the role for cytoreductive surgery.

Results

Cerebrospinal fluid-based diagnostics are supplementary and cannot replace stereotactic biopsy-based diagnostics.

Conclusion

Histopathological diagnosis after stereotactic biopsy of the brain remains the gold standard for diagnosis. Additional diagnostics should not be a cause of diagnostic delay. There is currently no sufficient evidence supporting cytoreductive surgery in PCNSL, with recent studies showing contradictive data and suboptimal study designs.

Introduction

Primary central nervous system lymphomas are rare extranodal non-Hodgkin lymphomas confined to the central nervous system, without systemic involvement. According to the WHO classification of Central Nervous System Tumours 5th edition, four more common types can be defined: primary large B-cell lymphoma of the CNS (PCNS-LBCL), immunodeficiency-associated CNS lymphomas, lymphomatoid granulomatosis and intravascular large B-cell lymphoma [42]. Miscellaneous rare lymphomas that can primarily occur in the CNS are MALT lymphoma of the dura, other low-grade B-cell lymphomas of the CNS, anaplastic large cell lymphoma (ALK + /ALK −) and T-cell and NK/T-cell lymphomas. Of these, PCNSL-LBCL is the most common tumor type encountered and will be the focus of this review. In the more recent WHO classification of Hematolymphoid Tumours 5th edition, PCNS-LBCL is classified with the category of primary large B-cell lymphoma of immune-privileged sites, together with primary large B-cell lymphoma of the brain, spinal cord, vitreoretina, cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) and of the testis. PCNS-LBCL is otherwise known as primary CNS lymphoma (PCNSL) and shall be referred to as such in this article. PCNSL comprises less than 1% of lymphomas and 4% of brain tumors [3]. PCNSL has an incidence of approximately 0.44 per 100,000, which is increased in patients > 60 years old [50, 66, 70]. The median age at presentation is 65 years old [47]. In cases of immunodeficiency, autoimmune disease, or immunosuppressive medication, PCNSL is more prevalent and is typically Eppstein-Barr virus (EBV) related. Presenting symptoms include cognitive and behavioral changes, focal deficits, headache, visual complaints, and/or epilepsy, depending on the localization of PCNSL [40]. 25–40% of PCNSL patients present with leptomeningeal disease [63].

Untreated PCNSL has a disconcerting overall survival of 1.5 months [31]. High-dose methotrexate is the cornerstone of treatment for PCNSL, but there is currently no international uniform treatment for PCNSL [58]. In population-based studies, the median survival time of PCNSL is 16 months [50]. However, the prognosis is age dependent and worsens at higher age. PCNSL patients undergoing treatment, have a 5-year overall survival (OS) in the total population of 35% and a 5-year OS in elderly (i.e. > 70 years-old) of 6% [66]. In recent trials, 2- and 3-year OS was 70–80%, and 60%, respectively [10, 22]. Predictive models using prognostic parameters were developed for clinical care and the design of prospective studies. The Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Centre uses > 50 years and a Karnofsky Performance Status (KPS) score of < 70 as factors predicting a worse prognosis [2]. The International Extranodal Lymphoma Study Group model considers an age > 60 years, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) clinical performance > 1, increased serum lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), elevated protein in cerebrospinal fluid, and involvement of deep brain structures (i.e. periventricular, brain stem, basal ganglia, and/or cerebellum) as parameters for a negative outcome [20]. However, the latter model has not been externally validated and experts warn against the use of KPS as a prognostic marker in PCNSL, due to possible rapid neurological deterrence at onset of disease. Comorbidity and performance prior to onset of disease are of importance in an elderly population.

The gold standard for diagnosis of PCNSL is histopathological diagnosis after stereotactic biopsy [4]. This article outlines the diagnostic work-up for suspected PCNSL and aims to provide neurosurgeons a summary of the current treatment options and prognostic factors of PCNSL.

Diagnostic work-up

Neuroimaging

On magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), lymphoma typically shows as a solitary (in circa 65% of the cases) or multiple space occupying lesions that are sharply demarcated and surrounded by vasogenic edema. Most lesions are isointense or hypointense on T2-weighted fluid-attenuated inversion recovery (FLAIR) MRI. T1-weighted imaging after contrast administration is likely to show homogenous enhancement. Over 80% of the lesions are located supratentorially with a high affinity for the periventricular regions, basal ganglia and corpus callosum [54]. Diffusion weighted imaging (DWI) and apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) may show diffusion restriction in 90% of the patients, concordant to the high cellularity of the tumor (Fig. 1). In comparison to other intracranial tumors, PCNSL show relatively low perfusion and is unlikely to contain calcifications, bleeding, or necrosis prior to treatment. Cystic and ring-shaped enhancements are unlikely to be found, except in immunocompromised patients like human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-related lymphoma. In rapidly expanding lesions, there could be non-homogenous enhancement on T1 + gadolinium MRI, even in immunocompetent patients [65].

Fig. 1.

Example of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the brain for patient suffering from primary central nervous system lymphoma (PCNSL). a T1-weighted; b T1-weighted post gadolinium; c T2-weighted; d Fluid-attenuated inversion recovery (FLAIR); e Diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI); f Apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC)

Next, it is important to differentiate between primary and secondary CNSL. Secondary CNSL is based on dissemination of systemic lymphoma to the central nervous system, which is reported in 4–13% of CNSL cases [1]. Computed tomography (CT) of the neck, thorax and abdomen may reveal lymphadenopathy or other tumors eligible for biopsy, and may avert the need for stereotactic biopsy of the brain. In comparison to conventional CT imaging, positron emission tomography (PET) imaging can prove more sensitive in identifying systemic illness and is preferred [45]. However, to avoid diagnostic delay, subsequent imaging with PET-CT can be performed after histopathological confirmation of PCNSL.

Stereotactic biopsy versus vitreous- and CSF-based diagnostics

The gold standard for diagnosis of PCNSL is histopathological analysis of a brain biopsy, with a diagnostic yield of over 91% [33, 60]. General considerations for neurosurgical intervention are tumor location, suspected entity and patient preferences. Other factors of influence are the prognostic factors conjointly determining eligibility for treatment, such as age, HIV-status, and clinical performance. Decision making requires interdisciplinary communication about treatment options. Following biopsy, histopathology of lymphoma typically shows infiltration of neoplastic large B-cells in the brain parenchyma with prominent nuclei, necrosis and activation of astrocytes and microglial cells. Immunohistochemical phenotyping can confirm post germinal center B-cell phenotype (MUM1 + ; BCL6 + ; CD10-) to exclude alternative diagnoses [35]. Chromogen in situ hybridization (CISH) can be used to detect EBV-encoded ribonucleic acids (RNAs), such as EBER (Fig. 2), to exclude EBV driven large B-cell lymphoma (LBCL). EBV-driven immunodeficiency-associated CNS lymphomas are associated with a worse prognosis [55]. In low cellularity biopsies or biopsies taken after corticosteroid treatment, molecular MYD88 testing or B-cell clonality analysis of immunoglobulin genes can be performed [11]. When a B-cell clone is detected, this enables the differentiation between PCNSL from reactive inflammatory lesions or “vanished lymphoma” cases, subsequent to administration of corticosteroids. Furthermore, demonstration of MYD88, CD79b or other mutations may offer additional diagnostic value in cases where histology is not definitive, as for example MYD88 is mutated in approximately 85% of PCNSL [33]. The combination of these tests may support diagnosis with a high sensitivity and specificity for PCNSL[5, 74], but neither are required for confirmation of diagnosis [23].

Fig. 2.

