Abstract
Centrin1 gene deleted Leishmania donovani parasite (LdCen1−/−) was developed and extensively tested experimentally as an intracellular stage-specific attenuated and immunoprotective live parasite vaccine candidate ex vivo using human PBMCs and in vivo in animals. Here we report manufacturing and pre-clinical evaluation of current Good-Laboratory Practice (cGLP) grade LdCen1−/− parasites, as a prerequisite before proceeding with clinical trials. We screened three batches of LdCen1−/− parasites manufactured in bioreactors under cGLP conditions, for their consistency in genetic stability, attenuation, and safety. One such batch was preclinically tested using human PBMCs and animals (hamsters and dogs) for its safety and protective immunogenicity. The immunogenicity of the CGLP grade LdCen1−/− parasites was similar to one grown under laboratory conditions. The cGLP grade LdCen1−/− parasites were found to be safe and non-toxic in hamsters and dogs even at 3 times the anticipated vaccine dose. When PBMCs from healed visceral leishmaniasis (VL) cases were infected with cGLP LdCen1−/−, there was a significant increase in the stimulation of cytokines that contribute to protective responses against VL. This effect, measured by multiplex ELISA, was greater than that observed in PBMCs from healthy individuals. These results suggest that cGLP grade LdCen1−/− manufactured under cGMP complaint conditions can be suitable for future clinical trials.
Keywords: Leishmania donovani, Visceral leishmaniasis, Vaccine candidate, Live attenuated, Preclinical, Toxicity study
Subject terms: Immunology, Microbiology, Molecular medicine
Introduction
Visceral leishmaniasis (VL)/kala-azar, caused by the protozoan parasite, either Leishmania donovani and L. infantum is a potentially fatal disease, with an estimated 50,000 to 90,000 cases worldwide annually as per leishmaniasis fact sheet 2021 by World Health Organization (https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/leishmaniasis#:~:text=Visceral%20leishmaniasis%20(VL)%2C%20also,East%20Africa%20and%20in%20India). One of the major hurdles in VL elimination is the presence of asymptomatic cases as they can transmit the infection without getting noticed and the parasites may also persist for a longer period in the absence of treatment1,2. Owing to the limited drug options for VL, the development of resistance by Leishmania to most of the available drugs, and the prevalence of asymptomatic cases, vaccination seems to be the most viable option for the elimination of leishmaniasis3–5.
Induction of robust protective immunity against VL in the recovered patients, suggests that the development of a vaccine for VL is a feasible goal6,7. Vaccination could be an effective approach to reduce both symptomatic as well as asymptomatic cases and to achieve the VL eradication target of 20304,8,9. Several vaccine candidates against leishmaniasis have been tried in the past, but no licensed vaccine is yet available for human use6,10.
One of the major concerns that limit the widespread use of live attenuated parasite vaccines is the absence of clear biomarkers related to their safety and protection11. Partially attenuated parasites can revert to virulent types and cause serious disease, especially in immunocompromised individuals. To rule out any such possibility of conversion, we developed a live attenuated L. donovani parasite by deleting both the alleles of the growth-regulating gene, centrin1 (LdCen1−/−)12,13. LdCen1 is a basal body-associated protein known to be involved in cell division13. LdCen1−/− amastigotes (intracellular form) undergo continued karyokinesis without cytokinesis due to the absence of basal body duplication, resulting in the formation of large multinucleated cells followed by apoptosis12. This non-replicating parasite hence can be cultivated as promastigotes (extracellular form) in vitro. Extensive studies in animal models with LdCen1−/− suggest, that they are safe, immunogenic, and protective against wild-type L. donovani infection, and also cross-protective against L. major that causes cutaneous leishmaniasis (CL) and L. braziliensis that causes mucocutaneous leishmaniasis14–17. Studies using human PBMCs also showed that they strongly promote protective pro-inflammatory cytokines in PBMCs of post-kala-azar-dermal leishmaniasis (PKDL) and healed VL (HVL) patients, who are already exposed to Leishmania infection18. These results suggest that LdCen1−/− has great potential as a live attenuated vaccine candidate against leishmaniases. However, there are possibilities that a parasite grown at a large scale in the industry for the vaccine may behave differently compared to its small-scale culturing in the laboratory environment. Hence to confirm the attenuation and efficacy consistency of a large-scale cultivation of LdCen1−/− in an industry setting, the cells were grown following current good laboratory practices (cGLP) at our industry partner Gennova Biopharmaceuticals, Pune, India, and the cells were used in subsequent toxicity studies. Here, we have presented the results of the detailed toxicity studies carried out in hamsters and dogs using cGLP grade of the parasite.
Recently, a detailed confirmation of protective immunity against the cGLP grade L. major centrin deleted live attenuated parasite as a vaccine candidate has been reported19. However, a preclinical toxicity analysis of a cGLP prepared live attenuated whole parasite as a vaccine before its use in clinical trials is needed. In this study we have outlined a comprehensive strategy of characterizing cGLP grade LdCen1−/− parasites. We describe (1) preparation of consecutive batches of cGLP grade LdCen1−/− parasites, including optimisation of batch cultivation steps, cell cryopreservation and stabilization/viability of frozen cells after thaw, parasites genetic stability, confirmation of its attenuation, (2) testing of toxicity of one of the batches and route of administration in animals, and (3) testing of the cGLP vaccine’s immunogenicity using the PBMCs from HVL patients and healthy controls. Here we present a detailed model of preclinical studies with the cGLP live attenuated vaccine parasitic cells, the needed approval processes to execute the studies, animal models used, ethical clearances obtained, number of sample sizes in the studies, replicas followed in the experiments, comprehensive toxicity analysis in the immunized animals, clinical samples used, and the data compared with the earlier results obtained using the laboratory strain of the vaccine with appropriate statistical validations. The presented protocol would help subsequently other researchers who would tend to validate preclinically their live parasite vaccines.
Results
cGLP LdCen1−/− batch to batch consistency
Parasite cell growth and viability during fermentation
The cGLP parasites were grown from the stored research cell bank of 2.5 × 106 cells in 200 µL cryoprotectant prepared from the initial seed vial having similar number of stored cells (Fig. 1a). The preparation of the ready-to-use vials of cells through sequential volume escalation has been schematically described in Fig. 1b. The promastigote cells of LdCen1−/− in the bioreactor culture displayed a sigmoid pattern of growth (Fig. 1c) and the cells’ density under microscope from day 1 to 5 are shown (Fig. 1d). As shown in Fig. 1c, LdCen1−/− parasites reached their peak growth at about ~ 52 million cells per ml. All batches were harvested on day 5 when the culture reached a late stationary phase.
Parasite yield from the batch cultures
Each of the three batches of LdCen1−/−, yielded a mean cell density of 47 ± 3 × 106 cells/ml in a 500 ml production batch in 5 days. The total parasite number from each batch was 23,700 ± 0.15 × 106 cells (Table 1).
