Abstract
Objectives
The aim of the study was to compare a group of cats with feline idiopathic cystitis (FIC) with a group of control cats without present or previous signs of lower urinary tract disease in order to identify factors in characteristics, personality, behaviour, environment and daily life that would make them more susceptible to the disease.
Methods
The study was a matched case-control study comparing results from telephone interviews based on a standardised questionnaire. The questions were organised into six subject groups: the characteristics of the cat; the cat’s environment; the presence of other pets in the household; the cat’s feeding and drinking regime; management of the cat’s litter box; and the cat’s opportunity to perform natural behaviour.
Results
The results from the present study showed that a cat diagnosed with FIC was more likely to be overweight and to be of a nervous disposition than the control cats. In addition, several differences between cases and controls were detected at a univariable level of analysis, related to outdoor access and the cats’ perceived safety and comfort in their home environments. While not significant after multivariable analysis, these variables may still be of importance owing to potential interrelations.
Conclusions and relevance
Several significant differences between cats with FIC and control cats were revealed, and the results support the hypothesis of environmental stress as being a potential factor in the development of FIC.
Introduction
Feline lower urinary tract disease (FLUTD) is common in the domestic cat, affecting approximately 1.5% of cats treated in primary veterinary practices.1–4 Possible causes are reported to be infections, urolithiasis, urethral plugs, neoplasia and anatomical defects, or iatrogenic causes.5–9 However, when thorough diagnostic investigation does not reveal a specific cause, the patients are classified as having feline idiopathic cystitis (FIC).5,10
Several studies have reported FIC as the most frequent cause of FLUTD, accounting for 54–69% of cases.6,10–13 As reviewed by Kruger et al, 10 many theories have been evaluated with regard to the aetiopathogenesis of FIC, such as various infections, vesicourachal diverticulum, behavioural problems, dysfunctions and abnormalities in the urothelium, or neurogenic inflammation. However, a consistent cause remains to be revealed and there are, therefore, no specific diagnostic markers or consistently effective methods of therapy available.8,10,12,13 FIC has much in common with interstitial cystitis in humans, including the clinical signs, a tendency towards recurrence, comorbid conditions and a relationship with stress.10,13,14 It is suggested that these disorders may represent syndromes resulting from a variety of separate underlying, but potentially inter-related mechanisms, rather than one disease with a single uniform pathogenesis. 10
The association between FIC and environmental, psychological, physiological and pathological stressors, together with the identification of multiple abnormalities of the nervous and endocrine systems in affected cats, has led to the hypothesis that psychoneuroendocrine factors may be involved in the pathogenesis of the disease.3,12,15–18 Suggested stressors include conflicts with other cats within or outside the household, changes in diet, environment or weather, owner stress and greater changes such as moving house or the addition of new animals or persons to the household.11,12,18 The role of stress in the induction and/or maintenance of FIC is supported by studies reporting that affected cats seem to react differently to stress than control cats.17–22 Further support is gained from studies reporting positive effects of environmental and behavioural modifications in these patients.3,23 Additionally, in a recent review, Buffington presented the possibility of FIC being a part of a larger systemic disorder, with related disease processes and stress responses extending outside the urinary system – the Pandora syndrome. 24
The aim of the present study was to compare a group of cats with FIC with a group of control cats without present or previous signs of lower urinary tract disease in order to identify factors in characteristics, personality, behaviour, environment and daily life that would make them more susceptible to the disease.
Materials and methods
The study was a matched case-control study, using telephone interviews based on a standardised questionnaire, comparing cats diagnosed with FIC and control cats that had never shown signs of FLUTD.
Study population
The study population consisted of client-owned cats from Oslo and the surrounding areas presented to the Department of Companion Animal Clinical Sciences at the Norwegian School of Veterinary Science (NVH).
The cases were recruited from a group of 104 cats diagnosed with FIC, as described in a previously published study of FLUTD performed at NVH in the period 2003–2007.25,26 A total of 70 cases were included; 34 of the owners could, for various reasons, not be reached at the time of the present study.
Inclusion criteria for the FIC group in the previous study were clinical signs of FLUTD (periuria, haematuria, dysuria, pollakiuria or stranguria) and a final diagnosis consistent with FIC made by excluding other causes of FLUTD by physical examination, blood and urine analysis, and radiological examination.25,26 Exclusion criteria included any treatment that could interfere with the diagnostics (medication altering blood pressure, urine production and/or composition, hormones or medication with an antimicrobial effect) and concurrent diseases likely to be of influence on the urinary findings, such as chronic kidney disease, diabetes mellitus or hyperthyroidism. Only cats aged 7 months or older were included, and no restrictions were made with regard to sex, reproductive status or breed.
The controls consisted of 95 cats randomly selected from the patient database at NVH. A search was made for each case and the first available match not previously enrolled in the control group was chosen. The controls were individually matched in pairs with the cats in the case group by age, sex and reproductive status. Exclusion criteria for the controls were present or previous clinical signs of FLUTD (ie, periuria, haematuria, dysuria, pollakiuria or stranguria). The control group was established in 2009 and the present study performed directly thereafter.
Questionnaire
A standardised questionnaire was designed in order to evaluate aspects of the cats’ characteristics and daily life as potential factors in the development of FIC. In order to identify unintelligible questions and sources of misinterpretation, the questionnaire was tested in a pilot study that included six owners of healthy cats. Appropriate changes to the questionnaire were made based on the responses.
The final questionnaire consisted of 40 closed questions, which included checklists, two-choice or multiple choice questions. The questions were grouped into six parts according to subject: the characteristics of the cat; the cat’s environment; the presence of other pets in the household; the cat’s feeding and drinking regime; the management of the cat’s litter box; and the cat’s opportunity to perform natural behaviour. Definitions were provided for some of the terms used in the questionnaire; these were presented to the owners during the interview (see supplementary material).
Telephone interview
The telephone numbers of the cat owners were obtained from the patient database at NVH. In cases of missing, outdated or incomplete contact information, internet-based search engines (www.telefonkatalogen.no and www.1881.no) were used to retrieve the correct information. If an owner could not be reached by telephone, a letter was sent, encouraging the owner to participate in the study.
The interviews were performed in January and February 2009 by three of the authors. A script was made, and each interview began with an introduction explaining the purpose and importance of the study. The owners of the cats with FIC were asked to answer the questions based on the circumstances present at the time their cat was diagnosed with idiopathic cystitis. The interviewers were trained and, in order to increase the internal validity of the results, initially performed the interviews in pairs.
In addition to the body condition scores reported by the owners, the actual body weight of each cat was obtained from the patient database at NVH (ie, body weight at the time of diagnosis for the FIC cats and at time of inclusion for the control cats).
For the FIC cats, a substantial amount of information was also available for confirmation in the questionnaires used in the larger study of FLUTD from 2003–2006, such as description of body condition, type of food, whether the cat was defined as nervous, outdoor access, and so on.
Permission to perform the study was granted from the research and ethics committee at the NVH, as well as from the individual owners.
Statistical analysis
The results are presented as frequencies of occurrence, expressed in percentages for categorical variables and mean (standard error [SE]) for continuous variables. The relationship between the potential explanatory variables and the outcome was initially tested using a tabular χ2 analysis for categorical analyses and the Kruskal–Wallis for continuous variables. These statistical analyses were performed in JMP 10 (SAS Institute). Finally, variables with a P value <0.20 from the univariable analyses were used as candidate variables for multivariable analyses in a matched logistic regression platform in Stata/ MP13 for Windows (StataCorp). The logistic model was established using a backward selection procedure with a likelihood ratio test of 0.05 as the inclusion criteria. Model testing was performed using standard procedures, including graphical examination of the model predictions compared with outcome. Variables found to be of statistical significance in the multivariable model were tested for pairwise interactions.
Results
Study population
The inclusion of 70 cases and 95 control cats gave 1.4 controls per case. Of the cases, 56 (80%) were domestic shorthair (DSH) and 14 (20%) were pure breed cats. Corresponding values for the control group were 77 (81%) and 24 (25%), respectively (P = 0.08). Mean age was 5.7 years (SE 0.42) for the cases and 5.8 years (SE 0.36) for the controls. Forty-seven (67%) of the cats with FIC were neutered males, three (4%) were intact males, 16 (23%) were spayed females and four (6%) were intact females. Corresponding values for the controls were 60 (63%), six (6%), 23 (24%) and six (6%), respectively.
Characteristics
An overview of the univariable analyses of the cats’ characteristics is given in Table 1. More than half of the owners of the cats with FIC reported their cats to be slightly overweight (30%) or obese (21%), while the corresponding numbers for the controls were 28% and 4%, respectively. This resulted in a significant difference (P = 0.004). Mean body weight was 5.3 kg (SE 0.15) for the cats with FIC and 4.5 kg (SE 0.15) for the controls, a significant difference (P = 0.0002) that is in keeping with the body condition reports from the owners.
Table 1.
