Skip to main content
JAMA Network logoLink to JAMA Network
. 2024 Jun 10;7(6):e2414122. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.14122

Severe Pediatric Neurological Manifestations With SARS-CoV-2 or MIS-C Hospitalization and New Morbidity

Conall Francoeur 1, Alicia M Alcamo 2,3,4, Courtney L Robertson 5, Mark S Wainwright 6, Juan D Roa 7,8, Marlina E Lovett 9, Casey Stulce 10, Mais Yacoub 11, Renee M Potera 12, Elizabeth Zivick 13, Adrian Holloway 14, Ashish Nagpal 15, Kari Wellnitz 16, Katelyn M Even 17, Werther Brunow de Carvalho 18, Isadora S Rodriguez 18, Stephanie P Schwartz 19, Tracie C Walker 19, Santiago Campos-Miño 20, Leslie A Dervan 21, Andrew S Geneslaw 22, Taylor B Sewell 22, Patrice Pryce 23, Wendy G Silver 24, Jieru E Lin 24, Wendy S Vargas 24, Alexis Topjian 2,3,4, Jennifer L McGuire 4,25,26, Jesus Angel Domínguez Rojas 27, Jaime Tasayco-Muñoz 27, Sue J Hong 5, William J Muller 28, Matthew Doerfler 28, Cydni N Williams 29,30, Kurt Drury 30, Dhristie Bhagat 31, Aaron Nelson 31, Dana Price 31, Heda Dapul 32, Laura Santos 32, Robert Kahoud 33, Brian Appavu 34, Kristin P Guilliams 35,36,37, Shannon C Agner 35,36,37, Karen H Walson 38, Lindsey Rasmussen 39, Ria Pal 40, Anna Janas 39, Peter Ferrazzano 41, Raquel Farias-Moeller 42, Kellie C Snooks 43, Chung-Chou H Chang 44, Tomás Iolster 45, Jennifer C Erklauer 46,47, Facundo Jorro Baron 48, Evangeline Wassmer 49,50,51, Michael Yoong 52, Michelle Jardine 53, Zoha Mohammad 54, Akash Deep 55, Tanil Kendirli 56, Karen Lidsky 57, Samantha Dallefeld 58, Helen Flockton 59, Shruti Agrawal 60, Krishna Sumanth Siruguppa 61,62,63, Michaela Waak 64, Alfonso Gutiérrez-Mata 65, Warwick Butt 66,67, Sixto Bogantes-Ledezma 65, Fabricio Sevilla-Acosta 68, Andres Umaña-Calderón 65, Adriana Ulate-Campos 65, Adriana Yock-Corrales 69, Victor Brodzik Talisa 44, Hari Krishnan Kanthimathinathan 70, Michelle E Schober 71, Ericka L Fink 44,, for the Global Consortium Study of Neurologic Dysfunction in COVID-19 (GCS-NeuroCOVID) Investigators
PMCID: PMC11165382  PMID: 38857050

Key Points

Question

Are severe pediatric neurological manifestations during a SARS-CoV-2–related hospitalization associated with new neurocognitive or functional morbidities?

Findings

In this cohort study of 3568 patients younger than 18 years, hospitalized with acute SARS-CoV-2 or multisystem inflammatory syndrome in children, severe neurological manifestations, including acute encephalopathy, seizures or status epilepticus, and delirium, were common and were associated with new neurocognitive or functional morbidity at hospital discharge.

Meaning

These findings suggest that patients under 18 years with a SARS-CoV-2–related hospitalization who experience severe neurological manifestations should be evaluated for new morbidity.

Abstract

Importance

Neurological manifestations during acute SARS-CoV-2–related multisystem inflammatory syndrome in children (MIS-C) are common in hospitalized patients younger than 18 years and may increase risk of new neurocognitive or functional morbidity.

Objective

To assess the association of severe neurological manifestations during a SARS-CoV-2–related hospital admission with new neurocognitive or functional morbidities at discharge.

Design, Setting, and Participants

This prospective cohort study from 46 centers in 10 countries included patients younger than 18 years who were hospitalized for acute SARS-CoV-2 or MIS-C between January 2, 2020, and July 31, 2021.

Exposure

Severe neurological manifestations, which included acute encephalopathy, seizures or status epilepticus, meningitis or encephalitis, sympathetic storming or dysautonomia, cardiac arrest, coma, delirium, and stroke.

Main Outcomes and Measures

The primary outcome was new neurocognitive (based on the Pediatric Cerebral Performance Category scale) and/or functional (based on the Functional Status Scale) morbidity at hospital discharge. Multivariable logistic regression analyses were performed to examine the association of severe neurological manifestations with new morbidity in each SARS-CoV-2–related condition.

Results

Overall, 3568 patients younger than 18 years (median age, 8 years [IQR, 1-14 years]; 54.3% male) were included in this study. Most (2980 [83.5%]) had acute SARS-CoV-2; the remainder (588 [16.5%]) had MIS-C. Among the patients with acute SARS-CoV-2, 536 (18.0%) had a severe neurological manifestation during hospitalization, as did 146 patients with MIS-C (24.8%). Among survivors with acute SARS-CoV-2, those with severe neurological manifestations were more likely to have new neurocognitive or functional morbidity at hospital discharge compared with those without severe neurological manifestations (27.7% [n = 142] vs 14.6% [n = 356]; P < .001). For survivors with MIS-C, 28.0% (n = 39) with severe neurological manifestations had new neurocognitive and/or functional morbidity at hospital discharge compared with 15.5% (n = 68) of those without severe neurological manifestations (P = .002). When adjusting for risk factors in those with severe neurological manifestations, both patients with acute SARS-CoV-2 (odds ratio, 1.85 [95% CI, 1.27-2.70]; P = .001) and those with MIS-C (odds ratio, 2.18 [95% CI, 1.22-3.89]; P = .009) had higher odds of having new neurocognitive and/or functional morbidity at hospital discharge.