Example of microscopy images (400 × magnification) of Eppstein Bar virus-positive primary central nervous system lymphoma (PCNSL). a Chromogen situ hybridization (CISH) portraying a blue positive EBER stain in; b Immunohistochemical staining of B-cell nuclei with Pax 5; c Immunohistochemical staining of membrane and cytoplasm of B-cells with CD79a; d Histological staining with hematoxylin and eosin

Preferably, all patients should undergo a lumbar puncture (LP) for cytopathology and immunophenotyping by flowcytometry of CSF for tumor staging. In any case, CSF diagnostics should not delay stereotactic biopsy for diagnostic purposes. CSF cytopathology reveals an increase in large blast-like lymphocytes in CSF in 25–40% of patients with PCNSL. Immunophenotyping can further distinguish B-cell from T-cell lymphoma with a combination of cluster of differentiation (CD) markers either by immunocytopathologic or flowcytometric means. Negative cytopathology and flowcytometric immunophenotyping do not rule out PCNSL, because these methods have a low sensitivity of 2–32% [61]. Clonality analysis of immunoglobulin genes and PCR testing of MYD88 hotspot mutations on CSF may again be of additional diagnostic value. When stereotactic biopsy is not feasible, diagnosis can be made based on a combination of typical presentation on MRI in combination with immunophenotyping of CSF with the potential addition of molecular makers. If the diagnosis remains uncertain, biopsy is inevitable. Furthermore, in patients known with a systemic lymphoma in the recent medical history, an LP is sufficient to diagnose CNS involvement. This is supported by the notion that secondary CNS lymphoma more often present with leptomeningeal disease, rather than intraparenchymal [25, 34].

In exceptional cases where stereotactic biopsy and LP are not feasible, vitreous biopsy could confirm the diagnosis [17]. In patients with vitreoretinal lymphoma (VRL) diagnostic vitrectomy has a sensitivity of 77% [41]. However, ocular dissemination is present at diagnosis in 10–25% of patients with PCNSL [19]. All patients should be referred to the ophthalmologist for tumor staging [35]. Intra-ocular localization could have consequences for treatment administration and follow-up [28]. Vitreous biopsy could take place if intra-ocular examination shows cellular infiltration, or subretinal tumor cell infiltrates are observed on fundoscopy. For vitreous samples the same set of tests described for CNS sampling can be performed with the addition of IL10/IL6 cytokine testing, and excluding the differential diagnosis of EBV-driven PCNSL remains of importance [62].

Evidently, the question arises whether brain biopsy is indicated if a sampling of CSF or vitreous fluid can be performed. Literature has suggested that identification of lymphoma cells in CSF or vitreous fluid in combination with clinical and radiological features of PCNSL are confirmative for PCNSL and may avert the need for (high risk) biopsy [35]. Unfortunately for diagnostic purposes, the incidence of ocular dissemination is low and prioritizing ocular biopsy could result in diagnostic delay. In only 7% of patients with clinical and radiological features suspect for PCNSL diagnosis can be made upon LP [29, 46]. In addition to the low sensitivity of LP-based cytopathology and immunophenotyping of CSF. Unfortunately, diagnosis cannot be made solely on cytopathology. Histopathology is needed to examine the morphology, hemotoxylin and eosin (H&E) staining, immunohistochemistry (IHC), B-cell immunophenotype analysis and testing for EBV-driven RNAs. Hematologists suggest that a LP is not sufficient for the extensive molecular and immunophenotype analysis necessary for exact WHO tumor classification and determination of treatment [17].

Consequently, it is advised to perform a stereotactic biopsy of the brain as soon as possible. Histopathological diagnosis obtained after stereotactic biopsy remains the gold standard for diagnosing a PCNSL and should not be delayed to perform CSF diagnostics. Clinicians involved should strive to minimize delay in the diagnostic process of PCNSL to prevent progressive neurological symptomatology. Old age, clinical performance and treatment delay are correlated with a reduced survival in patients with PCNSL, who already have a limited prognosis [2, 12].

Following histological confirmation of CNSL

After histological determination that the lesion is a lymphoma, the patient is referred to the hematologist for tumor staging. Subsequent imaging of the neck, thorax, and abdomen with PET-CT should be performed to differentiate between primary and secondary CNSL, and for tumor staging. In 10% of CNSL cases it concerns SCNSL, oftentimes based on recurrence of systemic lymphoma, or discovery of an intravascular or testicular secondary localization. Therefore, physical examination (and potentially ultrasound) of the testis should be performed, as well as additional blood tests, including blood count, immunoglobulins (IgM, IgG and IgA), LDH, kidney- and liver function, and the left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) of cardiovascular patients. Furthermore, all patients presenting with PCNSL should be tested for Hepatitis B, C, and additionally HIV and Quantiferon in high-risk populations [35]. Bone marrow diagnostics have no additional value for tumor staging [29].