Univariable analysis comparing cats with feline idiopathic cystitis (FIC) with control cats. Part 1: the cats’ characteristics
| Variable | Alternatives | FIC (n = 70) | Controls (n = 95) | P value |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Use of the cat | Companion | 70 (100) | 92 (97) | 0.263 |
| Companion and breeding or show | 0 | 3 (3) | ||
| Rehoming (from shelter or between private homes) | Yes | 25 (36) | 27 (28) | 0.320 |
| No | 45 (64) | 68 (72) | ||
| Body condition | Thin | 6 (9) | 9 (9) | 0.004 |
| Normal | 28 (40) | 55 (58) | ||
| Slightly overweight | 21 (30) | 27 (28) | ||
| Obese | 15 (21) | 4 (4) | ||
| Nervous behaviour | Yes | 31 (44) | 24 (25) | 0.011 |
| No | 39 (56) | 71 (75) | ||
| Fearful behaviour | Yes | 25 (36) | 23 (24) | 0.109 |
| No | 45 (64) | 72 (76) | ||
| Aggressive behaviour | Yes | 6 (9) | 11 (12) | 0.527 |
| No | 64 (91) | 84 (88) |
Data are presented as n (%)
There were significant differences in the behavioural traits reported among the cats with FIC and the controls. Forty-four percent of the cats with FIC were described as nervous compared with 25% of the controls (P = 0.011). The cats with FIC were also more commonly reported as fearful (36%) compared with the controls (24%); with a P value of 0.109, this variable also qualified for inclusion in the multivariable analysis. P values >0.20 were found with regard to aggressive behaviour, previous rehoming and the use of the cats as companions or also as breeding or show animals. Consequently, these variables were not included in the multivariable analysis.
In the multivariable analysis, obesity and a nervous predisposition among the FIC cats were both found to be significant results, with P values of 0.004 and 0.011, respectively (Table 2).
Table 2.
Results from a multivariable regression model of risk factors for feline idiopathic cystitis (FIC) in a case-control study of 70 cats with FIC and 95 control cats
| Variable | OR | P value | 95 CI |
|---|---|---|---|
| Body condition | 0.004* | ||
| Thin | 1.00 | – | – |
| Normal | 0.86 | 0.819 | 0.24–3.05 |
| Slightly overweight | 1.57 | 0.537 | 0.38–6.50 |
| Obese | 7.03 | 0.033 | 1.17–42.39 |
| Nervous behaviour | 0.011* | ||
| Yes | 1.00 | – | – |
| No | 0.33 | 0.007 | 0.14–0.74 |
| Frequent change of diet | 0.033* | ||
| Yes | 1.00 | – | – |
| No | 2.41 | 0.025 | 1.12–5.18 |
P value from the likelihood ratio test of the variable
OR = odds ratio; CI = confidence interval
The cats’ environment
Of the variables regarding the cats’ environment, only outdoor access qualified for inclusion in the multivariable analysis (Table 3). The FIC cats were significantly more likely to live strictly indoors (53%), compared with controls (35%) (P = 0.020). However, despite being an obvious candidate variable at the univariable level, this variable was not found significant in the multivariable model.
Table 3.
Univariable analysis comparing cats with feline idiopathic cystitis (FIC) with control cats. Part 2: the cats’ environment
| Variable | Alternatives | FIC (n = 70) | Controls (n = 90) | P value |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Outdoor access | Yes | 33 (47) | 62 (65) | 0.020 |
| No | 37 (53) | 33 (35) | ||
| Type of area | Countryside | 2 (3) | 2 (2) | 0.985 |
| Small village | 13 (19) | 19 (20) | ||
| Suburb | 21 (30) | 29 (31) | ||
| City | 34 (49) | 45 (47) | ||
| Type of housing | Detached/terraced | 22 (31) | 41 (43) | 0.286 |
| Apartment ground floor | 14 (20) | 14 (15) | ||
| Apartment 1st floor/higher | 34 (49) | 40 (42) | ||
| Neighbouring cats | Yes | 32 (46) | 40 (42) | 0.668 |
| No | 1 (1) | 19 (20) | ||
| Not answered | 37 (53) | 36 (38) | ||
| Fighting with neighbouring cats | Yes | 20 (29) | 23 (24) | 0.612 |
| No | 12 (17) | – | ||
| Not applicable | 38 (54) | 72 (76) | ||
| Often injured fighting | Yes | 11 (16) | 16 (17) | 0.271 |
| No | 9 (13) | 24 (25) | ||
| Not applicable | 50 (71) | 55 (58) | ||
| Cat flap/pet door | Yes | 4 (6) | 7 (7) | 0.672 |
| No | 66 (94) | 88 (93) | ||
| Chooses sleeping place | Yes | 67 (96) | 91 (96) | 0.981 |
| No | 3 (4) | 4 (4) | ||
| Core area | Yes | 70 (100) | 95 (100) | – |
| No | 0 | 0 |
Data are presented as n (%)
Other pets in the household
None of the differences detected between cats with FIC and controls when evaluating variables related to other pets in the household qualified for inclusion in the multivariable analysis (Table 4).
Table 4.