Conclusions and Relevance

The results of this study suggest that children and adolescents with acute SARS-CoV-2 or MIS-C and severe neurological manifestations may be at high risk for long-term impairment and may benefit from screening and early intervention to assist recovery.


This cohort study of patients younger than 18 years hospitalized for SARS-CoV-2 or multisystem inflammatory syndrome evaluates the association of severe neurological manifestations with new neurocognitive or functional morbidities at discharge.

Introduction

Most children infected with SARS-CoV-2 do not require hospitalization, and mortality rates are low.1,2 For some, however, acute SARS-CoV-2 infection can result in a significant burden of illness, especially among infants and children with comorbid illness.3,4,5,6,7,8,9 Children with the SARS-CoV-2–related condition multisystem inflammatory syndrome in children (MIS-C) often require critical care due to multisystem organ dysfunction, with high survival rates10,11 but with risk of post–critical illness sequelae. In particular, neurological manifestations of pediatric SARS-CoV-2–related conditions have been associated with morbidity and mortality in prior studies.12,13

Neurological manifestations of SARS-CoV-2–related conditions include a wide array of symptoms or conditions with varying severity.12,13,14,15,16,17 In our group’s multicenter preliminary report of neurological manifestations in hospitalized individuals younger than 18 years with SARS-CoV-2–related conditions, we found that 44% had at least 1 neurological manifestation (40% in patients with acute SARS-CoV-2 and 66% in patients with MIS-C).12 The most common symptoms were headache (16% in acute SARS-CoV-2 and 47% in MIS-C), which may be nonspecific and challenging to evaluate in younger children, and acute encephalopathy or altered mental status (15% in acute SARS-CoV-2 and 22% in MIS-C). To date, few studies have evaluated the potential association of neurological manifestations with outcomes, and only a limited number of symptoms and conditions have been considered.17

We performed a secondary analysis of an international, multicenter cohort study12 to describe severe neurological manifestations and analyze their association with new neurocognitive or functional morbidity at hospital discharge. We hypothesized that the occurrence of severe neurological manifestations during acute SARS-CoV-2 or MIS-C hospitalization would be associated with new neurocognitive and/or functional morbidity at hospital discharge compared with individuals under 18 years without severe neurological manifestation. An association between severe neurological manifestations and new neurocognitive and/or functional morbidity may suggest severe neurological manifestations as an independent predictor of poor outcomes in hospitalized young patients with acute SARS-CoV-2 or MIS-C and therefore could be used to guide postdischarge management.

Methods

Study Population

This cohort study is a secondary analysis of individuals younger than 18 years with acute SARS-CoV-2 or SARS-CoV02–related MIS-C with and without severe neurological manifestations from the pediatric Global Consortium Study of Neurologic Dysfunction in COVID-19 (GCS-NeuroCOVID).12 The GCS-NeuroCOVID was a prospective, multicenter, international cohort study performed in 46 centers across 10 countries. Patients under the age of 18 years who were admitted with acute SARS-CoV-2–related MIS-C were included, and only those previously enrolled were excluded. As described in the initial GCS-NeuroCOVID,12 acute SARS-CoV-2 was classified as either confirmed (a positive SARS-CoV-2 test result) or presumed (a clinical diagnosis in the setting of clinical suspicion and/or close contact) without a diagnosis of MIS-C. An MIS-C diagnosis was classified by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention definition.12 Patients were enrolled between January 2, 2020, and July 31, 2021. The enrollment period was extended beyond the preliminary report for the original sites from May 1, 2021, to July 31, 2021, and additional sites were added for the entire reporting period.12 Local regulatory approval was obtained at each study site, and the need for informed consent was determined by each site’s regulatory authority. The University of Pittsburgh Institutional Review Board was the main study site, and it approved the study. The data coordinating center that received and analyzed data was at the University of Pittsburgh. This study followed the Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) reporting guideline.

Data Collection

Data were collected from each study site using a case report form with common data elements and a data dictionary as previously described.12 Demographic, illness, laboratory, imaging, and outcomes data were collected. Race and ethnicity data, as defined by each site and reported in the medical records, were collected because of reported associations with COVID-19 outcomes.18 Race categories included Black, White, and other (including American Indian or Alaska Native, Asian, Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander, and all other races), and ethnicity categories included Hispanic or Latino and non-Hispanic or non-Latino.

Neurological manifestations were previously defined and included a broad spectrum of symptoms from headache and malaise to encephalopathy and coma.12,19 For this study, severe neurological manifestations were defined during the design phase and before the primary analysis and were approved by expert opinion including consensus (by C.F., A.M.A., C.L.R., M.S.W., J.D.R., M.E.S., and E.L.F.) and evidence of association with worse outcomes in both SARS-CoV-2–related conditions and other acute pediatric illnesses.13,20 The final definition of severe manifestations included acute encephalopathy (altered mental status, lethargy, or drowsiness), seizures or status epilepticus, meningitis or encephalitis, sympathetic storming or dysautonomia, hypoxic ischemic brain injury secondary to cardiac arrest, coma, delirium, and stroke. These terms were indicated on the primary case report form. Laboratory values, including liver enzymes, inflammatory markers (eg, interleukin 6, C-reactive protein, ferritin, and procalcitonin), complete blood count, and electrolytes, were collected.

