Abstract
Objective:
To determine whether socio-demographic and preoperative clinical factors contribute to the percent total body weight loss (%TBWL) after bariatric surgery (BS).
Background:
BS is the most effective long-term treatment for medically complicated obesity. More information is needed about the factors that contribute to postoperative %TBWL in large and ethnically diverse cohorts.
Methods:
This retrospective study conducted in the Kaiser Permanente Northern California region included 7698 patients who underwent Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) or sleeve gastrectomy (SG) between January 2009 and March 2015. Trajectory analyses were conducted from 5-year follow-up data to assign patients to “low,” “average,” or “high” postoperative %TBWL groups. We then evaluated whether age, sex, race/ethnicity, neighborhood deprivation index and preoperative body mass index (BMI)/weight loss, diabetes, hypertension, and sleep apnea contributed to postoperative %TBWL using logistic regression models.
Results:
Of 7698 patients (83.2% women), 48.6% underwent a RYGB and 51.4% underwent a SG. Postoperative %TBWL trajectories over 5 years were obtained in 6229 (81%) of 7698 eligible patients. About 27.8% and 29.3% of patients followed the “low” postoperative %TBWL trajectory, for RYGB and SG, respectively. Men, older patients, and Asian, Black, and Hispanic/Latino patients were more likely to be classified in the low postoperative %TBWL group. Patients showing lower postoperative %TBWL had a lower preoperative BMI (but lost less weight before surgery) and were more likely to have preoperative comorbidities.
Conclusions:
This study confirms and extends prior findings of the effects of several demographic and preoperative clinical factors on postoperative weight loss. Findings could improve the support of patients to achieve desired surgical outcomes.
Keywords: bariatric surgery, gastric bypass, gender, health determinants, obesity, race/ethnicity, Roux-en-Y, sleeve gastrectomy, socio-demographics
Mini-abstract:
Of 6229 individuals who underwent Roux-en-Y gastric bypass or sleeve gastrectomy, men, older patients, those with preoperative comorbidities, and Asian, Black, and Hispanic/Latino individuals were more likely to have low weight loss (LWL) after surgery. Identifying risk factors for LWL after surgery is important to improve postoperative outcomes.
INTRODUCTION
Bariatric surgery (BS) is currently the most effective long-term treatment for medically complicated obesity,1 but the degree of weight loss after surgery is inconsistent, with an estimated 20% of patients failing to achieve or maintain greater than 50% loss of their excess body weight.2–4 As the number of bariatric procedures performed in the United States rises,5 it is essential to understand the factors that influence the efficacy of BS on weight loss.
Previous bariatric epidemiological observational studies6–9 have suggested the moderating effects of several demographic and clinical factors on postoperative weight loss, such as age, sex, and preoperative body mass index (BMI). Most of these studies6,7,10–13 have been limited in sample size (N < 500 patients) and were restricted to mainly White individuals, making their findings ungeneralizable. Important preoperative comorbidities associated with severe obesity such as diabetes, hypertension, and sleep apnea are under-investigated in regard to their contribution to long-term postoperative weight loss.14 Further, most prior epidemiological studies have focused solely on one type of BS, the Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB). Though the RYGB was at the forefront of bariatric procedures for the past 2 decades, the sleeve gastrectomy (SG) has become the most performed BS in the United States.5 Importantly, recent studies appear to indicate that long-term weight loss outcomes after SG may be inferior compared to those of the RYGB.15–17 Thus, additional studies that consider both procedures performed in large and ethnically diverse cohorts are needed.
To address these gaps and limitations of previous studies, we conducted a retrospective longitudinal study on 7698 patients from a large and multiethnic BS cohort. We evaluated whether socio-demographic and preoperative clinical factors independently contribute to postoperative percent total body weight loss (%TBWL) using data from 5 years of follow-up. Our large and diverse longitudinal study serves to clarify and provide insight into the risk factors that affect postoperative weight loss.
METHODS
Study Population
All patients were members of the Kaiser Permanente Medical Care Plan, Northern California region (KPNC), an integrated healthcare delivery system that includes ongoing longitudinal electronic health records (EHR). Patients who entered the BS program were part of the KPNC BS cohort, which comprises over 18,000 adult men and women patients, as of 2023, whose primary operation was performed between 2009 and 2023. Patients from the KPNC BS cohort were recruited at their preoperative BS clinic appointments, and health information, including preoperative comorbidities, operative records, and weight loss metrics were collected in a similar manner for each patient.
For this study, we identified 7698 patients among the KPNC BS cohort who underwent either RYGB or SG between January 5, 2009 and March 1, 2015. RYGB and SG patients were identified by current procedural terminology (CPT) procedure codes (eg, 43644, 43645, 43846, 43847, 43775, and 43999) which were recorded in the EHR system. As the SG procedure received a unique CPT code in 2010, we identified patients who underwent SG before that based on having a BMI > 30 kg/m2 and the partial gastrectomy CPT code. Further, these cases were done at KPNC medical centers performing BS and by surgeons identified as bariatric surgeons. This date range was chosen to ensure a follow-up period of 5 years and to avoid the potential influence of the COVID-19 pandemic on patient’s lifestyle changes in weight. The Institutional Review Board of the Kaiser Foundation Research Institute approved all study procedures. Written informed consent was obtained from all participants.
Primary Outcome
Postoperative %TBWL is the gold standard for measuring the extent of weight loss after BS.18–20 Postoperative %TBWL is calculated as follows: [(initial weight)–(postop weight)]/[(initial weight)] × 100.
Socio-Demographic Factors
Data on age at surgery, sex, and self-reported race/ethnicity were captured from the EHR for each patient. As an indicator of socio-economic status, we used a neighborhood deprivation index (NDI) based on the home address available in the EHR.
Preoperative Clinical Factors
Health information included preoperative BMI (assessed between the surgery date and 2 months prior), preoperative comorbidities (ie, diabetes, hypertension, and sleep apnea), and preoperative weight loss. Preoperative BMI and weight loss were obtained from the patients’ EHR. Diagnoses for preoperative diabetes (type 1 or 2), hypertension, and sleep apnea were based on the International Classification of Disease, Ninth (ICD-9) or Tenth Revision (ICD-10) diagnosis codes recorded in the EHR system.
Postoperative Follow-Up of Weight Loss and Type of Surgery
Patients were scheduled for follow-up visits at 6 months and 12 months after BS and then yearly thereafter. Information on the type of surgery (ie, RYGB or SG) and weight loss after surgery for the selected period of 5 years (including 6 postoperative follow-up time points: 6, 12, 24, 36, 48, and 60 months) were captured in a database internal to the KPNC BS cohort.
Postoperative %TBWL Trajectory Group Analysis
According to postoperative %TBWL based on the 6 postoperative follow-up time points, patients were assigned to 3 trajectory groups [ie, low weight loss (LWL), average weight loss (AWL), and high weight loss (HWL)] by semiparametric trajectory analysis. This semiparametric trajectory-based methodology has been shown to be an accurate method to estimate weight loss over time and has been largely used to analyze longitudinal weight loss data.2,6,9,21 Postoperative %TBWL trajectories were estimated for each patient by latent class growth analysis implemented using Proc Traj in SAS 9.4 (SAS Institute Inc.).22,23 Proc Traj can handle data that are missing completely at random, yet at least 3 time points per patient was set as inclusion criteria. Furthermore, to minimize classification error, follow-up time points with less than 50% completeness were excluded from weight loss trajectory analysis, and patients showing a posterior probability of class assignment less than 0.7 were excluded, as previously done.2,24 Consequently, we excluded 1469 patients from trajectory analyses due to follow-up attrition or posterior probability of class assignment <0.7. A total of 6229 patients were included in the trajectory analyses (Fig. 1), and the 6 follow-up time points (ie, 6, 12, 24, 36, 48, and 60 months) were further analyzed. Spaghetti plots showing the percentage of postoperative TBWL of the included patients over the 6 postoperative follow-up time points were generated in R (version 4.1.2) (https://www.R-project.org) using the “ggplot2” package. A Wald statistical test was used to determine whether the trajectory groups were significantly different. Patients from the AWL and HWL groups were reassigned into a combined (HWL+AWL) group to compare them with patients from the LWL group. The different analyses conducted in this study are summarized in an overview diagram (Fig. 1).
FIGURE 1.
Flow diagram of the study design and study participants included in the analyses. %TBWL indicates percentage total body weight loss; AWL, average weight loss; HWL, high weight loss; KPNC, Kaiser Permanente Northern California; LWL, low weight loss.
Postoperative %TBWL Logistic Models
Based on postoperative %TBWL trajectory groups, a predictive model of weight loss response to the BS, including socio-demographic and clinical variables was assessed by multivariate logistic regression. Socio-demographic (ie, age, sex, race/ethnicity, and NDI), preoperative clinical variables (BMI, weight loss, diabetes, hypertension, and sleep apnea), and type of BS were tested independently and added to a multivariate model when showing statistical significance (P < 0.05).
Statistical Analyses
In addition to the overall analyses, with RYGB and SG data combined, we also conducted stratified analyses by BS type (ie, RYGB or SG analyzed separately). Sex-stratified and race/ethnicity-stratified analyses were also conducted. All tests were 2-sided, and P < 0.05 was considered significant. Both binary logistic and multivariate models were performed using R (version 4.1.2) glm function.