PCNSL diagnostics and corticosteroids

Patients with a symptomatic intracranial mass are often prescribed corticosteroids to ameliorate symptoms and reduce cerebral edema. It is crucial that clinicians treating patients with PCNSL prior to histopathological diagnosis refrain from prescribing corticosteroids if possible [59]. Dexamethasone induces apoptosis of PCNSL cells and could lead to temporary disappearance, otherwise known as “vanished lymphoma”, which complicates histopathological diagnostics due to morphological changes and transient tumor mass reduction [27, 49]. The administration of corticosteroids is associated with inconclusive biopsy by an odds ratio of 3.3 [59]. Even a single dose of corticosteroids could lead to inconclusive results [43]. In case corticosteroids have been given, it is recommended to postpone (re-)biopsy until serial MRI imaging indicates new tumor growth [35]. Alternatively, in patients with symptomatic lesions or edema suspected for lymphoma, osmotic treatment with mannitol or hypertonic saline could be considered to lower intracranial pressure [57]. Of note, vanishing of the enhancement under corticosteroid administration is not specific nor diagnostic for lymphoma [8].

After biopsy, treatment with dexamethasone can be started to reduce intracranial edema and the consequential neurological symptoms. There is no consensus about dosage and duration of treatment. There is no evidence suggesting that dexamethasone leads to prolonged survival in patients with PCNSL, therefore it could be argued not to administer corticosteroids in the absence of edema-related symptoms. Long-term treatment is not indicated and especially contra-indicated in immunocompromised patients, due to the possible side-effects of glucocorticoids and the inevitable relapse of lymphoma [57].

Role for cytoreductive surgery

Neurosurgical intervention is usually limited to stereotactic biopsy for pathological diagnosis. PCNSL often presents with multiple, diffuse deep-seated lesions. In the past, resection has been advised against, because of the risk of developing surgery-related neurological deficits and the high sensitivity of PCNSL to chemotherapy, whole brain radiotherapy (WBRT), and autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) [21, 24, 37]. The recommendation against resection was based on small retrospective studies failing to show cytoreductive surgery has a benefit over supportive care or over biopsy followed by chemo- and radiotherapy [6, 7, 15, 32]. However, this data may no longer reflect modern neurosurgery with novel imaging- and navigation techniques.

Recently, larger series have shown the possible benefits of resection for PCNSL [56, 73]. A retrospective analysis of a phase 3 trial comprising 526 patients showed that 67 patients undergoing (sub)total resection had a significantly better progression free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) in comparison to patients undergoing biopsy, independently of age and clinical performance. [73] After adjusting for patients with single lesions more often undergoing resection, only PFS remained statistically significant. There is a strong risk of bias though, given the study does not adjust for localization of the tumor in surgically inaccessible areas of the brain, which has a negative impact on both prognosis and the decision to perform resection. A retrospective case control study of the National Cancer Database (NCDB) found a median survival (MS) of 19.5 versus 11.0 months in 8936 patients undergoing craniotomy versus biopsy respectively, independent of subsequent treatment with chemo-/radiotherapy [56]. The benefit of craniotomy over biopsy increased after adjusting for age with a MS of 95.1 versus 29.1 months respectively in age < 50 years (HR 0.66, p < 0.001) and 14.9 versus 10.0 months in age > 50 years (HR 0.86, p < 0.001). Benefit of craniotomy over biopsy was statistically dependent on patient risk stratification based on comorbidity, tumor focality, deep versus superficial lesions, comorbidity, performance in activities of daily living, and age. Both studies propose reevaluation of resection of PCNSL in single lesions with low-risk localization.