Table 1.
Batch no. | Harvest cell density | Volume produced per batch | Total cells per batch |
---|---|---|---|
× 106 cells/ml | mL | × 106 cells | |
Batch-1 | 49.8 | 500 | 24,900 |
Batch-2 | 48.3 | 500 | 24,150 |
Batch-3 | 44.1 | 500 | 22,050 |
Stability of the cGLP grade parasite
A. Genetic Stability: The genetic stability of the cGLP parasites in vitro was conducted to confirm the authenticity of the cells and make sure that they still resembled the original laboratory strain as reported12. The genomic DNA obtained from the cultured cells of cGLP from the three batches was subjected to PCR analysis using centrin gene-specific primers12 and confirmed the absence of the centrin1 gene in the cells of all the batches, confirming it to be LdCen1−/− (Fig. 2a). Similarly, the total proteins obtained from the cultured cells of all cGLP batches were subjected to Western blot analysis using rabbit anti-centrin1 antibodies12 and confirmed the absence of centrin1 proteins in the cells (Fig. 2b).
In addition, the cells of the cGLP batches were sub-cultured into axenic amastigotes and confirmed their growth and cell structure under the microscope. The appearance of typical multinucleated cells of axenic amastigotes on day 2 in the culture due to arrest of the cell cycle in them compared to the control wild-type cells (having a typical single set of nucleus and kinetoplast; Fig. 2c) was observed (Fig. 2c)12. The growth study displays the growth-arrested nature of the LdCen1−/− cells of all the batches (Fig. 2d). This confirms that LdCen1−/− parasites grown under cGLP conditions behave like the lab-grown parasites12.
b. Infectivity: The infectivity and the associated safety and protective efficacy of LdCen1−/− have been extensively studied ex vivo and in vivo in animal models as well as in clinically isolated human PBMCs, as described in our earlier publications14–17,20,21. To briefly confirm the infectivity of the cGLP cells in the human THP-1 cell line, we infected the cells with the cGLP promastigote cells in vitro, measured the percent of cells infected, and compared them with the infection due to the freeze–thaw wild-type cells. The results showed that initially (at 12 h), the infective nature of the cells was similar to that of wild-type cells. However, after 48 h, there was a significant reduction in the virulence of only the cGLP cells (Fig. 2e).
Viability of cGLP vaccine cells post cryopreservation
The viability of 3 batches of cGLP LdCen1−/− parasites was monitored over three months after cryopreservation. The results showed that the promastigote cells were ~ 70% viable after thawing and the viability decreased to ~ 50% when stored at 4 °C for 10 h (Fig. 3a, b and e). However, there was drastic decline in the viability of cells if stored at either 25 °C or 37 °C within 2 h post thaw (Fig. 3b and c) and the cells were all dead by 6 h (conducted with all the 3 batch cells). The cells were viable between 50 and 70% while kept at 4 °C in the refrigerator for 10 h uniformly with all the batch cells. Hence, we conclude that 4 °C could be the preferred temperature to store the parasites post-thaw until it is used for immunization. Depending on the viability of the thawed cGLP parasite cells stored at 4 °C, the conversion table in Supplementary Table 1 suggests the actual live cells (100%) as 1X and 3X doses to be used in the toxicity analysis in the animals. As there was little variability in cell viability between the 3 batches, batch ‘1’ cells were selected for use in the preclinical toxicity (PCT) analysis as per the cell number mentioned in the Supplementary Table 1.
Toxicity study in the animals
A. Study 1: Single dose toxicity study of LdCen1−/− cGLP cells by subcutaneous (SC) and intradermal (ID) administration in hamsters. This study was conducted to assess the safety and tolerability of the cGLP cells. These different routes of administration were attempted to choose an appropriate one for the subsequent studies. This study was also intended to provide information on important toxic effects, target organs and an estimation of the maximum tolerable dose (MTD). Both the administration studies were with 3 groups (G1: group 1 with placebo; G2: group 2 with 1 × vaccine dose and G3: group 3 with 3X vaccine dose), and each group had 6 hamsters (3 females and 3 males; Table 2; Supplementary Table 2). Parameters evaluated during the study period were survival, clinical signs, body weight, feed consumption, and necropsy findings.
Table 2.
Study name | Route of administration SC/ID & other details |
Groups and sex (6 animals in each group) |
Treatment | Study details |
---|---|---|---|---|
STUDY I Single dose toxicity study in Hamsters |
SC Analysed on day 15 |
G1 (3♂ & 3♁) | G1: Placebo |
Clinical observations: General and local examinations till 4 h after vaccination on Day 1 and once daily thereafter Body weights & Food consumption: On Day 0, 4, 8 and 15 Gross pathology: Day 15, gross lesions if any were collected |
G2 (3♂ & 3♁) | G2: 1X vaccine | |||
G3 (3♂ & 3♁) | G3: 3X vaccine | |||
ID Analysed on day 15 |
G4 (3♂ & 3♁) | G4: Placebo | ||
G5 (3♂ & 3♁) | G5: 1X vaccine | |||
G6 (3♂ & 3♁) | G6: 3X vaccine | |||
STUDY II Double dose toxicity study in Hamsters |
SC First immunization on day 0. Analyse on day 30 |
G1 (3♂ & 3♁) | G1: Placebo |
Clinical observations: General and local examinations till 4 h after vaccinations and once daily thereafter Body weights & Food consumption: weekly study Necropsy & Gross pathology: Day 30 and day 90, gross lesions if any were collected. Detailed pathology in individual organs including their weight |
G2 (3♂ & 3♁) | G2: 1X vaccine | |||
G3 (3♂ & 3♁) | G3: 3X vaccine | |||
SC Second immunization on day 30. Analyse on day 90 |
G4 (3♂ & 3♁) | G4: Placebo | ||
G5 (3♂ & 3♁) | G5: 1X vaccine | |||
G6 (3♂ & 3♁) | G6: 3X vaccine | |||
STUDY III Single dose toxicity study in dogs |
SC Analysed on day 15 |
G1 (3♂ & 3♁) | G1: Placebo |
Clinical observations: General and local examinations till 4 h after vaccination and once daily thereafter Body weights & Food consumption: On day 1, 4, 8 and 15 Rectal temperature: On day 1 and 2 Necropsy and Histopathology: day 15, All lesions if any were collected |
G2 (3♂ & 3♁) | G2: 1X vaccine | |||
G3 (3♂ & 3♁) | G3: 3X vaccine |
All animals were normal and were free from all visible clinical signs throughout the study period and survived up to scheduled termination. No treatment-related changes were observed in weekly body weight (Fig. 4a) and feed consumption (Supplementary Fig. 1A) compared to the control group. Neither any kind of lesion nor any disease-related clinical symptoms were noticed. The single SC and ID administration of cells in hamsters was found to be well tolerated without any clinical signs of toxicity. Based on these results, the MTD was found to be 9 million cells under the tested conditions. Comparing these two routes of injections, SC being less painful than ID22, we conducted the rest of the animal studies with SC administration.
b. Study 2: Double dose immunization study in hamsters. Animals from Groups G1–G3, that got one dose of vaccination (SC) on day1 were monitored till day 31, whereas the animals of groups G4–G6 with 2 doses of vaccines (administered subcutaneously on day 1 and day 31) were studied till day 91. In each case, there were 3 groups of animals (G1: group 1 with placebo; G2: group 2 with 1 × vaccine dose and G3: group 3 with 3X vaccine dose) and each group had 6 hamsters (3 females and 3 males; Table 2). Toxicity was assessed based on clinical signs, ophthalmoscopy, body weight, feed consumption, clinical and anatomic pathology. Animals were euthanized on Day 31 (G1–G3) and on Day 91 (G4–G6).
Body weight, mortality and clinical signs. There were no changes in the body weights or in any clinical signs of leishmaniasis/abnormalities attributable to treatment any of the placebo control and parasite-injected animals (Fig. 4b and c; Supplementary Table 3).
One female (T024/035) from G3 (3X dose treated) showed emaciation and dullness from Day 12 to Day 16 and was found dead on Day 17. Gross pathological examination revealed reduced thymus, blackish right eye, pus oozing out from cut open lacrimal gland, blackish enlargement in right lower jaw and abscess in right cerebrum. Mild suppurative inflammation in the brain and moderate infiltration of mononuclear cells in the liver and lungs were recorded on histopathological examination. These inflammatory findings might be the cause of death and were considered incidental and not attributed to treatment. One female (T024/046) from G4 (placebo control) had alopecia from Day 32 to Day 91, which was considered an incidental finding as there were no correlated changes in other parameters and the values were within the normal historical range.
Detailed clinical observations. All treated animals appeared normal without any clinical signs of toxicity during detailed veterinary examination (Supplementary Table 4), just as the control with the placebo. No musculoskeletal, nervous system, and respiratory disorders were noticed during the examination. The same female animal described above (T024/035) (from G3; 3X dose treated) from mid-dose exhibited incidental findings of dullness during week 2 and similarly, another female (T024/046) from high dose had alopecia from week 5 onwards.
Ophthalmoscopic examination. No ocular abnormalities were detected during the ophthalmoscopic examination carried out before treatment, on Day 30 (G1 and G3) and Day 91 (G4 and G6) (Supplementary Table 5).
Body weight. No statistically significant changes were observed in the mean body weight of test item-treated groups when compared with respective placebo control groups (Fig. 5).
Feed consumption. No treatment-related changes were observed in weekly feed consumption of all test item treated groups as compared to respective placebo control groups (Supplementary Fig. 1B; Supplementary Table 6). A statistically significant but marginal decrease in feed consumption was observed on Day 30 in G3 females when compared to G1 females compared to control. However, no associated changes were observed in body weight in the same group and no significant changes were observed in feed consumption in G6 females on Day 91. Further, an isolated significant increase in feed consumption was observed on Day 36 in G5 and G6 males when compared to G4 males. In the absence of changes in associated parameters or due to isolated occurrences, these findings were of no toxicological significance.
Clinical pathology: Hematology. No treatment-related adverse changes were observed up to the highest dose of 9 million cells/animal in any of the hematologic parameters on Day 31 and Day 91 as compared to respective placebo controls (Supplementary Table 7). Similarly, on day 91, no significant changes were observed in the hematology parameters tested (Supplementary Table 7).
Clinical pathology: Coagulation parameters. No significant immunization-related changes were observed in any of the coagulation parameters on Day 31 and Day 91 in parasite-injected animals as compared to respective placebo controls (Supplementary Table 8).
Clinical chemistry. No significant changes were observed in any of the clinical chemistry parameters on Day 31 and Day 91 in parasite-injected animals as compared to respective placebo controls (Supplementary Table 9). On Day 31, a statistically significant increase in globulin was observed in males treated with 3 million cells (G2). In the absence of a dose relationship, it was considered an incidental finding. Further, there was a decrease in creatinine in females (Day 31) and males (Day 91) treated with 9 million cells. The observed changes were minor or toxicologically insignificant.
Clinical pathology: Urinalysis. No treatment-related changes were observed in tested urine parameters (Supplementary Table 10). A statistically significant increase in mean urine pH was observed in males treated with 9 million cells (G6) when compared to Placebo control (G4) animals. Changes were considered incidental without a toxicological significance as there were no correlated changes in other parameters and values were within the normal historical range.
Organ weight and relative organ weight. No significant changes were observed in any of the absolute and relative organ weights on Days 31 and 91 as compared to respective placebo controls (Supplementary Tables 11–12; Fig. 5).
Gross pathology. No changes were observed in vaccinated animals sacrificed on days 31 and 91 (Supplementary Table 13) compared to control. On gross pathological examination of found dead female (T024/035) from G3 revealed a reduced thymus, blackish right eye, pus oozing out from cut open lacrimal gland, blackish enlargement in the right lower jaw and abscess in the right cerebrum. Unilateral adhesion of testes and epididymides with small seminal vesicle in one male (T024/025) and dark red colored enlarged ovary in one female (T024/033) were observed in 9 million cells dosed group on Day 31. Based on the histopathology evaluation of these organs, these findings were considered as incidental/spontaneous in nature and not attributed to test item treatment.
Histopathology. No histopathological findings were observed in 9 million cells dosed animals that were sacrificed on Day 91 (Supplementary Table 14). The histopathology findings observed in other organs were comparable between placebo control and 9 million cells dosed animals in terms of severity and incidences. Therefore, recorded histopathology findings were considered incidental/spontaneous and not attributed to test item treatment. Histopathological evaluation of femur bone with marrow revealed no abnormalities in vaccine-treated groups as compared to the vehicle control groups in both male and female hamsters. Further, a qualitative evaluation of the bone marrow smear did not reveal any abnormalities. No local reaction of erythema and edema was observed at the injection site in all vaccine-treated animals including vehicle control animals. Similarly, no pathological changes were identified during microscopic examination of the injection sites in all groups of both sexes. In conclusion, SC administration of LdCen1−/− cGLP cells up to 9 million cells/animal was found to be well tolerated in hamsters up to 90 days, without any obvious signs of systemic toxicity under the study conditions.
a. Study 3: Toxicity analysis of single-dose LdCen1−/− cGLP administered to dogs to assess the safety and tolerability of the parasite. This study was conducted to assess the safety and tolerability of cGLP cells in Beagle Dogs by single subcutaneous administrations. The results shown here are on day 15 post-immunization. The SC administration was with 3 groups (G1: group 1 with placebo; G2: group 2 with 1 × vaccine dose and G3: group 3 with 3X vaccine dose) and each group was with 6 dogs (3 females and 3 males; Table 2). Toxicity was assessed based on clinical signs, body weight, food consumption, clinical, Electrocardiogram (ECG) recording and anatomic pathology. Animals were sacrificed on Day 15. No treatment-related mortality and clinical signs were observed till day 15 of the study period up to the highest dose of 9 million cells/animal in both male and female dogs. No abnormal changes were observed during the detailed clinical examination. Body weight and food consumption in all the groups were comparable to the respective placebo control groups throughout the experimental period in both sexes (Fig. 4d). No treatment-related changes were observed in any of the electrocardiogram parameters evaluated in animals treated at 3 million, and 9 million cells/animal as compared to treatment with the placebo control (Supplementary Table 15). No changes attributable to treatment were observed in any of the hematology, coagulation and clinical chemistry parameters tested as compared to placebo control (Supplementary Tables 16–18). Gross pathological observations of all animals did not reveal any abnormalities. The single SC administration of cGLP cells in Beagle Dogs was found to be well tolerated without any clinical signs of toxicity. Based on these results, the MTD of was found to be 9 million cells/animal under tested conditions.
Measurement of immunoprotection of cGLP LdCen1−/− in human PBMCs
A. Cytokines involved in promoting host protection against leishmaniasis were induced by cGLP LdCen1−/− in HVL individuals. Cytokines (IL-2, IL-12, IL-13, IFN-γ, TNF-α, IP-10, IL-17, MCP-1 and IL-1β) that play an important role in protecting leishmaniasis (Th1 response), were measured in PBMC supernatants. It was observed that there was a significant increase in the release of all studied cytokines in PBMC supernatants of HVL after infection with both wild-type as well as cGLP LdCen1−/− parasites in comparison to the control uninfected PBMCs (Fig. 6A). In the healthy group, except IL-13, no significant difference in the production of any other cytokine was found in PBMCs after infection with Ld1S and LdCen1−/− in comparison to control of uninfected cells. Further, this observed production of IL-13 in the healthy group was only observed in the cGLP LdCen1−/− parasite-infected PBMCs. In HVL, secretion of IL-13 was observed with both wild-type and cGLP parasites infected PBMCs and the level of significance (P < 0.005) was more compared to the healthy group (P < 0.05). Moreover, the level of production of all cytokines obtained with the cGLP parasites in both study groups was similar to that with the wild-type parasites.
b. Cytokines involved in increasing susceptibility to leishmaniasis were not induced by cGLP LdCen1−/− in both the studied groups. Under this study, 3 cytokines (IL-4, IL-6 and IL-10), with a role in increasing susceptibility towards leishmaniasis progression (Th2 response), were estimated in PBMC supernatants. No significant production of any cytokine was observed after infection with wild-type or cGLP LdCen1−/− parasites in comparison to the control uninfected PBMCs in both the groups examined i.e., healthy and HVL (Fig. 6B).
c. Granzyme B is stimulated by cGLP LdCen1−/− Granzyme B, a serine protease, is mainly secreted by cytotoxic T-Cells (CTLs) and Natural killer (NK) cells. It is a potent inducer of apoptosis in target cells. Granzyme B level was determined in the cell supernatant of PBMCs of healthy and HVL (n = 6) infected with wild-type and cGLP LdCen1−/− parasites. An increase in the release of Granzyme B was only observed in blood PBMC supernatants of HVL group infected with wild-type (Mean ± SEM = 381.9 ± 163.2) and LdCen1−/− (Mean ± SEM = 404.2 ± 179.0 pg/ml) parasites as compared to the control uninfected cells (Mean ± SEM = 126.1 ± 50.98), not with the healthy group. The level of the release induced by LdCen1−/− was comparable to that of the wild-type (Supplementary Fig. 2). However, this observed difference in the release of the infected cells compared to the control of uninfected cells was not significant (P > 0.05), which might be due to small sample size.
Discussion
Detailed studies on the animal safety and immunity in a gene deleted (LdCen1−/−) live attenuated L. donovani vaccine candidate have been described through several of our earlier studies and in a recent review4. In addition, a pre-clinical evaluation of the safety and immunogenicity of cGLP grade L. major centrin−/− parasites against sand fly infection was recently demonstrated19,23. However, a detailed study describing the preclinical toxicity evaluation of cGLP grade of such live attenuated parasites as a vaccine in the animals/human cells starting from the optimization of the culture of the industrial grade parasite in the bioreactors, freeze transporting followed by viability and genetic stability assessment and evaluations experimentally in animals and human cells using freeze thawed cells (cGLP) is still needed. The current study addressed these aspects for the first time and an optimized protocol and data are presented here.
The development of a safe and effective vaccine against the life-threatening infectious disease, VL/kala-azar is a long-term goal. Towards this goal, we have developed a replication-deficient live attenuated L. donovani parasite, which has shown good potential as a vaccine candidate in studies in the human PBMCs14,16–18 and animal models21,24. The present study was carried out using cGLP grade LdCen1−/− parasite grown in the industrial setting to ensure that the results obtained are consistent with the laboratory grade parasite, to serve as a prerequisite test for the clinical studies. In addition, the report also carries the detailed toxicity study carried out in the animals for the first time in consultation with the regulatory agencies, as there is no precedence of such a preclinical procedure available to test whole live parasites as a vaccine.
Genetic recombination and introgression, contributing to the emergence of new parasite species could be a possibility in nature25. However, since 2009, with several reports on the stability of our gene-deleted parasite in animal models, we found genetic stability in the mutant parasite, without a sign of reverting to virulent form12,14,24. Moreover, in our live attenuated parasite, the mutation is irreversible, since the deletion is of both the alleles of the gene, centrin1 in L. donovani, whose homologous sequence is not present in higher eukaryotes including humans.
A controlled culture condition in the bioreactor, optimizations described for this study rendered a consistency between lot-to-lot preparation, which is mandatory for the regulating agencies to approve clinical studies. The consistency of parasite character among different lots was observed for cell number yield, genetic and cell attenuation in vitro in the macrophages. The study also revealed the viability of the freeze–thaw parasites of different lots (prepared at different times) uniformly showing reduced viability from initially 70% reducing to ~ 50% by 10 days. This will help to assess the number of cells to be used as a single vaccine dose within 10 h after transport to vaccination into remote places, where deep freezers are not easy to access. A study reported close to 90% viability after cryopreservation for just 20 min at − 80 °C yields with the wild-type L. amazonensis26. Whereas in our case the parasites were weakened by gene deletion that grows slightly slow even as promastigotes in culture12. Such cells of cGLP grade were cryopreserved at − 80 °C duly following the recommended procedures of slow cooling to − 80 °C (plus fast thawing at the time of use)26, stored for several months at the partner industry and transported in dry ice box having thermo-monitors to our university and upon receipt, they were again stored at − 80 °C for further use on a different date. Hence to the best of our knowledge, ours is the first such report describing the cold chain transport and viability counting of the cryopreserved cGLP of live attenuated Leishmania parasite.
Studies suggest that recovery from VL infection is favored by the induction of cell-mediated immunity followed by the production of pro-inflammatory cytokines by Th1 cells, while its progression is associated with the production of anti-inflammatory cytokines by Th2 cells27. Hence, an ideal vaccine candidate of VL should be capable of stimulation of Th1 cell-mediated pro-inflammatory cytokine response. In the present study, significant stimulation in the level of pro-inflammatory cytokines was observed in the PBMCs of HVL after infection with cGLP LdCen1−/− parasites compared to the healthy human control; however, no such stimulation was found for anti-inflammatory cytokines. Further, the immune response induced by cGLP LdCen1−/− parasites was comparable to that by wild-type parasites (Ld1S). These findings are consistent with the results obtained with laboratory-cultured LdCen1−/− in our previous studies18. In addition to the previous observations, here we examined the stimulation of 4 more chemokines/cytokines i.e., IP-10, MCP-1, IL-1β, and IL-13 in the PBMCs, which are implicated in protecting against VL progression. All 4 of them were found to be stimulated in blood PBMCs of HVL after infection with cGLP LdCen1−/− parasites.
Monocyte chemotactic protein-1 (MCP-1), a chemokine secreted in response to inflammatory signals, plays an important role in providing a protective immune response to the host by selective recruitment of neutrophils, monocytes, dendritic cells, and lymphocytes28. A previous study showed higher stimulation of MCP-1 in plasma samples of Leishmania antigen-stimulated whole blood collected from HVL and individuals living in the endemic area of L. infantum29, like the finding of the current study. Further, this study advocated MCP-1 as a very potent biomarker of cure and efficacy of drug treatment in VL and the selection and follow-up of the individuals in vaccine clinical trials. MCP-1 was also found to be a very robust biomarker in identifying asymptomatic infection30. IFN-γ-inducible protein-10 (IP-10) is produced by various cell types in response to IFN-γ mediated activation and it further promotes IFN-γ production. It also protects against VL progression in a manner like the MCP-1. Another study carried out by the same group found IP-10 as a robust marker of treatment response and cure from VL29.
IL-1β is a potent pro-inflammatory cytokine and helps in providing host resistance against Leishmania infection31. A study showed that there is a significantly higher level of IL-1β in serum samples of active VL patients as compared to the control uninfected individual32. Another study with antigen-stimulated PBMCs of CL patients found significant stimulation of IL-1β33. The role of IL-13 in leishmaniasis progression is conflicting. Some studies suggest that IL-13 contributes to increased susceptibility toward the cutaneous form of leishmaniasis34, while others suggest it plays a protective role35. However, VL studies suggest that it predominantly plays a protective role against disease progression. A study using mice infected with L. donovani as an experimental host of VL infection suggested that deletion of the IL-13 gene (IL-13−/−) resulted in decreased IFN-γ and increased IL-10 and IL-4 production, reduced granuloma maturation and drug responsiveness36, suggesting its pivotal role against VL progression. This report also similarly found an elevated level of IL-13 only in the HVL cases as a protective role.
We also measured the production of granzyme B in the PBMCs of HVL and healthy individuals after infection with cGLP LdCen1−/− parasites. Granzyme B is a serine protease, produced by cytotoxic T cells and a potent inducer of apoptosis in the target cells37. Studies conducted in the CL suggest that granzyme B production is associated with protecting against disease progression38. The findings of the present study also indicate that there was an increase in granzyme B production in PBMCs of HVL cases after infection with cGLP LdCen1−/− parasites. This further supports the potential of cGLP LdCen1−/− as a live attenuated vaccine candidate.
Vaccination of asymptomatic VL cases is one of the finest approaches to control the spread of the disease. A study with a mice model of asymptomatic infection found that immunization with LdCen1−/− generates multifunctional T-cell response and memory T-cell population and induces protection as evidenced by reduced wild-type parasite burden20. In addition, PBMCs, isolated from healthy volunteers from a non-endemic region, infected with centrin-deleted L. major parasite (LmCen1−/−) also stimulated enhanced IFN-γ compared to IL-10, which was consistent with the immunogenicity of this parasite in hamsters19. These data provide additional support that live attenuated parasites could be considered as prophylactic vaccines. To our knowledge ours is a novel preclinical study, where a vaccine candidate of cGLP grade has been comprehensively tested, meeting all the product characteristics. The cGLP grade LmCen1−/− recently tested in hamsters and challenged with L. donovani and confirming cross-protection against the VL-causing parasite has also been demonstrated19 confirming cGLP grade cells in the in vivo studies in the animals demonstrating the utility of industrial grade cells for the vaccine efficacy evaluations.
Conclusions
In conclusion, the present study describes a detailed procedure to monitor the genetic stability and toxicology aspects of the vaccine candidate including the needed regulatory approvals to similarly follow for other such eukaryotic whole live parasites as a vaccine. Based on the findings, the generated cGLP grade cells were genetically stable and the no-observed-adverse-effect level (NOAEL) of the parasites following SC administration in hamsters was 9 million cells/animal and demonstrated appropriate safety of vaccine at the proposed dose for humans. These findings further support the vaccine potential of cGLP LdCen1−/−. With the amount of data collected through this study determining the safety, and efficacy of the cGLP cells along with our earlier studies in various animal models using laboratory-grade parasites, the LdCen1−/− cells as a vaccine can be tested clinically in humans or domestic dogs. Additionally, in this process, we described a detailed controlled preclinical study design to prepare, characterize, and evaluate the cGLP of LdCen1−/− cells preclinically in ex vivo cells, toxicity analysis in the animals and protective immunity in the human cells.
Materials and methods
Preparation of cGLP grade parasites
Centrin1 gene deleted live growth attenuated L. donovani 1S (LdCen1−/−)12 and the parent L. donovani 1S strain (MHOM/SD/62/1S) were used in all the experiments. Promastigotes and the axenic amastigotes of such strains were grown in vitro in T25 cm2 culture flasks (Corning, New York, US) in media as described earlier12,39,40. The cGLP grade cells were produced at 1L bioreactor scale having 500 ml of working volume. For the bioreactor production, each batch was inoculated with seed prepared by using T-flask and shake flask. In the seed development process, cells were revived from one frozen stock vial (having cell number 2.5 × 106 cells stored in 200 µL cryoprotectant) and grown into a T-flask (25 cm2) containing 5 ml growth medium and incubated at 25 °C for the promastigote form12,39,40 (Fig. 1A-B). Further, cells were passaged after every second day in fresh growth medium to expand inoculum volume. Finally, 1L bioreactors having 500 ml of working volume were inoculated from the seed prepared in shake-flask. The initial cell density of the bioreactor was kept 2.0–4.0 × 106 cells/ml. Bioreactor temperature and agitation were maintained at 25 °C and 100 rpm respectively throughout the run. The cells were measured using a hemacytometer and the viability of the cells was confirmed microscopically using trypan blue (Sigma Aldrich)40. The cells were harvested when they reached in the stationary phase after 5 days of cultivation (Fig. 1C, D). The harvested cells were pelleted and re-suspended in 1X PBS containing 8% glycerol (non-toxic cryoprotectant) and cell concentration of 60 × 106 cells/ml to prepare a stock solution. From the prepared stock, the cells were aliquoted as 300 µl (6 million cells/100 µl) and stored at − 80 °C. Once the cells from the manufacturer under cGLP conditions were received by the testing facility (transported in dry ice), the cells were stored at − 80 °C. Such cells were used for the toxicity study in the animals.
Each parent and the batch cultures were tested/confirmed for their purity/absence of contaminants by periodically monitoring the cultures under the microscope and by plating an aliquot of cells on Luria Bertani (Sigma Aldrich) agar plates without any antibiotics and observing for contaminants if any following day. The parameters assessed for the quality confirmation of different lots of LdCen1−/− promastigotes were: (a) enlarged cell structure and multinucleate of the axenic amastigotes in culture; (b) absence of centrin gene in the genome by PCR analysis compared with the DNA from the wild type parasites using primers reported previously and c) absence of LdCen1 protein in the parasites in a Western blot analysis using anti LdCen1 Ab12. These studies were conducted in the non-GLP condition in the laboratory.
Optimization of cold-chain and management for vaccine delivery
After required periods of storage time, the cryotubes were removed from the freezer and thawed quickly at − 37 °C (water bath) and used directly in the preclinical studies. During the storage period, the cGLP vials were also transported from the industry to the testing sites by courier in the dry-ice boxes with temperature-controlled logistics (TCL) in place for real-time temperature monitoring during transport. Thus, right from the manufacturing till before its final thaw to use, the vaccine vials were monitored 24/7 for the maintenance of its stored temperature.
A detailed study of the viability of cells after thaw and its stability at different higher temperatures including room temperature was carried out for the LdCen1−/− parasites. The promastigotes of LdCen1−/− parasites stored at − 80 °C for different time periods were analyzed for the initial viability soon after thaw by measuring under a microscope with trypan blue vital stain and comparing with the similarly processed wild-type cells, wherever needed. In addition, the viability of the thawed cells was analyzed by extending its incubation at 4 °C and ambient temperature. This indicated the vaccine’s stability at a temperature feasible to maintain until it is used for vaccination.
Survivability of cGLP LdCen1−/− parasites in human macrophages
The macrophage cell line, THP-1 [Sigma Aldrich; monocyte culture maintained and differentiated to macrophages following exposure to lipopolysaccharides and lipoteichoic acid and used as per earlier report41 was infected with the three batches of the late stationary promastigotes of the cGLP LdCen1−/− and the wild-type parasites as control. The parasites’ survival inside macrophages was measured by counting the infected macrophages and the internalized parasites by microscopy following published protocol12.
Testing of cGLP product in animals for toxicity optimising different routes of administration
As per the regulatory norm, before testing the parasites in humans in phase I clinical study, it is mandatory to study the vaccine toxicity responses in animal models. Moreover, the toxicity analysis of LdCen1−/− parasites in the animals was never carried out for the earlier laboratory grade of the parasite. Hence, the toxicity analysis in detail with the cGLP grade cryopreserved and thawed LdCen1−/− parasites in hamsters and dogs was carried out at Vimta Laboratories, Hyderabad, India under the guidelines and approvals of the Institutional Biosafety Committee as well as the Review Committee on Genetic Manipulation, Department of Biotechnology, Ministry of Science and Technology, New Delhi, India. The studies were all conducted in compliance with The Organization of Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) Principles of Good Laboratory Practice (GLP) for the testing of cells as specified by International [C (97) 186/Final] Legislation and in accordance with the approved study plan and following all relevant SOPs. The type of animals, their groups in the study, route of vaccine administration, duration of incubation and the type of analysis at the end of experiments are described briefly in Table 2 and detailed in Supplementary Table 2.
Detailed animal care specific to hamsters and dogs, that includes environmental conditions, housing, diet and feeding and drinking water, has been shown in the Supplementary section: pages 8–9.
Infectivity and Immune responses due to cGLP product in the human cells
We reported the elicitation of Th1 immune response of laboratory grown LdCen1−/− parasites in the human PBMCs18. It is imperative to similarly confirm the infectivity and immune responses with the cGLP product, in the human PBMCs.
PBMCs isolation and stimulation: Blood PBMCs were isolated from healthy and healed VL individuals’ heparinized blood by density gradient centrifugation with Ficoll-Hypaque (Sigma-Aldrich, St Louis, MO) and cultured in RPMI medium as previously reported18. The PBMCs of 2 × 105 were plated in 96 well flat bottom tissue culture plates and incubated with (i) only media (unstimulated control) (ii) phytohemagglutinin (PHA) (1 μg/mL) as a positive control and (iii) 1 × 104 live wild-type L. donovani (LDS) or (iv) 1 × 104 LdCen1−/− parasites. After 120 h of incubation at 37 °C and 5% CO2, supernatants were collected and stored at − 70 °C until further analysis.
Cytokine levels in supernatants were determined using the Human Cytokines, Bio-PlexPro™ (BIO-RAD) kit according to the manufacturer's protocol. Th1/Th2/Th17 cytokines were analyzed as reported previously18. The concentration of cytokines was calculated using software provided by the manufacturer (Bio-Plex Manager Software).
Parasite survival in macrophages: Macrophage cell line, THP-1 was infected with the cGLP parasite and macrophage ratio (10:1) and the wild-type parasites as control as late stationary promastigotes and the survival of the parasite inside macrophages were measured by counting the infected macrophages and internalized parasites by microscopy by following published protocol12.
Human study populations and ethical consideration
The study was conducted in two groups: healthy (n = 10) and healed VL (n = 10). The sample size was determined based on the previous immunogenicity studies in humans18 using the published method42. People coming from VL non-endemic areas and negative for rk39 strip test (antigen test to diagnose VL)43 were included in the healthy group, while those having previous history of VL and treated at least 1 year before recruitment in the study were included in healed VL category. The study for the recruitment of both healthy individuals and healed VL groups was approved and carried out under the guidelines of the Ethical Committee of the Vardhman Mahavir Medical College and Safdarjung Hospital, New Delhi, India, and the samples were collected at the Department of Dermatology, Safdarjung Hospital. Informed consent was obtained from all the individuals recruited in the study.
Multiplex cytokine and Granzyme B ELISA
Multiplex cytokine ELISA was performed with 50 µl of collected PBMC supernatants using Human Cytokines, Bio-PlexPro™ (Bio-Rad) kit as per the manufacturer protocol. A total of 12 cytokines, involved in providing host protection (IFN-γ, TNF-α, IP-10, IL-2, IL-12, IL-13, IL-17, MCP-1 and IL-1β) and increasing disease susceptibility (IL-4, IL-6 and IL-10) were studied. Reading was taken on a multiplex array reader instrument from Luminex™ Instrumentation System (Bio-Plex Workstation from Bio-Rad Laboratories) and concentrations were calculated using software provided by the manufacturer (Bio-Plex Manager Software). Granzyme B ELISA was also performed in 50 µl of PBMC supernatants using Human Granzyme B ELISA kit (Thermo Fisher Scientific) as per the manufacturer’s protocol.