Univariable analysis comparing cats with feline idiopathic cystitis (FIC) with control cats. Part 3: other animals in the household
| Variable | Alternatives | FIC (n = 70) | Controls (n = 95) | P value |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other animals in the household | Yes | 33 (48) | 40 (42) | 0.467 |
| No | 37 (53) | 55 (58) | ||
| Dogs in the household | Yes | 8/33 (24) | 12/40 (30) | 0.582 |
| No | 25/33 (76) | 28/40 (70) | ||
| Other cats in the household | Yes (1 additional cat) | 25/33 (76) | 29/40 (73) | 0.288 |
| Yes (⩾2) | 5/33 (15) | 3/40 (8) | ||
| No | 3/33 (9) | 8/40 (20) | ||
| Stable cat population in household | Yes | 29/30 (97) | 29/32 (91) | 0.322 |
| No | 1/30 (3) | 3/32 (9) | ||
| Cats eating together | Yes | 26/30 (87) | 30/32 (94) | 0.343 |
| No | 4/30 (13) | 2/32 (6) | ||
| Cats sleeping together | Yes | 22/30 (73) | 24/32 (75) | 0.819 |
| No | 8/30 (27) | 8/32 (25) |
Data are presented as n (%)
The cats’ eating and drinking regime
The univariable analyses of variables evaluated with regard to eating and drinking are listed in Table 5. The cats with FIC were significantly more likely to be meal-fed (36%) compared with the controls, where the majority were fed ad libitum (81%) (P = 0.016). There was also a significant difference between the two groups with regard to type of food presented to the cats. The control cats were predominantly fed a commercial dry diet, while the number of FIC cats fed commercial canned food or combinations of types of food was higher (P = 0.002). In addition, the P values related to frequent changes in diet among the controls (P = 0.080), more frequent use of specialised commercial diet after neutering in cats with FIC (P = 0.063) and a tendency towards cats with FIC having their food and water bowl in a less safe and comfortable location (P = 0.079) were considered eligible for multivariable analysis. The remaining factors did not qualify for further analysis (keeping the food and water fresh, the frequency of cleaning the food and water bowl with a detergent, and whether the food and water bowls were kept in a separate location from the litter box).
Table 5.
Univariable analysis comparing cats with feline idiopathic cystitis (FIC) with control cats. Part 4: the cats’ feeding and drinking regime
| Variable | Alternatives | FIC (n = 70) | Controls (n = 95) | P value |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Type of food | Commercial dry food | 47 (67) | 76 (80) | 0.002 |
| Commercial canned food | 11 (16) | 3 (3) | ||
| Homemade diet | 0 | 5 (5) | ||
| Combinations | 12 (17) | 11 (12) | ||
| Often change of diet | Yes | 24 (34) | 45 (48) | 0.080 |
| No | 46 (66) | 49 (52) | ||
| Specialised diet after neutering | Yes | 14 (22) | 9 (11) | 0.063 |
| No | 49 (78) | 74 (89) | ||
| Feeding schedule | Ad libitum | 45 (64) | 77 (81) | 0.016 |
| Meal fed | 25 (36) | 18 (19) | ||
| Comfort/safety when eating/drinking | Yes | 62 (89) | 91 (96) | 0.079 |
| No | 8 (11) | 4 (4) | ||
| Separate location for food/water and litter box | Yes | 59 (84) | 79 (83) | 0.846 |
| No | 11 (16) | 16 (17) | ||
| Fresh food and water | Yes | 62 (89) | 81 (85) | 0.534 |
| No | 8 (11) | 14 (15) | ||
| Regular cleaning of bowls | Yes | 45 (64) | 55 (58) | 0.406 |
| No | 25 (36) | 40 (42) |
Data are presented as n (%)
Only the association between frequent changes in diet and controls was found to be significant in the multivariable analysis (P = 0.033) (Table 2).
Litter box management
In the univariable analyses, compared with controls, a significantly higher number of cats with FIC had their litter box in a location that did not offer a quiet, safe and comfortable environment for the cat (10%) (2%) (P = 0.038). In addition, the control cats were less likely to have a litter box in their homes (P = 0.087). However, these variables were not found in the multivariable analysis to be significant.
The remaining differences found between the cats with FIC and controls with regard to size of litter boxes, the type of substrate used in the boxes, frequency of scooping out of the litter box or cleaning the litter box itself were not found to be eligible for inclusion in the multivariable analysis (Table 6).
Table 6.
Univariable analysis comparing cats with feline idiopathic cystitis (FIC) with control cats. Part 5: management of the cats’ litter box
| Variable | Alternatives | FIC (n = 70) | Controls (n = 95) | P value |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Number of litter boxes | Same as number of cats | 44 (63) | 57 (60) | 0.087 |
| More than number of cats | 1 (1) | 4 (4) | ||
| Less than number of cats | 22 (31) | 21 (22) | ||
| No litter box | 3 (4) | 13 (14) | ||
| Comfort/safety when using box | Yes | 60/67 (90) | 80/82 (98) | 0.038 |
| No | 7/67 (10) | 2/82 (2) | ||
| Type of litter substrate | Cat sand | 57/67 (85) | 66/82 (80) | 0.669 |
| Litter pearls | 8/67 (12) | 14/82 (17) | ||
| Litter pellets | 2/67 (3) | 2/82 (2) | ||
| Size of litter box | Longer than the cat | 64/67 (96) | 79/82 (96) | 0.801 |
| Shorter than the cat | 3/67 (4) | 3/82 (4) | ||
| Scooping out of the litter box | Daily | 33/67 (49) | 48/82 (59) | 0.244 |
| Every other day | 11/67 (16) | 16/82 (20) | ||
| Less frequently | 23/67 (34) | 18/82 (22) | ||
| Cleaning the litter box | Weekly | 29/67 (43) | 30/82 (37) | 0.736 |
| Every other week | 11/67 (16) | 19/82 (23) | ||
| Monthly | 15/67 (22) | 18/82 (22) | ||
| Less frequently | 12/67 (18) | 15/82 (18) |
Data are presented as n (%)
Opportunity to perform natural behaviour
Among the variables evaluated with regard to opportunity to perform natural behaviour, only the indication of cats with FIC being less likely to have access to an elevated vantage point (14%) compared with controls (6%) (P = 0.089) qualified for further analysis (Table 7). However, the variable was not found to be significant in the multivariable analysis.
Table 7.
Univariable analysis comparing cats with feline idiopathic cystitis (FIC) with control cats. Part 6: the cats’ opportunity to perform natural behaviour
| Variable | Alternatives | FIC (n = 70) | Controls (n = 95) | P value |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Scratching area provided | Yes | 64 (91) | 90 (95) | 0.403 |
| No | 6 (9) | 5 (5) | ||
| Climbing post/elevated vantage point | Yes | 60 (86) | 89 (94) | 0.089 |
| No | 10 (14) | 6 (6) | ||
| Degree of playful activity | Low | 2 (3) | 4 (4) | 0.868 |
| Average | 23 (33) | 29 (31) | ||
| High | 45 (64) | 62 (65) |
Data are presented as n (%)
Discussion
The present comparison of cats with FIC with control cats revealed several differences. On a univariable level of analysis, a cat diagnosed with FIC was significantly more likely to be overweight, of a nervous disposition and restricted to a life indoors. Compared with the control cats, a larger proportion of cats with FIC was meal fed and had their litter box in a location less likely to provide safety and comfort. Also, the tendencies of cats with FIC to be more likely to be described as fearful, have less frequent changes in diet, to be less likely to have an elevated vantage point in their home, and to be less likely to have food and water bowls in a location providing safety and comfort were found eligible for inclusion in the multivariable model. However, after multivariable analysis, only the tendencies among cats with FIC towards being overweight, having a nervous disposition and having less frequent changes of diet were found to be significant, with P values of 0.004, 0.011 and 0.033, respectively.
There are potential interrelations between several of the variables found to be eligible for inclusion in the multivariable analysis, which, to some extent, may explain the end results. Obesity has previously been reported in relation to FIC and FLUTD in general,6,11,27–29 and has, as a factor in itself, been shown to predispose for and exacerbate other diseases. 30 The main contributing factors to obesity are inactivity and increased food consumption. Inactivity and subsequent weight gain have been described as both a sign and result of stress, and a result of neutering.31–34 Fettman et al considered the increase in body weight after neutering primarily to be a result of increased food consumption rather than inactivity. 35 However, other authors consider changes in activity level to be of importance. Roaming may persist in male cats neutered after puberty; thus, the impact on activity level may depend on the timing of the castration. 36 In a small survey conducted among veterinary practitioners, the effects of neutering on behaviour and level of activity were found to be more pronounced in male cats than in females, a result which may explain, in part, the over-representation of neutered males among the cats with FIC in the project database. 37
While being fed ad libitum could potentially contribute to obesity, especially in cats with low activity levels, meal feeding, however, may be a source of stress to cats, forcing them to eat together with other cats and at a schedule differing from their natural eating pattern.29,32,36 It should be kept in mind that the casual connection could be the other way around; the tendency towards obesity among cats with FIC could have led to higher proportion of cats in this group being fed restricted portions of food. The lower frequency of changes of diet among the cats with FIC and the higher proportion fed specialised diets may have a similar explanation; the owners may have had special types of diets recommended by their veterinarian owing to the need for weight loss or other medical conditions.
The difference between cases and controls with regard to outdoor access may also be seen in relation to stress and obesity.12,29,32,38 Besides the obvious effect on activity level, the opportunity to leave the house at will has been shown to reduce stress and reduced chances of developing cystitis.32,38
In the present study, the owners of the cats with FIC were more likely to describe their cats as nervous and, to a certain extent, as fearful. This is in accordance with other studies and also relates to the stress association detected in humans with interstitial cystitis.9,11,12,29,32,39 Further, it strengthens the hypotheses of a psychoneuroendocrine pathogenesis and the implication that FIC may be more likely to occur in susceptible cats in combination with external stressors.12,29
The relationship between some of the additional significant findings and stress is also apparent, such as the differences detected between cases and controls with regard to levels of perceived safety and comfort related to the location of food and water bowls and litter box. Also, the lack of an elevated vantage point in the homes of some of the cats with FIC may function as a stressor, especially in combination with restrictions on outdoor access.
The cats with FIC included in the present study were predominantly DSH, and no significant difference was detected with regard to breed between cases and controls. While some earlier studies reported a possible predisposition to FIC in pure-breed cats, a similar tendency towards an increased prevalence in DSH cats was described in a recently published study of FIC.11,12,28 In the present study, the majority of the cats with FIC were neutered males (63%), reflecting the total database of FLUTD cats from which the FIC cats were selected, where 67% of the cats were neutered males. This is in accordance with previous studies of FIC and FLUTD in general and does not reflect a skewed distribution of male and female feline patients in general in the study area.4,11–13,21,27 The sex distribution in the clinic’s patient mass is quite even, although the proportion of neutered/spayed cats is greater than the number of intact cats. Urethral plugs of various composition have been suggested as an important cause or contributing factor in the development of FIC.12,40 The cats may not necessarily be diagnosed as obstructed at presentation, as plugs may dissolve or be removed in the process of catheterisation.7,12 However, the present study included obstructed, as well as unobstructed, cats; thus, the increased risk of being obstructed related to the anatomy of the male feline urinary system does not explain the large proportion of neutered males.11,27
In the aforementioned survey among veterinary practitioners on the effects of neutering, the author noted a greater impact of gonadectomy in male cats than females. In addition, the author reported that the more profound changes observed in male cats resulted in reduced sex differences; there were few and minimal differences between neutered male cats and neutered female cats. 37 These findings are, to some extent, supported by studies comparing groups of neutered and intact feral cats, and also neutered cats in private homes.41–43 Time of castration was again reported to be of importance, as it is hypothesised that in some cats reaching sexual maturity before castration, social rank and behaviour become fixed at the time of neutering. 43 Previously, an increased chance of urethral obstruction was proposed as a potential adverse effect of prepubertal castration due to underdeveloped urethral diameter. 44 This is no longer considered a risk, and, in fact, a reduced chance of developing clinical signs of FLUTD was associated with early castration in an unpublished student project at the NVH. This is in agreement with a larger study of cats adopted from shelters, where cats neutered at a traditional age (>24 weeks) were found to be of greater risk of developing lower urinary tract disease than cats neutered at a prepubertal age (<24 weeks). 45 More research is needed to determine the effect of neutering, and especially the age at neutering, on the male cats’ susceptibility to stress and subsequent development of FIC, or the even more complex stress-related disease syndrome recently presented by Buffington. 24
Evaluation of the multivariable model was found to be satisfactory. With the current design of 70 cases and 95 controls, the power at 5% significance in a non-matched study would be 69% to detect an odds ratio of 3.0 for a variable at 10% occurrence in controls, 86.0 for a 20% occurrence and 91.0 for a 30% occurrence. As our study did not reveal a large effect of matching, this would be representative for our study. A factor at 15% occurrence would represent a power of approximately 80% with this design.
The cats with FIC in the present study were all primary accession cases, in contrast to most previously published studies, which are commonly based on referred cases.7,37 This may contribute to increased external validity, reflecting the situation in general first-opinion practice. The patient load admitted to the non-referral, small animal policlinic at the NVH is considered to reflect the general patient population in the area. 46 A possible limitation of the present study, however, is the element of recall bias with regard to the cats with FIC, as the owners were asked to recall the circumstances present at the time their cats were diagnosed with idiopathic cystitis. Recall bias is more likely to affect non-consistent variables such as ‘change of food’ than more constant variables such as the personality of the cat. The magnitude of recall bias was, however, found to be minimal when comparing the data from the present study with the information available for confirmation in the database established from the study performed in the period 2003–2006, as previously described. Another potential limitation is that some of the variables examined were, to some extent, owner defined. While definitions were made for most variables, definite description of, for instance, a safe and comfortable location for food and water bowls or the litter box was considered difficult with regard to covering all possibilities. Obtaining the information through a telephone interview may have amended some of the potential shortcomings related to lack of definitions, as the interviewers were able to clarify and discuss these with the cat owners.
Retrospectively, questions pertaining to moving house or introducing new persons to the household should also have been included in the questionnaire, as some of the respondents volunteered information of this nature during the interviews. Episodes of FIC were reported, for instance, in connection with the owners having a baby or leaving the cat with an unfamiliar caretaker when travelling.
Conclusions
The results from the present study showed that a cat diagnosed with FIC was more likely to be overweight and of a nervous disposition than the control cats. In addition, several differences between cases and controls were detected at a univariable level of analysis, related to outdoor access and the cats’ perceived safety and comfort in their home environments. While not significant after multivariable analysis, owing to potential interrelations, these variables may still be of importance.
Supplemental Material
Questionnaire and definition of terms used in the questionnaire
Acknowledgments
We would like to thank the veterinarians and veterinary nurses at the Norwegian School of Veterinary Science for their help and assistance in collecting the material, and Professor Eystein Skjerve for invaluable assistance with the statistical analyses.
Footnotes
Supplementary material: Questionnaire and definition of terms used in the questionnaire.
The authors do not have any potential conflicts of interest to declare.
Funding: This work was supported by two not-for-profit foundations: Astri and Birger Torsted’s Foundation, and Veterinary Smidt’s Foundation.
Accepted: 27 April 2015
References
- 1. Lawler DF, Sjolin DW, Collins JE. Incidence rates of feline lower urinary tract disease in the United States. Feline Pract 1985; 15: 13–16. [Google Scholar]
- 2. Lund EM, Armstrong PJ, Kirk CA, et al. Health status and population characteristics of dogs and cats examined at private veterinary practices in the United States. J Am Vet Med Assoc 1999; 214: 1336–1341. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3. Buffington CAT, Westropp JL, Chew DJ, et al. Clinical evaluation of multimodal environmental modification (MEMO) in the management of cats with idiopathic cystitis. J Feline Med Surg 2006; 8: 261–268. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4. Lemberger SIK, Dorsch R, Hauck SM, et al. Decrease of Trefoil factor 2 in cats with idiopathic cystitis. BJU Int 2010; 107: 670–677. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5. Osborne CA, Kruger JM, Lulich JP. Feline lower urinary tract disorders – definitions of terms and concepts. Vet Clin North Am Small Anim Pract 1996; 26: 169–179. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6. Gunn-Moore D. Feline lower urinary tract disease. J Feline Med Surg 2003; 5: 133–138. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7. Gerber B, Boretti FS, Kley S, et al. Evaluation of clinical signs and causes of lower urinary tract disease in European cats. J Small Anim Pract 2005; 46: 571–577. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8. Westropp JL, Buffington CAT, Chew D. Feline lower urinary tract diseases. In: Ettinger SJ, Feldman EC. (eds). Textbook of veterinary internal medicine. 6th ed. St Louis, MO: Elsevier Saunders, 2005, pp 1818–1850. [Google Scholar]
- 9. Buffington CAT, Westropp JL, Chew DJ, et al. Risk factors associated with clinical signs of lower urinary tract disease in indoor-housed cats. J Am Vet Med Assoc 2006; 228: 722–725. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10. Kruger JM, Osborne CA, Lulich JP. Changing paradigms of feline idiopathic cystitis. Vet Clin North Am Small Anim Pract 2009; 39: 15–40. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11. Cameron ME, Casey RA, Bradshaw JWS, et al. A study of environmental and behavioural factors that may be associated with feline idiopathic cystitis. J Small Anim Pract 2004; 45: 144–147. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12. Defauw PAM, Van de Maele I, Duchateau L, et al. Risk factors and clinical presentation of cats with feline idiopathic cystits. J Feline Med Surg 2011; 13: 967–975. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13. Lemberger SIK, Deeg CA, Hauck SM, et al. Comparison of urine protein profiles in cats without urinary tract disease and cats with idiopathic cystitis, bacterial urinary tract infection, or urolithiasis. Am J Vet Res 2011; 72: 1407–1415. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14. Siddiqui H, Lagesen K, Nederbragt AJ, et al. Alterations of microbiota in urine from women with interstitial cystitis. BMC Microbiol 2012; 12: 205. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15. Buffington CAT, Pacak K. Increased plasma norepinephrine concentration in cats with interstitial cystitis. J Urol 2001; 165: 2051–2054. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16. Buffington CAT. External and internal influences on disease risk in cats. J Am Vet Med Assoc 2002; 220: 994–1002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17. Westropp JL, Kass PH, Buffington CAT. Evaluation of the effects of stress in cats with idiopathic cystits. Am J Vet Res 2006; 67: 731–736. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18. Stella JL, Lord LK, Buffington CAT. Sickness behaviors in response to unusual external events in healthy cats and cats with interstitial cystitis. J Am Vet Med Assoc 2011; 238: 67–73. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19. Buffington CAT, Chew DJ, Woodworth BE. Feline interstitial cystitis. J Am Vet Med Assoc 1999; 215: 682–687. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20. Hostutler RA, Chew DJ, DiBartola SP. Recent concepts in feline lower urinary tract disease. Vet Clin Small Anim Pract 2005; 1: 147–170. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21. Westropp JL, Buffington CAT. Feline idiopathic cystitis: current understanding of pathophysiology and management. Vet Clin Small Anim 2004; 34: 1043–1055. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22. Stella JL, Croney C, Buffington T. Effects of stressors on the behavior and physiology of domestic cats. Appl Anim Behav Sci 2012; 143: 157–163. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23. Seawright A, Casey R, Kiddie J, et al. A case of recurrent feline idiopathic cystitis: the control of clinical signs with behavioral therapy. J Vet Behav 2008; 3: 32–38. [Google Scholar]
- 24. Buffington CAT. Idiopathic cystitis in domestic cats – beyond the lower urinary tract. J Vet Intern Med 2011; 25: 784–796. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25. Eggertsdóttir AV, Lund HS, Krontveit R, et al. Bacteriuria in cats with feline lower urinary tract disease: a clinical study of 134 cases in Norway. J Feline Med Surg 2007; 9: 458–465. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26. Sævik BK, Trangerud C, Ottesen N, et al. Causes of lower urinary tract disease in Norwegian cats. J Feline Med Surg 2011; 13: 410–417. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27. Kruger JM, Osborne CA, Goyal SM, et al. Clinical evaluation of cats with lower urinary tract disease. J Am Vet Med Assoc 1991; 199: 211–216. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28. Lekcharoensuk C, Osborne CA, Lulich JP. Epidemiologic study of risk factors for lower urinary tract diseases in cats. J Am Vet Med Assoc 2001; 218: 1429–1434. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29. Buffington CAT, Chew DJ. Management of non-obstructive idiopathic/interstitial cystitis in cats. In: Elliott J, Grauer GF. (eds). BSAVA manual of canine and feline nephrology and urology. 2nd ed. Quedgeley: British Small Animal Veterinary Association, 2007, pp 264–281. [Google Scholar]
- 30. German AJ, Ryan VH, German AC, et al. Obesity, its associated disorders and the role of inflammatory adipokines in companion animals. Vet J 2010; 185: 4–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31. Carlstead K, Brown JL, Strawn W. Behavioral and physiological correlates of stress in laboratory cats. Appl Anim Behav Sci 1993; 38: 143–158. [Google Scholar]
- 32. Jones BR, Sanson RL, Morris RS. Elucidating the risk factors of feline lower urinary tract disease. New Zealand Vet J 1997; 45: 100–108. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33. Sloth C. Practical management of obesity in dogs and cats. J Small Anim Pract 1992; 33: 178–182. [Google Scholar]
- 34. Scott KC, Levy JK, Gorman SP, et al. Body condition of feral cats and the effect of neutering. J Appl Anim Welfare Sci 2002; 5: 203–213. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35. Fettmann MJ, Stanton CA, Banks LL, et al. Effects of neutering on body weight, metabolic rate and glucose tolerance of domestic cats. Res Vet Sci 1997; 62: 131–136. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36. Bradshaw JWS, Casey RA, Brown SL. The behaviour of the domestic cat. 2nd ed. Wallingford: CABI International, 2012. [Google Scholar]
- 37. Fogle B. The effects of neutering. http://maxhouse.com/effects_of_neutering.htm (accessed 10 April 2014).
- 38. Heidenberger E. Housing conditions and behavioural problems of indoor cats as assessed by their owners. Appl Anim Behav Sci 1997; 52: 345–364. [Google Scholar]
- 39. Kraijer M, Fink-Gremmels J, Nickel RF. The short-term clinical efficacy of amitriptyline in the management of idiopathic feline lower urinary tract disease: a controlled clinical study. J Feline Med Surg 2003; 5: 191–196. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40. Westropp JL, Ruby AL, Bailiff NL, et al. Dried solidified blood calculi in the urinary tract of cats. J Vet Intern Med 2006; 20: 828–834. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41. Barry KJ, Crowell-Davis SL. Gender differences in the social behavior of the neutered indoor-only domestic cat. Appl Anim Behav Sci 1999; 43: 193–211. [Google Scholar]
- 42. Finkler H, Terkel J. Cortisol levels and aggression in neutered and intact free-roaming female cats living in urban social groups. Physiol Behav 2010; 99: 343–347. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43. Finkler H, Gunther I, Terkel J. Behavioral differences between urban feeding groups of neutered and sexually intact free-roaming cats following a trap-neuter-return procedure. J Am Vet Med Assoc 2011; 238: 1141–1149. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44. Johnston SD. Questions and answers on the effects of surgically neutering of dogs and cats. J Am Vet Med Assoc 1991; 198: 1206–1214. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45. Howe LM, Boothe HW, Fossum TW. Long-term outcome of gonadectomy performed at an early age or traditional age in cats. J Am Vet Med Assoc 2000; 217: 1661–1665. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46. Lund HJS. Feline lower urinary tract disease in Norwegian cats. PhD thesis, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine and Biosciences, Norwegian University of Life Sciences, 2014. [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Questionnaire and definition of terms used in the questionnaire