RESULTS
The KPNC Bariatric Surgery Cohort
Of the 7698 patients studied, around 48.6% of patients underwent a RYGB and around 51.4% underwent a SG (Table 1). The majority of individuals were female (83.2%), and the mean (SD) age at surgery was 44.5 (10.8) years. White patients accounted for the largest ethnic group (57.3%) followed by Hispanic/Latino (23.2%), Black (12.2%), and Asian (2.9%) individuals. Hypertension was the most prevalent preoperative comorbidity (51.4%), followed by sleep apnea (43.4%), and diabetes (28.5%). The average preoperative BMI was similar for individuals who underwent RYGB or SG. Although the mean preoperative %TBWL for patients who underwent RYGB was slightly higher (8.4%) than of those who underwent SG (7.8%), there was not a significant difference that was noted. Postoperative %TBWL data completeness varied from a maximum of 91.7% at 12 months to a minimum of 68.4% at 60 months after surgery (Table 1).
TABLE 1.
KPNC Bariatric Surgery Cohort: Patients’ Characteristics
| Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass | Sleeve Gastrectomy | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| N Ind. | % | N Ind. | % | ||
| Total | 3741 | 100% | 3957 | 100% | |
| Sex | Female | 3139 | 83.9% | 3267 | 82.6% |
| Male | 602 | 16.1% | 690 | 17.4% | |
| Race/ethnicity | Asian | 101 | 2.7% | 126 | 3.2% |
| Black | 410 | 11.0% | 529 | 13.4% | |
| Hispanic/Latino | 919 | 24.6% | 870 | 22.0% | |
| White | 2140 | 57.2% | 2269 | 57.3% | |
| Other* | 171 | 4.6% | 163 | 4.1% | |
| Age (in years) at surgery, Mean ± SD | 44.5 ± 10.8 | 44.4 ± 11.0 | |||
| BMI (in kg/m2) at surgery, Mean ± SD | 42.4 ± 6.3 | 42.0 ± 6.1 | |||
| Preoperative comorbidities | Diabetes | 1294 | 34.6% | 901 | 22.8% |
| Hypertension | 2009 | 53.7% | 1949 | 49.3% | |
| Sleep apnea | 1570 | 42.0% | 1773 | 44.8% | |
| Preoperative weight loss, Mean ± SD | TBWL (%) | 8.4 ± 4.0 | 7.8 ± 3.5 | ||
| Follow-up after surgery | N months postsurgery | Mean ± SD | N Ind. (%) | Mean ± SD | N Ind. (%) |
| Postoperative TBWL (%) | 6 | 32.0 ± 6.3 | 3086 (82.5%) | 29.4 ± 6.6 | 3211 (81.1%) |
| 12 | 35.6 ± 7.9 | 3452 (92.3%) | 31.4 ± 8.5 | 3605 (91.1%) | |
| 24 | 34.9 ± 9.1 | 3009 (80.4%) | 29.5 ± 9.8 | 3145 (79.5%) | |
| 36 | 32.3 ± 9.7 | 2786 (74.5%) | 26.3 ± 10.2 | 2936 (74.2%) | |
| 48 | 30.2 ± 9.9 | 2689 (71.9%) | 24.1 ± 10.4 | 2849 (72.0%) | |
| 60 | 28.8 ± 10.3 | 2566 (68.6%) | 22.6 ± 10.5 | 2705 (68.4%) | |
Other” race/ethnicity category included patients who self-reported “other” or “don’t know” or if patients self-selected multiethnic categories.
BMI indicates body mass index; Ind., individuals; N, number; SD, standard deviation; TBWL, total body weight loss.
Interindividual Variability in Postoperative %TBWL
We detected significant interindividual variability in %TBWL after both RYGB and SG. We found that 27.8%, 48.0%, and 24.2% of RYGB patients were assigned to the LWL, AWL, and HWL group, respectively (Fig. 2) and that 29.3%, 46.6%, and 24.1% of SG patients were assigned to the LWL, AWL, and HWL group, respectively (Fig. 3). The average of %TBWL for each group (LWL, AWL, and HWL group) at 6, 12, 24, 36, 48, and 60 months after surgery are reported in Supplemental Tables 1 and 2, see http://links.lww.com/AOSO/A349. Using a Wald test, we confirmed that the 3 trajectory groups were significantly different (χ2 = 3479.2 and P = 2.2 × 10−16 for RYGB; χ2 = 4870.9 and P = 2.2 × 10−16 for SG). Because the type of surgery (RYGB vs SG) was not significantly associated with postoperative %TBWL trajectory group assignment (Table 2), the trajectory groups were combined across surgery types (eg, RYGB LWL+SG LWL) (Supplemental Figure 1, see http://links.lww.com/AOSO/A349). However, individual surgery type (ie, RYGB and SG) results from the binary logistic and multivariate models are reported in Supplemental Tables 3 and 4, see http://links.lww.com/AOSO/A349.
FIGURE 2.
Roux-En-Y gastric bypass postoperative %TBWL trajectories. Spaghetti plots showing the percentage of postoperative %TBWL of the included 3021 patients (who underwent Roux-en-Y gastric bypass) over the 6 postoperative follow-up time points (6, 12, 24, 36, 48, and 60 months). The 3 trajectory groups [ie, low weight loss (LWL), average weight loss (AWL), and high weight loss (HWL)] were represented by different colors (ie, red for LWL, blue-gray for AWL, and green for HWL). Three thicker lines were added to report the average level of each group.
FIGURE 3.
Sleeve gastrectomy postoperative %TBWL trajectories. Spaghetti plots showing the percentage of postoperative %TBWL of the included 3208 patients (who underwent sleeve gastrectomy) over the 6 postoperative follow-up time points (6, 12, 24, 36, 48, and 60 months). The 3 trajectory groups [ie, low weight loss (LWL), average weight loss (AWL), and high weight loss (HWL)] were represented by different colors (ie, red for LWL, blue-gray for AWL, and green for HWL). Three thicker lines were added to report the average level of each group.
TABLE 2.
Logistic Regression Analyses of Binary Postoperative %TBWL (LWL vs HWL+AWL)
| Univariate Models | Multivariate Model† | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LWL | HWL+AWL | OR (95% CI) | P | OR (95% CI) | P | ||
| Sex, % | Female | 1447 (81.2%) | 3784 (85.1%) | 1 | — | — | — |
| Male | 335 (18.8%) | 663 (14.9%) | 1.32 (1.14–1.53) | <0.001 | 1.19 (1.01–1.40) | 0.04 | |
| Race/ethnicity, % | Asian | 73 (4.1%) | 111 (2.5%) | 1.95 (1.44–2.64) | <0.001 | 1.62 (1.17–2.24) | 0.003 |
| Black | 298 (16.7%) | 486 (10.9%) | 1.82 (1.55–2.14) | <0.001 | 1.85 (1.56–2.21) | <0.001 | |
| Hispanic | 418 (23.5%) | 1008 (22.7%) | 1.23 (1.07–1.41) | 0.003 | 1.22 (1.05–1.41) | 0.01 | |
| White | 894 (50.2%) | 2656 (59.7%) | 1 | — | — | — | |
| Other* | 99 (5.6%) | 186 (4.2%) | 1.58 (1.22–2.04) | <0.001 | 1.35 (1.02–1.76) | 0.03 | |
| Age (years) at surgery, Mean ± SD | 46.8 ± 10.7 | 44.0 ± 10.9 | 1.02 (1.02–1.03) | <0.001 | 1.01 (1.00–1.02) | 0.002 | |
| NDI | Mean ± SD | −0.040 (0.8) | −0.010 (0.8) | 0.96 (0.90–1.02) | 0.20 | — | — |
| BMI (kg/m2) at surgery | Mean ± SD | 41.4 ± 6.1 | 42.54 ± 6.32 | 0.97 (0.97–0.98) | <0.001 | 0.98 (0.97–0.99) | 0.002 |
| Preoperative comorbidities, N (%) | Diabetes | 760 (42.6%) | 1047 (23.5%) | 2.41 (2.15–2.71) | <0.001 | 2.02 (1.77–2.31) | <0.001 |
| Hypertension | 1092 (61.3%) | 2170 (48.8%) | 1.66 (1.49–1.86) | <0.001 | 1.26 (1.10–1.44) | <0.001 | |
| Sleep apnea | 934 (52.4%) | 1852 (41.6%) | 1.54 (1.38–1.72) | <0.001 | 1.40 (1.24–1.59) | <0.001 | |
| Preoperative weight loss Mean ± SD | %TBWL | 6.7 ± 3.3 | 8.6 ± 3.8 | 0.85 (0.84–0.87) | <0.001 | 0.85 (0.84–0.87) | <0.001 |
| Surgery type, N (%) | RYGB | 841 (47.2%) | 2180 (49.0%) | 0.96 (0.88–1.05) | 0.19 | — | — |
| SG | 941 (52.8%) | 2267 (51.0%) | 1 | — | — | — | |
Other” race/ethnicity category included patients who self-reported “other” or “don’t know” or if patients self-selected multiethnic categories.
Multivariate analysis was not completed on sociod-emographic and clinical factors that did not show statistical significance on univariate analysis.
AWL indicates average weight loss; BMI, body mass index; CI, confidence interval; HWL, high weight loss; LWL, low weight loss; NDI, neighborhood deprivation index; OR, odds ratio; SD, standard deviation.
Socio-Demographic Factors Influence Weight Loss After BS
To determine which socio-demographic factors (ie, age at surgery, sex, race/ethnicity, and NDI) were specifically correlated with low postoperative %TBWL, patients from the LWL group were compared with patients from the AWL and HWL groups, who were reassigned into a combined (HWL+AWL) group. The results of the binary logistic regression are reported in Table 2. In the combined surgery type analysis, the probability of belonging to the LWL group was significantly higher in men [odds ratio (OR) = 1.32; 95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.14–1.53; P < 0.001], older patients (OR = 1.02; 95% CI = 1.02–1.03; P < 0.001), and nonwhite compared to White patients (OR = 1.95; 95% CI = 1.44–2.64; P < 0.001 for Asian patients; OR = 1.82; 95% CI = 1.55–2.14; P < 0.001 for Black patients; and OR = 1.23; 95% CI = 1.07–1.41; P = 0.003 for Hispanic/Latino patients) (Table 2). No significant association was found between socio-economic status (NDI) and %TBWL. Similar results were observed when RYGB and SG were analyzed separately (Supplemental Tables 3 and 4, see http://links.lww.com/AOSO/A349), except for sex, which was not a significant risk factor of postoperative %TBWL trajectory group assignment in the SG-specific-analysis.
Preoperative Clinical Factors Influence Weight Loss After BS
We then conducted binary logistic regression to assess whether each preoperative clinical factor (ie, BMI at surgery, diabetes, hypertension, sleep apnea, and preoperative %TBWL) was associated with postoperative %TBWL trajectory group assignment. In the combined surgery type analysis, patients in the LWL group had a lower BMI at surgery (OR = 0.97; 95% CI = 0.97–0.98; P < 0.001), but lost less weight before surgery (OR = 0.85; 95% CI = 0.84–0.87; P < 0.001 for preoperative %TBWL) than those in the combined AWL and HWL group (Table 2). Furthermore, patients in the LWL group were more likely to have preoperative comorbidities than patients in the combined AWL and HWL group (OR = 2.41, 95% CI = 2.15–2.71, P < 0.001 for diabetes; OR = 1.66, 95% CI = 1.49–1.86, P < 0.001 for hypertension; and OR = 1.54, 95% CI = 1.38–1.72, P < 0.001 for sleep apnea). Associations persisted in the analyses stratified by type of BS (ie, RYGB or SG analyzed separately) (Supplemental Tables 3 and 4, see http://links.lww.com/AOSO/A349).
Multivariate Logistic Model for Postoperative %TBWL
In a multivariate analysis that included all risk factors of postoperative trajectory group assignment (LWL vs HWL plus AWL), age at surgery (OR = 1.01; 95% CI = 1.00–1.02; P = 0.002), male sex (OR = 1.19; 95% CI = 1.01–1.40; P = 0.04), race/ethnicity (OR = 1.62; 95% CI = 1.17–2.24; P = 0.003 for Asian patients; OR = 1.85; 95% CI = 1.56–2.21; P < 0.001 for Black patients; and OR = 1.22; 95% CI = 1.05–1.41; P = 0.01 for Hispanic/Latino patients), BMI at surgery (OR = 0.98; 95% CI = 0.97–0.99; P = 0.002), preoperative comorbidities (OR = 2.02; 95% CI = 1.77–2.31; P < 0.001 for diabetes, OR = 1.26; 95% CI = 1.10–1.44; P < 0.001 for hypertension, OR = 1.40; 95% CI = 1.24–1.59; P < 0.001 for sleep apnea), and preoperative %TBWL (OR = 0.85; 95% CI = 0.84–0.87; P < 0.001) remained associated with postoperative %TBWL trajectory group assignment (Table 2). This suggests that these factors are risk factors for a lower weight loss response to BS.
Sex-Specific Analyses
Sex-specific binary and multivariate analyses were conducted to determine differences in risk factors of poor postoperative weight loss according to sex (Supplemental Tables 5 and 6, see http://links.lww.com/AOSO/A349). In analyses among women (N = 5231 patients), we found very similar results (Supplemental Table 5, see http://links.lww.com/AOSO/A349) to those for the overall cohort, except surgery type was significantly associated with postoperative %TBWL group assignment. Specifically, women who underwent SG were more likely to belong to the LWL group compared to women who underwent RYGB. The association of surgery type with trajectory group outcome persisted in the multivariate model, along with race/ethnicity, age and BMI at surgery, preoperative diabetes, hypertension, sleep apnea, and preoperative weight loss. In analyses among men (N = 998 patients), findings (Supplemental Table 6, see http://links.lww.com/AOSO/A349) differed compared to the overall cohort results, likely due to the more limited sample size. Specifically, we did not detect significant differences in postoperative %TBWL trajectory group assignment for Asian and Hispanic/Latino men compared to White men. Further, sleep apnea was not associated with postoperative %TBWL outcome in men, and the association of diabetes was not significant in the multivariate model. Finally, men who underwent a RYGB were more likely to belong to the LWL group compared to men who underwent SG.
Race/Ethnicity-Specific Analyses
Race/ethnicity-specific binary and multivariate analyses were conducted to evaluate differences in risk factors for lower weight loss after BS according to race/ethnicity (Supplemental Tables 7–10, see http://links.lww.com/AOSO/A349). On the Asian population binary analyses (N = 184 patients), sex, age, preoperative hypertension, and sleep apnea were not associated with postoperative %TBWL outcomes. On multivariate analysis of Asian patients, only lower preoperative BMI (OR = 0.94; 95% CI = 0.88–0.99; P = 0.04), smaller preoperative weight loss (OR = 0.84; 95% CI = 0.75–0.92; P = 0.001), and preoperative diabetes (OR = 2.80; 95% CI = 1.46–5.49; P = 0.002) were independent risk factors for belonging to the LWL group (Supplemental Table 7, see http://links.lww.com/AOSO/A349). On binary analyses of Black individuals (N = 784 patients) (Supplemental Table 8, see http://links.lww.com/AOSO/A349), preoperative BMI and hypertension were not associated with postoperative %TBWL outcome. In the Hispanic/Latino population binary analyses (N = 1426 patients), male sex was not associated with postoperative %TBWL outcome. Moreover, on multivariate analysis of Hispanic/Latino patients, age (OR = 1.01; 95% CI = 0.99–1.02; P = 0.45), and preoperative hypertension (OR = 1.22; 95% CI = 0.94–1.60; P = 0.14) were no longer associated with postoperative %TBWL trajectory group assignment (Supplemental Table 9, see http://links.lww.com/AOSO/A349). On binary analyses of White individuals (N = 3550 patients), similar results were observed compared to the overall cohort findings, except for NDI, which was a significant risk factor for LWL in White patients. On multivariate analysis of White individuals, male sex (OR = 1.13; 95% CI = 0.91–1.40; P = 0.27) and age at surgery (OR = 1.01; 95% CI = 1.00–1.02; P = 0.05) were no longer statistically significantly associated with postoperative %TBWL trajectory group assignment (Supplemental Table 10, see http://links.lww.com/AOSO/A349).
DISCUSSION
The present study addressed several knowledge gaps about the effects of socio-demographic factors and preoperative clinical factors on postoperative weight loss after BS in a large and multiethnic cohort. We found that 28.6% of KPNC patients experienced lower-than-expected weight loss after BS. Further, we reported variability in postoperative %TBWL according to race/ethnicity with 39.7%, 38.0%, 29.3%, and 25.2% of patients assigned to the LWL group, for Asian, Black, Hispanic/Latino, and White individuals, respectively. Our combined surgery type analysis revealed several demographic and preoperative clinical factors that influenced postoperative %TBWL. Men, older patients, and patients who are Black, Asian, or Hispanic/Latino were more likely to be in the LWL group. These results indicate that sex, age, race/ethnicity influence weight loss after BS. Additionally, patients in the LWL group had a higher prevalence of preoperative diabetes, hypertension, and sleep apnea when compared to those in the AWL and HWL groups. Finally, lower BMI at surgery and losing less weight before surgery were independent risk factors of lower postoperative %TBWL. Those associations remained when stratified by type of BS (i.e., RYGB or SG analyzed separately).
Our study findings are consistent with previous studies8–13,25,26 that reported demographic and preoperative clinical factors associated with lower weight loss after RYGB, including male sex, older age, Black and Hispanic populations, preoperative weight loss, and preoperative diabetes. Especially, a large study conducted in the KP Southern California bariatric registry reported that non-Hispanic White RYGB patients had a higher percent excess weight loss than non-Hispanic Black and Hispanic RYGB patients.26 In contrast to some previous studies,8,27,28 but consistent with a recent study,29 we found that a lower BMI at surgery was associated with less postoperative TBWL. Our study also reinforces well-established associations between preoperative hypertension and sleep apnea with lower postoperative weight loss,27,30 although the mechanisms underlying those associations remain unclear.
Our study builds upon previous literature8–13,25,26 by looking at risk factors of lower weight loss after BS among women and men, separately. Surgery type was differently associated with postoperative %TBWL in sex-stratified analyses; RYGB was associated with higher weight loss trajectories in women and, SG was associated with higher weight loss trajectories in men. However, in multivariate analyses stratified by sex, a number of risk factors other than surgery type were no longer associated with postoperative weight loss in men, likely due to the limited sample size (N = −998 men) and representation of some risk factors in this subgroup analysis, resulting in being underpowered to detect some effects with statistical significance. Thus, further large studies are needed to confirm these male-specific findings.
Similarly, our study builds upon previous literature8–13,25,26 by looking at risk factors of lower weight loss after BS across race/ethnicity groups. First, we found that NDI was a risk factor for unfavorable weight loss after surgery trajectories in White patients, but not in Hispanic/Latino, Black, and Asian populations. This result is consistent with a previous study, including mostly Black or Hispanic individuals, that reported no significant associations between census tract-level NDI score and weight loss at either follow-up time point after BS.31 Further, we found that age and sex were independent risk factors of postoperative %TBWL outcome only in Black patients, but not in White, Hispanic/Latino, or Asian patients. Moreover, for Asian, Black, and Hispanic/Latino patients, hypertension was not a significant contributor to lower weight loss after surgery. This finding is consistent with previous work from the OneFlorida Clinical Research Consortium that reported no difference in postoperative %TBWL between patients with or without preoperative hypertension.29 Finally, while Black patients were the only racial group for which preoperative BMI was not a risk factor of postoperative %TBWL, Asian individuals were the sole racial group for which preoperative sleep apnea did not affect postoperative weight loss. However, we note that the Asian race/ethnicity group (N = 184) is the smallest in our study, and we may have been underpowered to detect effects with statistical significance. These nuanced findings underscore the importance of conducting race/ethnicity-stratified analyses when evaluating risk factors that contribute to weight loss after BS. Future large and ethnically studies will confirm how each of these risk factors correlates with weight loss after surgery.
There are several strengths of the current study. This study benefits from a large cohort of ethnically diverse patients based in a single integrated delivery system (KPNC) with a comprehensive EHR, facilitating a standardized bariatric program, standardized data collection, and standardized procedures. When compared to earlier studies investigating risk factors for weight loss following BS,6,7,10–13 the current study includes a larger number of patients with greater ethnic diversity. Furthermore, the extended follow-up period allows for a comprehensive assessment of long-term postoperative %TBWL outcomes. There are, however, certain limitations to consider when reviewing this study. First, while postoperative %TBWL is considered the gold standard for measurement of weight loss after surgery,18–20 it may not capture all aspects of successful surgery and long, disease-free life. Future investigations should consider a wider range of outcomes that are important for overall health status, such as postoperative comorbidities improvements, surgery complications, reoperations, and modifications in gut microbiota composition. Second, the limited sample size in some subgroup analyses (eg, men only, N = 998; Asian and Black race/ethnicity groups, N = 184 and 784, respectively) could be considered as a study limitation. Lastly, our study focused on the main preoperative comorbidities associated with obesity (ie, diabetes, hypertension, and sleep apnea), but future studies might consider additional potential perioperative comorbidities such as cardiovascular disease, and psychiatric disorders.
In summary, our study highlights key socio-demographic and clinical factors that contribute to variation in %TBWL outcome after BS. These findings emphasize the importance of considering individual characteristics when evaluating which patients may be at a higher risk of experiencing LWL postoperatively. Future research could focus on understanding the underlying mechanisms behind the observed associations and developing tailored interventions to optimize weight loss outcomes. The identification of these risk factors could help clinicians personalize treatment approaches and set realistic expectations for patients based on their individual characteristics.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
We are grateful to the Kaiser Permanente Northern California members who have generously agreed to participate in the KPNC Bariatric Surgery Program. We would like to acknowledge Aaron Rosenberger and Dd Kadiyala for the creation and maintenance of the KPNC Bariatric Surgery registry and clinical dashboard.
Supplementary Material
Footnotes
Published online 16 May 2024
Disclosure: The authors declare that they have nothing to disclose.
This study was supported by Kaiser Permanente Northern California Community Health (H.C.). The funder had no role in the design and conduct of the study; collection, management, analysis, and interpretation of the data; preparation, review, or approval of the manuscript; and decision to submit the manuscript for publication.
Supplemental digital content is available for this article. Direct URL citations appear in the printed text and are provided in the HTML and PDF versions of this article on the journal’s Web site (www.annalsofsurgery.com).
