Multimodal optoacoustic imaging: methods and contrast materials

Zhenyue Chen; Irmak Gezginer; Quanyu Zhou; Lin Tang; Xosé Luís Deán-Ben; Daniel Razansky

doi:10.1039/d3cs00565h

. 2024 May 13;53(12):6068–6099. doi: 10.1039/d3cs00565h

Multimodal optoacoustic imaging: methods and contrast materials

Zhenyue Chen ^a,^b, Irmak Gezginer ^a,^b, Quanyu Zhou ^a,^b, Lin Tang ^a,^b, Xosé Luís Deán-Ben ^a,^b, Daniel Razansky ^a,^b,^✉

PMCID: PMC11181994 PMID: 38738633

Abstract

Optoacoustic (OA) imaging offers powerful capabilities for interrogating biological tissues with rich optical absorption contrast while maintaining high spatial resolution for deep tissue observations. The spectrally distinct absorption of visible and near-infrared photons by endogenous tissue chromophores facilitates extraction of diverse anatomic, functional, molecular, and metabolic information from living tissues across various scales, from organelles and cells to whole organs and organisms. The primarily blood-related contrast and limited penetration depth of OA imaging have fostered the development of multimodal approaches to fully exploit the unique advantages and complementarity of the method. We review the recent hybridization efforts, including multimodal combinations of OA with ultrasound, fluorescence, optical coherence tomography, Raman scattering microscopy and magnetic resonance imaging as well as ionizing methods, such as X-ray computed tomography, single-photon-emission computed tomography and positron emission tomography. Considering that most molecules absorb light across a broad range of the electromagnetic spectrum, the OA interrogations can be extended to a large number of exogenously administered small molecules, particulate agents, and genetically encoded labels. This unique property further makes contrast moieties used in other imaging modalities amenable for OA sensing.

Combining optoacoustics with other imaging techniques helps bring its powerful label-free functional readings and molecular sensitivity into precise anatomical context while providing an essential cross-validation against established imaging methods.

Introduction

Optoacoustic (OA) imaging, also known as photoacoustic imaging, synergistically combines optical excitation and ultrasound (US) detection to retrieve comprehensive anatomical, functional, metabolic, and molecular information from biological tissues. The physical principle underlying the technique entails illumination of the tissue of interest with short light pulses, typically of nanosecond duration, followed by thermoelastic expansion and detection of acoustic radiation generated via transient light absorption by tissue chromophores (Fig. 1(a)). While the underlying photophonic phenomenon was first described in 1880,¹ rapid development of biomedical applications only commenced at the turn of the 21st century.^2,3 OA imaging translates the molecular specificity of light into deep-seated areas by capitalizing on the low scattering of US to break through the depth barriers imposed by light diffusion in living tissues.⁴ The versatile contrast of OA imaging, which is based on optical absorption, allows for sensing and spatially resolving spectrally-distinctive endogenous chromophores essential to biological function, such as hemoglobin in its oxygenated (HbO) and deoxygenated (HbR) forms, melanin, water, collagen, lipids and others (Fig. 1(b)). Due to the strong intrinsic hemoglobin contrast, OA represents a valuable tool to study the evolution of important hallmarks of cancer such as angiogenesis, hypoxia and hypermetabolism.^5,6 Furthermore, considering that most substances absorb light across a broad range of the electromagnetic spectrum, the OA interrogations can be extended to a large number of exogenously administered small molecules, particulate agents, as well as targeted, activatable, and genetically-encoded labels.^7–11

Following two decades of rapid technological developments, state-of-the-art OA embodiments can visualize life at multiple spatial scales, ranging from subcellular structures to entire organs, with the same type of optical absorption contrast (Fig. 1(c)).^13,14 Optical-resolution OA microscopy with focused excitation light covers depths within the transport mean free path of photons (∼1 mm in biological tissues),¹⁰ thus facilitating capillary-level microvascular imaging with a typical resolution of a few microns, which can further be refined to cover sub-cellular structures.¹⁵ OA mesoscopy uses instead unfocused illumination and broadband focused US detection to overcome the hard penetration-resolution trade-offs in optical imaging, hence enabling high resolution imaging of deep tissues in the diffuse regime of light.^7,8 Tomographic image acquisition and rendering with multi-element transducer arrays further enable a real-time imaging capability essential for capturing rapid biological dynamics, such as cardiac or neural activity, at the whole-organ level in mice.^16,17 These unique advantages have attracted growing attention within the biomedical research community, further fostering the development of new theranostic chemical agents.¹⁸

Despite its powerful technical capabilities, OA suffers from several drawbacks, including limited soft tissue contrast and penetration depth, inevitable trade-offs between penetration and spatial resolution, as well as limited sensitivity and specificity (Fig. 1(d)). More importantly, OA contrast primarily stems from optical absorption, rendering it less sensitive to other contrast mechanisms related to scattering, fluorescence, acoustic, and magnetic properties of tissue. This motivated the combination of OA with other imaging modalities to fully exploit the unique advantages and complementarity of the method toward a more comprehensive understanding of biological processes.

Due to the inherent hybrid optical and acoustic nature of OA, multi-modality efforts have mainly been focused on hybridization with US,^19–23 fluorescence (FL),^24–29 and other optical imaging modalities.^30–38 Recent progress on multimodal OA has also seen promising combinations with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI),^39–46 X-ray computed tomography (CT),^14,47,48 single-photon-emission computed tomography (SPECT),^47,49 or positron emission tomography (PET)^50–53 to exploit entirely different types of anatomical, functional, and molecular contrast. Multimodal imaging expands the contrast dimension to aid a comprehensive understanding of biological structure and function, at the expense of a more complex design of imaging systems and contrast materials.^{18,25,39,46,54–60} This review delves into hybridization efforts of OA with other imaging modalities, development of multimodal contrast materials, as well as emerging applications in preclinical research and clinical diagnostics.

Merging optoacoustic imaging with ultrasound

OA and US imaging share common advantages, such as the use of non-ionizing radiation, real-time imaging capability, high spatio-temporal resolution, and portability.⁶¹ Both techniques are based on acquisition of time-resolved pressure signals, which facilitates hybridization. While US renders important structural and blood flow contrast, OA provides additional oxygenation and molecular readings both in preclinical and clinical applications.²² Moreover, the dual-modality combination enables more accurate probing into heterogeneous acoustic and optical properties of living tissues, thus improving image reconstruction performance, data quantification and interpretation.^23,62,63 The synergistic combination with the well-established US technique can further expedite the clinical adoption of the OA technology.

OA–US imaging systems

High-resolution US and OA imaging is based on point-by-point mechanical scanning of a focused transducer e.g. via motorized translational stages^21,64,65 or a slider-crank scanner.⁶⁶ In multimodal OA–US systems, data acquisition is sequentially switched between the OA and US modes. Anatomical US images were reported to extract the contour maps of uneven surfaces to guide dynamic focusing.²¹ The collected US echoes have also been used to remove the multi-reflection artifacts in OA images by assuming an equivalent impulse function.⁶⁷ Generally, dual-modality systems based on single-element transducers for endoscopic^68,69 and sub-surface⁷⁰ imaging have been reported and found wide applications in multi-parametric brain imaging,²¹ melanoma staging,⁷¹ or skull bone morphogenesis and angiogenesis^64,65 in mice.

Dual-modal OA–US tomographic systems operate instead on a macroscopic imaging scale by employing linear^19,72–75 or concave transducer arrays^76–79 in conjunction with broad (unfocused) illumination through a fiber bundle or mirrors.⁷³ Dedicated multi-segment array configurations have been proposed to deliver optimal performance in both OA and US modes^22,80–82 (Fig. 2(a)). Dual-modality imaging with spectrally unmixed HbO and HbR blood components superimposed on pulse-echo US images have extensively been employed in both small animal and clinical investigations (Fig. 2(b)).^83–86 Several configurations have been reported to combine OA and transmission-mode US imaging, which is additionally capable of rendering speed of sound (SoS) and acoustic attenuation (AA) maps of tissues^23,87 (Fig. 2(c)). Fully coregistered OA, reflection- and transmission-mode US images of mice were shown to provide highly complementary multi-parametric readings related to disease state and progression in mice, e.g. in the context of tumor growth⁸⁶ (Fig. 2(d)) or fatty liver disease.⁸⁷

OA–US contrast agents

Contrast-enhanced OA–US imaging has been achieved with several types of dual-mode contrast agents. These can be broadly classified into two categories: microbubbles and droplets (Table 1). Microbubbles consisting of a gas–shell structure are routinely employed as US contrast agents. OA contrast has been additionally introduced by incorporating optical-absorbing dyes or nanoparticles (NPs), such as black ink, methylene blue, or porphyrin, onto their shell,^54–56,88 or by encapsulating nanoparticles (i.e., ink, gold nanorods) within a gas cavity.^89,90 For instance, engineered microbubbles featured with a porphyrin shell have been proposed (Fig. 2(e)), exhibiting peak optical absorption within the near-infrared (NIR) window (Fig. 2(f)). The enhanced OA signal from porphyrin shell microbubbles, when compared to unmodified microbubbles and microbubbles mixed with free porphyrin, confirms their potential as a dual-modal contrast agent (Fig. 2(g)).⁸⁸ Nanodroplets and microdroplets can also be designed as a core–shell structure, characterized by liquid core formed with perfluorocarbon (PFC) or perfluorobutane (PFB). Different types of photo-absorbers, including indocyanine green (ICG), plasmonic NPs, and porphyrin have been integrated into the core^54,91 or the shell.⁵⁶ Upon exposure to light radiation or high rarefactional pressure,⁵⁶ nanodroplets can undergo a phase change transforming them into microbubbles, thereby enhancing the US contrast (Fig. 2(h)). The small size of these nanodroplets (<200 nm) allows them to extravasate and accumulate in tumor regions via the enhanced permeability and retention (EPR) effect.^92,93 The dual contrast of the accumulated droplets was exploited for a better characterization of the tumor microenvironment (Fig. 2(i)). Besides simple shell structures, multilayer structures have also been employed, as exemplified by hydrogel microdroplets encapsulating conjugated polymer NPs as photo-absorbers.⁵⁹ The NPs generate OA signals while hydrogel-oil-aqueous layers with varied acoustic resistance provide US contrast. In addition to tumor imaging, dual-modal OA–US contrast agents have been used for urinary bladder,⁹⁴ and pancreas imaging.⁹¹ Despite promising proof-of-concept studies, many of the reported OA–US contrast agents have not been tested in vivo,^54,88–90 presumably due to biostability or biocompatibility issues. The ongoing development and refinement of these contrast agents remains an active area of research, aiming at achieving stronger OA and US responses, improved targeting functions, extended circulation time, and biodegradability.

Dual-modal OA–US contrast materials.

Modality	Type	Absorber location	Contrast agents	Absorption (nm)	Application	Ref.
OA–US	Microbubbles	OA shell	Methylene blue MBs	675	Urinary bladder (rat)	94
			Black ink MBs	1064	Urinary bladder (rat)	94
			Porphyrin shell MBs	700	Phantom imaging	88
		OA core	AuMBs	760	Phantom imaging	89
		OA core	Encapsulated-ink PLGA MBs	767	Phantom imaging	90
	Droplets	OA core	ICG-loaded PFC nanodroplet	∼800	Phantom imaging	54
			PAnDs	780	Pancreas (mouse)	95
			Hydrogel-based microdroplets	750	Tumor imaging	59
		OA shell	Porphyrin nanodroplet	705	Tumor imaging (chicken embryo)	56

Open in a new tab

Optoacoustic and fluorescence imaging

FL imaging is a mainstay technique in biological discovery owing to its high sensitivity and specificity in detecting targeted molecular labels and activity indicators. The depth covered with FL microscopy systems is typically restricted to <1 mm, mainly owing to the strong photon scattering in living biological tissues. In contrast, OA imaging maintains high resolution imaging performance at millimeter to centimeter scale depths, owing to the insignificant scattering of US waves relative to light. Nevertheless, OA imaging can greatly benefit from the versatile molecular contrast of FL-based techniques. FL imaging assisted with FDA-approved dyes like ICG is routinely used in the clinics, e.g. in ophthalmology or surgical guidance applications. Most optical dyes provide excellent OA contrast, making them promising candidates for multimodal OA–FL applications.

OA–FL imaging systems

Scanning OA and FL microscopy may share a common excitation path based on focused light beams. Hybrid OA–FL imaging systems then allow for a separate collection of the generated US and FL responses. This can been achieved by placing light sensors and US transducers on the opposite sides of the sample (Fig. 3(a)), which enabled multimodal integration of OA with nonlinear optical microscopy methods, such as two-photon microscopy (2PM), second-harmonic generation (SHG) microscopy, and third harmonic generation (THG) microscopy.^96,97 Mechanical scanning is generally used to acquire two-dimensional OA images, while optical scanning with a galvo mirror is the common approach in nonlinear modalities. To this end, OA microscopy has been combined with confocal fluorescence microscopy (CFM) and 2PM based on a commercial FL microscope, thus enabling sectioned retinal slice imaging in transgenic mice. The FL mode was used to detect yellow fluorescence protein (YFP, Fig. 3(b)) labeled bipolar cells, while melanin in the retinal pigmented layer provided the absorption contrast in OA images⁹⁸ (Fig. 3(c)). A different multimodal OA–FL approach employs an epi-illumination approach with both light and US detectors positioned on the same side to facilitate imaging of thicker specimen. It has been implemented with a customized miniaturized US transducer inserted between the objective and the imaged object.²⁹ The compact design employs a high numerical aperture (NA) objective with minimal interference to the US transducer. This hybrid OA–CFM system enabled imaging of 4T1 breast cancer cells labeled with FL proteins in a xenograft tumor model with surrounding vascular network being depicted in the OA mode.²⁹ Another type of the hybrid combination involved the use of a mechanically-scanned acoustic-optical beam splitter, which was inserted between the objective and sample to reflect the generated OA waves while allowing the detection of back-scattered FL⁹⁹ (Fig. 3(d)). By injecting oxygen sensitive Pd–meso-tetra(4-carboxyphenyl)porphyrin phosphorescent probe (Fig. 3(e)), mapping of both blood hemoglobin sO₂ and tissue oxygen partial pressure (pO₂) has been demonstrated under normoxia and hyperoxia conditions¹⁰⁰ (Fig. 3(f)). The sO₂ map was acquired with dual-wavelength excitation at 570/578 nm (Fig. 3(f), top), which correlated well with the pO₂ values derived from the FL lifetime of the probe measured with CFM (Fig. 3(f), bottom). Transparent US transducer (TUT) technology has opened new possibilities for multimodal OA–FL imaging using on-axis excitation, further enabling quadruple modality US, OA, optical coherence tomography (OCT), and FL fusion imaging.¹⁰¹ Optically-transparent micro-ring resonator (MRR)-based US transducers have also been developed,¹⁰² offering high US detection sensitivity, a wide angular detection angle, and miniature (submillimeter) size. Fabrication of a MRR directly on a microscope coverslip facilitated the hybrid OA–CFM microscopic imaging with a commercial inverted microscope platform, which was subsequently used to image retinal pigment epithelium samples ex vivo with cellular resolution.¹⁰³

Contrary to scanning FL microscopy, widefield epifluorescence (epiFL) imaging is characterized by high temporal resolution and large (centimeter scale) field-of-view (FOV) matching well those achieved with tomographic OA systems. Yet, a combined OA-epiFL imaging is hampered by the fact that optimal tomographic OA image acquisition implies signal collection over a large angle surrounding the object thus limiting the physical space for recording FL responses. Simultaneous OA-epiFL imaging of thin samples in transmission mode was accomplished with a 60-element hemispherical transducer array and a CCD camera arranged on the opposite side of the sample.²⁵ More recently, OA-epiFL imaging in reflection mode was achieved using an electron multiplying charge-coupled device (EMCCD)-based fiberscope inserted in a central aperture of a 512-element hemispherical transducer array¹⁰⁴ (Fig. 4(a)). Excitation of both OA and FL responses was performed with a nanosecond pulsed laser that triggered simultaneous EMCCD and US data acquisition. Liposomal ICG was used to achieve contrast-enhanced images of the mouse brain in vivo with both modalities and increase the circulation time of free ICG.^28,104 Combined epiFL and OA imaging of sensory-evoked brain activity has been demonstrated by simultaneously capturing hemodynamics and calcium activity using genetically-encoded calcium indicator GCaMP6f¹⁰⁵ (Fig. 4(b) and (c)). OA-epiFL imaging enabled concurrent measurements of neuronal activity and accompanying hemodynamic responses in mice, thus attaining multiparametric noninvasive characterization of brain activity and neurovascular coupling¹⁰⁶ (Fig. 4(d)–(f)). When combined with Aβ-targeted probes, such as the luminescent conjugated oligothiophene HS-169 or oxazine dye derivative AOI987, OA-epiFL imaging facilitates transcranial Aβ detection at multiple scales, all the way from single-plaque resolution in the cortex to whole brain mapping of the plaque load in deep areas such as hippocampus and thalamus¹⁰⁷ (Fig. 4(g) and (h)). Enhancement in tissue penetration and imaging contrast can be achieved for both OA and FL modalities when leveraging the diminished scattering and autofluorescence in the second near-infrared (NIR-II, 1000–1700 nm) range, as has been shown for non-invasive angiography,¹⁰⁸ inflammation detection,¹⁰⁹ tumor diagnosis,^108,110 and photothermal therapy^111–113 applications.

OA–FL contrast agents

OA provides label-free contrast based on optical absorption of endogenous substances, such as oxygenated and deoxygenated hemoglobin, melanin, bilirubin, lipids, and water. OA imaging can also visualize FL substances that thermalize part of the absorbed energy.²⁷ Small FL molecules, such as ICG¹¹⁴ or other cyanine dyes^115,116 having absorption peaks in the NIR spectrum, are ideally suited for synergistically exploiting the advantages of dual-modality OA–FL imaging. The enhanced penetration of light in the NIR range enables tracking specifically-labeled biomolecules in small animals at the whole-body level.¹¹⁷ Both FL and OA signal intensities are proportional to the extinction coefficient (ε) of the contrast material. However, FL intensity scales with the quantum yield (QY) while OA intensity is proportional to 1-QY.²⁷ Organic FL dyes with peak absorption in the NIR spectrum commonly exhibit a relatively high ε yet low QY, making them particularly suitable for hybrid OA–FL imaging.⁶⁰ Hybrid OA–FL can also be performed with particulate agents, e.g. quantum dots (QDs),¹¹⁸ gold nanorods (GNRs),¹¹⁹ carbon nanotubes,¹²⁰ FL silica NPs,¹²¹ or liposomes.¹²² In addition, the use of particles composed of organometallic materials,¹²³ metal-dye composites,¹²⁴ or metal–polymer composites¹²⁵ have also been explored. A list of common OA–FL dual-modal contrast materials appears in Table 2.

Dual-modal OA–FL contrast materials.

Modality	Category	Subcategory	Contrast agents	Absorption/emission (nm)	Application	Ref.
OA–FL	Organic materials	Small-molecule dyes	PSMAP/ICG NBs	780/820	Prostate cancer	114
			Cy7-1-maltotriose	750/780	Bacterial infection	115
			SAPTN	1024/1128	mildPTT, cancer immunotherapy	126
			MC-PSE	900, 980/940	Glutathione detection	127
			DTP-DPTQ NPs	852/1120	PTT of breast cancer model	111
			CySO₃-GGT	675/750	Hepatocellular carcinoma	128
			LET-12	1400/1520	Glioblastoma PTT	112
			CyA	602/719	PDT, systemic immunotherapy	129
			IR780-SPhF	780/810	Triple negative breast cancer theranostics	116
			FMP&N-FMP	680/689	PDT, cancer Immunotherapy	130
			P-CyPt	700, 750/710	Cancer theranostics	131
			CTSK-APPA	615, 690/720	Early osteolytic metastasis	132
			AOI987	650/720	Aβ imaging	107
		AIEgens	MPNPs	500–800/650–1100	Cancer immunotherapy, type I/II PDT	133
			AIE-4PEG550 NPs	645/900–1700	Kidney fibrosis	134
			C-NTBD NPs	732/1042	Resection of neuroendocrine neoplasms and SLN	135
		Polymeric nanoprobes	EMT-NPs	>700/643–765	PDX cancer treatment	136
			SPCy	607, 670/720, 800	Neutrophil elastase	137
			P2NPs	920/1120	osteosarcoma PTT	138
			CF-SPNs	580, 775/680, 820	Drug-induced hepatotoxicity monitoring	139
			mPPy@COF-Por	808/501	PDT, PTT of colorectal carcinoma	131
	Inorganic materials	Rare-earth doped NPs	Gd_0.8Nd_1.2O₂S@PVP	680–970/1000–1700	Phantom study	126
		Noble metals	AuPd-BSA CN	400–800/1100–1500	Dual-PDT synergized enzyme catalytic therapy	140
		Quantum dots	PCD	400–900/450–650	Breast cancer model	141
			V₂C-TAT@Ex-RGD	1000–1350/422	Nucleus-targeted PTT	142
			a-Ag_2−xCu_xS QDs	635/∼820	PTT of murine hepatoma tumor	143
		Other	AuNNPs–Ag₂S Ve	400–1200/1250	RT of breast cancer model	110
			mdGC	510, 798/480	PTT of breast cancer model	144
			HSC-2	400–1000/957	PTT/catalytic synergistic therapy	113
	Hybrid materials	Organometallic materials	PhAg NPs	680, 850/675, 730	Chemo-PTT melanoma therapy	123
		Metal-dye composites	CFNPs	760/780–840	Photothermal primed CDT	124
		Metal-dye composites	Cy5-conjugated PEG@AgIONPs	680–924/640	PTT, Thrombosis	145
		Metal–polymeric NPs	Au⁰–Por@FeCO nanosheets	200–1000/630–800	PTT-gas therapy of breast cancer model	125
		Other	AHZ NPs	744/1000–1700	PTT in deep tumors	146
			MTCNs	1048/1080, 1550	H₂O₂ imaging, lymphatic metastasis	147
			CRUN	663/545, 655	Tumor microenvironment	148
			HCy5/Cy7-UCNs	640, 780/660–800 (tunable)	Multiple ROS/RNS species sensing	149

Open in a new tab

To this end, the high versatility of OA–FL imaging has been exploited in a number of biomedical applications. A small molecule termed MC-PSE, which is synthesized by utilizing phenylselenophenols to replace the median chlorine atom of an anionic cyanine dye, could self-assemble into J-aggregates in an aqueous solution and disassemble when activated by glutathione. This triggers OA–FL signal fluctuations reflecting the presence of glutathione in cancer.¹²⁷ A synthesized IR780 derivative (IR780-SPhF) also induces ferroptosis-mediated cell death after accumulating in tumors with a highly elevated glutathione level.¹¹⁶ The reduced light scattering in NIR-II facilitates imaging with deep-tissue. However, design and synthesis of organic probes emitting light in this range remains challenging. NIR-II fluorophores DTP-DPTQ and LET-12 exhibited good performance in imaging-guided photothermal therapy of breast and glioblastoma tumors.^111,112 Normally, OA–FL dyes have balanced absorption and emission. However, aggregation-induced emission luminogens (MTPE-TT, AIE-4COOH and C-NTBD) feature boosted FL and OA intensity simultaneously, benefiting multifunctional image-guided self-synergistic immunotherapy,¹³³ early diagnosis of renal dysfunction (Fig. 5(a) and (b)),¹³⁴ accurate detection of neuroendocrine neoplasms, and intraoperative sentinel lymph nodes (SLNs) dissection.¹³⁵ Contrary to small molecules, semiconducting polymer particles offer structural flexibility for efficient design of activatable OA–FL probes. For example, semiconducting polymer nanoprobe SPCy initiates its OA and ratiometric FL imaging after reacting with tumor-associated neutrophils.¹³⁷ In addition, the first reported covalent organic framework (COF)-based biomimetic nanomotor composed of a polypyrrole (PPy) core and a porphyrin–COF shell provided a new design strategy of a single multifunctional platform for imaging-guided combined photothermal therapy (PTT) and photodynamic therapy (PDT).¹³¹

Compared with organic contrast agents, the multimodal OA–FL inorganic materials, including Rare-earth (RE) particles, carbon dots, QDs, and noble nanocomposites, are of interest due to their good photostability, broad absorption band, and long FL lifetime. Rare-earth oxysulfide (Gd₂O₂S) NPs have shown excellent optical performance and low cytotoxicity.¹²⁶ Vanadium carbide (V₂C) QDs modified with TAT peptides and packaged into engineered exosomes could realize nucleus targeting and further destroy tumor cells by low-temperature photothermal therapy.¹⁴² Ultrasmall carbon dots without excess modification could further penetrate deeper into tumors for improved therapeutic outcomes.¹⁴¹ As a novel multifunctional agent, AuPd-BSA CN benefited from its strong NIR absorption and FL intensity in the NIR-II spectrum to guide type I/type II PDT performance. Furthermore, different types of inorganic materials have been integrated together for dual-modal OA–FL imaging in the NIR-II window, such as zeolite–carbon-based nanozymes and nanogapped gold nanoparticles (AuNNPs)–silver sulfide (Ag₂S) vesicles. These enabled prolonged blood circulation times and enhanced tumor accumulation, thus providing enhanced diagnostic information with high resolution (Fig. 5(c) and (d)).^110,113

Other sophisticated strategies have been explored to develop advanced OA–FL contrast agents. The FL molecule Pheophorbide-a was loaded into silver NPs that could be activated by NIR light to mediate reactive oxygen species (ROS)-dependent apoptotic cell death to treat melanomas.¹²³ According to a simple reaction between tetrachloroaurate and meso-tetra(pyridyl)porphyrin hydrochloric solution, Au⁰–Por nanosheets served as the carrier of carbon monoxide-releasing molecules for image-guided gas therapy. The time-to-peak delay of the OA/FL signals between the kidneys and tumor indicates that the nanosheets are accumulated in the tumor by passive targeting, while the quick degradation and excretion by digestive organs corroborates their biodegradability and improved biosafety (Fig. 5(e)–(h)).¹²⁵ Liposomes, approved as a drug delivery system for clinical use, have been widely used to load drugs, dyes, DNA, and other molecules for multifunctional applications. Through loading of Fe²⁺, 2,2′-azino-bis(3-ethylbenzothiazoline-6-sulfonic acid)diammonium salt, citric acid, and polyethylene glycol (PEG)-modified lanthanide downconversion nanophosphors in the aqueous core and encapsulating IR1048 in the lipid bilayer, liposome-based microenvironment-tailored catalytic nanoprobes were allowed to do accurate and sensitive detection of H₂O₂in vivo via bimodal OA–FL ratiometric imaging in the NIR-II window.¹⁴⁷ Different from conventional contrast materials employing “on or off” concept, the lanthanide-doped upconversion nanocrystals (UCNs) have been extensively applied in biosensing, molecular imaging, and nanomedicine. Owing to their extraordinary capability to convert NIR photonic excitations into multiplexed emissions ranging from ultraviolet to NIR windows, UCNs can ideally realize a precise interrelation and meet complex biological demands by fitting different sensing moieties into one rationally integrated nanomatrix to simultaneously read out numerous analytes, e.g. ROS and reactive nitrogen species (RNS), in highly complex and dynamic living environments.^{139,148,149,151} By taking advantages of multiplexing luminescence of UCNs and two specific ROS- and RNS-sensitive NIR cyanine fluorophores, simultaneous screening of various redox species and dynamic profiling of their intricate correlations with pathophysiological implications was achieved.¹⁴⁹

Optoacoustic microscopy and optical coherence tomography

OA microscopy and OCT share a number of common and complementary features in terms of contrast, penetration depth, and spatial resolution, so that more comprehensive tissue characterization is achieved by combining these two modalities. By simultaneously rendering depth-dependent optical scattering profiles, volumetric structural information, chromophore bio-distribution maps, flow velocity values, polarization properties, and temperature maps, the combination between OA and OCT can impact a broad range of applications in oncology, neurology, dermatology, and ophthalmology, both in preclinical and clinical settings.^{35,57,152–155}

OA–OCT imaging systems

Much like for OA–FL imaging, early implementation of hybrid OA and spectral domain OCT was achieved in transmission mode with light delivery and US detection performed from the opposite sides of a thin sample. Light was coupled into the platform through a single-mode optical fiber and focused into the object with a microscope objective.¹⁵² In contrast, reflection mode (epi-illumination) OA–OCT systems share the same optical scanning method for both OA and OCT, with an US detector positioned at the same side to enable an intrinsically-registered imaging performance, as demonstrated e.g. by simultaneous visualization of the microanatomy and microvasculature of the mouse ear in vivo (Fig. 6(a)–(d)).³⁴ The opacity of standard US transducers poses challenges for the hybridization between OCT and OA, which was typically achieved by positioning an unfocused US transducer obliquely with respect to the optical axis (Fig. 6(a)), thus causing loss of sensitivity for OA signal detection. A modified design of an akinetic sensor with a large translucent imaging window and a thickness of only 1 mm was reported for dual-modal OA–OCT. The in vivo images of zebrafish larvae produced with this system demonstrate its potential in biomedical research (Fig. 6(e) and (f)). Alternatively, TUTs represents a promising avenue for hybridizing OA imaging with other optical imaging methods by enabling on-axis excitation and detection, as previously described in the hybrid OA–FL section. In the same work, seamless integration between US, OA, OCT, and FL imaging was reported based on co-axial illumination through a TUT, further incorporating a spherical acoustic focusing lens combined with multiple light sources, namely, two pulsed lasers for spectroscopic OA imaging, a continuous wave (CW) laser for FL imaging, and a superluminescent light-emitting diode for OCT.¹⁰¹ This quadruple fusion imaging system was shown to provide multiparametric visualization of ophthalmic injuries and neoplastic lesions in rodents. OA imaging methods are well-established for quantifying blood oxygen saturation, which can be complemented with flow measurements provided by Doppler OCT. This provides a powerful means for characterizing blood flow in cardiovascular diseases, such as stroke, hemorrhages, vascular occlusions, as well as other pathologies with flow stasis such as tumors.^35,156 It is also expected to open a broad range of applications in studying angiogenesis, tissue inflammatory, or healing responses.

OA–OCT imaging contrast agents

The sensitivity and specificity of both OA and OCT can be improved by adding exogenous contrast agents, thus extending the application scope of both modalities from imaging the intrinsic tissue contrast to specific molecular and cellular observations. Among different types of contrast materials, gold nanoparticles (AuNPs) generate signals detectable with both modalities.^159,160 Owing to the surface plasmon resonance, AuNPs have unique optical properties including strong optical absorption and scattering, making them excellent candidates for dual-mode OA–OCT imaging. AuNPs also have excellent optical tunability as well as bio-, photo-, and thermal-stability. Physically synthesized gold nanodisks (SANs) have been proposed as dual-modal OA–OCT contrast agents due to the excellent tunability of their optical properties, including resonant wavelengths, absorption-to-scattering ratio, and responsiveness to random incident light. By changing the nanodisk's thickness, it is possible to shift its resonant frequency while maintaining the lateral size and achieve excitation within a broad spectral window (Fig. 6(g)). Furthermore, different-sized disks inside the SAN can interact with different wavelengths of the incident light, as evidenced by the extinction spectrum measured from the SAN aqueous solution and fitted by the envelope curve of two Gaussian peaks (Fig. 6(h)). In a chick embryo study SANs could be spectrally differentiated from other tissue chromophores by OA, whilst OCT enabled correlating the NPs distribution profiles with the surrounding tissue structures (Fig. 6(i)).¹⁵⁸ Gold nanoshells are other type of AuNPs have also been used to enhance the OCT contrast in cells and improve microangiographic images. In this way, the signal from the retinal and choroidal vessels in living rabbits was enhanced by up to 82% and 45% for OA and OCT, respectively.⁵⁷ Importantly, conventional OCT contrast generating moieties such as hemoglobin, gold nanorods and plasmonic NPs,^161–166 liquid-filled microspheres¹⁶⁷ and absorption-based NIR dyes^168–170 can also serve as OA contrast agents if made to exhibit suitable light absorption properties. Recently introduced gas vesicles (GVs), a class of naturally evolved gas-filled protein nanostructures, can serve as genetically encodable OCT contrast agents. GVs have yet to be used for OA imaging, but might be a promising candidate for dual-modal OA–OCT applications as the light absorption of the protein is substantially different from the surrounding aqueous environment.¹⁷¹ A summary of dual-modal OA–OCT contrast agents is provided in Table 3.

Dual-modal OA–OCT contrast materials.

Modality	Category	Subcategory	Contrast agents	Peak absorption (nm)	Application	Ref.
OA–OCT	Inorganic materials	Gold particles	Stacked gold nanodisks (SANs)	670–830	Chick embryo imaging	158
			PEG-AuNPs	520	Retinal and choroidal blood vessels imaging	57
			Gold nanorod	700	Choroidal neovascularization imaging	155
			Gold nanostars	650	Choroidal neovascularization imaging	154
		Gold clusters	CGNPs (clusters)	650	Choroidal neovascularization imaging	172

Open in a new tab

Optoacoustic and Raman scattering microscopy

Raman scattering microscopy (RSM) is a well-established technique for detecting both endogenous and exogenous markers with high specificity, based on vibrational and rotational transitions of molecular structures. The relatively weak intrinsic Raman scattering signal can be amplified with the surface-enhanced Raman scattering (SERS) and the surface-enhanced resonance Raman scattering (SERRS) effects. RSM offers complementary molecular contrast when paired with OA imaging. However, concurrent OA-Raman measurements are impeded by several factors. Firstly, due to the small cross-section of Raman scattering, RSM suffers from inherently weak signals, necessitating lengthy integration times for each measurement point whereas OA microscopy recordings over large FOVs are typically done within seconds or minutes. Secondly, in coherent RSM two ultrafast pulsed lasers in femtosecond or picosecond range are used while OA usually employs a different type of a nanosecond pulsed laser to effectively induce the OA effect. Finally, RSM and OA have different contrast mechanisms and do not share common information that can facilitate image co-registration. Given the differences in their temporal and spatial resolutions, signal excitation/detection schemes, and contrast mechanisms, OA-Raman imaging has been performed by sequential scanning with both modalities. Most of the recent work in this topic has focused on the development of dual-modal OA-Raman contrast agents, particularly for tumor diagnosis purposes to enhance clinical management of cancer.

OA-Raman contrast agents

To harness the advantages of excellent molecular specificity of Raman imaging and deep penetration of OA imaging, several dual-modal OA-Raman contrast agents have been introduced, primarily in the form of core–shell composites (Table 4). Nanostars for combined SERRS and multi-spectral optoacoustic tomography (MSOT) imaging were produced by encapsulating light-absorbing IR780 dye onto a gold nanostar core (Fig. 7(a)), which resulted in a light absorption peak at ∼770 nm (Fig. 7(b)). The proposed SERRS-MSOT-nanostars were subsequently employed for dual-mode imaging of glioblastoma tissue sections (Fig. 7(c) and (d)).³³ GNRs are another type of nanomaterial providing high SERS signal and a tunable optical absorption cross section. When functionalized with SERS reporters such as IR792, the modified GNRs manifest a different Raman spectrum, and the absorption peak could be tuned by changing the aspect ratio and particle size for optimized OA performance.³⁰ Besides, a ratiometric dual-modal contrast agent, termed AuNNR@MSi-AuNPs, was designed based on a core–satellite nanostructure by incorporating additional standard OA-Raman reporters located on mesoporous silica-coated nanogapped gold nanorods (AuNNRs) for optimal OA and Raman imaging. Specifically, the ratiometric OA-Raman readings between standard reporters (OA: gold nanorod; Raman: 2-naphthalenethiol) and reference reporters (OA: 2,2′-azino-bis 3-ethylbenzothiazoline-6-sulfonic acid; Raman: 4-mercaptobenzoboric acid) facilitate quantitative detection of H₂O₂ in subcutaneous tumor models in mice and knee osteoarthritis in rabbits.¹⁷³ Another approach involves doping polydopamine (PDA) with the semi-conducting polymer PPy on the supportive SiO₂ templates, shown in Fig. 7(e). PDA offers high absorption and tunes the optical bandgap energy for enhanced Raman signals and diminished FL background due to the resonance Raman effect. Both macromolecules are deposited on a SiO₂ template to form a SiO₂-CS@PPy-PDA nanoparticle, using chondroitin sulfate as the stabilizer. The enhanced OA and Raman signals were validated in images of tumor regions in A549-tumor-bearing mice (Fig. 7(f) and (g)).

Hybrid OA-Raman contrast materials.

Modality	Category	Subcategory	Contrast agents	Absorption (nm)	Application	Ref.
OA-Raman	Organic materials	Polymeric nanoprobes	SiO₂-CS@PPy-PDA	650	Tumor imaging	32
	Inorganic materials	Nobel metals	AuNNR@MSi-AuNPs	750	Tumor, knee osteoarthritis	173
	Hybrid materials	Metal-dye complexes	SERRS-MSOT-nanostars	770	Tumor imging (glioblastoma)	33
	Hybrid materials	Other	GNR with SERS reporter	661/698/756	Tumor imaging (ovarian cancer)	30

Open in a new tab

Combining optoacoustic and magnetic resonance imaging

Magnetic resonance (MR) imaging is a well-established anatomical and functional imaging tool featured with excellent soft tissue contrast and whole-body coverage, both in small animals and humans. As a non-invasive and non-ionizing modality, it is widely used in preclinical and clinical applications and is often the method of choice in oncological and brain investigations.¹⁷⁴ Like any other imaging modality, MRI is afflicted with a number of shortcomings, including high procurement and maintenance costs, slow imaging speed for high-resolution interrogations, and limited molecular sensitivity. Functional MR imaging (fMRI) based on the blood-oxygen-level-dependent (BOLD) signal has become the gold standard to study brain function. Likewise, fMRI suffers from limited ability to capture fast neuronal responses owning to the indirect hemodynamic readings provided by the BOLD signal.¹⁷⁵ Advanced molecular MRI approaches have been proposed, yet failing to provide high spatio-temporal resolution readings with adequate sensitivity.¹⁷⁶ In contrast, OA offers fast imaging performance with higher molecular sensitivity but limited penetration depth and relatively poor soft tissue contrast. Powerful complementary advantages could therefore be unlocked with dual-modal OA–MR imaging. The excellent soft tissue contrast provided by MR may serve as anatomical reference for OA, while the multiparametric hemodynamic readings retrieved with OA can complement and cross-validate the BOLD signal, which is currently assumed to be primarily sensitive to deoxygenated hemoglobin. Generally, this multimodal approach can impact many biomedical research fields and improve the diagnostic and therapeutic monitoring capabilities of the standalone modalities e.g. in breast cancer or cardiovascular disease imaging applications. Considering that OA has recently been shown capable of imaging the human brain,^177,178 the multimodal OA–MR combination may potentially have an impact on clinical neuroscience.

OA–MR imaging systems

The high magnetic field strength used by MR scanners combined with the strong field gradients generated by radio-frequency (RF) pulses hampers efficient implementation of the dual-modality OA and MR imaging, which has mainly been achieved via stand-alone acquisitions.^{40,44,179–181} Accurate image coregistration is crucial for accurately combining, correlating, and validating the information acquired from independent measurements. This has mostly been performed via landmark-based methods from sequentially acquired images.^42,182 However, coregistration is significantly challenged by differences in orientation and tissue deformations resulting from independent acquisitions. Recently, a fully hybrid magnetic resonance optoacoustic tomography (MROT) scanner has been developed featuring an MR-compatible OA tomography module inserted into a 9.4 T preclinical MR scanner bore (Fig. 8(a)).⁴³ MROT provides concurrent dual-modal in vivo anatomical and functional acquisitions, thus averting the complexity of the coregistration problem with simultaneously acquired images.¹⁸³ The mutual interference challenges between the OA and MR acquisitions were mitigated via automatic detection of corrupted frames and by using deuterium oxide (heavy water) to couple US waves. Induced hemodynamic responses to an oxygen challenge paradigm were successfully captured with both modalities across the entire mouse brain.⁴³ Additionally, highly-correlated changes in BOLD and OA hemodynamic components (HbO, HbR, HbT and sO₂) (Fig. 8(b)) were observed under an electrical stimulation paradigm.⁴⁵ Stronger percentile changes were measured in the HbO signal (Fig. 8(c)), while BOLD and HbR signals were found to be less sensitive to sensory responses.⁴⁵

OA–MR contrast agents

A variety of probes have been developed to enhance performance of the dual-modal OA–MR imaging (Table 5). Of particular interest are nanomaterials providing high optical absorption and altered T₁ or T₂ relaxation times, such as Gd³⁺ chelates, superparamagnetic iron oxide (SPIO) NPs, manganese(ii) chelates, and reporter genes.¹⁸⁴ Triple-modality MR–OA-Raman imaging was achieved with multimodal NPs composed of a gold core covered with Raman active layer and coated with Gd³⁺ (Fig. 9(a)).³¹ These provided a high longitudinal (T₁) relaxation time (3.0 × 10⁶ mM⁻¹ s⁻¹), strong optical absorbance (2.75 × 10¹⁰ cm⁻¹ M⁻¹) peaked at 540 nm (Fig. 9(b)), and a unique Raman signature. Consecutive MR, OA and Raman imaging revealed EPR-based co-localized accumulation of the NPs in murine glioblastomas following intravenous injection (Fig. 9(c)). Whole-brain localization of the tumor was achieved by MRI, with OA offering high 3D spatial resolution and Raman providing high-sensitivity surface imaging of the tumor margins.

Dual-modal OA–MR contrast materials.

Modality	Category	Subcategory	Contrast agents	Peak absorption (nm)	Application	Ref.
OA-MR	Organic materials	Small molecule	Gd-IR780	790	Tumor apoptosis	185
	Inorganic materials	Metal sulfide	Cu_2−xS NPs	∼1160	Cervical cancer	186
		Metal sulfide	Cu₂MnS₂ NPs	800–1300	PTT of murine sarcoma model	187
		Multimetallic particles	Au-IO NP	530–550	Cell imaging	188
			SPIO@Au	810	Glioblastoma tumors	40
			Nanowontons	700	Mouse imaging	189
			MSIOs	NIR	PTT of hepatocellular carcinoma	190
		Iron particles	MINPs	NIR	Immunotherapy, PTT of breast cancer model	41
		Iron particles	Fe³⁺-PEG-MNP	680–980	MSC labeling	191
		Other	Cobalt at carbon NPs	400–1000	Glioma tumors	192
			Gd–Fe/HCSs	400–1100	Liver imaging	193
			HA-MnO@MSN NPs	N.A.	Tumor oxygen modulation	181
	Hybrid materials	Metal–polymer composites	CP-IO	750	Breast tumor imaging	39
		Other	DDNPs	790	Thrombus diagnosis	194
		Other	PB:Mn nanocubes	808	PTT of breast cancer model	195

Open in a new tab

Melanin, an endogenous biomarker for melanoma detection providing strong OA contrast, has also been applied in the dual-modal OA–MR setting.¹⁹⁶ PEGylated melanin NPs (MNPs) were further conjugated with RGD for tumor targeting and chelated to ⁶⁴Cu²⁺ (PET radiolabel) and Fe³⁺ (T₁ contrast agent) ions to form a ⁶⁴Cu–Fe-RGD-PEG-MNP nanoplatform for triple-modality OA–MR–PET imaging (Fig. 9(d)). Hyperintensities in the T₁-weighted (Fig. 9(e)) and OA images (Fig. 9(f)) were produced at the tumor site. Both MR and OA signals were found to be linear with NP concentration, with OA being superior to MR in terms of detection sensitivity. A myriad of other probes have been developed for dual-mode OA–MR diagnostic imaging, including cobalt NPs,¹⁸⁹ copper sulfide NPs,¹⁸⁶ copper manganese sulfide nanoplates,¹⁸⁷ conjugated polymer iron oxide (CP-IO) NPs,³⁹ SPIO@Au-labeled mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs),⁴⁰ manganese monoxide nanocomposites (MnO@Au NCs),¹⁹⁷ PEGylated melanin and iron ions NPs (Fe³⁺-PEG-MNPs),¹⁹¹ manganese dioxide coated NPs,¹⁸⁰ cobalt core/carbon shell NPs,¹⁹² carbon nanospheres,¹⁹³ caspase-3 activatable Gd-chelated fluorophores,¹⁸⁵ MnO-hyaluronic acid NPs,¹⁸¹ gold/iron oxide (Au–IO) multimetallic NPs¹⁸⁸ and fluorophore–protein complex.¹⁹⁸ The dual-modal agents have been utilized for enhanced visualization of tumors, thrombi, stem cells, and nerve injuries, to name a few representative examples.^31,44,194

Notably, there is a growing interest in the design of dual-modal theranostic probes providing both therapeutic and diagnostic capabilities. PTT is a cancer treatment strategy based on light-absorbing probes converting laser energy into heat to ablate cancer cells with little collateral damage to surrounding healthy tissues. PTT exhibits reduced side effects compared to mainstream cancer treatments like chemotherapy and radiotherapy (RT).¹⁹⁹ Dual-modal OA–MR image-guided PTT with a single theranostic nanoagent offers complementary advantages for precise lesion localization in the murine brain. Furthermore, dual-modal imaging enables monitoring functional parameters of the tumor environment, such as oxygen and hemoglobin levels in response to therapy, thus allowing continuous adjustment of the intervention. Dual-modal OA–MR contrast agents with high photothermal efficiency under laser radiation have been studied for photothermal applications, including Mn²⁺-doped Prussian blue nanocubes,¹⁹⁵ MoS₂/Fe₃O₄ NPs,¹⁹⁰ copper manganese sulfide nanoplates,¹⁸⁷ mesoporous silica NPs hybridized with manganese dioxide NPs,²⁰⁰ and FeSe₂/Bi₂Se₃ nanosheets.²⁰¹ Recently, magnetic responsive immunostimulatory nanoagents (MINPs) were explored for OA–MR image guided PTT on primary tumors and hyperthermia-triggered immunotherapy on distant metastatic tumors. The MINPs were fabricated using a double-emulsion process and involved three key components: (1) SPIO NPs with combined MR, OA, and PTT functionality, (2) cytosine–phosphate–guanine (CpG) oligodeoxynucleotides (ODNs), immunoadjuvants increasing antitumor immunity, (3) monomethoxypoly(ethylene glycol)-poly(lactic-co-glycolic acid)-polyl-lysine (mPEG-PLGA-PLL) triblock copolymers, which are cationic carriers to encapsulate the aforementioned agents (Fig. 9(g)). MINPs displayed broad absorption spectra, featuring a peak at 262 nm, which is indicative of the characteristic absorption peak of CpG ODNs (Fig. 9(h)). Upon intravenous injection of MINPs and subsequent magnetic targeting with external magnetic field exposure, a rapid increase in OA signals and decrease in T₂-weighted signals were observed and sustained for 24 h demonstrating the accumulation and retention of the MINPs at the tumor site⁴¹ (Fig. 9(i)).

Multimodal combinations with ionizing imaging techniques

Nuclear medicine imaging methods, such as positron emission tomography (PET) or single-photon-emission computed tomography (SPECT), are molecular imaging techniques that map the biodistribution of extrinsically administered radioactive tracers to provide information on organ function and cellular (metabolic) activity at the whole-body level.^202,203 Due to their poor anatomical contrast and spatial resolution, these techniques are commonly combined with X-ray computed tomography (CT) that provides the missing anatomical context with high spatial resolution but suffers from low molecular sensitivity.²⁰⁴ Combination between OA and ionizing imaging modalities brings together the functional OA readouts related to blood oxygenation, the 3D whole-body structural information from CT, and other valuable functional and molecular information from PET or SPECT. Considering the widespread use of PET–CT in clinical oncology, OA can further impact clinical cancer diagnosis and treatment monitoring by providing additional information on tumor hypoxia. To this end, such multimodal combinations have been performed with independent measurements from stand-alone scanners.

OA and X-ray CT

CT contrast stems from the interaction (attenuation) of X-rays and inner-shell electrons. Thereby, probes containing elements with a high atomic number (commonly iodine or barium) are frequently used as CT contrast agents in clinical settings.²⁰⁵ Diverse dual-modal OA–CT diagnostic and theranostic agents have been extensively explored (Table 6). In all cases, multimodal imaging has been realized sequentially with preclinical OA and CT scanners. PEGylated tungsten disulfide nanosheets (WS₂-PEG) have been reported as dual-modal OA–CT contrast agents. The synthesis procedure involves fabrication of single-layered WS₂ nanosheets from bulk WS₂ by means of the Morrison method²⁰⁶ and a subsequent surface coating with lipoic acid conjugated PEG (Fig. 10(a)). The probe was shown to provide high NIR-absorbance (Fig. 10(b)) and high X-ray attenuation.²⁰⁷In vivo CT imaging of mice bearing 4T1 breast tumors before and after intratumoral injection of WS₂-PEG revealed an almost 6-fold enhancement of the CT signal at the tumor site (Fig. 10(c)), while OA signals were enhanced by approximately 5 and 3 times following intratumoral and intravenous injection, respectively (Fig. 10(d)). Hybrid OA–CT imaging of WS₂-PEG exploited the complementary strength of both modalities. Whole-body imaging achieved with CT was complemented with the high spatial resolution images of tumor microstructures acquired with OA. In a recent study, titanium carbide embedded in gold nanocomposites (Ti₃C₂@Au) were developed to study photothermally-enhanced RT in the NIR-II window.²⁰⁸ The nanocomposites, synthesized by Au growth on the surface of the Ti₃C₂ nanosheets (Fig. 10(e)), displayed high optical absorption for both the NIR-I and the NIR-II windows (Fig. 10(f)). Following intravenous injection of Ti₃C₂@Au to 4T1 tumor bearing mice, enhanced OA signal with maximum at 24 h post-injection was observed at the tumor site, demonstrating the high uptake of the probe due to the EPR effect (Fig. 10(g)). Similarly, increased CT signals 24 h after injection corroborated the OA imaging results (Fig. 10(h)). Blood oxygen saturation measured with OA doubled that of preinjection levels and was maintained for an hour post the NIR-II irradiation (Fig. 10(i)), indicating that the mild photothermal heating could effectively improve the tumor hypoxia microenvironment thus enhance cancer RT performance.²⁰⁸

OA–CT, OA–SPECT, and OA–PET contrast materials.

Modality	Category	Subcategory	Contrast agents	Absorption	Application (nm)	Ref.
OA–CT	Inorganic materials	Nobel metals	Pd@Au-PEG	700	PTT of breast cancer model	209
		Semimetals	Bi₂Se₃ NSS	400–900	HeLa tumor, PTT, Chemo	210
		Semimetals	Bi-LyP-1 NPs	200–1100	PTT/RT of breast cancer model	48
		Transition-metal dichalcogenides	WS₂-PEG	700–1000	PTT of breast cancer model	207
		Multimetallic particles	Ti₃C₂@Au	700–1000	PTT/RT of breast cancer model	208
	Hybrid materials	Metal/semimetals-polymer	TaO_x@PPy NPs	300–900	PTT of glioma	211
		Metal/semimetals-polymer	Bi@ PPy-PEG NHs	400–900	PTT of breast cancer model	212
		Other	Au@PB NPs	650–900	PTT of colorectal adenocarcinoma	213
OA–SPECT	Organic materials	Small molecule	A1094@RGD-HBc	1094	Brain gliomas	214
			Cy@Silk-^99mTc	600–900	PTT of orthotopic osteosarcoma	215
			¹²⁵I-MB	667	SLN mapping	47
	Hybrid materials		CPMSN@¹²⁵I-SD	680–860	Brain ischemia treatment	216
OA–PET	Inorganic materials	Metal sulfide	⁶⁴CuS-NPs	1064	SLN mapping	53
OA–PET	Inorganic materials	Other	⁸⁹Zr-bGNR@MSN(DOX)-PEG	805	Chemo-PTT therapy of breast cancer model	51

Open in a new tab

OA and SPECT imaging

Nanoagents labeled with radionuclides, e.g.¹²⁵I,^47,216¹³¹I,²¹⁴ and ^99mTc⁴¹ have been further studied for OA–SPECT hybrid imaging. OA–SPECT–CT probes have been used as diagnostics agents for sentinel lymph node mapping⁴⁷ and tumor imaging,^214,217 and substantially as theranostics agents to perform image-guided PTT,^{209–213,218,219} combined PTT and RT,^{48,208,220,221} and combined PTT and chemotherapy.²²² A cypate-induced silk nanoagent labeled with ^99mTc was used for dual-modal OA-SPECT imaging and theranostic applications⁴⁹ The synthesis procedure consisted in chemically linking the cypate molecule to the amine groups of silk fibroin and subsequent formation of NPs (Cy@Silk) through self-assembly under alkaline conditions (Fig. 11(a)), which provided strong NIR absorption (Fig. 11(b)). In vivo dynamic OA-SPECT imaging of mice bearing osteosarcomas was performed via intravenous injection of the radionuclide labeled NP Cy@Silk-^99mTc (Fig. 11(c) and (d)). OA signals were increased by 4.3-fold at the tumor location 2 h post-injection, demonstrating the accumulation of NPs via the EPR effect (Fig. 11(c) and (e)). Similarly, SPECT imaging was realized at 30 min, 2, 6, and 24 h after injection of Cy@Silk-^99mTc, and a high uptake was observed at the tumor location and through the removal pathway of the nanoagent (Fig. 11(d) and (f)). The OA–SPECT–CT contrast materials are further summarized in Tables 6 and 7.

Multimodal OA contrast materials.

Modality	Category	Subcategory	Contrast agents	Absorption (nm)	Application	Ref.
OA–MR-Raman	Hybrid materials		MPR nanoparticle	540	Brain tumor resection	31
OA–MR–CT	Inorganic materials	Multimetallic composites	MnO@Au NCs	400–1100	Liver cancer model	197
		Multimetallic composites	MnO₂-mSiO₂@Au NPs	680–1064	PTT/RT in breast cancer model	200
		Other	MPDA-WS₂@MnO₂	300–808	PTT/RT in breast cancer model	221
			Gd₂O₃/BSA@MoS₂-HA NPs	200–900	PTT/RT in breast cancer model	220
	Hybrid materials		Au@MIL-88(Fe)	720	Glioma	217
	Hybrid materials		Gd-PEG-Bi NPs	700 –900	PTT of glioma	219
OA–MR–PET	Inorganic materials		⁶⁴Cu-MoS₂-IO-(d)PEG	400–1000	PTT in breast cancer model	223
	Hybrid materials	Melanin-based particles	⁶⁴Cu-Fe-RGD-PEG-MNP	300–1000	Glioblastoma	196
			⁶⁴ Cu-MMNs	500–1100	PTT of glioma, γ-irradiation protection	224
			⁶⁴Cu-AMF	N.A.	Colon cancer, liver cancer	225
		Other	CDPGM NPs	500–900	Chemo-PTT therapy of glioma	226
		Other	⁶⁴Cu-NOTA-RGO-IONP-^1stPEG-^2ndPEG	700–1000	Breast cancer model	227
OA–MR–US	Inorganic materials	Iron particles	PBNCs	750	MSC labeling	179
OA–CT–FL	Organic materials		PFOB@IR825-HA-Cy5.5 NPs	870	PTT of colon cancer	218
OA–CT–FL	Organic materials		Pdots-DOX-iohexol@hydroge	800	Chemo-PTT therapy in breast cancer model	222
OA–PET–FL	Organic materials	Small molecule	[¹⁸F]CDA-3	798	Aβ plaque imaging in AD	50
OA–PET–FL	Organic materials	Other	Pheo ss-InFroMs	∼660	Intestine	228
OA–MR–CT–PET	Inorganic materials	Multimetallic composite	⁶⁴Cu-FeSe₂/Bi₂Se₃-PEG	700–1000	PTT/RT in breast cancer model	201

Open in a new tab

OA–PET combinations

The PET technique is widely used in disease diagnosis, monitoring responses to therapy, and pharmacokinetic studies. It allows whole-body quantitative tracking of radionuclide-labeled tracers with high sensitivity, but suffers from limited spatial resolution, slow imaging speed, absence of anatomical information, and a need for radionuclide production facility.²⁰³ The low spatial resolution of preclinical PET scanners relative to the size of internal structures in small animals often leads to partial volume effects.²²⁹ The higher resolution of OA imaging can help to better exploit the excellent sensitivity and deep tissue quantitative imaging capacity of PET. OA provides unique oxygenation readouts that can be exploited in a dual-modal OA–PET combination, which has been used e.g. for image-guided cancer therapy, gut imaging, and neuroimaging of amyloid-beta plaque.^{50,51,224,226,228,230}

Positron-emitting radioisotopes, such as ⁶⁴Cu^{53,201,223–225,227,230} and ¹⁸F,⁵⁰ have been combined with OA nanoprobes to establish the dual contrast (Tables 6 and 7). IONPs self-assembled on MoS₂ nanosheets labeled with ⁶⁴Cu (⁶⁴Cu-MoS₂-IO-(d)PEG) (Fig. 12(a)) act as a biocompatible triple-modality OA–PET–MR contrast agent.²²³ This probe exhibits high NIR-absorbance attributed to MoS₂ nanosheets and allowed imaging the distribution and pharmacokinetics of the ⁶⁴Cu isotope with PET in an animal tumor model (Fig. 12(b)). Similarly, elevated OA signal levels were observed following administration of the probe peaking at ∼8 h post injection, thus corroborating tumor retention of the probe (Fig. 12(c)). The whole-body imaging capacity and high sensitivity of PET, combined with the high-resolution functional OA readings, were used for image-guided PTT with 808 nm laser irradiation (0.78 W cm⁻², 5 min), resulting in complete tumor ablation. Another notable multimodal nanotheranostic probe is ⁶⁴Cu-labeled doxorubicin (DOX)-loaded polydopamine (PDA)-gadolinium-metallofullerene (CDPGM), which was used for OA–PET–MR imaging-guided chemo-photothermal combination therapy.²²⁶ The PDA core of the CDPGM acts as an OA contrast agent with high NIR-absorption and photothermal stability. In vivo imaging of U87MG-tumor-bearing mice following intravenous injection of the probe manifested gradually enhanced OA contrast at the tumor site (Fig. 12(d)). The uptake efficiency of the probe within the tumor was measured quantitatively with PET, indicating increased uptake at 24 h postinjection followed by a subsequent decrease (Fig. 12(e) and (f)). OA signal intensity showed a maximum 3-fold increase 24 h post-injection and decreased at later time points in accordance with the PET results (Fig. 12(f)).

Dual-modal neuroimaging of disease models may enable validating the functional OA readouts with a well-established PET modality. Also, the high spatial resolution and molecular information from OA can enhance the capabilities of PET for accurate diagnosis and localization of lesions. Recent work incorporated a ¹⁸F labeled croconium dye in an amyloid probe ([¹⁸F]-CDA-3) to visualize amyloid beta (Aβ) deposits in the Alzheimer's disease (AD) murine brain.⁵⁰ The designed OA–PET–FL probe exhibited strong NIR-absorption (Fig. 12(g)) and photothermal efficiency, displaying distinct distribution pattern in transgenic as opposed to wildtype mice (Fig. 12(h)). Time-lapse OA images displayed enhanced signals in cerebral vessels in the brains of transgenic mice predominantly in the sagittal sinus, while the signal intensity remained almost identical in wildtype mice (Fig. 12(j) and (i)). The OA signal intensity ratio between transgenic and wildtype mice peaked at 4 h following injection, suggesting gradual accumulation in the vessels and high binding to the Aβ plaque.

Conclusions and outlook

Bioimaging techniques have become essential tools in basic and translational research.²³¹ In parallel, contrast materials are being developed for improved visibility of specific tissues, cells, physiological processes, or molecular pathways in health and disease.²³² Each modality comes with specific strengths and weaknesses pertaining to its costs, portability, spatial and temporal resolution performance, penetration depth, or molecular sensitivity and specificity. A common approach to achieve comprehensive examinations is to integrate different modalities into hybrid (multimodal) imaging systems providing complementary information. The added value of multimodal imaging is manifested e.g. with the widespread use of PET–CT scanners in oncology, brain diseases and other fields, where functional (metabolic) information retrieved with PET is fused onto CT anatomical images.²³³ Proper selection of the contrast agents is essential for attaining optimal multimodal imaging performance. Multiple substances can be administered, e.g. to facilitate co-registration of multimodal images by enhancing angiographic contrast.²³⁴ However, multimodal agents with suitable pharmacokinetic properties, which simultaneously provide detectable contrast in all the employed modalities, are generally preferred.

As a relatively new addition to the bioimaging arsenal, OA techniques are experiencing rapid technological progress. Initially, light absorption properties of the common optical contrast agents have been exploited for contrast-enhanced OA imaging.²³⁵ More recently, the unique advantages of OA imaging are fostering the development of dedicated contrast materials with physical, chemical, and biochemical characteristics tailored to specific applications.^{18,232,235,236} Dissemination of OA imaging systems among biomedical researchers helps crystallizing the key advantages and limitations of this modality with respect to alternative imaging methods, thus reinforcing the need for developing multimodal OA imaging approaches. Here we provide a detailed description of the benefits and challenges associated with state-of-the-art multi-modality systems, contrast materials, and respective applications, including the combinations of OA with US, FL, OCT, Raman, MRI, CT, SPECT, and PET imaging. We delve into specific strengths achieved by merging the information stemming from absorption of photons in biological tissues with complementary imaging contrast mechanisms based on reflection, scattering, and attenuation of US waves, FL emission, proton relaxation, diffusion, and perfusion-weighted contrast in MRI, X-ray attenuation in CT, single-photon or positron-emitting radionuclides in SPECT and PET. Beyond enriching the structural, molecular, functional, and metabolic information retrieved from living tissues, hybridization with other methods can also help solving or mitigating some of the challenges commonly attributed to the OA methods, such as limited imaging depth, image artifacts associated with acoustic heterogeneities, or wavelength-dependent light attenuation adversely affecting the image quantification capacity.

An important advantage of OA imaging is its label-free capacity, i.e. the ability to operate based solely on endogenous chromophores such as hemoglobin, lipids, water, collagen, or melanin. The high concentration of hemoglobin in red blood cells enables label-free angiographic imaging as well as monitoring of hemodynamic changes and oxygen saturation, which has provided new insights in neuroscience, oncology, and other fields.^237,238 However, the strong absorption background by hemoglobin is a double-edged sword that may hamper the detection of other molecules in the presence of blood. Exogenously administered molecules and particulate agents have been used to enhance the performance of stand-alone and multimodal OA imaging.^18,235 Accumulation of such agents in specific tissues and cells reveals the presence of pathological microenvironments or protein targets. Organic fluorescent dyes are excellent light absorbers thus ideally suited for hybrid OA–FL imaging, while radio-labelled molecules can readily facilitate hybridization with nuclear medicine methods. More flexibility is achieved by capitalizing on the capabilities of modern nanotechnology to produce multiple types of NPs that can improve molecular targeting efficiency or encapsulate multiple contrast substances and/or therapeutic moieties. Nanoparticulate contrast agents are widely used for contrast enhancement in various imaging modalities thus can readily be engineered to exhibit light absorption properties to achieve optimal OA multimodal performance. Larger micrometer-scale particles and microbubbles are commonly used for enhancing US contrast and enabling super-resolution imaging beyond the acoustic diffraction barrier.²³⁹ Recently, microparticles have also been used to realize similar super-resolution approaches in FL and OA imaging.^240–242 Further developments in multimodal contrast materials should not only focus on improving their efficiency of signal generation but also optimizing the biodistribution properties, targeting capacity, biodegradability, and biocompatibility to reduce toxicity and administered doses.

Hybridization of OA with other imaging modalities may face technical challenges. OA imaging traditionally requires an opaque transducer array detector to collect signals over a broad angle surrounding the object thus limiting the physical space for signal collection with other modalities. Furthermore, the OA signal sampling electronics emits electromagnetic radiation, potentially interfering with other imaging modalities, such as MRI, where shielding and proper grounding are essential to minimize electromagnetic interference. Besides, coupling media (e.g., water or gel) is commonly required for efficient detection of the generated OA responses, which may introduce additional compatibility issues and image artifacts when combining OA with other modalities. Multimodal system integration also comes with an inevitable cost of higher complexity in terms of the system's hardware design, synchronization of data acquisition, and image interpretation. Nonetheless, with the advent of more affordable lasers and US detection platforms along with new high-performance contrast materials, multimodal OA imaging is expected to find broad applicability in diverse areas, such as oncology, dermatology, neurology, and cardiovascular diseases.

We have shown that multimodal OA approaches can impact a myriad of biomedical research fields. When combined with MRI or US, the simultaneous multi-parametric hemodynamic readings can significantly enhance neuroscience research into resting-state or stimulus-evoked brain activity with FL imaging assisted with calcium or voltage indicators providing additional insights on the neural activity. Combining MRI or CT for anatomical tumor characterization with the functional and molecular contrast offered by OA can enhance oncological research, where multimodal agents further enable therapeutic interventions, e.g. via PTT or PDT. The use of high-frame-rate imaging technologies, such as OA, US, or OCT, is essential in cardiovascular biology, where simultaneous imaging with diverse contrast mechanisms can facilitate the study of electromechanical wave propagation and cardiac arrythmias. Verification and cross-validation of experimental results with other imaging methods have also been essential for the wider adoption of OA imaging approaches. This is of particular relevance for successful clinical translation of OA imaging where the physicians trained with well-established clinical imaging methods may lack the knowledge to interpret OA images. Multimodal imaging systems based on hybridization with routinely used clinical approaches can then help identify OA biomarkers of clinical relevance for diagnostic purposes. Multimodal contrast agents with clear OA signatures can also potentially be used in patients. Light-absorbing organic dyes, such as ICG, Evans blue, or Methylene blue, are approved for clinical use, while contrast-enhanced US, MRI, or CT is also routinely used. This is expected to facilitate the regulatory approval of new hybrid formulations provided the added value of multimodal OA imaging has been demonstrated. All in all, the complementary anatomical, functional, molecular, and metabolic information rendered with multimodal imaging systems facilitates the full exploitation of the unique advantages and complementarity of OA toward a more comprehensive understanding of biological processes.

Abbreviations

NP: Nanoparticle
PFC: Perfluorocarbon
MB: Methylene blue
BI: Black ink
MSOT: Multi-spectral optoacoustic tomography
AuMBs: Albumin-shelled microbubbles with encapsulated gold nanorods
PAnDs: Plasmonic noble metal nanoparticles-encapsulated PFC nanodroplet
PSMAP/ICG NBs: Prostate-specific membrane antigen-targeting, indocyanine green-loaded nanobubbles
SAPTN: Stimulator of interferon genes agonist-based photoimmunothernostic nanomedicine
MC-PSE: GSH-activatable probe
DTP-DPTQ NPs: Fluorophore with dithienopyrrole as the donor and 6,7-diphenyl-[1,2,5]thiadiazolo [3,4-g]quinoxaline as the acceptor
PTT: Photothermal therapy
RT: Radiotherapy
GGT: γ-Glutamyltranspeptidase
LET-12: IR-1064 self-assembly modified with a choline and acetylcholine analogue, 2-methacryloyloxy ethyl phosphorylcholine
CyA: Aminopeptidase N (APN)-activated type I phototheranostic probe
FMP&N-FMP: FAPα-activatable molecular pro-theranostic probes organic materials
P-CyPt: NIR merocyanine fluorophore capped with an ALP-recognition phosphate group (PO₃H), a GSH-reducible CDDP prodrug (Pt(iv)), and a hydrophobic d-Phe-d-Phe (FF) dipeptide
CTSK-APPA: Hemicyanine dye (CyN₃OH) caged by a cathepsin K (CTSK)-cleavable peptide sequence on one side and functionalized with osteophilic alendronate
AIEgens: Aggregation-induced emission luminogens
MPNPs: AIEgens MTPE-TT and chemotherapeutic drug PTX conjugated with 4-nitrobenzyl chloroformate
C-NTBD: Aggregation-induced emission luminogens with benzodithiadiazole as the electron acceptor
EMT-NPs: Endoplasmic reticulum and mitochondria dual-targeting nanoparticles
PDX: Patient-derived xenograft
SPCy: Semiconducting polymer conjugated with a hemicyanine (hemi-Cy) dye caged by a NE-cleavable peptide as the side chain
P₂NPs: Semiconductor polymer P2 encapsulated with amphiphilic PEGylated phospholipid
CF-SPNs: Semiconducting polymer nanoparticles with fluorescence resonance energy transfer (FRET) and chemiluminescence resonance energy transfer
mPPy@COF-Por: Membrane-coated core–shell nanomotor consisting a porphyrin-decorated COF Shell and polypyrrole core
AuNNPs–Ag₂S Ve: Nanogapped gold nanoparticles (AuNNPs)–silver sulfide (Ag₂S) vesicle (Ve)
AgIONPs: Silver-iron oxide nanoparticles
mdGC: Gold nanorods with carbon-based nanomaterials
PCD: Permeable carbon dots
V₂C-TAT@Ex-RGD: Vanadium carbide (V₂C) QDs PTA modified with TAT peptides and packaged into engineered exosomes (Ex) vector with RGD modification
PhAg NPs: NIR light absorbing Silver NPs loaded with Pheophorbide-a
CFNPs: Croconium dye (Croc)–ferrous ion (Fe²⁺) nanoprobes
CDT: Chemodynamic therapy
Au⁰–Por@FeCO: Gold-based porphyrinic coordination polymer nanosheet loaded with triiron dodecarbonyl
MTCN: Microenvironment-tailored catalytic nanoprobe
UCN: Upconversion nanocrystal
CRUN: Enzyme-responsive cross-linking of rare-earth UCNs
HCy5/Cy7-UCNs: Lanthanide-doped upconversion nanocrystals with ROS- and RNS-sensitive NIR cyanine fluorophores
AHZ NPs: Acid-labile metal–organic frameworks with mineralized hyaluronidase (HAase) and encapsulated Ag₂S nanodots
HSC-2: Zeolite–carbon-based nanozymes
MSbNSs: Monodispersed mesoporous Sb nanospheres
QDs: Quantum dots
MOF: Metal–organic frameworks
Nanowontons: Zero-valence ferromagnetic cobalt particles with a gold coating
CP-IO: Nanocomposites of conjugated polymers and iron oxide nanoparticles
SPIO@Au nanoparticles: Containing superparamagnetic iron oxide coated with gold
Fe³⁺-PEG-MNP: Polyethylene glycol-modified magnetic nanoparticle
MSC: Mesenchymal stem cells
Gd–Fe/HCSs: Hollow carbon nanospheres dotted with GdPO4 and γ-Fe₂O₃ nanoparticles
HA-MnO@MSN: Core–shell nanoparticle consists of manganese oxide and hyaluronic acid-conjugated mesoporous silica nanoparticle
Au-IO NP: Gold/iron oxide multimetallic nanoparticles
DDNPs: Dual-modality and dual-ligand nanoparticles
PB: Prussian blue
MSIOs: MoS₂/Fe₃O₄ composite
MINPs: Composites of superparamagnetic iron oxide nanoparticles and cytosine–phosphate–guanine oligodeoxynucleotides
NSS: Nanoscale spherical sponges
Bi@PPy-PEG: NHs polyethylene glycol-modified polypyrrole-coated bismuth nanohybrids
Bi-LyP-1: NPs peptide (LyP-1)-labeled ultrasmall semimetal bismuth nanoparticles
CPMSN@¹²⁵I-SD: Cobalt protoporphyrin IX-loaded mesoporous silica nanoparticle with a 125I conjugated/spermine-modified dextran polymer
A1094@RGD-HBc: Mesoionic dye A1094 encapsulated in Arg-Gly-Asp-modified hepatitis B virus core protein (RGD-HBc)
Cy@Silk-^99mTc: Indocyanine green analogue cypate-induced silk fibroin self-assembly nanoagents
SLN: Sentinel lymph node
MPR nanoparticle: Gold–silica–based SERS nanoparticle coated with Gd³⁺ ions
MPDA: Mesoporous polydopamine nanosponges
Gd-PEG-Bi NPs: Pure Bi NPs conjugated with gadolinium-diethylenetriaminepentaacetic acid-bis-tetradecylamide
MNP: Melanin nanoparticle
PGM: Polydopamine–gadolinium–metallofullerene
CPGM: Core–satellite polydopamine–gadolinium–metallofullerene
CDPGM: Radionuclide-⁶⁴Cu-labeled doxorubicin-loaded polydopamine–gadolinium–metallofullerene core–satellite nanotheranostic agent
⁶⁴Cu-MMNs: ⁶⁴Cu-labeled magnetic melanin nanoparticles
PBNCs: Prussian blue nanocubes
Aβ: Amyloid beta
AD: Alzheimer's disease
MINPs: Magnetic responsive immunostimulatory nanoagents
CpG: Cytosine–phosphate–guanine
ODNs: Oligodeoxynucleotides
FOV: Field-of-view
SAN: Stacked gold nanodisk
TUT: Transparent ultrasound transducer
EPR: Enhanced permeability and retention

Author contributions

ZC and DR outlined the review content and structure. QZ, LT, ZC, IG, and XLDB drafted the individual sections. DR supervised the work and edited the manuscript. All authors contributed constructively to the manuscript writing and revisions.

