Skip to main content
The BMJ logoLink to The BMJ
editorial
. 2000 Jul 15;321(7254):126–127. doi: 10.1136/bmj.321.7254.126

Quinolone ear drops for chronic otitis media

They are safer and more effective than aminoglycosides

S Ghosh 1, A Panarese 1, A J Parker 1, P D Bull 1
PMCID: PMC1118144  PMID: 10894673

An estimated 1.5% of the adult population in the United Kingdom has active chronic otitis media with perforated tympanic membranes; this is comparable to the prevalence in western Europe and the United States. Although surgery is often necessary, antibiotic ear drops are frequently prescribed to control the discharge that patients may have with this condition. Until recently aminoglycoside ear drops were widely used, but concerns about ototoxicity, which occurs rarely, have restricted their use. Quinolone ear drops are an effective alternative, and there is good evidence from randomised controlled trials that they are the best choice for treating chronic middle ear infections.1 They are already in use in the United States, Canada, New Zealand, Japan, and other countries, although they are still not available in the United Kingdom because they have not been licensed by the Medicines Control Agency.

The principal organisms isolated from patients with chronic otitis media are Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Staphylococcus aureus, and other Gram negative organisms, chiefly proteus. Pseudomonas, the pathogen most commonly identified, is potentially difficult to eradicate and develops resistance comparatively quickly to a variety of antibiotics.2 It is now recognised that patients with chronic ear infections, irrespective of the type of tympanic membrane perforation (central or attic), are never “safe” from intracranial complications.3 Eradication of the infection should therefore be the goal. Although aminoglycoside eardrops, particularly gentamicin, are effective in pseudomonal infections, recent reports from two retrospective studies have confirmed that ototoxicity occurs with topical gentamicin and primarily affects the vestibular system.4,5 There have been a few case reports of ototoxicity occurring in humans treated with neomycin or framycetin, the other aminoglycosides in use; and recent studies on animals using comparable doses to that of ear drops have confirmed this.6,7 The potential medicolegal implications of ototoxicity, therefore, have created a dilemma: we need to determine which topical antibiotic is safe and effective in treating patients with chronic discharge from their ears.

Ciprofloxacin and ofloxacin ear drops have several advantages over aminoglycosides. The Cochrane systematic review on interventions in chronic otitis media shows that quinolone ear drops are more effective than non-quinolone agents both in reducing ear discharge and in eradicating bacteria (data from five randomised controlled trials: odds ratio 0.26, 95% confidence interval 0.16 to 0.41).1 It also confirmed that antibiotic ear drops were more effective than systemic antibiotics in chronic otitis media. Results from studies in animals and humans have so far failed to show any ototoxicity resulting from quinolone ear drops.8

Among the quinolones ciprofloxacin, apart from having the greatest activity against pseudomonas, is effective against Staphylococcus aureus, the other major pathogen in chronic otitis media.9 Recent studies have failed to show that oral ciprofloxacin has any deleterious effects on growing cartilagein children, and with the comparatively small doses used in topical application, it is likely soon to be officially recognised as safe for paediatric use.10 In the United States topical ofloxacin has already been approved for the treatment of otorrhoea after grommet insertion in children older than 1 year (although in chronic middle ear infections it can only be used in children older than 12 years).

On the other hand, caution must be exercised so that quinolone ear drops are not used inappropriately because of the risk of promoting resistance both for the patient and the community. Resistance to ciprofloxacin in pseudomonas strains (arising from mutation of the bacterial enzymes involved in DNA replication, gyrase and topoisomerase), is a growing problem. Roughly 20% of pseudomonas isolates identified in hospitals in Europe and the United States are resistant to ciprofloxacin,and most of these strains are multidrug resistant.11

Ciprofloxacin is already commonly used in respiratory, gastrointestinal, and ophthalmic practice: the additional use in otolaryngology would not add greatly to the pool of resistant bacteria. Curative doses of topical ciprofloxacin or ofloxacin might actually help eradicate chronic pseudomonas infections, thus reducing the problem of resistance associated with less effective antibiotics. Concentrations achieved through topical use are substantially higher than those achieved by using other forms of administration, and thus there is a good chance of eradicating the infection. If ciprofloxacin or ofloxacin fails, parenteral treatment with ceftazidime or imipenem can be used.12

Until topical ciprofloxacin is commercially available its use will remain restricted in the United Kingdom. Guidelines should be issued for the appropriate use of the drug in chronic otitis media with perforated eardrums, and its introduction for treating chronic otitis externa as well as its use in children should also be considered.

References

  • 1.Acuin J, Smith A, Mackenzie I Cochrane Collaboration, editors. Cochrane Library. Issue 4. Oxford: Update Software; 1999. Interventions for chronic suppurative otitis media. [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Altuntas A, Aslan A, Eren N, Unal A, Nalco Y. Susceptibility of microorganisms isolated from chronic suppurative otitis media to ciprofloxacin. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 1996;253:364–366. doi: 10.1007/BF00178293. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Browning GG. Clinical otology and audiology. 2nd ed. Oxford: Butterworth-Heinemann; 1998. Specific management of external and middle ear conditions; pp. 997–118. [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Bath AP, Walsh RM, Bance ML, Rutka JA. Ototoxicity of topical gentamicin preparations. Laryngoscope. 1999;109:1088–1093. doi: 10.1097/00005537-199907000-00015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Marais J, Rutka JA. Ototoxicity and topical eardrops. Clin Otolaryngol Allied Sci. 1998;23:360–367. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2273.1998.00161.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Wright CG, Meyerhoff WL, Halama AR. Ototoxicity of neomycin and polymyxin B following middle ear infection in the chinchilla and baboon. Am J Otol. 1987;8:495–499. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Linder TE, Zwicky S, Brandle P. Ototoxicity of ear drops: a clinical perspective. Am J Otol. 1995;16:653–657. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Dohar JE, Alper CM, Rose EA, Doyle WJ, Casselbrant ML, Kenna MA, et al. Treatment of chronic suppurative otitis media with topical ciprofloxacin. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 1998;107:865–871. doi: 10.1177/000348949810701010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Archer GL, Polk RE. Harrison's principles of internal medicine. In: Fauci AS, Braunwald E, Isselbacher KJ, Wilson JD, Martin JB, Kasper DL, et al., editors. Treatment and prophylaxis of bacterial infections. 14th ed. New York: MacGraw-Hill; 1998. pp. 856–859. [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Buck ML. Ciprofloxacin use in children: a review of recent findings. Pediatric Pharmacother. 1998;4:12. [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Blondeau JM, Suter ME, Borsos S, Misfeldt C. Canadian Pseudomonas aeruginosa susceptibility study from 48 medical centres: focus on ciprofloxacin. Int J Antimicrob Agents. 1998;10:297–302. doi: 10.1016/s0924-8579(98)00049-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Iaconis JP, Pitkin DH, Sheikh W, Nadler HL. Comparison of antibacterial activities of meropenem and six other antimicrobials against Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates from North American studies and clinical trials. Clin Infect Dis. 1997;24(suppl 2):191–16S. doi: 10.1093/clinids/24.supplement_2.s191. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from BMJ : British Medical Journal are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES