Abstract
Objectives
The present study assessed the late results of the operation, which consisted of the construction of a stentless mitral valve using autologous pericardium and valve implantation.
Methods
Between 2011 and 2018, among 1617 consecutive patients who underwent mitral valve operation at our institution, 15 adult patients (0.9%) with unrepairable mitral valves who wished to avoid conventional mitral valve replacement underwent this operation. Ten patients (67%) had a history of valve repair. After discharge, patients were prospectively followed-up with a echocardiographic evaluation up to the end point. The mean follow-up term was 70.8 ± 42.5 months.
Results
There were no hospital deaths or thromboembolic events and only 1 late noncardiac death. Intraoperative transesophageal echocardiography of all patients revealed no or trivial mitral regurgitation. Eight patients (53.3%) underwent redo valve replacement within 12 years. Except 1 late death, the postoperative course was divided into 3 groups depending on the occurrence of redo surgery, as follows: an early reoperation group (reoperation within 4 years; n = 4), a late reoperation group (reoperation after 4 years; n = 4), and a free from reoperation group (n = 6). The latest transthoracic echocardiographic examination performed 7.2 ± 2.9 years after the operation revealed the grade of mitral regurgitation to be none in 2 patients, mild in 2 patients, mild to moderate in 1 patients, and moderate in 1 patient in the free from reoperation group.
Conclusions
Despite the high incidence of reoperation, Normo operation can be a viable option during valve replacement, especially for young patients.
Key Words: mitral valve repair, mitral valve replacement, stentless mitral valve, Normo valve, autologous pericardium
Graphical Abstract
Among 1617 consecutive patients who underwent mitral valve (MV) surgery at the Sakakibara Heart Institute between 2011 and 2018, 15 patients with unrepairable MV who strongly requested MV repair were enrolled in this study. Although the long-term echo findings were variable, perhaps depending on the quality of the autologous pericardium used, in patients without early progression of MR, echo findings were stable in the long-term.
Central Message.
Normo operation is a viable option during valve replacement for young patients. A higher failure rate may occur with lower quality autologous pericardium in elderly and reoperative patients.
Perspective.
Although echo follow-up demonstrated the variableness of the material, in patients free from the early progression of mitral regurgitation, echo findings were stable in the long-term. Normo operation can be a viable alternative to bioprosthesis replacement in select patients.
The incidence of mitral valve (MV) repair has been increasing1 since the end of the 20th century, accompanied by an improving trend in patients’ quality of life. However, MV repair for patients with complicated pathology remains challenging,2,3 and repair has not been attempted to avoid the risk of reoperation in many institutions. Furthermore, because the feasibility of successful redo repair is reported to be low,4 MV replacement (MVR) rather than MV repair is generally performed for recurrence of mitral regurgitation (MR) after complicated MV repair.
To overcome the disadvantages of the existing MVR techniques, Kasegawa and colleagues5 designed the 2-leaflet stentless mitral valve (SMV) they called the Normo valve in 2002 (Figure 1). The design concepts of the Normo valve, presented in Table 1, provide a deep coaptation area, and the anatomic features of this valve can ensure a high level of competency with good left ventricle function. The Normo operation consists of the construction of a SMV using fresh autologous pericardium (AP) before cardiopulmonary bypass and valve implantation. The hydrodynamic function of a valve made from bovine pericardium has been tested using a pulsatile MV simulator combined with echocardiography at the Center for Advanced Biomedical Sciences of Waseda University, Tokyo, Japan.5 After successful implantation for experimental animals, a meeting to explore the future development of SMVs involving 10 specialists in this field from Japan was held in 2010. The operative procedure was approved at the meeting.
Table 1.
|
After receiving approval from the local institutional review board (No.: 23-027; approved: May 24, 2011), we performed this operation in 2011 at our institution on a woman who wished to eventually have a baby. The goal of this study was to assess the late results of the Normo procedure.
Patients and Methods
Between July 2011 and November 2018, 15 adult patients (9 women; mean age 48.7 ± 15.9 years) who had requested valve repair rather than replacement underwent this operation at the Sakakibara Heart Institute (Figure 2). During the same period, MV repair was performed in 969 (59.9%) of 1617 consecutive patients who underwent MV surgery at our institution. The clinical profiles of the patients are shown in Table 2. In all 15 patients who strongly requested MV repair rather than the existing MVR procedure, preoperative transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) and transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) performed in each patient revealed low feasibility for successful MV repair. This operation using AP is recommended as an alternative to MVR. The study was approved by the local institutional review board. All 15 patients agreed to undergo this surgery and provided written informed consent for publication (No.: 23-027; approved: May 24, 2011).
Table 2.
No. | Age | Gender | Diagnosis | Rhythm | Etiology | NYHA functional class |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 43 | F | MSR post-MVP | NSR | Rheumatic | II |
2 | 30 | M | MR | NSR | Infective endocarditis | IV |
3 | 59 | F | MSR | NSR, paf | Rheumatic | II |
4 | 29 | F | MSR post-MVP | NSR | Congenital | II |
5 | 28 | F | MSR post-MVP | NSR | Congenital | II |
6 | 54 | F | MSR | NSR | Infective endocarditis | II |
7 | 41 | M | MSR post-MVP | NSR | Rheumatic | II |
8 | 61 | M | MR post-MVP | NSR, paf | Degenerative | II |
9 | 63 | M | MR post-redo MVP | NSR, paf | Degenerative | II |
10 | 47 | M | MR post-MVP | NSR | Degenerative | II |
11 | 69 | F | MSR post-MVP | NSR, paf | Degenerative | II |
12 | 27 | F | MR | NSR | Infective endocarditis | IV |
13 | 72 | M | MR post-MVP | NSR | Infective endocarditis | II |
14 | 66 | F | MS, post-OMC | NSR, paf | Rheumatic | II |
15 | 41 | M | MR, MAC | NSR, paf | Degenerative | II |
NYHA, New York Heart Association; F, female; MSR, mitral stenosis and regurgitation; MVP, mitral valve plasty; NSR, normal sinus rhythm; M, male; MR, mitral regurgitation; paf, paroxysmal atrial fibrillation; MS, mitral stenosis; OMC, open mitral commissurotomy; MAC, mitral annular calcification.
After discharge, patients were prospectively followed-up with periodic clinical and echocardiographic evaluations up to the end point (death or redo operation). The end point of this study was June 15, 2023.
Operative Technique
Through median sternotomy, the AP was harvested and cut along with a specially designed template for the Normo valve, and the valve was constructed by suturing to the flexible ring or a strip of AP before cardiopulmonary bypass (Figure 3).
After confirming that the valve was not repairable, the native MV was removed, and the SMV made from nontreated AP was implanted. Figure 1 illustrates the procedure of implantation of the SMV. The distance between the plane of the mitral annulus and the fixation point on each papillary muscle was measured by placing a horizontal mattress stitch with a small pledget on each papillary muscle (posteromedial and anterolateral). The fixation point was marked on both legs of the SMV, and stitches that passed through the papillary muscle were passed through these marks on the SMV and tied down. We then assessed whether or not the length of the leg of the SMV decided by direct measurement was appropriate under a filling test of the left ventricle with a small amount of cardioplegic solution.
We confirmed good ballooning of the anterior leaflet (AL), a symmetric closure line, and performed fixation of the SMV to the mitral annulus using continuous sutures. In 2 patients in whom the flexible band was used to construct the SMV, an autologous leaflet was directly sutured to the anterior mitral annulus. In the other 2 patients, in whom a strip of AP instead of a flexible ring or band was used to construct the SMV, the autologous leaflet together with a thin strip of AP was sutured to the entire mitral annulus (Video 1).
Results
Early Outcomes
There were no postoperative hospital deaths or thromboembolic events. In a 30-year-old patient with severe active infective endocarditis (IE) and congestive heart failure, acute renal dysfunction occurred immediately after surgery. However, no other serious complications occurred in any of the remaining 14 patients.
Late Survival
The mean follow-up period was 100.0 ± 35.7 months (range, 11-143 months). Late noncardiac death occurred in a 72-year-old patient with trivial MR during follow-up TTE. Ten months after the operation, he underwent an emergency abdominal operation twice for bowel obstruction at a general hospital and died of multiple organ failure. The autopsy revealed no abnormal findings in the SMV, resulting in the conclusion that there was no relationship between death and this operation. The survival rate at 5 years was 92.9% ± 6.9%.
Findings of Echocardiography and Reoperation
Intraoperative TEE of all 15 patients revealed no or only trivial MR. Follow-up TTE was performed before discharge, at 6 months, and annually thereafter (mean, 6.2 ± 3.4 years). During the study period, 8 of 15 patients (53.3%) underwent reoperation after surgery (1 to 8 years after the operation). The postoperative courses of 14 patients, excluding 1 patient of late noncardiac death, were divided into 3 groups depending on the occurrence of redo surgery: Group E, early reoperation group (reoperation within 4 years; n = 4; age 45.0 ± 14.6 years); Group L, late reoperation group (reoperation after 4 years; n = 4; age 43.3 ± 16.7 years); and Group N, no reoperation group (n = 6; age 40.0 ± 17.9 years).
In 3 patients in Group E, the progression of MR was detected within 3 months. In Group L, acute IE in 1 patient, perforation of the leaflet in 2 patients, and sclerotic change of the leaflet in 1 patient were considered causes of valve failure. In Group N, the latest TTE examination, performed 7.2 ± 2.9 years (range, 6 to 11.5 years) after the operation, revealed no MR in 2 patients, mild MR in 2 patients, mild-to-moderate MR in 1 patient, and moderate MR in 1 patient; these 6 patients had been living normal daily lives (New York Heart Association functional class I or II) without taking Coumadin. Figure 4 shows the change in MR findings after discharge. As indicated in Figure 4, MR was well controlled, even when it became more than mild. Follow-up TTE of a 30-year-old man revealed mild to moderate 5 years after the operation. However, the MR of this patient involved 3 leakages and has remained stable since then. These 6 patients had been living normal daily lives (New York Heart Association functional class I or II) without taking Coumadin. Table 3 shows the changes in the mean mitral pressure gradient (PG).
Table 3.
Period | At discharge | 1 y | 3 y | 5 y | 7 y |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
PG (mm Hg) | 4.3 ± 1.7 | 5.4 ± 2.3 | 6.0 ± 2.8 | 5.5 ± 3.0 | 8.7 ± 3.9 |
N | 14 | 14 | 8 | 8 | 5 |
Values are presented as mean ± SD unless otherwise noted. PG, Pressure gradient.
Among 8 patients who received reoperation after this operation, the cause of failure was unclear in only 1 patient. This 41-year-old patient, in Group E, lived abroad before and after the surgery. Thirteen months after the operation, he underwent emergency MVR abroad for acute MR. Just 1 month before this event, he came to our institute for a 1-year postoperative examination, and the echocardiography-Doppler study revealed good performance of the valve with only trivial MR and a low PG (2.5 mm Hg). Unfortunately, we were unable to identify the exact etiology of acute MR based on the information from the hospital, although the possibility of endocarditis cannot be discounted. The other 3 patients in Group E were older than age 60 years and needed dissection of the adhesion of the AP due to previous MV repair. Figure 5 shows the intraoperative findings of redo MVR performed 14 months after this operation in a 69-year-old patient (Group E, Case 3). In these 3 patients, MR progressed within 3 months.
In Group L, active IE occurred in a young woman immediately after she became pregnant. Perforation of the AL near the large vegetation was found during the reoperation. It was considered the cause of structural valve deterioration (SVD) in 2 patients. In the remaining 1 patient, uncontrolled hypertension was a major concern at the outpatient clinic. In a 58-year-old patient with rheumatic heart disease, a reduction in the size of the huge mitral annulus resulted in several paravalvular leakages during the operation, and the technique of covering the posterior mitral annulus with a large piece of AP was considered the cause of the high-pressure gradient at the early stage. Progression of mitral stenosis (MS) was the cause of SVD in this patient. The excised SMV of the patient revealed thickening of the autologous leaflet only in the posterior side where the additional procedure was performed. There were no remarkable changes on the AL nor on the legs of the SMV.
Discussion
The Normo operation consists of the construction of the SMV using AP (like MV repair) before the institution of cardiopulmonary bypass and the implantation of the valve (like replacement).6 This is why we call this operation a repair-like replacement. This study reported the late results of Normo valve implantation. Despite excellent early results, the incidence of reoperation is high during the postoperative period. However, the patients who did not show progression of MR in the early postoperative stage were stable in the long-term.
To overcome the disadvantages of MVR, Frater and colleagues7 developed a chordal-supported SMV (Quattro; St Jude Medical) in 1994 made from glutaraldehyde-treated bovine pericardium and demonstrated annulo-papillary continuity. The Quattro valve has been used in a limited number of institutions, and good early and midterm results have been reported.7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12 However, the long-term durability remains unclear. What differentiates the Normo valve from the Quattro valve is that the Normo valve is completely flexible, made from the nontreated patient’s own tissue, composed of 2 leaflets, and anatomically similar to the normal MV.5 The advantages of the Normo operation are as follows: the valve can be constructed with a clear view without any time limit before the initiation of cardiopulmonary bypass, the competency of the valve can be confirmed following its construction, and the technique of implanting the valve is very simple and reproducible. These advantages are considered to have resulted in the excellent intraoperative TEE findings of the patients in this study. However, the major disadvantage of this operation is the variableness of the AP used to make the valve. It takes time to harvest the patient’s AP, especially in patients with a history of previous cardiac surgery. In such patients, the AP can be thickened, and the technique for dissecting the adhesion of the AP can cause microinjury, subsequently leading to perforation of the leaflet of this valve.
In this study, despite excellent early results, 8 of 15 patients underwent reoperation during postoperative period. The cause of reoperation was SVD in 7 patients (MR in 6, MS in 1) and non-SVD (ie, IE) in 1. Excluding 1 patient who received emergency MVR abroad, the starting point of SVD detected by an echocardiography-Doppler examination was a small perforation of the AL near the suture line in 3 patients, dehiscence of the interleaflet stitch in 1 patient, elongation of 1 leg of the posterior leaflet in 1 patient, and MS possibly due to an additional surgical procedure in 1 patient. In the early reoperation group, 3 of the 4 patients had MR progression within 3 months. All 3 of these patients were elderly (older than age 60 years) and had a history of MV repair, which consequently indicates a low quality of the AP. SMV remodeling is considered to occur several months after the operation. Remodeling, including transformation of the leg from a strip-like structure to a roll-like structure (Figure 5), is considered to strengthen the component of the SMV. We believe that afterload reduction is indispensable in the early stage because Normo valves with only 2 pairs of legs are structurally weak before remodeling completion. The results of changes in MR (Figure 4) demonstrated that patients who did not show progression of MR during the early postoperative stage were stable in the long-term.
Excellent early results are considered to correspond with the results of simulator testing and animal experimental studies.5,13 The stability of the valve competency shown in the results of the no reoperation group is considered to reflect the design of the Normo valve. The deep zone of coaptation of the Normo valve ensures good competency even when the leg length is less than optimal. Simulator and animal studies13 have demonstrated an excellent diastolic function of the Normo valve. However, in a clinical study,14 a postoperative echocardiography examination showed a higher mean PG than that observed after conventional MV repair. This might have been a reflection of the quality of the AP used. The postoperative mean PG of the patient using a large band (33 mm) instead of a ring remained under 5 mm Hg at 8 years after the operation, and that of 1 patient without a ring/band remained at 3.9 mm Hg at 6 years after the operation. We believe that the cause of the high PG is not the design of the valve but the quality of the AP. As previously described, the opening function of the Normo valve was evaluated repeatedly using mechanical simulator testing. In terms of generating identical testing conditions, an evaluation of the hydrodynamic function of prostheses using a simulator is far superior to the use of either clinical or animal experimental studies, with very high reproducibility of the results.
After submitting the results of simulator testing, an animal experimental study, and 14 multicenter clinical studies performed at 5 institutes in Japan between 2011 and 2015, this operation was approved by the government as an advanced medical treatment in December 2015, and clinical testing was started in January 2016. However, it was withdrawn after being performed in 6 patients, including the 4 of this study. In the present study, 10 (67%) of 15 patients had a history of MV repair, and 5 patients (30%) were older than age 60 years. We therefore considered that using the AP of elderly patients or patients with a history of MV repair is associated with a high risk of SVD of the SMV.
Limitations
This study represents the long-term follow-up of a newly developed repair-like replacement of MV. Because the number of treated patients was limited and no control group was available, statistical analyses were not performed.
Conclusions
Despite excellent early results, the incidence of reoperation is high during the postoperative period. Although the cause of the high incidence of valve failure is not clear, it appears to be related to the fact that patients in this study included many elderly and redo patients. By respecting the quality of the autologous pericardium, the Normo operation can be a viable alternative to valve replacement, especially for young patients with an unrepairable valve who wish to avoid conventional MVR.
Conflict of Interest Statement
The authors reported no conflicts of interest.
The Journal policy requires editors and reviewers to disclose conflicts of interest and to decline handling or reviewing manuscripts for which they may have a conflict of interest. The editors and reviewers of this article have no conflicts of interest.
Footnotes
IRB number: 23-027, the date of IRB approval: May 24, 2011.
All 15 patients agreed to undergo Normo operation of mitral valve using autologous pericardium with an explicit document regarding approval by the IRB and a separate consent statement declaring whether the patients provided informed written consent for the publication of their study data.
Supplementary Data
References
- 1.Kuwano H., Amano J., Yokomise H. Thoracic and cardiovascular surgery in Japan during 2010: annual report by the Japanese Association for Thoracic Surgery. Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2012;60:680–708. doi: 10.1007/s11748-012-0119-y. [Erratum in: Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2013;61:57-59] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Flameng W., Meuris B., Herijgers P., Herregods M.C. Durability of mitral valve repair in Barlow disease versus fibroelastic deficiency. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2008;135:274–282. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2007.06.040. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.David T.E., Ivanov J., Armstrong S., Christie D., Rakowski H. A comparison of outcome of mitral valve repair for degenerative disease with posterior, anterior, and bileaflet prolapsed. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2005;130:1242–1249. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2005.06.046. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Gillinov A.M., Cosgrove D.M., Lytle B.W., et al. Reoperation for failure of mitral valve repair. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1997;113(3):467–473. doi: 10.1016/S0022-5223(97)70359-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Kasegawa H., Iwasaki K., Kusunose S., et al. Assessment of a novel stentless mitral valve using a pulsatile mitral valve simulator. J Heart Valve Dis. 2012;21:71–77. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Kasegawa H., Tabata M., Shimizu A., Naito K., Fukui T., Takanashi S. A new type of mitral valve operation using a novel stentless mitral valve made from autologous pericardium for unrepairable valve. J Heart Valve Dis. 2015;24:53–56. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Frater R.W., Sussman M., Middlemost S., et al. Quattro valve trial at mid-term: 1996 to November 2004. J Heart Valve Dis. 2006;15(2):230–237. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Alsoufi B., Al-Shahid M., Manlhiot C., et al. Mitral valve replacement with the Quattro stentless pericardial bioprothesis: mid-term clinical and echocardiographic follow up. J Heart Valve Dis. 2019;19(3):304–311. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Walther T., Walther C., Falk V., et al. Stentless mitral valve replacement using the Quattro valve. Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1999;11(4 suppl 1):186–190. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Lehmann S., Walther T., Kempfert J., et al. Stentless mitral valve implantation in comparison to conventional mitral valve repair or replacement at five years. Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2006;54(1):10–14. doi: 10.1055/s-2005-865870. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Walther T., Lehmann S., Falk V., et al. Midterm results after stentless mitral valve replacement. Circulation. 2003;108(suppl 1):II85–II89. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.0000087904.06645.60. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Mohr F.W., Lehmann S., Falk V., et al. Clinical experience with stentless mitral valve replacement. Ann Thorac Surg. 2005;79(3):772–775. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2004.08.027. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Kainuma S., Kasegawa H., Miyagawa S., et al. In vivo assessment of novel stentless valve in the mitral position. Circ J. 2015;79(3):553–559. doi: 10.1253/circj.CJ-14-1113. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Kim J.H., Lee S.H., Jo H.C., et al. Long-term clinical impacts of functional mitral stenosis after mitral valve repair. Ann Thorac Surg. 2021;111(4):1207–1215. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2020.07.030. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.