In contrast, a recent study found no significant difference in OS or PFS in 105 patients with single lesion PCNSL undergoing biopsy versus resection [13, 60]. Another retrospective analysis in 1002 patients of the French oculo-cerebral lymphoma network (LOC) database showed a benefit in univariate analysis of resection versus biopsy of PCNSL with an OS of 23.8 months versus 37.3 months, respectively. However, the results were not significant in multivariate analysis [38]. In conclusion, recent study designs are suboptimal, and data is contradictive. Consequently, there is no consensus on whether resection leads to prolonged survival or whether resection should take place in patients with unifocal and resectable lesions. Though resection has become safer with modern surgical and imaging techniques, it is currently not the standard of care for PCNSL and is advised only in cases with the risk of impending brain herniation or rapidly progressive neurological deterioration [7, 18].

Treatment and follow up: what the neurosurgeon needs to know

Following neurosurgical intervention, patients are referred to the hematologist or neuro-oncologist for induction treatment with chemotherapy. It is important to start treatment for PCNSL as quickly as possible, since delay of induction treatment is associated with reduced PFS in PCNSL patients [12, 58]. Currently, there is no uniform treatment for PCNSL and there are very few controlled studies available [53]. For induction treatment the European Association of Neuro-Oncology (EANO) recommends intravenous administration of high-dose methotrexate, best administered in combination with chemotherapeutic agents with the ability to cross the blood–brain barrier [36, 76]. The chemotherapeutic drug of choice is preferably cytarabine or combinations used in randomized prospective trials, such as the alkylating agents temozolomide, procarbazine, thiotepa and carmustine [9, 21, 37]. The role of rituximab in the treatment of PCNSL is still unclear. One phase II study showed an improved PFS and OS when rituximab and thiotepa were added to HD-MTX and cytarabine [22]. However, a larger phase III study showed no benefit of adding rituximab to MBVP chemotherapy [9]. In the Netherlands patients < 70 years receive methotrexate, etoposide carmustine and predison (MBVP) and rituximab, methrotrexate, cytarabine and thiotepa (MATRix), where patients > 65 years are eligible for rituximab, methotraxeate and procarbazine (R-MP) [14, 21, 26]. Response rate is measured on MRI, and in case of CSF localization and/or intra-ocular involvement also with an LP and/or fundus examination, respectively. The induction treatment is followed by consolidation treatment with chemotherapy followed by ASCT or WBRT [22, 35, 37].

Treatment with ASCT may result in longer remission, but it is advised against in patients over 65–70 years of age or with a poor KPS due to high toxicity [22, 37]. WBRT is associated with neurotoxicity and the possible advantage of progression-free survival should therefore be weighed against the risk of toxicity in long term survivors [64]. WBRT is not recommended in patients with HIV or in those over the age of 61 years [16, 35, 71]. However, due to the limited prognosis of the disease and its correlation with neurocognitive symptoms, WBRT could nonetheless be discussed with a radiotherapist. Prognostic factors such as performance status, renal function, HIV-status and age should be taken into account conjointly to prevent undertreatment of patients that are able to tolerate more aggressive treatment [35, 67, 72]. Unfortunately, PCNSL is characterized by a high relapse rate of 36–66% [39, 75]. If there is at least a partial response (i.e. a reduction of 50% of the enhancing tumor), the extent of radiological response does not seem to influence survival rates in PCNSL [1, 68].

Diagnostic delay and treatment delay

There are several intervals between the diagnostic procedures and the start of treatment of PCNSL where significant delay can occur. Primarily, the time span from clinical onset of symptoms to neuroimaging. A study showed this period can last up to a median 21 days in patients without HIV [30]. Factors of influence on a delay in radiological diagnostics are presenting symptoms of personality changes or visual disturbance. Neurocognitive disturbance is an unfavorable prognostic marker [69]. A study that compared the diagnostic delay in patients with PCNSL and patients with glioblastoma found a median delay of 19 days and 9.5 days respectively, suggesting that patients with PCNSL are more at risk of a delayed neurosurgical intervention. The delay was not in the period from clinical onset of symptoms to imaging, but seemed to occur between neuroimaging and morphological diagnosis [12]. Literature suggests that early biopsy for PCNSL is safe, valid, and may minimize diagnostic delay [46]. It generally takes two more weeks after biopsy until histopathological diagnosis of PCNSL and induction of treatment [48]. This results in a cumulative delay of more than 30 days, which is strongly correlated with a reduced survival compared to induction of treatment within one month [12].