Statistical analysis
Data obtained in multiplex cytokine ELISA and Granzyme B ELISA were analyzed using Graph Pad Prism software (version 5.0). Results were represented as Mean Mean ± Standard Error Mean (SEM) in pg/ml. P value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Significance was determined by Mann–Whitney U test. Whereas the statistical analysis for the significance for the body/organ weight was measured by 2way ANOVA (Tukey’s multiple comparisons test).
Ethical Clearances/statements
Various ethical clearances necessary to execute the studies were obtained by the respective institutes and industries. Animal Ethics Clearance was obtained by Vimta Laboratories, Hyderabad, AP, India (#VLS/IBSC-01/2017); Preclinical toxicity in the animals was approved by the review committee on genetic manipulation, Department of Biotechnology, (RCGM) (BT/BS/17/135/2004 = PID), New Delhi, India. Institutional Ethics Committee approval was obtained by National Institute of Pathology (IEC-NIP 2/3/17/03), New Delhi, India. Institute Biosafety Committee approval was obtained by the Department of Molecular Medicine (JH/DBT/FS/IBSC-03/2017), Jamia Hamdard, New Delhi, India. In addition, RCGM approved separately for all the transfer of parasites from one institute to the other and to execute specific the studies described in this report (viz.BT/BS/17/374/2016-PID; BT/BS/17/99/2002-PID; BT/BS/17/135/2004-PID).
Animal ethics statement
We confirm that the study is reported following the approval of The Committee for the Purpose of Control and Supervision of Experiments on Animals (CPCSEA), India, and following the guidelines of the Association for the Assessment and Accreditation of Laboratory Animal Care International (AAALAC). As per the animal protocol followed, at the final time point of study before acquiring the tissues/organs, the animals were euthanized by CO2 asphyxiation followed by exsanguination.
Supplementary Information
Acknowledgements
We acknowledge the research grant for AS, PS, MSAM from Biotechnology Industry Research Assistance Council, India (# BT/CRS02l 4/CRS-1 0/l 6); for PS the Indian Council of Medical Research-Emeritus Scientist grant; Dr. Niti Puri, School of Life Sciences, Jawaharlal Nehru University, New Delhi for critical reading of the manuscript. None of the funders played any role directly in the research part.
Author contributions
K.A. performed immunogenicity studies in human cells. M.A.B. and K.V. were involved in the genetic and stability assessments of the cGLP cells. A.K.S., K.P.S. and R.K.S. developed the cGLP cells. M.S.A.M. and U.B. were involved in toxicity studies in hamsters and dogs. R.D., G.S., V.R., S.S. and H.L.N., P.S. and A.S. were involved in the planning and execution of the studies. K.A., P.S., H.N. and A.S. prepared the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Data availability
All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in this published article [and its supplementary information files].
Competing interests
The US-FDA is currently a co-owner of two US patents that claim attenuated Leishmania species with the Centrin gene deletion (US 7,887,812 and US 8,877,213). All other authors declare they have no competing interests.
Footnotes
Publisher's note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
These authors contributed equally: Kumar Avishek, Mirza A. Beg, Kavita Vats and Avinash Kumar Singh.
Supplementary Information
The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1038/s41598-024-64592-6.
References
- 1.Das VNR, et al. Conversion of asymptomatic infection to symptomatic visceral leishmaniasis: A study of possible immunological markers. PLoS Negl. Trop. Dis. 2020;14:e0008272. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0008272. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Selvapandiyan A, Croft SL, Rijal S, Nakhasi HL, Ganguly NK. Innovations for the elimination and control of visceral leishmaniasis. PLoS Negl. Trop. Dis. 2019;13:e0007616. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0007616. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Ponte-Sucre A, et al. Drug resistance and treatment failure in leishmaniasis: A 21st century challenge. PLoS Negl. Trop. Dis. 2017;11:e0006052. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0006052. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Volpedo G, et al. The history of live attenuated centrin gene-deleted Leishmania vaccine candidates. Pathogens. 2022 doi: 10.3390/pathogens11040431. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Deep DK, et al. Increased miltefosine tolerance in clinical isolates of Leishmania donovani is associated with reduced drug accumulation, increased infectivity and resistance to oxidative stress. PLoS Negl. Trop. Dis. 2017;11:e0005641. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0005641. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Volpedo G, et al. From infection to vaccination: Reviewing the global burden, history of vaccine development, and recurring challenges in global leishmaniasis protection. Expert Rev. Vaccines. 2021;20:1431–1446. doi: 10.1080/14760584.2021.1969231. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Volpedo G, et al. Determinants of innate immunity in visceral leishmaniasis and their implication in vaccine development. Front. Immunol. 2021;12:748325. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2021.748325. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Selvapandiyan A, et al. Generation of growth arrested Leishmania amastigotes: A tool to develop live attenuated vaccine candidates against visceral leishmaniasis. Vaccine. 2014;32:3895–3901. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2014.05.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Selvapandiyan A, et al. Immunity to visceral leishmaniasis using genetically defined live-attenuated parasites. J. Trop. Med. 2012;2012:631460. doi: 10.1155/2012/631460. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Gillespie PM, et al. Status of vaccine research and development of vaccines for leishmaniasis. Vaccine. 2016;34:2992–2995. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2015.12.071. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Gannavaram S, et al. Biomarkers of safety and immune protection for genetically modified live attenuated leishmania vaccines against visceral leishmaniasis—discovery and implications. Front. Immunol. 2014;5:241. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2014.00241. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Selvapandiyan A, et al. Centrin gene disruption impairs stage-specific basal body duplication and cell cycle progression in Leishmania. J. Biol. Chem. 2004;279:25703–25710. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M402794200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Selvapandiyan A, et al. Expression of a mutant form of Leishmania donovani centrin reduces the growth of the parasite. J. Biol. Chem. 2001;276:43253–43261. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M106806200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Selvapandiyan A, et al. Intracellular replication-deficient Leishmania donovani induces long lasting protective immunity against visceral leishmaniasis. J. Immunol. 2009;183:1813–1820. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.0900276. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Fiuza JA, et al. Induction of immunogenicity by live attenuated Leishmania donovani centrin deleted parasites in dogs. Vaccine. 2013;31:1785–1792. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2013.01.048. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Fiuza JA, et al. Vaccination using live attenuated Leishmania donovani centrin deleted parasites induces protection in dogs against Leishmania infantum. Vaccine. 2015;33:280–288. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2014.11.039. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Dey R, et al. Characterization of cross-protection by genetically modified live-attenuated Leishmania donovani parasites against Leishmania mexicana. J. Immunol. 2014;193:3513–3527. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.1303145. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Avishek K, et al. Gene deleted live attenuated Leishmania vaccine candidates against visceral leishmaniasis elicit pro-inflammatory cytokines response in human PBMCs. Sci. Rep. 2016;6:33059. doi: 10.1038/srep33059. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Karmakar S, et al. Preclinical validation of a live attenuated dermotropic Leishmania vaccine against vector transmitted fatal visceral leishmaniasis. Commun. Biol. 2021;4:929. doi: 10.1038/s42003-021-02446-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Ismail N, Kaul A, Bhattacharya P, Gannavaram S, Nakhasi HL. Immunization with live attenuated Leishmania donovani Centrin−/− parasites is efficacious in asymptomatic infection. Front. Immunol. 2017;8:1788. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2017.01788. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Bhattacharya P, et al. Genetically modified live attenuated Leishmania donovani parasites induce innate immunity through classical activation of macrophages that direct the Th1 response in mice. Infect. Immun. 2015;83:3800–3815. doi: 10.1128/IAI.00184-15. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Martensson L, Nyberg K, Wallin G. Subcutaneous versus intracutaneous injections of sterile water for labour analgesia: A comparison of perceived pain during administration. BJOG Int. J. Obstet. Gynaecol. 2000;107:1248–1251. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2000.tb11615.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Fiuza JA, et al. Intradermal immunization of Leishmania donovani Centrin knock-out parasites in combination with salivary protein LJM19 from Sand fly vector induces a durable protective immune response in hamsters. PLoS Negl. Trop. Dis. 2016;10:e0004322. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0004322. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Bhattacharya P, et al. Live attenuated Leishmania donovani Centrin knock out parasites generate non-inferior protective immune response in aged mice against visceral leishmaniasis. PLoS Negl. Trop. Dis. 2016;10:e0004963. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0004963. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Lypaczewski P, Matlashewski G. Leishmania donovani hybridisation and introgression in nature: A comparative genomic investigation. Lancet Microbe. 2021;2:e250–e258. doi: 10.1016/S2666-5247(21)00028-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Miyake Y, Karanis P, Uga S. Cryopreservation of protozoan parasites. Cryobiology. 2004;48:1–7. doi: 10.1016/j.cryobiol.2003.10.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Dayakar A, Chandrasekaran S, Kuchipudi SV, Kalangi SK. Cytokines: Key determinants of resistance or disease progression in visceral leishmaniasis: Opportunities for novel diagnostics and immunotherapy. Front. Immunol. 2019;10:670. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2019.00670. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Sato N, et al. CC chemokine receptor (CCR)2 is required for langerhans cell migration and localization of T helper cell type 1 (Th1)-inducing dendritic cells. Absence of CCR2 shifts the Leishmania major-resistant phenotype to a susceptible state dominated by Th2 cytokines, b cell outgrowth, and sustained neutrophilic inflammation. J. Exp. Med. 2000;192:205–218. doi: 10.1084/jem.192.2.205. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Ibarra-Meneses AV, et al. IFN-gamma, IL-2, IP-10, and MIG as biomarkers of exposure to Leishmania spp., and of cure in human visceral leishmaniasis. Front. Cell. Infect. Microbiol. 2017;7:200. doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2017.00200. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Ibarra-Meneses AV, Sanchez C, Alvar J, Moreno J, Carrillo E. Monocyte chemotactic protein 1 in plasma from soluble Leishmania antigen-stimulated whole blood as a potential biomarker of the cellular immune response to Leishmania infantum. Front. Immunol. 2017;8:1208. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2017.01208. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Lima-Junior DS, et al. Inflammasome-derived IL-1beta production induces nitric oxide-mediated resistance to Leishmania. Nat. Med. 2013;19:909–915. doi: 10.1038/nm.3221. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Babaloo Z, Oskoei MR, Kohansal MH, Barac A, Ahmadpour E. Serum profile of IL-1beta and IL-17 cytokines in patients with visceral leishmaniasis. Comp. Immunol. Microbial. Infect. Dis. 2020;69:101431. doi: 10.1016/j.cimid.2020.101431. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Santos D, et al. IL-1beta production by intermediate monocytes is associated with immunopathology in cutaneous leishmaniasis. J. Investig. Dermatol. 2018;138:1107–1115. doi: 10.1016/j.jid.2017.11.029. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Alexander J, et al. An essential role for IL-13 in maintaining a non-healing response following Leishmania mexicana infection. Eur. J. Immunol. 2002;32:2923–2933. doi: 10.1002/1521-4141(2002010)32:10<2923::AID-IMMU2923>3.0.CO;2-E. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Haber ME, Daher CF, Karam MC, Baroody GM. Leishmania major: Interleukin-13 increases the infection-induced hyperalgesia and the levels of interleukin-1beta and interleukin-12 in rats. Exp. Parasitol. 2009;121:224–229. doi: 10.1016/j.exppara.2008.11.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.McFarlane E, et al. Endogenous IL-13 plays a crucial role in liver granuloma maturation during Leishmania donovani infection, independent of IL-4Ralpha-responsive macrophages and neutrophils. J. Infect. Dis. 2011;204:36–43. doi: 10.1093/infdis/jir080. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Cullen SP, Martin SJ. Mechanisms of granule-dependent killing. Cell Death Differ. 2008;15:251–262. doi: 10.1038/sj.cdd.4402244. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Bousoffara T, Louzir H, Ben Salah A, Dellagi K. Analysis of granzyme B activity as a surrogate marker of Leishmania-specific cell-mediated cytotoxicity in zoonotic cutaneous leishmaniasis. J. Infect. Dis. 2004;189:1265–1273. doi: 10.1086/382031. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Joshi M, Dwyer DM, Nakhasi HL. Molecular cloning and characterization of a Leishmania donovani alpha-tubulin gene. J. Eukaryot. Microbiol. 1995;42:628–632. doi: 10.1111/j.1550-7408.1995.tb05918.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Ahuja K, Arora G, Khare P, Selvapandiyan A. Selective elimination of Leptomonas from the in vitro co-culture with Leishmania. Parasitol. Int. 2015;64:1–5. doi: 10.1016/j.parint.2015.01.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Deng Y, et al. A THP-1 cell line-based exploration of immune responses toward heat-treated BLG. Front. Nutr. 2020;7:612397. doi: 10.3389/fnut.2020.612397. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Rao MR, Blackwelder WC, Troendle JF, Naficy AB, Clemens JD. Sample size determination for phase II studies of new vaccines. Vaccine. 2002;20:3364–3369. doi: 10.1016/s0264-410x(02)00317-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Sundar S, et al. Rapid, noninvasive diagnosis of visceral leishmaniasis in India: Comparison of two immunochromatographic strip tests for detection of anti-K39 antibody. J. Clin. Microbiol. 2006;44:251–253. doi: 10.1128/JCM.44.1.251-253.2006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in this published article [and its supplementary information files].