Outcomes

The primary outcome was new neurocognitive and/or functional morbidity at hospital discharge. Neurocognitive morbidity was as defined as a Pediatric Cerebral Performance Category (PCPC) score of 3 or more with a change of 1 or more points from the prehospitalization baseline.21 Scores for the PCPC range from 1 to 6 (1 indicates normal; 2, mild disability; 3, moderate disability; 4, severe disability; and 5, for vegetative state or coma—6 indicates death, which was not included in the baseline scores but was possible after hospitalization and was used to define unfavorable outcomes). Functional morbidity was defined as a change in the Functional Status Scale score of 1 or more between baseline and hospital discharge scores.22 The Functional Status Scale is based on 6 domains of functioning, and each domain ranges from 1 to 5. The final score is a cumulative score of all 6 domains, with higher scores indicating more severe dysfunction. Secondary outcomes included hospital mortality and new neurocognitive morbidity alone or new functional morbidity alone (rather than a combined outcome).

Statistical Analysis

Data were analyzed using Stata, version 18 (StataCorp LLC). Analyses were performed overall and by acute SARS-CoV-2 or MIS-C group, given the distinct differences in pathophysiology between these disease presentations.11 Categorical data were summarized as frequencies using χ2 tests and continuous data as median with IQR using Mann-Whitney tests. Multivariable logistic regression modeling was performed to evaluate the independent association of severe neurological manifestations during hospital admission with the presence of new neurocognitive and/or functional morbidity at hospital discharge for survivors. This regression analysis was stratified on and conducted within SARS-CoV-2 and MIS-C cohorts, and potential risk factors were considered separately in these populations.

We included age and sex a priori as potential risk factors for model building. The remaining demographic and clinical variables associated with new neurocognitive or functional morbidity at hospital discharge on univariable logistic regression with a P value <.20 were included as potential risk factors in model building. The final model was determined using backward stepwise elimination with a P value cutoff of .20 for removal from the model. A 2-sided P < .05 was considered statistically significant. Missing data were not imputed.

Results

Overall Patient Characteristics

During the study period, 3568 patients younger than 18 years were admitted to participating hospitals for either acute SARS-CoV-2 or MIS-C. The median age was 8 years (IQR, 1-14 years), 1627 (45.6%) were female, 3 (0.1%) were intersex, 1938 (54.3%) were male (n = 1938), and 1517 (42.5%) had no preexisting comorbidities. Of the total patients, 820 (23.0%) were Black, 1024 (28.7%) were Hispanic or Latino, 2271 (63.6%) were non-Hispanic or non-Latino, 1925 (54.0%) were White, and 890 (24.9%) were categorized as other race.

Patient Characteristics by Acute SARS-CoV-2 and MIS-C Group

Most patients included in this study had acute SARS-CoV-2 (83.5% [n = 2980]), and the remainder had MIS-C (588 [16.5%]). Among the patients with acute SARS-CoV-2, 536 (18.0%) had a severe neurological manifestation during hospitalization, as did 146 (24.8%) of the patients with MIS-C. In patients with acute SARS-CoV-2, those with severe neurological manifestations were less likely to be Hispanic or Latino (26.7% vs 30.4%), more likely to have more than 1 preexisting comorbidity (46.6% vs 32.5%), and more likely to have a neurological preexisting condition (45.7% vs 16.3%) compared with those without severe neurological manifestations (eTable 1 in Supplement 1). In patients with MIS-C, those with severe neurological manifestations were more likely to have a preexisting neurological condition (11.6% vs 5.9%) compared with those without severe neurological manifestations (Table 1).

Table 1. Clinical Characteristics of Patients With and Without Severe Neurological Manifestations by Acute SARS-CoV-2 and MIS-C Groupa.

Characteristic Patients with SARS-CoV-2, No. (%) Patients with MIS-C, No. (%)
Without severe neurological manifestations (n = 2444) With severe neurological manifestations (n = 536) Without severe neurological manifestations (n = 442) With severe neurological manifestations (n = 146)
Age, median (IQR)b 8.0 (0.9-14.0) 7.0 (1.1-14.0) 8.5 (2.0-12.0) 8.6 (5.0-12.0)
Sex
Female 1145 (46.8) 227 (42.4) 193 (43.7) 62 (42.5)
Intersex 3 (0.1) 0 0 0
Male 1296 (53.0) 309 (57.6) 249 (56.3) 84 (57.5)
Race
Black 553 (22.6) 101 (18.8) 123 (27.8) 43 (29.5)
White 1283 (52.5) 301 (56.2) 208 (47.1) 66 (45.2)
Otherc 608 (24.9) 134 (25.0) 111 (25.1) 37 (25.3)
Ethnicity
Hispanic or Latino 743 (30.4) 143 (26.7) 107 (24.2) 31 (21.2)
Non-Hispanic or non-Latino 1504 (61.5) 363 (67.7) 296 (67.0) 108 (74.0)
Not reported 197 (8.1) 30 (5.6) 39 (8.8) 7 (4.8)
Type of comorbidity
None 955 (39.1) 156 (29.1) 308 (69.7) 98 (67.1)
Neurological 398 (16.3) 245 (45.7) 26 (5.9) 17 (11.6)
Nonneurological 1091 (44.6) 135 (25.2) 108 (24.4) 31 (21.2)
Total comorbidities
0 955 (39.1) 156 (29.1) 308 (69.7) 98 (67.1)
1 695 (28.4) 130 (24.3) 95 (21.5) 24 (16.4)
>1 794 (32.5) 250 (46.6) 39 (8.8) 24 (16.4)
Baseline PCPC
1 1989 (81.4) 317 (59.1) 404 (91.4) 126 (86.3)
2 137 (5.6) 54 (10.1) 12 (2.7) 6 (4.1)
3 84 (3.4) 52 (9.7) 3 (0.7) 7 (4.8)
4 91 (3.7) 72 (13.4) 2 (0.5) 5 (3.4)
5 0 0 0 1 (0.7)
Missing 143 (5.9) 41 (7.6) 21 (4.8) 1 (0.7)
Baseline FSS
6-7 1950 (79.8) 344 (64.2) 388 (87.8) 129 (88.4)
8-9 90 (3.7) 27 (5.0) 4 (0.9) 4 (2.7)
10-14 73 (3.0) 53 (9.9) 0 2 (2.7)
≥15 37 (1.5) 25 (4.7) 1 (0.2) 1 (0.7)
Missing 294 (12.0) 87 (16.2) 49 (11.11) 8 (5.5)
Pandemic epoch
January-June 2020 431 (17.6) 90 (16.8) 55 (12.4) 24 (16.4)
July-December 2020 1131 (46.3) 256 (47.8) 176 (39.8) 66 (45.2)
January-July 2021 725 (29.7) 164 (30.6) 201 (43.5) 52 (35.6)
Missing 157 (6.4) 26 (4.9) 10 (2.3) 4 (2.7)
ICU admission 1316 (53.8) 310 (57.8) 213 (48.2) 68 (46.6)
Neurological manifestation
Acute encephalopathy NA 332 (61.9) NA 111 (76.0)
Seizures or status epilepticus NA 218 (40.7) NA 14 (9.6)
Delirium NA 40 (7.5) NA 17 (11.6)
Coma NA 40 (7.5) NA 7 (4.8)
Hypoxic ischemic brain injury secondary to cardiac arrest NA 36 (6.7) NA 8 (5.5)
Meningitis or encephalitis NA 28 (5.2) NA 12 (8.2)
Stroke NA 14 (2.6) NA 5 (3.4)
Sympathetic storming or dysautonomia NA 32 (5.9) NA 16 (10.9)

