Skip to main content
PMC home page
Discover Oncology logoLink to Discover Oncology
. 2024 Jun 18;15:232. doi: 10.1007/s12672-024-01056-3

Targeting IL-11R/EZH2 signaling axis as a therapeutic strategy for osteosarcoma lung metastases

Eswaran Devarajan 1, R Eric Davis 2, Hannah C Beird 3, Wei-Lien Wang 4, V Behrana Jensen 5, Arumugam Jayakumar 6, Cheuk Hong Leung 7, Heather Y Lin 7, Chia-Chin Wu 3, Stephanie A Ihezie 8, Jen-Wei Tsai 9, P Andrew Futreal 3, Valerae O Lewis 1,✉
PMCID: PMC11183017  PMID: 38886296

Abstract

Lung metastases are the primary cause of death for osteosarcoma (OS) patients. We recently validated interleukin-11 receptor α (IL-11Rα) as a molecular target for the inhibition of OS lung metastases. Since there is no clinically approved antibody against this receptor, we sought to identify downstream targets that mediate the effects of IL-11Rα signaling. We used shRNA to deplete IL-11Rα from OS cells; as a complementary approach, we added IL-11 exogenously to OS cells. The resulting changes in gene expression identified EZH2 as a downstream candidate. This was confirmed by knockdown of IL-11Rα in OS cells, which led to increased expression of genes repressed by histone methyltransferase EZH2, including members of the WNT pathway, a known target pathway of EZH2. Exogenous IL-11 increased the global levels of histone H3 lysine 27 trimethylation, evidence of EZH2 activation. Treatment with the EZH2 inhibitor GSK126 significantly reduced in vitro proliferation and increased cell-cycle arrest and apoptosis, which were partially mediated through the WNT pathway. In vivo, treatment of an orthotopic nude mouse model of OS with GSK126 inhibited lung metastatic growth and prolonged survival. In addition, significantly shorter recurrence-free survival was seen in OS patients with high levels of EZH2 in their primary tumors (P < .05). This suggests that IL-11Rα promotes OS lung metastasis via activation of EZH2. Thus, blocking EZH2 activity may be an effective strategy for inhibiting OS lung metastasis and improving prognosis.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s12672-024-01056-3.

Keywords: Osteosarcoma, PRC2 complex, EZH2 inhibitors, H3K27me3, Metastasis

Introduction

Osteosarcoma (OS) is the most common primary malignant bone tumor in children and young adults [1]. Although chemotherapy has improved the 5-year survival, the prognosis for patients with OS has not changed over the past 40 years. Local disease is often controlled with chemotherapy and surgical resection, but many patients still develop pulmonary metastases, compromising their survival [2]. Patients with relapsed disease only have a 20% survival rate [3]. Systemic chemotherapy treatment is associated with significant morbidity, including renal failure, cardiac compromise and neuropathy [4, 5]. Alternative noncytotoxic targeted therapeutics, including tyrosine kinase inhibitors and insulin-like growth factor-1 inhibitors, have shown limited effectiveness against human OS or are associated with intolerable adverse effects [6–10]. The best alternative therapeutic options would be efficacious agents with specific targets that cause minimal collateral systemic damage.

Previously, we demonstrated that interleukin-11 receptor α (IL-11Rα) is overexpressed in both OS primary tumors and lung metastases, and short hairpin RNA (shRNA)-mediated knockdown of IL-11Rα can inhibit the development of lung metastasis in orthotopic models of OS [11]. Using phage displaying a peptide with high-affinity binding to IL-11Rα, a well-known cytokine signaling pathway that controls osteoclast development, we found strong and highly-specific accumulation of phage in orthotopic OS tumors in mice [12]. Metastatic OS has a higher expression of IL-11Rα than in primary OS samples, normal tibia, or lung tissue samples and silencing of IL-11Rα by shRNA inhibited lung metastasis [12].

However, there is no clinically approved antibody against IL-11Rα, so we sought to identify the downstream targets that mediate its effects. One such candidate is the enhancer of zeste homolog 2 (EZH2), the catalytic methyltransferase subunit of the multimeric polycomb repressive complex 2 (PRC2), which includes SUZ12 and EED [13]. The PRC2 complex mediates histone H3 lysine 27 trimethylation (H3K27me3), which results in epigenetic silencing of genes involved in proliferation and invasion. Since the effects of H3K27me3 are tissue-, context-, and disease-specific, EZH2 can function as either a tumor suppressor or an oncogene. Inhibiting EZH2 in T-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia activates NOTCH1 [14]. In diffuse large B-cell lymphoma and follicular lymphoma, recurrent point mutations in the catalytic SET domain (Y641) of EZH2 increase H3K27me3 activity, repressing the expression of tumor suppressor genes that mediate differentiation, cell-cycle inhibition, and apoptosis [15–17]. In prostate cancer, breast cancer, myeloma, and OS, high EZH2 levels are associated with tumor invasiveness and metastasis [13]. Currently, EZH2 is the only component of the PRC2 complex for which small-molecule inhibitors are being tested or have already been approved for certain indications. Given the availability and potential therapeutic effects of EZH2 inhibitors and the dire need for new OS treatment options, we conducted preclinical studies to explore the potential therapeutic benefit of EZH2 inhibition on osteosarcoma progression and the development/suppression of pulmonary metastatic disease .

Materials and methods

Cell culture

The human OS cell lines KRIB (CVCL_AU05), SJSA1 (CVCL_1697), CCH-OS-D (CVCL_XG67), Saos-2 (CVCL_0548), MG63 (CVCL_0426) and HOS (CVCL_0312) were either obtained from the American Type Culture Collection (ATCC) or were internally established cells were cultured as recommended [11]. These cell lines were authenticated by short tandem repeat profiling at the Cytogenetics and Cell Authentication Core at UT MDACC.

shRNA knockdown and gene expression profiling by microarray

Knockdown studies using shRNA were performed with KRIB cells as previously described [11] using an IL-11Rα–specific shRNA and a control GIPZ lentiviral shRNA (GE Healthcare). Total RNA was extracted from knockdown cells using a mirVana miRNA Isolation Kit (Life Technologies). Microarray analysis was performed with Illumina HumanHT-12 v4 Expression BeadChip array. Array data were processed as described previously using quantile normalization, "flooring" of data to the detection threshold, and elimination of unreliable probes [18].

Immunohistochemical staining (IHC) of OS samples for IL-11 and H3K27me3

Tissue microarrays (TMA) containing formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded (FFPE) specimens of recurrent and metastatic OS tumors from 200 patients were built according to National Cancer Institute guidelines. The protocol was approved by the institutional ethics, biohazards, and Institutional Review Board at UT MDACC. IHC was performed with unstained 4- μM-thick slices, decalcified TMA, and using an anti-human IL-11 antibody (polyclonal, 1:100; LifeSpan BioSciences) and an anti-human H3K27me3 antibody (clone C36B11, 1:200; Cell Signaling Technology) with a Leica Bond-III autostainer (Leica Biosystems).

Real-time reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction analysis

An AgPath-ID One-Step RT-PCR Kit (Applied Biosystems/Life Technologies) was used with TaqMan probes on StepOnePlus PCR System (Applied Biosystems) to quantify EZH2 expression in IL-11Rα and EZH2 shRNA-treated OS cell lines (SJSA1 and KRIB). EZH2, SUZ12, and EED expression levels were quantified using 10 ng of total RNA. Cyclophilin A was used as an endogenous control.

EZH2 knockdown and lentivirus infection

First, 293 T cells were transfected with EZH2–specific (GE Healthcare) and control GIPZ lentiviral shRNA plasmids (Dharmacon), together with packaging vectors, following the manufacturer's instructions. At 48–72 h post-transfection, viral particle-containing supernatants were collected, filtered through 0.45-µm-pore filters, and used to infect SJSA1 and KRIB cells in the presence of 8 µg/mL polybrene (Sigma-Aldrich). After another 72 h, shRNA-transduced GFP-expressing cells were separated by cell sorting with a BD FACSAria instrument (BD Biosciences) according to the manufacturer's instruction as previously described (11), and EZH2 silencing was confirmed by qPCR and immunoblotting.

Immunohistochemical staining of EZH2

FFPE samples of primary tumors (n = 18) and lung metastases (n = 27) were identified from the UT MDACC OS database and hospital tumor registry and were used to build a TMA. Antigen retrieval via heating with EDTA (pH 8.0; Zymed Laboratories) was followed by biotin and protein blocking (Dako). Expression of EZH2 was evaluated using a rabbit anti-EZH2 antibody (clone AC22; Cell Signaling Technology) diluted at 1:15 (vol/vol) and incubated for 45 min, followed by development using an LSAB + Kit (Dako). Staining was evaluated as described previously [11]. Recurrence-free survival was defined as the period from the time of surgery to the time of first relapse or death or to the time of last contact. The Kaplan–Meier method and log-rank test estimated the recurrence-free survival distributions. All studies were performed in accordance with the guidelines of the Institutional Review Board.

Addition of exogenous IL-11 to CCH-OS-D cells and histone isolation

On the first day, 3 × 103 CCH-OS-D cells were plated into a petri dish. The next day, they were treated with recombinant human IL-11 (R&D Systems, 218-IL) at increasing concentrations (100, 200, 300 ng) and EZH2 shRNA SJSA1 and KRIB cells for (200 ng) for 48 h. The histone extraction protocol from Abcam was used for histone isolation (ab1134760. A dish of untreated cells was used as a control for quantitative PCR (qPCR) and Western blot analyses.

H3K27 methylation status with GSK126 treatment

SJSA1, KRIB, and CCH-OS-D Cells were seeded into 100 mm tissue culture plates in the appropriate cell culture media 24 h before treatment. Cells were then exposed to 0.1% DMSO or varying concentrations of GSK126 (range 2, 1, and 0.5 μM) for 24 h, then histones were isolated and used for western blotting.

Western blot analysis and antibodies and immunoprecipitation

SJSA1, KRIB, HOS, and CCH-OS-D OS cells were lysed as previously described [11]. Primary antibodies against EZH2 (Cell Signaling Technology, 5246), EED (GeneTex, Inc., GTX628007), H3K27me3 (Millipore Sigma, 07–449), total histone (Abcam, ab1791) and β-actin (Cell Signaling Technology, 12620) were performed. Enhanced chemiluminescence detection was performed using the SuperSignal West Dura Extended Duration Kit (Thermo Fisher Scientific). For immunoprecipitation, CCH-OS-D and SJSA1 cells were treated with IL-11(200 and 400 ng). Treated cells were lysed with RIPA buffer plus protease inhibitors, and the EZH2 antibodies used for immunoprecipitation (Millipore AC22 CS-203193).

In vivo orthotopic model of OS

Mouse experiments were conducted in compliance with the policies and procedures of the UT MD Anderson Cancer Center Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee. Two-week-old male nude mice were purchased from the National Cancer Institute. OS cells were injected into the right tibia (2 × 104 cells/mouse) of the mice [11, 12]. Before and throughout all imaging and surgical procedures, mice were anesthetized as previously described. [11] Mice will be amputated when tumor burden reached 1.5 cm. Subsequently mice will be randomized into treatment groups and monitored by imaging. When mice are moribund with weight loss and difficulty breathing mice will be euthanized. In all experiments tumor size did not exceed 1.5 cm. All studies were performed in accordance with the guidelines of Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee at UT MD Anderson Cancer Center.

Leg amputation

Mice underwent either stifle or hip disarticulation once their primary tumors reached at least 1.5 cm3 in volume, approximately 21 days after injection. Post-operative care consisted of subcutaneous saline and heat packs. Mice were monitored until they fully recovered from anesthesia.

Preclinical therapeutic protocols

Once primary tumors reached a volume of 4 to 5 mm3, mice were randomized to treatment groups. One group received treatment with GSK126 intraperitoneally at 0.1 mL (150 mg per 20 g of body weight) in 20% Captisol (cyclodextrin vehicle) every 2 days for 28 days similar to the middle dosage used by McCabe et al. [19]. Control mice received Captisol on the same schedule (300 mg/kg once every 2 days for 4 weeks). Mice were weighed, and their primary tumor growth was measured using calipers twice weekly. Lung metastases were monitored using luciferase imaging. Mice were euthanized at day 48, and their lungs were harvested and processed into FFPE samples for histopathological analysis.

Proliferation assay

Cell proliferation was measured with the use of a colorimetric assay in 96-well plates with 2-(4-iodophenyl)-3-(4-nitrophenyl)-5-(2,4-disulfophenyl)-2H-tetrazolium monosodium salt (WST-1 reagent; Roche). One thousand cells per well were plated onto a 96-well plate in triplicate. The next day, cells were treated with increasing concentrations of GSK126 (0.0625–20.0000 µM) for 48 h. WST-1 was added to the cells and incubated for 2 h. Cell proliferation was measured at 450 nm using a microplate reader (DTX880; Beckman Coulter), and the cytotoxicity of GSK126 was expressed as the percentage of viable cells. Half-maximal inhibitory concentrations (IC50 values) were calculated using Prism software (version 6.0; GraphPad Software).

Apoptotic cell death and flow cytometric cell cycle analysis

For three independent replicates, OS cells were starved for 24 h in serum-free medium and then cultured overnight in complete growth medium. A panel of OS cells was treated with vehicle or GSK126 (1 and 2 µM) for 96 h, cells were collected and stained with annexin V and propidium iodide for the apoptosis assay and DAPI for the cell-cycle assay. Cells treated with 1 and 2 µM GSK126 were analyzed using flow cytometry (BD Biosciences) and FlowJo software.

RNA sequencing

Coding regions were captured using a SureSelectXT RNA Direct Library Preparation Kit (Agilent Technologies) and sequenced using the Illumina HiSeq 2000 system to generate 75-bp paired-end reads. Preprocessing was performed as previously described [20]. Differential expression analysis between GSK126-treated cells (both 1 µm and 2 µm) and control cells (DMSO) was performed using the limma [21]. Pathway analyses of genes were performed using gene set enrichment analysis [22].

Ex vivo bioluminescent imaging

Mice were implanted with luciferase-expressing SJSA1 variants and then injected subcutaneously with 15 mg/mL luciferin potassium salt in phosphate-buffered saline at 150 mg/kg body weight. Imaging was performed as previously described [11].

Results

Gene expression changes in IL-11Rα–knockdown cells

We examined the effects of IL-11Rα knockdown in OS cell line KRIB by using transcriptome microarrays. For cells transduced and selected with lentivirus expressing shRNA sequences targeting IL-11Rα, comparison of gene expression to that of untransduced parental cells showed differences that were highly reproducible across technical replicates and similar for 3 of the shRNA sequences (C1, H2, and H8; Fig. 1a), which reduced IL-11Rα expression fourfold. A fourth shRNA sequence (G2), which induced only a twofold reduction, produced dissimilar and less-pronounced changes and was not further considered. For the 3 shRNA sequences with similar reductions in IL-11Rα, comparison to control cells identified 270 genes (of 11,153 total) that were upregulated and 216 downregulated by at least twofold (Supplementary Table S1).

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1

Open in a new tab

Gene expression changes after IL-11Rα knockdown or IL-11 exogenous expression in the OS cells. a, Four shRNA sequences (G2, C1, H8, and H2) targeting IL-11Rα were stably expressed in KRIB cells. Gene expression was measured by microarray. Processed and log2-transformed gene expression data were compared to that of control cells. The heat map shows subtracted values for the gene probes in which values for shRNA sequences C1, H8, and H2 differed on average by at least twofold from those in the control cells. The color bar shows the fold-change difference from the values in the control cells. b, Quantitative reverse-transcription PCR analysis of the mRNA expression levels of the PRC2 complex members EZH2, EED, and SUZ12 in SJSA1 (upper panel) and KRIB cells (lower panel). P—parental cells, E—empty vector, C1—IL-11Rα knockdown via shRNA C1, H8—IL-11Rα knockdown via shRNA H8, RQ—relative quantity. c Immunoblot of EZH2 and EED protein levels in SJSA1 and KRIB cells. β-actin served as a loading control. P—parental cells, E—empty vector, C1—IL-11Rα knockdown via shRNA C1, H8—IL-11Rα knockdown via shRNA H8, RQ—relative quantity.

Gene set enrichment analysis with genes ranked according to fold-change differences between IL-11Rα knockdown (shRNA sequences C1, H2, and H8) and control replicates (Supplementary Table S2) was performed. Several of the most significantly upregulated gene sets following IL-11Rα knockdown were related to the PRC2 chromatin remodeling complex and histone H3 epigenetic modifications. For instance, the set with the second greatest significance was LU_EZH2_TARGETS_UP (P < 0.001; false discovery rate [FDR], q < 10–3), which includes genes that were upregulated in SKOV3ip1 ovarian cancer cells upon knockdown of EZH2 [23]. The third most significant gene set was MARTENS_TERTINOIN_RESPONSE_UP (P < 0.001; FDR, q < 10–3), which contains genes that were upregulated in NB4 acute promyelocytic leukemia cells in response to treatment with all-trans retinoic acid, which alters H3 acetylation. The top 20 gene sets also included those with genes whose promoters contain H3K4me3 (MIKKELSEN_IPS_LCP_WITH_H3K4ME3: P < 0.001; FDR, q < 0.1) or H3K27me3 (MIKKELSEN_MEF_HCP_WITH_H3K27ME3: P < 0.001; FDR, q < 0.15). In addition, genes downregulated in TIG3 fibroblasts upon knockdown of EED were enriched (PRC2_EED_UP.V1_DN: P < 0.001; FDR, q < 0.05). These data suggest that IL-11Rα knockdown affected genes related to PRC2 and genes whose promoters rely on H3 modifications for controlling their expression. Other observations include the Wnt/β-catenin pathway, which was significantly deregulated upon IL-11Rα knockdown (WNT_SIGNALING: P < 0.01; FDR, q < 0.1, Supplementary Table S2), with the most dramatic expression level changes in WNT7B and TCF20 (Supplementary Figure S1). Several microRNAs were upregulated in cells after the knockdown of IL-11Rα, such as miR-488 and miR-7-3HG (Supplementary Figure S2).

IL-11 increases PRC2 and H3K27me3 in OS Cells

Our microarray data suggested that IL-11Rα knockdown affects PRC2 activity and may alter epigenetic programming. To survey the expression of PRC2 complex members, we performed qPCR and Western blotting on IL-11Rα shRNA-knockdown OS cells. Knockdown of IL-11Rα had no effect on either RNA (Fig. 1b) or protein levels (Fig. 1c) of the PRC2 components EZH2, EED, and SUZ12 in KRIB or SJSA1 cells. To determine the effect of IL-11 activation on PRC2, we added exogenous human IL-11 to CCH-OS-D cells, which do not express IL-11 but do express IL-11Rα [11]. As shown in Fig. 2, the addition of exogenous human IL-11 increased EZH2 RNA levels (Fig. 2a) in a dose-dependent manner. EZH2 and H3K27me3 protein levels (Fig. 2b, c) were also increased similarly without any changes in the levels of total histone H3. Therefore, active IL-11 signaling affects PRC2 levels and activity.

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2

Open in a new tab

Exogenous addition of human IL-11 to OS cells enhances PRC2 activity. Cells were treated with human recombinant IL-11 (hIL-11; 100, 200, and 300 ng) for 1 h and analyzed by a, qPCR for EZH2, EED, and SUZ12 values, normalized to PPIA, and b, immunoblotting for H3K27 methylation status and expression of PRC2 complex member proteins (EZH2, SUZ12, and EED). Total histone and β-actin were used as loading controls. c Densitometry measurements of H3K27me3 levels normalized to total histone H3 for each dose of hIL-11. UT – untreated, ****P < 0.0001. d Kaplan–Meier curves showing probability of recurrence-free survival by extent of EZH2 staining. e–g The extent of positive EZH2 staining (percentage of positively stained nuclei) was scored on TMAs composed of 200 formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded, decalcified human OS samples (141 primary and 59 metastatic). e Strong diffuse nuclear labeling. f Weak nuclear labeling. g Negative. Magnification 200X

High levels of EZH2 expression are associated with worse recurrence-free survival

To determine the prognostic value of EZH2, we performed immunohistochemical staining for EZH2 using primary tumors obtained from OS patients with known outcomes. Patients whose tumors had greater than 10% or more tumor cells with positive nuclear staining for EZH2 had worse recurrence-free survival rates than did those with lower than 10% positively stained tumor cells, which is consistent with what has been observed by others (Fig. 2d–g) [24–26].

To address whether EZH2 might be a target of the IL-11/IL-Rα pathway, we treated the CCH-OS-D and SJSA1 OS cell lines with IL-11 (200 and 400 ng) for 24 h and immunoprecipitated with EZH2 antibody or IgG control. Western blotting showed enrichment of EZH2 upon IL-11 treatment in both cell lines (Fig. 3a); the effects of exogenous IL-11 addition were more pronounced in CCH-OS-D cells, consistent with the previous observation that only SJSA1 cells express endogenous IL-11(11). Next, we investigated whether IL-11 addition can lead to phosphorylation of EZH2 at Y244, which is required for activation of EZH2. Treatment of CCH-OS-D cells, which do not express IL-11, with human IL-11 produced increased EZH2 Y244 phosphorylation in a dose-dependent manner (Fig. 3b). These data indicate that the IL-11/IL-11Rα pathway may play a role in EZH2 activation in OS.

Fig. 3.

Fig. 3

Open in a new tab

IL-11 activates EZH2 OS cells a Immunoprecipitation assay of EZH2 in CCH-OS-D and SJSA1 cells treated with human IL11 (200 or 400 ng) for 24 h. b CCH-OS-D cells were treated with human IL-11 for 48 h and then used for immunoblot analysis of phosphorylated EZH2-Y244. β-actin was used as loading control

To determine whether there was evidence for this relationship in OS patients, we conducted immunohistochemical staining for H3K27me3 and IL-11 using a TMA containing local recurrent and metastatic OS specimens (Supplementary Figures S3 and S4). We found that 38 of 89 (43%) recurrent and 30 of 48 (63%) metastatic OS samples had strong IL-11 staining. For H3K27me3, 62 of 96 (65%) recurrent and 34 of 61 (56%) metastatic OS samples had moderate to strong staining (Supplementary Table S3). There was a significant positive correlation between the extents of staining for IL-11 and H3K27me3 (the percentages of positively stained nuclei) among locally recurrent tumors (P < 0.05) (Supplementary Tables S4 and S5). No other significant associations or correlations were observed between the 2 markers.

Inhibitory effect of EZH2 on IL-11 mediated H3K27me3 activation

It has been established that a high level of EZH2 and activation of H3K27me3 is found in many cancer types and confers a significantly poor prognosis. Down-regulation of EZH2 suppresses the growth and invasion in cancer cells, so we wanted to explore the relationship between EZH2 and H3K27me3 in the IL11/IL-11Rα pathway. To investigate that we generated SJSA1 and KRIB EZH2 knockdown cells using shRNA lentivirus. Knockdown efficiency was analyzed by qPCR and western blotting. Further, we treated SJSA1 and KRIB EZH2 shRNA cells with human IL-11 (200 ng) for 48 h before isolating their histones. Western blotting showed that EZH2 knockdown markedly decreased H3K27me3 in both lines, at baseline and after IL-11 treatment (Fig. 4). These data demonstrate that IL11 alters the methylation of H3K27 that is mediated by EZH2.

Fig. 4.

Fig. 4

Open in a new tab

IL-11 mediates H3K27 trimethylation. a KRIB and SJSA1, EZH2shRNA and vector control cells were treated with human IL-11 for 48 h, Cells were harvested and used for immunoblot with H3K27 antibody. Total H3 was used as a control. b Immunoblot analysis of EZH2 knockdown and vector control in KRIB and SJSA1 cells. β-actin was used as a loading control

GSK126 decreases the viability of OS cells

We assessed the possibility of using EZH2 inhibition as a therapeutic option for primary and metastatic OS. We first tested the effect of the S-adenosyl-L-methionine–competitive, small-molecule EZH2 inhibitor GSK126 on the viability of 5 OS cell lines. Proliferation was inhibited in a dose-dependent manner for 4 (KRIB, CCH-OS-D, SJSA1 and HOS) of the 5 OS cell lines tested, of which 3 lines (KRIB, HOS, and SJSA1) were particularly sensitive to GSK126 (Fig. 5a, Supplemental Table S6). The IC50 values for all lines ranged from 0.1987 to 1.045 µM.

Fig. 5.

Fig. 5

Open in a new tab

GSK126 inhibits proliferation and H3K27me3 of OS cells. a OS cell lines were treated for 48 h with GSK126, and their proliferation was assessed using the WST-1 assay. GSK126 inhibited the proliferation of KRIB, HOS, and SJSA-1 cells. Half-maximal inhibitory concentrations (IC50) values are available in Table S4. b and c Treatment with GSK126 induced apoptosis and cell-cycle arrest in OS cells. b Results of annexin V–fluorescein isothiocyanate/propidium iodide analysis of the indicated OS cell lines after 24 h of treatment with GSK126 (P < .01). The error bars represent standard error of the mean. c, Results of flow cytometric analysis of the cell-cycle progression in OS cell lines after 24 h of treatment with GSK126. GSK126 induced sub-G1 arrest in KRIB, SJSA1, and CCH-OS-D cells and S-phase arrest in HOS cells (P < .05). The error bars represent standard error of the mean **P < 0.01; ***P < 0.001; ****P < 0.0001. d Evaluation of H3K27me3 in SJSA1, KRIB and CCH-OS-D cell lines following GSK126 treatment for 72 h. Total histone H3 is shown as a loading control

GSK126 induces apoptosis and cell-cycle arrest in OS cells

OS cell lines that were treated with GSK126 displayed a high proportion of apoptotic cells (Fig. 5b). Increasing the concentration of GSK126 from 1 to 2 µM enhanced apoptosis 4.5-fold (P ≤ 0.01). Flow cytometric analysis demonstrated a significant elevation in the number of G1-phase cells and a decline in the number of S-phase cells upon GSK126 treatment (Fig. 5c), indicating decreased proliferation, although HOS cells were an exception. The addition of GSK126 to SJSA1, KRIB AND CCH-OS-D cell lines also decreased trimethylation of H3K27 (Fig. 5d). Therefore, GSK126 compromises the cell viability and H3K27me3 in OS cells, some being more sensitive than others.

We performed RNA sequencing on OS cells before and after treatment with GSK126 at 1 and 2 µM. HOS and SJSA1 cells were the most sensitive to treatment, whereas CCH-OS-D cells were less sensitive (Fig. 5a). Principal component analyses demonstrated distinguishable, likely dose-dependent gene expression changes in these cells after treatment (Fig. 6a–c). We found 39 upregulated and 56 downregulated genes in the GSK126-sensitive cells (Fig. 6d, e). Enriched pathways included (Fig. 6f) neuroactive ligand-receptor interactions (P < 0.01), transfer RNA-related pathways (P < 0.05), and Wnt signaling (P < 0.05) (Supplementary Table S7). The most highly ranking Wnt pathway members in this enrichment were NKD1 and RSPO3, both of which had reduced levels in the sensitive cell lines after GSK126 treatment.

Fig. 6 .

Fig. 6 

Open in a new tab

RNA sequencing of OS cells treated with GSK126. a-c Principal component analysis of RNA expression levels of genes for GSK126-sensitive cell lines HOS and SJSA1 (a and b) and the GSK126-resistant cell line CCH-OS-D c. subjected to no treatment (control, C), treatment with dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO, vehicle), or treatment with GSK126 at 1 or 2 µM. d and e Venn diagrams showing the intersection of significantly upregulated and downregulated genes (upon GSK126 treatment, both 1 or 2 µM, as compared to control and DMSO) of the 3 cell lines. f Bar plot of the Gene Ontology enriched pathways

GSK126 inhibits lung metastasis in an orthotopic model of OS

In our hands, only two OS cell lines are readily metastatic: SJSA1 and KRIB. However, KRIB cells are transfected with Kirsten murine sarcoma virus Ki-Ras, and thus the mechanism of metastasis may not represent what occurs in patients. SJSA1 cells were therefore used to examine the in vivo effects of GSK126 on lung metastases. Luciferase-expressing SJSA1 cells were injected into the tibiae of nude mice. The affected limb was amputated when primary tumors reached 1.5 cm3 in volume. GSK126 was given at 150 mg per 20 g of body weight every 2 days for 28 days. At the end of 48 days, luciferase imaging revealed significant inhibition in the growth of pulmonary metastases (Fig. 7a, b), fewer lung nodules (Fig. 7c), lower tumor weights (Fig. 7e) and higher rate of survival in treated mice 48 days after treatment (P ≤ 0.0363) (Fig. 7d), in the treated mice GSK126 compared to the control-treated or vehicle-treated mice (P ≤ 0.01). This result was further confirmed by histological analysis of hematoxylin and eosin (H&E)-stained formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded (FFPE) tissue sections (Fig. 7f).

Fig. 7.

Fig. 7

Open in a new tab

Inhibition of OS lung metastases by GSK126 in vivo. a Luciferase imaging of mice injected with SJSA1 cells comparing day 3, when primary tumors had developed, and day 21, after primary tumors had been removed by amputation but before treatment initiation. The bottom panels shows luciferase imaging and lung tumors for mice treated with control-, vehicle (cyclodextrin)-, and EZH2 inhibitor (EZH2i; GSK126) by day 48 after the start of the regimen. b Quantification of luciferase activity. c number of tumor nodules in control-treated versus GSK126-treated mice. d Survival curves for all mice. e Weight of lungs in control- and GSK126-treated mice. F Representative images of H&E staining of explanted lungs treated with Vehicle and GSK126. Scale bar: 100 μm

Discussion

IL-11 is a cytokine produced by normal osteoblasts and presumably regulates bone remodeling in a manner similar to that of IL-6 [27]. This pathway appears to be intact in OS, as stimulation of some OS cells with osteotropic agents such as transforming growth factor-β and prostaglandins increases the levels of IL-11 [27]. Previously, we observed that IL-11/IL-11Rα signaling in OS cells promotes lung metastasis in an orthotopic model [12]. In the present study, we compared OS cell transcriptomes before and after the knockdown of IL-11Rα. Several miRNAs were increased, including mIR-488 and mIR-103A1. Induction of miR-488 reduces the proliferation, invasion, and epithelial-mesenchymal transition of the OS cell line U2OS [28]. Elevated levels of miR-103A1 promote invasion and epithelial-mesenchymal transition in multiple OS lines [29]. These microRNAs may also promote metastasis.

PRC2 complexes were responsible for much of the downstream changes in expression. Our observation supports that IL-11 stimulation increases expression of PRC2 complex members, activation of EZH2 by phosphorylation of Y244, and levels of H3K27me3. Knocking down EZH2 prevents H3K27me3 by IL-11 and EZH2 levels are independent of IL11R levels. Furthermore, OS patients have a significant positive association between IL-11 and H3K27me3 immunostaining. Therefore, IL-11 activates EZH2 to methylate H3K27.

Although other mechanisms of increasing EZH2 expression exist, our study is the first to demonstrate that IL-11/IL-11Rα signaling can activate EZH2. Transcription factors such as Myc in prostate cancer cells [30] and the EWS-FLI1 fusion protein in Ewing sarcoma cells [31] can bind to the EZH2 promoter and enhance its expression. In addition to transcription factors, several microRNAs and long noncoding RNAs (lncRNAs) directly regulate EZH2 expression [13, 32–34].

Our study confirms that EZH2 protein levels are associated with aggressive tumor behavior and poor outcomes in OS patients [24, 25, 35]. In vitro data demonstrate that small interfering RNA knockdown of EZH2 inhibits OS cell growth, proliferation, and invasion, and decreases cancer stem cell functions. In vivo data showed fewer lung metastases. EZH2 levels have also been shown to be associated with metastasis of pediatric rhabdomyosarcoma, Ewing sarcoma, and synovial sarcoma [26, 36]. It remains to be seen whether EZH2 promotes metastasis in the same manner across tumor types.

The molecular mechanism by which EZH2 enhances metastasis is still unclear. One consistent downstream effect of EZH2 noted in other cancer types is the perturbation of the Wnt pathway. We too observed this in both IL-11Rα knockdown cells and cells treated with GSK126. In colon cancer, hepatocellular carcinoma, precancerous mammary epithelial lesions, and breast cancer cells, EZH2 binds to β-catenin and activates Wnt signaling [37–40]. The relationship may also be in a feedback loop where the Wnt/β-catenin pathway may positively regulate PRC2 and affect invasiveness [41].

EZH2 has been targeted pharmacologically in various tumor types with the small-molecule inhibitor GSK126 [42], a highly selective EZH2 inhibitor that competes with S-adenosyl-L-methionine binding [19]. In agreement with the results of these previous studies, we found that GSK126 repressed the growth of several OS cell lines, with IC50 values ranging from 0.1987 to 1.045 µM. For SJSA1, KRIB, and CCHOS-D cells, the addition of GSK126 prevented trimethylation of H3K27. Thus, our study further supports the therapeutic use of EZH2 inhibition in OS patients. Multiple types of EZH2 inhibitors appear to have similar effects in OS cells. For instance, treatment with the EZH2 inhibitor GSK343 inhibited Saos2 cell viability by attenuating cell-cycle progression and promoting apoptosis [43]. GSK343 inhibited the expression of EZH2 and its targets c-Myc and H3K27me3 and inhibited the expression of FUSE-binding protein 1 in these cells [43]. Likewise, treatment with the EZH2 inhibitor DZNep decreased the expression of EZH2 and H3K27me3 in U2OS and Saos2 OS cells [25]. We also observe a decrease in H3K27me3 after treating with GSK126. All five OS lines showed dose-dependent increases in apoptosis and G1 cell cycle arrest. However, they differed in their proliferation sensitivities. These differences may indicate that resistance mechanisms could vary among patients, with some having more proliferative abilities than others.

Our results further demonstrated that IL-11 and IL-11Rα act upstream of the PRC2 complex and H3K27me3. This relationship allowed us to demonstrate that either silencing IL-11Rα or debilitating the PRC2 complex through EZH2 inhibition can reduce primary tumor growth and prevent lung metastatic growth in vivo. Reduced lung tumor growth was also verified by H&E staining. Therefore, inhibiting EZH2 activity is a viable therapeutic proxy for inhibiting IL-11 signaling. Furthermore, our work, and that of others, demonstrated that the poor prognosis of OS patients is associated with high EZH2 expression and activity. Currently, the only trial using EZH2 inhibition in OS patients is the Pediatric MATCH trial (NCT03155620), which requires the presence of an EZH2 mutation for eligibility. We found no point mutations in EZH2 in the OS patient samples we examined [20], and none have been reported in HOS, Saos2, or SJSA1 cells, for which sequencing data are publicly available [44]. Therefore, the requirement of an EZH2 mutation in OS may be overly restrictive in that EZH2 can be active in OS cases without gain-of-function mutations.

In summary, our data suggest that EZH2 is downstream of the IL-11R pathway. Blocking EZH2 activity results in a reduction of osteosarcoma lung metastases. The findings here suggest that EZH2 inhibitors may be a viable therapeutic option for the treatment of  OS patients.

Supplementary Information

Supplementary material 1. (3.7MB, zip)

Acknowledgements

We thank the Advanced Technology Genomics Core at MD Anderson for microarray services (NCI Grant CA016672), Jianhua Zhang for bioinformatics pipeline service, and the Flow Cytometry Lab–South Campus at MD Anderson for flow cytometry services. We thank Dr. Abhinav K. Jain from the Department of Epigenetics and Molecular Carcinogenesis at MD Anderson Cancer Center for EZH2 and EED antibodies. We thank Amy Ninetto, Scientific Editor, and Sarah Bronson, Scientific Editor, of the Research Medical Library, MD Anderson Cancer Center, for editing the manuscript. Figures 3, 4, 5, 7 were put together in Biorender.com.

Author contributions

ED and VOL designed and conducted in vitro and in vivo experiments, interpreted the data and wrote the manuscript. RED analyzed the microarray data. HCB conducted data analysis, interpretation, and wrote the manuscript. WLW and JWT conducted immunohistochemical staining. VBJ assisted with amputations. AJ conducted data analysis. CHL and HYL conducted statistical analyses of the immunohistochemical staining. CCW conducted bioinformatics analyses of the RNA sequencing data. SAI assisted with in vitro experiments. PAF and VOL supervised the study.

Funding

This work was supported by the Triumph Over Kid Cancer Foundation to V.O.L., The National Institutes of Health/National Cancer Institute (Award Number P30CA016672); the Cancer Prevention and Research Institute of Texas (Grant Number R120501 to PAF); and the Welch Foundation Robert A. Welch Distinguished University Chair (Award Number G-0040 to PAF).

Data availability

The microarray data used to support the findings of this study were deposited in the Gene expression Omnibus repository (GSE 191215) on December 19, 2021 [45].

Declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

All patient data was obtained through approval from the Institutional Review Board at UT MD Anderson Cancer Center. Animal work was approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee at UT MD Anderson Cancer Center.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Footnotes

