Skip to main content
eLife logoLink to eLife
. 2024 Jun 24;12:RP91506. doi: 10.7554/eLife.91506

The αC-β4 loop controls the allosteric cooperativity between nucleotide and substrate in the catalytic subunit of protein kinase A

Cristina Olivieri 1,†,, Yingjie Wang 1,2,†,§, Caitlin Walker 1, Manu Veliparambil Subrahmanian 1, Kim N Ha 3, David Bernlohr 1, Jiali Gao 2, Carlo Camilloni 4,#, Michele Vendruscolo 4, Susan S Taylor 5,6, Gianluigi Veglia 1,2,
Editors: Amy H Andreotti7, Volker Dötsch8
PMCID: PMC11196109  PMID: 38913408

Abstract

Allosteric cooperativity between ATP and substrates is a prominent characteristic of the cAMP-dependent catalytic subunit of protein kinase A (PKA-C). This long-range synergistic action is involved in substrate recognition and fidelity, and it may also regulate PKA’s association with regulatory subunits and other binding partners. To date, a complete understanding of this intramolecular mechanism is still lacking. Here, we integrated NMR(Nuclear Magnetic Resonance)-restrained molecular dynamics simulations and a Markov State Model to characterize the free energy landscape and conformational transitions of PKA-C. We found that the apoenzyme populates a broad free energy basin featuring a conformational ensemble of the active state of PKA-C (ground state) and other basins with lower populations (excited states). The first excited state corresponds to a previously characterized inactive state of PKA-C with the αC helix swinging outward. The second excited state displays a disrupted hydrophobic packing around the regulatory (R) spine, with a flipped configuration of the F100 and F102 residues at the αC-β4 loop. We validated the second excited state by analyzing the F100A mutant of PKA-C, assessing its structural response to ATP and substrate binding. While PKA-CF100A preserves its catalytic efficiency with Kemptide, this mutation rearranges the αC-β4 loop conformation, interrupting the coupling of the two lobes and abolishing the allosteric binding cooperativity. The highly conserved αC-β4 loop emerges as a pivotal element to control the synergistic binding of nucleotide and substrate, explaining how mutations or insertions near or within this motif affect the function and drug sensitivity in homologous kinases.

Research organism: E. coli

Introduction

Eukaryotic protein kinases (EPKs) are plastic enzymes of paramount importance in signaling processes, catalyzing phosphoryl transfer reactions, or acting as scaffolds for other enzymes and/or binding partners (Manning et al., 2002; Huse and Kuriyan, 2002). Of all kinases, the catalytic subunit of protein kinase A (PKA-C) was the first to be structurally characterized by X-ray crystallography (Knighton et al., 1991b; Knighton et al., 1991c). In its inhibited state, PKA-C assembles into a heterotetrametric holoenzyme comprising two catalytic (C) and two regulatory (R) subunits (Taylor et al., 2012). The canonical activation mechanism of PKA involves the binding of two cAMP molecules that disassemble the holoenzyme, unleashing active PKA-C monomers, which target signaling partners (Walsh et al., 1968). In 2017, however, Scott and coworkers proposed an alternative activation mechanism in which the holoenzyme does not disassemble under physiological conditions; rather, it is clustered in signaling islands, localized near the substrates by A-kinase anchoring proteins (AKAPs), facilitating targeted signaling interactions (Smith et al., 2017). To date, the activation mechanism of PKA is still under active investigation since PKA-C appears to be fully liberated under pathological conditions (Tillo et al., 2017; Xiong et al., 2023; Omar et al., 2022).

X-ray crystallography studies revealed that PKA-C is a bilobal enzyme, with a dynamic N-terminal lobe (N-lobe) comprising four β-sheets and an αC helix, while the C-terminal lobe (C-lobe) is more rigid and mostly composed of α-helices (Figure 1A; Knighton et al., 1991b; Knighton et al., 1991c; Knighton et al., 1991a). The N-lobe harbors the nucleotide-binding site, whereas the substrate-binding cleft lays at the interface between the N- and C-lobe. The three-dimensional structure of PKA-C features a highly conserved hydrophobic core decorated with catalytically important motifs, that is, the Gly-rich loop, DFG-loop, activation loop, and magnesium and peptide positioning loops (Johnson et al., 2001). In the catalytically active state, these motifs are all poised for phosphoryl transfer (Bastidas et al., 2013; Gerlits et al., 2015; Gerlits et al., 2019), a condition necessary but not sufficient to define an active kinase. More recent studies revealed a critical role of the enzyme’s hydrophobic core, which is crossed by a catalytic (C) spine and a regulatory (R) spine surrounded by shell residues (Figure 1B; Kornev et al., 2006; Ten Eyck et al., 2008). The C spine comprises an array of hydrophobic residues and is assembled upon binding ATP, whereas the R spine is engaged when the activation loop is phosphorylated at Thr197, which positions the αC-helix in an active configuration (Hu et al., 2015).

Figure 1. Structural and catalytic motifs of PKA-C.

Figure 1.

(A) Backbone representation of the ternary complex of PKA-C bound to ATP and the PKI5-24 peptide (not depicted), PDB code 4WB5. Highlighted are key motifs including the αA, αC, and αE helices, C-terminal tail, activation loop, peptide-positioning loop, Gly-rich loop, and the DFG and APE motifs. (B) The hydrophobic core of PKA-C features the regulatory spine (R-spine, gold), catalytic spine (C-spine, blue), shell residues (cyan), and the αC-β4 loop (hot pink), which locks the αE helix and couples the two lobes of PKA-C.

A distinct property of PKA-C is the binding cooperativity between ATP and substrate (Lew et al., 1997). In the catalytic cycle, the kinase binds ATP and unphosphorylated substrates with positive binding cooperativity, whereas a negative binding cooperativity between ADP and phosphorylated substrate characterizes the exit complex (Wang et al., 2019). The biological importance of these phenomena has been emphasized by our recent studies on disease-driven mutations, (Olivieri et al., 2021; Walker et al., 2019; Walker et al., 2021) which all feature disrupted cooperativity between nucleotides and protein kinase inhibitor (PKI) or canonical substrates (Olivieri et al., 2021; Walker et al., 2019; Walker et al., 2021). Since the recognition sequence of substrates is highly homologous to that of the R subunits (Taylor et al., 2012), a loss of cooperativity may affect not only substrate-binding fidelity but also regulatory processes. Thus far, the molecular determinants for the binding cooperativity between nucleotide and substrate and its role in PKA signalosome remain elusive.

Aiming to define the allosteric mechanism for PKA-C cooperativity, we combined NMR-restrained replica-averaged metadynamics (RAM) (Camilloni et al., 2013; Camilloni and Vendruscolo, 2014) and Markov State Model (MSM) (Husic and Pande, 2018) and charted the conformational landscape and dynamic transitions of the main forms of PKA-C. We found that the apo kinase occupies three distinct basins: (1) a most populated ground state (GS) with constitutively active conformations competent for catalysis, (2) a first high free energy basin representative of typical inactive states with a dislodged configuration of theαC helix (ES1), and (3) a second high free energy basin with a disrupted hydrophobic array of residues at the core of the enzyme (ES2). Notably, the equilibrium between the most populated GS and the other low-populated states agrees with previous NMR Carr–Purcell–Meiboom–Gill (CPMG) relaxation dispersion and chemical exchange saturation transfer (CEST) measurements (Olivieri et al., 2022). To compound the existence of the second inactive basin, we mutated F100 at the αC-β4 loop into Ala (PKA-CF100A) and characterized its ligand-binding thermodynamics and structural response by isothermal titration calorimetry (ITC) and NMR spectroscopy, respectively. We found that PKA-CF100A phosphorylates a canonical peptide with a catalytic efficiency similar to the wild-type kinase (PKA-CWT); however, this mutation abolishes the binding cooperativity between nucleotide and substrate. The NMR experiments reveal that F100A perturbs the hydrophobic packing around the αC-β4 loop and interrupts the allosteric communication between the two lobes of the enzyme. Overall, these results emphasize the pivotal role of the αC-β4 loop in kinase function and may explain why single-site mutations or insertion mutations stabilizing this motif in homologous kinases result in oncogenes and confer differential drug sensitivity (Ruan and Kannan, 2018; Kannan et al., 2008; Zhao et al., 2020).

Results

The free energy landscape of PKA-C charted by NMR-restrained RAM simulations

To characterize the experimentally accessible conformational landscape of PKA-C in the µs-to-ms timescale, we performed NMR-restrained metadynamics simulations within the RAM framework (Camilloni et al., 2013; Camilloni and Vendruscolo, 2014). Using four replicas restrained with backbone chemical shifts (CS), we simulated the apo, binary (PKA-C/ATP), and ternary (PKA-C/ATP/PKI5-24) complexes of PKA-C. Incorporating the CS restrains in the simulations ensures a close agreement with the conformational space explored by the kinase under our NMR experimental conditions (Robustelli et al., 2010; Qi et al., 2022), whereas the enhanced sampling through metadynamics simulations boosts the conformational plasticity of the enzyme along different degrees of freedom (i.e., collective variables, CVs, see Methods) (Figure 2—figure supplement 1; Piana and Laio, 2007). In our case, back-calculations of the CS values with Sparta+ (Shen and Bax, 2010) show that the restrained simulations improved the agreement between theoretical and experimental CS values of ~0.2 ppm for the amide N atoms and ~0.1 ppm for the remainder backbone atoms (Figure 2—figure supplement 2). Also, the bias-exchange metadynamics allow each replica to span a significantly broader conformational space relative to classical MD(Molecular Dynamics) simulations (Figure 2—figure supplement 3). The metadynamics simulations were equilibrated and converged in 300 ns (Figure 2A, Figure 2—figure supplement 4). The full free energy landscape was then reconstructed by sampling an extra 100 ns of production phase with reduced bias along each CV. We found that the population of the PKA-C conformers is modulated by ATP and pseudosubstrate binding within the NMR detection limit of sparsely populated states (~0.5% or ΔG < 3.2 kcal/mol).

Figure 2. Free energy landscape of PKA-C obtained from replica-averaged metadynamics (RAM) simulations.

(A) Convergence of the bias deposition along the first three collective variables (CVs). The free energy (expressed in kcal/mol) of the different CVs was averaged over the last 100 ns of RAM simulations. The standard deviations are reported as red error bars. (B–D) Free energy landscape along the first two principal components (PC1 and PC2) of PKA-C in the apo, ATP-, and ATP/PKI-bound forms. PC1 and PC2 are projected from the first three CVs. The vertices represent conformational states. In the apo form, multiple states have comparable free energy with ΔG < 5 kcal/mol, whereas in the binary form, fewer states have ΔG < 5 kcal/mol. For the ternary form only a major ground state is populated.

Figure 2—source data 1. ΔG (kcal/mol) and relative population of the ground state and the first six excited states in different forms of PKA-C obtained from the replica-averaged metadynamics (RAM) simulations.

Figure 2.

Figure 2—figure supplement 1. Illustration of the collective variables (CVs) used in the replica-averaged metadynamics (RAM) simulations.

Figure 2—figure supplement 1.

(A) Backbone ψ angles of loops not in contact with ATP (Back-far). The Cα atoms are depicted as blue spheres. (B) Backbone ψ angles of loops in contact with ATP (Back-close). The Cα atoms are colored in magenta. (C) Side chains χ1 angles of loops in contact with ATP (Side-close). The side chains are represented in sticks colored in magenta. (D) The radius of gyration is calculated over the rigid part of the protein (Rgss), where the residues involved are colored in cyan.
Figure 2—figure supplement 2. Distribution of the root-mean-square-error (RMSE) of the chemical shifts (CSs) for the different simulation schemes.

Figure 2—figure supplement 2.

(A) RMSE of CS for apo PKA-C calculated from standard MD (left), replica exchange (REX; middle), and replica-averaged metadynamics (RAM) (right). (B) RMSE of CS for PKA-C/ATP calculated from standard MD (left), REX (middle), and RAM (right). (C) RMSE of CS for PKA-C/ATP/PKI5-24 from standard MD (left), REX (middle), and RAM (right). Color codes for different backbone atoms (C, Cα, CO, H, and N) are indicated in the left figures.
Figure 2—figure supplement 3. Replica-averaged metadynamics (RAM) simulations explore a larger conformational space than standard MD and replica exchange (REX) simulations.

Figure 2—figure supplement 3.

(A) Comparison of conformational space (CV1 vs. CV2) sampled by RAM Replica 1, standard MD, and REX Replica 1 for PKA-C. (B) Comparison of conformational space (CV3 vs. CV2) sampled by RAM Replica 1, standard MD, and REX Replica 1 for apo PKA-C.
Figure 2—figure supplement 4. Accumulative deposition of history-dependent biases along the first three collective variables (CVs) for the replica-averaged metadynamics (RAM) simulations of the apo PKA-C.

Figure 2—figure supplement 4.

The accumulative biases converged after ~300 ns in the three CVs.

Specifically, the apo PKA-C populates preferentially a GS and five readily accessible low-populated excited states (Figure 2B, Figure 2—source data 1). The binary complex populates the same GS and a broad higher energy basin (Figure 2C, Figure 2—source data 1). Finally, the ternary complex occupies a narrower dominant GS (Figure 2D, Figure 2—source data 1). Overall, these calculations revealed that the apo kinase explores multiple minima along each CV. The binding of ATP shifts the population of the ensemble into an additional minimum, featuring structures that are committed to substrate binding. Finally, the conformational heterogeneity of the ensemble is significantly reduced upon formation of the ternary complex, which represents a catalytically committed state (Bastidas et al., 2013; Figure 2A). The free energy landscape obtained from these RAM simulations is consistent with the qualitative picture previously inferred from our NMR spin relaxation experiments and hydrogen/deuterium exchange studies (Masterson et al., 2011; Masterson et al., 2010; Li et al., 2015), while providing a detailed structural characterization of the ground and sparsely populated conformationally excited states.

MSM reveals the conformational transitions of PKA-C from ground to high free energy (excited) states

To refine the free energy landscape and delineate the kinetics of conformational transitions of the kinase, we performed additional unbiased sampling to build MSMs (Kohlhoff et al., 2014; Plattner et al., 2017). MSMs are commonly used to describe the dynamic transitions of various metastable states for macromolecules in terms of their populations and transition rates. MSMs are typically created by combining thousands of short unbiased simulations (Kohlhoff et al., 2014; Plattner et al., 2017). Following this strategy, we performed several short simulations (10–20 ns) using thousands of the low free energy conformations (ΔG < 3.2 kcal/mol) chosen randomly from the three forms of PKA-C as starting structures. The conformational ensembles were clustered into microstates and seeded to start a second round of adaptive sampling (see Methods). This iterative process was repeated three times to assure convergence and yielded 100 μs trajectories for both the apo and binary forms, whereas 60 μs trajectories were collected for the less dynamic ternary complex. Once we reached a sufficient sampling, we built an MSM including L95, V104, L106, M118, M120, Y164, and F185 to investigate the dynamic transitions of the hydrophobic R spine and shell residues (Figure 3—figure supplement 1). These residues are ideal reporters of the dynamic processes governing the activation/deactivation of the kinase (Kim et al., 2017). To compare the free energy landscape of different complexes, we projected the conformational ensembles of three forms and existing crystal structures of PKA-C onto the first two time-lagged independent components (tICs) of the apo form, which were obtained by a time-lagged independent component analysis (tICA). These tICs represent the directions of the slowest motion of the kinase and visualize the conformational transitions of V104, L95, and F185 (Figure 3—figure supplement 1). The MSM shows that the hydrophobic core of the apo PKA-C accesses three major basins. The broadest basin represents the GS and corresponds to the conformations of PKA-C captured in several crystal structures (Figure 3A). The other two states (conformationally excited states) are less populated. The first excited state (ES1) features a disrupted hydrophobic packing of L95, V104, and F185. This conformation matches an inactive state with an outward orientation of the αC-helix typical of the inhibited states of PKA-C (Figure 3—figure supplement 2). The second state (ES2) displays a flipped configuration of the V104 side chain and disrupted hydrophobic interactions responsible for anchoring the αC-β4 loop to the C-lobe, with F100 and F102 adopting a gauche+ configuration and forming a stable π–π stacking. (Figure 3A). In contrast, the active GS ensemble features a trans configuration for the F100 and F102 side chains that stabilize the π–π stacking with Y156 at the αE-helix and cation-π interactions with R308 at the C-tail (Figure 3A). To our knowledge, the ES2 state was never observed in the available crystal structures. Upon ATP binding, the conformational space spanned by the kinase becomes narrower, and the conformers populate mostly the GS, with a small fraction in the ES1 state (Figure 3B). This is consistent with the role of the nucleotide as an allosteric effector that enhances the affinity of the enzyme for the substrate (Masterson et al., 2008). In the ternary form (ATP and PKI-bound), PKA-C populates only the GS consistent with the competent conformation observed in the ternary structure (i.e., 1ATP). In this case, the αC-β4 loop of the enzyme is locked in a well-defined, active configuration (Figure 3A).

Figure 3. Free energy surfaces and dynamic transitions determined by a Markov State Model (MSM) for apo, ATP-, and ATP/PKI-bound PKA-C.

(A) Free energy landscape projected along the first two time-lagged independent components (tICs) of apo PKA-C, featuring three basins, ground state (GS), ES1, and ES2. The transition from GS to ES1 (arrow) highlights the changes around the αB-αC loop, with the disruption of the K72–E91 salt bridge and the PIF pocket (V80–I85–F347) hydrophobic interactions. The GS to ES2 transition (arrow) displays the rearrangement of the hydrophobic packing around the αC-β4 loop. (B, C) Free energy surfaces projected along the first two tICs for the ATP- and ATP/PKI-bound PKA-C, respectively. Known crystal structures for the three forms are indicated by small white triangles.

Figure 3.

Figure 3—figure supplement 1. R spine and shell residues selected for two time-lagged independent components (tICA) and Markov State Model (MSM) analysis.

Figure 3—figure supplement 1.

(A) Atom motions of key residues that define tIC1 of apo PKA-C colored according to the superposition deviations. Backbone atoms of Val104 show the largest change in tIC1. (B) Atom motions of key residues that define tIC2 of apo PKA-C colored according to the superposition deviations. Backbone atoms of Phe185 and Val104 show the largest change in tIC2.
Figure 3—figure supplement 2. Structural features of αC-out transition (ES1) in various inactive kinases.

Figure 3—figure supplement 2.

(A) Crystal structures of PKA-C in active and inactive states highlight the αB-αC loop alterations. Crystal structures of PKA-C in the active (1ATP) and inactive conformations (3AG9, 1SZM, 4DFY), highlighting the electrostatic interactions between K72 in β3 and E91 in the αC. (B) Disruption of the K72–E91 salt bridge in the inactive structures of Abl (1OPJ), Src (1FMK), and CDK2 (4EK3). (C) The αC helix orientation of active PKA-C compared to the orientation in inactive kinases. (D) Structural transition from the ground state (GS) to ES1 state characterized by the outward movement of the αC helix (i.e., kinase inactivation).
Figure 3—figure supplement 3. Distinct hydrophobic packing for residues around the αC-β4 loop in the ground state (GS) and ES states of apo PKA-C.

Figure 3—figure supplement 3.

(A) Projections of randomly selected conformations for the GS (blue) and ES (magenta) onto the conformational landscape of apo PKA-C. Snapshots with tIC1 <1.2 were clustered to separate the ES and GS, whereas those confomers with tIC1 >0.2 were clustered as GS. (B, C) Close up of the hydrophobic packing in the ES and GS (C) states, highlighting Leu103, Val104, Ile150, Leu172, and Ile180 that show slow exchange in the Carr–Purcell–Meiboom–Gill (CPMG) experiments.

Moreover, in the apo form, the αC-β4 loop is quite dynamic due to transient hydrophobic interactions involving F100 and V104, as well as W222 and the APE motif (A206 and P207) (Figure 4A). The binding of both nucleotide and PKI rigidifies the residues near F100 and V104, for example, V103 and F185 (Figure 4A) and makes more persistent several electrostatic interactions essential for catalysis (D166–N171, K168–T201, and Y204–E230), which are transient in the apo PKA-C. Finally, we used kinetic Monte Carlo sampling to characterize the slow transition between different states (Shukla et al., 2014). In the GS state of the apo PKA-C, F100 and F102 adopt trans configurations that stabilize the interactions with the αE and αJ helices, and, together with the nucleotide, they lock the αC-β4 loop in an active state (Figure 3A). The GS to ES1 transition features the disruption of the K72–E91 salt bridge, typical of the inactive kinase. In contrast, the GS to ES2 transition involves a 120o flip of the F100 aromatic group that interacts with V104, a conformation found only in the catalytically uncommitted apoenzyme (Figure 3A). Interestingly, the GS to ES2 transition involves a concerted disruption of the D166–N171 and K168–T201 electrostatic interactions and the destabilization of the packing between W222 and the APE motif (A206 and P207) required for substrate recognition (Figure 3C). Overall, these calculations show that conformational transitions from the active GS to ES1 and ES2 represent two independent pathways toward inactive states of the kinase.

Figure 4. Conformational transitions of apo and ATP-bound PKA-C from ground state (GS) to ES1 and ES2 states as shown by the kinetic Monte Carlo trajectories.

Figure 4.

(A, B) Time course of the structural transitions from GS to ES1 and GS to ES2 for apo and ATP-bound PKA-C, respectively. The GS to ES1 transition is characterized by the disruption of the K72–E91 salt bridge and occurs frequently for both PKA-C forms. In contrast, the structural transition from GS to ES2 occurs only for the apo PKA-C, and it features the interactions between F100 and V104 that cause allosteric changes between D166–N171, K168–T201, and W222–A206–P207. The dark color traces indicate the moving averages calculated every 10 frames. (C) Structural snapshot of the GS conformation showing that the key catalytic motifs are poised for phosphoryl transfer. (D) Structural snapshot of the ES2 conformation with a disrupted configuration of key catalytic motifs typical of inactive kinase.

Direct correspondence between the conformationally excited states identified by MD simulations and NMR data

NMR CPMG relaxation dispersion and CEST experiments performed on the apo PKA-C revealed the presence of conformationally excited states for several residues embedded into the hydrophobic core of the enzyme (Olivieri et al., 2022). The CSs of one of these states follow the previously observed open-to-closed transitions of the enzyme (Masterson et al., 2008), whereas another excited state observable in the CEST experiments does not follow the same trend. We surmised that this new state may represent an alternate inactive state (Olivieri et al., 2022). Since ES2 features a disrupted hydrophobic packing of the αC-β4 loop and several of the methyl groups displaying the excited state in the CEST experiments are near the αC-β4 loop, we compared the CS differences of the methyl group from CEST experiments (Olivieri et al., 2022) (ΔωExp) with those from the MD simulations (ΔωPred). We analyzed the methyl groups of L103, V104, I150, L172, and I180, sampling more than 500 snapshots as representative conformations of the kinase in the ES2 and GS states (Figure 3—figure supplement 3). We then computed the distribution of the methyl 13C CS using ShiftX2 (Han et al., 2011). For Val104 and Ile150, these calculations yielded ΔωPred values of 0.87 ± 0.02 and 0.85 ± 0.02 ppm between the ES2 and GS conformations, respectively, which are in good agreement with ΔωExp (1.10 ± 0.06 and 0.94 ± 0.09 ppm) obtained from the CEST experiments or fitting the CPMG dispersion curves (Figure 5A, B). The ΔωPred values and the directions of the CS changes obtained for the remainder three sites are also in good agreement with the CEST profiles (Figure 5—figure supplement 1). Figure 4C shows a linear fitting of ΔωPred and ΔωExp with a slope of 0.86 and R2 of 0.82. The latter supports the hypothesis that the excited state observed by NMR may correspond to the simulated structural ensemble of the ES2 basin. Finally, MSM estimates a population of ES2 of 6 ± 2%, which is consistent with the 5 ± 1% population found by fitting the NMR data (Kim et al., 2017). Altogether, the combination of NMR and MD simulations support the presence of an alternate inactive state that features disrupted hydrophobic interactions near the αC-β4 loop that perturb the anchoring with the αE helix, and in turn, the structural couplings between the two lobes of the kinase.

Figure 5. Comparison of experimental versus calculated 13C chemical shifts (CSs) of methyl groups of PKA-C.

(A) Experimental and calculated CS for Val104-Cγ1 of apo PKA-C. The ground state (GS) is in blue and the ES in magenta. (B) Corresponding CS profiles for Ile150-Cδ1. The experimental CS is shown in dotted lines for GS (black) and ES (red). (C) Correlation between predicted |ΔωPred| and experimental |ΔωExp| CS differences for methyl groups near the αC-β4 loop. The fitted linear correlation has a slope of 0.86 and R2 of 0.82. The experimental errors were estimated from the signal-to-noise ratios of the CEST spectra.

Figure 5.

Figure 5—figure supplement 1. Distribution of predicted and experimental 13C chemical shift (CS) of selected methyl groups.

Figure 5—figure supplement 1.

ES (magenta) and ground state (GS; blue) of apo PKA-C for Leu103-Cδ2 (A), Leu172-Cδ1 (B), and Ile180-Cδ1 (C). The experimental CSs are shown as dotted lines for GS (black) and ES (red).

The F100A mutation disrupts the allosteric network of the kinase

The above analysis suggests that the destabilization of the αC-β4 loop may promote the GS to ES2 transition of the kinase. To validate this hypothesis, we generated the F100A mutant seeking to increase the flexibility of the αC-β4 loop. Starting from the coordinates of the X-ray structure of the ternary complex (PDB ID: 4WB5), we simulated the F100A dynamics in an explicit water environment. First, we performed a short equilibration using classical MD simulations. During 1 μs of MD simulations, the αC-β4 loop of the F100A mutant undergoes a significant motion as manifested by increased values of the backbone root mean square deviation (rmsd) and a conformational change (flipping) of the F102 side chain (Figure 6A). This region in PKA-CWT adopts a stable β-turn, with a persistent hydrogen bond between the backbone oxygen of F100 and the amide hydrogen of L103. In contrast, the hydrogen bond in F100A is formed more frequently between A100 and F102, resulting in an average γ-turn conformation (Figure 6B). Such local rearrangement not only disrupts the hydrogen bond between N99 and Y156, altering the interactions between the αC-β4 loop and the αE helix but also destabilizes the cation-π interaction between F102 and R308 at the C-tail (Figure 6B—figure supplement 1).

Figure 6. F100A mutation increases the dynamics of the αC-β4 loop, perturbing the local hydrophobic packing and its anchoring to the αE helix.

(A) Time series of the αC-β4 loop dynamics, H-bond occurrence for the β- and γ-turns, F102 χ1 angle, and N99 and Y156 for WT (black) and F100A (red) in the ATP-bound state. (B) Representative structural snapshots showing the β-turn conformation for PKA-CWT (green) and γ-turn for PKA-CF100A (magenta).

Figure 6.

Figure 6—figure supplement 1. Time series of the distance between F102 and R308 for PKA-CWT (black) and the PKA-CF100A mutant (magenta).

Figure 6—figure supplement 1.

The π-cation interactions between the aromatic ring of F102 and the guanidine group of R308 are more persistent in the WT enzyme than in the F100A mutant.

The structural changes of the αC-β4 loop caused by the F100A mutation propagate through the protein core across the R spine, C spines, and shell residues (Figure 7A), and alter the response of the kinase to nucleotide binding. In the PKA-CWT, ATP-binding shifts the conformational ensemble of the kinase toward an intermediate state competent to substrate binding, as represented by the changes in the population densities of the hydrophobic core residues as a function of the rmsd (Figure 7B). For F100A, the population of the C spine follows the same trend of the WT kinase, with the shell residues already populating the intermediate state. In contrast, the R spine residues fail to adopt a competent state (Figure 7B). The latter is due to the perturbation of hydrophobic packing of L95 and L106 in the R spine, and V104 in the shell near the mutation site. Using the lowest principal components, we also analyzed the global dynamic response of the kinase to ATP binding. Not only does F100A change the breathing mode of the two lobes (PC1), but it also alters the shearing motion (PC2) of the binary complex, emphasizing the importance of this allosteric site for the inter-lobe communication (Figure 7C–E).

Figure 7. Structural responses to ATP binding of PKA-CF100A mutant.

Figure 7.

(A) Superposition of the hydrophobic cores (C spine, R spine, and shell residues) for PKA-CWT (lime) and PKA-CF100A (hot pink), highlighting the structural perturbations of the R spine and shell residues. (B) Structural perturbation upon ATP binding for the hydrophobic core residues of PKA-CWT and PKA-CF100A shown as changes in the population densities versus rmsd. (C, D) First (PC1) and second (PC2) principal components describing breathing and shearing motions of the two lobes. (E) 2D projections and distributions of PC1 and PC2 for PKA-CWT and PKA-CF100A.

To analyze the internal correlated motions of the kinase, we further analyzed the MD trajectories of both wild-type and mutant enzyme using mutual information (Figure 8; McClendon et al., 2012). This method identifies correlated changes of backbone and side chain rotamers in proteins and detects clusters of residues that are responsible for intramolecular communication between active sites (McClendon et al., 2012). For PKA-CWT, we observed numerous strong correlations that are clustered within each lobe and across the enzyme, connecting key motifs, such as the Gly-rich loop, αC-β4 loop, activation loop, and C-terminal tail (Figure 8A). These correlation patterns are reminiscent of the CS correlations experimentally found for PKA-CWT (Wang et al., 2019), which constitute the hallmark of the dynamically committed state (Masterson et al., 2011; Masterson et al., 2010). In contrast, the mutual information matrix for the F100A mutant displays weaker and interspersed correlations across the enzyme. New correlations also are present across the helical C-lobe suggesting a rewiring of the internal allosteric communication (Figure 8B). A possible explanation is that the increased motion caused by the elimination of the F100 aromatic side chain at the αC-β4 loop propagates throughout the entire hydrophobic core. This structural reorganization causes the F100A kinase to adopt a dynamically uncommitted state (Masterson et al., 2011). Taken together, the simulations of F100A suggest that perturbations of the αC-β4 loop increase the local flexibility and break the structural connection between the two lobes, disrupting the correlated breathing/shearing motions highlighted in previous MD simulation studies (Tsigelny et al., 1999; Lu et al., 2005). Although the single F100A mutation does not drive the kinase into a completely inactive state (ES2), it is sufficient to abolish the structural couplings between the two lobes.

Figure 8. Mutual information analysis of backbone and side chain rotamers of ATP-bound PKA-CWT and PKA-CF100A.

Figure 8.

(A) Mutual information matrix for PKA-CWT showing well-organized clusters of interactions within each lobe and distinct inter-lobe communication typical of an active kinase. (B) Mutual information matrix for PKA-CF100A revealing an overall reorganization of the allosteric network caused by the disruption of the hydrophobic core. Effects of the F100A mutation on the catalytic efficiency and binding thermodynamics of PKA-C.

Based on the MD simulations of the F100A mutant, we hypothesized that the disruption of the structural coupling between the N- and C-lobe would affect the binding cooperativity between nucleotide (ATPγN) and pseudosubstrate inhibitor (PKI5-24). To test this hypothesis, we expressed, purified, and evaluated the catalytic efficiency for the WT and F100A kinases by carrying out steady-state coupled enzyme assays (Cook et al., 1982) using the standard substrate Kemptide (Kemp et al., 1977). F100A showed only a slight increase in KM and Vmax compared to PKA-CWT, resulting in a small reduction of the catalytic efficiency (kcat/KM = 0.50 ± 0.04 and 0.41 ± 0.08 for PKA-CWT and PKA-CF100A, respectively; Supplementary file 1). We then performed ITC (Wiseman et al., 1989) to obtain ΔG, ΔH, −TΔS, and Kd, and determine the cooperativity coefficient (σ) for ATPγN and PKI5-24 binding. We first analyzed the binding of ATPγN to the apo PKA-CF100A and, subsequently, the binding of PKI5-24 to the ATPγN-saturated PKA-CF100A (Supplementary file 2). We found that PKA-CWT and PKACF100A have similar binding affinities for ATPγN (Kd = 83 ± 8 and 73 ± 2 μM, respectively). However, in the apo form, F100A showed a threefold higher binding affinity for the pseudosubstrate relative to PKA-CWT (Kd = 5 ± 1 and 17 ± 2 μM, respectively – Supplementary file 2). Upon saturation with ATPγN, PKA-CF100A displayed a 12-fold reduction in binding affinity for PKI5-24, resulting in a σ of ~3, a value significantly lower than the WT enzyme (σ greater than 100). These data support the predictions of MD simulations and mutual information that ATP binding to F100A does not promote a conformational state fully competent with substrate binding.

NMR mapping of nucleotide-/pseudosubstrate-binding response

To elucidate the atomic details of the disrupted structural coupling and binding cooperativity for PKA-CF100A, we used solution NMR spectroscopy mapping its response to the nucleotide (ATPγN) and pseudosubstrate (PKI5-24) binding. Specifically, we monitored the 1H and 15N chemical shift perturbations (CSPs, Δδ) of the amide fingerprints for the binary (PKA-CF100A/ATPγN) and ternary (PKA-CF100A/ATPγN/PKI5-24) complexes and compared them with the corresponding complexes of PKA-CWT (Figure 9 and Figure 9—figure supplement 1). The interaction with ATPγN causes a dramatic broadening of several amide resonances throughout the structure of PKA-CF100A, suggesting the presence of an intermediate conformational exchange as previously observed (Srivastava et al., 2014). For the remainder of the amide peaks, both PKA-CWT and PKA-CF100A exhibit similar CSP profiles upon binding ATPγN (Figure 9A, B), although the extent of the CS changes is significantly attenuated for F100A (Figure 9—figure supplement 1B). This reduction is apparent for residues in the N-lobe (β2–β3 region), around the mutation site (β4), and at the C-terminal tail. A similar pattern emerges upon binding PKI5-24 to the ATPγN-saturated PKA-CF100A, where a substantial decrease in CSP is observed for residues of the C-lobe localized near the motifs critical for substrate binding (i.e., αE, αF, and αG helices, Figure 9C, D).

Figure 9. NMR map of the structural response of PKA-CF100A to nucleotide and protein kinase inhibitor (PKI) binding.

(A) Comparison of the chemical shift perturbation (CSP) of the amide resonances for PKA-CF100A (black) and PKA-CWT (cyan) upon ATPγN binding. The dashed line indicates one standard deviation from the average CSP. (B) CSPs of PKA-CF100A/ATPγN amide resonances mapped onto the crystal structure (PDB: 4WB5). (C) Comparison of the CSPs of the amide resonances for PKA-CF100A and PKA-CWT upon binding ATPγN and PKI5-24 (black). (D) CSPs for the F100A/ATPγN/PKI complex mapped onto the crystal structure (PDB: 4WB5).

Figure 9.

Figure 9—figure supplement 1. NMR fingerprints of PKA-CF100A.

Figure 9—figure supplement 1.

(A) [1H,15N]-WADE-TROSY spectra of apo, ADP-, ATPγN-, and ATPγN/PKI5-24-bound PKA-CF100A. (B) Changes in the chemical shift perturbation (CSP) between PKA-CWT and PKA-CF100A bound to ATPγN. (C) Changes in CSP (ΔδWT − ΔδF100A) upon binding ATPγN and PKI5-24.
Figure 9—figure supplement 2. COordiNated ChemIcal Shifts bEhavior (CONCISE) plot showing the shifts of the probability distribution of the amide resonances as a function of nucleotides and substrate binding.

Figure 9—figure supplement 2.

The per-residue chemical shift information is averaged into the average principal component (PC) score indicative of the position of each conformational state of the kinase along the open-to-closed equilibrium.

To determine the global response to ligand binding for WT and F100A, we analyzed the CSs of the amide fingerprints of the two proteins using the COordiNated ChemIcal Shifts bEhavior (CONCISE) (Cembran et al., 2014). CONCISE describes the overall changes of the protein fingerprint resonances by providing the probability density (population) of each state along the conformational equilibrium for binding phenomena that follow linear CS trajectories (Cembran et al., 2014). For PKA-CWT, both nucleotide- and pseudosubstrate-binding shift the overall population of the amides from an open to an intermediate and a fully closed state (Figure 9—figure supplement 2). A similar trend is observed for PKA-CF100A, though the probability densities are broader, indicating that the amide resonances follow a less coordinated response (Cembran et al., 2014). Also, the maximum of the probability density for the ternary complex is shifted toward the left, indicating that the mutant adopts a more open structure than the corresponding wild-type enzyme. Overall, the shapes and the positions of the probability distributions of the resonances suggest that several residues do not respond in a coordinated manner to the nucleotide binding, and PKI5-24 shifts the conformation of the kinase toward a partially closed state, which explains the loss in binding cooperativity as previously observed (Olivieri et al., 2021; Walker et al., 2019; Walker et al., 2021).

To define the allosteric network of the kinase upon binding nucleotides and substrate, we examined the CS using CHEmical Shift Covariance Analysis (CHESCA) (Walker et al., 2019; Walker et al., 2021; Olivieri et al., 2022), a statistical method that identifies correlated responses of residue pairs to a specific perturbation (i.e., ligand binding, mutations, etc.). CHESCA works under the assumption that pairwise correlated CS changes of residues identify possible intramolecular allosteric networks (Akimoto et al., 2013; Selvaratnam et al., 2011). For PKA-C, we found that coordinated structural rearrangements, as identified by CHESCA, are directly related to the extent of binding cooperativity (Walker et al., 2019; Walker et al., 2021; Olivieri et al., 2022). Therefore, we compared the CHESCA maps for PKA-CWT and PKACF100A for four different states: apo, ATPγN-, ADP-, and ATPγN/PKI5-24-bound. For PKA-CF100A, the CHESCA matrix exhibits sparser and more attenuated correlations (i.e., lower correlation coefficient value) relative to PKA-CWT (Figure 10A). Although many inter-lobe correlations are still present for F100A, several other correlations in specific structural domains such as the αG-, αH-, and αI-helices are absent or attenuated. For instance, the F100A mutation does not display correlations between the αA-helix and the C-terminal tail that constitute a critical ‘complement to the kinase core’ (Veron et al., 1993). We also utilized CHESCA to assess the allosteric communication among the PKA-C communities as defined by McClendon et al., 2014. The CHESCA community map for PKA-CWT shows strong correlations across the enzyme, especially for structurally adjacent communities and at the interface between the two lobes (see for instance the correlations among ComA, ComB, ComC, ComE, and ComH) (Figure 10B, C). For F100A, the CHESCA community map shows that the cross-talk between the nucleotide-binding (ComA) and positioning of αC-helix (ComB) communities, as well as the R-spine assembly (ComC) and the activation loop (ComF) communities are preserved (Figure 10B, C). However, the correlations between ComE, responsible for stabilizing the C spine, and ComC, involved in the assembly of the R spine, are absent. Similarly, the long-range correlations between the C and R spines (i.e., ComD with ComC) are missing. Finally, several correlations between ComF1, ComG, and ComH are no longer present. These communities orchestrate substrate recognition and R subunits binding. Overall, the CHESCA analysis for PKA-CF100A suggests that the reduced degree of cooperativity we determined thermodynamically corresponds to a decrease in coordinated structural changes upon ligand binding. The latter is apparent from the loss of correlated structural changes among the structural communities, including the hydrophobic spines, substrate binding cleft, and the docking surface for PKA interactions with other binding partners.

Figure 10. Correlated chemical shift changes reveal the uncoupling of the intramolecular allosteric network in PKA-CF100A.

(A) Comparison of the CHEmical Shift Covariance Analysis (CHESCA) matrices obtained from the analysis of the amide CS of PKA-CWT (blue correlations) and PKA-CF100A (black correlations). The correlations coefficients (Rij) were calculated using the apo, ADP-, ATPγN-, and ATPγN/PKI5-24-bound states. For clarity, only correlation with Rij > 0.98 are displayed. For the enlarged CHESCA map of F100A see Figure 10—figure supplement 1. The data for the PKA-CWT matrix were taken from Walker et al., 2019. (B) Community CHESCA analysis of PKA-CWT (blue correlations) and PKA-CF100A (black correlations). Only correlations with RA,B > 0.98 are shown. (C) Spider plot showing the extent of intramolecular correlations identified by the community CHESCA analysis for PKA-CF100A mapped onto the crystal structure (PDB: 4WB5). The thickness of each line in the spider plot indicates the extent of coupling between the communities.

Figure 10.

Figure 10—figure supplement 1. Intermolecular allosteric network of F100A mapped using CHEmical Shift Covariance Analysis (CHESCA) and community CHESCA.

Figure 10—figure supplement 1.

(A) CHESCA matrix obtained from the amide chemical shift trajectories of PKA-CF100A in the apo, ADP-, ATPγN-, and ATPγN/PKI5-24-bound states. Only correlations with Rij > 0.98 are displayed. (B) Plot of the correlation scores versus residue calculated for PKA-CWT (blue) and PKA-CF100A (black). (C) Community CHESCA analysis of PKA-CF100A. Only correlations with RA,B > 0.98 are shown. (D) Spider plots indicating the correlated structural communities of PKA-CF100A and PKA-CWT plotted on their corresponding structures. The size of each node is independent of the number of residues it encompasses, and the weight of each line indicates the strength of coupling between the individual communities.

Discussion

Our structural and dynamic studies suggest that the binding cooperativity of PKA-C originates from the allosteric coupling between the nucleotide-binding pocket and the interfacial region between the two lobes, which harbors the substrate binding cleft (Olivieri et al., 2021; Walker et al., 2019; Walker et al., 2021). The latter has been emphasized for other kinases such as Src and ERK2 (Foda et al., 2015; Iverson et al., 2020). The biological significance of this intramolecular communication has emerged from our recent studies on pathological mutations situated in the activation loop of PKA-C and linked to Cushing’s syndrome (Olivieri et al., 2021; Walker et al., 2019; Walker et al., 2021). These mutations drastically reduce substrate-binding affinity, and more importantly, disrupt the communication between the two ligand binding pockets of the kinase (Olivieri et al., 2021; Walker et al., 2019; Walker et al., 2021). Interestingly, the E31V mutation distal from the active site and also related to the Cushing’s syndrome, displays disfunction similar to the other orthosteric mutations, suggesting that it is possible to modulate substrate recognition allosterically (Walker et al., 2021). Indeed, these mutations are connected to allosteric nodes that, once perturbed, radiate their effects toward the periphery of the enzyme interrupting the coordinated dynamic coupling between the two lobes (Walker et al., 2021). Interestingly, these mutations do not prevent Kemptide phosphorylation; rather, they cause a loss of substrate fidelity with consequent aberrant phosphorylation of downstream substrates (Omar et al., 2022; Beuschlein et al., 2014; Calebiro et al., 2017; Calebiro et al., 2014; Di Dalmazi et al., 2014; Lubner, 2017). Additionally, recent thermodynamic and NMR analyses of PKA-C binding to different nucleotides and inhibitors demonstrated that it is possible to control substrate-binding affinity by changing the chemistry of the ligand at the ATP-binding pocket (Walker et al., 2019). Altogether, these studies put forward the idea that substrate phosphorylation and cooperativity between ATP and substrates may be controlled independently.

By integrating our NMR data with RAM simulations and MSM, we comprehensively mapped the free energy landscape of PKA-C in various forms. We found that the active kinase unleashed from the regulatory subunits occupies a broad energy basin (GS) that corresponds to the conformation of the ternary structure of PKA-C with ATP and pseudosubstrate (PKI5-24), exemplifying a catalytic competent state poised for phosphoryl transfer (Gerlits et al., 2019). We also identified two orthogonal conformationally excited states, ES1 and ES2. While ES1 corresponds to canonical inactive kinase conformations, the ES2 state was never observed in the crystallized structures. Our previous CEST NMR measurements suggested the presence of an additional sparsely populated state that, at that time, we were unable to characterize structurally (Olivieri et al., 2022). The CSs of this state did not follow the opening and closing of the kinase active cleft and were assigned to a possible alternate inactivation pathway (Olivieri et al., 2022). These new simulations and MSM show that this sparsely populated state may be attributed to the transition from GS to ES2, which features a disruption of hydrophobic packing, with a conformational rearrangement for the αC-β4 loop that causes a partial disruption of the hydrophobic R spine. These structural changes rewire the allosteric coupling between the two lobes, as shown by mutual information analysis. A single mutation (F100A), suggested by our simulations, promotes the flip of the αC-β4 loop and reproduces the hypothesized structural uncoupling between the two lobes of PKA-C. We experimentally tested the effects of the F100A mutation and found that it prevents the enzyme from adopting a conformation competent for substrate binding, resulting in a drastic reduction of the cooperativity between ATP and substrate. These NMR data further support our working model, showing that if the inter-lobe communication is interrupted, the binding response of the kinase is attenuated. Indeed, our investigation further emphasizes the integral role of the kinase hydrophobic core and demonstrates that alterations in the spines and shell residues may lead to a dysfunctional kinase by either preventing phosphorylation (see V104G and I150A mutations) (Kim et al., 2017) or by disrupting the binding cooperativity as for F100A.

The αC-β4 loop is a regulatory element present in all EPKs and its importance has been stressed in bioinformatics studies (Kannan and Neuwald, 2005) and supported by computational work (McClendon et al., 2014). F100 and F102 in the αC-β4 loop are at intersections of various structural communities and constitute a critical hydrophobic node that anchors the N- to the C-lobe. Also, studies on EGFR(epidermal growth factor receptor) and ErbB2 kinases led to the hypothesis that the αC-β4 loop may act as a molecular brake (Chen et al., 2007; Klein et al., 2015) or an autoinhibitory switch (Fan et al., 2008). Therefore, it is not surprising that activating mutations and in-frame insertions in the αC-β4 loop are frequently found in kinase-related cancers and somatic oncogenic mutations such as P101S, P101L, and L103F (McSkimming et al., 2015). Also, an elegant study by Kannan and coworkers emphasized the role of the αC-β4 loop in dimerization and aberrant activation of EGFR by insertion mutations (Ruan and Kannan, 2018). Moreover, in a recent paper Zhang and co-workers found a similar behavior for the HER2 exon 20 insertions (Zhao et al., 2020). These latter two studies propose that in-frame insertions alter the conformational landscape of the kinase rigidifying the structure around the αC-β4 loop and restricting the kinase conformational ensemble in a constitutively active state. Remarkably, in the case of EGRF insertion mutations, the activation of the kinase occurs in a length-dependent manner (Ruan and Kannan, 2018). Additionally, these human mutations display a gradual response to drugs, which can be exploited for designing selective inhibitors against EGFR pathological mutants (Yeung et al., 2020).

The data presented here show that it is possible to abolish the binding cooperativity of a kinase by turning the dial in the opposite direction, that is, increasing the flexibility of the αC-β4 loop and disconnecting the allosteric network between the N- and C-lobes. The identification of this new, partially inactivating pathway provides further understanding of how to control the dynamics and function of kinases.

Materials and methods

Key resources table.

Reagent type (species) or resource Designation Source or reference Identifiers Additional information
Gene (Homo sapiens) PKA-Cα PKA-C Uniprot ID:
P17612
Strain, strain background (Escherichia coli) BL21(DE3) pLyss Agilent Cat. #200132 Chemically
competent cells
Sequence-based reagent PKA-CF100A This study PCR primer
(Forward)
tattctgcaagcggtgaacgccccgtttctggttaagctg
Sequence-based reagent PKΙα 5-24 Synthetic peptide PKI5-24 Chemically synthesized
Sequence-based reagent Kemptide Synthetic peptide Kemptide LRRASLG
Commercial assay or kit QuikChange Lightning Multi Mutagenesis Kit Agilent genomics Cat #210519 Commercial
mutagenesis kit
Recombinant DNA reagent PKA-CF100A This study PKA-CF100A Single Ala mutant
of PKA-C
Chemical compound, drug AMP-PNP or ATPγN Roche Applied Science CAS 25612-73-1 ATP analogous
Chemical compound, drug ADP Sigma-Aldrich CAS 20398-34-9 Nucleotide
Software, algorithm TopSpin 4.1 Bruker Inc https://www.bruker.com/
Software, algorithm NMRFAM-Sparky NMRFAM https://nmrfam.wisc.edu/nmrfam-sparky-distribution/
Software, algorithm NMRPipe Delaglio F., NIH https://www.ibbr.umd.edu/nmrpipe/install.html
Software, algorithm POKY Lee W. https://sites.google.com/view/pokynmr
Software, algorithm COordiNated ChemIcal Shift bEhavior (CONCISE) Veglia G. https://conservancy.umn.edu/handle/11299/217206
https://conservancy.umn.edu/handle/11299/227294
Matlab script
Software, algorithm CHEmical Shift Covariance Analysis (CHESCA) Melacini G. https://academic.oup.com/bioinformatics/article/37/8/1176/5905475?login=true NMRFAM-Sparky
&POKY tools
Software, algorithm PyMol Schrödinger, LLC https://pymol.org
Software, algorithm MatLab2022b MathWorks https://www.mathworks.com/products/matlab.html
Software, algorithm GraphPad Prism 9 GraphPad Software Inc https://www.graphpad.com/
Software, algorithm GROMACS 4.6 Hess B et al. http://www.gromacs.org/
Software, algorithm CHARMM36a1 Best et al., 2012 https://doi.org/10.1021/ct300400x
Software, algorithm PLUMED 2.1.1 Bonomi et al., 2009 https://www.plumed.org/doc-v2.5/user-doc/html/_c_h_a_n_g_e_s-2-1.html
Software, algorithm ALMOST 2.1 Kohlhoff et al., 2009. https://svn://svn.code.sf.net/p/almost/code/almost-code
Software, algorithm METAGUI Biarnés et al., 2012 https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0010465511003079
Software, algorithm MDTraj McGibbon et al., 2015 https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0006349515008267
Software, algorithm SPARTA+ Shen and Bax, 2010 https://spin.niddk.bov/bax/software/SPARTA+/
Software, algorithm MSMbuilder Harrigan et al., 2017; https://msmbuilder.org/
Software, algorithm Mutinf McClendon et al., 2012 https://simtk.org/projects/mutinf/

RAM simulations

System setup

As a starting structure, we used the coordinates of the crystal structure of PKA-CWT (PDB ID: 1ATP) and added the missing residues 1–14 at the N terminus. The protonation state of histidine residues was set as previously reported (Cembran et al., 2012). The kinase was solvated in a rhombic dodecahedron solvent box using the three-point charge TIP3P model (Jorgensen et al., 1983) for water, which extended approximately 10 Å away from the surface of the proteins. Counter ions (K+ and Cl) were added to ensure electrostatic neutrality to a final ionic concentration of ~150 mM. All protein covalent bonds were constrained using the LINCS algorithm (Hess et al., 1997) and long-range electrostatic interactions were simulated using the particle-mesh Ewald method with a real-space cutoff of 10 Å (Darden et al., 1993). The simulations of apo, binary (one Mg2+ ion and one ATP), and ternary (two Mg2+ ions, one ATP, and PKI5-24) forms were performed simultaneously using GROMACS 4.6 (Hess et al., 1997) with CHARMM36a1 force field (Best et al., 2012). For F100A, the corresponding residues were mutated through the mutagenesis wizard of Pymol (DeLano, 2002).

Standard MD simulations

Each system was minimized using the steepest descent algorithm to remove the geometric distortions, and then gradually heated to 300 K at a constant volume over 1 ns using harmonic restraints with a force constant of 1000 kJ/(mol*Å) (Huse and Kuriyan, 2002) on heavy atoms for both the kinase and nucleotide. The restraints were gradually released over the following 12 ns of simulations at constant pressure (1 atm) and temperature (300 K). The systems were equilibrated for an additional 20 ns without positional restraints. A Parrinello–Rahman barostat (Parrinello and Rahman, 1980) was used to keep the pressure constant, while a V-rescale thermostat (Bussi et al., 2007) with a time step of 2 fs was used to keep the temperature constant. Each system was simulated for 1.05 µs, with snapshots recorded every 20 ps.

Replica exchange (REX) simulations

Following standard MD simulations, parallel REX simulations were set up on the apo, binary, and ternary forms of PKA-C. Four replicas were used for each REX simulation, and the initial structures were randomly chosen from the µs-scale unbiased simulations. CSs of PKA-C for N, CA, CO, CB, and HN from NMR experiments were imposed as restraints based on the following penalty function:

Ecs=αk=1Nl=15δklexp-1Mm=1Mδklcalc2

where α is the force constant, k runs over all residues of the protein, l denotes the different backbone atoms, and m runs over the four replicas. δklcalc was computed using CamShift, a module of ALMOST-2.1 (Kohlhoff et al., 2009). The force constant was gradually increased from 0 (unbiased) to 20 (maximum restraints for production) over 50 ns. All other settings were identical to the unbiased simulations. REX simulations were carried out with GROMACS 4.6 (Hess et al., 2008), with the REX controlled by the PLUMED 2.1.1 module (Bonomi et al., 2009). Approximately, 100 ns of REX simulations were further carried out for each replica in the three PKA-C forms.

RAM simulations

RAM simulations were started from the final structures of REX simulations. The CS restraints were imposed in the same manner as for the REX simulations. Four CVs are chosen to increase the conformational plasticity around the catalytic cores (detailed in Figure 2—figure supplement 1): (CVI) the ψ angles of the backbone of all the loops that are not in contact with ATP (Back-far), (CVII) the ϕ angles of the backbone of all the loops that are in contact with ATP (Back-close), (CVIII) the χ1 angles of side chains of all the loops that are in contact with ATP (Side-close), (CVIV) the radius of gyration calculated over the rigid part (i.e., residues 50–300) of the protein (rgss). Gaussian deposition rate was performed with an initial rate of 0.125 kJ/mol/ps, where the σ values were set to 0.5, 0.2, 0.2, and 0.01 nm for the four CVs, respectively. The RAM simulations were also carried out with GROMACS 4.6 in conjunction with PLUMED 2.1 and ALMOST 2.1, and continued for ~400 ns for each replica with exchange trails every 1 ps.

Reconstruction of free energy surface (FES) from the RAM simulations

After about 300 ns, the sampling along the first three CVs reached convergence with fluctuations of bias within 1 kcal/mol, allowing a reliable reconstruction of the corresponding FES. The production run was continued for another 100 ns to sample enough conformations. These conformations were first clustered into microstates using the regular spatial method (cutoff radius of 0.13), and then the free energy of each state was reweighted according to the deposited potential along each CV, which can be obtained from the analysis module of METAGUI (Biarnés et al., 2012). To visualize the distribution of these microstates and their relative energy differences, we further performed principal component analysis to project the microstates represented in the three-dimensional CV space into two-dimensional space spanned by PC1 and PC2. Then we plotted these microstates in a three-dimensional space spanned by PC1, PC2, and free energy differences ΔG.

Independent validation of CSs with SPARTA+

During the REX and RAM simulations, the CSs were computed via CamShift in ALMOST 2.1 (Kohlhoff et al., 2009). As an independent validation for the efficacy of the bias, we further calibrated the CSs of 2000 snapshots with MDTraj (McGibbon et al., 2015) and SPARTA+ (Shen and Bax, 2010).

Adaptive sampling

The first round of adaptive sampling started from the snapshots of low-energy microstates obtained from the previous step, that is, 1200 structures for the apo form, 400 structures for the binary form, and 200 structures for the ternary form. The initial velocities were randomly generated to satisfy the Maxwell distribution at 300 K. For the apo form, a 10-ns simulation was performed for each run, whereas for the binary, each simulation lasted 30 ns, resulting in a total of 12 μs trajectories for both the apo and binary forms. Three rounds of adaptive sampling were started from the 400 microstates, derived via K-mean clustering of all snapshots of previous ensembles, to obtain a converged free energy landscape. Therefore, a total of 100 µs trajectories and 1,000,000 snapshots (100 ps per frame) were collected for both the apo and binary form after three rounds of adaptive sampling, and a total of 60 µs trajectories were collected for the ternary form.

MSM and tICA

The Cartesian coordinates of key hydrophobic residues, including R-spine residues, L95, L106, Y164, and F185, and the shell residues, V104, M118, and M120, were chosen as the metrics to characterize the conformational transition of the hydrophobic core of PKA-C. Specifically, each snapshot was first aligned to the same reference structure by superimposing the αE (residues 140–160) and αF helices (residues 217–233) and represented by the deviation of the Cartesian coordinates of key residues. The representation in this metric space was further reduced to 10-dimension vectors using tICA (Schwantes and Pande, 2013) at a lag time of 1 ns. All snapshots were clustered into 400 microstates with K-mean clustering. An MSM was built upon the transition counts between these microstates.

Kinetic Monte Carlo trajectory of PKA-C in different forms

Long trajectories were generated using a kinetic Monte Carlo method based on the MSM transition probability matrix of the three forms of PKA-C. Specifically, the discrete jumps between the 100 microstates were sampled for 60 μs. Random conformations were chosen for each state from all the available snapshots. Subsequently, the time series of various order parameters were analyzed and plotted.

Protein expression and purification

The recombinant human Cα subunit of cAMP-dependent protein kinase with the Phe to Ala mutation in position 100 (PKA-CF100A) was generated from the human PKA-Cα wild-type using QuikChange Lightning mutagenesis kit (Agilent genomics). The key resource table lists the PCR primers used to modify the pET-28a expression vector encoding for the wild-type human PKA-Cα gene (PRKACA – uniprot P17612) (Olivieri et al., 2021; Walker et al., 2019; Walker et al., 2021). The unlabeled and uniformly 15N-labeled PKA-CF100A mutant was expressed and purified following the same protocols used for the wild-type protein (Masterson et al., 2008). Briefly, transformed E. coli BL21 (DE3) pLyss cells (Agilent) were cultured overnight at 30°C in Luria-Bertani (LB) medium. The next morning, the cells were transferred to fresh LB medium for the overexpression of the unlabeled protein or to M9 minimal medium supplied with 15NH4Cl (Cambridge Isotope Laboratories Inc) as the only nitrogen source for the labeled protein overexpression. In both cases, protein overexpression was induced with 0.4 mM of β-D-thiogalactopyranoside and carried out for 16 hr at 20°C. The cells were harvested by centrifugation and resuspended in 50 mM Tris–HCl, 30 mM KH2PO4, 100 mM NaCl, 5 mM 2-mercaptoethanol, 0.15 mg/ml lysozyme, 200 μM ATP, DNaseI, 1 tablet of cOmplete ULTRA EDTA-free protease inhibitors (Roche Applied Science) (pH 8.0) and lysed using French press at 1000 psi. The cell lysate was cleared by centrifugation (60,000 × g, 4°C, 45  min), and the supernatant was batch-bound with Ni2+-NTA agarose affinity resin (Thermo Scientific). The his-tagged PKA-CF100A was eluted with 50 mM Tris–HCl, 30 mM KH2PO4, 100  mM NaCl, 5  mM 2-mercaptoethanol, 0.5  mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride (PMSF) (pH 8.0) supplied with 200 mM of imidazole. The tail of poly-His was cleaved using a stoichiometric amount of recombinant tobacco etch virus protease in 20 mM KH2PO4, 25 mM KCl, 5 mM 2-mercaptoethanol, 0.1 mM PMSF (pH 6.5), overnight at 4°C. The different phosphorylation states of PKA-CF100A were separated using a cation exchange column (HiTrap Q-SP, GE Healthcare Life Sciences) using a linear gradient of KCl in 20 mM KH2PO4 at pH 6.5 (Yonemoto et al., 1993). The purified protein isoforms were then stored in phosphate buffer containing 10 mM dithiothreitol (DTT), 10 mM MgCl2, and 1 mM NaN3 at 4°C. The protein purity was assessed by sodium dodecyl sulfate–polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis.

Peptide synthesis

The Kemptide (LRRASLG) and PKI5-24 (TTYADFIASGRTGRRNAIHD) peptides were synthesized using a CEM Liberty Blue microwave synthesizer using standard Fmoc chemistry. All peptides were cleaved with Reagent K (82.5% trifluoroacetic acid, 5% phenol, 5% thioanisole, 2.5% ethanedithiol, and 5% water) for 3 hr and purified using a semipreparative Supelco C18 reverse-phase HPLC column at 3 ml/min. The purified peptides were concentrated, lyophilized, and stored at −20°C. Molecular weight and quantity were verified by matrix assisted laser desorption ionization-time of flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF) and/or amino-acid analysis (Texas A&M University).

ITC measurements

PKA-CF100A was dialyzed into 20 mM 3-(N-morpholino)propanesulfonic acid (MOPS), 90 mM KCl, 10 mM DTT, 10 mM MgCl2, and 1 mM NaN3 (pH 6.5) and concentrated using conical spin concentrator (10 kDa membrane cutoff, Millipore) to a solution at 80–100 μM, as confirmed by A280 = 55,475 M−1 cm−1. Approximately 300 μl of protein was used for each experiment, with 50 μl of 2  mM ATPγN and/or 1 mM PKI5-24 in the titrant syringe. All measurements were performed at 300 K in triplicates with a low-volume NanoITC (TA Instruments). The binding was assumed to be 1:1, and curves were analyzed with the NanoAnalyze software (TA Instruments) using the Wiseman isotherm (Wiseman et al., 1989).

dMXdXtot=ΔH°V012+1-1-r2-Rm/2Rm2-2Rm1-r+1+r21/2

where d[MX] is the change in total complex relative to the change in total protein concentration, d[Xtot] is dependent on r (the ratio of Kd relative to the total protein concentration), and Rm (the ratio between total ligand and total protein concentration). The heat of dilution of the ligand into the buffer was considered for all experiments and subtracted.

The free energy of binding was determined from:

G=RTlnKd

where R is the universal gas constant and T is the temperature at measurement (300 K). The entropic contribution to binding was calculated using:

TS=H-G

The degree of cooperativity (σ) was calculated as:

σ=KdapoKdnucleotide

where Kd apo is the dissociation constant of PKI5-24 binding to the apo-enzyme, and Kd nucleotide is the corresponding dissociation constant for PKI5-24 binding to the nucleotide-bound kinase.

Enzyme assays

Steady-state coupled enzyme activity assays using Kemptide as substrate were performed under saturating ATP concentrations and spectrophotometrically at 298 K, as reported by Cook et al., 1982. The values of Vmax and KM were obtained from a nonlinear fit of the initial velocities to the Michaelis–Menten equation.

NMR spectroscopy

NMR measurements were performed on a Bruker Avance NEO spectrometer operating at a 1H Larmor frequency of 600 MHz equipped with a cryogenic probe or on a Bruker Avance III 850 MHz spectrometer equipped with a TCI cryoprobe. The NMR experiments were recorded at 300 K in 20 mM KH2PO4 (pH 6.5), 90 mM KCl, 10 mM MgCl2, 10 mM DTT, 1 mM NaN3, 5% D2O, and 0.1% 4-benzene sulfonyl fluoride hydrochloride (AEBSF, Pefabloc – Sigma-Aldrich). Concentrations for samples were 0.15 mM of uniformly 15N-labeled PKA-CF100A, as determined by A280 measurements, 12 mM ATPγN or ADP was added for the nucleotide-bound form, and 0.3 mM PKI5-24 for the ternary complex. [1H, 15N]-WADE-TROSY-HSQC pulse sequence (Manu et al., 2022) was used to record the amide fingerprint spectra of PKA-CF100A in the apo, nucleotide-bound (ADP- or ATPγN-bound – binary form), and ternary complex (PKACF100A/ATPγN/PKI5-24). All [1H, 15N]-WADE-TROSY-HSQC experiments were acquired with 2048 (proton) and128 (nitrogen) complex points, processed using NMRPipe (Delaglio et al., 1995) and visualized using NMRFAM-SPARKY (Lee et al., 2015) and POKY (Manthey et al., 2022). Combined CSPs were calculated using 1H and 15N CSs according to:

Δδ=(ΔδH)2+(0.154×ΔδN)2

in which Δδ is the CSP; ΔδH and ΔδN are the differences of 1H and 15N CSs, respectively, between the first and last points of the titration; and 0.154 is the scaling factor for nitrogen (Williamson, 2013).

COordiNated ChemIcal Shift bEhavior

The normal distributions reported in the CONCISE plot were calculated using principal component analysis for residues whose CSs responded linearly to ligand binding (Cembran et al., 2014). In this work, we use the 1H and 15N CSs derived from the [1H, 15N]-WADE-TROSY-HSQC experiments for the apo, ADP-, ATPγN-, and ATPγN/PKI5-24-bound forms of PKA-C.

CHEmical Shift Covariance Analysis

This analysis was used to identify and characterize allosteric networks of residues showing concerted responses to nucleotide and pseudosubstrate binding. To identify inter-residue correlations, four states were used: apo, ATPγN-, ADP-, and ATPγN/PKI5-24-bound. The identification of inter-residue correlations by CHESCA relies on agglomerative clustering and singular value decomposition (Selvaratnam et al., 2011). Pairwise correlations of CS changes were calculated to identify networks. When plotted on a correlation matrix, the 2D correlations allow the identification of local and long-range correlated residues. For each residue, the maximum change in the CS was calculated in both the 1H (x) and 15N (y) dimensions (Δδx,y). The residues included in the CHESCA analysis were those satisfying Δδx,y > ½ ΔνxA,yA + ½ ΔνxB,yB, where A and B correspond to two different forms analyzed, and Δν denotes the linewidth. Correlation scores were used to quantify the CHESCA correlation of a single residue or a group of residues with another group. Correlation scores were evaluated for single residues or for the entire protein using the following expression:

CorrScore=numberof(Rij>Rcutoff)totalnumberofRij

where Rij is the correlation coefficient and i and j denote (1) a single residue and the remainder residues of the protein, respectively, or (2) both represent all the assigned residues in the entire protein. For all the analyses a Rcutoff of 0.98 was used. Community CHESCA analysis utilizes a similar approach to map correlations between functional communities within the kinase. Each community represents a group of residues associated with a function or regulatory mechanism (McClendon et al., 2014). To represent community-based CHESCA analysis, we utilized Rcutoff > 0.8. For instance, to represent a CS correlation between two communities (X and Y) with nA and nB number of assigned residues, respectively, the correlation score between A and B is defined as

RA,B=numberof(Rij>Rcutoff)/(nAnB)

where Rij is the correlation coefficient between residue i (belonging to community A) and residue j (belonging to community B). Rcutoff is the correlation value cutoff. RA,B assumes values from 0 (no correlation between residues in A and B) to 1 (all residues in A have correlations > cutoff with all residues in B).

Materials availability statement

All newly created materials are available upon request. Details on how to obtain these materials can be found by contacting the corresponding author or through the repository website mentioned above. This ensures transparent disclosure and accessibility for further research and verification.

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the National Institutes of Health GM 100310 and HL 144130 to GV. The authors would like to acknowledge the Minnesota Supercomputing Institute for MD calculations. YW would like to thank the Guangdong Pearl River Talent Program (2021QN02Y618) and the National Natural Science Foundation of China (22007069, 92269102) for part of the MD analysis carried out at the Shenzhen Bay Laboratory Supercomputing Centre.

Funding Statement

The funders had no role in study design, data collection, and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Contributor Information

Gianluigi Veglia, Email: vegli001@umn.edu.

Amy H Andreotti, Iowa State University, United States.

Volker Dötsch, Goethe University, Germany.

Funding Information

This paper was supported by the following grants:

  • National Institute of General Medical Sciences GM100310 to Gianluigi Veglia.

  • National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute NHLBI to Gianluigi Veglia.

  • Guangdong Pearl River Talent Program 2021QN02Y618 to Yingjie Wang.

  • National Natural Science Foundation of China-China Academy of General Technology Joint Fund for Basic Research 22007069 to Yingjie Wang.

  • National Natural Science Foundation of China-China Academy of General Technology Joint Fund for Basic Research 92269102 to Yingjie Wang.

  • National Institutes of Health 100310 to Gianluigi Veglia.

  • National Institutes of Health 144130 to Gianluigi Veglia.

Additional information

Competing interests

No competing interests declared.

Author contributions

Conceptualization, Formal analysis, Validation, Investigation, Visualization, Writing – original draft, Writing – review and editing.

Conceptualization, Data curation, Software, Formal analysis, Validation, Investigation, Visualization, Writing – original draft.

Investigation, Writing – review and editing.

Data curation, Formal analysis, Validation, Investigation, Visualization.

Formal analysis, Writing – review and editing.

Formal analysis, Supervision, Writing – review and editing.

Formal analysis, Supervision, Funding acquisition, Writing – review and editing.

Formal analysis, Supervision, Writing – review and editing.

Formal analysis, Supervision, Writing – original draft, Writing – review and editing.

Conceptualization, Supervision, Funding acquisition, Writing – original draft, Writing – review and editing.

Conceptualization, Data curation, Supervision, Funding acquisition, Visualization, Writing – original draft, Project administration, Writing – review and editing.

Additional files

Supplementary file 1. Kinetic parameters of Kemptide phosphorylation by PKA-CWT and PKA-CF100A obtained from coupled assays.

The KM and Vmax values were obtained from a nonlinear least squares analysis of the concentration-dependent initial phosphorylation rates. Errors in the kcat/KM ratios were propagated from the individual errors in KM and kcat.

elife-91506-supp1.docx (14.3KB, docx)
Supplementary file 2. Changes in enthalpy, entropy, free energy, and dissociation constants for nucleotide binding to PKA-CWT and PKA-CF100A.

All errors were calculated from triplicate measurements. Values for PKA-CWT are taken from Walker et al., 2019

elife-91506-supp2.docx (16.6KB, docx)
Supplementary file 3. Changes in enthalpy, entropy, free energy, and dissociation constants for PKI5-24 binding to apo and ATPγN - saturated PKA-CWT and PKA-CF100A.

All errors were derived from triplicate measurements. The error for the cooperativity coefficient (σ) was propagated from the errors in Kd. Values for PKA-CWT were originally published in Walker et al., 2019.

elife-91506-supp3.docx (17.3KB, docx)
MDAR checklist

Data availability

All the data generated or analyzed in this study are included in the manuscript and supporting files. The NMR chemical shifts and MD trajectories are deposited in the Data Repository for the University of Minnesota, https://doi.org/10.13020/8f9s-qd79.

The following dataset was generated:

Olivieri C, Cristina O. 2024. The role of the αC-β4 loop in regulating cooperativity interaction in Protein Kinase A. Dyrad Digital respitory.

References

  1. Akimoto M, Selvaratnam R, McNicholl ET, Verma G, Taylor SS, Melacini G. Signaling through dynamic linkers as revealed by PKA. PNAS. 2013;110:14231–14236. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1312644110. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Bastidas AC, Deal MS, Steichen JM, Guo Y, Wu J, Taylor SS. Phosphoryl transfer by protein kinase A is captured in A crystal lattice. Journal of the American Chemical Society. 2013;135:4788–4798. doi: 10.1021/ja312237q. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Best RB, Zhu X, Shim J, Lopes PEM, Mittal J, Feig M, Mackerell AD., Jr Optimization of the additive CHARMM all-atom protein force field targeting improved sampling of the backbone φ, ψ and side-chain χ(1) and χ(2) dihedral angles. Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation. 2012;8:3257–3273. doi: 10.1021/ct300400x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Beuschlein F, Fassnacht M, Assié G, Calebiro D, Stratakis CA, Osswald A, Ronchi CL, Wieland T, Sbiera S, Faucz FR, Schaak K, Schmittfull A, Schwarzmayr T, Barreau O, Vezzosi D, Rizk-Rabin M, Zabel U, Szarek E, Salpea P, Forlino A, Vetro A, Zuffardi O, Kisker C, Diener S, Meitinger T, Lohse MJ, Reincke M, Bertherat J, Strom TM, Allolio B. Constitutive activation of PKA catalytic subunit in adrenal Cushing’s syndrome. The New England Journal of Medicine. 2014;370:1019–1028. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1310359. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Biarnés X, Pietrucci F, Marinelli F, Laio A. METAGUI. A VMD interface for analyzing metadynamics and molecular dynamics simulations. Computer Physics Communications. 2012;183:203–211. doi: 10.1016/j.cpc.2011.08.020. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  6. Bonomi M, Branduardi D, Bussi G, Camilloni C, Provasi D, Raiteri P, Donadio D, Marinelli F, Pietrucci F, Broglia RA, Parrinello M. PLUMED: A portable plugin for free-energy calculations with molecular dynamics. Computer Physics Communications. 2009;180:1961–1972. doi: 10.1016/j.cpc.2009.05.011. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  7. Bussi G, Donadio D, Parrinello M. Canonical sampling through velocity rescaling. The Journal of Chemical Physics. 2007;126:014101. doi: 10.1063/1.2408420. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Calebiro D, Hannawacker A, Lyga S, Bathon K, Zabel U, Ronchi C, Beuschlein F, Reincke M, Lorenz K, Allolio B, Kisker C, Fassnacht M, Lohse MJ. PKA catalytic subunit mutations in adrenocortical Cushing’s adenoma impair association with the regulatory subunit. Nature Communications. 2014;5:5680. doi: 10.1038/ncomms6680. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Calebiro D, Bathon K, Weigand I. Mechanisms of aberrant PKA activation by Cα subunit mutations. Hormone and Metabolic Research = Hormon- Und Stoffwechselforschung = Hormones et Metabolisme. 2017;49:307–314. doi: 10.1055/s-0042-112817. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Camilloni C, Cavalli A, Vendruscolo M. Assessment of the use of NMR chemical shifts as replica-averaged structural restraints in molecular dynamics simulations to characterize the dynamics of proteins. The Journal of Physical Chemistry. B. 2013;117:1838–1843. doi: 10.1021/jp3106666. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Camilloni C, Vendruscolo M. Statistical mechanics of the denatured state of a protein using replica-averaged metadynamics. Journal of the American Chemical Society. 2014;136:8982–8991. doi: 10.1021/ja5027584. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Cembran A, Masterson LR, McClendon CL, Taylor SS, Gao J, Veglia G. Conformational equilibrium of N-myristoylated cAMP-dependent protein kinase A by molecular dynamics simulations. Biochemistry. 2012;51:10186–10196. doi: 10.1021/bi301279f. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Cembran A, Kim J, Gao J, Veglia G. NMR mapping of protein conformational landscapes using coordinated behavior of chemical shifts upon ligand binding. Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics. 2014;16:6508–6518. doi: 10.1039/c4cp00110a. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Chen H, Ma J, Li W, Eliseenkova AV, Xu C, Neubert TA, Miller WT, Mohammadi M. A molecular brake in the kinase hinge region regulates the activity of receptor tyrosine kinases. Molecular Cell. 2007;27:717–730. doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2007.06.028. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Cook PF, Neville ME, Vrana KE, Hartl FT, Roskoski R. Adenosine cyclic 3’,5’-monophosphate dependent protein kinase: kinetic mechanism for the bovine skeletal muscle catalytic subunit. Biochemistry. 1982;21:5794–5799. doi: 10.1021/bi00266a011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Darden T, York D, Pedersen L. Particle Mesh Ewald - an N.Log(N) method for ewald sums in large systems. Journal of Chemical Physics. 1993;98:10089–10092. doi: 10.1063/1.464397. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  17. Delaglio F, Grzesiek S, Vuister GW, Zhu G, Pfeifer J, Bax A. NMRPipe: a multidimensional spectral processing system based on UNIX pipes. Journal of Biomolecular NMR. 1995;6:277–293. doi: 10.1007/BF00197809. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. DeLano W. The PyMOL Molecular Graphics System, Version 0.99 Rc6. DeLano Scientific; 2002. [Google Scholar]
  19. Di Dalmazi G, Kisker C, Calebiro D, Mannelli M, Canu L, Arnaldi G, Quinkler M, Rayes N, Tabarin A, Laure Jullié M, Mantero F, Rubin B, Waldmann J, Bartsch DK, Pasquali R, Lohse M, Allolio B, Fassnacht M, Beuschlein F, Reincke M. Novel somatic mutations in the catalytic subunit of the protein kinase A as A cause of adrenal Cushing’s syndrome: A European multicentric study. The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology and Metabolism. 2014;99:E2093–E2100. doi: 10.1210/jc.2014-2152. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Fan Y-X, Wong L, Ding J, Spiridonov NA, Johnson RC, Johnson GR. Mutational activation of ErbB2 reveals a new protein kinase autoinhibition mechanism. The Journal of Biological Chemistry. 2008;283:1588–1596. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M708116200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Foda ZH, Shan Y, Kim ET, Shaw DE, Seeliger MA. A dynamically coupled allosteric network underlies binding cooperativity in Src kinase. Nature Communications. 2015;6:5939. doi: 10.1038/ncomms6939. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Gerlits O, Tian J, Das A, Langan P, Heller WT, Kovalevsky A. Phosphoryl transfer reaction snapshots in crystals: insights into the mechanism of protein kinase a catalytic subunit. The Journal of Biological Chemistry. 2015;290:15538–15548. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M115.643213. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Gerlits O, Weiss KL, Blakeley MP, Veglia G, Taylor SS, Kovalevsky A. Zooming in on protons: Neutron structure of protein kinase A trapped in A product complex. Science Advances. 2019;5:eaav0482. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.aav0482. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Han B, Liu YF, Ginzinger SW, Wishart DS. SHIFTX2: significantly improved protein chemical shift prediction. Journal of Biomolecular NMR. 2011;50:43–57. doi: 10.1007/s10858-011-9478-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Harrigan MP, Sultan MM, Hernández CX, Husic BE, Eastman P, Schwantes CR, Beauchamp KA, McGibbon RT, Pande VS. MSMBuilder: Statistical Models for Biomolecular Dynamics. Biophysical Journal. 2017;112:10–15. doi: 10.1016/j.bpj.2016.10.042. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Hess B, Bekker H, Berendsen HJC, Fraaije J. LINCS: A linear constraint solver for molecular simulations. Journal of Computational Chemistry. 1997;18:1463–1472. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1096-987X(199709)18:12&#x0003c;1463::AID-JCC4&#x0003e;3.0.CO;2-H. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  27. Hess Berk, Kutzner C, van der Spoel D, Lindahl E. GROMACS 4:algorithms for highly efficient, load-balanced, and scalable molecular simulation. Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation. 2008;4:435–447. doi: 10.1021/ct700301q. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Hu J, Ahuja LG, Meharena HS, Kannan N, Kornev AP, Taylor SS, Shaw AS. Kinase regulation by hydrophobic spine assembly in cancer. Molecular and Cellular Biology. 2015;35:264–276. doi: 10.1128/MCB.00943-14. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Huse M, Kuriyan J. The conformational plasticity of protein kinases. Cell. 2002;109:275–282. doi: 10.1016/s0092-8674(02)00741-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Husic BE, Pande VS. Markov state models: from an art to a science. Journal of the American Chemical Society. 2018;140:2386–2396. doi: 10.1021/jacs.7b12191. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Iverson DB, Xiao Y, Jones DN, Eisenmesser EZ, Ahn NG. Activation loop dynamics are coupled to core motions in extracellular signal-regulated kinase-2. Biochemistry. 2020;59:2698–2706. doi: 10.1021/acs.biochem.0c00485. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Johnson DA, Akamine P, Radzio-Andzelm E, Madhusudan M, Taylor SS. Dynamics of cAMP-dependent protein kinase. Chemical Reviews. 2001;101:2243–2270. doi: 10.1021/cr000226k. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Jorgensen WL, Chandrasekhar J, Madura JD, Impey RW, Klein ML. Comparison of simple potential functions for simulating liquid water. The Journal of Chemical Physics. 1983;79:926–935. doi: 10.1063/1.445869. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  34. Kannan N, Neuwald AF. Did protein kinase regulatory mechanisms evolve through elaboration of a simple structural component? Journal of Molecular Biology. 2005;351:956–972. doi: 10.1016/j.jmb.2005.06.057. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Kannan N, Neuwald AF, Taylor SS. Analogous regulatory sites within the αC-β4 loop regions of ZAP-70 tyrosine kinase and AGC kinases. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta. 2008;1784:27–32. doi: 10.1016/j.bbapap.2007.09.007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Kemp BE, Graves DJ, Benjamini E, Krebs EG. Role of multiple basic residues in determining the substrate specificity of cyclic AMP-dependent protein kinase. The Journal of Biological Chemistry. 1977;252:4888–4894. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Kim J, Ahuja LG, Chao F-A, Xia Y, McClendon CL, Kornev AP, Taylor SS, Veglia G. A dynamic hydrophobic core orchestrates allostery in protein kinases. Science Advances. 2017;3:e1600663. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.1600663. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Klein T, Vajpai N, Phillips JJ, Davies G, Holdgate GA, Phillips C, Tucker JA, Norman RA, Scott AD, Higazi DR, Lowe D, Thompson GS, Breeze AL. Structural and dynamic insights into the energetics of activation loop rearrangement in FGFR1 kinase. Nature Communications. 2015;6:7877. doi: 10.1038/ncomms8877. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Knighton DR, Xuong NH, Taylor SS, Sowadski JM. Crystallization studies of cAMP-dependent protein kinase: Cocrystals of the catalytic subunit with A 20 amino acid residue peptide inhibitor and MgATP diffract to 3.0 A resolution. Journal of Molecular Biology. 1991a;220:217–220. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(91)90005-q. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Knighton DR, Zheng JH, Ten Eyck LF, Ashford VA, Xuong NH, Taylor SS, Sowadski JM. Crystal structure of the catalytic subunit of cyclic adenosine monophosphate-dependent protein kinase. Science. 1991b;253:407–414. doi: 10.1126/science.1862342. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Knighton DR, Zheng JH, Ten Eyck LF, Xuong NH, Taylor SS, Sowadski JM. Structure of a peptide inhibitor bound to the catalytic subunit of cyclic adenosine monophosphate-dependent protein kinase. Science. 1991c;253:414–420. doi: 10.1126/science.1862343. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Kohlhoff KJ, Robustelli P, Cavalli A, Salvatella X, Vendruscolo M. Fast and accurate predictions of protein NMR chemical shifts from interatomic distances. Journal of the American Chemical Society. 2009;131:13894–13895. doi: 10.1021/ja903772t. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Kohlhoff KJ, Shukla D, Lawrenz M, Bowman GR, Konerding DE, Belov D, Altman RB, Pande VS. Cloud-based simulations on Google Exacycle reveal ligand modulation of GPCR activation pathways. Nature Chemistry. 2014;6:15–21. doi: 10.1038/nchem.1821. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Kornev AP, Haste NM, Taylor SS, Eyck LFT. Surface comparison of active and inactive protein kinases identifies a conserved activation mechanism. PNAS. 2006;103:17783–17788. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0607656103. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. Lee W, Tonelli M, Markley JL. NMRFAM-SPARKY: enhanced software for biomolecular NMR spectroscopy. Bioinformatics. 2015;31:1325–1327. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btu830. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. Lew J, Coruh N, Tsigelny I, Garrod S, Taylor SS. Synergistic binding of nucleotides and inhibitors to cAMP-dependent protein kinase examined by acrylodan fluorescence spectroscopy. The Journal of Biological Chemistry. 1997;272:1507–1513. doi: 10.1074/jbc.272.3.1507. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  47. Li GC, Srivastava AK, Kim J, Taylor SS, Veglia G. Mapping the hydrogen bond networks in the catalytic subunit of protein kinase a using H/D fractionation factors. Biochemistry. 2015;54:4042–4049. doi: 10.1021/acs.biochem.5b00387. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  48. Lu B, Wong CF, McCammon JA. Release of ADP from the catalytic subunit of protein kinase A: a molecular dynamics simulation study. Protein Science. 2005;14:159–168. doi: 10.1110/ps.04894605. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  49. Lubner JM. Cushing’s syndrome mutant PKA(L)(205R) exhibits altered substrate specificity. FEBS Letters. 2017;591:459–467. doi: 10.1002/1873-3468.12562. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  50. Manning G, Whyte DB, Martinez R, Hunter T, Sudarsanam S. The protein kinase complement of the human genome. Science. 2002;298:1912–1934. doi: 10.1126/science.1075762. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  51. Manthey I, Tonelli M, Ii LC, Rahimi M, Markley JL, Lee W. POKY software tools encapsulating assignment strategies for solution and solid-state protein NMR data. Journal of Structural Biology. 2022;6:100073. doi: 10.1016/j.yjsbx.2022.100073. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  52. Manu VS, Olivieri C, Pavuluri K, Veglia G. Design and applications of water irradiation devoid RF pulses for ultra-high field biomolecular NMR spectroscopy. Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics. 2022;24:18477–18481. doi: 10.1039/d2cp01744j. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  53. Masterson LR, Mascioni A, Traaseth NJ, Taylor SS, Veglia G. Allosteric cooperativity in protein kinase A. PNAS. 2008;105:506–511. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0709214104. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  54. Masterson LR, Cheng C, Yu T, Tonelli M, Kornev A, Taylor SS, Veglia G. Dynamics connect substrate recognition to catalysis in protein kinase A. Nature Chemical Biology. 2010;6:821–828. doi: 10.1038/nchembio.452. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  55. Masterson LR, Shi L, Metcalfe E, Gao J, Taylor SS, Veglia G. Dynamically committed, uncommitted, and quenched states encoded in protein kinase A revealed by NMR spectroscopy. PNAS. 2011;108:6969–6974. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1102701108. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  56. McClendon CL, Hua L, Barreiro A, Jacobson MP. Comparing conformational ensembles using the kullback-leibler divergence expansion. Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation. 2012;8:2115–2126. doi: 10.1021/ct300008d. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  57. McClendon CL, Kornev AP, Gilson MK, Taylor SS. Dynamic architecture of a protein kinase. PNAS. 2014;111:E4623–E4631. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1418402111. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  58. McGibbon RT, Beauchamp KA, Harrigan MP, Klein C, Swails JM, Hernández CX, Schwantes CR, Wang L-P, Lane TJ, Pande VS. MDTraj: a modern open library for the analysis of molecular dynamics trajectories. Biophysical Journal. 2015;109:1528–1532. doi: 10.1016/j.bpj.2015.08.015. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  59. McSkimming DI, Dastgheib S, Talevich E, Narayanan A, Katiyar S, Taylor SS, Kochut K, Kannan N. ProKinO: a unified resource for mining the cancer kinome. Human Mutation. 2015;36:175–186. doi: 10.1002/humu.22726. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  60. Olivieri C, Walker C, Karamafrooz A, Wang Y, Manu VS, Porcelli F, Blumenthal DK, Thomas DD, Bernlohr DA, Simon SM, Taylor SS, Veglia G. Defective internal allosteric network imparts dysfunctional ATP/substrate-binding cooperativity in oncogenic chimera of protein kinase A. Communications Biology. 2021;4:321. doi: 10.1038/s42003-021-01819-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  61. Olivieri C, Li GC, Wang Y, V S M, Walker C, Kim J, Camilloni C, De Simone A, Vendruscolo M, Bernlohr DA, Taylor SS, Veglia G. ATP-competitive inhibitors modulate the substrate binding cooperativity of a kinase by altering its conformational entropy. Science Advances. 2022;8:eabo0696. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.abo0696. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  62. Omar MH, Byrne DP, Jones KN, Lakey TM, Collins KB, Lee K-S, Daly LA, Forbush KA, Lau H-T, Golkowski M, McKnight GS, Breault DT, Lefrançois-Martinez A-M, Martinez A, Eyers CE, Baird GS, Ong S-E, Smith FD, Eyers PA, Scott JD. Mislocalization of protein kinase A drives pathology in Cushing’s syndrome. Cell Reports. 2022;40:111073. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2022.111073. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  63. Parrinello M, Rahman A. Crystal structure and pair potentials: a molecular-dynamics study. Physical Review Letters. 1980;45:1196–1199. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.45.1196. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  64. Piana S, Laio A. A bias-exchange approach to protein folding. The Journal of Physical Chemistry. B. 2007;111:4553–4559. doi: 10.1021/jp067873l. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  65. Plattner N, Doerr S, De Fabritiis G, Noé F. Complete protein-protein association kinetics in atomic detail revealed by molecular dynamics simulations and Markov modelling. Nature Chemistry. 2017;9:1005–1011. doi: 10.1038/nchem.2785. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  66. Qi G, Vrettas MD, Biancaniello C, Sanz-Hernandez M, Cafolla CT, Morgan JWR, Wang Y, De Simone A, Wales DJ. Enhancing biomolecular simulations with hybrid potentials incorporating NMR Data. Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation. 2022;18:7733–7750. doi: 10.1021/acs.jctc.2c00657. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  67. Robustelli P, Kohlhoff K, Cavalli A, Vendruscolo M. Using NMR chemical shifts as structural restraints in molecular dynamics simulations of proteins. Structure. 2010;18:923–933. doi: 10.1016/j.str.2010.04.016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  68. Ruan Z, Kannan N. Altered conformational landscape and dimerization dependency underpins the activation of EGFR by αC-β4 loop insertion mutations. PNAS. 2018;115:E8162–E8171. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1803152115. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  69. Schwantes CR, Pande VS. Improvements in markov state model construction reveal many non-native interactions in the folding of NTL9. Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation. 2013;9:2000–2009. doi: 10.1021/ct300878a. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  70. Selvaratnam R, Chowdhury S, VanSchouwen B, Melacini G. Mapping allostery through the covariance analysis of NMR chemical shifts. PNAS. 2011;108:6133–6138. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1017311108. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  71. Shen Y, Bax A. SPARTA+: a modest improvement in empirical NMR chemical shift prediction by means of an artificial neural network. Journal of Biomolecular NMR. 2010;48:13–22. doi: 10.1007/s10858-010-9433-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  72. Shukla D, Meng Y, Roux B, Pande VS. Activation pathway of Src kinase reveals intermediate states as targets for drug design. Nature Communications. 2014;5:3397. doi: 10.1038/ncomms4397. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  73. Smith FD, Esseltine JL, Nygren PJ, Veesler D, Byrne DP, Vonderach M, Strashnov I, Eyers CE, Eyers PA, Langeberg LK, Scott JD. Local protein kinase A action proceeds through intact holoenzymes. Science. 2017;356:1288–1293. doi: 10.1126/science.aaj1669. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  74. Srivastava AK, McDonald LR, Cembran A, Kim J, Masterson LR, McClendon CL, Taylor SS, Veglia G. Synchronous opening and closing motions are essential for cAMP-dependent protein kinase A signaling. Structure. 2014;22:1735–1743. doi: 10.1016/j.str.2014.09.010. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  75. Taylor SS, Ilouz R, Zhang P, Kornev AP. Assembly of allosteric macromolecular switches: lessons from PKA. Nature Reviews. Molecular Cell Biology. 2012;13:646–658. doi: 10.1038/nrm3432. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  76. Ten Eyck LF, Taylor SS, Kornev AP. Conserved spatial patterns across the protein kinase family. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta. 2008;1784:238–243. doi: 10.1016/j.bbapap.2007.11.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  77. Tillo SE, Xiong W-H, Takahashi M, Miao S, Andrade AL, Fortin DA, Yang G, Qin M, Smoody BF, Stork PJS, Zhong H. Liberated PKA catalytic subunits associate with the membrane via myristoylation to preferentially phosphorylate membrane substrates. Cell Reports. 2017;19:617–629. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2017.03.070. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  78. Tsigelny I, Greenberg JP, Cox S, Nichols WL, Taylor SS, Ten Eyck LF. 600 ps molecular dynamics reveals stable substructures and flexible hinge points in cAMP dependent protein kinase. Biopolymers. 1999;50:513–524. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0282(19991015)50:5&#x0003c;513::AID-BIP5&#x0003e;3.0.CO;2-I. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  79. Veron M, Radzio-Andzelm E, Tsigelny I, Ten Eyck LF, Taylor SS. A conserved helix motif complements the protein kinase core. PNAS. 1993;90:10618–10622. doi: 10.1073/pnas.90.22.10618. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  80. Walker C, Wang Y, Olivieri C, Karamafrooz A, Casby J, Bathon K, Calebiro D, Gao J, Bernlohr DA, Taylor SS, Veglia G. Cushing’s syndrome driver mutation disrupts protein kinase A allosteric network, altering both regulation and substrate specificity. Science Advances. 2019;5:eaaw9298. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.aaw9298. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  81. Walker C, Wang Y, Olivieri C, V S M, Gao J, Bernlohr DA, Calebiro D, Taylor SS, Veglia G. Is disrupted nucleotide-substrate cooperativity a common trait for cushing’s syndrome driving mutations of protein kinase A? Journal of Molecular Biology. 2021;433:167123. doi: 10.1016/j.jmb.2021.167123. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  82. Walsh DA, Perkins JP, Krebs EG. An adenosine 3’,5’-monophosphate-dependant protein kinase from rabbit skeletal muscle. The Journal of Biological Chemistry. 1968;243:3763–3765. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  83. Wang Y, V.s. M, Kim J, Li G, Ahuja LG, Aoto P, Taylor SS, Veglia G. Globally correlated conformational entropy underlies positive and negative cooperativity in a kinase’s enzymatic cycle. Nature Communications. 2019;10:799. doi: 10.1038/s41467-019-08655-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  84. Williamson MP. Using chemical shift perturbation to characterise ligand binding. Progress in Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy. 2013;73:1–16. doi: 10.1016/j.pnmrs.2013.02.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  85. Wiseman T, Williston S, Brandts JF, Lin LN. Rapid measurement of binding constants and heats of binding using a new titration calorimeter. Analytical Biochemistry. 1989;179:131–137. doi: 10.1016/0003-2697(89)90213-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  86. Xiong WH, Qin M, Zhong H. PKA regulation of neuronal function requires the dissociation of catalytic subunits from regulatory subunits. bioRxiv. 2023 doi: 10.1101/2023.09.05.556437. [DOI]
  87. Yeung W, Ruan Z, Kannan N. Emerging roles of the αC-β4 loop in protein kinase structure, function, evolution, and disease. IUBMB Life. 2020;72:1189–1202. doi: 10.1002/iub.2253. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  88. Yonemoto W, Garrod SM, Bell SM, Taylor SS. Identification of phosphorylation sites in the recombinant catalytic subunit of cAMP-dependent protein kinase. The Journal of Biological Chemistry. 1993;268:18626–18632. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  89. Zhao S, Fang W, Pan H, Yang Y, Liang Y, Yang L, Dong X, Zhan J, Wang K, Zhang L. Conformational landscapes of HER2 Exon 20 Insertions explain their sensitivity to kinase inhibitors in lung adenocarcinoma. Journal of Thoracic Oncology. 2020;15:962–972. doi: 10.1016/j.jtho.2020.01.020. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

eLife assessment

Amy H Andreotti 1

This important study provides an example of integrating computational and experimental approaches that lead to new insights into the energy landscape of a model kinase. Compelling use of molecular dynamics simulations and NMR spectroscopy provide a conformational description of active and excited states of the kinase; one of which has not been captured in previously solved crystal structures. Overall, this comprehensive study expands our understanding of the architecture and allosteric features of the conserved bilobal kinase domain structure.

Reviewer #1 (Public Review):

Anonymous

Summary:

The authors use insights into the dynamics of the PKA kinase domain, obtained by NMR experiments, to inform MD simulations that generate an energy landscape of PKA kinase domain conformational dynamics.

Strengths:

The authors integrate strong experimental data through the use of state-of-the-art MD studies and derive detailed insights into allosteric communication in PKA kinase. Comparison of wt kinase with a mutant (F100A) shows clear differences in the allosteric regulation of the two proteins. These differences can be rationalized by NMR and MD results. During the revision process, the authors have addressed the reviewers' comments adequately and have improved the accessibility of the manuscript to a wider audience.

Reviewer #3 (Public Review):

Anonymous

Summary:

Combining several MD simulation techniques (NMR-constrained replica-exchange metadynamics, Markov State Model, and unbiased MD) the authors identified the aC-beta4 loop of PKA kinase as a switch crucially involved in PKA nucleotide/substrate binding cooperatively. They identified a previously unreported excited conformational state of PKA (ES2), this switch controls and characterized ES2 energetics with respect to the ground state. Based on translating the simulations into chemical shits and NMR characterizing of PKA WT and an aC-beta4 mutant, the author made a convincing case in arguing that the simulation-suggested excited state is indeed an excited state observed by NMR, thus giving the excited state conformational details.

Strengths:

This work incorporates extensive simulation works, new NMR data, and in vitro biochemical analysis. It stands out in its comprehensiveness, and I think it made a great case.

Weaknesses:

The manuscript is somewhat difficult to read even for kinase experts, and even harder for the layman. The difficulty partially arises from mixing the technical description of the simulations with the structural interpretation of the results, which is more intuitive, and partially arises from the assumption that readers are familiar with kinase architecture and its key elements (the aC helix, the APE motif, etc).

eLife. 2024 Jun 24;12:RP91506. doi: 10.7554/eLife.91506.3.sa3

Author response

Cristina Olivieri 1, Yingjie Wang 2, Caitlin Walker 3, Manu Veliparambil Subrahmanian 4, Kim N Ha 5, David Bernlohr 6, Jiali Gao 7, Carlo Camilloni 8, Michele Vendruscolo 9, Susan S Taylor 10, Gianluigi Veglia 11

The following is the authors’ response to the original reviews.

Reviewer #1:

The very detailed insights gained by the authors into allosteric regulation require very specialized techniques in this study. This poses a challenge to communicate the methods, the results, and the meaning of the results to a broader audience. In some places, the authors overcome this challenge better than in others.

Following this reviewer’s suggestions, we have extensively revised the text, making the text more understandable to a broader audience.

The manuscript does not show up on BioRxiv.

The manuscript is now deposited in Biorxv (doi: 10.1101/2023.09.12.557419)

Fig3: GS-ES2 transition: the changes appear minimal in the illustration.

As suggested by this reviewer, we have re-examined the GS-ES2 transition and clearly defined the structural characteristics of the conformationally excited state 2 (ES2) state. As shown in the revised Fig.3 of the main text, the ground state (GS) features a π-π packing between the aromatic rings of F100 and Y156, as well as a cation-π stacking between R308 and F102. In the ES2 state, these above interactions are disrupted, while a new π-π packing interaction is formed between F100 and F102. We added new comments in the main text clarifying these structural interactions that characterize each state.

GS-ES1 transition: how is the K72-E91 salt bridge disrupted? How do you define the formation/disruption of a salt bridge? The current figure does not make this very clear and the K72-E91 salt bridge appears to be intact in ES1. Maybe the authors could replace the dotted K72-E91 line with a dotted line and distance?

As stated above, we revised Fig. 3 highlighting the differences between the two states. The K72 and E91 salt bridge is formed when the distance between Nε of K72 and Oε of E91 is shorter than 4.0 Å(the typical cutoff for a salt bridge). In the ES1 state, the outward movement of the αC helix increases the distance over 4.5 Å, disrupting the salt bridge.

L251: Could the authors remind the reader why they are only comparing V104 and I150? Could they give a little context as to why they consider the agreement to be good? It appears that they would be statistically different, so a little context for what comprises a good agreement in the literature may be helpful.

Our mutagenesis studies show that V104 and I150 are key residues for allosteric communication, and if mutated, result in well-folded but inactive kinases (Sci Adv. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.1600663). Importantly, V104 and I150 show two distinct populations in the CEST experiments that can be directly related to the GS and ES states. Regarding the fitting of these residues, we obtained a good agreement with the direction of the chemical shifts, which supports the hypothesized GS -> ES structural transition. The lack of a quantitative agreement between the chemical shifts of the experimental and simulated excited state is not surprising for two reasons (a) all state-of-the art simulations fall short in sampling slow conformational interconversions, and (b) the uncertainty of the SHIFTX algorithm for the prediction of 13C chemical shifts of methyl groups is quite large. Finally, we would like to point out that most NMR relaxation-dispersion experiments (CEST and CPMG) are performed for the backbone 15N, 13Calpha and 1H resonances, which have been used to calculate the structures of the intermediate states (Neudecker, P. et. al Science, 2012, 336,doi: 10.1126/science.1214203) and yield reasonable agreement with the prediction for metastable states derived from Markov Models (Olsson, S. J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2017,139,doi:10.1021/jacs.6b09460). To the best of our knowledge, there is no literature reporting on calculations of the 13C CEST profiles for methyl groups from MD simulations, and remarkably, we found a reasonably good agreement between experimental and predicted chemical shifts (see Fig.5C).

Just to clarify: the calculated CS values are informed by experimental CS values that were used in the calculation?

We used the backbone chemical shifts as the restraints only in the metadynamics simulations. We used the chemical shifts of the methyl groups and their corresponding excited states to verify the ES2 state.

Figure 8: in its current form this potentially exciting result is lost on the average reader.

we modified Fig. 8 of the main text, making the intra- and inter-residue correlations visible to the reader.

Reviewer #2:

While the alphaC-beta4 loop is a conserved feature of protein kinases, the residues within this loop vary across various kinase families and groups, enabling group and family-specific control of activity through cis and trans acting elements. F102 in PKA interacts with co-conserved residues in the C-tail, which has been proposed to function as a cis regulatory element. The authors should elaborate on the conformational changes in the C-tail, particularly in the arginine that packs against F102, in the results and discussion. This would further extend the impact and scope of the manuscript, which is currently confined to PKA.

As suggested by this reviewer, we re-analyzed the time-dependent interactions between F102 and R308 at the C-tail. As this reviewer suspected, these interactions differentiate the ES2 from the GS state. In the GS state, there is a stable cation-π interaction between F102 and R308, which becomes transient in the ES2 state (Fig. 3). For the F100A mutant, the interactions between F102 and R308 have lower occurrence relative to the WT enzyme, i.e., a weaker interaction between the αC-β4 loop and the C-tail (see new Figure 6 - figure supplement 1). The latter supports our conclusion that the structural coupling between the C-tail and the two lobes of the enzyme decreases for the F100A mutant. We added more comments in the main text.

FAIR standards of making the data accessible and reproducible are not directly addressed.

We have deposited all our NMR data on the Data Repository Site at the University of Minnesota, DRUM (https://hdl.handle.net/11299/261043).

The MD data and conformational states would be a valuable resource for the community and should be shared via some open-source repositories.

Due to the large size of the simulations (>500 GB), we could not deposit them in the DataRepository Site at the University of Minnesota (DRUM). We are actively working with the personnel at DRUM to upload all the trajectories in an alternate site. However, these data will be available to the public immediately upon request.

The authors state that ES1 and ES2 states are novel and not observed in previous crystal structures. The authors should quantify this through comparisons with PKA inactive states and with other AGC kinases.

We apologize for the confusion. We now clarify that the ES1 is a well-known inactivation pathway.As suggested by this reviewer, we now report a few examples of active and inactive conformations of PKA-C and other kinases (see new Figure 3 – figure supplement 2.). Briefly, ES1 corresponds to the typical αC-out conformation found for PKA-C bound to inhibitors or in R194A mutant. A similar conformation is present for Src, Abl, and CDK2. The αC-out conformation features a disrupted β3K-αCE salt bridge, which is key for active kinases. In contrast, the transition GS-ES2 is not present in the inactive conformations deposited in the PDB.

Based on the results, can the authors speculate on the impact of oncogenic mutations in the alphaCbeta4 loop mutations in PKA?

We now include additional comments and another citation that further supports our findings. In short, the activation of a kinase is generated by mutation insertions that stabilize the αC-β4 loop as pointed out by Kannan and Zhang (see references 28, 30, and 68). In contrast, mutations that destabilize this allosteric site (e.g., F100A) are inactivating, disrupting the structural couplings of the two lobes (our work).

Reviewer #3:

The manuscript is somewhat difficult to read even for kinase experts, and even harder for the layman. The difficulty partially arises from mixing technical description of the simulations with structural interpretation of the results, which is more intuitive, and partially arises from the assumption that readers are familiar with kinase architecture and its key elements (the aC helix, the APE motif, etc).

We revised the text and modified Fig. 1 in the main text to make the paper more accessible to the general audience.

The authors haven't done a good job describing the ES2 state intuitively. From my examination of the figures, it appears that in the ES2 state, the kinase domain is more elongated and the N and the C lobes are relatively less engaged than in the ground state. This may or may not be exactly, but a more intuitive description of the ES2 state is needed.

As suggested by this reviewer, we include a better description of the ES2 state of the kinase and the structural details of the inactivation pathway. Also, we checked the radius of gyration of the two lobes for GS and ES2. ES2 is slightly more elongated with an Rg of 20.3 ± 0.1 Å as compared to the GS state (20.0 ± 0.2 Å). This marginal difference is consistent with our characterization of the local packing around the αC-β4 loop, in which the lack of stable interaction with αE and C-tail in the ES2 state makes the overall structure less compact.

The authors need to introduce and give a brief description of technical terms such as CV (collective variable), PC (principal component) etc.

We now specify both collective variables and principal components and include those definitions in the Method section. Briefly, to characterize the complex conformational transitions of PKA-C, we utilize collective variables (Figure 2 – figure supplement 1). We chose these variables based on structural motifs described in the literature to define local and global structural transitions (Camilloni C., Vendruscolo, M, Biochemistry, 2015,54,7470; Kukic, P. et al. Structure, 2015,23, 745). On the other hand, we utilized the principal component analysis to compare the conformational changes of the kinase in the same two-dimensional space, revealing the two lowest frequencies that define the global motions of the enzyme (Figures 7C, D, and E).

The following paper should be discussed as it discussed similar ATP/substrate binding of Src kinase based on an extensive network that largely overlaps with the discussed PKA network. Foda, et al. "A dynamically coupled allosteric network underlies binding cooperativity in Src kinase." Nature communications 6.1 (2015): 5939.

We apologize for missing this citation. Indeed, it makes our finding more general as allosteric cooperativity is key in other kinases such as Src and ERK2. We included this in the Discussion section.

The CHESCA analysis appears to be an add-on that doesn't add much value. It is difficult to direct. I'd suggest considering removing it to the SI.

We understand this concern. We rewrote part of the paper to make the NMR analysis of the correlated chemical shifts described by the CHESCA matrices linked to the MD calculations.

Associated Data

    This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

    Data Citations

    1. Olivieri C, Cristina O. 2024. The role of the αC-β4 loop in regulating cooperativity interaction in Protein Kinase A. Dyrad Digital respitory. [DOI]

    Supplementary Materials

    Figure 2—source data 1. ΔG (kcal/mol) and relative population of the ground state and the first six excited states in different forms of PKA-C obtained from the replica-averaged metadynamics (RAM) simulations.
    Supplementary file 1. Kinetic parameters of Kemptide phosphorylation by PKA-CWT and PKA-CF100A obtained from coupled assays.

    The KM and Vmax values were obtained from a nonlinear least squares analysis of the concentration-dependent initial phosphorylation rates. Errors in the kcat/KM ratios were propagated from the individual errors in KM and kcat.

    elife-91506-supp1.docx (14.3KB, docx)
    Supplementary file 2. Changes in enthalpy, entropy, free energy, and dissociation constants for nucleotide binding to PKA-CWT and PKA-CF100A.

    All errors were calculated from triplicate measurements. Values for PKA-CWT are taken from Walker et al., 2019

    elife-91506-supp2.docx (16.6KB, docx)
    Supplementary file 3. Changes in enthalpy, entropy, free energy, and dissociation constants for PKI5-24 binding to apo and ATPγN - saturated PKA-CWT and PKA-CF100A.

    All errors were derived from triplicate measurements. The error for the cooperativity coefficient (σ) was propagated from the errors in Kd. Values for PKA-CWT were originally published in Walker et al., 2019.

    elife-91506-supp3.docx (17.3KB, docx)
    MDAR checklist

    Data Availability Statement

    All the data generated or analyzed in this study are included in the manuscript and supporting files. The NMR chemical shifts and MD trajectories are deposited in the Data Repository for the University of Minnesota, https://doi.org/10.13020/8f9s-qd79.

    The following dataset was generated:

    Olivieri C, Cristina O. 2024. The role of the αC-β4 loop in regulating cooperativity interaction in Protein Kinase A. Dyrad Digital respitory.


    Articles from eLife are provided here courtesy of eLife Sciences Publications, Ltd

    RESOURCES