Abbreviations: FSS, Functional Status Scale; ICU, intensive care unit; MIS-C, multisystem inflammatory syndrome in children; NA, not applicable; PCPC, Pediatric Cerebral Performance Category.

a

Scoring for the PCPC and FSS are described in Methods.

b

Age was not recorded for all patients: number without acute SARS-CoV-2, 2438; with acute SARS-CoV-2, 535; without MIS-C, 442; and with MIS-C, 145.

c

Other includes American Indian or Alaska Native, Asian, Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander, and all other races.

The most common severe neurological manifestations with acute SARS-CoV-2 were acute encephalopathy (332 patients [61.9%]), seizures or status epilepticus (218 patients [40.7%]), and delirium and coma (both 40 patients [7.5%]). For MIS-C, the most common severe neurological manifestations were acute encephalopathy (111 patients [76.0%]), delirium (17 patients [11.6%]), sympathetic storming or dysautonomia (16 patients [10.9%]), and seizures or status epilepticus (14 patients [9.6%]) (Table 1).

Outcomes by Acute SARS-CoV-2 and MIS-C Group

SARS-CoV-2 Group

Of patients with severe neurological manifestations in acute SARS-CoV-2, 24 (4.8%) died within the hospitalization compared with 7 (0.3%) of those without severe neurological manifestations. Survivors with acute SARS-CoV-2 who experienced severe neurological manifestations were more likely to have new neurocognitive and/or functional morbidity at hospital discharge compared with those without severe neurological manifestations (27.7% [n = 142] vs 14.6% [n = 356]; P < .001). New neurocognitive morbidity was identified in 17.9% (n = 92) vs 7.1% (n = 173) of survivors with acute SARS-CoV-2 who experienced severe neurological manifestations compared with those who did not experience severe neurological manifestations, and new functional morbidity was identified in 26.7% (n = 137) vs 14.2% (n = 347) of those with and without severe neurological manifestations, respectively (both P < .001). Furthermore, patients who had severe neurological manifestations during acute SARS-CoV-2 were more likely to receive physical therapy, occupational therapy, speech and language therapy, and rehabilitation consults during hospitalization compared with those without severe neurological manifestations (Table 2).

Table 2. Hospital Outcomes for Patients With and Without Severe Neurological Manifestations by Acute SARS-CoV-2 and MIS-C Group.
Outcome Patients with SARS-CoV-2, No. (%) P value Patients with MIS-C, No. (%) P value
Without severe neurological manifestations (n = 2444) With severe neurological manifestations (n = 536) Without severe neurological manifestations 442) With severe neurological manifestations (n = 146)
Hospital mortality 7 (0.3) 24 (4.8) <.001 2 (0.5) 7 (4.9) <.001
New neurocognitive and/or functional morbiditya 356 (14.6) 142 (27.7) <.001 68 (15.5) 39 (28.0) .002
New neurocognitive morbiditya 173 (7.1) 92 (17.9) <.001 33 (7.5) 23 (16.5) .003
New functional morbiditya 347 (14.2) 137 (26.7) <.001 63 (14.3) 32 (23.0) .03
Consults
Physical therapy 243 (11) 130 (27.8) <.001 122 (30.4) 63 (46.3) <.001
Occupational therapy 164 (7.4) 103 (22.0) <.001 87 (21.8) 47 (34.8) .003
Speech and language therapy 72 (3.3) 57 (12.2) <.001 15 (3.8) 24 (17.8) <.001
Rehabilitation 31 (1.7) 39 (8.3) <.001 9 (2.2) 12 (8.5) <.001
Hospital length of stay, median (IQR), db 3.0 (2.0-6.0) 4.0 (2.0-11.0) <.001 6.0 (5.0-9.0) 8.0 (5.0-14.0) <.001

Abbreviation: MIS-C, multisystem inflammatory syndrome in children.

a

Frequency calculated in survivors only.

b

Because hospital length of stay was not recorded for all patients, the number of patients without acute SARS-CoV-2 was 2440; with acute SARS-CoV-2, 533; without MIS-C, 441; and with MIS-C, 144.

