Skip to main content
F1000Research logoLink to F1000Research
. 2022 Feb 1;11:131. [Version 1] doi: 10.12688/f1000research.73820.1

HIF-1α regulated pathomechanism of low birth weight through angiogenesis factors in placental Plasmodium vivax infection

Nugrahanti Prasetyorini 1,2,3, Nabila Erina Erwan 3,4, Teguh Wahju Sardjono 3,5, Tatit Nurseta 1, Rudi Priyo Utomo 6, Rivo Yudhinata Brian Nugraha 3,5, Wike Astrid Cahayani 3,7, Ettie Rukmigarsari 8, Latania Naufa Arinugraha 3, Loeki Enggar Fitri 3,5,a
PMCID: PMC11179053  PMID: 38884107

Abstract

Background: Malaria in pregnancy can lead to placental malaria. The main pathogenesis of the complex fetal implications in placental malaria is tissue hypoxia, due to sequestrations of Plasmodium falciparum infected erythrocytes in the placenta, but the pathomechanism of placental Plasmodium vivax infection have not been studied in detail. Hypoxia inducible factor-1α (HIF-1α) is a key transcriptional mediator of the response to hypoxic conditions which interacts with the change and imbalances of many chemical mediators including angiogenic factors, leading to abnormality of fetal growth.

Methods: This study was conducted cross sectionally in Sikka Regency, East Nusa Tenggara Province, Indonesia, currently known as a malaria endemic area with high incidence of low birth weight (LBW) cases. In this study the peripheral and umbilical blood samples as well as placental tissues were collected from mothers who delivered their babies with LBW at the TC Hiller Regional Hospital. Blood samples were examined for the presence of parasites by microscopic and polymerase chain reaction (PCR) techniques, while the plasma levels of VEGF, PlGF, and VEGFR-1, VEGFR-2, and HIF-1α were determined using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). The sequestration of infected erythrocytes and hemozoin were determined from placental histological slides and the expression of placenta angiogenic factors were observed by immunofluorescent techniques.

Results: In total, 33 cases had complete data to be analyzed. Of them, there were 19 diagnosed with vivax malaria and none with falciparum malaria. There were significant differences of Δ 10th percentile growth curve of baby’s body weights and also all angiogenic factors in placental tissues {VEGF, PlGF, and VEGFR-1, VEGFR-2, and HIF-1α} between those infected and not infected (p<0.05), but not for VEGF and VEGFR-2 in the plasma.

Conclusions: This study found Plasmodium vivax sequestration is associated with LBW through the changes and imbalances of angiogenic factors leaded by HIF-1α.

Keywords: Placental malaria, Plasmodium vivax, LBW, HIF1-α, angiogenesis factors

Introduction

Malaria is still a major public health problem and the main cause of disease and death in developing countries 1 . Young children and pregnant women, especially in the 1 st and 2 nd trimesters, are the population most vulnerable to malaria infection 1 . In malaria-endemic areas, at least 25% of pregnant women are infected with malaria, which accounts for 20% of maternal deaths 2, 3 . In 2019, for 33 countries in the World Health Organisation (WHO) African Region with moderate to high malaria transmission it was estimated that 12 million (35%) of 33 million pregnancies were exposed to Plasmodium falciparum malaria 4 . Rijken et al. reported that around 75 million pregnant women in the Asia-Pacific region were exposed to Plasmodium vivax in 2007 2 . Globally, malaria causes more than 10,000 maternal deaths and 200,000 neonatal deaths annually, most of which are due to low birth weight (LBW) 46 . Pregnant women living in stable transmission areas are at risk for placental malaria, and pregnant women living in unstable areas have three times the risk of developing severe malaria than non-pregnant adult women living in the same areas 2, 3 .

Indonesia is one of the countries in Southeast Asia that has a fairly high malaria case. In 2016 there were 218,480 positive cases of malaria, this condition decreased by almost half of the positive cases of malaria in 2012 7 . The malaria parasites found were Plasmodium falciparum (62%) and Plasmodium vivax (37%). Reports by health facilities in Indonesia (2016) stated that there were 218,450 confirmed cases of malaria with a death rate of 161 cases 8 . The three high malaria-endemic provinces are Papua, West Papua, and East Nusa Tenggara (NTT). Three regencies in NTT which are high endemic areas for malaria are Sikka Regency, Lembata Regency, and Ngada Regency. Sikka Regency is located on Flores Island, bordered by East Flores Regency and Ende Regency, has an area of 7,436.10 km 2 and a population based on a survey population in 2010 was 315,477 people 9 . In 2008, 87,622 clinical malaria cases were reported in Sikka Regency 10 . A previous study conducted on 92 babies born with low birth weight in T.C. Hillers Regional Hospital, Maumere, Sikka Regency between December 2012 to December 2013, reported that 39 (42.4%) infants had congenital malaria of which 19 (48.7%) infants were asymptomatic, while the rest had sepsis, jaundice, and prematurity 11 .

Placental malaria is characterized by the accumulation of parasite-infected erythrocytes, mononuclear cells and malaria pigment (hemozoin) in the placental blood vessels 12 . Most reports of placental malaria are caused by infection with Plasmodium falciparum, which sequesters in the syncytiotrophoblast. This sequestration occurs by expressing the surface protein Plasmodium falciparum erythrocyte membrane protein 1 (PfEMP1) which specifically mediates the cytoadhesion of Plasmodium falciparum infected erythrocytes to placental chondroitin sulfate A (CSA) located in the syncytiotrophoblast 6, 13, 14 . This cytoadhesion and sequestration prevent the escape of circulating adult parasites thereby avoiding the mechanism of clearance by complement and spleen. During the occurrence of placenta malaria, the Th1/Th2 balance shifts to the Th1 pathway and there is an increase in the production of the pro-inflammatory cytokines, interferon-ϒ (IFN-ϒ) and tumour necrosis factor-α (TNF-α). This inflammatory response causes changes in the structure and function of the placenta which are associated with poor pregnancy outcomes such as maternal anemia, prematurity, stunted fetal growth and LBW 15 . Placental malaria is a major cause of stunted fetal growth with poor pregnancy outcomes in the form of babies born with LBW 16 .

Placenta malaria will evoke complement activation, both systemically and at the maternal-fetal interface in the placenta 17 . There is an increase in complement of anaphylatoxin C5a in circulating blood and in placental tissue in mothers with placental malaria 5 . Previous in vitro studies showed that Plasmodium falciparum glycosylphosphatidylinositol (PfGPI) together with C5a increased pro-inflammatory milieu at the maternal-fetal interface, in the form of increased cytokines and chemokines derived from monocytes 18 . One of the consequences is the occurrence of dysregulation of angiogenic factors 19 which causes stunted fetal growth 5, 6, 20, 21 . The local oxygen environment during pregnancy is one of the important regulatory factors of angiogenesis. The main pathway of oxygen regulation of gene expression is hypoxia inducible factor-1α (HIF-1α). Under hypoxic conditions, HIF-1α accumulation upregulates VEGF which is a major proangiogenic factor directly. VEGF activity will induce the expression of vascular endothelial growth factor receptor-1 (VEGFR-1/Flt-1) and vascular endothelial growth factor receptor-2 (VEGFR-2/KDR). During hypoxia, VEGF will bind to receptors and stimulate capillary growth. Hypoxia inducible factor-1α (HIF-1α) also induces an increase in the soluble anti-angiogenic factor Flt-1 (sFlt-1) 22, 23 . High placental HIF-1α expression after the 1 st trimester of pregnancy is an abnormal condition that describes the occurrence of placental hypoxia due to inadequate placentation. Increased placental HIF-1α expression will cause an increase in placental sFlt-1 levels which will be released into the maternal circulation. Soluble Flt-1 (sFlt-1) strongly binds free VEGF and free PlGF, decreased placental angiogenic activity. This condition is found in pregnancies with preeclampsia and IUGR 2426 , and in placental malaria 27 . Increased placental HIF-1α expression is also found in maternal anemia 28 .

Carvalho et al. for the first time demonstrated that Plasmodium vivax-infected erythrocytes (Pv-iEs) can perform ex vivo cytoadhesion on human lung endothelial cells (HLECs), Saimiri brain endothelial cells (SBECs), and placental cryosections both under static and flow conditions. This cytoadhesion is smaller than that of Plasmodium falciparum-infected erythrocytes (Pf-iEs), and is partly mediated by the VIR protein encoded by the Plasmodium vivax variant (vir) gene 29 . Fernandez-Becerra et al. showed in his study that spleen-dependent Plasmodium vivax genes encode immunogenic proteins during the course of infection, so it can be said that the spleen is an organ that plays a major role in expressing parasitic proteins involved in cytoadhesion 30 . Pv-iEs binding to endothelial cells is mediated by glycosaminoglycans, namely chondroitin sulfate A (CSA) and hyaluronic acid (HA) 29, 31 . Although all stages of the Plasmodium vivax were found in peripheral blood, only a few of the mature forms of schizonts were found. It is not yet possible to establish whether the disproportionate Plasmodium vivax parasitaemia results from its sequestration in specific organs 32 .

Data on the number of pregnancies infected with Plasmodium vivax have not been widely published. The mechanism and clinical implications of Plasmodium vivax infection in pregnancy are still not clearly known, possibly because it is considered to cause a milder clinical effect than Plasmodium falciparum infection 33 . However, many studies have reported that vivax malaria in pregnancy is more associated with low birth weight and maternal anemia 34, 35 and may not be affected by parity because women living in areas with low malaria endemicity have low immunity to malaria 36 . In this study, an in vivo study was conducted on pregnant women infected with malaria, with an emphasis on placental malaria, to determine the effect of placental angiogenesis factors and maternal plasma angiogenesis factors on the pathomechanism of LBW through HIF-1α regulation. This study is the first study of placental malaria angiogenesis factors in Indonesia using human placenta samples.

Methods

Ethics approval and consent

This research was conducted according to the guidelines of the Declaration of Helsinki and approved by the Faculty of Medicine Universitas Brawijaya Ethics Committee number 307/EC/KEPK/11/2018. Written informed consent, including for the baby's data to be used, was obtained from all subjects before participating in this study.

Characteristics of research participants

This study used a cross-sectional research design and took place in T.C. Hillers Regional Hospital, Maumere, Sikka Regency, East Nusa Tenggara Province; a malaria-endemic area in Indonesia. This study used a purposive sampling technique in managing research participants. Thus, all of the subjects which met the inclusion criteria were included. The study subjects were pregnant women who came to T.C. Hillers Regional Hospital during 2018 and met the inclusion criteria. The inclusion criteria were pregnant women who gave birth to babies with low birth weight (LBW) and small for gestational age (SGA). Subjects were divided into two groups, they were (i) case group, pregnant women who met the inclusion criteria and the malaria diagnosis criteria and (ii) control group, pregnant women who met the inclusion criteria and did not meet the malaria diagnosis criteria. Malaria cases were determined based on the discovery of Plasmodium parasites on examination of thin or thick blood smears and or the discovery of Plasmodium DNA in maternal blood and or umbilical cord blood by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) examination, and or the discovery of Plasmodium parasites or hemozoin in the placenta.

Diagnosis of placental malaria

The diagnosis of malaria case in this study was confirmed by discovery of either the asexual form of Plasmodium on examination of thick or thin blood smears derived from maternal blood and or umbilical cord blood, and/or Plasmodium DNA obtained by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) examination, and/ finding of placental malaria. Hemozoin is a brown pigment crystal that forms in the digestive vacuole of Plasmodium as a product of hemoglobin catabolism 37 . Hemozoin was seen as greenish-black or yellowish-brown granules using a light microscope and sequestered intra or extra erythrocytes. Observations were made using a light microscope with 1000x magnification in 100 fields of view. Identification of infected erythrocytes was carried out by observing 100 fields of view. Identification of hemozoin sequestration was carried out by observing 100 fields, then the total number of hemozoin was calculated by dividing all fields by 100. The count includes hemozoin found in and outside infected (free) erythrocytes, attached to connective tissue, on white blood cells in the intervillous space, or macrophages covered by fibrin in the intervillous space.

Definition of low birth weight

Low birth weight is defined as a birth weight of less than 2500 g 38 . In this study, what is meant by low birth weight is the difference between birth weight and the 10th percentile of the mean birth weight curve for boys and girls by gestational age from the reference curves of birth weight, length, and head circumference for gestational ages in Yogyakarta, Indonesia 39 .

Maternal peripheral blood sample preparation

In total, 10 milliliters of maternal venous blood were drawn from the median vein and put into a vacutainer containing anticoagulant (BD Vacutainer EDTA Tubes, 366643) for making blood smear preparations, plasma and dried blood spots on filter paper. Microscopic examination was carried out on blood smear preparations. Dried blood spots then were used for PCR examination to confirm the diagnosis of malaria. Plasma was stored at 20°C and sent to Malang city (in collaboration with the Prodia Laboratory) in less than 48 hours. These samples were then used to examine plasma levels of VEGF, PlGF, and VEGFR-1 (sFlt-1), VEGFR-2, and HIF-1α using ELISA method.

Umbilical artery blood sample preparation

In total, five milliliters of blood were taken from the umbilical artery of the newborns and put into a blood collection tube containing anticoagulant (BD Vacutainer EDTA Tubes, 367863) to make blood smears for malaria parasites identification and make dried blood spots on filter paper for PCR examination, and for hemoglobin and leucocyte test.

Parasitemia examination

The blood sample was dropped on an object-glass where a thin smear was made and dried. Furthermore, the smears were fixed evenly using absolute methanol and dried. The smears were stained with Giemsa solution (a mixture of Giemsa stain (Merck, HX612241) and Giemsa buffer (Bioanalytica, Indonesia) with a ratio of 1:9), then rinsed and dried. The thin smear slides were examined microscopically at 100 times magnification under the objective lens with immersion oil, on at least 100 visual fields for each examination. To calculate the degree of parasitemia, 1000x magnification was carried out using a light microscope (Olympus Biological Microscope, CX23), counting the number of erythrocytes infected with malaria parasites per 1000 erythrocytes 40 .

Placental sampling for histopathological preparation

Samples obtained from the central part of the gross placental anatomy with a size of 2 cm and fixation with 10% neutral buffer formalin, were then embedded into paraffin for immunofluorescence examination to determine the expression of VEGF, PlGF, VEGFR-1, VEGFR-2, and HIF-1α, the sequestration of infected erythrocytes and or hemozoin, as well as placental parasitemia. Placental histology preparations were made by cutting tissue that had previously been fixed with 10% neutral buffer formalin and inserted into a tissue cassette. Then, the samples were put into a basket and processed using tissue processor tool (Thermo Scientific Microm STP 120 Spin Tissue Processor). The process of casting into paraffin blocks was done by using tissue embedding tool (Sakura Tissue-Tek TEC 5 Embedding Station). The paraffin blocks were cooled in a freezer before cutting with a microtome (Leica, RM2245). Then, the tissue was put into an incubator (Memmert, UN30) for 30 minutes in a 70-80 oC temperature setting to maximize further deparaffination. Furthermore, after the tissue was removed from the incubator, deparaffination and Hematoxylin-Eosin staining were performed using the Tissue Tex DRS 2000 Multiple Slide Stainer tool.

Immunofluorescence preparation

Immunofluorescence examination procedure on placental tissue was used to measure placental expression of variables VEGF (anti-VEGFA antibody, SC 7269 FITC), PlGF (anti-PLGF antibody, SC 518003), VEGFR-1 (anti VEGFR-1 antibody, SC 271789 PE), VEGFR-2 (anti VEGFR-2 antibody, SC 6251 FITC), and HIF-1α (anti HIF-1α antibody (SC 13515 PE). The immunofluorescence procedure was performed by single staining for HIF-1α and double staining for other variables. The results of the immunofluorescence images were then quantified using ImageJ 1.52p Fiji software.

Nested polymerase chain reaction (PCR) examination to detect Plasmodium falciparum and Plasmodium vivax DNA

DNA samples were obtained from blood sample extraction using PureLinkTM Genomic DNA Kits (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, California, USA) according to the manufacturer's instructions. After purification, all samples were stored at -20 C till ready for the nested PCR. For the amplification of Plasmodium genus sequences, outer primer pairs (rPLU1 and rPLU5) were used. In the second reaction, two pairs of inner primers were used to detect P. falciparum (rFal1-rFal2) and P. vivax (rVIV1-rVIV2). PCR was performed using a Go Tag® Green Master Mix (Promega, Madison, Wisconsin, USA). 1 l template was treated with the following conditions: 1 l of each primer (10 M), 12.5 l of PCR master mix, and 9.5 l of double-distilled H 2O 2. The second nest reactions were carried out in a similar way using different primers. Sterile distilled water was used as a control 11 .

Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA)

ELISA examination was performed to measure plasma levels of VEGF (human VEGF ELISA kit, Biolegend, Catalog No. 446507), PlGF (human PGF ELISA kit, bt-Lab, Catalog No. EO138Hu), VEGFR-1(sFlit1) (human VEGFR-1 ELISA kit, Invitrogen, REF#BMS268-3), VEGFR-2 (human VEGFR-1 ELISA kit, Invitrogen, REF#BMS2019), and HIF-1α (human HIF-1α ELISA kit, Invitrogen, REF#EHIF1A). The technique used was a quantitative sandwich enzyme immunoassay with the following procedure. The ELISA's standard was pipetted into a microplate that had been pre-coated with a specific antibody to the antigen according to the manufactured ELISA Kit. Each sample was pipetted into each well so the antigen would be bound to the immobilized antibody. Unbound materials were discarded. Then biotin-conjugated antibody specific for antigen was added into the wells, then washed. Afterward, avidin-conjugated Horseradish Peroxidase (HRP) was added, then washed to remove any unbound materials. Staining was done by adding a solution substrate, incubated for 30 minutes, and added a stop solution to stop the reaction. The preparations were read with a microplate reader (ZENIX-320).

Neonatal examination

Newborns were examined by the obstetrician for the birth weight, length, head circumference, mid-upper arm circumference, chest circumference, Apgar score, placental size, and placental weight. The birth weight was measured immediately after birth using calibrated weighing scales. The birth length, head circumference, mid-upper arm circumference, and chest circumference were measured using a measuring tape. Apgar score was noted at the first minute of birth. The placental size was measured using a ruler, and the weight was measured using calibrated weighing scales.

Statistical analysis

All statistical analyses were conducted using SPSS 23 Statistic Program for Windows. The techniques for analyzing data include the normality test using the Shapiro Wilk test to determine the normal data distribution. Comparative analysis between the case and control groups was carried out using a one-way ANOVA test for normally distributed data and the Kruskal Wallis test for non-normally distributed data to assess dysregulation of angiogenesis in the pathomechanism of low birth weight due to malaria-inhibited fetal growth in the placenta. The correlation test used was a Pearson test for normally distributed data and the Spearman's rho test for non-normally distributed data to assess the correlation between the variables observed in the study. Path analysis was used to assess the conceptual research framework, i.e. whether the authors' concepts are relevant to the research findings. Data analysis was carried out with a confidence level of 95% and a degree of significance by p≤0.05.

Results

Subject characteristics

A total of 33 subjects met the inclusion criteria of this study. Then laboratory tests were carried out to identify the control group and the case group, as shown in Table 1 41 .

Table 1. Laboratory examination results.

No Examination Malaria (+) Malaria (-) Notes
1 Thin/Thick Peripheral Blood Smear 7 26 P. vivax
2 Blood PCR from Mother 12 21 P. vivax
3 Cord Blood PCR 2 31 P. vivax
4 Placental Histopathological Examination 19 14 IE/hemozoin (+)
Total Cases = 33 19 14

Notes: IE: infected erythrocytes; PCR=polymerase chain reaction.

Plasmodium vivax was identified in all subjects of the case group, and no Plasmodium falciparum nor mixed infection was found. Histopathological examination of placental tissue from the case group showed sequestration of infected erythrocytes and/or hemozoin, followed by monocytes infiltration in the intervillous space in all samples. Two of the 19 malaria cases were identified from cord blood PCR. Examination of maternal peripheral blood smear can at least identify parasites compared to PCR and histopathological examination of the placenta, which is about 36.84%. The blood smears from the malaria case group showed in Figure 1.

Figure 1. Blood smears from the malaria case group.

Figure 1.

In panel A, the arrow indicates the amoeboid form of Plasmodium vivax, panel B shows young schizonts of Plasmodium vivax, and panel C displays the mature schizont of Plasmodium vivax. The image size is the only modification made; no changes to brightness or contrast have been done.

This study showed no statistically significant differences in maternal age, gestational age, and maternal leukocyte count between the case and control groups. It can be seen that in the case group, the age distribution of pregnant women is slightly lower than the age distribution of pregnant women in the control group, but this is not statistically different. Statistically significant differences were only found in maternal hemoglobin levels in the case group (p=0,000<α), lower than in the control group. The subject characteristics and distributions showed in Table 2.

Table 2. Subject characteristics and distributions.

Characteristics Case (N=19) mean ± SD (min-max) Control (n-14) mean ± SD (min-max) p-value
Age (year) 27.68±7.21 (19-39) 32.21±6.25 (20-38) 0.076
Gestational Age (Weeks) 39.47±1.39 (38-42) 38.64±0.84 (38-40) 0.078
Haemoglobin Level (g dL -1) 9.88±0.62 (9.03 -11.28) 11.10±1.20 (10.01-13.16) 0.000
Leukocyte (10 3 µL -1) 7622.11±2317.69 (4900-14200) 7796.79±2385.25 (4560-13890) 0.675

Notes: All of the data were analyzed with the Mann-Whitney test. The case group was pregnant mothers who were diagnosed with malaria (+); The control group was normal pregnant mother/malaria (-) SD=standard deviation.

The characteristics of the babies in this study were recorded as shown in Table 3. There was a significant difference (p=0,000<α) in the mean Δ 10th percentile growth curve of birth weight between the case group (413.16±460,33 g) and the control group (-42.86±129.88 g). However, there was no significant difference (p=0.325>α) in the mean birth weight (g) between the case group (2189.47 ±182.06 g) and the control group (2239.29 ±190.85 g). It appears that the mean value of birth weight in the case group is significantly smaller than the mean in the control group. It can be said that pregnant women with malaria are likely to give birth to a baby with a smaller birth weight than a baby born to a non-malaria pregnant woman.

Table 3. The results of the comparison test of baby characteristics.

Variables Case
Mean ± deviation
Control
Mean ± deviation
p-value
Δ 10th percentile growth curve (g) 413.16±460.33 -42.86±129.88 0.000 **
Baby birthweight (g) 2189.47 ±182.06 2239.29 ±190.85 0.325 **
Body length (cm) 42.95±3.58 41.86±2.91 0.452 **
Head circumference (cm) 27.47±1.26 27.21±1.05 0.495 **
Upper arm circumference (cm) 6.05±0.71 6.21±0.70 0.509 **
Chest circumference (cm) 21.00±1.89 20.71±1.33 0.528 **
APGAR score 9.16±0.60 9.14±0.36 0.852 **
Placental size (cm 3) 392.16±40.08 404.86±44.84 0.415 *
Placental weight (g) 450.00±57.73 457.14±43.22 0.519 **
Hemoglobin level (g dL -1) 14.96±2.49 16.35±2.30 0.113 *
Leukocyte level (10 3 µL -1) 12.70±2.81 10.24±2.11 0.010 *

Note: *) comparative results on the free sample t-test

**) comparative results on the Mann-Whitney test

Association of angiogenic factors expression with birth weight

VEGF in the placenta of the case group was lower (64,404±28,942) than the control group (226,693±39,025). In both the case and control groups, VEGF expression was more abundant in the trophoblast cells of the placental villi than in the intervillous space. PlGF expression in the placenta of the case group was lower (22,814,440±9,497,663) than the control group (84,693,238±29,981,727). PlGF expression in the case group was abundant in trophoblast cells of the placental villi, whereas it was mostly found in the intervillous space in the control group. PlGF expression in the placenta of the case group was significantly lower than that of the control group.

The expression of VEGFR-1 in the placenta of the case group was lower (107,444±46,696) than the control group (213,410±35,251). VEGFR-1 expression was more abundant in trophoblast cells in the placental villi than in the intervillous space in the case and control groups. The expression of VEGFR-1 in the case group's placenta was significantly lower than that of the control group. VEGFR-2 expression in the placenta of the case group was lower (96,968,870±24,300,623) than the control group (167,673,566±90,824,566). VEGFR-2 expression was abundant in trophoblast cells in the placental villi in the case and control groups. The expression of VEGFR-2 in the case group's placenta was significantly lower than that of the control group. The expression of HIF-1α in the placenta of the case group was higher (80,375,094±40,647,360) than the control group (25,286,646±27,238,953). In the case and control groups, HIF-1α expression was more commonly found in the trophoblast cells of the placental villi. HIF-1α expression in the placenta of the case group was significantly higher than that of the control group, as seen in the Figure 2. The quantification of angiogenic factor expression in the case and control groups are presented in Figure 3.

Figure 2. Angiogenic factors expression in placenta.

Figure 2.

Panel A to E shows the angiogenic expression in the placenta using immunofluorescence staining of VEGF, PlGF, VEGFR-1, VEGFR-2, and HIF-1α, respectively; VEGF: vascular endothelial growth factor; PlGF: placental growth factor; VEGFR-1: vascular endothelial growth factor receptor-1; VEGFR-2: vascular endothelial growth factor receptor-2; HIF-1α: hypoxia-inducible factor-1α.

Figure 3. Quantification of angiogenic factors expression in Placenta.

Figure 3.

Panel A to E shows semiquantitative analysis of VEGF, PlGF, VEGFR-1, VEGFR-2, and HIF-1α expression in placenta, respectively; VEGF: vascular endothelial growth factor; PlGF: placental growth factor; VEGFR-1: vascular endothelial growth factor receptor-1; VEGFR-2: vascular endothelial growth factor receptor-2; HIF-1α: hypoxia-inducible factor-1α.

The results of the path analysis test showed that there was a significant direct effect (p=0.035) HIF-1α expression on VEGF expression with an effect coefficient of -0.545. Likewise, there was a significant direct effect (p=0.026) of HIF-1α expression on PlGF expression with an effect coefficient of -0.603. VEGF expression had no direct effect on VEGFR-1 expression (p=0.886), but had a direct effect on VEGFR-2 expression (p=0.000) with a coefficient of effect of 0.748. There was a significant direct effect (p=0.000) PlGF expression on VEGFR-1 expression with an effect coefficient of 0.937 shown. VEGFR-1 expression had no direct effect on birth weight (p=0.464), but VEGFR-2 expression had a significant direct effect (p=0.020) on birth weight with an effect coefficient of 0.743.