Discussion

Given the high specificity and sensitivity of brain biopsy, this remains the gold standard for diagnosis of PCNSL. Cytoreductive surgery remains advised against, due to the risk of developing neurological deficits subsequent to resection and the high sensitivity of PCNSL to chemotherapy, ASCT and WBRT. This recommendation is based on small retrospective studies in the past and their data may no longer reflect modern neurosurgery, guided by novel imaging- and navigation techniques. Recent literature is contradictive, though there are several studies suggesting a benefit in survival related to resection over biopsy in PCNSL. It would be interesting to explore in a prospective cohort study whether resection of superficial, unifocal lesions in non-eloquent regions leads to better overall survival in comparison to biopsy in patients with PCNSL.

Various fields of medicine are involved in the diagnostic work up of PCNSL. Stereotactic biopsy should be prioritized and should not be delayed by CSF diagnostics or vitreous biopsy, as the gold standard remains histopathological diagnosis. CSF diagnostics does not provide enough material for sufficient testing to obtain diagnosis, as it does not provide the tissue that is per definition needed for histological diagnosis. Similarly, vitreous biopsy provides material for cytology, but does not allow for the same diagnostic certainty as brain biopsy. In conclusion, CSF diagnostics and vitreous biopsy are no realistic substitutes for brain biopsy due to their low sensitivity and the risk of reaching no pathological confirmation of diagnosis. However, when brain biopsy is not feasible, these alternatives should be considered. Immunocytopathology is necessary to confirm PCNSL. Molecular clonality analysis of immunoglobulin genes or mutation in specific genes (e.g. MYD88, CD79b) may further support the diagnosis, but they are optional and not standard practice. Administration of corticosteroids should be postponed until a brain biopsy has been performed, because it is associated with inconclusive biopsy and a delay in treatment. After histological confirmation of CNSL, subsequent diagnostics should differentiate between primary and secondary CNSL.

Diagnostic delay of PCNSL is correlated with treatment delay, which is associated with earlier relapse and reduced survival in PCNSL [12, 58]. Treatment selection is influenced by prognostic markers, such as age, clinical performance, and HIV-status. Upon progression of disease, clinical performance may deteriorate due to progression of neurocognitive symptomology. Evidently, some causes of delay are influenced by the organization of care, thus are subordinate to hospital structures and contextual factors. Retrospective research compared treatment selection for PCNSL patients in a public safety-net hospital to a private tertiary academic institution in America [52]. It was suggested that sociodemographic barriers impact treatment selection and its outcome [51].

As treatment options for the elderly population (> 70 years) are being developed, the requests for stereotactic biopsy in vulnerable patients may increase. Clinicians should be aware of the vulnerability of the elderly population with PCNSL. They are particularly at risk of worsening their already unfavorable prognosis, when they suffer from factors associated with delayed diagnostics, such as vision loss or neurocognitive problems.[30] As the median OS of patients with PCNSL under the age of 70 doubled over a 40-year period to 2010, the survival of elderly patients remained unchanged with a marginal 6–7 months [44]. Fields of medicine involved in the care for patients with PCNSL should strive to determine and optimize factors influencing timely diagnostics and induction of treatment. Therefore, patients suspect of PCNSL should preferably be referred to a clinical setting where all diagnostic and treatment modalities are available to avoid delay.

Authors’ contributions

RMV performed histopathological examination of brain biopsy. LCJB provided expert opinion regarding Dutch guidelines for treatment of patients with PCNSL. MCH wrote the first draft article. All other authors made substantial contributions to the review or substantively revised it. All authors approved the submitted version.

Funding

Not applicable.

Data availability

Not applicable.

Code availability

Not applicable.

Declarations

Ethics approval

Not applicable.

Consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Not applicable, patient on Fig. 1 is deceased.

Conflict of interest

None of the authors declare a conflict of financial or non-financial interest.