Conflicts of interest

The authors declare no competing interests.

Acknowledgments

The authors acknowledge grant support from the Swiss National Science Foundation (310030_192757), US National Institutes of Health (UF1-NS107680), Innosuisse – Swiss Innovation Agency (51767.1 IP-LS), Swiss Cancer Research (KFS-5234-02-2021), and Personalized Health and Related Technologies of the ETH Domain (PHRT-582).

Biographies

Biography

Zhenyue Chen is a Senior Scientist at the Institute for Biomedical Engineering, University of Zurich and ETH Zurich. He received his PhD degree in Optical Engineering from Beijing Institute of Technology in 2016. During 2016–2019, he worked as a postdoc at the Technical University of Munich and Helmholtz Center Munich, focusing on optoacoustic imaging techniques. His current work involves development of multimodal biomedical imaging approaches combining optics, optoacoustics and MRI. He has co-authored more than 50 papers in peer-reviewed journals and serves as a reviewer for a variety of journals such as Optics Letters, Optics Express, Journal of Biophotonics, ACS Photonics, IEEE TMI.

Biography

Irmak Gezginer obtained her MSc degree in Electrical Engineering from ETH Zurich in 2021. She is currently a PhD candidate under the supervision of Prof. Daniel Razansky at the University of Zurich and ETH Zurich. Her research focuses on development of multimodal imaging techniques that combine optoacoustic tomography and magnetic resonance imaging to study brain function.

Biography

Quanyu Zhou serves as a postdoctoral researcher at the Institute for Biomedical Engineering, University of Zurich and ETH Zurich. She obtained her DrSc degree in Electrical Engineering from ETH Zurich in 2024. Her current research focuses on the development of large-scale fluorescence microscopy techniques for functional brain imaging.

Biography

Lin Tang received her BSc degree in Pharmaceutics from Sichuan Agricultural University in 2017 and MSc degree in 2020 from Wuhan University. She is currently working on a PhD dissertation at the Department of Information Technology and Electrical Engineering at ETH Zurich. Her research interests focus on the development of novel contrast agents with strong spectral signatures in the second near-infrared window to enhance the sensitivity, contrast and penetration depth of optoacoustic and fluorescence imaging techniques.

Biography

Xosé Luís Deàn-Ben has been working in the field of optoacoustic (photoacoustic) imaging since 2010. He currently serves as a senior scientist and group leader at the Institute for Biomedical Engineering and Institute of Pharmacology and Toxicology, University of Zurich and ETH Zurich. Previously, he received post-doctoral training at the Institute of Biological and Medical Imaging, Helmholtz Zentrum Munich. He has contributed to the development of new optoacoustic systems and data processing algorithms and the application of the new imaging methods in cancer research, cardiovascular biology and neuroscience. He has co-authored more than 150 papers in peer-reviewed journals on these topics.

Biography

Daniel Razansky holds the Chair of Biomedical Imaging with double appointment at the Faculty of Medicine, University of Zurich and Department of Information Technology and Electrical Engineering, ETH Zurich. He earned PhD in Biomedical Engineering and MSc in Electrical Engineering from the Technion – Israel Institute of Technology and completed post-doctoral training in bio-optics at the Harvard Medical School. Between 2007 and 2018 he was the Director of Multi-Scale Functional and Molecular Imaging Lab and Professor of Molecular Imaging Engineering at the Technical University of Munich and Helmholtz Center Munich. His Lab pioneered and commercialized a number of imaging technologies, among them the multi-spectral optoacoustic tomography and hybrid optoacoustic ultrasound imaging. He has published over 300 peer-review journal articles and holds 15 patented inventions in bio-imaging and sensing. He is the Founding Editor of Photoacoustics journal and serves on Editorial Boards of a number of journals published by Springer Nature, Elsevier, IEEE and AAPM. He is also an elected Fellow of the IEEE, Optica and SPIE.

