Skip to main content
BMC Urology logoLink to BMC Urology
. 2024 Jun 12;24:123. doi: 10.1186/s12894-024-01503-x

Detection of AZF microdeletions and analysis of reproductive hormonal profiles in Hainan men undergoing assisted reproductive technology

Qina He 1,2,#, Yongle Zhang 1,2,#, Mengyi Song 1,2, Yao Zhou 1,2, Dan Lin 1,2, Yanlin Ma 1,2,, Fei Sun 1,2,3,, Qi Li 1,2,4,
PMCID: PMC11167749  PMID: 38867229

Abstract

Background

Male infertility has become a global health problem, and genetic factors are one of the essential causes. Y chromosome microdeletion is the leading genetic factor cause of male infertility. The objective of this study is to investigate the correlation between male infertility and Y chromosome microdeletions in Hainan, the sole tropical island province of China.

Methods

We analyzed the semen of 897 infertile men from Hainan in this study. Semen analysis was measured according to WHO criteria by professionals at the Department of Reproductive Medicine, the First Affiliated Hospital of Hainan Medical University, where samples were collected. Y chromosome AZF microdeletions were confirmed by detecting six STS markers using multiple polymerase chain reactions on peripheral blood DNA. The levels of reproductive hormones, including FSH, LH, PRL, T, and E2, were quantified using the enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA).

Results

The incidence of Y chromosome microdeletion in Hainan infertile men was 7.13%. The occurrence rate of Y chromosome microdeletion was 6.69% (34/508) in the oligozoospermia group and 7.71% (30/389) in the azoospermia group. The deletion of various types in the AZF subregion was observed in the group with azoospermia, whereas no AZFb deletion was detected in the oligozoospermia group. Among all patients with microdeletions, the deletion rate of the AZFc region was the higher at 68.75% (44 out of 64), followed by a deletion rate of 6.25% (4 out of 64) for the AZFa region and a deletion rate of 4.69% (3 out of 64) for the AZFb region. The deletion rate of the AZFa region was significantly higher in patients with azoospermia than in patients with oligozoospermia (0.51% vs. 0.39%, p < 0.001). In comparison, the deletion rate of the AZFc region was significantly higher in patients with oligozoospermia (3.08% vs. 6.30%, p < 0.001). Additionally, the AZFb + c subregion association deletion was observed in the highest proportion among all patients (0.89%, 8/897), followed by AZFa + b + c deletion (0.56%, 5/897), and exclusively occurred in patients with azoospermia. Hormone analysis revealed FSH (21.63 ± 2.01 U/L vs. 10.15 ± 0.96 U/L, p = 0.001), LH (8.96 ± 0.90 U/L vs. 4.58 ± 0.42 U/L, p < 0.001) and PRL (263.45 ± 21.84 mIU/L vs. 170.76 ± 17.10 mIU/L, p = 0.002) were significantly increased in azoospermia patients with microdeletions. Still, P and E2 levels were not significantly different between the two groups.

Conclusions

The incidence of AZF microdeletion can reach 7.13% in infertile men in Hainan province, and the deletion of the AZFc subregion is the highest. Although the Y chromosome microdeletion rate is distinct in different regions or populations, the regions mentioned above of the Y chromosome may serve an indispensable role in regulating spermatogenesis. The analysis of Y chromosome microdeletion plays a crucial role in the clinical assessment and diagnosis of male infertility.

Keywords: Male infertility, Y chromosome microdeletion, AZF microdeletion, Reproductive hormones, Azoospermia, Oligozoospermia

Background

The current state of male reproductive health presents a significant global public health challenge, with available data indicating that approximately 50% of infertility cases worldwide can be attributed to male factors [1]. Factors associated with male infertility include abnormal hormone levels, erectile dysfunction, presence of anti-sperm antibodies, varicocele, exposure to chemicals or radiation, and other factors. Most cases are attributed to genetic factors [2, 3].

As early as 1976, Tiepolo et al. first found that azoospermia was associated with microdeletions on the long arm of the Y chromosome and hypothesized that it was primarily related to microdeletions in the azoospermia factor (AZF) region of the long arm of the Y chromosome, region 1, band 1 (Yq11) [4]. The human Y chromosome is essential in sex determination and spermatogenesis [5]. The AZF region is situated on the long arm of the Y chromosome. It is primarily subdivided into the AZFa, AZFb, and AZFc regions, encompassing genes crucial in spermatogenesis and testicular development [6], shown in Fig. 1. Microdeletions in the AZF region have been observed in most patients diagnosed with severe oligozoospermia and non-obstructive azoospermia (NOA) [7, 8]. It is regarded as one of the essential genetic factors for male infertility. The screening for Y chromosome microdeletion is now routinely employed in the evaluation of male infertility, offering prognostic value for patients with azoospermia and severe oligozoospermia.