MIS-C Group

Among patients with MIS-C, those with severe neurological manifestations had higher in-hospital mortality (4.9% [n = 7]) compared with those without severe neurological manifestations (0.5% [n = 2]) (P < .001). Among survivors with MIS-C, 28.0% (n = 39) of those with severe neurological manifestations had new neurocognitive and/or functional morbidity at hospital discharge compared with 15.5% (n = 68) of those without severe neurological manifestations (P = .002). New neurocognitive morbidity was identified in 16.5% (n = 23) vs 7.5% (n = 33) (P = .003) and new functional morbidity in 23.0% (n = 32) vs 14.3% (n = 63) (P = .03) of those with severe neurological manifestations compared with those without severe neurological manifestations. Patients with MIS-C who had severe neurological manifestations were more likely to receive physical therapy, occupational therapy, speech and language therapy, and rehabilitation consults during hospitalization compared with those without (Table 2).

Laboratory Values and Neurodiagnostics by Acute SARS-CoV-2 and MIS-C Group

Patients with severe neurological manifestations had lower median (IQR) platelet counts on admission than did those without severe neurological manifestations for both the acute SARS-CoV-2 group (215.0 × 103/μL [IQR, 133.0-302.5 × 103/μL] vs 250.0 × 103/μL [IQR, 171.0-331.0 × 103/μL]; P < .001) and MIS-C group (114.0 × 103/μL [IQR, 73.0-174.0 × 103/μL] vs 143.0 × 103/μL [IQR, 103.0-205.0 × 103/μL]; P < .001) (to convert ×103/μL to ×109/L, multiply by 1.0). There was no difference in the C-reactive protein levels, lymphocyte counts, or sodium levels (eTable 2 in Supplement 1). For the patients with acute SARS-CoV-2, those with severe neurological manifestations more frequently received electroencephalography (26.1% vs 1.1%; P < .001), brain computed tomography (30.2% vs 3.7%; P < .001), and brain magnetic resonance imaging (20.6% vs 2.4%; P < .001) than did those without severe neurological manifestations. For the patients with MIS-C, those with severe neurological manifestations more frequently received electroencephalography (17.1% vs 1.4%; P < .001), brain computed tomography (23.6% vs 5.4%; P < .001), and brain magnetic resonance imaging (17.9% vs 2.9%; P < .001) than those without severe neurological manifestations (eTable 2 in Supplement 1).

Treatments by Acute SARS-CoV-2 and MIS-C Group

Individuals with acute SARS-CoV-2 and severe neurological manifestations were more likely to receive remdesivir (14.9% vs 8.6%; P < .001), corticosteroids (22.0% vs 12.5; P < .001), and intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) treatments (2.8% vs 1.0%; P = .001) than those without severe neurological manifestations (eTable 2 in Supplement 1). In patients with MIS-C, those with severe neurological manifestations were more likely to receive remdesivir (6.2% vs 2.5%; P = .03) than were those without severe neurological manifestations, but both groups were similarly likely to receive corticosteroids or IVIG.

Association Between Severe Neurological Manifestations and New Neurocognitive and/or Functional Morbidity at Discharge

For patients admitted with acute SARS-CoV-2 who survived the admission, those with severe neurological manifestations had higher odds of having new neurocognitive and/or functional morbidity at hospital discharge (odds ratio, 1.85 [95% CI, 1.27-2.70]; P = .001), adjusting for race, neurological comorbidity, corticosteroid administration, pandemic epoch, lymphocyte counts, and initial sodium levels (Table 3). Similarly, for surviving patients with MIS-C, those with severe neurological manifestations had higher odds of having new neurocognitive and/or functional morbidity at hospital discharge (odds ratio, 2.18 [95% CI, 1.22-3.89]; P = .009), adjusting for race, baseline PCPC score, IVIG administration, and initial sodium levels (Table 4).

Table 3. Multivariable Logistic Regression Model for New Neurocognitive and/or Functional Morbidity Based on the Presence of Severe Neurological Manifestations With Acute SARS-CoV-2.

Characteristic Odds ratio (95% CI) P value
Severe neurological manifestation 1.85 (1.27-2.70) .001
Black race 2.90 (2.07-4.07) <.001
Neurological comorbidity 1.87 (1.29-2.70) .001
Corticosteroid treatment 1.63 (1.09-2.42) .02
Pandemic epoch July-December 2020 1.26 (1.03-1.12) .18
Absolute lymphocyte count 1.00 (1.00-1.00) .02
Initial sodium level 1.07 (1.02-1.12) .002

Table 4. Multivariable Logistic Regression Model for New Neurocognitive or Functional Morbidity Based on the Presence of Severe Neurological Manifestations With MIS-C.

Characteristic Odds ratio (95% CI) P value
Severe neurological manifestation 2.18 (1.22-3.89) .009
Black race 2.52 (1.42-4.47) .002
Baseline PCPC 5.47 (0.98-30.57) .05
Intravenous immunoglobulin 0.60 (0.28-1.27) .18
Initial sodium level 1.04 (0.98-1.1) .18

Abbreviations: MIS-C, multisystem inflammatory syndrome in children; PCPC, Pediatric Cerebral Performance Category.

Discussion

This international, multicenter cohort study of hospitalized individuals younger than 18 years with SARS-CoV-2–related conditions found that severe neurological manifestations were common in those admitted with acute SARS-CoV-2 (18.0%) or MIS-C (24.8%). Acute encephalopathy, seizure or status epilepticus, and delirium were among the most common severe manifestations in patients with both acute SARS-CoV-2 and MIS-C. For those with acute SARS-CoV-2 or MIS-C, the occurrence of a severe manifestation was associated with increased odds of new neurocognitive and/or functional morbidity at hospital discharge. The individuals with severe manifestations were also more likely to receive inpatient services including physical and occupational therapy and rehabilitation consults. These patients may be at risk for ongoing postdischarge sequelae.

Central nervous system involvement in acute SARS-CoV-2 or MIS-C carries potential for both short-term and long-term morbidities. Young persons who are hospitalized and critically ill can have significant morbidity after hospital discharge,23,24,25 including physical26 and neurocognitive and/or psychosocial dysfunctions.25 In our study, patients with severe neurological manifestations were more likely to have new neurocognitive and functional morbidities at hospital discharge. These patients were also more likely to receive physical therapy, occupational therapy, speech and language therapy, and rehabilitation consults during hospitalization. The finding that patients with severe neurologic manifesations were more likely to have new neurocognitive and functional morbidities at hospital discharge parallels observations in other pediatric critical illnesses. Among children with sepsis, the presence of neurological dysfunction is associated with greater odds of death or new moderate disability at discharge in survivors.27 Identifying the patients at the highest risk of new and persistent impairment is essential to direct them to the follow-up care necessary to best support their recovery and adaptation. Low platelet count, for example, found in both of the groups with severe neurological manifestations, may be a marker for disease severity in both acute SARS-CoV-228,29 and MIS-C30,31 and therefore may serve as a flag for patients deserving scrutiny acutely and in follow-up. Despite strong agreement about the importance of postdischarge follow-up care of children who are critically ill, few systematic, multidisciplinary post–pediatric intensive care unit (ICU) follow-up programs exist,32 often due to logistical and reimbursement challenges. By identifying cohorts of patients at high risk of postdischarge sequelae, future research could demonstrate the value of these programs and their potential effects on improving long-term outcomes.

For both acute SARS-CoV-2 and MIS-C, patients with severe neurological manifestations were more likely to have a preexisting neurological condition. These findings are in agreement with a national study in the United Kingdom which found that children with medical comorbidities and/or neurodisability were at higher risk of pediatric ICU admission with severe COVID-19.33 Similarly, there is an association between short-term and long-term outcomes in patients with preexisting neurological conditions following ICU discharge for other illnesses. For example, children with neurodisability are at increased risk of ICU delirium,34,35,36 and children with ICU delirium are at increased risk of postdischarge decline in health-related quality of life.37,38 Preexisting neurological conditions are also a risk factor for the development of severe neurological manifestations of other virus-induced acute pediatric disease processes. For example, several studies found that children with influenza-associated neurological manifestations were more likely to have preexisting neurological comorbidity.20,39,40,41 Interestingly, in our MIS-C cohort, it was more common for patients without known comorbidities to have severe neurological manifestations. Some data do show, however, that despite initial severe illness, patients younger than 18 years with MIS-C have minimal functional impairment at 6-month follow-up.42 Our findings highlight the risk of new neurological manifestations among individuals in this age group with preexisting neurological conditions who present with either acute SARS-CoV-2 or MIS-C. Future studies of patients with acute SARS-CoV-2 and MIS-C, and likely those with other acute viral illnesses as well, should include and comprehensively evaluate those with preexisting neurological conditions for both in-hospital and postdischarge outcomes.

Strengths and Limitations

Strengths of our study include its large multicenter, multinational prospective design and comprehensive data collection. In contrast to several large studies evaluating neurological complications of acute SARS-CoV-2 or MIS-C in children,11,13,17,33,43,44,45 our data included granular neurological outcomes at hospital discharge.

Our study also has limitations. Neurological manifestations were characterized based on a review of the medical record, and it is possible that these findings underestimated or overestimated their true prevalence. Some neurological diagnoses such as encephalopathy are more difficult to assess in individuals of different ages and developmental stages. We were unable to accurately ascertain the number of patients who incidentally tested positive for SARS-CoV-2 during hospitalization for other primary diagnoses. We also could not determine how many patients were not captured due to institutional differences in admission testing for SARS-CoV-2. In patients with preexisting neurological disease, we could not determine whether new neurological manifestations were secondary to SARS-CoV-2 disease presentation or to the preexisting neurological disease. There were imbalances in several covariates at baseline between groups. We collected data at hospital discharge, thus our study could not evaluate the long-term implications of these neurological manifestations, including the potential role of long COVID. Future studies should aim to address these limitations.

Conclusions

This cohort study found that severe neurological manifestations were common in children hospitalized with acute SARS-CoV-2 and MIS-C and were associated with new neurocognitive and/or functional morbidities at hospital discharge compared with those without severe neurological manifestations. Patients with severe neurological manifestations with acute SARS-CoV-2 or MIS-C were more likely to have a preexisting neurological condition. Those with either acute SARS-CoV-2 or MIS-C who had severe neurological manifestations were more likely to require additional inpatient resources like physical and occupational therapy and rehabilitation consults. Future studies should aim to better understand the pathophysiology behind the severe neurological manifestations and to investigate the role of surveillance, treatment, and follow-up of these patients with high risk of neurocognitive and/or functional morbidities.

Supplement 1.

eTable 1. Comorbidities by Acute SARS-CoV-2 and MIS-C Groups

eTable 2. Laboratory, Neurotesting, and Treatment Variables of Patients With and Without Severe Neurologic Manifestations by Acute SARS-CoV-2 and MIS-C Groups

Supplement 2.

