Abstract
Background:
Breast cancer is the most common malignant tumor in women worldwide, and disproportionately affects Sub-Saharan Africa compared to high income countries. The global disease burden is growing, with Sub-Saharan Africa reporting majority of the cases. In Kenya, breast cancer is the most commonly diagnosed cancer, with an annual incidence of 7,243 new cases in 2022, representing 25.5% of all reported cancers in women. Evidence suggests that women receiving breast cancer treatment are at a greater risk of developing hypertension than women without breast cancer. Hypertension prevalence has been on the rise in SSA, with poor detection, treatment and control. The JAK-STAT signaling is activated in hormone receptor-positive breast tumors, leading to inflammation, cell proliferation, and treatment resistance in cancer cells. We sought to understand the association between the expression of JAK-STAT Pathway genes and hypertension among Kenyan women diagnosed with breast cancer.
Methods:
Breast tumor and non-tumor tissues were acquired from patients with a pathologic diagnosis of invasive breast carcinoma. RNA was extracted from fresh frozen tumor and adjacent normal tissue samples of 23 participants who had at least 50% tumor after pathological examination, as well as their corresponding adjacent normal samples. Differentially expressed JAK-STAT genes between tumor and normal breast tissues were assessed using the DESEq2 R package. Pearson correlation was used to assess the correlation between differentially expressed JAK-STAT genes and participants’ blood pressure, heart rate, and body mass index (BMI).
Results:
11,868 genes were differentially expressed between breast tumor and non-tumor tissues. Eight JAK-STAT genes were significantly dysregulated (Log2FC ≥ 1.0 and an Padj ≤ 0.05), with two genes (CISH and SCNN1A) being upregulated. Six genes (TGFBR2, STAT5A, STAT5B, TGFRB3, SMAD9, and SOCS2) were downregulated. We identified STAT5A and SOCS2 genes to be significantly correlated with elevated systolic pressure and heart rate, respectively.
Conclusions:
Our study provides insights underlying the molecular mechanisms of hypertension among Kenyan women diagnosed with breast cancer. Understanding these mechanisms may help develop targeted treatments that may improve health outcomes of Kenyan women diagnosed with breast cancer. Longitudinal studies with larger cohorts will be needed to validate our results.
1. Introduction
Breast cancer (BC) was the most common cancer in women in 157 countries out of 185 and accounted for 670,000 deaths globally in 2022 (Arnold et al., 2022a). Even though the disease incidence in Sub-Saharan Africa (SSA) is lower than in high-income countries, the region is disproportionately affected by breast cancer mortality (Martini et al., 2022),(Anyigba, Awandare and Paemka, 2021). In 2022, Low and middle-income countries (LMIC) registered more than half of the reported global breast cancer diagnoses and two-thirds of all breast cancer deaths (Arnold et al., 2022b; Wilkinson and Gathani, 2022). In Kenya, BC is a major public health concern, with an increasing incidence and mortality(Sung et al., 2021). According to the GLOBOCAN 2022 report, breast cancer was the second most prevalent cancer in Kenya and the most common cancer type among women, accounting for 25.5% of all new cancer types. Breast cancer incidence in Kenya has steadily increased over the last decade, with an estimated 2,296,840 new cases in 2022 and an estimated mortality of 66,103 women during the same year.
There is growing evidence of a bidirectional relationship between cardiovascular diseases and cancer (Bertero, Ameri and Maack, 2019; Cai et al., 2021; Guha et al., 2021; Chianca et al., 2022), whereby each can influence the development, progression, and treatment outcomes of the other. Mechanisms such as shared risk factors, systemic inflammation, oxidative stress, and endothelial dysfunction may influence this bidirectional relationship (Ganz et al., 2011; Wang et al., 2021). The regional heterogeneity in hypertension prevalence may be attributed to differences in the level of risk factors such as physical inactivity, alcohol consumption, high sodium intake, and low potassium intake (Mills, Stefanescu and He, 2020; Zhou et al., 2021; Vacca et al., 2023). Despite the rising prevalence of hypertension, particularly in SSA countries, there are few comprehensive assessments for hypertension early detection and treatment (Okello et al., 2020).
Breast cancer is associated with a chronic inflammatory state that can contribute to hypertension development (Jahan, Al-saigul and Abdelgadir, 2016; Ruan et al., 2023). Chronic inflammation is characterized by persistent immune system activation, which results in the production of pro-inflammatory cytokines such as interleukin-6 (IL-6) and tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-) (Jahan, Al-saigul and Abdelgadir, 2016; Ruan et al., 2023). Chemotherapy, radiation therapy, and hormonal therapy can all contribute to the development of a hypertensive phenotype (Darby et al., 2013; McGowan et al., 2017; Shin and Noh, 2018). Anthracyclines and taxanes, two chemotherapy drugs, have been linked to an increased risk of hypertension (de Jesus et al., 2022). Tamoxifen and aromatase inhibitors, for example, can cause hypertension by promoting vasoconstriction and endothelial dysfunction (Clarke et al., 2001; Blaes et al., 2019). Postmenopausal women with hypertension may have up to a 15% increased risk of developing breast cancer. This may be due to shared pathophysiological pathway mediated by adipose tissue, which may cause inflammation (Siiteri, 1987; Balkwill, Charles and Mantovani, 2005; Han et al., 2017)
The JAK/STAT signaling pathway is essential in many biological processes, including cell growth, differentiation, and survival. This pathway’s dysregulation has been linked to the development of breast cancer and hypertension (Roger et al., 2021; Ayele et al., 2022). In this study, we analyzed the expression profile of genes involved in hypertension to look for associations with blood pressure, heart rate, and body mass index (BMI) in Kenyan women diagnosed with and without breast cancer to determine their possible roles in either disease diagnosis, progression or treatment response, including hypertension. Understanding these mechanisms may help develop targeted treatments that may improve health outcomes of Kenyan women diagnosed with breast cancer
3. Methods
3.1. Participant recruitment, sample collection, and Ethical consideration.
The study Participants were selected from outpatient breast clinics at Aga Khan University Hospital-Nairobi (AKU) and AIC Kijabe Hospital (KAIC). The study recruited patients with a pathologic diagnosis of invasive breast carcinoma who were undergoing surgery and agreed to have their breast tumor and non-tumor tissue from the definitive surgical specimen genetically analyzed. Patients with benign breast disease were excluded from this study.
The AKU (2018/REC-80(v3)) and KAIC (KH IERC-02718/0036/2019) Institutional Scientific and Research Ethics Committees approved this study. The Ministry of Health in Kenya granted permission to transfer samples to the Laboratory of Human Carcinogenesis, National Cancer Institute (NCI), Bethesda, Maryland (MOH/ADM/1/1/81) for sequencing.
3.2. RNA Extraction and Sequencing
Fresh frozen tumors and adjacent normal tissue samples from 45 participants were shipped on dry ice to the National Cancer Institute’s Laboratory of Human Carcinogenesis in Bethesda, Maryland, for RNA extraction and sequencing. RNA extraction was performed on tumor samples from 23 participants who had at least 50% tumor composition, as well as their corresponding adjacent normal samples. Total RNA was isolated with the TRIzol reagent (Thermo Fisher Scientific) and treated with DNase.
The Agilent TapeStation High Sensitivity RNA ScreenTape was used to assess the integrity of the isolated RNA (Agilent Technologies). Total RNAseq was carried out at Leidos Biomedical Research, Inc.’s Sequencing Facility at the Frederick National Laboratory for Cancer Research. NEBNext UltraII Directional RNA Library Prep and paired-end sequencing were used on the NovaSeq S2 to sequence the samples.
3.3. RNAseq data pre-processing
The sequenced samples had an average of 57 million pass filter reads, with 93.7% of bases scoring higher than Q30. The samples’ reads were trimmed for adapters and low-quality bases with Cutadapt before being aligned with the reference genome (hg38) and annotated transcripts with STAR. All samples had a 96% mapping rate on average. Picard software was used to compute the mapping statistics. Picard’s Mark Duplicate utility was used to assess library complexity in terms of unique fragments in mapped reads. The samples contained up to 0.05% ribosomal bases and had 70% non-duplicate reads with 59% mRNA bases on average. All samples were aligned to the reference genome (hg38) and gene expression quantified using STAR/RSEM tools in NextFlow’s RNAseq pipeline (version 3.8) (Lataretu and Hölzer, 2020). The raw counts were normalized in R statistical software using the trimmed mean of M values (TMM) (Robinson and Oshlack, 2010).
3.4. Differential gene expression analysis
Differentially-expressed JAK-STAT genes (DEGs) between tumor and normal breast tissues were assessed using the DESEq2 R package (Robinson, McCarthy and Smyth, 2009). Prior to analyzing differential gene expression, Principal Component Analysis (PCA) was done to determine sample clustering using variance stabilizing transformation (vsd) normalization extracted with DESEq2 analysis in ggplot2 R package. The raw counts data were thereafter used as an input for DESEq2 analysis, with the cut-off criteria for assessing the DEGs set at |log2FC|>1.0 and adjusted P<0.05. The resultant volcano plot was depicted using the Enhanced volcano plot R package (Blighe, 2018). In the differential expression analysis, a multiple testing correction was performed using the Benjamini-Hochberg procedure to reduce the number of false positives, and a false discovery rate (FDR) <5% was considered to identify the significantly dysregulated pathways within each group sample group.
3.5. Correlational analysis
A Pearson’s correlation coefficient was used to examine differentially expressed JAK-STA genes using the packages corrplot, and psych in R. Systolic and diastolic blood pressure, heart rate, weight, and BMI were correlated with normalized counts of key JAK-STAT genes. A single data frame with clinical information parameters and normalized counts was formed, and thereafter their correlation was calculated.
4. Results
We collected and extracted RNA from twenty-three (23) tumor and normal paired samples, performed differential gene expression analysis, identified differentially expressed JAK-STAT genes, and performed a correlational analysis with patient clinical data. One sample was excluded from the study as it did not meet the quality threshold. The gene expression levels of the twenty-two (22) paired samples from tumor and non-tumor adjacent tissues were compared. A total of 11,868 differentially expressed genes from the initial 44,584 genes using an adjusted P-value of <0.05, and a Log Fc of +/−1 (Figure 3) were identified. Of the differentially expressed genes, eight (8) JAK-STAT genes were significantly expressed between normal and tumor tissues.
Figure 3:
Volcano plot showing up and down differentially expressed JAK-STAT genes, between tumor and non-tumor adjacent tissues. Each dot represents a gene; blue dots represent genes with above cutoff adjusted P-values but with insignificant log2 fold change. Red dots represent significant genes, above an adjusted P-value and log2 fold change cutoff. Green dots represent genes with significant log2 fold change but below cutoff adjusted P-values. Grey dots represent non-significant genes (NS). A significance threshold of an absolute fold change of ≥ 1.0 and an adjusted P ≤0.05 were applied.
Exploratory analysis using the Principal Component Analysis (PCA) in R showed sample clustering of the twenty-two paired breast tissues. Tumor and normal samples clustered separately as depicted in Figure 2. PCA plot visualized the overall variance and patterns present in the gene expression data, between tumor and normal samples. Additionally, the PCA plot checked for outliers in the dataset.
Figure 2:
A PCA plot of normalized RNA-Seq count data. Each dot represents a sample, and twenty-two paired breast tumors and normal tissues were compared.
Eight out of the 64 previously characterized JAK-STAT genes were key in this study (Hu et al., 2021). Six (6) genes were upregulated while two (2) were downregulated. The downregulated genes included CISH and SCNN1A, while the downregulated genes included TGFBR2, STAT5A, STAT5B, TGFRB3, SMAD9 and SOC2 (table 1).
Table 1:
Significantly expressed JAK-STAT genes with a log2 foldchange of more than +1 and less than −1, and an adjusted pvalue of <0.05. Seven genes were downregulated, while two genes were upregulated.
Gene Name | log2FoldChange | Pvalue | Adjusted Pvalue (padj) | |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | TGFBR2 | −1.927096647 | 5.91E-20 | 1.64E-17 |
2 | STAT5A | −1.764815254 | 1.94E-18 | 3.63E-16 |
3 | STAT5B | −1.114759028 | 2.17E-12 | 9.58E-11 |
4 | TGFBR3 | −2.093546869 | 7.00E-10 | 1.73E-08 |
5 | SMAD9 | −1.130709869 | 4.81E-08 | 7.41E-07 |
6 | SOCS2 | −1.60570176 | 1.08E-06 | 1.14E-05 |
7 | CISH | 1.188695794 | 0.000197662 | 0.001082063 |
8 | SCNN1A | 1.437997521 | 0.000971912 | 0.004243666 |
The correlation analysis between clinical data from breast cancer patients and the expression levels of JAK-STAT genes revealed a positive correlation between the SOCS2 gene and heart rate (see Figure 4). Additionally, the expression of the STAT5A gene showed a positive correlation with systolic blood pressure.
Figure 4:
A correlational Matrix illustrating the correlation, and statistical significance between the JAK/STAT genes and key clinical characteristics of the Kenyan breast cancer patients. The SOCS2 and STAT5A genes are positively correlated with heart rate and systolic blood pressure with a P-value of 0.05. The color-coded correlations depict their direction and strength, as outlined in the legend on the right.
5. Discussion
In this study, we investigated the association between the expression of JAK-STAT genes with hypertension among Kenyan women diagnosed with breast cancer. We also investigated whether the expression of these genes is associated with clinical parameters such as blood pressure, heart rate, and BMI. Our findings indicate significant dysregulation in the expression of eight genes and our analysis showed that STAT5A and SOCS2 positively correlated with systolic blood pressure and heart rate respectively.
Our analysis identified a significant positive correlation between the expression of SOCS2 gene and heart rate. Elevated heart rate is associated with elevated blood pressure, increasing the risk of hypertension (Reule and Drawz, 2012). Several studies have reported a correlation between the downregulation of SOCS2 gene and breast cancer pathogenesis. A study by (Sutherland et al., 2004) observed that the expression of SOCS2 inhibits the growth of breast cancer cells. The investigators reported that aberrant methylation of SOCS2 gene correlates with transcriptional silencing of both breast and ovarian cell lines and that SOCS2 gene suppressed the growth of both tumor cells. We identified downregulation of the SOCS2 gene among Kenyan breast cancer patients. These findings were also in line with studies by (Farabegoli, 2005; Haffner et al., 2007). According to (Haffner et al., 2007), breast cancer patients with a higher expression of SOCS2 gene significantly lived longer than those with a lower expression profile. In our study, we observed the downregulation of SOCS2 gene, suggesting a more aggressive tumor among breast cancer Kenyan women. Between 2009 and 2019, diabetes associated deaths in Nairobi, the capital of Kenya increased by 65% (Manyara et al., 2024). Hypertension is twice as frequent in patients with diabetes compared with those who do not have diabetes (Petrie, Guzik and Touyz, 2018), due to salt and water retention. Studies have shown a decreased expression of SOCS2 gene in diabetic patients, and there exists a correlation between diabetes and hypertension; we suggest a that a downregulation of this gene in breast cancer patients may predispose them to a hypertensive phenotype.
According to the American heart Association, normal blood pressure readings are usually less than 120mmHg, with elevated blood pressure ranging between 120 and 129mmHg. High blood pressure (hypertension) is exhibited by systolic blood pressure reading of above 130mmHg (Ali et al., 2018). We observed that 19 breast cancer women were hypertensive. We also observed a significant correlation between the downregulation of STAT5A JAK-STAT gene and systolic blood pressure. STAT5A gene is predominantly in the mammary gland (Hennighausen and Robinson, 2008). There exist conflicting findings in literature pertaining to the role of STAT5A in breast cancer pathogenesis. On one hand, there are studies that associate the STAT5A with survival of breast cancer tissues due to the role of STAT5A in promoting breast tissue proliferation (Yamashita and Iwase, 2002a; Vafaizadeh et al., 2010). On the other hand, other studies associate expression of STAT5A gene with a better breast cancer prognosis, as the gene promotes mammary gland epithelial cell differentiation (Miyoshi et al., 2001; Yamashita and Iwase, 2002b; Wagner and Rui, 2008; Peck et al., 2012).
It is established that STAT5A gene is involved in various cellular processes, including cell proliferation and differentiation (Halim et al., 2020). STAT5A also regulates endothelial function and its downregulation may reduce the ability of blood vessels to dilate thereby creating internal pressure that may result to hypertension. Additionally, downregulation of STAT5A gene may lead to excessive smooth muscle proliferation, ultimately resulting in vascular remodeling and increased vascular resistance that contributes to hypertension.
While our study suggests a potential mechanism contributing to hypertension among Kenyan breast cancer patients, several limitations should be acknowledged. The relatively small sample size and cross-sectional nature of our study may limit the generalizability of our findings. Consequently, we propose longitudinal studies with larger cohorts, to validate our results and elucidate the underlying mechanisms further.
Our study may potentially enhance the understanding of molecular mechanisms underlying hypertension among Kenyan women diagnosed with breast cancer. By studying the dysregulated JAK-STAT genes, findings demonstrate a possible synergistic and/or antagonistic molecular mechanisms associated with the dysregulation of JAK-STAT genes. Our study therefore highlights the need for further research using larger samples, to potentially decipher mechanisms involved between systolic blood pressure, breast cancer pathogenesis and hypertension.
Figure 1:
The schematic diagram shows the experimental design of isolation of human monocytes, followed by RNA extraction and performing bulk-RNA-seq.
Figure 5:
A diagrammatic representation of the positive correlation between the expression of STAT5A (5A), and SOCS2 (5B), genes and key clinical characteristics of Kenyan breast cancer patients. STAT5A gene is positively correlated with systolic blood pressure (SBP), while SOCS2 gene is positively correlated with heart rate (HR).
Table 2:
A table showing nineteen tumor samples with their corresponding Systolic blood pressure, diastolic blood pressure, heart rate, height, weight, and Body Mass Index (BMI).
Sample id | Sample type | Systolic Pressure | Diastolic Pressure | heart rate | Height | Weight | BMI |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Sample 1 | tumor | 120 | 78.5 | 83 | 163.5 | 101.5 | 38 |
Sample 2 | tumor | 134 | 91 | 74 | 160 | 71 | 27.7 |
Sample 3 | tumor | 144 | 94 | 88 | 157 | 63 | 25.6 |
Sample 4 | tumor | 125 | 84.25 | 88.25 | 168 | 95 | 33.7 |
Sample 5 | tumor | 124 | 55 | 78 | 159 | 63 | 24.9 |
Sample 6 | tumor | 121.6 | 81 | 85.6 | 170 | 77 | 26.8 |
Sample 7 | tumor | 133 | 88 | 71 | - | 90 | - |
Sample 8 | tumor | 124.8 | 70.3 | 113.5 | 159 | 70.3 | 27.83 |
Sample 9 | tumor | 132.6 | 80.6 | 92.6 | 163 | 69.1 | 25.5 |
Sample 10 | tumor | 142 | 94 | 94 | 142 | 59 | 22.5 |
Sample 11 | tumor | 101 | 64 | 75 | 148.99 | 70.66 | - |
Sample 12 | tumor | 137 | 92 | 79 | - | - | - |
Sample 13 | tumor | 172 | 85 | 71 | 147 | 50 | 23.14 |
Sample 14 | tumor | 147 | 82 | 100 | 152 | 70 | 30.30 |
Sample 15 | tumor | 150 | 87 | 64 | 164 | 84 | 31.42 |
Sample 16 | tumor | 129 | 83 | 96 | 172 | 75.5 | 25.52 |
Sample 17 | tumor | 116 | 60 | 86 | 160 | 74.4 | 29.06 |
Sample 18 | tumor | 114 | 72 | 75 | - | 67.3 | - |
Sample 19 | tumor | 113 | 67 | 98 | 162.5 | 73.8 | 27.95 |
Acknowledgement
We thank the breast cancer patients at The Aga Khan hospital Nairobi, and AIC Kijabe mission hospital for allowing us to use their tissue samples for this work.
Funding
This project was supported by the Kenyan National Cancer and Dr. Annet Kirabo Lab, specifically Professor Annet Kirabo, and Dr. Mohammad Saleem, through the following grants:
NIH, National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI): Annet Kirabo R01 HL157584, R01HL144941, R03HL155041; Mohammad Saleem AHA 23CDA1053072.
Funding Statement
This project was supported by the Kenyan National Cancer and Dr. Annet Kirabo Lab, specifically Professor Annet Kirabo, and Dr. Mohammad Saleem, through the following grants:
NIH, National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI): Annet Kirabo R01 HL157584, R01HL144941, R03HL155041; Mohammad Saleem AHA 23CDA1053072.
Footnotes
Data accessibility
The RNA-seq data analyzed in this study is publicly accessible at the GEO database under Accession number: GSE225846. All other datasets are included in the article.
Disclosure of conflict of interest
None
References
- Ali A. et al. (2018) ‘American Heart Association High Blood Pressure Protocol 2017: A Literature Review’, Cureus [Preprint]. Available at: 10.7759/cureus.3230. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Anyigba C.A., Awandare G.A. and Paemka L. (2021) ‘Breast cancer in sub-Saharan Africa: The current state and uncertain future’, Experimental Biology and Medicine, 246(12), pp. 1377–1387. Available at: 10.1177/15353702211006047. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Arnold M. et al. (2022a) ‘Current and future burden of breast cancer: Global statistics for 2020 and 2040’, The Breast, 66, pp. 15–23. Available at: 10.1016/j.breast.2022.08.010. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Arnold M. et al. (2022b) ‘Current and future burden of breast cancer: Global statistics for 2020 and 2040’, Breast, 66(September), pp. 15–23. Available at: 10.1016/j.breast.2022.08.010. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ayele T.M. et al. (2022) ‘Role of JAK2/STAT3 Signaling Pathway in the Tumorigenesis, Chemotherapy Resistance, and Treatment of Solid Tumors: A Systemic Review’, Journal of Inflammation Research, 15(February), pp. 1349–1364. Available at: 10.2147/JIR.S353489. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Balkwill F., Charles K.A. and Mantovani A. (2005) ‘Smoldering and polarized inflammation in the initiation and promotion of malignant disease’, Cancer Cell, 7(3), pp. 211–217. Available at: 10.1016/j.ccr.2005.02.013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Bertero E., Ameri P. and Maack C. (2019) ‘Bidirectional Relationship Between Cancer and Heart Failure: Old and New Issues in Cardio-oncology’, Cardiac Failure Review, 5(2), pp. 106–111. Available at: 10.15420/cfr.2019.1.2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Blaes A. et al. (2019) ‘Tamoxifen Effects on Endothelial Function and Cardiovascular Risk Factors in Men With Advanced Atherosclerosis’, 166(2), pp. 541–547. Available at: 10.1007/s10549-017-4447-6.Vascular. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Blighe K. (2018) ‘EnhancedVolcano’. [object Object]. Available at: 10.18129/B9.BIOC.ENHANCEDVOLCANO. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Cai H. et al. (2021) ‘Mechanism and prevention strategy of a bidirectional relationship between heart failure and cancer (Review)’, Experimental and Therapeutic Medicine, 22(6). Available at: 10.3892/etm.2021.10898. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Chianca M. et al. (2022) ‘Bidirectional Relationship Between Cancer and Heart Failure: Insights on Circulating Biomarkers’, Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine, 9(July), pp. 1–15. Available at: 10.3389/fcvm.2022.936654. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Clarke S.C. et al. (2001) ‘Tamoxifen effects on endothelial function and cardiovascular risk factors in men with advanced atherosclerosis’, Circulation, 103(11), pp. 1497–1502. Available at: 10.1161/01.CIR.103.11.1497. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Darby S.C. et al. (2013) ‘Risk of Ischemic Heart Disease in Women after Radiotherapy for Breast Cancer’, New England Journal of Medicine, 368(11), pp. 987–998. Available at: 10.1056/nejmoa1209825. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Farabegoli F. (2005) ‘Suppressor of cytokine signalling 2 (SOCS-2) expression in breast carcinoma’, Journal of Clinical Pathology, 58(10), pp. 1046–1050. Available at: 10.1136/jcp.2004.024919. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ganz P.A. et al. (2011) ‘Examining the influence of beta blockers and ACE inhibitors on the risk for breast cancer recurrence: Results from the LACE cohort’, Breast Cancer Research and Treatment, 129(2), pp. 549–556. Available at: 10.1007/s10549-011-1505-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Guha A. et al. (2021) ‘Obesity and the Bidirectional Risk of Cancer and Cardiovascular Diseases in African Americans: Disparity vs. Ancestry’, Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine, 8(October), pp. 1–11. Available at: 10.3389/fcvm.2021.761488. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Haffner M.C. et al. (2007) ‘Favorable prognostic value of SOCS2 and IGF-I in breast cancer’, BMC Cancer, 7(1), p. 136. Available at: 10.1186/1471-2407-7-136. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Halim C.E. et al. (2020) ‘Involvement of STAT5 in Oncogenesis’, Biomedicines, 8(9), p. 316. Available at: 10.3390/biomedicines8090316. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Han H. et al. (2017) ‘Hypertension and breast cancer risk: a systematic review and meta-analysis’, Scientific Reports, 7(1), p. 44877. Available at: 10.1038/srep44877. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hennighausen L. and Robinson G.W. (2008) ‘Interpretation of cytokine signaling through the transcription factors STAT5A and STAT5B’, Genes & Development, 22(6), pp. 711–721. Available at: 10.1101/gad.1643908. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hu X. et al. (2021) ‘The JAK/STAT signaling pathway: from bench to clinic’, Signal Transduction and Targeted Therapy, 6(1), p. 402. Available at: 10.1038/s41392-021-00791-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Jahan S., Al-saigul A.M. and Abdelgadir M.H. (2016) ‘Breast Cancer Breast Cancer’, Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine, 70(8), pp. 515–517. [Google Scholar]
- de Jesus M. et al. (2022) ‘Etiology and Management of Dyslipidemia in Patients With Cancer’, Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine, 9, pp. 1–13. Available at: 10.3389/fcvm.2022.892335. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lataretu M. and Hölzer M. (2020) ‘Rnaflow: An effective and simple rna-seq differential gene expression pipeline using nextflow’, Genes, 11(12), pp. 1–17. Available at: 10.3390/genes11121487. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Manyara A.M. et al. (2024) ‘Perceptions of diabetes risk and prevention in Nairobi, Kenya: A qualitative and theory of change development study’, PloS One, 19(2), p. e0297779. Available at: 10.1371/journal.pone.0297779. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Martini R. et al. (2022) ‘African Ancestry–Associated Gene Expression Profiles in Triple-Negative Breast Cancer Underlie Altered Tumor Biology and Clinical Outcome in Women of African Descent’, Cancer Discovery, 12(11), pp. 2530–2551. Available at: 10.1158/2159-8290.CD-22-0138. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- McGowan J. V. et al. (2017) ‘Anthracycline Chemotherapy and Cardiotoxicity’, Cardiovascular Drugs and Therapy, 31(1), pp. 63–75. Available at: 10.1007/s10557-016-6711-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Mills K.T., Stefanescu A. and He J. (2020) ‘The global epidemiology of hypertension’, Nature Reviews Nephrology, 16(4), pp. 223–237. Available at: 10.1038/s41581-019-0244-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Miyoshi K. et al. (2001) ‘Signal transducer and activator of transcription (Stat) 5 controls the proliferation and differentiation of mammary alveolar epithelium’, The Journal of Cell Biology, 155(4), pp. 531–542. Available at: 10.1083/jcb.200107065. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Okello S. et al. (2020) ‘Hypertension prevalence, awareness, treatment, and control and predicted 10-year CVD risk: a cross-sectional study of seven communities in East and West Africa (SevenCEWA)’, BMC Public Health, 20(1), pp. 1–13. Available at: 10.1186/s12889-020-09829-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Peck A.R. et al. (2012) ‘Low levels of Stat5a protein in breast cancer are associated with tumor progression and unfavorable clinical outcomes’, Breast Cancer Research, 14(5), p. R130. Available at: 10.1186/bcr3328. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Petrie J.R., Guzik T.J. and Touyz R.M. (2018) ‘Diabetes, Hypertension, and Cardiovascular Disease: Clinical Insights and Vascular Mechanisms’, Canadian Journal of Cardiology, 34(5), pp. 575–584. Available at: 10.1016/j.cjca.2017.12.005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Reule S. and Drawz P.E. (2012) ‘Heart Rate and Blood Pressure: Any Possible Implications for Management of Hypertension?’, Current Hypertension Reports, 14(6), pp. 478–484. Available at: 10.1007/s11906-012-0306-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Robinson M.D., McCarthy D.J. and Smyth G.K. (2009) ‘edgeR: A Bioconductor package for differential expression analysis of digital gene expression data’, Bioinformatics, 26(1), pp. 139–140. Available at: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btp616. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Robinson M.D. and Oshlack A. (2010) ‘A scaling normalization method for differential expression analysis of RNA-seq data’, Genome Biology, 11(3). Available at: 10.1186/gb-2010-11-3-r25. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Roger I. et al. (2021) ‘The role of JAK/STAT molecular pathway in vascular remodeling associated with pulmonary hypertension’, International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 22(9). Available at: 10.3390/ijms22094980. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ruan G.T. et al. (2023) ‘Comprehensive prognostic effects of systemic inflammation and Insulin resistance in women with breast cancer with different BMI : a prospective multicenter cohort’, Scientific Reports, pp. 1–13. Available at: 10.1038/s41598-023-31450-w. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Shin S. and Noh Y. (2018) ‘Increased risk of adverse drug events secondary to bevacizumab treatment in patients with advanced or metastatic breast cancer: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials’, Therapeutics and Clinical Risk Management, 14, pp. 833–847. Available at: 10.2147/TCRM.S148840. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Siiteri P.K. (1987) ‘Adipose tissue as a source of hormones’, The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 45(1), pp. 277–282. Available at: 10.1093/ajcn/45.1.277. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Sung H. et al. (2021) ‘Global Cancer Statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN Estimates of Incidence and Mortality Worldwide for 36 Cancers in 185 Countries’, CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians, 71(3), pp. 209–249. Available at: 10.3322/caac.21660. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Sutherland K.D. et al. (2004) ‘Differential hypermethylation of SOCS genes in ovarian and breast carcinomas’, Oncogene, 23(46), pp. 7726–7733. Available at: 10.1038/sj.onc.1207787. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Vacca A. et al. (2023) ‘Alcohol Intake and Arterial Hypertension: Retelling of a Multifaceted Story’, Nutrients, 15(4), pp. 1–14. Available at: 10.3390/nu15040958. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Vafaizadeh V. et al. (2010) ‘Mammary Epithelial Reconstitution with Gene-Modified Stem Cells Assigns Roles to Stat5 in Luminal Alveolar Cell Fate Decisions, Differentiation, Involution, and Mammary Tumor Formation’, Stem Cells, 28(5), pp. 928–938. Available at: 10.1002/stem.407. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Wagner K.-U. and Rui H. (2008) ‘Jak2/Stat5 Signaling in Mammogenesis, Breast Cancer Initiation and Progression’, Journal of Mammary Gland Biology and Neoplasia, 13(1), pp. 93–103. Available at: 10.1007/s10911-008-9062-z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Wang W. et al. (2021) ‘A narrative review on the interaction between genes and the treatment of hypertension and breast cancer’, Annals of Translational Medicine, 9(10), pp. 894–894. Available at: 10.21037/atm-21-2133. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Wilkinson L. and Gathani T. (2022) ‘Understanding breast cancer as a global health concern’, British Journal of Radiology, 95(1130), pp. 7–9. Available at: 10.1259/BJR.20211033. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Yamashita H. and Iwase H. (2002a) ‘The role of stat5 in estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer’, Breast Cancer, 9(4), pp. 312–318. Available at: 10.1007/BF02967610. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Yamashita H. and Iwase H. (2002b) ‘The role of stat5 in estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer’, Breast Cancer, 9(4), pp. 312–318. Available at: 10.1007/BF02967610. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Zhou B. et al. (2021) ‘Global epidemiology, health burden and effective interventions for elevated blood pressure and hypertension’, Nature Reviews Cardiology, 18(11), pp. 785–802. Available at: 10.1038/s41569-021-00559-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]