Comparison test of angiogenic factor in the placenta and maternal plasma

The mean maternal plasma VEGF levels in the case and control groups were almost the same; statistical results showed no statistically significant difference (p=0.769). The mean maternal plasma PlGF, VEGFR-1, VEGFR-2 level in the case group was lower than those in the control group. Statistically, there is a significant difference (p=0.026; 0.044; 0.042, respectively). Similar to VEGF plasma level, the HIF-1α plasma levels in the case and control groups had values that were not much different, which showed no significant difference (p=0.402). The angiogenic factor level in the case and control group are presented in Figure 4.

Figure 4. Angiogenic factors level in maternal plasma.

Figure 4.

Panel A to E shows the angiogenic factors level in the maternal plasma using ELISA of VEGF, PlGF, VEGFR-1, VEGFR-2, and HIF-1α, respectively; VEGF: vascular endothelial growth factor; PlGF: placental growth factor; VEGFR-1: vascular endothelial growth factor receptor-1; VEGFR-2: vascular endothelial growth factor receptor-2; HIF-1α: hypoxia-inducible factor-1α.

Comparison test of the placenta and maternal plasma data

There was a significant difference in the mean expression of VEGF, PlGF, VEGFR-1, and VEGFR-2 placenta between the case and control groups. The mean value of placental VEGF, PlGF, VEGFR-1 and VEGFR-2 expression in the case group was lower than the mean in the control group. In addition, there was a significant difference in the mean placental HIF-1α expression between the case and the control groups. However, in contrast to other angiogenic factors, the mean placental HIF-1α expression in the case group was higher than the mean placental HIF-1α expression in the control group. The comparison of angiogenic factor expression in the placenta is shown in Table 4.

Table 4. The comparison test of angiogenic factors in the placenta and maternal plasma between case and control group.

Variable Case group (n=19)
Mean ± SD
Control group (n=14)
Mean ± SD
p-value
Placenta
(pixel 2)
Plasma Placenta
(pixel 2)
Plasma Placenta Plasma
VEGF 64,404 ± 28,942 51.04 ± 1.99 (pg/mL) 226,693 ± 39,025 50.82 ± 2.41 (pg/mL) 0.000 * 0.769 *
PlGF 22,814,440 ± 9,497,663 100.47 ± 10.72
(ng/mL)
84,693,238 ± 29,981,727 116.00 ± 26.19 (ng/mL) 0.000 * 0.026 *
VEGFR-1 107,444 ± 46,695 9.41 ± 3.86
(ng/mL)
213,410 ± 35,251 12.49 ± 4.57 (ng/mL) 0.000 * 0.044 *
VEGFR-2 96,968,870 ± 24,300,623 9271 ± 2419 (pg/mL) 167,673,566 ± 90,824,566 12257 ± 5482 (pg/mL) 0.015 ** 0.042 *
HIF-1α 80,375,094 ± 40,647,360 43.24 ± 20.19 (pg/mL) 25,286,646.1±27,238,953 44.94 ± 15.49 (pg/mL) 0.001 ** 0.402 **

Notes: *) T-test

**) Mann-Whitney test

SD=standard deviation.

There was no significant difference in the mean VEGF plasma levels between the case group and the control group. The mean value of VEGF plasma levels in the case group was slightly higher than the average VEGF level in the control group. However, this increase was not statistically significant. Similar to VEGF, the mean plasma levels of HIF-1α between case and control groups did not show a significant difference. However, HIF-1α in the case group was slightly lower than the mean HIF-1α expression in the control group. The plasma levels of PlGF, VEGFR-1, and VEGFR-2 between the case group and the control group showed significant differences. The mean levels of PlGF, VEGFR-1, and VEGFR-2 in the case group were lower than in the control group. The comparison of maternal plasma angiogenic factor levels is shown in Table 4.

Discussion

All malaria-positive samples in this study were identified either using maternal peripheral blood smear examination or PCR examination caused by Plasmodium vivax ( Table 1). Microscopic examination of blood smears only detected 7 of the 19 positive samples (36.84%). On the other hand, 12 blood samples were detected positively by PCR examination (63.16%). The results showed that PCR is more sensitive than blood smear examination. Malaria detection using microscopic examination was only able to detect Plasmodium at levels of 20 parasites/μL and was influenced by the experience of the observer and the quality of staining blood smears. PCR is the most sensitive method because it can detect 2-6 parasites/μL 4245 . It was surprising that all the histopathological preparations of 19 samples showed pigment/hemozoin depositions with or without infected erythrocytes or monocytes accumulation, indicated that all of the samples had already been infected as active acute, active chronic, and past infection 4649 . In this study, all positive samples did not show signs and symptoms of malaria, so all positive samples were subclinical infections.

Investigation of acute infection through maternal peripheral blood smear examination cannot fully describe the history of maternal exposure to malaria during pregnancy. The absence of parasitemia on peripheral blood smear examination does not always represent a malaria-free placental infection 48 . In this study, acute, chronic, and past malaria infection in pregnancy may be related to placental histopathological changes' adverse consequences. In cases of subclinical malaria, placental histopathological changes might be found due to most of the sub-populations of parasites sequestered in several organs that serve as reservoirs of the parasite, such as the spleen and placenta, cause other inflammatory reactions 43, 48, 50, 51 .

Characteristics of subjects and their distribution

Characteristics of mothers. In this study, there were significant differences in the mean hemoglobin levels in women infected with Plasmodium vivax during pregnancy compared to the group of women who were not infected. At the same time, gestational age, maternal age, and leukocyte count showed no significant difference. The average hemoglobin level of pregnant women infected with malaria was 1.22 g/dL lower than the control group (mean ± standard deviation [SD]; 9.88±0.62 vs. 11.10±1.20, p=0.000). This finding aligned with several previous studies, which also shown that vivax malaria infection is associated with maternal anemia, abortion, premature birth, congenital malaria, and other severe complications 36, 5256 . Single Plasmodium vivax infection during pregnancy had a significant association with a twofold increased risk of maternal anemia compared to the group of mothers who did not experience malaria infection 36, 57 . The occurrence of maternal anemia is closely correlated with nutritional status 36 . However, one of the other risk factors that can increase anemia in pregnant women with Plasmodium vivax infection is young age pregnancy 58 . In this study, the mean age of pregnant women in the case group was lower than the control group (mean ± SD; 27.68 ± 7.21 vs. 32.21 ± 6.25, p = 0.076); there was no significant difference. This factor may be considered one of the critical risk factors in the subsequent study involving many subjects.

The parity distribution in the case group was mainly primiparity (11/19; 57.9%), while in the control group, the highest number was mothers with third parity (6/14; 42.9%). This result has a distribution pattern similar to Bardaji et al. In their study, most malaria pregnant women were primigravida, and there was a tendency to decrease malaria prevalence as gravidity increased 35 . In a study of Karen women in Thailand involving a comparable number of participants, Plasmodium vivax was more common in primigravidas than in multigravida, and this was associated with anemia and an increased risk of low birth weight/LBW 53 .

Both case and control groups showed no significant difference (mean ± SD: 39.47±1.39 vs. 38.64±0.84, p=0.078) in gestational age, but all participants gave birth at term. In the study of Bardaji et al., it was found that the average gestational age was 38.6 weeks, with 12.6% of all participants giving birth prematurely (<37 weeks) 35 . From the results of their study, it cannot be concluded that there is a related relationship because it requires a joint analysis with other factors such as the severity of malaria infection, the onset of malaria infection, and pregnancy outcomes, which in this case includes the baby's birth weight. As in this study, all infants were born at term but had a significant effect of small for gestational age with malaria infection status in the form of the chronic active or previous history of malaria.

Characteristics of babies. This study showed a significant difference in the mean Δ 10th percentile growth curve of birth weight between the case group. However, there were no significant differences in the average birth weight of the baby, the length of the baby's birth weight, head circumference, upper arm circumference, chest circumference, Apgar score, placental weight, placenta size, and hemoglobin levels. However, the baby's mean hemoglobin level of the case group was 1.39 g/dL lower than the control group. The result was consistent with a previous study, which reported that single-episode of P. vivax infection during pregnancy was associated with a significant reduction in neonatal birth weight and maternal hemoglobin levels 33 . The results of the meta-analysis study also stated that there was an increased risk of 1-2 times the occurrence of LBW in pregnant women infected with malaria compared to those who were not infected 59 .

Meanwhile, babies in both the case and control groups were included in LBW criteria, so it is not yet known whether the leading cause of LBW in the case group is influenced by the main factor of Plasmodium vivax infection, as in the previous studies 33, 58 . While according to Bardaji et al., no direct relationship between Plasmodium vivax infection and an increased risk of LBW but stated that Plasmodium vivax infection during pregnancy is closely associated with maternal anemia, where this condition may harm the health of the newborn 35 . In addition, maternal anemia is a risk factor for the occurrence of LBW with an odds ratio (OR) value of 1.23 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.06–1.43) 60 .

The results showed significant differences in the LBW leukocyte count parameters in the case and control groups (mean ± SD: 12.70 x 10 3±2.81/μL vs. 10.24 x 10 3±2.11/μL, p<0.05). In general, the range of leukocyte count values in newborns can range from 10,000-26,000/μL, which is also highly dependent on the time of sampling 61 . Meanwhile, the results of the leukocyte count in newborns at Bantul Hospital, Indonesia, in 195 infants showed an average leukocyte count of 14.62 x 10 3±3.49/μL 62 . The leukocyte count in newborns in the case and control groups showed values within normal limits, with the leukocyte count in the case group significantly higher than the control group. Several factors can increase the leukocyte count in newborns, including infection, inflammation, medication history, and stress 6365 .

Sequestration of hemozoin, infected erythrocytes, and monocytes in histopathology result

Sequestration is the attachment of infected erythrocytes to host cells associated with severe malaria, such as cerebral malaria and malaria in pregnancy. Sequestration occurs in the capillaries and post-capillary venules of specific organs such as the brain, lungs, and placenta. Sequestration correlates with mechanical obstruction of blood flow in the microvasculature and the activation of vascular endothelial cells, leading to pathological outcomes. Some parasitic and host proteins as ligands and receptors for sequestration have been identified and explored further 66 .

Heretofore, the sequestration phenomenon only occurred in Plasmodium falciparum infection 46, 67, 68 . Interestingly, none of the subjects in this study were infected with Plasmodium falciparum, but instead, hemozoin depositions were found in all 19 positive samples, while Plasmodium vivax infected erythrocyte sequestrations were found in some samples. The result indicates that the Plasmodium vivax could cause sequestration of infected erythrocytes. Submicroscopic placental infection of Plasmodium vivax confirmed by placental histopathology indicates that the Plasmodium vivax can be selectively sequestered in the placenta even at low densities in peripheral blood 69 . The finding of Plasmodium vivax-infected erythrocytes sequestration was also mentioned by Carvalho et al. through an ex vivo study, which found that Plasmodium vivax-infected erythrocytes could adhere to the placental tissue. This study also demonstrated the cytoadherence of Plasmodium vivax-infected erythrocytes on endothelial cells by in vitro approach and was known to have the same strength as cytoadherence of Plasmodium falciparum-infected erythrocytes 29 . Toda et al. found that Plasmodium vivax-infected reticulocytes could bind to human spleen fibroblasts (hSF). The binding involves the NF-kB signaling pathway transcription factor by plasma-derived extracellular vesicles that act as cargo for the Plasmodium vivax parasite. This process facilitates the expression of ICAM-1 on the surface of hSF as a receptor for Plasmodium vivax sequestration 51 . Other evidence supporting placental malaria due to other non-falciparum Plasmodium species is a submicroscopic infection of Plasmodium malariae and Plasmodium ovale in the placenta confirmed by PCR of placental blood samples. Detection of Plasmodium malariae infection was higher in placental blood samples than in peripheral blood samples, indicating a possibility of Plasmodium malariae binding affinity to the placenta. However, the study of non-falciparum placental infection was not supported by histopathological examination of the placenta 70 .

Malaria infection causes changes in the placenta structure in the form of hemozoin deposition and an increase in monocyte infiltration in the intervillous space, which interferes with maternal-fetal circulation 48 . Sequestration of infected erythrocytes, hemozoin deposition, and monocyte infiltration in placental histopathology are the main signs of placental malaria 12, 71, 72 . The pathomechanism of sequestration of infected erythrocytes in the placenta is clearly described in Plasmodium falciparum infection. However, Plasmodium vivax, which has been considered to cause a mild latent infection than Plasmodium falciparum, has also been reported to cause placental malaria. Histopathological changes of placental malaria due to Plasmodium falciparum can show a different representation of placental malaria due to Plasmodium vivax. However, these differences are not delineated yet 48 . The histopathological appearance of the placenta due to Plasmodium vivax infection is similar to that of Plasmodium falciparum. Plasmodium vivax had also demonstrated the sequestration mechanism of infected erythrocytes in placental tissue structures 49, 73 . These findings are consistent with the results of this study.

Several mechanisms can explain the Plasmodium vivax-infected erythrocytes sequestration phenomenon. First, the Plasmodium vivax-infected erythrocytes sequestration can occur under low shear stress conditions in the placental intervillous space and causes a local inflammatory process of the placenta 31 . Second, Plasmodium vivax lacks surface proteins, such as Plasmodium falciparum Erythrocyte Membrane Protein-1 (PfEMP-1) called Variant Surface Antigen-2-CSA (VAR2CSA) for adhesion and sequestration of CSA in the placental intervillous space 74, 75 . However, the Plasmodium vivax genome contains a subtelomeric multigene family called VIR proteins. VIR proteins can mediate the adhesion of infected erythrocytes to ICAM-1 by VIR14 and the CSA by VIR2 and VIR24. The bindings are speculative and require further research 73, 74, 76 . The discovery of VIR binding in ICAM-1 and CSA proved the presence of Plasmodium vivax sequestration in the previous study 29 . The third mechanism that can explain the sequestration of Plasmodium vivax is the formation of rosettes by interacting with the Glycophorin C receptor present on normal erythrocytes, which has the adhesive power as in Plasmodium falciparum. However, further research is needed to determine the specific mechanism of rosette formation 73, 77, 78 .

On histopathological examination of the placenta, it was found that pigment/hemozoin depositions were trapped in the fibrin or freely circulating in the intervillous space and monocyte infiltration in all 19 positive samples. This finding indicates that the mother had experienced malaria infection during her pregnancy 46, 79 . The presence of pigment/hemozoin and monocyte depositions in the placenta indicates that malaria infection does not occur in late pregnancy. The infection process has occurred long enough to cause deposition and accumulation of inflammatory cells in the placenta acquired early in pregnancy or before pregnancy 69, 70 . However, the time required for the appearance of placental malaria is not known and requires further research.

The placental expression and plasma level of VEGF, PlGF, VEGFR-1, VEGFR-2, and HIF-1α in placenta malaria

Vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF). In this study, VEGF expression in the placenta of the case group was lower than in the control group. In the case and control groups, VEGF expression was more abundant in trophoblast cells in the placental villi than in the intervillous space. VEGF expression in the case group placenta was significantly lower than in the control group (p=0.00). Expression of VEGF placental IUGR was inconsistent between several studies that have been carried out. The results of this study are consistent with several studies, which reported a decrease in VEGF expression accompanied by increased placental PlGF expression of IUGR 80, 81 . Several studies reported an increase in the expression of VEGF, VEGFA, bFGF, and eNOS in the IUGR placenta due to placental hypoxia 8284 . However, another study concluded that there was no decrease in VEGF expression of IUGR compared to normal placentas 85, 86 . In addition, VEGF expression and plasma VEGF levels could not predict late-onset preeclampsia, small gestational age (SGA), or premature delivery 87 .

Plasma VEGF levels in the case group were lower and not significantly different from the control group in this study (p=0.769). The findings were consistent with several studies, which found that maternal plasma VEGF levels of IUGR and SGA did not show significant differences compared to preeclampsia 88 or normal pregnancy 89 . Moreover, Tang et al. reported that maternal plasma VEGF levels in pregnancies with preeclampsia were lower than normal pregnancies and were associated with impaired fetal growth 90 . However, Boras et al. found that maternal free plasma levels of VEGF and sFlt-1 were higher in IUGR than in normal pregnancies 91 .

Besides being involved in the regulation of development and vascular remodeling during placentation, VEGF, PlGF, and Angiopoietin are also involved in trophoblast invasion. Failure of trophoblast invasion and remodeling of the spiral arteries causes placental hypoxia, which involves pregnancy complications such as preeclampsia and IUGR 92 , causing the fetus to experience hypoxia. At low oxygen concentrations, there should be an increase in VEGF expression. The mechanism that can explain the decrease in placental VEGF expression in this study is increased soluble VEGFR-1 (sFlt-1) in the placental intervillous space. sFlt-1 is a form of the VEGFR-1 gene that is physiologically secreted by the placenta. sFlt-1 physiologically binds to free VEGF and PlGF with strong affinity and inhibits their binding to VEGFR-1 and VEGFR-2 receptors, thereby decreasing placental VEGF and PlGF expression. HIF-1α regulates placental sFlt-1 expression; under conditions of placental hypoxia, there will be an increase in placental sFlt-1 expression 93, 94 . The sFlt-1 expression was also reported to increase in IUGR placentas 95, 96 . An in vivo study in transgenic mice by Vogtmann et al. found that an increase in placental sFlt1 would disrupt the vascular endothelial growth factor signalling pathway, resulting in decreased expression of VEGFA, VEGFB, PlGF, and increased the expression of band and mRNA of Caspase-9 97 . Placental hypoxia will increase placental VEGF expression 92, 93 , but the source of circulating VEGF is not only from the placenta but also from another organs 98 , then those can explain why the plasma levels of VEGF in the case group and the control group were not different.

The finding of decreased placental VEGF expression in this study can describe early-onset IUGR because of placental hypoxia, correlated with placental HIF-1α expression. However, histo-morphological studies of placental villi were not performed to confirm the dominance of branching angiogenesis in placental villi. Early-onset IUGR in this study can be caused by malaria infection before pregnancy or early pregnancy 46 , as evidenced in this study.

Placental growth factor (PlGF). The placenta is the only organ that produces PlGF 98 . PlGF has a significant function in the activation, proliferation, and migration of endothelial cells and trophoblast invasion into the maternal spiral arteries 99 . In this study, the expression of PlGF in the placenta in the case group was lower than the control group (p=0.00). In the case group, PlGF expression was more abundant in trophoblast cells in the placental villi, whereas in the control group, it was primarily found in the intervillous space. Studies on PlGF expression in placental IUGR had also shown inconsistent results. The results of this study support previous studies which reported that placental PlGF expression in severe IUGR was significantly lower than in controls and inhibition of PlGF/Flt-1 signalling will interfere with trophoblast proliferation and migration 99101 . However, Alahakoon et al. found an increase in PlGF and KDR expression in IUGR and preeclampsia placentas 86 . It explained that hyperoxia conditions in IUGR due to impaired oxygen extraction to the fetus increase PlGF expression and decrease placental VEGF expression, with the consequence of reduced capillary branching and terminal villi resulting in placental dysfunction 92, 93, 102, 103 .

Placental hypoxia conditions that occur early in pregnancy result in a decrease in placental PlGF production by the syncytiotrophoblast, so PlGF expression and PlGF levels in maternal circulation decreases 92, 93, 100 . In this study, the plasma levels of PlGF in the case group were significantly lower than in the control group (p=0.026). Previous studies have also shown that plasma or plasma PlGF levels are lower in pregnancies with IUGR 95, 104, 105 in pregnancies with preeclampsia 97, 106108 and pregnancies with preeclampsia and IUGR 88, 90, 96, 109115 . Decreased maternal plasma PlGF levels in pregnancy complications due to defective placentation are associated with increased production of sFlt-1 in the ischemic placenta, which is then secreted into the maternal circulation 104, 106 . Furthermore, significantly lower PlGF levels in the case group indicate that the causes of IUGR in the two groups may be different. Malaria infection in the placenta causes the activation of complement C5a, which will stimulate the accumulation of monocytes to release sFlt-1 18 , explaining that the plasma levels of PlGF in the case group were significantly lower than the control group.

Vascular endothelial growth factor receptor (VEGFR)-1 and VEGFR-2. This study showed that VEGFR-1 expression in the placenta was lower in the case group than in the control group (p=0.00). VEGFR-1 expression was more abundant in trophoblast cells in the placental villi than in the intervillous space, both in the case and control group. VEGFR-1 is a receptor for VEGF and PlGF. Helske et al. found that VEGFR-1 expression was increased in preeclamptic and IUGR placentas compared with normal placentas. The up-regulated expression is not exactly found on all preeclamptic samples but may be associated with hypoxia and abnormal function of the placenta 116 . However, down-regulation of both receptors was also reported during mid-pregnancy with IUGR 117 .

In line with VEGFR-1, the expression of VEGFR-2 in the placenta of the case group was lower than the control group (p=0.015). In the case group and the control group, VEGFR-2 expression was more abundant in trophoblast cells in the placental villi. VEGFR-2 is a significant receptor for VEGF, plays a role in endothelial proliferation and normal vascular formation. In the placenta, the role of VEGFR-2 is to change trophoblasts into intravascular trophoblasts and form spiral arteries. VEGFR-2 is expressed in low amounts under hypoxic conditions because oxygen levels regulate VEGFR-2 expression. Placental VEGFR-2 and sFlt-1 expression was also reported to decrease in cases of preeclampsia 95, 118 .

In this study, plasma levels of VEGFR-1 in the case group were lower and significantly different with the control group (p=0.044) Anna et al. found that serum VEGFR-1 concentrations in women with IUGR were decreased, along with a decrease in PlGF. At low oxygen concentrations, PlGF and VEGFR-1 levels decrease 119 . Besides that, serum levels of VEGFR-2 in the case group were lower and significantly different with the control group (p=0.042). Chaiworapongsa et al. found soluble VEGFR-2 (sVEGFR2) concentration increased in women with preeclamptic pregnancies and interpreted that sVEGFR-2 in maternal plasma could reflect endothelial cell function 120 .

Hypoxia-inducible factor-1α (HIF-1α). This study revealed that the expression of HIF-1α in the placenta of the case group was higher than the control group (p=0.001). In the case group and the control group, HIF-1α expression was more commonly found in trophoblast cells in the placental villi. There are not many studies in humans examining HIF-1α expression in the placenta of pregnancies with complications such as preeclampsia, IUGR, and SGA. The results of this study support an in vivo study on the IUGR mice model conducted by Robb et al., who found an increase in HIF-1α expression in the placenta 121 .

In this study, plasma levels of HIF-1α in the case group were lower and not significantly different with the control group (p=0.402). So far, studies of HIF-1α have been mainly carried out in placental tissue, as in the discussion on placental HIF-1α expression above. Azhur-Fabian et al. found elevated HIF-1α and p21 mRNA expression in all pregnancy plasma samples with hypoxia and IUGR and recommended them as markers for hypoxic pregnancy and/or IUGR 122 . In pregnancy, HIF-1α is expressed in the placenta early in normal pregnancy and throughout pregnancy under hypoxic conditions 123 . Those explain no statistically significant difference in plasma HIF-1α levels in the case and control groups.

Under normoxic conditions, HIF-1α will undergo rapid degradation so that it is considered inactive. At low oxygen levels, HIF-1α will regulate genes that control cell growth, differentiation, and metabolism. The active form of HIF-1α that was continuously exposed to cultured cells was shown to inhibit trophoblast differentiation. In placental IUGR, impaired invasion and remodelling of the spiral arteries result in placental ischemia throughout pregnancy because of the increased expression of HIF-1α. The increase in placental HIF-1α expression in this study represents early-onset IUGR. However, this study has not determined whether placental hypoperfusion causes hypoxia as the main factor causing the increase in HIF-1α because other factors such as reactive oxygen species (ROS) and inflammation induced by nuclear factor kappa (NF-κB) can also modulate HIF-1α accumulation.

Association between low birth weight and VEGF, PlGF, VEGFR-1, VEGFR-2, HIF-1α expression in placenta

Path analysis revealed the effect of placental angiogenesis and HIF-1α transcription factors on LBW. From this analysis, it was seen that the signalling pathway from HIF-1α to placental VEGF expression, then from placental VEGF expression to placental VEGFR-2 expression, and from placental VEGFR-2 expression to LBW showed statistically significant results. In contrast, HIF-1α could not cause a direct effect on LBW (p=0.881). Placental VEGF expression significantly affected placental VEGFR-1 expression. The signalling pathway of HIF-1α significantly affected placental PlGF expression, then placental PlGF expression significantly affected placental VEGFR-1 expression, but this pathway did not significantly affect the incidence of LBW (p=0.504).

VEGF and VEGFR regulate vasculogenesis during early embryogenesis and angiogenesis in later stages of pregnancy. VEGF bind to VEGFR-1/Flt-1 and VEGFR-2/KDR, playing an essential role in physiological and pathological angiogenesis 124 . PlGF binds to the VEGFR-1 receptor, plays a role in angiogenesis in the later stages of pregnancy 125 . VEGFR-2 is the primary receptor mediating the pro-angiogenic effects of VEGF 126 . sFlt1, the free form of Flt-1, has a strong ability to bind to VEGFA, PlGF, and VEGFB. Because the trophoblast lies between the maternal and fetal vascular systems, it is thought that sFlt1 functions as a separator between the maternal and fetal circulations in the placenta by suppressing both excessive angiogenesis and abnormal vascular permeability. Therefore, under physiological conditions, sFlt1 levels are maintained in the suitable range. The increased expression of sFLT-1, triggered by hypoxic conditions, will bind to VEGF, causing disturbances in vasculogenesis and angiogenesis, leading to obstetric complications. Several studies have reported overexpression of sFlt1 and decreased expression of VEGFA in preeclamptic patients 127 .

In placental malaria infection, there is an accumulation of Plasmodium-infected erythrocytes in the intervillous space of the placenta. Several histopathological characteristics of placental malaria, including thickening of the basement membrane and infiltration of monocytes in the intervillous space of the placenta (intervillositis), can increase the resistance to oxygen transport across the placenta. Accumulation of inflammatory cells and infected erythrocytes can cause placental hypoxia due to oxygen consumption by these cells, in addition to decreased blood perfusion due to reduced effective surface area for feto-maternal exchange. Such placental dysfunction can result in stunted fetal growth, characterized by low birth weight babies 27 .