REFERENCES
- 1.Terranova L, Busetto L, Vestri A, et al. Bariatric surgery: cost-effectiveness and budget impact. Obes Surg. 2012;22:646–653. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.de Toro-Martin J, Guenard F, Tchernof A, et al. Polygenic risk score for predicting weight loss after bariatric surgery. JCI Insight. 2018;3:1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Eldar S, Heneghan HM, Brethauer SA, et al. Bariatric surgery for treatment of obesity. Int J Obes (Lond). 2011;35(Suppl 3):S16–S21. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Marceau P, Biron S, Marceau S, et al. Long-term metabolic outcomes 5 to 20 years after biliopancreatic diversion. Obes Surg. 2015;25:1584–1593. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.English WJ, DeMaria EJ, Brethauer SA, et al. American Society for Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery estimation of metabolic and bariatric procedures performed in the United States in 2016. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2018;14:259–263. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Baldridge AS, Pacheco JA, Aufox SA, et al. Factors associated with long-term weight loss following bariatric surgery using 2 methods for repeated measures analysis. Am J Epidemiol. 2015;182:235–243. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Rojo-Tirado MA, Benito PJ, Atienza D, et al. Effects of age, sex, and treatment on weight-loss dynamics in overweight people. Appl Physiol Nutr Metab. 2013;38:967–976. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Wood GC, Benotti PN, Lee CJ, et al. Evaluation of the association between preoperative clinical factors and long-term weight loss after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. JAMA Surg. 2016;151:1056–1062. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Courcoulas AP, King WC, Belle SH, et al. Seven-year weight trajectories and health outcomes in the Longitudinal Assessment of Bariatric Surgery (LABS) study. JAMA Surg. 2018;153:427–434. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Ma Y, Pagoto SL, Olendzki BC, et al. Predictors of weight status following laparoscopic gastric bypass. Obes Surg. 2006;16:1227–1231. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Junior WS, do Amaral JL, Nonino-Borges CB. Factors related to weight loss up to 4 years after bariatric surgery. Obes Surg. 2011;21:1724–1730. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Campos GM, Rabl C, Mulligan K, et al. Factors associated with weight loss after gastric bypass. Arch Surg. 2008;143:877–883; discussion 884. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Melton GB, Steele KE, Schweitzer MA, et al. Suboptimal weight loss after gastric bypass surgery: correlation of demographics, comorbidities, and insurance status with outcomes. J Gastrointest Surg. 2008;12:250–255. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Khaodhiar L, McCowen KC, Blackburn GL. Obesity and its comorbid conditions. Clin Cornerstone. 1999;2:17–31. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Ahmed B, King WC, Gourash W, et al. Long-term weight change and health outcomes for sleeve gastrectomy (SG) and matched Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) participants in the Longitudinal Assessment of Bariatric Surgery (LABS) study. Surgery. 2018;164:774–783. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Gronroos S, Helmio M, Juuti A, et al. Effect of laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy vs Roux-en-Y gastric bypass on weight loss and quality of life at 7 years in patients with morbid obesity: the SLEEVEPASS randomized clinical trial. JAMA Surg. 2021;156:137–146. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Guraya SY, Strate T. Effectiveness of laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass and sleeve gastrectomy for morbid obesity in achieving weight loss outcomes. Int J Surg. 2019;70:35–43. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Brethauer SA, Kim J, El Chaar M, et al. ; ASMBS Clinical Issues Committee. Standardized outcomes reporting in metabolic and bariatric surgery. Obes Surg. 2015;25:587–606. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Grover BT, Morell MC, Kothari SN, et al. Defining weight loss after bariatric surgery: a call for standardization. Obes Surg. 2019;29:3493–3499. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.van Rijswijk AS, van Olst N, Schats W, et al. What is weight loss after bariatric surgery expressed in percentage total weight loss (%TWL)? A systematic review. Obes Surg. 2021;31:3833–3847. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Dallal RM, Quebbemann BB, Hunt LH, et al. Analysis of weight loss after bariatric surgery using mixed-effects linear modeling. Obes Surg. 2009;19:732–737. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Jones BL, Nagin DS, Roeder K. A SAS procedure based on mixture models for estimating developmental trajectories. Sociol Methods Res. 2001;29:374–393. [Google Scholar]
- 23.Jones BL, Nagin DS. Advances in group-based trajectory modeling and an SAS procedure for estimating them. Sociol Methods Res. 2007;35:542–571. [Google Scholar]
- 24.Nagin DS. Group-based trajectory modeling: an overview. Ann Nutr Metab. 2014;65:205–210. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Carbonell AM, Wolfe LG, Meador JG, et al. Does diabetes affect weight loss after gastric bypass?. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2008;4:441–444. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Coleman KJ, Huang YC, Hendee F, et al. Three-year weight outcomes from a bariatric surgery registry in a large integrated healthcare system. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2014;10:396–403. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Still CD, Wood GC, Chu X, et al. Clinical factors associated with weight loss outcomes after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass surgery. Obesity (Silver Spring). 2014;22:888–894. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Livhits M, Mercado C, Yermilov I, et al. Preoperative predictors of weight loss following bariatric surgery: systematic review. Obes Surg. 2012;22:70–89. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Chen G, Donahoo WT, Cardel MI, et al. Variation by race/ethnicity in the utilization and weight loss following metabolic bariatric surgery. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2023;19:1391–1404. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Al-Khyatt W, Ryall R, Leeder P, et al. Predictors of inadequate weight loss after laparoscopic gastric bypass for morbid obesity. Obes Surg. 2017;27:1446–1452. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Drewnowski A, Hong BD, Shen E, et al. Neighborhood deprivation and residential property values do not affect weight loss at 1 or 3 years after bariatric surgery. Obesity (Silver Spring). 2023;31:545–552. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.