References

Manohar S. Razansky D. Photoacoustics: a historical review. Advances in Optics and Photonics. Adv. Opt. Photonics. 2016;8(4):586–617. doi: 10.1364/AOP.8.000586. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
Oraevsky A., et al., Laser optoacoustic imaging of the breast: detection of cancer angiogenesis. BiOS ’99 International Biomedical Optics Symposium. Vol. 3597. 1999: SPIE
Wang X. et al., Noninvasive laser-induced photoacoustic tomography for structural and functional in vivo imaging of the brain. Nat. Biotechnol. 2003;21(7):803–806. doi: 10.1038/nbt839. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Park B. et al., Functional photoacoustic imaging: from nano- and micro- to macro-scale. Nano Convergence. 2023;10(1):29. doi: 10.1186/s40580-023-00377-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Laufer J. et al., In vivo preclinical photoacoustic imaging of tumor vasculature development and therapy. J. Biomed. Opt. 2012;17(5):056016. doi: 10.1117/1.JBO.17.5.056016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Ron A. et al., Volumetric Optoacoustic Imaging Unveils High-Resolution Patterns of Acute and Cyclic Hypoxia in a Murine Model of Breast Cancer. Cancer Res. 2019;79(18):4767–4775. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-18-3769. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Cho E. C. et al., Measuring the Optical Absorption Cross Sections of Au–Ag Nanocages and Au Nanorods by Photoacoustic Imaging. J. Phys. Chem. C. 2009;113(21):9023–9028. doi: 10.1021/jp903343p. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Kim G. et al., Indocyanine-green-embedded PEBBLEs as a contrast agent for photoacoustic imaging. J. Biomed. Opt. 2007;12(4):044020. doi: 10.1117/1.2771530. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Razansky D. et al., Multispectral opto-acoustic tomography of deep-seated fluorescent proteins in vivo. Nat. Photonics. 2009;3(7):412–417. doi: 10.1038/nphoton.2009.98. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
Zhao Z. Swartchick C. B. Chan J. Targeted contrast agents and activatable probes for photoacoustic imaging of cancer. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2022;51(3):829–868. doi: 10.1039/D0CS00771D. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Neuschmelting V. et al., Dual-Modality Surface-Enhanced Resonance Raman Scattering and Multispectral Optoacoustic Tomography Nanoparticle Approach for Brain Tumor Delineation. Small. 2018;14(23):1800740. doi: 10.1002/smll.201800740. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Sanathana Konugolu Venkata S. et al., Diffuse optical characterization of collagen absorption from 500 to 1700 nm. J. Biomed. Opt. 2017;22(1):015006. doi: 10.1117/1.JBO.22.1.015006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Razansky D. Klohs J. Ni R. Multi-scale optoacoustic molecular imaging of brain diseases. Eur. J. Nucl. Med. Mol. Imaging. 2021;48(13):4152–4170. doi: 10.1007/s00259-021-05207-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Wang L. V. Multiscale photoacoustic microscopy and computed tomography. Nat. Photonics. 2009;3(9):503–509. doi: 10.1038/nphoton.2009.157. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Shi J. Tang Y. Yao J. Advances in super-resolution photoacoustic imaging. Quant. Imaging Med. Surg. 2018;8(8):724–732. doi: 10.21037/qims.2018.09.14. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Yao J. Wang L. V. Sensitivity of photoacoustic microscopy. Photoacoustics. 2014;2(2):87–101. doi: 10.1016/j.pacs.2014.04.002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Deán-Ben X. L. et al., Advanced optoacoustic methods for multiscale imaging of in vivo dynamics. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2017;46(8):2158–2198. doi: 10.1039/C6CS00765A. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Weber J. Beard P. C. Bohndiek S. E. Contrast agents for molecular photoacoustic imaging. Nat. Methods. 2016;13(8):639–650. doi: 10.1038/nmeth.3929. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Garcia-Uribe A. et al., Dual-modality photoacoustic and ultrasound imaging system for noninvasive sentinel lymph node detection in patients with breast cancer. Sci. Rep. 2015;5(1):1–8. doi: 10.1038/srep15748. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Nam S. Y. et al., Combined ultrasound and photoacoustic imaging to noninvasively assess burn injury and selectively monitor a regenerative tissue-engineered construct. Tissue Eng., Part C. 2015;21(6):557–566. doi: 10.1089/ten.tec.2014.0306. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Ning B. et al., Ultrasound-aided multi-parametric photoacoustic microscopy of the mouse brain. Sci. Rep. 2015;5(1):18775. doi: 10.1038/srep18775. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Mercep E. Dean-Ben X. L. Razansky D. Combined Pulse-Echo Ultrasound and Multispectral Optoacoustic Tomography With a Multi-Segment Detector Array. IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging. 2017;36(10):2129–2137. doi: 10.1109/TMI.2017.2706200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Merčep E. et al., Transmission–reflection optoacoustic ultrasound (TROPUS) computed tomography of small animals. Light: Sci. Appl. 2019;8(1):18. doi: 10.1038/s41377-019-0130-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Wang Y. et al., Integrated photoacoustic and fluorescence confocal microscopy. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 2010;57(10):2576–2578. doi: 10.1109/TBME.2010.2059026. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Kosik I. and Carson J., Combined 3D photoacoustic and 2D fluorescence imaging of indocyanine green contrast agent flow, SPIE BiOS, vol. 8581. 2013 [Google Scholar]
Chen Z. et al., Hybrid system for in vivo epifluorescence and 4D optoacoustic imaging. Opt. Lett. 2017;42(22):4577–4580. doi: 10.1364/OL.42.004577. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Chen Z. et al., Performance of optoacoustic and fluorescence imaging in detecting deep-seated fluorescent agents. Biomed. Opt. Express. 2018;9(5):2229–2239. doi: 10.1364/BOE.9.002229. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Chen Z. et al., Concurrent fluorescence and volumetric optoacoustic tomography of nanoagent perfusion and bio-distribution in solid tumors. Biomed. Opt. Express. 2019;10(10):5093–5102. doi: 10.1364/BOE.10.005093. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Liu C. et al., The integrated high-resolution reflection-mode photoacoustic and fluorescence confocal microscopy. Photoacoustics. 2019;14:12–18. doi: 10.1016/j.pacs.2019.02.001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Jokerst J. V. et al., Gold nanorods for ovarian cancer detection with photoacoustic imaging and resection guidance via Raman imaging in living mice. ACS Nano. 2012;6(11):10366–10377. doi: 10.1021/nn304347g. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Kircher M. F. et al., A brain tumor molecular imaging strategy using a new triple-modality MRI-photoacoustic-Raman nanoparticle. Nat. Med. 2012;18(5):829–834. doi: 10.1038/nm.2721. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Lin Q. et al., Bandgap Engineered Polypyrrole-Polydopamine Hybrid with Intrinsic Raman and Photoacoustic Imaging Contrasts. Nano Lett. 2018;18(12):7485–7493. doi: 10.1021/acs.nanolett.8b02901. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Neuschmelting V. et al., Dual-Modality Surface-Enhanced Resonance Raman Scattering and Multispectral Optoacoustic Tomography Nanoparticle Approach for Brain Tumor Delineation. Small. 2018;14(23):e1800740. doi: 10.1002/smll.201800740. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Jiao S. et al., Simultaneous multimodal imaging with integrated photoacoustic microscopy and optical coherence tomography. Opt. Lett. 2009;34(19):2961–2963. doi: 10.1364/OL.34.002961. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Zhang E. Z. et al., Multimodal photoacoustic and optical coherence tomography scanner using an all optical detection scheme for 3D morphological skin imaging. Biomed. Opt. Express. 2011;2(8):2202–2215. doi: 10.1364/BOE.2.002202. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Berer T. et al., Multimodal noncontact photoacoustic and optical coherence tomography imaging using wavelength-division multiplexing. J. Biomed. Opt. 2015;20(4):46013. doi: 10.1117/1.JBO.20.4.046013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Zhang W. et al., High-resolution, in vivo multimodal photoacoustic microscopy, optical coherence tomography, and fluorescence microscopy imaging of rabbit retinal neovascularization. Light: Sci. Appl. 2018;7:103. doi: 10.1038/s41377-018-0093-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Hosseinaee Z. Tummon Simmons J. A. Reza P. H. Dual-Modal Photoacoustic Imaging and Optical Coherence Tomography [Review] Front. Phys. 2021;8:616618. doi: 10.3389/fphy.2020.616618. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
Duan Y. et al., Photoacoustic and Magnetic Resonance Imaging Bimodal Contrast Agent Displaying Amplified Photoacoustic Signal. Small. 2018;14(42):e1800652. doi: 10.1002/smll.201800652. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Qiao Y. et al., Magnetic resonance and photoacoustic imaging of brain tumor mediated by mesenchymal stem cell labeled with multifunctional nanoparticle introduced via carotid artery injection. Nanotechnology. 2018;29(16):165101. doi: 10.1088/1361-6528/aaaf16. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Guo Y. et al., Magnetic-responsive and targeted cancer nanotheranostics by PA/MR bimodal imaging-guided photothermally triggered immunotherapy. Biomaterials. 2019;219:119370. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2019.119370. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Gehrung M. et al., Co-registration of optoacoustic tomography and magnetic resonance imaging data from murine tumour models. Photoacoustics. 2020;18:100147. doi: 10.1016/j.pacs.2019.100147. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Chen Z. et al., Hybrid magnetic resonance and optoacoustic tomography (MROT) for preclinical neuroimaging. Light: Sci. Appl. 2022;11(1):332. doi: 10.1038/s41377-022-01026-w. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Ren J. et al., A Dual-Modal Magnetic Resonance/Photoacoustic Imaging Tracer for Long-Term High-Precision Tracking and Facilitating Repair of Peripheral Nerve Injuries. Adv. Healthcare Mater. 2022;11(13):e2200183. doi: 10.1002/adhm.202200183. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Chen Z. et al., Simultaneous Functional Magnetic Resonance and Optoacoustic Imaging of Brain-Wide Sensory Responses in Mice. Adv. Sci. 2023;10(3):e2205191. doi: 10.1002/advs.202205191. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Zhang S. et al., In vivo co-registered hybrid-contrast imaging by successive photoacoustic tomography and magnetic resonance imaging. Photoacoustics. 2023;31:100506. doi: 10.1016/j.pacs.2023.100506. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Akers W. J. et al., Multimodal sentinel lymph node mapping with single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT)/computed tomography (CT) and photoacoustic tomography. Transl. Res. 2012;159(3):175–181. doi: 10.1016/j.trsl.2011.09.006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Yu X. et al., Ultrasmall Semimetal Nanoparticles of Bismuth for Dual-Modal Computed Tomography/Photoacoustic Imaging and Synergistic Thermoradiotherapy. ACS Nano. 2017;11(4):3990–4001. doi: 10.1021/acsnano.7b00476. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Wang Y. et al., In Vivo Photoacoustic/Single-Photon Emission Computed Tomography Imaging for Dynamic Monitoring of Aggregation-Enhanced Photothermal Nanoagents. Anal. Chem. 2019;91(3):2128–2134. doi: 10.1021/acs.analchem.8b04585. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Liu Y. et al., Highly specific noninvasive photoacoustic and positron emission tomography of brain plaque with functionalized croconium dye labeled by a radiotracer. Chem. Sci. 2017;8(4):2710–2716. doi: 10.1039/C6SC04798J. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Xu C. et al., Bacteria-like mesoporous silica-coated gold nanorods for positron emission tomography and photoacoustic imaging-guided chemo-photothermal combined therapy. Biomaterials. 2018;165:56–65. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2018.02.043. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Qin C. et al., Tyrosinase as a multifunctional reporter gene for Photoacoustic/MRI/PET triple modality molecular imaging. Sci. Rep. 2013;3(1):1–8. doi: 10.1038/srep01490. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Liu Q. et al., 64) CuS-labeled nanoparticles: a new sentinel-lymph-node-mapping agent for PET-CT and photoacoustic tomography. Contrast Media Mol. Imaging. 2016;11(6):475–481. doi: 10.1002/cmmi.1709. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Hannah A. et al., Indocyanine Green-Loaded Photoacoustic Nanodroplets: Dual Contrast Nanoconstructs for Enhanced Photoacoustic and Ultrasound Imaging. ACS Nano. 2014;8(1):250–259. doi: 10.1021/nn403527r. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Jeon M. et al., Methylene blue microbubbles as a model dual-modality contrast agent for ultrasound and activatable photoacoustic imaging. J. Biomed. Opt. 2014;19(1):16005. doi: 10.1117/1.JBO.19.1.016005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Paproski R. J. et al., Porphyrin Nanodroplets: Sub-micrometer Ultrasound and Photoacoustic Contrast Imaging Agents. Small. 2016;12(3):371–380. doi: 10.1002/smll.201502450. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Nguyen V. P. et al., Contrast Agent Enhanced Multimodal Photoacoustic Microscopy and Optical Coherence Tomography for Imaging of Rabbit Choroidal and Retinal Vessels in vivo. Sci. Rep. 2019;9(1):5945. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-42324-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Sun I. C. et al., Photoacoustic imaging of cancer cells with glycol-chitosan-coated gold nanoparticles as contrast agents. J. Biomed. Opt. 2019;24(12):1–5. doi: 10.1117/1.JBO.24.12.121903. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Xu Y. et al., Organic nanoparticle-doped microdroplets as dual-modality contrast agents for ultrasound microvascular flow and photoacoustic imaging. Sci. Rep. 2020;10(1):17009. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-72795-w. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Cardinell K. et al., A novel photoacoustic-fluorescent contrast agent for quantitative imaging of lymphatic drainage. Photoacoustics. 2021;21:100239. doi: 10.1016/j.pacs.2021.100239. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Deán-Ben X. L. Razansky D. Functional optoacoustic human angiography with handheld video rate three dimensional scanner. Photoacoustics. 2013;1(3):68–73. doi: 10.1016/j.pacs.2013.10.002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Jose J. et al., Speed-of-sound compensated photoacoustic tomography for accurate imaging. Med. Phys. 2012;39(12):7262–7271. doi: 10.1118/1.4764911. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Zhang Y. Wang L. Video-rate full-ring ultrasound and photoacoustic computed tomography with real-time sound speed optimization. Biomed. Opt. Express. 2022;13(8):4398–4413. doi: 10.1364/BOE.464360. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Li W. et al., Tracking Strain-Specific Morphogenesis and Angiogenesis of Murine Calvaria with Large-Scale Optoacoustic and Ultrasound Microscopy. J. Bone Miner. Res. 2022;37(5):1032–1043. doi: 10.1002/jbmr.4533. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Estrada H. et al., Intravital optoacoustic and ultrasound bio-microscopy reveal radiation-inhibited skull angiogenesis. Bone. 2020;133:115251. doi: 10.1016/j.bone.2020.115251. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Ly C. D. et al., Development of fast photoacoustic and ultrasound imaging system based on slider-crank scanner for small animals and humans study. Expert Syst. Appl. 2022;206:117939. doi: 10.1016/j.eswa.2022.117939. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
Chen W. Tao C. Liu X. Artifact-free imaging through a bone-like layer by using an ultrasonic-guided photoacoustic microscopy. Opt. Lett. 2019;44(5):1273–1276. doi: 10.1364/OL.44.001273. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Yang J.-M. et al., Simultaneous functional photoacoustic and ultrasonic endoscopy of internal organs in vivo. Nat. Med. 2012;18(8):1297–1302. doi: 10.1038/nm.2823. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Dai X. et al., Miniature Endoscope for Multimodal Imaging. ACS Photonics. 2017;4(1):174–180. doi: 10.1021/acsphotonics.6b00852. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
Estrada H. et al., Virtual craniotomy for high-resolution optoacoustic brain microscopy. Sci. Rep. 2018;8(1):1459. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-18857-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Wang Y. et al., Toward in vivo biopsy of melanoma based on photoacoustic and ultrasound dual imaging with an integrated detector. Biomed. Opt. Express. 2016;7(2):279–286. doi: 10.1364/BOE.7.000279. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Jeng G.-S. et al., Real-time interleaved spectroscopic photoacoustic and ultrasound (PAUS) scanning with simultaneous fluence compensation and motion correction. Nat. Commun. 2021;12(1):716. doi: 10.1038/s41467-021-20947-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Niederhauser J. J. et al., Combined ultrasound and optoacoustic system for real-time high-contrast vascular imaging in vivo. IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging. 2005;24(4):436–440. doi: 10.1109/tmi.2004.843199. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Kim J. et al., Multiparametric Photoacoustic Analysis of Human Thyroid Cancers in vivo photoacoustic Analysis of Human Thyroid Cancers. Cancer Res. 2021;81(18):4849–4860. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-20-3334. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Neuschler E. I. et al., A pivotal study of optoacoustic imaging to diagnose benign and malignant breast masses: a new evaluation tool for radiologists. Radiology. 2018;287(2):398–412. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2017172228. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Merčep E. et al., Hybrid optoacoustic tomography and pulse-echo ultrasonography using concave arrays. IEEE Trans. Ultrason. Eng. 2015;62(9):1651–1661. doi: 10.1109/TUFFC.2015.007058. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Merčep E. et al., Whole-body live mouse imaging by hybrid reflection-mode ultrasound and optoacoustic tomography. Opt. Lett. 2015;40(20):4643–4646. doi: 10.1364/OL.40.004643. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Dima A. Ntziachristos V. In-vivo handheld optoacoustic tomography of the human thyroid. Photoacoustics. 2016;4(2):65–69. doi: 10.1016/j.pacs.2016.05.003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Becker A. et al., Multispectral optoacoustic tomography of the human breast: characterisation of healthy tissue and malignant lesions using a hybrid ultrasound-optoacoustic approach. Eur. Radiol. 2018;28:602–609. doi: 10.1007/s00330-017-5002-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Deán-Ben X. L. Merčep E. Razansky D. Hybrid-array-based optoacoustic and ultrasound (OPUS) imaging of biological tissues. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2017;110(20):203703. doi: 10.1063/1.4983462. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
Wang X. et al., Integrated thermoacoustic and ultrasound imaging based on the combination of a hollow concave transducer array and a linear transducer array. Phys. Med. Biol. 2021;66(11):115011. doi: 10.1088/1361-6560/abfc91. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Merčep E. Deán-Ben X. L. Razansky D. Imaging of blood flow and oxygen state with a multi-segment optoacoustic ultrasound array. Photoacoustics. 2018;10:48–53. doi: 10.1016/j.pacs.2018.04.002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Merčep E. Deán-Ben X. L. Razansky D. Combined pulse-echo ultrasound and multispectral optoacoustic tomography with a multi-segment detector array. IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging. 2017;36(10):2129–2137. doi: 10.1109/TMI.2017.2706200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Knieling F. et al., Multispectral Optoacoustic Tomography for Assessment of Crohn's Disease Activity. N. Engl. J. Med. 2017;376(13):1292–1294. doi: 10.1056/NEJMc1612455. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Erratum for the Research Article: “Metastatic status of sentinel lymph nodes in melanoma determined noninvasively with multispectral optoacoustic imaging” by ; Stoffels I. Morscher S. Helfrich I. Hillen U. Lehy J. Burton N. C. Sardella T. C. P. Claussen J. Poeppel T. D. Bachmann H. S. Roesch A. Griewank K. Schadendorf D. Gunzer M. Klode J. Sci. Transl. Med. 2015;7(319):319er8. doi: 10.1126/scitranslmed.aad1278. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Lafci B. et al., Noninvasive multiparametric characterization of mammary tumors with transmission-reflection optoacoustic ultrasound. Neoplasia. 2020;22(12):770–777. doi: 10.1016/j.neo.2020.10.008. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Lafci B. et al., Multimodal assessment of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease with transmission-reflection optoacoustic ultrasound. Theranostics. 2023;13(12):4217–4228. doi: 10.7150/thno.78548. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Huynh E. et al., Porphyrin shell microbubbles with intrinsic ultrasound and photoacoustic properties. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2012;134(40):16464–16467. doi: 10.1021/ja305988f. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Wang Y.-H. et al., Photoacoustic/ultrasound dual-modality contrast agent and its application to thermotherapy. J. Biomed. Opt. 2012;17(4):045001. doi: 10.1117/1.JBO.17.4.045001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Kim C. et al., Multifunctional microbubbles and nanobubbles for photoacoustic and ultrasound imaging. J. Biomed. Opt. 2010;15(1):010510. doi: 10.1117/1.3302808. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Wilson K. Homan K. Emelianov S. Biomedical photoacoustics beyond thermal expansion using triggered nanodroplet vaporization for contrast-enhanced imaging. Nat. Commun. 2012;3:618. doi: 10.1038/ncomms1627. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Greish K. Enhanced permeability and retention (EPR) effect for anticancer nanomedicine drug targeting. Methods Mol. Biol. 2010;624:25–37. doi: 10.1007/978-1-60761-609-2_3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Nichols J. W. Bae Y. H. EPR: Evidence and fallacy. J. Controlled Release. 2014;190:451–464. doi: 10.1016/j.jconrel.2014.03.057. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Das D. et al., On-chip generation of microbubbles in photoacoustic contrast agents for dual modal ultrasound/photoacoustic in vivo animal imaging. Sci. Rep. 2018;8(1):6401. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-24713-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Wilson K. Homan K. Emelianov S. Biomedical photoacoustics beyond thermal expansion using triggered nanodroplet vaporization for contrast-enhanced imaging. Nat. Commun. 2012;3(1):618. doi: 10.1038/ncomms1627. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Tserevelakis G. J. et al., Hybrid multiphoton and optoacoustic microscope. Opt. Lett. 2014;39(7):1819–1822. doi: 10.1364/OL.39.001819. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Soliman D. et al., Combining microscopy with mesoscopy using optical and optoacoustic label-free modes. Sci. Rep. 2015;5(1):1–9. doi: 10.1038/srep12902. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Rao B. et al., Integrated photoacoustic, confocal, and two-photon microscope. J. Biomed. Opt. 2014;19(3):036002. doi: 10.1117/1.JBO.19.3.036002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Hu S. et al., Intravital imaging of amyloid plaques in a transgenic mouse model using optical-resolution photoacoustic microscopy. Opt. Lett. 2009;34(24):3899–3901. doi: 10.1364/OL.34.003899. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Wang Y. et al., In vivo integrated photoacoustic and confocal microscopy of hemoglobin oxygen saturation and oxygen partial pressure. Opt. Lett. 2011;36(7):1029–1031. doi: 10.1364/OL.36.001029. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Park J. et al., Quadruple ultrasound, photoacoustic, optical coherence, and fluorescence fusion imaging with a transparent ultrasound transducer. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2021;118(11):e1920879118. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1920879118. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Li H. et al., A transparent broadband ultrasonic detector based on an optical micro-ring resonator for photoacoustic microscopy. Sci. Rep. 2014;4(1):1–8. doi: 10.1038/srep04496. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Dong B. et al., Isometric multimodal photoacoustic microscopy based on optically transparent micro-ring ultrasonic detection. Optica. 2015;2(2):169–176. doi: 10.1364/OPTICA.2.000169. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Chen Z. et al., Hybrid system for in vivo epifluorescence and 4D optoacoustic imaging. Opt. Lett. 2017;42(22):4577–4580. doi: 10.1364/OL.42.004577. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Gottschalk S. et al., Rapid volumetric optoacoustic imaging of neural dynamics across the mouse brain. Nat. Biomed. Eng. 2019;3(5):392–401. doi: 10.1038/s41551-019-0372-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Chen Z. et al., Multimodal Noninvasive Functional Neurophotonic Imaging of Murine Brain-Wide Sensory Responses. Adv. Sci. 2022;9(24):2105588. doi: 10.1002/advs.202105588. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Ni R. et al., Multiscale optical and optoacoustic imaging of amyloid-β deposits in mice. Nat. Biomed. Eng. 2022;6(9):1031–1044. doi: 10.1038/s41551-022-00906-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Guo B. et al., Precise Deciphering of Brain Vasculatures and Microscopic Tumors with Dual NIR-II Fluorescence and Photoacoustic Imaging. Adv. Mater. 2019;31(30):e1902504. doi: 10.1002/adma.201902504. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
She Z. et al., An NO-responsive probe for detecting acute inflammation using NIR-II fluorescence/optoacoustic imaging. Chem. Commun. 2022;58(94):13123–13126. doi: 10.1039/D2CC05386A. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Lv N. et al., Stimuli-Responsive Hybrid Vesicle for Tumor Dual-Model NIR-II Photoacoustic and Fluorescence Imaging and Precise Radiotherapy. Adv. Opt. Mater. 2022;10(17):2200694. doi: 10.1002/adom.202200694. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
Xiao P. et al., A fluorophore with dithienopyrrole donor for beyond 1300 nm NIR-II fluorescence/photoacoustic dual-model imaging and photothermal therapy. Mater. Today Nano. 2023;24:100404. doi: 10.1016/j.mtnano.2023.100404. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
Zhao F. et al., Maximum Emission Peak Over 1500 nm of Organic Assembly for Blood–Brain Barrier-Crossing NIR-IIb Phototheranostics of Orthotopic Glioblastoma. Adv. Mater. 2023;35(22):2208097. doi: 10.1002/adma.202208097. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Zheng Z. et al., All-in-One Zeolite-Carbon-Based Nanotheranostics with Adjustable NIR-II Window Photoacoustic/Fluorescence Imaging Performance for Precise NIR-II Photothermal-Synergized Catalytic Antitumor Therapy. Small. 2021;17(41):e2103252. doi: 10.1002/smll.202103252. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Wang Y. et al., Targeted nanobubbles carrying indocyanine green for ultrasound, photoacoustic and fluorescence imaging of prostate cancer. Int. J. Nanomed. 2020:4289–4309. doi: 10.2147/IJN.S243548. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Zlitni A. et al., Maltotriose-based probes for fluorescence and photoacoustic imaging of bacterial infections. Nat. Commun. 2020;11(1):1250. doi: 10.1038/s41467-020-14985-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Gan H. et al., A Mitochondria-Targeted Ferroptosis Inducer Activated by Glutathione-Responsive Imaging and Depletion for Triple Negative Breast Cancer Theranostics. Adv. Healthcare Mater. 2023;12(22):e2300220. doi: 10.1002/adhm.202300220. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Shcherbakova D. M. Verkhusha V. V. Near-infrared fluorescent proteins for multicolor in vivo imaging. Nat. Methods. 2013;10(8):751–754. doi: 10.1038/nmeth.2521. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Zhao Y. et al., Amorphous Ag2−xCuxS quantum dots:“all-in-one” theranostic nanomedicines for near-infrared fluorescence/photoacoustics dual-modal-imaging-guided photothermal therapy. Chem. Eng. J. 2020;399:125777. doi: 10.1016/j.cej.2020.125777. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
Shang W. et al., Core–shell gold Nanorod@metal–organic framework nanoprobes for multimodality diagnosis of glioma. Adv. Mater. 2017;29(3):1604381. doi: 10.1002/adma.201604381. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Qian M. et al., Highly crystalline multicolor carbon nanodots for dual-modal imaging-guided photothermal therapy of glioma. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces. 2018;10(4):4031–4040. doi: 10.1021/acsami.7b19716. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Huang C. et al., Efficient Photoacoustic Imaging With Biomimetic Mesoporous Silica-Based Nanoparticles. Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol. 2021;9:762956. doi: 10.3389/fbioe.2021.762956. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Miranda D. et al., Highly-soluble cyanine J-aggregates entrapped by liposomes for in vivo optical imaging around 930 nm. Theranostics. 2019;9(2):381. doi: 10.7150/thno.28376. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Patil P. M. et al., Optoresponsive Pheophorbide-Silver based organometallic nanomaterials for high efficacy multimodal theranostics in Melanoma. Chem. Eng. J. 2023;470:144110. doi: 10.1016/j.cej.2023.144110. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
Zhang X. et al., Programmably Controllable Delivery of Metastable Ferrous Ions for Multiscale Dynamic Imaging Guided Photothermal Primed Chemodynamic Therapy. Adv. Mater. 2023:2210876. doi: 10.1002/adma.202210876. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Zhou G. et al., Renal Clearable Catalytic 2D Au–Porphyrin Coordination Polymer Augmented Photothermal-Gas Synergistic Cancer Therapy. Small. 2023;19(14):2206749. doi: 10.1002/smll.202206749. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Zou Q. et al., PVP-coated ultrasmall Nd-doped Gd2O2S nanoparticles for multimodal imaging. Mater. Chem. Front. 2023:4109–4119. doi: 10.1039/D3QM00554B. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
Zhao Y. et al., Reaction-Activated Disassembly of the NIR-II Probe Enables Fast Detection and Ratiometric Photoacoustic Imaging of Glutathione In Vivo. Anal. Chem. 2023:14043–14051. doi: 10.1021/acs.analchem.3c02664. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Wang K. et al., Imaging Investigation of Hepatocellular Carcinoma Progress via Monitoring γ-Glutamyltranspeptidase Level with a Near-Infrared Fluorescence/Photoacoustic Bimodal Probe. Anal. Chem. 2023;95(38):14235–14243. doi: 10.1021/acs.analchem.3c02270. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Zhao M. et al., An Activatable Phototheranostic Probe for Anti-hypoxic Type I Photodynamic- and Immuno-Therapy of Cancer. Adv. Mater. 2023:e2305243. doi: 10.1002/adma.202305243. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Zhou H. et al., A Tumor-Microenvironment-Activatable Molecular Pro-Theranostic Agent for Photodynamic and Immunotherapy of Cancer. Adv. Mater. 2023;35(30):e2211485. doi: 10.1002/adma.202211485. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Wen X. et al., Controlled sequential in situ self-assembly and disassembly of a fluorogenic cisplatin prodrug for cancer theranostics. Nat. Commun. 2023;14(1):800. doi: 10.1038/s41467-023-36469-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Song Z. et al., Cathepsin K-Activated Probe for Fluoro-Photoacoustic Imaging of Early Osteolytic Metastasis. Adv. Sci. 2023;10(24):e2300217. doi: 10.1002/advs.202300217. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Kang X. et al., A photo-triggered self-accelerated nanoplatform for multifunctional image-guided combination cancer immunotherapy. Nat. Commun. 2023;14(1):5216. doi: 10.1038/s41467-023-40996-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Yan D. et al., A Water-Soluble AIEgen for Noninvasive Diagnosis of Kidney Fibrosis via SWIR Fluorescence and Photoacoustic Imaging. Adv. Mater. 2022;34(50):e2206643. doi: 10.1002/adma.202206643. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Xu R. et al., Highly bright aggregation-induced emission nanodots for precise photoacoustic/NIR-II fluorescence imaging-guided resection of neuroendocrine neoplasms and sentinel lymph nodes. Biomaterials. 2022;289:121780. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2022.121780. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Wang W. et al., A Native Drug-Free Macromolecular Therapeutic to Trigger Mutual Reinforcing of Endoplasmic Reticulum Stress and Mitochondrial Dysfunction for Cancer Treatment. ACS nano. 2023;17(11):11023–11038. doi: 10.1021/acsnano.3c03450. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Zhang Y. et al., An Activatable Polymeric Nanoprobe for Fluorescence and Photoacoustic Imaging of Tumor-Associated Neutrophils in Cancer Immunotherapy. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2022;61(27):e202203184. doi: 10.1002/anie.202203184. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Zhang C. Tai X. Xu J. Sun P. Fan Q. Cheng Z. Zhang Y. 1064 nm activatable semiconducting polymer-based nanoplatform for NIR-II fluorescence/NIR-II photoacoustic imaging guided photothermal therapy of orthotopic osteosarcoma. Chem. Eng. J. 2022;445:136836. doi: 10.1016/j.cej.2022.136836. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
Shuhendler A. J. et al., Real-time imaging of oxidative and nitrosative stress in the liver of live animals for drug-toxicity testing. Nat. Biotechnol. 2014;32(4):373–380. doi: 10.1038/nbt.2838. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Ren S. et al., Multifunctional AuPd-cluster nanotheranostic agents with a cascade self-regulating redox tumor-microenvironment for dual-photodynamic synergized enzyme catalytic therapy. J. Mater. Chem. B. 2023;11(1):109–118. doi: 10.1039/D2TB02096C. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Han Y. et al., Near-infrared-II photothermal ultra-small carbon dots promoting anticancer efficiency by enhancing tumor penetration. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2022;616:595–604. doi: 10.1016/j.jcis.2022.02.083. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Cao Y. et al., Engineered exosome-mediated near-infrared-II region V2C quantum dot delivery for nucleus-target low-temperature photothermal therapy. ACS Nano. 2019;13(2):1499–1510. doi: 10.1021/acsnano.8b07224. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Zhao Y. et al., Amorphous Ag2−xCuxS quantum dots: “all-in-one” theranostic nanomedicines for near-infrared fluorescence/photoacoustics dual-modal-imaging-guided photothermal therapy. Chem. Eng. J. 2020;399:125777. doi: 10.1016/j.cej.2020.125777. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
Zhang J. et al., A Multifunctional Photoacoustic/Fluorescence Dual-Mode-Imaging Gold-Based Theranostic Nanoformulation without External Laser Limitations. Adv. Mater. 2022;34(19):2110690. doi: 10.1002/adma.202110690. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Vazquez-Prada K. X. et al., A Spiky Silver-Iron Oxide Nanoparticle for Highly Efficient Targeted Photothermal Therapy and Multimodal Imaging of Thrombosis. Small. 2023;19(11):e2205744. doi: 10.1002/smll.202205744. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Li S. et al., A Two-Pronged Strategy for Enhanced Deep-Tumor Penetration and NIR-II Multimodal Imaging-Monitored Photothermal Therapy. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces. 2022;14(37):41684–41694. doi: 10.1021/acsami.2c08930. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Chen T. et al., Microenvironment-Tailored Catalytic Nanoprobe for Ratiometric NIR-II Fluorescence/Photoacoustic Imaging of H2O2 in Tumor and Lymphatic Metastasis. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2022;32(47):2208720. doi: 10.1002/adfm.202208720. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
Ai X. et al., In vivo covalent cross-linking of photon-converted rare-earth nanostructures for tumour localization and theranostics. Nat. Commun. 2016;7(1):10432. doi: 10.1038/ncomms10432. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Ai X. et al., Multispectral optoacoustic imaging of dynamic redox correlation and pathophysiological progression utilizing upconversion nanoprobes. Nat. Commun. 2019;10(1):1087. doi: 10.1038/s41467-019-09001-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Yan D. et al., A Water-Soluble AIEgen for Noninvasive Diagnosis of Kidney Fibrosis via SWIR Fluorescence and Photoacoustic Imaging. Adv. Mater. 2022;34(50):2206643. doi: 10.1002/adma.202206643. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Zheng W. et al., Lanthanide-doped upconversion nano-bioprobes: electronic structures, optical properties, and biodetection. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2015;44(6):1379–1415. doi: 10.1039/C4CS00178H. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Li L. et al., Three-dimensional combined photoacoustic and optical coherence microscopy for in vivo microcirculation studies. Opt. Express. 2009;17(19):16450–16455. doi: 10.1364/OE.17.016450. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Liu M. Drexler W. Optical coherence tomography angiography and photoacoustic imaging in dermatology. Photochem. Photobiol. Sci. 2019;18(5):945–962. doi: 10.1039/c8pp00471d. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Nguyen V.-P. et al., Plasmonic gold nanostar-enhanced multimodal photoacoustic microscopy and optical coherence tomography molecular imaging to evaluate choroidal neovascularization. ACS Sens. 2020;5(10):3070–3081. doi: 10.1021/acssensors.0c00908. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Nguyen V.-P. et al., Gold nanorod enhanced photoacoustic microscopy and optical coherence tomography of choroidal neovascularization. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces. 2021;13(34):40214–40228. doi: 10.1021/acsami.1c03504. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Ma Z. et al., Assessment of microvasculature flow state with a high speed all-optic dual-modal system of optical coherence tomography and photoacoustic imaging. Biomed. Opt. Express. 2018;9(12):6103–6115. doi: 10.1364/BOE.9.006103. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Haindl R. et al., Dual modality reflection mode optical coherence and photoacoustic microscopy using an akinetic sensor. Opt. Lett. 2017;42(21):4319–4322. doi: 10.1364/OL.42.004319. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Wi J.-S. et al., Stacked Gold Nanodisks for Bimodal Photoacoustic and Optical Coherence Imaging. ACS Nano. 2017;11(6):6225–6232. doi: 10.1021/acsnano.7b02337. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Si P. et al., Gold nanomaterials for optical biosensing and bioimaging. Nanoscale Adv. 2021;3(10):2679–2698. doi: 10.1039/D0NA00961J. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Han S. Bouchard R. Sokolov K. V. Molecular photoacoustic imaging with ultra-small gold nanoparticles. Biomed. Opt. Express. 2019;10(7):3472–3483. doi: 10.1364/BOE.10.003472. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Wax A. Sokolov K. Molecular Imaging and Darkfield Microspectroscopy of Live Cells Using Gold Plasmonic Nanoparticles. Laser Photonics Rev. 2009;3:146. doi: 10.1002/lpor.200810011. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
Oldenburg A. L. et al., Motility-, Autocorrelation-, and Polarization-Sensitive Optical Coherence Tomography Discriminates Cells and Gold Nanorods within 3d Tissue Cultures. Opt. Lett. 2013;38:2923. doi: 10.1364/OL.38.002923. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Nahas A. et al., Detection of Plasmonic Nanoparticles with Full Field-Oct: Optical and Photothermal Detection. Biomed. Opt. Express. 2014;5:3541. doi: 10.1364/BOE.5.003541. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Jia Y. et al., Spectral Fractionation Detection of Gold Nanorod Contrast Agents Using Optical Coherence Tomography. Opt. Express. 2015;23:4212. doi: 10.1364/OE.23.004212. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Liba O. et al., Contrast-Enhanced Optical Coherence Tomography with Picomolar Sensitivity for Functional In Vivo Imaging. Sci. Rep. 2016;6:23337. doi: 10.1038/srep23337. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Hu J. et al., Gold nanoshells: Contrast agents for cell imaging by cardiovascular optical coherence tomography. Nano Res. 2018;11(2):676–685. doi: 10.1007/s12274-017-1674-4. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
Lee T. M. et al., Engineered Microsphere Contrast Agents for Optical Coherence Tomography. Opt. Lett. 2003;28:1546. doi: 10.1364/OL.28.001546. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Xu C. et al., Near-Infrared Dyes as Contrast-Enhancing Agents for Spectroscopic Optical Coherence Tomography. Opt. Lett. 2004;29:1647. doi: 10.1364/OL.29.001647. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Yang C. et al., Spectral Triangulation Molecular Contrast Optical Coherence Tomography with Indocyanine Green as the Contrast Agent. Opt. Lett. 2004;29:2016. doi: 10.1364/OL.29.002016. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Robles F. E. et al., Molecular Imaging True-Colour Spectroscopic Optical Coherence Tomography. Nat. Photonics. 2011;5:744. doi: 10.1038/nphoton.2011.257. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Lu G. J. et al., Genetically Encodable Contrast Agents for Optical Coherence Tomography. ACS Nano. 2020;14(7):7823–7831. doi: 10.1021/acsnano.9b08432. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Nguyen V. P. et al., Chain-like gold nanoparticle clusters for multimodal photoacoustic microscopy and optical coherence tomography enhanced molecular imaging. Nat. Commun. 2021;12(1):34. doi: 10.1038/s41467-020-20276-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Li Q. et al., Dual Ratiometric SERS and Photoacoustic Core–Satellite Nanoprobe for Quantitatively Visualizing Hydrogen Peroxide in Inflammation and Cancer. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2021;60(13):7323–7332. doi: 10.1002/anie.202015451. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Glover G. H. Overview of functional magnetic resonance imaging. Neurosurg. Clin. N. Am. 2011;22(2):133–139. doi: 10.1016/j.nec.2010.11.001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; , vii
Handwerker D. A. et al., The continuing challenge of understanding and modeling hemodynamic variation in fMRI. NeuroImage. 2012;62(2):1017–1023. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.02.015. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Terreno E. et al., Challenges for molecular magnetic resonance imaging. Chem. Rev. 2010;110(5):3019–3042. doi: 10.1021/cr100025t. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Na S. Russin J. J. Lin L. et al., Massively parallel functional photoacoustic computed tomography of the human brain. Nat. Biomed. Eng. 2022;6:584–592. doi: 10.1038/s41551-021-00735-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Ni R. Deán-Ben X. L. Treyer V. Gietl A. Hock C. Klohs J. Nitsch R. M. Razansky D. Coregistered transcranial optoacoustic and magnetic resonance angiography of the human brain. Opt. Lett. 2023;48(3):648–651. doi: 10.1364/OL.475578. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Kubelick K. P. Emelianov S. Y. A Trimodal Ultrasound, Photoacoustic and Magnetic Resonance Imaging Approach for Longitudinal Post-operative Monitoring of Stem Cells in the Spinal Cord. Ultrasound Med. Biol. 2020;46(12):3468–3474. doi: 10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2020.08.026. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Rich L. J. et al., Photoacoustic and Magnetic Resonance Imaging of Hybrid Manganese Dioxide-Coated Ultra-small NaGdF(4) Nanoparticles for Spatiotemporal Modulation of Hypoxia in Head and Neck Cancer. Cancers. 2020;12(11):3294. doi: 10.3390/cancers12113294. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Sivasubramanian M. et al., Multimodal Magnetic Resonance and Photoacoustic Imaging of Tumor-Specific Enzyme-Responsive Hybrid Nanoparticles for Oxygen Modulation. Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol. 2022;10:910902. doi: 10.3389/fbioe.2022.910902. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Attia A. B. E. et al., Multispectral optoacoustic and MRI coregistration for molecular imaging of orthotopic model of human glioblastoma. J. Biophotonics. 2016;9(7):701–708. doi: 10.1002/jbio.201500321. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Gezginer I. et al., Volumetric registration framework for multimodal functional magnetic resonance and optoacoustic tomography of the rodent brain. Photoacoustics. 2023;31:100522. doi: 10.1016/j.pacs.2023.100522. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Wang D. Wu Y. Xia J. Review on photoacoustic imaging of the brain using nanoprobes. Neurophotonics. 2016;3(1):010901. doi: 10.1117/1.NPh.3.1.010901. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Bai H. et al., A caspase-3-activatable bimodal probe for photoacoustic and magnetic resonance imaging of tumor apoptosis in vivo. Biosens. Bioelectron. 2022;216:114648. doi: 10.1016/j.bios.2022.114648. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Mou J. et al., A facile synthesis of versatile Cu2−xS nanoprobe for enhanced MRI and infrared thermal/photoacoustic multimodal imaging. Biomaterials. 2015;57:12–21. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2015.04.020. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Ke K. et al., Copper Manganese Sulfide Nanoplates: A New Two-Dimensional Theranostic Nanoplatform for MRI/MSOT Dual-Modal Imaging-Guided Photothermal Therapy in the Second Near-Infrared Window. Theranostics. 2017;7(19):4763–4776. doi: 10.7150/thno.21694. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Bogdanov Jr. A. A. et al., Synthesis and Testing of Modular Dual-Modality Nanoparticles for Magnetic Resonance and Multispectral Photoacoustic Imaging. Bioconjugate Chem. 2016;27(2):383–390. doi: 10.1021/acs.bioconjchem.5b00633. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Bouchard L. S. et al., Picomolar sensitivity MRI and photoacoustic imaging of cobalt nanoparticles. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2009;106(11):4085–4089. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0813019106. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Yu J. et al., Smart MoS2/Fe3O4 Nanotheranostic for Magnetically Targeted Photothermal Therapy Guided by Magnetic Resonance/Photoacoustic Imaging. Theranostics. 2015;5(9):931–945. doi: 10.7150/thno.11802. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Zhang H. et al., A dual-mode nanoparticle based on natural biomaterials for photoacoustic and magnetic resonance imaging of bone mesenchymal stem cells in vivo. RSC Adv. 2019;9(60):35003–35010. doi: 10.1039/C9RA05937G. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Li Y. et al., Carbon-Coated Magnetic Nanoparticle Dedicated to MRI/Photoacoustic Imaging of Tumor in Living Mice. Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol. 2021;9:800744. doi: 10.3389/fbioe.2021.800744. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Zhang H. et al., Hollow carbon nanospheres dotted with Gd–Fe nanoparticles for magnetic resonance and photoacoustic imaging. Nanoscale. 2021;13(24):10943–10952. doi: 10.1039/D1NR02914B. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Zhang Y. et al., Polydopamine-modified dual-ligand nanoparticles as highly effective and targeted magnetic resonance/photoacoustic dual-modality thrombus imaging agents. Int. J. Nanomed. 2019;14:7155–7171. doi: 10.2147/IJN.S216603. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Zhu W. et al., Mn2+-doped prussian blue nanocubes for bimodal imaging and photothermal therapy with enhanced performance. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces. 2015;7(21):11575–11582. doi: 10.1021/acsami.5b02510. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Fan Q. et al., Transferring biomarker into molecular probe: melanin nanoparticle as a naturally active platform for multimodality imaging. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2014;136(43):15185–15194. doi: 10.1021/ja505412p. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Liu Y. et al., Porous gold nanocluster-decorated manganese monoxide nanocomposites for microenvironment-activatable MR/photoacoustic/CT tumor imaging. Nanoscale. 2018;10(8):3631–3638. doi: 10.1039/C7NR08535D. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Yang J. et al., Structurally symmetric near-infrared fluorophore IRDye78-protein complex enables multimodal cancer imaging. Theranostics. 2021;11(6):2534–2549. doi: 10.7150/thno.54928. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Zou L. et al., Current Approaches of Photothermal Therapy in Treating Cancer Metastasis with Nanotherapeutics. Theranostics. 2016;6(6):762–772. doi: 10.7150/thno.14988. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Wang S. et al., MSOT/CT/MR imaging-guided and hypoxia-maneuvered oxygen self-supply radiotherapy based on one-pot MnO(2)-mSiO(2)@Au nanoparticles. Nanoscale. 2019;11(13):6270–6284. doi: 10.1039/C9NR00918C. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Cheng L. et al., FeSe(2)-Decorated Bi(2)Se(3) Nanosheets Fabricated via Cation Exchange for Chelator-Free (64)Cu-labeling and Multimodal Image-Guided Photothermal-Radiation Therapy. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2016;26(13):2185–2197. doi: 10.1002/adfm.201504810. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Khalil M. M. et al., Molecular SPECT Imaging: An Overview. Int. J. Mol. Imaging. 2011;2011:796025. doi: 10.1155/2011/796025. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Shukla A. K. Kumar U. Positron emission tomography: An overview. J. Med. Phys. 2006;31(1):13–21. doi: 10.4103/0971-6203.25665. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Withers P. J. et al., X-ray computed tomography. Nat. Rev. Methods Primers. 2021;1(1):18. doi: 10.1038/s43586-021-00015-4. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
Lusic H. Grinstaff M. W. X-ray-computed tomography contrast agents. Chem. Rev. 2013;113(3):1641–1666. doi: 10.1021/cr200358s. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Eda G. et al., Photoluminescence from chemically exfoliated MoS2. Nano Lett. 2011;11(12):5111–5116. doi: 10.1021/nl201874w. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Cheng L. et al., PEGylated WS(2) nanosheets as a multifunctional theranostic agent for in vivo dual-modal CT/photoacoustic imaging guided photothermal therapy. Adv. Mater. 2014;26(12):1886–1893. doi: 10.1002/adma.201304497. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Tang W. et al., Multifunctional Two-Dimensional Core-Shell MXene@Gold Nanocomposites for Enhanced Photo-Radio Combined Therapy in the Second Biological Window. ACS Nano. 2019;13(1):284–294. doi: 10.1021/acsnano.8b05982. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Chen M. et al., Core-shell Pd@Au nanoplates as theranostic agents for in-vivo photoacoustic imaging, CT imaging, and photothermal therapy. Adv. Mater. 2014;26(48):8210–8216. doi: 10.1002/adma.201404013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Li Z. et al., Multimodal Imaging-Guided Antitumor Photothermal Therapy and Drug Delivery Using Bismuth Selenide Spherical Sponge. ACS Nano. 2016;10(10):9646–9658. doi: 10.1021/acsnano.6b05427. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Jin Y. et al., Encapsulating tantalum oxide into polypyrrole nanoparticles for X-ray CT/photoacoustic bimodal imaging-guided photothermal ablation of cancer. Biomaterials. 2014;35(22):5795–5804. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2014.03.086. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Yang S. et al., Multifunctional Bi@PPy-PEG Core-Shell Nanohybrids for Dual-Modal Imaging and Photothermal Therapy. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces. 2018;10(2):1605–1615. doi: 10.1021/acsami.7b17838. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Jing L. et al., Prussian blue coated gold nanoparticles for simultaneous photoacoustic/CT bimodal imaging and photothermal ablation of cancer. Biomaterials. 2014;35(22):5814–5821. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2014.04.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Liu Y. et al., Aggregation-Induced Absorption Enhancement for Deep Near-Infrared II Photoacoustic Imaging of Brain Gliomas In Vivo. Adv. Sci. 2019;6(8):1801615. doi: 10.1002/advs.201801615. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Wang Y. et al., In Vivo Photoacoustic/Single-Photon Emission Computed Tomography Imaging for Dynamic Monitoring of Aggregation-Enhanced Photothermal Nanoagents. Anal. Chem. 2019;91(3):2128–2134. doi: 10.1021/acs.analchem.8b04585. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Yao M. et al., Engineering of SPECT/Photoacoustic Imaging/Antioxidative Stress Triple-Function Nanoprobe for Advanced Mesenchymal Stem Cell Therapy of Cerebral Ischemia. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces. 2020;12(34):37885–37895. doi: 10.1021/acsami.0c10500. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Shang W. et al., Core-Shell Gold Nanorod@Metal-Organic Framework Nanoprobes for Multimodality Diagnosis of Glioma. Adv. Mater. 2017;29(3):1604381. doi: 10.1002/adma.201604381. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Liang X. et al., Activatable near infrared dye conjugated hyaluronic acid based nanoparticles as a targeted theranostic agent for enhanced fluorescence/CT/photoacoustic imaging guided photothermal therapy. Biomaterials. 2017;132:72–84. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2017.04.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Wu B. et al., Gadolinium-chelate functionalized bismuth nanotheranostic agent for in vivo MRI/CT/PAI imaging-guided photothermal cancer therapy. Biomaterials. 2018;159:37–47. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2017.12.022. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Cheng Y. et al., Glutathione-Mediated Clearable Nanoparticles Based on Ultrasmall Gd(2)O(3) for MSOT/CT/MR Imaging Guided Photothermal/Radio Combination Cancer Therapy. Mol. Pharmaceutics. 2019;16(8):3489–3501. doi: 10.1021/acs.molpharmaceut.9b00332. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Wang Y. et al., Oxygen-supplementing mesoporous polydopamine nanosponges with WS(2) QDs-embedded for CT/MSOT/MR imaging and thermoradiotherapy of hypoxic cancer. Biomaterials. 2019;220:119405. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2019.119405. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Men X. et al., Thermosensitive Polymer Dot Nanocomposites for Trimodal Computed Tomography/Photoacoustic/Fluorescence Imaging-Guided Synergistic Chemo-Photothermal Therapy. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces. 2020;12(46):51174–51184. doi: 10.1021/acsami.0c13252. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Liu T. et al., Iron oxide decorated MoS2 nanosheets with double PEGylation for chelator-free radiolabeling and multimodal imaging guided photothermal therapy. ACS Nano. 2015;9(1):950–960. doi: 10.1021/nn506757x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Lin J. et al., Multimodal-Imaging-Guided Cancer Phototherapy by Versatile Biomimetic Theranostics with UV and γ-Irradiation Protection. Adv. Mater. 2016;28(17):3273–3279. doi: 10.1002/adma.201505700. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Yang M. et al., Dragon fruit-like biocage as an iron trapping nanoplatform for high efficiency targeted cancer multimodality imaging. Biomaterials. 2015;69:30–37. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2015.08.001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Wang S. et al., Core-Satellite Polydopamine–Gadolinium–Metallofullerene Nanotheranostics for Multimodal Imaging Guided Combination Cancer Therapy. Adv. Mater. 2017;29(35):1701013. doi: 10.1002/adma.201701013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Xu C. et al., Long circulating reduced graphene oxide-iron oxide nanoparticles for efficient tumor targeting and multimodality imaging. Nanoscale. 2016;8(25):12683–12692. doi: 10.1039/C5NR09193D. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Zhang Y. et al., Surfactant-Stripped Frozen Pheophytin Micelles for Multimodal Gut Imaging. Adv. Mater. 2016;28(38):8524–8530. doi: 10.1002/adma.201602373. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Vaquero J. J. Kinahan P. Positron Emission Tomography: Current Challenges and Opportunities for Technological Advances in Clinical and Preclinical Imaging Systems. Annu. Rev. Biomed. Eng. 2015;17:385–414. doi: 10.1146/annurev-bioeng-071114-040723. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Zhang Y. et al., Non-invasive multimodal functional imaging of the intestine with frozen micellar naphthalocyanines. Nat. Nanotechnol. 2014;9(8):631–638. doi: 10.1038/nnano.2014.130. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Hussain S. et al., Modern Diagnostic Imaging Technique Applications and Risk Factors in the Medical Field: A Review. BioMed Res. Int. 2022;2022:5164970. doi: 10.1155/2022/5164970. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Calle D. Ballesteros P. Cerdán S. Advanced Contrast Agents for Multimodal Biomedical Imaging Based on Nanotechnology. Methods Mol. Biol. 2018;1718:441–457. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4939-7531-0_26. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Delbeke D. et al., Hybrid imaging (SPECT/CT and PET/CT): improving therapeutic decisions. Semin. Nucl. Med. 2009;39(5):308–340. doi: 10.1053/j.semnuclmed.2009.03.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Dizendorf E. V. et al., Application of Oral Contrast Media in Coregistered Positron Emission Tomography—CT. Am. J. Roentgenol. 2002;179(2):477–481. doi: 10.2214/ajr.179.2.1790477. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Choi W. et al., Recent Advances in Contrast-Enhanced Photoacoustic Imaging: Overcoming the Physical and Practical Challenges. Chem. Rev. 2023;123(11):7379–7419. doi: 10.1021/acs.chemrev.2c00627. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Shi X.-f. et al., Multimodal Contrast Agents for Optoacoustic Brain Imaging in Small Animals. Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol. 2021;9:746815. doi: 10.3389/fbioe.2021.746815. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Bodea S.-V. Westmeyer G. G. Photoacoustic Neuroimaging - Perspectives on a Maturing Imaging Technique and its Applications in Neuroscience. Front. Neurosci. 2021;15:655247. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2021.655247. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Lin L. Wang L. V. The emerging role of photoacoustic imaging in clinical oncology. Nat. Rev. Clin. Oncol. 2022;19(6):365–384. doi: 10.1038/s41571-022-00615-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Deán-Ben X. L. et al., Deep optoacoustic localization microangiography of ischemic stroke in mice. Nat. Commun. 2023;14(1):3584. doi: 10.1038/s41467-023-39069-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Chen Z. et al., Widefield fluorescence localization microscopy for transcranial imaging of cortical perfusion with capillary resolution. Opt. Lett. 2020;45(13):3470–3473. doi: 10.1364/OL.396123. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Liu N. et al., Croconaine-based nanoparticles enable efficient optoacoustic imaging of murine brain tumors. Photoacoustics. 2021;22:100263. doi: 10.1016/j.pacs.2021.100263. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Zhou Q. et al., Three-dimensional wide-field fluorescence microscopy for transcranial mapping of cortical microcirculation. Nat. Commun. 2022;13(1):7969. doi: 10.1038/s41467-022-35733-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[cit1] Manohar S. Razansky D. Photoacoustics: a historical review. Advances in Optics and Photonics. Adv. Opt. Photonics. 2016;8(4):586–617. doi: 10.1364/AOP.8.000586. [DOI] [Google Scholar]

[cit2] Oraevsky A., et al., Laser optoacoustic imaging of the breast: detection of cancer angiogenesis. BiOS ’99 International Biomedical Optics Symposium. Vol. 3597. 1999: SPIE

[cit3] Wang X. et al., Noninvasive laser-induced photoacoustic tomography for structural and functional in vivo imaging of the brain. Nat. Biotechnol. 2003;21(7):803–806. doi: 10.1038/nbt839. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[cit4] Park B. et al., Functional photoacoustic imaging: from nano- and micro- to macro-scale. Nano Convergence. 2023;10(1):29. doi: 10.1186/s40580-023-00377-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[cit5] Laufer J. et al., In vivo preclinical photoacoustic imaging of tumor vasculature development and therapy. J. Biomed. Opt. 2012;17(5):056016. doi: 10.1117/1.JBO.17.5.056016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[cit6] Ron A. et al., Volumetric Optoacoustic Imaging Unveils High-Resolution Patterns of Acute and Cyclic Hypoxia in a Murine Model of Breast Cancer. Cancer Res. 2019;79(18):4767–4775. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-18-3769. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[cit7] Cho E. C. et al., Measuring the Optical Absorption Cross Sections of Au–Ag Nanocages and Au Nanorods by Photoacoustic Imaging. J. Phys. Chem. C. 2009;113(21):9023–9028. doi: 10.1021/jp903343p. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[cit8] Kim G. et al., Indocyanine-green-embedded PEBBLEs as a contrast agent for photoacoustic imaging. J. Biomed. Opt. 2007;12(4):044020. doi: 10.1117/1.2771530. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[cit9] Razansky D. et al., Multispectral opto-acoustic tomography of deep-seated fluorescent proteins in vivo. Nat. Photonics. 2009;3(7):412–417. doi: 10.1038/nphoton.2009.98. [DOI] [Google Scholar]

[cit10] Zhao Z. Swartchick C. B. Chan J. Targeted contrast agents and activatable probes for photoacoustic imaging of cancer. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2022;51(3):829–868. doi: 10.1039/D0CS00771D. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[cit11] Neuschmelting V. et al., Dual-Modality Surface-Enhanced Resonance Raman Scattering and Multispectral Optoacoustic Tomography Nanoparticle Approach for Brain Tumor Delineation. Small. 2018;14(23):1800740. doi: 10.1002/smll.201800740. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[cit12] Sanathana Konugolu Venkata S. et al., Diffuse optical characterization of collagen absorption from 500 to 1700 nm. J. Biomed. Opt. 2017;22(1):015006. doi: 10.1117/1.JBO.22.1.015006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[cit13] Razansky D. Klohs J. Ni R. Multi-scale optoacoustic molecular imaging of brain diseases. Eur. J. Nucl. Med. Mol. Imaging. 2021;48(13):4152–4170. doi: 10.1007/s00259-021-05207-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[cit14] Wang L. V. Multiscale photoacoustic microscopy and computed tomography. Nat. Photonics. 2009;3(9):503–509. doi: 10.1038/nphoton.2009.157. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[cit15] Shi J. Tang Y. Yao J. Advances in super-resolution photoacoustic imaging. Quant. Imaging Med. Surg. 2018;8(8):724–732. doi: 10.21037/qims.2018.09.14. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[cit16] Yao J. Wang L. V. Sensitivity of photoacoustic microscopy. Photoacoustics. 2014;2(2):87–101. doi: 10.1016/j.pacs.2014.04.002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[cit17] Deán-Ben X. L. et al., Advanced optoacoustic methods for multiscale imaging of in vivo dynamics. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2017;46(8):2158–2198. doi: 10.1039/C6CS00765A. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[cit18] Weber J. Beard P. C. Bohndiek S. E. Contrast agents for molecular photoacoustic imaging. Nat. Methods. 2016;13(8):639–650. doi: 10.1038/nmeth.3929. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[cit19] Garcia-Uribe A. et al., Dual-modality photoacoustic and ultrasound imaging system for noninvasive sentinel lymph node detection in patients with breast cancer. Sci. Rep. 2015;5(1):1–8. doi: 10.1038/srep15748. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[cit20] Nam S. Y. et al., Combined ultrasound and photoacoustic imaging to noninvasively assess burn injury and selectively monitor a regenerative tissue-engineered construct. Tissue Eng., Part C. 2015;21(6):557–566. doi: 10.1089/ten.tec.2014.0306. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[cit21] Ning B. et al., Ultrasound-aided multi-parametric photoacoustic microscopy of the mouse brain. Sci. Rep. 2015;5(1):18775. doi: 10.1038/srep18775. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[cit22] Mercep E. Dean-Ben X. L. Razansky D. Combined Pulse-Echo Ultrasound and Multispectral Optoacoustic Tomography With a Multi-Segment Detector Array. IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging. 2017;36(10):2129–2137. doi: 10.1109/TMI.2017.2706200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[cit23] Merčep E. et al., Transmission–reflection optoacoustic ultrasound (TROPUS) computed tomography of small animals. Light: Sci. Appl. 2019;8(1):18. doi: 10.1038/s41377-019-0130-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[cit24] Wang Y. et al., Integrated photoacoustic and fluorescence confocal microscopy. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 2010;57(10):2576–2578. doi: 10.1109/TBME.2010.2059026. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[cit25] Kosik I. and Carson J., Combined 3D photoacoustic and 2D fluorescence imaging of indocyanine green contrast agent flow, SPIE BiOS, vol. 8581. 2013 [Google Scholar]

[cit26] Chen Z. et al., Hybrid system for in vivo epifluorescence and 4D optoacoustic imaging. Opt. Lett. 2017;42(22):4577–4580. doi: 10.1364/OL.42.004577. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[cit27] Chen Z. et al., Performance of optoacoustic and fluorescence imaging in detecting deep-seated fluorescent agents. Biomed. Opt. Express. 2018;9(5):2229–2239. doi: 10.1364/BOE.9.002229. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[cit28] Chen Z. et al., Concurrent fluorescence and volumetric optoacoustic tomography of nanoagent perfusion and bio-distribution in solid tumors. Biomed. Opt. Express. 2019;10(10):5093–5102. doi: 10.1364/BOE.10.005093. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[cit29] Liu C. et al., The integrated high-resolution reflection-mode photoacoustic and fluorescence confocal microscopy. Photoacoustics. 2019;14:12–18. doi: 10.1016/j.pacs.2019.02.001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[cit30] Jokerst J. V. et al., Gold nanorods for ovarian cancer detection with photoacoustic imaging and resection guidance via Raman imaging in living mice. ACS Nano. 2012;6(11):10366–10377. doi: 10.1021/nn304347g. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[cit31] Kircher M. F. et al., A brain tumor molecular imaging strategy using a new triple-modality MRI-photoacoustic-Raman nanoparticle. Nat. Med. 2012;18(5):829–834. doi: 10.1038/nm.2721. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[cit32] Lin Q. et al., Bandgap Engineered Polypyrrole-Polydopamine Hybrid with Intrinsic Raman and Photoacoustic Imaging Contrasts. Nano Lett. 2018;18(12):7485–7493. doi: 10.1021/acs.nanolett.8b02901. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[cit33] Neuschmelting V. et al., Dual-Modality Surface-Enhanced Resonance Raman Scattering and Multispectral Optoacoustic Tomography Nanoparticle Approach for Brain Tumor Delineation. Small. 2018;14(23):e1800740. doi: 10.1002/smll.201800740. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[cit34] Jiao S. et al., Simultaneous multimodal imaging with integrated photoacoustic microscopy and optical coherence tomography. Opt. Lett. 2009;34(19):2961–2963. doi: 10.1364/OL.34.002961. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[cit35] Zhang E. Z. et al., Multimodal photoacoustic and optical coherence tomography scanner using an all optical detection scheme for 3D morphological skin imaging. Biomed. Opt. Express. 2011;2(8):2202–2215. doi: 10.1364/BOE.2.002202. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[cit36] Berer T. et al., Multimodal noncontact photoacoustic and optical coherence tomography imaging using wavelength-division multiplexing. J. Biomed. Opt. 2015;20(4):46013. doi: 10.1117/1.JBO.20.4.046013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[cit37] Zhang W. et al., High-resolution, in vivo multimodal photoacoustic microscopy, optical coherence tomography, and fluorescence microscopy imaging of rabbit retinal neovascularization. Light: Sci. Appl. 2018;7:103. doi: 10.1038/s41377-018-0093-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[cit38] Hosseinaee Z. Tummon Simmons J. A. Reza P. H. Dual-Modal Photoacoustic Imaging and Optical Coherence Tomography [Review] Front. Phys. 2021;8:616618. doi: 10.3389/fphy.2020.616618. [DOI] [Google Scholar]

[cit39] Duan Y. et al., Photoacoustic and Magnetic Resonance Imaging Bimodal Contrast Agent Displaying Amplified Photoacoustic Signal. Small. 2018;14(42):e1800652. doi: 10.1002/smll.201800652. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[cit40] Qiao Y. et al., Magnetic resonance and photoacoustic imaging of brain tumor mediated by mesenchymal stem cell labeled with multifunctional nanoparticle introduced via carotid artery injection. Nanotechnology. 2018;29(16):165101. doi: 10.1088/1361-6528/aaaf16. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[cit41] Guo Y. et al., Magnetic-responsive and targeted cancer nanotheranostics by PA/MR bimodal imaging-guided photothermally triggered immunotherapy. Biomaterials. 2019;219:119370. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2019.119370. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[cit42] Gehrung M. et al., Co-registration of optoacoustic tomography and magnetic resonance imaging data from murine tumour models. Photoacoustics. 2020;18:100147. doi: 10.1016/j.pacs.2019.100147. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[cit43] Chen Z. et al., Hybrid magnetic resonance and optoacoustic tomography (MROT) for preclinical neuroimaging. Light: Sci. Appl. 2022;11(1):332. doi: 10.1038/s41377-022-01026-w. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[cit44] Ren J. et al., A Dual-Modal Magnetic Resonance/Photoacoustic Imaging Tracer for Long-Term High-Precision Tracking and Facilitating Repair of Peripheral Nerve Injuries. Adv. Healthcare Mater. 2022;11(13):e2200183. doi: 10.1002/adhm.202200183. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[cit45] Chen Z. et al., Simultaneous Functional Magnetic Resonance and Optoacoustic Imaging of Brain-Wide Sensory Responses in Mice. Adv. Sci. 2023;10(3):e2205191. doi: 10.1002/advs.202205191. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[cit46] Zhang S. et al., In vivo co-registered hybrid-contrast imaging by successive photoacoustic tomography and magnetic resonance imaging. Photoacoustics. 2023;31:100506. doi: 10.1016/j.pacs.2023.100506. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[cit47] Akers W. J. et al., Multimodal sentinel lymph node mapping with single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT)/computed tomography (CT) and photoacoustic tomography. Transl. Res. 2012;159(3):175–181. doi: 10.1016/j.trsl.2011.09.006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[cit48] Yu X. et al., Ultrasmall Semimetal Nanoparticles of Bismuth for Dual-Modal Computed Tomography/Photoacoustic Imaging and Synergistic Thermoradiotherapy. ACS Nano. 2017;11(4):3990–4001. doi: 10.1021/acsnano.7b00476. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[cit49] Wang Y. et al., In Vivo Photoacoustic/Single-Photon Emission Computed Tomography Imaging for Dynamic Monitoring of Aggregation-Enhanced Photothermal Nanoagents. Anal. Chem. 2019;91(3):2128–2134. doi: 10.1021/acs.analchem.8b04585. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[cit50] Liu Y. et al., Highly specific noninvasive photoacoustic and positron emission tomography of brain plaque with functionalized croconium dye labeled by a radiotracer. Chem. Sci. 2017;8(4):2710–2716. doi: 10.1039/C6SC04798J. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[cit51] Xu C. et al., Bacteria-like mesoporous silica-coated gold nanorods for positron emission tomography and photoacoustic imaging-guided chemo-photothermal combined therapy. Biomaterials. 2018;165:56–65. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2018.02.043. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[cit52] Qin C. et al., Tyrosinase as a multifunctional reporter gene for Photoacoustic/MRI/PET triple modality molecular imaging. Sci. Rep. 2013;3(1):1–8. doi: 10.1038/srep01490. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[cit53] Liu Q. et al., 64) CuS-labeled nanoparticles: a new sentinel-lymph-node-mapping agent for PET-CT and photoacoustic tomography. Contrast Media Mol. Imaging. 2016;11(6):475–481. doi: 10.1002/cmmi.1709. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[cit54] Hannah A. et al., Indocyanine Green-Loaded Photoacoustic Nanodroplets: Dual Contrast Nanoconstructs for Enhanced Photoacoustic and Ultrasound Imaging. ACS Nano. 2014;8(1):250–259. doi: 10.1021/nn403527r. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[cit55] Jeon M. et al., Methylene blue microbubbles as a model dual-modality contrast agent for ultrasound and activatable photoacoustic imaging. J. Biomed. Opt. 2014;19(1):16005. doi: 10.1117/1.JBO.19.1.016005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[cit56] Paproski R. J. et al., Porphyrin Nanodroplets: Sub-micrometer Ultrasound and Photoacoustic Contrast Imaging Agents. Small. 2016;12(3):371–380. doi: 10.1002/smll.201502450. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[cit57] Nguyen V. P. et al., Contrast Agent Enhanced Multimodal Photoacoustic Microscopy and Optical Coherence Tomography for Imaging of Rabbit Choroidal and Retinal Vessels in vivo. Sci. Rep. 2019;9(1):5945. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-42324-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[cit58] Sun I. C. et al., Photoacoustic imaging of cancer cells with glycol-chitosan-coated gold nanoparticles as contrast agents. J. Biomed. Opt. 2019;24(12):1–5. doi: 10.1117/1.JBO.24.12.121903. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[cit59] Xu Y. et al., Organic nanoparticle-doped microdroplets as dual-modality contrast agents for ultrasound microvascular flow and photoacoustic imaging. Sci. Rep. 2020;10(1):17009. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-72795-w. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[cit60] Cardinell K. et al., A novel photoacoustic-fluorescent contrast agent for quantitative imaging of lymphatic drainage. Photoacoustics. 2021;21:100239. doi: 10.1016/j.pacs.2021.100239. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[cit61] Deán-Ben X. L. Razansky D. Functional optoacoustic human angiography with handheld video rate three dimensional scanner. Photoacoustics. 2013;1(3):68–73. doi: 10.1016/j.pacs.2013.10.002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[cit62] Jose J. et al., Speed-of-sound compensated photoacoustic tomography for accurate imaging. Med. Phys. 2012;39(12):7262–7271. doi: 10.1118/1.4764911. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[cit63] Zhang Y. Wang L. Video-rate full-ring ultrasound and photoacoustic computed tomography with real-time sound speed optimization. Biomed. Opt. Express. 2022;13(8):4398–4413. doi: 10.1364/BOE.464360. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[cit64] Li W. et al., Tracking Strain-Specific Morphogenesis and Angiogenesis of Murine Calvaria with Large-Scale Optoacoustic and Ultrasound Microscopy. J. Bone Miner. Res. 2022;37(5):1032–1043. doi: 10.1002/jbmr.4533. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[cit65] Estrada H. et al., Intravital optoacoustic and ultrasound bio-microscopy reveal radiation-inhibited skull angiogenesis. Bone. 2020;133:115251. doi: 10.1016/j.bone.2020.115251. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[cit66] Ly C. D. et al., Development of fast photoacoustic and ultrasound imaging system based on slider-crank scanner for small animals and humans study. Expert Syst. Appl. 2022;206:117939. doi: 10.1016/j.eswa.2022.117939. [DOI] [Google Scholar]

[cit67] Chen W. Tao C. Liu X. Artifact-free imaging through a bone-like layer by using an ultrasonic-guided photoacoustic microscopy. Opt. Lett. 2019;44(5):1273–1276. doi: 10.1364/OL.44.001273. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[cit68] Yang J.-M. et al., Simultaneous functional photoacoustic and ultrasonic endoscopy of internal organs in vivo. Nat. Med. 2012;18(8):1297–1302. doi: 10.1038/nm.2823. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[cit69] Dai X. et al., Miniature Endoscope for Multimodal Imaging. ACS Photonics. 2017;4(1):174–180. doi: 10.1021/acsphotonics.6b00852. [DOI] [Google Scholar]

[cit70] Estrada H. et al., Virtual craniotomy for high-resolution optoacoustic brain microscopy. Sci. Rep. 2018;8(1):1459. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-18857-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[cit71] Wang Y. et al., Toward in vivo biopsy of melanoma based on photoacoustic and ultrasound dual imaging with an integrated detector. Biomed. Opt. Express. 2016;7(2):279–286. doi: 10.1364/BOE.7.000279. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[cit72] Jeng G.-S. et al., Real-time interleaved spectroscopic photoacoustic and ultrasound (PAUS) scanning with simultaneous fluence compensation and motion correction. Nat. Commun. 2021;12(1):716. doi: 10.1038/s41467-021-20947-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[cit73] Niederhauser J. J. et al., Combined ultrasound and optoacoustic system for real-time high-contrast vascular imaging in vivo. IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging. 2005;24(4):436–440. doi: 10.1109/tmi.2004.843199. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[cit74] Kim J. et al., Multiparametric Photoacoustic Analysis of Human Thyroid Cancers in vivo photoacoustic Analysis of Human Thyroid Cancers. Cancer Res. 2021;81(18):4849–4860. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-20-3334. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[cit75] Neuschler E. I. et al., A pivotal study of optoacoustic imaging to diagnose benign and malignant breast masses: a new evaluation tool for radiologists. Radiology. 2018;287(2):398–412. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2017172228. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[cit76] Merčep E. et al., Hybrid optoacoustic tomography and pulse-echo ultrasonography using concave arrays. IEEE Trans. Ultrason. Eng. 2015;62(9):1651–1661. doi: 10.1109/TUFFC.2015.007058. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[cit77] Merčep E. et al., Whole-body live mouse imaging by hybrid reflection-mode ultrasound and optoacoustic tomography. Opt. Lett. 2015;40(20):4643–4646. doi: 10.1364/OL.40.004643. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[cit78] Dima A. Ntziachristos V. In-vivo handheld optoacoustic tomography of the human thyroid. Photoacoustics. 2016;4(2):65–69. doi: 10.1016/j.pacs.2016.05.003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[cit79] Becker A. et al., Multispectral optoacoustic tomography of the human breast: characterisation of healthy tissue and malignant lesions using a hybrid ultrasound-optoacoustic approach. Eur. Radiol. 2018;28:602–609. doi: 10.1007/s00330-017-5002-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[cit80] Deán-Ben X. L. Merčep E. Razansky D. Hybrid-array-based optoacoustic and ultrasound (OPUS) imaging of biological tissues. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2017;110(20):203703. doi: 10.1063/1.4983462. [DOI] [Google Scholar]

[cit81] Wang X. et al., Integrated thermoacoustic and ultrasound imaging based on the combination of a hollow concave transducer array and a linear transducer array. Phys. Med. Biol. 2021;66(11):115011. doi: 10.1088/1361-6560/abfc91. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[cit82] Merčep E. Deán-Ben X. L. Razansky D. Imaging of blood flow and oxygen state with a multi-segment optoacoustic ultrasound array. Photoacoustics. 2018;10:48–53. doi: 10.1016/j.pacs.2018.04.002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[cit83] Merčep E. Deán-Ben X. L. Razansky D. Combined pulse-echo ultrasound and multispectral optoacoustic tomography with a multi-segment detector array. IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging. 2017;36(10):2129–2137. doi: 10.1109/TMI.2017.2706200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[cit84] Knieling F. et al., Multispectral Optoacoustic Tomography for Assessment of Crohn's Disease Activity. N. Engl. J. Med. 2017;376(13):1292–1294. doi: 10.1056/NEJMc1612455. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[cit85] Erratum for the Research Article: “Metastatic status of sentinel lymph nodes in melanoma determined noninvasively with multispectral optoacoustic imaging” by ; Stoffels I. Morscher S. Helfrich I. Hillen U. Lehy J. Burton N. C. Sardella T. C. P. Claussen J. Poeppel T. D. Bachmann H. S. Roesch A. Griewank K. Schadendorf D. Gunzer M. Klode J. Sci. Transl. Med. 2015;7(319):319er8. doi: 10.1126/scitranslmed.aad1278. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[cit86] Lafci B. et al., Noninvasive multiparametric characterization of mammary tumors with transmission-reflection optoacoustic ultrasound. Neoplasia. 2020;22(12):770–777. doi: 10.1016/j.neo.2020.10.008. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[cit87] Lafci B. et al., Multimodal assessment of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease with transmission-reflection optoacoustic ultrasound. Theranostics. 2023;13(12):4217–4228. doi: 10.7150/thno.78548. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[cit88] Huynh E. et al., Porphyrin shell microbubbles with intrinsic ultrasound and photoacoustic properties. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2012;134(40):16464–16467. doi: 10.1021/ja305988f. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[cit89] Wang Y.-H. et al., Photoacoustic/ultrasound dual-modality contrast agent and its application to thermotherapy. J. Biomed. Opt. 2012;17(4):045001. doi: 10.1117/1.JBO.17.4.045001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[cit90] Kim C. et al., Multifunctional microbubbles and nanobubbles for photoacoustic and ultrasound imaging. J. Biomed. Opt. 2010;15(1):010510. doi: 10.1117/1.3302808. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[cit91] Wilson K. Homan K. Emelianov S. Biomedical photoacoustics beyond thermal expansion using triggered nanodroplet vaporization for contrast-enhanced imaging. Nat. Commun. 2012;3:618. doi: 10.1038/ncomms1627. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[cit92] Greish K. Enhanced permeability and retention (EPR) effect for anticancer nanomedicine drug targeting. Methods Mol. Biol. 2010;624:25–37. doi: 10.1007/978-1-60761-609-2_3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[cit93] Nichols J. W. Bae Y. H. EPR: Evidence and fallacy. J. Controlled Release. 2014;190:451–464. doi: 10.1016/j.jconrel.2014.03.057. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[cit94] Das D. et al., On-chip generation of microbubbles in photoacoustic contrast agents for dual modal ultrasound/photoacoustic in vivo animal imaging. Sci. Rep. 2018;8(1):6401. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-24713-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[cit95] Wilson K. Homan K. Emelianov S. Biomedical photoacoustics beyond thermal expansion using triggered nanodroplet vaporization for contrast-enhanced imaging. Nat. Commun. 2012;3(1):618. doi: 10.1038/ncomms1627. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[cit96] Tserevelakis G. J. et al., Hybrid multiphoton and optoacoustic microscope. Opt. Lett. 2014;39(7):1819–1822. doi: 10.1364/OL.39.001819. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[cit97] Soliman D. et al., Combining microscopy with mesoscopy using optical and optoacoustic label-free modes. Sci. Rep. 2015;5(1):1–9. doi: 10.1038/srep12902. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[cit98] Rao B. et al., Integrated photoacoustic, confocal, and two-photon microscope. J. Biomed. Opt. 2014;19(3):036002. doi: 10.1117/1.JBO.19.3.036002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[cit99] Hu S. et al., Intravital imaging of amyloid plaques in a transgenic mouse model using optical-resolution photoacoustic microscopy. Opt. Lett. 2009;34(24):3899–3901. doi: 10.1364/OL.34.003899. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[cit100] Wang Y. et al., In vivo integrated photoacoustic and confocal microscopy of hemoglobin oxygen saturation and oxygen partial pressure. Opt. Lett. 2011;36(7):1029–1031. doi: 10.1364/OL.36.001029. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[cit101] Park J. et al., Quadruple ultrasound, photoacoustic, optical coherence, and fluorescence fusion imaging with a transparent ultrasound transducer. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2021;118(11):e1920879118. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1920879118. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[cit102] Li H. et al., A transparent broadband ultrasonic detector based on an optical micro-ring resonator for photoacoustic microscopy. Sci. Rep. 2014;4(1):1–8. doi: 10.1038/srep04496. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[cit103] Dong B. et al., Isometric multimodal photoacoustic microscopy based on optically transparent micro-ring ultrasonic detection. Optica. 2015;2(2):169–176. doi: 10.1364/OPTICA.2.000169. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[cit104] Chen Z. et al., Hybrid system for in vivo epifluorescence and 4D optoacoustic imaging. Opt. Lett. 2017;42(22):4577–4580. doi: 10.1364/OL.42.004577. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[cit105] Gottschalk S. et al., Rapid volumetric optoacoustic imaging of neural dynamics across the mouse brain. Nat. Biomed. Eng. 2019;3(5):392–401. doi: 10.1038/s41551-019-0372-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[cit106] Chen Z. et al., Multimodal Noninvasive Functional Neurophotonic Imaging of Murine Brain-Wide Sensory Responses. Adv. Sci. 2022;9(24):2105588. doi: 10.1002/advs.202105588. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[cit107] Ni R. et al., Multiscale optical and optoacoustic imaging of amyloid-β deposits in mice. Nat. Biomed. Eng. 2022;6(9):1031–1044. doi: 10.1038/s41551-022-00906-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[cit108] Guo B. et al., Precise Deciphering of Brain Vasculatures and Microscopic Tumors with Dual NIR-II Fluorescence and Photoacoustic Imaging. Adv. Mater. 2019;31(30):e1902504. doi: 10.1002/adma.201902504. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[cit109] She Z. et al., An NO-responsive probe for detecting acute inflammation using NIR-II fluorescence/optoacoustic imaging. Chem. Commun. 2022;58(94):13123–13126. doi: 10.1039/D2CC05386A. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[cit110] Lv N. et al., Stimuli-Responsive Hybrid Vesicle for Tumor Dual-Model NIR-II Photoacoustic and Fluorescence Imaging and Precise Radiotherapy. Adv. Opt. Mater. 2022;10(17):2200694. doi: 10.1002/adom.202200694. [DOI] [Google Scholar]

[cit111] Xiao P. et al., A fluorophore with dithienopyrrole donor for beyond 1300 nm NIR-II fluorescence/photoacoustic dual-model imaging and photothermal therapy. Mater. Today Nano. 2023;24:100404. doi: 10.1016/j.mtnano.2023.100404. [DOI] [Google Scholar]

[cit112] Zhao F. et al., Maximum Emission Peak Over 1500 nm of Organic Assembly for Blood–Brain Barrier-Crossing NIR-IIb Phototheranostics of Orthotopic Glioblastoma. Adv. Mater. 2023;35(22):2208097. doi: 10.1002/adma.202208097. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[cit113] Zheng Z. et al., All-in-One Zeolite-Carbon-Based Nanotheranostics with Adjustable NIR-II Window Photoacoustic/Fluorescence Imaging Performance for Precise NIR-II Photothermal-Synergized Catalytic Antitumor Therapy. Small. 2021;17(41):e2103252. doi: 10.1002/smll.202103252. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[cit114] Wang Y. et al., Targeted nanobubbles carrying indocyanine green for ultrasound, photoacoustic and fluorescence imaging of prostate cancer. Int. J. Nanomed. 2020:4289–4309. doi: 10.2147/IJN.S243548. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[cit115] Zlitni A. et al., Maltotriose-based probes for fluorescence and photoacoustic imaging of bacterial infections. Nat. Commun. 2020;11(1):1250. doi: 10.1038/s41467-020-14985-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[cit116] Gan H. et al., A Mitochondria-Targeted Ferroptosis Inducer Activated by Glutathione-Responsive Imaging and Depletion for Triple Negative Breast Cancer Theranostics. Adv. Healthcare Mater. 2023;12(22):e2300220. doi: 10.1002/adhm.202300220. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[cit117] Shcherbakova D. M. Verkhusha V. V. Near-infrared fluorescent proteins for multicolor in vivo imaging. Nat. Methods. 2013;10(8):751–754. doi: 10.1038/nmeth.2521. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[cit118] Zhao Y. et al., Amorphous Ag2−xCuxS quantum dots:“all-in-one” theranostic nanomedicines for near-infrared fluorescence/photoacoustics dual-modal-imaging-guided photothermal therapy. Chem. Eng. J. 2020;399:125777. doi: 10.1016/j.cej.2020.125777. [DOI] [Google Scholar]

[cit119] Shang W. et al., Core–shell gold Nanorod@metal–organic framework nanoprobes for multimodality diagnosis of glioma. Adv. Mater. 2017;29(3):1604381. doi: 10.1002/adma.201604381. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[cit120] Qian M. et al., Highly crystalline multicolor carbon nanodots for dual-modal imaging-guided photothermal therapy of glioma. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces. 2018;10(4):4031–4040. doi: 10.1021/acsami.7b19716. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[cit121] Huang C. et al., Efficient Photoacoustic Imaging With Biomimetic Mesoporous Silica-Based Nanoparticles. Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol. 2021;9:762956. doi: 10.3389/fbioe.2021.762956. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[cit122] Miranda D. et al., Highly-soluble cyanine J-aggregates entrapped by liposomes for in vivo optical imaging around 930 nm. Theranostics. 2019;9(2):381. doi: 10.7150/thno.28376. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[cit123] Patil P. M. et al., Optoresponsive Pheophorbide-Silver based organometallic nanomaterials for high efficacy multimodal theranostics in Melanoma. Chem. Eng. J. 2023;470:144110. doi: 10.1016/j.cej.2023.144110. [DOI] [Google Scholar]

[cit124] Zhang X. et al., Programmably Controllable Delivery of Metastable Ferrous Ions for Multiscale Dynamic Imaging Guided Photothermal Primed Chemodynamic Therapy. Adv. Mater. 2023:2210876. doi: 10.1002/adma.202210876. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[cit125] Zhou G. et al., Renal Clearable Catalytic 2D Au–Porphyrin Coordination Polymer Augmented Photothermal-Gas Synergistic Cancer Therapy. Small. 2023;19(14):2206749. doi: 10.1002/smll.202206749. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[cit126] Zou Q. et al., PVP-coated ultrasmall Nd-doped Gd2O2S nanoparticles for multimodal imaging. Mater. Chem. Front. 2023:4109–4119. doi: 10.1039/D3QM00554B. [DOI] [Google Scholar]

[cit127] Zhao Y. et al., Reaction-Activated Disassembly of the NIR-II Probe Enables Fast Detection and Ratiometric Photoacoustic Imaging of Glutathione In Vivo. Anal. Chem. 2023:14043–14051. doi: 10.1021/acs.analchem.3c02664. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[cit128] Wang K. et al., Imaging Investigation of Hepatocellular Carcinoma Progress via Monitoring γ-Glutamyltranspeptidase Level with a Near-Infrared Fluorescence/Photoacoustic Bimodal Probe. Anal. Chem. 2023;95(38):14235–14243. doi: 10.1021/acs.analchem.3c02270. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[cit129] Zhao M. et al., An Activatable Phototheranostic Probe for Anti-hypoxic Type I Photodynamic- and Immuno-Therapy of Cancer. Adv. Mater. 2023:e2305243. doi: 10.1002/adma.202305243. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[cit130] Zhou H. et al., A Tumor-Microenvironment-Activatable Molecular Pro-Theranostic Agent for Photodynamic and Immunotherapy of Cancer. Adv. Mater. 2023;35(30):e2211485. doi: 10.1002/adma.202211485. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[cit131] Wen X. et al., Controlled sequential in situ self-assembly and disassembly of a fluorogenic cisplatin prodrug for cancer theranostics. Nat. Commun. 2023;14(1):800. doi: 10.1038/s41467-023-36469-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[cit132] Song Z. et al., Cathepsin K-Activated Probe for Fluoro-Photoacoustic Imaging of Early Osteolytic Metastasis. Adv. Sci. 2023;10(24):e2300217. doi: 10.1002/advs.202300217. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[cit133] Kang X. et al., A photo-triggered self-accelerated nanoplatform for multifunctional image-guided combination cancer immunotherapy. Nat. Commun. 2023;14(1):5216. doi: 10.1038/s41467-023-40996-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[cit134] Yan D. et al., A Water-Soluble AIEgen for Noninvasive Diagnosis of Kidney Fibrosis via SWIR Fluorescence and Photoacoustic Imaging. Adv. Mater. 2022;34(50):e2206643. doi: 10.1002/adma.202206643. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[cit135] Xu R. et al., Highly bright aggregation-induced emission nanodots for precise photoacoustic/NIR-II fluorescence imaging-guided resection of neuroendocrine neoplasms and sentinel lymph nodes. Biomaterials. 2022;289:121780. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2022.121780. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[cit136] Wang W. et al., A Native Drug-Free Macromolecular Therapeutic to Trigger Mutual Reinforcing of Endoplasmic Reticulum Stress and Mitochondrial Dysfunction for Cancer Treatment. ACS nano. 2023;17(11):11023–11038. doi: 10.1021/acsnano.3c03450. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[cit137] Zhang Y. et al., An Activatable Polymeric Nanoprobe for Fluorescence and Photoacoustic Imaging of Tumor-Associated Neutrophils in Cancer Immunotherapy. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2022;61(27):e202203184. doi: 10.1002/anie.202203184. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[cit138] Zhang C. Tai X. Xu J. Sun P. Fan Q. Cheng Z. Zhang Y. 1064 nm activatable semiconducting polymer-based nanoplatform for NIR-II fluorescence/NIR-II photoacoustic imaging guided photothermal therapy of orthotopic osteosarcoma. Chem. Eng. J. 2022;445:136836. doi: 10.1016/j.cej.2022.136836. [DOI] [Google Scholar]

[cit139] Shuhendler A. J. et al., Real-time imaging of oxidative and nitrosative stress in the liver of live animals for drug-toxicity testing. Nat. Biotechnol. 2014;32(4):373–380. doi: 10.1038/nbt.2838. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[cit140] Ren S. et al., Multifunctional AuPd-cluster nanotheranostic agents with a cascade self-regulating redox tumor-microenvironment for dual-photodynamic synergized enzyme catalytic therapy. J. Mater. Chem. B. 2023;11(1):109–118. doi: 10.1039/D2TB02096C. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[cit141] Han Y. et al., Near-infrared-II photothermal ultra-small carbon dots promoting anticancer efficiency by enhancing tumor penetration. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2022;616:595–604. doi: 10.1016/j.jcis.2022.02.083. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[cit142] Cao Y. et al., Engineered exosome-mediated near-infrared-II region V2C quantum dot delivery for nucleus-target low-temperature photothermal therapy. ACS Nano. 2019;13(2):1499–1510. doi: 10.1021/acsnano.8b07224. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[cit143] Zhao Y. et al., Amorphous Ag2−xCuxS quantum dots: “all-in-one” theranostic nanomedicines for near-infrared fluorescence/photoacoustics dual-modal-imaging-guided photothermal therapy. Chem. Eng. J. 2020;399:125777. doi: 10.1016/j.cej.2020.125777. [DOI] [Google Scholar]

[cit144] Zhang J. et al., A Multifunctional Photoacoustic/Fluorescence Dual-Mode-Imaging Gold-Based Theranostic Nanoformulation without External Laser Limitations. Adv. Mater. 2022;34(19):2110690. doi: 10.1002/adma.202110690. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[cit145] Vazquez-Prada K. X. et al., A Spiky Silver-Iron Oxide Nanoparticle for Highly Efficient Targeted Photothermal Therapy and Multimodal Imaging of Thrombosis. Small. 2023;19(11):e2205744. doi: 10.1002/smll.202205744. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[cit146] Li S. et al., A Two-Pronged Strategy for Enhanced Deep-Tumor Penetration and NIR-II Multimodal Imaging-Monitored Photothermal Therapy. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces. 2022;14(37):41684–41694. doi: 10.1021/acsami.2c08930. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[cit147] Chen T. et al., Microenvironment-Tailored Catalytic Nanoprobe for Ratiometric NIR-II Fluorescence/Photoacoustic Imaging of H2O2 in Tumor and Lymphatic Metastasis. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2022;32(47):2208720. doi: 10.1002/adfm.202208720. [DOI] [Google Scholar]

[cit148] Ai X. et al., In vivo covalent cross-linking of photon-converted rare-earth nanostructures for tumour localization and theranostics. Nat. Commun. 2016;7(1):10432. doi: 10.1038/ncomms10432. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[cit149] Ai X. et al., Multispectral optoacoustic imaging of dynamic redox correlation and pathophysiological progression utilizing upconversion nanoprobes. Nat. Commun. 2019;10(1):1087. doi: 10.1038/s41467-019-09001-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[cit150] Yan D. et al., A Water-Soluble AIEgen for Noninvasive Diagnosis of Kidney Fibrosis via SWIR Fluorescence and Photoacoustic Imaging. Adv. Mater. 2022;34(50):2206643. doi: 10.1002/adma.202206643. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[cit151] Zheng W. et al., Lanthanide-doped upconversion nano-bioprobes: electronic structures, optical properties, and biodetection. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2015;44(6):1379–1415. doi: 10.1039/C4CS00178H. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[cit152] Li L. et al., Three-dimensional combined photoacoustic and optical coherence microscopy for in vivo microcirculation studies. Opt. Express. 2009;17(19):16450–16455. doi: 10.1364/OE.17.016450. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[cit153] Liu M. Drexler W. Optical coherence tomography angiography and photoacoustic imaging in dermatology. Photochem. Photobiol. Sci. 2019;18(5):945–962. doi: 10.1039/c8pp00471d. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[cit154] Nguyen V.-P. et al., Plasmonic gold nanostar-enhanced multimodal photoacoustic microscopy and optical coherence tomography molecular imaging to evaluate choroidal neovascularization. ACS Sens. 2020;5(10):3070–3081. doi: 10.1021/acssensors.0c00908. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[cit155] Nguyen V.-P. et al., Gold nanorod enhanced photoacoustic microscopy and optical coherence tomography of choroidal neovascularization. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces. 2021;13(34):40214–40228. doi: 10.1021/acsami.1c03504. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[cit156] Ma Z. et al., Assessment of microvasculature flow state with a high speed all-optic dual-modal system of optical coherence tomography and photoacoustic imaging. Biomed. Opt. Express. 2018;9(12):6103–6115. doi: 10.1364/BOE.9.006103. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[cit157] Haindl R. et al., Dual modality reflection mode optical coherence and photoacoustic microscopy using an akinetic sensor. Opt. Lett. 2017;42(21):4319–4322. doi: 10.1364/OL.42.004319. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[cit158] Wi J.-S. et al., Stacked Gold Nanodisks for Bimodal Photoacoustic and Optical Coherence Imaging. ACS Nano. 2017;11(6):6225–6232. doi: 10.1021/acsnano.7b02337. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[cit159] Si P. et al., Gold nanomaterials for optical biosensing and bioimaging. Nanoscale Adv. 2021;3(10):2679–2698. doi: 10.1039/D0NA00961J. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[cit160] Han S. Bouchard R. Sokolov K. V. Molecular photoacoustic imaging with ultra-small gold nanoparticles. Biomed. Opt. Express. 2019;10(7):3472–3483. doi: 10.1364/BOE.10.003472. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[cit161] Wax A. Sokolov K. Molecular Imaging and Darkfield Microspectroscopy of Live Cells Using Gold Plasmonic Nanoparticles. Laser Photonics Rev. 2009;3:146. doi: 10.1002/lpor.200810011. [DOI] [Google Scholar]

[cit162] Oldenburg A. L. et al., Motility-, Autocorrelation-, and Polarization-Sensitive Optical Coherence Tomography Discriminates Cells and Gold Nanorods within 3d Tissue Cultures. Opt. Lett. 2013;38:2923. doi: 10.1364/OL.38.002923. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[cit163] Nahas A. et al., Detection of Plasmonic Nanoparticles with Full Field-Oct: Optical and Photothermal Detection. Biomed. Opt. Express. 2014;5:3541. doi: 10.1364/BOE.5.003541. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[cit164] Jia Y. et al., Spectral Fractionation Detection of Gold Nanorod Contrast Agents Using Optical Coherence Tomography. Opt. Express. 2015;23:4212. doi: 10.1364/OE.23.004212. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[cit165] Liba O. et al., Contrast-Enhanced Optical Coherence Tomography with Picomolar Sensitivity for Functional In Vivo Imaging. Sci. Rep. 2016;6:23337. doi: 10.1038/srep23337. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[cit166] Hu J. et al., Gold nanoshells: Contrast agents for cell imaging by cardiovascular optical coherence tomography. Nano Res. 2018;11(2):676–685. doi: 10.1007/s12274-017-1674-4. [DOI] [Google Scholar]

[cit167] Lee T. M. et al., Engineered Microsphere Contrast Agents for Optical Coherence Tomography. Opt. Lett. 2003;28:1546. doi: 10.1364/OL.28.001546. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[cit168] Xu C. et al., Near-Infrared Dyes as Contrast-Enhancing Agents for Spectroscopic Optical Coherence Tomography. Opt. Lett. 2004;29:1647. doi: 10.1364/OL.29.001647. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[cit169] Yang C. et al., Spectral Triangulation Molecular Contrast Optical Coherence Tomography with Indocyanine Green as the Contrast Agent. Opt. Lett. 2004;29:2016. doi: 10.1364/OL.29.002016. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[cit170] Robles F. E. et al., Molecular Imaging True-Colour Spectroscopic Optical Coherence Tomography. Nat. Photonics. 2011;5:744. doi: 10.1038/nphoton.2011.257. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[cit171] Lu G. J. et al., Genetically Encodable Contrast Agents for Optical Coherence Tomography. ACS Nano. 2020;14(7):7823–7831. doi: 10.1021/acsnano.9b08432. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[cit172] Nguyen V. P. et al., Chain-like gold nanoparticle clusters for multimodal photoacoustic microscopy and optical coherence tomography enhanced molecular imaging. Nat. Commun. 2021;12(1):34. doi: 10.1038/s41467-020-20276-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[cit173] Li Q. et al., Dual Ratiometric SERS and Photoacoustic Core–Satellite Nanoprobe for Quantitatively Visualizing Hydrogen Peroxide in Inflammation and Cancer. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2021;60(13):7323–7332. doi: 10.1002/anie.202015451. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[cit174] Glover G. H. Overview of functional magnetic resonance imaging. Neurosurg. Clin. N. Am. 2011;22(2):133–139. doi: 10.1016/j.nec.2010.11.001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; , vii

[cit175] Handwerker D. A. et al., The continuing challenge of understanding and modeling hemodynamic variation in fMRI. NeuroImage. 2012;62(2):1017–1023. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.02.015. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[cit176] Terreno E. et al., Challenges for molecular magnetic resonance imaging. Chem. Rev. 2010;110(5):3019–3042. doi: 10.1021/cr100025t. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[cit177] Na S. Russin J. J. Lin L. et al., Massively parallel functional photoacoustic computed tomography of the human brain. Nat. Biomed. Eng. 2022;6:584–592. doi: 10.1038/s41551-021-00735-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[cit178] Ni R. Deán-Ben X. L. Treyer V. Gietl A. Hock C. Klohs J. Nitsch R. M. Razansky D. Coregistered transcranial optoacoustic and magnetic resonance angiography of the human brain. Opt. Lett. 2023;48(3):648–651. doi: 10.1364/OL.475578. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[cit179] Kubelick K. P. Emelianov S. Y. A Trimodal Ultrasound, Photoacoustic and Magnetic Resonance Imaging Approach for Longitudinal Post-operative Monitoring of Stem Cells in the Spinal Cord. Ultrasound Med. Biol. 2020;46(12):3468–3474. doi: 10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2020.08.026. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[cit180] Rich L. J. et al., Photoacoustic and Magnetic Resonance Imaging of Hybrid Manganese Dioxide-Coated Ultra-small NaGdF(4) Nanoparticles for Spatiotemporal Modulation of Hypoxia in Head and Neck Cancer. Cancers. 2020;12(11):3294. doi: 10.3390/cancers12113294. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[cit181] Sivasubramanian M. et al., Multimodal Magnetic Resonance and Photoacoustic Imaging of Tumor-Specific Enzyme-Responsive Hybrid Nanoparticles for Oxygen Modulation. Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol. 2022;10:910902. doi: 10.3389/fbioe.2022.910902. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[cit182] Attia A. B. E. et al., Multispectral optoacoustic and MRI coregistration for molecular imaging of orthotopic model of human glioblastoma. J. Biophotonics. 2016;9(7):701–708. doi: 10.1002/jbio.201500321. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[cit183] Gezginer I. et al., Volumetric registration framework for multimodal functional magnetic resonance and optoacoustic tomography of the rodent brain. Photoacoustics. 2023;31:100522. doi: 10.1016/j.pacs.2023.100522. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[cit184] Wang D. Wu Y. Xia J. Review on photoacoustic imaging of the brain using nanoprobes. Neurophotonics. 2016;3(1):010901. doi: 10.1117/1.NPh.3.1.010901. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[cit185] Bai H. et al., A caspase-3-activatable bimodal probe for photoacoustic and magnetic resonance imaging of tumor apoptosis in vivo. Biosens. Bioelectron. 2022;216:114648. doi: 10.1016/j.bios.2022.114648. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[cit186] Mou J. et al., A facile synthesis of versatile Cu2−xS nanoprobe for enhanced MRI and infrared thermal/photoacoustic multimodal imaging. Biomaterials. 2015;57:12–21. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2015.04.020. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[cit187] Ke K. et al., Copper Manganese Sulfide Nanoplates: A New Two-Dimensional Theranostic Nanoplatform for MRI/MSOT Dual-Modal Imaging-Guided Photothermal Therapy in the Second Near-Infrared Window. Theranostics. 2017;7(19):4763–4776. doi: 10.7150/thno.21694. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[cit188] Bogdanov Jr. A. A. et al., Synthesis and Testing of Modular Dual-Modality Nanoparticles for Magnetic Resonance and Multispectral Photoacoustic Imaging. Bioconjugate Chem. 2016;27(2):383–390. doi: 10.1021/acs.bioconjchem.5b00633. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[cit189] Bouchard L. S. et al., Picomolar sensitivity MRI and photoacoustic imaging of cobalt nanoparticles. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2009;106(11):4085–4089. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0813019106. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[cit190] Yu J. et al., Smart MoS2/Fe3O4 Nanotheranostic for Magnetically Targeted Photothermal Therapy Guided by Magnetic Resonance/Photoacoustic Imaging. Theranostics. 2015;5(9):931–945. doi: 10.7150/thno.11802. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[cit191] Zhang H. et al., A dual-mode nanoparticle based on natural biomaterials for photoacoustic and magnetic resonance imaging of bone mesenchymal stem cells in vivo. RSC Adv. 2019;9(60):35003–35010. doi: 10.1039/C9RA05937G. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[cit192] Li Y. et al., Carbon-Coated Magnetic Nanoparticle Dedicated to MRI/Photoacoustic Imaging of Tumor in Living Mice. Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol. 2021;9:800744. doi: 10.3389/fbioe.2021.800744. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[cit193] Zhang H. et al., Hollow carbon nanospheres dotted with Gd–Fe nanoparticles for magnetic resonance and photoacoustic imaging. Nanoscale. 2021;13(24):10943–10952. doi: 10.1039/D1NR02914B. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[cit194] Zhang Y. et al., Polydopamine-modified dual-ligand nanoparticles as highly effective and targeted magnetic resonance/photoacoustic dual-modality thrombus imaging agents. Int. J. Nanomed. 2019;14:7155–7171. doi: 10.2147/IJN.S216603. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[cit195] Zhu W. et al., Mn2+-doped prussian blue nanocubes for bimodal imaging and photothermal therapy with enhanced performance. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces. 2015;7(21):11575–11582. doi: 10.1021/acsami.5b02510. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[cit196] Fan Q. et al., Transferring biomarker into molecular probe: melanin nanoparticle as a naturally active platform for multimodality imaging. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2014;136(43):15185–15194. doi: 10.1021/ja505412p. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[cit197] Liu Y. et al., Porous gold nanocluster-decorated manganese monoxide nanocomposites for microenvironment-activatable MR/photoacoustic/CT tumor imaging. Nanoscale. 2018;10(8):3631–3638. doi: 10.1039/C7NR08535D. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[cit198] Yang J. et al., Structurally symmetric near-infrared fluorophore IRDye78-protein complex enables multimodal cancer imaging. Theranostics. 2021;11(6):2534–2549. doi: 10.7150/thno.54928. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[cit199] Zou L. et al., Current Approaches of Photothermal Therapy in Treating Cancer Metastasis with Nanotherapeutics. Theranostics. 2016;6(6):762–772. doi: 10.7150/thno.14988. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[cit200] Wang S. et al., MSOT/CT/MR imaging-guided and hypoxia-maneuvered oxygen self-supply radiotherapy based on one-pot MnO(2)-mSiO(2)@Au nanoparticles. Nanoscale. 2019;11(13):6270–6284. doi: 10.1039/C9NR00918C. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[cit201] Cheng L. et al., FeSe(2)-Decorated Bi(2)Se(3) Nanosheets Fabricated via Cation Exchange for Chelator-Free (64)Cu-labeling and Multimodal Image-Guided Photothermal-Radiation Therapy. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2016;26(13):2185–2197. doi: 10.1002/adfm.201504810. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[cit202] Khalil M. M. et al., Molecular SPECT Imaging: An Overview. Int. J. Mol. Imaging. 2011;2011:796025. doi: 10.1155/2011/796025. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[cit203] Shukla A. K. Kumar U. Positron emission tomography: An overview. J. Med. Phys. 2006;31(1):13–21. doi: 10.4103/0971-6203.25665. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[cit204] Withers P. J. et al., X-ray computed tomography. Nat. Rev. Methods Primers. 2021;1(1):18. doi: 10.1038/s43586-021-00015-4. [DOI] [Google Scholar]

[cit205] Lusic H. Grinstaff M. W. X-ray-computed tomography contrast agents. Chem. Rev. 2013;113(3):1641–1666. doi: 10.1021/cr200358s. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[cit206] Eda G. et al., Photoluminescence from chemically exfoliated MoS2. Nano Lett. 2011;11(12):5111–5116. doi: 10.1021/nl201874w. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[cit207] Cheng L. et al., PEGylated WS(2) nanosheets as a multifunctional theranostic agent for in vivo dual-modal CT/photoacoustic imaging guided photothermal therapy. Adv. Mater. 2014;26(12):1886–1893. doi: 10.1002/adma.201304497. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[cit208] Tang W. et al., Multifunctional Two-Dimensional Core-Shell MXene@Gold Nanocomposites for Enhanced Photo-Radio Combined Therapy in the Second Biological Window. ACS Nano. 2019;13(1):284–294. doi: 10.1021/acsnano.8b05982. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[cit209] Chen M. et al., Core-shell Pd@Au nanoplates as theranostic agents for in-vivo photoacoustic imaging, CT imaging, and photothermal therapy. Adv. Mater. 2014;26(48):8210–8216. doi: 10.1002/adma.201404013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[cit210] Li Z. et al., Multimodal Imaging-Guided Antitumor Photothermal Therapy and Drug Delivery Using Bismuth Selenide Spherical Sponge. ACS Nano. 2016;10(10):9646–9658. doi: 10.1021/acsnano.6b05427. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[cit211] Jin Y. et al., Encapsulating tantalum oxide into polypyrrole nanoparticles for X-ray CT/photoacoustic bimodal imaging-guided photothermal ablation of cancer. Biomaterials. 2014;35(22):5795–5804. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2014.03.086. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[cit212] Yang S. et al., Multifunctional Bi@PPy-PEG Core-Shell Nanohybrids for Dual-Modal Imaging and Photothermal Therapy. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces. 2018;10(2):1605–1615. doi: 10.1021/acsami.7b17838. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[cit213] Jing L. et al., Prussian blue coated gold nanoparticles for simultaneous photoacoustic/CT bimodal imaging and photothermal ablation of cancer. Biomaterials. 2014;35(22):5814–5821. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2014.04.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[cit214] Liu Y. et al., Aggregation-Induced Absorption Enhancement for Deep Near-Infrared II Photoacoustic Imaging of Brain Gliomas In Vivo. Adv. Sci. 2019;6(8):1801615. doi: 10.1002/advs.201801615. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[cit215] Wang Y. et al., In Vivo Photoacoustic/Single-Photon Emission Computed Tomography Imaging for Dynamic Monitoring of Aggregation-Enhanced Photothermal Nanoagents. Anal. Chem. 2019;91(3):2128–2134. doi: 10.1021/acs.analchem.8b04585. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[cit216] Yao M. et al., Engineering of SPECT/Photoacoustic Imaging/Antioxidative Stress Triple-Function Nanoprobe for Advanced Mesenchymal Stem Cell Therapy of Cerebral Ischemia. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces. 2020;12(34):37885–37895. doi: 10.1021/acsami.0c10500. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[cit217] Shang W. et al., Core-Shell Gold Nanorod@Metal-Organic Framework Nanoprobes for Multimodality Diagnosis of Glioma. Adv. Mater. 2017;29(3):1604381. doi: 10.1002/adma.201604381. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[cit218] Liang X. et al., Activatable near infrared dye conjugated hyaluronic acid based nanoparticles as a targeted theranostic agent for enhanced fluorescence/CT/photoacoustic imaging guided photothermal therapy. Biomaterials. 2017;132:72–84. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2017.04.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[cit219] Wu B. et al., Gadolinium-chelate functionalized bismuth nanotheranostic agent for in vivo MRI/CT/PAI imaging-guided photothermal cancer therapy. Biomaterials. 2018;159:37–47. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2017.12.022. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[cit220] Cheng Y. et al., Glutathione-Mediated Clearable Nanoparticles Based on Ultrasmall Gd(2)O(3) for MSOT/CT/MR Imaging Guided Photothermal/Radio Combination Cancer Therapy. Mol. Pharmaceutics. 2019;16(8):3489–3501. doi: 10.1021/acs.molpharmaceut.9b00332. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[cit221] Wang Y. et al., Oxygen-supplementing mesoporous polydopamine nanosponges with WS(2) QDs-embedded for CT/MSOT/MR imaging and thermoradiotherapy of hypoxic cancer. Biomaterials. 2019;220:119405. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2019.119405. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[cit222] Men X. et al., Thermosensitive Polymer Dot Nanocomposites for Trimodal Computed Tomography/Photoacoustic/Fluorescence Imaging-Guided Synergistic Chemo-Photothermal Therapy. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces. 2020;12(46):51174–51184. doi: 10.1021/acsami.0c13252. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[cit223] Liu T. et al., Iron oxide decorated MoS2 nanosheets with double PEGylation for chelator-free radiolabeling and multimodal imaging guided photothermal therapy. ACS Nano. 2015;9(1):950–960. doi: 10.1021/nn506757x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[cit224] Lin J. et al., Multimodal-Imaging-Guided Cancer Phototherapy by Versatile Biomimetic Theranostics with UV and γ-Irradiation Protection. Adv. Mater. 2016;28(17):3273–3279. doi: 10.1002/adma.201505700. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[cit225] Yang M. et al., Dragon fruit-like biocage as an iron trapping nanoplatform for high efficiency targeted cancer multimodality imaging. Biomaterials. 2015;69:30–37. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2015.08.001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[cit226] Wang S. et al., Core-Satellite Polydopamine–Gadolinium–Metallofullerene Nanotheranostics for Multimodal Imaging Guided Combination Cancer Therapy. Adv. Mater. 2017;29(35):1701013. doi: 10.1002/adma.201701013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[cit227] Xu C. et al., Long circulating reduced graphene oxide-iron oxide nanoparticles for efficient tumor targeting and multimodality imaging. Nanoscale. 2016;8(25):12683–12692. doi: 10.1039/C5NR09193D. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[cit228] Zhang Y. et al., Surfactant-Stripped Frozen Pheophytin Micelles for Multimodal Gut Imaging. Adv. Mater. 2016;28(38):8524–8530. doi: 10.1002/adma.201602373. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[cit229] Vaquero J. J. Kinahan P. Positron Emission Tomography: Current Challenges and Opportunities for Technological Advances in Clinical and Preclinical Imaging Systems. Annu. Rev. Biomed. Eng. 2015;17:385–414. doi: 10.1146/annurev-bioeng-071114-040723. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[cit230] Zhang Y. et al., Non-invasive multimodal functional imaging of the intestine with frozen micellar naphthalocyanines. Nat. Nanotechnol. 2014;9(8):631–638. doi: 10.1038/nnano.2014.130. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[cit231] Hussain S. et al., Modern Diagnostic Imaging Technique Applications and Risk Factors in the Medical Field: A Review. BioMed Res. Int. 2022;2022:5164970. doi: 10.1155/2022/5164970. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[cit232] Calle D. Ballesteros P. Cerdán S. Advanced Contrast Agents for Multimodal Biomedical Imaging Based on Nanotechnology. Methods Mol. Biol. 2018;1718:441–457. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4939-7531-0_26. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[cit233] Delbeke D. et al., Hybrid imaging (SPECT/CT and PET/CT): improving therapeutic decisions. Semin. Nucl. Med. 2009;39(5):308–340. doi: 10.1053/j.semnuclmed.2009.03.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[cit234] Dizendorf E. V. et al., Application of Oral Contrast Media in Coregistered Positron Emission Tomography—CT. Am. J. Roentgenol. 2002;179(2):477–481. doi: 10.2214/ajr.179.2.1790477. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[cit235] Choi W. et al., Recent Advances in Contrast-Enhanced Photoacoustic Imaging: Overcoming the Physical and Practical Challenges. Chem. Rev. 2023;123(11):7379–7419. doi: 10.1021/acs.chemrev.2c00627. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[cit236] Shi X.-f. et al., Multimodal Contrast Agents for Optoacoustic Brain Imaging in Small Animals. Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol. 2021;9:746815. doi: 10.3389/fbioe.2021.746815. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[cit237] Bodea S.-V. Westmeyer G. G. Photoacoustic Neuroimaging - Perspectives on a Maturing Imaging Technique and its Applications in Neuroscience. Front. Neurosci. 2021;15:655247. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2021.655247. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[cit238] Lin L. Wang L. V. The emerging role of photoacoustic imaging in clinical oncology. Nat. Rev. Clin. Oncol. 2022;19(6):365–384. doi: 10.1038/s41571-022-00615-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[cit239] Deán-Ben X. L. et al., Deep optoacoustic localization microangiography of ischemic stroke in mice. Nat. Commun. 2023;14(1):3584. doi: 10.1038/s41467-023-39069-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[cit240] Chen Z. et al., Widefield fluorescence localization microscopy for transcranial imaging of cortical perfusion with capillary resolution. Opt. Lett. 2020;45(13):3470–3473. doi: 10.1364/OL.396123. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[cit241] Liu N. et al., Croconaine-based nanoparticles enable efficient optoacoustic imaging of murine brain tumors. Photoacoustics. 2021;22:100263. doi: 10.1016/j.pacs.2021.100263. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[cit242] Zhou Q. et al., Three-dimensional wide-field fluorescence microscopy for transcranial mapping of cortical microcirculation. Nat. Commun. 2022;13(1):7969. doi: 10.1038/s41467-022-35733-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

PERMALINK

Multimodal optoacoustic imaging: methods and contrast materials

Zhenyue Chen

Irmak Gezginer

Quanyu Zhou

Lin Tang

Xosé Luís Deán-Ben

Daniel Razansky

Abstract

Introduction

Merging optoacoustic imaging with ultrasound

OA–US imaging systems

OA–US contrast agents

Dual-modal OA–US contrast materials.

Optoacoustic and fluorescence imaging

OA–FL imaging systems

OA–FL contrast agents

Dual-modal OA–FL contrast materials.

Optoacoustic microscopy and optical coherence tomography

OA–OCT imaging systems

OA–OCT imaging contrast agents

Dual-modal OA–OCT contrast materials.

Optoacoustic and Raman scattering microscopy

OA-Raman contrast agents

Hybrid OA-Raman contrast materials.

Combining optoacoustic and magnetic resonance imaging

OA–MR imaging systems

OA–MR contrast agents

Dual-modal OA–MR contrast materials.

Multimodal combinations with ionizing imaging techniques

OA and X-ray CT

OA–CT, OA–SPECT, and OA–PET contrast materials.

OA and SPECT imaging

Multimodal OA contrast materials.

OA–PET combinations

Conclusions and outlook

Abbreviations

Author contributions

Conflicts of interest

Acknowledgments

Biographies

Biography

Zhenyue Chen .

Biography

Irmak Gezginer .

Biography

Quanyu Zhou .

Biography

Lin Tang .

Biography

Xosé Luís Deán-Ben .

Biography

Daniel Razansky .

References

ACTIONS

PERMALINK

RESOURCES

Similar articles

Cited by other articles

Links to NCBI Databases