Increased expression of HIF-1α is a marker of placental hypoxia, which should increase the expression of VEGF, VEGFR-1, and VEGFR-2. Decreased expression of VEGFR, VEGFR-1, and VEGFR-2 is possible through increased sFlt-1 binding to VEGF with strong affinity. sFlt-1 of the placenta increases its expression under hypoxic conditions 93, 94 . Further studies are needed to prove this.

The pathway analysis results indicate a dysregulation of the angiogenic factor VEGF and its receptor VEGFR-2 due to the regulation of HIF-1α in placental malaria on the incidence of LBW. It can be interpreted that the occurrence of LBW in placental malaria due to the influence of angiogenesis factors VEGF and VEGFR-2, which are regulated by HIF-1α and are more significant than LBW in non-malaria cases.

Association between low birth weight and haemoglobin, PlGF levels, VEGFR-1 levels, and VEGFR-2 levels in plasma

The effect of plasma angiogenesis and HIF-1α transcription factors on the incidence of LBW was observed using binary logistic regression as bivariate analysis. Based on the results of the observational test of data in maternal plasma, four parameters were significantly different between the case group and the control group, namely: haemoglobin, PlGF levels, VEGFR-1 levels, and VEGFR-2 levels. It showed that haemoglobin levels were the most significant (p=0.010) in influencing the incidence of LBW, followed by plasma levels of PlGF (p=0.021) and plasma levels of VEGFR-1 (p=0.056). The plasma levels of VEGFR-2 did not affect the incidence of LBW (p=0.131).

The haematological effect of Plasmodium vivax malaria is anaemia with its consequent increased morbidity and mortality and more frequent in blood transfusions. Although the parasitemia of Plasmodium vivax malaria is lower than that of Plasmodium falciparum malaria, it can cause severe anaemia, as in Plasmodium falciparum malaria. Anaemia in Plasmodium vivax malaria can be explained by two mechanisms. First, production/transfer of infected and uninfected erythrocytes are more in Plasmodium vivax malaria, 34 uninfected erythrocytes for one infected erythrocyte (in Plasmodium falciparum malaria, the ratio is 8:1). Second, Plasmodium vivax-infected erythrocytes undergo more rapid deformity limiting erythrocytes that are expelled through the microvessels of the spleen during the 'spleen clearance' phase. In addition to these two mechanisms, activation of the immune system due to Plasmodium vivax infection increases the detection and removal of abnormal infected and uninfected erythrocytes 57 .

In this study, maternal anaemia significantly affected the incidence of LBW. Several publications also reported the same thing. Plasmodium vivax malaria infection in pregnant women in Bolivia was more at risk of anaemia and giving birth to low birth weight babies than pregnant women who were not infected 36 as well as in a multicenter study in an area of low malaria transmission 35 and Mangaluru, India 128 .

Based on the above discussion, in this study, it can be concluded that angiogenesis factors and HIF-1α transcription factors in placenta or in local environment play a more important role in the incidence of low birth weight than those in systemic. Those indicated that there is dysregulation of placental angiogenesis factors VEGF, PlGF, and their receptors VEGFR-1 and VEGFR-2, which is triggered by placental hypoxia conditions (marked by increased placental HIF-1α expression) during placental Plasmodium vivax infection.

Data availability

Underlying data

Figshare: HIF-1α REGULATED PATHOMECHANISM OF LOW BIRTH WEIGHT THROUGH ANGIOGENESIS FACTORS IN PLACENTAL Plasmodium vivax INFECTION. https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.16577468 41 .

This project contains the following underlying data:

  • -

    Raw Data.xlsx (ELISA Graph and Raw Data, Immunofluorescence Graph and Raw Data, Subject Characteristics, and Baby’s Characteristics Data)

  • -

    Figure 1A (Blood Smear Figure 1A)

  • -

    Figure 1B (Blood Smear Figure 1B)

  • -

    Figure 1C (Blood Smear Figure 1C)

  • -

    Figure 2A (VEGF immunofluorescence)

  • -

    Figure 2B (PlGF immunofluorescence)

  • -

    Figure 2C (VEGFR-1 immunofluorescence)

  • -

    Figure 2D (VEGFR-2 immunofluorescence)

  • -

    Figure 2E (HIF-α immunofluorescence)

  • -

    Figure 3 (Angiogenic Factor Expression Graph)

  • -

    Figure 4 (Angiogenic Factor Level in Maternal Plasma Graph)

  • -

    PCR Images 1-4 (Raw Gel Images of PCR test from maternal (1-3) and cord (4) blood samples)

Data are available under the terms of the Creative Commons Zero "No rights reserved" data waiver (CC0 1.0 Public domain dedication).

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to acknowledge and thank the Chairman of dr. T.C. Hiller Regional Hospital, Public Health Office of Sikka Regency, and Public Health Office of Nusa Tenggara Timur (NTT), Indonesia, for the permission and substantial support to this research. We also thanks to Tarina Widaningrum S.Si., MP. Ami Maghfironi, S.Si., and Wahyuda Ngatiril Lady S.Si., for their assistance in carrying out laboratory work.

Funding Statement

This work was supported by the PNBP Faculty of Medicine Universitas Brawijaya and Universitas Brawijaya (Contract Number 30/SK/UN10.7/PN/BPPM/2017).

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

[version 1; peer review: 2 approved with reservations]

