Table 8.
Reference | Study Features | Result Summary |
---|---|---|
Mikkelsen et al. [67] | N = 12, only men RCT BMI 26–32 4-day isoenergetic intervention 3-way crossover (1) Low-fat, high pork-meat protein diet (pork diet); (2) Low-fat, high-soy-protein diet (soy diet); (3) Low-fat, high-carbohydrate diet (carbohydrate diet) |
There were no differences in body weight between the three protocols |
Campbell W. & Tang, M. [63] | N = 28, only women 12-week 750 kcal/d energy-deficit diet containing higher or normal protein In the high protein group, 40% was from pork meat Normal diet was egg-lacto-vegetarian |
Postmenopausal women in both NP and HP (40% pork) energy restriction diet groups showed decreases in BMI, fat mass and lean mass (p < 0.001); however, no difference was found between normal protein and higher protein diet on BMI, fat mass and lean mass |
Murphy et al. [62] | N = 49, adults 140 g/day chicken, 150 g pork or beef Crossover design: 3 months, 1-week washout |
There was no difference in BMI, body fat percentage, fat mass, abdominal fat, lean mass, WC and HC when comparing pork group with beef or chicken diet group (p > 0.05); WHR was lower in pork group than beef and chicken group (p = 0.046) |
BMI: body mass index; WC: waist circumference; HC: hip circumference; WHR: waist-to-hip ratio.