Skip to main content
The BMJ logoLink to The BMJ
. 1999 Dec 4;319(7223):1496. doi: 10.1136/bmj.319.7223.1496

Improving access to medical care

General practice cooperatives are coping well

Mark Reynolds 1
PMCID: PMC1117213  PMID: 10582942

Editor—Cooperatives present patients with the easiest access to a doctor of any part of the NHS. We have led the way in modernising out of hours primary care, and we have been arguing for, and in many areas creating, a “whole systems approach” to access. It was therefore galling to read that “patients may have bypassed general practices and cooperatives as phone lines became overwhelmed; and accident and emergency staff often had no other options but to admit.”1 These unfounded assertions are damaging.

The evidence set out in the report Winter Pressures on Primary Care by the Health Economics Consortium, which was commissioned by the Department of Health, showed that primary care, and cooperatives in particular, coped admirably. It is just as likely that patients would have phoned their cooperatives when faced with long delays in accident and emergency departments. Indeed, I triaged several calls made from Maidstone accident and emergency department last Boxing Day.

About 1-2% of the population contacted primary care out of hours services between 24 December 1998 and 2 January 1999. It wasn't primary care that collapsed under the strain, but a secondary service that is always working almost flat out and therefore has no spare capacity. This is because we spend less on health as a percentage of gross national product than almost any other westernised nation.

References

  • 1.Rogers A, Flowers J, Pencheon D. Improving access needs a whole systems approach. BMJ. 1999;319:866–867. doi: 10.1136/bmj.319.7214.866. . (2 October.) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
BMJ. 1999 Dec 4;319(7223):1496.

Telephone consultations are the answer

Morris Doublet-Stewart 1

Editor—I am a singlehanded general practitioner with a paperless practice and a list size of 2800 (50% greater than the average), so improving systems of access, as described by Rogers et al,1-1 is a priority for me and my patients. Over the past three years I have done an increasing number of consultations over the telephone (table).

Table.

Numbers (percentages) of surgery, telephone, and home consultations over three years

Surgery consultations Telephone consultations Home visits Total
1 April 97-31 March 98 7511 (88)   378 (4.4)   639 (7.5) 8528
1 April 98-31 March 99 7377 (81) 1108 (12) 632 (7) 9117
1 April 99-8 October 99   3686 (79.4)    676 (14.6) 280 (6) 4642

Apart from their convenience for doctor and patient, I believe telephone consultations have clinical merits because of improved communication. Firstly, patients are more relaxed when speaking from their own home. Despite our best intention surgeries, outpatient clinics, and medical and nursing staff may be intimidating. Secondly, the queues in surgeries and clinics will adversely influence both doctor and patient behaviour.

Telephone consultations have already revolutionised the provision of out of hours services, producing a large reduction in home visits, and NHS Direct is a popular idea whatever the reservations of the profession. Provided that good computerised clinical records are available, I believe telephone consultations could significantly improve access to both primary and secondary care.

References

  • 1-1.Rogers A, Flowers J, Pencheon D. Improving access needs a whole systems approach. BMJ. 1999;319:866–867. doi: 10.1136/bmj.319.7214.866. . (2 October.) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from BMJ : British Medical Journal are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES