Abstract
RNA thermometers are highly structured noncoding RNAs located in the 5′-untranslated regions (UTRs) of genes that regulate expression by undergoing conformational changes in response to temperature. The discovery of RNA thermometers through bioinformatics is difficult because there is little sequence conservation among their structural elements. Thus, the abundance of these thermosensitive regulatory structures remains unclear. Herein, to advance the discovery and validation of RNA thermometers, we developed Robo-Therm, a pipeline that combines an adaptive and user-friendly in silico motif search with a well-established reporter system. Through our application of Robo-Therm, we discovered two novel RNA thermometers in bacterial and bacteriophage genomes found in the human gut. One of these thermometers is present in the 5′-UTR of a gene that codes for σ70 RNA polymerase subunit in the bacteria Mediterraneibacter gnavus and Bacteroides pectinophilus, and in the bacteriophage Caudoviricetes, which infects B. pectinophilus. The other thermometer is in the 5′-UTR of a tetracycline resistance gene (tetR) in the intestinal bacteria Escherichia coli and Shigella flexneri. Our Robo-Therm pipeline can be applied to discover multiple RNA thermometers across various genomes.
Keywords: bioinformatics, gene regulation, microbiology, noncoding RNA, RNA thermometer
INTRODUCTION
Recent discoveries have revealed that many bacteria respond to heat stress through temperature-sensing RNAs that use structure-based strategies to regulate gene expression (Narberhaus et al. 2006; Meyer et al. 2017). RNA thermometers are highly structured RNA elements existing in the 5′-untranslated regions (UTRs) of mRNAs (Altuvia et al. 1989; Loh et al. 2018; Sharma et al. 2022). In most characterized examples, RNA thermometers increase gene expression of a downstream gene in response to higher temperatures (Kortmann and Narberhaus 2012; Tong et al. 2023). Most RNA thermometers function by folding into a stable secondary structure at physiologically low temperatures (<30°C) to sequester the Shine–Dalgarno (SD) sequence in a stem, preventing the ribosome from accessing the SD. Conversely, when they encounter physiologically higher temperatures (up to 45°C), the increased thermodynamic energy denatures the secondary structure of the RNA thermometer, exposing the SD sequence to allow ribosomal binding and initiation of translation, resulting in increased expression of the downstream gene (Smith et al. 2010; Loh et al. 2018).
To date, there are two classes of well-characterized and conserved RNA thermometers that share common secondary structures and motifs. FourU thermometers contain one to four hairpins, with the terminal hairpin having at least four consecutive uracil nucleotides base-pairing with the SD sequence (Waldminghaus et al. 2007b; Noll et al. 2021). The fourU motif typically contains at least two noncanonical G•U wobble base pairs (Waldminghaus et al. 2007b; Noll et al. 2021; Tong et al. 2023). These noncanonical base pairs contribute to the destabilization of the terminal hairpin upon heat stress; this causes the hairpin to melt and denature in a zipper-like mechanism (Kortmann and Narberhaus 2012). The second highly conserved class of thermometers, ROSE-like (repression of heat shock gene expression) thermometers, contain two to four hairpins, with the terminal hairpin containing the SD sequence imperfectly base-paired with a highly conserved U(U/C)GCU motif. The ROSE-like motif typically contains a predicted bulged G and noncanonical base-pairing (Waldminghaus et al. 2009; Abduljalil 2018). The bulged G and noncanonical base-pairing in this motif denote its temperature sensitivity due to this network of weak hydrogen bonds, allowing the SD-containing hairpin to open when exposed to increased temperature (Chowdhury et al. 2006). Many other reported RNA thermometers do not contain the same motifs as the fourU and ROSE-like thermometers and have yet to be grouped into specific classifications (Scheller et al. 2021).
Several RNA thermometers have been discovered through transcriptome probing or by bioinformatic predictions. Both methods exploit the secondary structures of RNA thermometers to identify potential candidates. Transcriptome-wide probing marries structure probing techniques with next-generation sequencing (NGS) to identify genes that are differentially expressed in a specific organism during heat stress. Transcriptome probing has led to the discovery of several RNA thermometers in Yersinia pseudotuberculosis (Righetti et al. 2016) and RNA thermometers that regulate the translation of glycerol permease genes in Bacillus subtilis (Jolley et al. 2023). Transcriptome probing can reveal the abundance of many RNA thermometers at once but is usually constrained to one organism.
Bioinformatics has been used to identify novel RNA thermometers across multiple genomes (Narberhaus et al. 2006; Waldminghaus et al. 2007a; Chursov et al. 2013; Churkin et al. 2014; Tong et al. 2023). These approaches emphasize predicted secondary structure searching due to higher conservation of secondary structure rather than sequence identity among RNA thermometers. RNAthermsw (Churkin et al. 2014) and RNAtips (Chursov et al. 2013) both use RNAfold (Hofacker 2003), an in silico RNA structure prediction software, and temperature simulations to discover candidate thermometer sequences by predicted changes in energy. RNA-SURIBA (Waldminghaus et al. 2007a) is a database that uses Mfold, another in silico RNA structure predication software (Zuker 2003), to identify new candidate RNA thermometers. RNA-SURIBA uses Mfold to create bracket annotations to define previously annotated thermometers as a template to find new candidates. Additionally, well-defined motifs of RNA thermometers can be used as scaffolds to search for functional RNAs with similar predicted structures and function in programs such as MSARI (Coventry et al. 2004), CMfinder (Yao et al. 2006), Infernal (Nawrocki and Eddy 2013), and RNArobo (Rampášek et al. 2016).
Herein, we developed a bioinformatic-based pipeline, termed Robo-Therm, for the discovery of novel RNA thermometers across various genomes (Fig. 1). Through this pipeline, we have previously identified and validated a fourU RNA thermometer (Tong et al. 2023), and here we report two novel fourU RNA thermometers that occur across different prokaryotic genomes. The first occurs upstream of a tetracycline resistance gene (tetR) in the intestinal bacteria Escherichia coli and Shigella flexneri. The second discovered RNA thermometer occurs upstream of the RNA polymerase σ70 subunit in the bacteria Mediterraneibacter gnavus and Bacteroides pectinophilus as well as a bacteriophage Caudoviricetes, which infects B. pectinophilus (Liang and Bushman 2021; Gulyaeva et al. 2022). This is our second example of an RNA thermometer discovered in a bacteriophage and its host.
FIGURE 1.
Robo-Therm pipeline for RNA thermometer discovery and validation. (A) The characterized structure and predicted functional motif of a validated RNA thermometer are used as a scaffold to search for similar RNA thermometers. (B) RNArobo search consisting of a map and descriptor based on the characterized secondary structure is performed, with “s” denoting single-stranded regions, “h” denoting helical regions in the structure, “N” denoting any nucleotide, and “*” denoting a nucleotide may or may not be present. (C) RNArobo results are submitted to NCBI Blast and filtered to select candidate thermometers. (D) The secondary structure of the candidate thermometers is predicted via RNAfold (Hofacker 2003). (E) Example of β-galactosidase assay of cells after incubation at 25°C, 37°C, and 42°C used to determine the RNA thermometer activity.
RESULTS
Using bioinformatics to identify candidate RNA thermometer sequences
Robo-Therm uses the RNA motif descriptor program RNArobo (Rampášek et al. 2016) to search through annotated genomes for RNA thermometers. Most impactful RNA motif prediction programs commonly use covariance models, a probabilistic approach using primary sequence and secondary structure (Coventry et al. 2004; Yao et al. 2006; Nawrocki and Eddy 2013). RNARobo allows users to input customized descriptors to narrow and refine searches for RNA structures through any genomic data set in FASTA format. We used RNArobo because of its flexibility in sequence input, completely defined by the user, allowing researchers to fully handcraft and feature components of an RNA that are believed to be crucial to its function. RNArobo, or its predecessor RNAbob, has been used to discover ribozymes in various genomes, and we recently used it to discover the blyA fourU RNA thermometer that occurs in the genomes of the SPβ prophage and its host, B. subtilis 168 (Webb et al. 2009; Webb and Lupták 2018; Tong et al. 2023). RNArobo is uniquely amenable to the discovery of RNAs that are more conserved in secondary structure than sequence, making it an efficient tool for RNA thermometer discovery.
To search for new potential RNA thermometers, previously characterized RNA thermometer motifs (Fig. 1A) were used as the template to develop new RNA maps and descriptors (Fig. 1B). Despite the presence of defined core motifs in fourU and ROSE-like thermometers, the overall secondary structure and sequences of thermometers containing these motifs can vary significantly, resulting in unique search outcomes for each template RNA explored. Furthermore, searches of each specific RNA thermometer can vary, depending on which features, such as insertions and mismatches, are defined by the user and how strict or permissive those features are defined. We chose to identify potential fourU RNA thermometers based on the predicted secondary structure of the extensively studied agsA fourU thermometer (Figs. 2A and 3D; Waldminghaus et al. 2007b). The agsA thermometer stands out as an exemplary template because of the abundance of literature discussing its structure and function (Waldminghaus et al. 2007b; Shah and Gilchrist 2010; Meyer et al. 2017). Moreover, we successfully used the agsA thermometer as a scaffold in the identification of the similarly structured blyA thermometer (Tong et al. 2023).
FIGURE 2.
Using RNArobo to search for potential RNA thermometers similar to the second stem of the agsA thermometer. (A) The entire agsA RNA thermometer secondary structure (Waldminghaus et al. 2007b). (B) A visualization of the map and descriptor. (C) RNArobo search using the second stem (P2 and L2) of the agsA thermometer as a scaffold. Our map and descriptor with the conservation of four uracil nucleotides in a hairpin base paired with the Shine–Dalgarno sequence, and ending with the AUG start codon. “s” denotes single-stranded regions, “h” denotes helical regions in the structure, “N” denotes any nucleotide, and “*” denotes a nucleotide may or may not be present.
FIGURE 3.

Secondary structure prediction of the tetR (A), σ70 (B), blyA (C), and agsA (D) RNA thermometers. The start codons for their respective downstream genes and the SD sequences are boxed and labeled. Stems in the structure are labeled with “P,” single-stranded loops are labeled with “L,” and a single-stranded region linking two stems is labeled “J1/2” to indicate the junction of stems one and two.
Sequences from our RNArobo search results were curated and filtered through NCBI Blast (Fig. 1C) and ranked according to proximity to a gene, to secondary structure predictions in RNAfold (Fig. 1D; Hofacker 2003), and to the function of the downstream gene. Predicted structures of candidates are sorted based on possessing defined motif features that are essential for thermometer function. For example, a promising candidate for a fourU thermometer should contain four consecutive uracil nucleotides base-paired with an SD sequence. Generally, candidates that are identified as directly in the 5′-UTR of an annotated gene are chosen. These searches can be applied to unannotated genomes as well (such as soil metadata sets), to study the prevalence of thermometers in certain environments. The predicted SD should occur 5–10 nt upstream of the start codon of the annotated gene of interest, to ensure the necessary distance for ribosome initiation (Steitz and Jakes 1975). Candidates from our search results are fused to a thermally stable β-galactosidase reporter (Hirata et al. 1984; Klinkert et al. 2012) to test and validate thermometer function (Fig. 1E). From our search results, we tested two new potential fourU thermometers with predicted secondary structures that contain the fourU motif and that occur in genomes that are found in the human gut microbiome (Table 1; Supplemental Table S1).
TABLE 1.
Genomic description of RNA thermometers discovered by Robo-Therm
| Gene | Protein description | Genome |
|---|---|---|
| tetR | tetR family transcriptional regulator |
Escherichia coli
Shigella flexneri |
| σ 70 | RNA polymerase subunit σ70 |
Mediterraneibacter gnavus Bacteroides pectinophilus Caudoviricetes (bacteriophage) |
| blyA | Autolysin enzyme (N-acetylmuramoyl-l-alanine amidase) |
Bacillus subtilis SPβc2 (bacteriophage) |
RNArobo searches consist of a map that lists each structural element of the secondary structure and a descriptor that defines each component of the map (Rampášek et al. 2016). Single-stranded (s) and paired elements (h) were manually described for each search (Figs. 1B and 2A,B). It is important to include elements that are essential for thermometer function such as the SD and start codon. Other elements to be considered are those specific to the template that the search is based on. For example, for the agsA-based search, we included four uracils across from the SD (Fig. 2B). For our search, we used the second hairpin of the agsA thermometer as a scaffold for our map and descriptor to find similar RNA structures containing a fourU motif (Fig. 2C). Incorporating highly conserved elements unique to a class of RNA thermometers led to the discovery of new thermometers in that class.
The first candidate fourU thermometer was found in the 5′-UTR of a tetR/acrR family transcriptional regulator (tetR) (Fig. 3A; Supplemental Fig. S1A), with a 100% sequence identity match in E. coli and S. flexneri. The TetR-family of transcriptional regulators (TFTRs) play an important role in antimicrobial resistance, as regulators of antibiotic efflux pumps (Cuthbertson and Nodwell 2013; Colclough et al. 2019). The second fourU candidate was found in the 5′-UTR of the RNA polymerase subunit σ70 (Fig. 3B; Supplemental Fig. S1B), with a 100% sequence identity match in the bacteria genomes of M. gnavus, B. pectinophilus, and the bacteriophage Caudoviricetes (Caudoviricetes sp. isolate ctoMw15). σ70 is a family of primary initiation factors in bacteria for the RNA polymerase complex and directs the RNA polymerase to specific promoter sites of a wide variety of genes (Paget and Helmann 2003). Interestingly, Caudoviricetes is one of the most abundant groups of phages found in the human gut and infects bacteria of the phylum Bacteriodete (Liang and Bushman 2021; Gulyaeva et al. 2022). Although the impact of heat stress on the gut microbiome remains limited, it is known that heat stress increases bacterial translocation, infection, and increased risk of septic shock in humans (Schwab et al. 2014; Ogden et al. 2020; Huus and Ley 2021).
σ70 is known as a “housekeeping” factor because of its critical role in mediating the transcription of many essential genes (Gruber and Gross 2003). Multiple members of the σ70 family can occur in a single genome, including up to 63 in a single bacterial genome (Paget and Helmann 2003). Interestingly, both M. gnavus and B. pectinophilus contain several paralogs of σ70, suggesting that σ70 may not be widely regulated by heat stress in these genomes. The presence of the σ70 thermometer and gene in the bacteriophage Caudoviricetes may suggest that regulation by heat is mediated by the life cycle of the bacteriophage; however, there is no current evidence to make this direct correlation.
Our results were curated from a single descriptor and search based on the second hairpin of the agsA thermometer. The predicted secondary structures of the candidates tetR, σ70, and our previously characterized blyA thermometer all contain structurally similar terminal hairpins with the agsA thermometer which our search was based on (Fig. 3A–D). Additionally, the secondary structures of tetR, σ70, and the agsA thermometers all contain an SD sequence base paired with four uracil nucleotides, illustrating the accuracy of RNArobo in predicting secondary structure based on a handmade descriptor. Handcrafted variants of our agsA search can be designed to discover other similar fourU thermometers. Moreover, the secondary structure of our new thermometers can serve as a template for future searches.
Validation of RNA thermometer activity
Once candidate sequences were identified, the putative DNA sequences were cloned into a reporter plasmid, positioned directly upstream of a thermally stable β-galactosidase (bgaB) enzyme (Fig. 4A,B). Because of its stability under heat stress, bgaB is a reliable reporter that has been used to characterize several RNA thermometers (Hirata et al. 1984; Klinkert et al. 2012). The candidate RNA sequence replaces the native 5′-UTR of bgaB and contains the ribosome-binding site (RBS) sequence necessary for translation (Supplemental Table S2). Temperature-dependent expression was determined by heat induction of E. coli cells expressing the candidate 5′-UTR–bgaB fusions. The reporter plasmid contains a PBAD promoter and transcription was induced by arabinose immediately before heat induction. Cells containing the tetR or σ70–bgaB fusions were incubated for 60 min at 25°C, 37°C, or 42°C to examine expression. Subsequently, β-galactosidase activity was measured for each temperature (Supplemental Fig. S2), and heat induction profiles were calculated for each RNA thermometer (activity in Miller units [M.U.] at 37°C/25°C or 42°C/25°C).
FIGURE 4.

β-Galactosidase assays of the 5′-UTR–bgaB fusions. (A) The used inducible reporter plasmid with the candidate thermometer placed directly upstream of the thermal stable β-galactosidase gene (bgaB) along with a schematic of bgaB fusions. (B) The activity of the tetR thermometer is expressed in Miller units. The 5′-UTR–bgaB fusions were incubated at 25°C, 37°C, and 42°C in triplicates, and their absorbances were measured to determine the expression of bgaB at each temperature. The Miller units were calculated for all 5′-UTR–bgaB fusions using the absorbances, and can be seen in Supplemental Figure S2. (C) Heat induction profiles for 5′-UTR–bgaB fusions, with the expressions at 25°C, 37°C, and 42°C compared to a positive control, the blyA fourU thermometer, and a negative control, DNA gyrase (gyrA). (D) Heat induction profiles of the mutated RNA thermometers. The heat inductions of the UU2930CC tetR and the UU2122CC σ70 mutants were calculated, and compared to the blyA positive control and gyrA negative control.
Heat shock of cells expressing tetR–bgaB fusion resulted in heat induction factors ∼2.4- and 4.3-fold at 37°C and 42°C, respectively. Interestingly, heat shock of cells expressing σ70–bgaB fusion resulted in no significant heat induction at 37°C (∼1.3). In contrast, at 42°C, the same σ70–bgaB fusion resulted in heat induction factors of approximately threefold (Fig. 4C). bgaB fusions containing the previously established blyA RNA thermometer (Tong et al. 2023) were used as positive controls. As a negative control, the 5′-UTR of a DNA gyrase gene (gyrA), which is not thermally regulated, was used. These findings demonstrate that the 5′-UTR of our candidates modulates reporter gene activity in a temperature-dependent manner, with a notable increase in the level of gene expression at increased temperatures.
To further validate that the candidate sequences tested were directly responsible for the thermal regulation of gene expression, mutations were made to strengthen and stabilize base-pairing. We used previously successful stabilizing mutations based on the predicted secondary structure (Waldminghaus et al. 2007b; Tong et al. 2023). For motifs based on the fourU thermometers, the strongest stabilizing mutations are made in the fourU region across from the SD sequence to change G•U wobble base pairs to stronger canonical G–C base pairs. Stabilizing mutations were made to the tetR (UU2930CC) and σ70 (UU2122CC) RNA thermometers and decreased thermometer activity to negative control levels (Fig. 4D). These mutations demonstrate that the noncanonical G•U wobble base pairs within the fourU motif are essential for temperature-sensitive gene regulation. Overall, our results indicate that thermoregulation of the tetR and σ70 RNA thermometers is directly dependent on the thermal stability of the fourU motif.
DISCUSSION
Future directions
The steps outlined in our results are sufficient for identifying potential RNA thermometer candidates and validating the thermoregulatory function of those candidates. In addition to validation of thermometer activity, an additional step to further characterize the system and gain insight into the mechanisms underlying thermoregulation is strongly suggested. We previously characterized the blyA thermometer through structure probing and gene expression experiments. Structure probing, such as selective 2′-hydroxyl acylation analyzed by primer extension (SHAPE) (Merino et al. 2005; Spitale et al. 2013), in-line probing (Regulski and Breaker 2008), and DMS probing (Wells et al. 2000; Rouskin et al. 2014), can be performed to profile changes in secondary structure at different temperatures. In our previous report (Tong et al. 2023), we used SHAPE to investigate conformational changes due to heat. SHAPE provides information on secondary structure at a single-nucleotide resolution. The reactivity of each RNA base is correlated with the flexibility of the 2′-OH, with single-stranded or flexible regions exhibiting increased reactivity in opposition to regions engaged in base-pairing or other interactions. Additionally, to investigate differences between transcriptional and translational control in the system, transcript levels of bgaB fusions should be measured by quantitative real-time PCR (qRT-PCR) at different temperatures. Cells for qRT-PCR should be harvested at the same time as β-galactosidase assays for consistent results. Northern blot analysis can also be used to measure RNA transcript levels (Böhme et al. 2012).
Gene-specific experiments should also be considered to gain knowledge of the particular thermoregulation being investigated. One such experiment particular to the tetR RNA thermometer discovered here would be the investigation of tetracycline resistance under different temperatures in E. coli and S. flexneri. Results would provide an additional layer of knowledge on how the tetR RNA thermometer affects bacterial survival in the presence of tetracycline under different temperatures. A prospective experiment specific to the σ70 thermometer would be to test if any genes with a σ70 promoter are up-regulated on the transcriptional level at higher temperatures in M. gnavus and B. pectinophilus. Both tetR and σ70 are vital genes for cell survival, and full investigations on how these newly reported thermometers alter gene function will be of great importance.
These investigations provide details on how RNA thermometers respond to heat stress on a structural and molecular level and will be applied to the tetR and σ70 thermometers in future studies. Other biophysical investigations, such as NMR studies, X-ray crystallography, circular dichroism, fluorescence studies, and thermal stability comparisons, can be used to complement the characterization of these temperature-sensitive RNA molecules.
Application of Robo-Therm pipeline
Many naturally occurring RNA thermometers have been discovered and subsequently characterized; however, the extent to which these RNA thermometers occur remains unclear. We successfully developed Robo-Therm to identify and validate potential RNA thermometers across various genomes based on the highly customizable motif-driven program, RNArobo, and a well-established expression investigation based on the thermally stable β-galactosidase. Robo-Therm could be applied to any RNA thermometers with established secondary structures. From our Robo-Therm search, we identified two interesting candidates occurring in the 5′-UTR of different genes across different prokaryotic genomes. These new thermometers have a high predicted secondary structure homology with the RNA structure they were based on, exemplifying the utility of Robo-Therm in discovering RNA thermometers based significantly on a known structure. Furthermore, our pipeline outlines how to identify and incorporate sequence elements into important structural elements, which can be applied to any RNA thermometer search. These findings suggest that RNA thermometers may play an important role in antibiotic resistance and regulating gene expression in bacteria of the gut microbiome.
Thermosensitive regulation of virulence gene expression has been discovered in various bacteria (Loh et al. 2018), but our previous discovery of the blyA thermometer revealed only the second RNA thermometer in a phage genome (Altuvia et al. 1989; Tong et al. 2023), and the identification of the σ70 thermometer in bacteriophage Caudoviricetes implies that RNA thermometers might be more prevalent in bacteriophages than previously anticipated. The discovery of the blyA thermometer linked the previously described thermal regulation of blyA (Regamey and Karamata 1998) to the thermally regulated life cycle of the bacteriophage SPβ. The identity of the same σ70 thermometer in two prevalent gut bacteria and the gut bacteriophage Caudoviricetes proposes a direct phage–host relationship that may be regulated by heat. The role of the σ70 thermometer in these organisms should be investigated further. Additionally, thermometers in viruses have been found to function beyond modulating gene expression in their hosts. An RNA thermometer in the flavivirus West Nile controls flavivirus replication during host switching (Meyer et al. 2020). These studies suggest that RNA thermometers may be integral to the life cycles of many viruses.
To date, temperature-sensing RNA elements have not been fully explored in prokaryotes and eukaryotes. Our bioinformatics-based pipeline can be applied to investigate the occurrence of any RNA thermometer in different genomes to reveal the possible widespread occurrence of RNA thermometers. Robo-Therm integrates in silico approaches with direct experimentation in order to reveal the abundance of potential RNA thermometers across multiple genomes.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RNA motif search in genomic sequences
Bacterial genomic sequences were downloaded from the NIH National Library of Medicine, National Center for Biotechnology Information, using the Nucleotide search (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nuccore/). RNArobo (Rampášek et al. 2016) was used to perform an RNA motif search using the following descriptor:
s1 h1 s2 h2 s3 h2′ s4 h1′ s5
s1 0 NNN******
h1 0:0 *NNNNN:NNNNN*
s2 0 N*
h2 0:0 *CUUUUNNNN*:*NNNNAGGAG*
s3 0 NNN****
s4 0 N*
s5 0 NAUG***
See the RNArobo article (Rampášek et al. 2016) for detailed instructions on descriptor search design. Results were manually curated and verified with the Basic Local Alignment Search Tool (BLAST) (https://blast.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/).
Plasmid construction
The initial plasmid backbone was synthesized from VectorBuilder (VectorBuilder Inc.). The 5′-UTR of thermometer candidates were placed directly upstream of a heat-stable β-galactosidase from Bacillus stearothermophilus and driven by a pBAD promoter (pBAD: β-galactosidase). ATG (start codon) in the thermometer sequences replaces the first ATG of bgaB. NEBuilder HiFi DNA Assembly was used to insert sequences into the same plasmid backbone described above. NEBuilder HiFi DNA Assembly was performed according to the manufacturer's protocol. A previously described vector used to validate the blyA thermometer (Tong et al. 2023) (VectorBuilder ID: VB220225-1020jdm, can be retrieved from https://en.vectorbuilder.com/design/retrieve.html) was used as the backbone for plasmid construction. NEBuilder Assembly Tool 2.0 was used to design fragments. Sequences of mutants for β-galactosidase assay (Supplemental Table S2) were designed with the following complementary flanking sequences to the VB220225-1020jdm plasmid.
5′-ATACCCGTTTTTTGGGCTAA—Sequences for β-galactosidase assay (Supplemental Table S2)—AATGTGTTATCCTCAATTTG-3′
β-Galactosidase assays
E. coli DH5α cells carrying bgaB plasmids were grown overnight at 25°C in LB broth plus 100 μg/mL ampicillin. Overnight cultures were diluted in LB broth plus 100 μg/mL ampicillin to an optical density at 600 nm (OD600) of 0.1, and then grown at 25°C to an OD600 of 0.3–0.5. Transcription was induced with 0.01% (w/v) arabinose addition, then they were split and incubated at 25°C, 37°C, or 42°C. After 60 min, 500 μL samples were taken, OD600 was measured, and samples were used for β-galactosidase assays as previously described (Miller 1972; Zhang and Bremer 1995; Tong et al. 2023), with the following modifications. Three 20-μL samples of culture were added to 80 μL of permeabilization solution (0.8 mg/mL hexadecyltrimethylammonium bromide, 0.4 mg/mL sodium deoxycholate, 100 mM Na2HPO4, 20 mM KCl, 2 mM MgSO4, and 5.4 μL/mL β-mercaptoethanol). After a 30-min incubation at 30°C, 600 μL of substrate solution (60 mM Na2HPO4, 40 mM NaH2PO4, 1 mg/mL o-nitrophenyl-β-d-galactoside (ONPG), 2.7 μL/mL β-mercaptoethanol) was added. The reactions were incubated for 90 min at 55°C . The addition of 700 μL of 1 M Na2CO3 terminated the reactions to be prepared for absorbance readings. Assays were performed in triplicate. Heat induction factor was calculated by dividing expression in Miller units at 37°C or 42°C by expression at 25°C.
SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIAL
Supplemental material is available for this article.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
We thank A. Lupták (University of California, Irvine) and the members of the Ferré-D'Amaré Lab (National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute) for fruitful discussions. We also thank Adrian R. Ferré-D'Amaré for support and mentorship. This work was supported in part by California Lutheran University start-up funding (M.M.A.), by The Ronald E. McNair Postbaccalaureate Achievement Program (P217A220157) at California Lutheran University (M.T.A., A.V.B, A.M.C., C.G.O.H., M.L.L., D.R., M.R.S.), by the Lenfant Postdoctoral Fellowship from the NHLBI (L.F.M.P.), and in part by the intramural program of the NHLBI, NIH (L.F.M.P.).
Author contributions: L.F.M.P. and M.M.A. conceived and supervised the project. D.M.S., M.T.A., A.V.B., A.M.C., C.G.O.H., M.L.L., D.R., M.R.S., and M.M.A. performed β-galactosidase assays. L.F.M.P. and M.M.A. performed bioinformatics. D.M.S., M.T.A., A.V.B., A.M.C., C.G.O.H., M.L.L., D.R., M.R.S., and M.M.A. performed HiFi cloning. A.Y.T. provided suggestions, guidance, and initial setup. D.M.S., L.F.M.P., and M.M.A. wrote the manuscript with contributions from all authors. All authors have given approval to the final version of the manuscript.
Footnotes
Article is online at http://www.rnajournal.org/cgi/doi/10.1261/rna.079980.124.
Freely available online through the RNA Open Access option.
MEET THE FIRST AUTHORS
Maria T. Almanza.

Andrea V. Banks.

Alyssa M. Castellanos.

Catherine G.O. Hernandez.

Monica L. Lopez.

Daniela Rodriguez.

Davis M. Sharts.

Meet the First Author(s) is an editorial feature within RNA, in which the first author(s) of research-based papers in each issue have the opportunity to introduce themselves and their work to readers of RNA and the RNA research community. Davis M. Sharts, Maria T. Almanza, Andrea V. Banks, Alyssa M. Castellanos, Catherine G.O. Hernandez, Monica L. Lopez, and Daniela Rodriguez are co-first authors of this paper, “Robo-Therm, a pipeline to RNA thermometer discovery and validation.” This research was conducted at California Lutheran University, under the mentorship of Dr. Michael Abdelsayed, by a majority of first-generation Hispanic undergraduate students looking to further their education and scientific careers. The project was largely funded by the Ronald E. McNair Postbaccalaureate Achievement Program, which prepares first-generation college students from traditionally underrepresented groups for PhD programs by expanding their undergraduate experience.
What are the major results described in your paper and how do they impact this branch of the field?
Our bioinformatic pipeline, Robo-Therm, combines an adaptive and user-friendly in silico motif search with an efficient reporter system to facilitate RNA thermometer discovery in bacterial and viral genomes. Through our application of Robo-Therm, we discovered two novel four U RNA thermometers in bacterial and bacteriophage genomes found in the human gut. One of these thermometers is present in the 5′-UTR of a gene that codes for a housekeeping σ70 RNA polymerase subunit in the bacteria Mediterraneibacter gnavus and Bacteroides pectinophilus, and in the bacteriophage Caudoviricetes, which infects B. pectinophilus. The other thermometer is in the 5′-UTR of a tetracycline resistance gene (tetR) in the intestinal bacteria Escherichia coli and Shigella flexneri. Our Robo-Therm pipeline is a powerful tool that can be applied to discover multiple RNA thermometers across various genomes, furthering this understudied area of science.
What led you to study RNA or this aspect of RNA science?
Once we began learning under the mentorship of Dr. Michael Abdelsayed, his passion for this niche area of molecular biology and biochemistry was contagious. Under his guidance, we understood the importance that RNA thermometers have on gene expression and that they are incredibly undervalued. As young scientists who are interested in molecular and biomedical sciences, we will carry our research with us as we begin our journeys into graduate school.
During the course of these experiments, were there any surprising results or particular difficulties that altered your thinking and subsequent focus?
Although the tetR thermometer adds fascinating insight for increasing antibiotic resistance in bacteria, the most surprising result was the validation of a thermometer in front of a σ70 RNA polymerase subunit gene. To our knowledge, this gene has not been proven to be thermally regulated by a functional RNA and, more interestingly, the σ70 thermometer exists in a bacteria and bacteriophage genome. Our discovery raises more questions as to whether other σ factor genes are thermally regulated by functional RNAs in bacteria. Our research also implies that RNA thermometers might be more prevalent in bacteriophages than previously anticipated.
REFERENCES
- Abduljalil JM. 2018. Bacterial riboswitches and RNA thermometers: nature and contributions to pathogenesis. Non-Coding RNA Res 3: 54–63. 10.1016/j.ncrna.2018.04.003 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Altuvia S, Kornitzer D, Teff D, Oppenheim AB. 1989. Alternative mRNA structures of the cIII gene of bacteriophage λ determine the rate of its translation initiation. J Mol Biol 210: 265–280. 10.1016/0022-2836(89)90329-X [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Böhme K, Steinmann R, Kortmann J, Seekircher S, Heroven AK, Berger E, Pisano F, Thiermann T, Wolf-Watz H, Narberhaus F, et al. 2012. Concerted actions of a thermo-labile regulator and a unique intergenic RNA thermosensor control Yersinia virulence. PLoS Pathog 8: e1002518. 10.1371/journal.ppat.1002518 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Chowdhury S, Maris C, Allain FH-T, Narberhaus F. 2006. Molecular basis for temperature sensing by an RNA thermometer. EMBO J 25: 2487–2497. 10.1038/sj.emboj.7601128 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Churkin A, Avihoo A, Shapira M, Barash D. 2014. RNAthermsw: direct temperature simulations for predicting the location of RNA thermometers. PLoS ONE 9: e94340. 10.1371/journal.pone.0094340 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Chursov A, Kopetzky SJ, Bocharov G, Frishman D, Shneider A. 2013. RNAtips: analysis of temperature-induced changes of RNA secondary structure. Nucleic Acids Res 41: W486–W491. 10.1093/nar/gkt486 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Colclough AL, Scadden J, Blair JMA. 2019. TetR-family transcription factors in Gram-negative bacteria: conservation, variation and implications for efflux-mediated antimicrobial resistance. BMC Genomics 20: 731. 10.1186/s12864-019-6075-5 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Coventry A, Kleitman DJ, Berger B. 2004. MSARI: multiple sequence alignments for statistical detection of RNA secondary structure. Proc Natl Acad Sci 101: 12102–12107. 10.1073/pnas.0404193101 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Cuthbertson L, Nodwell JR. 2013. The TetR family of regulators. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev 77: 440–475. 10.1128/MMBR.00018-13 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Gruber TM, Gross CA. 2003. Multiple sigma subunits and the partitioning of bacterial transcription space. Annu Rev Microbiol 57: 441–466. 10.1146/annurev.micro.57.030502.090913 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Gulyaeva A, Garmaeva S, Kurilshikov A, Vich Vila A, Riksen NP, Netea MG, Weersma RK, Fu J, Zhernakova A. 2022. Diversity and ecology of Caudoviricetes phages with genome terminal repeats in fecal metagenomes from four Dutch cohorts. Viruses 14: 2305. 10.3390/v14102305 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hirata H, Negoro S, Okada H. 1984. Molecular basis of isozyme formation of β-galactosidases in Bacillus stearothermophilus: isolation of two β-galactosidase genes, bgaA and bgaB. J Bacteriol 160: 9–14. 10.1128/jb.160.1.9-14.1984 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hofacker IL. 2003. Vienna RNA secondary structure server. Nucleic Acids Res 31: 3429–3431. 10.1093/nar/gkg599 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Huus KE, Ley RE. 2021. Blowing hot and cold: body temperature and the microbiome. mSystems 6: e0070721. 10.1128/mSystems.00707-21 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Jolley EA, Yakhnin H, Tack DC, Babitzke P, Bevilacqua PC. 2023. Transcriptome-wide probing reveals RNA thermometers that regulate translation of glycerol permease genes in Bacillus subtilis. RNA 29: 1365–1378. 10.1261/rna.079652.123 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Klinkert B, Cimdins A, Gaubig LC, Roßmanith J, Aschke-Sonnenborn U, Narberhaus F. 2012. Thermogenetic tools to monitor temperature-dependent gene expression in bacteria. J Biotechnol 160: 55–63. 10.1016/j.jbiotec.2012.01.007 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kortmann J, Narberhaus F. 2012. Bacterial RNA thermometers: molecular zippers and switches. Nat Rev Microbiol 10: 255–265. 10.1038/nrmicro2730 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Liang G, Bushman FD. 2021. The human virome: assembly, composition and host interactions. Nat Rev Microbiol 19: 514–527. 10.1038/s41579-021-00536-5 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Loh E, Righetti F, Eichner H, Twittenhoff C, Narberhaus F. 2018. RNA thermometers in bacterial pathogens. Microbiol Spectr 6: 6.2.13. 10.1128/microbiolspec.RWR-0012-2017 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Merino EJ, Wilkinson KA, Coughlan JL, Weeks KM. 2005. RNA structure analysis at single nucleotide resolution by selective 2′-hydroxyl acylation and primer extension (SHAPE). J Am Chem Soc 127: 4223–4231. 10.1021/ja043822v [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Meyer S, Carlson PD, Lucks JB. 2017. Characterizing the structure-function relationship of a naturally occurring RNA thermometer. Biochemistry 56: 6629–6638. 10.1021/acs.biochem.7b01170 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Meyer A, Freier M, Schmidt T, Rostowski K, Zwoch J, Lilie H, Behrens S-E, Friedrich S. 2020. An RNA thermometer activity of the West Nile virus genomic 3′-terminal stem-loop element modulates viral replication efficiency during host switching. Viruses 12: 104. 10.3390/v12010104 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Miller JH. 1972. Experiments in molecular genetics. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Cold Spring Harbor, NY. [Google Scholar]
- Narberhaus F, Waldminghaus T, Chowdhury S. 2006. RNA thermometers. FEMS Microbiol Rev 30: 3–16. 10.1111/j.1574-6976.2005.004.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Nawrocki EP, Eddy SR. 2013. Infernal 1.1: 100-fold faster RNA homology searches. Bioinformatics 29: 2933–2935. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btt509 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Noll P, Treinen C, Müller S, Lilge L, Hausmann R, Henkel M. 2021. Exploiting RNA thermometer-driven molecular bioprocess control as a concept for heterologous rhamnolipid production. Sci Rep 11: 14802. 10.1038/s41598-021-94400-4 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ogden HB, Child RB, Fallowfield JL, Delves SK, Westwood CS, Layden JD. 2020. The gastrointestinal exertional heat stroke paradigm: pathophysiology, assessment, severity, aetiology and nutritional countermeasures. Nutrients 12: 537. 10.3390/nu12020537 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Paget MSB, Helmann JD. 2003. The σ70 family of sigma factors. Genome Biol 4: 203. 10.1186/gb-2003-4-1-203 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Rampášek L, Jimenez RM, Lupták A, Vinař T, Brejová B. 2016. RNA motif search with data-driven element ordering. BMC Bioinformatics 17: 216. 10.1186/s12859-016-1074-x [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Regamey A, Karamata D. 1998. The N-acetylmuramoyl-l-alanine amidase encoded by the Bacillus subtilis 168 prophage SPβ. Microbiology 144: 885–893. 10.1099/00221287-144-4-885 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Regulski EE, Breaker RR. 2008. In-line probing analysis of riboswitches. Methods Mol Biol 419: 53–67. 10.1007/978-1-59745-033-1_4 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Righetti F, Nuss AM, Twittenhoff C, Beele S, Urban K, Will S, Bernhart SH, Stadler PF, Dersch P, Narberhaus F. 2016. Temperature-responsive in vitro RNA structurome of Yersinia pseudotuberculosis. Proc Natl Acad Sci 113: 7237–7242. 10.1073/pnas.1523004113 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Rouskin S, Zubradt M, Washietl S, Kellis M, Weissman JS. 2014. Genome-wide probing of RNA structure reveals active unfolding of mRNA structures in vivo. Nature 505: 701–705. 10.1038/nature12894 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Scheller D, Twittenhoff C, Becker F, Holler M, Narberhaus F. 2021. OmpA, a common virulence factor, is under RNA thermometer control in Yersinia pseudotuberculosis. Front Microbiol 12: 687260. 10.3389/fmicb.2021.687260 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Schwab F, Gastmeier P, Meyer E. 2014. The warmer the weather, the more gram-negative bacteria—impact of temperature on clinical isolates in intensive care units. PLoS ONE 9: e91105. 10.1371/journal.pone.0091105 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Shah P, Gilchrist MA. 2010. Is thermosensing property of RNA thermometers unique? PLoS ONE 5: e11308. 10.1371/journal.pone.0011308 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Sharma P, Mondal K, Kumar S, Tamang S, Najar IN, Das S, Thakur N. 2022. RNA thermometers in bacteria: role in thermoregulation. Biochim Biophys Acta - Gene Regul Mech 1865: 194871. 10.1016/j.bbagrm.2022.194871 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Smith AM, Fuchs RT, Grundy FJ, Henkin T. 2010. Riboswitch RNAs: regulation of gene expression by direct monitoring of a physiological signal. RNA Biol 7: 104–110. 10.4161/rna.7.1.10757 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Spitale RC, Crisalli P, Flynn RA, Torre EA, Kool ET, Chang HY. 2013. RNA SHAPE analysis in living cells. Nat Chem Biol 9: 18–20. 10.1038/nchembio.1131 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Steitz JA, Jakes K. 1975. How ribosomes select initiator regions in mRNA: base pair formation between the 3′ terminus of 16S rRNA and the mRNA during initiation of protein synthesis in Escherichia coli. Proc Natl Acad Sci 72: 4734–4738. 10.1073/pnas.72.12.4734 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Tong AY, Caudill EE, Jones AR, Passalacqua L FM, Abdelsayed MM. 2023. Characterization of a fourU RNA thermometer in the 5′ untranslated region of autolysin gene blyA in the Bacillus subtilis 168 prophage SPβ. Biochemistry 62: 2902–2907. 10.1021/acs.biochem.3c00368 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Waldminghaus T, Gaubig LC, Narberhaus F. 2007a. Genome-wide bioinformatic prediction and experimental evaluation of potential RNA thermometers. Mol Genet Genomics 278: 555–564. 10.1007/s00438-007-0272-7 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Waldminghaus T, Heidrich N, Brantl S, Narberhaus F. 2007b. FourU: a novel type of RNA thermometer in Salmonella. Mol Microbiol 65: 413–424. 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2007.05794.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Waldminghaus T, Gaubig LC, Klinkert B, Narberhaus F. 2009. The Escherichia coli ibpA thermometer is comprised of stable and unstable structural elements. RNA Biol 6: 455–463. 10.4161/rna.6.4.9014 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Webb C-HT, Lupták A. 2018. Kinetic parameters of trans scission by extended HDV-like ribozymes and the prospect for the discovery of genomic trans-cleaving RNAs. Biochemistry 57: 1440–1450. 10.1021/acs.biochem.7b00789 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Webb C-HT, Riccitelli NJ, Ruminski DJ, Lupták A. 2009. Widespread occurrence of self-cleaving ribozymes. Science 326: 953. 10.1126/science.1178084 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Wells SE, Hughes JM, Igel AH, Ares M. 2000. Use of dimethyl sulfate to probe RNA structure in vivo. Methods Enzymol 318: 479–493. 10.1016/S0076-6879(00)18071-1 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Yao Z, Weinberg Z, Ruzzo WL. 2006. CMfinder—a covariance model based RNA motif finding algorithm. Bioinformatics 22: 445–452. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btk008 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Zhang X, Bremer H. 1995. Control of the Escherichia coli rrnB P1 promoter strength by ppGpp. J Biol Chem 270: 11181–11189. 10.1074/jbc.270.19.11181 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Zuker M. 2003. Mfold web server for nucleic acid folding and hybridization prediction. Nucleic Acids Res 31: 3406–3415. 10.1093/nar/gkg595 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]


