Editor—Law and Wald focused on the so called French paradox.1 In the 1980s national statistics and data on food balance were the only available sources of information, and the eccentric position of France on a plot of mortality from coronary heart disease against consumption of animal fat was obvious.2,3 However, we later concluded that caution was necessary because data on comparative incidence were unavailable and interpretation should not rely entirely on the dietary lipids and heart disease hypothesis, although it may be central.4
Using mortality as a surrogate for incidence may be misleading. Data from the MONICA project are now available,5 and the content of Law and Wald's article might have been considerably different had they written it a few months later. During 1985-95 rates of coronary events per 100 000 men aged 35-64 averaged 274 in three French regions, 266 in two Italian regions, 261 in two Swiss regions, 210 in Barcelona, 695 in Belfast, and 777 in Glasgow. Rates were considerably lower in women, but rankings and risk ratios were nearly identical with those in men. Unambiguously, rates of coronary heart disease in France are of the same order as those in southern Europe, to which it belongs geographically. The interesting question is therefore not why mortality from heart disease is low in France but why heart disease is less prevalent in southern than northern Europe.
Law and Wald may be reproached for introducing a time lag hypothesis to explain a problem that is not specific to France, and we think that their hypothesis is not well supported by their arguments. There is now much evidence that the southern European diet and other lifestyle factors play a part and may modulate the effect of cholesterol and fat in the aetiology of coronary heart disease.
We conclude that the time has come to relieve epidemiology of the French paradox. Much more attention should be paid to collecting reliable data to produce more satisfactory explanations for the complex causes of heart disease.
References
- 1.Law M, Wald N. Why heart disease mortality is low in France: the time lag explanation [with commentaries by M Stampfer and E Rimm, D J P Barker, and J P Mackenbach, and A E Kunst] BMJ. 1999;318:1471–1480. doi: 10.1136/bmj.318.7196.1471. . (29 May.) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Richard JL, Cambien F, Ducimetière P. Particularités épidémiologiques de la maladie coronarienne en France. Press Med. 1981;10:1111–1114. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Richard JL. Les facteurs de risque coronarien—le paradoxe français. Arch Mal Coeur. 1987;80 (suppl):17–21. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Ducimetière P, Richard JL. Dietary lipids and coronary disease: is there a French paradox? Nutr Metab Cardiovasc Dis. 1992;2:195–201. [Google Scholar]
- 5.Tunstall-Pedoe H, Kuulasmaa K, Mähönen M, Tolonen H, Ruokokoski E, Amouyel P. Contribution of trends in survival and coronary-event rates to changes in coronary heart disease mortality: 10-year results from 37 WHO MONICA Project populations. Lancet. 1999;353:1547–1557. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(99)04021-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]