Data Sharing Statement

References

  • 1.Castagnoli R, Votto M, Licari A, et al. Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection in children and adolescents: a systematic review. JAMA Pediatr. 2020;174(9):882-889. doi: 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2020.1467 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Lu X, Zhang L, Du H, et al. ; Chinese Pediatric Novel Coronavirus Study Team . SARS-CoV-2 infection in children. N Engl J Med. 2020;382(17):1663-1665. doi: 10.1056/NEJMc2005073 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Guan WJ, Ni ZY, Hu Y, et al. ; China Medical Treatment Expert Group for Covid-19 . Clinical characteristics of coronavirus disease 2019 in China. N Engl J Med. 2020;382(18):1708-1720. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2002032 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.COVID-19 Mental Disorders Collaborators . Global prevalence and burden of depressive and anxiety disorders in 204 countries and territories in 2020 due to the COVID-19 pandemic. Lancet. 2021;398(10312):1700-1712. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(21)02143-7 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Huang L, Yao Q, Gu X, et al. 1-Year outcomes in hospital survivors with COVID-19: a longitudinal cohort study. Lancet. 2021;398(10302):747-758. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(21)01755-4 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Singh SJ, Baldwin MM, Daynes E, et al. Respiratory sequelae of COVID-19: pulmonary and extrapulmonary origins, and approaches to clinical care and rehabilitation. Lancet Respir Med. 2023;11(8):709-725. doi: 10.1016/S2213-2600(23)00159-5 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Wu Z, McGoogan JM. Characteristics of and important lessons from the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) outbreak in China: summary of a report of 72 314 cases from the Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention. JAMA. 2020;323(13):1239-1242. doi: 10.1001/jama.2020.2648 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Grasselli G, Zangrillo A, Zanella A, et al. ; COVID-19 Lombardy ICU Network . Baseline characteristics and outcomes of 1591 patients infected with SARS-CoV-2 admitted to ICUs of the Lombardy Region, Italy. JAMA. 2020;323(16):1574-1581. doi: 10.1001/jama.2020.5394 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Guan WJ, Zhong NS. Clinical characteristics of Covid-19 in China. Reply. N Engl J Med. 2020;382(19):1861-1862. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Feldstein LR, Tenforde MW, Friedman KG, et al. ; Overcoming COVID-19 Investigators . Characteristics and outcomes of US children and adolescents with multisystem inflammatory syndrome in children (MIS-C) compared with severe acute COVID-19. JAMA. 2021;325(11):1074-1087. doi: 10.1001/jama.2021.2091 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Feldstein LR, Rose EB, Horwitz SM, et al. ; Overcoming COVID-19 Investigators; CDC COVID-19 Response Team . Multisystem inflammatory syndrome in U.S. children and adolescents. N Engl J Med. 2020;383(4):334-346. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2021680 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Fink EL, Robertson CL, Wainwright MS, et al. ; Global Consortium Study of Neurologic Dysfunction in COVID-19 (GCS-NeuroCOVID) Investigators . Prevalence and risk factors of neurologic manifestations in hospitalized children diagnosed with acute SARS-CoV-2 or MIS-C. Pediatr Neurol. 2022;128:33-44. doi: 10.1016/j.pediatrneurol.2021.12.010 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.LaRovere KL, Riggs BJ, Poussaint TY, et al. ; Overcoming COVID-19 Investigators . Neurologic involvement in children and adolescents hospitalized in the United States for COVID-19 or multisystem inflammatory syndrome. JAMA Neurol. 2021;78(5):536-547. doi: 10.1001/jamaneurol.2021.0504 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Aghagoli G, Gallo Marin B, Katchur NJ, Chaves-Sell F, Asaad WF, Murphy SA. Neurological involvement in COVID-19 and potential mechanisms: a review. Neurocrit Care. 2021;34(3):1062-1071. doi: 10.1007/s12028-020-01049-4 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.García-Azorín D, Abildúa MJA, Aguirre MEE, et al. ; Spanish neuroCOVID registry group . Neurological presentations of COVID-19: findings from the Spanish Society of Neurology NeuroCOVID-19 Registry. J Neurol Sci. 2021;423:117283. doi: 10.1016/j.jns.2020.117283 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Helms J, Kremer S, Merdji H, et al. Neurologic features in severe SARS-CoV-2 infection. N Engl J Med. 2020;382(23):2268-2270. doi: 10.1056/NEJMc2008597 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.LaRovere KL, Poussaint TY, Young CC, et al. ; Overcoming COVID-19 Investigators . Changes in distribution of severe neurologic involvement in US pediatric inpatients with COVID-19 or multisystem inflammatory syndrome in children in 2021 vs 2020. JAMA Neurol. 2023;80(1):91-98. doi: 10.1001/jamaneurol.2022.3881 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Magesh S, John D, Li WT, et al. Disparities in COVID-19 outcomes by race, ethnicity, and socioeconomic status: a systematic-review and meta-analysis. JAMA Netw Open. 2021;4(11):e2134147. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.34147 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.McNett M, Fink EL, Schober M, et al. The Global Consortium Study of Neurological Dysfunction in COVID-19 (GCS-NeuroCOVID): development of case report forms for global use. Neurocrit Care. 2020;33(3):793-828. doi: 10.1007/s12028-020-01100-4 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Wilking AN, Elliott E, Garcia MN, Murray KO, Munoz FM. Central nervous system manifestations in pediatric patients with influenza A H1N1 infection during the 2009 pandemic. Pediatr Neurol. 2014;51(3):370-376. doi: 10.1016/j.pediatrneurol.2014.04.026 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Fiser DH. Assessing the outcome of pediatric intensive care. J Pediatr. 1992;121(1):68-74. doi: 10.1016/S0022-3476(05)82544-2 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Pollack MM, Holubkov R, Funai T, et al. ; Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Collaborative Pediatric Critical Care Research Network . Pediatric intensive care outcomes: development of new morbidities during pediatric critical care. Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2014;15(9):821-827. doi: 10.1097/PCC.0000000000000250 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Herrup EA, Wieczorek B, Kudchadkar SR. Characteristics of postintensive care syndrome in survivors of pediatric critical illness: a systematic review. World J Crit Care Med. 2017;6(2):124-134. doi: 10.5492/wjccm.v6.i2.124 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Woodruff AG, Choong K. Long-term outcomes and the post-intensive care syndrome in critically ill children: a North American perspective. Children (Basel). 