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1

The Y-chromosome microdeletion model and the EAA/EMQN guidelines recommended sequence-tagged site (STS)

The latest guidelines from The European Association of Urology (EAU) and the American Society for Reproductive Medicine (ASRM) state that the prevalence rates of Y-chromosome microdeletions in patients with severe oligozoospermia are 3–7% and 5%, respectively. They recommend screening for Y-chromosome microdeletions in men with sperm counts below 5 million/ml [9, 10]. Additionally, several studies have demonstrated that oligozoospermia and azoospermia are accompanied by alterations in levels of follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH), luteinizing hormone (LH), and testosterone (T) [11].

The province of Hainan is China’s only tropical island province, and it has a tropical monsoon marine climate. There are more than 30 ethnic groups in Hainan, including Han, Li, Miao, and Hui, among which ethnic minorities account for 18.02% of the province’s population. In this study, we evaluated the prevalence of various types of Y chromosome microdeletions in a cohort of infertile men from the southernmost region of China and analyzed their hormonal profile. Furthermore, we will conduct a comparative analysis between our findings and the documented regional outcomes in the Asian region, as well as the internationally published results.

Methods

Study participants

This study retrospectively enrolled 897 infertile males who attended the Reproductive Center of the First Affiliated Hospital of Hainan Medical University as study subjects. All patients were not using contraception for more than one year and had regular sexual life but were infertile, without other congenital diseases, and were diagnosed with non-obstructive azoospermia or oligozoospermia.

Semen analysis

Patients were abstinent for 3–7 days, and semen was collected by masturbation method to observe the liquefaction time and to measure sperm concentration and viability, as well as sperm morphology analysis. All patients underwent at least two routine semen analyses. The results were analyzed and diagnosed according to the WHO laboratory manual for examining and processing human semen (5th edition).

Y-Chromosome microdeletion screening

Each participant’s peripheral blood sample was collected, genomic DNA was extracted using the phenol-chloroform method, and DNA concentration and purity were checked. Subsequently, following the EAA/EMQN guidelines, screening was conducted using multiplex real-time PCR technology with six pairs of primers specific to sequence-tagged sites (STSs) in the AZF region: sY84 and sY86 in the AZFa region, sY127 and sY134 in the AZFb region, and sY254 and sY255 in the AZFc region. The sex-determining region of Y (SRY) was used as the internal control. PCR amplification products were qualified using agarose electrophoresis, and the results were observed and analyzed using an Alphalmager 2200 gel imaging system. Primers were used for SRY, as shown in Table 1.

Table 1.

Sequence-tagged sites and primer sequences for Y chromosome microdeletion analysis

Region STS Probe Sequence (5’ to 3’) length (nt)
Yp SRY Forward CCTCTTTGTTTTAAGGAAGAAAGGA 480
Reverse AATCACCTAGCAACTGATGCATTTA
AZFa sY84 Forward AGAAGGGTCCTGAAAGCAGGT 324
Reverse GCCTACTACCTGGAGGCTTC
sY86 Forward GTGACACACAGACTATGCTTC 318
Reverse ACACACAGAGGGACAACCCT
AZFb sY127 Forward GGCTCACAAACGAAAAGAAA 274
Reverse CTGCAGGCAGTAATAAGGGA
sY134 Forward GTCTGCCTCACCATAAAACG 301
Reverse ACCACTGCCAAAACTTTCAA
AZFc sY254 Forward GGGTGTTACCAGAAGGCAAA 380
Reverse GAACCGTATCTACCAAAGCAGC
sY255 Forward GTTACAGGATTCGGCGTGAT 126
Reverse CTCGTCATGTGCAGCCAC

Hormonal analysis

The peripheral blood sample was collected from each patient and centrifuged to collect their serum. ELISA assay was used to measure reproductive hormones: follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH), luteinizing hormone (LH), prolactin (PRL), progesterone (P), estrogen (E2), and testosterone (T).

Assisted reproductive technology (ART)

Sperm were visible in the patient’s semen, and we selected the sperm among them. While the patient is azoospermia, Microdissection Testicular Sperm Extraction (mTESE) is performed to take sperm. If sperm is absent after mTESE, we recommend the patient accept the donated sperm. Controlled ovarian hyperstimulation was conducted using a gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) agonist based on a long protocol to obtain enough oocytes. Oocyte retrieval was performed 35–36 h after hCG injection, and all metaphase II oocytes underwent intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI). Embryo transfer was performed according to the actual situation.

Statistical analysis

Data were expressed as the mean ± the standard deviation (SD) or number (percentage %). Comparisons between outcome groups were performed using Student’s t-test for continuous variables and Chi-square test or Fisher’s exact test for categorical variables. Statistical significance was considered when p ≤ 0.05.

Results

A total of 897 infertile men from Hainan Province, diagnosed with oligozoospermia or azoospermia and excluding chromosomal abnormalities, were included in the study. According to the semen analysis results, the patients were divided into the oligozoospermia group (508 cases) and the azoospermia group (389 cases). Y chromosome microdeletions were detected in 64 patients, with an overall incidence of 7.13% (64/897). The occurrence rate of Y chromosome microdeletion was 6.69% (34/508) in the oligozoospermia group and 7.71% (30/389) in the azoospermia group, respectively. As shown in Table 2, the deletion of various types in the AZF subregion was observed in the group with azoospermia, whereas no AZFb deletion was detected in the oligozoospermia group. Additionally, this study examined the prevalence of concurrent deletion of distinct subregions in all patients, with AZFb + c deletion exhibiting the highest frequency (0.89%, 8/897), followed by AZFa + b + c deletion (0.56%, 5/897). Multiple subregions were deleted in the azoospermia group, whereas no co-deletion was detected among patients with oligozoospermia. We observed a significantly higher deletion rate of the AZFa region in patients with azoospermia compared to those with oligozoospermia (0.51% vs. 0.39%, p < 0.001). Conversely, we found a significantly lower deletion rate of the AZFc region in patients with oligozoospermia (3.08% vs. 6.30%, p < 0.001, Table 2).

Table 2.

The frequencies and types of Y chromosome microdeletions in infertile participants

Microdeletions Azoospermia (n = 389) Oligozoospermia (n = 508) p value Total N
microdeletions 7.71%(30/389) 6.69%(34/508) p < 0.001 7.13%(64/897)
AZFa 0.51%(2/389) 0.39%(2/508) p < 0.001 0.45%(4/897)
AZFb 0.77%(3/389) 0.00%(0/508) 0.33%(3/897)
AZFc 3.08%(12/389) 6.30%(32/508) p < 0.001 4.91%(44/897)
AZFb + c 2.06%(8/389) 0.00%(0/508) 0.89%(8/897)
AZFa + b + c 1.29%(5/389) 0.00%(0/508) 0.56%(5/897)

Among all patients with microdeletions, the deletion rate of AZFc region was the highest (68.75%, 44/64), followed by AZFa region deletion (6.25%, 4/64) and AZFb region deletion (4.69%, 3/64). The incidence of AZFc deletion was highest (83.33%, 25/30) among patients with azoospermia, including combined deletions (AZFb + c at 26.67% and AZFa + b + c at 16.67%). Total AZFb deletion had a higher rate than total AZFa region, while no cases of AZFa + b or AZFa + c deletions were detected. Similarly, among patients with oligozoospermia, the AZFc region exhibited the highest rate of total deletion (94.12%, n = 32). In contrast, no deletions were detected in the combined AZFb region and its various subregions, as illustrated in Fig. 2.

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2

Diagram shows AZF microdeletion percentage in Azoospermia and Oligozoospermia patients. Total AZFa, AZFb, and AZFc show the percentage of deletion, including the combination

The serum levels of sex hormones (FSH, LH, PRL, T, E2, P) in the microdeletion patients were subsequently assessed. As shown in Table 3, compared to oligozoospermia patients with microdeletions, azoospermia patients with microdeletions exhibited significantly elevated levels of FSH (21.63 ± 2.01 U/L vs. 10.15 ± 0.96 U/L, p = 0.001), LH (8.96 ± 0.90 U/L vs. 4.58 ± 0.42 U/L, p < 0.001), and PRL (263.45 ± 21.84 mIU/L vs. 170.76 ± 17.10 mIU/L, p = 0.002). However, there were no significant differences in the levels of P and E2 between the two groups. Although T levels were higher in microdeletion oligospermia patients, the two groups had no statistical significance. 66.85% (44/64) of the patients with AZF deletions underwent Assisted Reproductive Technology (ART) procedures following diagnosis. 31.25% (20/64) of patients refused the donated sperm and opted not to proceed with ART.

Table 3.

Comparison of the Mean hormonal levels in Azoospermic and Oligozoospermic infertile men with Y chromosome microdeletion

Total Azoospermia Oligozoospermia p value
Age (y) 33.15 ± 0.60 33.37 ± 1.01 32.97 ± 0.71 p = 0.021
FSH (U/L) 16.65 ± 1.46 21.63 ± 2.01 10.15 ± 0.96 p = 0.001
LH (U/L) 7.07 ± 0.65 8.96 ± 0.90 4.58 ± 0.42 p < 0.001
P (nmol/L) 1.91 ± 0.19 2.03 ± 0.13 1.78 ± 0.50 p = 0.638
PRL (mIU/L) 221.33 ± 16.14 263.45 ± 21.84 170.76 ± 17.10 p = 0.002
T (nmol/L) 23.18 ± 10.67 12.12 ± 0.91 37.13 ± 24.35 p = 0.060
E2(pmol/L) 106.38 ± 6.84 107.14 ± 7.17 101.60 ± 12.05 p = 0.605

Discussion

Genetic factors are one of the critical factors leading to male infertility, including chromosome karyotype abnormality, gene copy number variation, single gene mutation, and Y chromosome microdeletion, among which the most common are karyotype abnormality and Y chromosome microdeletion [12]. The findings of several studies indicate that approximately 8–10% of infertile males in China exhibit Y chromosome microdeletions [1316]. However, no studies with a substantial sample size have been published in the southernmost region of China.

In this study, we evaluated the prevalence of Y chromosome microdeletions in male infertility among the Hainan population, China’s sole tropical island province. A total of 897 infertile men from Hainan Province, diagnosed with oligozoospermia or azoospermia and excluding chromosomal abnormalities, were included in the study. Y chromosome microdeletions were detected in 64 patients, with an overall incidence of 7.13% (64/897). The rate of Y chromosome microdeletion in infertile males in Hainan was generally lower than in other regions of China [8] and the world, including Iraqi (47.8%) [17], Morocco (18.82%) [18], India (10.02%) [8] and Korea (10.93%) [19] but higher than in Turkey (6.82%) [20] (Table 4). It may be a unique group characteristic of the Hainan population in China. The deletion of the AZF region is typically regarded as Y chromosome microdeletion and is being gradually considered by specialists. The incidence of Y chromosome microdeletion in infertile men varies significantly among different laboratories due to the utilization of diverse population methodologies and STSs [2123]. Therefore, it is imperative to integrate multiple influencing factors to comprehensively describe and elucidate the occurrence of Y chromosome microdeletions across diverse regions.

Table 4.

Studies in Some of the Asia countries and regions with different frequencies

References Year Region Study population Frequency
Wang et al. [14] 2010

Northeastern

China

305 9.2%
Waseem et al. [8] 2020 Indian 379 10.02%
Liu et al. [15] 2007

Guangzhou

China

175 10.90%
Jafari et al. [45] 2022 Iranian 200 7.5%
Sha et al. [16] 2020

Eastern

China

201 10.95%
Al-Janabi et al. [17] 2020 Iraqi 90 47.8%
Birowo et al. [46] 2017 Indonesian 71 15.49%
Zhu et al. [13] 2017

Southern

China

1808 8.3%
This Study 2023

Hainan

China

897 7.13%

The AZF region of the Y chromosome is further divided into three subregions: AZFa, AZFb, and AZFc. Regarding localization, the AZFa region is situated at the proximal end of the long arm of the Y chromosome, closest to the centromere. The AZFc region is located at the distal end, while the AZFb region lies between these two subregions (Fig. 1). Additionally, specific fragments within the AZFb region overlap with those in the AZFc region [24]. The deletion of distinct subregions results in varying sterility phenotypes. The present study investigated the effects of single and combined subregion deletion in infertile males. We found that the most common type of AZF microdeletion in infertile men in Hainan Province was AZFc deletion (4.91%), and there was a significant difference in incidence between oligozoospermia and azoospermia, i.e., infertile men with AZFc deletion were more frequently found to have oligozoospermia. The previous data indicated that the highest incidence of AZF microdeletion in infertile men was AZFc deletion [18, 20, 2527]. However, some studies have reported different results. The recent study revealed a higher prevalence of AZFa subregion deletion in microdeletion infertile men, significantly correlated with the oligozoospermia phenotype [28]. Although much of the present data still suggests that AZFa deletions are not the most common type in male infertility patients compared with other kinds of AZF deletion [29, 30], it has been reported that AZFa deletion can lead to the most severe phenotype, which in the case of complete AZFa region deletion occurs as Sertoli Cell Only Syndrome (SCOS), in which there are no sperm cells at all in the testicular convoluted tubules, and only Sertoli cells are seen [3133]. The reported prevalence of SCOS in azoospermia patients ranges from 26.3–57.8% [34, 35]. The etiologies of human SCOS are diverse, encompassing Y chromosome microdeletions, cryptorchidism, chromosomal disorders, cytotoxic drugs, radiation exposure, and viral infections [36].

In our study, we identified four infertility patients with AZFa deletions. Two patients exhibited complete AZFa deletions (i.e., deletions at both sY84 and sY86 STS sites) and consistently presented with azoospermia. The other two patients showed deletions only at the sY86 STS site, without the sY84 deletion, which was considered partial AZFa deletion and exhibited oligozoospermia. A recent study reported that approximately 61.3% of 75 males with severe oligozoospermia or azoospermia had AZFa region deletions, confirming a significant association between partial or complete AZFa deletions and male infertility and spermatogenic failure, with partial AZFa deletions occurring more frequently than complete deletions [37]. However, another study reported that microdeletions in the AZFa region are associated with diverse phenotypes, including azoospermia, oligozoospermia, and normozoospermia [38]. Patients with complete AZFa deletions and Sertoli cell-only syndrome (SCOS) cannot retrieve sperm via microdissection testicular sperm extraction (mTESE) for assisted reproductive techniques such as intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI). Thus, mTESE is not recommended clinically [39]. Instead, donor sperm should be considered for assisted reproductive treatments of these patients. However, for patients with partial deletions who may present with oligozoospermia, mTESE followed by ICSI is a viable option. Still, the patient must be fully informed of the potential of inheriting the same deletion in the male of his offspring.

This study found two types of co-deletion of AZF subregions, AZFb + c and AZFa + b + c. The incidence of AZFb + c subregion combined deletion is higher in infertile men, followed by AZFa + b + c deletion. These two types of combined microdeletion were only detected in patients with azoospermia, not in oligozoospermia, consistent with previous reports [19]. It was shown that AZFb + c subregion deletion may be most closely related to the azoospermia phenotype. Azoospermia and oligozoospermia patients should perform Y chromosome deletion screening before testicular sperm extraction (TESE) or intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI). If they are found in the region of AZFa, AZFb + c, or AZFa + b + c complete deletion, TESE should not be recommended. If these partial deletion patients have a strong desire for fertility, can we perform mTESE to win some opportunities for patients? This question is worth discussing and analyzing. Hainan Island has more than 30 ethnic groups, including Han, Li, Miao, and Hui, among which ethnic minorities account for 18.02% of the province’s population. Minority groups have more traditional ideas and a strong desire to have children. With fully informed consent, can we take some proactive ways to assist sperm retrieval in patients with AZF deletion? We need more scientific evidence and support.

The hypothalamic-pituitary-testicular axis mainly regulates testicular spermatogenesis and changes in reproductive hormones will affect male reproductive function [40]. This study further analyzed the sex hormone levels of infertile men with AZF microdeletion in Hainan. It aimed to explore the relationship between sex hormone levels and different sterility phenotypes caused by AZF microdeletion. We found a significant increase in serum FSH (21.63 ± 2.01 U/L vs. 10.15 ± 0.96 U/L) and LH (8.96 ± 0.90 U/L vs. 4.58 ± 0.42 U/L) levels in AZF microdeletion azoospermia patients compared to AZF microdeletion oligospermia patients. This finding is consistent with hormonal analysis results from the previous report [28]. Normal spermatogenesis depends on the synergistic regulation of multiple sex hormones. Elevated FSH levels suggest a decline in testicular function [41]. Previous studies have also shown that infertile patients with microdeletions have significantly higher FSH and LH levels than those without [19]. In addition, we found that compared with oligozoospermia patients, the serum PRL levels of AZF microdeletion in azoospermia men were also significantly higher. A previous study revealed that serum PRL levels were significantly elevated in patients with azoospermia compared to healthy men, while patients with oligozoospermia were in between [42]. In the male reproductive system, the prominent role of PRL is to regulate the FSH receptor on the supporting cells and the LH receptor on the testicular interstitial cells to affect the reproductive function of the testis [43]. At the same time, serum PRL can inhibit the release of GnRH and decrease the secretion of both FSH and LH [44]. FSH, LH, and PRL levels may have specific diagnostic and predictive values for infertile men with AZF microdeletion.

Conclusion

The province of Hainan is the sole tropical island province in China. The incidence of AZF microdeletion can reach 7.13% in infertile men in Hainan province, and the deletion of the AZFc subregion is the highest. Although the Y chromosome microdeletion rate is distinct in different regions or populations, the regions mentioned above of the Y chromosome may serve an indispensable role in regulating spermatogenesis. The analysis of Y chromosome microdeletion plays a crucial role in the clinical assessment and diagnosis of male infertility. Further studies will help to understand better and diagnose male infertility and provide a theoretical basis for the diagnosis and treatment of male infertility.

Acknowledgements

We thank all staff in the Department of Reproductive Medicine, the First Affiliated Hospital of Hainan Medical University (especially Dr. Lingxiao Zhang) for their help and support.

Author contributions

M.Y., L.Q. and S.F. initiated and designed the project. H.Q., and S.F. wrote the manuscript. Z.L., Z.Y., S.M., and L.D. performed most experiments and analyzed result data. S.F., L.Q., and M.Y. supervise the designed structure of the manuscript, reviews and helps revise this manuscript.All authors reviewed the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by the Major Science and Technology Program of Hainan Province (ZDKJ2021037), Hainan Province Science and Technology Special Fund (ZDYF2020117, ZDYF2022SHFZ312), Hainan Province Science and Technology Project (LCXY202102, LCYX202203, LCYX202301), China Postdoctoral Science Foundation (2022T150180 and 2022M710992), and the Postdoctoral Science Foundation of Hainan Province, project supported by Hainan Province Clinical Medical Center, the specific research fund of The Innovation Platform for Academicians of Hainan Province (YSPTZX202310).

Data availability

The datasets used and/or analysed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The study was approved by the Research Ethics Committee of the First Affiliated Hospital of Hainan Medical University IRB. A sentence confirming that “informed consent” was obtained from all participants/patients.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Footnotes

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Qina He and Yongle Zhang contributed equally to this work.

Contributor Information

Yanlin Ma, Email: mayanlinma@163.com.

Fei Sun, Email: 99609248@qq.com.

Qi Li, Email: 1315286326@qq.com.

References

  • 1.AGARWAL A, BASKARAN S, PAREKH N, et al. Male Infertility [J] Lancet. 2021;397(10271):319–33. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)32667-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.BONDE JP. Occupational causes of male infertility [J] Curr Opin Endocrinol Diabetes Obes. 2013;20(3):234–9. doi: 10.1097/MED.0b013e32835f3d4b. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.TOURNAYE H, KRAUSZ C, OATES RD. Novel concepts in the aetiology of male reproductive impairment [J] Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2017;5(7):544–53. doi: 10.1016/S2213-8587(16)30040-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.TIEPOLO L, ZUFFARDI O. Localization of factors controlling spermatogenesis in the nonfluorescent portion of the human Y chromosome long arm [J] Hum Genet. 1976;34(2):119–24. doi: 10.1007/BF00278879. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.COLACO S. Consequences of Y chromosome microdeletions beyond male infertility [J] J Assist Reprod Genet. 2019;36(7):1329–37. doi: 10.1007/s10815-019-01492-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.PUNJANI N, KANG C. SCHLEGEL P N. Clinical implications of Y chromosome microdeletions among infertile men [J] Best Pract Res Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2020;34(6):101471. doi: 10.1016/j.beem.2020.101471. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.ZHANG YS, LI L L, XUE L T, et al. Complete azoospermia factor b deletion of Y chromosome in an infertile male with severe oligoasthenozoospermia: Case Report and Literature Review [J] Urology. 2017;102:111–5. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2016.07.022. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.WASEEM AS, SINGH V, MAKKER G C, et al. AZF deletions in Indian populations: original study and meta-analyses [J] J Assist Reprod Genet. 2020;37(2):459–69. doi: 10.1007/s10815-019-01661-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.PRACTICE COMMITTEE OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR REPRODUCTIVE M Diagnostic evaluation of the infertile male: a committee opinion [J] Fertil Steril. 2015;103(3):e18–25. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2014.12.103. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.MINHAS S, BETTOCCHI C. European Association of Urology Guidelines on male sexual and Reproductive Health: 2021 update on male infertility [J] Eur Urol. 2021;80(5):603–20. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2021.08.014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.PRACTICE COMMITTEE OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR REPRODUCTIVE MEDICINE IN COLLABORATION WITH THE SOCIETY FOR MALE R, UROLOGY Evaluation of the azoospermic male: a committee opinion [J] Fertil Steril. 2018;109(5):777–82. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2018.01.043. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.MIYAMOTO T, MINASE G, OKABE K, et al. Male infertility and its genetic causes [J] J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2015;41(10):1501–5. doi: 10.1111/jog.12765. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Zhu XB, Gong YH, He J et al. Multicentre study of Y chromosome microdeletions in 1,808 Chinese infertile males using multiplex and real-time polymerase chain reaction [J]. Andrologia, 2017, 49(5). [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 14.WANG R X, FU C, YANG Y P, et al. Male infertility in China: laboratory finding for AZF microdeletions and chromosomal abnormalities in infertile men from Northeastern China [J] J Assist Reprod Genet. 2010;27(7):391–6. doi: 10.1007/s10815-010-9420-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.LIU Y F, OU J P, ZHOU C Q, et al. [Screening for the microdeletions of azoospermia factor on the Y chromosome in male infertile patients from Guangzhou] [J] Zhonghua Yi Xue Yi Chuan Xue Za Zhi. 2007;24(5):564–6. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.SHA J, HUANG G, ZHANG B, et al. Chromosomal abnormalities and Y chromosome microdeletions in infertile men with azoospermia and oligozoospermia in Eastern China [J] J Int Med Res. 2020;48(4):300060519896712. doi: 10.1177/0300060519896712. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Al-Janabi AM, Rahim AIR, Faris SA et al. Prevalence of Y chromosome microdeletion in azoospermic infertile males of Iraqi population [J]. J Genet, 2020, 99(0). [PubMed]
  • 18.NAASSE Y, CHAROUTE H, EL HOUATE B, et al. Chromosomal abnormalities and Y chromosome microdeletions in infertile men from Morocco [J] BMC Urol. 2015;15:95. doi: 10.1186/s12894-015-0089-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.KIM S Y, KIM H J, LEE B Y, et al. Y chromosome microdeletions in infertile men with non-obstructive azoospermia and severe oligozoospermia [J] J Reprod Infertil. 2017;18(3):307–15. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.ACET EMIRDARV. The effect of azoospermia factor microdeletions on intracytoplasmic sperm injection results in azoospermia patients [J] Pak J Med Sci. 2023;39(3):672–6. doi: 10.12669/pjms.39.3.7003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.MOHAMMED F, AL-YATAMA F, AL-BADER M, et al. Primary male infertility in Kuwait: a cytogenetic and molecular study of 289 infertile Kuwaiti patients [J] Andrologia. 2007;39(3):87–92. doi: 10.1111/j.1439-0272.2007.00769.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.SACHDEVA K, SAXENA R, MAJUMDAR A, et al. Use of ethnicity-specific sequence tag site markers for Y chromosome microdeletion studies [J] Genet Test Mol Biomarkers. 2011;15(6):451–9. doi: 10.1089/gtmb.2010.0159. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.ZAIMY M A, KALANTAR S M, SHEIKHHA M H, et al. The frequency of Yq microdeletion in azoospermic and oligospermic Iranian infertile men [J] Iran J Reprod Med. 2013;11(6):453–8. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.COLACO S. Genetics of the human Y chromosome and its association with male infertility [J] Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2018;16(1):14. doi: 10.1186/s12958-018-0330-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.UZAY E, KIZILAY F. Investigation of genotype-phenotype correlation in patients with AZF microdeletion in a single-reference centre [J] Andrologia. 2021;53(10):e14188. doi: 10.1111/and.14188. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.CHEN S W, CHEN C P CHERNSR, et al. The significance of karyotyping and azoospermia factor analysis in patients with nonobstructive azoospermia or oligozoospermia [J] Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol. 2022;61(5):800–5. doi: 10.1016/j.tjog.2022.02.046. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.RANI D S, RAJENDER S, PAVANI K, et al. High frequencies of non allelic homologous recombination (NAHR) events at the AZF loci and male infertility risk in Indian men [J] Sci Rep. 2019;9(1):6276. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-42690-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.ELSAID H O A, GADKAREIM T, ABOBAKR T, et al. Detection of AZF microdeletions and reproductive hormonal profile analysis of infertile Sudanese men pursuing assisted reproductive approaches [J] BMC Urol. 2021;21(1):69. doi: 10.1186/s12894-021-00834-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.SUGANTHI R, VIJESH V V, VANDANA N, et al. Y choromosomal microdeletion screening in the workup of male infertility and its current status in India [J] Int J Fertil Steril. 2014;7(4):253–66. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.KRAUSZ C, HOEFSLOOT L, SIMONI M, et al. EAA/EMQN best practice guidelines for molecular diagnosis of Y-chromosomal microdeletions: state-of-the-art 2013 [J] Andrology. 2014;2(1):5–19. doi: 10.1111/j.2047-2927.2013.00173.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.BLAGOSKLONOVA O, FELLMANN F, CLAVEQUIN M C, et al. AZFa deletions in sertoli cell-only syndrome: a retrospective study [J] Mol Hum Reprod. 2000;6(9):795–9. doi: 10.1093/molehr/6.9.795. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.KAMP C, HUELLEN K, FERNANDES S, et al. High deletion frequency of the complete AZFa sequence in men with sertoli-cell-only syndrome [J] Mol Hum Reprod. 2001;7(10):987–94. doi: 10.1093/molehr/7.10.987. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.LARDONE M C, PARODI D A, VALDEVENITO R, et al. Quantification of DDX3Y, RBMY1, DAZ and TSPY mRNAs in testes of patients with severe impairment of spermatogenesis [J] Mol Hum Reprod. 2007;13(10):705–12. doi: 10.1093/molehr/gam057. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.AMMAL D P L Testicular biopsy in male infertility [J] J Med Sci Clin Res. 2017;05(04):20616–9. doi: 10.18535/jmscr/v5i4.143. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.FRANCO G, SCARSELLI F. A novel stepwise micro-TESE approach in non obstructive azoospermia [J] BMC Urol. 2016;16(1):20. doi: 10.1186/s12894-016-0138-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.KOC G, OZDEMIR A A, GIRGIN G, et al. Male infertility in sertoli cell-only syndrome: an investigation of autosomal gene defects [J] Int J Urol. 2019;26(2):292–8. doi: 10.1111/iju.13863. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.MT S A-O, AL-ANI S K, ALAANY R, et al. Detection of partial and/or complete Y chromosome microdeletions of azoospermia factor a (AZFa) sub-region in infertile Iraqi patients with azoospermia and severe oligozoospermia [J] J Clin Lab Anal. 2022;36(3):e24272. doi: 10.1002/jcla.24272. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.WEI W, FITZGERALD T W AYUBQ, et al. Copy number variation in the human Y chromosome in the UK population [J] Hum Genet. 2015;134(7):789–800. doi: 10.1007/s00439-015-1562-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.GHANAMI GASHTI N, SADIGHI GILANI M A ABBASIM. Sertoli cell-only syndrome: etiology and clinical management [J] J Assist Reprod Genet. 2021;38(3):559–72. doi: 10.1007/s10815-021-02063-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Oduwole OO, Huhtaniemi IT Misrahim. The roles of luteinizing hormone, follicle-stimulating hormone and testosterone in spermatogenesis and folliculogenesis revisited [J]. Int J Mol Sci, 2021, 22(23). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 41.BAHMANIMEHR A, ZEIGHAMI S, NAMAVAR JAHROMI B, et al. Detection of Y chromosome microdeletions and Hormonal Profile Analysis of Infertile men undergoing assisted Reproductive technologies [J] Int J Fertil Steril. 2018;12(2):173–7. doi: 10.22074/ijfs.2018.5244. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.GONZALES G F, GARCIA-HJARLES M VELASQUEZG. Hyperprolactinaemia and hyperserotoninaemia: their relationship to seminal quality [J] Andrologia. 1992;24(2):95–100. doi: 10.1111/j.1439-0272.1992.tb02617.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.RAUT S, DESHPANDE S, BALASINOR N H Unveiling the role of Prolactin and its receptor in Male Reproduction [J] Horm Metab Res. 2019;51(4):215–9. doi: 10.1055/a-0859-1144. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.DABBOUS Z, ATKIN SL. Hyperprolactinaemia in male infertility: clinical case scenarios [J] Arab J Urol. 2018;16(1):44–52. doi: 10.1016/j.aju.2017.10.002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.JAFARI L, SAFINEJAD K, NASIRI M, et al. The relationship between common mutations in CFTR, AR genes, Y chromosome microdeletions and karyotyping abnormalities with very severe oligozoospermia in Iranian men [J] Genes Genomics. 2023;45(4):519–29. doi: 10.1007/s13258-022-01300-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.BIROWO P, PUTRA D E, DEWI M, et al. Y-Chromosomal microdeletion in idiopathic azoospermic and severe oligozoospermic Indonesian men [J] Acta Med Indones. 2017;49(1):17–23. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Data Availability Statement

The datasets used and/or analysed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.


Articles from BMC Urology are provided here courtesy of BMC

RESOURCES