Table 2. Univariable Cox regression analysis for PFS in EC patients treated with ICI.
Baseline characteristic | Variables | Univariable HR (95% CI) | p value |
---|---|---|---|
BMI (kg/m 2 ) | Normal (reference) | 1 | |
Overweight | 0.71 (0.55 – 0.93) | 0.011 | |
Obese | 0.61 (0.47 – 0.77) | <0.0001 | |
Age (years) | 1 (0.99 – 1.01) | 0.83 | |
Self-reported race | White (reference) | 1 | |
Asian | 1.14 (0.79 – 1.65) | 0.47 | |
Black | 1.21 (0.92 – 1.6) | 0.18 | |
Other | 0.83 (0.57 – 1.22) | 0.35 | |
Histology | Endometrioid low grade (reference) | 1 | |
Endometrioid high grade | 1.59 (1.12 – 2.26) | 0.01 | |
Serous | 1.88 (1.4 – 2.53) | < 0.0001 | |
Mixed/high-grade NOS | 2.07 (1.48 – 2.9) | < 0.0001 | |
Carcinosarcoma | 2.53 (1.79 – 3.6) | < 0.0001 | |
Clear cell | 1.46 (0.86 – 2.47) | 0.16 | |
Un-/dedifferentiated | 1.76 (0.93 – 3.3) | 0.08 | |
Checkpoint inhibitor | Pembrolizumab (reference) | 1 | |
Durvalumab | 2.26 (1.73 –2.94) | <0.0001 | |
Nivolumab | 1.63 (0.95 – 2.79) | 0.08 | |
Other | 0.22 (0.06 – 0.88) | 0.03 | |
Combination therapies | Lenvatinib/pembrolizumab (reference) | 1 | |
Tremelimumab/durvalumab | 2.22 (1.54 – 3.2) | <0.0001 | |
ICI alone | 0.71 (0.57 – 0.9) | 0.005 | |
Other combination | 2.14 (1.1 – 4.17) | 0.03 | |
ECOG Performance Status | 0 (reference) | 1 | |
1 | 1.24 (1 – 1.52) | 0.04 | |
2–3 | 4.28 (2.62 – 6.99) | < 0.0001 | |
Stage at diagnosis | 1,2 (reference) | 1 | |
3,4 | 1.28 (1.04 – 1.58) | 0.02 | |
Previous lines of therapy | 0 (reference) | 1 | |
1 | 1.9 (1.14 – 3.17) | 0.013 | |
2 | 2.48 (1.47 – 4.2) | 0.0007 | |
≥3 | 3.41 (1.96 – 5.92) | <0.0001 | |
Previous pelvic radiotherapy | No (reference) | 1 | |
Yes | 0.87 (0.71 – 1.06) | 0.17 | |
Molecular Subtype A | MSI-H | 1 | |
CN-H/TP53abn | 3.05 (2.19 – 4.25) | < 0.0001 | |
CN-L/NSMP | 2.91 (1.98 – 4.27) | < 0.0001 | |
VAT (cm 2 ) B | Low (≤112 cm2) (reference) | 1 | |
High (>112 cm2) | 0.69 (0.56 – 0.85) | 0.0004 | |
SAT (cm 2 ) B | Low (≤270 cm2) (reference) | 1 | |
High (>270 cm2) | 0.82 (0.67 – 1.01) | 0.062 |