2021;8(4):254. doi: 10.3390/children8040254 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Ducharme-Crevier L, La KA, Francois T, et al. PICU follow-up clinic: patient and family outcomes 2 months after discharge. Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2021;22(11):935-943. doi: 10.1097/PCC.0000000000002789 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Knoester H, Bronner MB, Bos AP. Surviving pediatric intensive care: physical outcome after 3 months. Intensive Care Med. 2008;34(6):1076-1082. doi: 10.1007/s00134-008-1061-4 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Alcamo AM, Weiss SL, Fitzgerald JC, et al. ; Sepsis Prevalence, Outcomes and Therapies (SPROUT) Study Investigators and Pediatric Acute Lung Injury and Sepsis Investigators (PALISI) Network . Outcomes associated with timing of neurologic dysfunction onset relative to pediatric sepsis recognition. Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2022;23(8):593-605. doi: 10.1097/PCC.0000000000002979 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Kutlusoy S, Koca E. Routine laboratory parameters in estimating mortality and morbidity in COVID-19 diagnosed cases followed in the intensive care unit. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci. 2023;27(12):5885-5892. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Paciorek M, Bieńkowski C, Kowalska JD, et al. Hospital admission factors independently affecting the risk of mortality of COVID-19 patients. J Clin Med. 2023;12(19):6264. doi: 10.3390/jcm12196264 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Abrams JY, Oster ME, Godfred-Cato SE, et al. Factors linked to severe outcomes in multisystem inflammatory syndrome in children (MIS-C) in the USA: a retrospective surveillance study. Lancet Child Adolesc Health. 2021;5(5):323-331. doi: 10.1016/S2352-4642(21)00050-X [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Yilmaz D, Ekemen Keles Y, Emiroglu M, et al. Evaluation of 601 children with multisystem inflammatory syndrome (Turk MISC study). Eur J Pediatr. 2023;182(12):5531-5542. doi: 10.1007/s00431-023-05207-6 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Williams CN, Hall TA, Francoeur C, et al. ; Pediatric Neurocritical Care Research Group (PNCRG). . Continuing care for critically ill children beyond hospital discharge: current state of follow-up. Hosp Pediatr. 2022;12(4):359-393. doi: 10.1542/hpeds.2021-006464 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Ward JL, Harwood R, Kenny S, et al. Pediatric hospitalizations and ICU admissions due to COVID-19 and pediatric inflammatory multisystem syndrome temporally associated with SARS-CoV-2 in England. JAMA Pediatr. 2023;177(9):947-955. doi: 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2023.2357 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Zhu X, Feng X, Lin J, Ding Y. Risk factors of delirium in paediatric intensive care units: a meta-analysis. PLoS One. 2022;17(7):e0270639. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0270639 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Dervan LA, Di Gennaro JL, Farris RWD, Watson RS. Delirium in a tertiary PICU: risk factors and outcomes. Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2020;21(1):21-32. doi: 10.1097/PCC.0000000000002126 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Traube C, Silver G, Gerber LM, et al. Delirium and mortality in critically ill children: epidemiology and outcomes of pediatric delirium. Crit Care Med. 2017;45(5):891-898. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000002324 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Dervan LA, Killien EY, Smith MB, Watson RS. Health-related quality of life following delirium in the PICU. Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2022;23(2):118-128. doi: 10.1097/PCC.0000000000002813 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Silver G, Doyle H, Hegel E, et al. Association between pediatric delirium and quality of life after discharge. Crit Care Med. 2020;48(12):1829-1834. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000004661 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Antoon JW, Hall M, Herndon A, et al. Prevalence, risk factors, and outcomes of influenza-associated neurologic complications in children. J Pediatr. 2021;239:32-38.e5. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2021.06.075 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Donnelley E, Teutsch S, Zurynski Y, et al. ; Contributors to the Australian Paediatric Surveillance Unit . Severe influenza-associated neurological disease in Australian children: seasonal population-based surveillance 2008-2018. J Pediatric Infect Dis Soc. 2022;11(12):533-540. doi: 10.1093/jpids/piac069 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Goetz V, Yang DD, Abid H, et al. Neurological features related to influenza virus in the pediatric population: a 3-year monocentric retrospective study. Eur J Pediatr. 2023;182(6):2615-2624. doi: 10.1007/s00431-023-04901-9 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Penner J, Abdel-Mannan O, Grant K, et al. ; GOSH PIMS-TS MDT Group . 6-Month multidisciplinary follow-up and outcomes of patients with paediatric inflammatory multisystem syndrome (PIMS-TS) at a UK tertiary paediatric hospital: a retrospective cohort study. Lancet Child Adolesc Health. 2021;5(7):473-482. doi: 10.1016/S2352-4642(21)00138-3 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Abdel-Mannan O, Eyre M, Löbel U, et al. Neurologic and radiographic findings associated with COVID-19 infection in children. JAMA Neurol. 2020;77(11):1440-1445. doi: 10.1001/jamaneurol.2020.2687 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Antoon JW, Grijalva CG, Thurm C, et al. Factors associated with COVID-19 disease severity in US children and adolescents. J Hosp Med. 2021;16(10):603-610. doi: 10.12788/jhm.3689 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Ray STJ, Abdel-Mannan O, Sa M, et al. ; CoroNerve study group . Neurological manifestations of SARS-CoV-2 infection in hospitalised children and adolescents in the UK: a prospective national cohort study. Lancet Child Adolesc Health. 2021;5(9):631-641. doi: 10.1016/S2352-4642(21)00193-0 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplement 1.

eTable 1. Comorbidities by Acute SARS-CoV-2 and MIS-C Groups

eTable 2. Laboratory, Neurotesting, and Treatment Variables of Patients With and Without Severe Neurologic Manifestations by Acute SARS-CoV-2 and MIS-C Groups

Supplement 2.

Data Sharing Statement


Articles from JAMA Network Open are provided here courtesy of American Medical Association

RESOURCES