References

  • 1. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC): Malaria's Impact Worldwide. CDC.2021. Reference Source [Google Scholar]
  • 2. Rijken MJ, McGready R, Boel ME, et al. : Malaria in pregnancy in the Asia-Pacific region. Lancet Infect Dis. 2012;12(1):75–88. 10.1016/S1473-3099(11)70315-2 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3. Kovacs SD, Rijken MJ, Stergachis A: Treating severe malaria in pregnancy: a review of the evidence. Drug Saf. 2015;38(2):165–81. 10.1007/s40264-014-0261-9 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4. WHO: World Malaria Report 2020. WHO.2020;73:1–4. Reference Source [Google Scholar]
  • 5. Conroy AL, Silver KL, Zhong K, et al. : Complement activation and the resulting placental vascular insufficiency drives fetal growth restriction associated with placental malaria. Cell Host Microbe. 2013;13(2):215–26. 10.1016/j.chom.2013.01.010 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6. Sharma L, Shukla G: Placental malaria: a new insight into the pathophysiology. Front Med (Lausanne). 2017;4:117. 10.3389/fmed.2017.00117 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7. Ministry of Health of the Republic of Indonesia: Malaria Elimination in Indonesia.2017. [Google Scholar]
  • 8. WHO Report: World Malaria Report 2017. World Health Organization.2017. Reference Source [Google Scholar]
  • 9. Sikka Regency Government: Profile of Sikka Regency.2017. Reference Source [Google Scholar]
  • 10. Kazwaini M, Laumalay HM, Prasetyawan FS, et al. : SISTEM SURVEILANS MALARIA DI PROVINSI NUSA TENGGARA TIMUR.2011. Reference Source [Google Scholar]
  • 11. Fitri LE, Jahja NE, Huwae IR, et al. : Congenital malaria in newborns selected for low birth-weight, anemia, and other possible symptoms in maumere, Indonesia. Korean J Parasitol. 2014;52(6):639–44. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12. Muehlenbachs A, Nabasumba C, McGready R, et al. : Artemether-lumefantrine to treat malaria in pregnancy is associated with reduced placental haemozoin deposition compared to quinine in a randomized controlled trial. Malar J. 2012;11(1):150. 10.1186/1475-2875-11-150 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13. Pehrson C, Mathiesen L, Heno KK, et al. : Adhesion of Plasmodium falciparum infected erythrocytes in ex vivo perfused placental tissue: a novel model of placental malaria. Malar J. 2016;15(1):292. 10.1186/s12936-016-1342-2 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14. Ayres Pereira M, Mandel Clausen T, Pehrson C, et al. : Placental sequestration of Plasmodium falciparum malaria parasites is mediated by the interaction between VAR2CSA and chondroitin sulfate A on syndecan-1. PLoS Pathog. 2016;12(8):e1005831. 10.1371/journal.ppat.1005831 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15. Talundzic E: Plasticity and diversity of the Plasmodium falciparum placental malaria antigen VAR2CSA. University of Georgia,2013. Reference Source [Google Scholar]
  • 16. Schlaudecker EP, Munoz FM, Bardají A, et al. : Small for gestational age: Case definition & guidelines for data collection, analysis, and presentation of maternal immunisation safety data. Vaccine. 2017;35(48 Pt A):6518–6528. 10.1016/j.vaccine.2017.01.040 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17. Ngai M, Weckman AM, Erice C, et al. : Malaria in pregnancy and adverse birth outcomes: new mechanisms and therapeutic opportunities. Trends Parasitol. 2020;36(2):127–37. 10.1016/j.pt.2019.12.005 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18. Conroy A, Serghides L, Finney C, et al. : C5a enhances dysregulated inflammatory and angiogenic responses to malaria in vitro: potential implications for placental malaria. PLoS One. 2009;4(3):e4953. 10.1371/journal.pone.0004953 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19. McDonald CR, Tran V, Kain KC: Complement activation in placental malaria. Front Microbiol. 2015;6:1460. 10.3389/fmicb.2015.01460 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20. Weckman AM, Ngai M, Wright J, et al. : The impact of infection in pregnancy on placental vascular development and adverse birth outcomes. Front Microbiol. 2019;10:1924. 10.3389/fmicb.2019.01924 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21. Singh PP, Bhandari S, Sharma RK, et al. : Association of angiopoietin dysregulation in placental malaria with adverse birth outcomes. Dis Markers. 2020;2020:6163487. 10.1155/2020/6163487 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22. Nevo O, Soleymanlou N, Wu Y, et al. : Increased expression of sFlt-1 in in vivo and in vitro models of human placental hypoxia is mediated by HIF-1. Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol. 2006;291(4):1085–93. 10.1152/ajpregu.00794.2005 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23. Rath G, Aggarwal R, Jawanjal P, et al. : HIF-1 alpha and placental growth factor in pregnancies complicated with preeclampsia: a qualitative and quantitative analysis. J Clin Lab Anal. 2016;30(1):75–83. 10.1002/jcla.21819 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24. Tal R, Shaish A, Barshack I, et al. : Effects of hypoxia-inducible factor-1alpha overexpression in pregnant mice: Possible implications for preeclampsia and intrauterine growth restriction. Am J Pathol. 2010;177(6):2950–62. 10.2353/ajpath.2010.090800 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25. Chen DB, Zheng J: Regulation of placental angiogenesis. Microcirculation. 2014;21(1):15–25. 10.1111/micc.12093 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26. Zimna A, Kurpisz M: Hypoxia-Inducible factor-1 in physiological and pathophysiological angiogenesis: Applications and therapies. Biomed Res Int. 2015;2015:549412. 10.1155/2015/549412 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27. Boeuf P, Tan A, Romagosa C, et al. : Placental hypoxia during placental malaria. J Infect Dis. 2008;197(5):757–65. 10.1086/526521 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28. Michalitsi V, Dafopoulos K, Gourounti K, et al. : Hypoxia-inducible factor-1α (HIF-1α) expression in placentae of women with iron deficiency anemia and β-thalassemia trait. J Matern Neonatal Med. 2015;28(4):470–4. 10.3109/14767058.2014.921672 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29. Carvalho BO, Lopes SCP, Nogueira PA, et al. : On the cytoadhesion of Plasmodium vivax-infected erythrocytes. J Infect Dis. 2010;202(4):638–47. 10.1086/654815 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30. Fernandez-Becerra C, Bernabeu M, Castellanos A, et al. : Plasmodium vivax spleen-dependent genes encode antigens associated with cytoadhesion and clinical protection. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2020;117(23):13056–65. 10.1073/pnas.1920596117 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31. Chotivanich K, Udomsangpetch R, Suwanarusk R, et al. : Plasmodium vivax adherence to placental glycosaminoglycans. PLoS One. 2012;7(4):e34509. 10.1371/journal.pone.0034509 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32. Costa FTM, Avril M, Nogueira PA, et al. : Cytoadhesion of Plasmodium falciparum-infected erythrocytes and the infected placenta: A two-way pathway. Braz J Med Biol Res. 2006;39(12):1525–36. 10.1590/s0100-879x2006001200003 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33. Pincelli A, Neves PAR, Lourenço BH, et al. : The Hidden Burden of Plasmodium vivax Malaria in Pregnancy in the Amazon: An Observational Study in Northwestern Brazil. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2018;99(1):73–83. 10.4269/ajtmh.18-0135 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34. Rayis DA, Ahmed MA, Omer EM, et al. : Plasmodium vivax malaria among pregnant women in Eastern Sudan. Asian Pacific J Trop Dis. 2016;6(6):421–3. 10.1016/S2222-1808(15)61058-1 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 35. Bardají A, Martínez-Espinosa FE, Arévalo-Herrera M, et al. : Burden and impact of Plasmodium vivax in pregnancy: A multi-centre prospective observational study. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2017;11(6):1–22. 10.1371/journal.pntd.0005606 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36. Brutus L, Santalla J, Schneider D, et al. : Plasmodium vivax malaria during pregnancy, Bolivia. Emerg Infect Dis. 2013;19(10):1605–11. 10.3201/eid1910.130308 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37. Olivier M, Van Den Ham K, Shio MT, et al. : Malarial pigment hemozoin and the innate inflammatory response. Front Immunol. 2014;5:25–10. 10.3389/fimmu.2014.00025 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists: Practice Bulletin No. 134: fetal growth restriction. Obs Gynecol. 2013;121(5):1122–33. 10.1097/01.AOG.0000429658.85846.f9 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39. Haksari EL, Lafeber HN, Hakimi M, et al. : Reference curves of birth weight, length, and head circumference for gestational ages in Yogyakarta, Indonesia. BMC Pediatr. 2016;16(1):188. 10.1186/s12887-016-0728-1 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40. Rahmah Z, Sasmito SD, Siswanto B, et al. : Parasitemia Induces High Plasma Levels of Interleukin-17 (IL-17) and Low Levels of Interleukin-10 (IL-10) and Transforming Growth Factor-ß (TGF-ß) in Pregnant Mice Infected with Malaria. Malays J Med Sci. 2015;22(3):25. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41. Prasetyorini N, Erwan NE, Sardjono TW, et al. : HIF-1α regulated pathomechanism of low birth weight through angiogenesis factors in placental Plasmodium vivax Infection. figshare. Journal contribution,2021. 10.6084/m9.figshare.16577468.v4 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 42. Moody A: Rapid diagnostic tests for malaria parasites. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2002;15(1):66–78. 10.1128/CMR.15.1.66-78.2002 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43. Harris I, Sharrock WW, Bain LM, et al. : A large proportion of asymptomatic Plasmodium infections with low and sub-microscopic parasite densities in the low transmission setting of Temotu Province, Solomon Islands: Challenges for malaria diagnostics in an elimination setting. Malar J. 2010;9(1):254. 10.1186/1475-2875-9-254 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44. Golassa L, Enweji N, Erko B, et al. : Detection of a substantial number of sub-microscopic Plasmodium falciparum infections by polymerase chain reaction: A potential threat to malaria control and diagnosis in Ethiopia. Malar J. 2013;12(1):352. 10.1186/1475-2875-12-352 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45. Berzosa P, De Lucio A, Romay-Barja M, et al. : Comparison of three diagnostic methods (microscopy, RDT, and PCR) for the detection of malaria parasites in representative samples from Equatorial Guinea.11 Medical and Health Sciences 1108 Medical Microbiology. Malar J. 2018;17(1):333. 10.1186/s12936-018-2481-4 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46. Rogerson SJ, Pollina E, Getachew A, et al. : Placental monocyte infiltrates in response to Plasmodium falciparum malaria infection and their association with adverse pregnancy outcomes. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2003;68(1):115–9. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47. Rogerson SJ, Hviid L, Duffy PE, et al. : Malaria in pregnancy: pathogenesis and immunity. Lancet Infect Dis. 2007;7(2):105–17. 10.1016/S1473-3099(07)70022-1 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48. Parekh FK, Davison BB, Gamboa D, et al. : Placental histopathologic changes associated with subclinical malaria infection and its impact on the fetal environment. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2010;83(5):973–80. 10.4269/ajtmh.2010.09-0445 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49. López-Guzmán C, Carmona-Fonseca J: Submicroscopic placental malaria: Histopathology and expression of physiological process mediators. Rev Peru Med Exp Salud Publica. 2020;37(2):220–8. 10.17843/rpmesp.2020.372.4759 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50. Chaikitgosiyakul S, Rijken MJ, Muehlenbachs A, et al. : A morphometric and histological study of placental malaria shows significant changes to villous architecture in both Plasmodium falciparum and Plasmodium vivax infection. Malar J. 2014;13(1):1–13. 10.1186/1475-2875-13-4 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51. Toda H, Diaz-Varela M, Segui-Barber J, et al. : Plasma-derived extracellular vesicles from Plasmodium vivax patients signal spleen fibroblasts via NF-kB facilitating parasite cytoadherence. Nat Commun. 2020;11(1):2761. 10.1038/s41467-020-16337-y [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52. Rivera AJ, Rivera LL, Dubon JM, et al. : Effect of Plasmodium vivax malaria on perinatal health. Rev Honduras Pediátrica. 1993;16:7–10. [Google Scholar]
  • 53. Nosten F, Rogerson SJ, Beeson JG, et al. : Malaria in pregnancy and the endemicity spectrum: What can we learn? Trends Parasitol. 2004;20(9):425–32. 10.1016/j.pt.2004.06.007 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54. Kochar DK, Saxena V, Singh N, et al. : Plasmodium vivax malaria. Emerg Infect Dis. 2005;11(1):132–4. 10.3201/eid1101.040519 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55. Rodriguez-Morales AJ, Sanchez E, Vargas M, et al. : Pregnancy outcomes associated with Plasmodium vivax malaria in northeastern Venezuela. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2006;74(5):755–7. 10.4269/ajtmh.2006.74.755 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56. Carvalho BO, Matsuda JS, Luz SL, et al. : Gestational malaria associated to Plasmodium vivax and Plasmodium falciparum placental mixed-infection followed by foetal loss: a case report from an unstable transmission area in Brazil. Malar J. 2011;10(1):178. 10.1186/1475-2875-10-178 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57. Douglas NM, Anstey NM, Buffet PA, et al. : The anaemia of Plasmodium vivax malaria. Malar J. 2012;11:135. 10.1186/1475-2875-11-135 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58. Poespoprodjo JR, Fobia W, Kenangalem E, et al. : Adverse pregnancy outcomes in an area where multidrug-resistant Plasmodium vivax and Plasmodium falciparum infections are endemic. Clin Infect Dis. 2008;46(9):1374–81. 10.1086/586743 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59. Anggara FY, Rahardjo SS, Murti B: Meta-Analysis: The Effect of Malaria Infection on the Incidence of Low Birth Weight. J Matern Child Heal. 2020;5(5):549–62. Reference Source [Google Scholar]
  • 60. Figueiredo ACMG, Gomes-Filho IS, Silva RB, et al. : Maternal anemia and low birth weight: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Nutrients. 2018;10(5):601. 10.3390/nu10050601 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61. Milcic TL: The complete blood count. Neonatal Netw. 2010;29(2):109–15. 10.1891/0730-0832.29.2.109 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62. Hariningrum A: Rentang Nilai Hitung Darah Lengkap Bayi Baru Lahir di RSU PKU Muhammadiyah Bantul. Universitas Gadjah Mada;2014. Reference Source [Google Scholar]
  • 63. Manroe BL, Weinberg AG, Rosenfeld CR, et al. : The neonatal blood count in health and disease. I. Reference values for neutrophilic cells. J Pediatr. 1979;95(1):89–98. 10.1016/s0022-3476(79)80096-7 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64. Weinberg AG, Rosenfeld CR, Manroe BL, et al. : Neonatal blood cell count in health and disease. II. Values for lymphocytes, monocytes, and eosinophils. J Pediatr. 1985;106(3):462–6. 10.1016/s0022-3476(85)80681-8 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65. De Winter JP, Van Bel F: The effect of glucocorticosteroids on the neonatal blood count. Acta Paediatr Scand. 1991;80(2):159–62. 10.1111/j.1651-2227.1991.tb11827.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66. Franke-Fayard B, Fonager J, Braks A, et al. : Sequestration and Tissue Accumulation of Human Malaria Parasites: Can We Learn Anything from Rodent Models of Malaria? PLoS Pathog. 2010;6(9):e1001032. 10.1371/journal.ppat.1001032 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67. Ismail MR, Ordi J, Menendez C, et al. : Placental pathology in malaria: A histological, immunohistochemical, and quantitative study. Hum Pathol. 2000;31(1):85–93. 10.1016/s0046-8177(00)80203-8 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68. Suguitan Jr AL, Leke RG, Fouda G, et al. : Changes in the levels of chemokines and cytokines in the placentas of women with Plasmodium falciparum malaria. J Infect Dis. 2003;188(7):1074–82. 10.1086/378500 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69. Mayor A, Bardají A, Felger I, et al. : Placental infection with plasmodium vivax: A histopathological and molecular study. J Infect Dis. 2012;206(12):1904–10. 10.1093/infdis/jis614 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70. Doritchamou JYA, Akuffo RA, Moussiliou A, et al. : Submicroscopic placental infection by non- falciparum Plasmodium spp. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2018;12(2):e0006279. 10.1371/journal.pntd.0006279 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71. Carmona-Fonseca J, Arango E, Maestre A: Placental malaria in Colombia: Histopathologic findings in Plasmodium vivax and P. falciparum infections. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2013;88(6):1093–101. 10.4269/ajtmh.12-0363 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72. Souza RM, Ataíde R, Dombrowski JG, et al. : Placental Histopathological Changes Associated with Plasmodium vivax Infection during Pregnancy. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2013;7(2):e2071. 10.1371/journal.pntd.0002071 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73. Totino PR, Lopes SC: Insights into the Cytoadherence Phenomenon of Plasmodium vivax: The Putative Role of Phosphatidylserine. Front Immunol. 2017;8:1148. 10.3389/fimmu.2017.01148 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 74. Requena P, Rui E, Padilla N, et al. : Plasmodium vivax VIR Proteins Are Targets of Naturally-Acquired Antibody and T Cell Immune Responses to Malaria in Pregnant Women. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2016;10(10):e0005009. 10.1371/journal.pntd.0005009 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 75. Zakama AK, Ozarslan N, Gaw SL: Placental Malaria. Curr Trop Med Rep. 2020;7(4):1–10. 10.1007/s40475-020-00213-2 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 76. Bernabeu M, Lopez FJ, Ferrer M, et al. : Functional analysis of Plasmodium vivax VIR proteins reveals different subcellular localizations and cytoadherence to the ICAM-1 endothelial receptor. Cell Microbiol. 2012;14(3):386–400. 10.1111/j.1462-5822.2011.01726.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 77. Marín-Menéndez A, Bardají A, Martínez-Espinosa FE, et al. : Rosetting in Plasmodium vivax: A Cytoadhesion Phenotype Associated with Anaemia. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2013;7(4):e2155. 10.1371/journal.pntd.0002155 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 78. Albrecht L, Lopes SCP, da Silva ABIE, et al. : Rosettes integrity protects Plasmodium vivax of being phagocytized. Sci Rep. 2020;10(1):16706. 10.1038/s41598-020-73713-w [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 79. Mens PF, Bojtor EC, Schallig HD: Molecular interactions in the placenta during malaria infection. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2010;152(2):126–32. 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2010.05.013 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 80. Khaliq A, Li XF, Shams M, et al. : Localisation of placenta growth factor (PIGF) in human term placenta. Growth Factors. 1996;13(3–4):243–50,color plates I-II,pre.bk cov. 10.3109/08977199609003225 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 81. Lyall F, Young A, Boswell F, et al. : Placental expression of vascular endothelial growth factor in placentae from pregnancies complicated by pre-eclampsia and intrauterine growth restriction does not support placental hypoxia at delivery. Placenta. 1997;18(4):269–76. 10.1016/s0143-4004(97)80061-6 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 82. Chen Q, Schlichtherle M, Wahlgren M: Molecular aspects of severe malaria. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2000;13(3):439–50. 10.1128/CMR.13.3.439 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 83. Kinzler W, Kizhner O, Peltier M: 402: Role of angiogenesis-related genes in fetal growth restriction. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2008;199(6):S122. 10.1016/j.ajog.2008.09.431 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 84. Szentpéteri I, Rab A, Kornya L, et al. : Gene expression patterns of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF-A) in human placenta from pregnancies with intrauterine growth restriction. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2013;26(10):984–9. 10.3109/14767058.2013.766702 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 85. Tse JY, Lao TT, Chan CC, et al. : Expression of vascular endothelial growth factor in third-trimester placentas is not increased in growth-restricted fetuses. J Soc Gynecol Investig. 2001;8(2):77–82. 10.1177/107155760100800203 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 86. Alahakoon TI, Zhang W, Arbuckle S, et al. : Reduced angiogenic factor expression in intrauterine fetal growth restriction using semiquantitative immunohistochemistry and digital image analysis. J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2018;44(5):861–72. 10.1111/jog.13592 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 87. Andraweera PH, Dekker GA, Roberts CT: The vascular endothelial growth factor family in adverse pregnancy outcomes. Hum Reprod Update. 2012;18(4):436–57. 10.1093/humupd/dms011 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 88. Afzal I: Master of philosophy the levels of angiogenic and anti-angiogenic molecule concentrations in pregnancy based disorders in the maternal and fetal.2012. [Google Scholar]
  • 89. Wallner W, Sengenberger R, Strick R, et al. : Angiogenic growth factors in maternal and fetal serum in pregnancies complicated by intrauterine growth restriction. Clin Sci (Lond). 2007;112(1):51–7. 10.1042/CS20060161 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 90. Tang Y, Ye W, Liu X, et al. : VEGF and sFLT-1 in serum of PIH patients and effects on the foetus. Exp Ther Med. 2019;17(3):2123–8. 10.3892/etm.2019.7184 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 91. Borras D, Perales-Puchalt A, Ruiz Sacedón N, et al. : Angiogenic growth factors in maternal and fetal serum in pregnancies complicated with intrauterine growth restriction. J Obstet Gynaecol. 2014;34(3):218–20. 10.3109/01443615.2013.834304 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 92. Gourvas V, Dalpa E, Vrachnis N, et al. : Placental angiogenesis and fetal growth restriction. From Preconception to Postpartum.2012;179. 10.5772/37879 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 93. Arroyo JA, Winn VD: Vasculogenesis and angiogenesis in the IUGR placenta. Semin Perinatol. Elsevier,2008;32(3):172–7. 10.1053/j.semperi.2008.02.006 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 94. Tang L, He G, Liu X, et al. : Progress in the understanding of the etiology and predictability of fetal growth restriction. Reproduction. 2017;153(6):R227–40. 10.1530/REP-16-0287 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 95. Nevo O, Many A, Xu J, et al. : Placental expression of soluble fms-like tyrosine kinase 1 is increased in singletons and twin pregnancies with intrauterine growth restriction. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2008;93(1):285–92. 10.1210/jc.2007-1042 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 96. Tsatsaris V, Goffin F, Munaut C, et al. : Overexpression of the soluble vascular endothelial growth factor receptor in preeclamptic patients: pathophysiological consequences. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2003;88(11):5555–63. 10.1210/jc.2003-030528 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 97. Vogtmann R, Kühnel E, Dicke N, et al. : Human sFLT1 leads to severe changes in placental differentiation and vascularization in a transgenic hsFLT1/rtTA FGR mouse model. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2019;10:165. 10.3389/fendo.2019.00165 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 98. Cerdeira AS, Karumanchi SA: Angiogenic factors in preeclampsia and related disorders. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Med. 2012;2(11):a006585. 10.1101/cshperspect.a006585 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 99. Joó JG, Rigó J Jr, Börzsönyi B, et al. : Placental gene expression of the placental growth factor (PlGF) in intrauterine growth restriction. J Matern Neonatal Med. 2017;30(12):1471–5. 10.1080/14767058.2016.1219993 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 100. Wu WB, Xu YY, Cheng WW, et al. : Decreased PGF may contribute to trophoblast dysfunction in fetal growth restriction. Reproduction. 2017;154(3):319–29. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 101. Ravikumar G, Mukhopadhyay A, Mani C, et al. : Placental expression of angiogenesis-related genes and their receptors in IUGR pregnancies: correlation with fetoplacental and maternal parameters. J Matern Neonatal Med. 2020;33(23):3954–61. 10.1080/14767058.2019.1593362 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 102. Ahmed A, Perkins J: Angiogenesis and intrauterine growth restriction. Baillieres Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2000;14(6):981–98. 10.1053/beog.2000.0139 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 103. Burton GJ, Charnock-Jones DS, Jauniaux E: Regulation of vascular growth and function in the human placenta. Reproduction. 2009;138(6):895–902. 10.1530/REP-09-0092 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 104. Benton SJ, McCowan LM, Heazell AEP, et al. : Placental growth factor as a marker of fetal growth restriction caused by placental dysfunction. Placenta. 2016;42:1–8. 10.1016/j.placenta.2016.03.010 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 105. Komwilaisak R, Tangkiratichai P: Maternal serum angiogenic growth factors in intrauterine growth restriction versus normal pregnancies. J Med Assoc Thai. 2017;100(2):119–24. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 106. Maynard SE, Venkatesha S, Thadhani R, et al. : Soluble Fms-like Tyrosine Kinase 1 and Endothelial Dysfunction in the Pathogenesis of Preeclampsia. Pediatr Res. 2005;57(5 Pt 2):1R–7R. 10.1203/01.PDR.0000159567.85157.B7 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 107. Vrachnis N, Kalampokas E, Sifakis S, et al. : Placental growth factor (PlGF): A key to optimizing fetal growth. J Matern Neonatal Med. 2013;26(10):995–1002. 10.3109/14767058.2013.766694 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 108. Rădulescu C, Bacârea A, Huțanu A, et al. : Placental Growth Factor, Soluble fms-Like Tyrosine Kinase 1, Soluble Endoglin, IL-6, and IL-16 as Biomarkers in Preeclampsia. Mediators Inflamm. 2016;2016:3027363. 10.1155/2016/3027363 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 109. Bersinger NA, Ødegård RA: Serum levels of macrophage colony stimulating, vascular endothelial, and placenta growth factor in relation to later clinical onset of pre-eclampsia and a small-for-gestational age birth. Am J Reprod Immunol. 2005;54(2):77–83. 10.1111/j.1600-0897.2005.00290.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 110. Karumanchi SA, Epstein FH: Placental ischemia and soluble fms-like tyrosine kinase 1: Cause or consequence of preeclampsia? Kidney Int. 2007;71(10):959–61. 10.1038/sj.ki.5002281 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 111. Romero R, Nien JK, Espinoza J, et al. : A longitudinal study of angiogenic (placental growth factor) and anti-angiogenic (soluble endoglin and soluble vascular endothelial growth factor receptor-1) factors in normal pregnancy and patients destined to develop preeclampsia and deliver a small for gestational age neonate. J Matern Neonatal Med. 2008;21(1):9–23. 10.1080/14767050701830480 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 112. Ghosh SK, Raheja S, Tuli A, et al. : Can maternal serum placental growth factor estimation in early second trimester predict the occurrence of early onset preeclampsia and/or early onset intrauterine growth restriction? A prospective cohort study. J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2013;39(5):881–90. 10.1111/jog.12006 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 113. Laskowska M, Laskowska K, Oleszczuk J: aVEGF-A and its Soluble Receptor Type 1 (sVEGFR-1, sFlt-1) Concentrations in Pregnancies with Intrauterine Growth Restriction in the Presence or Absence of Preeclampsia. Res J Pharm Biol Chem Sci. 2015;6(2):319–25. Reference Source [Google Scholar]
  • 114. Chang YS, Chen CN, Jeng SF, et al. : The sFlt-1/PlGF ratio as a predictor for poor pregnancy and neonatal outcomes. Pediatr Neonatol. 2017;58(6):529–33. 10.1016/j.pedneo.2016.10.005 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 115. Naimi AA, Schmidt-fittschen M, Herzeg A, et al. : Is There Any Association Between the Angiogenic Factors Sflt-1 / Plgf And Intrauterine Growth Restriction in Patients with Preeclamsia? J Womens Health Gyn. 2019;6(3):1–7. Reference Source [Google Scholar]
  • 116. Helske S, Vuorela P, Carpén O, et al. : Expression of vascular endothelial growth factor receptors 1, 2 and 3 in placentas from normal and complicated pregnancies. Mol Hum Reprod. 2001;7(2):205–10. 10.1093/molehr/7.2.205 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 117. Regnault TR, de Vrijer B, Galan HL, et al. : The relationship between transplacental O 2 diffusion and placental expression of PlGF, VEGF and their receptors in a placental insufficiency model of fetal growth restriction. J Physiol. 2003;550(Pt 2):641–56. 10.1113/jphysiol.2003.039511 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 118. Nevo O, Lee DK, Caniggia I: Attenuation of VEGFR-2 expression by sFlt-1 and low oxygen in human placenta. PLoS One. 2013;8(11):e81176. 10.1371/journal.pone.0081176 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 119. Semczuk-Sikora A, Krzyzanowski A, Stachowicz N, et al. : [Maternal serum concentration of angiogenic factors: PIGF, VEGF and VEGFR-1 and placental volume in pregnancies complicated by intrauterine growth restriction]. Ginekol Pol. 2007;78(10):783–6. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 120. Chaiworapongsa T, Romero R, Gotsch F, et al. : Low maternal concentrations of soluble vascular endothelial growth factor receptor-2 in preeclampsia and small for gestational age. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2008;21(1):41–52. 10.1080/14767050701831397 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 121. Robb KP, Cotechini T, Allaire C, et al. : Inflammation-induced fetal growth restriction in rats is associated with increased placental HIF-1α accumulation. PLoS One. 2017;12(4):e0175805. 10.1371/journal.pone.0175805 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 122. Ashur-Fabian O, Yerushalmi GM, Mazaki-Tovi S, et al. : Cell free expression of hif1α and p21 in maternal peripheral blood as a marker for preeclampsia and fetal growth restriction. PLoS One. 2012;7(5):e37273. 10.1371/journal.pone.0037273 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 123. Pringle KG, Kind KL, Sferruzzi-Perri AN, et al. : Beyond oxygen: complex regulation and activity of hypoxia inducible factors in pregnancy. Hum Reprod Update. 2010;16(4):415–31. 10.1093/humupd/dmp046 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 124. Shibuya M: Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor (VEGF) and Its Receptor (VEGFR) Signaling in Angiogenesis: A Crucial Target for Anti- and Pro-Angiogenic Therapies. Genes Cancer. 2011;2(12):1097–105. 10.1177/1947601911423031 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 125. Wang Y, Zhao S: Vascular biology of the placenta.In: Colloquium Series on Integrated Systems Physiology: From Molecule to Function. Morgan & Claypool Life Sciences. 2010;1–98. 10.4199/C00016ED1V01Y201008ISP009 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 126. Otrock ZK, Mahfouz RA, Makarem JA, et al. : Understanding the biology of angiogenesis: review of the most important molecular mechanisms. Blood Cells Mol Dis. 2007;39(2):212–20. 10.1016/j.bcmd.2007.04.001 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 127. Kappou D, Sifakis S, Konstantinidou A, et al. : Role of the angiopoietin/Tie system in pregnancy (Review). Exp Ther Med. 2015;9(4):1091–6. 10.3892/etm.2015.2280 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 128. Chandrashekar VN, Punnath K, Dayanand KK, et al. : Malarial anemia among pregnant women in the south-western coastal city of Mangaluru in India. Informatics Med Unlocked. 2019;15:100159. 10.1016/j.imu.2019.02.003 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
F1000Res. 2023 Aug 29. doi: 10.5256/f1000research.77499.r182970

