Skip to main content
Journal of Surgical Case Reports logoLink to Journal of Surgical Case Reports
. 2024 Jun 21;2024(6):rjae422. doi: 10.1093/jscr/rjae422

A cesarean section scar dehiscence during the first trimester of an intrauterine pregnancy: a rare case report and literature review

Fadi Alhalak 1, Sultaneh Haddad 2,3, Gabriel Nasseh 4, Mira Nasseh 5, Joud Marroush 6, Rami Abaza 7, Aya AlSafadi 8, Majd Jehad Dakhalalah Bani Hani 9, George Michael Kabbabe 10,
PMCID: PMC11190852  PMID: 38912433

Abstract

Uterine rupture is specified as a complete laceration of the uterine wall, including its serosa, leading to a connection between the endometrial and peritoneal chambers. It can occur in any stage of pregnancy and is considered a severe and perhaps fatal complication. A 35-year-old woman at 9 weeks of gestation with a medical history of five prior cesarean sections presented with lower abdominal pain that had lasted for 5 hr. We detected small amounts of free fluid in the Douglas pouch using ultrasound. Subsequently, a laparotomy revealed a cesarean scar dehiscence from a non-cesarean scar pregnancy. Patients who experience a uterine rupture may have vague symptoms, severe abdominal discomfort, abnormal uterine bleeding, and severe hemorrhagic shock, depending on their gestational age. Ultrasound imaging can be used to diagnose this fatal condition in addition to laparoscopy to immediately identify and treat the issue in urgent cases.

Keywords: uterine rupture, cesarean section, first trimester, dehiscence

Introduction

Uterine rupture is defined as a complete laceration of the uterine wall, including its serosa, resulting in a communication between the peritoneal and endometrial chambers, and this can occur at any stage of pregnancy [1]. It is a serious and potentially life-threatening complication [1], carrying a high risk of morbidity and mortality for the mother and the developing fetus [2].

The incidence of rupture in women with a previous cesarean section scar is 0.3% in comparison with an unscarred uterus, which is 1 in 5700 to 1 in 20 000 [3].

In fact, uterine rupture is a rare complication that can occur in the first trimester of pregnancy (3), even when risk factors are present [1].

Patients with a prior cesarean section were more likely to develop uterine rupture when trying a vaginal birth [3]. Short interpregnancy intervals, classical uterine scars, and misoprostol treatment can also raise the chance [3].

However, uterine rupture can occur in women with scarring from myomectomy, profound corneal resection, corneal pregnancy, trauma, and previous cesarean sections [3].

When uterine rupture manifests clinically, it usually involves acute severe abdominal pain and vaginal bleeding. Hemodynamic instability accompanied by tachycardia and hypotension may also be present in the patient [3].

Case presentation

A 35-year-old woman was admitted to the hospital after experiencing lower abdominal pain for 5 hr, with a medical history of five previous cesarean sections (CS). The last cesarean section was 2 years before the administration. There was no medical or allergic history. On physical examinations, a lower abdominal tenderness was noticed. Her vital signs were within normal ranges with a blood pressure (BP) of 110/70 mmHg and a pulse rate (PR) of 86 beats per minute indicating a stable hemodynamic condition.

An ultrasound (US) scan identified an intrauterine gestational sac with cardiac activity, a caudal-rump length (CRL) of 9 weeks, and a gestational Sac Age (GS) of 9 weeks. A small amount of free fluid was noticed in the Douglas diverticulum. Laboratory test results on admission showed a hematocrit of 33.7 g/dl, hemoglobin of 302 cells/μl, and platelets of 9.7 g/L.

Furthermore, hemoglobin levels dropped to 9.7 g/L the following day and further deteriorated to 8.7 g/dl as the patient’s hemodynamic condition worsened, with her pulse accelerating to 120 beats per minute. Ultrasound revealed a moderate amount of free fluid in the pouch of Douglas and Morrison’s Pouch with an eventration in the previous cesarean scar and the gestational sac descending to the level of this scar and starting to form an occlusal line at the upper part of the uterus (Fig. 1).

Figure 1.

Figure 1

The ultrasonographic imaging conducted the day following the patient’s hospital admission revealed a ruptured gestational sac (the lower arrow), which was apparent outside the uterus. The uterine mass was visible on one side (the upper arrow), and the gestational mass was on the other side.

Given the emergent situation, a surgical procedure was initiated under general anesthesia via a Pfannenstiel skin incision. Then, it was decided to undergo a laparotomy that exposed ~1.5 L of hemorrhagic fluid and clots, followed by isolating the uterus, during which a gestational sac with the placenta, mostly protruding from the Cesarean scar, was removed along with the placental remnants (Fig. 2) (Video 1). The cesarean scar was sutured with absorbable thread, hemostasis was achieved, and the abdominal cavity was cleaned. The abdominal layers were then closed, and a drain was placed in Douglas’ pouch. During these procedures, the patient received transfusions of 3 units of complete blood and 2 units of plasma during surgery. Finally, she was discharged in good general condition 2 days later.

Figure 2.

Figure 2

The extracted gestational sac at the end of the surgical procedure.

Discussion

The incidence of uterine rupture among women who have had a previous cesarean section is 3 cases per 1000 deliveries. Our patient had a uterine rupture in the first trimester of her pregnancy, which is extremely rare [4]. About 1 in 500 episodes of uterine rupture end in death, making it a risky condition with a high morbidity and mortality rate [5].

Risk factors for uterine rupture include a history of uterine surgery, such as prior cesarean delivery or myomectomy. While classical incisions during cesarean deliveries are infrequent, accounting for 0.3%–0.4% of deliveries, they pose a notable risk of uterine rupture in subsequent pregnancies, with reported rates ranging from 1% to 12% based on available literature. Our patient’s medical history includes a record of five prior cesarean sections, making her susceptible to uterine rupture [6].

The induction of labor in women with previous cesarean deliveries elevates the chances of uterine rupture when compared to spontaneous labor [7]. Specifically, misoprostol induction of labor heightens the risk of uterine rupture among women who have previously undergone cesarean delivery [8]. Moreover, uterine ruptures are more common in patients having Trial of Labor After Cesarean (TOLAC) than in patients choosing scheduled repeat cesarean delivery [9]. Uterine rupture is more likely in situations where there is a low Bishop score at the time of admission to the labor and delivery unit, dystocia, delayed cervical dilatation in the first stage of labor, and an extended second stage of labor [10–12]. However, our patient did not show any signs of labor or delivery.

Limited evidence supports the association between a history of prior uterine ruptures and an elevated likelihood of subsequent occurrences; however, our patient has no history of uterine ruptures [13].

Additional risk factors include a brief inter-pregnancy interval, prior preterm cesarean delivery, and a previous cesarean delivery complicated by severe postpartum hemorrhage. Our patient’s latest cesarean delivery was 16 months before her uterine rupture [14, 15].

Patients with uterine rupture can present with a broad spectrum of symptoms and signs, ranging from nonspecific symptoms up to acute pelvic pain, metrorrhagia, and severe hemorrhagic shock, depending on their gestational age. Therefore, women in their first trimester usually present with vague symptoms [1], which can lead to a diagnostic delay. Delays in diagnosis can result in fatalities and severe bleeding. Therefore, it’s crucial to have a high index of suspicion, especially when there’s intense stomach discomfort and abnormal vital signs [3]. Particularly the same as our patient, who suffered from lower abdominal pain with a good general health condition that deteriorated several hours later.

Diagnosing uterine rupture can be done by using US imaging, which helps to detect free fluids in the peritoneum, especially in Douglas and Morrison’s pouches [3], exactly where free fluids were found in our patient.

Ultrasound might not be useful in cases of fatal bleeding; therefore, a laparoscopy or other urgent diagnostic procedures may be required to identify and treat the condition right away [3], which was done to the patient after her vital signs began to worsen.

Before now, fewer than 50 spontaneous uterine rupture cases during the first trimester and the gestational sac within the uterus have been reported in the English literature since 1990 (Table 1). With only 14 cases, the gestational age was <10, including ours. The average age was 29 years (range: 19–43 years). The most common symptom that we have detected in nearly all cases, including ours, was abdominal pain.

Table 1.

A literature review of similar cases.

Author Age Gestation age Gravida/Para/Abortion Symptoms Risk factors Rupture location Treatment Follow up
1 Pridjian et al. 1990 [16] 23 13 Primigravid Hypotension, vaginal hemorrhage, abdominal pain Pelvic irradiation 7 years before Anterior fundal defect Supracervical hysterectomy and left salpingo-oophorectomy N/A
2 Dibbs et al. 1995 [17] 29 8 2/0 abdominal pain, diarrhea, and lightheadedness placenta percreta The fundus Surgical repair No complications
3 Arbab et al. 1996 [18] 34 13 8/1/ep5/ab1 Shock and acute abdominal pain Placenta percreta, bilateral salpingectomy, left cornual resection Right-sided uterine cornual rupture Surgical repair N/A
4 Arbab et al. 1996 [18] 25 8 Ab2/p2 Hemorrhagic shock Left cornual resection, bilateral salpingectomy The fundus Surgical repair N/A
5 Marcus et al. 1999 [19] 38 13 4/2-0-1-1 Spotting and cramping Two cesarean scars, placenta percreta The lower uterine segment Radical hysterectomy No complications
6 Hamsho et al. 1999 [20] 34 13 4 + 3 Abdominal pain Four lower segment cesarean sections The lower part of its anterior aspect Surgical repair No complications
7 Porcu et al. 2003 [21] 28 12 1/0 Acute abdominal pain DES Anterior fundal area Surgical repair No complications
8 deRoux et al. 1999 [22] 22 12 9/ Abdominal pain 6 curettages, placenta percreta The fundus Surgical repair Died
9 Matsuo et al. 2004 [23] 31 10 3/1 Little abnormal genital bleeding and mild abdominal pain Previous cesarean section, dilatation, and curettage The lower uterine wall Surgical repair No complications
10 Park et al. 2005 [24] 36 10 *** Abdominal pain Without The upper portion of the left fundus Surgical repair N/A
11 Dabulis et al. 2007 [25] N/A 9 N/A Abdominal pain, bloating, vomiting, and diarrhea Three previous cesarean sections At the site of the prior cesarean section Hysterectomy N/A
12 TANYI et al. 2008 [26] 32 7 6/3 Abdominal pain, vaginal spotting Right salpingo-oophorectomy Cesarean section curettage, Placenta percreta 3 cm from the dome of the uterus Hysterectomy N/A
13 Ijaz et al. 2011 [27] 32 8 3/1 Acute abdomen Manual removal of placenta in a previous pregnancy The fundus Surgical repair No complications
14 Visariya et al. 2011 [28] 26 9 2/1 Abdominal pain, giddiness, and shock Previous cesarean Lower anterior uterine wall Surgical repair No complications
15 Snigh et al. 2012 [29] 24 10 Primigravida Abdominal pain Bicornuate uterus Left rudimentary horn Surgical repair No complications
16 Tola et al. 2014 [30] 24 8 Multigravida Vaginal bleeding and generalized abdominal pain Bicornuate uterus Left part of the uterus Left part of the uterus No complication
17 Sinha et al. 2014 [31] 30 11 6/5 Syncopal attack, syncopal attack One cesarian section, history of repair uterine rupture? Upto the fundus Surgical repair No complication
18 Bandarian et al. 2015 [32] 30 11 4/2/ab1 Shock and acute syncopal attack D&C, two scars On the previous scar Surgical repair No complication
19 AKBAŞ et al. 2015 [33] 36 12 8/7 Abdominal pain Without At the side of the left uterine vessels extended to the cervix. Hysterectomy No complication
20 Taskin et al. 2015 [34] 32 13 2/1 Pelvic pain Curettage, one cesarean Posterior Surgical repair No complication
21 Okada et al. 2015 [35] 39 10 Primigravida Abdominal pain and shock Laparoscopic myomectomy The fundus Surgical repair No complications
22 Pendy et al. 2015 [36] 30 8 3/2 Acute abdominal pain with hemorrhagic shock A unicornuate uterus Rudimentary horn Surgical repair No complications
23 Hefny et al. 2015 [37] 24 9 Primigravida Vomiting and severe epigastric pain Bicornuate uterus Superior-lateral region Surgical repair No complications
24 Bechem et al. 2016 [38] 24 11 2/1 Exteriorisation of bowel through the vagina Manual vacuum aspiration Fundus Surgical repair No complications
25 Vaezi et al. 2017 [39] 34 12 2/1 Acute abdominal pain Without The fundus Surgical repair No complications
26 Miranda et L.2017 [40] 32 13 3/2 Acute abdominal pain Short pregnancy interval and previous scar The previous scar Surgical repair No complications
27 Surve et al. 2017 [41] 25 10 3/1/ab1 Shock and acute abdominal pain One previous scar The previous scar Surgical repair No complications
28 Mosad et al. 2017 [42] 19 11 2/1 + 0 Sudden abdominal pain, severe vaginal bleeding, syncopal attacks IUCD N/A Surgical repair No complications
29 Cho et al. 2017 [43] 34 7 Primigravida Abdominal pain Placenta percreta Fundus Surgical repair No complications
30 Abbas et al. 2018 [44] 24 10 3/2 Shock and acute abdominal pain Two previous scars Posterior wall and fundus Surgical repair No complications
31 Abbas et al. 2018 [44] 27 10 3/2 Severe lower abdominal pain and shock Two previous scars Previous scar Surgical repair No complications.
32 Ambrogi et al. 2018 [45] 36 9 2/1 Moderete abdominal pain One previous scar The back and the right uterine horn hysterectomy No complications
33 Takashima et al. 2018 [46] 43 11 2/1 Sudden lower abdominal pain Abdominal myomectomy and Cesarean section The uterine fundus and cornea of the Cesarean scar Hysterectomy No complications
34 Amro et al. 2019 [47] 27 12 4/2 + 1 Severe lower abdominal pain Right salpingectomy for tubal pregnancy? The fundus Surgical repair No complications
35 Amro et al. 2019 [47] 34 6 4/1 + 3 Severe lower abdominal pain Left-sided salpingectomy for tubal pregnancy? The fundus Surgical repair No complications
36 Cecchini et al. 2020 [48] 35 11 5/2 Abdominal pain, fainting, and shock Two previous cesarean sections Lower anterior uterine wall Surgical repair No complications
37 Lee et al. 2020 [49] 28 13 2/1 Pain in the right lower quadrant, nausea, and fever Placenta percreta Uterine fundus Total laparoscopic hysterectomy No complications
38 Bruand et al. 2020 [50] 18 12 2/0 Abdominal pain Abortion by vacuum extraction Uterine horn in the right side Surgical repair No complications
39. Mutiso et al. 2024 [3] 39 11 6/4 + 1 Severe lower abdominal pain, dizziness Four previous hysterotomy scars Anterior uterine rupture Surgical repair No complications
40 Faraj et al. 2022 [1] 28 9 2/1 Abdominal pain and metrorrhagia Previous cesarean scar In the anterior uterine wall Surgical repair No complications

In most cases, the rupture was localized in the fundus of the uterus (15/40).

In all cases, surgery was resorted to, whether through repair or radical excision, and in all cases, no complications were observed except for one patient who died due to hemorrhagic shock [22].

Conclusion

Women who are pregnant and primarily in the first trimester with a history of cesarean sections should receive extra care. Uterine ruptures should be taken into mind, particularly when risk factors including a history of cesarean delivery, myomectomy, or uterine scarring are present. In addition, when symptoms like pain in the abdomen appear, uterine rupture should be considered, and it is crucial to confirm that there is no free fluid in the Douglas pouch to protect the patient.

Supplementary Material

Video_1_rjae422
Download video file (2.9MB, mov)
Video_legends_rjae422

Contributor Information

Fadi Alhalak, University Hospital of Obstetrics and Gynecology in Damascus, G76Q+3RH, Damascus, Syrian Arab Republic.

Sultaneh Haddad, Children's Hospital Damascus, Syrian Arab Republic; Stemosis for Scientific Research, Damascus, Syrian Arab Republic.

Gabriel Nasseh, University of Aleppo Faculty of Medicine, 646G+8FG, Aleppo, Syrian Arab Republic.

Mira Nasseh, University of Aleppo Faculty of Medicine, 646G+8FG, Aleppo, Syrian Arab Republic.

Joud Marroush, Syrian Private University, M5, Damascus, Syrian Arab republic.

Rami Abaza, Damascus University Faculty of Medicine, G748+VRH, Damascus, Syrian Arab Republic.

Aya AlSafadi, Syrian Private University, M5, Damascus, Syrian Arab republic.

Majd Jehad Dakhalalah Bani Hani, Yarmouk University, Shafiq Irshidat st., Irbid, Jordan.

George Michael Kabbabe, University of Aleppo Faculty of Medicine, 646G+8FG, Aleppo, Syrian Arab Republic.

References

  • 1. Faraj C, Chait F, Elharras Y, et al. A rare case of uterine rupture in the first trimester of pregnancy: case report and review of literature. Radiol Case Rep 2024;19:2202–5. 10.1016/j.radcr.2024.02.055. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2. Michael JT. Uterine rupture. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol 2002;16:69–79. 10.1053/beog.2001.0256. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3. Mutiso SK, Oindi FM, Mundia DM. Uterine rupture in the first trimester: a case report and review of the literature. J Med Case Rep 2024;18:5. 10.1186/s13256-023-04318-w. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4. Guise JM, Eden K, Emeis C, et al. Vaginal birth after cesarean: new insights. Evid Rep Technol Assess 2010;191:1–397. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5. Guise JM, McDonagh MS, Osterweil P, et al. Systematic review of the incidence and consequences of uterine rupture in women with previous caesarean section. BMJ 2004;329:19–25. 10.1136/bmj.329.7456.19. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6. Landon MB, Lynch CD. Optimal timing and mode of delivery after cesarean with previous classical incision or myomectomy: a review of the data. Semin Perinatol 2011;35:257–61. 10.1053/j.semperi.2011.05.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7. Rossi AC, Prefumo F. Pregnancy outcomes of induced labor in women with previous cesarean section: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Arch Gynecol Obstet 2015;291:273–80. 10.1007/s00404-014-3444-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8. Aslan H, Unlu E, Agar M, et al. Uterine rupture associated with misoprostol labor induction in women with previous cesarean delivery. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2004;113:45–8. 10.1016/S0301-2115(03)00363-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9. National Institutes of Health consensus development conference statement: vaginal birth after cesarean: new insights March 8-10, 2010. Obstet Gynecol 2010;115:1279–95. 10.1097/AOG.0b013e3181e459e5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10. Hamilton EF, Bujold E, McNamara H, et al. Dystocia among women with symptomatic uterine rupture. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2001;184:620–4. 10.1067/mob.2001.110293. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11. Khan KS, Rizvi A. The partograph in the management of labor following cesarean section. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 1995;50:151–7. 10.1016/0020-7292(95)02431-b. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12. Vachon-Marceau C, Demers S, Goyet M, et al. Labor dystocia and the risk of uterine rupture in women with prior cesarean. Am J Perinatol 2016;33:577–83. 10.1055/s-0035-1570382. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13. Fox NS. Pregnancy outcomes in patients with prior uterine rupture or dehiscence: a 5-year update. Obstet Gynecol 2020;135:211–2. 10.1097/AOG.0000000000003622. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14. Landon MB. Predicting uterine rupture in women undergoing trial of labor after prior cesarean delivery. Semin Perinatol 2010;34:267–71. 10.1053/j.semperi.2010.03.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15. Al-Zirqi I, Daltveit AK, Forsén L, et al. Risk factors for complete uterine rupture. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2017;216:165.e1–8. 10.1016/j.ajog.2016.10.017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16. Pridjian G, Rich NE, Montag AG. Pregnancy hemoperitoneum and placenta percreta in a patient with previous pelvic irradiation and ovarian failure. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1990;162:1205–6. 10.1016/0002-9378(90)90018-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17. Dibbs KI, Ball RH, Huettner PC. Spontaneous uterine rupture and hemoperitoneum in the first trimester. Am J Perinatol 1995;12:439–41. 10.1055/s-2007-994516. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18. Arbab F, Boulieu D, Bied V, et al. Uterine rupture in first or second trimester of pregnancy after in-vitro fertilization and embryo transfer. Hum Reprod 1996;11:1120–2. 10.1093/oxfordjournals.humrep.a019308. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19. Marcus S, Cheng E, Goff B. Extrauterine pregnancy resulting from early uterine rupture. Obstet Gynecol 1999;94:804–5. 10.1016/s0029-7844(99)00492-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20. Hamsho A, Alloub M. Spontaneous rupture of a 13 week gravid scarred uterus. J Obstet Gynaecol 1999;19:316–7. 10.1080/01443619965237. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21. Porcu G, Courbière B, Sakr R, et al. Spontaneous rupture of a first-trimester gravid uterus in a woman exposed to diethylstilbestrol in utero. A case report. J Reprod Med 2003;48:744–6. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22. deRoux SJ, Prendergast NC, Adsay NV. Spontaneous uterine rupture with fatal hemoperitoneum due to placenta accreta percreta: a case report and review of the literature. Int J Gynecol Pathol 1999;18:82–6. 10.1097/00004347-199901000-00013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23. Matsuo K, Shimoya K, Shinkai T, et al. Uterine rupture of cesarean scar related to spontaneous abortion in the first trimester. J Obstet Gynaecol Res 2004;30:34–6. 10.1111/j.1341-8076.2004.00152.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24. Park YJ, Ryu KY, Lee JI, et al. Spontaneous uterine rupture in the first trimester: a case report. J Korean Med Sci 2005;20:1079–81. 10.3346/jkms.2005.20.6.1079. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25. Dabulis SA, McGuirk TD. An unusual case of hemoperitoneum: uterine rupture at 9 weeks gestational age. J Emerg Med 2007;33:285–7. 10.1016/j.jemermed.2007.01.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26. Tanyi JL, Coleman NM, Johnston ND, et al. Placenta percreta at 7th week of pregnancy in a woman with previous caesarean section. J Obstet Gynaecol 2008;28:338–40. 10.1080/01443610802047828. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27. Ijaz S, Mahendru A, Sanderson D. Spontaneous uterine rupture during the 1st trimester: a rare but life-threatening emergency. J Obstet Gynaecol 2011;31:772. 10.3109/01443615.2011.606932. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28. Visariya N, Purandare CN, Bandukwalla V, et al. First trimester uterine rupture previous lower segment cesarean scar. J Obstet Gynaecol India 2011;61:88–9. 10.1007/s13224-011-0010-2. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 29. Singh N, Singh U, Verma ML. Ruptured bicornuate uterus mimicking ectopic pregnancy: a case report. J Obstet Gynaecol Res 2013;39:364–6. 10.1111/j.1447-0756.2012.01914.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30. Tola EN. First trimester spontaneous uterine rupture in a young woman with uterine anomaly. Case Rep Obstet Gynecol 2014;2014:967386. 10.1155/2014/967386. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31. Sinha P, Agrawal NR. Spontaneous uterine rupture in first trimester of pregnancy. Int J Reprod Contracept Obstet Gynecol 2014;3:831–2. 10.5455/2320-1770.ijrcog20140956. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 32. Bandarian M, Bandarian F. Spontaneous rupture of the uterus during the 1st trimester of pregnancy. J Obstet Gynaecol 2015;35:199–200. 10.3109/01443615.2014.937334. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33. Akbaş M, Ömeroğlu I, Birge Ö. Spontaneous uterine rupture with retroperitoneal hematoma in the first trimester: case report. J Clin Obstet Gynecol 2015;25:205–8. [Google Scholar]
  • 34. Taskin MI, Adali E. Spontaneous uterine rupture in the first trimester with missed fetus. J Cases Obstet Gynecol 2015;2:97–9. [Google Scholar]
  • 35. Okada Y, Hasegawa J, Mimura T, et al. Uterine rupture at 10 weeks of gestation after laparoscopic myomectomy. J Med Ultrason (2001) 2016;43:133–6. 10.1007/s10396-015-0665-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36. Pandey D, Tripathi BN, Mishra P. Rudimentary horn pregnancy: a rare first trimester acute presentation. Int J Women’s Heal Reprod Sci 2015;3:115–7. 10.15296/ijwhr.2015.23. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 37. Hefny AF, Kunhivalappil FT, Nambiar R, et al. A rare case of first-trimester ruptured bicornuate uterus in a primigravida. Int J Surg Case Rep 2015;14:98–100. 10.1016/j.ijscr.2015.07.019. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38. Bechem E, Leopold D, Ako TW. Small bowel exteriorisation after uterine perforation from manual vacuum aspiration for abortion in a young cameroonian: a case report. Pan Afr Med J 2016;25:198. 10.11604/pamj.2016.25.198.10006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39. Vaezi M. Unexpected rupture of unscarred uterus at 12 weeks of pregnancy: a case report and literature review. Int J Womens Health Reprod Sci 2017;5:339–41. 10.15296/ijwhr.2017.57. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 40. Miranda A, Castro L, Rocha MJ, et al. Uterine rupture in early pregnancy. Int J Pregn & Chi Birth 2017;2:186–8. 10.15406/ipcb.2017.02.00046. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 41. Surve M, Pawar S, Panigrahi PP. A case report of first trimester spontaneous uterine scar rupture. MIMER Med J 2017;1:26–8. [Google Scholar]
  • 42. Mosad A, Altraigey A. Scar pregnancy and spontaneous rupture uterus - a case report. Ginekol Pol 2017;88:698–9. 10.5603/GP.a2017.0124. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43. Cho MK, Ryu HK, Kim CH. Placenta percreta-induced uterine rupture at 7th week of pregnancy after In vitro fertilization in a primigravida woman: case report. J Emerg Med 2017;53:126–9. 10.1016/j.jemermed.2017.01.041. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44. Abbas AM, Hussein RS, Ali MN, et al. Spontaneous first trimester posterior uterine rupture in a multiparous woman with scarred uterus: a case report. Middle East Fertil Soc J 2018;23:81–3. 10.1016/j.mefs.2017.07.007. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 45. Ambrogi G, Ambrogi G, Marchi AA. Placenta percreta and uterine rupture in the first trimester of pregnancy. Case Rep Obstet Gynecol 2018;2018:6842892. 10.1155/2018/6842892. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46. Takashima A, Takeshita N, Kinoshita T. A case of scarred uterine rupture at 11 weeks of gestation having a uterine scar places induced by in vitro fertilization-embryo transfer. Clin Pract 2018;8:1038. 10.4081/cp.2018.1038. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47. Amro B, Lotfi G. Spontaneous rupture of an unscarred uterus in early pregnancy: a rare but life-threatening emergency. BMJ Case Rep 2019;12:e228493. 10.1136/bcr-2018-228493. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48. Cecchini F, Tassi A, Londero AP, et al. First trimester uterine rupture: a case report and literature review. Int J Environ Res Public Health 2020;17:2976. 10.3390/ijerph17082976. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49. Lee F, Zahn K, Knittel AK, et al. Laparoscopic hysterectomy to manage uterine rupture due to placenta percreta in the first trimester: a case report. Case Rep Women's Health 2019;25:e00165. 10.1016/j.crwh.2019.e00165. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50. Bruand M, Thubert T, Winer N, et al. Rupture of non-communicating rudimentary horn of uterus at 12 weeks' gestation. Cureus 2020;12:e7191. 10.7759/cureus.7191. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Video_1_rjae422
Download video file (2.9MB, mov)
Video_legends_rjae422

Articles from Journal of Surgical Case Reports are provided here courtesy of Oxford University Press

RESOURCES