Skip to main content
The BMJ logoLink to The BMJ
. 2001 Jul 7;323(7303):50.

Diagnosis of acute appendicitis

Appendicitis is a separate clinical entity in men and women

Luke Devey 1, James Henderson 1, Christian Wakefield 1
PMCID: PMC1120680  PMID: 11464830

Editor—We read with interest the randomised controlled trial of ultrasonography in the diagnosis of acute appendicitis reported by Douglas et al.1 This trial would add more to the literature if it were to acknowledge sex differences in the management of abdominal pain.

On every surgical take, the investigation of pain in the right iliac fossa differs between men and women. Often women have an ultrasound examination of the pelvis and abdomen primarily to exclude gynaecological or pelvic pathology. Conversely, men are much more commonly assessed by repeated clinical examination. Given the marked difference in the differential diagnosis of pain in the right iliac fossa in men and women, we argue that it should be seen as two separate clinical problems. To illustrate the above difference, we performed a retrospective analysis of 59 consecutive cases of pain in the right iliac fossa from the first three months of 2000 at the Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh. Of 30 men, three (10%) underwent ultrasound examination compared with 14 of 29 women (48%). Of those women who underwent ultrasound and subsequent appendicectomy, the ultrasound examination was usually negative (seven out of eight, one confirmed appendix mass) and had been used to exclude alternative diagnoses before appendicectomy.

A Medline search of the past two years did not find any papers in which men and women had been considered separately with regard to ultrasonography in appendicitis. Meaningful data can come only from trials that separate men and women. We would be interested to see if Douglas et al had separate data available.

References

  • 1.Douglas CD, Macpherson NE, Davidson PM, Gani JS. Randomised controlled trial of ultrasonography in diagnosis of acute appendicitis, incorporating the Alvarado score. BMJ. 2000;321:919. doi: 10.1136/bmj.321.7266.919. . (14 October.) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
BMJ. 2001 Jul 7;323(7303):50.

Author's reply

Charles Douglas 1

Editor—Thank you for raising the question of sex, which we did not address in the original article in the interests of being concise. It is well recognised that the diagnosis of appendicitis in women is harder, principally because of several gynaecological causes for pain.

In our study, 10 of 73 women (13.6%) in the control group had a non-therapeutic operation, compared with 9/73 (12.3%) in the intervention group. In men the numbers were 5/69 (7.2%) in the control group and 5/87(5.7%) in the intervention group. Numbers of cases of delayed treatment in association with perforation were as follows: in women, control 1/73, intervention 2/73; and in men, control 1/69, intervention 3/87.

Mean duration of stay was slightly longer in men, but did not differ between groups on analysis of subgroup by sex. Time to therapeutic operation differed between groups, much as it did in the overall analysis, but the difference did not reach significance in the analysis of the male subgroup.

Although there are sex differences that affect diagnosis and subsequent management, there is no evidence that ultrasonography improves outcomes in either subgroup.


Articles from BMJ : British Medical Journal are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES