Abstract
Purpose
One of the key strategies for effective management of osteoporosis is training health care professionals on early diagnosis and treatment of osteoporosis according to a structured course. The aim was to investigate the e-learning courses on osteoporosis around the world in order to develop an online course on osteoporosis management for general practitioners (GPs).
Methods
In this review, the Web of Science, Scopus, PubMed, Embase, and ERIC databases and the Google search engine were searched until March, 2021.Then, the contents of the eligible courses were extracted by two researchers independently and verified. After that, the content for an online course for GPs was developed and approved by a panel of experts constituted of endocrinologists, orthopedists, and other specialties involved in the management of osteoporosis to develop the final online course for GPs.
Results
In this review, 22 e-learning courses provided through 3 studies, and 19 websites were included. The content of the osteoporosis e-learning course was categorized into ten thematic categories including bone health, osteoporosis definitions and pathophysiology, prevention of osteoporosis, diagnosis of osteoporosis, fractures, non-pharmacological treatments, pharmacological treatments, treatment follow-up, postmenopausal considerations and hands-on work. The final modules for the osteoporosis e-learning contained five main categories, including bone measurement and fracture risk assessment, diagnosis of osteoporosis, clinical management, monitoring and follow-up, and sarcopenia.
Conclusion
Through a systematic approach, we developed modules for e-learning of osteoporosis management, which can be used to improve knowledge and skills of GPs in their practice in our setting.
Supplementary Information
The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s40200-023-01361-8.
Keywords: Osteoporosis, Healthcare providers, E-learning
Introduction
Osteoporosis affects around 200 million women worldwide [1]. Fractures caused by osteoporosis are more common in men at younger age, and almost double in women over the age of 50 [2]. Osteoporosis is clinically silent, and due to its morbidity and mortality, it has become a major concern for health care system in terms of reducing health care resources [3]. Moreover, fractures caused by osteoporosis can lead to mobility restrictions, pain, and even mortality [2, 4]. It has been estimated that the annual cost of osteoporosis-related fractures in the UK is around £4 billion and in the U.S., it is $17.9 billion [2]. Despite the significant advances in osteoporosis screening, diagnosis, and fracture reduction interventions due to the emergence of clinical guidelines, few patients at high risk of fracture are being treated, owing to the complexity of osteoporosis management, uncertainty in diagnosing and treating, ambiguities in clinical practice guidelines, and lack of health care providers` expertise in osteoporosis management [2, 5–7].
One of the key strategies to improve the management of osteoporosis is training healthcare professionals who are involved in the management and care of patients [8, 9]. In 2000, the National Institutes of Health identified the most effective way of educating healthcare specialists about the management of osteoporosis as a research priority [8, 10]. Healthcare professionals need to be empowered with new knowledge and competencies to provide patient care, effectively [8, 11]. Therefore, continuous professional development (CPD) of health care professionals is essential to improve their competency, and patient outcomes [7, 12, 13].
Because of the emergence of technology, traditional learning methods such as teacher-centered learning using textbooks in the classroom have been replaced by an e-learning approach [14]. E-learning is a cost-effective method without geographical boundaries, available at any time and place to transfer knowledge and CPD [15]. Transferring new knowledge or skills through e-learning is effective [16–18]. The COVID-19 pandemic revolutionized e-learning [19, 20] undoubtedly, the COVID-19 pandemic accelerated the process of e-learning and provided an opportunity for effective e-education [19, 21]. On the other hand, due to the high workload of healthcare providers and their time constraints, e-learning is a suitable alternative to face-to-face education for CPD [22].
In this study, due to the high prevalence of osteoporosis, especially in the elderly, and osteoporosis-related fractures [23], as well as the lack of national guideline awareness among healthcare providers in our setting [24, 25] and the potential capability of e-learning to improve the knowledge and skills of health care professionals [9], we developed e-learning modules based on the needs of society. Therefore, we reviewed osteoporosis e-learning courses from around the world to create an e-learning course in the field of osteoporosis management for general practitioners. We leveraged the experiences of the whole world regarding the course objectives, training duration, educational curriculum and evaluation method. This will be an effective step towards GPs` training in the field of prevention, diagnosis and timely treatment of osteoporosis, which will help to decrease primary and secondary costs and reduce the pain and suffering of people in the community with osteoporosis and subsequent complications.
Methods
Study design and eligibility criteria
This was a systematic review of articles with full text available in the English language, which included osteoporosis e-learning for GPs and/or medical or pharmacy students. We excluded surveys, patient education, letters to the editors, and review studies from our review process. Also, we included websites for all medical groups, and those that could not be accessed due to access limitations were excluded. In the e-learning that was the result of checking Google websites, we also included training courses included other care teams in addition to general practitioners.
Information sources and search strategy
According to the aim of the study, we reviewed e-learning of osteoporosis worldwide, at first. Web of Science, Scopus, PubMed, Embase, and ERIC databases, as well as the first three pages of the Google search engine, were sources. We searched until March 28th, 2021. The search strategy of each database and Google search engine were developed by a medical librarian (R.A), which can be seen in Table S1 and Table S2 (Appendix), respectively.
Screening and selection process
The two researchers in the team (R. N, and M. A) screened all the records retrieved from databases and the Google search engine. They first removed duplicates via endnote, then screened, the remaining records for eligibility criteria according to their titles and abstracts. In case of any doubt regarding eligibility criteria, the full texts of the studies and the contents of the websites were assessed. Any disagreements in this stage were resolved by the principal investigator of the project (M.S).
Data items and data extraction process
After selecting eligible studies and websites, we considered the following items for data extraction: Which centers provided osteoporosis e-learning services? What were the objectives of the osteoporosis e-learning course? What was the target group of the osteoporosis e-learning? What was the duration of the osteoporosis e-learning course? What did the osteoporosis e-learning curriculum include? What techniques were used to evaluate osteoporosis e-learning?”.
The content of the courses included in the study, whether from articles or websites, was screened by the two researchers in the team (R. N, and M. A) and verified by the third researcher (M.S). Data were extracted by data extraction form which included the goal and learning domains, the program’s mission, the target groups, the knowledge, and skills included in the curriculum content on osteoporosis, details of the syllabus and modules, instruction tools and methods, and evaluation methods [26, 27]. After collecting and extracting the related programs on osteoporosis management, we reviewed and analyzed each program and their results were shown in a table. Finally, we designed a new model and its graphical presentation according to our results. Based on national guidelines, the results of this study and the panel of experts an online course content for GPs was developed and approved in our setting. In each session of the expert panel, the content was discussed and reviewed by a multidisciplinary team consisting of endocrinologists, orthopedists, rheumatologists and other specialties involved in the treatment and management of osteoporosis.
Results
Study and website selection
According to the search strategies developed for the databases and Google search engine, we identified 4475 records from all databases. After removing duplicates (n = 2029), there were 2446 records for screening titles and abstracts. Then, the full texts of 15 studies were assessed for eligibility criteria. Finally, three studies were included in the review process. By using the Google search engine, we found 19 eligible online courses for health care specialists. Thus, 22 records including 19 websites and 3 studies were included in the study and their contents were extracted. The PRISMA flow diagram of the searching, screening, and selecting process has been shown in Fig. 1.
Data extraction
The details of courses extracted from the studies and websites are shown in Table 1. According to the content analysis of the courses included in the study, information about the goals of the e-learning courses, the target group (s), the duration of the training, course outline/ course syllabus/ module syllabus, educational strategy and evaluation at the end of the course were extracted (Table1). Studies showed that the Royal Osteoporosis Society and the National Osteoporosis Foundation held the most e-learning on osteoporosis (21.7% and 17.4%, respectively). The general purpose of e-learning classes was to improve skills, and knowledge of the quality of diagnosis, treatment, and care for patients with osteoporosis (Table 1). Additionally, the specific purpose of each training program can be seen in Table 1. The major target group of e-learning included physicians (41%), nurses (36.4%), pharmacists (27.3%), researchers (22.7%) and technologists (18.2%). Others included healthcare professionals (18.2%), public health professionals (18.2%), GPs (13.6%), allied health professionals (13.6%), residents (9.1%), internal medicine specialists (4.5%), radiographers (4.5%), fracture Liaison nurses (4.5%), rheumatologists (4.5%), endocrinologists (4.5%), care of the elderly (4.5%), and orthopedics (4.5%) who are involved in the care team.
Table 1.
NO | Provider center /Name | Course objectives | Target group | Course duration | Course outline/ Course syllabus/ Module syllabus | Educational strategies | Course assessment & evaluation |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | University of Georgia/ IBOP1 [31] | To determine the difference in the attitude of pharmacy students and pharmacists towards online and "live" lectures and the level of comfort of each | Pharmacists and pharmacy students | second-year course |
-Pathophysiology of postmenopausal osteoporosis -Risk factors of postmenopausal osteoporosis -Complications of postmenopausal osteoporosis -Preventing and treating postmenopausal osteoporosis |
On-line lecture | Quiz with 10 multiple choice questions and grade of at least 70 percent |
2 | Boston/ randomized control trial [32] | Investigate whether an online bone health curriculum improves physicians' knowledge on the Quality of Resident-Delivered Care |
-Internal medicine -Residents -Physicians |
3- to 6-month |
-Bone health care -Osteoporosis care -Fracture prevention |
Online formative self-assessment and learning |
Continuous self-assessment of residents’ knowledge, 10 months after the educational intervention patient outcome |
3 | Project Extension for Community Healthcare Outcomes [11] | Improving participants' knowledge in the management of skeletal diseases | healthcare professionals | 3- to 6-month |
-Radiation therapy and anabolic therapy -Bone density and utilization of bone health resources -Treatment of osteoporosis -Osteoporosis management |
weekly interactive videoconferencing technology, collaborative learning and share information, provide support and guidance |
NA |
4 | National Osteoporosis Society /Diagnosis and management of osteoporosis [29] | Better bone health of everybody | GPs | 30 min |
-Identify groups at risk for osteoporosis -Early diagnosis and treatment of osteoporosis -Prevention of fractures due to fragility -Application of NICE, SIGN and NOGG instructions -FRAX and QFracture risk assessment methods -Using different scenarios -Monitoring the risk of fragility fractures |
Case based approach | Online assessment |
5 | Health Education England programme in partnership with the NHS and Professional Bodies/Image Interpretation- Osteoporosis and Fragility Fracture [33] | Image Interpretation | Radiographers | NA |
- Definition of osteoporosis -Description of normal and hollow bone anatomy -Diagnosis of osteoporosis -Common causes of osteoporosis -Demographics relating to osteoporosis -Fragility fractures and common mechanisms of injury -Osteoporotic vertebral fractures -Best practice for identification vertebral fractures -Detection of vertebral fractures by imaging |
NA |
Self-evaluation exercise Images interpretation |
6 |
National Osteoporosis Society, accredited by the Royal College of Nursing For four CPD points by the Royal College of Physicians in the UK / Fracture Prevention Practitioner Training [34] |
-Caring for people with osteoporosis or at risk for osteoporosis -Identify patients with fragility fractures -Fracture fragility and its management based on the best method |
- Fracture Liaison nurses -Specialist nurses -Allied health professionals -Clinicians -Healthcare professionals |
NA |
-Definition, incidence, epidemiology and risk factors for osteoporosis -Fracture assessment tools, nutritional assessment, DXA scan -Pharmacological and non-pharmacological treatment of osteoporosis -Managing the complex cases of osteoporosis |
NA | Online assessment |
7 | EACCME2 /Excellence in osteoporosis optimizing patient outcomes [35] | NA | medical specialist/Physicians | NA |
-Why do bones fracture? -Diagnosis and assessing fracture risk -Treatment -Use of bisphosphonates and SERMs -Considerations in the clinic |
NA | NA |
8 |
Bone Research society and Federation of the Royal Colleges of Physicians of the United Kingdom /Online BRS3 Clinical Training Course: Osteoporosis and Other Metabolic Bone Diseases 2021 [36] |
Management of osteoporosis and other metabolic bone diseases |
Rheumatology Endocrinology Care of the elderly, Gastroenterology, Orthopedics Respiratory medicine, Clinical chemistry, Nurses and other allied health professionals |
3 weeks | -Management and treatment of osteoporosis focusing on practical tips |
Combining lectures -Panel discussions –Debates -Workshops -Interactive sessions |
NA |
9 | NA/Osteoporosis: Therapeutic Management of Bone Health [37] |
- osteoporosis and management of bone health - bone anatomy and physiology—classifications, causes, and effects of low bone density - medical management and medications - therapist’s role in managing osteoporosis and related conditions |
Physicians | 7 h |
-Human bone physiology and bone changes in old age -Classification of osteopenia and osteoporosis and its demographic information in the United States -Diagnostic parameters of osteoporosis and its disadvantages -Physiological effects of osteoporosis -Risk factors, complications and mortality associated with fractures -Osteoporotic drug interventions -Exercise and its effect on bone health, contraindications or exercise precautions -Evaluation of a patient with osteoporosis -Case care program for patients with osteoporosis -Special exercises for patients with osteoporosis at the beginner level such as stretching, balance, strengthening and aerobic exercises |
-Textbook -Booklet -eBook -PDFs -Multimedia or online (electronic) formats |
Passing the online exam |
10 | Med Fit Education Foundation /Osteoporosis Fitness Specialist Online Course [38] | Diet and exercise and its effect on restoring and maintaining bone health function | Fitness professionals/ trainers | 10 h |
-Bone physiology and bone response to stress including Wolf's law -Conditions of osteopenia and osteoporosis -The role of exercise and diet in maintaining bone health and regeneration -The role of drugs and nutrients in bone health - S.A.F.E. Exercise and its role in bone health |
- Course manual -Video slides -Videos of sports examples |
Multiple choice question, competency assessment with at least 80% correct answer |
11 | Endocrine society/Better Bones: A Course On Osteoporosis & Metabolic Bone Disease [3] |
-Provide comprehensive and up-to-date information on bone diseases -Basic and advanced principles of diagnosis and treatment of osteoporosis -Presenting the latest clinical guidelines for hypothyroidism and hyperparathyroidism |
-Physician -Fellow -Resident -Clinical researcher -Scientific researcher -Educator -Pharmacist -Nurse practitioner -Physician assistant -Allied health professional |
NA |
-Prevalence, pathophysiology and progression of metabolic bone diseases including osteoporosis -Identify people at risk for bone fractures with imaging and new diagnostic guidelines -Therapeutic interventions such as nutrition, exercise, to reduce the risk of fractures in people with metabolic bone diseases -Individual treatment strategy for the management of osteoporosis and metabolic bone diseases |
Interactive and multi-faceted learning opportunities | NA |
12 | The Royal Osteoporosis Society of UK and RCGP4 /e-Learning osteoporosis module [30] |
-Improve the bone health and prevent osteoporosis - professionals to deliver high quality healthcare -Provide the best information, support and services to help people -Drive the research and development of new treatments and therapies |
NA | NA |
-Prevention, diagnosis and management of osteoporosis and its associated fractures -Use NICE, SIGN and NOGG -Identification of risk groups FRAX and QFracture risk assessment tools - Monitoring of patients with osteoporosis and osteopenia |
Case based approach | NA |
13 | NA/Advanced Learning Module: Osteoporosis & Exercise [8] | NA | NA | 3 months |
-Management of osteoporosis and fracture risk -Caring for people with osteoporosis -Familiarity with the latest clinical guidelines -Lifestyle and physical activity and its effects on osteoporosis -Medication and sports prescription in osteoporosis |
NA | NA |
14 | National Osteoporosis Foundation /Menopause and HT5 Clinical review of HT in prevention and treatment of osteoporosis [5] |
-Primary and secondary osteoporosis and their distinguishing features -Diagnostic and therapeutic discussion of case studies / scenarios |
-Physicians -Nurses -Pharmacists -Technologists -Researchers -Public health professionals and health educators |
1 h |
-Menopause and osteoporosis -Premature menopausal osteoporosis -Prevention and treatment of osteoporosis with hormone therapy (HT) -Relationship between HT and other treatments for osteoporosis |
NA | NA |
15 | National Osteoporosis Foundation /FLS6 Certificate Program [11] |
-FLS Coordinator -Learn the basics of FLS -Apply the principles of FLS care in your practice |
-Physicians -Nurses -Healthcare professionals |
One week |
-Learn the basics of FLS care -Prevention of secondary fractures -Management of osteoporosis through medication, exercise and nutrition -Essentials for using FLS -Principles of patient evaluation, initiation of treatment, follow-up and post-fracture care |
-Synchronized slide/audio presentations | Receive a certificate of continuing education after completing the sessions |
16 | National Osteoporosis Foundation /Disuse and Transient Osteoporosis [6] | - Discuses Bone remodeling along with forms of disuse and transient osteoporosis |
-Physicians -Nurses -Pharmacists -Technologists -Researchers -Public health professionals and health educators |
NA |
-Principles of bone reconstruction -The effect of exercise on BMD7 -Effects of smoking cessation on bone -Different forms of transient osteoporosis -Effects of pregnancy and lactation on bone |
NA | NA |
17 | National Osteoporosis Foundation /Secondary Causes of Osteoporosis [14] |
-Causes of secondary osteoporosis -Practical approach to patient treatment in the office |
-Physicians -Nurses -Pharmacists -Technologists -Researchers -Public health professionals and health educators |
NA |
-Primary and secondary osteoporosis and their distinguishing features -Diagnosis and treatment of case studies / scenarios |
NA | NA |
18 | National Osteoporosis Foundation /Identifying Osteoporosis-Related Vertebral Fractures in Primary Care [7] |
-Evaluation of osteoporosis -Pathological changes in the spine and the factors affecting it -Differentiation and differentiation of back pain from spinal fractures -Diagnosis of such fractures -Principles of treatment of fractures |
-Physicians -Nurses -Pharmacists -Technologists -Researchers -Public health professionals and health educators |
NA |
-Signs and Symptoms of Acute or "Silent" VCF8 -Detection and differentiation of VCF from other causes of back pain -VCF risk assessment in patients -Significance, Complications and Mortality in VCF -Diagnosis of secondary causes of VCF other than osteoporosis |
NA | NA |
19 | Royal Osteoporosis Society/ National Training Scheme for Bone Densitometry [12] | Bone densitometry certification for physicians | Clinicians | A 2-day lecture |
-Use of DEXA9 in the effective diagnosis and evaluation of osteoporosis -Record reliable DEXA information for diagnosis and treatment |
NA | Mandatory online exam and mandatory submission of work samples |
20 | Royal Osteoporosis Society/Bone Densitometry Foundation course [15] | NA | NA | NA |
-Evaluation and prevention of osteoporosis -Effects, regulations and practical techniques of DEXA |
Video-based learning | 50-question multiple-choice test, score of 80%, with 3 attempts to the assessment |
21 |
Royal Osteoporosis Society The module is CPD accredited by the RCGP10/RCGP Osteoporosis e-Learning Diagnosis and management of osteoporosis [19] |
NA | GPs | NA |
-Diagnosis, management of osteoporosis and prevention of fractures with, SIGN and NOGG guidelines -Identification of risk groups and risk assessment tools FRAX and QFracture -Assess learners' managerial knowledge of the appropriate time to provide secondary care -Monitoring of patients with osteoporosis and osteopenia and resource management |
Case based approach | NA |
22 | Royal Osteoporosis Society /Osteoporosis resources for primary care (ORPC) [28] | NA |
-GPs -Nurses -Other members of the practice team |
NA |
-Diagnosis and management of osteoporosis -Use guides such as NICE, SIGN and NOGG |
NA | NA |
1The internet-based osteoporosis program
2European accreditation council for continuing medical education
3Bone research society
4Royal college of general practitioners
5Hormone therapy
6Fracture liaison service
7Bone mineral density
8Vertebral compression fracture
9Dual energy X-Ray absorptiometry (bone scan test)
10Royal college of general practitioners
According to the study, four studies taught the diagnosis of osteoporosis and, incorporated the guidance from NICE, SIGN, and NOGG [19, 28–30]. Osteoporosis courses with titles such as “Osteoporosis definition and its classifications”, “osteoporosis management including drug treatment, adherence, monitoring and non-pharmacological treatments”, “Discussing the role of medications and nutrients in bone health, highlights ‘at risk’ groups of osteoporosis and FRAX and Fracture risk assessment tools were observed in at least three studies (Table 1).
Also, the osteoporosis courses taught in the two included studies were as follows: applying bone health and osteoporosis resources, bone physiology, and anatomy and how bones respond to stress, demographics of osteoporosis, diagnosis and management of osteoporosis, prevention of fragility fractures, monitoring patients with osteoporosis and osteopenia, introducing clinical practice guidelines, describing the significance of vertebral compression fractures, testing knowledge of participants, and discussing cases.
After reviewing the course outlines, relevant information in ten thematic categories of bone health, osteoporosis definitions and pathophysiology, prevention of osteoporosis, diagnosis of osteoporosis, fractures, non-pharmacological treatments, pharmacological treatments, treatment follow up, postmenopausal considerations and hands-on work was extracted as the final modules for osteoporosis e-learning. Figure 2, the model of osteoporosis e-learning. furthermore, various educational strategies such as digital teaching multimedia, interactive modules, videoconferencing technology, case-based approach, and synchronized slide/audio presentations were used in e-teaching (Table 1). As shown in Table 1, some courses, have an online test score which is determined by taking the certificate, and self-assessment to evaluate students was intended.
Course content
In this study, according to the review of the 22 courses provided in studies and websites as well as national guidelines, 45 sub-modules were extracted. The findings were then reviewed by expert panels according to the current needs of our setting. Then, the final modules and sub-modules of osteoporosis courses for GPs were developed and approved for use in our setting (Table 2). It should be noted that according to the expert’s opinion, Sarcopenia, as one of the important problems of the musculoskeletal system in the elderly, was added to the content of the e-learning (Table 2).
Table 2.
Modules | Sub-modules | |
---|---|---|
1 | Bone measurement and fracture risk assessment | Overview of Osteoporosis |
Bone measurement device: Operating principles of Measurement Device | ||
Bone measurement device: X-Ray Science, radiation safety | ||
Clinical evaluation of bone health | ||
Fracture risk assessment: FRAX and other devices | ||
2 | Diagnosis of osteoporosis | Diagnosis of osteoporosis |
Principles of DXA scan interpretation | ||
Principles of DXA scan reporting | ||
3 | Clinical management | Non-Pharmacologic, calcium and vitamin D |
Pharmacologic treatment: Bisphosphonate | ||
Pharmacologic treatment: HRT, SERMS | ||
Pharmacologic treatment: PTH and RPTH analogs | ||
Pharmacologic treatment: Denosumab | ||
Pharmacologic treatment: Further Pharmacologic Treatment | ||
Surgical treatment: kyphoplasty and vertebroplasty | ||
TBS and osteoporosis management | ||
4 | Monitoring and follow-up | Monitoring and treatment failure |
Bone turnover markers | ||
Fracture Liaison Services: Introduction and fundamentals | ||
Fracture Liaison Services: Implementations | ||
5 | Sarcopenia | Introduction and epidemiology |
Management |
Discussion
As far as we know, this is the first study to examine e-learning of osteoporosis. Our findings indicate that the e-osteoporosis training was held for a wide range of osteoporosis care teams for prevention, early detection, treatment, follow-up, and rehabilitation. The e-learning course of osteoporosis treatment principles was designed and implemented in response to this need covering the principles of diagnosis, the latest findings on bone density, control and management of osteoporosis for CPD (Table 2). This ensures that GPs have a general understanding of the disease and how to manage it. Furthermore, the experts recommended adding, the subject of Sarcopenia to the content of the course, as it is considered an important problem of the musculoskeletal system in the elderly.
Jaglal et al. stated that one of the main components of the Ontario Osteoporosis Strategy is training physicians in osteoporosis. The goal of this strategy is to improve the use of clinical guidelines by physicians. To this end, the Ontario College of Family Physicians has designated three evidence-based training modules: osteoporosis in men, fragility and fracture in osteoporosis, and menopausal health. This College also intends to provide e-learning content [28]. Smith et al. believe that healthcare workers should be familiar with osteoporosis and continuously evaluate and planning of interventions in clients. Also, general and comprehensive instructions should be tailored to the patient's specific context [39]. It should be mentioned that knowledge of osteoporosis is still not enough in some fields [24, 25]. Paying attention to the educational content of e-learning and their application in the curriculum of the medical staff, and updating the educational content of osteoporosis will be an effective step in the screening, prevention, treatment, management, and rehabilitation of people with osteoporosis [8, 9, 40, 41]. In this study, we attempted to provide comprehensive content for osteoporosis management according to the needs of our society divided into five main modules: bone measurement and fracture risk assessment, osteoporosis diagnosis, clinical management, monitoring and follow-up and Sarcopenia and 22 sub-modules (Table 2).
However, due to the importance of osteoporosis and its complications such as fracture, a more comprehensive view of the education of the target group in the field of prevention, early diagnosis, treatment, follow-up, and rehabilitation and the application of appropriate educational materials in their curriculum and ongoing training courses is essential [2, 9, 23, 42, 43]. Course contents should focus on the recognition of sensitive groups, the physiology of bone formation and structure, pathology and lifestyle, and the relationship between bone density, body weight, nutrition, and exercise [4, 44, 45]. The present study showed a wide range of training in the field of osteoporosis management, and with the course titles placed in ten thematic categories (Fig. 2).
Understanding osteoporosis requires understanding the various aspects of the disease and obtaining accurate information and with a focus on specific topics of osteoporosis, which should be included in the training programs of health care professionals [8, 25]. According to Lopez et al. study, providing understandable information, and the cooperation of medical scientific associations are essential to provide quality information [46]. Clynes et al. acknowledged that few people with osteoporosis are treated, and resources should be focused on identifying and treating those at risk of fracture [2, 8]. Fahimfar et al. acknowledge that comprehensive interventions are needed to prevent fractures caused by osteoporosis in the elderly [43, 45]. Sarcopenia is one of the main modules that was not provided in the included studies. However, we included it as one of the main modules in the educational content due to the needs of society and its importance (Table2).
The development of educational materials on osteoporosis should be appropriate to the weaknesses and deficiencies of healthcare professionals in order to be more effective [8, 9, 47]. Osteoporosis prevention and treatment require the cooperation of various health care professionals other than physicians and GPs, including nurses, physiotherapists, occupational therapists, pharmacists, nuclear medicine technicians, dentists and nutritionists who play an important role in diagnosis, treatment, care and rehabilitation [8, 48–50]. As GPs are at the forefront of early diagnosis and referral of patients, it is important to follow the suitable path to improve osteoporosis management [51]. Thus the principles of osteoporosis management for GPs were compiled in this study. It would have been interesting to look for information on other online courses for doctors that could provide ideas or evidence on the best way to implement a new course on osteoporosis management. Obviously, in the next steps, specialized training should be developed for each medical specialist providing services in the field of osteoporosis.
Dewan et al. acknowledged that more than half of therapists preferred to use knowledge translation strategies such as online workshops, YouTube videos, webinars, e-reminders, and websites to bridge the knowledge-to-action gap [52]. Increasing access to information, an easy way to update website content, and content distribution, content standardization, and accountability are the benefits of e-learning. On the other hand, learners have control over the time and speed of learning content [20, 21, 25]. The increasing growth of technology and the improvement of the technical knowledge of students have forced teachers to use new, relevant and attractive teaching methods and tools [53–56].
In this study, due to the high workload of GPs and their time constraints, online education was selected as a suitable alternative to face-to-face education for CPD [22]. Web-based educational interventions have shown positive effects on the knowledge, attitude, skill, performance and quality of care of doctors [21, 57]. Alignment of technology, beliefs, practice, and curriculum updates will provide the necessary motivation to advance educational goals [53, 56].
We conducted a comprehensive review of various databases and the Google search engine to ensure that we did not miss anything. Despite the study’s strengths, our study had some limitations. Due to the small number of studies, we included all of them and did not conduct a quality appraisal. Additionally, we reviewed records in English language While there were some online osteoporosis courses in other languages. Furthermore, we were unable to answer some of the research questions in the study (NA values in the Table 1), which we attempted to answer by searching other sources and related websites. Thus, it is recommended to carry out further studies regarding the effectiveness of e-learning in transferring knowledge or skills of osteoporosis management by health care providers and patient outcomes, as well as a comparative study of effective methods of e-learning for osteoporosis management. Since the prevention, early diagnosis, treatment and rehabilitation of patients with osteoporosis requires the cooperation of a wide range of specialists, it is recommended to develop specialized and comprehensive online courses for all groups involved in diagnosis, treatment and rehabilitation including gynecologists, endocrinologists and radiologists.
Conclusion
In this study, we reviewed online courses on osteoporosis management using a systematic approach. Our major goals were to increase the therapists’ knowledge and confidence in osteoporosis management, fracture management, and updating information about diagnosis and treatment. The optimal management of osteoporosis requires the development and revision of specialty curriculum from screening to treatment, and aligning training with information technology in order to achieve effective results. Accordingly, we developed modules and sub-modules of an osteoporosis online course for GPs with the aim of early diagnosis and referral of at-risk patients if possible. The content of the approved e-learning contained five main categories, including bone measurement and fracture risk assessment, diagnosis of osteoporosis, clinical management, monitoring and follow-up, and Sarcopenia. This content can be used for osteoporosis e-learning in our setting and the countries with the similar health care condition in the near future.
Supplementary Information
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Acknowledgements
This study was supported by the Elite Researcher Grant Committee (Grant. No. 958942) from the National Institute for Medical Research Development, Tehran, Iran.
Abbreviations
- CPD
Continuous Professional Development
- DEXA
Dual Energy X-Ray Absorptiometry (bone scan test)
- FLS
Fracture Liaison Service
- HT
Hormone Therapy
- RCGP
Royal College of General Practitioners
- VCF
Vertebral Compression Fracture
- FRAX
Fracture Risk Assessment Tool
- HRT
Hormone replacement therapy
- SERMs
Selective estrogen receptor modulators
- PTH
Parathyroid hormone
- RPTH
Recombinant parathyroid hormone
Authors' contributions
MA, NF, AO, NM, BL participated in the concept/design, and drafting of the article. RA participated in the search, scientometric analysis, interpretation of data. RN, MA, MS participated in screening, data extraction and verification. RN prepared figures. MN participated in the conducted the review, editing of the article. All authors have read and approved the final manuscript.
Funding
This study was supported by the Elite Researcher Grant Committee (Grant. No. 958942) from the National Institute for Medical Research Development, Tehran, Iran.
Data availability
The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.
Declarations
Conflict of interest
The Authors declare that there is no conflict of interest.
Footnotes
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
References
- 1.Lane NE. Epidemiology, etiology, and diagnosis of osteoporosis. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2006 doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2005.08.047. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Clynes MA, Harvey NC, Curtis EM, Fuggle NR, Dennison EM, Cooper C. The epidemiology of osteoporosis. Br Med Bull. 2020 doi: 10.1093/bmb/ldaa005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Kling JM, Clarke BL, Sandhu NP. Osteoporosis prevention, screening, and treatment: a review. J Womens Health. 2014 doi: 10.1089/jwh.2013.4611. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Berghaus S, Müller D, Gandjour A, Civello D, Stock S. Osteoporosis in German men: a cost-of-illness study. Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res. 2015 doi: 10.1586/14737167.2015.990885. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Nik J, Lai PSM, Ng CJ, Emmerton L. A qualitative study of community pharmacists’ opinions on the provision of osteoporosis disease state management services in Malaysia. BMC Health Serv Res. 2016 doi: 10.1186/s12913-016-1686-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Salminen H, Piispanen P, Toth-Pal E. Primary care physicians’ views on osteoporosis management: a qualitative study. Arch Osteoporos. 2019 doi: 10.1007/s11657-019-0599-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Ngenzi JL, Scott RE, Mars M. Information and communication technology to enhance continuing professional development (CPD) and continuing medical education (CME) for Rwanda: a scoping review of reviews. BMC Med Educ. 2021 doi: 10.1186/s12909-021-02607-w. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Giangregorio L, Fisher P, Papaioannou A, Adachi J. Osteoporosis knowledge and information needs in healthcare professionals caring for patients with fragility fractures. Orthop Nurs. 2007. 10.1097/00006416-200701000-00009 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 9.Sorbi R, Aghamirsalim MR. Knowledge of orthopaedic surgeons in managing patients with fragility fracture. Int Orthop. 2012 doi: 10.1007/s00264-012-1482-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Nguyen VH, Wang Z. Osteoporosis knowledge of students in relevant healthcare academic programs. J Osteoporos. 2012 doi: 10.1155/2012/383412. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Lewiecki EM, Jackson A, Lake AF, Carey JJ, Belaya Z, Melnichenko GA, et al. Bone health TeleECHO: a force multiplier to improve the care of skeletal diseases in underserved communities. Curr Osteoporos Rep. 2019 doi: 10.1007/s11914-019-00543-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Samuel A, Cervero RM, Durning SJ, Maggio LA. Effect of Continuing Professional Development on Health Professionals’ Performance and Patient Outcomes: A Scoping Review of Knowledge Syntheses. Acad Med. 2021 doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000003899. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Schooley B, Singh A, Hikmet N, Brookshire R, Patel N. Integrated digital patient education at the bedside for patients with chronic conditions: observational study. JMIR mHealth uHealth. 2020 doi: 10.2196/22947. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Klimova B. The use of eLearning in medical education and healthcare practice–A review study. Online Eng Internet Things. 2018:933–9.
- 15.Delf P. Designing effective eLearning for healthcare professionals. Radiography. 2013 doi: 10.1016/j.radi.2013.06.002. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Jayakumar N, Brunckhorst O, Dasgupta P, Khan MS, Ahmed K. e-Learning in surgical education: a systematic review. J Surg Educ. 2015 doi: 10.1016/j.jsurg.2015.05.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Tarpada SP, Morris MT, Burton DA. E-learning in orthopedic surgery training: a systematic review. J Orthop. 2016 doi: 10.1016/j.jor.2016.09.004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Maertens H, Madani A, Landry T, Vermassen F, Van Herzeele I, Aggarwal R. Systematic review of e-learning for surgical training. J Br Surg. 2016 doi: 10.1002/bjs.10236. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Lapitan LD, Jr, Tiangco CE, Sumalinog DAG, Sabarillo NS, Diaz JM. An effective blended online teaching and learning strategy during the COVID-19 pandemic. Educ Chem Eng. 2021 doi: 10.1016/j.ece.2021.01.012. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Agarwal PK. A combined approach in prolonged COVID-19 pandemic to teach undergraduate surgery students—future primary care physicians. J Family Med Prim Care. 2020. 10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_1129_20 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 21.Uzzaman M, Jackson T, Uddin A, Rowa-Dewar N, Chisti MJ, Habib G, et al. Continuing professional education for general practitioners on chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: feasibility of a blended learning approach in Bangladesh. BMC Fam Pract. 2020. 10.1186/s12875-020-01270-2 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 22.Murad A, Hyde N, Chang S, Lederman R, Bosua R, Pirotta M, et al. Quantifying Use of a Health Virtual Community of Practice for General Practitioners’ Continuing Professional Development: A Novel Methodology and Pilot Evaluation. J Med Internet Res. 2019 doi: 10.2196/14545. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Salari N, Ghasemi H, Mohammadi L, Rabieenia E, Shohaimi S, Mohammadi M. The global prevalence of osteoporosis in the world: a comprehensive systematic review and meta-analysis. J Orthop Surg Res. 2021 doi: 10.1186/s13018-021-02772-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Mahdaviazad H, Keshtkar V, Emami MJ. Osteoporosis guideline awareness among Iranian family physicians: results of a knowledge, attitudes, and practices survey. Prim Health Care Res Dev. 2018 doi: 10.1017/S1463423618000014. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Mahdaviazad H, Keshtkar V, Emami MJ, Kargarshouroki Z, Vosoughi AR. Osteoporosis guideline awareness among Iranian nurses: results of a knowledge and attitudes survey. J Prev Med Hyg. 2021. 10.15167/2421-4248/jpmh2021.62.2.1738 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 26.Hays R. How to review a medical curriculum. The Asia-Pacific scholar. 2016. 10.29060/TAPS.2016-1-1/SC1009
- 27.Kumaravel B, Hearn JH, Jahangiri L, Pollard R, Stocker CJ, Nunan D. A systematic review and taxonomy of tools for evaluating evidence-based medicine teaching in medical education. Sys Rev. 2020 doi: 10.1186/s13643-020-01311-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Jaglal S, Hawker G, Cameron C, Canavan J, Beaton D, Bogoch E, et al. The Ontario Osteoporosis Strategy: implementation of a population-based osteoporosis action plan in Canada. Osteoporosis Int. 2010 doi: 10.1007/s00198-010-1206-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.RCGP. Title of Diagnosis and management of osteoporosis. Royal Osteoporosis Society. https://elearning.rcgp.org.uk/course/info.php?id=233. Accessed Dec 2021
- 30.RCGP. Title of e-Learning osteoporosis module. Royal Osteoporosis Society. https://theros.org.uk/healthcare-professionals/courses-and-cpd/rcgp-osteoporosis-e-learning/#:~:text=e%2DLearning%20osteoporosis%20module&text=The%20module%3A,from%20NICE%2C%20SIGN%20and%20NOGG&text=tests%20your%20knowledge%20of%20management,to%20refer%20to%20secondary%20care. Accessed Dec 2021
- 31.Chisholm MA. An internet-based program to teach osteoporosis. Am J Pharm Educ. 2002;66(4):416–420. [Google Scholar]
- 32.Dolan BM, Yialamas MA, McMahon GT. A randomized educational intervention trial to determine the effect of online education on the quality of resident-delivered care. J Grad Med Educ. 2015 doi: 10.4300/JGME-D-14-00571.1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.James House, Lower Bristol Road, Bath BA2 3BH. Title of fracture prevention practitioner training. Royal Osteoporosis Society. https://theros.org.uk/healthcare-professionals/courses-and-cpd/fracture-prevention-practitioner-training/. Accessed Dec 2021
- 34.Society NO. Title of fracture prevention practitioner Royal Osteoporosis Society. https://theros.org.uk/healthcare-professionals/courses-and-cpd/fracture-prevention-practitioner-training/. Accessed Dec 2021
- 35.Title of Excellence in osteoporosis – optimizing patient outcomes. 2016. https://www.intmedpress.com/osteoporosis-online/about-the-programme/. Accessed Dec 2021
