Abstract
Interspecies transmission of the transmissible spongiform encephalopathies (TSEs), or prion diseases, can result in the adaptation and selection of TSE strains with an expanded host range and increased virulence such as in the case of bovine spongiform encephalopathy and variant Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease. To investigate TSE strain adaptation, we serially passaged a biological clone of transmissible mink encephalopathy (TME) into Syrian golden hamsters and examined the selection of distinct strain phenotypes and conformations of the disease-specific isoform of the prion protein (PrPSc). The long-incubation-period drowsy (DY) TME strain was the predominate strain, based on the presence of its strain-specific PrPSc following interspecies passage. Additional serial passages in hamsters resulted in the selection of the hyper (HY) TME PrPSc strain-dependent conformation and its short incubation period phenotype unless the passages were performed with a low-dose inoculum (e.g., 10−5 dilution), in which case the DY TME clinical phenotype continued to predominate. For both TME strains, the PrPSc strain pattern preceded stabilization of the TME strain phenotype. These findings demonstrate that interspecies transmission of a single cloned TSE strain resulted in adaptation of at least two strain-associated PrPSc conformations that underwent selection until one type of PrPSc conformation and strain phenotype became predominant. To examine TME strain selection in the absence of host adaptation, hamsters were coinfected with hamster-adapted HY and DY TME. DY TME was able to interfere with the selection of the short-incubation HY TME phenotype. Coinfection could result in the DY TME phenotype and PrPSc conformation on first passage, but on subsequent passages, the disease pattern converted to HY TME. These findings indicate that during TSE strain adaptation, there is selection of a strain-specific PrPSc conformation that can determine the TSE strain phenotype.
The transmissible spongiform encephalopathies (TSEs) are fatal neurodegenerative diseases of humans and animals. A hallmark characteristic of the TSEs is the conversion of the cellular prion protein (PrPC) to an abnormal conformation (PrPSc) that progressively accumulates during disease (28). A new phenotype of human Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease (CJD), called variant CJD, that is clinically and pathologically distinct from classic forms of CJD was first diagnosed in 1996 and appears to be a result of interspecies transmission of bovine spongiform encephalopathy (BSE) to humans (12, 31). The BSE strain is highly pathogenic and is also responsible for the BSE-related spongiform encephalopathies found in domestic cats and many species of zoo animals (8). It has been proposed that BSE resulted from interspecies transmission of sheep scrapie, or a previously unrecognized TSE, to cattle via contaminated feed additives. Adaptation and selection of the BSE strain from sheep scrapie or other sources was likely a result of the recycling of BSE-contaminated cattle-derived protein supplements during several cattle-to-cattle passages.
Transmission of a TSE to a new host species is an inefficient process due to a phenomenon known as the species barrier effect (26). This effect refers to an increase in the length of the incubation period upon interspecies transmission compared to the incubation period found in the donor host species. TSE adaptation and selection occur during subsequent serial passages in the new host and lead to a reduction and eventual stabilization of the incubation period (15). For example, the mouse-adapted Chandler strain of scrapie has a 160-day incubation period in C57BL/6 mice, but upon interspecies transmission to Syrian hamsters the incubation period increases to 380 days. Additional serial passages in hamsters results in a reduction and stabilization of the incubation period to 75 days. One factor that can influence the species transmission barrier is the difference in the amino acid sequence between the donor PrPSc and the host prion protein PrPC (2, 11, 29, 30). Differences in PrP sequence can result in an inefficient propagation of PrPSc and prolonged incubation periods upon interspecies transmission. On second passage in the same host species, the amino acid sequences of the donor PrPSc and host PrPC are identical and formation of additional PrPSc is more efficient, resulting in shorter incubation periods. In some cases, differences in the PrP sequence between the host and donor PrPs can result in a complete interference in PrPSc formation and development of TSE disease (29, 30).
Interspecies TSE transmission can lead to the maintenance of the original strain phenotype or a change in the TSE strain phenotype. The selection of TSE strains that have an advantage in the new host is illustrated by the serial transmission of the drowsy goat source of scrapie into rats, mice, and hamsters (20). Early hamster passages identified strain 431K that maintained pathogenicity for mice, but after several additional passages in hamsters, strain 263K was the only strain present. The selection of 263K was accompanied by a shortening of the incubation period and a loss of pathogenicity in mice. This suggested that 431K was the original or dominant murine pathogen, but passage into hamsters selected for, or gave rise to, the variant 263K strain that had a selective advantage in hamsters. The TSE strain with the shortest incubation period in the new host species is the predominate one found between the second and fifth intraspecies serial passage (20, 21). The dose of each TSE strain in the mixture is also likely to influence the outcome of interspecies transmission and subsequent selection upon intraspecies passage (20).
The basis of TSE strain diversity is proposed to be determined by either differences in the conformation of PrPSc among strains (4, 5, 7, 27) or mutation of the putative TSE nucleic acid genome (9). To investigate the molecular basis of TSE adaptation and selection upon interspecies transmission, we used a model of transmissible mink encephalopathy (TME) in Syrian hamsters (6, 24). Previously, we identified two strains of TME after interspecies passage into hamsters that were called hyper (HY) and drowsy (DY) TME. Phenotypic properties between these TME strains differed with respect to incubation period (e.g., 65 versus 165 days), clinical signs (e.g., hyperexcitability and ataxia versus progressive lethargy), neuropathology, brain distribution of PrPSc, and TME brain titers (4, 5). PrPSc isolated from the brains of HY and DY TME-infected hamsters exhibit strain-specific conformations based on differences in sedimentation properties, susceptibility to protease cleavage, N-terminal cleavage sites by proteases, and β-sheet secondary structure (4, 5, 13). Using a PrP cell-free conversion assay, PrPC could be converted into a PrP molecule resembling the HY or DY PrPSc strain-specific conformation when directly incubated with the respective PrPSc strains, indicating that a similar PrPC molecule can be folded into multiple conformations via direct PrPC-PrPSc interactions (3). These findings support the protein-only model on the nature of the TSE agent and TSE strain diversity. We now report that interspecies transmission of a biological clone of TME results in the adaptation of both the HY and DY strain-specific PrPSc conformations, often present as a mixture, which can undergo selection during subsequent intraspecies hamster passage. The PrPSc strain pattern was found prior to stabilization of the TME strain phenotype, indicating that the PrPSc conformation can determine TSE biological characteristics. Furthermore, direct competition studies between HY and DY TME demonstrated that changes in the PrPSc conformation accompany a switch in TME phenotypes.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Biological cloning of TME in mink.
To produce a biological clone of the Stetsonville TME agent, we performed a series of endpoint dilution experiments as described previously (9). A TME-infected mink brain from the Stetsonville ranch was homogenized to 10% (wt/vol) in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) using disposable syringes and plasticware. Serial 10-fold dilutions of brain homogenates (10−1 to 10−8) were intracerebrally (i.c.) inoculated into weanling mink. Control animals were inoculated with PBS alone. All animals were observed weekly for the onset of neurological disease. Clinically ill animals were sacrificed by CO2 asphyxiation, and brain tissue was removed with new instruments.
The biological clone of the Stetsonville TME agent (24) was prepared from brain tissue of a TME-positive mink that received the highest dilution of inoculum. The brain was subsequently homogenized in PBS and two additional serial 10-fold dilutions of the brain homogenate, and inoculations were performed in order to obtain TME inocula that had the highest likelihood of containing a single strain of TME agent.
Interspecies transmission experiments.
Weanling Syrian golden hamsters were i.c. inoculated with 30 μl of a 10% (wt/vol) TME brain homogenate that was biologically cloned in mink by three successive endpoint dilution experiments. Control animals were inoculated with buffer alone. All animals were observed daily for the onset of neurological disease as described previously (6). Animals were sacrificed by CO2 asphyxiation, and brain tissue was removed using new surgical instruments designated for these studies. Brains from individual animals were homogenized using disposable syringes and plasticware. Serial hamster-to-hamster passages were performed by i.c. inoculation at dilutions of 10−1 or 10−5. Up to five additional hamster passages were performed, depending on the time at which incubation period and clinical signs stabilized.
Hamster TME competition experiments.
Syrian golden hamsters were i.c. inoculated with either biologically cloned DY TME (10−2 brain dilution or 105.4 50 lethal doses per g of tissue) or biologically cloned HY TME (10−6 to 10−9 brain dilutions or 103.8 to 100.8 50% lethal doses per g of tissue) alone or with a mixed inoculum containing DY TME (10−2 brain dilutions) and HY TME at either 10−6, 10−7, 10−8, or 10−9 dilutions. Brain titers were calculated by endpoint dilution analysis using the Kärber method (25). Animals exhibiting clinical signs of neurological TME disease were sacrificed, and brain material was serially passaged at a 10−2 dilution as described above.
Tissue preparations and PrPSc Western blot analysis.
Two protocols were used for the preparation of brain material for PrPSc analysis. In the abbreviated protocol, a 10% (wt/vol) brain homogenate was digested with proteinase K (50 μg/ml) for 30 min at 37°C. Phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride was added to 5 mM. For the second method, brain tissue was homogenized to 10% (wt/vol) in 10% sarcosyl in buffer A (10 mM Tris [pH 8.3], 133 mM NaCl, 1 mM EDTA, and 1 mM dithiothreitol). Following ultracentrifugation in a Beckman Instruments TLA-45 rotor at 20,000 rpm (22,000 × g) for 20 min in a TL-120 ultracentrifuge, the supernatant was removed and centrifuged in a TLA-45 rotor at 45,000 rpm (125,000 × g) for 1 h. The pellets were resuspended in Tris-buffered saline (1 μl per g of tissue), proteinase K was added to 10 μg/ml, and the mixture was incubated at 37°C for 1 h. Phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride was added to 5 mM, and the preparation was brought to 1% sarcosyl–10% NaCl in buffer A. Following ultracentrifugation in a TLA-45 rotor at 45,000 rpm for 1 h, the pellet was washed and resuspended in sample buffer for sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE).
Brain samples were analyzed by SDS-PAGE (15% gel), transferred to Immobilon P membrane (Millipore), and incubated with monoclonal antibody 3F4 (1:40,000; a gift from Richard Kascsak, Institute for Basic Research in Developmental Disabilities [18]) or rabbit polyclonal R20 (1:3,000; a gift from Byron Caughey, NIH Rocky Mountain Laboratories [14]) for 2 h at room temperature or at 4°C overnight as described previously (5). The secondary antibody used was either anti-mouse immunoglobulin G conjugated to alkaline phosphatase (1:1,000; Sigma, St. Louis, Mo.) or goat anti-mouse immunoglobulin G conjugated to horseradish peroxidase (1:1,000; Bio-Rad Laboratories, Hercules, Calif.). Detection of the immunoblot signal was performed using the nitrobluetetrazolium method or chemiluminescence (Amersham).
RESULTS
Interspecies transmission of cloned TME.
A biological clone of the Stetsonville TME isolate was produced by 10-fold serial dilutions of a mink brain homogenate and inoculation into pastel mink. The brains from the animals that developed TME after receiving the highest dilution of inocula (e.g., 10−5 or 10−6) were collected, and endpoint dilutions and inoculations were repeated two additional times. This approach has been used to isolate a homogenous population of a single TSE strain from a mixture containing more than a single strain (9).
Four independent biological clones of mink-passaged TME were i.c. inoculated into a total of 88 Syrian golden hamsters, and the incubation periods, clinical symptoms, and PrPSc patterns were determined. For TME clone 4, disease was observed in 12 out of 21 hamsters with an incubation period ranging from 219 to 522 days (x̄ = 450 ± 83 days [standard error of the mean]; Table 1). Analysis of PrPSc after limited proteinase K digestion (of 7 out of 12 clinically affected hamsters) revealed that six (incubation period = 473 ± 24 days) had a polypeptide banding pattern characteristic of the DY TME strain in hamsters. This pattern was characterized by three polypeptide bands (i.e., unglycosylated, monoglycosylated, and diglycosylated isoforms of PrP) ranging from 19 to 29 kDa (i.e., 19-kDa pattern; Fig. 1B, lane DY) (6). The one remaining PrPSc pattern (incubation period = 219 days) was similar to that of the HY TME strain, which has a molecular size ranging from 21 to 31 kDa and will be referred to as the 21-kDa pattern (Fig. 1B, lane HY). The clinical symptoms upon interspecies transmission to hamsters were not characteristic of the hamster-adapted HY and DY TME strains described previously but were variable in type and duration. The results from TME clone 4 were similar to those obtained for the other three biological clones of TME (data not shown).
TABLE 1.
Interspecies transmission of biologically cloned TME to Syrian hamsters
Animal no. | PrPSc pattern (kDa) | Incubation period (days) |
---|---|---|
1 | 19 | 446 |
2 | NDa | 501 |
3 | ND | 522 |
4 | 19 | 473 |
5 | ND | 473 |
6 | 21 | 219 |
7 | ND | 383 |
8 | 19 | 501 |
9 | ND | 501 |
10 | 19 | 453 |
11 | 19 | 501 |
12 | 19 | 461 |
13–21 | ND | >600 |
ND, not determined.
FIG. 1.
Transmission of a biological clone of TME to hamsters. (A) Serial transmission of TME into hamsters is indicated in passage lines A and B. On first passage, the animal numbers refer to Table 1, with incubation period in days (d.) ± standard error of the mean and clinical phenotype, when apparent, noted as either HY, DY, or HD, a combination of both. Incubation periods without a standard error of the mean refer to individual animals that were used for both PrPSc analysis and subsequent passages. The PrPSc polypeptide migration pattern (19 or 21 kDa) is indicated; numbers 1, 2, and 3 refer to animals whose PrPSc patterns were analyzed in panels B and C. (B and C) Western blot analysis of PrPSc from first interspecies passage (lanes 1 and 2) and second intraspecies hamster passage (lane 3). Brain samples were resolved by SDS-PAGE (15% gel), and PrP was detected with monoclonal antibody 3F4 as described in Materials and Methods. Lanes HY and DY are the control 21- and 19-kDa patterns, respectively.
