Skip to main content
The BMJ logoLink to The BMJ
. 1999 Dec 4;319(7223):1497. doi: 10.1136/bmj.319.7223.1497

Managing drug misuse in general practice

Republic of Ireland has set up scheme to regulate methadone prescribing by GPs

Eamon Keenan 1,2, Joe Barry 1,2
PMCID: PMC1117215  PMID: 10582944

Editor—The Republic of Ireland has adopted a similar approach to drug misuse to that discussed in Keen's editorial.1 General practitioners are encouraged to become involved in the treatment of drug misusers by legislation introduced in October 1998 to regulate the prescribing and dispensing of methadone.2

Providing methadone maintenance in general practice has led to encouraging reductions in the use of illicit drugs,3 but concerns have been expressed about the problems of double prescribing and the availability of methadone on the black market. Despite the existence of a central methadone treatment list in Ireland since 1993, doctors were not legally obliged to register patients. An added problem was that the presence of large numbers of drug users attending individual private general practitioners or pharmacies had contributed to considerable local community resistance to health boards establishing locations for treatment.

The main points of the new protocol are as follows. All methadone treatment is now free. Only methadone of 1 mg/ml concentration can be prescribed. All patients for whom methadone is started must be registered on the central treatment list. For patients being prescribed methadone in general practice a treatment card, incorporating the patient's details and photograph plus the doctor's details, must be lodged in a specified dispensing pharmacy.

Doctors, depending on training, are limited to certain numbers of patients. Level 1 general practitioners can prescribe to 15 patients whose condition has been stabilised in a clinic. Level 2 general practitioners can prescribe to 35 patients, who can be a combination of patients whose condition has been stabilised and new patients. Training and regular audit are organised jointly by the relevant health board and the Irish College of General Practitioners. Pharmacists are also limited, to a total of 50 patients. Remuneration for both groups of professionals is provided centrally, with recognition given for daily dispensing by pharmacists. All the Irish health boards are represented on a methadone protocol implementation committee to oversee this initiative.

The success of this legislation, which aspires to normalise drug treatment in primary care, will only become apparent over time. Since October 1998 the numbers registered centrally have increased from 3200 to 3750, of whom 1000 are in treatment through general practice. Despite the stricter regulations the numbers of general practitioners and pharmacists involved continue to increase (table). This perhaps indicates that these professionals have overcome some of their fears about treating drug users and are prepared to give the new legislation a chance to work.

Table.

Numbers of general practitioners and pharmacies participating in Irish methadone regulations in May 1998 and May 1999, before and after legislative changes were introduced to regulate prescribing and dispensing of methadone

31 May 1998 31 May 1999
General practitioners:
 Within Eastern Health Board area 82 111
 Outside Eastern Health Board area 10 28
 Total 92 139
Pharmacies:
 Within Eastern Health Board area 88 150
 Outside Eastern Health Board area 0 37
 Total 88 187

References

  • 1.Keen J. Managing drug misuse in general practice. BMJ. 1999;318:1503–1504. doi: 10.1136/bmj.318.7197.1503. . (5 June.) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Department of Health. Misuse of drugs(supervision of prescription and supply of methadone) regulations, 1998. Dublin: Stationery Office; 1998. (Statutory Instrument No 225.) [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Wilson P, Watson R, Ralston GE. Methadone maintenance in general practice: patients, workload, and outcomes. BMJ. 1994;309:641–644. doi: 10.1136/bmj.309.6955.641. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
BMJ. 1999 Dec 4;319(7223):1497.

Study is being done of Scottish GPs' involvement with users of illicit drugs

Edwin van Teijlingen 1,2,3,4, Mandy Ryan 1,2,3,4, Catriona Matheson 1,2,3,4, Christine Bond 1,2,3,4

Editor—The latest version of the guidelines on the clinical management of drug misuse1-1 have indeed sparked controversy, and not all practitioners will endorse every recommendation in the guidelines, as highlighted in Keen's editorial.1-2 To inform the implementation process for the guidelines and to maximise their uptake, we must be aware of the nature and extent of any such disagreements. It is particularly relevant in this context that we collect this information from general practitioners, because of the central role that is proposed for them in the guidelines.

The chief scientist's office of the Scottish Office has recently awarded us funding for a Scotland-wide explorative study of the factors influencing Scottish general practitioners' treatment decisions for, attitudes toward, and involvement with users of illicit drugs. One of the questions we will address is the level of awareness of and attitudes towards both the new clinical guidelines for managing drug dependency and similar policy documents—for example, Tackling Drugs in Scotland.1-3

For the implementation of any guideline it is essential to be aware of the obstacles and barriers that exist.1-4 This is particularly important for the more controversial topics such as the management of drug misuse. For further details of this study, readers should contact Dr Catriona Matheson at the address below.

References

  • 1-1.Department of Health. Drug misuse and dependence: guidelines on clinical management. London: Stationery Office; 1999. [Google Scholar]
  • 1-2.Keen J. Managing drug misuse in general practice. BMJ. 1999;318:1503–1504. doi: 10.1136/bmj.318.7197.1503. . (5 June.) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 1-3.The Scottish Office. Tackling drugs in Scotland. Edinburgh: Stationery Office; 1999. [Google Scholar]
  • 1-4.Haynes B, Haines A. Barriers and bridges to evidence based clinical practice. BMJ. 1998;317:273–276. doi: 10.1136/bmj.317.7153.273. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from BMJ : British Medical Journal are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES