Editor—Smith points to increasing international awareness about inadequate supplies of vaccines and drugs in tropical countries.1 Future private-public partnerships for better supply of vaccines and medicines for the world's poorest countries with “push” and “pull” mechanisms and financial allocation of billions of dollars by the American Congress would indeed imply adequate funds for researchers and others. Nevertheless, even that exorbitant fiscal input would provide little relief to many people living in tropical countries. Funds should be spared to monitor the quality of vaccines, drugs, and diagnostics in such countries.
There have been frequent reports of the poor quality of vaccines, drugs, and diagnostics in Asia, Africa, and Latin America. In Kelantan, a state in northwestern Malaysia, the contents of 14 of 33 phials of live poliovirus vaccine did not meet the criteria of a potent vaccine.2 Assay of active ingredients of tetracycline, co-trimoxazole, ampicillin-clavulanate, and chloroquine being offered to patients in Nigeria and Thailand showed 37% of samples to be substandard; in six samples of chloroquine no active ingredient was left.3 Reagents for HIV antibody assay that had been improperly stored or were past the expiry period in a Zambian hospital had their sensitivity and specificity reduced by 11-18%. The use of blood pretested with such reagents was associated with at least a six times higher than expected risk of HIV transmission.4
The prospective international collaborators to address current issues with vaccines, drugs, and diagnostics in tropical countries should allocate money to assess the quality of these items available for local use. Representative aliquots should be retrieved for measurement of the active ingredients. Research towards standardisation of simple tests to assay active ingredients in the field is essential. A paracetamol specific test that does not require costly equipment and trained staff has been useful as an initial screening test to monitor the quality of individual tablets in the field.5
Only pilot programmes for surveillance of vaccines, drugs, and diagnostics in the world's poorest countries would determine if there was any need to stabilise them. The addition of stabilisers to labile vaccines might well ensure the full stability and utility of vaccines, drugs, and diagnostics among people in the world's poorest countries. An inbuilt programme for surveillance of these items in any global push and pull strategy would ensure that billions of dollars would assist in alleviating the misery of masses.
Footnotes
subhashji@hotmail.com
References
- 1.Smith R. Vaccines and medicines for the world's poorest. BMJ. 2000;320:952–953. doi: 10.1136/bmj.320.7240.952. . (8 April.) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Hanjeet K, Lye MS, Sinnian M, Schnur A. Evaluation of cold chain monitoring in Kelantan, Malaysia. Bull WHO. 1996;74:391–397. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Shakoor O, Taylor RB, Behrens RH. Assessment of the incidence of substandard drugs in developing countries. Trop Med Int Health. 1997;2:839–845. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-3156.1997.d01-403.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Consten ECJ, van der Meer JTM, de Wolf F, Heij HA, Henny PC, van Lanschot JJ. Risk of iatrogenic human immunodeficiency virus infection through transfusion of blood tested by inappropriately stored or expired antibody assays in a Zambian hospital. Transfusion. 1997;37:930–934. doi: 10.1046/j.1537-2995.1997.37997454020.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Roy J, Saha P, Sultana Kenyon AS. Rapid screening of marketed paracetamol tablets: use of thin layer chromatography. Bull WHO. 1997;75:19–22. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
