Introduction
Almost 75% of admissions for asthma are avoidable, and potentially preventable factors are common in deaths from asthma.1,2 At least 40% of people with asthma do not react appropriately when their symptoms worsen, and over 50% of patients admitted with acute asthma have had alarming symptoms for at least a week before admission.3,4 As many as 60% of asthmatic patients are poor at judging their dyspnoea.5 Self management of asthma involves the patient making therapeutic, behavioural, and environmental adjustments in accordance with advice from healthcare professionals.6 Guided self management of asthma is a treatment strategy in which patients are taught to act appropriately when the first signs of asthma exacerbations appear.
In a recent Cochrane review, self management of asthma in adults was compared with usual care in 22 studies.7 Self management education reduced hospital admissions (odds ratio 0.57, 95% confidence interval 0.38 to 0.88), emergency room visits (0.71, 0.57 to 0.90), unscheduled visits to the doctor (0.57, 0.40 to 0.82), days off work or off school (0.55, 0.38 to 0.79), and nocturnal asthma (0.53, 0.39 to 0.72). Self management programmes that contained a written action plan showing patients how to act in early exacerbations showed a greater reduction in admissions to hospital than did programmes without a plan (0.35, 0.18 to 0.68).
Cost effectiveness studies of self management programmes for asthma have shown positive results, with cost benefit ratios between 1:2.5 and 1:11.228; the programme with the most favourable result saved $11.22 (£7) for every $1 (£1.60) spent.
Summary points
Self management of asthma prevents exacerbations, improves care, and is a cost effective investment
Patient education is crucial and should be given in a structured way
Patients should be taught to understand their symptoms and to monitor peak expiratory flow at home
Patients should know how to act when signs of asthma deterioriation first appear
There should always be supervision of and continuity in asthma care
Methods
This article is based largely on my experience as a pulmonary specialist, in charge of organising asthma treatment in my hospital district, and on studies of self management of asthma. I have also included the views of several national and international working groups in which I have participated, and I have supplemented reviews and articles from high quality journals.
Setting up a self management programme for asthma
Although the reasons for starting a self management programme for asthma are obvious (box B1), it is not always an easy task to start this kind of programme. Giving asthmatic patients more responsibility and independence may be a cultural challenge for healthcare staff, and starting a new programme means additional workload. Patients’ willingness to make decisions in their own asthma care can also be poor.9 Educating and motivating both patients and healthcare teams are crucial for a successful self management programme. The good results achieved with self management programmes should be emphasised and shown, and information supplied should be kept as clear and simple as possible.
There is reasonable consensus on the self management skills that patients should possess as a result of education (box B2).12 Although research evaluating education for asthma has been conducted in many settings—hospitals, emergency rooms, general practices, community organisations, hospital outpatient clinics—there have been no studies assessing the effect of the setting on education. It would seem reasonable to expect that education should be available at every patient contact for each setting and that the information should be given in a structured form. In my experience, group sessions plus personal counselling is the most effective method for educating asthmatic patients. Good audiovisual material can give help and increase interest. Although asthmatic patients have a strong desire to be informed about their illness,9 their individual backgrounds will influence the extent to which they utilise information. The patient’s own responsibility for treatment is crucial, and building a firm partnership with the patient is the key to success. The responsibility for treatment is borne by the patient and the primary healthcare system, supported by specialised medical care. In asthma self management the patients should not be seen as objects for treatment but rather as active participants in a treatment team.
Information alone is insufficient, and successful interventions combine the provision of information with individualised self treatment plans. Such action plans may be based on symptoms, peak expiratory flow values, or both.13 It is essential that patients notice exacerbations in their asthma (box B3) early enough and start appropriate interventions by themselves. Self management programmes for asthma have used different action limits or zones for peak expiratory flow or symptoms. Clear peak flow charts or pocket sized cards with colours to mark different action limits can be used. For example14:
Asthma under control: peak expiratory flow values greater than 85% of personal best—use regular treatment
Asthma getting worse: peak expiratory flow values less than 85% of personal best—double dose of inhaled steroids
Asthma severe: peak expiratory flow values less than 70% of personal best—start course of oral prednisone
Asthma emergency: peak expiratory flow values less than 50% of personal best—go to emergency room immediately.
Programmes for self management of asthma should be aimed primarily at those patients who probably will benefit the most (box B4), and programmes should be individualised to suit the patient.
In Finland, regional asthma networks according to the Finnish national asthma programme15 have been built up between general practice and specialised care to enforce the quality and continuity of asthma care. The experiences of these networks are good and they help asthma self management to work.
Footnotes
Competing interests: None declared.
References
- 1.Blainey D, Lomas D, Beale A, Partridge MR. The cost of acute asthma—how much is preventable? Health Trends. 1991;22:151–153. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Johnson AJ, Nunn AJ, Somner AR, Stableforth DE, Stewart CJ. Circumstances of death from asthma. BMJ. 1984;288:1870–1875. doi: 10.1136/bmj.288.6434.1870. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Avery CH, March J, Brook RH. An assessment of the adequacy of self-care by adult asthmatics. J Community Health. 1980;5:167–180. doi: 10.1007/BF01323989. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Partridge MR. Patients’ self assessment and treatment strategies for acute asthma. Res Clin Forums. 1993;15:65–73. [Google Scholar]
- 5.Kendrick AH, Higgs CMB, Whitfield MJ, Laszlo G. Accuracy of perception of severity of asthma: patients treated in general practice. BMJ. 1993;307:422–424. doi: 10.1136/bmj.307.6901.422. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Partridge MR. Self-management in adults with asthma. Patient Educ Counseling. 1997;32:1–4. [Google Scholar]
- 7.Gibson PG, Coughlan J, Wilson AJ, Abramson M, Bauman A, Hensley MJ, et al. Cochrane Collaboration, editors. Cochrane Library. Issue 2. Oxford: Update Software; 1999. Self-management education and regular practitioner review for adults with asthma. [Google Scholar]
- 8.Liljas B, Lahdensuo A. Is asthma self-management cost-effective? Patient Educ Counseling. 1997;32:97–104. doi: 10.1016/s0738-3991(97)00101-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Gibson PG, Talbot PI, Toneguzzi RE the Population Medicine Group. Self-management, autonomy and quality of life in asthma. Chest. 1995;107:1003–1008. doi: 10.1378/chest.107.4.1003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Osman LM, Abdalla MI, Beattle JAG, Ross SJ, Russell IT, Friend JA, et al. Reducing hospital admissions through computer supported education for asthma patients. BMJ. 1994;308:568–571. doi: 10.1136/bmj.308.6928.568. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Kleiger JH, Dirks JF. Medication compliance in chronic asthma patients. J Asthma Res. 1979;16:93–96. doi: 10.3109/02770907909106618. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.American Lung Association Working Group. Standards for comprehensive asthma education programs. New York: ALA; 1998. [Google Scholar]
- 13.Charlton I, Charlton G, Broomfield J, Mullee MA. Evaluation of peak flow and symptoms only self management plans for control of asthma in general practice. BMJ. 1990;301:1355–1359. doi: 10.1136/bmj.301.6765.1355. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Lahdensuo A, Haahtela T, Herrala J, Kava T, Kiviranta K, Kuusisto P, et al. Randomised comparison of guided self management and traditional treatment of asthma over one year. BMJ. 1996;312:748–752. doi: 10.1136/bmj.312.7033.748. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Ministry of Social Affairs and Health. Asthma programme in Finland 1994-2004. Clin Exp Allergy. 1996;26(suppl1):1–24. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2222.1996.tb02572.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]