- 36.Lips P. Epidemiology and predictors of fractures associated with osteoporosis. Am J Med. 1997 doi: 10.1016/S0002-9343(97)90021-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Häussler B, Gothe H, Göl D, Glaeske G, Pientka L, Felsenberg D. Epidemiology, treatment and costs of osteoporosis in Germany—the BoneEVA Study. Osteoporos Int. 2007 doi: 10.1007/s00198-006-0206-y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Mark P. Kelly. Title of osteoporosis fitness specialist online course. MedFit Classroom. https://www.medfitclassroom.org/product/osteoporosis-fitness-specialist-online-course/. Accessed Dec 2021
- 39.Smith MC, O'May F, Tropea S, Berg J. Framing moving and handling as a complex healthcare intervention within the acute care of older people with osteoporosis: a qualitative study. J Clin Nurs. 2016 doi: 10.1111/jocn.13344. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Cook DA, Dupras DM. A practical guide to developing effective web-based learning. J Gen Intern Med. 2004 doi: 10.1111/j.1525-1497.2004.30029.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Kline GA, Symonds CJ, Billington EO. A retrospective review of the community medicine needs from osteoporosis services in Canada. BMC Endocr Disord. 2022 doi: 10.1186/s12902-022-01000-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Irani AD, Poorolajal J, Khalilian A, Esmailnasab N, Cheraghi Z. Prevalence of osteoporosis in Iran: A meta-analysis. J Res Med Sci. 2013;18(9):759. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Fahimfar N, Noorali S, Yousefi S, Gharibzadeh S, Shafiee G, Panahi N, et al. Prevalence of osteoporosis among the elderly population of Iran. Arch Osteoporos. 2021 doi: 10.1007/s11657-020-00872-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Chen I-J, Yu S, Wang T-F, Cheng S-P, Huang L-H. Knowledge about osteoporosis and its related factors among public health nurses in Taiwan. Osteoporos Int. 2005 doi: 10.1007/s00198-005-2015-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Nourmohammadi H, Abdan Z, Hashemipour SMA, Sarokhani D, Abdan M, Fakhri M, et al. Prevalence of osteoporosis and osteopenia in people over 60 years in Iran: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Prev Med. 2022 doi: 10.4103/ijpvm.IJPVM_657_20. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Pérez-López FR, Pérez Roncero GR. Assessing the content and quality of information on the treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis on the World Wide Web. Gynecol Endocrinol. 2006 doi: 10.1080/09513590601012603. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Torrent-Sellens J, Díaz-Chao Á, Soler-Ramos I, Saigí-Rubió F. Modelling and predicting eHealth usage in Europe: a multidimensional approach from an online survey of 13,000 european union internet users. J Med Internet Res. 2016 doi: 10.2196/jmir.5605. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Taguchi A, Shiraki M, Tsukiyama M, Miyazaki T, Soen S, Ohta H, et al. Impact of osteonecrosis of the jaw on osteoporosis treatment in Japan: results of a questionnaire-based survey by the adequate treatment of osteoporosis (A-TOP) research group. Calcif Tissue Int. 2015 doi: 10.1007/s00223-015-0045-y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Taguchi A, Shiraki M, Sugimoto T, Ohta H, Soen S, Society JO Lack of cooperation between physicians and dentists during osteoporosis treatment may increase fractures and osteonecrosis of the jaw. Curr Med Res Opin. 2016 doi: 10.1185/03007995.2016.1170005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Aghdam HA, Zandi-Esfahani H, Arash N, Motififard M, Elmi A, Telloo M. Educational needs of general practitioners in the domain of orthopedic disorders: investigating the differences from the viewpoints of medical trainees, interns, orthopedic assistants, and professors. J Med Educ. 2019;18(2).
- 51.Jothimurugan S, Sanganee D, Jothimurugan S, Williams S, Lynn M, Moorthy A. Testing the Water: Osteoporosis Management in Primary Care. Cureus. 2022 doi: 10.7759/cureus.21082. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Dewan N, MacDermid JC, MacIntyre NJ, Grewal R. Therapist's practice patterns for subsequent fall/osteoporotic fracture prevention for patients with a distal radius fracture. J Hand Ther. 2019 doi: 10.1016/j.jht.2018.03.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Ertmer PA, Ottenbreit-Leftwich AT, Sadik O, Sendurur E, Sendurur P. Teacher beliefs and technology integration practices: A critical relationship. Comput Educ. 2012 doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2012.02.001. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 54.De Gagne JC, Yang Y, Rushton S, Koppel PD, Hall K. Email Use Reconsidered in Health Professions Education. JMIR Med Educ. 2020 doi: 10.1016/10.2196/19300. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Huhta A-M, Hirvonen N, Huotari M-L. Health literacy in web-based health information environments: systematic review of concepts, definitions, and operationalization for measurement. J Med Internet Res. 2018 doi: 10.2196/10273. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Nessler JN, Schaper E, Tipold A. Proof of Concept: Game-based mobile learning-The first experience with the app Actionbound as case-based geocaching in education of veterinary neurology. Front Vet Sci. 2021 doi: 10.3389/fvets.2021.753903. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Casebeer LL, Strasser SM, Spettell CM, Wall TC, Weissman N, Ray MN, et al. Designing tailored Web-based instruction to improve practicing physicians' preventive practices. J Med Internet Res. 2003. 10.2196/jmir.5.3.e20 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.