Reviewer response for version 1

Jean Claude Djontu 1

I enjoyed reading this manuscript (Nugrahanti Prasetyorini et al) examining the HIF-1α regulated pathomechanism of low birth weight through angiogenesis factors in placental Plasmodium vivax. 

I have no major concerns with the scientific approach, but the sample size is too small (n= 19), and cannot allow to drawn high evidence based conclusion. The results of the abstract are not clearly stated, thus do not support the conclusion.

In the method section, the authors should define the word “placental malaria” and add the the placental tissue histology as one of the tools for the placental malaria diagnosis.

Importantly, the manuscript is in need of a linguistic revision to correct grammar, sentence structure and other language issues. I encourage the authors to engage a copyeditor, preferably with a science background.

Is the work clearly and accurately presented and does it cite the current literature?

Yes

If applicable, is the statistical analysis and its interpretation appropriate?

Yes

Are all the source data underlying the results available to ensure full reproducibility?

Yes

Is the study design appropriate and is the work technically sound?

Partly

Are the conclusions drawn adequately supported by the results?

Partly

Are sufficient details of methods and analysis provided to allow replication by others?

Yes

Reviewer Expertise:

Immunology and molecular epidemiology of malaria

I confirm that I have read this submission and believe that I have an appropriate level of expertise to confirm that it is of an acceptable scientific standard, however I have significant reservations, as outlined above.

F1000Res. 2024 Jan 23.
Nabila Erina Erwan 1

Thank you for the comments. Here are the responses for the reviewer:

  • We acknowledge our limitation regarding the sample size, even though we conducted a total sampling collection for one year.

  • We will increase the sample size in further research to reveal the conclusion. 

  • We will clearly state the definition of placental malaria in the method section, specifically in the diagnosis of placental malaria subsection, as shown by the phrase "which is determined by placental tissue histopathological examination based on infected erythrocyte sequestration, monocyte infiltration, and hemozoin deposition (Rogerson et al., 2007)". 

  • We will proofread our manuscript before it is resubmitted as the new version.

F1000Res. 2023 Aug 24. doi: 10.5256/f1000research.77499.r192254

Reviewer response for version 1

Alberto Tobón-Castaño 1, Carolina López-Guzman 2

General recommendations

Introduction:

  • Organize the epidemiological information to create a stronger narrative thread for conveying the intended message. For instance, consider presenting the findings of P. falciparum and P. vivax cases by year to avoid jumping between different years or locations without a specific order.

  • Upon concluding the epidemiological figures, it is worthwhile to include a conclusion, which could be positioned at the end of the second paragraph. This conclusion could emphasize that, just as P. falciparum has been implicated in cases of gestational malaria and low birth weight, it is important to underscore that P. vivax also leads to similar outcomes. Moreover, cases among pregnant women might vary in frequency based on the specific study area or endemic region being referred to.

  • It is crucial to begin reinforcing the significance of P. vivax and its implications for infected pregnant women, as well as its association with the discovery of low birth weight, right from these initial two paragraphs.

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Term pregnancies? The gestational weeks of the included women are not specified.

  • Only reference is made to infants born with low birth weight and small for gestational age.

  • Recommendation for Definitions: Similar to the definition of placental malaria, it would be beneficial to first define gestational malaria and congenital malaria. This clarification would elucidate the reason for discussing analyses of peripheral blood and cord blood samples, respectively.

  • Terminology Recommendation: Clarify terms when referring to the presence of HZ in tissue; it's not about sequestration, but rather about its presence or absence. It can be found inside or outside the erythrocyte, either in a free or intraleukocytic form.

  • Reference Modification: Reference 40, which relates to the count of parasitized erythrocytes and addresses parasitemia, might not be the most suitable. We suggest finding a reference related to parasitemia in humans, considering the study's context, rather than using one related to mice.

Results Recommendation:

  • Regarding the diagnosis, all samples tested positive for P. vivax, and no positive samples were found for P. falciparum. Could a brief explanation be provided for this? Was it due to the endemic zone of the pregnant women? Did these results align with the diagnoses the pregnant women had at the time of inclusion?

  • Based on the histological analysis of the placentas, was the parasitemia detected in tissue exclusively from P. vivax? Were the infected erythrocytes located in the intervillous space or adhered to the villi? Do you have images that can illustrate how the parasitized erythrocytes were observed in the tissue? It might be beneficial to include a panel of parasites and/or hemozoin seen in the tissue in Figure 1.

  • Were the two cases of malaria diagnosed through cord blood classified as congenital malaria?

Recommendations: Table 1:

  • It is suggested to change the order in which the data is presented, beginning with Controls and then Cases. This order aligns with how the rest of the results are shown from (Fig 2, Fig 3, Fig 4).

  • It is recommended to standardize the table presentation. In Table 2, consider displaying Controls (N=14) and Cases (N=19), and remove the last row that shows the total number of cases.

Recommendation: Figure 1:

  • For Panel A, consider selecting a more representative and clear image of an amoeboid trophozoite of P. vivax.

  • In Panel B, the schizont appears truncated. Display a complete schizont instead.

  • In Panel C, if feasible, improve the photo quality. The current image seems to have a flash glare. It should be taken without flash and with improved focus, ideally using a microscope equipped with a camera.

Recommendation: Table 2:

  • It is recommended to change the order in which the data is presented, starting with Controls and then Cases, to maintain consistency with how the rest of the results are shown from (Fig 2, Fig 3, Fig 4).

  • Bold significant P-value data. Although more of a stylistic suggestion, it helps draw the reader's attention and focuses on those key points.

  • It is suggested to show the sociodemographic characteristics first, describing from the general features of the study population to the specific aspects centered around the molecular results. This approach moves from general to specific. Consider using this table as Table 1 and organizing the information based on the results section.

Recommendation: Table 3:

  • It is recommended to change the order in which the data is presented, starting with Controls and then Cases, to maintain the consistency shown in the rest of the results from (Fig 2, Fig 3, Fig 4).

  • Bold the data with significant P-values.

  • Note that the P-value for the t-test and the Mann-Whitney test is significant at a level below 0.05%, only for the parameters of leukocytes and the percentile growth curve. While the results make reference to the growth curve, there is no mention of the increase in leukocytes in the cases. This should also be mentioned, as it allows for further discussion later on. This effect is expected and aligns with what has been reported for P. falciparum infections or previous reports on P. vivax.

Recommendation: Table 4:

  • We recommend changing the order in which the data is presented, starting with Controls and then Cases, to maintain consistency with how the rest of the results are shown from (Fig 2, Fig 3, Fig 4).

  • Bold the data with significant P-values.

Subject Characteristics and Distribution:

  • We suggest placing this section first, before presenting other results related to molecular parameters such as angiogenic or hypoxia factors. It is important to describe the population characteristics of the subjects to whom various molecular parameters will be measured.

General Recommendations for Results:

  • Ensure consistency in the presentation of decimal figures. If you are using two decimal places in tables, maintain the same format in the text and avoid using three decimal places.

  • Incorporate these suggestions into the structure and formatting of your results section to enhance clarity and coherence.

Recommendation:

  • For the section "Association of Angiogenic Factors Expression with Birth Weight": Clarify the meaning of the expression values such as VEGF (64,404±28,942), PIGF (22,814,440±9,497,663), and others like VEGFR-1 (107,444±46,696). To understand the origin of these values, specify which parameter of the ImageJ software you are using. If you are using Pixel2, explain why you chose that parameter and not the mean fluorescence intensity (IntDent) as the expression value. This question applies to other sections where expression is discussed based on an Image analysis of photos.

  • The analyzes related to Low Birth Weight are not presented in detail; since all neonates had LBW, analyzes related to this outcome must be interpreted with care; it is not clear how these P values were obtained. For example: In relation to this :”VEGFR-1 expression had no direct effect on birth weight (p=0.464), but VEGFR-2 expression had a significant direct effect (p=0.020) on birth weight with an effect coefficient of 0.743”. It is not clear how this P values were obtained.

  • Figure 2 and Figure 3: Since Figure 2 and Figure 3 stem from the same analysis, we recommend placing statistical analyses alongside the IFIs images. This layout would enhance clarity for the reader.

  • We suggest using a scale bar in the photographs or specifying if they were captured using a mobile device or cell phone, which could explain the absence of a scale bar. This will provide clarity to the readers regarding the visual representation of the images.

  • Incorporate this recommendation into your article's image captions or descriptions to enhance the understanding of the visual content.

Summary recommendations

Introduction: It's important to organize the epidemiological information coherently to effectively convey the message. It's suggested to present the findings of P. falciparum and P. vivax cases per year to avoid jumping around in time or space. After presenting the epidemiological figures, it could be concluded that, like P. falciparum, P. vivax also leads to consequences in pregnant women, influenced by the geographical zone.

Focus on P. vivax and its Implications in Pregnant Women: From the initial paragraphs, emphasize the significance of P. vivax in pregnant women and its relation to low birth weight.

Inclusion Criteria: Specify the term of gestation. Clarify that the included women had babies with low birth weight and small for gestational age. Detail the case and control groups, diagnostic methods, and sources of blood samples.

Definitions and Terminology: Define "gestational malaria" and "congenital malaria" first. Clarify the term "presence" of HZ in tissue. Adjust reference 40 to make it relevant to the study context.

Results: Explain why all samples tested positive for P. vivax and none for P. falciparum. Clarify if this is due to the endemic zone. Detail whether tissue parasitemia was exclusively from P . vivax and the location of infected erythrocytes in the placenta. Add clear photos of parasitized erythrocytes in tissue in Figure 1. Clarify if cases diagnosed through cord blood were classified as congenital malaria.

Tables and Figures: Change the presentation order in tables to start with Controls. Standardize data presentation and highlight significant P-value values. Enhance the image quality in Figure 1, specifically in panels A, B, and C. Include statistical analyses alongside IFIs images in Figure 2 and Figure 3. Use a scale bar on photographs or explain if they were taken from a mobile device.

Presentation of Results: Highlight the sociodemographic characteristics of subjects initially and then address the molecular results. Organize information based on the study's focus.

General: Maintain consistency in presenting decimal figures in tables and text. Specify ImageJ analysis parameters in sections related to angiogenic factor expression.

Is the work clearly and accurately presented and does it cite the current literature?

Partly

If applicable, is the statistical analysis and its interpretation appropriate?

Partly

Are all the source data underlying the results available to ensure full reproducibility?

No

Is the study design appropriate and is the work technically sound?

Yes

Are the conclusions drawn adequately supported by the results?

Partly

Are sufficient details of methods and analysis provided to allow replication by others?

Yes

Reviewer Expertise:

Malaria Clinical and epidemiological aspects. Malaria immunology and molecular diagnosis.

We confirm that we have read this submission and believe that we have an appropriate level of expertise to confirm that it is of an acceptable scientific standard, however we have significant reservations, as outlined above.

F1000Res. 2024 Jan 23.
Nabila Erina Erwan 1

Introduction

  • We will reorganize the epidemiological data of malaria in our manuscript.

  • As suggested, we added the conclusion of the epidemiological data at the end of the second paragraph. The conclusion will be: "This finding might emphasize that P. vivax also causes comparable effects, as P. falciparum has been linked to low birth weight and gestational malaria cases. Furthermore, the prevalence of instances among pregnant mothers may differ depending on the particular research location or endemic region in question."

  • We mentioned the previous study in NTT, Indonesia, which showed evidence of P. vivax-associated low birth weight (LBW) in the second paragraph.

Inclusion criteria

  • All the participants were in term pregnancy, and the gestational age ranged from 37 to 42 weeks (ACOG, 2013). The characteristics of the subject are shown in Table 2. We will add the definition of the term pregnancies in the characteristic of the research participant subsection.

  • The inclusion criteria were pregnant women who gave birth to babies with low birth weight (LBW) and small for gestational age (SGA). The research subjects were mothers who gave birth to babies with low birth weight (< 2500 g) and small gestational age (birth weight < 10th percentile for gestational age at birth) to describe the occurrence of stunted fetal growth. 

  • Our study used a peripheral blood sample to determine gestational malaria and a cord blood sample to determine placental malaria. However, we don’t identify the presence of congenital malaria. We also used placental samples to identify the placenta's pathological properties and diagnose placental malaria.

  • We will change the term of hemozoin sequestration to hemozoin deposition (free hemozoin). Free hemozoin is found in extracellular form (outside the cell).

  • We will change the reference with a more suitable reference for human parasitemia counting.

Result Recommendation:

  • In Nusa Tenggara Timur, the most common species of Plasmodium is P. vivax, which mostly affects women (Fitri et al., 2014). The results align with the diagnoses of the pregnant women, which met the inclusion criteria.

  • The infected erythrocytes are located in the intervillous space, as in Figure 2.

  • The two cases, which are the infected erythrocytes found in cord blood, might not become congenital malaria because the parasite might not developed due to the presence of the IgG of the mother and the kind of fetal hemoglobin (HbF). The definitive diagnosis of congenital malaria is defined by the presence of infected erythrocytes in the peripheral blood of the fetus.

Recommendation: Table 1:

  • We changed the order of the data presented in Table 1.

  • We will edit the table presentation as suggested.

Recommendation: Figure 1:

  • For Panel A, this is the best figure among the blood slides.

  • For Panel B, most parasite morphology is not intact; it might be because the patients/subjects have antibodies against Plasmodium, characterized by no clinical symptoms of all the subjects (pregnant mother). This is the best figure among the blood slides.

  • For Panel C, this is the best figure among the blood slides.

Recommendation: Table 2:

  • We changed the order of the data in Table 2 and bolded the p-value data as suggested.

  • We switched the data in Table 2 into Table 1 and vice versa to be presented in the text as suggested.

Recommendation: Table 3:

  • We changed the order of the data in Table 3 and bolded the p-value data as suggested.

  • We added some discussion related to the laboratory findings of the baby in the discussion section.

Recommendation: Table 4:

  • We changed the order of the data in Table 4 and bolded the p-value data as suggested.

Subject Characteristics and Distribution:

  • We first presented the subject characteristics and distribution in the result and discussion section, followed by molecular parameters in the study.

General Recommendations for Results:

  • We will make sure of the consistency of decimal figures in the text.

Recommendation:

  • The meaning of expression values of angiogenic factors expression is a semi-quantification result of the immunofluorescence image using mean fluorescence intensity (IntDent) by Image J software.

  • The relationship between HIF-1a, VEGFR1, and VEGFR2 expression and birth weight was analyzed using path analysis, which describes the causal-effect relationship and the residual coefficient (e). From the model, an equation was obtained, which explained that there was no significant direct effect (p=0.99) between HIF-1∝ expression on the baby's birth weight, nor did VEGFR1 expression directly affect the baby's birth weight (p=0.46 ). However, the expression of VEGFR2 had a significant direct effect (p=0.02) on the baby's birth weight with an influence coefficient of 0.74.

  • As suggested, we merged Figures 2 and 3 to place the statistical analysis alongside the IFI images.

  • The figures were captured using a mobile device, which could explain the absence of a scale bar.

Summary Recommendations:

  • We have revised the manuscript as suggested by the reviewers, and a detailed response is explained in the above response points.

Associated Data

    This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

    Data Availability Statement

    Underlying data

    Figshare: HIF-1α REGULATED PATHOMECHANISM OF LOW BIRTH WEIGHT THROUGH ANGIOGENESIS FACTORS IN PLACENTAL Plasmodium vivax INFECTION. https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.16577468 41 .

    This project contains the following underlying data:

    • -

      Raw Data.xlsx (ELISA Graph and Raw Data, Immunofluorescence Graph and Raw Data, Subject Characteristics, and Baby’s Characteristics Data)

    • -

      Figure 1A (Blood Smear Figure 1A)

    • -

      Figure 1B (Blood Smear Figure 1B)

    • -

      Figure 1C (Blood Smear Figure 1C)

    • -

      Figure 2A (VEGF immunofluorescence)

    • -

      Figure 2B (PlGF immunofluorescence)

    • -

      Figure 2C (VEGFR-1 immunofluorescence)

    • -

      Figure 2D (VEGFR-2 immunofluorescence)

    • -

      Figure 2E (HIF-α immunofluorescence)

    • -

      Figure 3 (Angiogenic Factor Expression Graph)

    • -

      Figure 4 (Angiogenic Factor Level in Maternal Plasma Graph)

    • -

      PCR Images 1-4 (Raw Gel Images of PCR test from maternal (1-3) and cord (4) blood samples)

    Data are available under the terms of the Creative Commons Zero "No rights reserved" data waiver (CC0 1.0 Public domain dedication).


    Articles from F1000Research are provided here courtesy of F1000 Research Ltd

    RESOURCES