Two additional criteria were used in discriminating the HY and DY PrPSc 21- and 19-kDa banding patterns. The migration distance of the top edge of the diglycosylated PrPSc band at approximately 30 kDa also differs by 1 to 2 kDa between the TME strains (Fig. 2). In addition, rabbit polyclonal antibody R20, which is directed to the C-terminal portion (i.e., amino acids 218 to 232) of the murine prion protein, has stronger immunoreactivity in the 6- to 8-kDa molecular size range of DY PrPSc compared to HY PrPSc (Fig. 2).
FIG. 2.
PrPSc polypeptide patterns from Syrian hamsters infected with the HY and DY strains of TME. Animals were infected with different combinations and dilutions of HY and DY TME as indicated in each of the trials reported in Table 2 and also illustrated above each lane. Each lane contains an enriched PrPSc brain fraction digested with proteinase K from an individual animal and analyzed by SDS-PAGE and Western blot analysis using monoclonal antibody 3F4 (lanes 1 to 3 and 12 to 21) or rabbit polyclonal antibody R20 (lanes 4 to 11). R20 is immunoreactive to a synthetic peptide containing the C-terminal end of the mature prion protein; in addition to recognizing similar-molecular-weight PrP polypeptides as 3F4, it can also detect a 6- to 8-kDa band. Boxed areas refer to the second serial passage, inoculated at a 10−2 brain dilution, of individual brains from the first passage. HY and DY TME control PrPSc banding patterns are indicated in lanes 1, 4, 11, 16, and 21 and in lanes 1 and 11, respectively.
Intraspecies transmission of TME.
Additional serial passages of the hamster-passaged cloned TME agent into Syrian hamsters resulted in a reduction of the incubation period and the selection of distinct TME strain phenotypes. Two individual hamsters inoculated with TME clone 4 were further passaged at a 10−2 dilution into six hamsters. The most common outcome of second passage of the TME clones into hamsters is illustrated in passage line A (Fig. 1A). Passage of animal 11, which had an incubation of 501 days and the 19-kDa PrPSc pattern, resulted in an incubation period of 167 ± 10 days (n = 6), the 19-kDa PrPSc pattern, and clinical signs predominantly of lethargy but with some evidence of hyperexcitability. Since these animals did not exhibit the classical HY or DY clinical signs, they were considered to represent a syndrome sharing features of both phenotypes. At the next passage, the dilution of the brain inocula was an important determinant for the outcome of TME strain selection. Third hamster passage with a 10−1 brain dilution inoculum resulted in an incubation period of 129 ± 4 days, no change in the clinical symptoms, and a mixture of the 19- and 21-kDa PrPSc patterns (Fig. 1C, lane 3). The transition from DY to HY TME continued at fourth hamster passage, where the incubation period (i.e., 59 ± 2 days), clinical symptoms, and 21-kDa PrPSc band pattern characteristic of HY TME were found. However, third hamster passage at a 10−5 brain dilution from the same animal having a 159-day incubation period resulted in an increase in the incubation period to 193 ± 11 days, clinical disease characterized by a progressive lethargy, and the 19-kDa PrPSc pattern (Fig. 1A, passage line A). This DY TME phenotype was maintained on additional passages at low dilutions (e.g., 10−2). Similar results were obtained from the other TME clones.
Two additional but less frequent outcomes were found in passage line A during second passage. In one group, the HY TME strain emerged similar to that observed in passage line B on second and third passages (see below), while in a third group, the DY TME clinical symptoms and 19-kDa PrPSc pattern stabilized by the third passage (data not shown). In passage line B, brain inocula from animal 6, which had an incubation period of 219 days and a 21-kDa PrPSc pattern, resulted in an incubation period of 67 ± 3 days, the HY TME clinical phenotype characterized by hyperexcitability, tremor, and ataxia, and the 21-kDa PrPSc banding pattern (Fig. 1A and B, passage line B). Third passage using an individual animal from this group (incubation period of 66 days) resulted in stabilization of the HY TME PrPSc banding pattern and clinical phenotype. The results from intraspecies transmission using TME clone 4 as the inoculum were similar to those obtained for the other three biological clones of TME (data not shown).
Intraspecies competition of HY and DY TME.
To test the hypothesis that low levels of HY TME can emerge from a combined infection of HY and DY TME that initially exhibits a DY TME phenotype, hamsters were coinfected with biologically cloned HY and DY TME. Clinical disease, incubation period, and PrPSc pattern were investigated during several serial passages.
In the intraspecies competition experiment, hamsters were coinfected with a 10−2 brain homogenate of DY TME and increasing brain dilutions (e.g., 10−6 to 10−9) of HY TME-infected brain homogenates. All passages after the initial coinfection experiment were performed at a brain inoculum dilution of 10−2. Three patterns of TME disease were found, depending on the dose of each strain: (i) the short incubation HY TME phenotype and strain-specific PrPSc pattern was established and maintained (Table 2, trial A; Fig. 2, lanes 1 to 3); (ii) the DY TME or mixed pattern found on first passage reverted to the HY TME phenotype after additional passages (Table 2, trial B; Fig. 2, lanes 4 to 11); and (iii) the DY TME strain was able to block the selection of the short incubation HY TME strain (Table 2, trial C; Fig. 2, lanes 12 to 16).
TABLE 2.
HY and DY TME competition experiment
Trial | Inoculum dilution
|
1st passage
|
2nd passage
|
|||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HY | DY | Mean incubation period (days) ± SEM | Clinical symptoms | PrPSc pattern (kDa) | Mean incubation period (days) ± SEM | Clinical symptoms | PrPSc pattern (kDa) | |
A | 10−6 | 107 ± 1 (5/5a) | HY | 21 | 61 ± 1 (4/4) | HY | 21 | |
10−2 | 158 ± 2 (6/6) | DY | 19 | 157 ± 3 (4/4) | DY | 19 | ||
10−6 | 10−2 | 104 ± 1 (5/5) | HY | 21 | 55 ± 2 (4/4) | HY | 21 | |
B | 10−7 | 154 ± 22 (5/5) | HY | 21 | NDb | ND | ND | |
10−7 | 10−2 | 126 | HY | 21 | 68 ± 2 (5/5) | HY | 21 | |
10−7 | 10−2 | 148 | DY | 19 | 61 ± 0 (6/6) | HY | 21 | |
10−7 | 10−2 | 155 | DY | 19 | 75 ± 0 (6/6) | HY | 21 | |
10−7 | 10−2 | 155 | DY | 19/21 | 75 ± 0 (5/5) | HY | 21 | |
10−7 | 10−2 | 160 | DY | 19/21 | 81 ± 3 (5/5) | HY | 19/21 | |
C | 10−8 | 190 ± 22 (5/5) | HY | 21 | ND | ND | ND | |
10−8 | 10−2 | 122 | HY | 21 | 66 ± 0 (5/5) | HY | 21 | |
10−8 | 10−2 | 150 | DY | 19 | 143 ± 2 (6/6) | DY | 19 | |
10−8 | 10−2 | 150 | DY | 19 | 147 ± 2 (5/5) | DY | 19 | |
10−8 | 10−2 | 155 | DY | 19 | 154 ± 7 (6/6) | DY | 19 | |
D | 10−9 | >400 (5/5) | None | ND | ND | ND | ND | |
10−9 | 10−2 | 147 | DY | 19 | 133 ± 0 (4/4) | DY | 19 | |
10−9 | 10−2 | 154 | DY | 19 | 137 ± 0 (4/4) | DY | 19 |
Number affected/number inoculated.
ND, not determined.
The selection of HY TME from animals exhibiting the DY TME phenotype was found when hamsters were coinfected with brain dilutions of HY TME at 10−7 and DY TME at 10−2 (Table 2, trial B). At first passage, one animal with an incubation period of 126 days exhibited a HY TME clinical phenotype and a 21-kDa PrPSc pattern that was maintained on second serial passage in which the incubation period shortened to 68 ± 2 days. The remaining four animals had incubation periods ranging from 148 to 160 days and exhibited clinical symptoms of DY TME. Two had the 19-kDa PrPSc banding pattern (Fig. 2, lanes 6 and 7), while the remaining two had an intermediate size banding pattern that was between the 19- and 21-kDa patterns and could represent a mixture of HY and DY PrPSc (Fig. 2, lane 5, and data not shown). In the second passage performed at a 10−2 brain dilution, all of the DY TME animals reverted to a HY TME clinical phenotype and the incubation periods shortened to between 61 and 81 days. The PrPSc banding pattern switched to the 21-kDa pattern (Fig. 2, lanes 8 and 10); in one case, an intermediate PrPSc pattern between the 19- and 21-kDa patterns was found (Fig. 2, lane 9). Rabbit polyclonal antibody R20, directed to a synthetic peptide corresponding to the C-terminal portion of the prion protein, was used to aid in identification of the HY and DY TME banding patterns. Antiserum R20 immunoreacts with a 6- to 8-kDa PrPSc band present in control DY TME hamster brain (Fig. 2, lane 11) but only weakly reacts with this PrPSc band from the control HY TME brain (Fig. 2, lane 4).