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

References

  • 1.Ottaviani G, Jaffe N. The epidemiology of osteosarcoma. Cancer Treat Res. 2009;152:3–13. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4419-0284-9_1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Hudson M, Jaffe MR, Jaffe N, Ayala A, Raymond AK, Carrasco H, Wallace S, Murray J, Robertson R. Pediatric osteosarcoma: therapeutic strategies, results, and prognostic factors derived from a 10-year experience. J Clin Oncol. 1990;8(12):1988–1997. doi: 10.1200/JCO.1990.8.12.1988. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Daw NC, Chou AJ, Jaffe N, Rao BN, Billups CA, Rodriguez-Galindo C, Meyers PA, Huh WW. Recurrent osteosarcoma with a single pulmonary metastasis: a multi-institutional review. Br J Cancer. 2015;112(2):278–282. doi: 10.1038/bjc.2014.585. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Kim C, Davis LE, Albert CM, Samuels B, Roberts JL, Wagner MJ. Osteosarcoma in pediatric and adult populations: are adults just big kids? Cancers. 2023 doi: 10.3390/cancers15205044. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Chen B, Zhao X, Li X, Liu J, Tang J. Fatal heart disease in patients with bone and soft tissue sarcoma. Front Cardiovasc Med. 2022;9:951940. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2022.951940. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Anderson PM, Wiseman GA, Dispenzieri A, Arndt CA, Hartmann LC, Smithson WA, Mullan BP, Bruland OS. High-dose samarium-153 ethylene diamine tetramethylene phosphonate: low toxicity of skeletal irradiation in patients with osteosarcoma and bone metastases. J Clin Oncol. 2002;20(1):189–196. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2002.20.1.189. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Heiner JP, Miraldi F, Kallick S, Makley J, Neely J, Smith-Mensah WH, Cheung NK. Localization of GD2-specific monoclonal antibody 3F8 in human osteosarcoma. Cancer Res. 1987;47(20):5377–5381. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Mansky PJ, Liewehr DJ, Steinberg SM, Chrousos GP, Avila NA, Long L, Bernstein D, Mackall CL, Hawkins DS, Helman LJ. Treatment of metastatic osteosarcoma with the somatostatin analog OncoLar: significant reduction of insulin-like growth factor-1 serum levels. J Pediatr Hematol Oncol. 2002;24(6):440–446. doi: 10.1097/00043426-200208000-00007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.McGary EC, Weber K, Mills L, Doucet M, Lewis V, Lev DC, Fidler IJ, Bar-Eli M. Inhibition of platelet-derived growth factor-mediated proliferation of osteosarcoma cells by the novel tyrosine kinase inhibitor STI571. Clin Cancer Res. 2002;8(11):3584–3591. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Raile K, Hoflich A, Kessler U, Yang Y, Pfuender M, Blum WF, Kolb H, Schwarz HP, Kiess W. Human osteosarcoma (U-2 OS) cells express both insulin-like growth factor-I (IGF-I) receptors and insulin-like growth factor-II/mannose-6-phosphate (IGF-II/M6P) receptors and synthesize IGF-II: autocrine growth stimulation by IGF-II via the IGF-I receptor. J Cell Physiol. 1994;159(3):531–541. doi: 10.1002/jcp.1041590317. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Lewis VO, Devarajan E, Cardo-Vila M, Thomas DG, Kleinerman ES, Marchio S, Sidman RL, Pasqualini R, Arap W. BMTP-11 is active in preclinical models of human osteosarcoma and a candidate targeted drug for clinical translation. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2017;114(30):8065–8070. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1704173114. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Lewis VO, Ozawa MG, Deavers MT, Wang G, Shintani T, Arap W, Pasqualini R. The interleukin-11 receptor alpha as a candidate ligand-directed target in osteosarcoma: consistent data from cell lines, orthotopic models, and human tumor samples. Cancer Res. 2009;69(5):1995–1999. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-08-4845. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Yamaguchi H, Hung MC. Regulation and role of EZH2 in cancer. Cancer Res Treat. 2014;46(3):209–222. doi: 10.4143/crt.2014.46.3.209. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Ntziachristos P, Tsirigos A, Van Vlierberghe P, Nedjic J, Trimarchi T, Flaherty MS, Ferres-Marco D, da Ros V, Tang Z, Siegle J, et al. Genetic inactivation of the polycomb repressive complex 2 in T cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Nat Med. 2012;18(2):298–301. doi: 10.1038/nm.2651. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Qi W, Chan H, Teng L, Li L, Chuai S, Zhang R, Zeng J, Li M, Fan H, Lin Y, et al. Selective inhibition of Ezh2 by a small molecule inhibitor blocks tumor cells proliferation. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2012;109(52):21360–21365. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1210371110. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Yap DB, Chu J, Berg T, Schapira M, Cheng SW, Moradian A, Morin RD, Mungall AJ, Meissner B, Boyle M, et al. Somatic mutations at EZH2 Y641 act dominantly through a mechanism of selectively altered PRC2 catalytic activity, to increase H3K27 trimethylation. Blood. 2011;117(8):2451–2459. doi: 10.1182/blood-2010-11-321208. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Morin RD, Johnson NA, Severson TM, Mungall AJ, An J, Goya R, Paul JE, Boyle M, Woolcock BW, Kuchenbauer F, et al. Somatic mutations altering EZH2 (Tyr641) in follicular and diffuse large B-cell lymphomas of germinal-center origin. Nat Genet. 2010;42(2):181–185. doi: 10.1038/ng.518. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Ma W, Wang M, Wang ZQ, Sun L, Graber D, Matthews J, Champlin R, Yi Q, Orlowski RZ, Kwak LW, et al. Effect of long-term storage in TRIzol on microarray-based gene expression profiling. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2010;19(10):2445–2452. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-10-0565. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.McCabe MT, Ott HM, Ganji G, Korenchuk S, Thompson C, Van Aller GS, Liu Y, Graves AP, Della Pietra A, Diaz E, et al. EZH2 inhibition as a therapeutic strategy for lymphoma with EZH2-activating mutations. Nature. 2012;492(7427):108–112. doi: 10.1038/nature11606. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Wu CC, Beird HC, Andrew Livingston J, Advani S, Mitra A, Cao S, Reuben A, Ingram D, Wang WL, Ju Z, et al. Immuno-genomic landscape of osteosarcoma. Nat Commun. 2020;11(1):1008. doi: 10.1038/s41467-020-14646-w. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Smyth GK. limma: linear models for microarray data. In: Gentleman R, Carey VJ, Huber W, Irizarry RA, Dudoit S, editors. Bioinformatics and Computational Biology Solutions Using R and Bioconductor. New York: Springer; 2005. [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Mootha VK, Lindgren CM, Eriksson KF, Subramanian A, Sihag S, Lehar J, Puigserver P, Carlsson E, Ridderstrale M, Laurila E, et al. PGC-1alpha-responsive genes involved in oxidative phosphorylation are coordinately downregulated in human diabetes. Nat Genet. 2003;34(3):267–273. doi: 10.1038/ng1180. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Lu C, Han HD, Mangala LS, Ali-Fehmi R, Newton CS, Ozbun L, Armaiz-Pena GN, Hu W, Stone RL, Munkarah A, et al. Regulation of tumor angiogenesis by EZH2. Cancer Cell. 2010;18(2):185–197. doi: 10.1016/j.ccr.2010.06.016. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Lv YF, Yan GN, Meng G, Zhang X, Guo QN. Enhancer of zeste homolog 2 silencing inhibits tumor growth and lung metastasis in osteosarcoma. Sci Rep. 2015;5:12999. doi: 10.1038/srep12999. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Sun R, Shen J, Gao Y, Zhou Y, Yu Z, Hornicek F, Kan Q, Duan Z. Overexpression of EZH2 is associated with the poor prognosis in osteosarcoma and function analysis indicates a therapeutic potential. Oncotarget. 2016;7(25):38333–38346. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.9518. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Ramaglia M, D'Angelo V, Iannotta A, Di Pinto D, Pota E, Affinita MC, Donofrio V, Errico ME, Lombardi A, Indolfi C, et al. High EZH2 expression is correlated to metastatic disease in pediatric soft tissue sarcomas. Cancer Cell Int. 2016;16:59. doi: 10.1186/s12935-016-0338-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Elias JA, Tang W, Horowitz MC. Cytokine and hormonal stimulation of human osteosarcoma interleukin-11 production. Endocrinology. 1995;136(2):489–498. doi: 10.1210/endo.136.2.7835281. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Qiu J, Zhang Y, Chen H, Guo Z. MicroRNA-488 inhibits proliferation, invasion and EMT in osteosarcoma cell lines by targeting aquaporin 3. Int J Oncol. 2018;53(4):1493–1504. doi: 10.3892/ijo.2018.4483. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] [Retracted]
  • 29.Chen J, Yan D, Wu W, Zhu J, Ye W, Shu Q. MicroRNA-130a promotes the metastasis and epithelial-mesenchymal transition of osteosarcoma by targeting PTEN. Oncol Rep. 2016;35(6):3285–3292. doi: 10.3892/or.2016.4719. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Koh CM, Iwata T, Zheng Q, Bethel C, Yegnasubramanian S, De Marzo AM. Myc enforces overexpression of EZH2 in early prostatic neoplasia via transcriptional and post-transcriptional mechanisms. Oncotarget. 2011;2(9):669–683. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.327. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Richter GH, Plehm S, Fasan A, Rossler S, Unland R, Bennani-Baiti IM, Hotfilder M, Lowel D, von Luettichau I, Mossbrugger I, et al. EZH2 is a mediator of EWS/FLI1 driven tumor growth and metastasis blocking endothelial and neuro-ectodermal differentiation. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009;106(13):5324–5329. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0810759106. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Palmini G, Marini F, Brandi ML. What is new in the miRNA world regarding osteosarcoma and chondrosarcoma? Molecules. 2017 doi: 10.3390/molecules22030417. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Hirata H, Hinoda Y, Shahryari V, Deng G, Nakajima K, Tabatabai ZL, Ishii N, Dahiya R. Long noncoding RNA MALAT1 promotes aggressive renal cell carcinoma through Ezh2 and interacts with miR-205. Cancer Res. 2015;75(7):1322–1331. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-14-2931. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Cao J, Han X, Qi X, Jin X, Li X. TUG1 promotes osteosarcoma tumorigenesis by upregulating EZH2 expression via miR-144-3p. Int J Oncol. 2017;51(4):1115–1123. doi: 10.3892/ijo.2017.4110. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Feng H, Tillman H, Wu G, Davidoff AM, Yang J. Frequent epigenetic alterations in polycomb repressive complex 2 in osteosarcoma cell lines. Oncotarget. 2018;9(43):27087–27091. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.25484. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Changchien YC, Tatrai P, Papp G, Sapi J, Fonyad L, Szendroi M, Papai Z, Sapi Z. Poorly differentiated synovial sarcoma is associated with high expression of enhancer of zeste homologue 2 (EZH2) J Transl Med. 2012;10:216. doi: 10.1186/1479-5876-10-216. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Jung HY, Jun S, Lee M, Kim HC, Wang X, Ji H, McCrea PD, Park JI. PAF and EZH2 induce Wnt/beta-catenin signaling hyperactivation. Mol Cell. 2013;52(2):193–205. doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2013.08.028. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Li X, Gonzalez ME, Toy K, Filzen T, Merajver SD, Kleer CG. Targeted overexpression of EZH2 in the mammary gland disrupts ductal morphogenesis and causes epithelial hyperplasia. Am J Pathol. 2009;175(3):1246–1254. doi: 10.2353/ajpath.2009.090042. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Shi B, Liang J, Yang X, Wang Y, Zhao Y, Wu H, Sun L, Zhang Y, Chen Y, Li R, et al. Integration of estrogen and Wnt signaling circuits by the polycomb group protein EZH2 in breast cancer cells. Mol Cell Biol. 2007;27(14):5105–5119. doi: 10.1128/MCB.00162-07. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Cheng AS, Lau SS, Chen Y, Kondo Y, Li MS, Feng H, Ching AK, Cheung KF, Wong HK, Tong JH, et al. EZH2-mediated concordant repression of Wnt antagonists promotes beta-catenin-dependent hepatocarcinogenesis. Cancer Res. 2011;71(11):4028–4039. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-10-3342. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Enomoto M, Hayakawa S, Itsukushima S, Ren DY, Matsuo M, Tamada K, Oneyama C, Okada M, Takumi T, Nishita M, et al. Autonomous regulation of osteosarcoma cell invasiveness by Wnt5a/Ror2 signaling. Oncogene. 2009;28(36):3197–3208. doi: 10.1038/onc.2009.175. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Tiffen JC, Gunatilake D, Gallagher SJ, Gowrishankar K, Heinemann A, Cullinane C, Dutton-Regester K, Pupo GM, Strbenac D, Yang JY, et al. Targeting activating mutations of EZH2 leads to potent cell growth inhibition in human melanoma by derepression of tumor suppressor genes. Oncotarget. 2015;6(29):27023–27036. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.4809. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Xiong X, Zhang J, Liang W, Cao W, Qin S, Dai L, Ye D, Liu Z. Fuse-binding protein 1 is a target of the EZH2 inhibitor GSK343, in osteosarcoma cells. Int J Oncol. 2016;49(2):623–628. doi: 10.3892/ijo.2016.3541. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Barretina J, Caponigro G, Stransky N, Venkatesan K, Margolin AA, Kim S, Wilson CJ, Lehar J, Kryukov GV, Sonkin D, et al. The cancer cell line encyclopedia enables predictive modelling of anticancer drug sensitivity. Nature. 2012;483(7391):603–607. doi: 10.1038/nature11003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Barrett T, Wilhite SE, Ledoux P, Evangelista C, Kim IF, Tomashevsky M, Marshall KA, Phillippy KH, Sherman PM, Holko M, et al. NCBI GEO: archive for functional genomics data sets–update. Nucleic Acids Res. 2013;41(D1):D991–995. doi: 10.1093/nar/gks1193. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplementary material 1. (3.7MB, zip)

Data Availability Statement

The microarray data used to support the findings of this study were deposited in the Gene expression Omnibus repository (GSE 191215) on December 19, 2021 [45].

Articles from Discover Oncology are provided here courtesy of Springer

RESOURCES