DISCUSSION
The interspecies and intraspecies transmission of a biological clone of TME was investigated by monitoring the adaptation and selection of TME strains through evaluation of the PrPSc banding patterns, incubation periods, and clinical symptoms. Two distinct PrPSc banding patterns were detected prior to the stabilization of the HY and DY TME clinical phenotypes. In some hosts a mixture of the 19- and 21-kDa PrPSc patterns and clinical symptoms characteristic of both strains were found; in these cases, the shorter incubation HY TME strain was predominant on subsequent serial passages indicating that strain selection determines the emergence of strain phenotypes. Direct evidence for TME strain selection was provided by coinfection with predetermined amounts of each strain. High doses of DY TME were able to interfere with low titers of HY TME and cause partial or complete interference of the HY PrPSc banding pattern and clinical phenotype. A mixture of PrPSc banding patterns could be found in hosts that switched from a DY to HY phenotype in a single passage, indicating the selection of the HY TME strain. These findings provide the first evidence for selection of TSE strains at the molecular level.
In a previous study, transmission of the Stetsonville TME field isolate to hamsters resulted in the identification of the HY and DY TME strains (6). In the present study, the Stetsonville TME field isolate was cloned by limiting dilution in mink in three consecutive passage experiments in order to isolate the single predominant mink strain. The TME biological mink clone had a similar transmission history in hamsters as the Stetsonville field isolate, suggesting that upon interspecies transmission, two hamster-adapted TME strains emerged from a single mink TME strain. Although it cannot be ruled out that more than a single pathogenic PrPSc conformation exists in the biologically cloned inoculum, we propose that the ability of the donor mink PrPSc to convert the host hamster PrPC into more than one stable hamster PrPSc conformation can give rise to multiple TME strains.
An alternative explanation for the emergence of TSE strains from a biological clone is a mutation in the putative TSE nucleic acid genome, despite a lack of a candidate molecule (1, 9, 10). The current findings provide molecular evidence that two distinct PrPSc patterns were found upon interspecies passage of a biological clone into a new host species. Furthermore, these PrPSc conformations could determine, or be used to predict, which strain will emerge upon additional passage. The strain-specific PrPSc patterns also were consistently found prior to stabilization of the TME phenotype in hamsters and therefore could be the molecular determinant of strain phenotype and preclude the requirement for a nucleic acid genome.
Three distinct TME strain patterns were observed upon interspecies transmission of cloned TME to hamsters: establishment of either the HY or DY TME phenotype during second or third hamster passage without evidence of mixed infection, and an indirect route in which a mixture of HY and DY TME was initially observed and led to the selection of either one of the TME strains upon additional passage. It appears that the DY TME strain was responsible for clinical disease upon interspecies transmission since the 19-kDa PrPSc pattern was most often found. DY TME likely represents the pathogenic strain present in the cloned mink inocula. Selection of the HY TME strain occurred after additional passage because it has a shorter incubation period than DY TME even though it was initially present at lower doses. Once the HY TME phenotype and PrPSc pattern were found, they never reverted to the DY TME strain. It is difficult to resolve whether the HY TME strain was generated de novo upon interspecies transmission or was present at low levels in the cloned TME inoculum. However, the findings that the HY TME agent could be eliminated after a single 10−5 dilution of second hamster passage TME indicates that it was unlikely that the biologically cloned TME agent contained a minor population of HY TME. Furthermore, previous studies demonstrated that hamster-adapted HY TME loses its pathogenicity in mink (6). These observations strongly support the concept of adaptation of the HY strain-specific PrPSc conformation upon interspecies transmission and the selection of HY TME upon additional hamster passages.
TME strain selection during coinfection with biological clones of HY and DY TME support the interspecies transmission findings that in a mixed TME infection, small doses of the short-incubation-period HY TME require additional animal passages in order to outcompete the long-incubation-period DY TME. The transition from the DY to HY TME phenotype corresponded with a switch in the PrPSc banding pattern. This was observed when DY TME titer was inoculated with a 100- and 1,000-fold excess with respect to HY TME and was followed by an additional passage. Complete interference of HY TME could be achieved in a mixed TME infection when the titer of the DY TME was greater than 1,000-fold excess over HY TME in the inoculum. In this case, the DY TME phenotype was maintained upon two additional serial passages; therefore, the HY TME agent could not be recovered when provided the opportunity to replicate. These findings were confirmed at the molecular level by the propagation of the 21-kDa DY TME banding pattern. Our results have similarities to a competition study between mouse-adapted strains of scrapie upon intraspecies infection (16, 17). In that study, the long-incubation (i.e., 550 days) 22A strain interfered with the short-incubation (i.e., 230 days) scrapie strain 22C when 22A was inoculated at least 100 days prior to 22C. Both the incubation period and brain neuropathology were characteristic of 22A despite the delayed coinfection with the faster-replicating 22C strain and indicated that the long-incubation pathogen blocked the replication sites of the short-incubation agent. An additional passage from animals coinfected with 22A and 22C was not performed, but we speculate that the shorter incubation 22C strain would not have emerged since a mixture of the 22A and 22C neuropathological lesion profiles or incubation periods was not observed. This is in contrast to the present study, in which a mixture of the HY and DY PrPSc patterns could give rise to either TME strain phenotype or PrPSc banding pattern, depending on the dose of inoculum.
A model for TSE strain adaptation and selection at the molecular level following interspecies transmission is proposed based on both the current findings of TME transmission to hamsters and previous transmission studies (5, 6, 19, 20–23, 29). Two events likely occur upon interspecies TSE transmission: (i) TSE strain adaptation involves the conversion of host PrPC to PrPSc by a donor PrPSc molecule having a different primary structure (i.e., responsible for the species barrier effect) and (ii) the formation of multiple PrPSc conformations from a single donor PrPSc conformation that is responsible for generation of TSE strains. During intraspecies transmission, the selection of TSE strain phenotypes results from competition among the multiple PrPSc conformations. The outcome of TSE strain selection is dependent on the dose of each strain and kinetics of agent replication. This can result in propagation of several PrPSc strain-specific conformations or in interference with the formation of a particular PrPSc conformation. In the case of a mixture of strain-specific PrPSc conformations, the more rapidly propagating PrPSc strain in the new host species will predominate after additional passages. However, if the PrPSc conformation of a long incubation TSE strain is present at high doses, then it could interfere with the manifestation of a rapid onset TSE strain PrPSc conformation and phenotype.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
The first two authors contributed equally to this work.
We thank Neil Jones and Lauren Heystek for technical assistance, Karen Gould, Marianne Mannion, Ellyn Mulcahy, Volga Iniguez, Allen Herbst, and Adeline Nukuna for critical reading of the manuscript, and Lavern Bahler for animal care assistance.
This work was supported in part by NIH grant R01 AG10669-04 (R.F.M. and R.A.B.), NIH R29 NS37914-01 (R.A.B.), USDA 95-37204-2238 (R.F.M. and J.M.A.), and USDA 98-35204-6409 (R.A.B.).
REFERENCES
- 1.Aiken J M, Williamson J L, Borchardt L M, Marsh R F. Presence of mitochondrial D-loop DNA in scrapie-infected brain preparations enriched for the prion protein. J Virol. 1990;64:3265–3268. doi: 10.1128/jvi.64.7.3265-3268.1990. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Bartz J C, McKenzie D I, Bessen R A, Marsh R F, Aiken J M. Transmissible mink encephalopathy species barrier effect between ferret and mink: PrP gene and protein analysis. J Gen Virol. 1994;75:2947–2953. doi: 10.1099/0022-1317-75-11-2947. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Bessen R A, Kocisko D A, Raymond G J, Nandan S, Lansbury P T, Caughey B. Non-genetic propagation of strain-specific properties of scrapie prion protein. Nature. 1995;375:698–700. doi: 10.1038/375698a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Bessen R A, Marsh R F. Biochemical and physical properties of the prion protein from two strains of the transmissible mink encephalopathy agent. J Virol. 1992;66:2096–2101. doi: 10.1128/jvi.66.4.2096-2101.1992. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Bessen R A, Marsh R F. Distinct PrP properties suggest the molecular basis of strain variation in transmissible mink encephalopathy. J Virol. 1994;68:7859–7868. doi: 10.1128/jvi.68.12.7859-7868.1994. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Bessen R A, Marsh R F. Identification of two biologically distinct strains of transmissible mink encephalopathy in hamsters. J Gen Virol. 1992;73:329–334. doi: 10.1099/0022-1317-73-2-329. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Bolton D C, Bendheim P E. A modified host protein model of scrapie. Ciba Found Symp. 1988;135:164–181. doi: 10.1002/9780470513613.ch11. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Bruce M, Chree A, McConnell I, Foster J, Pearson G, Fraser H. Transmission of bovine spongiform encephalopathy and scrapie to mice: strain variation and the species barrier. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B. 1994;343:405–411. doi: 10.1098/rstb.1994.0036. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Bruce M E, Dickinson A G. Biological evidence that scrapie agent has an independent genome. J Gen Virol. 1987;68:79–89. doi: 10.1099/0022-1317-68-1-79. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Bruce M E, Fraser H. Scrapie strain variation and its implications. Curr Top Microbiol Immunol. 1991;172:125–138. doi: 10.1007/978-3-642-76540-7_8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Bruce M E, McConnell I, Fraser H, Dickinson A G. The disease characteristics of different strains of scrapie in Sinc congenic mouse lines: implications for the nature of the agent and host control of pathogenesis. J Gen Virol. 1991;72:595–603. doi: 10.1099/0022-1317-72-3-595. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Bruce M E, Will R G, Ironside J W, McConnell I, Drummond D, Suttie A, McCardle L, Chree A, Hope J, Birkett C, Cousens S, Fraser H, Bostock C J. Transmissions to mice indicate that ‘new variant’CJD is caused by the BSE agent. Nature. 1997;389:498–501. doi: 10.1038/39057. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Caughey B, Raymond G J, Bessen R A. Strain-dependent differences in β-sheet conformations of abnormal prion protein. J Biol Chem. 1998;273:32230–32235. doi: 10.1074/jbc.273.48.32230. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Caughey B, Raymond G J, Ernst D, Race R E. N-terminal truncation of the scrapie-associated form of PrP by lysosomal protease(s): implications regarding the site of conversion of PrP to the protease-resistant state. J Virol. 1991;65:6597–6603. doi: 10.1128/jvi.65.12.6597-6603.1991. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Dickinson A G. Scrapie in sheep and goats. In: Kimberlin R H, editor. Slow virus diseases of animals and man. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: North-Holland; 1976. pp. 209–241. [Google Scholar]
- 16.Dickinson A G, Fraser H, McConnell I, Outram G W, Sales D I, Taylor D M. Extraneural competition between different scrapie agents leading to loss of infectivity. Nature. 1975;253:556. doi: 10.1038/253556a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Dickinson A G, Fraser H, Meikle V M, Outram G W. Competition between different scrapie agents in mice. Nat New Biol. 1972;237:244–245. doi: 10.1038/newbio237244a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Kascsak R J, Rubenstein R, Merz P A, Tonna-DeMasi M, Fersko R, Carp R I, Wisniewski H M, Diringer H. Mouse polyclonal and monoclonal antibody to scrapie-associated fibril proteins. J Virol. 1987;61:3688–3693. doi: 10.1128/jvi.61.12.3688-3693.1987. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Kimberlin R H, Cole S, Walker C A. Temporary and permanent modifications to a single strain of mouse scrapie on transmission to rats and hamsters. J Gen Virol. 1987;68:1875–1881. doi: 10.1099/0022-1317-68-7-1875. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Kimberlin R H, Walker C A. Evidence that the transmission of one source of scrapie agent to hamsters involves separation of agent strains from a mixture. J Gen Virol. 1978;39:487–496. doi: 10.1099/0022-1317-39-3-487. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Kimberlin R H, Walker C A. Pathogenesis of scrapie: agent multiplication in brain at the first and second passage of hamster scrapie in mice. J Gen Virol. 1979;42:107–117. doi: 10.1099/0022-1317-42-1-107. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Kimberlin R H, Walker C A, Fraser H. The genomic identity of different strains of mouse scrapie is expressed in hamsters and preserved on reisolation in mice. J Gen Virol. 1989;70:2017–2025. doi: 10.1099/0022-1317-70-8-2017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Manuelidis E E, Gorgacz E J, Manuelidis L. Interspecies transmission of Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease to Syrian hamsters with reference to clinical syndromes and strains of agent. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1978;75:3432–3436. doi: 10.1073/pnas.75.7.3432. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Marsh R F, Bessen R A, Lehmann S, Hartsough G R. Epidemiological and experimental studies on a new incident of transmissible mink encephalopathy. J Gen Virol. 1991;72:589–594. doi: 10.1099/0022-1317-72-3-589. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Parker R C. Methods of tissue culture. 3rd ed. London, England: Pitman Medical Publishing; 1959. pp. 245–266. [Google Scholar]
- 26.Pattison I H. The relative susceptibility of sheep, goats and mice to two types of the goat scrapie agent. Res Vet Sci. 1966;7:207–212. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Prusiner S B. Molecular biology of prion diseases. Science. 1991;252:1515–1522. doi: 10.1126/science.1675487. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Prusiner S B. Novel proteinaceous infectious particles cause scrapie. Science. 1982;216:136–144. doi: 10.1126/science.6801762. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Prusiner S B, Scott M, Foster D, Pan K-M, Groth D, Mirenda C, Torchia M, Yang S-L, Serban D, Carlson G A, Hoppe P C, Westaway D, DeArmond S J. Transgenic studies implicate interactions between homologous PrP isoforms in scrapie prion replication. Cell. 1990;63:673–686. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(90)90134-z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Scott M, Foster D, Mirenda C, Serban D, Coufal F, Walchli M, Torchia M, Groth D, Carlson G, DeArmond S J, et al. Transgenic mice expressing hamster prion protein produce species- specific scrapie infectivity and amyloid plaques. Cell. 1989;59:847–857. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(89)90608-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Will R G, Ironside J W, Zeidler M, Cousens S N, Estibeiro K, Alperovitch A, Poser S, Pocchiari M, Hofman A, Smith P G. A new variant of Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease in the UK. Lancet. 1996;347:921–925. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(96)91412-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]